IncomeTable Tax Expense (Benefit): The Company recorded a tax benefit of $1,723,000 for the year ended June 30, 2014 versus income tax expense of $1,691,000 for the prior year. Contents

ForTable the year ended June 30, 2014, net cash provided by operating activities was $9,406,000, compared with cash provided by operating activities of $4,645,000 during the year ended June 30, 2013. The increase was due mainly to the Company’s increased profitability along with a small net difference in various balance sheet accounts. Contents

InTable addition, for the years ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, realized currency transaction losses from operations of $70,000 and $110,000, respectively, were recorded in the statement of operations. Contents

LevelTable 2 – defined as observable inputs other than Level I prices such as quoted prices for similar assets; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and Contents

11.Table Incomeof Taxes Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

IncomeTable Tax Expense (Benefit): The Company recorded a tax benefit of $1,723,000 for the year ended June 30, 2014 versus income tax expense of $1,691,000 for the prior year. Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

InTable addition, for the years ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, realized currency transaction losses from operations of $70,000 and $110,000, respectively, were recorded in the statement of operations. Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

11.Table Incomeof Taxes Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x	Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015

¨	Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission file number: 001-31265

RAND WORLDWIDE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE		84-1035353
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
11201 Dolfield Boulevard, Suite 112, Baltimore, MD		21117
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

161 Worcester Road, Suite 401, Framingham, Massachusetts		01701
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (410) 581-8080

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (508) 663-1400

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common stock, par value $.01 per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No þx

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No þx

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þx No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þx No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will ~~not~~ not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statement incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K þx

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer ¨ Accelerated Filer ¨ Non-Accelerated Filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller Reporting Company þx

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No þx

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting equity stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of December 31, ~~2013~~2014 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter): $5429,~~248~~641,~~466~~063.

The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of September 228, ~~2014~~2015 was 5429,~~491~~766,~~296~~756.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Information required by Part III of this Form 10-K is incorporated therein by reference to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed in connection with its 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I			2	1
ITEM 1.	~~Business~~	Business	2	1
ITEM 1B.	~~Unresolved Staff Comments.~~	Unresolved Staff Comments	6	5
ITEM 2.	~~Properties~~	Properties	7	5
ITEM 3.	~~Legal Proceedings~~	Legal Proceedings	8	6
ITEM 4.	~~Mine Safety Disclosures~~	Mine Safety Disclosures	8	6
PART II			9	6
ITEM 5.	~~Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities~~	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	9	6
ITEM 6.	~~Selected Financial Data~~	Selected Financial Data	10	7
ITEM 7.	~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	10	8
ITEM 8.	~~Financial Statements and Supplementary Data~~	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	19	15
ITEM 9.	~~Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures~~	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures	19	15
ITEM 9A.	~~Controls and Procedures~~	Controls and Procedures	19	16
ITEM 9B.	~~Other Information~~	Other Information	19	16
PART III			20	17
ITEM 10.	~~Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance~~	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	20	17
ITEM 11.	~~Executive Compensation~~	Executive Compensation	20	20
ITEM 12.	~~Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters~~	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	20	24
ITEM 13.	~~Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence~~	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	20	25
ITEM 14.	~~Principal Accounting Fees and Services~~	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	20	26
PART IV			21	27
ITEM 15.	~~Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules~~	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	21	27
SIGNATURES			22	29
EXHIBIT INDEX

This Annual Report of Rand Worldwide, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, ~~2014~~ ~~may~~2015 may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Readers of this report should be aware of the speculative nature of “forward-looking statements”. Statements that are ~~not~~ not historical in nature, including those that include the words “anticipate”, “estimate”, “should”, “expect”, “believe”, “intend”, and similar expressions, are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about, among other things, the industry and the markets in which Rand Worldwide, Inc. operates, and they are not guarantees of future performance. Whether actual results will conform to expectations and predictions is subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including risks and uncertainties discussed in this report; general economic, market, or business conditions; cost of capital, demand for products and services; changes in Rand Worldwide, Inc.’s competitive position or competitive actions by other companies; the ability to manage growth; changes in laws or regulations or policies of federal and state regulators and agencies; and other circumstances beyond the Rand Worldwide, Inc.’s control. Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this document are qualified by these cautionary statements, and there can be no assurance that the actual results anticipated will be realized, or if ~~substantially~~ substantially realized, will have the expected consequences on the Rand Worldwide, Inc.’s business or operations. Except as required by applicable laws, Rand Worldwide, Inc. does not intend to publish updates or revisions of forward-looking statements it makes to reflect new information, future events or otherwise.

When used throughout this annual report, the terms “Rand Worldwide”, “the Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Rand Worldwide, Inc. and, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, its consolidated subsidiaries.

PART I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

General

Rand Worldwide, Inc. (“Rand Worldwide”) is a Delaware corporation formed in 1986. On August 17, 2010, the Company, then known as Avatech Solutions, Inc., acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital securities of a Delaware corporation then known as Rand Worldwide, Inc. from RWWI Holdings LLC in a reverse merger transaction (the “Merger”). Subsequently, on January 1, 2011, Avatech Solutions, Inc. changed its name to Rand Worldwide, Inc.

The Company is a leader in design, engineering, ~~data archiving solutions,~~ and facilities management technology solutions with expertise in computer aided design (“CAD”) software, computational fluid dynamics (“CFD”), data management, and process optimization for the manufacturing, engineering, and building design industries. The Company specializes in software resale, technology consulting, implementation, integration, training, ~~data archiving,~~ CFD analysis consulting and thermal simulation services and technical support solutions that enable clients to more effectively design, develop, and manage projects, products, and facilities. Rand Worldwide has over 25 years of industry experience and expertise, an extensive list of training and implementation services and longstanding relationships with design technology leaders including Autodesk, Archibus, and Dassault Systèmes ~~and Autonomy~~. The Company’s clients include businesses, government agencies, and educational institutions.

The Company differentiates itself from traditional product resellers through a wide range of value-added services, consisting primarily of training, technical support, professional services and courseware development. It also provides software customization, data migration, computer-aided design standards consulting, process workflow analysis, and implementation assistance for complex design environments. Its strategic focus is to provide clients a competitive advantage with technology solutions that address broad, enterprise-wide initiatives.

Rand Worldwide’s sales and service delivery network consists of approximately 250 employees operating out of 4741 business offices throughout North America. The Company has an extensive sales database that contains several hundred thousand point-of-contact names collected over its history and an active customer list of approximately 30,000 private firms, federal, state, and local agencies, and colleges and universities.

The Company’s ongoing strategic plan calls for it to leverage the solid core business base that has been established to profitably grow its product and services offerings in the design engineering market space. Concurrently, the Company plans to continue to identify and engage in diverse software and services opportunities through strategic relationship development while taking advantage of its established brand, its geographic footprint and technical expertise to accomplish its objectives. Thus, the strategic plan calls for the Company to target specific product lines that will maximize its Autodesk business, to leverage its market position and core competencies, and to grow the services component of its business.

Rand Worldwide has a software development team within its professional services group that is charged with the responsibility of developing software-based solutions for customers that improve the customers’ design workflow processes. These may include sales-oriented configuration tools or engineering-oriented automation and integration tools. The solutions often involve automating or enhancing the software products the Company sells. While focused on software customization services, the team has developed a series of add-ons and utilities complementary to the products that it resells. Such software is both offered for sale and, in some cases, provided at no cost as an additional benefit to its customers. It is Rand Worldwide’s intention to continue the development of software applications as well as to identify new areas for commercial software development.

The Company’s product sales are somewhat cyclical, and increase when the developer of a specific software product releases a new version, offers promotions or discontinues support of an older product. As is common among software resellers, the Company purchases products from its suppliers with a combination of cash and credit. The Company allows returns in limited situations.

Products

Substantially all of Rand Worldwide’s product sales consist of the sale of prepackaged software focused on the following four major product categories.

Design Automation. More than 9591% of product revenues arise from the resale of design software developed by Autodesk for the building design and land development, manufacturing, utilities, and telecommunications industries. These product sales are primarily packaged software programs installed on a user workstation, on a local area network server, or in a ~~hosted~~ hosted environment. The programs perform and support a wide variety of functions related to design, drafting, manufacturing, workflow automation, and document management activities.

In addition, Rand Worldwide offers 3DExperience products from Dassault Systèmes which include CATIA, ENOVIA, SIMULIA, DELMIA, and DMU.

Rand Worldwide also provides 3D laser scanning products including scanners and related hardware and software, as well as equipment rentals. This solution provides accurate as-builts of existing structures and facilities, resulting in a more accurate and cost effective design.

Data Management. Data management software products help businesses reduce costs, improve quality, strengthen relationships with customers and suppliers, and deliver more innovative products and services to minimize product time-to-market by leveraging the value of existing data.

Facilities Management. Physical assets, such as real estate, buildings, equipment, materials, and furniture, are a significant percentage of an organization’s total asset value. These assets are used by many different business units, departments, and individuals, and must be accurately managed in order to extend asset life cycles and keep operating costs at a minimum.

Integrated Workplace Management Systems (“IWMS”) and Computer Aided Facilities Management (“CAFM”) systems enable organizations to make informed strategic and business decisions that optimize return on investment, lower asset lifecycle costs, and increase enterprise-wide productivity and profitability. Organizations of all sizes, spanning the financial, educational, governmental, healthcare, and manufacturing industries, use these solutions to deliver timely, relevant facilities information as part of their strategic business plans.

Geographic Information Systems (“GIS”) permit users to link together disparate data files (maps, aerial photos, tax records, marketing data, etc.) and provide the user with a unified image and knowledge base of a specific geographic location or building location. When combined with information from a facilities management system, information from GIS applications provide an integrated facilities view that allows enhanced analysis in various spatial contexts for professionals responsible for asset tracking, maintenance, emergency preparedness, space allocation, and construction planning.

The Company sells, customizes, and implements IWMS and CAFM solutions through its dedicated sales team, technical specialists, and network of strategic partners. It also provides GIS database development services to facilities management customers, both through its employees and strategic partners.

ASCENT Courseware. Through its ASCENT division, the Company is a leading developer and publisher of professional training and knowledge products for engineering software applications. ASCENT courseware is distributed globally through outside distribution channels and its products are used to train thousands of people in the engineering and manufacturing fields around the world each year. ASCENT’s courseware for the Autodesk products has received Autodesk Official Training Guide (AOTG) designation.

Services

Professional services include project-focused software implementations, software customization, data migration, computer aided design ~~standards~~ standards consulting, supplemental design staffing, drawing digitization, symbol library development, ~~and~~ CFD analysis consulting and thermal simulation services and training solutions for Dassault Systèmes and PTC products including Pro/ENGINEER, CREO, and Windchill. The Company employs over 100 industry specialists who provide professional services to its design automation customers.

3Rand Worldwide offers training courses in approximately 50 different subjects related to various software solutions offered at 39 training facilities and through mobile labs sent to customer sites or other off-site facilities. Training is led by over 80 technical experts that have formal training or proven industry experience in the topics they teach. The Company also provides training services that are highly tailored to meet the needs of a particular customer, including company-specific operational topics, customized product usage, and other general technology or process training. As part of the training offering, the Company has developed and deployed an Internet-based assessment tool that allows its clients to test their employees’ knowledge and ability to use the software tools.

Rand Worldwide offers training courses in approximately 50 different subjects related to various software solutions offered at 43 training facilities and through mobile labs sent to customer sites or other off-site facilities. Training is led by over 100 technical experts that have formal training or proven industry experience in the topics they teach. The Company also provides training services that are highly tailored to meet the needs of a particular customer, including company-specific operational topics, customized product usage, and other general technology or process training. As part of the training offering, the Company has developed and deployed an Internet-based assessment tool that allows its clients to test their employees’ knowledge and ability to use the software tools.

The Company provides end-user support services through its Solution Center which provides customers with access to highly-trained certified product-specific support engineers who accelerate issue resolution, live telephone and desktop support, online case management, and the ProductivityNOW Online Portal. A staff of full-time technology consultants assists customers with questions about product features, functions, usability issues, and configurations. The Solution Center offers services through multiple access levels including prepaid services, actual elapsed time, and annual support contracts.

Markets and Competition

Design Automation. In the design automation market, Rand Worldwide focuses on providing enterprise solutions to small- and medium-sized businesses with under one billion dollars of annual revenue, primarily in the architecture, engineering, and construction (“AEC”) market and the mechanical design and manufacturing (“MFG”) market. The AEC market is comprised of design services focused on the construction of large physical assets such as buildings, roads, factories, utility companies, and commercial infrastructure projects. The MFG market is primarily focused on the design, tooling, assembly, and testing of instruments, electronic devices, machines, mechanical devices, and power-driven equipment.

While several local and regional competitors exist in the various geographic territories where the Company conducts business, itwe ~~believes~~believe that the itCompany has a competitive advantage in terms of geographic reach, comprehensive training and support, and the provision of other products and services, and that it is one of the largest commercial Autodesk resellers in the United States. Two competitors that could be compared to Rand Worldwide in scale, size, geographical reach, and target markets for the resale of Autodesk products are Tata Technologies Company (“Tata”) and Mensch und Maschine Software SE (“M+M”).

Tata is a systems integrator for design automation products with offices located in 1725 countries and has headquarters in the United States, the United Kingdom, India, and ~~India~~Singapore. While the Company believes that Tata has greater revenues than Rand Worldwide, the Company estimates that the Autodesk portion of Tata’s business is less than the Company’s Autodesk business.

M+M is one of the leading European providers of computer aided design and manufacturing solutions with more than 50 offices located across the world and headquarters in Germany. M+M is the largest European Autodesk value-added reseller; however, the Company believes that M+M’s Autodesk-related business in Europe is comparable to the Company’s Autodesk-related business in North America.

Data Management. In this market, the Company faces similar competition from local and regional Autodesk resellers in its design automation business.

Facilities Management. The Company provides IWMS and CAFM solutions to organizations of all sizes, spanning the financial, educational, governmental, healthcare, and manufacturing industries. As a reseller of technology from ARCHIBUS and Idisis, the Company competes with not only competitive applications but also other resellers of the products it represents.

Computational Fluid Dynamics. In the CFD market, the Company provides CFD analysis consulting and thermal simulation services to businesses primarily in the AEC and MFG markets. Competitors include local and regional consulting firms as well as software companies which have developed CFD analysis software and provide consulting services.

Arrangements with Principal Suppliers

Revenues are primarily derived from the resale of vendor software products and services. These sales are made pursuant to channel sales agreements whereby Rand Worldwide is granted the authority to purchase and resell the vendor products and services. Under these agreements, the Company both resells software directly to its customers and acts as a sales agent for various vendors and receives commissions for its sales efforts.

On February 1, ~~2013~~2015, the Company entered into renewable Value Added Reseller Agreements with Autodesk. The renewable agreements have a term of three years but provide targets and set forth rebate programs for a one-year period. Under these agreements, Autodesk appointed the Company as a non-exclusive partner to market, distribute, and support Autodesk software products. The territories for such authorizations include the authorization to sell various Autodesk products in parts of the United States and in all of Canada. The Company must achieve yearly minimum purchase requirements from the sale of Autodesk’s various software products in order to be eligible to purchase such products directly from Autodesk. For the year ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015, the Company’s revenue from the sale of Autodesk software and subscriptions was approximately $6362.9 million.

Customers

The Company currently markets its products to private companies, public corporations, government agencies, and educational institutions throughout the United States and Canada. In the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015, the revenues generated by our top 10 customers represented approximately ~~nine~~six percent of consolidated revenues, and no single customer accounted for ~~five~~two percent or more of our consolidated revenues.

Intellectual Property

The Company regards its technology and other proprietary rights as essential to its business. As such, it relies on copyright, trade secret, confidentiality procedures, contract provisions, and trademark law to protect its technology and intellectual property. Rand Worldwide has confidentiality agreements with its consultants and corporate partners and controls access to, and distribution of, its products, documentation, and other proprietary information.

Rand Worldwide owns several federally registered trademarks, and has other trademark applications pending, but has no patents or patent applications pending. This Annual Report contains trademarks and trade names of Rand Worldwide and its affiliates as well as those of other companies. All trademarks and trade names appearing in this report are the property of their respective holders.

Employees

At June 30, ~~2014~~2015, the Company had ~~360~~345 employees, of which ~~354~~339 ~~are~~were full-time employees, including 3435 at our Owings Mills, Maryland ~~office~~ ~~and 17 at our Framingham, Massachusetts~~ office, which ~~both~~constitutes ~~constitute~~ our corporate headquarters and ~~house~~houses a training facility and ~~some~~certain sales and technical personnel. Other employees are located in 4540 other offices throughout the United States and Canada. None of our employees are represented by collective bargaining agreements, and we have never experienced a work stoppage. WeThe ~~believe~~Company believes that ~~our~~its employee relations are good.

Available Information

Rand Worldwide maintains an Internet site at http://rand.com on which it makes available, free of charge, this and its previously-filed Annual Reports ~~Report~~ on Form 10-K, its previously-filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, its previously-filed Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to the foregoing, as ~~soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are electronically~~ filed with, ~~or furnished to,~~ the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In addition, stockholders may access these reports and documents on the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov. ~~The Company’s executive offices are located at 161 Worcester Road, Suite 401, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701 and its telephone number is (508) 663-1400.~~

On March 27, 2015, we filed a Form 15 with the SEC to terminate our reporting obligations under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), with respect to our common stock, which became effective on June 25, 2015. In addition, on July 6, 2015, we filed a Form 15 with the SEC to report that our reporting obligations under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act had been automatically suspended effective July 1, 2015 because, as of such date, our common stock was held by less than 300 owners of record. We are filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act and Rule 12h-3 under the Exchange Act, which requires us to file a final Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2015. Upon the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we will no longer be obligated to file periodic reports, current reports or proxy statements under the Exchange Act, including Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or Current Reports on Form 8-K, and we do not intend to file any such reports or proxy statements on a voluntary basis.

The Company’s executive offices are located at 11201 Dolfield Boulevard, Suite 112, Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 and its telephone number is (410) 581-8080.

ITEM 1B.

RISK FACTORS

This item is not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

This item is not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

The Company has a corporate ~~offices~~office in ~~Framingham, Massachusetts and~~ Owings Mills, Maryland with ~~leases~~a lease for 10,~~127 square feet and 10,~~179 square feet, ~~respectively,~~ that ~~expire~~expires on ~~October 31, 2015 and~~ September 30, 2016~~, respectively~~. ~~These facilities~~This ~~house~~facility houses executive and primary administrative offices as well as accounting, order processing operations, IT, sales, and marketing. The Company also leases office space at the following locations:

Domestic Locations	Square Footage		Term
California—Newport Beach		948		10/31/~~2014~~2015
Colorado—Greenwood Village		3,381		7/31/2017
Florida—Maitland		32,~~425~~042		10/31/~~2014~~2020
Florida—Tampa		4,103		3/31/2019
Illinois— Chicago		2,095		10/31/2017
Illinois—Rolling Meadows		3,440		4/30/~~2015~~2018
Indiana—Indianapolis		1,858		7/31/2018
Iowa—Cedar Rapids		2,456		10/31/2014
Iowa—Urbandale		3,027		8/31/2016
Michigan—Grandville		505		2/28/2015
Massachusetts—Framingham		10,127		10/31/2015
Michigan—Grandville		505		2/28/2016
Michigan—Troy		5,090		6/30/2019
Minnesota—Eagan		1,808		5/31/2019
Nebraska—Omaha		4,573		3/31/2021
New Hampshire—Bedford		2,843		1/31/2016
New Mexico—Albuquerque		~~2,490~~130		~~7/31/2015~~month to month
New York—Albany		2,027		5/31/~~2015~~2016
New York—Buffalo		1,875		11/30/2016
New York—New York		2,323		11/30/2017
New York—Rome		111		7/31/2015
North Carolina—Charlotte		1,866		5/31/2019
New York—Syracuse		1,280		12/31/2014
North Carolina—Mint Hill		135		1/14/2016
North Carolina—Charlotte		2,093		5/31/2016
North Carolina—Huntersville		204		3/31/2015
North Carolina—Huntersville		221		4/30/2015
North Carolina—Morrisville		3,671		11/30/2016
Ohio—Columbus		1,715		8/31/2018
Ohio—Independence		8,493		9/30/2017
Ohio—Maumee		675		9/30/2018
Ohio—Vandalia		1,567		10/31/2016
Oregon—Portland		3,147		10/31/2015
Texas—Houston		2,352		12/31/~~2014~~2020
Texas—Irving		3,252		7/31/2018
Utah—Murray City		2,870		5/31/~~2015~~2020
Virginia—Charlottesville		1,546		2/28/2018
Virginia—Richmond		1,832		9/30/~~2015~~2018
Virginia—Virginia Beach		3,191		3/31/2018
Washington—Seattle		31,~~621~~853		1012/31/~~2015~~2020
Wisconsin—Milwaukee		1,909		4/30/2016

International Locations	Square Footage		Term
Alberta—Calgary, CA		2,312		9/30/2019
Alberta—Edmonton, CA		3,075		month to month
British Columbia—Richmond, CA		2,319		1/31/2017
Manitoba—Winnipeg, CA		1,517		10/31/2017

International Locations	Square Footage		Term
Nova Scotia—Halifax, CA		1,850		12/31/2014
Alberta—Calgary, CA		2,312		9/30/2019
Ontario—Mississauga, CA		12,063		9/30/2019
Alberta—Edmonton, CA		2,174		10/31/2019
Ontario—Nepean, CA		955		8/31/2014
British Columbia—Richmond, CA		2,319		1/31/2017
Manitoba—Winnipeg, CA		1,517		10/31/2017
Ontario— Mississauga, CA		12,063		9/30/2019
Saskatchewan—Saskatoon, CA		3,360		11/30/2015

The commercial real estate market iscan be volatile and unpredictable in terms of available space, rental fees, and occupancy rates and preferred locations. The Company cannot be certain that additional space will be available when it is required, or that it will be affordable or in a preferred location.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, the Company is involved in legal matters or named as a defendant in legal actions arising from normal operations, or is presented with claims for damages arising out of the conduct of its business. Management believes that no pending matter, alone or together with other pending matters, is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFTEY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Price Data

Rand Worldwide’s common stock is not heavily traded. Trades are affected in privately-negotiated transactions and by certain broker-dealers, who make a market in the common stock through the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (the “OTCBB”) . Market information for Rand Worldwide, Inc.’s common stock may be found at the OTCBB’s Internet website, www.otcbb.com , under the symbol “RWWI”. The information contained in or accessed through that website is not part of this Annual Report or incorporated herein by reference. The following table sets forth, to the best knowledge of the Company, the high and low bid quotations per share, rounded to the nearest whole cent, as available through the OTCBB for each quarterly period within the two most recent fiscal years. These quotations represent prices between dealers and do not reflect retail mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions, and may not represent actual transactions. There may have been additional transactions during these periods of which the Company is not aware.

Period	High		Low
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
First Quarter	$	1.02	$	0.91
Second Quarter		1.07		0.96
Third Quarter		1.25		0.99
Fourth Quarter		1.19		1.05
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013
First Quarter	$	0.85	$	0.67
Second Quarter		0.86		0.68
Third Quarter		0.94		0.70
Fourth Quarter		0.95		0.81

Recent Closing Price


Period	High		Low
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015
First Quarter	$	1.24	$	1.11
Second Quarter		1.91		1.22
Third Quarter		2.24		1.77
Fourth Quarter		2.27		2.00

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
First Quarter	$	1.02	$	0.91
Second Quarter		1.07		0.96
Third Quarter		1.25		0.99
Fourth Quarter		1.19		1.05

On September 228, ~~2014~~2015, the closing sales price for our common stock as reported on the OTCBB was $12.1321 per share.

As discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report, the Company is no longer obligated to file periodic or other reports under the Exchange Act and it does not intend to do so on a voluntary basis. As a result, broker-dealers who currently make a market in the common stock through the OTCBB may choose to cease their market-making efforts. No assurance can be given that broker-dealers will continue to make a market in the common stock or that price information for the common stock will continue to be quoted on the OTCBB or elsewhere.

Dividend Information

The Company has never paid cash dividends on its common stock and has no plans to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The declaration and amount of any future cash dividends is at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. Moreover, without the consent of our senior lender, the Company is prohibited from declaring dividends on the Company’s common stock. Accordingly, there can be no guarantee that stockholders will receive any cash dividends on their common stock in the future.

The Company has outstanding shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series D Stock”) and Series E Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series E Stock”), which are eligible for 10% annual, cumulative dividends. The dividends are payable quarterly as declared by the Board of Directors. These dividends have priority over any declaration or payment of any dividend or other distribution on the common stock and have been paid each quarter.

For the years ended June 30, ~~2014~~ 2015 and ~~2013~~2014, dividends totaling $~~109~~95,000 ~~during~~and ~~each~~$109,000, ~~fiscal~~respectively, ~~year~~ were paid to the holders of the Series D Stock and Series E Stock.

Number of Stockholders

As of September 228, ~~2014~~2015, there were ~~280~~223 holders of record of the Company’s common stock, 7six holders of Series D Stock, and 17 25 holders of Series E Stock.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Pursuant to the SEC’s Regulation S-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation 106.01, the information regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans required by this Item pursuant to Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K is located in Item 12 of Part III of this annual report and is incorporated herein by reference.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year ~~2014~~2015, the Company did not purchase any shares of its common stock.

Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year ~~2014~~2015, the Company did not sell any unregistered equity securities.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

This item is not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF THE FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE RELATED NOTES THERETO INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT.

Overview

Rand Worldwide is a leading provider of design automation and data management solutions for the manufacturing, building design, engineering, infrastructure and facilities management markets. The Company also specializes in technical support, training, and consulting aimed at improving design and documentation efficiencies and the seamless integration of workflow processes. This combination of technology solutions and services enables customers to enhance productivity, profitability, and competitive position.

The Company’s business strategy is built on three core principles designed to leverage its existing strengths with expected market opportunities:

-• Maintain and profitably grow its strong position in the Autodesk software market.

-• Profitably grow its consulting and services business by leveraging its experts in design engineering.

-• Acquire or license and integrate diverse, yet complementary, software and services businesses to extend its product offerings to its large customer base and expand its market potential.

This strategy was designed to match the Company’s product and service offerings more precisely with the needs of its customers, while providing avenues of growth and diversification.

Discontinued Operations

During ~~the~~September ~~fourth~~2014, ~~quarter~~as part of ~~its~~the ~~fiscal~~Company’s ~~year~~strategy ~~ended~~to ~~June 30,~~focus ~~2013~~on its core strengths, the Company ~~sold~~divested its ~~operations~~Rand inSecure ~~Singapore, Malaysia and~~Data ~~Australia~~archiving business. ~~Accordingly~~Thus, the results of ~~these~~ operations ~~and~~from the ~~gains~~archiving ~~and~~business ~~losses~~have ~~recognized~~been ~~upon~~classified ~~their~~as ~~disposal are considered~~ discontinued operations ~~and are presented separately from the results of the Company’s continuing operations. The results~~ for ~~prior~~all periods ~~have been reclassified to separately present the results of discontinued operations~~presented.

Recent Developments

~~During~~On March 27, ~~September of 2014~~2015, the Company ~~spun~~filed ~~off~~a ~~its~~Form ~~Rand~~15 ~~Secure~~with ~~Data~~the ~~division~~SEC ~~into~~to aterminate ~~separate~~its ~~subsidiary~~reporting ~~and~~obligations ~~sold~~under ~~the~~Section 12(g) ~~stock~~ of the ~~newly~~Exchange ~~formed~~Act ~~subsidiary~~with ~~for~~respect ~~$500~~to its common stock,~~000~~ inwhich ~~cash~~became effective on June 25, ~~resulting~~2015. inIn anaddition, ~~estimated~~on ~~loss~~July 6, of2015, ~~$1.1~~the ~~million.~~Company ~~During~~filed ~~FY2014~~a Form 15 with the ~~Secure~~SEC ~~Data~~to ~~division~~report ~~had~~that ~~revenues~~its reporting obligations under Section 15(d) of ~~$2.6~~the ~~million~~Exchange Act had been automatically suspended effective July 1, ~~gross~~2015 ~~margins~~because, as of ~~$761~~such date,~~000~~ ~~and~~the Company’s ~~operating~~common ~~losses~~stock was held by less than 300 owners of $1record.2 ~~million~~Upon ~~before~~the ~~income~~filing ~~taxes~~of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, ~~interest~~the Company will no longer be obligated to file periodic reports, ~~depreciation~~current reports or proxy statements under the Exchange Act, including ~~amortization~~Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or Current Reports on Form 8-K, and ~~corporate~~the ~~overhead~~Company ~~allocations~~does not intend to file any such reports or proxy statements on a voluntary basis.

Critical Accounting Policies

The consolidated financial statements are impacted by the accounting policies used and the estimates and assumptions made by management during their preparation. Critical accounting policies and estimates that impact the consolidated financial statements are those that relate to software revenue recognition, estimates of bad debts, income taxes and recoverability of goodwill and purchased intangible assets. All of these critical accounting policies are discussed with and reviewed by the Company’s Audit Committee on a periodic basis. Presented below is a description of the accounting policies that management believes are most critical to an understanding of the consolidated financial statements.

Software Revenue Recognition- The Company derives most of its revenue from the resale of packaged software products, and, historically, the Company has not experienced significant customer returns. Rand Worldwide earns service revenue from training and other professional services, which often are related to the products that are sold but are not essential to the functionality of the software. Annual support contracts are also offered to customers for the software products that are sold, or the Company offers maintenance and support services under hourly billing arrangements.

revenue from training and other professional services, which often are related to the products that are sold but are not essential to the functionality of the software. Annual support contracts are also offered to customers for the software products that are sold, or the Company offers maintenance and support services under hourly billing arrangements.

Revenue from software arrangements is recognized in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 985, Software Revenue Recognition. Prior to recognizing any revenue under these arrangements, (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement must exist, (2) delivery of the software or service must have occurred, (3) all fees must be assessed as fixed or determinable, and (4) all fees must be probable of collection. The Company determines whether criteria (3) and (4) have been satisfied based on its judgment regarding the fixed nature of the fee charged for services rendered and products delivered and the collectability of such fee. Revenue recognized in a reporting period could be adversely affected if future changes in conditions related to a transaction cause management to determine these criteria are not met. In the past, it has not been necessary to adjust reported revenues due to changes in conditions, and the Company continues to evaluate current conditions that may affect the nature and timing of our revenue recognition.

The Company’s arrangements with its customers may involve the sale of one or more products and services at the same time. The Company considers these to be multiple elements of a single arrangement. The Company follows the guidance in FASB ASC 605-25, Multiple-Element Arrangements, where we allocate the total arrangement consideration to each separable element based on the relative selling price of each element in accordance with selling price hierarchy, which includes: vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) if available; third party evidence (“TPE”) if VSOE is not available; and best estimate of selling price if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. In general, the Company uses VSOE to allocate the selling price to each element. Arrangement consideration allocated to undelivered elements is deferred until delivery of the individual elements.

Bad Debts- The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses which may result from the inability of customers to pay for purchased products and services or for disputes that affect the ability to fully collect accounts receivable. Rand Worldwide estimates this allowance by reviewing the status of past-due accounts and records general reserves based on historical bad debt expense. Accounts are considered past due based on the payment terms as stated on the invoice. Actual experience has not varied significantly from estimates; however, if the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in their inability to pay for products or services, there may be a need to record additional allowances in future periods. To mitigate this risk, the Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers.

estimates; however, if the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in their inability to pay for products or services, there may be a need to record additional allowances in future periods. To mitigate this risk, the Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers.

Income Taxes- Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets is recorded if based upon the weight of available evidence it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company records liabilities for income tax contingencies if it is probable that the Company has incurred a tax liability and the liability or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company records liabilities for uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740-10, Income Taxes.

Recoverability of goodwill and purchased intangible assets- The Company accounts for goodwill and other intangibles under ASC 350, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. ASC 350 prescribes a two-phase process for impairment testing of goodwill. The first phase screens for impairment; while the second phase, if necessary, measures the impairment. The Company performs the required impairment analysis of goodwill at the reporting unit level annually or on an interim basis if circumstances dictate. Any reduction of the reporting unit fair value below the recorded amount of equity could require the Company to write down the value of goodwill and record an expense for an impairment loss. Management’s analysis of the recoverability of goodwill as of June 30, 2014 identified an impairment of the goodwill and acquired customer list of the CFD consulting business that was acquired in July of 2012. Impairment charges of $1 million were recorded during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014, reducing the carrying value of the CFD goodwill and customer list. There were no further impairments of goodwill or other intangible assets outside of the CFD business. Management’s analysis of the recoverability of goodwill as of June 30, 2015 determined that there was no need for any write downs of its assets.

Results of Operations

The following describes the components of each line item of our consolidated statement of operations.

Product Sales- Product sales consist primarily of the resale of packaged design software, including:

•

Autodesk 2D and 3D computer aided design software for customers in the mechanical, architectural and civil engineering sectors, as well as visualization and animation technology to companies in the media and entertainment industry;

•

Autodesk data management software;

•

Archibus facilities management software for space planning, strategic planning, and lease/property administration;

•

3DExperience design software products from Dassault Systèmes which include CATIA, ENOVIA, SIMULIA, DELMIA, and DMU;

•

Leica 3D laser scanning equipment for the Architectural, Engineering and Construction sector;

•

ASCENT internally-developed courseware for a variety of engineering applications; and

•Service ~~Autonomy~~Revenue- ~~data~~Rand ~~archiving~~Worldwide ~~solutions~~provides services in the form of training, consulting services, software development, custom courseware development and technical to its customers. Rand Worldwide employs a technical staff of over 100 personnel associated with these types of services.

~~Service~~Commission Revenue- ~~Rand~~The ~~Worldwide~~Company ~~provides~~offers ~~services~~Autodesk’s insubscription ~~the~~programs, ~~form~~which ofentitle ~~training,~~subscribers ~~consulting~~to ~~services,~~receive software ~~development~~upgrades, web ~~custom courseware development, technical~~ support and ~~data~~eLearning ~~archiving~~lessons ~~solutions to~~directly ~~its~~from ~~customers~~Autodesk. Because Rand Worldwide ~~employs~~does anot ~~technical~~participate ~~staff~~in the delivery of ~~over~~these ~~100~~subscription ~~personnel~~products ~~associated~~or ~~with~~the ~~these~~web ~~types~~support and eLearning lesson benefits, the Company records the gross profit from the sale of ~~services~~Autodesk software subscriptions as commission revenue. ~~The~~In addition, the Company ~~also~~sells ~~offers~~technology ~~support~~upgrades ~~and~~to ~~implementation~~existing ~~services~~Autodesk tocustomers ~~complement~~through the ~~data~~Autodesk ~~archive~~Subscription ~~solutions~~program ~~provided~~where ~~and~~the ~~sold~~customers ~~through~~receive the latest releases of Autodesk ~~its~~software, ~~Rand~~incremental ~~Secure~~product ~~Data~~enhancements, ~~Division~~and personalized web support direct from Autodesk.

Commission Revenue- The Company offers Autodesk’s subscription programs, which entitle subscribers to receive software upgrades, web support and eLearning lessons directly from Autodesk. Because Rand Worldwide does not participate in the delivery of these subscription products or the web support and eLearning lesson

benefits, the Company records the gross profit from the sale of Autodesk software subscriptions as commission revenue. In addition, the Company sells technology upgrades to existing Autodesk customers through the Autodesk Subscription program where the customers receive the latest releases of Autodesk software, incremental product enhancements, and personalized web support direct from Autodesk.

Based on its analysis of the Autodesk Subscription program, Rand Worldwide records the net proceeds that it receives from Autodesk for subscription sales in accordance with the provisions of ASC 605, Revenue Recognition.

Rand Worldwide also generates commission revenue from the resale of Autodesk software to various customers, a number of which Autodesk considers major and government accounts. Autodesk designates customers as major accounts based on specific criteria, primarily sales volume, and typically gives these customers volume discounts. The Company is responsible for managing and reselling Autodesk products to a number of these major and government account customers; however, software products are shipped directly from Autodesk to the customers. Rand Worldwide receives commissions upon shipment of the products from Autodesk to the customer based on a percentage of the sales price.

Cost of Product Sales- The cost of product sales consists of the cost of purchasing products from software suppliers or hardware manufacturers as well as the associated shipping and handling costs. The Company earns a volume-based rebate from its primary supplier, Autodesk, paid monthly as a percentage of qualifying purchases. The rebate percentage is established based on the level of new product and subscription purchases as measured against quarterly targets developed by Autodesk . These rebates serve to reduce the cost of product sales. The Company accrues its rebates the month the underlying sales are posted, in accordance with ASC 605-50, Customer Payments and Incentives. The Company has generally been able to focus its sales efforts in a manner to achieve margins on its product sales that are within a relatively narrow range period to period.

Cost of Service Revenue- Cost of service revenue includes the direct costs associated with the implementation of software and hardware solutions as well as training, support services, and professional services. These costs consist primarily of compensation, travel, literature, and the costs of third-party contractors engaged by the Company. The cost of service revenue does not include an allocation of overhead costs.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses- Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and other expenses associated with the Company’s sales force, management, finance, human resources, and information systems. Advertising and public relations expenses and expenses for facilities, such as rent and utilities, are also included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses- Depreciation expense represents the period costs associated with our investment in property and equipment, consisting principally of computer equipment, software, furniture and fixtures, and leasehold improvements. Amortization expense represents the period costs of the acquired customer list and trade name intangible assets. The Company computes depreciation and amortization expenses using the straight-line method. Rand Worldwide leases all of its facilities and depreciates leasehold improvements over the lesser of the ~~lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. Total amortization expense for the year ended June 30, 2014 was $828,000 and total depreciation expense for the same period was $1,087,000.~~

Interest Expense- For the year ended June 30, 2014, interest expense consisted of interest on capital lease obligations, earn-out consideration and borrowings from lines of credit.

~~Selected~~ intangible ~~Revenue~~assets. ~~Information~~The Company computes depreciation and amortization expenses using the straight-line method. Rand Worldwide leases all of its facilities and depreciates leasehold improvements over the lesser of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. Total amortization expense for ~~Years~~the ~~Ended~~year ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015 was $782,000 and ~~June 30~~total depreciation expense for the same period was $666,000. ~~2013~~

Interest Expense- Interest expense consists of interest on its term note, borrowings from lines of credit, capital lease obligations, and earn-out consideration paid in connection with prior business acquisitions.

Selected Revenue Information for Years Ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014

The following table sets forth the percentages of total revenue represented by selected items reflected in our audited Consolidated Statements of Operations included elsewhere in this report. The year-to-year comparisons of financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results.

	Years ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014
Revenue:
Product sales		5251.26	%		5053.76	%
Service revenue		2523.63	%		2623.46	%
Commission revenue		2225.21	%		22.98	%
Total revenue		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of revenue:
Cost of product sales		33.43	%		3134.93	%
Cost of service revenue		1716.23	%		1715.67	%
Total cost of revenue		5049.6	%		4950.50	%
Gross margin		4950.4	%		50.50	%
Other operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		3940.1	%		4237.58	%
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets		10.10	%		01.01	%
Change in value of contingent consideration		(10.10	)%		0(1.02	)%
Depreciation and amortization		2.1.7	%		2.30	%
Total other operating expenses		41.28	%		4439.87	%
Operating income		8.26	%		510.73	%
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(0.15	)%		(0.41	)%
Currency exchange losses		(0.18	)%		(0.1	)%
Other expense		0.0	%		(0.10	)%
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		87.03	%		510.1	%
Income tax expense (benefit)		(13.92	)%		2(1.02	)%
Income from continuing operations		94.91	%		311.13	%

Year Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Year Ended June 30, 2013

Revenue

	Years ended
	June 30, 2014		June 30, 2013		% change
Revenue:
Product sales	$	47,822,000	$	41,869,000		14.2	%
Service revenue		23,480,000		21,764,000		7.9	%
Commission revenue		20,294,000		18,870,000		7.5	%
Total Revenue:	$	91,596,000	$	82,503,000		11.0	%

Revenue: Total revenue for the year ended June 30, 2014 increased by $9.1 million, or 11.0%, when compared to the prior year.

~~Product~~Year ~~sales~~Ended ~~as reported in the current fiscal year increased by $6.0 million~~June 30, or2015 ~~14.2%, from~~Compared ~~the~~to ~~levels~~Year inEnded ~~the prior year. Of this increase~~June 30, ~~$3.2~~2014 million was the result of a single large sale. Additionally, product sales from the Company’s Rand 3D division have increased $546,000. The remaining increased product revenues are attributable to the increased focus of the sales division on generating new product sales and new subscriptions.

~~Service revenues~~Revenue increased $1.7 million, or 7.9%, for the year ended June 30, 2014 when compared to those reported for the year ended June 30, 2013. The increased service revenues were fueled by large growth in CFD consulting, facilities management software services and Rand Secure Data implementations.

In fiscal year 2014, commission revenues increased $1.4 million, or 7.5%. Through a disciplined approach to sales and a heightened attention to customer satisfaction, the Company’s renewal rates on its Autodesk subscriptions are among the highest in the sales channel, leading to year-over-year growth in commission revenues.


	Years ended
	June 30, 2015		June 30, 2014		% change
Revenue:
Product sales	$	44,752,000	$	47,727,000		(6.2	)%
Service revenue		20,206,000		21,005,000		(3.8	)%
Commission revenue		21,741,000		20,252,000		7.4	%

Total Revenue:	$	86,699,000	$	88,984,000		(2.6	)%

Revenue: Total revenue for the year ended June 30, 2015 decreased by $2.3 million, or 2.6%, when compared to the prior year.

Product sales as reported in fiscal year 2015 decreased by $3.0 million, or 6.2%, from the levels in the prior year. Product sales for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 included a single large sale of $3.2 million. Excluding this one-time large sale, product sales for fiscal year 2015 would have increased by $200,000, or 0.4%, over the prior fiscal year, driven by vendor-subsidized discounts and other promotional incentives.

Service revenues decreased $799,000, or 3.8%, for the year ended June 30, 2015 when compared to those reported for the year ended June 30, 2014.

In fiscal year 2015, commission revenues increased $1.5 million, or 7.4%, when compared to the year ended June 30, 2014. Through a disciplined approach to sales and a heightened attention to customer satisfaction, the Company’s renewal rates on its Autodesk subscriptions are among the highest in the sales channel, leading to year-over-year growth in commission revenues.

Cost of Revenue

	Years ended
	June 30, 2014		June 30, 2013		% change
	June 30, 2015		June 30, 2014		% change
Cost of revenue:
Cost of product sales	$	3028,~~547~~821,000	$	2630,~~282~~534,000		16(5.26	)%
Cost of service revenue		1514,~~763~~145,000		1413,~~540~~925,000		81.46	%
Total cost of revenue	$	4642,~~310~~966,000	$	4044,~~822~~459,000		13(3.4	)%
Gross margin	$	4543,~~286~~733,000	$	4144,~~681~~525,000		8(1.68	)%

Cost of Revenue: Total cost of revenue ~~increased~~decreased by $~~5.5 million~~1,493,000, or 133.4%, for the year ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015 when compared to the year ended June 30, ~~2013~~2014.

Cost of product sales ~~increased~~decreased 165.26% while product sales ~~increased 14~~decreased 6.2% over the previous fiscal year. During fiscal year ~~2014~~2015, the Company’s product margin rates decreased from 3736.20% to 3635.16%. Cost of product sales increased to a larger extent than did product revenues primarily due to a decreased rate of sales rebates from the Company’s principal supplier, Autodesk, because the Company had a single large product sale of $3.2 million which did not qualify for a supplier rebate.

Cost of service revenue increased 81.46%, while service revenue ~~increased~~decreased by 73.98% over last year. Salaries increased due to added technical staff, including filling vacant positions on the IMAGINiT services team and expanding the Rand Secure Data division. Royalties relating to the Rand Secure Data services increased at a faster pace than their corresponding revenue growth. Additionally, the Company had a large services project which involved significantly more subcontracted services than usual resulting in a temporary increase in the cost of service revenue. As a result, cost of service revenue as a percentage of related revenue increased to 67.1% during fiscal year 2014 from 66.8% during the prior fiscal year.

~~Gross~~Cost ~~Margin: The Company’s overall gross margin percentage~~ of ~~49.4%~~service ~~for~~revenues ~~the~~increased ~~year~~as ~~ended June 30, 2014 was lower than~~ the Company ~~50.5%~~engaged ~~gross~~in ~~margin~~large ~~for~~strategic ~~the~~projects ~~previous~~that ~~year.~~included ~~The~~a ~~Company~~wider ~~had~~range aof ~~large~~services ~~sale~~than ~~during~~its ~~the~~traditional ~~current~~projects ~~fiscal~~and ~~year~~thus ~~which~~required ~~was~~a ~~primarily~~higher ~~comprised~~proportion of ~~new~~ ~~products. This~~subcontracted ~~sale~~services ~~did~~to ~~not~~perform ~~qualify~~these ~~for~~more ~~any~~comprehensive ~~supplier~~projects. ~~rebates~~As ~~and,~~a ~~due to its size~~result, ~~adjusted~~cost ~~the~~of service ~~overall~~ revenue ~~mix~~as ~~that~~a ~~the~~percentage ~~Company~~of ~~realized~~related ~~for~~revenue ~~the~~increased ~~year~~to 70. ~~Both~~0% ofduring ~~these~~fiscal ~~factors~~year ~~served~~2015 tofrom ~~reduce~~66.3% during the ~~reported~~prior ~~gross~~fiscal ~~margin percentage~~year.

15Gross Margin: The Company’s overall gross margin percentage of 50.4% for the year ended June 30, 2015 was slightly higher than the 50.0% gross margin for the previous year, due to the higher proportion of commission revenues.

Other Operating Expenses

	Years ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013			% change
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014			% change
Other operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	$	3534,~~902~~805,000		$	3533,~~111~~687,000			23.3	%
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets		~~1,000,000~~—			—1,000,000			(100.0	)%
Change in the value of contingent consideration		~~(1,089,000~~—	)		—(1,089,000	)		(100.0	)%
Depreciation and amortization		1,~~915~~448,000			1,~~891~~778,000			1(18.36	)%
Total other operating expenses	$	3736,~~728~~253,000		$	3735,~~002~~376,000			2.05	%

Selling, General and Administrative: Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $~~791~~1,118,000, or 23.3%, over the prior year. The ~~increase~~increased inexpenses ~~these~~were ~~expenses~~costs ~~was~~associated ~~primarily~~with the ~~result~~Company’s ofissuer ~~higher~~tender ~~commissions~~offer ~~and~~that ~~bonuses~~closed ~~due~~in toNovember 2014 (the ~~increased~~“Tender ~~revenues~~Offer”), offset by decreases in ongoing operating expenses including occupancy costs and ~~earnings~~travel. ofFurther information regarding the ~~Company~~Tender asOffer ~~compared~~is toprovided below under the ~~prior~~heading, ~~fiscal~~“Liquidity ~~year~~and Capital Resources”.

Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets: ~~The~~During ~~Company~~the ~~recorded~~fiscal ~~impairment~~year ~~charges~~ended ~~against~~June 30, ~~its~~2014, ~~goodwill~~the ~~and~~Company ~~the~~performed ~~value~~an ofassessment ~~its~~of ~~acquired~~the ~~customer~~fair ~~list~~value of ~~the~~its CFD ~~consulting~~ business ~~that was~~ acquired in July 2012. ~~While the CFD business is consistently profitable~~ and ~~experiencing growth in revenue~~, ~~its~~following ~~earnings have been less than~~ the ~~levels forecasted at the time of the acquisition. Following an~~ assessment ~~of the fair value of the CFD business~~, recorded impairment charges ~~were recorded~~ to reduce the book value of goodwill and the value of the acquired customer list.

Change in the value of contingent consideration: ~~Part~~During of the ~~acquisition~~fiscal ~~price~~year ~~for~~ended ~~the~~June 30, ~~CFD~~2014, ~~consulting~~the ~~business~~Company ~~includes~~assessed ~~contingent consideration~~the tovalue beof ~~paid~~its contingent inconsideration ~~future~~associated ~~years~~with ~~based upon whether~~ the CFD business ~~achieves~~acquired ~~certain earnings targets~~ in ~~those~~July ~~years. At the time~~ of ~~the~~2012 ~~acquisition~~and, ~~the~~following ~~Company~~this ~~estimated~~assessment, ~~the~~reduced ~~value~~its ofliability ~~future contingent consideration payments~~accordingly. Because the historical earnings of the CFD business have been less than those earnings targets, the Company reduced its estimate of the remaining liability for contingent consideration recorded and recorded an adjustment during ~~the current~~ fiscal year 2015 to reflect the reduced liability for contingent consideration.

Depreciation and Amortization: Depreciation and amortization expenses ~~increased~~decreased $24330,000, or 118.36%, when compared to fiscal year ~~2013~~2014. The asdecrease occurred after a ~~result~~portion of ~~additional~~computer ~~depreciation~~equipment ~~expense~~that ~~associated~~was ~~with~~fully ~~hardware and software acquired for the Company’s data archiving division as well as the regularly scheduled replacement of computer equipment~~depreciated.

Other ~~Income~~Expense (~~Expense~~Income):

	Years ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013			% change
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014			% change
Other income (expense):
Other expense (income):
Interest expense	$	~~(158~~469,000	)	$	~~(304~~158,000	)		~~(48~~196.08	)%
Currency exchange losses		~~(70~~683,000	)		~~(110~~70,000	)		~~(36~~875.47	)%
Other expense		4,000			(62,000	)		(106.5	)%
Other expense (income)		13,000			(4,000	)		(425.0	)%
Total other income (expense)	$	(224,000	)	$	(476,000	)		(52.9	)%
Total other expense (income)	$	1,165,000		$	224,000			420.1	%

Other ~~Income~~Expense (~~Expense~~Income): Other ~~income~~expense (~~expense~~income) includes interest expense arising from the Company’s borrowings and recognized foreign exchange gains and losses.

Interest expense for fiscal year 2015 increased $311,000, or 196.8%, when compared to the prior fiscal year, due to the borrowings under the Company’s $21 million term note (the “Term Note”) issued in November 2014 to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”) to fund the Tender Offer. The Company has since paid $3.1 million in scheduled and optional principal payments bringing the Term Note balance to $17.9 million at June 30, 2015. Additional payments were made in July 2015 that reduced the Term Note balance to $16.1 million. Further information regarding the Term Note is provided below under the heading, “Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

~~Table~~The Company recorded $683,000 of ~~Contents~~currency exchange losses during the year ended June 30, 2015, compared with $70,000 of losses for the year ended June 30, 2014, due to the Canadian Dollar weakening relative to the US Dollar.

Interest expense for fiscal year 2014 decreased $146,000, or 48.0%, when compared to the prior fiscal year, mainly due to decreased borrowings on its line of credit.

The Company incurred $70,000 of currency exchange losses during the year ended June 30, 2014, compared with $110,000 of losses for the year ended June 30, 2013, mainly due to the Canadian Dollar gaining strength relative to the US Dollar.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

Years ended

June 30, 2014

June 30, 2013

% change

June 30, 2015

June 30, 2014

% change

Income tax expense (benefit)

(12,~~723~~750,000

)

(1,~~691~~139,000

)

(~~201~~341.94

Income Tax Expense (Benefit): The Company recorded a tax expense of $2,750,000 for the year ended June 30, 2015 versus income tax benefit of $1,139,000 for the prior year.

The income tax benefit recorded during fiscal year 2014 was the result of recognizing the realizable portion of the Company’s Canadian net operating loss carryforward as a deferred tax asset. The Company previously had created a valuation allowance against the entire Canadian amount of net operating loss carryforwards, recognizing no deferred tax asset because it did not have a sufficient history of profitable operations to support the recognition of the asset. Since the Canadian entity has established a sufficient history of profitability and projects continuing profits, the valuation allowance against the Canadian net operating loss carryforward was reduced in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014 by $4.5 million to recognize the portion of net operating loss carryforwards projected to be utilized prior to expiration. As of June 30, 2014, the remaining valuation allowance on the Canadian deferred tax asset totaled $1.4 million.

As of June 30, ~~2014~~2015, the Company had U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income of ~~approximately~~ $3027.3 1 million; however, $23.3 million of these carryforwards were not recognized because they are subject to annual limitations under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and are expected to expire before being utilized. For tax year ended June 30, ~~2014~~ 2015, ~~it is projected that~~ approximately $~~2.4~~560,000 ~~million~~ of net operating loss carryforwards will be utilized to offset taxable income.

In addition, as of June 30, ~~2014~~2015, the Company had foreign net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1413.80 million available to reduce future taxable income;. ~~however~~Approximately ~~approximately~~ $4.0 million is ~~expected~~of tothe ~~expire~~prior byyear net operating losses expired December 31, 2014, which ~~and~~had ~~the~~a valuation allowance. The balance of the net operating losses will expire between 2028 and 2031.

The Company maintains a valuation allowance of $9.7 million for it and its United States subsidiaries due to the expiration of net operating losses carryforward prior to utilization, capital losses and a portion of state net operating loss carryforwards. The valuation allowances are evaluated quarterly to determine the appropriate allowance amount.

Rand Worldwide’s Canadian subsidiary, Rand A Technology Corporation, underwent an audit by the Canadian Revenue Authority for tax years 2005 through 2009. The audit has been concluded and adjustments resulting from the audit were not material to the financial statements.

Discontinued Operations

	Years ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014			% change
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax of $0	$	—		$	(241,000	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax of $232,000 and $584,000	$	(452,000	)	$	(1,007,000	)		(55.1	)%
Loss on sales of discontinued operations, net of tax of $0 and $0	$	(463,000	)	$	(370,000	)
Loss on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax of $414,000 and $0	$	(1,072,000	)	$	(463,000	)		131.5	%

17The Company divested its Rand Secure Data archiving business during the first quarter of fiscal year 2015 as detailed in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented elsewhere in this report. Losses from this operation prior to the divestiture were $452,000 and $1,007,000 for the years ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively, and have been included in discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Losses on the sale of discontinued operations include losses related to the disposal of the Rand Secure Data division of $1,072,000 and losses related to the disposal of the Singapore operations of $463,000 for the years ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively.

The Company disposed of its operations in Singapore, Malaysia and Australia during May and June of 2013 as detailed in Note 15. The disposals resulted in losses of $463,000 and $370,000 during the fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically, the Company has financed its operations and met its capital expenditure requirements primarily through cash flows provided by operations and borrowings under short-term debt arrangements.

On February 29, 2012, the Company entered into an $8 million line of credit facility, including a $1,000,000 sublimit for the issuance of standby or trade letters of credit, with PNC Bank, National Association (“PNC”). The interest rate iswas the “Eurodollar Rate”, which iswas calculated by using the LIBO ~~LIBOR~~ rate, plus a margin of 2.0%. The ~~Company had no outstanding borrowings from the bank under its credit~~ line asexpired ofon ~~June~~November 30, 2014 and ~~June 30,~~ ~~2013~~was ~~and~~replaced ~~did~~by ~~not~~another ~~utilize~~credit ~~the~~facility ~~line~~with ~~during its third and fourth fiscal quarters~~JPMorgan. The Company’s ~~U.S.~~had ~~trade~~no ~~accounts~~outstanding ~~receivable~~borrowings ~~are~~under ~~pledged~~its asPNC ~~collateral~~credit ~~against~~facility ~~the~~ line of ~~credit~~as ~~and~~of ~~the~~June 30, ~~line~~2015 ~~expires on November~~or June 30, 2014.

~~The~~On ~~Company’s~~November 3, ~~operating~~2014, ~~assets~~the ~~and~~Company ~~liabilities~~completed ~~consist~~the ~~primarily~~Tender ofOffer ~~accounts~~by ~~receivable,~~repurchasing ~~cash~~25,849,945 ~~borrowings~~shares ~~under~~of ~~line~~its ofcommon ~~credit,~~stock ~~accounts~~from ~~payable,~~existing ~~and deferred revenue~~stockholders. ~~Changes~~This inbuyback ~~these~~was ~~balances~~financed ~~are~~through ~~affected principally by~~ the ~~timing~~Term ofNote ~~sales, collections~~ and ~~vendor~~a ~~payments.~~$10 ~~The~~million ~~Company~~line ~~purchases~~of ~~approximately~~credit ~~92%~~from ofJPMorgan, ~~its~~as ~~product~~well ~~from~~as ~~one~~the ~~principal~~Company’s ~~supplier~~then-existing ~~and~~cash ~~its distributors,~~surplus. ~~which~~The ~~provide~~line ~~the~~of ~~Company~~credit ~~with~~is ~~credit~~secured toby ~~finance~~all ~~those~~assets ~~purchases.~~of the Company

~~Approximately~~ with ~~$1,059,000~~borrowing oflevels ~~cash~~subject ~~was~~to ~~used~~borrowing inbase ~~investing~~limits ~~activities during~~and ~~the~~bears ~~year~~interest ~~ended~~at ~~June 30,~~the ~~2014~~LIBO ~~compared~~rate, toplus ~~$1,632,000~~a margin of ~~cash~~2.5%. ~~used~~The inTerm ~~investing~~Note ~~activities~~bears ~~during~~interest ~~the~~rate ~~year~~at ~~ended~~the ~~June 30~~LIBO rate, ~~2013~~plus a margin of 3.15%. The principal ~~main~~of ~~change~~the inTerm ~~the~~Note ~~use~~will be amortized over five years with quarterly repayments of ~~cash~~$787,500 infor the ~~prior~~first ~~fiscal~~two ~~year~~years, ~~was~~$1,050,000 for the ~~acquisition~~third ofyear, ~~its~~and ~~CFD~~$1,312,500 ~~business~~for the fourth and fifth years. The Company ~~did~~had ~~not~~no ~~have~~outstanding ~~any~~borrowings ~~acquisitions~~under the inJPMorgan ~~the~~line ~~current~~of ~~fiscal~~credit ~~year~~as of June 30, 2015.

~~For~~The ~~the~~Company’s ~~year~~operating ~~ended~~assets ~~June 30,~~and ~~2014,~~liabilities ~~net~~consist ~~cash~~primarily ~~used~~of inaccounts ~~financing~~receivable, ~~activities was $42~~cash,~~000~~ ~~compared~~borrowings tounder ~~$3,534,000~~line of ~~net~~credit, ~~cash~~current ~~used~~portion inof ~~financing~~long-term ~~activities~~debt, ~~during~~accounts ~~the~~payable ~~year~~and ~~ended~~deferred ~~June 30, 2013~~revenue. ~~The~~Changes ~~difference resulted mainly from little activity~~ in ~~the~~these ~~Company’s~~balances ~~line~~are ofaffected ~~credit~~principally ~~during~~by the ~~current fiscal~~timing ~~year compared to net paydowns~~ of ~~$3.1~~sales, ~~million~~collections ~~during~~and ~~the~~vendor ~~prior fiscal year~~payments. ~~Additionally,~~The ~~the~~ Company purchases ~~received~~approximately ~~$348,000~~96% ~~in proceeds upon the exercise~~ of ~~stock~~its ~~options~~product ~~during~~from ~~the~~one ~~current~~principal ~~fiscal~~supplier ~~year~~that ~~compared~~provides it with ~~$3,000~~credit into ~~proceeds~~finance ~~during~~those ~~the prior fiscal year~~purchases.

~~Because~~For the ~~Company is one of the largest resellers of Autodesk software and because Autodesk has~~ ~~continued~~year toended ~~state~~June 30, ~~its~~2015, ~~intention~~net tocash ~~continue~~provided toby ~~strengthen~~operating ~~its~~activities ~~relationships~~was ~~with its resellers~~$6,984,000, ~~the~~compared ~~Company~~with ~~expects~~cash toprovided ~~continue~~by tooperating beactivities ~~a leading seller~~ of ~~Autodesk~~$9,406,000 ~~software.~~during ~~The~~the ~~Company~~year isended ~~a party to a Value Added Reseller Agreement with Autodesk effective February~~June 130, ~~2013~~2014. The ~~agreement~~decrease ~~provides~~was ~~for~~due anmainly ~~initial term of 12 months that, subject~~ to ~~certain requirements and termination rights of~~ the ~~parties,~~transaction ~~automatically renews on an annual basis for two additional 12 month periods. The~~costs ~~agreement designates the Company as an authorized reseller~~ of ~~Autodesk software and prescribes~~ the ~~authorized~~Tender ~~sales~~Offer ~~territories,~~incurred ~~authorized~~during ~~products~~fiscal ~~and~~year ~~services, rebate and incentive program details and marketing support~~2015.

Approximately $130,000 of cash was provided by investing activities during the year ended June 30, 2015 compared with $1,059,000 of cash used in investing activities during the year ended June 30, 2014. The difference was due to decreased purchases of equipment, as well as cash proceeds received from the sale of the Rand Secure Data Division during the first quarter of fiscal year 2015.

For the year ended June 30, 2015, net cash used in financing activities was $13,300,000 compared to $42,000 of net cash used in financing activities during the year ended June 30, 2014. The difference resulted mainly from the transactions associated with the Tender Offer during fiscal year 2015, including the $31 million paid out for the stock buyback, offset by $21 million in proceeds from the Term Note. The Company repaid $3.1 million of the balance due under the Term Note during the fiscal year 2015, including $1.5 million in prepayments, bringing the Term Note balance to $17.9 million at June 30, 2015. Additional principal payments were made shortly after June 30, 2015 that reduced the Term Note balance to $16.1 million.

Because the Company is one of the largest resellers of Autodesk software and because Autodesk has continued to state its intention to continue to strengthen its relationships with its resellers, the Company expects to continue to be a leading seller of Autodesk software. The Company is a party to a Value Added Reseller Agreement with Autodesk effective February 1, 2015. The agreement provides for an initial term of twelve months that, subject to certain requirements and termination rights of the parties, automatically renews on an annual basis for two additional twelve-month periods. The agreement designates the Company as an authorized reseller of Autodesk software and prescribes the authorized sales territories, authorized products and services, rebate and incentive program details and marketing support.

Off Balance Sheet Transactions

The Company is not party to any off-balance sheet transactions as defined in Item 303 of the SEC’s Regulation S-K.

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

This item is not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The information required by this Item may be found immediately after the signatures to this report and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

None.

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that information, which is required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the ~~Securities and~~ Exchange Act ~~of 1934, as amended,~~ is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the ~~Securities and Exchange Commission~~SEC, and is accumulated and communicated to management in a timely manner. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

An evaluation of the effectiveness of these disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, ~~2014~~2015 was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including ~~the~~its ~~Chief~~principal ~~Executive~~executive ~~Officer~~officer and ~~the~~principal ~~Chief~~accounting ~~Financial Officer~~officer. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the ~~Chief~~Company’s ~~Executive~~principal ~~Officer~~executive officer and ~~the~~principal ~~Chief~~accounting ~~Financial Officer~~officer, has concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are, in fact, effective at the reasonable assurance level.

During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015, there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

As required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management has performed an evaluation and testing of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, ~~2014~~2015. Management’s report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is included in Item 8 of this report and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

~~The~~Board ~~information required by this item is contained in the sections~~ of ~~the~~Directors definitive Proxy Statement of the Company to be filed with the SEC in connection with the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) entitled, “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (Proposal 1)”, “EXECUTIVE OFFICERS”, “SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE”, and “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE” and is incorporated herein by reference.

The Company has four directors. Certain information regarding the directors, including their names, ages as of September 15, 2015, and principal occupations and business experience for the past five years, is set forth below. The Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer is also a director.


Name	Age	Director Since
Peter H. Kamin	53	March 2012
Philip Livingston	58	November 2014
Lawrence Rychlak	59	September 2013
David Schneider	43	November 2014

PETER H. KAMIN — Mr. Kamin joined the Board of Directors in March 2012. He is the founder and Managing Partner of 3K Limited Partnership. For the previous 11 years, Mr. Kamin was a founding member and Managing Partner of ValueAct Capital. Prior to founding ValueAct Capital in 2000, Mr. Kamin founded and managed Peak Investment L.P., a limited partnership organized to make investments in a select number of domestic public and private companies. Mr. Kamin is presently a Director of the following companies with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act: Ambassadors Group, Inc.; MAM Software Group, Inc.; and Tile Shop Holdings. In addition, he is a Director of several privately held companies. Mr. Kamin has previously served as a Director of a number of public and private companies. Mr. Kamin holds a BA from Tufts University and an MBA from Harvard’s Graduate School of Business.

PHILIP LIVINGSTON — Mr. Livingston was elected to the Board of Directors on November 10, 2014. He has served as Chief Executive Officer and a director of Ambassadors Group, Inc., a provider of educational travel experiences and online education research materials, since May 2014. Prior to joining Ambassadors Group, Mr. Livingston was Chief Executive Officer of LexisNexis Web Based Marketing Solutions until October 2013. He joined LexisNexis in April 2009 as Senior Vice President of Practice Management and served in executive management positions from April 2009 to October 2013. Mr. Livingston has, in the past, served as Chief Financial Officer for Celestial Seasonings, Inc., Catalina Marketing Corporation and World Wrestling Entertainment. From 1999 to 2003 he served as President of Financial Executives International, the leading professional association of chief financial officers and controllers. In that role he led the organization’s support of regulatory and corporate governance reforms culminating in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Mr. Livingston is presently a director of the following companies with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act: Ambassadors Group, Inc. and SITO Mobile. In the past, he has served on numerous public and private company boards including Broadsoft Corporation, Insurance Auto Auction, Cott Corporation, MSC Software and Seitel Inc.

LAWRENCE RYCHLAK — Mr. Rychlak joined the Board of Directors in September 2013. Mr. Rychlak was hired by the Company in May 2005 as Chief Financial Officer and was appointed President in October 2009. Following the Merger, Mr. Rychlak continued as the President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining the Company, he worked for Environmental Elements Corporation, where he served as interim president and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2001 to May 2005. Mr. Rychlak’s background also includes several senior financial positions in both for profit and not-for-profit organizations, business consulting with a regional consulting firm and eight years with an international accounting and consulting firm. He is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Accounting and a Master’s degree in Business Administration from Loyola University Maryland.

DAVID SCHNEIDER — Mr. Schneider joined the Board of Directors on November 10, 2014. He is a Partner of 3K Limited Partnership with 20 years of business experience including 15 years in private equity and debt investing. Prior to joining 3K Limited Partnership, for over twelve years Mr. Schneider was with Main Street Resources, a middle market private equity firm. As a Partner with Main Street Resources, Mr. Schneider was responsible for all facets of the firm’s activities including fund raising, deal sourcing and execution, and worked closely with the firm’s portfolio companies at the board and management level. Prior to his service with Main Street Resources, he spent time with J.H. Whitney & Co., an alternative asset investment firm, and MCG Global, a boutique merchant banking firm. Mr. Schneider started his career with Price Waterhouse LLP. He is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a BS from Bryant College and an MBA from Bentley College. Mr. Schneider is presently a Director of The Roberts Company and has served as Director/Advisor for over a dozen companies including Glass America, Morgan Contracting, Vertex Fasteners, Sage Parts Plus, Black Clawson, and Midasco.

Qualifications of Directors

The following table lists the specific experience, qualifications, other attributes and skills of each of the directors that led the Board of Directors to determine that such persons should serve on the Board.


Director		Skills/Qualifications

Peter H. Kamin		Founder of ValueAct Capital, a venture capital firm; Founded and managed Peak Investment L.P. a limited partnership, organized to make investments in a select number of domestic public and private companies; Holds B.A. and MBA degrees.

Philip Livingston		Business and Finance experience gained over 30 years of experience; Previous senior executive experience in a variety of private and public companies and several positions on Boards of Directors; B.A. in Business Management; B.S. degree in Government and Politics; MBA in Finance and Accounting.

Lawrence Rychlak		Business and Finance experience gained over 35 years of experience; Previous senior executive experience in a variety of private and public companies; B.A. degree in Accounting, MBA and a Certified Public Accountant.

David Schneider		Business experience includes directorships on over a dozen companies, significant private equity experience with several firms and currently a partner in 3K Limited Partnership; A strong background in finance including Big Four international accounting experience; B.S. and MBA degrees.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Board of Directors periodically reviews its corporate governance policies and procedures to ensure that the Company meets the highest standards of ethical conduct, reports results with accuracy and transparency, and complies with the laws, rules and regulations that govern the Company’s operations in all material respects.

Committees and Meetings of the Board of Directors

Board of Directors — During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, the Board of Directors held four meetings. During the period he served, no incumbent director attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board held during the year and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees on which the director served during such year. Directors are not required to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders but all persons who were serving as directors at the time of the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders attended that meeting.

Following the completion of the Tender Offer on November 3, 2014 and in accordance with its planned reorganization, former Directors Richard Charpie, Marc L. Dulude, Manu Parpia and Charles D. Yie resigned from the Board of Directors. In addition, the size of the Board was reduced from six to four, and Messrs. Livingston and Schneider were elected to the Board on November 10, 2014 to fill the resulting vacancies. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 and until November 3, 2014, the Board had established a separately-designated Audit Committee and a separately-designated Compensation Committee. The reconstituted Board determined, given its small size and the fact that all but one of the current directors is independent, that the Company would be best served by dissolving those committees and having the full Board of Directors oversee those committee functions directly. Thus, all business that would have previously come before the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee come before the full Board for consideration. Information regarding the former Audit Committee and Compensation Committee is provided below.

Audit Committee — Prior to November 2014, the Company’s Board maintained a separately-designated standing Audit Committee, consisting of Charlie Yie (Chair) and Peter H. Kamin, that was appointed by the Board to oversee the Company’s accounting, financial reporting and internal control functions and the audit of the Company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee’s responsibilities included, among others, direct responsibility for hiring, firing, overseeing the work of and determining the compensation for the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, which reported directly to the Audit Committee. The Board determined that Mr. Yie satisfied the definition of “audit committee financial expert” contained in Item 407 of the SEC’s Regulation S-K. The Board has determined that

Mr. Kamin satisfies the definition of “audit committee financial expert”. The Audit Committee adopted a written charter, which is available on the Company’s Internet website at www.rand.com. As noted above, the full Board of Directors now functions as the Audit Committee.

Nominating Committee — The full Board of Directors acts as a nominating committee for the selection of nominees for election as directors (see “Director Recommendations and Nominations” below). The Board met in this capacity one time during fiscal year 2015. In fulfilling its nominating function, the Board does not operate under a separate charter.

Compensation Committee — Prior to November 2014, Messrs. Yie and Parpia were appointed to serve as the members of the Compensation Committee. As noted above, the full Board of Directors now functions as the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee was charged with reviewing and determining the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and the other members of the senior management of the Company, subject to approval from the full Board. On an annual basis, the Chief Executive Officer evaluates the compensation of the senior management team based on their performance and peer comparisons and makes recommendations to the full Board as to the compensation level for those positions for the coming year. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, the Compensation Committee held one official meeting and did not operate under a written charter.

Executive Officers

Set forth below is information with respect to the individuals who serve as the executive officers of the Company.


Name	Age	Position
Lawrence Rychlak	59	President and Chief Executive Officer
John Kuta	41	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Lawrence Rychlak - Mr. Rychlak became President and Chief Executive Officer on November 10, 2014 following the completion of the Company’s Tender Offer. Information about Mr. Rychlak, including his business experience during the past five years, is set forth above under the heading “BOARD OF DIRECTORS”.

John Kuta - Mr. Kuta became Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on November 10, 2014. Mr. Kuta was hired by the Company in January 2005 to serve as Director of Finance and was promoted to Corporate Controller in August 2007. In early 2011, Mr. Kuta was promoted to Vice President of Finance and Controller. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Kuta worked for American Express Tax & Business Services, the CPA firm of Walpert & Wolfpoff and as an internal auditor for Carefirst of Maryland. Mr. Kuta holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from Towson University and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our directors and/or executive officers.

Indemnification Agreements

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements (the “Indemnification Agreements”) with each of its directors (each, an “Indemnitee” and collectively, the “Indemnitees”). Under the Indemnification Agreements, the Company agreed to indemnify each Indemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by law against any liability arising out of the Indemnitee’s performance of his or her duties to the Company. The indemnification provided by the Indemnification Agreements is in addition to the indemnification required by the Company’s bylaws and applicable law. Among other things, each Indemnification Agreement indemnifies the Indemnitee (and under certain circumstances, investment funds affiliated with the Indemnitee) against certain expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) incurred by the Indemnitee in any action or proceeding, including any action by or in the right of the Company, arising out of the Indemnitee’s service to the Company or to any other entity to which the Indemnitee provides services at the Company’s request. Further, each Indemnification Agreement requires the Company to advance funds to the Indemnitee to cover any expenses the Indemnitee incurs in connection with any proceeding against the Indemnitee as to which the Indemnitee could be indemnified. Each of the director nominees is an Indemnitee.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (“Code of Ethics”) that is designed to promote the highest standards of ethical conduct by the Company’s directors, executive officers and employees, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Company will provide a copy of this document, free of charge, upon request. In the event of an amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of the Company’s Code of Ethics that applies to any of the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, or controller, or persons performing similar functions, the Company intends to promptly disclose such amendment or waiver on its Internet website.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires directors and executive officers of the Company and each person who beneficially owns more than 10% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock to file with the SEC an initial report of beneficial ownership on Form 3 and reports with respect to subsequent changes in beneficial ownership of such securities on Form 4 or Form 5. To the Company’s knowledge, based solely upon the review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company, these persons timely filed all reports required by Section 16(a) during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

~~The~~Compensation ~~information required by this item is contained in the sections~~ of ~~the~~Directors ~~Proxy Statement entitled “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE” and “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” and is incorporated herein by reference.~~

The full Board is responsible for establishing compensation policies and setting directors’ compensation. The following table provides information about the compensation paid to or earned by the Company’s directors during fiscal year 2015 who are not named executive officers (as defined below under the heading “Executive Compensation”). Information regarding directors who are also named executive officers is presented in the Summary Compensation Table that is also provided below. Information with respect to Messrs. Charpie, Dulude and Yie is not included because they waived receipt of, and did not receive, any director compensation, in any form, from the Company during fiscal year 2015.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards ($)⁽¹⁾		Option Awards ($)⁽¹⁾		All Other Compensation ($)⁽²⁾		Total ($)
Peter H. Kamin		86,833		—		—		335		87,168
Philip Livingston		26,667		—		—		1,142		27,809
David Schneider		26,667		—		—		962		27,629

(1)	At June 30, 2015, outstanding stock options held by Messrs. Kamin, Schneider and Livingston were options to purchase 36,000, 18,000 and 18,000 shares, respectively.

(2)	Amounts represent travel reimbursements for attending Board and other Company meetings.

Under the provisions of the current Board Compensation Plan, non-employee members of the Board of Directors receive an annual salary of $40,000 and the Chairman of the Board receives annual salary of $120,000, all of which is paid in quarterly installments. Directors are also eligible to participate in the Company’s Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”). Each non-employee director receives an initial grant of an option to purchase 18,000 shares of Common Stock upon joining the Board, one-third of which vests immediately and the remainder vests in equal installments on the first and second anniversary of the grant date. The exercise price of all non-employee director stock options and the value of stock granted in lieu of cash compensation is the closing price of a share of the Common Stock on the last business day before the options are granted or shares of stock are issued.

Directors who also serve as employees of the Company do not receive separate remuneration for service on the Board.

Executive Compensation

The following table provides detailed information about the remuneration (for services in all capacities) awarded to, earned by, or paid during the last two fiscal years to (i) each individual who served as the Company’s principal executive officer at any time during fiscal year 2015 (the “PEO”), (ii) the Company’s two most highly compensated executive officers

other than the PEO who were serving as executive officers as of June 30, 2015 and who earned more than $100,000 during fiscal year 2015, and (iii) up to two additional individuals for whom information would have been disclosed pursuant to the preceding item (ii) but for the fact that such individuals were not serving as executive officers as of June 30, 2015 (collectively, the “named executive officers”). The Board has determined that Mr. Rychlak, who serves as the Company’s PEO, Mr. Kuta and the Company’s former PEO, Mr. Dulude, constitute the “named executive officers” for purposes of this report. Mr. Dulude served as the Company’s PEO until November 3, 2014,


Summary Compensation Table
Name and principal position	Fiscal Year		Salary ($)		Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Option Awards ($) (1)		All Other Compensation ($) (2)		Total ($)
Lawrence Rychlak		2015		281,000		171,000		—		10,993		462,993
President and Chief Executive Officer		2014		260,068		162,532		68,245		7,757		498,602

John Kuta		2015		164,333		37,000		—		8,301		209,634
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		2014		149,667		50,010		22,655		6,482		228,814

Marc L. Dulude		2015		319,000		—		—		4,087		323,087
Former Chief Executive Officer		2014		313,919		259,142		136,490		7,858		717,409

(1)

For purposes of this table, the value of each equity award reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of that award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, “Accounting for Stock Compensation”. See Note 1 to the consolidated audited financial statements presented elsewhere in this report regarding the assumptions underlying the valuation of equity awards.

(2)	Amount represents employer matching contributions under the Company’s 401(k) plan

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Employment Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

Compensation Philosophy

The full Board is charged with establishing executive compensation. The Board understands and values the vital impact that executive management has in achieving success for the Company and the creation of stockholder value, and it recognizes the highly competitive environment in which the Company must compete for top-level executive management. The overall objective in establishing executive compensation is to ensure that the Company can attract, retain, motivate and reward a high caliber, high performing executive team, which is continually focused on achieving long-term stockholder value. The Board believes that the Company’s compensation program offers a competitive compensation package to all executive employees that takes into account both individual contributions and corporate performance. The Chief Executive Officer plays a role in recommending incentive plan compensation awards to the Board and also serves as a director and votes on compensation matters of the senior management, except for his own compensation.

The Board seeks to accomplish its goals by paying competitive base salaries augmented with performance-based incentives, and securing these benefits and the employment of the executives through written employment agreements when appropriate. Short-term compensation includes both base salary and performance-based cash bonus opportunities, while long-term incentives are generally in the form of equity based awards, with or without performance features. Both cash bonuses and long-term incentive plans align management’s interests with stockholders by incenting earnings growth and providing significant equity interest in the Company.

Base salaries are set at levels intended to foster career development among executives, consistent with the long-term nature of the Company’s business objectives. In setting base salary levels, consideration is given to salary levels paid to executives holding similar positions at other comparable organizations. Annual salary adjustments are determined after considering the executive’s performance during the immediately preceding year.

Employment Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

Mr. Rychlak is a party to an employment agreement with the Company. This agreement entitles him to an annual base salary that is currently set at $290,000 plus an annual bonus targeted at $210,000 for fiscal year 2015, based on his achievement of certain performance goals established from time to time, and subject to annual review by the Compensation Committee. The agreement also entitles Mr. Rychlak to participate in any long term incentive plan that may be adopted by the Board. Mr. Rychlak is also entitled to participate in the Company’s benefit programs to the same extent as, and subject

to the same terms, conditions and limitations applicable to, other employees of the Company, including 401(k) plan participation, life, health, dental, accident and short term and long term disability insurance. The effective date of his agreement is November 1, 2014 and the agreement may be terminated by the Company or Mr. Rychlak at any time without prior notice. If the Company terminates the agreement without “Cause” (as defined in the agreement) or in the event of Mr. Rychlak’s death or disability, then Mr. Rychlak is entitled to salary and benefits continuation for a period of twenty four (24) months provided that he (or his estate, as the case may be) executes and delivers a release and waiver of claims acceptable to the Company within twenty eight (28) days of the termination. The Company will be deemed to have terminated Mr. Rychlak without “Cause” if Mr. Rychlak terminates his agreement and any of the following events occur and the Company does not take action to remedy such event within 30 days of receiving notice from Mr. Rychlak of such event: (i) the Company substantially reduces or diminishes Mr. Rychlak’s duties and responsibilities without Cause; (ii) the Company reduces Mr. Rychlak’s base salary (other than in connection with a proportional reduction of the base salaries of a majority of the executive employees of the Company); or (iii) the Company permanently relocates Mr. Rychlak without his written consent to another primary office unless Mr. Rychlak’s primary office following such relocation is within 25 miles of his primary office immediately before the relocation or his permanent residence immediately prior to the date of his relocation. If Mr. Rychlak is terminated by the Company with Cause or if Mr. Rychlak voluntarily resigns, then he is entitled only to the amount owed for work done prior to the termination or resignation. In connection with his employment agreement, Mr. Rychlak executed an Employee Confidentiality, Assignment of Inventions, Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement (the “Confidentiality Agreement”) pursuant to which he agreed, among other things, not to compete with the Company or any of its affiliates, during the term of his employment or for a period of twelve months following his termination.

Mr. Kuta is not a party to an employment agreement with the Company. Under the terms of his employment, Mr. Kuta receives an annual base salary of $170,000 plus an annual bonus which was targeted at $45,000 for fiscal year 2015, based on his achievement of certain performance goals established from time to time, and subject to annual review by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Kuta is also entitled to participate in the Company’s benefit programs to the same extent as, and subject to the same terms, conditions and limitations applicable to, other employees of the Company, including 401(k) plan participation, life, health, dental, accident and short term and long term disability insurance. At the discretion of the Board, Mr. Kuta may have opportunities to participate in a long term incentive plan that may be adopted by the Board.

Mr. Dulude resigned on November 3, 2014. During his term of service, he was party to an employment agreement with the Company that entitled him to an annual base salary that was set at $319,000 plus an annual bonus targeted at $228,000 for fiscal year 2014, based on his achievement of certain performance goals established from time to time, and subject to annual review by the Compensation Committee. The agreement also entitled Mr. Dulude to participate in any long term incentive plan that may be adopted by the Board. Mr. Dulude was also entitled to participate in the Company’s benefit programs to the same extent as, and subject to the same terms, conditions and limitations applicable to, other employees of the Company, including 401(k) plan participation, life, health, dental, accident and short term and long term disability insurance. The agreement provided that if the Company were to terminate the agreement without “Cause” (as defined in the agreement) or in the event of Mr. Dulude’s death or disability, then Mr. Dulude would be entitled to salary and benefits continuation for a period of twelve (12) months provided that Mr. Dulude (or his estate, as the case may be) executed and delivered a release and waiver of claims acceptable to the Company within twenty eight (28) days of the termination. If Mr. Dulude were terminated by the Company with Cause or if Mr. Dulude were to voluntarily resign, then his agreement provided that he would be entitled only to the amount owed for work done prior to the termination or resignation. In connection with his employment agreement, Mr. Dulude executed a Confidentiality Agreement pursuant to which he agreed, among other things, not to compete with the Company or any of its affiliates, during the term of his employment or for 12 months thereafter. In connection with his resignation, Mr. Dulude received severance in the form of continued base salary for 12 months and the costs associated with continuing his employee benefits during such 12-month period, including medical coverage under the Company’s insurance plans.

Executive Bonuses

The Company maintains an Annual Cash Bonus Plan which is designed to pay out cash bonuses based on the achievement of pre-established levels of annual earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, with adjustments for one-time items (“Adjusted EBITDA target”). For the year ended June 30, 2015, management exceeded the Adjusted EBITDA threshold established by the Board. Messrs. Rychlak and Kuta were awarded bonuses of $171,000 and $37,000, respectively.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation/Equity Based Awards

The Compensation Committee believes that equity based compensation is among the most effective means of creating a long-term link between the interests of the Company’s stockholders and the performance of our organization and its executive team. Vesting schedules for equity based awards also encourage officer retention. To further this objective, the Company has adopted the Omnibus Plan that was presented to, and approved by, its shareholders at the Company’s 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Company previously maintained its 2002 Option Plan and the Avatech Solutions, Inc. Amended and Restricted Stock Award Plan (the “Stock Plan”), both of which have expired by their terms. Stock options granted under the 2002 Option Plan were outstanding at June 30, 2015.

Under the Omnibus Plan, the Compensation Committee may award, and executives are eligible to receive, the following: (i) options to purchase shares of Common Stock at a price equal to the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant; (ii) shares of Common Stock that may be subject to restrictions on transfer pending the vesting of those awards; (iii) stock units, which are similar to a stock award, except that no shares of Common Stock are immediately transferred to the participant and they have no voting rights; (iv) performance units, which represent the right of the participant to receive a share of Common Stock or an amount based on the value of a share of Common Stock, if specified performance goals are met; and/or (v) other stock-based awards that are based on, measured by or payable in shares of Common Stock to anyone eligible to participate in the Omnibus Plan, on such terms and conditions as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate. Under the Omnibus Plan, the number of shares of Common Stock subject to each award, the period of its exercisability and any restrictions imposed on the award are based on competitive market practices, Company performance, and the performance of the participant receiving the award. The Compensation Committee recommends, in its discretion, the form, number, and terms of equity based awards, and the full Board of Directors approves the awards.

The following table sets forth certain information about options under the Company’s equity compensation plans that remain unexercised at June 30, 2015. As of that date, no other forms of equity awards were outstanding.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End


Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date
Lawrence Rychlak		50,000		-0-	$	1.71		9/29/2016
		100,000		-0-	$	0.84		10/29/2017
		278,550		-0-	$	0.70		5/10/2021
		139,275		-0-	$	0.80		5/21/2022
		139,275		-0-	$	0.98		8/21/2023
John Kuta		46,425		-0-	$	0.70		5/10/2021
		46,425		-0-	$	0.80		5/21/2022
		46,425		-0-	$	0.98		8/21/2023

Retirement Benefits

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table provides information, as of June 30, ~~2014~~2015, with respect to all compensation arrangements that we maintain under ~~which~~ which shares of common stock may be issued:

Plan Category

Number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights(a)

Weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights(b)

Number of securitiesremaining available ~~for~~forfuture ~~future~~ issuance underequity compensationplans (excludingsecurities reflected incolumn (a))(c) (1)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

31,~~311~~274,~~745~~575

0.8392

12,~~388~~114,~~641~~671

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

-0-

Total

31,~~311~~274,~~745~~575

0.8392

12,~~388~~114,~~641~~671

(1) This amount represents shares of stock that may be issued under (a) the Avatech Solutions, Inc. Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Plan, which contemplates the grant of shares of common stock upon such terms, including with respect to forfeiture and restrictions of resale and transfer, as the Board deems appropriate, and (b) the ~~Rand Worldwide, Inc.~~ Omnibus ~~Equity Compensation~~ Plan, which, in addition to stock options, permits the grant of stock awards, stock units, performance units, and other stock-based awards in the amounts and types to be determined by the Board of Directors and/or its Compensation Committee.

~~All other information required by this item is contained in the section of the Proxy Statement entitled, “~~BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF VOTING SECURITIES OF RAND WORLDWIDE, INC.” ~~and is incorporated herein by reference.~~

The following table shows information known by the Company, as of September 4, 2015, with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s voting securities by (i) each person or group of persons, other than directors, director nominees, and named executive officers of the Company, to beneficially own more than 5% of the Company’s voting securities, (ii) each of the Company’s current directors, director nominees, and named executive officers, and (iii) all of the current directors, director nominees, and executive officers as a group. Generally, a person “beneficially owns” voting securities if that person has or shares with others the right to vote those securities or to invest (or dispose of) those securities, or if that person has the right to acquire such voting or investment rights, within 60 days of the specified date (such as by exercising stock options or similar rights). The percent of class owned by each such person is calculated based number of securities of such class actually outstanding as of September 4, 2015 plus, for each named person, any such securities that he or she could acquire within 60 days of such date. To the Company’s knowledge, subject to community property laws where applicable, the persons named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of the voting securities shown as beneficially owned by them.


	Common Stock					Series D Convertible Preferred Stock				Series E Convertible Preferred Stock
	Shares Beneficially Owned		Percent of Class			Shares Beneficially Owned		Percent of Class		Shares Beneficially Owned		Percent of Class
Directors, Director Nominees and Named Executive Officers
Peter H. Kamin(¹)		16,869,215		56.6	%		—		—		—		—
Lawrence Rychlak(²)		945,562		3.1	%		—		—		25		4.0	%
John Kuta(³)		139,275		*			—		—		—		—
Philip Livingston(⁴)		21,800		*			—		—		—		—
David Schneider(⁴)		18,000		*			—		—		—		—
Marc Dulude		-0-		*			—		—		—		—
All current directors, director nominees, and executive officers as a group (a total of 6 persons):		17,990,052		58.6	%		—		—		25		4.0	%
5% Holders
Rand Acquisition, LLC(⁵)		9,000,000		30.2	%		—		—		—		—

*	Less than one percent.

(1)

The amount reported for Mr. Kamin includes shares held in his own name as well as (a) 9,000,000 shares of Common Stock held by Rand Acquisition, LLC, which is majority owned by Mr. Kamin; (b) 1,196,219 shares of Common Stock held by 3K Limited Partnership, whose managing partner is Mr. Kamin; (c) 832,635 shares of Common Stock held by the Peter H. Kamin Children’s Trust of which Mr. Kamin serves as trustee, and (d) 36,000 shares of Common Stock subject to exercisable options held by Mr. Kamin.

(2)	The amount reported for Mr. Rychlak includes 200,000 shares of Common Stock, 707,100 shares of Common Stock subject to exercisable options and 38,462 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock.

(3)	Mr. Kuta serves as the Company’s Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. The amount shown for Mr. Kuta is comprised of 139,275 shares of Common Stock subject to exercisable options.

(4)	The amounts shown for Messrs. Livingston and Schneider each include 18,000 shares of Common Stock subject to options.

(5)	The shares reported for Rand Acquisition, LLC are also included in the amount reported for Peter H. Kamin above. Rand Acquisition, LLC’s address is One Avery Street, Boston MA 02111.

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

~~The~~Certain ~~information~~Relationships ~~required by this item is contained in the sections of the Proxy Statement entitled, “CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS”~~ and ~~“CORPORATE~~Related ~~GOVERNANCE”~~Transactions ~~and is incorporated herein by reference.~~

The Company and its subsidiaries have adopted policies and procedures to ensure that related party transactions are reviewed for potential conflicts of interest and that related party transactions are disclosed in SEC reports as and when required by applicable securities laws and regulations. The term “related party transaction” is generally defined as any transaction (or series of related transactions) in which the Company is a participant and the amount involved exceeds the lesser of (i) $120,000 or (ii) one percent of the Company’s average total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any director, director nominee, or executive officer of the Company, any holder of more than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of the Company, or any immediate family member of the foregoing persons will have a direct or indirect interest. The term includes most financial transactions and arrangements, such as loans, guarantees and sales of property, and remuneration for services rendered (as an employee, consultant or otherwise) to the Company. Every related party transaction is reviewed by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and is disclosed to and reviewed by the Board of Directors and is documented in the Corporate minutes. In addition to the Board’s general duties of care and loyalty, the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware requires the Board to review and approve loans that the Company makes to employees and officers to ensure that such loans will benefit the Company.

In the Tender Offer, the Company purchased a total of 25,232,682 shares of common stock that were tendered by RWWI Holdings, LLC for a total of $30,279,218. RWWI Holdings, LLC is majority-owned by funds associated with Ampersand Capital, a private equity firm located in Wellesley, Massachusetts (“Ampersand”). Richard A. Charpie, who served as a director of the Company until November 3, 2014, serves as the Managing Partner of Ampersand, Charles D. Yie, who also served as a director of the Company until November 3, 2014, serves as a Senior Advisor of Ampersand and Marc L. Dulude, who served a director and as Chief Executive Officer of the Company until November 3, 2014, serves as an Operating Partner of Ampersand.

Other than as discussed above, there were no related party transactions during the last two fiscal years, and no related party transaction is currently contemplated for the current fiscal year that have not already been disclosed in the Company’s public filings.

Director Independence

The Board has determined that (i) each of Messrs. Kamin, Livingston and Schneider is an “independent director” as defined by Rule 5605(a)(2) of The NASDAQ Stock Market Rules (the “NASDAQ Rules”), and (ii) Mr. Kamin satisfies the audit committee independence standards of NASDAQ Rule 5605(c)(2). The Board determined that, during their periods of service, (x) each of Mr. Charpie, Mr. Parpia, who served on the Compensation Committee, and Mr. Yie, who served on the Compensation Committee, was an “independent director” as defined by NASDAQ Rule 5605(a)(2), and (y) each of Messrs. Parpia and Yie, who served on the Audit Committee, satisfied the audit committee independence standards of NASDAQ Rule 5605(c)(2). Mr. Rychlak is not an “independent director” because he is the chief executive officer of the Company, and Mr. Dulude was not an “independent director” because he served as the Company’s chief executive officer.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

~~The~~Stegman & Company ~~information~~(“Stegman”) ~~required~~audited bythe ~~this~~Company’s ~~item~~consolidated isfinancial ~~contained~~statements infor the ~~section~~years ofended ~~the Proxy Statement entitled~~June 30, ~~“ACCOUNTING~~2015 ~~FEES AND SERVICES”~~ and ~~is incorporated herein by reference~~2014.

20The following is a description of the fees billed to the Company during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 by Stegman.

Audit Fees

Audit fees include fees paid to Stegman in connection with the annual audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the review of interim financial statements. Audit fees also include fees for services performed by Stegman that are closely related to the audit and in many cases could only be provided by Stegman. Such services include consents related to SEC and other regulatory filings. The aggregate audit fees billed or expected to be billed to the Company by Stegman for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 totaled $169,000 and $153,000, respectively.

Audit Related Fees

Audit related fees include fees paid to Stegman for due diligence services related to accounting consultations, internal control reviews, and employee benefit plan audits. There were no audit related fees billed or expected to be billed to us by Stegman for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.

Tax Fees

Tax fees include fees paid to Stegman for corporate tax compliance, counsel and advisory services. The aggregate tax fees billed or expected to be billed to the Company by Stegman for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 totaled $44,000 and $42,000, respectively.

All Other Fees

There were no other services provided to the Company by Stegman during the years ended June 30, 2015 or 2014.

Approval of Independent Auditor Services and Fees

The Audit Committee reviews all fees charged by our independent registered public accounting firm, and actively monitors the relationship between audit and non-audit services provided. The Audit Committee must pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm and fees charged, subject to the de minimus exceptions for non-audit services described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act. All of the services described above performed by Stegman were pre-approved by the Audit Committee, and none of the fees described above were paid to Stegman pursuant to the “de minimis” exception to the foregoing pre-approval policy.

The Audit Committee has considered the nature and amount of fees billed by Stegman, and believes that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining Stegman’s independence, respectively.

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1) and (2). List of Financial Statements and Schedules.

	Page
Financial Statement Schedule II—Rand Worldwide, Inc. and Subsidiaries Valuation and Qualifying Accounts		22
Financial Statement Schedule II – Rand Worldwide, Inc. and Subsidiaries Valuation and Qualifying Accounts		28
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting		F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2014 and 2013		F-4
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2015 and 2014		F-4
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013		F-6
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014		F-6
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013		F-7
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014		F-7
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013		F-8
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014		F-8
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013		F-10
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014		F-10
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-11

(a)(3) and (b). Exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K

The exhibits filed or furnished with this annual report are listed in the Exhibit List that immediately follows the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented elsewhere in this report, which list is incorporated herein by reference.

(c). Financial Statement Schedule – Schedule II

Rand Worldwide, Inc. and Subsidiaries Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

Description	Balance ~~atbeginning~~atbeginningof ~~ofperiod~~period		Additions						Deductions			Balance at endof period
			Charged tocosts andexpenses			Charged ~~to otheraccounts~~tootheraccounts
Year Ended June 30, 2015:
Deducted from assets accounts:
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	211,000	$	119,000		$	—		$	(150,000	)(1)	$	180,000
Valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets	$	11,029,000	$	(3,015,000	)	$	—		$	—		$	8,014,000
Year Ended June 30, 2014:
Deducted from assets accounts:
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	253,000	$	130,000		$	—		$	(172,000	)(1)	$	211,000
Valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets	$	9,725,000	$	(3,836,000	)	$	5,140,000	(2)	$	—		$	11,029,000
Year Ended June 30, 2013:
Deducted from assets accounts:
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	405,000	$	110,000		$	(117,000	)(3)	$	(145,000	)(1)	$	253,000
Valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets	$	11,691,000	$	(997,000	)	$	(449,000	)(2)	$	(520,000	)(3)	$	9,725,000

(1)	Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries

(2)	Change in valuation allowance, net of temporary differences as discussed in Footnote 11 of the accompanying financial statements

(3) Write-off from disposal of foreign subsidiaries

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By:	/s/ ~~Richard~~Peter AH. ~~Charpie~~Kamin	By:	/s/ ~~Marc~~John ~~L. Dulude~~Kuta
	Director September 29, 2014		Director and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) September 29, 2014
	Director September 15, 2015		Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) September 15, 2015
By:	/s/ ~~Peter~~Philip HB. ~~Kamin~~Livingston	By:	/s/ ~~Manu~~Lawrence ~~Parpia~~Rychlak
	Director September 29, 2014		Director September 29, 2014
	Director September 15, 2015		Director, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) September 15, 2015
By:	/s/ ~~Lawrence~~David ~~Rychlak~~Schneider	~~By:~~	~~/s/ Charles D. Yie~~
	Director, President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) September 29, 2014		Director September 29, 2014
	Director September 15, 2015

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Rand Worldwide, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Index to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements


		Page

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting		F–2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F–3
Consolidated Balance Sheets		F–4
Consolidated Statements of Operations		F–6
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income		F–7
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity		F–8
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		F–10
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F–11

F-1

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Rand Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting because management’s report is not subject to attestation pursuant to Section 989G(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which permits the Company, as a “smaller reporting company”, to provide only this management’s report.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their cost.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s ~~internal~~ internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, ~~2014~~2015 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992 Framework). Based on its assessment and the foregoing criteria, management has concluded that, as of June 30, ~~2014~~2015, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.

September 2915, ~~2014~~2015

/s/ ~~Marc~~Lawrence L.Rychlak ~~Dulude~~ /s/ ~~Lawrence~~John ~~Rychlak~~Kuta President and Chief Executive Officer Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer) (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

F-2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Rand Worldwide, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Rand Worldwide, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015. Company management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of their internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purposes of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Rand Worldwide, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Stegman & Company

Baltimore, Maryland

September 2915, ~~2014~~2015

F-3

Rand Worldwide, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	June 30,
	2014			2013
	2015			2014
Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	92,~~557~~762,000		$	19,~~214~~557,000
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $211,000 and $253,000 in 2014 and 2013		15,290,000			13,097,000
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $180,000 and $211,000 in 2015 and 2014		15,061,000			15,290,000
Income tax receivable		~~1,088,000~~—			~~851~~1,088,000
Other receivables		~~922~~886,000			2922,~~227,~~000
Inventory		~~101~~103,000			27101,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		21,~~021~~038,000			2,~~520~~021,000
Deferred tax assets		~~119~~73,000			~~141~~119,000
Total current assets		2919,~~098~~923,000			2029,~~077~~098,000
Property and equipment:
Computer software and equipment		85,~~160~~095,000			8,~~432~~160,000
Office furniture and equipment		1,~~444~~329,000			1,~~900~~444,000
Leasehold improvements		~~579~~486,000			~~685~~579,000
		10,183,000			11,017,000
		6,910,000			10,183,000
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(75,~~600~~857,000	)		(87,~~379~~600,000	)
		2,583,000			2,638,000
		1,053,000			2,583,000
Customer list, net of accumulated amortization of $7,173,000 and $6,648,000 in 2014 and 2013		2,981,000			3,586,000
Customer list, net of accumulated amortization of $7,652,000 and $7,173,000 in 2015 and 2014		2,502,000			2,981,000
Goodwill		16,~~758~~544,000			1716,~~700~~758,000
Trade name, net of accumulated amortization of $1,549,000 and $1,247,000 in 2014 and 2013		2,382,000			2,684,000
Trade name, net of accumulated amortization of $1,852,000 and $1,549,000 in 2015 and 2014		2,079,000			2,382,000
Deferred income taxes		4,~~732~~364,000			14,~~245~~732,000
Other assets		~~223~~299,000			~~236~~223,000
Total assets	$	5846,~~757~~764,000		$	4858,~~166~~757,000

F-4

Rand Worldwide, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Continued)

	June 30,
	2014			2013
	2015			2014
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	8,901,000		$	7,458,000
Current portion of long term debt	$	3,150,000		$	—
Accrued compensation and related benefits		1,973,000			1,453,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		10,558,000			8,901,000
Deferred revenue		4,227,000			4,255,000
Accrued compensation and related benefits		1,866,000			1,973,000
Obligations under capital leases		188,000			294,000
Deferred revenue		3,303,000			4,227,000
Income tax payable		796,000			—
Obligations under capital leases		—			188,000
Total current liabilities		16,085,000			13,460,000
Income tax payable		195,000			796,000
Total current liabilities		19,072,000			16,085,000
Long-term liabilities:
Obligations under capital leases		~~147,000~~—			~~322~~147,000
Other long-term liabilities		205,000			1,184,000
Notes payable, net of current portion		14,775,000			—
Total liabilities		16,437,000			14,966,000
Other long-term liabilities		—			205,000
Total liabilities		33,847,000			16,437,000
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
Stockholders’ equity:
Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value; 1,300,537 shares authorized, 1,298,728 shares issued; 385,357 shares outstanding at June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013; aggregate liquidation preference of $1,093,000 at June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013		4,000			4,000
Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value; 1,300,537 shares authorized, 1,298,728 shares issued; 343,461 and 385,357 shares outstanding at June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014; aggregate liquidation preference of $838,000 and $1,093,000 at June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively		3,000			4,000
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 80,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding shares of 54,491,296 and 54,000,186 at June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively		545,000			540,000
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 80,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding shares of 29,766,756 and 54,491,296 at June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively		298,000			545,000
Additional paid-in capital		6635,~~028~~714,000			6566,~~497~~028,000
Accumulated deficit		(2523,~~205~~164,000	)		(3325,~~799~~205,000	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		~~948~~66,000			~~958~~948,000
Total stockholders’ equity		4212,~~320~~917,000			3342,~~200~~320,000
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	5846,~~757~~764,000		$	4858,~~166~~757,000

See accompanying notes.

F-5

Rand Worldwide, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

	Years ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014
Revenues:
Product sales	$	4744,~~822~~752,000		$	4147,~~869~~727,000
Service revenue		2320,~~480~~206,000			21,~~764~~005,000
Commission revenue		2021,~~294~~741,000			1820,~~870~~252,000
Total revenue		9186,~~596~~699,000			8288,~~503~~984,000
Cost of revenue:
Cost of product sales		3028,~~547~~821,000			2630,~~282~~534,000
Cost of service revenue		1514,~~763~~145,000			1413,~~540~~925,000
Total cost of revenue		4642,~~310~~966,000			4044,~~822~~459,000
Gross margin		4543,~~286~~733,000			4144,~~681~~525,000
Other operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		3534,~~902~~805,000			3533,~~111~~687,000
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets		~~1,000,000~~—			—1,000,000
Change in the value of contingent consideration		~~(1,089,000~~—	)		—(1,089,000	)
Depreciation and amortization		1,~~915~~448,000			1,~~891~~778,000
Total operating expenses		3736,~~728~~253,000			3735,~~002~~376,000
Operating income		7,~~558~~480,000			49,~~679~~149,000
Other expense:
Interest expense		~~158~~469,000			~~304~~158,000
Currency exchange losses		70683,000			~~110~~70,000
Other expense		(413,000	)		62(4,000	)
		224,000			476,000
		1,165,000			224,000
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		76,~~334~~315,000			48,~~203~~925,000
Income tax (benefit) expense		(1,723,000	)		1,691,000
Income tax expense (benefit)		2,750,000			(1,139,000	)
Income from continuing operations		93,~~057~~565,000			210,~~512~~064,000
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		—(452,000	)		(~~241~~1,007,000	)
Loss on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax		(~~463~~1,072,000	)		(~~370~~463,000	)
Net income		82,~~594~~041,000			18,~~901~~594,000
Preferred stock dividends		(~~109~~95,000	)		(109,000	)
Net income available to common stockholders	$	81,~~485~~946,000		$	18,~~792~~485,000
Earnings (loss) per common share attributable to common shareholders – basic:
Income from continuing operations per common share	$	0.1709		$	0.0419
Loss from discontinued operations per common share		(0.0104	)		(0.0103	)
Earnings per common share attributable to common shareholders – basic	$	0.1605		$	0.0316
Earnings (loss) per common share attributable to common shareholders – diluted:
Income from continuing operations per common share	$	0.1609		$	0.0418
Loss from discontinued operations per common share		(0.0104	)		(0.0103	)
Earnings per common share attributable to common shareholders – diluted	$	0.1505		$	0.0315
Shares used for computing income per common share:
Weighted average shares used in computation—basic		54,210,555			53,951,438
Weighted average shares used in computation - basic		38,328,115			54,210,555
Weighted average shares used in computation—diluted		57,039,061			55,102,436
Weighted average shares used in computation - diluted		40,569,340			57,039,061
See accompanying notes.

~~F-6~~ See accompanying notes.

Rand Worldwide, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

	Years ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014
Net income	$	82,~~594~~041,000		$	18,~~901~~594,000
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net change in cumulative foreign currency translation gain		(10,000	)		(102,000	)
Net change in cumulative foreign currency translation loss		(882,000	)		(10,000	)
Comprehensive income	$	81,~~584~~159,000		$	18,~~799~~584,000

See accompanying notes.

F-7

Rand Worldwide, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

	Convertible Preferred Stock				Common Stock				~~AdditionalPaid-InCapital~~			~~AccumulatedDeficit~~			~~AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome~~			~~Total~~
	Number ofShares		Par Value		Number ofShares		Par Value		AdditionalPaid-InCapital			AccumulatedDeficit			AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome			Total
Balance at July 1, 2012		385,357	$	4,000		53,493,077	$	535,000	$	64,947,000		$	(35,700,000	)	$	1,060,000		$	30,846,000
Balance at July 1, 2013		385,357	$	4,000		54,000,186	$	540,000	$	65,497,000		$	(33,799,000	)		958,000		$	33,200,000
Stock based compensation		—		—		—		—		~~261~~297,000			—			—			~~261~~297,000
Preferred stock dividends		—		—		—		—		(109,000	)		—			—			(109,000	)
Issuance of common stock upon the exercise of options		—		—		9491,~~597~~110		—5,000		3343,000			—			—			3348,000
Issuance of common stock for acquisition		—		—		497,512		5,000		395,000			—			—			400,000
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—		—		—		—		—			—			(10,000	)		(10,000	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—		—		—		—		—			—			(102,000	)		(102,000	)
Net income		—		—		—		—		—			8,594,000			—			8,594,000
Net income		—		—		—		—		—			1,901,000			—			1,901,000
Balance at June 30, 2014		385,357	$	4,000		54,491,296	$	545,000	$	66,028,000		$	(25,205,000	)		948,000		$	42,320,000
Balance at June 30, 2013		385,357	$	4,000		54,000,186	$	540,000	$	65,497,000		$	(33,799,000	)		958,000		$	33,200,000

See accompanying notes.

F-8

Rand Worldwide, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Continued)

	Convertible Preferred Stock						Common Stock						~~AdditionalPaid-InCapital~~			~~AccumulatedDeficit~~			~~AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome~~			~~Total~~
	Number ofShares			~~Par Value~~ParValue			Number ofShares			Par Value			AdditionalPaid-InCapital			AccumulatedDeficit			AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome			Total
Balance at July 1, 2013		385,357		$	4,000			54,000,186		$	540,000		$	65,497,000		$	(33,799,000	)		958,000		$	33,200,000
Balance at July 1, 2014		385,357		$	4,000			54,491,296		$	545,000		$	66,028,000		$	(25,205,000	)		948,000		$	42,320,000
Stock based compensation		—			—			—			—			~~297~~566,000			—			—			~~297~~566,000
Preferred stock dividends		—			—			—			—			(109,000	)		—			—			(109,000	)
Issuance of common stock upon the exercise of stock options		—			—			218,000			2,000			171,000			—			—			173,000
Issuance of common stock upon the exercise of options		—			—			491,110			5,000			343,000			—			—			348,000
Conversion of preferred stock into common stock		(41,896	)		(1,000	)		437,250			5,000			(4,000	)		—			—			—
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—			—			—			—			—			—			(10,000	)		(10,000	)
Cashless exercise of stock options		—			—			470,155			5,000			(5,000	)		—			—			—
Net income		—			—			—			—			—			8,594,000			—			8,594,000
Stock purchased through tender offer		—			—			(25,849,945	)		(259,000	)		(30,762,000	)		—			—			(31,021,000	)
Balance at June 30, 2014		385,357		$	4,000			54,491,296		$	545,000		$	66,028,000		$	(25,205,000	)		948,000		$	42,320,000
Payment of taxes upon the exercise of stock options		—			—			—			—			(185,000	)		—			—			(185,000	)
Preferred stock dividends		—			—			—			—			(95,000	)		—			—			(95,000	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—			—			—			—			—			—			(882,000	)		(882,000	)
Net income		—			—			—			—			—			2,041,000			—			2,041,000
Balance at June 30, 2015		343,461		$	3,000			29,766,756		$	298,000		$	35,714,000		$	(23,164,000	)		66,000		$	12,917,000

See accompanying notes.

F-9

Rand Worldwide, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	~~Years ended~~		Years ended
	June 30, 2014				June 30, 2013
			June 30, 2015				June 30, 2014
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	~~8,594,000~~	$	2,041,000	$	~~1,901,000~~	$	8,594,000
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Bad debt expense		130,000				110,000
Noncash portion of loss from discontinued operations				231,000				—
Depreciation and amortization		1,915,000				1,891,000
Loss on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax				1,486,000				—
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets		1,000,000				—
Bad debt expense				119,000				130,000
Change in the value of contingent consideration		(1,089,000	)			—
Depreciation and amortization				1,448,000				1,915,000
Stock-based compensation		297,000				261,000
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets				—				1,000,000
Deferred income taxes		(3,465,000	)			1,268,000
Change in the value of contingent consideration				—				(1,089,000	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Stock-based compensation				566,000				297,000
Accounts receivable and other receivables		(1,018,000	)			3,659,000
Deferred income taxes				414,000				(3,465,000	)
Income tax receivable		(237,000	)			(570,000	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Inventory		(74,000	)			80,000
Accounts receivable and other receivables				(616,000	)			(1,018,000	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		499,000				(436,000	)
Income tax receivable				1,088,000				(237,000	)
Other assets		13,000				134,000
Inventory				(2,000	)			(74,000	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		1,844,000				(3,030,000	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets				(610,000	)			499,000
Accrued compensation and related benefits		520,000				(351,000	)
Other assets				(76,000	)			13,000
Deferred revenue		(28,000	)			(411,000	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses				1,310,000				1,844,000
Income taxes payable		796,000				—
Accrued compensation and related benefits				(161,000	)			520,000
Other long-term liabilities		(291,000	)			139,000
Deferred revenue				552,000				(28,000	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		9,406,000				4,645,000
Income taxes payable				(601,000	)			796,000
Cash flows from investing activities
Other long-term liabilities				(205,000	)			(291,000	)
Purchases of property and equipment		(1,059,000	)			(1,032,000	)
Net cash provided by operating activities				6,984,000				9,406,000
Purchase of Informative Design Partners		—				(600,000	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Net cash used in by investing activities		(1,059,000	)			(1,632,000	)
Purchases of property and equipment				(370,000	)			(1,059,000	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations				500,000				—
Proceeds from borrowings under line of credit		78,680,000				63,992,000
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities				130,000				(1,059,000	)
Repayment of borrowings under line of credit		(78,680,000	)			(67,132,000	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Principal payments on capital lease obligations		(281,000	)			(288,000	)
Proceeds from borrowings under line of credit				5,324,000				78,680,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock to employees		348,000				3,000
Repayment of borrowings under line of credit				(5,324,000	)			(78,680,000	)
Payment of preferred stock dividends		(109,000	)			(109,000	)
Proceeds of borrowings under term note				21,000,000				—
Net cash used in financing activities		(42,000	)			(3,534,000	)
Repayment of borrowings under term note				(3,075,000	)			—
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash from continuing operations		38,000				55,000
Principal payments on capital lease obligations				(97,000	)			(281,000	)
Net change in cash		8,343,000				(466,000	)
Stock repurchased through tender offer				(31,021,000	)			—
Cash—beginning of year		1,214,000				1,680,000
Payment of taxes upon the exercise of stock options				(185,000	)			—
Cash—end of year	$	9,557,000			$	1,214,000
Payment of preferred stock dividends				(95,000	)			(109,000	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon the exercise of stock options				173,000				348,000
Net cash used in financing activities				(13,300,000	)			(42,000	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash from continuing operations				(609,000	)			38,000
Net change in cash				(6,795,000	)			8,343,000
Cash - beginning of year				9,557,000				1,214,000
Cash - end of year			$	2,762,000			$	9,557,000

See accompanying notes.

F-10

Rand Worldwide, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

When used throughout these notes, the terms “Rand Worldwide”, “the Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Rand Worldwide, Inc. and, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, its consolidated subsidiaries.

Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation

Rand Worldwide, Inc. is a leading supplier in the design automation, facilities and data management software marketplace. Rand Worldwide also provides value-added services, such as training, technical support, ~~hosted data archiving solutions~~ and other consulting and professional services to businesses, government agencies and educational institutions worldwide.

The Company is organized into ~~three~~four divisions: IMAGINiT Technologies (“IMAGINiT”), ~~Enterprise~~Rand ~~Applications~~3D, Facilities Management, and ASCENT – Center for Technical Knowledge (“ASCENT”).

The IMAGINiT division is one of the largest value-added resellers of Autodesk, Inc. (“Autodesk”) products in the world, providing Autodesk solutions and value-added services to customers in the manufacturing, infrastructure, building, and media and entertainment industries. IMAGINiT also specializes in computational fluid dynamics analysis consulting and thermal simulation services and sells its own proprietary software products and related services, enhancing its total client solution offerings. IMAGINiT operates in the United States and Canada.

The ~~Enterprise~~Rand ~~Applications~~3D division ~~is the non-Autodesk component of the business and~~ offers ~~various products and services including data governance solutions, facilities management solutions and~~ 3DExperience products from Dassault Systèmes which include CATIA, ENOVIA, SIMULIA, DELMIA, and DMU. ~~Enterprise~~Rand ~~Applications~~3D also specializes in training solutions for Dassault Systèmes and PTC products including Pro/ENGINEER, CREO, and Windchill. In December 2013, the Rand Secure Archive division within Enterprise Applications expanded its range of data governance solutions with the addition of data backup. To reflect this evolution beyond data archiving and eDiscovery, this division has changed its name to Rand Secure Data.

The Facilities Management Division offers ARCHIBUS products for facilities management software for space planning, strategic planning, and lease/property administration, and provides a full range of training, consulting and support services for the ARCHIBUS products.

ASCENT is the courseware division of Rand Worldwide and is a leading developer of professional training materials and knowledge products for engineering software tools.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Inventory

Inventory consists of packaged computer hardware and software and is stated at the lower of first-in, first-out cost, or market.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation for computer software and equipment and office furniture and equipment is provided for by the straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging from three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the lease term or the useful life of the asset using the straight-line method. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

F-11

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Excluding Goodwill

Long-lived assets, excluding goodwill, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets may not be fully recoverable. These events or changes in circumstances may include a significant deterioration of operating results, changes in business plans, or changes in anticipated future cash flows. If an impairment ~~indicator~~ indicator is present, the Company evaluates recoverability by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. Assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows generated by other asset groups. If the assets are impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the assets. Fair value is generally determined by estimates of discounted cash flows. The discount rate used in any estimate of discounted cash flows would be the rate required for a similar investment of like risk. ~~During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, the Company recorded impairment charges of $80,000 against its acquired customer list of the CFD consulting business that was acquired in July 2012.~~

Goodwill

Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired in purchase business combinations. The Company accounts for goodwill in accordance with Financial Standards Accounting Board Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Under ASC 350, goodwill is subject to annual impairment tests or more frequently when events and circumstances occur indicating that recorded goodwill may be impaired. Impairment is the condition that exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The implied fair value of goodwill is the amount determined by deducting the estimated fair value of all tangible and identifiable intangible net assets of the reporting unit to which goodwill has been allocated from the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. If the recorded value of goodwill exceeds its implied value, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, the Company recorded impairment charges of $920,000 against its goodwill of the CFD consulting business that was acquired in July 2012. While the CFD business is consistently profitable and experiencing growth in revenue, its earnings have been less than the levels forecasted at the time of the acquisition. Following an assessment of the fair value of the CFD business, impairment charges were recorded to reduce the book value of goodwill.

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill during the ~~twelve~~year ~~months~~ ended June 30, ~~2014~~ 2015 is as follows:

Balance as of June 30, 2013	$	17,700,000
Balance as of July 1, 2013	$	17,700,000
Impairment charges		(920,000	)
Effect of foreign currency translation		(22,000	)
Balance as of June 30, 2014	$	16,758,000
Effect of foreign currency translation		(214,000	)
Balance as of June 30, 2015	$	16,544,000

Stock Options and Stock Granted to Employees

The Company applies ASC 718-10, Share-Based Payment, which requires companies to measure the cost of share-based awards to employees based on the grant-date fair value of the award using an option pricing model, and to recognize that cost over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options granted to employees and recognizes the compensation cost of employee share-based awards in its statement of operations using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the award, net of estimated forfeitures.

FThe use of the Black-12Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of share-based awards requires that the Company make certain assumptions and estimates for required inputs to the model, including (i) the fair value of the Company’s common stock at each grant date, (ii) the expected volatility of the Company’s common stock value based on industry comparisons, (iii) the expected life of the share-based award, (iv) the risk-free interest rate, and (v) the dividend yield. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option

~~The use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of share-based awards requires~~ that the Company make certain assumptions and estimates for required inputs to the model, including (i) the fair value of the Company’s common stock at each grant date, (ii) the expected volatility of the Company’s common stock value based on industry comparisons, (iii) the expected life of the share-based award, (iv) the risk-free interest rate, and (v) the dividend yield. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model. ~~The Black-Scholes option pricing model~~ was developed for estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility.

Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable

The Company’s revenue recognition policies are in accordance with ASC 985-685, Software – Revenue Recognition, and ASC 605-20, Revenue Recognition.

Revenue from product sales and the sale of developed software is recognized when the following four criteria are met: (i) an executed proposal or signed purchase order has been obtained; (ii) delivery of the software has occurred; (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable; and (iv) the fee is probable of collection. Software product sales billed and not recognized as revenue are included in deferred revenue. The Company generally does not require collateral for accounts receivable. The Company allows returns from customers in limited situations. The Company has historically not experienced significant returns, and accordingly, allowances for returned products are not recorded.

Product Sales

For revenue derived from license fees for packaged software products, the Company follows ASC 985-605, Software-Revenue Recognition, and ASC 605-10, Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of software licenses and training materials upon shipment of the products, provided that evidence of the arrangement exists, the arrangement fee is fixed or determinable, and collection of the related receivable is probable and free of contingencies.

Service Revenue

Revenue from installation, training and consulting services is recognized upon completion of the requested service, which typically occurs within ninety days of receipt of an order. Support services are sold either in prepaid blocks of hours which typically expire in one year, or as annual contracts for unlimited support for a specified number of users and products supported. Prepaid support service revenue is recognized monthly based upon usage with unused balances recognized in full upon expiration. Annual support contract revenues are recognized ratably over the contract period. Revenue from the Rand Secure Archive hosted data archiving solution is recognized ratably over the contract period. Installation and consulting services provided by the Company are not considered essential to the functionality of any software products sold as those services do not alter the functionality or capabilities of the product and could be performed by customers or other vendors.

Commission Revenue

Fees earned from the resale of Autodesk’s software support agreements are reported as commission revenue and presented net of their related costs. For these transactions, the Company considers Autodesk to be the primary obligor in the arrangement as Autodesk has the responsibility of providing the end-customer all the deliverables under the contract, including software upgrades and various support services. As a result, the Company assumes an agency relationship in these transactions, and recognizes the net fee associated with serving as an agent in revenue.

FThe Company earns a rebate from its primary supplier, Autodesk, for its qualifying renewal subscriptions, which increase gross profits and the corresponding commission revenues on such sales. The rebates on renewal subscriptions are paid monthly and are accrued in accordance with ASC 605-1350, Customer Payments and Incentives¸ in the month the underlying sales are posted.

The Company earns a rebate from its primary supplier, Autodesk, for its qualifying renewal subscriptions, which increase gross profits and the corresponding commission revenues on such sales. The rebates on renewal subscriptions are paid monthly and are accrued in accordance with ASC 605-50, Customer Payments and Incentives, in the month the underlying sales are posted.

Commissions revenue also includes referral fees paid by Autodesk for major account and government customer transactions, determined based on specified percentages of the amount billed by Autodesk to the referred customer. These referral fees are recorded as revenue in the period earned, based on reporting by Autodesk, and are typically settled within ten days following the end of the reporting period.

Multiple-Element Arrangements

The Company’s arrangements with its customers may involve the sale of one or more products and services at the same time. The Company considers these to be multiple elements of a single arrangement. The Company follows ASC 605-25, Multiple-Element Arrangements. We allocate the total arrangement consideration to each separable element based on the relative selling price of each element in accordance with selling price hierarchy, which includes: vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) if available; third party evidence (“TPE”) if VSOE is not available; and best estimate of selling price if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. In general, the Company uses VSOE to allocate the selling price to each element. Arrangement consideration allocated to undelivered elements is deferred until delivery of the individual elements.

Fixed or Determinable Fee

Management assesses whether the total fee payable to the Company for the order is fixed or determinable and free of contingencies at the time of delivery. Management considers the payment terms of the transaction, including whether the terms are extended, and its collection experience in similar transactions that did not require concessions, among other factors. If the total consideration payable to the Company is not fixed or determinable, revenue is recognized only as payments become due from the customer, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

Customer Acceptance Criteria

If an arrangement includes customer acceptance criteria, the Company defers all revenue from the arrangement until acceptance is received or the acceptance period has lapsed, unless those acceptance criteria only require that the product perform in accordance with the software vendor’s standard published product specifications. If a customer’s obligation to pay the Company is contingent upon a future event, such as installation or acceptance, the Company defers all revenue from the arrangement until that event has occurred.

Deferred Revenue

Deferred product revenue is comprised of amounts that have been invoiced to customers upon delivery of a product, but are not yet recognizable as revenue because one or more of the conditions required for revenue recognition have not yet been met. Deferred service revenue represents amounts invoiced to customers for telephone support contracts or maintenance and support contracts, which are recognized ratably as revenue over the term of the arrangements, or for installation, training or professional services that have not yet been performed.

Product Returns

The Company’s arrangements with customers do not contain any rights of product return, other than those related to standard warranty provisions that permit replacement of defective goods. As of June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and June 30, ~~2013~~2014, the Company had no reserve recorded for product returns because such returns have historically been insignificant.

F-14

Shipping and Handling Fees

The Company records as revenue any amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling costs, and it records as cost of revenue its actual shipping costs incurred.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company uses estimates to determine the amount of the allowance for doubtful accounts necessary to reduce accounts receivable to its expected net realizable value. The Company estimates the amount of the required allowance by reviewing the status of past-due receivables and analyzing historical bad debt trends. Actual collection experience has not varied significantly from estimates, due primarily to credit policies, collection experience, and a lack of concentration of accounts receivable. The Company charges-off receivables deemed to be uncollectible to the allowance for doubtful accounts.

Cost of Product Sales

Cost of product sales consists of the cost of purchasing products from software suppliers or hardware manufacturers as well as the associated shipping and handling costs. The Company earns a volume-based rebate from its primary supplier, Autodesk, paid monthly as a percentage of qualifying purchases. The rebate percentage is established based on the level of new product and subscription purchases as measured against quarterly targets developed by Autodesk. These rebates serve to reduce the cost of product sales. The Company accrues its rebates the month the underlying sales are posted, in accordance with ASC 605-50, Customer Payments and Incentives. The Company has generally been able to focus its sales efforts in a manner to achieve margins on its product sales that are within a relatively narrow range from period to period.

Cost of Service Revenue

Cost of service revenue consists primarily of direct employee compensation of all service personnel, the cost of subcontracted services and direct expenses billable to customers. Cost of service revenue does not include an allocation of overhead costs.

Advertising and Marketing Costs

The Company’s marketing activities performed and executed over the course of the year include public relations, tradeshows, email campaigns, social media, website development and enhancement, marketing automation initiatives, virtual events, advertising and promotions as well as ongoing branding efforts. The Company receives funding from its primary vendor, Autodesk, which offsets a portion of the costs incurred for marketing and advertising. Marketing and advertising costs are expensed as incurred, net of vendor funding and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of operations. Advertising expenses, net of reimbursements from suppliers, were immaterial for the years ~~ended~~ ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and June 30, ~~2013~~2014.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income and foreign currency translation adjustments. During the years ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and June 30, ~~2013~~2014, unrealized foreign currency translation losses of $10882,000 and $~~102~~10,000, respectively, were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income within stockholders’ equity.

Income Taxes

The Company uses the liability method to account for income taxes. Income tax expense includes income taxes currently payable and deferred taxes arising from temporary differences between financial reporting and income tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred income taxes are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Income tax expense, if any, consists of the taxes payable for the current period. Valuation allowances are established when the realization of deferred tax assets are not considered more likely than not. The Company records liabilities from uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740-10, Income Taxes. The Company believes that its income tax filing positions taken or expected to be taken in its tax returns will more likely than not be sustained upon audit by the taxing authorities and does not anticipate any adjustments that will results in a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flow. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax position have been recorded. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded as part of income tax expense. The Company’s income tax returns for the past three years are subject to examination by tax authorities, and may change upon examination.

F-15

will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Income tax expense, if any, consists of the taxes payable for the current period. Valuation allowances are established when the realization of deferred tax assets are not considered more likely than not. The Company records liabilities from uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740-10, Income Taxes. The Company believes that its income tax filing positions taken or expected to be taken in its tax returns will more likely than not be sustained upon audit by the taxing authorities and does not anticipate any adjustments that will results in a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flow. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax position have been recorded. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded as part of income tax expense. The Company’s income tax returns for the past three years are subject to examination by tax authorities, and may change upon examination.

Foreign Currency Translation

Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries, whose functional currencies are the respective local currencies, are translated into U.S. dollars at the current rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet dates. Revenues and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the period. The resulting translation adjustments are included as a separate component of stockholders’ deficit in the consolidated balance sheets within accumulated other comprehensive income. Foreign currency transaction gains or losses resulting from the re-measurement of monetary assets and liabilities stated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in the Company’s results of operations.

In addition, for the years ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, realized currency transaction losses from operations of $683,000 and $70,000, respectively, were recorded in the statement of operations.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year financial statement amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

2. Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information

The Company paid interest of approximately $32386,000 and $8132,000, and paid federal and state taxes of approximately $~~182,000~~2.6 million and $~~124~~182,000, respectively, for the years ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and June 30, ~~2013~~2014. The majority of taxes paid during the year ended June 30, 2015 were federal income taxes. During the year ended June 30, 2014, the Company paid no federal income taxes because the Company utilized net operating losses to reduce its federal tax liability; taxes paid during that period were state income taxes.

In3. ~~connection~~Borrowings ~~with~~Under ~~the~~Line ~~acquisition~~ of ~~Informative Design~~Credit ~~Partners~~and ~~(“IDP”)~~Note onPayable ~~July 31, 2012, the Company issued 497,512 shares of its common stock with a value of $400,000.~~

3On February 29, 2012, the Company entered into an $8 million line of credit facility, including a $1,000,000 sublimit for the issuance of standby or trade letters of credit, with PNC Bank, National Association (“PNC”). ~~Business~~The ~~Combinations~~interest rate was the “Eurodollar Rate”, which was calculated by using the LIBOR rate, plus a margin of 2.0%. The Company had no outstanding borrowings from PNC under its credit line of as of June 30, 2014. The line expired on November 30, 2014.

~~Acquisition~~On November 4, 2014, the Company entered into two credit facilities with JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association (“Chase”) which replaced the Company’s existing facilities with PNC. The first is a five-year $10 million line of ~~Informative~~credit, ~~Design~~secured ~~Partners~~by all assets of the Company with borrowing levels subject to borrowing base limits. The interest rate on the line of credit is the LIBO rate, plus a margin of 2.5%. The second facility is a five-year $21 million term loan with an interest rate equal to the LIBO rate, plus a margin of 3.15%. The principal of this loan is amortized over five years with quarterly repayments of $787,500 for the first two years, $1,050,000 for the third year, and $1,312,500 for the fourth and fifth years. The new loans contain certain financial covenants including a maximum leverage ratio, a maximum fixed charge coverage ratio, and minimum adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The Company was in compliance with the loans’ financial covenants during the year ended June 30, 2015. The Company had no outstanding borrowings from Chase under its line of credit as of June 30, 2015.

OnPrincipal ~~July 31,~~payments ~~2012,~~on the ~~Company~~term ~~acquired~~loan ~~certain~~are ~~assets~~due ofas ~~Informative~~follows: Design Partners for an initial payment of $1 million, comprised of $600,000 in cash and $400,000 in common stock, plus contingent consideration to be paid over three years based on earnings achieved from the acquired business.

4. Borrowings Under Line of Credit


Year ending June 30:
2016	$	3,150,000
2017		3,675,000
2018		4,725,000
2019		5,250,000
2020		1,125,000

Total payments	$	17,925,000

F-16

54. Preferred Stock

The Company’s preferred stock included in the equity section of the accompanying consolidated balance sheets consists of the following as of June 30, 2015 ~~2014~~ and ~~2013~~2014:

	June 30
	2014		2013
	2015		2014
Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value; 1,297,537 shares authorized and issued; and 384,495 shares outstanding at June 30, 2014 and 2013; aggregate liquidation preference of $231,000 at June 30, 2014 and 2013,	$	4,000	$	4,000
Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value; 1,297,537 shares authorized and issued; and 342,829 and 384,495 shares outstanding at June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively; aggregate liquidation preference of $206,000 and $231,000 at June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively	$	3,000	$	4,000
Series E Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value; 3,000 shares authorized; 1,191 shares issued; 862 shares outstanding at June 30, 2014 and 2013; aggregate liquidation preference of $862,000 at June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively		—		—
Series E Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value; 3,000 shares authorized; 1,191 shares issued; 632 and 862 shares outstanding at June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively; aggregate liquidation preference of $632,000 and $862,000 at June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively		—		—
Total Preferred Stock	$	43,000	$	4,000

Convertible Preferred Stock

In 2004, the Company issued 813,050 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock for cash proceeds totaling $330,000 and a reduction in notes payable to a related party of $98,000. At June 30, ~~2014~~ 2015 and ~~2013~~2014, 342,829 shares and 384,495 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, respectively, were outstanding with the following terms:

Redemption Feature- The Series D shares are redeemable in the event that the Company is engaged in a business combination that is approved by the Board of Directors and subsequently submitted and approved by a vote of the Company’s stockholders. The 2010 merger with pre-merger Rand Worldwide did not trigger any redemption provisions of the Series D shares. Any director who holds shares of Series D is not eligible to vote on the proposed business combination. The redemption price is $0.30 (upon conversion) per share plus an amount equal to all declared and unpaid dividends accrued on such shares since the original issue date.

Voting Rights- Each holder of the Series D shares shall vote together with all other classes and series of stock of the Company as a single class on all actions. Each share shall entitle the holder to one vote per share of common stock into which the preferred stock is then convertible on each such action. In addition, these holders have special voting rights in connection with certain matters, including the issuance of senior stock or debentures, certain mergers, the dissolution of the Company and any amendment to the charter or the terms of the securities that would impair their rights.

Dividend Rate- The holders of the Series D shares are entitled to receive cumulative dividends at a rate of 10% per annum when and as declared by the Board of Directors. Dividends are paid quarterly to preferred stockholders.

Conversion Feature- The Series D shares are convertible at any time beginning 120 days after the original issuance date at the option of the holder and automatically converts into common stock if the common stock trades for more than $2.25 per share for 60 consecutive trading days. Each Series D share is convertible into shares of common stock by multiplying the appropriate conversion rate in effect by the number of shares of preferred stock being converted. As of June 30, ~~2014~~2015, the conversion rate would yield approximately two shares of common stock for each share of Series D share; however, this rate may be adjusted due to stock splits, dividends, and other events defined in the stock purchase agreement between the Company and the holders of the Series D shares.

Liquidation Preference- In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the holders of Series D shares are entitled to receive for each share, prior and in preference to any distribution of any of the assets or surplus funds to the holders of common stock, an amount equal to $0.3060 per share plus all accumulated but unpaid dividends. If upon ~~the~~ the occurrence of such event, the assets and funds thus distributed among the holders are insufficient to permit the payment of the preferential amount, then the entire assets and funds of the Company legally available for distribution shall be distributed ratably among the preferred stockholders.

F-17

In July 2005, the Company issued 1,191 shares of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock which raised $1,191,000 for working capital purposes. At June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, 632 shares and 862 shares of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series E shares”), respectively, were outstanding with the following terms:

Redemption Feature- The Series E shares are redeemable in the event that the Company is engaged in a business combination that is approved by the Board of Directors and subsequently submitted and approved by a vote of the Company’s stockholders. The 2010 merger with pre-merger Rand Worldwide did not trigger any redemption provisions of the Series E shares. Any director who holds shares of Series E is not eligible to vote on the proposed business combination. The redemption price is $0.65 per share (upon conversion) plus an amount equal to all declared and unpaid dividends accrued on such shares since the original issue date.

Voting Rights- Each holder of the Series E shares shall vote together with all other classes and series of stock of the Company as a single class on all actions. Each share shall entitle the holder to one vote per share of common stock into which the preferred stock is then convertible on each such action. In addition, these holders have special voting rights in connection with certain matters, including the issuance of senior stock or debentures, certain mergers, the dissolution of the Company and any amendment to the charter or the terms of the securities that would impair their rights.

Dividend Rate- The holders of the Series E shares are entitled to receive cumulative dividends at a rate of 10% per annum when and as declared by the Board of Directors. Dividends are paid quarterly to preferred stockholders.

Conversion Feature- The Series E shares are convertible at any time beginning 120 days after the original issuance date at the option of the holder and automatically converts into common stock if the common stock trades for more than $2.25 per share for 60 consecutive trading days. Each Series E share is convertible into shares of common stock by multiplying the appropriate conversion rate in effect by the number of shares of preferred stock being converted. As of June 30, ~~2014~~2015, the conversion rate would yield 1,538.5 shares of common stock for each share of Series E; however, this rate may be adjusted due to stock splits, dividends, and other events defined in the stock purchase agreements between the Company and the holders of the Series E shares.

Liquidation Preference- In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the holders of Series E shares are entitled to receive for each share, prior and in preference to any distribution of any of the assets or surplus funds to the holders of common stock, an amount equal to $0.65 per share (upon conversion) plus all accumulated but unpaid dividends. If upon the occurrence of such event, the assets and funds thus distributed among the holders are insufficient to permit the payment of the preferential amount, then the entire assets and funds of the Company legally available for distribution shall be distributed ratably among the preferred stockholders.

F-18

65. Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net earnings (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Such outstanding shares include those issued through equity compensation plans, Board compensation, and the exercise of stock warrants. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share include the potential dilution that would occur from common shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants and the conversion of preferred stock. As of June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, 52,~~407~~933,~~529~~112 and 5,~~584~~407,~~413~~529 shares of common stock, respectively, were issuable upon the conversion or exercise of options and preferred stock. For the years ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, ~~272~~91,~~750~~000 and 1272,~~850,651~~750 shares of common stock equivalents, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been antidilutive. The following summarizes the computations of basic and diluted earnings per common share:

	Years ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:
Net income from continuing operations	$	93,~~057~~565,000		$	210,~~512~~064,000
Payment of preferred stock dividends		(~~109~~95,000	)		(109,000	)
Net income from continuing operations available to common stockholders		83,~~948~~470,000			29,~~403~~955,000
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		—(452,000	)		(~~241~~1,007,000	)
Loss on disposition of discontinued operations, net of tax		(463,000	)		(370,000	)
Loss on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax		(1,072,000	)		(463,000	)
Net income available to common stockholders	$	81,~~485~~946,000		$	18,~~792~~485,000
Weighted average shares used in computing basic net earnings per share:		5438,~~210~~328,~~555~~115			5354,~~951~~210,~~438~~555
Assumed conversion of preferred stock		21,~~095~~658,~~784~~537			~~769~~2,~~630~~095,784
Effect of outstanding stock options		~~732~~582,~~722~~688			~~381~~732,~~368~~722
Weighted average shares used in computing diluted net earnings per share:		5740,~~039~~569,~~061~~340			5557,~~102~~039,~~436~~061
Earnings (loss) per common share attributable to common stockholders – basic
Income from continuting operations per common share	$	0.17		$	0.04
Income from continuing operations per common share	$	0.09		$	0.19
Loss from discontinued operations per common share		(0.0104	)		(0.0103	)
Earnings per common share attributable to common shareholders – basic	$	0.1605		$	0.0316
Earnings (loss) per common share attributable to common stockholders – diluted
Income from continuting operations per common share	$	0.16		$	0.04
Income from continuing operations per common share	$	0.09		$	0.18
Loss from discontinued operations per common share		(0.0104	)		(0.0103	)
Earnings per common share attributable to common shareholders – diluted	$	0.1505		$	0.0315

~~F-19~~ 6. Intangible Assets

7. Intangible Assets

The following is a summary of the carrying amount, accumulated amortization and the resulting net book value of intangible assets:

June 30, 2015


	Carrying amount		Accumulated amortization		Impairment charge		Net book value
Customer list	$	10,154,000	$	7,652,000	$	—	$	2,502,000
Trade name		3,931,000		1,852,000		—		2,079,000
Intellectual property		1,324,000		1,324,000		—		—

Total intangible assets	$	15,409,000	$	10,828,000	$	—	$	4,581,000

June 30, 2014

	Carrying amount		Accumulatedamortization		Impairmentcharge		Net book value
	Carryingamount		Accumulatedamortization		Impairmentcharge		Net book value
Customer list	$	10,234,000	$	7,173,000	$	80,000	$	2,981,000
Trade name		3,931,000		1,549,000		—		2,382,000
Intellectual property		1,324,000		1,324,000		—		—
Total intangible assets	$	15,489,000	$	10,046,000	$	80,000	$	5,363,000

Amortization expense for intangible assets for the years ended June 30, ~~2013~~2015 and June 30, 2014 was $782,000 and $828,000, respectively. Future estimated amortization expense for intangibles assets is as follows: $752,000 in 2016, $709,000 in 2017, $431,000 in 2018, $377,000 in 2019, $377,000 in 2020 and $1,935,000 thereafter.

	Carrying amount		Accumulatedamortization		Impairmentcharge		Net book value
Customer list	$	10,234,000	$	6,648,000	$	—	$	3,586,000
Trade name		3,931,000		1,247,000		—		2,684,000
Intellectual property		1,324,000		1,324,000		—		—
Total intangible assets	$	15,489,000	$	9,219,000	$	—	$	6,270,000

While the CFD business is consistently profitable and experiencing growth in revenue, its earnings have been less than the levels forecasted at the time of the acquisition. Following an assessment of the fair value of the CFD business, impairment charges were recorded to reduce the book value of goodwill and the value of the acquired customer list.

Amortization expense for intangible assets for the years ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 was $828,000 and $845,000, respectively. Future estimated amortization expense for intangibles assets is as follows: $781,000 in 2015, $752,000 in 2016, $709,000 in 2017, $431,000 in 2018, $377,000 in 2019 and $2,313,000 thereafter.

8. Director and Employee Stock Compensation Plans

Employee Stock Option Plans

On November 7, 2012, the Company’s stockholders approved the Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”). The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors administers the Omnibus Plan and, in that capacity, has the exclusive authority to grant various incentive awards under the Omnibus Plan in the form of stock options, stock awards, stock units, performance units, and other stock-based awards. Up to 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock are available for issuance to participants under the Omnibus Plan. The Omnibus Plan is available to all employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, including employees who are officers or members of the Board, and all non-employee directors and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries. Prior to the adoption of the Omnibus Plan, the Board of Directors granted options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of not less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant, under the Avatech Solutions, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan (the “2002 Option Plan”). The 2002 Option Plan, which expired in August 2012, provided for the granting of either incentive or non-qualified stock options to purchase an aggregate of up to 7,800,000 shares of common stock to eligible employees, officers, and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries. Although the term of the 2002 Option Plan has expired, it will continue to govern all options granted thereunder until such options are exercised, expire or are forfeited in accordance with their terms.

F-20

~~The~~7. ~~Company~~Director ~~recorded~~ and ~~included~~Employee inStock ~~selling,~~Compensation ~~general~~Plans ~~and administrative expenses, $297,000 and $261,000 of stock compensation expense for the years ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively.~~

Employee Stock Option Plans

On November 7, 2012, the Company’s stockholders approved the Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”). Until November 2014, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors administered the Omnibus Plan. The full Board is the current administrator of the Omnibus Plan and, in that capacity, has the exclusive authority to grant various incentive awards under the Omnibus Plan in the form of stock options, stock awards, stock units, performance units, and other stock-based awards. Up to 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock are available for issuance to participants under the Omnibus Plan. The Omnibus Plan is available to all employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, including employees who are officers or members of the Board, and all non-employee directors and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries. Prior to the adoption of the Omnibus Plan, the Board of Directors granted options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of not less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant, under the Avatech Solutions, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan (the “2002 Option Plan”). The 2002 Option Plan, which expired in August 2012, provided for the granting of either incentive or non-qualified stock options to purchase an aggregate of up to 7,800,000 shares of common stock to eligible employees, officers, and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries. Although the term of the 2002 Option Plan has expired, it will continue to govern all options granted thereunder until such options are exercised, expire or are forfeited in accordance with their their terms.

On September 29, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a planned recapitalization of its balance sheet in order to provide liquidity to its shareholders and to maximize shareholder value. This planned recapitalization process was accomplished through a tender offer which was concluded on November 3, 2014 whereby the Company purchased 25,849,945 shares of its common stock from its shareholders for a price of $1.20 per share. In conjunction with the tender offer, the Company’s Board of Directors voted to accelerate the vesting of all unvested stock options effective September 29, 2014. The Board of Directors also voted to provide option holders the ability to exercise their options under a net-settlement program, whereby the Company issued common shares for the aggregate difference between the exercise price and the $1.20 tender offer price, minus required tax withholdings. There were 1,810,920 options exercised under this program, resulting in 470,155 common shares issued in settlement, which were immediately tendered at the $1.20 per-share tender offer price.

The Company recorded and included in selling, general and administrative expenses, $566,000 and $297,000 of stock compensation expense for the years ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively.

The following are the assumptions made in computing the fair value of stock-based awards:

	Year EndedJune 30 2014		Year EndedJune 30 2013
	Year Ended June 30			Year Ended June 30
Average risk-free interest rate	2.031%		0.72% – 2.22%
	2015			2014
Dividend yield	0 %		0 %
Average risk-free interest rate		2.19	%		2.031	%
Expected life	5 years		5 – 6.25 years
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%
Expected volatility	.50		.50 – .56
Expected life		10 years			5 years
Weighted average fair value of granted options	$ 0.51		$ 0.60
Expected volatility		.52			.50
Weighted average fair value of granted options	$	1.09		$	0.51

Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The expected term of options granted represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination within the valuation model. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

A summary of stock option activity during the year ended June 30, 2014 and related information is included in the table below:

	Options			Weighted-AverageExercisePrice		AggregateIntrinsicValue
Outstanding at July 1, 2013		3,488,629		$	0.77
Granted		1,053,360			1.00
Exercised		(491,110	)		0.71
Forfeited		(673,026	)		0.86
Expired		(66,108	)		0.62
Outstanding at June 30, 2014		3,311,745		$	0.83	$	1,227,000
Exercisable at June 30, 2014		1,960,591		$	0.80	$	798,000
Weighted-average remaining contractual life		6.4 Years

The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised was $204,000 and $4,000 during the years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

All options granted have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Exercise prices for options outstanding as of June 30, 2014 ranged from $0.50 to $1.71 as follows:

Range of ExercisePrices	OptionsOutstanding	WeightedAverageExercise Pricesof OptionsOutstanding	WeightedAverageRemainingContractual Lifeof OptionsOutstanding	OptionsExercisable	WeightedAverageExercise Pricesof OptionsExercisable	WeightedAverageRemainingContractual Lifeof OptionsExercisable
$0.50 – 0.75	1,454,385	$0.69	6.4 years	1,115,485	$0.68	6.3 years
0.76 – 1.00	1,584,610	0.89	8.2 years	647,356	0.86	7.5 years
1.01 – 1.71	272,750	1.22	3.8 years	197,750	1.24	1.6 years
	3,311,745			1,960,591

F-21

~~Assuming~~A ~~that~~summary noof ~~additional~~stock ~~share-based~~option ~~payments~~activity ~~are~~during ~~granted~~the ~~after~~year ended June 30, ~~2014,~~2015 ~~$556,000~~and ~~of compensation~~related ~~expense~~information ~~will~~is ~~be recognized~~ included in the ~~consolidated~~table ~~statement~~below: ~~of operations over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years.~~

9. Shares Reserved for Future Issuance


	Options			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at July 1, 2014		3,311,745		$	0.83
Granted		36,000			1.72
Exercised		(2,028,920	)		0.79
Forfeited		(44,250	)		0.88
Expired		—			—

Outstanding at June 30, 2015		1,274,575		$	0.92	$	1,527,000

Exercisable at June 30, 2015		1,250,575		$	0.91	$	517,000

Weighted-average remaining contractual life		6.4 Years

AtThe ~~June 30,~~aggregate ~~2014,~~intrinsic ~~the~~value ~~Company~~of ~~has~~options ~~reserved~~exercised was $1,~~388~~007,~~641~~000 ~~shares~~and of$204,000 ~~common~~during ~~stock for future issuance upon~~ the ~~exercise~~years ofended ~~stock options granted under the Stock Option Plan~~June 30, ~~the~~2015 ~~vesting of restricted stock awards~~ and ~~the conversion of Series D Stock~~ 2014, ~~and Series E Stock~~respectively.

10All options granted have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Exercise ~~Fair~~prices ~~Value~~for ~~Measurements~~options outstanding as of June 30, 2015 ranged from $0.67 to $1.72 as follows:


Range of Exercise Prices	Options Outstanding		Weighted Average Exercise Prices of Options Outstanding		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life of Options Outstanding	Options Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Prices of Options Exercisable		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life of Options Exercisable
$0.67 – 0.75		342,975	$	0.70	5.9 years		342,975	$	0.70	5.9 years
0.76 – 1.00		744,100	$	0.89	6.9 years		744,100	$	0.89	6.9 years
1.01 – 1.72		187,500	$	1.44	5.2 years		163,500	$	1.40	4.6 years

		1,274,575					1,250,575

Assuming that no additional share-based payments are granted after June 30, 2015, $25,000 of compensation expense will be recognized in the consolidated statement of operations over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years.

8. Shares Reserved for Future Issuance

At June 30, 2015, the Company has reserved 2,933,112 shares of common stock for future issuance upon the exercise of stock options granted under its equity compensation plans, the vesting of restricted stock awards and the conversion of Series D Stock, and Series E Stock.

9. Fair Value Measurements

Our balance sheets include non-financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Fair value is the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability assuming an orderly transaction in the most advantageous market at the measurement date. U.S. GAAP establishes a hierarchical disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of observability of inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include:

Level 1 – defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets;

Level 2 – defined as observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

Level 3 – defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. At each reporting period, we perform a detailed analysis of our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value. All assets and liabilities for which the fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs or instruments which trade infrequently and therefore have little or no price transparency are classified as Level 3.

Assets and ~~Liabilities~~Liabilites Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

We have no non-financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Property and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis (upon impairment). The intangible assets in the table below are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and are presented at fair value as of the date of impairment.

On July 31, 2012, the Company acquired certain assets of Informative Design Partners, a CFD consulting business. While the CFD business is consistently profitable and experiencing growth in revenue, its earnings have been less than the levels forecasted at the time of the acquisition. As a result, the Company concluded that the carrying value of the CFD business exceeded its fair value as of June 30, 2014 and recorded an impairment charge of approximately $1.0 million to reduce the book value of goodwill and the value of the acquired customer list. The Company used several methods to calculate the fair values, including discounted projected cash flows and multiples of historical earnings (all of which are Level 3 inputs according to ~~FASB~~ ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement).

Part of the acquisition price for the CFD consulting business includes contingent consideration to be paid in future years based upon whether the CFD business achieves certain earnings targets in those years. At the time of the acquisition, the Company estimated the value of future contingent consideration payments. Because the historical earnings of the CFD business have been less than those earnings targets, the Company reduced its estimate of the remaining liability for contingent consideration recorded and recorded an adjustment during the ~~current~~ fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 to reflect the reduced liability for contingent consideration

FThe following table represents the fair value hierarchy for non-22 financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2015:

The following table represents the fair value hierarchy for non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2014:


	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Intangible assets
Customer list	$	—	$	—	$	438,000	$	438,000

Total	$	—	$	—	$	438,000	$	438,000

The carrying fair value of the Company’s CFD related customer list reflects a reduction in value of approximately $80,000, as a result of an impairment loss recognized in the year ended June 30, 2014. This asset is included in “Customer list” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

10. Income Taxes

The components of income from continuing operations before income taxes are as follows:

	Years ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014
Domestic	$	6,~~132~~764,000		$	37,~~671~~008,000
Foreign		1(449,~~202,~~000	)		~~532~~1,917,000
Total	$	76,~~334~~315,000		$	48,~~203~~925,000

The components of the income tax provision (benefit) are as follows:

	Years ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014
Federal tax	$	~~(809~~2,344,000	)	$	1(341,~~447,~~000	)
State tax		~~(914~~406,000	)		~~244~~(798,000	)
Total	$	(12,~~723~~750,000	)	$	(1,~~691~~139,000	)
	Years ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014
Current	$	12,~~742~~336,000		$	~~354~~2,326,000
Deferred		(3414,~~465,~~000	)		1(3,~~337~~465,000	)
Total	$	(12,~~723~~750,000	)	$	(1,~~691~~139,000	)

F-23

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

	Years ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	1413,~~681~~283,000		$	1614,~~126~~681,000
Capital loss carryforwards		~~1,674,000~~—			1,674,000
Accrued expenses		~~193~~237,000			~~185~~193,000
Expenses not currently deductible		~~100~~88,000			~~154~~100,000
Excess of book over tax depreciation		~~642~~62,000			49642,000
Excess of book over tax amortization		~~899~~855,000			~~602~~899,000
Deferred revenue		—			2,000
Other asset		3,000			3,000
Other asset		3,000			—
Foreign tax benefit		—			82,000
Foreign tax benefit		82,000			82,000
Total deferred tax assets		14,528,000			18,274,000
Total deferred tax assets		18,274,000			18,874,000
Deferred tax liabilities:
Intangible assets		2,~~194~~061,000			2,~~333~~194,000
Excess of tax over book depreciation		~~185,000~~—			—185,000
Other liabilities		1516,000			2115,000
Total deferred tax liabilities		2,~~394~~077,000			2,~~354~~394,000
Deferred tax assets, net of liabilities	$	1512,~~880~~451,000		$	1615,~~520~~880,000
Valuation allowance		(118,~~029~~014,000	)		(1511,~~134~~029,000	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	4,~~851~~437,000		$	14,~~386~~851,000

The Company’s provision for income taxes resulted in effective tax rates attributable to loss from continuing operations that varied from the statutory federal income tax rate of 34%, as summarized in the table below.

	Years ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
Expected federal income tax expense from continuing operations at 34%	$	2,494,000		$	1,429,000
Expenses not deductible for income tax purposes		239,000			159,000
Amendment of prior year return		(66,000	)		(67,000	)
Taxable income from divestiture of foreign subsidiaries		—			260,000
State income taxes, net of federal benefit		238,000			161,000
Current year utilization of deferred tax asset		(462,000	)		—
Difference in conversion rate		(61,000	)		—
Change in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets		(4,105,000	)		(251,000	)
Income tax (benefit) expense	$	(1,723,000	)	$	1,691,000

As of June 30, 2014, the Company had U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income of approximately $30.3 million; however, $23.3 million of these carryforwards were not recognized because they are subject to annual limitations under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and are expected to expire before being utilized. For tax year June 30, 2014, it is projected that approximately $2.4 million of net operating loss carryforwards will be utilized to offset taxable income. The remaining $4.6 million will be carried forward and will begin to expire in 2019.

In addition, as of June 30, 2014, the Company had foreign net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $14.8 million available to reduce future taxable income; however, approximately $4.0 million of these loss carryforwards is expected to expire by December 31, 2014 and the balance will expire between 2028 and 2031.

F-24

The ~~United~~Company’s ~~States~~provision ~~entities~~for ~~maintain~~income ataxes ~~valuation~~resulted ~~allowance~~in ofeffective ~~$9.7~~tax ~~million~~rates ~~due~~attributable to ~~expiration~~loss from ofcontinuing ~~net~~operations ~~operating~~that ~~losses~~varied ~~carryforward~~from ~~prior~~the tostatutory ~~utilization,~~federal ~~capital~~income ~~losses~~tax ~~and~~rate ~~a portion~~ of ~~state~~34%, ~~net~~as ~~operating~~summarized ~~loss~~in ~~carryforwards. The valuation allowances are evaluated quarterly to determine~~ the ~~appropriate~~table ~~allowance amount~~below.


	Years ended
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014
Expected federal income tax expense from continuing operations at 34%	$	2,147,000		$	3,035,000
Expenses not deductible for income tax purposes		208,000			101,000
Amendment of prior year return		—			(60,000	)
State income taxes, net of federal benefit		406,000			399,000
Difference in conversion rate		—			(46,000	)
Other		(11,000	)		(1,000	)
Change in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets		—			(4,567,000	)

Income tax (benefit) expense	$	2,750,000		$	(1,139,000	)

12As of June 30, 2015, the Company had U.S. ~~Commitments~~federal net operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income of approximately $27.1 million; however, $23.3 million of these carryforwards were not recognized because they are subject to annual limitations under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and ~~Contingencies~~are expected to expire before being utilized. For tax year June 30, 2015, it is projected that approximately $560,000 of net operating loss carryforwards will be utilized to offset taxable income.

In addition, as of June 30, 2015, the Company had foreign net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $13.0 million available to reduce future taxable income. Approximately $4.0 million of the prior year net operating losses expired December 31, 2014, which had a valuation allowance. The balance of the net operating losses will expire between 2028 and 2031.

The Company maintains a valuation allowance of $8.0 million for its United States subsidiaries due to the expiration of net operating losses carryforward prior to utilization and a portion of state net operating loss carryforwards. The valuation allowances are evaluated quarterly to determine the appropriate allowance amount.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

The Company leases certain office space and equipment under noncancellable operating lease agreements that expire in various years through 2021, and generally do not contain significant renewal options. Rent expense under operating leases for the years ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and June 30, ~~2013~~2014 was $2.31 million and $2.23 million, respectively. Future minimum payments under all noncancellable operating leases with initial terms of one year or more consisted of the following at June 30, ~~2014~~ 2015:

Year ending June 30:
2015	$	2,459,000
2016	$	2,117,000
2016		1,811,000
2017		1,682,000
2017		1,307,000
2018		1,198,000
2018		820,000
2019		755,000
2019		441,000
2020		344,000
Thereafter		~~227~~100,000
Total minimum lease payments	$	76,~~065~~196,000

Capital Leases

The Company leases computer equipment used in training facilities and by employees throughout its office locations. These capital lease obligations totaled $335,000 as of June 30, 2014, with approximately $188,000 representing the short-term balance of the lease and shown as Obligations under capital leases in the accompanying balance sheets. Payments for the leases are made either monthly or quarterly through September 2016 and depreciation expense on this equipment was approximately $363,000 as of June 30, 2014. Future minimum payments consisted of the following at June 30, 2014:

Year ending June 30:
2015	$	205,000
2016		137,000
2017		24,000
Total minimum lease payments		366,000
Less:
Taxes		18,000
Imputed interest		13,000
Present value of future minimum lease payments	$	335,000

Litigation

The Company is party to various litigation matters that management considers routine and incidental to the Company’s business. As of June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, the Company had accrued no material amounts related to these matters.

F-25

Litigation

The Company is party to various litigation matters that management considers routine and incidental to the Company’s business. As of June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, the Company had accrued no material amounts related to these matters.

Guarantees

In the normal course of business, the Company indemnifies third parties and enters into commitments and guarantees (“Agreements”) under which it may be required to make payments. These Agreements include indemnities to the following parties: lessors in connection with facility leases; customers in relation to the performance of services; vendors in connection with guarantees of expenses incurred by employees in the normal course of business; former employees in connection with their prior services as a director or officer of the Company or its subsidiary companies; vendors or principals in connection with performance under asset or share purchase and sale agreements and performance under credit facilities and other agreements of the Company’s subsidiaries. The duration of these Agreements varies, and in certain cases, is indefinite. Furthermore, the majority of these Agreements do not limit the Company’s maximum potential payment exposure. In addition, the Company is party to a guarantee with its largest vendor, Autodesk, in relation to all of the Company’s subsidiaries’ obligations to Autodesk. The Company has recorded no accrued liability related to these Agreements, based on its historical experience and information known as of June 30, ~~2014~~2015.

1312. Employee Benefit Plans

The Company has a defined contribution savings plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “401(k) Plan”). The 401(k) Plan is a defined contribution plan, which covers substantially all U.S.-based employees of the Company, or its wholly-owned subsidiaries, who have completed three months of service. Participants may elect a pre-tax payroll deduction up to IRS maximums. As amended, the 401(k) Plan provides that the Company will match 100% of the participant salary deferrals up to 3% of a participant’s compensation and 50% of the next 2% of a participant’s compensation, or a total possible maximum matching contribution of 4% of a participant’s compensation, for all participants. The Company may also make discretionary profit-sharing contributions to the 401(k) Plan for all participants who are employed on the last day of the plan year but has not done so for the plan year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014. The Company also has a retirement savings plan (“RSP”) that covers substantially all Canadian-based employees of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Upon hire, participants may elect a pre-tax payroll deduction, subject to limitations as prescribed by the Canadian Revenue Agency. The RSP provides that the Company will match 100% of the participant salary deferrals up to 3% of a participant’s compensation and 50% of the next 2% of a participant’s compensation, for a total possible maximum matching contribution of 4% of a participant’s compensation, for all participants who have completed 12 months of service. The total amount recorded by the Company as expense, under both plans, during the years ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and June 30, ~~2013~~2014 was approximately $~~900~~854,000 and $~~787~~900,000, respectively.

1413. Significant Supplier

Approximately 9697% and 9796%, respectively, of the Company’s inventory purchases for the years ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 were from one vendor and its distributors, and approximately 92% and 89%, respectively, of accounts payable at June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 were due to this vendor and its distributors. Approximately 9596% of the Company’s total product revenues are related to this supplier’s products. The Company is a party to a Value Added Reseller Agreement with Autodesk effective February 1, ~~2013~~ 2015. The agreement has a term of three years and designates the Company as an authorized reseller of Autodesk software and prescribes the authorized sales territories, authorized products and services, rebate and incentive program details and marketing support.

1514. Discontinued Operations

During the ~~fourth~~fiscal quarter ofended ~~2013~~September 30, ~~the~~2014, ~~Company~~as ~~disposed~~part of ~~its~~the ~~operations~~Company’s instrategy ~~Australia,~~to ~~Singapore~~focus ~~and~~on ~~Malaysia~~its ~~because~~core ~~those~~strengths, ~~divisions did~~the ~~not~~Company ~~align~~sold ~~with~~its ~~the~~Rand Secure ~~current~~Data ~~strategic~~archiving ~~direction~~business. ofThus, the ~~Company.~~results ~~The~~of ~~following~~operations ~~table~~and ~~summarizes~~cash ~~the~~flows ~~financial~~from ~~results of~~ the ~~entities~~data ~~which~~archiving business have been ~~reclassified~~classified as discontinued operations for ~~the~~all periods presented:.

	Years ended
	June 30, 2014		June 30, 2013
Revenues	$	—	$	7,281,000
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax of $0		—		241,000
Loss on sale or disposition of discontinued operations, net of tax of $0 and $0		463,000		370,000

F-26

~~16.~~During ~~Liquidity~~the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company disposed of its operations in Australia, Singapore and ~~Capital~~Malaysia because ~~Resources~~those divisions did not align with the current strategic direction of the Company.

The ~~Company~~following ~~had~~table asummarizes ~~working~~the ~~capital~~financial ~~surplus~~results of ~~$13,013,000~~the entities ~~and~~which ~~$6,617,000~~have been reclassified as ofdiscontinued ~~June 30,~~operations ~~2014~~for ~~and~~the ~~June 30,~~periods ~~2013,~~presented ~~respectively.~~

17. Segment Information


	Years ended
	June 30, 2015		June 30, 2014
Revenues	$	915,000	$	2,612,000
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax of $232,000 and $584,000		452,000		1,007,000
Loss on sale or disposition of discontinued operations, net of tax of $414,000 and $0		1,072,000		463,000

The Company’s chief operating decision maker, its chief executive officer, reviews operating results and analyses and makes resource allocation decisions between its three divisions: IMAGINiT, Enterprise Applications, and ASCENT15. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~Liquidity ~~does not separately accumulate~~ and ~~report~~Capital ~~asset~~Resources ~~information by segment, nor does it have any material inter-segment revenue.~~

The ~~IMAGINiT~~Company ~~division~~had ~~provides~~a ~~Autodesk~~working ~~solutions~~capital ~~and~~surplus ~~value-added~~of ~~services~~$851,000 toand ~~customers~~$13,013,000 inas ~~the~~of ~~manufacturing~~June 30, ~~infrastructure,~~2015 ~~building,~~ and ~~media~~ ~~and~~June 30, ~~entertainment~~2014, ~~industries~~respectively.

The Enterprise Applications offers various products and services including data governance solutions, facilities management solutions and 3DExperience products from Dassault Systèmes as well as training solutions for Dassault Systèmes and PTC products.

ASCENT is the courseware division of Rand Worldwide and is a leading developer of professional training materials and knowledge products for engineering software tools.

The following tables illustrate certain financial information about these segments in the corresponding fiscal periods:

Year Ended June 30, 2014:

	IMAGINiT			EnterpriseApplications			ASCENT		Total
Revenue-
Product sales	$	44,018,000		$	998,000		$	2,806,000	$	47,822,000
Service revenue		15,318,000			8,087,000			75,000		23,480,000
Commission revenue		20,152,000			142,000			—		20,294,000
Total revenue		79,488,000			9,227,000			2,881,000		91,596,000
Cost of revenue-
Cost of product sales		28,571,000			556,000			1,420,000		30,547,000
Cost of service revenue		10,679,000			5,036,000			48,000		15,763,000
Total cost of revenue		39,250,000			5,592,000			1,468,000		46,310,000
Gross Margin		40,238,000			3,635,000			1,413,000		45,286,000
Total operating expenses		31,453,000			5,283,000			992,000		37,728,000
Operating income		8,785,000			(1,648,000	)		421,000		7,558,000
Other expense, net		194,000			22,000			8,000		224,000
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		8,591,000			(1,670,000	)		413,000		7,334,000
Income tax expense (benefit)		(1,149,000	)		(673,000	)		99,000		(1,723,000	)
Income from continuing operations	$	9,740,000		$	(997,000	)	$	314,000	$	9,057,000

F-27

Year Ended June 30, 2013:

	IMAGINiT		EnterpriseApplications			ASCENT		Total
Revenue-
Product sales	$	38,475,000	$	561,000		$	2,833,000	$	41,869,000
Service revenue		14,920,000		6,805,000			39,000		21,764,000
Commission revenue		18,735,000		135,000			—		18,870,000
Total revenue		72,130,000		7,501,000			2,872,000		82,503,000
Cost of revenue-
Cost of product sales		24,709,000		261,000			1,312,000		26,282,000
Cost of service revenue		10,409,000		4,115,000			16,000		14,540,000
Total cost of revenue		35,118,000		4,376,000			1,328,000		40,822,000
Gross Margin		37,012,000		3,125,000			1,544,000		41,681,000
Total operating expenses		31,226,000		4,927,000			849,000		37,002,000
Operating income		5,786,000		(1,802,000	)		695,000		4,679,000
Other expense, net		442,000		17,000			17,000		476,000
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		5,344,000		(1,819,000	)		678,000		4,203,000
Income tax expense (benefit)		2,054,000		(627,000	)		264,000		1,691,000
Income from continuing operations	$	3,290,000	$	(1,192,000	)	$	414,000	$	2,512,000

18. Subsequent Events

Recapitalization

The new debt from Chase will be comprised of two credit facilities. The first is a five-year $10 million line of credit, secured by all assets of the Company with borrowing levels subject to borrowing base limits. The interest rate on the line of credit will be the LIBOR rate, plus a margin of 2.5%. The second facility is a five-year term loan of up to $25 million, based upon the final financing requirements of the tender offer. The interest rate on the term loan will be the LIBOR rate, plus a margin of 3.15%. The new loans will contain certain financial covenants including a maximum leverage ratio, a maximum fixed charge coverage ratio, and minimum adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

Sale of Rand Secure Data Division

During September of 2014, the Company spun off its Rand Secure Data division into a separate subsidiary and sold the stock of the newly formed subsidiary for $500,000 in cash, resulting in an estimated loss of $1.1 million.

F-28

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit		Description
2.1		Agreement and Plan Merger dated as of August 17, 2010 by and among Avatech Solutions, Inc., ASRW Acquisition Sub, Inc., Rand Worldwide, Inc. and RWWI Holdings LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on August 17, 2010)
3.1(i)		Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Spatial Technology, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i).1 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed by Spatial Technology, Inc. on November 21, 2000, File No. 333-50426)
3.1(ii)		Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Spatial Technology, Inc., changing Spatial Technology, Inc.’s name to PlanetCad, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i).2 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed by PlanetCad, Inc. on November 21, 2000, File No. 333-50426)
3.1(iii)		Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed by PlanetCad, Inc. on March 11, 2002, File No. 001-31265)
3.1(iv)		Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by PlanetCad, Inc. on May 28, 2002)
3.1(v)		Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of PlanetCad, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Annex G of the Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 on Form S-4/A filed by PlanetCad, Inc. on September 13, 2002, File No. 333-89386)
3.1(vi)		Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, changing PlanetCad, Inc.’s name to Avatech Solutions, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Annex G of the Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 on Form S-4/A filed by PlanetCad, Inc. on September 13, 2002, File No. 333-89386)
3.1(vii)		Certificate of Designations – Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6A of the Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-1/A filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on April 11, 2003, File No. 333-104035)
3.1(viii)		Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Designations – Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on February 13, 2004)
3.1(ix)		Certificate of Designations of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on February 13, 2004)
3.1(x)		Certificate of Elimination of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.10 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on February 13, 2004
3.1(xi)		Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Designation of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.12 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on February 13, 2004)
3.1(xii)		Certificate of Elimination of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.11 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on February 13, 2004)
3.1(xiii)		Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.13 of the Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-1/A filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on July 19, 2004, File No. 333-114230)

3.1(xii)		Certificate of Elimination of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.11 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on February 13, 2004)
3.1(xiii)		Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.13 of the Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-1/A filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on July 19, 2004, File No. 333-114230)
3.1(xiv)		Certificate of Designations of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on May 9, 2005)
3.1(xv)		Certificate of Designation of the Powers, Preferences and Relative, Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights of Preferred Stock and Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions Thereof of Series F 10% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on June 19, 2006)
3.1 (xvi)		Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Avatech Solutions, Inc., changing Avatech’s name to Rand Worldwide, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Rand Worldwide, Inc. on May 16, 2011)
3.1(xvi)		Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Avatech Solutions, Inc., changing Avatech’s name to Rand Worldwide, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Rand Worldwide, Inc. on May 16, 2011)
3.2		Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii).1 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed by Spatial Technology, Inc. on November 21, 2000, File No. 333-50426)
4.1		Form of Amended and Restated Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on August 17, 2010)
4.2		Registration Rights Agreement between Avatech Solutions, Inc. and RWWI Holdings LLC, dated August 17, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K of Avatech Solutions, Inc. filed on August 17, 2010)
9.1		Stockholders’ Agreement by and among Avatech Solutions, Inc., RWWI Holdings LLC and certain holders of common stock dated as of August 17, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 9.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on August 17, 2010)
10.1		Lease between Merritt-DM1, LLC and Avatech Solutions, Inc. effective June 1, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-1/A filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on July 19, 2004, File No. 333-114230)
10.2		Form of Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement for Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on February 13, 2004)
10.3		Form of Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement for Series E Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on September 28, 2010)
10.4		Avatech Solutions, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex F of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on May 30, 2002, File No. 333-89386)
10.5		Form of First Amendment to Stock Option (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on August 17, 2010)
10.6		Avatech Solutions, Inc. Restricted Stock Award Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on February 10, 2006, File No. 333-131721)
10.7		Form of Restricted Stock Award (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on January 12, 2009)
10.8		Avatech Solutions, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on December 4, 2007 File No. 333-147823)
10.9		Rand Worldwide, Inc. Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quartered ended December 31, 2012 filed by Rand Worldwide, Inc. on February 14, 2013)

10.6		Avatech Solutions, Inc. Restricted Stock Award Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on February 10, 2006, File No. 333-131721)
10.7		Form of Restricted Stock Award (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on January 12, 2009)
10.8		Avatech Solutions, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on December 4, 2007 File No. 333-147823)
10.9		Rand Worldwide, Inc. Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quartered ended December 31, 2012 filed by Rand Worldwide, Inc. on February 14, 2013)
10.10		Employment Agreement between Avatech Solutions, Inc. and George Davis dated 28, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on June 29, 2010)
10.11		Employment Agreement between Marc L. Dulude and Rand Worldwide, Inc. ~~datedMarch~~dated March 30, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Rand Worldwide, Inc. on April 4, 2011)
10.12		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Avatech Solutions, Inc. and Lawrence Rychlak dated August 17, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on August 17, 2010)
10.13		Employment Agreement between Robert F. Heeg and Rand Worldwide, Inc. dated May 16, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rand Worldwide, Inc. filed on September 28, 2011)
10.14		Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on August 17, 2010)
10.15		Revolving Loan Promissory Note issued by Avatech Solutions Subsidiary, Inc. and Avatech Solutions Subsidiary, Inc. to Mercantile Safe-Deposit & Trust Co. dated January 27, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.50 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on February 10, 2006, File No 333-131720)
10.16		Loan and Security Agreement among Avatech Solutions Subsidiary, Inc., Avatech Solutions Subsidiary, Inc. and Mercantile Safe-Deposit & Trust Co., dated January 27, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on February 10, 2006, File No 333-131720)
10.17		Modification Agreement among Avatech Solutions, Inc., Avatech Solutions Subsidiary, Inc. and Mercantile Safe-Deposit & Trust Co. dated May 30, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.57 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on June 8, 2006)
10.18		Second Modification Agreement among Avatech Solutions, Inc., Avatech Solutions Subsidiary, Inc and Mercantile Bank & Trust Co., dated December 31, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on November 14, 2007)
10.19		Third Modification Agreement among Avatech Solutions, Inc., Avatech Solutions Subsidiary, Inc and PNC Bank, National Association, dated December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on January 30, 2009)
10.20		Fourth Modification Agreement among Avatech Solutions, Inc., Avatech Solutions Subsidiary, Inc and PNC Bank, National Association, dated December 23, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on December 30, 2009)
10.21		Fifth Modification Agreement among Avatech Solutions, Inc., Avatech Solutions Subsidiary, Inc and PNC Bank, National Association, dated August 17, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on August 17, 2010)
10.22		Sixth Modification Agreement among Avatech Solutions, Inc., Avatech Solutions Subsidiary, Inc and PNC Bank, National Association, dated December 16, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on December 20, 2010)
10.23		Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated as of August 14, 2009 by and among PNC Bank, National Association and Rand Worldwide US Holdings, Inc., Rand A Technology Corporation, Rand Technologies of Michigan, Inc. and Rand IMAGINiT Technologies, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of the Transition Report on Form 10-KT filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on November 15, 2010)

10.20		Fourth Modification Agreement among Avatech Solutions, Inc., Avatech Solutions Subsidiary, Inc and PNC Bank, National Association, dated December 23, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on December 30, 2009)
10.21		Fifth Modification Agreement among Avatech Solutions, Inc., Avatech Solutions Subsidiary, Inc and PNC Bank, National Association, dated August 17, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on August 17, 2010)
10.22		Sixth Modification Agreement among Avatech Solutions, Inc., Avatech Solutions Subsidiary, Inc and PNC Bank, National Association, dated December 16, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on December 20, 2010)
10.23		Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated as of August 14, 2009 by and among PNC Bank, National Association and Rand Worldwide US Holdings, Inc., Rand A Technology Corporation, Rand Technologies of Michigan, Inc. and Rand IMAGINiT Technologies, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of the Transition Report on Form 10-KT filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on November 15, 2010)
10.24		First Amendment to Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated as of January 22, 2010 by and among PNC Bank, National Association and Rand Worldwide US Holdings, Inc., Rand A Technology Corporation, Rand Technologies of Michigan, Inc. and Rand IMAGINiT Technologies, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of the Transition Report on Form 10-KT filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on November 15, 2010)
10.25		Second Amendment to Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated as of July 23, 2010 by and among PNC Bank, National Association and Rand Worldwide US Holdings, Inc., Rand A Technology Corporation, Rand Technologies of Michigan, Inc. and Rand IMAGINiT Technologies, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of the Transition Report on Form 10-KT filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on November 15, 2010)
10.26		Third Amendment to Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated as of July 23, 2010 by and among PNC Bank, National Association and Rand Worldwide US Holdings, Inc., Rand A Technology Corporation, Rand Technologies of Michigan, Inc. and Rand IMAGINiT Technologies, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of the Transition Report on Form 10-KT filed by Avatech Solutions, Inc. on November 15, 2010)
10.27		Fourth Amendment to Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated as of December 31, 2010 by and among PNC Bank, National Association, Rand A Technology Corporation and Rand Worldwide Subsidiary, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Rand Worldwide, Inc. on January 5, 2011)
10.28		Committed Line of Credit Note, dated as of February 28, 2012, issued by Rand Worldwide, Inc. and Rand A Technology Corp. to the order of PNC Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Rand Worldwide, Inc. on March 5, 2012)
10.29		Financing and Security Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2012, by and among PNC Bank, National Association, Rand Worldwide, Inc. and Rand A Technology Corp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Rand Worldwide, Inc. on March 5, 2012)
10.30		Form of Guaranty and Security Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2012, by Rand Worldwide Subsidiary, Inc. and Rand Worldwide Foreign Holdings, Inc. in favor of PNC Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Rand Worldwide, Inc. on March 5, 2012)
10.31		Loan Document Modification Agreement dated April 12, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Rand Worldwide, Inc. on April 12, 2013)
10.32		Autodesk Authorized Value Added Reseller Agreement between Rand IMAGINiT Technologies, Inc. and Autodesk, Inc, dated February 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Rand Worldwide, Inc. on September 6, 2013)
10.33		Omnibus Waiver and Termination Agreement among Avatech Solutions, Inc., Pacific Asset Partners and Sigma Opportunity Fund, LLC, dated August 17, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Avatech Solutions, Inc. filed on September 28, 2010)
10.34		Omnibus Waiver and Termination Agreement among Avatech Solutions, Inc., Sigma Opportunity Fund, LLC, Garnett Y. Clark, Jr., Robert Post and George Davis, dated August 17, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Avatech Solutions, Inc. filed on September 28, 2010)
21.1		Subsidiaries of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (filed herewith)
23.1		Consent of Stegman & Company (filed herewith)
31.1		Rule 15d-14(a) Certifications by Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith)

31.2		Rule 15d-14(a) Certifications by Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith)
10.30		Form of Guaranty and Security Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2012, by Rand Worldwide Subsidiary, Inc. and Rand Worldwide Foreign Holdings, Inc. in favor of PNC Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Rand Worldwide, Inc. on March 5, 2012)
10.31		Loan Document Modification Agreement dated April 12, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Rand Worldwide, Inc. on April 12, 2013)
10.32		Credit Agreement dated as of November 3, among Rand Worldwide, Inc., the other Loan Parties party thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Rand Worldwide, Inc. on November 7, 2014)
10.33		Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of November 3, 2014 by and among Rand Worldwide, Inc., Rand Worldwide Foreign Holdings, Inc., Rand Worldwide Subsidiary, Inc., and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Rand Worldwide, Inc. on November 7, 2014)
10.33		Autodesk Authorized Value Added Reseller Agreement between Rand IMAGINiT Technologies, Inc. and Autodesk, Inc, dated February 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Rand Worldwide, Inc. on September 6, 2013)
10.34		Omnibus Waiver and Termination Agreement among Avatech Solutions, Inc., Pacific Asset Partners and Sigma Opportunity Fund, LLC, dated August 17, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Avatech Solutions, Inc. filed on September 28, 2010)
10.35		Omnibus Waiver and Termination Agreement among Avatech Solutions, Inc., Sigma Opportunity Fund, LLC, Garnett Y. Clark, Jr., Robert Post and George Davis, dated August 17, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Avatech Solutions, Inc. filed on September 28, 2010)
21.1		Subsidiaries of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (filed herewith)
31.1		Rule 15d-14(a) Certifications by Principal Executive Officer (filed herewith)
31.2		Rule 15d-14(a) Certifications by Principal Accounting Officer (filed herewith)
32.1		Section 1350 Certifications (furnished herewith)
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document. (~~furnished~~filed herewith)
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. (~~furnished~~filed herewith)
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document. (~~furnished~~filed herewith)
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. (~~furnished~~filed herewith)
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document. (~~furnished~~filed herewith)
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document. (~~furnished~~filed herewith)

RAND WORLDWIDE, INC.

Date: September 29, 2014

/s/ Marc L. Dulude

Date: September 15, 2015

/s/ Lawrence Rychlak

Chief Executive Officer

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

Filing Compare · RAND WORLDWIDE INC