19Table of Contents

F-1Table of Contents

F-2Table of Contents

F-3Table of Contents

F-4Table of Contents

F-5Table of Contents

F-6Table of Contents

F-7Table of Contents

F-9Table of Contents

NOTETable 6of - ACCRUED EXPENSES Contents

EffectiveTable April 12, 2013 Deer Valley entered into a Revolving Credit Loan and Security Agreement with its primary bank, used for funding “construction-to-permanent loans” prior to the issue of a certificate of occupancy and ultimate resale of the loan to either a private or government controlled long term financing entities. On August 19, 2014 the Company closed the Loan Facility used for funding “construction-to-permanent loans”. Contents

F-13Table of Contents

TheTable income tax provision consists of the following: Contents

NOTETable 11of - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Contents

OnTable February 12, 2015, Mobius Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Mobius”), through its wholly-owned subsidiary Mobius Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc. acquired all outstanding shares of Peerless for $7.00 per share through a merger under Section 251(h) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, Mobius is now the sole shareholder of Peerless. Contents

WeTable carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 27, 2014. Based upon such evaluation, the Chief Financial Officer, the principal financial officer and acting principal executive officer, has concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as required under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. We have reviewed the results of management’s assessment with our audit committee. Contents

*Table We have noted that there may be an insufficient quantity of dedicated resources and experienced personnel involved in reviewing and designing internal controls. As a result, a material misstatement of the interim and annual financial statements could occur and not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Contents

ChangesTable inof Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Contents

-Table 40of - Contents

2003,Table Mr. Murphree worked as General Manager of the Energy and LifeStyle Divisions of Southern Energy Homes, Inc. Mr. Murphree graduated from the University of Alabama Huntsville with a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration. Contents

ThereTable are no family relationships among any of our directors and executive officers. Contents

OnTable November 12, 2014, our Board of Directors formed an Audit Committee comprised of Messrs. Timothy E. Brog, Kevin Cavanaugh and Damien J. Park. The purpose of the audit committee is to assist the board of directors in its oversight of management’s conduct of our financial reporting process. The Board has determined that Mr. Timothy E. Brog, the Chairperson of the Audit Committee, meets the definition of “Audit Committee financial expert,” as such term is defined under SEC rules. Contents

EmploymentTable Agreements withof Named Executive Officers Contents

DIRECTORTable COMPENSATIONof Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x	ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016

¨	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 000-05388

DEER VALLEY CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Florida

20-5256635

(State of Incorporation)

(I.R.S. employer

identification no.)


205 Carriage Street, Guin, AL		35563
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (205) 468-8400

Securities registered under 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Securities registered under 12 (g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No x

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, ~~everyInteractive~~every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months. Yes x No ¨

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company. Yes ¨ No x

The issuer’s revenues for its most recent fiscal year were $3035,~~247~~663,~~725~~343. The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of June 30, ~~2014~~2015 was $1,~~745~~859,~~718~~881. As of March 1, ~~2015~~2016, the number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock (excluding 2,397,840 shares of treasury common stock) was 15,514,344, of which 12,~~869~~652,~~317~~989 shares of common stock were held by affiliates.

DEER VALLEY CORPORATION

~~2014~~2015 FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		PAGE
ITEM
ITEM 1.	DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS		23
ITEM 2.	DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY		1012
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		1012
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES		1112
ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS		1112
ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA		1214
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION		1214
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		19
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE		19
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE		38
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		19
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		38
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION		21
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION		39
ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT		21
ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT		40
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		24
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		43
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS		27
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS		46
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS		30
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS		47
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES		31
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES		48
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS		32
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS		49

- 2 -

PART I

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Information included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain forward-looking statements. This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from the future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies, and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology.

ITEM 1.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, all references below in this filing to “we,” “us,” the “Company,” and “Deer Valley” are to Deer Valley Corporation, a Florida corporation, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Deer Valley Homebuilders, Inc. (“DVH”), an Alabama corporation formed in January 2004, Deer Valley Financial Corp (“DVFC”), a Florida corporation formed in September 2009 and Deer Valley Home Repair Services, Inc. (“DVHRS”), a Florida corporation formed in February 2012.

General

The Company, under the name Cytation Corporation, was incorporated under the laws of Delaware on November 1, 1999. In the first quarter of 2005, the Company discontinued all prior business operations except finding an appropriate private entity with which it could acquire or merge.

During the first quarter of 2006, the Company entered into the Securities Purchase and Share Exchange Agreement, which, among other matters, resulted in the Company raising in excess of $7,400,000 in exchange for the issuance of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A Common Stock Purchase Warrants, and Series B Common Stock Purchase Warrants (“Series A Preferred Offering”). Contemporaneous with the completion of the Series A Preferred Offering, Deer Valley Acquisition Corp (“DVA”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of DVH. On July 24, 2006 the Company held a Special Meeting of Stockholders not in lieu of an annual meeting at which time it obtained the approval of an amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to change the name of the Company from Cytation Corporation to Deer Valley Corporation.

On September 3, 2014, Peerless Systems Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Peerless”), Vicis Capital Master Fund, a Cayman Island unit trust managed by Vicis Capital, LLC (“Vicis”), and the Company, entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”). The transaction described in the SPA closed, and the consummation of the transaction described in the SPA occurred, effective as of October 6, 2014.

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the SPA, (a) Vicis sold to Peerless, and Peerless purchased from Vicis, 12,310,458 shares of the Company’s common stock for a purchase price of $3,600,000, and (b) the Company sold to Peerless, and Peerless purchased from the Company, 126,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for a purchase price of $81,900. The purchased shares represent approximately eighty percent (80%) of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

On February 12, 2015, Mobius Acquisitions, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Mobius”), through its wholly-owned subsidiary Mobius Acquisitions Merger Sub, Inc. acquired all outstanding shares of Peerless Systems Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Peerless”) for $7.00 per share through a merger under Section 251 (h) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“the Merger”). As a result of the Merger, Mobius is now the sole shareholder of Peerless.

- 3 -

Peerless owns 12,436,458 shares of Deer Valley’s common stock which is approximately eighty percent (80%) of Deer Valley’s issued and outstanding common stock. As a result of the Merger, Mobius acquired (through its ownership in Peerless) majority ownership of Deer Valley.

Business of the Issuer

Overview

The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiaries DVH and DVHRS, design and manufacture factory built homes which are marketed in 14 states through a network of independent dealers, builders, developers and government agencies located primarily in the southeastern and south central regions of the United States. Our financial subsidiary, DVFC, provides dealer inventory-secured ~~financing~~ financing for our factory built homes ~~and provides bridge financing~~ to anqualified ~~established~~retail ~~mortgage~~dealers ~~originator~~and ~~for the funding of construction-to-permanent loans for ultimate resale~~developers.

- 2 -

The Company’s executives continue to focus on challenges faced by our industry and the general economy. As part of the Company’s strategic plan, management seeks to identify niche market opportunities where our custom building capabilities provide us with a competitive advantage. The Company continues to focus on the production of custom built, energy efficient, “heavy built homes” and has intensified efforts in innovative exterior elevations to meet the needs of homeowners and dealers. The Company continues to focus on operating activities to improve manufacturing efficiencies and maintaining a conservative cost structure. The Company continuously looks for new market opportunities and ways to expand our product offering by developing innovative product designs and production methods.

Our business segments consist of factory-built housing and financial services. Our financial services business provides qualified independent retail dealers and developers inventory-secured financing for homes the Company produces. Otherwise, the Company does not maintain separate operating segments for regions and does not separately report financial information by geographic sales area because they are similar products using similar production techniques and sold to the same class of customer. See Note 15 - Segment Information of the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on our net sales, income from operations, and identifiable assets by segment for the periods ended ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016 and December 2827, ~~2013~~2014.

Manufacturing Operations

We produce all of our factory-built homes at our plant in Guin, Alabama. During the quarter ended ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016, our plant was staffed for a single shift; 40 hour work week and producing an average of 1923 “floors” per week or 5366% of our maximum capacity of a single shift, 40 hour work week. As of ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016, our backlog of orders stood at approximately $12,~~675~~625,000. ~~We have one idle plant located in Sulligent, Alabama.~~

The Company manufacturers homes that are designed as primary residences ready for immediate occupancy. Most of our homes are customized at the Company’s factory to the home buyers’ specifications. The Company has concentrated on the medium to higher priced segments of the manufactured housing market.

While our homes are constructed with many of the same components and building materials used in site-built homes, we utilize a cost-efficient assembly line manufacturing process which enables us to produce a quality home at a significantly lower cost per square foot than a traditional, site-built home. Lower costs are achieved through bulk quantity purchase of building materials, production workforce is trained and managed more efficiently and effectively than the system of contract labor typical in the construction industry. The indoor building process allows work crews to avoid delays caused by outside factors, such as inclement weather, vandalism and theft that are common at traditional home sites.

The principal raw materials used in the production of our homes include wood, wood products, panels, steel, sheetrock, vinyl siding, gypsum wallboard, fiberglass insulation, carpet, appliances, electrical items, windows, roofing materials, electrical supplies, roof trusses, and plumbing fixtures. We believe that the raw materials used in the production of our factory-built homes are readily available from a wide variety of suppliers and that the loss of any single supplier would not have a material adverse effect on our business.

~~Because the cost of transporting a factory~~-~~built~~ ~~home~~4 is significant, substantially all of our homes are sold to dealers within a 500 mile radius of our manufacturing facility. DVH arranges, at dealers’ expense, for the transportation of finished homes to dealer locations using independent trucking companies. Customary sales terms are cash-~~on-delivery~~ ~~or guaranteed payment from an inventory-secured financing source. Dealers or other independent installers are responsible for placing the home on site and connecting utilities.~~

- 3 -

Because the cost of transporting a factory-built home is significant, substantially all of our homes are sold to dealers within a 500 mile radius of our manufacturing facility. DVH arranges, at dealers’ expense, for the transportation of finished homes to dealer locations using independent trucking companies. Customary sales terms are cash-on-delivery or guaranteed payment from an inventory-secured financing source. Dealers or other independent installers are responsible for placing the home on site and connecting utilities.

Backlog of Orders and Sales Policies

Substantially all production of our factory-built homes is initiated against specific orders. As of ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016, our total backlog of of orders stood at $12,~~675~~625,000, compared to $1,~~100~~675,000 at December 2827, ~~2013~~2014. Dealer orders are subject to cancellation prior to commencement of production, however, because we operate in an industry where order lead times are extremely short ~~such~~ such cancellations rarely occur. Because we initiate production against a specific product order, we do not have significant inventories of finished goods or a backlog of product orders, we do not view backlog to be indicative of the level of our ~~future~~ future revenues.

Sales of our HUD Code homes are made to dealers either through inventory-secured financing arrangements with a financial institution, DVFC or on a cash basis. When a home is purchased, we receive payment either directly from the dealer or from a financial institution which has agreed to finance dealer purchases of our manufactured homes. As is customary in our industry, many financial institutions that finance dealer purchases require that we execute a repurchase agreement which provides that, in the event a dealer defaults on its repayment of the financing arrangement, we agree to repurchase the manufactured home from the financing institution, in accordance with a declining repurchase price schedule that is mutually agreed upon.

Products

Most of our homes are constructed in accordance with the National Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards promulgated by HUD. We also produce modular homes constructed in accordance with the local building codes in effect at the point of delivery. Of the homes we produced in ~~2014~~2015, approximately 7580% were HUD code homes and approximately 2520% were modular homes. The following table sets forth certain sales information for ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014:

Shipments

~~2014~~2015 – Floors

~~2014~~2015- – Units

~~2013~~2014 – Floors

~~2013~~2014- – Units

HUD-Code

~~569~~712

~~276~~346

~~578~~569

~~279~~276

Modular

~~210~~203

9286

~~186~~210

7892

Total

~~779~~915

~~368~~432

~~764~~779

~~357~~368

We offer a variety of different floor plans, ranging in size from approximately 840 to more than 3,000 square feet. A single section home is generally 600 to 1,300 square feet, while multi section homes built with two or more modules range from 1,400 to more than 3,000 square feet. We are constantly introducing new designs, features and accessories to appeal to changing trends and consumer feedback. Many of our homes are customized to homebuyers’ specifications and have features associated with site-built homes, such as central heating and air conditioning, name-brand appliances, hand laid floor tile, KCMA certified solid wood cabinets, walk-in closets, porches, 1/2 inch drywall, thermally sealed double-paned low-e windows, enhanced insulation and 2x6 exterior wall construction standards. We believe that our willingness to offer superior construction standards, energy efficient homes and customize floor plans and design features to match homebuyers’ preferences are principal factors which differentiate us from our competitors.

Green construction processes and environmentally-friendly building materials are part of our home building process. We offer only energy efficient, heavy built homes that exceed industry standards for construction thresholds. Managing material selections, air quality issues and recycling strategies during the manufacturing process are all part of our effective green building strategy.

Our residential home typically includes three to five bedrooms, a great room which functions as a living room, family room, and dining room, a kitchen, and two or three bathrooms and features central air conditioning and heating, a water heater, a dishwasher, a refrigerator, a microwave, a cook top/range, and an oven. We offer a wide range of colors, moldings, and finishes and provide optional features including fireplaces, wood floors, and modern kitchen counter-~~tops.~~ We5 ~~continue to modify and improve the design of our homes in consultation with our sales representatives and independent dealer network. We also utilize computer~~-~~aided~~ ~~and other design methods in an effort to continuously improve the design of our homes and to permit our customers to customize their purchases.~~

- 4 -

~~The~~Our ~~Company~~residential ~~continues~~home totypically ~~expand~~includes ~~its~~three ~~product~~to ~~offerings~~five inbedrooms, ~~its~~a ~~modular~~great ~~home~~room ~~line.~~which ~~The~~functions ~~homes~~as ~~are~~a ~~currently~~living ~~offered in fourteen states: Alabama~~room, ~~Arkansas,~~family ~~Florida~~room, ~~Georgia,~~and ~~Illinois,~~dining ~~Kansas~~room, ~~Kentucky,~~a ~~Louisiana~~kitchen, ~~Mississippi,~~and ~~Missouri,~~two ~~Oklahoma,~~or ~~Tennessee,~~three ~~Texas~~bathrooms and ~~West~~features ~~Virginia.~~central ~~These~~air ~~modular~~conditioning ~~homes~~and ~~include~~heating, ~~front~~a ~~load~~water ~~porch~~heater, ~~designs~~a ~~to accommodate~~dishwasher, ~~the~~a ~~narrow~~refrigerator, ~~lot~~a ~~lines~~microwave, ~~typical~~a incook ~~coastal~~top/range, ~~areas.~~and ~~Our~~an ~~modular~~oven. ~~homes~~We ~~are~~offer ~~constructed to withstand~~ a ~~110~~wide ~~mile~~range ~~per~~of colors, ~~hour wind load. In addition~~moldings, weand ~~offer~~finishes anand provide optional ~~140~~features ~~mile~~including ~~per~~fireplaces, ~~hour~~wood ~~wind~~floors, ~~load~~and ~~feature~~modern onkitchen ~~our modular homes~~counter-tops. ~~The~~We ~~Company~~continue ~~is seeking~~ to ~~expand~~modify ~~into~~and ~~other~~improve ~~states~~the ~~with~~design ~~new~~of ~~designs~~our tohomes ~~fulfill~~in ~~the~~consultation ~~demand~~with ~~among~~our ~~builders~~sales representatives and ~~developers~~independent dealer ~~for factory-built structures~~network. ~~Typical~~We ~~features~~also inutilize ~~our~~computer-aided ~~modular~~and ~~homes~~other ~~include~~design ~~“heavy~~methods ~~built”~~in ~~construction~~an ~~very~~effort ~~similar~~ to ~~Deer~~continuously ~~Valley Homebuilders,~~improve ~~Inc.’s~~the ~~other~~design ~~offerings.~~of ~~The~~our ~~Company~~homes ~~will~~and ~~perform~~to ~~customization~~permit inour ~~this~~customers ~~line~~to ofcustomize ~~modular~~their ~~homes, as each builder has different needs~~purchases.

The Company’s product offerings in its modular home line are currently offered in fourteen states: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia. These modular homes include front load porch designs to accommodate the narrow lot lines typical in coastal areas. Our modular homes are constructed to withstand a 110 mile per hour wind load. In addition, we offer an optional 140 mile per hour wind load feature on our modular homes. The Company is seeking to expand into other states with new designs to fulfill the demand among builders and developers for factory-built structures. Typical features in our modular homes include “heavy built” construction very similar to Deer Valley Homebuilders, Inc.’s other offerings. The Company will perform customization in this line of modular homes, as each builder has different needs.

Our modular homes must be constructed in accordance with the local building codes in effect at the point of delivery. These codes vary from state to state and also within states. We build our modular homes to the standards of the International Residential Code (“IRC”). The IRC has been adopted wholesale by several states and by selected localities in many others.

Due to the nature of our business, we do not have a significant formal research and development program and we do not allocate significant funds for research and development activities. Instead we rely on constant consumer feedback from our network of dealers, developers and vendors to continually review our product offerings, expand product designs, production methods and marketing strategies.

Deer Valley is focused on designing affordable factory-built homes with features and construction standards comparable to site-built homes. In addition to offering the consumer options specified in the preceding paragraph, Deer Valley generally offers extensive customization of floor plan designs and exterior elevations to meet specific customer preferences.

Independent Dealer Network, Sales and Marketing

As of the date of this filing, we had approximately 55 participating independent dealers marketing our factory-built homes at around 6070 locations. Our independent dealers are not required to exclusively sell our homes and will typically choose to offer the products of other manufacturers in addition to ours. We do not have written exclusive agreements with our independent dealers and do not have any control over the operations of, or financial interest in, any of our independent dealers. During ~~2014~~2015, the Company ~~had~~did not have sales to any one customer of ~~approximately~~greater than 10%. During ~~2013~~2014, the Company ~~did~~had ~~not have~~ sales to ~~any~~ one customer of ~~greater~~approximately ~~than~~ 10%.

The utilization of our independent dealer network has enabled us to avoid the substantial investment in management, capital, and overhead associated with company-owned sales centers. Although we do not rely upon exclusive dealer arrangements, we typically rely upon a single dealer within a given geographical market to distribute our products. We believe our strategy of selling our homes through independent dealers helps to ensure that our homes are competitive with those of other companies in terms of quality, consumer acceptability, product design, and price.

~~During~~- ~~the~~6 ~~fiscal~~- ~~year ended December 27, 2014, we estimate that the percentage of our revenues by region was as follows:~~

Regions	Primary States	Percentage ofRevenue by Region
East South Central	Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee		43	%
West South Central	Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas		45	%
South Atlantic	Florida, Georgia, West Virginia		7	%
North Central	Kansas, Illinois, Missouri		5	%

- 5 -

During the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016, we estimate that the percentage of our revenues by region was as follows:


Regions	Primary States	Percentage of Revenue by Region
East South Central	Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee	38%
West South Central	Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas	48%
South Atlantic	Florida, Georgia, West Virginia	9%
North Central	Kansas, Illinois, Missouri	5%

Sales information provided above is merely a geographic indicator to the reader of where the Company’s products are sold by region. The Company does not maintain separate operating segments and does not separately report financial information, by geographic sales area or otherwise, for separate operating segments.

Financial Operations

The Company offers inventory-secured financing for its products to a limited number of qualified retail dealers and developers. Products shipped to dealers under the Company’s inventory-secured financing program are recorded by the Company as sales and the dealers’ obligations to the Company are reflected as inventory finance notes receivable.

Finance contracts typically require periodic installments of principal and interest over periods of up to twenty-four months. These notes are secured by a first priority secured interest in the inventory collateral and other security depending on borrower circumstances. Dealers who sell products utilizing inventory-secured financing are required to make immediate payment for those products to the Company upon sale to the retail customer. This type of inventory-secured financing accounted for approximately, 22% of the Company’s sales during ~~2014,~~2015 ~~compared~~and ~~to 36% of the Company’s sales during 2013~~2014.

Although inventory-secured financing continues to be somewhat restrictive for the industry’s wholesale distribution chain, recently third party lenders have introduced finance programs. The increased third party lending has allowed the Company to begin to reduce its capital commitment in direct inventory-secured financing. Nevertheless, until greater access to credit for inventory financing becomes available, the Company’s participation in inventory-secured financing is still needed to maintain a portion of our distribution base.

On April 12, 2013, the Company entered into a new credit arrangement with its primary bank by entering into a new Revolving Credit Loan and Security Agreement, which provided for a revolving line of credit in an amount not to exceed Two Million Five Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($2,500,000.00) (the “Construction Facility”). The Construction Facility was evidenced by a revolving credit note and secured by accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and all other tangible and intangible personal property of Deer Valley. The Loan matures on June 30, 2015 and has a variable interest rate of 4.00% above LIBOR. An event of default such as non-payment of amounts when due or a breach of a covenant may accelerate the maturity date of the facility. The facility provided for conditions to meet prior to each advance, including financial ratios.

Deer Valley’s financial subsidiary, DVFC used proceeds from the Construction Facility to furnish up to a total of $2.5 million dollars to CIS Financial Services, Inc. d/b/a CIS Home Loans (CIS), to provide on a revolving basis, 80% of the funding for “construction-to-permanent loans” prior to the issue of a certificate of occupancy and ultimate resale of the loan to either private or government controlled long term financing entities.

Single-closing, construction-to-permanent mortgage is a common form of financing for new site-built homes. Often, however, it is not readily available to buyers of factory-built homes. This specific source of retail financing is important for the factory-built housing industry. Through this arrangement with CIS, Deer Valley was able to assist its dealers and homebuyers with increased availability of this type of retail financing to the buyers of factory-built homes.

On April 11, 2014, the Company elected not to renew its agreement with CIS Financial Services, Inc. Under this agreement the Company had provided on a revolving basis, 80% of the funding for “construction-to-permanent loans” prior to the issue of a certificate of occupancy and ultimate resale of the loan to either private or government controlled long term financing entities.

See Note 8 – Revolving Credit Loans of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on our $5,000,000 display model line of credit, $3,000,000 working capital line of credit, and the $2,500,000 Construction Facility.

- 6 -

Continuing Operations

Factory-Built Homes - Industry Trends

Although, the ~~manufactured~~factory-built housing industry continues to operate at historically low production and shipment levels, ~~2014~~the ~~represents~~demand ~~the~~for ~~fourth~~affordable factory-built housing is improving. 2015 represented the fifth consecutive year of growth for industry shipments of HUD code homes. According to data provided by the Manufactured Housing Institute (“MHI”), ~~our~~ industry ~~shipped~~shipments of HUD code homes increased to approximately 52,000, 55,000, 60,000, 64,000 ~~HUD~~and ~~code~~70,500 ~~manufactured~~units ~~homes~~in ~~for~~2011, ~~the~~2012, ~~calendar~~2013, ~~year~~ 2014 and 2015, ~~compared~~respectively. toIn 2015, industry shipments were approximately 6070,~~000~~500 ~~HUD~~units; ~~code~~an ~~manufactured~~approximately ~~homes~~10% ~~for~~increase from 2014. During 2015 the Company’s ~~calendar~~shipments ~~year~~were ~~2013~~432 units; a 17.7% increase from 2014.

~~The~~Sales ~~manufactured~~of factory-built housing ~~industry~~are ~~and~~affected by the strength of the ~~Company~~U.S. ~~home~~economy, ~~sales~~interest ~~continue~~rates, toemployment ~~struggle~~levels, ~~due~~consumer toconfidence ~~ongoing~~and ~~economic~~the ~~challenges~~availability of wholesale and retail financing. ~~Low~~We ~~consumer~~believe ~~confidence~~our ~~levels~~market and ~~high~~housing ~~unemployment~~in general have reached bottom and ~~underemployment~~continue ~~rates~~to ~~are~~show ~~two~~signs of improvement; however, our sales continue to be affected by the ~~most~~challenging ~~significant~~housing ~~challenges~~environment, ~~affecting~~the ~~buyers~~uncertainty of ~~factory-built~~the ~~homes~~U.S. ~~Low~~ economy, employment levels, consumer confidence ~~regarding~~and, ~~the~~in ~~outlook~~particular, ~~for~~the ~~jobs~~lack isof ~~not~~available ~~conducive~~consumer ~~for~~financing. ~~potential~~We ~~customers~~believe tothat, ~~commit~~as toemployment aand consumer ~~home~~confidence ~~purchase.~~levels ~~Historically~~improve, ~~lower~~pent-~~income~~up ~~households~~demand ~~are~~will ~~among~~be ~~the~~released, ~~largest~~and, ~~segments~~gradually, ofmore ~~new~~buyers ~~factory-built~~will ~~home~~enter ~~purchasers~~the market. ~~Lower-income households~~We ~~are~~believe ~~particularly~~the ~~affected~~key byto ~~high~~full ~~unemployment~~recovery ~~and~~in ~~underemployment~~our ~~rates~~business depends on these factors as well as an increased availability of consumer financing for the retail purchase of manufactured homes.

We believe our market and housing in general have reached bottom and continue to show signs of improvement; however, we expect that there may be periods of volatility in the future. We believe that, as employment and consumer confidence levels improve, pent-up demand will be released, and, gradually, more buyers will enter the market. We believe the key to full recovery in our business depends on these factors as well as an increased availability of consumer financing for the retail purchase of manufactured homes.

Warranties, Quality Control, and Service

We endeavor to adhere to strict quality standards and continuously refine our production procedures. In addition, in accordance with the construction codes promulgated by HUD, an independent HUD-approved, third-party inspector inspects each HUD Code home for compliance during construction at our manufacturing facilities.

- 7 -

We provide initial home buyers with a one-year limited warranty against manufacturing defects in the home’s construction. In addition, direct warranties are often provided by the manufacturers of components and appliances.

We have experienced quality assurance personnel at our manufacturing facility who provide on-site service to dealers and home buyers. We continuously work to enhance our quality assurance systems, placing high emphasis on improving the value and appeal of our homes and reducing consumer warranty claims.

Independent Dealer Financing

The majority of our independent dealers finance their purchases through “inventory-secured financing” arrangements under which a financial institution provides the dealer with a loan for the purchase price of the home and maintains a security interest in the home as collateral. The nation-wide credit crisis has resulted in a precipitous reduction in the availability of inventory financing for retail outlets in the factory built housing industry. In late 2008, the Company received advisories from national financial service companies which provide “inventory-secured financing” for the majority of the Company’s independent retail dealers. Because of the worldwide volatility and disruption in the capital markets, these traditional lenders have terminated, reduced or modified their retail dealer financing programs in an effort to reduce their asset based portfolios. This reduced availability of wholesale financing has resulted in reduced sales to independent dealers and residential developers.

The Company addressed the limited availability of “dealer inventory financing” by the creation of DVFC. DVFC was created to provide inventory-secured loans to qualified retail dealers and developers. Through the establishment of the financial subsidiary, Deer Valley has moved to counter the credit squeeze that many of the Company’s existing dealers are experiencing. The existence of DVFC also positions the Company to potentially gain “shelf space” at additional independent dealer sales centers in regions where the Company is not currently represented. The Company continues to fund the financial subsidiary through the reallocation of existing cash reserves in combination with funds available from its commercial bank credit facility. Administrative services for DVFC’s new inventory-secured loan program are provided by a third party financial servicing company.

- 7 -

In connection with an inventory-secured financing arrangement by third parties, the financial institution that provides the independent dealer financing customarily requires DVH to enter into a separate repurchase agreement with the financial institution, under which DVH is obligated, upon default by the independent dealer, to repurchase the home at the original invoice price less the cost of all damaged/missing items, plus certain administrative and shipping expenses. The repurchase agreement relates to homes located on an authorized dealer’s lot and in new, sellable condition. As a result, the potential repurchase liability may be offset by the value of the repurchased house. The risk of loss which we face under these repurchase agreements is also lessened by additional factors listed under Item 7 of this filing, at “Reserve for Repurchase Commitments.”

DVH’s contingent repurchase liability under inventory-secured financing arrangements ~~through~~ through independent dealers was approximately $58,~~970~~525,000 and $35,~~815~~970,000 at ~~December 27~~January 2, ~~2014~~2016 and December 28 27, ~~2013~~2014, respectively. While homes repurchased by DVH under inventory-secured financing arrangements are usually sold to other dealers, no assurance can be given that DVH will be able to sell to other dealers homes which it may be obligated to repurchase in the future or that DVH will not suffer more losses with respect to, and as a consequence of, those arrangements than we have accrued in our financial statements.

Competition

The factory-built housing industry is highly competitive at both the manufacturing and retail levels, with competition based upon numerous factors, including total price to the dealer, customization to homeowners’ preferences, product features, quality, warranty repair service, and the terms of dealer and retail customer financing. We have many competitors, ranging from very large, experienced, and well-financed companies to small, specialized manufacturers. Numerous companies produce HUD Code homes and modular homes in the southeastern and south central United States, many of which are in direct competition with us. In addition, certain of our competitors provide retail customers with financing from captive finance subsidiaries.

- 8 -

HUD Code and modular homes also compete with other forms of housing, including site-built and prefabricated homes. Historically, HUD Code housing has had a price advantage over these other forms of housing. That advantage has deteriorated, however, as the credit market in the HUD Code housing industry has, at both the retail and wholesale levels, continued to tighten, while interest rates for site-built houses in recent years have been at historic lows, thus increasing the competitive pressures on HUD Code housing.

The capital requirements for entry as a producer in the factory-built housing industry are relatively small in comparison to potential revenue. However, entry into the industry remains a challenge due to the repurchase requirements imposed by the inventory-secured financing obtained by dealers. In addition, we believe that the qualifications for obtaining inventory financing, which are based upon the financial strength of the manufacturer and each of its dealers, have recently become more difficult to meet due to the departure of financial institutions from the market and efforts of our competitors to add dealers to their sales network.

We believe that our willingness to customize floor plans and design features to match customer preferences, offer energy efficient, heavy built homes that exceed industry standards for construction thresholds, offer inventory-secured financing to qualified dealers and developers, offer factory-provided trim-out and installation services, and provide efficient customer service differentiate us from most of our competitors in the factory-built housing industry. By focusing our manufacturing efforts exclusively on HUD Code homes and modular homes on a cost-effective basis and by relying upon our strong network of regional independent dealers within our geographical market, we have been able to minimize our administrative and marketing expenses while providing our customers with a competitively priced product that maximizes value for the purchase price paid for the home. We maintain close relationships with each of our independent dealers and carefully monitor our service responsibilities to the customers who purchase a factory-built home from us.

We compete with other manufacturers, some of which maintain their own wholesale (dealer) and retail (consumer) financing subsidiaries. Companies with greater access to inventory-secured financing and retail financing could have a significant market advantage.

- 8 -

Regulation

Deer Valley’s factory-built homes are subject to a number of federal, state and local laws. Construction of HUD Code homes is governed by the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (“1974 Act”). In 1976, HUD issued regulations under the 1974 Act establishing comprehensive national construction standards. The HUD regulations cover all aspects of HUD Code home construction, including structural integrity, fire safety, wind loads, thermal protection, plumbing, and electrical work. Such regulations preempt conflicting state and local regulations. Our manufacturing facilities and the plans and specifications of our HUD Code homes have been approved by a HUD-designated inspection agency. An independent, HUD-approved, third-party inspector checks each of our HUD Code homes for compliance during at least one phase of construction. In 1994, HUD amended construction safety standards to improve the wind force resistance of HUD Code homes sold for occupancy in coastal areas prone to hurricanes. Failure to comply with the HUD regulations could expose us to a wide variety of sanctions, including closing our manufacturing plant. We believe that our HUD Code homes meet or surpass all present HUD requirements.

HUD Code, modular, and site-built homes are all built with oriented strand board, paneling, and other products that contain formaldehyde resins. Since February 1985, HUD has regulated the allowable concentration of formaldehyde in certain products used in factory-built homes and requires manufacturers to warn purchasers concerning formaldehyde-associated risks. We currently use materials in our factory-built homes that meet HUD standards for formaldehyde emissions and that otherwise comply with HUD regulations in this regard. In addition, certain components of factory-built homes are subject to regulation by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (“CPSC”), which is empowered to ban the use of component materials believed to be hazardous to health and to require the manufacturer to repair defects in components of its homes. The CPSC, the Environmental Protection Agency, and other governmental agencies are evaluating the effects of formaldehyde. In February 1983, the Federal Trade Commission adopted regulations requiring disclosure of HUD Code home’s insulation specifications.

Our HUD Code and modular homes are also subject to local zoning and housing regulations. Utility connections are subject to state and local regulation, which must be followed by the dealer or other person installing the home. A number of states require HUD Code and modular home producers to post bonds to ensure the satisfaction of consumer warranty claims. Several states have adopted procedures governing the installation of HUD Code and modular homes. We have complied with these requirements in each of the states in which we operate.

In 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) was passed into law. The Dodd-Frank Act is a sweeping piece of legislation, and the financial services industry is still assessing its implications. Congress detailed some significant changes, but the Dodd-Frank Act leaves many details to be determined by regulation and further study. The full impact will not be fully known for months or even years, as regulations that are intended to implement the Dodd-Frank Act are adopted by the appropriate agencies, and the text of the Dodd-Frank Act is analyzed by impacted stakeholders and possibly the courts. The Dodd-Frank Act established the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) to regulate consumer financial products and services. On January 10, 2013 the CFPB released certain mortgage finance rules required under the Dodd-Frank Act. These rules define standards for origination of “Qualified Mortgages,” establish specific requirements for lenders to prove borrowers’ ability to repay loans, and outline the conditions under which Qualified Mortgages will be subject to safe harbor limitations on liability to borrowers. The rules became effective January 10, 2014 apply to consumer credit transactions secured by a dwelling, which include chattel-only loans (manufactured home without land). The rules also establish interest rate and other cost parameters for determining which Qualified Mortgages fall under safe harbor protection. Among other issues, Qualified Mortgages with interest rates and other costs outside the limits will be “rebuttable” by borrowers and expose the lender and its assignees (including investors in loans, pools of loans, and instruments secured by loans or loan pools) to litigation and penalties. While many manufactured homes are currently financed with agency-conforming mortgages in which the ability to repay is verified and at interest rates and other costs that would be within the safe harbor limits, a significant amount of loans as currently written, especially chattel loans and non-conforming land-home loans, would fall outside the safe harbor. After the rules are in effect, lenders may become reluctant to write such loans, and investors reluctant to own or participate in owning such loans because of the uncertainty of potential litigation and other costs. If so, some prospective buyers of manufactured homes may be unable to secure financing necessary to complete purchases. In addition, compliance with the law may be costly from

- 9 -

~~implementation~~Our ofHUD ~~new~~Code ~~processes,~~and ~~procedures,~~modular ~~controls~~homes are also subject to local zoning and ~~infrastructure~~housing ~~which~~regulations. ~~may~~Utility connections beare ~~required~~subject to ~~comply~~state ~~with~~and ~~the~~local ~~regulations.~~regulation, ~~Compliance~~which ~~may~~must ~~also~~be ~~create~~followed ~~operational~~by ~~constraints~~the ~~and~~dealer ~~place~~or ~~limits on~~other ~~pricing~~person installing the home. ~~Failure~~A tonumber ~~comply~~of ~~with~~states ~~these~~require ~~regulations,~~HUD ~~changes~~Code inand ~~these~~modular orhome ~~other~~producers ~~regulations,~~to orpost bonds to ensure the ~~imposition~~satisfaction of ~~additional~~consumer warranty ~~regulations,~~claims. ~~could~~Several ~~affect~~states ~~our~~have ~~earnings,~~adopted ~~limit~~procedures ~~our~~governing ~~access~~the toinstallation ~~capital~~of HUD Code and ~~have~~modular ahomes. ~~material~~We ~~adverse~~have ~~effect~~complied onwith ~~our~~these ~~business~~requirements ~~and results~~in each of ~~operations~~the states in which we operate.

In 2010, the ~~Patient~~Dodd-Frank ~~Protection~~Wall Street Reform and ~~Affordable~~Consumer ~~Care~~Protection Act, as(“Dodd-Frank ~~amended~~Act” byor the ~~Health~~“Act”) ~~Care~~was ~~and~~passed ~~Education~~into ~~Reconciliation~~law. The Dodd-Frank Act, ~~was~~is ~~passed~~a ~~into~~sweeping ~~law~~piece of legislation and the financial services industry continues to assess its implications and implement necessary changes in procedures and business practices. AsThe ~~enacted,~~Act established the ~~Health~~Consumer ~~Reform~~Financial Protection ~~Law~~Bureau ~~reforms~~(“CFPB”) to regulate consumer financial products and services. Although Congress detailed significant changes, ~~among~~and ~~other~~many ~~things~~new rules have been implemented, ~~certain~~the ~~aspects~~full impact will not be known for years as the development of additional ~~health~~rules ~~insurance~~continue, and Congress considers amending part of the Act. ~~The~~Enforcement ~~Health~~actions ~~Reform~~are ~~Law~~in ~~could~~the ~~increase~~early ~~our~~stages ~~healthcare~~and ~~costs,~~the ~~adversely~~effects ~~impacting~~of possible litigation related to the ~~Company’s~~regulations ~~earnings~~remains unknown.

On January 10, 2014, certain CFPB mortgage finance rules required under the Dodd-Frank Act became effective. The rules apply to consumer credit transactions secured by a dwelling, which include real property mortgages and chattel loans (financed without land) secured by manufactured homes. The rules defined standards for origination of “Qualified Mortgages,” established specific requirements for lenders to prove borrowers’ ability to repay loans, and outlined the conditions under which Qualified Mortgages are subject to safe harbor limitations on liability to borrowers. The rules also established interest rates and other cost parameters for determining which Qualified Mortgages fall under safe harbor protection. Among other issues, Qualified Mortgages with interest rates and other costs outside the limits are deemed “rebuttable” by borrowers and expose the lender and its assignees (including investors in loans, pools of loans and instruments secured by loans or loan pools) to possible litigation and penalties.

While many manufactured homes are currently financed with agency-conforming mortgages in which the ability to repay is verified, and interest rates and other costs are within the safe harbor limits established under the CFPB, a significant amount of loans to finance the purchase of manufactured homes, especially chattel loans and non-conforming land-home loans, fall outside the safe harbor limits. The rules have caused some lenders to curtail underwriting such loans, and some investors may be reluctant to own or participate in owning such loans because of the uncertainty of potential litigation and other costs. If so, some prospective buyers of manufactured homes may be unable to secure the financing necessary to complete purchases. In addition, compliance with the law is causing lenders to incur additional costs to implement new processes, procedures, controls and infrastructure required to comply with the regulations. Compliance may also constrain lenders’ ability to profitably price certain loans. Failure to comply with these regulations, changes in these or other regulations, or the imposition of additional regulations, could affect our earnings, limit our access to capital and have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

The CFPB rules amending the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“Regulation Z”). The final rule amended Regulation Z by expanding the types of mortgage loans that are subject to the protections of the Home Ownership and Equity Protections Act of 1994 (“HOEPA”), revise and expand the tests for coverage under HOEPA, and impose additional restrictions on mortgages that are covered by HOEPA. As a result, certain manufactured home loans are now subject to HOEPA limits on interest rates and fees. Loans with rates or fees in excess of the limits are deemed High Cost Mortgages and provide additional protections for borrowers, including with respect to determining the value of the home. Most loans for the purchase of manufactured homes have been written at rates and fees that would not appear to be considered High Cost Mortgages under the new rule. Although some lenders may continue to offer loans that are now deemed High Cost Mortgages, the rate and fee limits may deter some lenders from offering loans to certain borrowers due to the limits on rates and fees or be reluctant to enter into loans subject to the provisions of HOEPA. If so, some prospective buyers of manufactured homes may be unable to secure financing necessary to complete manufactured home purchases.

The Dodd-Frank Act amended provisions of TILA to require rules for appraisals on principal residences securing higher-priced mortgage loans (“HPML”). Certain loans secured by manufactured homes, primarily chattel loans, could be considered HPMLs. Among other things, the rule requires creditors to provide copies of appraisal reports to borrowers prior to loan closing. To implement these amendments, the CFPB adopted the HPML Appraisal Rule

- 10 -

effective December 30, 2014 and loans secured by new manufactured homes were exempt from the rule until July 18, 2015. Although the effects of these new requirements are not yet known, some prospective home buyers may be deterred from completing a manufactured home purchase as a result of appraised values.

The American Housing Rescue and Foreclosure Prevention Act was enacted in 2008 to provide assistance by way of legislation for the housing industry, including manufactured homes. Among other things, the act provided for increased loan limits for chattel (home-only Title I) loans to $69,678, up 43% from the previous limit of $48,600 set in 1992. New Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) Title I program guidelines became effective on June 1, 2010 and provide Ginnie Mae the ability to securitize manufactured home FHA Title I loans. These guidelines were intended to allow lenders to obtain new capital, which can then be used to fund new loans for our customers. Chattel loans have languished for several years and these changes were meant to broaden chattel financing availability for prospective homeowners. However, we are aware of only a small number of loans currently being securitized under the Ginnie Mae program.

The Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 (“SAFE Act”) established requirements for the licensing and registration of all individuals that are Mortgage Loan Originators (“MLOs”). MLOs must be registered or licensed by the states. Traditionally, manufactured housing retailers have assisted home buyers with securing financing for the purchase of homes. This assistance may have included assisting with loan applications and presenting terms of loans. Under the SAFE Act, these activities are prohibited unless performed by a registered or licensed MLO. Although the definition of an MLO contains exemptions for administrative and other specific functions and industries, manufactured housing retailers are no longer able to negotiate rates and terms for loans unless they are licensed as MLOs. Compliance may require manufactured housing retailers to become licensed lenders and employ MLOs, or alter business practices related to assisting home buyers in securing financing. This may result in increased costs for retailers who elect to employ MLOs, penalties assessed against or litigation costs incurred by retailers found to be in violation, reduced home sales from home buyers’ inability to secure financing without retailer assistance, or increased costs to home buyers or reduced transaction profitability for retailers as a result of the additional cost of mandatory MLO involvement.

If passed by Congress and signed into law, the proposed Preserving Access to Manufactured Housing Act (Senate Bill 682 and House of Representatives Bill 650) would amend some Dodd-Frank Act provisions that affect manufactured housing financing. The bill would revise the triggers by which small-sized manufactured home loans are considered “High-Cost” under HOEPA and clarify the MLO licensing requirements for manufactured home retailers and their employees.

In 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (“Health Reform Law”), was passed into law. As enacted, the Health Reform Law reforms, among other things, certain aspects of health insurance. The Health Reform Law could increase our healthcare costs, adversely impacting the Company’s earnings.

There are no special or unusual environmental laws or regulations which require us to make material expenditures or which can be expected to materially impact the operation of our business.

Patents and Licenses

We do not rely upon any significant patent rights, licenses or franchises under the trademarks or patents of any other person or entity in conducting our business. While DVH utilizes the mark “Deer Valley” and “Deer Valley Homebuilders” as Company trademarks in marketing its factory-built homes, we do not own any trademarks or patents registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. However, we have applied for trademark protection for “Deer Valley Homebuilders, Inc.” with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Employees

As of ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016, we we had ~~185~~approximately 200 employees, all of whom are full-time. None of our employees are represented by a labor union and we consider our relationships with our employees to be good.

- 11 -

ITEM 2.

DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

The Company’s executive offices are located at 205 Carriage Street, Guin, AL 35570. The telephone number at the Company’s executive offices is (205) 468-8400. DVH’s principal manufacturing plant and offices are located at 205 Carriage Street, Guin, Alabama 35563 (the “Guin Property”), and its telephone number is (205) 468-8400. DVH’s principal manufacturing plant and company offices consist of a manufacturing plant with 107,511 square feet, a frame shop with 10,800 square feet, material shed of 23,172 square feet and offices with 11,250 square feet of space. DVH owns the buildings and 25.5 acres underlying these facilities. DVH has executed a mortgage on the Guin Property in favor of a national bank. In addition, DVH owns an idled manufacturing facility with a 65,992 square foot manufacturing plant located on approximately 13 acres of land in Sulligent, Alabama (the “Sulligent Property”). The Sulligent Property was idled in September 2008.

We believe that the general physical condition of our manufacturing ~~facilities~~facility and executive offices is adequate to satisfy our current production needs. Accordingly, there are no present plans to improve or develop any of the unimproved or undeveloped portions of the Guin ~~or Sulligent Properties~~Property.

Except for ownership of the manufacturing ~~facilities~~facility we occupy or intend to occupy, we do not invest in real estate or real estate mortgages. It It is not our policy to acquire properties for capital gain or rental income. In our opinion, we have sufficient property insurance for our property.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Although the Company in the normal course of business is subject to claims and litigation, the Company is not a party to any material legal proceeding nor is the Company aware of any circumstance which may reasonably lead a third party to initiate legal proceeding against the Company.

As of the date of this filing, there are no material pending legal or governmental proceedings relating to our company or properties to which we are a party, and to our knowledge there are no material proceedings to which any of our directors, executive officers, or affiliates are a party adverse to us or which have a material interest adverse to us.

- 10 -

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND REGISTANT REPURCHASES OF SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock trades on the OTC Bulletin Board under the trading symbol “DVLY.” The figures set forth below reflect the quarterly high and low bid information for shares of our common stock during the last two fiscal years, as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail markup, markdown, or commission, and may not represent actual transactions. Please note that the board of directors approved a two-for-one stock dividend on November 4, 2005, payable to shareholders of record as of November 14, 2005, which doubled the numbers of shares outstanding.

	High		Low
2013 Quarter Ended
March 30, 2013	$	.65	$	.60
June 29, 2013	$	.80	$	.60
September 28, 2013	$	.65	$	.59
December 28, 2013	$	.66	$	.65
2014 Quarter Ended
March 29, 2014	$	.75	$	.65
June 28, 2014	$	1.00	$	.60
September 27, 2014	$	.95	$	.60
December 27, 2014	$	.85	$	.65
2015 Quarter Ended
March 28, 2015	$	.70	$	.30
June 27, 2015	$	.65	$	.31
September 26, 2015	$	.85	$	.35
January 2, 2016	$	.85	$	.69

- 12 -

RULES GOVERNING LOW-PRICE STOCKS THAT MAY AFFECT ABILITY TO RESELL SHARES. Our common stock is subject to certain rules adopted by the SEC that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in “penny stocks”. Penny stocks generally are securities with a price of less than $ 5.00 other than securities registered on certain national exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that the exchange or system provides current price and volume information with respect to transaction in such securities. The additional sales practice and disclosure requirements imposed upon broker-dealers may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our shares which could limit the market liquidity of the shares and impede the sale of our shares in the secondary market.

The penny stock rules require broker-dealers, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to make a special suitability determination for the purchaser to receive the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to sale, to deliver standardized risk disclosure documents prepared by the SEC that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. In addition, the penny stock regulations require the broker-dealer to deliver prior to any transaction involving the penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt. A broker-dealer is also required to disclose commissions payable to the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, a broker-dealer is required to send monthly statements disclosing recent price information with the respect to the penny stock held in a customer’s account and information with respect to the limited market in penny stocks.

Holders Of Common Stock

On March 115, ~~2015~~ 2016, there were ~~305~~273 registered holders or persons otherwise entitled to hold our common shares pursuant to a shareholders’ list provided by our transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services, N.A. The number of registered ~~shareholders~~ shareholders excludes any estimate by us of the number of beneficial owners of common shares held in street name.

- 11 -

Dividends

We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock since our inception, and our Board of Directors currently intends to retain all earnings for use in the business for the foreseeable future. Any future payment of dividends to holder of common stock will depend upon our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.

Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION


Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding option, warrants and rights (a)		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)		Number of securities remaining available for future issuances under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		—		—		—
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—		1,800,000

Total		—		—		1,800,000

- 13 -

On September 7, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors ratified the Company’s 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2007 Incentive Plan”). The 2007 Incentive Plan was effective as of July 1, 2007. A maximum of 1,800,000 shares of common stock has been authorized to be issued under the 2007 Incentive Plan in connection with the grant of awards, subject to adjustment for corporate transactions, including, without limitation, any stock dividend, forward stock split, reverse stock split, merger or recapitalization. Of this amount, no more than 1,000,000 shares of common stock may be issued as incentive stock options.

The Company did not issue any stock options or warrants pursuant to an equity compensation plan during ~~2014~~2015 or ~~2013~~2014. There were no outstanding stock options as of ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016 and December 2827, ~~2013~~2014.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Except as reported in previous filings, we did not sell any securities in transactions which were not registered under the Securities Act in the fiscal year ended ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA. Not Applicable.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward Looking Statements

We desire to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This filing contains a number of forward-looking statements which reflect management’s current views and expectations with respect to our business, strategies, products, future results and events, and financial performance. All statements made in this filing other than statements of historical fact, including statements addressing operating performance, events, or developments which management expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including statements related to distributor channels, volume growth, revenues, profitability, new products, adequacy of funds from operations, statements expressing general optimism about future operating results, and non-historical information, are forward looking statements. In particular, the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “may,” variations of such words, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements, and their absence does not mean that the statement is not forward-looking. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from historical results as well as those expressed in, anticipated, or implied by these forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to revise these forward-looking statements to reflect any future events or circumstances.

- 12 -

including statements related to distributor channels, volume growth, revenues, profitability, new products, adequacy of funds from operations, statements expressing general optimism about future operating results, and non-historical information, are forward looking statements. In particular, the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “may,” variations of such words, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements, and their absence does not mean that the statement is not forward-looking. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from historical results as well as those expressed in, anticipated, or implied by these forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to revise these forward-looking statements to reflect any future events or circumstances.

Readers should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are based on management’s current expectations and projections about future events, are not guarantees of future performance, are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions (including those described below), and apply only as of the date of this filing. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from the results expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Factors which could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, the risks to be discussed in our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on April 19, 2006, as subsequently amended or supplemented, and in the press releases and other communications to shareholders issued by us from time to time which attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors which may affect our business. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Overview

The Company, through its ~~wholly~~ wholly owned subsidiaries DVH and DVHRS, ~~designs~~design and ~~manufactures~~manufacture factory built homes which are marketed in 14 states through a network of independent dealers, builders, developers and government agencies located primarily in the southeastern and ~~south~~ south central regions of the United States. Our financial subsidiary, DVFC, provides dealer inventory-secured financing for our factory built homes ~~and provides bridge financing~~ to anqualified ~~established~~retail ~~mortgage~~dealers ~~originator~~and ~~for the funding of construction-to-permanent loans for ultimate resale~~developers.

The Company’s executives continue to focus on challenges faced by our industry and the general economy. (i) As part of the Company’s strategic plan, management seeks to identify niche market opportunities where our custom building capabilities provide us with a competitive advantage. The Company continues to focus on the production of custom built, energy efficient, “heavy built homes” and has intensified efforts in innovative exterior elevations to meet the needs of homeowners, dealers and developers (ii) Management has addressed the limited availability of “dealer inventory financing” with the establishment of its wholly owned subsidiary, DVFC. The subsidiary was created to provide inventory-~~secured~~ ~~loans~~14 to qualified retail dealers and developers. (iii) Management has addressed a need for consumer financing by teaming with an established mortgage originator to increase the availability of affordable loans for qualified retail buyers of factory-~~built~~ homes. (iv) The Company continues to focus on operating activities to improve manufacturing efficiencies and maintaining a conservative cost structure. (v) The Company continually looks for new market opportunities and expanding our product offering by developing product designs and production methods.

- 13 -

Results of Operations

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements, included herewith. This discussion should not be construed to imply that the results discussed herein will necessarily continue into the future, or that any conclusion reached herein will necessarily be indicative of actual operating results in the future. Such discussion represents only the best present assessment by our management. Information for the year ended ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016 and year ended December 2827, ~~2013~~2014 is that of the Company on a consolidated basis with DVH, DVFC and DVHRS.

Revenues. The Company had gross revenues of $3035,~~247~~663,~~725~~343 in fiscal year ~~2014~~2015, as compared to $2830,~~937~~247,~~716~~725 in fiscal ~~year~~ ~~2013~~year 2014. Accordingly, revenues increased $15,~~310~~415,~~009~~618 or an increase of 417.59% compared to the prior year. The increase in revenue for ~~2014~~2015, is primarily attributable to ~~an increase in the average wholesale price per unit in 2014 compared to prior year. Our average wholesale price per unit~~ increased tohome ~~approximately $81,100 in fiscal year 2014, as compared to $79,000 in fiscal year 2013~~sales. The ~~increase~~improved inhome ~~the~~sales ~~average~~volume ~~wholesale~~resulted ~~price~~from isstrengthening market ~~primarily~~conditions ~~the~~and ~~result~~an ofincrease ~~a change~~ in ~~the~~participating ~~product~~independent ~~mix.~~dealers ~~Our product~~marketing ~~mix~~our ~~in 2014 featured a greater percentage of modular~~ homes ~~and homes featuring innovative exterior elevations~~. Although we remain cautiously optimistic, several challenges such as ~~persistently~~sluggish ~~high~~wage ~~unemployment~~growth, low consumer confidence levels, and ~~low~~the ~~consumer~~restrictive mortgage ~~confidence~~lending ~~levels~~environment continue to hinder a full recovery ~~for~~in ~~our industry and~~ the ~~Company’s~~housing ~~sales~~market.

Gross Profit. Gross profit was $57,~~752~~978,~~470~~316 or 19 22.24% of total revenue for 2014, compared to $5,~~542~~752,~~376~~470 or 19.2% of total revenue for ~~2013~~2014. The increase in gross profit for the fiscal year 2015 is attributable to higher revenues, increased production efficiencies gained through greater utilization capacity and lower service and warranty costs. The Company includes the following types of expenses in cost of sales: purchase and receiving costs, freight in, direct labor, supply costs, warehousing, direct and indirect overhead costs, inspection, transfer, actual and accrued warranty, depreciation, and amortization costs.

Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ending ~~December~~ January 272, ~~2014~~2016 were $45,~~692~~969,~~077~~731, compared to $4,~~158~~692,~~080~~077 for the fiscal year ~~2013~~2014. Selling, general and administrative cost increased $~~533~~1,~~997~~277,654 for the fiscal year ending ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016, in comparison to the corresponding period for ~~2013~~ 2014. The increase in our selling, general and administration expenses is primarily due to anincreased ~~increase~~selling and administrative cost associated with the increase in ~~salaries~~revenues and ~~wages~~a ~~and~~charitable ~~insurance~~contribution ~~costs~~of ~~compared~~$800,000, related to to the ~~same~~Bargain ~~corresponding~~Sale ~~period~~Exchange ~~for~~of ~~2013~~the Company’s idled manufacturing plant. These increased costs were offset in-part by a decrease in general corporate expenses. The Company includes the following types of expenses in selling, general and administrative expense: sales salaries, sales commissions, bad debt expense, advertising, administrative overhead, administrative salaries and bonuses and legal and professional fees.

Operating Income. Operating income is derived by deducting cost of revenue, depreciation and amortization and selling, ~~general~~ general and administration expenses from total revenue. Operating income for ~~2014~~2015 was $12,~~060~~008,~~393~~585 compared to $1,~~384~~060,~~296~~393 in ~~2013~~2014. Accordingly, operating income ~~decreased~~increased $~~323~~948,~~903~~192 compared to the prior year. The ~~decrease~~increase was due to ~~the~~an increase in ~~selling,~~ ~~general~~revenues and ~~administrative~~gross ~~expenses~~profit ~~discussed~~previously ~~above~~discussed.

~~Income~~- ~~Tax~~15 ~~Expense.~~- An income expense of $374,278 was recognized for the year ended December 27, 2014, compared to an income tax expense of $528,546 for the year ended December 28, 2013. See Note 11 – Income Taxes of the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosure data.

Net Income. The net income for 2014 was $651,139 or .04 per diluted share, compared to net income of $815,233, or .05 per diluted share, in 2013.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Management believes that the Company currently has sufficient cash flow from operations, available bank borrowings, cash, and cash equivalents to meet its short-term working capital requirements. The Company had $4,116,101 in cash and cash equivalents as of December 27, 2014, compared to $3,107,213 in cash and cash equivalents as of December 28, 2013. The increase in cash and cash equivalents is primarily attributable to the decrease in our inventory finance receivable. Although inventory-secured financing continues to be in short supply for the industry’s wholesale distribution chain, recently a national lender introduced finance programs subject to less

- 14 -

~~financial~~Other ~~involvement~~Income ~~of the manufacturer~~(Expenses). ~~The~~Other ~~increased~~income ~~flexibility~~(expense) ~~has~~for ~~allowed~~ the ~~Company~~fiscal toyear ~~begin~~ending January 2, to2016 ~~reduce~~was ~~its involvement in direct inventory-secured financing. Nevertheless~~$626,125, ~~until~~compared ~~greater access~~ to ~~credit~~$(34,976) for ~~inventory~~the ~~financing~~fiscal ~~becomes~~year ~~available~~2014. ~~participation~~The increase in ~~inventory-secured~~other ~~financing~~income is ~~needed~~primarily tothe ~~maintain~~result ~~our~~of ~~distribution~~a ~~base.~~gain ~~Should~~of ~~our~~$653,261 ~~costs~~related ~~and expenses prove~~ to bethe ~~greater~~sale ~~than~~of ~~we currently anticipate, or should we change~~ our ~~current~~idled ~~business~~manufacturing ~~plan~~plant. inSee aNote ~~manner~~5 ~~which~~– ~~will increase or accelerate our anticipated costs or capital demand~~Property, ~~such~~Plant asand Equipment ~~through~~of the ~~acquisition~~notes ofto ~~new~~Consolidated ~~products,~~Financial ~~our~~Statements ~~working~~for ~~capital~~additional ~~could~~disclosure ~~be depleted at an accelerated rate~~data.

~~For~~Income ~~the~~Tax ~~fiscal~~Expense. ~~year~~An ~~ended~~income expense ~~December 27,~~of ~~2014~~$674,576 ~~our~~was ~~operating~~recognized ~~activities~~for ~~provided~~the ~~net~~year ~~cash~~ended ofJanuary 2, $42016,~~473,346,~~ as compared to ~~our~~an ~~operating activities~~income ~~provided~~tax ~~net~~expense ~~cash~~ of $2374,~~859,056~~278 for ~~fiscal~~the year ended December 2827, ~~2013~~2014. ~~Our~~See ~~significant~~Note ~~change~~10 in– ~~cash~~Income ~~flow~~Taxes isof ~~primarily~~the ~~attributable~~notes to aConsolidated ~~decrease~~Financial ~~in our participation in inventory finance receivables, which was offset in part by~~Statements anfor ~~increase~~additional indisclosure ~~accounts receivable and construction loan receivable~~data.

~~For~~Net ~~the~~Income. ~~fiscal~~The ~~year~~net ~~ended~~income ~~December 27~~for 2015 was $1,960,134 ~~2014~~or .13 per diluted share, ~~operating~~compared ~~activities~~to ~~provided~~ net ~~cash~~income of $4651,~~473~~139,~~346~~ ~~primarily~~or as.04 per adiluted ~~result~~share, ofin ~~the~~2014. ~~following:~~

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Management believes that the Company currently has sufficient cash flow from operations, available bank borrowings, cash, and cash equivalents to meet its short-term working capital requirements. The Company had $2,889,546 in cash and cash equivalents as of January 2, 2016, compared to $4,116,101 in cash and cash equivalents as of December 27, 2014. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents is primarily attributable to an increase in investments and an increase in our inventory finance receivable. Should our costs and expenses prove to be greater than we currently anticipate, or should we change our current business plan in a manner which will increase or accelerate our anticipated costs or capital demand, such as through the acquisition of new products, our working capital could be depleted at an accelerated rate.

For the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016, our operating activities provided net cash of $2,148,085, as compared to our operating activities provided net cash of $4,473,346 for fiscal year ended December 27, 2014. Our significant change in cash flow is primarily attributable to an increase in our participation in inventory finance receivables, which was offset in part by an increase in income tax payable, accrued estimated warranties and accrued expenses.

For the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016, operating activities provided net cash of $2,148,085 primarily as a result of the following:

(a)

We had net income of $1,960,134

Changes in our operating assets and liabilities are as follows:

(b)

an increase in income tax payable, accrued warranties and accrued expenses of $939,026 (a source of cash, which were offset in-part by,

(c)

an increase in inventory finance receivable of $814,232 (a use of cash).

For the fiscal year ended December 27, 2014, operating activities provided net cash of $4,473,376 primarily as a result of the following:

(a)

We had net income of $651,139

Changes in our operating assets and liabilities are as follows:

(b)

a decrease in inventory finance receivable of $2,480,743 (a source of cash), primarily a result a smaller percentage of sales utilizing the Company’s inventory secured financing programs due to a national inventory lender returning to the market,

- 16 -

(c)

a decrease in construction loan receivables of $693,257 (a source of cash), as result of the collection of construction-to-permanent loans, and

(d)

an increase in accrued expenses of $276,422 (a source of cash).

~~For~~The net cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended ~~December~~ January 282, ~~2013~~2015 was $2,888,573, ~~operating~~as ~~activities~~compared ~~provided~~to $334,196 for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2014. The net cash used in investing activities reflects normal equipment purchases of $2253,~~859~~773 and purchases of investments of $3,~~056~~000,000, ~~primarily~~which aswere aoffset ~~result~~in-part by sale of ~~the~~our ~~following:~~idled manufacturing plant. See description of investment at Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

~~(a)~~The Wenet ~~had~~cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016 was $486,067, primarily attributable to principal payments of long-term debt. The net ~~income~~cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2014 was $3,130,262, primarily attributable to scheduled principal payments of long-term debt of $~~815~~125,~~233~~600 and net repayments of revolving credit loans of $3,056,799.

Changes in our operating assets and liabilities are as follows:

(b) a decrease in inventory finance receivable of $2,177,243 (a source of cash), primarily a result a smaller percentage of sales utilizing the Company’s inventory secured financing programs due to a national inventory lender returning to the market,

(c) A decrease in inventories of $237,105 (a source of cash), primarily as a result of a decrease in finished goods inventory as a result of the holiday shutdown period, which were offset in part by

(d) an increase in accounts receivable of $478,169 (use of cash), the decrease in accounts receivable is a result of a smaller percentage of sales utilizing the Company’s inventory secured financing programs due to a national inventory lender returning to the market, and

(e) an increase in construction loan receivables of $693,257 (a use of cash), as result of the initial funding of construction-to-permanent loans.

The net cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2014 was $334,196, as compared to $226,653 for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013. The net cash used in investing activities reflects normal equipment purchases.

The net cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2014 was $3,130,262, primarily attributable to scheduled principal payments of long-term debt of $125,600 and net repayments of revolving credit loans of $3,056,799. The net cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013 was $1,959,417, primarily attributable to (i) scheduled principal payments of long-term debt of $125,600 (ii) net repayments of revolving credit loans of $1,693,200 and (iii) purchase of treasury stock at a cost of $140,617.

- 15 -

The Company is contingently liable under the terms of the repurchase agreements with financial institutions providing inventory financing for retailers of our products. For more information on the repurchase agreements, including the Company’s contingent liability there under, please see “Reserve for Repurchase Commitments” below.

DVH, during its normal course of business, is required to issue irrevocable standby letters of credit to cover obligations under its workers compensation insurance policy in the amount of $65,000. As of ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016, no amounts had been drawn on the above irrevocable letters of credit by the beneficiaries.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments which affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. For a description of those estimates, see Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, contained in the explanatory notes to the Company’s financial statements for the year ended ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016, contained in this filing. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to reserves, deferred tax assets, valuation allowances, impairment of long-lived assets, fair value of equity instruments issued to consultants for services, and estimates of costs to complete contracts. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities which are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. However, we believe that our estimates, including those for the above-described items, are reasonable.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Management is aware that certain changes in accounting estimates employed in generating financial statements can have the effect of making the Company look more or less profitable than it actually is. Management does not believe that the Company or its auditors has made any material changes in accounting estimates. A summary of the most critical accounting estimates employed by the Company in generating financial statements follows below.

Warranties

We provide our retail buyers with a one-year limited warranty covering defects in material or workmanship, including plumbing and electrical systems. We record a liability for estimated future warranty costs relating to homes sold, based upon our assessment of historical experience and industry trends. In making this estimate, we evaluate ~~historical sales amounts, warranty costs related~~ to homes sold and timing in which any work orders are completed. The Company has accrued a warranty liability reserve of $1,245,000 on its balance sheet as of December 27, 2014 compared with a warranty liability reserve of $1,185,000 on its balance sheet as of December 28, 2013. Based on management’s assessment of historical experience and current trends in wholesale shipments and dealer inventories we increased our warranty provision by $60,000 for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2014. Although we maintain reserves for such claims, there can be no assurance that warranty expense levels will remain at current levels or that the reserves that we have set aside will continue to be adequate. A large number of warranty claims which exceed our current warranty expense levels could have a material adverse affect upon our results of operations.

~~Volume Incentives~~- ~~Payable~~17 -

- 16 -

~~represent~~historical asales ~~significant~~amounts, ~~expense~~warranty costs related to ~~us,~~homes sold and timing in which any ~~significant~~work ~~changes~~orders inare ~~actual~~completed. ~~payouts~~The ~~could~~Company ~~have~~has anaccrued ~~adverse~~a ~~affect~~warranty liability reserve of $1,460,000 on ~~our~~its ~~financial~~balance sheet ~~performance.~~as Weof ~~had~~January 2, a2016 ~~reserve~~compared ~~for~~with ~~volume~~a ~~incentives~~warranty ~~payable~~liability reserve of $~~347~~1,~~421~~245,000 on its balance sheet as of December 27, 2014,. asBased ~~compared~~on tomanagement’s assessment of historical experience and current trends in wholesale shipments and dealer inventories we increased our warranty provision by $~~230~~215,~~429~~000 asfor ofthe ~~December~~fiscal year ended January 282, ~~2013~~2016. Although we maintain reserves for such claims, there can be no assurance that warranty expense levels will remain at current levels or that the reserves that we have set aside will continue to be adequate. A large number of warranty claims which exceed our current warranty expense levels could have a material adverse affect upon our results of operations.

Volume Incentives Payable

We have relied upon volume incentive payments to our independent dealers who retail our products. These volume incentive payments are accounted for as a reduction to gross sales, and are estimated and accrued when sales of our factory-built homes are made to our independent dealers. Volume incentive reserves are recorded based upon the annualized purchases of our independent dealers who purchase a qualifying amount of home products from us. We accrue a liability to our dealers, based upon estimates derived from historical payout rates. Volume incentive costs represent a significant expense to us, and any significant changes in actual payouts could have an adverse affect on our financial performance. We had a reserve for volume incentives payable of $340,585 as of January 2, 2016, as compared to $347,421 as of December 27, 2014.

Reserve for Repurchase Commitments

Most of our independent dealers finance their purchases under a wholesale inventory-secured financing arrangement under which a financial institution provides the dealer with a loan for the purchase price of the home and maintains a security interest in the home as collateral. When entering into an inventory-secured arrangement, the financial institution routinely requires that we enter into a separate repurchase agreement with the lender, under which we are obligated, upon default by the independent dealer, to repurchase the factory-built home at our original invoice price less the cost of administrative and shipping expenses. Our potential loss under a repurchase obligation depends upon the estimated net resale value of the home, as compared to the repurchase price that we are obligated to pay. This amount generally declines on a predetermined schedule over a period that usually does not exceed 24 months.

The risk of loss that we face under these repurchase agreements is lessened by several factors, including the following:

(i)

the sales of our products are spread over a number of independent dealers,

(ii)

we have had only isolated instances where we have incurred a repurchase obligation,

(iii)

the price we are obligated to pay under such repurchase agreements declines based upon a predetermined amount over a period which usually does not exceed 24 months, and

(iv)

we have been able to resell homes repurchased from lenders at current market prices, although there is no guarantee that we will continue to be able to do so.

The maximum amount for which the Company is contingently liable under such agreements amounted to approximately $58,~~970~~525,000 at ~~December~~ January 272, ~~2014~~ 2016, as compared to $35,~~815~~970,000 at December 2827, ~~2013~~2014. As of ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016 and December 2827, ~~2013~~2014, we had reserves of $~~179~~255,~~065~~715 and $~~116~~179,~~605~~065, respectively, established for future repurchase commitments, based upon our prior experience and evaluation of our independent dealers’ financial conditions. Because Deer Valley to date has not experienced any significant losses under these agreements, management does not expect any future losses to have a material effect on our accompanying financial statements.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

As previously discussed, the manufactured housing industry has experienced an overall market decline. Addressing the constriction of the retail housing market, in 2008 the Company idled its Sulligent, Alabama plant and thereafter consolidated its production operations at the Company’s larger plant located in Guin, Alabama. In accordance with FASB Topic ASC 420 “Exit on Disposal Cost Obligations”, the Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used when events and circumstances warrant such a review. The carrying value of long-lived assets is considered impaired when the anticipated undiscounted cash flow from such assets is less than its carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived assets. Fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Losses on long-lived assets to be disposed of are determined in a similar manner, except that the fair market values are primarily based on independent appraisals and preliminary or definitive contractual arrangements less costs to dispose. ~~Based on our estimates of the fair value of idled facility no impairment charges have been recorded.~~

Revenue Recognition

Revenue for our products sold to independent dealers are generally recorded when all of the following conditions have been met: (i) an order for the home has been received from the dealer, (ii) an agreement with respect to payment terms has been received, and (iii) the home has been shipped and risk of loss has passed to the dealer and collectability is reasonably assured.

- 17 -

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and other regulatory bodies that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective dates. Unless otherwise discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

None

- 18 -

Item 8.

Financial Statements

Deer Valley Corporation & Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016 and December 2827, ~~2013~~2014

Contents:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	~~F-1~~	F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013	F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 2, 2016 and December 27, 2014		F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013	F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended January 2, 2016 and December 27, 2014		F-3
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended January 2, 2016 and December 27, 2014		F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013	F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended January 2, 2016 and December 27, 2014		F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013	F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended January 2, 2016 and December 27, 2014		F-7

~~Table~~REPORT ofOF ~~Contents~~INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

~~REPORT~~The OFBoard ~~INDEPENDENT~~of ~~REGISTERED~~Directors ~~PUBLIC~~and ~~ACCOUNTING~~Stockholders ~~FIRM~~

~~The~~Deer ~~Board~~Valley Corporation & ofSubsidiaries ~~Directors and Stockholders~~

~~Deer~~Guin, ~~Valley Corporation &~~Alabama ~~Subsidiaries~~

~~Tampa~~We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Deer Valley Corporation & Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 2, ~~Florida~~2016 and December 27, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We ~~have audited~~conducted ~~the~~our ~~accompanying~~audits ~~consolidated~~in ~~balance~~accordance ~~sheets~~with ofthe ~~Deer~~standards ~~Valley~~of ~~Corporation & Subsidiaries (~~the “Public Company”) asAccounting ofOversight ~~December~~Board (United ~~27,~~States). ~~2014~~Those ~~and~~standards ~~December 28,~~require that ~~2013,~~we plan and perform the ~~related~~audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of ~~operations~~material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, ~~changes in~~nor ~~stockholders’~~were ~~equity~~we engaged to perform, ~~and~~an ~~cash~~audit ~~flows~~of ~~for~~its ~~the~~internal control ~~years~~over ~~then~~financial ~~ended~~reporting. ~~These~~Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial ~~statements~~reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the ~~responsibility~~circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s ~~management.~~internal ~~Our~~control ~~responsibility~~over isfinancial toreporting. Accordingly, we express anno such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on ~~these~~a ~~financial~~test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, ~~based~~assessing onthe accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

WeIn ~~conducted~~ our ~~audits~~opinion, ~~in accordance with~~ the ~~standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the~~ consolidated financial statements ~~are~~referred ~~free~~to ofabove ~~material~~present ~~misstatement. The Company is not required to have~~fairly, ~~nor~~in ~~were~~all wematerial ~~engaged to perform~~respects, anthe ~~audit of its internal control over~~ financial ~~reporting.~~position ~~Our audits included consideration~~ of ~~internal~~Deer ~~control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the~~Valley ~~effectiveness~~Corporation & ofSubsidiaries ~~the~~at ~~Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly~~January 2, we2016 ~~express~~and ~~no such opinion. An audit also includes examining~~December 27, ~~on a test basis~~2014, ~~evidence supporting the amounts~~ and ~~disclosures in~~ the ~~financial~~results ~~statements, assessing~~of ~~the~~their ~~accounting~~operations ~~principles used~~ and ~~significant~~their ~~estimates~~cash ~~made~~flows byfor ~~management,~~the asyears ~~well~~then asended ~~evaluating~~in ~~the~~conformity ~~overall~~with ~~financial~~U. ~~statement presentation~~S. Wegenerally ~~believe~~accepted ~~that~~accounting ~~our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion~~principles.

InThomas ~~our~~Howell ~~opinion,~~Ferguson the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Deer Valley Corporation & Subsidiaries at December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with UP. SA. ~~generally accepted accounting principles.~~

~~Thomas~~Tallahassee, ~~Howell~~Florida ~~Ferguson P.A.~~

~~Tallahassee~~April 1, ~~Florida~~2016

~~March 27,~~F-1 ~~2015~~

~~Table~~Deer ofValley ~~Contents~~Corporation & Subsidiaries

~~Deer~~Consolidated ~~Valley~~Balance ~~Corporation &~~Sheets ~~Subsidiaries~~

Consolidated Balance Sheets


	January 2, 2016			December 27, 2014
ASSETS

Current Assets:
Cash	$	2,889,546		$	4,116,101
Investments		3,000,000			—
Accounts receivable, net		1,590,187			1,577,111
Inventory		1,320,224			1,233,480
Deferred tax asset		911,262			578,928
Inventory finance notes receivable		1,763,313			2,081,511
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		76,174			67,532

Total Current Assets		11,550,706			9,654,663

Fixed Assets:
Property, plant and equipment, net		1,835,831			2,307,495

Other Assets:
Inventory finance notes receivable, net		2,510,014			1,443,294
Deferred tax asset		1,294,196			1,439,538
Other assets		11,290			14,386

Total Other Assets:		3,815,500			2,897,218

Total Assets	$	17,202,037		$	14,859,376


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current Liabilities:
Current maturities on long term debt	$	330,333		$	125,600
Accounts payable		257,344			327,775
Accrued expenses		2,104,776			1,790,432
Accrued warranties		1,460,000			1,245,000
Income tax payable		575,558			165,877

Total Current Liabilities		4,728,011			3,654,684

Long Term Liabilities:
Long-term debt, net of current maturities		—			690,800

Total Long Term Liabilities		—			690,800

Total Liabilities		4,728,011			4,345,484


Stockholders’ Equity:

Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 17,912,184 and 17,912,184 shares issued and 15,514,344 and 15,514,344 outstanding, respectively.		17,914			17,914

Additional paid-in capital		33,336,067			33,336,067

Treasury Stock, at cost; 2,397,840 and 2,397,840 shares, respectively		(1,305,378	)		(1,305,378	)

Accumulated deficit		(19,574,577	)		(21,534,711	)

Total Stockholders’ Equity		12,474,026			10,513,892

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	17,202,037		$	14,859,376

ASSETS
	December 27,			December 28,
	2014			2013
Current Assets:
Cash	$	4,116,101		$	3,107,213
Accounts receivable, net		1,577,111			1,537,027
Inventory		1,233,480			1,310,618
Deferred tax asset		578,928			567,693
Inventory finance notes receivable		2,081,511			2,607,456
Construction loan notes receivable		—			693,257
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		67,532			120,069
Total Current Assets		9,654,663			9,943,333
Fixed Assets:
Property, plant and equipment, net		2,307,495			2,143,707
Other Assets:
Inventory finance notes receivable, net		1,443,294			3,287,772
Deferred tax asset		1,439,538			1,621,179
Other assets		14,386			17,482
Total Other Assets:		2,897,218			4,926,433
Total Assets	$	14,859,376		$	17,013,473
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Current maturities on long term debt	$	125,600		$	125,600
Revolving credit loans		—			3,056,799
Accounts payable		327,775			364,887
Accrued expenses		1,790,432			1,514,010
Accrued warranties		1,245,000			1,185,000
Income tax payable		165,877			140,162
Total Current Liabilities		3,654,684			6,386,458
Long Term Liabilities:
Long-term debt, net of current maturities		690,800			816,400
Total Long Term Liabilities		690,800			816,400
Total Liabilities		4,345,484			7,202,858
Stockholders’ Equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 17,912,184 and 17,786,184 shares issued and 15,514,344 and 15,434,447 outstanding, respectively.		17,914			17,788
Additional paid-in capital		33,336,067			33,254,293
Treasury Stock, at cost; 2,397,840 and 2,351,737 shares, respectively		(1,305,378	)		(1,275,616	)
Accumulated deficit		(21,534,711	)		(22,185,850	)
Total Stockholders Equity		10,513,892			9,810,615
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity	$	14,859,376		$	17,013,473

See notes to consolidated financial statements

~~See~~F-2 ~~notes to consolidated financial statements~~

~~Table~~Deer ofValley ~~Contents~~Corporation & Subsidiaries

~~Deer~~Consolidated ~~Valley~~Statements ~~Corporation &~~of ~~Subsidiaries~~Operations

Consolidated Statements of Operations


	For the years ended
	January 2, 2016			December 27, 2014

REVENUE	$	35,663,343		$	30,247,725

COST OF REVENUE		27,685,027			24,495,255


GROSS PROFIT		7,978,316			5,752,470

OPERATING EXPENSES:
Selling, general and administrative		5,969,731			4,692,077


TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES		5,969,731			4,692,077


OPERATING INCOME		2,008,585			1,060,393

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)
Interest income		17			461
Other income (expense)		657,962			2,200
Interest expense		(31,854	)		(37,637	)


TOTAL OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSES)		626,125			(34,976	)


INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		2,634,710			1,025,417

INCOME TAX (EXPENSE)		(674,576	)		(374,278	)


NET INCOME	$	1,960,134		$	651,139


Net Income Per Share (Basic)	$	0.13		$	0.04
Net Income Per Share (Fully Diluted)	$	0.13		$	0.04

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding		15,514,344			15,436,518
Weighted Average Common and Common Equivalent Shares Outstanding		15,514,344			15,436,518

	For the years ended
	December 27,			December 28,
	2014			2013
REVENUE	$	30,247,725		$	28,937,716
COST OF REVENUE		24,495,255			23,395,340
GROSS PROFIT		5,752,470			5,542,376
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES		4,692,077			4,158,080
OPERATING INCOME		1,060,393			1,384,296
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)
Interest income		461			535
Other income		2,200			2,000
Interest expense		(37,637	)		(43,052	)
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES		(34,976	)		(40,517	)
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		1,025,417			1,343,779
INCOME TAX EXPENSE		(374,278	)		(528,546	)
NET INCOME	$	651,139		$	815,233
Net Income Per Share (Basic)	$	0.04		$	0.05
Net Income Per Share (Fully Diluted)	$	0.04		$	0.05
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding		15,436,518			15,493,116
Weighted Average Common and Common Equivalent Shares Outstanding		15,436,518			15,493,116

See notes to consolidated financial statements

~~See~~F-3 ~~notes to consolidated financial statements~~

~~Table~~Deer ofValley ~~Contents~~Corporation & Subsidiaries

~~Deer~~Consolidated ~~Valley~~Statements ~~Corporation &~~of ~~Subsidiaries~~Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

~~Consolidated~~For ~~Statements~~the ofYears ~~Changes~~Ended inJanuary 2, ~~Stockholders’~~2016 ~~Equity~~and December 27, 2014

For the Years Ended December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013


	Common				Additional Paid in Capital
	Shares		Amount		Additional Paid in Capital

Balance - December 28, 2013		17,786,184	$	17,788	$	33,254,293

Treasury Stock purchase at cost		—		—		—
Issuance of Common Stock		126,000		126		81,774
Net Income		—		—		—

Balance - December 27, 2014		17,912,184	$	17,914	$	33,336,067

Treasury Stock purchase at cost		—		—		—
Issuance of Common Stock		—		—		—
Net Income		—		—		—

Balance - January 2, 2016		17,912,184	$	17,914	$	33,336,067

	Common				Additional
	Shares		Amount		Paid in Capital
Balance—December 31, 2012		17,786,184	$	17,788	$	33,254,293
Treasury Stock purchase at cost		—		—		—
Net Income		—		—		—
Balance—December 28, 2013		17,786,184	$	17,788	$	33,254,293
Treasury Stock purchase at cost		—		—		—
Issuance of Common Stock		126,000		126		81,774
Net Income		—		—		—
Balance—December 27, 2014		17,912,184	$	17,914	$	33,336,067

See notes to consolidated financial statements

~~See~~F-4 ~~notes to consolidated financial statements~~

~~Table~~Deer ofValley ~~Contents~~Corporation & Subsidiaries

~~Deer~~Consolidated ~~Valley~~Statements ~~Corporation &~~of ~~Subsidiaries~~Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (continued)

~~Consolidated~~For ~~Statements~~the ofYears ~~Changes~~Ended inJanuary 2, ~~Stockholders’~~2016 ~~Equity~~and ~~(continued)~~December 27, 2014

For the Years Ended December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013


	Treasury						Accumulated Deficit
	Shares			Amount			Accumulated Deficit			Total

Balance - December 28, 2013		(2,351,737	)	$	(1,275,616	)	$	(22,185,850	)	$	9,810,615

Treasury Stock purchase at cost		(46,103	)		(29,762	)		—			(29,762	)
Issuance of Common Stock											81,900
Net Income		—			—			651,139			651,139

Balance - December 27, 2014		(2,397,840	)	$	(1,305,378	)	$	(21,534,711	)	$	10,513,892

Treasury Stock purchase at cost		—			—			—			—
Issuance of Common Stock		—			—			—			—
Net Income		—			—			1,960,134			1,960,134

Balance - January 2, 2016		(2,397,840	)	$	(1,305,378	)	$	(19,574,577	)	$	12,474,026

	Treasury						Accumulated
	Shares			Amount			Deficit			Total
Balance—December 31, 2012		(2,128,523	)	$	(1,134,998	)	$	(23,001,083	)	$	9,136,000
Treasury Stock purchase at cost		(223,214	)		(140,618	)		—			(140,618	)
Net Income		—			—			815,233			815,233
Balance—December 28, 2013		(2,351,737	)	$	(1,275,616	)	$	(22,185,850	)	$	9,810,615
Treasury Stock purchase at cost		(46,103	)		(29,762	)		—			(29,762	)
Issuance of Common Stock		—			—			—			81,900
Net Income		—			—			651,139			651,139
Balance—December 27, 2014		(2,397,840	)	$	(1,305,378	)	$	(21,534,711	)	$	10,513,892

See notes to consolidated financial statements

~~See~~F-5 ~~notes to consolidated financial statements~~

~~Table~~Deer ofValley ~~Contents~~Corporation & Subsidiaries

~~Deer~~Consolidated ~~Valley~~Statements ~~Corporation &~~of ~~Subsidiaries~~Cash Flows

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


	For The Twelve Month Period Ended
	January 2,			December 27,
	2016			2014

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	1,960,134		$	651,139
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		218,198			172,607
Charitable Contribution of property, plant and equipment		800,000			—
Gain on sale of equipment		(657,962	)		(2,200	)
Provision for credit losses		65,710			(110,320	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase)/decrease in accounts receivables		(13,076	)		(40,084	)
(Increase)/decrease in inventories		(86,744	)		77,138
(Increase)/decrease in deferred tax asset		(186,992	)		170,406
(Increase)/decrease in inventory finance receivable		(814,232	)		2,480,743
(Increase)/decrease in construction loan receivable		—			693,257
(Increase)/decrease in prepayments and other		(5,546	)		55,634
Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable		(70,431	)		(37,111	)
Increase/(decrease) in income tax payable		409,682			25,715
Increase/(decrease) in accrued warranties		215,000			60,000
Increase/(decrease) in accrued expenses		314,344			276,422

CASH FLOW PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES	$	2,148,085		$	4,473,346


CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of equipment		(253,773	)		(336,396	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		365,200			2,200
Purchases of investments		(3,000,000	)		—

CASH FLOW (USED) IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES	$	(2,888,573	)	$	(334,196	)


CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayment of long-term debt		(486,067	)		(125,600	)
Proceeds from revolving credit loans		—			5,000,000
Repayments of revolving credit loans		—			(8,056,799	)
Purchases of treasury stock		—			(29,763	)
Issuance of common stock		—			81,900

CASH FLOW (USED) IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES	$	(486,067	)	$	(3,130,262	)


NET (DECREASE)/INCREASE IN CASH	$	(1,226,555	)	$	1,008,888
CASH, Beginning	$	4,116,101		$	3,107,213

CASH, Ending	$	2,889,546		$	4,116,101


SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	39,547		$	86,022

Taxes	$	453,490		$	178,158

	For the years ended
	December 27,			December 28,
	2014			2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	651,139		$	815,233
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		172,607			212,951
Gain on sale of equipment		(2,200	)		(2,000	)
Bad debt expense		(110,320	)		(127,540	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase)/decrease in receivables		(40,084	)		(478,169	)
(Increase)/decrease in inventories		77,138			237,105
(Increase)/decrease in deferred tax asset		170,406			332,079
(Increase)/decrease in inventory finance receivable		2,480,743			2,177,243
(Increase)/decrease in construction loan receivable		693,257			(693,257	)
(Increase)/decrease in prepayments and other		55,634			5,306
Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable		(37,111	)		166,971
Increase/(decrease) in income tax payable		25,715			82,430
Increase/(decrease) in estimated services and warranties		60,000			15,000
Increase/(decrease) in accrued expenses		276,422			115,704
CASH FLOW PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES	$	4,473,346		$	2,859,056
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of equipment		(336,396	)		(228,653	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		2,200			2,000
CASH FLOW USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES	$	(334,196	)	$	(226,653	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayment of long-term debt		(125,600	)		(125,600	)
Proceeds from revolving credit loans		5,000,000			16,036,287
Repayments of revolving credit loans		(8,056,799	)		(17,729,487	)
Purchases of treasury stock		(29,763	)		(140,617	)
Issuance of common stock		81,900			—
CASH FLOW USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES	$	(3,130,262	)	$	(1,959,417	)
NET INCREASE IN CASH	$	1,008,888		$	672,986
CASH, Beginning	$	3,107,213		$	2,434,227
CASH, Ending	$	4,116,101		$	3,107,213
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	86,022		$	187,622
Taxes	$	178,158		$	106,008

See notes to consolidated financial statements

~~See~~F-6 ~~notes to consolidated financial statements~~

~~Table~~Deer ofValley ~~Contents~~Corporation & Subsidiaries

~~Deer~~Notes ~~Valley~~to ~~Corporation &~~Consolidated ~~Subsidiaries~~Financial Statements

~~Notes~~For tothe ~~Consolidated~~Years ~~Financial~~Ended ~~Statements~~January 2, 2016 and December 27, 2014

~~For~~NOTE ~~the~~1 ~~Years~~- ~~Ended~~NATURE ~~December 27,~~OF ~~2014~~OPERATIONS ~~and~~AND ~~December 28,~~BASIS ~~2013~~OF PRESENTATION

~~NOTE~~Nature 1of Operations - ~~NATURE~~Deer OFValley ~~OPERATIONS~~Corporation ~~AND~~(“The ~~BASIS~~Company”), OFthrough ~~PRESENTATION~~its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Deer Valley Homebuilders, Inc. (“DVH”), an Alabama corporation, Deer Valley Financial Corp (“DVFC”) a Florida corporation and Deer Valley Home Repair Services, Inc. (“DVHRS”), a Florida corporation designs, manufactures and provides dealer inventory-secured financing for the Company’s homes. The Company manufactures its factory-built homes at its principal manufacturing plant located in Guin, Alabama. The Company’s homes are marketed in 14 states through a network of independent dealers, builders, developers and government agencies located primarily in the southeastern and south central regions of the United States. Inventory-secured loan financing is offered to qualified retail dealers and developers, through DVFC, a wholly owned subsidiary. The Company relies upon a team of regional sales directors and independent dealers to market the factory-built homes in retail locations.

~~Nature~~The ofCompany ~~Operations~~has -increased ~~Deer~~its ~~Valley~~involvement ~~Corporation~~in ~~(“The~~the ~~Company”),~~modular ~~through~~segment ~~its~~of ~~wholly-owned~~the ~~subsidiaries,~~factory ~~Deer~~built ~~Valley Homebuilders,~~housing ~~Inc~~industry. The ~~(“DVH”),~~Company anhas ~~Alabama~~targeted ~~corporation,~~the ~~-Deer~~production ~~Valley~~of smaller ~~Financial~~units ~~Corp~~ (~~“DVFC”)~~less athan ~~Florida~~3,000 ~~corporation~~square ~~and~~feet) ~~Deer~~that ~~Valley~~are ~~Home~~readily ~~Repair Services~~producible, ~~Inc.~~in ~~(“DVHRS”),~~ a ~~Florida~~cost ~~corporation~~efficient ~~designs~~manner, ~~manufactures~~using ~~and provides dealer inventory-secured financing for~~ the Company’s ~~homes~~existing manufacturing capabilities. The Company ~~manufactures~~sells ~~its~~these ~~factory-built~~models ~~homes~~primarily atto ~~its~~independent ~~principal~~dealers, ~~manufacturing~~large ~~plant located in Guin~~tract developers, ~~Alabama~~ and ~~the~~government ~~Company owns a separate idled manufacturing plant in Sulligent, Alabama~~agencies. ~~The~~Modular ~~Company’s~~ homes are ~~marketed~~typically built in ~~14 states through~~ a ~~network~~factory ofin ~~independent~~sections ~~dealers, builders, developers~~ and ~~government~~transported ~~agencies~~to ~~located~~a ~~primarily~~site into ~~the~~be ~~southeastern~~joined ~~and~~together ~~south~~on ~~central~~a ~~regions~~permanent ~~of the United States~~foundation. Unlike ~~Inventory-secured~~homes ~~loan~~constructed ~~financing~~in isaccordance ~~offered~~with tothe ~~qualified~~Federal ~~retail~~Manufactured Home ~~dealers~~Construction and ~~developers,~~Safety ~~through~~Standards ~~DVFC,~~(“HUD aCode ~~wholly~~homes”), ~~owned~~modular ~~subsidiary.~~homes ~~The~~generally ~~Company~~do ~~relies~~not ~~upon~~have aintegrated ~~team~~steel offrames ~~regional sales directors~~ and ~~independent dealers to market the factory-built homes in retail locations~~axles.

~~The~~Basis of ~~Company~~Presentation ~~has~~- ~~increased~~This ~~its~~summary ~~involvement~~of insignificant ~~the~~accounting ~~modular~~policies ~~segment~~is ofpresented ~~the~~to ~~factory~~assist ~~built~~in ~~housing~~understanding ~~industry. The Company has targeted~~ the ~~production~~consolidated offinancial ~~smaller~~statements. ~~units~~The ~~(less~~consolidated ~~than~~financial ~~3,000~~statements ~~square~~and ~~feet)~~notes ~~that~~ are ~~readily~~representations ~~producible,~~of ~~in a cost efficient manner, using~~ the Company’s management, ~~existing~~which ~~manufacturing~~is ~~capabilities. The~~responsible ~~Company~~for ~~sells~~their ~~these~~integrity ~~models primarily to independent dealers, large tract developers,~~ and ~~government agencies~~objectivity. ~~Modular~~ ~~homes~~These ~~are~~accounting ~~typically~~policies ~~built~~conform ~~in a factory in sections and transported~~ to aaccounting ~~site~~principles togenerally beaccepted ~~joined together on a permanent foundation. Unlike homes constructed~~ in ~~accordance~~ ~~with~~ the ~~Federal~~United ~~Manufactured~~States ~~Home~~of ~~Construction~~America and ~~Safety~~have ~~Standards~~been ~~(“HUD~~consistently ~~Code~~applied ~~homes”),~~in ~~modular~~the ~~homes~~preparation ~~generally~~of dothe consolidated ~~not~~financial ~~have integrated steel frames and axles~~statements.

~~Basis~~NOTE of2 ~~Presentation~~ - ~~This~~SUMMARY ~~summary~~OF ofSIGNIFICANT ~~significant~~ACCOUNTING ~~accounting~~POLICIES policies is presented to assist in understanding the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

~~NOTE~~Reclassifications 2 - ~~SUMMARY~~To OFmaintain ~~SIGNIFICANT~~consistency ~~ACCOUNTING~~and ~~POLICIES~~comparability, certain reclassifications have been made related to the prior year period to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported income, net earnings or stockholders’ equity.

~~Reclassifications~~Principles -of ToConsolidation ~~maintain~~- ~~consistency~~The ~~and~~consolidated ~~comparability,~~financial ~~certain~~statements ~~reclassifications~~include ~~have~~the ~~been~~accounts ~~made~~of ~~related to~~ the ~~prior~~Company ~~year~~and ~~period~~its towholly-owned ~~conform to the current period presentation~~subsidiaries. Intercompany ~~These~~accounts ~~reclassifications~~and ~~had~~transactions nohave ~~effect~~been oneliminated ~~previously~~in ~~reported income, net earnings or stockholders’ equity~~consolidation.

~~Principles~~Accounting ofEstimates ~~Consolidation~~ - The ~~consolidated~~Company’s financial statements ~~include~~are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the ~~accounts~~United States of America which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the ~~Company~~reported amounts of assets and ~~its~~liabilities ~~wholly~~and ~~owned~~disclosure of ~~subsidiaries~~contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We believe our significant estimates ~~Intercompany~~include, ~~accounts~~allowance ~~and~~for ~~transactions~~loan ~~have~~losses, ~~been~~warranty ~~eliminated~~liability, indealer ~~consolidation~~incentives payable, and reserve for repurchase commitments.

~~Accounting Estimates~~ F-7 The Company’s financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We believe our significant estimates include, allowance for loan losses, warranty liability, dealer incentives payable, and reserve for repurchase commitments.

~~Table~~Fiscal Year - The Company operates on a 52-53 week fiscal year end. Each fiscal quarter consists of 13 ~~Contents~~weeks, with an occasional fourth quarter extending to 14 weeks, if necessary.

~~Fiscal~~Cash ~~Year~~Equivalents - The Company ~~operates~~considers onall ahighly ~~52-53~~liquid investments ~~week~~with ~~fiscal~~original ~~year~~maturities ~~end. Each fiscal quarter consists~~ of 13 ~~weeks,~~three ~~with~~months anor ~~occasional~~less ~~fourth quarter extending~~ to 14be ~~weeks,~~cash ~~if necessary~~equivalents.

~~Cash~~The ~~Equivalents~~Company -maintains ~~The~~its ~~Company~~cash ~~considers~~balances ~~all~~in ~~highly~~three ~~liquid~~different financial ~~investments~~institutions. ~~with~~The ~~original~~balances ~~maturities~~are ofinsured ~~three~~by ~~months~~the orFederal ~~less~~Deposit Insurance Corporation up to be$250,000. ~~cash~~Bank ~~equivalents~~deposit accounts at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

~~The~~Investments ~~Company~~– ~~maintains~~Based ~~its~~on ~~cash~~the ~~balances~~nature inof ~~three~~the ~~different~~asset, ~~financial institutions.~~the ~~The~~Company’s ~~balances~~short-term investments are ~~insured~~classified byas ~~the~~investment ~~Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up~~ held-to-maturity ~~$250,000.~~and carried ~~Bank deposit accounts~~ at ~~times,~~amortized ~~may exceed federally insured limits~~cost. The Company has ~~not~~the ~~experienced~~positive ~~any~~intent ~~losses~~and inability ~~such~~to ~~accounts~~hold the investment to maturity.

Accounts Receivable - Accounts receivable represent balances due from dealers. Credit risk associated with balances due from dealers is evaluated by management relative to financial condition and past payment experience. As a result of management’s reviews reserves for uncollectible amounts have been recorded in the accompanying financial statements. We have established reserves for uncollectible accounts of $18,500 and $1518,~~000~~500 Atat ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016 and December 2827, ~~2013~~2014, respectively.

Inventories - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. Work-in-process and finished goods inventories include an allocation for labor and overhead costs.

Inventory Finance Notes Receivable - The Company offers inventory-secured financing for its products to qualified retail dealers and developers. Finance contracts require periodic installments of principal and interest over periods of up to 24 months. These notes are secured by the inventory collateral and other security depending on borrower circumstances. The Company periodically evaluates the collectibility of our notes receivable and considers the need to establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon our historical collection experience. We have established an allowance for loan losses of $91157,~~640~~350 and $~~201~~91,~~960~~640 at ~~December~~ January 272, ~~2014~~2016 and December 2827, ~~2013~~2014, respectively. See Note 4 for further discussion regarding the Company’s inventory finance notes receivable.

Property, Plant, and Equipment - Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the related assets ranging from 5 to 40 years primarily using the straight-line method. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.

	Useful
Category	UsefulLife
Category	Life
Land improvements		10 years
Buildings		40 years
Machinery and equipment		5-10 years
Furniture and fixtures		5-10 years

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - Property and intangible assets are material to our consolidated financial statements. Further, these assets are subject to the potential negative effects arising from factors beyond the Company’s control including changing economic conditions. The Company evaluates its tangible and definite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually during our fourth quarter or more frequently in the presence of circumstances or trends that may be indicators of impairment. The evaluation is a two step process. The first step is to compare our undiscounted cash flows, as projected over the remaining useful lives of the assets, to their respective carrying values. In the event that the carrying values are not recovered by future undiscounted cash flows, as a second step, the Company compares the carrying values to the related fair values and, if fair value is lower, records an impairment adjustment. For purposes of fair value, the Company generally uses replacement costs for tangible fixed assets and discounted cash flows, using risk-adjusted discount rates, for intangible assets. These estimates are made by competent employees, using the best available information,

F-8

value is lower, records an impairment adjustment. For purposes of fair value, the Company generally uses replacement costs for tangible fixed assets and discounted cash flows, using risk-adjusted discount rates, for intangible assets. These estimates are made by competent employees, using the best available information, under the direct supervision of our management. For tangible property, plant and equipment, there have been no no changes in assumptions or methodologies for the year ended ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016 as compared to December 2827, ~~2013~~2014. The Company did not have definite-lived intangible assets at ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016 and December 2827, ~~2013~~2014.

In accordance with FASB Topic ASC 420 “Exit on Disposal Cost Obligations”, the Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used when events and circumstances warrant such a review. The carrying value of long-lived assets is considered impaired when the anticipated undiscounted cash flow from such assets is less than its carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived assets. Fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Losses on long-lived assets to be disposed of are determined in a similar manner, except that the fair market values are primarily based on independent appraisals and preliminary or definitive contractual arrangements less costs to dispose.

Revenue Recognition - Revenue for manufactured homes sold to independent dealers generally is recorded when all of the following conditions have been met: (a) an order for the home has been received from the dealer, (b) an agreement with respect to payment terms (usually in the form of a written or verbal approval for payment has been received from the dealer’s flooring institution), and (c) the home has been shipped and risk of loss has passed to the dealer and collectibility is reasonably assured.

Cost of Sales - The Company includes the following types of expenses in cost of sales: purchase and receiving costs, freight in, direct labor, supply costs, warehousing, direct and indirect overhead costs, inspection, transfer, actual and accrued warranty, depreciation and amortization.

Selling, General and Administrative - The Company includes the following types of expenses in selling, general and administrative expense: sales salaries, sales commissions, advertising, administrative overhead, administrative salaries and bonuses and legal and professional fees.

Income Taxes - Income taxes are accounted for using the liability method of accounting. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis, using currently enacted tax rates. The effect on deferred assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period when the change is enacted. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The Company has adopted the provision of the Accounting Standards Codification relating to uncertainty in income taxes. This guidance requires entities to assess their uncertain tax positions for the likelihood that they would be overturned upon Internal Revenue Service examinations or upon examination by state taxing authorities. The Company has determined that it does not have any uncertain tax positions at ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016 that it would be unable to substantiate.

Dealer Incentive Programs - The Company provides rebates to dealers based upon a predetermined formula applied to the volume of homes sold to the dealer during the year. These rebates are recorded at the time the dealer sales are consummated and are recorded as a reduction of revenue.

Advertising Costs - Advertising costs are charged to operations when incurred and are included in operating expenses. Advertising costs for the years ending ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016 and December 2827, ~~2013~~2014 were $6480,~~025~~784 and $4364,~~446~~025, respectively.

~~Concentration of Sales to Certain Customers~~ F-9 During 2014, the Company had sales to one customer of approximately 10%. During 2013, the Company did not have sales to any one customer of greater than 10%. These sales were made through the Company’s network of independent distributors.

~~Table~~Concentration of ~~Contents~~Sales to Certain Customers - During 2015, the Company did not have sales to any one customer of greater than 10%. During 2014, the Company had sales to one customer of approximately 10%. These sales were made through the Company’s network of independent distributors.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The carrying value of the Company’s cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximates fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

Financial instruments - Financial instruments consist of cash, evidence of ownership in an entity, and contracts that both (i) impose on one entity a contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial instrument to a second entity, or to exchange other financial instruments on potentially unfavorable terms with the second entity, and (ii) conveys to that second entity a contractual right (a) to receive cash or another financial instrument from the first entity, or (b) to exchange other financial instruments on potentially favorable terms with the first entity. Accordingly, our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, inventory finance notes receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and long term debt.

Earning ~~(Loss)~~ Per Share - The Company uses the guidance set forth under FASB topic ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share” for calculating the basic and diluted income per share. Basic income per share is computed by dividing income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income per share is computed similarly to basic income per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential shares had been issued and if the additional shares were dilutive.

	For the years ended
	December 27,		December 28,
	January 2,2016		December 27,2014
	2014		2013
Income attributable to common shareholders	$	1,960,134	$	651,139
Income attributable to common shareholders	$	651,139	$	815,233
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		15,~~436~~514,~~518~~344		15,~~493~~436,~~116~~518
Diluted		15,~~436~~514,~~518~~344		15,~~493~~436,~~116~~518
Income per share:
Basic	$	0.0413	$	0.0504
Diluted	$	0.0413	$	0.0504

The Company has no dilutive common stock equivalent shares at ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016 and December 2827, ~~2013~~2014.

NOTE 3 - INVENTORY

Inventory consisted of the following components:

	December 27,		December 28,
	January 2,2016		December 27,2014
	2014		2013
Raw Materials	$	882,357	$	883,363
Raw Materials	$	883,363	$	891,039
Work-in-Process		300,212		305,689
Work-in-Process		305,689		223,755
Finished Goods		137,655		44,428
Finished Goods		44,428		195,824
Total Inventory	$	1,320,224	$	1,233,480
Total Inventory	$	1,233,480	$	1,310,618

NOTE 4 - INVENTORY FINANCE NOTES RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSS

The Company offers inventory-secured financing for its products to a limited number of qualified retail dealers and developers. Administrative services for inventory-secured financing are provided by Triad Financial Services, Inc. of Jacksonville, Florida. Finance contracts require periodic installments of principal and interest over periods of up to 24 months. These notes are secured by the inventory collateral and other security depending on borrower circumstances.

F-10

Inventory finance notes receivable, net, consisted of the following:

	December 27,			December 28,
	January 2,2016			December 27,2014
	2014			2013
Inventory finance notes receivable	$	4,430,677		$	3,616,445
Inventory finance notes receivable	$	3,616,445		$	6,097,188
Allowance for loan loss		(157,350	)		(91,640	)
Allowance for loan loss		(91,640	)		(201,960	)
		4,273,327			3,524,805
		3,524,805			5,895,228
Current portion of inventory finance notes receivable		(1,763,313	)		(2,081,511	)
Current portion of inventory finance notes receivable		(2,081,511	)		(2,607,456	)
Inventory finance notes receivable, net	$	2,510,014		$	1,443,294
Inventory finance notes receivable, net	$	1,443,294		$	3,287,772

With respect to our inventory finance notes receivable, 80% of the risk of loss is spread over ~~four~~seven borrowers as of ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016, compared to 1180% of the risk of loss spread four borrowers as of December 2827, ~~2013~~2014. In addition to historical experience, borrower inventory levels and activity are monitored in conjunction with a third-party provider to estimate the potential for loss. The Company anticipates it will be able to resell any repossessed homes, thereby mitigating loss experience. If a default occurs and collateral is lost, the Company is exposed to the loss of the full value of the note receivable. The Company recorded a provision/(benefit) for credit losses of $~~110~~65,~~320~~710 and $~~127~~(110,~~540~~320) for years ending ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016 and December 2827, ~~2013~~2014, respectively. The following table represents changes in the estimated allowance for loan losses:

	December 27,			December 28,
	January 2,2016			December 27,2014
	2014			2013
Balance at beginning of period	$	91,640		$	201,960
Balance at beginning of period	$	201,960		$	329,500
Provision/(Benefit) for credit losses		65,710			(110,320	)
Benefit for credit losses		(110,320	)		(127,540	)
Balance at end of period	$	157,350		$	91,640
Balance at end of period	$	91,640		$	201,960

NOTE 5 - PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT

Property, Plant and Equipment consisted of the following:

	December 27,			December 28,
Category	January 2,2016			December 27,2014
Category	2014			2013
Land and improvements	$	335,744		$	423,244
Land and improvements	$	423,244		$	481,526
Buildings		1,684,096			2,251,264
Buildings		2,251,264			1,978,088
Machinery and equipment		1,314,336			1,291,703
Machinery and equipment		1,291,703			1,252,748
Furniture and fixtures		203,262			192,166
Furniture and fixtures		192,166			217,060
		3,537,438			4,158,377
		4,158,377			3,929,422
Accumulated depreciation		(1,701,607	)		(1,850,882	)
Accumulated depreciation		(1,850,882	)		(1,785,715	)
Total Property, Plant, and Equipment	$	1,835,831		$	2,307,495
Total Property, Plant, and Equipment	$	2,307,495		$	2,143,707

Depreciation expense totaled $~~172~~218,~~607and~~198 and $~~212~~172,~~951for~~607 for the years ended ~~December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016 and December 2827, ~~2013~~2014, respectively.

~~F-11~~On December 22, 2015, Deer Valley sold, in a Bargain Sale Exchange, its idle manufacturing plant located in Sulligent, Alabama, and the surrounding thirteen (13) acres (the “Sulligent Property”). Deer Valley sold the Sulligent Property to The Industrial Development Board of the Town of Sulligent Inc., a political subdivision of the State of Alabama and an IRS 561 approved organization (the “Buyer”), for a combined purchase price of One Million One Hundred Fifty Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($1,150,000), comprised of (i) a cash payment by Buyer to Deer Valley of Three Hundred Fifty Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($350,000), and (ii) a charitable contribution made by Deer Valley to Buyer of Eight Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($800,000). The

~~Table~~F-11 ~~of Contents~~

~~Accrued~~ charitable ~~expenses~~contribution ~~consisted~~equaled the difference between the appraised value of the ~~following:~~Sulligent Property, as determined by an independent appraiser, and the cash portion of the purchase price paid to Deer Valley by Buyer. The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) 170 Exchange, also known as Bargain Sale, is a transaction which allows a property owner donate its property and receive a “charitable contribution” income tax deduction.

	December 27,		December 28,
Category	2014		2013
Accrued dealer incentive program	$	347,421	$	230,429
Accrued third party billings		572,844		542,079
Accrued compensation		410,143		339,743
Accrued insurance		86,644		65,197
Accrued interest		3,930		11,985
Accrued repurchase commitment		179,065		152,510
Other		190,385		172,067
Total Accrued Expenses	$	1,790,432	$	1,514,010

NOTE 6 - ACCRUED EXPENSES

~~NOTE~~Accrued 7expenses -consisted ~~PRODUCT~~of ~~WARRANTIES~~the following:

The Company provides the retail home buyer a one-year limited warranty covering defects in material or workmanship in home structure, plumbing and electrical systems. The Company’s estimated warranty costs are accrued at the time of the sale to the dealer following industry standards and historical warranty cost incurred. Periodic adjustments to the estimated warranty accrual are made as events occur which indicate changes are necessary. As of December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013, the Company has provided a liability of $1,245,000 and $1,185,000, respectively, for estimated warranty costs relating to homes sold, based upon management’s assessment of historical experience factors and current industry trends.


Category	January 2, 2016		December 27, 2014

Accrued dealer incentive program	$	340,585	$	347,421
Accrued third party billings		674,317		572,844
Accrued compensation		513,808		410,143
Accrued insurance		84,883		86,644
Accrued interest		5,329		3,930
Accrued repurchase commitment		255,715		179,065
Other		230,139		190,385

Total Accrued Expenses	$	2,104,776	$	1,790,432

~~Management~~NOTE ~~reviews~~7 ~~its~~- ~~warranty~~PRODUCT ~~requirements at~~WARRANTIES ~~the close of each reporting period and adjusts the reserves accordingly. The following tabular presentation reflects activity in warranty reserves during the periods presented:~~

	For the years ended
	December 27,			December 28,
	2014			2013
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,185,000		$	1,170,000
Warranty charges		1,715,182			1,538,363
Warranty payments		(1,655,182	)		(1,523,363	)
Balance at end of period	$	1,245,000		$	1,185,000

The Company provides the retail home buyer a one-year limited warranty covering defects in material or workmanship in home structure, plumbing and electrical systems. The Company’s estimated warranty costs are accrued at the time of the sale to the dealer following industry standards and historical warranty cost incurred. Periodic adjustments to the estimated warranty accrual are made as events occur which indicate changes are necessary. As of January 2, 2016 and December 27, 2014, the Company has provided a liability of $1,460,000 and $1,245,000, respectively, for estimated warranty costs relating to homes sold, based upon management’s assessment of historical experience factors and current industry trends.

~~NOTE~~Management 8reviews -its ~~REVOLVING~~warranty ~~CREDIT~~requirements at ~~LOANS~~the close of each reporting period and adjusts the reserves accordingly. The following tabular presentation reflects activity in warranty reserves during the periods presented:

Effective September 10, 2013, Deer Valley renewed its $5,000,000 Revolving Credit Loan and Security Agreement with Fifth Third Bank, used for display model financing for dealers of the products produced by DVH (the “Display Model LOC”) The Display Model LOC has a two year term and has a variable interest rate at 4.00% above LIBOR or 4.154% and 4.16825% at December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013, respectively. As of December 27, 2014, the Company had no outstanding balance under the revolving credit loan. As of December 28, 2013 the Company had an outstanding balance of $750,000 under the revolving credit loan.


	For the years ended
	January 2, 2016			December 27, 2014
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,245,000		$	1,185,000
Warranty charges		1,478,920			1,715,182
Warranty payments		(1,263,920	)		(1,655,182	)

Balance at end of period	$	1,460,000		$	1,245,000

~~Effective~~NOTE ~~September 10,~~8 ~~2013,~~- ~~Deer~~REVOLVING ~~Valley~~CREDIT ~~renewed~~LOANS its Revolving Credit Loan and Security Agreement with Fifth Third Bank, used for short term working capital financing, letters of credit and as a bridge loan on financing the sale of retail units by DVH (the “Working Capital LOC”). The Working Capital LOC has a two year term and has a variable interest rate at 2.50% above LIBOR or 2.654% and 2.6824% at December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013, respectively. As of December 27, 2014, the Company had no outstanding balance under the revolving credit loan. As of December 28, 2013 the Company had an outstanding balance of $1,725,000 under the revolving credit loan.

~~F-12~~On August 17, 2015, Deer Valley renewed its existing revolving line of credit with Fifth Third Bank and reduced the maximum revolving principal limit from Five Million Dollars to Two Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars. The revolving line of credit provides for display model financing for dealers of the products produced by DVH (the “Display Model LOC”) The Display Model LOC has a two year term and has a variable interest rate at 4.00% above LIBOR or 4.4275% and 4.154% at January 2, 2016 and December 27, 2014, respectively. As of January 2, 2016 and December 27, 2014, the Company had no outstanding balance under the revolving credit loan.

~~Table~~F-12 ~~of Contents~~

~~The~~On ~~revolving~~August 17, ~~credit~~2015, ~~loans~~Deer ~~contain~~Valley ~~covenants including,~~renewed ~~but~~its ~~not~~Revolving ~~limited~~Credit toLoan and Security Agreement with Fifth Third Bank, ~~covenants~~which toprovides ~~maintain~~for a ~~minimum~~maximum ~~debt~~revolving ~~service~~principal ~~coverage~~limit ~~ratio~~of Three Million Dollars. The revolving line of credit provides for short-term working capital financing, ~~maintain~~letters of credit and as a ~~minimum~~bridge ~~debt~~loan toon ~~tangible~~financing ~~net~~the ~~worth~~sale ~~ratio~~of ~~and~~retail ~~requiring~~units ~~minimum~~by DVH ~~liquidity~~(the “Working Capital LOC”). The ~~Company~~Working ~~was~~Capital inLOC ~~compliance~~has ~~with~~a ~~these~~two ~~covenants~~year asterm ~~of December~~and has a variable interest rate at 2.50% above LIBOR or 2.9275% and 2.654% at January 272, ~~2014~~2016 and December 2827, ~~2013~~2014, respectively. ~~The~~As ~~Company~~of January 2, ~~granted~~2016 and December 27, 2014, the ~~Lender~~Company ahad ~~security~~no ~~interest~~outstanding inbalance ~~all~~under ofthe ~~its~~revolving ~~business~~credit ~~assets~~loan.

The ~~amount~~revolving ~~available~~credit loans ~~under~~contain ~~the~~covenants ~~revolving~~including, ~~credit~~but ~~loans~~not islimited ~~equal~~to, covenants to ~~the~~maintain ~~lesser~~a ofminimum ~~$8,000,000~~debt orservice ancoverage ~~amount~~ratio, ~~based~~maintain ona ~~defined~~minimum ~~percentages~~debt ofto ~~accounts~~tangible ~~receivable~~net worth ratio and ~~inventories~~requiring ~~reduced~~minimum byliquidity. ~~any~~The ~~outstanding~~Company ~~letters~~was in compliance with these covenants as of ~~credit.~~January 2, At2016 and December 27, 2014,. ~~$3,019,048~~The ~~was~~Company ~~available under~~granted the ~~revolving~~Lender ~~credit~~a ~~loans~~security ~~after~~interest ~~deducting~~in ~~letters~~all of ~~credit~~its ofbusiness ~~$65,000~~assets.

InThe ~~addition~~amount available tounder the revolving ~~line~~credit ofloans ~~credit~~is ~~described~~equal into the ~~preceding paragraph,~~lesser ~~DVH, during its normal course~~ of ~~business~~$5,500,000 isor ~~required~~an toamount ~~issue~~based ~~irrevocable~~on ~~standby~~defined ~~letters~~percentages of ~~credit~~accounts inreceivable ~~the~~and ~~favor~~inventories ofreduced ~~independent~~by ~~third~~any ~~party~~outstanding ~~beneficiaries~~letters toof ~~cover obligations under insurance policies~~credit. AsAt ~~of December~~January 272, ~~2014~~2016, no$3,473,551 was ~~amounts~~available ~~had~~under ~~been~~the ~~drawn~~revolving oncredit ~~the~~loans ~~above~~after ~~irrevocable~~deducting letters of credit byof ~~the beneficiaries~~$65,000.

~~NOTE~~In 9addition -to ~~LONG_TERM~~the ~~DEBT~~revolving line of credit described in the preceding paragraph, DVH, during its normal course of business, is required to issue irrevocable standby letters of credit in the favor of independent third party beneficiaries to cover obligations under insurance policies. As of January 2, 2016, no amounts had been drawn on the above irrevocable letters of credit by the beneficiaries.

OnNOTE ~~May 26,~~9 ~~2006,~~- ~~DVH~~LONG_TERM ~~entered~~DEBT into a Loan Agreement with Fifth Third Bank (the “Lender”) providing for a loan of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) (the “Loan”) evidenced by a promissory note and secured by a first mortgage on DVH’s properties in Guin, Alabama and Sulligent, Alabama, including the structures and fixtures located thereon, as well as DVH’s interest in any lease thereof. The Loan had a term from May 26, 2006 through June 1, 2011.

~~Effective~~On ~~June~~May 126, ~~2011~~2006, DVH ~~and the Lender~~ entered into ana ~~amendment~~Loan ~~that~~Agreement ~~extended~~with Fifth Third Bank (the ~~term~~“Lender”) providing for a loan of ~~the~~Two ~~Real~~Million Dollars ~~Estate~~($2,000,000) (the “Loan”) toevidenced ~~June 1,~~by ~~2016.~~a ~~The~~promissory ~~Loan~~note ~~has~~and secured by a ~~variable~~first ~~interest~~mortgage ~~rate~~on atDVH’s ~~4.0%~~properties ~~above~~in ~~One-Month~~Guin, ~~LIBOR-Index~~Alabama ~~rate.~~and ~~The~~Sulligent, ~~Company~~Alabama, ~~DVH~~including the structures and ~~DVFC~~fixtures ~~are~~located ~~guarantors~~thereon, onas ~~the~~well as DVH’s interest in any lease thereof. The Loan had a term from May 26, 2006 through June 1, 2011.

~~Long-term~~Effective ~~debt~~June 1, 2011, DVH and the Lender entered into an amendment that extended the term of the Real Estate Loan to June 1, 2016. The Loan has a variable interest rate at 4.0% above One-Month LIBOR-Index rate. The Company, ~~was~~DVH asand ~~follows:~~DVFC are guarantors on the Loan.

	December 27,			December 28,
	2014			2013
Note payable to Fifth Third Bank, payable in monthly installments of $10,467 plus interest at Libor plus 4.0%, maturing on June 1, 2016, secured by all assets of the Company.	$	816,400		$	942,000
Less: Current portion of long-term debt		(125,600	)		(125,600	)
Total long-term debt, net of current portion	$	690,800		$	816,400

Long-term debt of the Company was as follows:

At December 27, 2014, principal repayment requirements on long-term debt were as follows:


	January 2, 2016			December 27, 2014

Note payable to Fifth Third Bank, payable in monthly installments of $10,467 plus interest at Libor plus 4.0%, maturing on June 1, 2016, secured by all assets of the Company.	$	330,333		$	816,400
Less: Current portion of long-term debt		(330,333	)		(125,600	)

Total long-term debt, net of current portion	$	—		$	690,800

For year ended December 31,	Amount
2015		125,600
2016		565,200
Total repayments on long-term debt	$	690,800

F-13

~~Table~~At ofJanuary 2, ~~Contents~~2016, principal repayment requirements on long-term debt were as follows:

NOTE 10 - INCOME TAXES


For year ended December 31,	Amount

2016	$	330,333

Total repayments on long-term debt	$	330,333

~~The~~NOTE ~~Company’s~~10 ~~2014~~– ~~consolidated~~INCOME ~~effective~~TAXES ~~tax rate was 36.50% as compared to 39.33% in 2013.~~

The Company’s ~~and~~2015 ~~its~~consolidated ~~subsidiaries~~effective ~~file income~~ tax ~~returns~~rate ~~for~~was U25.S.6% Federal and Alabama purposes. The Company is not currently under a tax examination, but the statute of limitations has not yet expired on certain returns. The Company generally remains subject to examination of its U.S. federal income tax returns for 2011 and subsequent years as ~~the~~compared ~~IRS has a three year window~~ to ~~assess/collect taxes~~36. ~~In addition, the Company remains subject to examination of its Alabama income tax returns for 2011 and subsequent years. However, if required income taxes are understated by more than 25~~5%, ~~the~~in ~~statute of limitations is extended to 6 years, potentially opening the years of 2008 through 2010 as well~~2014.

~~F-14~~The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns for U.S. Federal and Alabama purposes. The Company is not currently under a tax examination, but the statute of limitations has not yet expired on certain returns. The Company generally remains subject to examination of its U.S. federal income tax returns for 2012 and subsequent years as the IRS has a three year window to assess/collect taxes. In addition, the Company remains subject to examination of its Alabama income tax returns for 2012 and subsequent years. However, if required income taxes are understated by more than 25%, the statute of limitations is extended to 6 years, potentially opening the years of 2009 through 2011 as well.

~~Table~~F-14 ~~of Contents~~

~~Income~~The ~~Taxes~~income tax provision consists of the following:

~~The~~Income ~~components of the provision for income taxes are as follows~~Taxes:

	2014		2013
Current income taxes	$	203,874	$	196,466
Deferred income taxes		170,404		332,080
Provision for income taxes	$	374,278	$	528,546

The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:

The items accounting for the difference between income taxes computed at the federal statutory rate and the provision for income taxes are as follows:


	2015			2014

Current income taxes	$	861,569		$	203,874
Deferred income taxes		(186,993	)		170,404

Provision for income taxes	$	674,576		$	374,278

	2014						2013
				Impact on						Impact on
	Amount			Rate			Amount			Rate
Income tax at federal rate	$	348,642			34.00	%	$	456,885			34.00	%
State tax, net of Federal effect		43,334			4.23	%		56,788			4.23	%
Permanent Differences:
Meals & Entertainment		21,722			2.12	%		20,792			1.55	%
Officers Life Insurance		1,337			0.13	%		1,337			0.10	%
Charitable Contribution C/F		—			0.00	%		(646	)		-0.05	%
Domestic Production Activities Deduction		(22,017	)		-2.15	%		(25,954	)		-1.94	%
Total Permanent Differences		1,042			0.10	%		(4,471	)		-0.34	%
NOL Deduction		—			0.00	%		(27,192	)		-2.02	%
Total Tax Credits		(27,214	)		-2.65	%		(20,068	)		-1.49	%
Prior Period over/under accrual		8,475			0.82	%		66,612			4.95	%
Rounding		(1	)		0.00	%		(8	)		0.00	%
Total Provision	$	374,278			36.50	%	$	528,546			39.33	%

The items accounting for the difference between income taxes computed at the federal statutory rate and the provision for income taxes are as follows:

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s net deferred income taxes are as follows:


	2015						2014
	Amount			Impact on Rate			Amount			Impact on Rate
Income tax at federal rate	$	895,801			34.00	%	$	348,642			34.00	%
State tax, net of Federal effect		111,343			4.23	%		43,334			4.23	%
Permanent Differences:

Meals & Entertainment		23,666			0.90	%		21,722			2.12	%
Officers Life Insurance		1,226			0.05	%		1,337			0.13	%
Gain on Bargain Sale of Asset		(173,048	)		-6.58	%		—			0.00	%
Domestic Production Activities Deduction		(92,822	)		-3.52	%		(22,017	)		-2.15	%

Total Permanent Differences		(240,978	)		-9.15	%		1,042			0.10	%


Total Tax Credits		(83,131	)		-3.16	%		(27,214	)		-2.65	%
Prior Period over/under accrual		(8,459	)		-0.32	%		8,475			0.82	%
Rounding		—			0.00	%		(1	)		0.00	%

Total Provision	$	674,576			25.60	%	$	374,278			36.50	%

	2014			2013
Current Deferred Tax Assets:
Warranty Reserve	$	475,914		$	452,978
Repurchase Reserve		68,449			58,298
Allowance for Loan Losses		35,030			77,201
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts		7,072			5,734
Inventory Reserve		9,552			5,531
Accrued Legal Fees		—			3,823
Total Current Deferred Tax Asset		596,017			603,565
Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets:
Goodwill Impairment		1,509,238			1,706,420
Total Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets		1,509,238			1,706,420
Current Deferred Tax Liabilities:
Prepaid insurance		(17,089	)		(35,872	)
Total Current Deferred Tax Liabilities		(17,089	)		(35,872	)
Non-Current Deferred Tax Liability:
Accelerated Depreciation		(78,168	)		(93,709	)
Sale of Assets		8,468			8,468
Total Non-Current Deferred Tax Liability		(69,700	)		(85,241	)
Total Deferred Tax Assets (Net)	$	2,018,466		$	2,188,872

F-15


	2015			2014

Current Deferred Tax Assets:
Warranty Reserve	$	558,099		$	475,914
Repurchase Reserve		97,750			68,449
Allowance for Loan Losses		60,149			35,030
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts		7,072			7,072
Inventory Reserve		13,528			9,552
Charitable Contribution C/F		194,025			—

Total Current Deferred Tax Asset		930,623			596,017


Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets:
Goodwill Impairment		1,451,626			1,509,238

Total Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets		1,451,626			1,509,238


Current Deferred Tax Liabilities:
Prepaid insurance		(19,361	)		(17,089	)

Total Current Deferred Tax Liabilities		(19,361	)		(17,089	)


Non-Current Deferred Tax Liability:
Accelerated Depreciation		(165,898	)		(78,168	)
Sale of Assets		8,468			8,468

Total Non-Current Deferred Tax Liability		(157,430	)		(69,700	)


Total Deferred Tax Assets (Net)	$	2,205,458		$	2,018,466

~~Table~~F-15 ~~of Contents~~

~~Litigation—The~~NOTE ~~Company~~11 in- ~~the~~COMMITMENTS ~~normal~~AND ~~course~~CONTINGENCIES of business is subject to claims and litigation. Management of the Company is of the opinion that, based on information available, such legal matters will not ultimately have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operation of the Company.

~~Accrued~~Litigation ~~Repurchase~~- ~~Commitments~~The –Company ~~DVH is contingently liable under the terms of repurchase agreements with financial institutions providing inventory financing for retailers of DVH’s products. These arrangements, which are customary~~ in the ~~industry,~~normal ~~provide~~course ~~for the repurchase~~ of ~~products~~business ~~sold to retailers in the event of default by the retailer. The risk of loss under these agreements~~ is ~~spread~~subject ~~over numerous retailers. The price DVH is obligated~~ to ~~pay~~claims ~~generally declines over the period of the agreement (typically 18 to 24 months)~~ and ~~the~~litigation. ~~risk~~Management of ~~loss is further reduced by~~ the ~~sale value of repurchased homes. The maximum amount for which the~~ Company is ~~contingently liable under repurchase agreements is approximately $5,970,000 and $3,815,000 at December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2103, respectively. As~~ of ~~December 27, 2014 and~~ ~~December 28, 2013~~ the ~~Company~~opinion ~~accrued $179~~that,~~065~~ ~~and $152,510, respectively, for future repurchase losses (included in accrued expenses)~~ based on ~~prior~~information ~~experience~~available, ~~and~~such anlegal ~~evaluation~~matters ofwill ~~dealers’ financial conditions. DVH to date has~~ not ~~experienced~~ ~~significant~~ultimately ~~losses~~have ~~under~~a ~~these~~material ~~agreements,~~adverse ~~and~~effect ~~management~~on ~~does~~the ~~not~~financial ~~expect~~position ~~any~~or ~~future~~results ~~losses~~of tooperation ~~have~~of ~~a material effect on~~ the ~~accompanying financial statements~~Company.

~~NOTE~~Accrued 12Repurchase -Commitments ~~EQUITY~~– ~~TRANSACTIONS~~DVH is contingently liable under the terms of repurchase agreements with financial institutions providing inventory financing for retailers of DVH’s products. These arrangements, which are customary in the industry, provide for the repurchase of products sold to retailers in the event of default by the retailer. The risk of loss under these agreements is spread over numerous retailers. The price DVH is obligated to pay generally declines over the period of the agreement (typically 18 to 24 months) and the risk of loss is further reduced by the sale value of repurchased homes. The maximum amount for which the Company is contingently liable under repurchase agreements is approximately $8,525,000 and $5,970,000 at January 2, 2016 and December 27, 2014, respectively. As of January 2, 2016 and December 27, 2014 the Company accrued $255,715 and $179,065, respectively, for future repurchase losses (included in accrued expenses) based on prior experience and an evaluation of dealers’ financial conditions. DVH to date has not experienced significant losses under these agreements, and management does not expect any future losses to have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

~~Common~~NOTE ~~Stock~~12 –- OnEQUITY ~~September 3,~~TRANSACTIONS 2014, Peerless Systems Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Peerless”), Vicis Capital Master Fund, a Cayman Island unit trust managed by Vicis Capital, LLC (“Vicis”), and the Company, entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”). The transaction described in the SPA closed, and the consummation of the transaction described in the SPA occurred, effective as of October 6, 2014.

~~Pursuant~~Common toStock ~~the~~– ~~terms and~~On ~~conditions~~September 3, of2014, ~~the~~Peerless ~~SPA~~Systems Corporation, (a~~) Vicis~~ ~~sold~~Delaware tocorporation (“Peerless”), Vicis ~~and~~Capital ~~Peerless~~Master ~~purchased from Vicis~~Fund, ~~12,310,458~~a ~~shares~~Cayman ofIsland ~~the~~unit ~~Company’s~~trust ~~common~~managed ~~stock~~by ~~for~~Vicis ~~a purchase price of $3~~Capital,~~600,000,~~ ~~and~~LLC (b“Vicis”) ~~the Company sold to Peerless~~, and ~~Peerless purchased from~~ the Company, ~~126,000~~entered ~~shares~~into ofa ~~the~~Stock ~~Company’s~~Purchase ~~common~~Agreement ~~stock~~(the ~~for~~“SPA”). aThe ~~purchase~~transaction ~~price~~described ofin ~~$81,900.~~the ~~The~~SPA ~~purchased~~closed, ~~shares~~and ~~represent~~the consummation ~~approximately~~of ~~eighty~~the ~~percent~~transaction ~~(80%) of~~described in the ~~Company’s~~SPA ~~issued~~occurred, ~~and~~effective ~~outstanding~~as ~~shares~~ of ~~common~~October 6, ~~stock~~2014.

~~Treasury~~Pursuant ~~Stock~~to –the ~~Pursuant~~terms toand conditions of the SPA, (a) Vicis ~~Common~~sold ~~Stock~~to ~~Repurchase~~Peerless, ~~Program~~and ~~approved~~Peerless bypurchased ~~our~~from ~~Board~~Vicis, 12,310,458 shares of ~~Directors,~~the Company’s common stock for a ~~total~~purchase price of 46$3,~~103~~600,000, and ~~223~~(b) the Company sold to Peerless,~~214~~ ~~shares were~~and Peerless purchased ~~during~~from the Company, ~~years~~126,000 ~~ended~~shares ~~December 27,~~of ~~2014~~the ~~and~~Company’s ~~December 28,~~common ~~2013~~stock atfor a ~~cost~~purchase price of $2981,~~762~~900. ~~and~~The ~~$140,618~~purchased shares represent approximately eighty percent (80%) of the Company’s issued and ~~recorded~~outstanding asshares ~~treasury~~of common stock.

~~F-16~~Treasury Stock – Pursuant to a Common Stock Repurchase Program approved by our Board of Directors, a total of 46,103 shares were purchased during the year ended December 27, 2014 at a cost of $29,762 and recorded as treasury stock. During the year ended January 2, 2016 there were no treasury stock purchases under the common stock repurchase program.

~~Table~~NOTE of13 ~~Contents~~– RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

~~NOTE~~On 13December 22, -2015, ~~SELECTED~~Deer ~~QUARTERLY~~Valley ~~FINANCIAL~~entered ~~DATA~~into that certain Secured Convertible Note and Security Agreement with BLU Autoworks LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (~~UNAUDITED~~the “Borrower”), pursuant to which Deer Valley loaned Three Million and No/100 Dollars ($3,000,000) to Borrower (the “Initial Advance”). The Secured Convertible Note provides that Borrower may, as agreed to by Deer Valley, borrower up to an additional One Million and No/100 Dollars ($1,000,000) (collectively, with the Initial Advance, the “Loan’). The Loan bears interest at a rate of five percent (5.0%) per annum, matures on June 30, 2016, and is secured by the assets of the Borrower. Deer Valley may, at its option, convert the outstanding principal and interest of the Loan into membership interests in Borrower, which membership interests shall entitle Deer Valley to receive, upon liquidation of Borrower, shares of Tua Autoworks Holdings S.à.r.l. (“Tua Luxembourg”) equal to 5.74% of the outstanding capital shares of Tua Luxembourg, or, if Deer Valley elects to request an independent

~~The~~F-16 ~~following is a summary of the Company’s unaudited quarterly results of operations for the periods ended December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013.~~

	For the three month periods ended
	December 27,			December 28,
	2014			2013
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
REVENUE	$	8,657,872		$	8,974,216
COST OF REVENUE		6,829,838			7,099,767
GROSS PROFIT		1,828,034			1,874,449
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Selling, general and administrative		1,240,806			1,112,845
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES		1,240,806			1,112,845
OPERATING INCOME		587,228			761,604
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)
Interest income		100			121
Interest expense		(8,979	)		(10,342	)
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSE		(8,879	)		(10,221	)
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		578,349			751,383
INCOME TAX EXPENSE		(176,737	)		(327,762	)
NET INCOME	$	401,612		$	423,621
Net Income Per Share (Basic)	$	0.03		$	0.03
Net Income Per Share (Fully Diluted)	$	0.03		$	0.03
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding		15,436,518			15,493,116
Weighted Average Common and Common Equivalent Shares Outstanding		15,436,518			15,493,116

~~NOTE~~ valuation 14analysis, -such ~~SEGMENT~~percentage ~~INFORMATION~~of the shares of Tua Luxembourg as determined by an independent valuation analysis. Tua Luxembourg and Borrower are developing an automobile manufacturing business located in Italy.

~~Our~~Tony ~~business~~Bonidy ~~segments~~and ~~consist~~Lodovico de Visconti are members of ~~factory-built~~the ~~housing~~Board ~~and~~of ~~financial~~Directors ~~services.~~of ~~Our~~Deer ~~chief~~Valley, ~~decision~~Lodovico ~~making~~de ~~officer~~Visconti ~~considers~~is ~~income~~the ~~from~~sole ~~operations~~manager asof the ~~basis~~Borrower, toand ~~measure~~Tony ~~segment~~Bonidy, ~~profitability.~~Lodovico ~~The~~de ~~following~~Visconti ~~table~~and ~~summarizes~~Christophe ~~net~~Fender ~~sales,~~(a ~~income~~resident ~~from~~of ~~operations,~~Luxembourg) are the sole members of the Board of Directors of Tua Luxembourg. Tony Bonidy and ~~identifiable~~Lodovico ~~assets~~de byVisconti ~~segment~~directly, ~~for~~or indirectly, control the ~~years~~voting ~~ended~~capital ~~December 27~~stock of Deer Valley, ~~2014~~Borrower, and ~~December 28,~~Tua ~~2013~~Luxembourg.

FNOTE 14 -17 SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

~~Table~~The following is a summary of ~~Contents~~the Company’s unaudited quarterly results of operations for the periods ended January 2, 2016 and December 27, 2014.

	December 27,			December 28,
	For the three month periods ended
	2014			2013
	January 2,2016			December 27,2014
Revenues from external customers
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Factory-built housing	$	29,852,273		$	28,252,606
REVENUE	$	11,138,300		$	8,657,872
Financial Services		395,452			685,110
COST OF REVENUE		8,451,573			6,829,838
Total Revenues	$	30,247,725		$	28,937,716
GROSS PROFIT		2,686,727			1,828,034
Income from operations
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Factory-built housing	$	1,572,740		$	1,497,515
Selling, general and administrative		2,268,236			1,240,806
Financial services		106,280			456,717
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES		2,268,236			1,240,806
General corporate expenses		(618,627	)		(569,936	)
OPERATING INCOME		418,491			587,228
Total Income from operations	$	1,060,393		$	1,384,296
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)
Identifiable assets by segment
Interest income		4			100
Factory-built housing	$	10,780,242		$	10,125,643
Interest expense		(7,242	)		(8,979	)
Financial Services		3,798,641			6,763,645
Gain on Sale of Assets		653,261			—
Other		280,493			124,185
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSE		646,023			(8,879	)
	$	14,859,376		$	17,013,473
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		1,064,514			578,349
INCOME TAX EXPENSE		(168,137	)		(176,737	)
NET INCOME	$	896,377		$	401,612
Net Income Per Share (Basic)	$	0.06		$	0.03
Net Income Per Share (Fully Diluted)	$	0.06		$	0.03
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding		15,514,344			15,436,518
Weighted Average Common and Common Equivalent Shares Outstanding		15,514,344			15,436,518

~~NOTE 15~~ F-17 ~~SUBSEQUENT EVENTS~~

~~Peerless~~NOTE ~~owns~~15 ~~12,436,458~~– ~~shares~~SEGMENT ofINFORMATION Deer Valley’s common stock which is approximately eighty percent (80%) of Deer Valley’s issued and outstanding common stock. As a result of the Merger, Mobius has acquired indirect (through its ownership in Peerless) majority ownership of Deer Valley. Mobius used cash to complete the Merger.

FOur business segments consist of factory-18built housing and financial services. Our chief decision making officer considers income from operations as the basis to measure segment profitability. The following table summarizes net sales, income from operations, and identifiable assets by segment for the years ended January 2, 2016 and December 27, 2014.


	January 2, 2016			December 27, 2014

Revenues from external customers
Factory-built housing	$	35,310,907		$	29,852,273
Financial Services		352,436			395,452

Total Revenues	$	35,663,343		$	30,247,725


Income from operations
Factory-built housing	$	2,158,733		$	1,572,740
Financial services		134,474			106,280
General corporate expenses		(284,622	)		(618,627	)

Total Income from operations	$	2,008,585		$	1,060,393


Identifiable assets by segment
Factory-built housing	$	9,636,878		$	10,780,242
Financial Services		4,488,800			3,798,641
Other		3,076,359			280,493

	$	17,202,037		$	14,859,376

~~ITEM~~NOTE 9.16 ~~CHANGES~~– INSUBSEQUENT ~~AND~~EVENTS ~~DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE~~

~~None~~Effective January 18, 2016, Mr. Joel Stephen Logan, II resigned as the Chief Operating Officer and Vice President of Deer Valley Corporation, the President of Deer Valley Homebuilders, Inc., the Vice President of Deer Valley Home Repair Services, Inc., and as Vice President of Deer Valley Financial Corp. Mr. Logan’s resignation was effective as of the end of the term of his employment agreement and was not the result of a dispute or disagreement between Deer Valley Corporation and Mr. Logan.

~~ITEM~~Effective 9Aas of February 1, 2016, Joel S. ~~CONTROLS~~Logan ~~AND~~resigned ~~PROCEDURES~~as a director of the Company. The resignation of Mr. Logan was not the result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices.

~~Evaluation~~On January 21, 2016, the Board of ~~Disclosure~~Directors ~~Controls~~of the Company and ~~Procedures~~the holders of a majority of the Company’s Common Stock have approved amendments to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s Common Stock, at an exchange ratio of 1-for-250 shares of outstanding Common Stock (the “Reverse Split”), immediately followed by a forward stock split of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock, at an exchange ratio of 250-for-1 shares of outstanding Common Stock (the “Forward Split” and together with the Reverse Split, the “Reverse/Forward Split”). Such amendments will not change the par value per share or the number of authorized shares of Common Stock. Holders of record of less than one share as a result of the reverse stock split will be cashed out at the rate of $0.73 per pre-split share. Holders of record of at least one share as a result of the Reverse Split will not be entitled to receive any cash payment. The Reverse/Forward Split will become effective upon the filing of the proposed Articles of Amendment with the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Florida twenty (20) calendar days following the date this Information Statement is first furnished to our stockholders.

~~Disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a~~F-~~15(e)~~18 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

~~Management’s~~Although ~~Report~~the onReverse/Forward ~~Internal~~Split ~~Control~~has ~~Over~~been approved by the holders of the requisite majority of the shares of ~~Financial~~our ~~Reporting~~Common Stock, the Board reserves the right, in its discretion, to abandon the Reverse/Forward Split before it becomes effective, if it determines that abandoning the Reverse/Forward Split is in the best interests of the Company or its stockholders.

~~Our~~The ~~management~~intended effect of the Reverse/Forward Split is ~~responsible~~to ~~for~~ensure ~~establishing~~that ~~and~~the ~~maintaining~~number ~~adequate~~of ~~internal~~record ~~controls~~holders ~~over~~of ~~financial~~our Common Stock will be below 300 so ~~reporting.~~that ~~Under~~we ~~the~~will ~~supervision~~be ~~and~~eligible ~~with~~to terminate the ~~participation~~public registration of our ~~management,~~Common ~~including~~Stock ~~our~~under ~~chief~~the ~~executive~~Securities ~~officer,~~Exchange weAct ~~conducted~~of an1934, ~~evaluation~~as ofamended (the ~~effectiveness~~“Exchange ofAct”). ~~our~~Provided ~~internal~~that ~~control~~the ~~over~~Reverse/Forward ~~financial~~Split ~~reporting~~has ~~using~~the ~~framework~~intended ~~similar~~effect, we will file to ~~criteria~~deregister ~~referenced~~our inCommon Stock with the ~~initial~~SEC. ~~steps~~We ofwill ~~the~~in ~~Internal~~such ~~Control~~case –no ~~Integrated~~longer ~~Framework~~be ~~issued~~required byto file periodic reports with the ~~Committee~~SEC, ofalthough ~~Sponsoring~~stockholders ~~Organizations~~will be entitled to access of ~~the~~certain ~~Treadway~~Company ~~Commission~~information ~~(“COSO”)~~under Florida law. WeThe ~~have~~Company ~~reviewed~~expects that the ~~results~~deregistration of ~~management’s assessment~~its Common Stock under the Exchange Act will eliminate the significant expense required to comply with ~~our~~its ~~Audit~~Exchange ~~Committee~~Act reporting obligations and the SEC’s proxy rules.

AF-19 material weakness is a significant deficiency (as defined in the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard No. 2), or a combination of significant deficiencies, that results in reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, management determined that there were control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses, as described below.

*ITEM ~~Our principal financial officer is also our current acting principal executive officer~~9. ~~While~~CHANGES ~~not~~IN ~~being~~AND ~~legally~~DISAGREEMENTS ~~obligated,~~WITH ~~it is~~ACCOUNTANTS ~~the~~ON ~~managements~~ACCOUNTING ~~view~~AND ~~that~~FINANCIAL ~~separating the functions of principal financial officer from role of acting principal executive officer is an important entity-level control over the Company’s financial statements.~~ DISCLOSURE

~~This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting~~None. ~~Management’s report is not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.~~

-ITEM 389A. -CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

~~Table~~Evaluation of ~~Contents~~Disclosure Controls and Procedures

~~Remediation~~Disclosure ~~Efforts~~controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), are designed to ~~Address~~ensure ~~Deficiencies~~that information required to be disclosed by us in ~~Internal~~the ~~Control~~reports ~~Over~~that ~~Financial~~we ~~Reporting~~ file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

AsWe acarried ~~result~~out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the ~~findings~~effectiveness ~~from~~of the ~~investigation~~design and aoperation ~~company-led~~of ~~accounting~~our ~~review~~disclosure controls and procedures as of January 2, ~~management~~2016. ~~intends~~Based toupon ~~take~~such ~~practical~~evaluation, ~~cost-effective~~the Chief Financial Officer, the ~~steps~~principal infinancial ~~implementing~~officer ~~internal~~and ~~controls~~acting principal executive officer, ~~including~~has concluded that, as of the ~~following~~end ~~remedial~~of ~~measures~~such period, ~~including:~~the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as required under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. We have reviewed the results of management’s assessment with our audit committee.

*InterviewingManagement’s ~~and potentially~~Report ~~hiring outside consultants that are experts in designing internal controls over financial reporting based~~ on ~~criteria established in~~ Internal Control~~-Integrated~~ ~~Framework~~Over Financial ~~issued~~Reporting ~~by COSO.~~

*Our ~~Segregation~~management ofis ~~the~~responsible ~~duties~~for ofestablishing ~~principal~~and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting. ~~officer~~Under the supervision and ~~principal~~with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer.,

A- ~~control~~19 system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-~~effective~~ ~~control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.~~

~~Except~~ we ~~the~~conducted ~~following,~~an ~~there~~evaluation ~~was~~of nothe ~~change~~effectiveness inof our internal ~~controls~~control over financial reporting ~~that~~using ~~occurred~~framework ~~during~~similar to criteria referenced in the ~~period~~initial ~~ended~~steps of the Internal Control – ~~December 27,~~Integrated ~~2014,~~Framework ~~which~~issued ~~has~~by ~~materially~~the ~~affected,~~Committee orof isSponsoring ~~reasonably~~Organizations ~~likely~~of tothe ~~materially~~Treadway ~~affect,~~Commission ~~our~~(“COSO”). ~~internal~~We ~~controls~~have ~~over~~reviewed ~~financial~~the ~~reporting:~~results of management’s assessment with our Audit Committee.

~~Effective~~A ~~October 6,~~material ~~2014,~~weakness ~~each~~is ofa ~~John~~significant N.deficiency ~~Giordano~~(as ~~and~~defined ~~Charles~~in G.the ~~Masters~~Public ~~resigned~~Company asAccounting aOversight ~~director~~Board’s ofAuditing ~~the Company~~Standard No. ~~John~~ N.2), ~~Giordano and~~or ~~Charles~~a G.combination ~~Masters~~of ~~did~~significant ~~not~~deficiencies, ~~hold~~that ~~any~~results ~~position~~in onreasonable ~~any~~possibility ~~committee~~that ofa ~~the~~material ~~board~~misstatement of ~~directors of~~ the ~~Company~~annual ator ~~the~~interim ~~time~~financial ofstatements ~~their~~will ~~resignation.~~not ~~Charles~~be G.prevented ~~Masters~~or ~~resigned~~detected on asa ~~the~~timely ~~Chief~~basis. ~~Executive~~In ~~Officer~~its ~~and President~~ assessment of the ~~Company~~effectiveness ~~effective December 31, 2014. The resignations~~ of ~~John~~the ~~Giordano~~Company’s ~~and~~internal ~~Charles~~controls G.over ~~Masters~~financial ~~are~~reporting, ~~not~~management ~~the~~determined ~~result~~that ofthere ~~any~~were ~~disagreement~~control ~~with~~deficiencies ~~the~~that ~~Company~~constituted onmaterial ~~any matter relating to the Company’s operations~~weaknesses, ~~policies~~as ordescribed ~~practices~~below.

By* ~~Written~~We ~~Action~~have ofnoted ~~the~~that ~~Board~~there ofmay ~~Directors~~be ~~dated~~an ~~September 2,~~insufficient ~~2014,~~quantity ~~the board~~ of ~~directors~~dedicated ofresources ~~the~~and ~~Company~~experienced ~~approved~~personnel ~~the~~involved ~~increase~~ in ~~the~~ ~~size~~reviewing ofand ~~the~~designing ~~board~~internal ~~of directors of the Company from five (5) directors to seven (7) directors~~controls. ~~Effective~~As ~~October 6,~~a ~~2014~~result, ~~the~~a ~~remaining~~material ~~directors~~misstatement ~~appointed and elected the following individuals to fill the vacancies created by the increase in the size~~ of the ~~board~~interim ~~of directors of the Company~~ and byannual ~~the~~financial ~~resignations~~statements ofcould ~~John~~occur ~~N. Giordano~~ and ~~Charles~~not G.be ~~Masters:~~prevented ~~Timothy~~or E.detected ~~Brog,~~on ~~Kevin A.~~a ~~Cavanaugh,~~timely ~~Julius Bloomston, and Damien J~~basis. ~~Park.~~

As* aOur ~~result~~principal offinancial ~~the~~officer ~~retirement~~is ofalso Mrour current acting principal executive officer. ~~Masters~~ ~~effective~~While ~~December 31,~~not ~~2014~~being legally obligated, ~~our~~it is the managements view that separating the functions of principal financial officer isfrom ~~currently~~role of acting ~~as our~~ principal executive officer is an important entity-level control over the Company’s financial statements.

OnThis ~~November 12,~~annual ~~2014,~~report does not include an attestation report of our ~~Board~~registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report is not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of ~~Directors~~the ~~established~~SEC anthat ~~Audit~~permit ~~Committee~~us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

~~ITEM~~Remediation ~~9B.~~Efforts ~~OTHER~~to ~~INFORMATION~~Address Deficiencies in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

~~None.~~As a result of the findings from the investigation and a company-led accounting review, management intends to take practical, cost-effective steps in implementing internal controls, including the following remedial measures, including:

-*Interviewing 39and potentially hiring outside consultants that are experts in designing internal controls over financial reporting based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

~~Table~~* Segregation of ~~Contents~~the duties of principal financial officer and principal executive officer.

~~PART~~A ~~III~~control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

~~ITEM~~Changes ~~10.~~in ~~DIRECTORS~~Internal ~~AND~~Control ~~EXECUTIVE~~Over ~~OFFICERS~~Financial OFReporting ~~THE REGISTRANT~~

~~Directors~~Except ~~and~~the ~~Executive~~following, ~~Officers~~there was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period ended January 2, 2016, which has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting:

AsEffective as of ~~March~~April 115, 2015, ~~the~~each ~~directors~~of Timothy E. Brog, Kevin A. Cavanaugh, and ~~executive~~Julius ~~officers~~Bloomston resigned as a director of the Company,. The ~~their~~resignations ~~ages~~of Messrs. Brog, ~~positions~~Cavanaugh, and Bloomston are not the ~~dates~~result of ~~initial~~any ~~election~~disagreement ~~or appointment~~with asthe ~~directors~~Company oron ~~executive~~any ~~officers~~matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices. Messrs. Brog and Bloomston were members of the ~~expiration~~Audit Committee of ~~their~~the ~~terms~~Board ~~are~~of asDirectors ~~set~~of ~~forth~~the inCompany at the ~~following~~time ~~table~~of their resignation.

Name of Director / Executive Officer	Age	Position(s)	Period Served
Timothy E. Brog	51	Class I Director of Deer Valley Corporation	October 6, 2014 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)
Kevin A. Cavanaugh	43	Class II Director of Deer Valley Corporation	October 6, 2014 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)
Julius Bloomston	47	Class III Director of Deer Valley Corporation	October 6, 2014 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)
John Steven Lawler	46	Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of DVH	September 22, 2006 to Present
		Class III Director of Deer Valley Corporation	September 22, 2006 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)
		Member of the Board of Directors of DVH	September 22, 2006 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)
		Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Deer Valley Corporation	January 27, 2009 to Present
		Secretary, Treasurer and Member of Board of Directors of DVFC	August 18, 2009 to Present
Damien J. Park	43	Class III Director of Deer Valley Corporation	October 6, 2014 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)
Charles L. Murphree, Jr.	53	Vice President and Regional Sales Director of DVH	September 22, 2006 to June 30, 2012
		Vice President and General Manager of DVH	July 1, 2012 to Present
		Class I Director of Deer Valley Corporation	September 22, 2006 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)
		Member of the Board of Directors of DVH	September 22, 2006 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)
		Member of Board of Directors of DVFC	August 18, 2009 to Present
Joel Stephen Logan, II	46	President and General Manager of DVH	September 22, 2006 to June 30, 2012
		Chief Operating Officer and Vice President of Deer Valley Corporation	July 1, 2012 to Present
		Class II Director of Deer Valley Corporation	September 22, 2006 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)
		Member of the Board of Directors of DVH	September 22, 2006 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)
		Vice President and Member of Board of Directors of DVFC	August 18, 2009 to Present

- 20 -

~~Table~~By resolution of ~~Contents~~the Board of Directors at a meeting on April 21, 2015, the remaining directors appointed and elected Tony Bonidy, Lodovico de Visconti, and Ron Frank to fill the vacancies created by the resignations of Messrs. Brog, Cavanaugh, and Bloomston. Mr. Bonidy was appointed to the Company’s Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee. Mr. de Visconti was appointed to the Company’s Audit Committee. Mr. Frank was appointed to the Company’s Audit Committee and Compensation Committee. Each of Messrs. Bonidy’s, de Visconti’s and Frank’s acceptance of the appointments is effective as of April 21, 2015.

~~Experience~~As a result of the retirement of Mr. Masters effective December 31, 2014, our principal financial officer is currently acting as our principal executive officer.

~~Timothy~~ITEM E9B. ~~Brog, age~~OTHER 51, was the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Peerless Systems Corporation from June 2008 to February 2015, Chief Executive Officer of Peerless from August 2010 to February 2015 and a director of Peerless from July 9, 2007 to February 2015. Mr. Brog was the Managing Director of Locksmith Capital Management LLC, the portfolio manager to Locksmith Value Opportunity Fund LP, from September 2007 to August 2010 and the Managing Director of E2 Investment Partners LLC, a special purpose vehicle to invest in Peerless, from March 2007 to July 2008. Mr. Brog was President of Pembridge Capital Management LLC, the portfolio manager of Pembridge Value Opportunity Fund LP, a deep value activist hedge fund, from June 2004 to September 2007. Mr. Brog was the Managing Director of The Edward Andrews Group Inc., a boutique investment bank, from 1996 to 2007. From 1989 to 1995, Mr. Brog was a corporate finance and mergers and acquisitions associate of the law firm, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. Mr. Brog received a J.D. from Fordham University School of Law in 1989 and a B.A. from Tufts University in 1986. Mr. Brog is a Director of Eco-Bat Technologies Limited. Mr. Brog’s legal, investment banking and value investment experience position him well to serve as a director of Deer Valley. INFORMATION

~~Kevin A~~None. Cavanaugh, age 43, is the Director of Communications and Public Affairs at The Leona M. And Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (the “Trust”), a $5 billion philanthropic foundation that funds health, education and a range of place-based initiatives. Mr. Cavanaugh joined the Trust in late 2012 and is a member of its five (5) person senior leadership team. Previously, he spent eleven (11) years at the global law firm of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP as the Director of Business Development, leading the firm’s client acquisition, marketing and communications functions. As a member of the executive staff, he was part of the leadership team that launched new practices in Corporate Governance and Dodd-Frank Regulation and new offices in Beijing, São Paulo and Madrid. Prior to Davis Polk, he was the Director of Communications at Winstar Communications, where he led all communications efforts, focusing personally on issues pertaining to Winstar Communications’ M&A transactions, joint ventures, private equity investments and corporate financings. Mr. Cavanaugh’s experience as a senior executive at public and private organizations make him well suited to serve as a director of Deer Valley.

~~Julius~~PART ~~Bloomston,~~III age 47, has been the President of Right Turn Promotions, LLC from 2009 to the present. Right Turn Promotions, LLC is a full service marketing company with strong B2B relationships with nationally recognized clients and suppliers. Mr. Bloomston was a co-owner of Shapes Marketing, a privately held catalog placement agency, from 2008 to 2009. Mr. Bloomston was the owner of Synergy Marketing, LLC, a key distributor in ad specialty and promotional marketing, from 2000 to 2008. He was the Director, New Store Operations, of Just for Feet from 1996 to 1999. Mr. Bloomston has a background in the hardware industry with associations to national companies throughout the United States. Mr. Bloomston holds a Bachelor of Science in Commerce and Business Administration, majoring in Marketing from the University of Alabama in 1989.

~~John~~ITEM ~~Steven Lawler, age 46, has been the Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Director of Deer Valley Corporation and Chief Financial Officer and Director of Deer Valley Homebuilders, Inc~~10. ~~(“DVH”)~~DIRECTORS ~~since~~AND ~~2006.~~EXECUTIVE AsOFFICERS ~~part~~OF ofTHE the DVH’s founding group, since April 2004, Mr. Lawler, a certified public accountant, has served as Chief Financial Officer for DVH. From 2001 until 2004, he served as ERP and IT Project Manager for Cavalier Homes, Inc. From 1999 until 2001, Mr. Lawler worked as the ERP Team Leader for Financial Accounting for Cavalier Homes, Inc. Mr. Lawler holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from the University of Alabama. REGISTRANT

~~Damien~~Directors J. Park, age 43, Managing Partner of Hedge Fund Solutions, LLC since 2004, President & CEO of Hibernian Partners, Inc. since 1998. Mr. Park received a MBA from Trinity College Dublin, Ireland in 1998 and aExecutive ~~B.S.~~Officers ~~from Delaware Valley College in 1994.~~

~~Charles~~As L.of ~~Murphree~~March 1, ~~Jr.~~2016, ~~age~~the ~~53,~~directors ~~has~~and ~~been~~executive aofficers ~~member~~ of the ~~Board~~Company, oftheir ~~Directors of Deer Valley Corporation and of DVH since 2006~~ages, ~~Vice President and General Manager of Deer Valley Homebuilders~~positions, ~~Inc. As one of~~ the ~~founders~~dates of ~~DVH,~~initial ~~since~~election ~~April~~or appointment ~~of 2004, Mr. Murphree has served~~ as adirectors ~~Corporate~~or ~~Director~~executive officers, ~~Sales Manager~~ and ~~Vice~~the ~~President~~expiration of ~~DVH.~~ ~~From~~their ~~2003~~terms ~~until~~are ~~2004, Mr. Murphree served~~ as ~~Plant~~set ~~Manager~~forth ~~for~~in ~~Clayton~~the ~~Homes,~~following ~~Inc~~table. ~~From 2000 through~~

- 41 -


Name of Director / Executive Officer	Age	Position(s)	Period Served
Anthony J. Bonidy	68	Class I Director of Deer Valley Corporation	April 21, 2015 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)

Lodovico de Visconti	40	Class II Director of Deer Valley Corporation	April 21, 2015 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)

Ronald W. Frank	68	Class III Director of Deer Valley Corporation	April 21, 2015 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)

John Steven Lawler	47	Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of DVH	September 22, 2006 to Present

		Class III Director of Deer Valley Corporation	September 22, 2006 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)

		Member of the Board of Directors of DVH	September 22, 2006 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)

		Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Deer Valley Corporation	January 27, 2009 to Present

		Secretary, Treasurer and Member of Board of Directors of DVFC	August 18, 2009 to Present

Damien J. Park	44	Class III Director of Deer Valley Corporation	October 6, 2014 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)

Charles L. Murphree, Jr.	54	Vice President and Regional Sales Director of DVH	September 22, 2006 to June 30, 2012

		Vice President and General Manager of DVH	July 1, 2012 to Present

		Class I Director of Deer Valley Corporation	September 22, 2006 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)

		Member of the Board of Directors of DVH	September 22, 2006 to Present (term expires at next meeting of shareholders)

		Member of Board of Directors of DVFC	August 18, 2009 to Present

~~Table~~- of21 ~~Contents~~-

~~Joel~~Experience Stephen Logan, II, age 46, has been the Chief Operating Officer and Director of Deer Valley Corporation and President and Director of DVH since 2006. Mr. Logan is well-known throughout the factory-built home industry, having founded and operated two successful companies in the industry. Since leading the group which founded DVH in 2004, Mr. Logan has served as Chairman of the Board, and President of Deer Valley Homebuilders, Inc. In 1996, Mr. Logan led the group which founded a HUD Code housing company, Pinnacle Homes of Alabama. Mr. Logan served as President and General Manager of Pinnacle until the company was purchased in 1998. Following the buy-out, Pinnacle became a division of Patriot Homes of Indiana, and Mr. Logan continued as General Manager of the Pinnacle Division until 2003. Mr. Logan holds a degree in Business Administration from Mississippi State University.

~~Significant~~Anthony ~~Employees~~J. Bonidy, age 68, joined LCV Capital Management, LLC in 2009. Prior to that, from 2002 to 2009, he served as President and CEO of CombineNet, Inc., a Pittsburgh-based top 100 advanced sourcing technology company. Under his management CombineNet delivered more than $6 billion in bottom-line savings for businesses worldwide including General Mills, PepsiCo, Procter & Gamble, Bayer, Sears, Johnson & Johnson, and many more across a spectrum of industries. In 2009, CombineNet was sold to a private equity investment firm. From 2000 to 2002, he co-purchased Revive, Inc., a Pittsburgh-based software conversion company. Revive was sold in 2002 to a division of Fluor, generating approximately 500% IRR to investors. From 1998 to 2000, he served as a member of the board of directors and later as CEO of InfoSage, Inc., a Pittsburgh-based leading business intelligence software company. From 1994 to 1998 he served as co-founder and President of Dlubak, OCD, a Pittsburgh-based specialty glass fabrication company focused on architectural projects like Reagan National Airport, the Getty Museum and the Baylor Medical Center, among others. From 1993 to 1994 he served as Vice President of Sales for Legent Corporation, a Washington, DC-based software development company, which was acquired by CA Associates. From 1987 to 1993, shortly after its inception, he joined the executive team at NeXT Computer, Inc., a California-based integrated computer manufacturer. Mr. Bonidy served as head of global product distribution and worked closely with NeXT’s CEO and founder, Steve Jobs, to build the Company’s Eastern Sales organization. Furthermore, he was responsible for developing the Federal Business Unit (NeXT’s most successful and profitable operation) and led NeXT into the financial investments arena through its rapid software deployment products for traders. From 1970 to 1987 he worked at IBM in various executive management positions, including Area Vice President responsible for 12% of IBM’s domestic revenues. Later, he was a Vice President of IBM’s Application Systems Division responsible for all application software worldwide. Additionally, Mr. Bonidy led the IBM mergers and acquisitions team, which acquired Metaphor Systems, which became the foundation of IBM’s Business Intelligence offering. In addition to serving as a member of the board of directors for most companies listed above, Mr. Bonidy has also served on the board of directors of Innovation Works, a Pittsburgh-based venture capital firm, as well as the Pittsburgh High Technology Council. In 2008, Mr. Bonidy was selected as a finalist for the Ernst & Young “Entrepreneur of the Year”award. Mr. Bonidy received a BS in Business from West Virginia University.

~~Other~~Lodovico ~~than~~de Visconti, age 40, is the ~~executive~~Founder, ~~officers~~Managing Member and Chief Investment Officer of ~~Deer~~LCV ~~Valley~~Capital ~~named~~Management, ~~above~~LLC – an alternative investment company, nowhich ~~other~~focuses ~~employees~~on ~~are~~managing ~~required~~multiple shareholder activist hedge funds. Prior to befounding ~~disclosed~~LCV ~~under~~Capital ~~this~~Management, ~~item~~from January 2006 to May 2009, he served as General Partner and Chief Investment Officer of RF Partners, L.P. ~~Because~~– a New York-based shareholder activist hedge fund. Lodovico’s activist experience includes multiple activist campaigns across a spectrum of ~~their~~industries, including ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc., Quidel Corporation, OM ~~importance~~Group, Inc., Horsehead Holding Corp., TOP Ships, Inc., James River Coal Company, JAKKS Pacific, Inc., AR Corp. and Maxim Crane WorksHoldings. From March 2007 to ~~the~~April ~~success~~2008 he served as non-executive Managing Director of ~~the~~Signal ~~Company~~Capital Management, LLC ~~Deer~~- ~~Valley~~a ~~maintains~~New ~~“key~~York-based ~~man”~~multi-strategy ~~life~~alternative ~~insurance~~investment ~~policies~~company, with ~~Deer~~strong ~~Valley~~focus on long/short, quantitative and SPAC investment strategies. From January 2005 to January 2006 he was a Director at Schneider Downs & Co. – a Pittsburgh-based financial advisory company. From March 2004 to December 2008 he served as ~~beneficiary~~a senior advisor at the Gerson Lehrman Group - an international executive consulting firm, onwhere ~~Joel~~he ~~Stephen~~specialized ~~Logan~~in IIproviding advisory services to hedge funds concerning shareholder activist-related matters. Major clients included the Goldman Sachs Special Opportunities Fund, ~~John~~L.P. ~~Steven~~and ~~Lawler~~Pirate Capital, LLC. From February 2004 to July 2006 he served as non-executive Director at NADTCO – a Swiss-based international commodities trading firm. From February 2000 to October 2004 he served as Vice President, Mergers and ~~Charles~~Acquisitions ~~Murphree~~at Antares International Partners, Inc. – a San Francisco and Paris-based international investment bank. From June 1997 to February 2000 he served as Associate, Mergers and Acquisitions at N.M. Rothschild and Goldman Sachs Group – London- and New York-based international investment banks, respectively. Lodovico’s experience encompasses circa $10 billion of middle-market transactions involving leading

~~Family~~- ~~Relationships~~22 -

~~Involvement~~ financial Insponsors, ~~Legal~~such ~~Proceedings~~as KKR, Blackstone Group, Carlyle Group, Apax Partners, Metalmark Capital and BC Partners. Lodovico received a BS in Finance, International Business and Economics from Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business and has completed extensive coursework at Boalt Hall School of Law at the University of California at Berkeley.

ToRonald W. Frank, age 68, has served as the ~~best~~General ofCounsel ~~our~~for ~~knowledge~~LCV Capital Management, ~~there~~LLC since 2009. He is noalso ~~material~~a ~~proceeding~~Partner toat Reed ~~which~~Smith, ~~any~~LLP ~~director~~– a major international law firm, ~~officer~~in orits ~~affiliate~~Corporate & Securities Group. Mr. Frank has over 30 years of ~~the~~experience ~~Company,~~in ~~any~~all ~~owner~~aspects of ~~record~~mergers and acquisitions. He has represented clients in connection with stock and orasset ~~beneficially~~transactions, ofand ~~more~~has ~~than~~represented 5%both private and publicly-traded corporations with respect to such transactions. Additionally, he has extensive experience in structuring contingent pay-out arrangements, earn-outs, and other forms of non-standard ~~any~~transaction ~~class~~structures, employment and consulting agreements and complex dispute resolution provisions. Mr. Frank has advised clients in connection with public securities transactions, including initial public offerings, acquisitions of ~~voting~~publicly-held corporations, tender offers, and “going private” transactions. He has also represented clients in securities transactions exempt from Federal and State registration, including employee stock purchase plans, tax-oriented investments, ESOP transactions, acquisitions and capital formation transactions. Mr. Frank has also served as Founder and Managing Director of ~~the~~Morgan ~~Company~~Franklin & Co. and B. I. Europa, orGmbH ~~security~~- ~~holder~~Pittsburgh- and Frankfurt-based investment banking and consulting firms, respectively. Mr. Frank is a ~~party~~graduate ~~adverse~~of toCarnegie Mellon University with a degree in Chemical Engineering and serves on the ~~Company~~Executive orCommittee ~~has~~of athe ~~material~~Andrew ~~interest~~Carnegie ~~adverse~~Society. toIn 1972 he received his Law Degree from the ~~Company~~Duke orLaw ~~any~~School and currently serves on the Advisory Council. He is a member of ~~its~~the ~~subsidiaries~~International Bar Association and the Pennsylvania Bar Association where he serves as Chairman, International and Comparative Law Section.

ToJohn ~~the~~Steven ~~best~~Lawler, ofage ~~our knowledge~~47, ~~during~~has been the ~~past~~Chief ~~ten~~Financial ~~years~~Officer, ~~none~~Executive ofVice ~~our~~President ~~directors~~and orDirector ~~executive officers were involved in any~~ of ~~the~~Deer ~~following:~~Valley ~~(1) any~~Corporation ~~bankruptcy~~and ~~petition~~Chief ~~filed~~Financial byOfficer orand ~~against~~Director ~~any property or business~~ of ~~which~~Deer ~~such~~Valley ~~person~~Homebuilders, ~~was~~Inc. a(“DVH”) ~~general~~since ~~partner~~2006. orAs ~~executive~~part ~~officer either at the time~~ of the ~~bankruptcy~~DVH’s orfounding ~~within~~group, ~~two~~since ~~years~~April ~~prior~~2004, ~~to that time; (2)~~Mr. ~~any~~Lawler, ~~conviction in~~ a ~~criminal~~ ~~proceeding~~certified orpublic ~~being~~accountant, ~~subject~~has toserved aas Chief ~~pending~~Financial ~~criminal~~Officer ~~proceeding~~for ~~(excluding~~DVH. ~~traffic~~From ~~violations~~2001 ~~and~~until ~~other~~2004, ~~minor~~he ~~offenses);~~served ~~(3) being~~as ~~subject~~ERP toand ~~any~~IT ~~order,~~Project ~~judgment,~~Manager orfor ~~decree,~~Cavalier ~~not subsequently reversed~~Homes, ~~suspended~~Inc. orFrom ~~vacated,~~1999 ofuntil ~~any court of competent jurisdiction~~2001, ~~permanently~~Mr. Lawler orworked ~~temporarily~~as ~~enjoining,~~the ~~barring,~~ERP ~~suspending,~~Team orLeader ~~otherwise~~for ~~limiting~~Financial ~~his~~Accounting ~~involvement~~for inCavalier ~~any type of business~~Homes, ~~securities or banking activities; or (4)~~Inc. Mr. ~~being~~Lawler ~~found~~holds by a ~~court~~Bachelor of ~~competent~~Science ~~jurisdiction (~~in ~~a civil~~Business ~~action),~~Administration ~~the~~from ~~SEC, or~~ the ~~Commodities~~University ~~Futures~~of ~~Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated~~Alabama.

~~Section~~Damien J. Park, ~~16(~~age 44, has served as the Managing Partner of Hedge Fund Solutions LLC, a) ~~Beneficial~~management ~~Ownership~~consulting ~~Reporting~~firm ~~Compliance~~focused on helping public-company clients make lasting improvements to their performance through strategic, operational and best-in-class corporate governance initiatives, since its formation in 2004. Mr. Park has also served as the President and CEO of Hibernian Partners, Inc., a strategy management consulting firm, since 1998. Mr. Park serves as a Director and Chairman of the Board, and a member of the Compensation and Governance Committees of iPass, Inc, a technology company enabling Wi-Fi mobile connectivity services, since May 2015. Mr. Park is a founding board member of Nightlight Foundation, LLC, a non-profit organization designed to support individuals with autism through affordable, supervised residential living. Mr. Park earned a B.S. from Delaware Valley College and his MBA from Trinity College in Dublin, Ireland.

~~Section 16(~~Charles L. Murphree, Jr., age 54 has been a) member of the ~~Securities~~Board ~~Exchange~~of ~~Act~~Directors of ~~1934,~~Deer asValley ~~amended,~~Corporation ~~requires~~and ~~the~~of ~~Company’s~~DVH ~~directors~~since 2006, Vice ~~officers~~President and ~~holders~~General Manager of ~~more~~Deer ~~than 10%~~Valley Homebuilders, Inc. As one of the ~~Company’s~~founders ~~equity~~of ~~securities~~DVH, tosince ~~file~~April ~~with~~of ~~the~~2004, ~~Securities~~Mr. Murphree ~~and~~has ~~Exchange~~served ~~Commission~~as ~~initial~~a ~~reports~~Corporate ofDirector, ~~ownership~~Sales Manager and ~~reports~~Vice President of ~~changes~~DVH. inFrom ~~ownership.~~2003 ~~Based~~until ~~solely~~2004, Mr. Murphree onserved aas ~~review~~Plant ofManager ~~the~~for ~~forms~~Clayton Homes, ~~reports~~Inc. From 2000 through 2003, ~~and~~Mr. Murphree ~~certificates~~worked ~~filed~~as ~~with~~General Manager of the ~~Company by~~Energy ~~such~~and ~~persons~~LifeStyle Divisions of Southern Energy Homes, ~~all~~Inc. ~~Section~~Mr. ~~16(a)~~Murphree ~~filing~~graduated ~~requirements~~from ~~were~~the University ~~complied~~of ~~with~~Alabama byHuntsville ~~such~~with ~~persons~~a ~~during~~Bachelor ~~the~~of ~~most~~Science ~~recent~~in ~~fiscal~~Business ~~year~~Administration.

~~Code~~Significant ofEmployees ~~Ethics~~

~~The~~Other ~~Company~~than ~~has~~the ~~not~~executive ~~adopted~~officers aof ~~code~~Deer ofValley ~~ethics~~named ~~which~~above, ~~applies~~no toother ~~its~~employees ~~principal~~are ~~executive~~required ~~officer,~~to ~~principal~~be ~~financial~~disclosed ~~officer,~~under ~~principal accounting~~this ~~officer~~item. orBecause ~~controller,~~of ortheir importance ~~persons~~to ~~performing~~the ~~similar~~success ~~functions.~~of ~~The~~the Company, ~~desires~~Deer toValley ~~implement~~maintains ~~board~~“key ~~committees~~man” ~~before~~life ~~adopting~~insurance ~~such~~policies, awith ~~code.~~Deer ~~The~~Valley ~~Company~~as isbeneficiary, ~~actively~~on ~~pursuing~~John ~~the~~Steven ~~implementation~~Lawler, ofand ~~board~~Charles ~~committees~~L Murphree, Jr.

-Family 42Relationships -

~~Table~~There are no family relationships among any of ~~Contents~~our directors and executive officers.

~~Material~~Involvement ~~Changes~~In toLegal ~~Nominations~~Proceedings ~~by Security Holders of Director Candidates~~

InTo the ~~past~~best ~~fiscal~~of ~~year~~our knowledge, there ~~has~~is ~~been~~ no material ~~change~~proceeding to which any director, officer or affiliate of the ~~procedures~~Company, byany ~~which~~owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of any class of voting securities of the Company, or security ~~holders~~holder ~~may~~is ~~recommend~~a ~~nominees~~party adverse to the ~~registrant’s~~ ~~board~~Company or has a material interest adverse to the Company or any of ~~directors~~its subsidiaries.

~~Audit~~- ~~Committee~~23 -

~~ITEM~~To ~~11.~~the ~~EXECUTIVE~~best ~~COMPENSATION~~of our knowledge, during the past ten years, none of our directors or executive officers were involved in any of the following: (1) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any property or business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (2) any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (3) being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending, or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or (4) being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC, or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

~~Summary~~Section 16(a) ofBeneficial ~~Executive~~Ownership ~~Compensation~~Reporting Compliance

~~The~~Section 16(a) ~~following~~of ~~table~~the ~~sets~~Securities ~~forth~~Exchange ~~information~~Act ~~regarding~~of ~~the~~1934, ~~compensation~~as ~~earned~~amended, byrequires ~~our~~the ~~Chief~~Company’s ~~Executive~~directors, ~~Officer~~officers and ~~each~~holders of ~~our~~more ~~most highly~~than ~~compensated~~10% ~~executive~~of ~~officers~~the ~~whose~~Company’s ~~total~~equity ~~compensation~~securities ~~exceeded~~to ~~$100,000~~file ~~for~~with the ~~fiscal~~Securities ~~year~~and ~~ended~~Exchange ~~December 27~~Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership. Based solely on a review of the forms, ~~2014~~reports, and certificates filed with ~~respect~~the toCompany by ~~services~~such ~~rendered~~persons, all Section 16(a) filing requirements were complied with by such persons. during the last fiscal year or prior fiscal years, except as otherwise set forth below:

~~SUMMARY~~Section 16(a) ~~COMPENSATION~~Beneficial ~~TABLE~~Ownership Reporting Compliance

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary			Bonus		StockAwards		OptionAwards		Non-EquityIncentive PlanCompensation			Non-qualifieddeferredcompensationearnings		All OtherCompensation			Total
Name of Filer	Title	# of LateReports		# of Transactionsnot timely reported	# of Failure toFile
Charles G. Masters (1)	2014 2013	$ $	150,000 150,000			— —		— —		— —		— —			— —	$ $	110,000 10,000	(6) (8)	$ $	260,000 160,000
Anthony J. Bonidy	Director	0		1	1
Joel Stephen Logan, II	2014 2013	$ $	91,000 91,000			— —		— —		— —		— —			— —	$ $	10,000 10,000	(8) (8)	$ $	101,000 101,000
Lodovico de Visconti	Officer/ Director	0		1	1
Charles L. Murphree, Jr.	2014 2013	$ $	85,150 85,150			— —		— —		— —	$ $	126,249 126,249	(2) (3)		— —	$ $	20,481 20,481	(7) (7)	$ $	231,880 231,880
John Steven Lawler	2013 2013	$ $	85,150 85,150			— —		— —		— —	$ $	91,789 91,789	(4) (5)		— —	$ $	10,000 10,000	(8) (8)	$ $	186,939 186,939

~~(1)~~Code ~~On January 18, 2006, Mr. Masters was elected to serve as a Director, Chief Executive Officer, and President~~ of ~~the~~Ethics ~~Company. Mr. Masters’ salary was $150,000 per year in 2014 and 2013. On December 31, 2014, Mr. Masters retired as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company.~~

~~(2)~~The ~~Non-equity~~Company ~~incentive~~has ~~plan~~not ~~compensation~~adopted ~~consisted~~a code of ~~“hitch”~~ethics ~~bonuses~~which ~~and~~applies ~~profit-sharing~~to ~~arrangements~~its ~~described~~principal inexecutive ~~“Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers” below. Amount reflects accruals in fiscal year 2013~~officer, ~~including~~principal afinancial ~~“hitch” bonus of $3~~officer,~~180~~ ~~and~~principal accounting ~~profit-sharing~~officer ofor ~~$45~~controller,~~600~~ ~~accrued~~or ~~but~~persons ~~unpaid~~performing insimilar ~~2013~~functions. InThe ~~2013,~~Company ~~Mr.~~desires ~~Murphree~~to ~~was~~implement ~~paid~~board ~~$44,580~~committees asbefore aadopting ~~“hitch~~such ~~bonus,”~~a ~~which~~code. ~~includes~~The ~~$2,520~~Company ~~accrued~~is ~~but~~actively ~~unpaid~~pursuing inthe ~~2012,~~implementation ~~and~~of ~~$66,895~~board ~~in profit-sharing, which includes $31,736 accrued but unpaid in 2012~~committees.

~~(3)~~Material ~~Non-equity~~Changes ~~incentive~~to ~~plan~~Nominations ~~compensation~~by ~~consisted~~Security ofHolders “hitch” bonuses and profit-sharing arrangements described in “Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers” below. Amount reflects accruals in fiscal year 2013, including a “hitch” bonus of ~~$3,180~~Director ~~and~~Candidates profit-sharing of $45,600 accrued but unpaid in 2013. In 2013, Mr. Murphree was paid $44,580 as a “hitch bonus,” which includes $2,520 accrued but unpaid in 2012, and $66,895 in profit-sharing, which includes $31,736 accrued but unpaid in 2012.

-In 43the -past fiscal year, there has been no material change to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s board of directors.

~~Table~~Audit ofCommittee ~~Contents~~

~~(4)~~Our ~~Non-equity~~Audit ~~incentive~~Committee ~~plan~~comprised ~~compensation consisted~~ of ~~“hitch”~~Messrs. ~~bonuses~~Lodovico ~~and~~de ~~profit-sharing~~Visconti, ~~arrangements~~Ronald ~~described~~W. inFrank ~~“Employment~~and ~~Agreements~~Damien ~~with~~J. ~~Named~~Park. ~~Executive~~The ~~Officers”~~purpose ~~below.~~of ~~Amount~~the ~~reflects~~audit ~~accruals~~committee inis ~~fiscal~~to assist ~~year~~the ~~2013,~~board ~~including~~of adirectors ~~“hitch”~~in ~~bonus~~its oversight of ~~$2,650~~management’s ~~and~~conduct ~~profit-sharing~~ of ~~$30,400~~our ~~accrued~~financial ~~but~~reporting ~~unpaid~~process. inThe ~~2013.~~Board Inhas ~~2013,~~determined that Mr. Lodovico ~~Lawler~~de ~~was paid $37~~Visconti,~~150~~ asthe aChairperson ~~“hitch~~of ~~bonus,”~~the ~~which~~Audit ~~includes $2~~Committee,~~100~~ ~~accrued~~meets ~~but~~the ~~unpaid~~definition inof ~~2012,~~“Audit Committee ~~and~~financial ~~$44~~expert,~~743~~” inas ~~profit-sharing,~~such ~~which~~term ~~includes~~is ~~$21,304~~defined ~~accrued~~under ~~but~~SEC ~~unpaid in 2012~~rules.

~~(5)~~ITEM ~~Non-equity incentive plan compensation consisted of “hitch” bonuses and profit-sharing arrangements described in “Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers” below~~11. ~~Amount~~EXECUTIVE reflects accruals in fiscal year 2013, including a “hitch” bonus of $2,650 and profit-sharing of $30,400 accrued but unpaid in 2013. In 2013, Mr. Lawler was paid $37,150 as a “hitch bonus,” which includes $2,100 accrued but unpaid in 2012, and $44,743 in profit-sharing, which includes $21,304 accrued but unpaid in 2012.COMPENSATION

~~(6)~~Summary ~~Amount~~of ~~relates to severance agreement and director fees in the respective fiscal year. On December 31, 2014, Mr. Masters retired as Chief~~ Executive ~~Officer~~Compensation ~~and President of the Company. Mr. Masters was paid a lump sum payment of $100,000 per the severance agreement.~~

~~(7)~~The ~~Amount~~following ~~relates~~table tosets ~~health~~forth ~~insurance~~information ~~premiums~~regarding the compensation earned by our Chief Executive Officer and ~~director~~each ~~fees~~of inour ~~the~~most ~~respective~~highly compensated executive officers whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016 with respect to services rendered by such persons.

~~(8)~~- ~~Amount~~24 ~~relates~~- ~~to director fees in the respective fiscal year.~~

~~Effective~~SUMMARY ~~July 1,~~COMPENSATION ~~2012,~~TABLE DVH entered into the First Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Joel Stephen Logan, II. Under the terms of Mr. Logan’s Employment Agreement, Mr. Logan is (a) entitled to receive a fixed annual salary of $91,000, (b) an annual discretionary compensation bonus as determined by the Board of Directors in its sole discretion, and (c) entitled to receive health benefits and coverage, as provided by DVH. The term of Mr. Logan’s Employment Agreement expires on January 18, 2016. Mr. Logan is subject to a non-compete that expires on the earlier of twenty-four months after termination of employment or the end of the term.

Effective July 1, 2012, DVH entered into the First Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Charles L. Murphree, Jr. Under the terms of Mr. Murphree’s Employment Agreement, Mr. Murphree is (a) entitled to receive a fixed annual salary of $78,000 through June 4, 2013 and $91,000 for the remainder of the term, (b) entitled to receive a monthly “hitch bonus” of $60.00 per “floor” produced by DVH, (c) is eligible to participate and receive 4.5% of the net income before taxes of DVH, and (d) entitled to receive health benefits and coverage, as provided by DVH. The term of Mr. Murphree’s Employment Agreement expires on January 18, 2016. Mr. Murphree is subject to a non-compete that expires on the earlier of twenty-four months after termination of employment or the end of the term.


Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary		Bonus		Stock Awards		Option Awards		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation			Non-qualified deferred compensation earnings		All Other Compensation			Total
Charles G. Masters ⁽¹⁾		2015 2014	$	— 150,000		— —		— —		— —		— —			— —	$	— 110,000	⁽⁶⁾	$	— 260,000

Joel Stephen Logan, II		2015 2014	$ $	106,115 92,750		— —		— —		— —		— —			— —	$	— 10,000	⁽⁷⁾	$ $	106,115 102,750

Charles L. Murphree, Jr.		2015 2014	$ $	106,115 92,750		— —		— —		— —	$ $	215,101 121,800	⁽²⁾ ⁽³⁾		— —	$ $	10,002 21,667	⁽⁸⁾ ⁽⁹⁾	$ $	331,216 236,217

John Steven Lawler		2015 2014	$ $	103,500 95,442		— —		— —		— —	$ $	152,581 88,949	⁽⁴⁾ ⁽⁵⁾		— —	$	— 10,000	⁽⁷⁾	$ $	256,081 194,391

~~Effective September 30, 2014, DVH entered into the Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with John Steven Lawler. Under the terms of Mr. Lawler’s Employment Agreement, Mr. Lawler is~~ (a1) ~~entitled~~ toOn ~~receive a fixed annual salary of $101,000 through~~ January 18, ~~2016 and $116~~2006,~~000~~ ~~for~~Mr. ~~the~~Masters ~~remainder~~was ofelected ~~the term, (b) entitled~~ to ~~receive~~serve as a ~~monthly~~Director, ~~“hitch~~Chief ~~bonus”~~Executive ~~of $50.00 per “floor” produced by DVH~~Officer, ~~(c) is eligible to participate~~ and ~~receive~~ ~~3.0%~~President of the ~~net~~Company. ~~income~~Mr. ~~before~~Masters’ ~~taxes~~salary ofwas ~~DVH~~$150,000 ~~and~~per ~~(d) entitled~~year toin ~~receive health benefits and coverage, as provided by DVH~~2014. ~~The~~On ~~term~~December ~~of Mr. Lawler’s Employment Agreement expires on May~~ 31, ~~2018.~~2014, Mr. ~~Lawler~~ isMasters ~~subject to~~retired aas ~~non-compete~~Chief ~~that~~Executive ~~expires~~Officer onand ~~the~~President ~~later~~ of ~~one year after termination of employment or~~ the ~~expiration of the term~~Company.

~~Each~~(2) Non-equity incentive plan compensation consisted of ~~the employment~~“hitch” ~~agreements~~bonuses and profit-sharing arrangements described ~~above~~in ~~provides~~“Employment ~~for~~Agreements ~~severance~~with ~~payments,~~Named Executive Officers” below. Amount reflects accruals in ~~the~~fiscal ~~amount~~year 2015, including a “hitch” bonus of ~~the~~$4,200 and profit-sharing of $77,393 accrued but unpaid ~~fixed~~in ~~annual~~2015. ~~salary~~In ~~due~~2015, ~~under~~Mr. ~~the~~Murphree ~~remaining~~was ~~term~~paid of$53,880 ~~such~~as ~~agreements~~a ~~(or~~“hitch ~~twenty-four~~bonus,” ~~months~~which includes $3,000 ifaccrued ~~the~~but ~~remaining~~unpaid ~~term~~in is2014, ~~greater~~and ~~than~~$123,529 ~~twenty~~in profit-~~four~~sharing, ~~months).~~which includes $40,901 accrued but unpaid in 2014.

(3) Non-equity 44incentive plan compensation consisted of “hitch” bonuses and profit-sharing arrangements described in “Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers” below. Amount reflects accruals in fiscal year 2014, including a “hitch” bonus of $3,000 and profit-sharing of $40,901 accrued but unpaid in 2014. In 2014, Mr. Murphree was paid $46,680 as a “hitch bonus,” which includes $3,180 accrued but unpaid in 2013, and $79,999 in profit-sharing, which includes $45,600 accrued but unpaid in 2013.

~~Table~~(4) Non-equity incentive plan compensation consisted of ~~Contents~~“hitch” bonuses and profit-sharing arrangements described in “Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers” below. Amount reflects accruals in fiscal year 2015, including a “hitch” bonus of $3,500 and profit-sharing of $51,594 accrued but unpaid in 2015. In 2015, Mr. Lawler was paid $44,900 as a “hitch bonus,” which includes $2,500 accrued but unpaid in 2014, and $82,354 in profit-sharing, which includes $27,267 accrued but unpaid in 2014.

~~Outstanding~~(5) ~~Equity~~Non-equity ~~Awards~~incentive plan compensation consisted of “hitch” bonuses and profit-sharing arrangements described in “Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers” below. Amount reflects accruals in fiscal year 2014, including a “hitch” bonus of $2,500 and profit-sharing of $27,267 accrued but unpaid in 2014. In 2014, Mr. Lawler was paid $38,900 as a “hitch bonus,” which includes $2,650 accrued but unpaid in 2013, and $53,332 in profit-sharing, which includes $30,400 accrued but unpaid in 2013.

~~The~~(6) ~~following~~Amount ~~table~~relates ~~sets~~to ~~forth~~severance ~~information~~agreement ~~concerning~~and ~~unexercised~~director ~~options,~~fees ~~stock~~in ~~that~~the ~~has~~respective ~~not~~fiscal ~~vested~~year. ~~and~~On ~~equity~~December ~~incentive~~31, ~~plan~~2014, ~~awards~~Mr. ~~for~~Masters ~~our~~ retired as Chief Executive Officer and ~~each~~President of ~~our~~the ~~most~~Company. ~~highly~~Mr. ~~compensated~~Masters ~~executive~~was ~~officers~~paid ~~whose~~a ~~total~~lump ~~compensation~~sum ~~exceeded~~payment of $100,000 ~~for~~per the ~~fiscal~~severance ~~year ended December 27, 2014 with respect to services rendered by such persons~~agreement.

~~OUSTANDING~~(7) ~~EQUITY~~Amount ~~AWARDS~~relates ATto ~~FISCAL~~director ~~YEAR-END~~fees in the respective fiscal year.

~~Option~~(8) ~~Awards~~Amount ~~Stock~~relates ~~Awards~~to ~~Name~~health ofinsurance ~~Executive~~premiums ~~Officer~~in ~~Number~~the ~~ofExercisableSecuritiesUnderlyingUnexercisedOptions~~respective ~~Number~~fiscal ofUnexercisableSecuritiesUnderlyingUnexercisedOptions EquityIncentivePlan Awards:Number ofSecuritiesUnderlyingUnexercisedUnearnedOptions OptionExercisePrice OptionExpirationDate Number ofShares ofStock ThatHave NotVested MarketValue ofShares ofStock ThatHave NotVested EquityIncentivePlanAwards:Number ofUnearnedShares ThatHave NotVested EquityIncentivePlanAwards:Market orPayoutValue ofUnearnedShares ThatHave NotVested — — — — — — — — — —year.

~~Compensation~~(9) ofAmount ~~Directors~~relates to health insurance premiums and director fees in the respective fiscal year.

~~The~~- ~~following~~25 ~~table sets forth information concerning compensation of the directors who are not included in the Summary Compensation Table or the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year~~-~~End~~ ~~table above for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2014 with respect to services rendered by such persons.~~

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated Filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Name	Year	Fees Earned orPaid in Cash		StockAwards		OptionAwards		Non-EquityIncentive PlanCompensation		Change in PensionValue andNonqualifiedDeferredCompensationEarnings		All OtherCompensation		Total
John N. Giordano(1)	2014 2013	$ $	10,000 10,000		— —		— —		— —		— —		— —	$ $	10,000 10,000
Shadron Stasney(2)	2014 2013	$	— 10,000		— —		— —		— —		— —		— —	$	— 10,000

Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers

InEffective ~~addition~~July 1, 2012, DVH entered into the ~~Company~~First ~~reimburses~~Amended ~~directors~~and ~~for~~Restated ~~their~~Employment ~~reasonable~~Agreement ~~expenses~~with ~~for~~Joel ~~attending~~Stephen Logan, II. Under the terms of Mr. Logan’s Employment Agreement, Mr. Logan is (a) entitled to receive a fixed annual salary of $91,000, (b) an annual discretionary compensation bonus as determined by the Board of Directors in its sole discretion, and (c) entitled ~~Board~~to ~~Committee~~receive ~~meetings~~health benefits and coverage, as provided by DVH. Mr. Logan’s Employment Agreement and non-compete expired on January 18, 2016. Effective as of the end of the term of his employment agreement, Mr. Logan resigned as the Chief Operating Officer and Vice President of DVC, the President of DVH, the Vice President of DVHRS and Vice President of DVF.

(Effective July 1), 2012, DVH entered into the First Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Charles L. Murphree, Jr. Under the terms of Mr. Murphree’s ~~Giordano~~Employment ~~resigned~~Agreement, asMr. Murphree is (a) entitled ~~Member~~to receive a fixed annual salary of $78,000 through June 4, 2013 and $91,000 for the ~~Board~~remainder of ~~Director~~the term, (b) entitled to receive a monthly “hitch bonus” of $60.00 per “floor” produced by DVH, (c) is eligible to participate and receive 4.5% of the ~~Company~~net ~~effective~~income ~~October~~before 6taxes of DVH, ~~2014~~and (d) entitled to receive health benefits and coverage, as provided by DVH. The term of Mr. Murphree’s Employment Agreement and non-compete expired on January 18, 2016.

~~(2)~~Effective September 30, 2014, DVH entered into the Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with John Steven Lawler. Under the terms of Mr. Lawler’s ~~Stasney~~Employment ~~resigned~~Agreement, asMr. Lawler is (a) entitled ~~Member~~to receive a fixed annual salary of $101,000 through January 18, 2016 and $116,000 for the ~~Board~~remainder of ~~Directors~~the term, (b) entitled to receive a monthly “hitch bonus” of $50.00 per “floor” produced by DVH, (c) is eligible to participate and receive 3.0% of the ~~Company~~net income ~~effective~~before ~~September~~taxes 17of DVH, ~~2013~~and (d) entitled to receive health benefits and coverage, as provided by DVH. The term of Mr. Lawler’s Employment Agreement expires on May 31, 2018. Mr. Lawler is subject to a non-compete that expires on the later of one year after termination of employment.

Each of the employment agreements described above provides for severance payments, in the amount of the unpaid fixed annual salary due under the remaining term of such agreements (or twenty-four 45months, if the remaining term is greater than twenty-four months).

~~Table~~Outstanding ofEquity ~~Contents~~Awards

The following table sets forth information concerning unexercised options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive plan awards for our Chief Executive Officer and each of our most highly compensated executive officers whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016 with respect to services rendered by such persons.

OUSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Name of

Executive

Officer

Number of
Exercisable
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

Number of
Unexercisable
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

Option
Exercise
Price

Option
Expiration
Date

Number of
Shares of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested

Market
Value of
Shares of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares That
Have Not
Vested

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares That
Have Not
Vested

—

- 26 -

Compensation of Directors

The following table sets forth information concerning compensation of the directors who are not included in the Summary Compensation Table or the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End table above for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016 with respect to services rendered by such persons.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION


Name	Year		Fees Earned or Paid in Cash		Stock Awards		Option Awards		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation		Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings		All Other Compensation		Total
John N. Giordano⁽¹⁾		2015		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
		2014	$	10,000		—		—		—		—		—	$	10,000

Timothy E. Brog⁽²⁾		2015	$	861		—		—		—		—		—	$	861
		2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Kevin A. Cavanaugh⁽²⁾		2015	$	4,864		—		—		—		—		—	$	4,864
		2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Julius Bloomston⁽²⁾		2015	$	4,864		—		—		—		—		—	$	4,864
		2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Damien J. Park		2015	$	9,864		—		—		—		—		—	$	9,864
		2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Anthony J. Bonidy		2015	$	5,000		—		—		—		—		—	$	5,000
		2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Lodovico de Visconti		2015	$	5,000		—		—		—		—		—	$	5,000
		2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Ronald W. Frank		2015	$	5,000		—		—		—		—		—	$	5,000
		2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

In addition, the Company reimburses directors for their reasonable expenses for attending Board and Board Committee meetings.

(1)	Mr. Giordano resigned as a Member of the Board of Director of the Company effective October 6, 2014.

(2)	Messrs. Brog, Cavanaugh, and Bloomston resigned as a Member of the Board of Directors of the Company effective April 15, 2015

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

See “Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” and Equity Compensation Plan Information table under Item 5 concerning the authorization and issuance of securities of the Company under an equity compensation plan.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The table below sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our capital stock as of March 115, ~~2015~~2016 for (i) any person whom we know to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock (ii) each of our directors or those nominated to be directors, and executive officers and (iii) all of of our directors and executive officers as a group.

~~SECURITY~~- ~~OWNERSHIP~~27 OF- ~~CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT~~

Title of Class	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)	Amount and Nature ofBeneficial Ownership	Percent ofClass(2)
Common Stock	Peerless Systems Corporation	12,436,458 Direct Ownership(3)		80.1	%
Common Stock	Timothy E. Brog, Member of the Board of Directors of Deer Valley Corporation	0		0	%
Common Stock	Kevin A. Cavanaugh, Member of the Board of Directors of Deer Valley Corporation	0		0	%
Common Stock	Julius Bloomston, Member of the Board of Directors of Deer Valley Corporation	0		0	%
Common Stock	Damien J. Park, Member of the Board of Directors of Deer Valley Corporation	0		0	%
Common Stock	Joel Stephen Logan, II, Member of the Board of Directors of Deer Valley Corporation and of DVH, President of DVH	216,328 Direct Ownership		1.4	%
Common Stock	Charles L. Murphree, Jr., Member of the Board of Directors of Deer Valley Corporation and of DVH, Executive Vice President and General Manager of DVH	144,353 Direct Ownership		*
Common Stock	John Steven Lawler, Member of the Board of Directors of Deer Valley Corporation and of DVH, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Deer Valley Corporation and Chief Financial Officer of DVH	72,178 Direct Ownership		*
Common Stock	All executive officers and directors as a group (7 persons)	12,869,317		83.0	%

* Less than 1%.

(1) Unless otherwise indicated, the mailing address of the shareholder is 205 Carriage St., Guin, Alabama 35563.

- 46 -

~~(2)~~SECURITY ~~Applicable~~OWNERSHIP ~~percentage~~OF ofCERTAIN ~~ownership~~BENEFICIAL isOWNERS ~~based~~AND onMANAGEMENT 15,514,344, shares of common stock (excluding 2,397,840 shares of treasury common stock) being issued and outstanding. Calculations do not include outstanding warrants or options, or other rights issued by the Company, unless the reporting person is the beneficial owner of the warrant, option, or other right. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Commission and generally includes voting of investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to securities exercisable or convertible into shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding such options for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such persons, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise noted, we believe that all shares are beneficially owned and that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock owned by them.

(3) The Board of Directors of Peerless Systems Corporation has voting and dispositive control over these shares of Common Stock owned by Peerless Systems Corporation. No single natural person can exercise voting or investment power with respect to these shares, and investment decisions with respect to these shares are made by a majority of these persons then serving on the Board of Directors of Peerless Systems Corporation. The address for Peerless Systems Corporation, 1055 Washington Blvd., 8th Floor, Stamford, Connecticut 06901.


Title of Class	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner⁽¹⁾	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percent of Class⁽²⁾
Common Stock	Peerless Systems Corporation	12,436,458 Direct Ownership⁽³⁾	80.1%
Common Stock	Anthony J. Bonidy, Member of the Board of Directors of Deer Valley Corporation	12,436,458 Indirect Ownership⁽³⁾	80.1%
Common Stock	Lodovico de Visconti, Member of the Board of Directors of Deer Valley Corporation	12,436,458 Indirect Ownership^(3),(4)	80.1%
Common Stock	Ronald Leplae	858,732 Indirect Ownership⁽⁵⁾	5.52%
Common Stock	Anthony J. Bonidy and Theresa M. Clark, as co-trustees of (a) the remainder trusts for Raymond J. Lane III and Catherine Victoria Lane under the RJL 2004 Grantor Retained Annuity Trust No. 9, and (b) the remainder trusts for Raymond J. Lane III and Catherine Victoria Lane under the SHL 2004 Grantor Retained Annuity Trust No. 9.	1,865,468 Indirect Ownership⁽⁶⁾	12.02%
Common Stock	Ronald W. Frank, Member of the Board of Directors of Deer Valley Corporation	0	0%
Common Stock	Damien J. Park, Member of the Board of Directors of Deer Valley Corporation	0	0%
Common Stock	Charles L. Murphree, Jr., Member of the Board of Directors of Deer Valley Corporation and of DVH, Executive Vice President and General Manager of DVH	144,353 Direct Ownership	*
Common Stock	John Steven Lawler, Member of the Board of Directors of Deer Valley Corporation and of DVH, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Deer Valley Corporation and Chief Financial Officer of DVH	72,178 Direct Ownership	*
Common Stock	All executive officers and directors as a group (6 persons)	12,652,989	81.6%

*	Less than 1%.

(1)	Unless otherwise indicated, the mailing address of the shareholder is 205 Carriage St., Guin, Alabama 35563.

(2)

Applicable percentage of ownership is based on 15,514,344, shares of common stock (excluding 2,397,840 shares of treasury common stock) being issued and outstanding. Calculations do not include outstanding warrants or options, or other rights issued by the Company, unless the reporting person is the beneficial

- 28 -

owner of the warrant, option, or other right. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Commission and generally includes voting of investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to securities exercisable or convertible into shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding such options for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such persons, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise noted, we believe that all shares are beneficially owned and that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock owned by them.

(3)

Anthony J. Bonidy and Lodovico de Visconti, each a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, are the sole members of the Board of Directors of Peerless Systems Corporation and the sole officers of Peerless Systems Corporation. Anthony J. Bonidy and Lodovico de Visconti, jointly have sole voting and dispositive control over these securities owned by Peerless Systems Corporation. For purposes of Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, Anthony J. Bonidy and Lodovico de Visconti may be deemed to beneficially own, but has disclaimed ownership of, all shares owned by Peerless Systems Corporation, a Delaware corporation with an address of 650 Smithfield Street, Suite 705 Pittsburgh, PA 15238. The mailing address of Peerless Systems Corporation, Mr. Bonidy, and Mr. de Visconti is 650 Smithfield Street, Suite 705 Pittsburgh, PA 15238. Except as stated in footnote (4), (5) and (6) below, no person, through ownership of Peerless Systems Corporation, is the beneficial owner of more than five (5%) percent of the common stock of the Company.

(4)

Lodovico de Visconti, based on his 34.323% ownership of Peerless Systems Corporation, is an indirect beneficial owner of 27.493% of the common stock of the Company. For purposes of Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, Lodovico de Visconti may be deemed to beneficially own, but has disclaimed ownership of, all shares owned by Peerless Systems Corporation. The mailing address of Mr. de Visconti is 650 Smithfield Street, Suite 705 Pittsburgh, PA 15238.

(5)

Ronald Leplae, based on his 6.89% ownership of Peerless Systems Corporation, is an indirect beneficial owner of 5.52% of the common stock of the Company. For purposes of Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, if Mr. Leplae may be deemed to beneficially own, but has disclaimed ownership of, all shares owned by Peerless Systems Corporation. The mailing address of Mr. Leplae is 650 Smithfield Street, Suite 705 Pittsburgh, PA 15238.

(6)

Anthony J. Bonidy and Theresa M. Clark, as co-trustees of (a) the remainder trusts for Raymond J. Lane III and Catherine Victoria Lane under the RJL 2004 Grantor Retained Annuity Trust No. 9, and (b) the remainder trusts for Raymond J. Lane III and Catherine Victoria Lane under the SHL 2004 Grantor Retained Annuity Trust No. 9 (the “Trusts”). The trustees of the Trusts, through 15% ownership of Peerless Systems Corporation, are an indirect beneficial owner of 12.02% percent of the common stock of the Company. For purposes of Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, if the trustees of the Trusts are deemed to beneficially own, but has disclaimed ownership of, all shares owned by Peerless Systems Corporation. The mailing address of the trustees for the Trusts is 650 Smithfield Street, Suite 705 Pittsburgh, PA 15238.

Change in Control and Acquisition

On February 12, 2015, Mobius Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Mobius”), through its wholly-owned subsidiary Mobius Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc. acquired all outstanding shares of Peerless Systems Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Peerless”) for $7.00 per share through a merger under Section 251(h) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, Mobius is now the sole shareholder or Peerless.

- 29 -

Peerless owns 12,436,458 shares of Deer Valley’s common stock which is approximately eighty percent (80%) of Deer Valley’s issued and outstanding common stock. As a result of the Merger, Mobius has acquired indirect (through its ownership in Peerless) majority ownership of Deer Valley. Mobius used cash to complete the Merger.

On September 3, 2014, Peerless Systems Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Peerless”), Vicis Capital Master Fund, a Cayman Island unit trust managed by Vicis Capital, LLC (“Vicis”), and Deer Valley Corporation, a Florida corporation (the “Company”), entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”). The transaction described in the SPA closed, and the consummation of the transaction described in the SPA occurred, effective as of October 6, 2014 (the “Closing Date”).

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the SPA, (a) Vicis sold to Peerless, and Peerless purchased from Vicis, 12,310,458 shares of the Company’s common stock, and (b) the Company sold to Peerless, and Peerless purchased from the Company, 126,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that the Company held in treasury (collectively, the “Purchase Shares”). The Purchased Shares represent approximately eighty percent (80%) of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares and were acquired for an aggregate purchase price of $3,681,900. The source of funds used for the purchase price for the Purchased Shares was from cash-on-hand of Peerless.

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons

Except as set forth below, there were no transactions during the last two fiscal years, and there are no proposed transactions to which the Company or its subsidiary was or is to become a party, in which any director, executive officer, director nominee, beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of any class of our stock, or members of their immediate families had, or is to have, a direct or indirect material interest.

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Stock Purchase Agreement dated September 3, 2014, the Company sold to Peerless, and Peerless purchased from the Company, 126,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that the Company held in treasury.

John N. Giordano, a director of the Company from July 27, 2006 to October 6, 2014, is also a shareholder of Bush Ross, P.A., the Company’s outside general legal counsel. The Company paid less than $75,000 for legal services during the fiscal year ending December 27, 2014.

-On 47December 22, -2015, Deer Valley entered into that certain Secured Convertible Note and Security Agreement with BLU Autoworks LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Borrower”), pursuant to which Deer Valley loaned Three Million and No/100 Dollars ($3,000,000) to Borrower (the “Initial Advance”). The Secured Convertible Note provides that Borrower may, as agreed to by Deer Valley, borrower up to an additional One Million and No/100 Dollars ($1,000,000) (collectively, with the Initial Advance, the “Loan’). The Loan bears interest at a rate of five percent (5.0%) per annum, matures on June 30, 2016, and is secured by the assets of the Borrower. Deer Valley may, at its option, convert the outstanding principal and interest of the Loan into membership interests in Borrower, which membership interests shall entitle Deer Valley to receive, upon liquidation of Borrower, shares of Tua Autoworks Holdings S.à.r.l. (“Tua Luxembourg”) equal to 5.74% of the outstanding capital shares of Tua Luxembourg, or, if Deer Valley elects to request an independent valuation analysis, such percentage of the shares of Tua Luxembourg as determined by an independent valuation analysis. Tua Luxembourg and Borrower are developing an automobile manufacturing business located in Italy.

Anthony J. Bonidy and Lodovico de Visconti are members of the Board of Directors of Deer Valley, Lodovico de Visconti is the sole manager of the Borrower, and Anthony J. Bonidy and Lodovico de Visconti are the sole members of the Board of Directors of Tua Luxembourg. Anthony J. Bonidy and Lodovico de Visconti directly, or indirectly, control the voting capital stock of Deer Valley, Borrower, and Tua Luxembourg.

- 30 -

Corporate Governance - Director Independence

The Company’s stock is quoted on the Over The Counter Bulletin Board, which does not have director independence requirements. Under Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K, the Company has chosen to measure the independence of its directors under the under definition of independence in the Nasdaq listing standards. Under such definition, ~~Messrs~~Mr. ~~Kevin Cavanaugh, Julius Bloomston,~~ Damien J. Park, ~~and Timothy E. Brog~~ satisfy the independence requirement.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Prior to engaging our accountants to perform a particular service, our board of directors obtains an estimate for the service to be performed. All of the services described above were approved by the board of directors in accordance with its procedures.

Audit Fees Disclosure

The aggregate following table presents fees for professional services rendered by Thomas Howell Ferguson P.A. (THF) for the audit of our annual ~~financial~~ financial statements for ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 and fees billed for audit-related services, tax services and all other services rendered by THF for ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014.

	THF		THF
	2014		2013
	2015		2014
Audit fees (a)	$	~~135~~88,~~029~~651	$	~~137~~135,~~256~~029
Tax fees	$	2015,~~819~~822	$	2520,~~600~~819
All other fees	$	~~13,910~~—	$	313,~~729~~910

(a)	Fees for the audit of our annual financial statements and quarterly reviews. Includes amounts for expenses incurred during the audit.

- 4831 -

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.		Description
3.01		Articles of Incorporation of Deer Valley Corporation (1)
3.02		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Deer Valley Corporation (12)
4.01		Certificate of Designation, Rights, and Preferences of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (1)
4.02		Certificate of Designation, Rights, and Preferences of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (1)
4.03		Certificate of Designation, Rights, and Preferences of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock (2)
10.01		Form of Loan Agreement – Real Estate Loan (3)
10.02		Form of Commercial Promissory Note – Real Estate Loan (3)
10.03		Form of Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing (3)
10.04		Form of Guaranty of Loan, Cytation Corp. – Real Estate Loan (3)
10.05		Form of Guaranty of Loan, DeerValley Acquisitions Corp. – Real Estate Loan (3)
10.06		Form of Guaranty of Deer Valley Corporation – 21st Mortgage (4)
10.07		Form of Guaranty of Deer Valley Corporation – Textron (4)
10.08		Deer Valley Corporation 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan effective July 1, 2007 (5)
10.09		Form of Stock Option Agreement - LTIP (5)
10.10		Revolving Credit Loan and Security Agreement - $7,500,000 Revolving Credit Loan (6)
10.11		Revolving Credit Note - $7,500,000 (6)
10.12		Revolving Credit Loan and Security Agreement - $5,000,000 Revolving Credit Loan (6)
10.13		Revolving Credit Note - $5,000,000 (6)
10.14		Amendment to Loan Agreement - Real Estate Loan (7)
10.15		Amendment to Loan Agreement - $7,500,000 Revolving Credit Loan (7)
10.16		Amendment to Loan Agreement - $5,000,000 Revolving Credit Loan (7)
10.17		Amendment to Loan Agreement – Real Estate Loan (8)
10.18		Renewal Commercial Promissory Note - $1,256,000(8)
10.19		Guaranty of Loan Agreement – Deer Valley Corporation (8)
10.20		Guaranty of Loan Agreement – Deer Valley Finance Corporation (8)
10.21		Second Amendment to Revolving Credit Loan and Security Agreement - $5,000,000 (9)
10.22		Revolving Credit Note - $5,000,000 (9)
10.23		Second Amendment to Revolving Credit Loan and Security Agreement - $3,000,000 (9)
10.24		Revolving Credit Note - $3,000,000 (9)
10.25		Third Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement - $5,000,000 (10)
10.26		Third Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement - $3,000,000(10)
10.27		Fourth Amendment to Loan Agreement – Real Estate Loan (10)
10.28		First Amended and Restated Agreement – Joel Stephen Logan, II (11)
10.29		First Amended and Restated Agreement - Charles L. Murphree, Jr. (11)
10.30		Amended and Restated Agreement - John Steven Lawler (13)
10.31		Severance Agreement – Charles G. Masters (14)
21.01		List of Subsidiaries of the Company. (14)
10.32		Fifth Amendment To Revolving Credit Loan And Security Agreement ($2,500,000 Revolving Line) (15)
31.01		Certification of Chief Financial Officer (as principal financial officer and acting principal executive officer) pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated March 27, 2014. (14)
10.33		Renewal Revolving Credit Note ($3,000,000 Revolving Line) (15)
32.01		Certification of Chief Financial Officer (as principal financial officer and acting principal executive officer) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated March 27, 2014. (14)
10.34		Fifth Amendment To Revolving Credit Loan And Security Agreement ($3,000,000 Revolving Line) (15)
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document (14)
10.35		Renewal Revolving Credit Note ($3,000,000 Revolving Line) (15)
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Scheme Document (14)
10.36		Secured Convertible Note. (16)
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (14)
10.37		Security Agreement. (16)
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (14)
10.38		Bargain Sale Agreement and Initial Escrow Instructions (16)
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (14)
21.01		List of Subsidiaries of the Company. (17)
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (14)
31.01		Certification of Chief Financial Officer (as principal financial officer and acting principal executive officer) pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated March 30, 2014. (17)

~~(1)~~- ~~Previously~~32 ~~filed as an exhibit to the Form 8~~-K, ~~filed with the SEC on July 28, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.~~

- 49 -



32.01		Certification of Chief Financial Officer (as principal financial officer and acting principal executive officer) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated March 30, 2014. (17)

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document (17)

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Scheme Document (17)

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (17)

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (17)

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (17)

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (17)

(1)	Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 28, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(2)	Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-QSB, filed with the SEC on November 20, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(3)	Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 1, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

(4)	Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-KSB, filed with the SEC on April 11, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.

(5)	Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-QSB, filed with the SEC on November 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.

(6)	Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 19, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.

(7)	Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 8, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference.

(8)	Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 12, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.

(9)	Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 25, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.

(10)	Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 25, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(11)	Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 28, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(12)	Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K,/A filed with the SEC on October 7, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

(13)	Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on November 12, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

(14) ~~Filed~~Previously ~~herewith~~filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 27, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

-(15) 50Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 7, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.

(16)	Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 30, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.

(17)	Filed herewith.

- 33 -

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

DEER VALLEY CORPORATION
By:		/s/ John S. Lawler
		John S. Lawler, Chief Financial Officer
		(Acting Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer) and Director
Date: March 27, 2015
Date: April 1, 2016

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities indicated on ~~March~~April 271, ~~2015~~2016.

Signature Title /s/ John S Lawler ~~John S. Lawler~~ Chief Financial Officer (Acting Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer) and Director ~~/s/~~John ~~Joel~~ S. ~~Logan~~Lawler ~~Joel S. Logan, II Director~~ /s/ Charles L Murphree Director Charles L Murphree ~~Director~~ /s/ ~~Timothy~~Damien EJ ~~Brog~~Park ~~Timothy~~Director EDamien J. ~~Brog~~Park ~~Director~~ /s/ ~~Kevin~~Anthony AJ. ~~Cavanaugh~~Bonidy ~~Kevin~~Director AAnthony J. ~~Cavanaugh~~Bonidy ~~Director~~ /s/ ~~Julius~~Lodovico ~~Bloomston~~de ~~Julius~~Visconti ~~Bloomston~~ Director Lodovico de Visconti /s/ ~~Damien~~Ronald JW. ~~Park~~Frank ~~Damien~~Director JRonald W. ~~Park Director~~Frank

- 5134 -

Filing Compare · DEER VALLEY CORP