UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011.

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission file number: 000-51763

COMCAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

23-2976562

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

1140 McDermott Drive, West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(610) 436-8089

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

n/a

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock, $0.0001 par value (the only class of voting stock), at May 16, 2011, was 16,178,312.

TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1- FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item1.	Financial Statements:	3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2011(unaudited) and December 31, 2010	4
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three month periods ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010	5
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three month periods ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010	6
	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	11
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	19
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	19
	PART II-OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	20
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	20
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	25
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	27
Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	27
Item 5.	Other Information	27
Item 6.	Exhibits	27
	Signatures	28
	Index to Exhibits	29

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As used herein, the terms “Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to ComCam International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, unless otherwise indicated. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited financial statements included in this Form 10-Q reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the periods presented. The results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

COMCAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
		March 31,		December 31,
		2011		2010
ASSETS		(Unaudited)		(Audited)
Current assets:
Cash	$	772,526		517,493
Accounts receivable		572,423		836,342
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of
billings on uncompleted contracts		428,829		114,827
Prepaid expenses		7,176		11,712
Total current assets		1,780,954		1,480,374
Property and equipment, net		145,144		157,263
Intangible assets, net		399,062		447,389
Other assets		173,456		23,926
Total assets	$	2,498,616		2,108,952
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	757,826		381,153
Accrued expenses		108,208		123,140
Billings in excess of costs and estimated
earnings on uncompleted contracts		87,103		387,923
Current portion of long-term debt		865,000		841,650
Total current liabilities		1,818,137		1,733,866
Accrued expenses		153,000		176,000
Long-term debt		176,568		641,568
Total liabilities		2,147,705		2,551,434
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity (deficit):
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 2,000,000
shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding		-		-
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares
authorized, 16,168,312 and 13,684,312 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively		1,617		1,368
Additional paid-in capital		8,589,556		7,194,492
Deferred stock compensation		(47,925	)	-
Accumulated deficit		(8,192,337	)	(7,638,342	)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		350,911		(442,482	)
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)	$	2,498,616		2,108,952

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

COMCAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010

		2011		2010

Revenues, net	$	1,381,531		947,540
Cost of revenues		1,050,330		710,678

Gross profit		331,201		236,862

Operating expenses:
General and administrative expenses		837,886		492,471
Research and development expenses		2,192		3,088

		840,078		495,559

Loss from operations		(508,877	)	(258,697	)

Other income (expense):
Interest income		355		419
Interest expense		(25,473	)	(27,671	)

		(25,118	)	(27,252	)

Loss before provision for income taxes		(533,995	)	(285,949	)

Provision for income taxes		20,000		-

Net loss	$	(553,995	)	(285,949	)


Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(0.04	)	(0.04	)

Weighted average common and common
equivalent shares		14,659,134		7,858,751

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

COMCAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010

		2011		2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(553,995	)	(285,949	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
cash used in operating activities:
Stock, options, and warrants compensation expense		491,824		-
Depreciation and amortization		60,775		126,258
Loss on disposal of assets		-		853
(Increase) decrease in:
Accounts receivable		263,919		250,733
Prepaid expenses		4,536		3,919
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of
billings on uncompleted contracts		(314,002	)	(4,436	)
Other assets		(149,530	)	(523	)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable		376,673		(143,703	)
Accrued expenses		86,732		35,563
Billings in excess of costs and estimated
earnings on uncompleted contracts		(300,820	)	(103,076	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(33,888	)	(120,361	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Payments received on note receivable		-		-
Purchase of property and equipment		(329	)	(5,411	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(329	)	(5,411	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on related party payable		-		-
Payments on long-term debt		(415,000	)	(95,562	)
Proceeds from issuance of debt		400,000		-
Issuance of common stock		304,250		382,500
Net cash provided by financing activities		289,250		286,938

Net increase in cash		255,033		161,166
Cash, beginning of period		517,493		217,783
Cash, end of period	$	772,526		378,949

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

COMCAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2011

Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

The consolidated financial statements consist of Comcam International, Inc. (Comcam) and its wholly owned subsidiary Pinnacle Integrated Systems, Inc. (Pinnacle). Collectively, these entities are referred to as “the Company”.

Comcam International, Inc. was organized under the laws of the state of Delaware on September 19, 1998. The Company’s operations consist primarily of the research and development of advanced compact video systems that utilize built-in digital compression technology. Pinnacle is a security systems integrator focused on correctional facilities across the United States, providing turnkey system design and installation, maintenance contracts, and field support technicians.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with the instructions in Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles and should, therefore, be read in conjunction with the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These statements do include all normal recurring adjustments which the Company believes necessary for a fair presentation of the statements. The interim operations are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ended December 31, 2011.

Additional Footnotes Included By Reference

Except as indicated in the following Notes, there have been no other material changes in the information disclosed in the notes to the financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Therefore, those footnotes are included herein by reference.

Note 2 – Going Concern

As of March 31, 2011, the Company has negative working capital and has incurred losses since inception. These factors taken alone raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. However, management is in the process of procuring additional financing to expand marketing efforts and product development which actions, if successful, will enable the Company to continue as a going concern. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that sufficient financing will be available to the Company to successfully pursue its marketing and product development efforts.

COMCAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2011

Note 3 – Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:

		March 31, 2011 (Unaudited)	December 31, 2010 (Audited)
Note payable to Robert Betty, bearing interest at
3%, secured by the common stock and assets of
Pinnacle, and due in five monthly installments of
$200,000, beginning February 15, 2010.	$	-	841,650

Notes payable to Paul Higbee, bearing interest
at 8%, due March 2012, secured by the intellectual
property of the Company.		465,000	465,000

Note payable to Doug Bartek, bearing interest at
18%, secured by the assets and common stock of
Pinnacle, due in four quarterly installments of
$100,000 , beginning May 2011		400,000	-

Unsecured note payable to Global Megatrend,
bearing interest at 7.5% and due December 2012.
The note may be converted to common shares of
the Company, at the option of the holder, based
on certain terms related to outstanding shares
and per share prices.		176,568	176,568

		1,041,568	1,483,218
Less current portion		(865,000)	(841,650)

	$	176,568	641,568

COMCAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2011

Note 4 – Supplemental Cash Flow Information

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company:

· Issued 352,000 shares of common stock in satisfaction of $110,475 of accrued expenses and $47,925 of deferred stock compensation.

· Issued 800,000 shares of common stock in exchange for $352,000 of long-term debt, $14,189 of accrued expenses, and recognized debt extinguishment income of $88,839. The debt extinguishment income was recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital due to the related party nature of the transaction.

During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company:

· Issued 508,200 shares of common stock in exchange for $127,050 of accrued interest expense.

During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, cash paid for interest was $0 and $9,438 respectively, and no amounts were paid for income taxes.

In April 2011, the Company entered into a letter of intent to acquire 1^st Choice Security Solutions of Georgia, Inc. in a stock and cash transaction expected to close in June 2011.

Note 5 – Common Stock Options and Warrants

Common stock options and warrants consist of:

				Exercise
	Number of			Price
	Options	Warrants		Per Share
Outstanding at January 1, 2011	-	-	$	-
Granted, vested, and excercisable	885,000	100,000		.50
Outstanding at March 31, 2011	885,000	100,000	$	.50

Note 6 – Subsequent Events

In April 2011, the Company entered into a secured promissory note wherein it borrowed $50,000 for a period of 18 months, including interest at 12% per annum. The lender was also granted two five-year warrants to purchase up to 220,000 shares of common stock at $0.60 for 100,000 warrants and $0.75 for 120,000 warrants.

In April 2011, the Company entered into a letter of intent to acquire 1^st Choice Security Solutions of Georgia in a stock and cash transaction expected to close in June 2011.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events from the balance sheet date through the date the financial statements were issued and determined there were no additional items to disclose.

COMCAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2011

Note 7 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-01 (ASU 2011-01) Receivables (Topic 310): Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20. ASU 2011-01 temporarily delays the effective date of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings. The effective date of the new disclosures about troubled debt restructurings for public entities and the guidance for determining what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring will then be coordinated. Currently, the guidance is anticipated to be effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2011. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2011-01 to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, or “ASU 2009-13.” ASU 2009-13 establishes the accounting and reporting guidance for arrangements that include multiple revenue-generating activities, and provides amendments to the criteria for separating deliverables, and measuring and allocating arrangement consideration to one or more units of accounting. The amendments in ASU 2009-13 also establish a hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. Enhanced disclosures are also required to provide information about a vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements, including information about the nature and terms of the arrangement, significant deliverables, and the vendor’s performance within arrangements. The amendments also require providing information about the significant judgments made and changes to those judgments and about how the application of the relative selling-price method affects the timing or amount of revenue recognition. The amendments in ASU 2009-13 are effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, or January 1, 2011 for us. The adoption of ASU 2009-13 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20 “Disclosures about the credit quality of financing receivables and the allowance for credit losses”, which requires expanded disclosures about the credit quality of an entity’s financing receivables and its allowance for credit loss on a disaggregated basis. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-13, “Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades” (“ASU 2010-13”). ASU 2010-13 addresses the classification of a share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which the underlying equity security trades. FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718 was amended to clarify that a share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trade shall not be considered to contain a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, such an award is not to be classified as a liability if it otherwise qualifies for equity classification. The amendments in ASU 2010-13 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations.

Other pronouncements issued by the FASB or other authoritative accounting standards groups with future effective dates are either not applicable or are not expected to be significant to the financial statements of the Company.

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other parts of this quarterly report contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “believes,” “plans,” “predicts,” and similar terms. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and our actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include but are not limited to those discussed in the subsection entitled Forward-Looking Statements and Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial Condition below. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto included in this report. Our fiscal year end is December 31. All information presented herein is based on the three month period ended March 31, 2011.

Discussion and Analysis

Our financial condition and results of operations depend primarily on revenue generated from the sale of our products and specialized services in addition to our ability to realize additional debt or equity financing. We can provide no assurance that revenue going forward will provide sufficient cash flows to sustain our operations though revenue approximating that required to sustain operations is anticipated in fiscal year 2011. Further, although we have no commitments for financing we remain in the process of procuring additional equity financing as we seek to redress any shortfall in cash flows to sustain operations while seeking to expand our business.

Business

We have two operating divisions. One focuses on product development, manufacturing and sales world-wide while the other focuses on the integration of command and control systems for correctional facilities across the United States.

Our product division has developed a video fusion platform that adds next generation, real-time interactive command-and-control capabilities to legacy security systems for greater performance at lower cost. The platform seamlessly integrates a suite of analytics, including third-party security solutions – access control, biometrics, radio frequency identification (RFID), chemical detection and seismic detection – to improve real-time decision-making for critical events over any wireless network. Our products have been deployed with the Department of Defense, Immigration & Customs Enforcement, and many other law enforcement and intelligence agencies in addition to businesses across a wide range of industries. On our own, or working with prime government contractors like DRS, Motorola, and Siemens, our products are deployed in such diverse locales as the John F. Kennedy International Airport, isolated sections of the Texas-Mexico border, and remote mountain passes in Afghanistan.

Our systems division acts as the general contractor or plays a key support role to leading government integrators. Our focus to date has been on installing and integrating security systems in juvenile to super-maximum security correctional facilities. We enable our clients to reach further operational excellence by providing a complete range of security integration services. In the past three years we have completed more than 15 security integration projects, with the largest topping $4.2M. We have the skill set and the resources to successfully complete projects in the $10M-$15M range.

Business Development Strategy

We are pursuing numerous new domestic and international sales opportunities intended to increase revenue by leveraging our product and systems divisions to provide turn-key solutions across a spectrum of applications within the security industry. While expanding marketing efforts to reach new customers we continue to focus on offering our services as an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) for strategic resellers, in order to serve as a research and development partner, and to develop a network of dealers, resellers and system integrators with differing targeted market expertise. Meanwhile we continue to service existing customers with our products and services.

Product Division

We intend to leverage pilot installations on the US/Mexico border, the Port of Philadelphia, and with Immigration and Customs Enforcement to focus on closing new proposals and contracts with the Department of Homeland Security. The key to this line of business is a value added reseller (VAR) agreement signed with DRS in 2010 offering an off-the-shelf advanced thermal tracking solution to be bundled with our microserver and software algorithms which addresses a major US initiative to fight border drug trafficking.

We are also focused on transforming non-recurring engineering contracts that utilize our hardware and software designs into opportunities to develop a recurring royalty model. Our near term intention is to take advantage of certain installations that utilize our cloud computing platform which allows franchise operators and large retail chains to improve remote operations management.

We also intend to develop a program to monetize our patents related to the integration of live video and analytics through a web portal used to make real time command and control decisions.

Systems Division

We are focused on pursuing new contracts related to the incremental integration of security measures utilized by correctional facilities. Our business has been limited in the past by an inability to secure performance bonds at a reasonable cost. We have recently overcome this limitation and going forward we are confident in our ability to procure new contracts. In addition, we have expanded our highly profitable long-term maintenance agreement program to existing and future integration customers with a goal of establishing a recurring revenue stream from this business unit.

Mergers and Acquisitions

We intend to continue to seek out the acquisition of companies and products that add synergistic distribution partners and broader application integration. Our intention is to target companies with intellectual properties in biometric algorithms, RFID sensors, and prison perimeter offerings.

During April of this year we announced that we had entered into a letter of intent to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of 1st Choice Security Solutions of Georgia (1st Choice), a leading OEM supplier of ultra-long range RFID technology in a stock and cash transaction expected to close June 2011.

Our business development strategy is prone to significant risks and uncertainties which can have an immediate impact on efforts to realize net cash flow and deter future prospects of revenue growth. We have a limited history of generating revenue which cannot be viewed as an indication of continued growth and a historical record of incurring losses. Should we be unable to consistently generate revenue and reduce or stabilize expenses on a consolidated basis to the point where we can realize net cash flow, such failure will have an immediate impact on our ability to continue our business operations.

Our financial condition and results of operations going forward will continue to depend primarily on revenue generated from the sale of specialized services and our ability to realize additional debt or equity financing. We can provide no assurance that future revenue will provide sufficient cash flow to sustain operations although the achievement of this milestone is anticipated in the near term. Further, we have no immediate commitments for additional financing though management is committed to procuring the capital required to develop our business.

Results of Operations

During the three month period ended March 31, 2011, we were engaged in (i) developing our Internet Protocol remote control platform cameras, micro servers, associated software, and unique end-to-end network solutions, (ii) providing turnkey system design and installation, maintenance contracts, and field support technicians to correctional facilities, (iii) completing debt financing arrangements, (iv) securing a performance bond and (iv) satisfying continuous public disclosure requirements.

Revenue

Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2011, increased to $1,381,531 from $947,540 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, an increase of 46%. The increase in revenue over the comparable period is due to the procurement of new contracts by our systems division. We expect to continue to increase revenues in future periods through the sale of services to correction facilities and video products.

Cost of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2011, was $1,050,330 compared to $710,678 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, an increase of 48%. The increase in the cost of revenue in the current period can be primarily attributed to the increase in revenue over the comparative period. We expect the cost of revenue to increase in future periods along with increases in revenue.

Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2011, increased to $331,201 from $236,862 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, an increase of 40%. The increase in gross profit over the comparable periods is primarily attributable to the increase in revenue over the comparative periods. We expect that gross profit will continue to increase in correlation with anticipated increases in revenue over future periods.

Expenses

Operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011, increased to $840,078 from $495,559 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, an increase of 70%. The increase in operating expenses over the comparative periods is primarily attributable to stock options and warrant compensation expense. We expect that operating expenses will remain relatively constant in the near term after adjusting for any stock options or warrant compensation expense.

Depreciation and amortization expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $60,775 and $126,258, respectively. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expenses over the respective periods can be attributed to a decrease in fixed assets as well as the amortization of intangible assets.

Other Income (Expense)

Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $355 as compared to $419 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease in interest income over the comparable periods is primarily attributable to the repayment of a note receivable. We expect that interest income will continue to decrease in the near term as we use current assets to maintain operations and meet obligations.

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $25,473 as compared to $27,671 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease in interest expense over the comparable periods can be attributed to the satisfaction of debt owed to a related party incurred in connection with the acquisition of our systems division. We expect that interest expense will continue to decrease in the near term as management strives to reduce debt pursuant to debt settlement or equity financing.

Net Loss

Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2011, was $553,995 as compared to a net loss of $285,949 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, an increase of 94%. The increase in net loss over the comparable period can be attributed to stock options and warrant compensation expense during the current three month period. We expect to transition to net income in the near term with anticipated increases in revenue and consistency in operating expenses.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

We have an income tax benefit resulting from net operating losses to offset any future operating profit. The net operating loss carry forwards at December 31, 2010, was approximately $6,195,000. These losses will begin to expire in the year 2019. The amount of net operating loss carry forwards that can be used in any one year can be limited by significant changes in the ownership and by the applicable tax laws which are in effect at the time such carry forwards are utilized. Some states do not allow us to file consolidated income tax returns and offset our net operating loss carryforwards against Pinnacle’s taxable income. When applicable, we record income taxes payable and income tax expense for these states.

Impact of Inflation

We believe that inflation has had a negligible effect on operations over the past three years and that we can offset any inflationary pressures by improving operating efficiencies.

Capital Expenditures

We made no significant capital expenditures on property or equipment for the three months ended March 31, 2011 or 2010.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At March 31, 2011 we had a working capital deficit of $37,183.

At March 31, 2011we had current assets of $1,780,954 that consisted of cash totaling $772,526, accounts receivable of $572,423, estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts of $428,829 and prepaid expenses of $7,176. Total assets of $2,498,616 include current assets as well as intangible assets of $399,062, property and equipment of $145,144 and other assets of $173,456.

At March 31, 2011 we had current liabilities of $1,818,137 that consisted of accounts payable of $757,826, accrued expenses of $108,208, excess billings on uncompleted contracts of $87,103 and the current portion of long-term debt of $865,000. Total liabilities of $2,147,705 include current liabilities as well as long-term debt of $176,568 and accrued expenses of $153,000.

Total stockholders’ equity was $350,911 as of March 31, 2011.

Cash flows used in operations were $33,888 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to $120,361 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The change in cash flows used in operations over the comparative periods can be primarily attributed to an increase in accounts payable. We expect to have cash flows provided by operating activities with an anticipated transition to net income in the near term.

Cash flows used in investing activities were $329 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to $5,411 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Cash flows used in investing activities in the current period are from the purchase of property and equipment. We expect to continue to use cash flows in investing activities in future periods.

Cash flows provided by financing activities were $289,250 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to $286,938 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Cash flows provided by financing activities for the current period are attributable to the issuance of common stock for cash and debt instruments offset by payments on long-term debt. We expect to continue to have cash flow provided by financing activities.

We had certain long-term debt obligations as of March 31, 2011:

· Unsecured note payable to Global Convertible Megatrend, Ltd. (“Global Megatrend”) in the amount of $176,568 bearing interest at 7.5% and due in December 2012. The note may be converted to our common shares, at the option of the holder, based on certain terms related to outstanding shares and per share prices. Accrued interest at March 31, 2011 was $5,028.

· Secured note payable to Paul Higbee in the amount of $465,000 bearing interest at 8%, due on March 31, 2012. Accrued interest at March 31, 2011 was $37,200.

· Secured promissory note payable to Bartek Investments -1, Ltd. in the amount of $400,000 bearing interest at 18%, with quarterly principal payments of $100,000 due on May 25, 2011, August 25, 2011, and November 25, 2011 with a final payment of $172,000 on February 25, 2012. The obligation is secured by the stock of our wholly owned subsidiary, Pinnacle.

We have a 2010 Benefit Plan registered under Form S-8 pursuant to which we can issue or option shares of its common stock to employees, directors, officers, consultants or advisors on the terms and conditions set forth therein. As of March 31, 2011we had granted 885,000 stock options for a two year term at an exercise price of $0.50 a share under the Benefit Plan to the following individuals:

*Individuals*	*Options*
Dale (Reed) Adams	50,000
Ruairidh Campbell	100,000
Kevin Betty	55,000
Don Cavett	100,000
Nick Carman	60,000
Richard Delaney	50,000
Kelly Eitner	10,000
Andy Finkel	50,000
Amy Largent	50,000
Brad Largent	50,000
Christie Peters	15,000
Richard Reed	50,000
Carolyn Scheppner	50,000
Bernard Ritter	5,000
Jason Verdu	5,000
Michael Vidro	60,000
Greg Palammaci	100,000
Shawn Teigen	25,000
*Total*	*885,000*

Our current assets are sufficient to maintain operations but insufficient to return to product research, development or manufacture over the next twelve (12) months. We need a minimum of $3,000,000 in debt or equity financing to fund these product related activities, expand our marketing efforts or raise our performance bond capacity, all of which are integral to our business success. Unfortunately, we have no commitments or arrangements for this financing, though management is actively pursuing acceptable arrangements for prospective debt or equity placements. Our inability to obtain financing would have a material adverse affect on our business operations.

We have no lines of credit or other bank financing arrangements in place.

We have no commitments for future capital expenditures that were material at March 31, 2011.

We have no defined benefit plan or contractual commitment with any of our officers or directors.

We have no current plans for the purchase or sale of any plant or equipment.

We have no current plans to make any changes in the number of employees.

We do not expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of March 31, 2011 we have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that is material to stockholders.

Going Concern

Our auditors have expressed an opinion as to our ability to continue as a going concern as a result of an accumulated deficit of $7,638,342 as of December 31, 2010 and a working capital deficit. Our ability to continue as a going concern remains dependent on an ability to realize net income and/or obtaining financing from outside sources. Management’s plan to address our ability to continue as a going concern includes (i) increases in revenue; (ii) decreases in general and administrative costs; (iii) financing from private placement sources; and (iv) converting outstanding debt to equity. Although we believe that we will be able to remain a going concern, through the methods discussed above, there can be no assurances that such methods will prove successful.

Critical Accounting Policies

In Note 1 to the audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, included in our Form 10-K, we discussed those accounting policies that are considered to be significant in determining the results of operations and its financial position. We believe that the accounting principles utilized by us conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of financial statements requires our management to make significant estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. On an on-going basis, we evaluate estimates. Our estimates are based on historical experience and other facts and circumstances that are believed to be reasonable, and the results form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities. The actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Revenue Recognition

We generate revenues from product sales, consulting, installation of security systems, and support and maintenance contracts. Our revenue recognition policy is as follows:

· Development and Delivery of Security Systems - Profits on long-term contracts are recorded primarily using the percentage of completion method for individual contracts. Estimated percentage of completion is determined on the basis of total costs expended as a percentage of total estimated costs. As our long-term contracts extend over one or more years, revisions in cost and profit estimates are reflected in the accounting period that the revisions become known. Due to the inherent uncertainties in estimating costs, it is at least reasonably possible that the estimates used will change within the near term.

o Contract costs include all direct materials, labor, and other costs. General and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred. At the time a loss on a contract is expected, the entire amount of the estimated loss is recognized.

o The asset, "Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts," represents revenues earned in excess of amounts billed. The liability, "Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts," represents billings in excess of revenues earned.

Support and Maintenance Revenue – Revenue from support and maintenance agreements is recognized ratably over the term of the agreement, which in most instances is one year.

Service Revenue – Revenue from system upgrades is recognized as the services are performed. Revenue from training and development services is recognized as the services are performed.

Product Sales Revenue – Revenue from product sales is recognized at the time the product is shipped and invoiced and collectibility is reasonably assured. We believe that revenue should be recognized at the time of shipment as title passes to the customer at the time of shipment.

Consulting Revenue – Revenues from consulting services are recognized when a consulting agreement is executed that establishes the amount and scope of service to be provided, the consulting services have been performed, and we have no additional rescission, refund, or customer satisfaction requirements, and collectibility of the amount billed is reasonably assured.

Forward-Looking Statements and Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial Condition

The statements contained in the section titled Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in this current report, with the exception of historical facts, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations and beliefs regarding our future results of operations, performance, and achievements. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and are based upon assumptions and beliefs that may or may not materialize. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning:

· our anticipated financial performance;

· the sufficiency of existing capital resources;

· our ability to raise additional capital to fund cash requirements;

· uncertainties related to our business;

· increases in revenues;

· the volatility of the stock market and;

· general economic conditions.

We wish to caution readers that our operating results are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those discussed or anticipated including the factors set forth in the section entitled Risk Factors included elsewhere in this report. We also wish to advise readers not to place any undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this report, which reflect our beliefs and expectations only as of the date of this report. We assume no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements to reflect new events or circumstances or any changes in our beliefs or expectations, other than as required by law.

Stock-Based Compensation

We have adopted Accounting Standards Codification Topic (“ASC”) 718, Share-Based-Payment, which addresses the accounting for stock-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments.

We account for equity instruments issued in exchange for the receipt of goods or services from other than employees in accordance with ASC 505. Costs are measured at the estimated fair market value of the consideration received or the estimated fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of equity instruments issued for consideration other than employee services is determined on the earliest of a performance commitment or completion of performance by the provider of goods or services.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Please see Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements for recent accounting pronouncements.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not required.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

In connection with the preparation of this report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was carried out by our management, with the participation of the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)). Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Based on that evaluation, our management concluded, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing, and reporting information required to be disclosed, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information was accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the period ended March 31, 2011 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our operations and securities are subject to a number of risks. Below we have identified and discussed the material risks that we are likely to face. Should any of the following risks occur, they will adversely affect our business, financial condition, and/or results of operations as well as the future trading price and/or the value of our securities.

Risks Related to our Business

OUR ABILITY TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN IS IN QUESTION

Our auditors included an explanatory statement in their report on our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, stating that there are certain factors which raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. These factors include an accumulated deficit and working capital deficit.

WE HAVE A HISTORY OF LOSSES AND MAY INCUR LOSSES FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE

We had an accumulated deficit of over $8,192,337 as of March 31, 2011 and a net operating loss. We do expect net income in the next twelve months but can provide no assurance to this end. Should we realize net income in the near term we can provide no assurance that we will be able to sustain net income over time.

WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO DEVELOP NEW PRODUCTS

We have historically had difficulty producing our products because of cash flow shortages. Though we have recently resumed limited production of our products, our future success depends in a significant part on our ability to evolve our hardware and software and to develop and introduce new products and technologies in response to market demands. If adequate funds are not available, our ability to develop or enhance products and services or otherwise respond to competitive pressures would be significantly limited.

THE VIDEO MONITORING SURVEILLANCE INDUSTRY IS SUBJECT TO RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE AND OUR PRODUCTS COULD BECOME OBSOLETE AT ANY TIME

Evolving technology, updated industry standards, and frequent new product and service introductions characterize the video surveillance systems and security integration services markets; our products could become obsolete at any time. Competitors could develop products similar to or better than our own, finish development of new technologies in advance of our research and development, or be more successful at marketing new products, any of which factors may hurt our prospects for success.

THE MARKET ACCEPTANCE OF OUR PRODUCTS IS CRITICAL TO OUR GROWTH

We generate revenue from the design and sale of video surveillance systems and security integration services; therefore, market acceptance of our products is critical. If our customers do not accept or purchase our products, then our revenue, cash flow and/or operating results will be negatively impacted.

WE COMPETE WITH LARGER AND BETTER-FINANCED CORPORATIONS

Competition within the international market for video surveillance systems and security integration services is intense. While our products are distinguished by next-generation innovations that are more sophisticated, flexible and cost effective than many competitive products currently in the marketplace, a number of entities offer video surveillance systems, and new competitors may enter the market in the future. Some of our existing and potential competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger customer bases and significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do, including well known multi-national corporations.

WE ARE LARGELY DEPENDENT UPON FEW CUSTOMERS

We have in the past, and may in the future lose our customers or a substantial portion of our business with one or more major customers. If we do not sell products to our existing customers in the quantities anticipated, or if our customers reduce or terminate their relationships with us, market perception of our products and technology, growth prospects, and financial condition and results of operations could be harmed. Any termination of our relationship with our largest customers or any other customers could materially reduce our revenue.

WE DEPEND ON ONE MANUFACTURER AND LIMITED SOURCE SUPPLIERS

Pennsylvania-based Strategic Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. currently procures our components and manufactures our video surveillance systems. Our components are purchased for us from such source suppliers as Motorola, Inc., and Analog Devices, Inc. We anticipate that we will continue to depend upon one or few manufacturers, as well as a limited number of source suppliers, which dependence reduces the level of control we have and exposes us to significant risks such as inadequate capacity, late delivery, substandard quality and higher prices, all of which could adversely affect our business. We currently have no agreement with Strategic Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. for the manufacture of our video surveillance systems.

If our suppliers were unable to provide parts in the volumes needed or at an acceptable price, our manufacturer and we would have to identify and qualify acceptable replacements from alternative sources of supply. If we were unable to obtain these components in a timely fashion, we would likely not be able to meet demand. Any disruption of either component procurement or manufacturing delays could adversely affect our results of operations.

OUR SUCCESS DEPENDS ON THE ABILITY TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN KEY PERSONNEL

Our future success will depend substantially on the continued service and performance of Don Gilbreath, Robert Betty and other key personnel. We have relatively few senior personnel, and so the loss of Don Gilbreath, Robert Betty or any other key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Our future success also depends on our ability to identify, attract, hire, train, retain and motivate technical, managerial and sales personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot assure that we will succeed in attracting and retaining such personnel. Our failure to attract and retain the necessary technical, managerial and sales personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

MISAPPROPRIATION OF PROPRIETARY RIGHTS OR CLAIMS OF INFRINGEMENT OR LEGAL ACTIONS RELATED TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COULD ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION

Our success also depends significantly on protecting proprietary technology. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our technology or products. Monitoring unauthorized use of our technology is difficult, and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent misappropriation of our technology, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States.

In addition, from time to time, third parties may assert patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights claims against us with respect to existing or future products or technology. If there is a successful claim of infringement and we fail or are unable to develop non-infringing technology or license the infringed or similar technology on a timely basis, our business and results of operations could be seriously harmed.

OUR BUSINESS IS SUBJECT TO GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS

International, national and local standards set by governmental regulatory authorities set the regulations by which communications are transmitted within and across respective territories. Our fixed and mobile digital video cameras and communication systems are subject to such regulation in addition to national, state and local taxation. Our products may be required to meet Federal Communications Commission approval, specifically for Classes A & B of Part 15 for the telephone related applications of our hardware products. Further, climate change legislation and greenhouse gas regulation is becoming increasingly ubiquitous. Although we successfully operate within current governmental regulations it is possible that regulatory changes could negatively impact our operations and cause us to diminish or cease operations.

OUR PRODUCTS ARE SUBJECT TO ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS

New hazardous materials restrictions have been and are being sought in numerous jurisdictions worldwide. As these restrictions take effect, we may need to change the components it uses in certain key products. These components may be difficult to procure or more expensive than the components we currently use. As such, current and future environmental regulations could negatively impact our operations.

Risks Related to our Stock

WE WILL NEED TO RAISE ADDITIONAL CAPITAL TO FUND AN EXPANSION OF OPERATIONS WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR SHAREHOLDERS

We will need to raise additional capital to fund an expansion of operations up to $3,000,000. Capital realized would be used for research and development expenses, product manufacture, marketing costs and performance bonds. We have no commitment from any sources of financing to provide us with any needed capital requirements. Any equity financing will obligate us to issue additional shares of our common stock which would result in dilution to existing shareholders.

We incur significant expenses as a result of being REGISTERED WITH THE COMMISSION, which EXPENSES negatively impact our financial performance.

We incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses as a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as related rules implemented by the Commission, which control the corporate governance practices of public companies. Compliance with these laws, rules and regulations, including compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as discussed in the following risk factor, has substantially increased our expenses, including legal and accounting costs, and made some activities more time-consuming and costly.

OUR STOCK PRICE IS VOLATILE

The market price for our common stock is subject to significant volatility and trading volumes are low. Factors affecting our stock price could include:

· our perceived prospects;

· negative variances in our operating results, and achievement of key business targets;

· limited trading volume in shares of our common stock in the public market;

· sales or purchases of large blocks of our stock;

· changes in, or failure to meet, earnings estimates;

· changes in securities analysts’ buy/sell recommendations;

· differences between our reported results and those expected by investors and securities analysts;

· announcements of new contracts or our competitors;

· announcements of legal claims against us;

· market reaction to any acquisitions, joint ventures or strategic investments announced by us or our competitors;

· developments in the financial markets;

· general economic, political or stock market conditions.

In addition, our stock price may fluctuate in ways unrelated or disproportionate to our operating performance. The general economic, political and stock market conditions that may affect the market price of our common stock are beyond our control. The market price of our common stock at any particular time may not remain the market price in the future. In the past, securities class action litigation has been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. Any such litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.

OUR STOCK IS A PENNY STOCK AND, THEREFORE, SHAREHOLDERS MAY FACE SIGNIFICANT RESTRICTIONS ON THEIR STOCK

Our stock differs from many stocks in that it is a "penny stock." The Commission defines a penny stock in Rule 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act as, generally speaking, those securities which are not listed on either NASDAQ or a national securities exchange and are priced under $5, excluding securities of issuers that (a) have net tangible assets greater than $2 million if they have been in operation at least three years, (b) have net tangible assets greater than $5 million if in operation less than three years, or (c) average revenue of at least $6 million for the last three years. OTCBB securities are considered penny stocks unless they qualify for one of the exclusions.

The Commission has adopted a number of rules to regulate penny stocks. These rules include, but are not limited to, Rules 3a5l-l, 15g-1, 15g-2, 15g-3, 15g-4, 15g-5, 15g-6 and 15g-9 under the Exchange Act. Since our securities constitute a "penny stock" within the meaning of the rules, the rules would apply to us and our securities. The rules may further affect the ability of owners of shares to sell their securities in any market that may develop for them. There may be a limited market for penny stocks, due to the regulatory burdens on broker-dealers. The market among dealers may not be active. Investors in penny stock often are unable to sell stock back to the dealer that sold them the stock. The mark-ups or commissions charged by the broker-dealers may be greater than any profit a seller may make. Because of large dealer spreads, investors may be unable to sell the stock immediately back to the dealer at the same price the dealer sold the stock to the investor. In some cases, the stock may fall quickly in value. Investors may be unable to reap any profit from any sale of the stock, if they can sell it at all.

Shareholders should be aware that, according to the Commission Release No. 34-29093, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. These patterns include:

control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer;
manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases;
"boiler room" practices involving high pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons;
excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers; and
the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the inevitable collapse of those prices with consequent investor losses.

Our internal controls over financial reporting may not be considered effective in the future, which could result in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports and in turn have an adverse effect on our stock price.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 we are required to furnish a report by our management on our internal controls over financial reporting. Such report must contain, among other matters, an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of the end of the year, including a statement as to whether or not our internal controls over financial reporting are effective. This assessment must include disclosure of any material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting identified by management. If we are unable to continue to assert that our internal controls are effective, our shareholders could lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Purchases of Equity Securities made by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

On March 22, 2011 we authorized the issuance of 352,000 shares of our common stock to Don Gilbreath pursuant to a debt settlement agreement whereby the parties agreed to convert the debt obligation due to Don Gilbreath for 2010 salary in the amount of $88,000, or at $0.25 a share, in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

We made this offering pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act based on the following factors: (1) the issuance was an isolated private transaction which did not involve a public offering; (2) the offeree has access to the kind of information which registration would disclose; and (3) the offeree is financially sophisticated.

On February 21, 2011 we authorized the issuance of 800,000 shares of our common stock to Robert Betty pursuant to an agreement in satisfaction of a note payable valued at $0.50 per share, in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On April 1, 2011 we authorized the grant of 220,000 warrants to Bayberry Capital, Inc. for the purchase of 100,000 shares of common stock at $0.60 per share for a period of five years and 120,000 shares of common stock at $0.75 for a period of five years, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a promissory note for $50,000, in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

On February 25, 2011 we authorized the grant of 100,000 warrants to Bartek Investments -1, Ltd., for the purchase of shares of common stock at $0.50 per share for a period of five years, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a promissory note for $400,000, in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

On January 18, 2011 we authorized the issuance of 65,000 shares of common stock to Flaherty Financial News, Inc., in exchange for services valued at $16,250 or $0.25 per share, in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

On January 18, 2011 we authorized the issuance of 1,099,600 shares of common stock in exchange for $274,900 in cash or $0.25 per share, pursuant to exemption provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act, to the following individuals and entities:

*Investor*	*Shares*	*Consideration*
Ron E. Barker	20,000	$5,000
Bahanna Group, LLC	100,000	$25,000
Bahanna Group, LLC	40,000	$10,000
Bahanna Group, LLC	100,000	$25,000
Sean Collins	20,000	$5,000
Tom R. Fishler	100,000	$25,000
Thomas Hoggard	30,000	$7,500
James M. Huntley Jr.	100,000	$25,000
Tony Jones	32,000	$8,000
Tony Jones	48,000	$12,000
Tony Jones	40,000	$10,000
Mark A. Scott	20,000	$5,000
SDT Holdings, LLC	100,000	$25,000
IRA FBO John R. Shand Jr. Pershing LLC as Custodian Roth Accountant	56,000	$14,000
IRA FBO John R. Shand Jr. Pershing LLC as Custodian Roth Accountant	44,000	$11,000
IRA FBO John R. Shand Jr. Pershing LLC as Custodian Roth Accountant	39,600	$9,900
Gabor Sztamenits	100,000	$25,000
Dan Traxler	60,000	$15,000
Pamala R. Wood	10,000	$2,500
Lou Wood	40,000	$10,000
Totals	1,099,600	$274,900

We complied with the requirements of Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act by: (i) foregoing any general solicitation or advertising to market the securities; (ii) selling only to accredited investors; (iii) having not violated antifraud prohibitions with the information provided to the investors; (iv) being available to answer questions by the investors; and (v) issuing restricted securities to the investors.

On January 12, 2011 we authorized the issuance of 50,000 shares of common stock to Equiti-Trend Advisors, LLC. in exchange for services valued at $12,250 or $0.25 per share, in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2011 we accounted for the issuance of 917,000 shares of common stock in exchange for $229,250 in cash or $0.25 per share, pursuant to exemption provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act, to the following individuals:

*Investor*	*Shares*	*Consideration*
Lou Wood	183,000	$45,750
John R. Shand	34,000	$8,500
Mark Jon Bowman	100,000	$25,000
William Steele	100,000	$25,000
Joseph P. Saline	400,000	$100,000
W. Reed	100,000	$25,000
Totals	917,000	$229,250

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS ON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)

Removed and reserved.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibits required to be attached by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Index to Exhibits on page 29 of this Form 10‑Q, and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

ComCam International, Inc.

Date

/s/ Don Gilbreath

By: Don Gilbreath

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal

Accounting Officer and Director

May 16, 2011

EXHIBITS

Exhibit Description

3 (i)* Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to the Form 10-SB/A filed with the Commission on June 26, 2006).

3 (ii)* Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to the Form 10-SB/A filed with the Commission on June 26, 2006).

10 (i)* Employment Agreement between the Company, ComCam, Inc. and Don Gilbreath dated June 22, 2005 (incorporated by reference to the Form 10-SB/A filed with the Commission on June 26, 2006).

10 (ii)* Amendment and Assignment of Convertible Debenture between the Company and Global Convertible Megatrend, LTD, dated June 30, 2007 (incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K/A filed with the Commission on January 14, 2011).

10 (iii)* Joinder, Amendment and Consent Agreement between ComCam, Inc., the Company and HNI, LLC dated September 28, 2007 (incorporated by reference to the Form 10-QSB filed with the Commission on November 14, 2007).

10 (iv)* Amendment Agreement dated February 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 14, 2008).

10 (v)* Amended and Restated Debenture between the Company and HNI dated July 10, 2009 (incorporated by reference to the Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on January 27, 2010).

10 (vi)* Share Purchase Agreement between the Company, Pinnacle Integrated Systems, Inc., Robert Betty and Feng Brown dated December 30, 2009 (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 31, 2009).

10 (vii)* Secured Promissory Note from Paul Higbee dated March 31, 2010 (incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K/A filed with the Commission on January 14, 2011).

10 (viii)* Debt Settlement Agreement between the Company and Paul Higbee dated March 31, 2010 (incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K/A filed with the Commission on January 14, 2011).

10(ix)* Restated Accord and Satisfaction Agreement dated March 24, 2011 (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K/A filed with the Commission on May 16, 2011.

14* Code of Ethics adopted March 24, 2008 (incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 14, 2008).

21* Subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 16, 2010).

31 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (attached).

32 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (attached).

99* Pinnacle Integrated Systems, Inc. audited financial statements for the period ended December 30, 2009 and the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 (predecessor to ComCam International, Inc.) (incorporated by reference to the Form 10-KA/2 filed with the Commission on March 9, 2011).

* Incorporated by reference to previous filings of the Company.

COMCAM INTERNATIONAL INC 10-Q