UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

Commission file number: 0-53331

OMA ENTERPRISES CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	98-0568270
(State of incorporation)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

OMA Enterprises, Corp.

1188 Howe Street

Suite 2605

Vancouver, British Columbia

Canada V6Z 2S8

__________________________

(Address of principal executive offices)

(778) 786-0258

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, $0.0001 par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes x No o

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2009 was not determinable since the Common Stock was not traded.

The number of shares of the issuer’s common stock issued and outstanding as of March 25, 2010 was 20,000,000 shares.

Documents Incorporated By Reference: None

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I
Item 1	Business	1
Item 1A	Risk Factors	2
Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	2
Item 2	Properties	2
Item 3	Legal Proceedings	2
Item 4	Removed and Reserved	2

PART II
Item 5	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	3
Item 6	Selected Financial Data	3
Item 7	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation	3
Item 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	8
Item 8	Financial Statements	F1 - F10
Item 9	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	9
Item 9A	Controls and Procedures	9
Item 9B	Other Information	10

PART III
Item 10	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	10
Item 11	Executive Compensation	11
Item 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	12
Item 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	12
Item 14	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	13

PART IV
Item 15	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	13

SIGNATURES		14

PART I

Item 1.

Business.

As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report”), references to the “Company,” the “Registrant,” “we,” “our” or “us” refer to OMA Enterprises, Corp., unless the context otherwise indicates.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Report contains forward-looking statements. For this purpose, any statements contained in this Report that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking information includes statements relating to future actions, prospective products, future performance or results of current or anticipated products, sales and marketing efforts, costs and expenses, interest rates, outcome of contingencies, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, business strategies, cost savings, objectives of management, and other matters. You can identify forward-looking statements by those that are not historical in nature, particularly those that use terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “contemplates,” “estimates,” “believes,” “plans,” “projected,” “predicts,” “potential,” or “continue” or the negative of these similar terms. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking information to encourage companies to provide prospective information about themselves without fear of litigation so long as that information is identified as forward-looking and is accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the information.

These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that we cannot predict. In evaluating these forward-looking statements, you should consider various factors, including the following: (a) those risks and uncertainties related to general economic conditions, (b) whether we are able to manage our planned growth efficiently and operate profitable operations, (c) whether we are able to generate sufficient revenues or obtain financing to sustain and grow our operations, (d) whether we are able to successfully fulfill our primary requirements for cash, which are explained below under “Liquidity and Capital Resources”. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements, except as otherwise required under the applicable federal securities laws.

Corporate Background

OMA Enterprises Corp. is a development stage company which was incorporated on February 6, 2008 in the state of Nevada. Since inception, the Company has been engaged in organizational efforts. The Registrant was organized as a vehicle to investigate and, if such investigation warrants, acquire a target company or business seeking the perceived advantages of being a publicly held corporation. The Registrant’s principal business objective for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be to achieve long-term growth potential through a combination with a business rather than immediate, short-term earnings. The Registrant will not restrict its potential candidate target companies to any specific business, industry or geographical location and, thus, may acquire any type of business. The address of our principal executive office is c/o Allon Messenberg, 1188 Howe Street, Suite 2605, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6Z 2S8. Our telephone number is (778) 786-0258. We do not have a functioning website.

Business Overview

We are considered a blank check company. The SEC defines those companies as “any development stage company that is issuing a penny stock, within the meaning of Section 3 (a)(51) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that has no specific business plan or purpose, or has indicated that its business plan is to merge with an unidentified company or companies.” Under SEC Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), we also qualify as a “shell company,” because we have no or nominal assets (other than cash) and no or nominal operations. Many states have enacted statutes, rules and regulations limiting the sale of securities of “blank check” companies in their respective jurisdictions. Management does not intend to undertake any efforts to cause a market to develop in our securities, either debt or equity, until we have successfully concluded a business combination. We intend to comply with the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for so long as we are subject to those requirements.

The Company’s current business plan is to attempt to identify and negotiate with a business target for the merger of that entity with and into the Company. In certain instances, a target company may wish to become a subsidiary of ours or may wish to contribute or sell assets to the Company rather than to merge. No assurances can be given that we will be successful in identifying or negotiating with any target company, or, if we do enter into such a business combination, no assurances can be given as to the terms of a business combination, or as to the nature of the target company. We seek to provide a method for a foreign or domestic private company to become a reporting or public company whose securities are qualified for trading in the United States secondary markets.

Competition

The Company is an insignificant participant among firms which engage in business combinations with, or financing of, development stage enterprises. There are many established management and financial consulting companies and venture capital firms which have significantly greater financial and personnel resources, technical expertise and experience than the Company. In view of the Company’s limited financial resources and management availability, the Company will continue to be at a significant competitive disadvantage vis-a-vis the Company’s competitors.

Regulation and Taxation

The Investment Company Act of 1940 defines an “investment company” as an issuer which is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading of securities. While the Company does not intend to engage in such activities, the Company could become subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940 in the event the Company obtains or continues to hold a minority interest in a number of development stage enterprises. The Company could be expected to incur significant registration and compliance costs if required to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Accordingly, management will continue to review the Company’s activities from time to time with a view toward reducing the likelihood the Company could be classified as an “investment company.”

The Company intends to structure a merger or acquisition in such manner as to minimize Federal and state tax consequences to the Company and to any target company.

Staffing

As of December 31, 2009, OMA has no permanent staff other than its sole officer and sole director. Our sole officer and sole director have the flexibility to work on OMA up to 10 to 25 hours per week and they are prepared to devote more time to our operations as may be required. Our sole officer and sole director are not being paid at present.

Employees and Employment Agreements

At present, we have no employees other than our sole officer and sole director, who have not been compensated. There are no employment agreements in existence. The company presently does not have, pension, health, annuity, insurance, stock options, profit sharing, or similar benefit plans; however, the company may adopt plans in the future. There are presently no personal benefits available to the company’s sole director.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

A smaller reporting company, as defined in Item 10 of Regulation S-K, is not required to provide the information required by this Item 1A.

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments.

None

Item 2.

Properties.

The company does not own any real estate or other properties. The company’s office is located at 1188 Howe Street, Suite 2605, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6Z 2S8 and our telephone number is (778) 786-0258. Our business office is located at the home of our President, Allon Messenberg and such space is made available to us at no charge. We believe that this space will be sufficient until we start generating revenues and need to hire employees.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings.

There are no pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or in which any director, officer or affiliate of the Company, any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of any class of voting securities of the Company, or security holder is a party adverse to the Company or has a material interest adverse to the Company. The Company’s property is not the subject of any pending legal proceedings.

Item 4.

Removed and Reserved

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

Our common stock is not eligible to be traded on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board and there is no assurance that one will develop in the near future, if ever. OMA will seek application to be listed on the over-the-counter bulletin board trading facility ("OTCBB") in the near future. The Company cannot assure that its shares will trade at or above the Company's net asset value.

Holders

As of March 25, 2010, there were 20,000,000 common shares issued and outstanding, which were held by 2 stockholders of record.

Dividends

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock nor do we anticipate paying any in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, we expect to retain any future earnings to finance our operations and expansion. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our earnings levels, capital requirements, any restrictive loan covenants and other factors the Board considers relevant.

Equity Compensation Plans

We do not have any equity compensation plans.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

None

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Small Business Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

We have not repurchased any shares of our common stock during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data.

A smaller reporting company, as defined in Item 10 of Regulation S-K, is not required to provide the information required by this Item 6.

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Certain statements contained in this prospectus, including statements regarding the anticipated development and expansion of our business, our intent, belief or current expectations, primarily with respect to the future operating performance of OMA Enterprises Corp. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. We undertake no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they are made.

Plan of Operation - General

During the next 12 months, the Company intends to seek, investigate and, if such investigation warrants, acquire an interest in one or more business opportunities presented to it by persons or firms who or which desire to seek the perceived advantages of a publicly held corporation. At this time, the Company has no plan, proposal, agreement, understanding or arrangement to acquire or merge with any specific business or company, and the Company has not identified any specific business or company for investigation and evaluation. No member of management has had any material discussions with any other company with respect to any acquisition of that company.

The Company will not restrict its search to any specific business, industry or geographical location, and the Company may participate in a business venture of virtually any kind or nature. The discussion of the proposed plan of operation under this caption and throughout this Annual Report is purposefully general and is not meant to be restrictive of the Company’s virtually unlimited discretion to search for and enter into potential business opportunities.

The Company will have to obtain funds in one or more private placements to finance the operation of any acquired business. Persons purchasing securities in these placements and other shareholders will likely not have the opportunity to participate in the decision relating to any acquisition. The Company’s proposed business is sometimes referred to as a “blind pool” because any investors will entrust their investment monies to the Company’s management before they have a chance to analyze any ultimate use to which their money may be put. Consequently, the Company’s potential success is heavily dependent on the Company’s management, which will have virtually unlimited discretion in searching for and entering into a business opportunity. Neither our sole officer nor our sole director has had any experience in the proposed business of the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise any funds in private placements. In any private placement, management may purchase shares on the same terms as offered in the private placement.

Management anticipates that it will only participate in one potential business venture. This lack of diversification should be considered a substantial risk in investing in the Company because it will not permit the Company to offset potential losses from one venture against gains from another. The Company may seek a business opportunity with a firm which only recently commenced operations, or a developing company in need of additional funds for expansion into new products or markets, or seeking to develop a new product or service, or an established business which may be experiencing financial or operating difficulties and is in the need for additional capital which is perceived to be easier to raise by a public company. In some instances, a business opportunity may involve the acquisition or merger with a corporation which does not need substantial additional cash but which desires to establish a public trading market for its common stock. The Company may purchase assets and establish wholly owned subsidiaries in various businesses or purchase existing businesses as subsidiaries.

The Company anticipates that the selection of a business opportunity in which to participate will be complex and extremely risky. Because of general economic conditions, rapid technological advances being made in some industries, and shortages of available capital, management believes that there are numerous firms seeking the benefits of a publicly traded corporation. Such perceived benefits of a publicly traded corporation may include facilitating or improving the terms on which additional equity financing may be sought, providing liquidity for the principals of a business, creating a means for providing incentive stock options or similar benefits to key employees, providing liquidity (subject to restrictions of applicable statutes) for all shareholders, and other factors. Potentially available business opportunities may occur in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex.

As part of any transaction, the acquired company may require that management or other stockholders of the Company sell all or a portion of their shares to the acquired company, or to the principals of the acquired company. It is anticipated that the sales price of such shares will be lower than the current market price or anticipated market price of the Company’s Common Stock. The Company’s funds are not expected to be used for purposes of any stock purchase from insiders. The Company shareholders will not be provided the opportunity to approve or consent to such sale. The opportunity to sell all or a portion of their shares in connection with an acquisition may influence management’s decision to enter into a specific transaction. However, management believes that since the anticipated sales price will be less than market value, that the potential of a stock sale by management will be a material factor on their decision to enter a specific transaction.

The above description of potential sales of management stock is not based upon any corporate bylaw, shareholder or board resolution, or contract or agreement. No other payments of cash or property are expected to be received by management in connection with any acquisition.

The Company has not formulated any policy regarding the use of consultants or outside advisors, but does not anticipate that it will use the services of such persons.

The Company has, and will continue to have, insufficient capital with which to provide the owners of business opportunities with any significant cash or other assets. However, management believes the Company will offer owners of business opportunities the opportunity to acquire a controlling ownership interest in a public company at substantially less cost than is required to conduct an initial public offering. The owners of the business opportunities will, however, incur significant post-merger or acquisition registration costs in the event they wish to register a portion of their shares for subsequent sale. The Company will also incur significant legal and accounting costs in connection with the acquisition of a business opportunity including the costs of preparing post-effective amendments, Forms 8-K, agreements and related reports and documents nevertheless, the officers and sole director of the Company have not conducted market research and are not aware of statistical data which would support the perceived benefits of a merger or acquisition transaction for the owners of a business opportunity.

The Company does not intend to make any loans to any prospective merger or acquisition candidates or to unaffiliated third parties.

Sources of Opportunities

The Company anticipates that business opportunities for possible acquisition will be referred by various sources, including its sole officer and sole director, professional advisers, securities broker-dealers, venture capitalists, members of the financial community, and others who may present unsolicited proposals.

The Company will seek a potential business opportunity from all known sources, but will rely principally on personal contacts of its sole officer and sole director as well as indirect associations between them and other business and professional people. It is not presently anticipated that the Company will engage professional firms specializing in business acquisitions or reorganizations.

The sole officer and sole director of the Company are currently employed in other positions and will devote only a portion of their time to the business affairs of the Company, until such time as an acquisition has been determined to be highly favorable. In addition, in the face of competing demands for their time, the sole officer and sole director may grant priority to their full-time positions rather than to the Company.

Evaluation of Opportunities

The analysis of new business opportunities will be undertaken by or under the supervision of the sole officer and sole director of the Company. Management intends to concentrate on identifying prospective business opportunities which may be brought to its attention through present associations with management. In analyzing prospective business opportunities, management will consider such matters as the available technical, financial and managerial resources; working capital and other financial requirements; history of operation, if any; prospects for the future; present and expected competition; the quality and experience of management services which may be available and the depth of that management; the potential for further research, development or exploration; specific risk factors not now foreseeable but which then may be anticipated to impact the proposed activities of the Company; the potential for growth or expansion; the potential for profit; the perceived public recognition or acceptance of products, services or trades; name identification; and other relevant factors. Our officer and director will meet personally with management and key personnel of the firm sponsoring the business opportunity as part of their investigation. To the extent possible, the Company intends to utilize written reports and personal investigation to evaluate the above factors. The Company will not acquire or merge with any company for which audited financial statements cannot be obtained.

It may be anticipated that any opportunity in which the Company participates will present certain risks. Many of these risks cannot be adequately identified prior to selection of the specific opportunity, and the Company’s shareholders must, therefore, depend on the ability of management to identify and evaluate such risk. In the case of some of the opportunities available to the Company, it may be anticipated that the promoters thereof have been unable to develop a going concern or that such business is in its development stage in that it has not generated significant revenues from its principal business activities prior to the Company’s anticipation. There is a risk, even after the Company’s participation in the activity and the related expenditure of the Company’s funds, that the combined enterprises will still be unable to become a going concern or advance beyond the development stage. Many of the opportunities may involve new and untested products, processes, or market strategies which may not succeed. Such risks will be assumed by the Company and, therefore, its shareholders.

The Company will not restrict its search for any specific kind of business, but may acquire a venture which is in its preliminary or development stage, which is already in operation, or in essentially any stage of its corporate life. It is currently impossible to predict the status of any business in which the Company may become engaged, in that such business may need additional capital, may merely desire to have its shares publicly traded, or may seek other perceived advantages which the Company may offer.

Acquisition of Opportunities

In implementing a structure for a particular business acquisition, the Company may become a party to a merger, consolidation, reorganization, joint venture, franchise or licensing agreement with another corporation or entity. It may also purchase stock or assets of an existing business. On the consummation of a transaction, it is possible that the present management and shareholders of the Company will not be in control of the Company. In addition, a majority or all of the Company’s officers and sole director may, as part of the terms of the acquisition transaction, resign and be replaced by new officers and directors without a vote of the Company’s shareholders.

It is anticipated that any securities issued in any such reorganization would be issued in reliance on exemptions from registration under applicable Federal and state securities laws. In some circumstances, however, as a negotiated element of this transaction, the Company may agree to register such securities either at the time the transaction is consummated, under certain conditions, or at specified time thereafter. The issuance of substantial additional securities and their potential sale into any trading market which may develop in the Company’s Common Stock may have a depressive effect on such market. While the actual terms of a transaction to which the Company may be a party cannot be predicted, it may be expected that the parties to the business transaction will find it desirable to avoid

the creation of a taxable event and thereby structure the acquisition in a so called “tax free” reorganization under Sections 368(a)(1) or 351 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). In order to obtain tax free treatment under the Code, it may be necessary for the owners of the acquired business to own 80% or more of the voting stock of the surviving entity. In such event, the shareholders of the Company, including investors in this offering, would retain less than 20% of the issued and outstanding shares of the surviving entity, which could result in significant dilution in the equity of such shareholders.

As part of the Company’s investigation, officers and directors of the Company will meet personally with management and key personnel, may visit and inspect material facilities, obtain independent analysis or verification of certain information provided, check references of management and key personnel, and take other reasonable investigative measures, to the extent of the Company’s limited financial resources and management expertise.

The manner in which each company participates in an opportunity will depend on the nature of the opportunity, the respective needs and desires of the company and other parties, and the relative negotiating strength of the company and its management.

With respect to any mergers or acquisitions, negotiations with target company management will be expected to focus on the percentage of the Company which target company shareholders would acquire in exchange for their shareholdings in the target company. Depending upon, among other things, the target company’s assets and liabilities, the Company’s shareholders will in all likelihood hold a lesser percentage ownership interest in the Company following any merger or acquisition. The percentage ownership may be subject to significant reduction in the event the Company acquires a target company with substantial assets. Any merger or acquisition effected by the Company can be expected to have a significant dilutive effect on the percentage of shares held by the Company’s shareholders.

The Company will not have sufficient funds (unless it is able to raise funds in a private placement) to undertake any significant development, marketing and manufacturing of any products which may be acquired.

Accordingly, following the acquisition of any such product, the Company will, in all likelihood, be required to either seek debt or equity financing or obtain funding from third parties, in exchange for which the Company would probably be required to give up a substantial portion of its interest in any acquired product. There is no assurance that the Company will be able either to obtain additional financing or interest third parties in providing funding for the further development, marketing and manufacturing of any products acquired.

It is anticipated that the investigation of specific business opportunities and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and substantial costs for accountants, attorneys and others. If a decision is made not to participate in a specific business opportunity the costs therefore incurred in the related investigation would not be recoverable.

Furthermore, even if an agreement is reached for the participation in a specific business opportunity, the failure to consummate that transaction may result in a loss to the Company of the related costs incurred.

Management believes that the Company may be able to benefit from the use of “leverage” in the acquisition of a business opportunity. Leveraging a transaction involves the acquisition of a business through incurring significant indebtedness for a large percentage of the purchase price for that business.

Through a leveraged transaction, the Company would be required to use less of its available funds for acquiring the business opportunity and, therefore, could commit those funds to the operations of the business opportunity, to acquisition of other business opportunities or to other activities. The borrowing involved in a leveraged transaction will ordinarily be secured by the assets of the business opportunity to be acquired. If the business opportunity acquired is not able to generate sufficient revenues to make payments on the debt incurred by the Company to acquire that business opportunity, the lender would be able to exercise the remedies provided by law or by contract. These leveraging techniques, while reducing the amount of funds that the Company must commit to acquiring a business opportunity, may correspondingly increase the risk of loss to the Company. No assurance can be given as to the terms or the availability of financing for any acquisition by the Company. No assurance can be given as to the terms or the availability of financing for any acquisition by the Company. During periods when interest rates are relatively high, the benefits of leveraging are not as great as during periods of lower interest rates because the investment in the business opportunity held on a leveraged basis will only be profitable if it generates sufficient revenues to cover the related debt and other costs of the financing. Lenders from which the Company may obtain funds for purposes of a leveraged buy-out may impose restrictions on the future borrowing, distribution, and operating policies of the Company. It is not possible at this time to predict the restrictions, if any, which lenders may impose or the impact thereof on the Company.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 reflect cash assets in the amount of $134 and $31, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents from inception to date have been sufficient to provide the operating capital necessary to operate to date. At December 31, 2009 the Company had a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $34,179, used cash from operations of $17,497 and has a working capital deficit of $32,179.

The Company does not have sufficient capital to fund its expenses over the next twelve months (unless it is able to raise funds in a private placement). There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available to the Company. The Company currently has no agreements, arrangements or understandings with any person to obtain funds through bank loans, lines of credit or any other sources. Since the Company has no such arrangements or plans currently in effect, its inability to raise funds for the above purposes will have a severe negative impact on its ability to remain a viable company.

Results of Operations

Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

We have $134 in cash and cash equivalent, and have experienced losses since inception. We did not generate any revenues from operations during the year ended December 31, 2009 and the period from February 6, 2008 (inception) through December 31, 2008. Expenses during the year ended December 31, 2009 were $17,497 for a net loss of $17,497 compared to expenses of $16,682 for a net loss of $16,682 for the year ended December 31, 2008. Expenses for both years consisted entirely of professional, legal and accounting fees relating to our reporting requirements and general and administrative expenses.

For the current fiscal year, the Company anticipates incurring a loss as a result of legal and accounting expenses, and expenses associated with locating and evaluating acquisition candidates. The Company anticipates that until a business combination is completed with an acquisition candidate, it will not generate revenues, and may continue to operate at a loss after completing a business combination, depending upon the performance of the acquired business.

Going Concern Consideration

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes the Company, will realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and the balance sheet does not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary to the carrying values and classification of assets and liabilities should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. At December 31, 2009 the Company has a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $34,179, used cash from operations of $17,497 and has a working capital deficit of $32,179. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on the raising of equity financing and finding suitable companies to invest in. However there is no assurance of additional funding being available. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise as a result of this uncertainty.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Below is a listing of the most recent accounting standards and their effect on the Company.

In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 105, Generally Accepted Principles, which establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the sole source of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The codification did not change GAAP but recognizes the literature. Pursuant to the provisions of FASB ASC 105, we have updated references to GAAP in our financial statements issued for the period ended December 31, 2009. The adoption of FASB ASC 105 did not impact our financial position or results of operations.

On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the new provisions of ASC Topic 805 “Business Combinations and Reorganizations” (“ASC Topic 805”). ASC Topic 805 provides revised guidance on how acquirers recognize and measure the consideration transferred, identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, non-controlling interests, and goodwill acquired in a business combination. ASC Topic 805 also expands required disclosures surrounding the nature and financial effects of business combinations. Acquisition costs are expensed as incurred.

On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the new provisions of ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC Topic 815”) relating to disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities. The new provisions expand quarterly disclosure requirements about an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities, which were effective beginning in the first quarter of 2009. The Company believes that these new provisions will not have a significant impact on its financial statement disclosures.

On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the new provisions of ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other” (“ASC Topic 350”) relating to the determination of the useful life of intangible assets. This new provision amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset, the objective is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under ASC Topic 805. ASC Topic 350 applies to all intangible assets, whether acquired in a business combination or otherwise and is applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after December 15, 2008.

In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC Topic 855 “Subsequent Events” (“ASC Topic 855”). The objective of this Statement is to establish general standards of accounting for disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, this Statement sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. ASC Topic 855 was adopted on April 5, 2009. The Company evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after October 3, 2009, through November 10, 2009, the date this quarterly report on Form 10-Q was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. During this period the Company did not have any material recognizable subsequent events that required recognition in our disclosures to the October 3, 2009 financial statements as a result of this subsequent evaluation.

On April 5, 2009, the Company adopted the new provisions of ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC Topic 820”). These new provisions amend ASC Topic 820, to provide additional guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. This new provision also provides additional guidance on circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly, and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements in annual and interim reporting periods. The adoption of these new provisions did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

On April 5, 2009, the Company adopted the new provisions of ASC Topic 825 “Financial Instruments” (“ASC Topic 825”), These new provisions require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in financial statements for interim reporting periods and in annual financial statements of publicly-traded companies. This also requires entities to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments in financial statements on an interim and annual basis and to highlight any changes from prior periods. The adoption of these new provisions did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

A smaller reporting company, as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, is not required to provide the information required by this item.

Item 8.

Financial Statements.

OMA ENTERPRISES CORP.

(A Development Stage Company)

AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the years ended

DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008

OMA ENTERPRISES CORP.
(A Development Stage Company)
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008


TABLE OF CONTENTS

		PAGE

ACCOUNTANTS REPORT		F1

BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 and DECEMBER 31, 2008		F2

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND		F3
FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 6, 2008 (Inception) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2008

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND		F4
FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 6, 2008 (Inception) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2008

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND		F5
FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 6, 2008 (Inception) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2008

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		F6-10

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

OMA Enterprises Corp

1188 Howe St. Suite 2605

Vancouver BC

V6Z 2S8

Canada

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of OMA Enterprises Corp. (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and the related statement of operations, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2009 and for the period from February 6, 2008 (date of inception) through December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statement is free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of OMA Enterprises Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and for the period February 6, 2008 (date of inception) through December 31, 2008, in conformance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 7 to the financial statements, the Company has a net accumulated deficit, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 7. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

FRUMKIN, LUKIN & ZAIDMAN CPAs’, P.C.

Rockville Centre, New York

February 25, 2010

F-1

OMA ENTERPRISES CORP.
(A Development Stage Company)
BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 2009 and DECEMBER 31, 2008


ASSETS

	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 2)	$	134		$	31

Total Current Assets		134			31

TOTAL ASSETS	$	134		$	31


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	3,000		$	3,000
Shareholders' Loan (Note 3)		29,313			11,713

Total Liabilities		32,313			14,713

Stockholders' Deficit:
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized;
none issued and outstanding
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 500,000,000 shares
authorized; 20,000,000 shares issued and outstanding as of
December 31, 2008		2,000			2,000
Deficit accumluated during development stage		(34,179	)		(16,682	)

Total Stockholders' Deficit		(32,179	)		(14,682	)


TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$	134		$	31

The accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements.

F-2

OMA ENTERPRISES CORP.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND
FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 6, 2008 (Inception) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2008



	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008

Revenue	$	-		$	-

Expenses:

General and administrative expenses		17,497			16,682

Total operating expenses		17,497			16,682

Net (Loss)	$	(17,497	)	$	(16,682	)





Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.00087	)	$	(0.00083	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		20,000,000			20,000,000

The accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements.

F-3

OMA ENTERPRISES CORP.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND
FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 6, 2008 (Inception) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2009


	COMMON STOCK
	NUMBER OF SHARES		AMOUNT		ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL		ACCUMULATED (DEFICIT) DURING DEVELOPMENT			STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)


Balance at inception		-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-

Issuance of common stock		20,000,000		2,000				-			2,000

Net (loss) - From inception
through December 31, 2008		-		-		-		(16,682	)		(16,682	)

Balance at December 31, 2008		20,000,000	$	2,000	$	-	$	(16,682	)	$	(14,682	)

Net loss - Year ended
December 31, 2009		-		-		-		(17,497	)		(17,497	)

Balance at December 31, 2009		20,000,000	$	2,000	$	-	$	(34,179	)	$	(32,179	)

The accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements.

F-4

OMA ENTERPRISES CORP.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND
FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 6, 2008 (Inception) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2008



		December 31, 2009		December 31, 2008
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Net loss	$	(17,497)	$	(16,682)

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash used in
operating activities:

Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses		-		3,000

Net cash used in operating activities		(17,497)		(13,682)


CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Proceeds from issuance of common stock		-		2,000
Proceeds from loan from shareholders		17,600		11,713

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		17,600		13,713

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		103		31

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		31		-

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	134	$	31

The accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements.

F-5

OMA ENTERPRISES CORP.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND FEBRUARY 6, 2008 (Inception) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2008

(AUDITED)

1 – ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

OMA Enterprises Corp (the “Company”), a development stage company, was incorporated in the State of Nevada on February 6, 2008. The Company was formed for the purpose of raising capital, act as a holding company and invest in technology companies primarily in Israel. The Company also plans to engage in any other business activities permitted by law, as designated by the board of directors of the Company. The Company selected a year end of December 31.

The Company is still in the development stage as defined in ASC Topic 915. All activities of the Company to date relate to its organization, initial funding and share issuance.

2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Accounting Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities and disclosures. Accordingly, the actual amounts could differ from those estimates. Any adjustments applied to estimate amounts are recognized in the year in which such adjustments are determined.

Income taxes – Future income taxes are recorded using the asset and liability method whereby future tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Future tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted or substantively enacted tax rates expected to apply when the asset is realized or the liability settled. The effect of future tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rate is recognized in income in the period that substantive enactment or enactment occurs. To the extent that the company does not consider it to be more likely than not that a future tax asset will be recovered, it provides a valuation allowance against the net future losses. The Company’s net operating loss carry forward is approximately $16,682 which may be used to reduce future taxable income. The net operating loss carry forward will expire in 2028 if not used prior to that time.

Cash and Cash Equivalents – For the purpose of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all short-term debt securities purchased with maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Advertising Costs – The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. The Company has not incurred advertising costs for the periods under review.

F-6

OMA ENTERPRISES CORP.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND FEBRUARY 6, 2008 (Inception) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2008

(AUDITED)

2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES CONT’D

Loss per common share – Basic loss per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares during each reporting period. Diluted loss per share includes potentially dilutive securities such as outstanding options and warrants, using various methods such as the treasury stock or modified treasury stock method in the determination of dilutive shares outstanding during each reporting period. The Company does not have any potentially dilutive instruments for this reporting period.

Fair value of Financial Instruments – The carrying value of accrued expenses approximates fair value due to the short period of time to maturity.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements – In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 105, Generally Accepted Principles, which establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the sole source of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The codification did not change GAAP but recognizes the literature. Pursuant to the provisions of FASB ASC 105, we have updated references to GAAP in our financial statements issued for the period ended December 31, 2009. The adoption of FASB ASC 105 did not impact our financial position or results of operations.

F-7

OMA ENTERPRISES CORP.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND FEBRUARY 6, 2008 (Inception) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2008

(AUDITED)

2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES CONT’D

F-8

OMA ENTERPRISES CORP.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND FEBRUARY 6, 2008 (Inception) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2008

(AUDITED)

3 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

As at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 amounts totaling $29,313 and $11,713 respectively were due to the shareholders for monies used in establishing the Company’s bank account and to cover operating expenses. These amounts bear no interest and are due on demand.

4 – COMMON AND PREFERRED STOCK

The Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value preferred shares. There were no shares issued and outstanding.

The Company is authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value common shares. There were 20,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

5 – CONCENTRATION OF RISK

The Company maintains cash in deposit accounts in federally insured banks. At times, the balance in the accounts may be in excess of federally insured limits.

6 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company’s management and its legal counsel assess such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company’s legal counsel evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein. If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the range of possible loss if determinable and material, would be disclosed. Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.

F-9

OMA ENTERPRISES CORP.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND FEBRUARY 6, 2008 (Inception) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2008

(AUDITED)

6 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONT’D)

Facility Leases

The Company does not lease or own any property.

Employment Agreements

The Company does not have any employment agreements in place.

7 – GOING CONCERN

F-10

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

The Company has had no disagreements with its certified public accountants with respect to accounting practices or procedures or financial disclosure.

Item 9A

Controls and Procedures.

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS

Our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective such that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance, however, that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. We believe our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive, principal operating and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records, that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Company’s assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Company’s management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, management used the framework in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” promulgated by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, commonly referred to as the “COSO” criteria. Based on the assessment performed, management believes that as of December 31, 2009, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based upon the COSO criteria. Additionally, based on management’s assessment, the Company determined that there were no material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTOLS

During the year ended December 31, 2009, there was no change in internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

The Company’s management, including the chief executive officer and principal financial officer, do not expect that its disclosure controls or internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.

Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management’s override of the control. The design of any systems of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of these inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Individual persons perform multiple tasks which normally would be allocated to separate persons and therefore extra diligence must be exercised during the period these tasks are combined. Management is aware of the risks associated with the lack of segregation of duties at the Company due to the small number of employees currently dealing with general administrative and financial matters. Although management will periodically reevaluate this situation, at this point it considers the risks associated with such lack of segregation of duties and that the potential benefits of adding employees to segregate such duties do not justify the substantial expense associated with such increases. It is also recognized the Company has not designated an audit committee and no member of the board of directors has been designated or qualifies as a financial expert. The Company should address these concerns at the earliest possible opportunity.

Item 9B.

Other Information.

There are no further disclosures. All information that was required to be disclosed in a Form 8-K during the fourth quarter 2009 has been disclosed.

PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the members of our board of directors and our executive officers:

Name	Age	Positions and Offices Held

Allon Messenberg 1188 Howe Street, Suite 2605 Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 2S8	32	President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer Principal Accounting Officer
Yechiel Oirechman 2118 West 14th Avenue Vancouver, BC, Canada V6K 2V7	33	Director

Allon Messenberg has been our President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Secretary since we were established. Mr. Messenberg is a Mechanical Engineer who received his B.Sc. in mechanical engineering, in July of 2002, from the Tel Aviv University in Israel. Mr. Messenberg began working as an airframe design engineer for the Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), in September of 2002, where he worked on several large scale projects, including commercial business jets and military unmanned aerial vehicles. Mr. Messenberg moved to Canada in February of 2005 and began working as a research assistant at the University of British Columbia’s Injury Biomechanics Laboratory. Mr. Messenberg is also a candidate for an M.A.Sc. degree in mechanical engineering from the University of British Columbia in Canada.

Yechiel Oirechman has been our sole director since our inception. Rabbi Oirechman is an accomplished businessman with expertise in the stock market, real estate and construction in Israel. Before moving to Canada, in July of 2004, Rabbi Oirechman served as a business consultant for several Israeli companies and was involved in real estate development in Israel. Rabbi Oirechman founded The Pacific Hebrew Culture Society in December of 2004 where he serves as a Rabbi. Rabbi Oirechman is also involved in various technology startups in the fields of advanced security solutions and the internet and has been bringing Israeli Technologies to North America the past few years with offices in New York. Rabbi Oirechman is one of the founders of ICMC Bank and an executive partner in Streamline Commercial, which has arranged financing for private and corporate bodies of over $250 Million in just the past two years.

There are no familial relationships among any of our sole director or sole officer. Neither our sole director nor our sole officer is a director in any other U.S. reporting companies. Neither our sole director nor our sole officer has been affiliated with any company that has filed for bankruptcy within the last five years. The Company is not aware of any proceedings to which our Company’s sole officer or sole director, or any associate of any such officer or director, is a party adverse to the Company or any of the Company’s subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to it or any of its subsidiaries.

Each director of the Company serves for a term of one year or until the successor is elected at the Company's annual shareholders' meeting and is qualified, subject to removal by the Company's shareholders. Each officer serves, at the pleasure of the board of directors, for a term of one year and until the successor is elected at the annual meeting of the board of directors and is qualified.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires officers and directors of the Company and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in their ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and forward copies of such filings to the Company. As of December 31, 2009, our officers and directors were not subject to the provisions of Section 16(a).

Auditors

Frumkin, Lukin & Zaidman, CPAs’, P.C., an independent registered public accounting firm, is our auditor.

We do not currently have a Code of Ethics applicable to our principal executive, financial and accounting officers. We do not have a “financial expert” on the board or an audit committee or nominating committee.

Potential Conflicts of Interest

Since we do not have an audit or compensation committee comprised of independent directors, the functions that would have been performed by such committees are performed by our directors. The Board of Directors has not established an audit committee and does not have an audit committee financial expert, nor has the Board established a nominating committee. The Board is of the opinion that such committees are not necessary since the Company has only one director, and to date, such director has been performing the functions of such committees. Thus, there is a potential conflict of interest in that our sole director and officer has the authority to determine issues concerning management compensation, nominations, and audit issues that may affect management decisions. We are not aware of any other conflicts of interest with any of our sole executive officer or sole director.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

There are no legal proceedings that have occurred within the past five years concerning our sole director, or control persons which involved a criminal conviction, a criminal proceeding, an administrative or civil proceeding limiting one’s participation in the securities or banking industries, or a finding of securities or commodities law violations.

Item 11.

Executive Compensation.

Summary Compensation

Since our incorporation on February 6, 2008, we have not paid any compensation to our directors or officers in consideration for their services rendered to our Company in their capacity as such. We have no pension, health, annuity, bonus, insurance, stock options, profit sharing or similar benefit plans.

Employment Contracts. We have no employment agreements with any of our directors or executive officers.

Stock Options/SAR Grants. No grants of stock options or stock appreciation rights were made since our date of incorporation on February 6, 2008.

Long-Term Incentive Plans. As of December 31, 2009, we had no group life, health, hospitalization, or medical reimbursement or relocation plans in effect. Further, we had no pension plans or plans or agreements which provide compensation on the event of termination of employment or corporate change in control.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End. Since our incorporation on February 6, 2008, no stock options or stock appreciation rights were granted to any of our directors or executive officers. We have no long-term equity incentive plans.

Compensation of Directors. Since our incorporation on February 6, 2008, no compensation has been paid to any of our directors in consideration for their services rendered in their capacity as directors.

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table lists, as of March 25, 2010, the number of shares of common stock of our Company that are beneficially owned by (i) each person or entity known to our Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock; (ii) each officer and director of our Company; and (iii) all officers and directors as a group. Information relating to beneficial ownership of common stock by our principal shareholders and management is based upon information furnished by each person using “beneficial ownership” concepts under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under these rules, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security, or investment power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security. The person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities, and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which he or she may not have any pecuniary beneficial interest. Except as noted below, each person has sole voting and investment power.

The percentages below are calculated based on 20,000,000 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of March 25, 2010. We do not have any outstanding options, warrants or other securities exercisable for or convertible into shares of our common stock. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person listed is c/o OMA Enterprises Corp. 1188 Howe Street, Suite 2605, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 2S8.

Name of Beneficial Owner	Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned	Percent of Common Stock Beneficially Owned

Allon Messenberg	10,000,000	50%

Yechiel Oirechman	10,000,000	50%

(All directors and executive officers as a group (two) persons)	20,000,000	100%

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

On February 6, 2008, by action taken by our board of directors, we issued 10,000,000 shares of our common stock to Allon Messenberg, our President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. The shares were issued in consideration for the payment of $1,000. This transaction was conducted in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Mr. Messenberg was our President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Secretary and had access to all of the information which would be required to be included in a registration statement, and the transaction did not involve a public offering.

On February 6, 2008, by action taken by our board of directors, we issued 10,000,000 shares of our common stock to Yechiel Oirechman, our sole director. The shares were issued in consideration for the payment of $1,000. This transaction was conducted in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Mr. Oirechman was a director of the Company at the time of the transaction and had access to all of the information which would be required to be included in a registration statement, and the transaction did not involve a public offering.

Director Independence

We are not subject to listing requirements of any national securities exchange or national securities association and, as a result, we are not at this time required to have our board comprised of a majority of “independent directors.” We do not believe that any of our directors currently meet the definition of “independent” as promulgated by the rules and regulations of the American Stock Exchange.

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Our principal independent accountant is Frumkin, Lukin & Zaidman CPAs’, P.C. Their pre-approved fees billed to the Company are set forth below:

	Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009	Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008

Audit Fees	$7,500	$6,000
Audit Related Fees	$0	$0
Tax Fees	$0	$0
All Other Fees	$0	$0

As of December 31, 2009, the Company did not have a formal documented pre-approval policy for the fees of the principal accountant. The Company does not have an audit committee. The percentage of hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit our financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees was 0%.

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Exhibit		Description

3.1		Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Registration Statement, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 18, 2008, file no. 000-53331)

3.2		By-Laws of Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Registration Statement, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 18, 2008, file no. 000-53331)

23.1		Consent of Consent of Frumkin, Lukin & Zaidman CPAs’, P.C. (filed herewith).

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley (filed herewith).

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	OMA ENTERPRISES, CORP.

Date: March 25, 2010	By:	/s/ Allon Messenberg
		Name: Allon Messenberg
		Title: President and Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Secretary (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

	OMA ENTERPRISES, CORP.

Date: March 25, 2010	By:	/s/ Allon Messenberg
		Name: Allon Messenberg
		Title: President and Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Secretary (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)


	By:	/s/ Yechiel Oirechman
		Name: Yechiel Oirechman
		Title: Director

OMA Enterprises Corp. 10-K