United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarter ended: June 30, 2012

Commission file no.: 000-26703

GREENWORLD DEVELOPMENT INC.

(Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)

Nevada		98-0206030
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

2101 Vista Parkway, Suite 4022
West Palm Beach, FL		33411
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Issuer's telephone number: (561) 939-4890

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:

		Name of each exchange
Title of each class		on which registered
None		None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share

(Title of class)

Copies of Communications Sent to:

Indicate by Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

o Yes

x No

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date:

As of June 30, 2012, there were 93,641,454 shares of voting stock of the registrant issued and outstanding.

PART I

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Balance Sheets	F-2

Statements of Operations	F-3

Statements of Cash Flows	F-4

Notes to Financial Statements	F-5

Greenworld Development Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheet

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011

ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	781		$	1,212

Total current assets		781			1,212
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (NET)		376			798
OTHER ASSETS
Property lease holding		1,040,672			1,103,354
Deferred expenses		674,295			714,910
Other assets		1,250			1,290

Total other assets		1,716,217			1,819,554

Total Assets	$	1,717,374		$	1,821,564

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	$	337,919		$	315,237
Note payable		128,000			111,000

Total current liabilities		465,919			426,237

Total Liabilities		465,919			426,237

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 and10,000 shares authorized, 0 issued and outstanding		0			0
Common stock, $0.001 and $0.00005 par value, authorized 300,000,000 and 93,641,454 shares; 87,241,457 issued and outstanding		93,641			87,241
Additional paid-in capital		1,901,313			1,901,313
Accumulated comprehensive income (loss)		(36,790	)		(22,001	)
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(706,709	)		(615,228	)

Total stockholders’ equity		1,251,455			1,395,327

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	1,717,374		$	1,821,564

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

F-2

Greenworld Development Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

The Three Months Ended June 30,

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
REVENUES	$	0		$	0		$	0		$	0

OPERATING EXPENSES:
General and administrative expenses		12,774			23,474			30,310			56,926
Professional fees		33,611			4,608			58,342			36,926

Total expenses		46,385			28,082			88,652			93,852

Interest expense		2,829			14,066			2,829			21,354

Net income (loss)		(49,214	)		(42,148	)		(91,481	)		(117,545	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)		-0-			(56,863	)		-0-			83,902

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(49,214	)	$	(99,001	)	$	(91,481	)		(31,304	)

Income (loss) per weighted average common share	$	(0.00		$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)		(0.00

Number of weighted average common shares outstanding		93,641,454			46,617,120			90,441,455			46,617,120

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

F-3

Greenworld Development Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Six Months Ended June 30,

	2012			2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(91,482	)	$	(117,445	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature discount		-			10,295
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
(Increase) decrease in deferred expenses		40,615			-0-
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable - trade		22,682			55,009
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest expense		-0-			11,058

Net cash provided (used) by operating activities		(28,185			(41,083	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of fixed assets		-			-0-

Net cash provided (used) by investing activities		-			-0-

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from stockholder loan payable		0			0
Proceeds from note payable		17,000			31,250

Net cash provided by financing activities		17,000			31,250

Effects of exchange rates on cash		10,754			(955)

Net increase (decrease) in cash		(431)			(10,788	)

CASH, beginning of period		1,212			13,001

CASH, end of period	$	781		$	2,213
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Non-Cash Financing Activities:
Exchange of assets for reduction in notes payable	$	0		$	0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

F-4

GREENWORLD DEVELOPMENT INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company Greenworl Development Inc., (f/k/a Fortress Exploration, Inc.), is a Nevada chartered development stage corporation which conducts business from its headquarters in West Palm Beach, Florida. The Company reincorporated from Delaware in June 2010.

Greenworl Development Inc. was incorporated on December 15, 1997 in Delaware as AlphaCom Corporation. Previously, we were a subsidiary of Lingo Media Inc. ("LMI") (formerly Alpha Communications Inc.) located at 151 Bloor Street West, Suite 890, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1S4. We changed our name in March 2003 to TVE Corporation and in July 2004 to Echo Resources, Inc. In September 2000, we commenced trading on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol "AHMC", our symbol was changed to "ALHO" as of March 7, 2003 due to a 1:25 reverse stock split and was later changed in March 2003 to "TVEO" due to a name change.

In July 2004, the Company affected a forward 2 for 1 stock split by way of a stock dividend, and officially changed its name to Echo Resources, Inc.

In the third quarter 2009 we changed our name to Fortress Exploration, Inc and the Company reincorporated from Delaware to Nevada in June 2010. On June 14, 2010, we changed our name to Greenworl Development Inc.

On April 30, 2010 we entered into an agreement to acquire 100% of the ownership interests of Greenworld International Resources, Ltd., a company formed under the laws of the Republic of Ireland. Pursuant to this agreement, we issued 30,000,000 shares of our common stock to those owners. This resulted in a change of control to the present controlling shareholders and also resulted in previous management resigning in favor of current management. In conjunction with the agreement, we also undertook a 3-1 forward split of our common stock which became effective on August 20, 2010.

In April 2011, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire 50% of Getting Green Solutions, LLC, (GGS), an entity located in Georgia. The Company was to issue 11,000,000 shares in exchange for the member ship interests in GGS, which develops a waste tire to energy technology. The 11,000,000 shares were never issued and subsequently, we and GGS determined that the Agreement needed to be modified. As a result, on or about October 1, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Agreement for the share exchange pursuant to which the Company issued 4,000,000 of its restricted common stock in exchange for a 100% interest in GGS. GGS now functions as the company’s US R&D and business development unit. On April 20, 2012 GGS changed its name to Greenworld USA LLC.

F-5

GREENWORLD DEVELOPMENT INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In September 2011, we signed an MOU to acquire 76% of W2R Ltd (a UK company) which has the operating license for waste tire disposal on a 3 acre site in Warsop, Nottinghamshire, UK. The remaining 24% shareholders are the freehold owners of the site. We have an option to acquire the freehold. W2R’s current waste transfer and treatment license allows for the processing of 2 million waste tires per annum. We anticipate completing this acquisition in the third quarter 2012, and subject to planning, the company plans to redevelop the site to install a carbon emission neutral (clean tech) waste tyre2energy/tyre2renewable plant, which will be the Company’s first UK Energy Centre. The Company anticipates that it will be producing in the UK 80MW within 5 years. There is, however, no guarantee that we will be able to finalize the agreement and commence operations on this project. Furthermore, even if we do commence these operations, there is no assurance that they will be profitable.

In December 2011 GDI entered into a Framework Agreement with Georgia based Green Mountain Management LLC, the owner of a 1522 acre landfill site in Alabama. Green Mountain’s landfill has a waste transfer license to take in 25,000 tons of waste daily. This Framework Agreement was extended and renewed on June 13, 2012.

The framework agreement contemplates for Greenworld to build, own and operate various waste conversion plants including, but not limited to, waste tires, wood pellets, municipal waste. Subject to planning and financing, and final agreement with Green Mountain, it is anticipated that development work will commence in the fourth quarter 2012. The Company will either recycle or convert to energy a percentage of the inbound material and produce energy equivalent of 120 MW by 2015. There is, however, no guarantee that we will be able to finalize the agreement and commence operations on this project. Furthermore, even if we do commence these operations, there is no assurance that they will be profitable.

On April 30, 2012 the Company entered into a Binding Framework Agreement with Nature’s Earth Pellets NC, LLC, a Limited Liability Company located in Laurinburg, North Carolina (“NEP”). Pursuant to the Framework Agreement, the Company will acquire tangible and intangible operating assets owned by NEP, including real property, and all of NEPs’ affiliated companies at its Laurinburg Landing Pellet Plant. The completion date of June 28, 2012 was extended, pending finalization of funding arrangements and is now expected to be finalized in the third quarter 2012.

On September 1, 2011, the Registrant’s Board of Directors approved a resolution for the issuance of the following shares of the Registrant’s restricted stock for the consideration listed.

NAME	NUMBER OF SHARES/CONSIDERATION FOR ISSUANCE
Leo J. Heinl	2,400,000	Board appointment and in lieu of salary valued at $2,400.
Niall Shanahan	2,400,000	Board appointment and in lieu of salary valued at $2,400.
Wolfgang H. Heinl	2,000,000	Appoint to Board of Greenworld International Services, Ltd and in lieu of salary valued at $2,000.
Sinead Heinl	500,000	In lieu of salary for services provided valued at $500.

In April 2011, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire 50% of Getting Green Solutions, LLC, (GGS), an entity located in Georgia. The Company was to issue 11,000,000 shares in exchange for the member ship interests in GGS, which owns a patented waste tire to energy technology. GGS is developing a demonstrator plant in Ohio, through a sister company. The 11,000,000 shares were never issued and subsequently, we and GGS determined that the Agreement needed to be modified. As a result, on or about October 1, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Agreement for the share exchange pursuant to which the Company issued 4,000,000 of its restricted common stock in exchange for a 100% interest in GGS. On April 20, 2012 GGS changed its name to Greenworld USA LLC.

F-6

GREENWORLD DEVELOPMENT INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On October 3, 2011, we issued a total of 22,324,334 shares of our common stock in consideration of Confederated Finance Corporation canceling its debt to the Company in the amount of $401,838. The Shares were issued in reliance upon the exemptions provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Basis of Presentation

The Company prepares its condensed financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant accounting policies are as follows:

Use of Estimates

The preparation of condensed financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, (ii) the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the condensed financial statements are published, and (iii) the reported amount of net sales and expenses recognized during the periods presented. Adjustments made with respect to the use of estimates often relate to improved information not previously available. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of condensed financial statements; accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates.

These estimates and assumptions also affect the reported amounts of revenues, costs and expenses during the reporting period. Management evaluates these estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of year ended or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include cash on hand and cash in the bank.

F-7

GREENWORLD DEVELOPMENT INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets using principally the straight-line method. When items are retired or otherwise disposed of, income is charged or credited for the difference between net book value and proceeds realized thereon. Ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, and replacements and betterments are capitalized.

The range of estimated useful lives used to calculate depreciation for principal items of property and equipment are as follow:

Asset Category	Depreciation/ Amortization Period
Furniture and Fixture	3 Years
Office equipment	3 Years
Leasehold improvements	5 Years

Property Evaluations

Management of the Company will periodically review the net carrying value of its properties on a property-by-property basis. These reviews will consider the net realizable value of each property to determine whether a permanent impairment in value has occurred and the need for any asset write-down. An impairment loss will be recognized when the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest) expected to result from the use of an asset are less than the carrying amount of the asset. Measurement of an impairment loss will be based on the estimated fair value of the asset if the asset is expected to be held and used.

Although management will make its best estimate of the factors that affect net realizable value based on current conditions, it is reasonably possible that changes could occur in the near term which could adversely affect management's estimate of net cash flows expected to be generated from its assets, and necessitate asset impairment write-downs.

F-8

GREENWORLD DEVELOPMENT INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Asset retirement obligations

The Company plans to recognize liabilities for statutory, contractual or legal obligations, including those associated with the reclamation of properties and any plant and equipment, when those obligations result from the acquisition, construction, development or normal operation of the assets. Initially, a liability for an asset retirement obligation will be recognized at its fair value in the period in which it is incurred. Upon initial recognition of the liability, the corresponding asset retirement cost will be added to the carrying amount of the related asset and the cost will be amortized as an expense over the economic life of the asset using either the unit-of-production method or the straight-line method, as appropriate. Following the initial recognition of the asset retirement obligation, the carrying amount of the liability will be increased for the passage of time and adjusted for changes to the amount or timing of the underlying cash flows needed to settle the obligation.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with ASC Topic 360, long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangibles, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Goodwill and other intangible assets are tested for impairment. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 350 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, effective July 1, 2002. In accordance with (“ASC Topic 350”) "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired and accounted for under the purchase method, acquired in business combinations is assigned to reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination as of the acquisition date. Under this standard, goodwill and intangibles with indefinite useful lives are no longer amortized. The Company assesses goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually during the fourth quarter, or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred in accordance with ASC Topic 350. If the carrying value of a reporting unit's goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, the Company records an impairment loss equal to the difference. ASC Topic 350 also requires that the fair value of indefinite-lived purchased intangible assets be estimated and compared to the carrying value. The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the estimated fair value of the indefinite-lived purchased intangible assets is less than the carrying value.

F-9

GREENWORLD DEVELOPMENT INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are provided based on the provisions of ASC Topic 740, "Accounting for Income Taxes", to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

The Company adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 740; "Accounting For Uncertainty In Income Taxes-An Interpretation Of ASC Topic 740 ("Topic 740"). Topic 740 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not, that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount, which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating the Company's tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments. At June 30, 2012, the Company did not record any liabilities for uncertain tax positions.

We have adopted “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”. A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. The adoption of ASC 740-10-25 had no effect on our condensed financial statements.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company maintains its operating cash balances in banks in Tampa, Florida. The Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insures accounts at each institution up to $250,000.

F-10

GREENWORLD DEVELOPMENT INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Share-Based Compensation

The Company applies Topic 718 “Share-Based Payments” (“Topic 718”) to share-based compensation, which requires the measurement of the cost of services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost is recognized when the event occurs. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of options granted.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

Net loss per share was computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of shares was calculated by taking the number of shares outstanding and weighting them by the amount of time that they were outstanding. Diluted net loss per share for the Company is the same as basic net loss per share, as the inclusion of common stock equivalents would be antidilutive.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company financial instruments consist primarily of cash, affiliate receivable, settlement receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses and debt. The carrying amounts of such financial instruments approximate their respective estimated fair value due to the short-term maturities and approximate market interest rates of these instruments. The estimated fair value is not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize in a current market exchange or from future earnings or cash flows.

The Company adopted ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements (“ASC Topic 820”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. The standard provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on an exit price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The standard also prioritizes, within the measurement of fair value, the use of market-based measurements.

F-11

GREENWORLD DEVELOPMENT INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements is defined as follows:

●	Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;

●

Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable of the asset or liability other than quoted prices, either directly or indirectly including inputs in markets that are not considered to be active;

●	Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation for comparative purposes.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

ASU 2011-05 – Presentation of comprehensive income

ASU 2011-05 was the result of a joint project with the IASB and amends the guidance in ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income (OCI) in the statement of stockholders’ equity. Instead, the new guidance now requires entities to present all nonowner changes in stockholders’ equity either as a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or as two separate but consecutive statements.

All entities that report OCI items will be impacted by the changes in this ASU. The components of OCI have not changed, nor has the guidance on when OCI items are reclassified to net income; however, the amendments require entities to present all reclassification adjustments from OCI to net income on the face of the statement of comprehensive income.

The amendments to ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, included in ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, are effective for fiscal years and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2011 (that is, the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2012 for calendar-year entities) for public entities and for interim and annual periods thereafter. The amended guidance must be applied retrospectively and early adoption is permitted.

ASU 2011-04 – Amendments to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs

F-12

GREENWORLD DEVELOPMENT INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The amendments in ASU 2011-04 do not modify the requirements for when fair value measurements apply; rather, they generally represent clarifications on how to measure and disclose fair value under ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, including the following revisions:

●	The concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise are relevant only for measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets and do not apply to financial assets and liabilities.

●	An entity should measure the fair value of an equity-classified financial instrument from the perspective of the market participant that holds the instrument as an asset.

●

An entity that holds a group of financial assets and financial liabilities whose market risk (that is, interest rate risk, currency risk, or other price risk) and credit risk are managed on the basis of the entity’s net risk exposure may apply an exception to the fair value requirements in ASC 820 if certain criteria are met. The exception allows such financial instruments to be measured on the basis of the reporting entity’s net, rather than gross, exposure to those risks.

●

Premiums or discounts related to the unit of account are appropriate when measuring fair value of an asset or liability if market participants would incorporate them into the measurement (for example, a control premium). However, premiums or discounts related to size as a characteristic of the reporting entity’s holding (that is, a “blockage factor”) should not be considered in a fair value measurement.

The amendments to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, included in ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs, are effective prospectively for public entities for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 (that is, the quarter ending June 30, 2012 for calendar-year entities). Early adoption is not permitted for public entities.

ASU 2011-03 – Reconsideration of effective control for repurchase agreements

The amendments to ASC 860-10 included in ASU 2011-03, simplified the accounting for financial assets transferred under repurchase agreements (repos) and similar arrangements, by eliminating the transferor’s ability criteria from the assessment of effective control over those assets as well as the related implementation guidance.

Currently under ASC 860-10-40-24 a transferor must meet four criteria to maintain effective control of securities transferred in a repo and to therefore account for the transfer as a secured borrowing rather than a sale. One of these criteria states that the transferor must be able to either repurchase or redeem the transferred securities on substantially the agreed terms, even if the transferee is in default. This criterion is satisfied only if the transferor has cash or collateral sufficient to fund substantially the entire cost of purchasing replacement securities.

F-13

GREENWORLD DEVELOPMENT INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The amendments in ASU 2011-03 remove this criterion and related implementation guidance from the Codification, thereby reducing the criteria that transferors must satisfy to qualify for secured borrowing accounting and, as a result, likely reducing the number of transfers accounted for as sales.

The amendments to ASC 860-10, Transfers and Servicing, included in ASU 2011-03, Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements, are effective for both public and nonpublic entities prospectively for new transfers and existing transactions modified as of the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (that is, the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2012 for calendar-year entities). Early adoption is not permitted.

ASU 2011-02 - FASB amends creditor troubled debt restructuring guidance

This bulletin discusses ASU 2011-02, which was issued by the FASB to provide creditors with additional guidance in evaluating whether a restructuring of debt is a troubled debt restructuring. The new guidance does not amend the guidance for debtors. It is generally effective for public entities in the quarter ended September 30, 2011.

ASU 2011-01 - Troubled debt restructuring disclosures for public-entity creditors deferred

The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-01, Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20, which temporarily defers the date when public-entity creditors are required to provide the new disclosures for troubled debt restructurings in ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The deferred effective date will coincide with the effective date for the clarified guidance about what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring, which the Board is currently deliberating. The clarified guidance is expected to apply for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2011.

When providing the new disclosures under ASU 2010-20, public entities would be required to retrospectively apply the clarified guidance on what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring to restructurings occurring on or after the beginning of the year in which the proposed clarified guidance is adopted.

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its condensed financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

F-14

GREENWORLD DEVELOPMENT INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company’s financial position and operating results raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, as reflected by the net loss of $706,709 accumulated through June 30, 2012. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon commencing operations, developing sales and obtaining additional capital and financing. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. The Company is currently seeking additional capital to allow it to begin its planned operations.

NOTE 3 – INVESTMENT

The 20% interest in two Canadian mining claims that Fortress purchased in 2004 required it to fund 50% of the exploration estimated work program beginning September 2005 in order to maintain the interest. In August 2005, this deadline was extended to February 26, 2006.

In August 2005, the Company purchased an additional 20% of this mining claim in exchange for $50,000 in cash.

NOTE 4 - NOTES PAYABLE

In September 2004, Fortress issued a convertible promissory note to allow advances up to $100,000. As of September 30, 2005, $100,000 had been advanced to the company. The note bears seven percent interest, is convertible at the lender's option at $2 per share, and is payable in one year. The lender has agreed to a third extension of the maturity date for an additional year, to September 2008. The note has been discounted for its beneficial conversion feature, which will be amortized over the life of the note.

The second note has been discounted for its beneficial conversion feature, which will be amortized over the life of the note. A summary of the notes follows.

F-15

GREENWORLD DEVELOPMENT INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On December 29, 2008, the Company and the lender entered into an extension and modification of the two notes, into 1 note with a new maturity of December 31, 2013 and an increase of the principal balance from a combined $200,000 to a total of $400,000.

	Notes Payable

Gross proceeds from notes	$	482,000
Less: Loan set-off		(73,000	)
Less: Beneficial conversion feature		(302,000	)
Add: Amortization of discount		302,000
Less: Beneficial conversion feature		(281,000	)

Value of note on June 30, 2012	$	128,000

F-16

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF PLAN OF OPERATION

Overview

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company's unaudited financial statements and notes thereto. In connection therewith, and because the Company desires to take advantage of, the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company cautions readers regarding certain forward looking statements in the following discussion and elsewhere in this report and in any other statement made by, or on its behalf, whether or not in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements are statements not based on historical information and which relate to future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments. Forward looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the Company's control and many of which, with respect to future business decisions, are subject to change. These uncertainties and contingencies can affect actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward looking statements made by, or on the Company's behalf. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as "may", "anticipate", "intend", "could", "estimate", or "continue" or the negative or other comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any obligation to update forward-looking statements.

Since the May 2010 reverse acquisition of Greenworld International Resources, Ltd., (GIR), the Company has been actively developing its activities in green and health technologies. GIR owns 35% of NEC Healthworld (Uganda), Ltd., (NHU), which owns a fully furnished, but not yet producing pharmaceutical manufacturing facility. GIR is actively seeking funding in conjunction with NHU to allow the facility to begin operations. In April 2011, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire 50% of Getting Green Solutions, LLC, (GGS), an entity located in Georgia. The Company was to issue 11,000,000 shares in exchange for the member ship interests in GGS, which owns a patented waste tire to energy technology. GGS is developing a demonstrator plant in Ohio, through a sister company. The 11,000,000 shares were never issued and subsequently, we and GGS determined that the Agreement needed to be modified. As a result, on or about October 1, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Agreement for the share exchange pursuant to which the Company issued 4,000,000 of its restricted common stock in exchange for a 100% interest in GGS.

GDI is acting as intermediary and negotiator for an Irish-American consortium on a construction project in Nairobi, Kenya. If this consortium is successful, GDI will earn a fee of approximately $1.6 million. The Company is also in negotiations with several Indian and European generic pharmaceutical manufacturers to license production at the Uganda facility. There is, however, no assurance that we will be able to either negotiation.

GDI is also acting as intermediary for an Irish company to assist in the implementation and construction of a solar power plant in Bulgaria, funding for which GDI is currently negotiating with UAE/Chinese/Italian suppliers. If successful, GDI will earn a fee of approximately $360,000 and 10% of the equity of the project. GDI is involved with another company in the United Kingdom to develop a waste tire to energy facility. Again, there is, no assurance that we will be able to consummate this transaction.

GDI has been licensed as a carbon emission trader by the German “Umwelt Bundes Amt”and “Gruener Markt” and expect to begin trading in the fourth quarter of 2011.

Business of Greenworld International Resources, Ltd.

Greenworld is dedicated to the global development and improvement of environmental services. It concentrates and is particularly active in developing Waste to Energy projects in the USA, UK and continental Europe.

Greenworld owns an interest in a pharmaceutical manufacturing plant in Uganda where it is in the process of completing the government awarded license to manufacture medical products, principally for consumption in sub-Sahara Africa. The expectation is that such products will have a significantly lower cost basis, therefore have a significantly lower end user cost, reducing the cost of health care in sub-Sahara Africa, along with providing greater access to needed health care products in the region. It is also hoped that products manufactured locally (within the region) will have more rapid acceptance and approval by other governments within the region. Greenworld and its partners are currently negotiating an agreement with a third party pharmaceutical company to operate the existing manufacturing facility upon receipt of the government license to manufacture such products under a royalty structure.

Greenworld is actively associated with certain Wind Energy projects in India, with the hope and expectations of bring lower cost electricity to needy and impoverished regions within the country. Greenworld is currently seeking to raise 5,000,000 Euros, (approximately $6,400,000), for the company’s first joint venture operation in the wind farm power generation sector in India. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to raise this capital, and if we do not, we will not be able to commence this project.

Greenworld is also engaged in projects in the development of economic plant-biomass extraction technologies as well as technologies related to the sustainable production of environmentally friendly power generation including wind, biomass, small-scale hydro, geothermal, biogas and solar.

Greenworld, during the first quarter of 2010, became registered in Germany as a Carbon Emission Trader and is operating from its offices in Hamburg, Germany and Dublin, Ireland. The Company has entered into success based service contracts with two individuals to operate in this arena.

In September 2011, we signed an MOU to acquire 76% of W2R Ltd (a UK company) which has the operating license for waste tire disposal on a 3 acre site in Warsop, Nottinghamshire, UK. The remaining 24% shareholders are the freehold owners of the site. We have an option to acquire the freehold. W2R’s current waste transfer and treatment license allows for the processing of 2 million waste tires per annum. We anticipate completing this acquisition in the third quarter 2012, and subject to planning, the company plans to redevelop the site to install a carbon emission neutral (clean tech) waste tyre2energy/tyre2renewable plant, which will be the Company’s first UK Energy Centre. The Company’s forward mission anticipates to be producing in the UK 80MW within 5 years. There is, however, no guarantee that we will be able to finalize the agreement and commence operations on this project. Furthermore, even if we do commence these operations, there is no assurance that they will be profitable.

On completion of the acquisition (anticipated to be in the second quarter this year) and subject to planning, the company plans to redevelop the site to install a carbon emission neutral (clean tech) waste tyre2energy/tyre2renewable plant, which will be the Company’s first UK Energy Centre. The Company’s forward mission anticipates to be producing in the UK 80MW within 5 years.

In December 2011 GDI entered into a Framework Agreement with Georgia based Green Mountain Management LLC, the owner of a 1522 acre landfill site in Alabama. Green Mountain’s landfill has the authority to take in 25,000 tons of waste monthly.

The framework agreement contemplates for Greenworld to build, own and operate various waste conversion plants including but not limited to waste tires, wood pellets, and municipal waste. Subject to planning and financing, and final agreement with Green Mountain, it is anticipated that development work will commence in the third quarter 2012. The Company will either recycle or convert to energy a percentage of the inbound material and produce energy equivalent of 120 MW by 2015. There is, however, no guarantee that we will be able to finalize the agreement and commence operations on this project. Furthermore, even if we do commence these operations, there is no assurance that they will be profitable.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company and the accompanying notes appearing subsequently under the caption "Financial Statements."

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011

Revenues

The Company did not generate any revenues from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 or 2011. Accordingly, comparisons with prior periods are not meaningful. The Company is subject to risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including limited capital resources and cost increases in services.

Expenses

Operating Expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 increased $18,276 from $46,385 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $28,082 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The primary reason for this increase in our net operating expenses was due to professional fees incurred. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 were $12,774 as compared to $23,474 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of approximately $11,200.

Income and Earnings Per Share

Our net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2012 increased by approximately $7,000 to $49,214 as compared to $42,148 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Net income per weighted average share was $0.00 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to $0.00 for the three months ended June 30, 2011.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

Revenues

Expenses

Operating Expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were $88,652 as compared to $93,852 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of approximately $5,200. General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were $30,310 as compared to $56,926 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of approximately $26,000.

Income and Earnings Per Share

Our net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $91,481 as compared to $117,545 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The primary reason for this decrease was a decrease in interest expenses of approximately $18,500. Net income per weighted average share was $0.00 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to $0.00 for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Assets and Liabilities

Our total assets were $1,717,374 at June 30, 2012 as compared to $1,821,524 at December 31, 2011, an decrease of $104,150. These assets are primarily comprised of property lease holdings and deferred expenses.

At June 30, 2012, our total current liabilities were $465,919, as compared to $426,237 at December 31, 2011. Our liabilities are comprised of accounts and notes payable.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of $781 as compared to $1,212 at December 31, 2011.

As of June 30, 2012, we had a working capital deficit of $1,251,455.

No trends have been identified which would materially increase or decrease our results of operations or liquidity.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES

The Company is not subject to any specific market risk other than that encountered by any other public company related to being publicly traded.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q which address activities, events or developments which the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including such things as future capital expenditures (including the amount and nature thereof), finding suitable merger or acquisition candidates, expansion and growth of the Company’s business and operations, and other such matters are forward-looking statements. These statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by the Company in light of its experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well as other factors it believes are appropriate in the circumstances. However, whether actual results or developments will conform with the Company’s expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, general economic market and business conditions; the business opportunities (or lack thereof) that may be presented to and pursued by the Company; changes in laws or regulation; and other factors, most of which are beyond the control of the Company. Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-Q are qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments anticipated by the Company will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequence to or effects on the Company or its business or operations. The Company assumes no obligations to update any such forward-looking statements.

ITEM 4T.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, within the 90 days prior to the filing date of this report, the Company carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, the Company's President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have been no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors, which could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date the Company carried out its evaluation.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

The Company knows of no legal proceedings to which it is a party or to which any of its property is the subject which are pending, threatened or contemplated or any unsatisfied judgments against the Company.

ITEM 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS IN SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

No matter was submitted during the quarter ending June 30, 2012, covered by this report, to a vote of the Company's shareholders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

(a) The exhibits required to be filed herewith by Item 601 of Regulation S-K, as described in the following index of exhibits, are incorporated herein by reference, as follows:

Exhibit No.		Description

31.1 *		Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 *		Certification pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

* Filed herewith

(b) The following sets forth the Company’s reports on Form 8-K that have been filed during the quarter for which this report is filed:

None.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Greenworld Development Inc.

(Registrant)


Date: August 20, 2012	By:	/s/ Leo Heinl
		Leo Heinl
		Chief Executive Officer
		Chief Financial Officer

GREENWORLD DEVELOPMENT, INC. 10-Q