UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013.

for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013.

o Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission file number: 000-54341

X-FACTOR COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware		45-1545032
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3 Empire Blvd., 5th Floor, South Hackensack, NJ 07606

(Address of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code)

201-518-1925

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)

Yes o No x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of ~~May~~August 2414, 2013 was 1718,~~753~~965,~~684~~115.

X-Factor Communications Holdings, Inc.

Index

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012*	2
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012*	1
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012	3
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six and three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	2
	Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit for the three months ended March 31, 2013	4
	Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit for the six months ended June 30, 2013	3
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012	5
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	4
	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	65
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2425
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	3234
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3234
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	3336
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	3336
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	3336
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	3336
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	3336
Item 5.	Other Information	3336
Item 6.	Exhibits	33
Item 6	Exhibits	36
Signatures43		34
Signatures		37
Certifications44
Certifications

*	The Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2012 has been derived from the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K that was filed on May 16, 2013.

X-Factor Communications Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	March 31,			December 31,
	2013			2012
Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	105,515		$	311,843
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
of $26,200 at both dates		94,276			79,964
Other current assets		18,445			27,793
Total current assets		218,236			419,600
Equipment and leasehold improvements		20,196			24,705
Total assets	$	238,432		$	444,305
Liabilities and Stockholders’ and Members’ Deficit
Current liabilities:
Line of credit	$	97,245		$	97,846
Current portion of note payable, net of discount of $2,256 at both dates		24,800			24,800
Current portion of capital leases payable		7,949			10,705
Accounts payable		655,967			624,045
Accrued expenses		187,034			137,213
Current portion of unearned revenues		47,841			30,008
Derivative financial instruments		167,183			165,640
Total current liabilities		1,188,019			1,090,257
Long term liabilities:
Note payable, less current portion, net of discount of $5,284 and $5,848, respectively		304,966			304,402
Notes payable – related parties		288,606			282,680
Total long term liabilities		593,572			587,082
Total liabilities		1,781,591			1,677,339
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ deficit:
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized,
no shares issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized,
17,414,934 and 17,214,934 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		1,742			1,721
Additional paid-in capital		6,814,838			6,519,602
Accumulated deficit		(8,359,739	)		(7,754,357	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(1,543,159	)		(1,233,034	)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	238,432		$	444,305

June 30, 2013 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2012

	June 30,			December 31,
	2013			2012
Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	185,556		$	311,843
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $27,900 and $26,200, respectively		140,973			79,964
Other current assets		26,810			27,793
Total current assets		353,339			419,600

Equipment and leasehold improvements		15,695			24,705
Total assets	$	369,034		$	444,305

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
Current liabilities:
Line of credit	$	97,836		$	97,846
Current portion of note payable, net of discount of $2,256 at both dates		24,800			24,800
Current portion of capital leases payable		5,075			10,705
Accounts payable		634,413			624,045
Accrued expenses		248,625			137,213
Current portion of unearned revenues		36,167			30,008
Derivative financial instruments		27,006			165,640
Total current liabilities		1,073,922			1,090,257

Long term liabilities:
Note payable, less current portion, net of discount of $4,720 and $5,848, respectively		305,530			304,402
Notes payable – related parties		292,466			282,680
Total long term liabilities		597,996			587,082
Total liabilities		1,671,918			1,677,339

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ deficit:
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized,
no shares issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized,
18,155,471 and 17,214,934 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		1,816			1,721
Additional paid-in capital		7,320,504			6,519,602
Accumulated deficit		(8,625,204	)		(7,754,357	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(1,302,884	)		(1,233,034	)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	369,034		$	444,305

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

X-Factor Communications Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2013			2012
Revenue	$	139,663		$	182,929
Cost of revenue		71,437			75,034
Gross profit		68,226			107,895
Operating expenses
Salaries and fringe benefits		238,134			93,482
General and administrative		414,048			451,887
Depreciation and amortization		4,509			16,065
Total operating expenses		656,691			561,434
Loss from operations		(588,465	)		(453,539	)
Other expenses
Interest expense, including $5,925 and $127,173, respectively for related parties		13,432			153,155
Change in the fair value of derivative financial instruments for related parties		1,543			121,296
Professional fees related to Merger		—			133,191
Loss on modification or extinguishment of debt		—			329,862
Other expenses		1,942			—
Total other expenses		16,917			737,504
Net loss	$	(605,382	)	$	(1,191,043	)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders per share (see Note 3): Basic and diluted		17,284,240			—
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (see Note 3): Basic and diluted	$	(0.04	)		—

Six and Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

	Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012

Revenue	$	387,900		$	325,793		$	248,237		$	142,864
Cost of revenue		119,083			133,158			47,646			58,124
Gross profit		268,817			192,635			200,591			84,740

Operating expenses
Salaries and fringe benefits		455,772			220,875			217,638			127,393
General and administrative		775,241			838,683			361,193			386,796
Depreciation and amortization		9,010			32,109			4,501			16,044
Total operating expenses		1,240,023			1,091,667			583,332			530,233

Loss from operations		(971,206	)		(899,032	)		(382,741	)		(445,493	)

Other (income) expenses
Interest expense, including $16,318, $163,322, $10,393 and $36,149, respectively for related parties		33,024			207,868			19,592			54,713
Change in the fair value of derivative financial instruments for related parties		(138,634	)		80,217			(140,177	)		(41,079	)
Professional fees related to Merger		—			202,867			—			69,676
Loss on modification or extinguishment of debt		—			515,135			—			185,273
Other expenses		5,251			2,825			3,309			2,825
Total other (income) expenses		(100,359	)		1,008,912			(117,276	)		271,408

Net loss	$	(870,847	)	$	(1,907,944	)	$	(265,465	)	$	(716,901	)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders per share (see Note 3):
Basic and diluted		17,492,449			—			17,698,370			—
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (see Note 3):
Basic and diluted	$	(0.05	)		—		$	(0.01	)		—

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

X-Factor Communications Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit (Unaudited)

			Common		Additional						Total
	Common		Shares		Paid in			Accumulated			Stockholders’
	Shares		Amount		Capital			Deficit			Deficit
Balance at January 1, 2013		17,214,934	$	1,721	$	6,519,602		$	(7,754,357	)	$	(1,233,034	)
Issuance of common shares sold in Offerings		200,000		21		159,979			—			160,000
Cash costs of Offerings		—		—		(16,000	)		—			(16,000	)
Equity based compensation – warrants issued to settle costs of Offerings		—		—		(17,101	)		—			(17,101	)
Warrants issued to Placement Agent in Offerings		—		—		2,850			—			2,850
Warrants issued in Offerings		—		—		14,251			—			14,251
Equity based compensation – options issued to employees and consultants		—		—		151,257			—			151,257
Net loss		—		—		—			(605,382	)		(605,382	)
Balance at March 31, 2013		17,414,934	$	1,742	$	6,814,838		$	(8,359,739	)	$	(1,543,159	)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

			Common		Additional						Total
	Common		Shares		Paid in			Accumulated			Stockholders’
	Shares		Amount		Capital			Deficit			Deficit
Balance at January 1, 2013		17,214,934	$	1,721	$	6,519,602		$	(7,754,357	)	$	(1,233,034	)
Issuance of common shares sold in Offerings		820,537		83		559,917			—			560,000
Cash costs of Offerings		—		—		(58,238	)		—			(58,238	)
Equity based compensation – warrants issued in Offerings		—		—		(39,851	)		—			(39,851	)
Warrants issued to Placement Agent in Offerings		—		—		5,918			—			5,918
Warrants issued in Offerings		—		—		33,933			—			33,933
Equity based compensation – shares issued in settlement of accounts payable		120,000		12		89,988			—			90,000
Equity based compensation – options issued to employees and consultants		—		—		209,235			—			209,235
Net loss		—		—		—			(870,847	)		(870,847	)
Balance at June 30, 2013		18,155,471	$	1,816	$	7,320,504		$	(8,625,204	)	$	(1,302,884	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

X-Factor Communications Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

	Three Months Ended
	Six Months Ended
	March 31,
	June 30,
	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(~~605~~870,~~382~~847	)	$	(1,~~191~~907,~~043~~944	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		49,~~509~~010			1632,~~065~~109
Capitalized interest payments for notes - related parties		512,~~926~~009			1733,~~999~~545
Capitalized interest income for note receivable		(~~277~~558	)		(~~281~~561	)
Accretion of discount on notes		~~564~~1,128			~~109~~132,~~070~~139
Amortization of prepaid financing costs		—			11,~~011~~869
Change in fair value of derivative
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments for related parties		(138,634	)		80,217
financial instruments for related parties		1,543			121,296
Bad debt expense		1,700			300
Loss on modification or extinguishment of debt		—			~~329~~515,~~862~~135
Equity-based compensation		~~151~~209,~~257~~235			13,~~485~~960
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(1464,~~312~~934	)		~~148~~153,~~137~~821
Other current assets		91,~~625~~541			(3029,~~000~~922	)
Accounts payable		31100,~~922~~368			~~519~~235,~~322~~808
Accrued expenses		49111,~~821~~414			(93133,~~648~~802	)
Unearned revenue		176,~~833~~159			(2043,~~811~~217	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(~~346~~622,~~971~~409	)		(61916,~~536~~543	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Refund of deposit for company to be acquired in Merger		—			75,000
Net cash provided by investing activities		—			75,000
Cash flows from financing activities:
Sale of common stock		~~160~~560,000			—1,236,250
Costs incurred in connection with Offerings		(1658,~~000~~238	)		(27209,~~983~~407	)
Principal advances (payments) of line of credit		(601	)		316
Net payments of line of credit		(10	)		—
Principal repayments of note payable		—			(85,227	)
Proceeds from notes payable - related parties		—			75,000
Principal repayments of obligations under capital leases		(25,~~756~~630	)		(25,~~897~~313	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		~~140~~496,~~643~~122			441,~~436~~011,303
Net change in cash		(~~206~~126,~~328~~287	)		57169,~~900~~760
Cash - beginning of period		311,843			78,639
Cash - end of period	$	~~105~~185,~~515~~556		$	~~136~~248,~~539~~399

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	615,~~943~~578	$	1524,~~075~~887
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Equity-based compensation costs of Offerings	$	1739,~~101~~851	$	—
Conversion of promissory notes and interest to common stock	$	—	$	728,049
Accounts receivable used to offset notes payable – related parties	$	2,223	$	4,700
Cancellations of derivative liabilities	$	—	$	39,130
Accrued costs incurred in connection with Offering	$	—	$	72,805
Common stock issued in settlement of accounts payable	$	90,000	$	118,449

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

X-Factor Communications Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 - Background and Nature of Operations

X-Factor Communications Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerly, Organic Spice Imports, Inc.) (“Holdings” or the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”), through its wholly-owned subsidiary X-Factor Communications, LLC, a New York limited liability company (“X-Factor”), located in South Hackensack, New Jersey, provides interactive digital media network software and services. References herein to: the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”, refer to X-Factor Communications Holdings, Inc. and X-Factor. The X-Factor Digital Media Network Platform, our cloud-based Digital Media, web and mobile solution, is delivered as a software-as-a-service and under a software license model, enabling our customers to build simple yet scalable advertising and corporate digital media networks. The Company’s webcasting solution, a live and on-demand multimedia distribution product, delivers rich media content, desktop signage and emergency messaging to mobile and Web devices. The Company’s solutions address the rapidly expanding digital media needs of its corporate, public venue, education and government sector customers. The Company markets its software and services throughout the United States. The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.

May 15, 2012 Merger

On May 15, 2012, pursuant to the terms and conditions of an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated March 5, 2012 (the "Merger Agreement"), X-Factor Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings merged with and into X-Factor (the "Merger"). X-Factor survived the Merger and became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings. On May 16, 2012, X-Factor Communications Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, formed solely for the purpose of changing the Company's name, was merged with and into the Company upon the filing of a Certificate of Ownership and Merger with the Secretary of State of Delaware and the Company adopted the name of this subsidiary thereby, changing its name from "Organic Spice Imports, Inc." to "X-Factor Communications Holdings, Inc." References herein to “Organic Spice” refer to the registrant prior to its name change.

Upon the closing of the Merger, in connection with the terms and conditions of a private placement offering issued then (the “May 2012 Offering”) (when combined with sales of securities in beginning in December 2012 (the “December 2012 Offering” and June 2013 (the “June 2013 Offering”) collectively referred to as the "Offerings") the Company issued and sold an aggregate of 3,~~333~~953,~~333~~870 shares of common stock at prices of $0.7556 to $0.80 per share, for gross proceeds of $2,~~522~~922,500.

The consummation of the Merger (the "Effective Time") and the May 2012 Offering had the following effects on the membership units and common stock equivalents of X-Factor:

(a) Each X-Factor common and preferred membership unit issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Merger was automatically converted into 5.286767 (the "Initial Exchange Ratio") shares of Holdings common stock. Upon the final closing of the May 2012 Offering in August 2012 the Initial Exchange Ratio was adjusted to reflect 5.550657 (the “Final Exchange Ratio”) and all initial exchanges were adjusted to reflect the Final Exchange Ratio. This resulted in the issuance of an additional 439,098 shares of Holdings common stock. All disclosures in this document reflect the Final Exchange Ratio.

(b) Each holder of an X-Factor preferred membership unit received 1.190229 shares of Holdings common stock as payment to eliminate the liquidation preference of the preferred membership units.

(c) Each X-Factor warrant or option issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Merger was automatically converted into the right to purchase 5.550657 shares of Holdings common stock. The new conversion price applicable to each warrant and option is equal to the conversion price in effect immediately prior to the Merger divided by 5.550657.

(d) All convertible debt of X-Factor outstanding immediately prior to the Merger was automatically converted into the right to purchase 5.550657 shares of Holdings common stock. The new conversion price applicable to convertible debt is equal to the conversion price in effect immediately prior to the Merger divided by 5.550657.

(e) One holder of a warrant to purchase X-Factor Preferred Membership Interests agreed to receive an additional warrant to purchase, for a period of 10 years from the Effective Time, 148,942 shares of Holdings common stock which was equal to the aggregate exercise price of such preferred warrant, which was $125,137, multiplied by 1.190229 and the exercise price of such additional warrant was the quotient of the exercise price of such preferred warrant, which was $4.33 per X-Factor Preferred Membership Interest, divided by 5.550657.

As an inducement for X-Factor to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, on May 15, 2012, the Company cancelled 10,000,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock owned of record by certain stockholders of the Company immediately prior to the Effective Time, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a cancellation agreement, dated May 15, 2012.

Note 2 – Liquidity and Going Concern

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 the Company had a stockholders' deficit of $1,~~543~~302,~~159~~884, a working capital deficiency of $~~969~~720,~~783~~583 and incurred a net loss of $~~605~~870,~~382~~847 for the ~~three~~six months then ended~~. In~~ ~~addition,~~and ~~there was~~ a ~~decrease~~net inloss ~~revenue~~ of $433,~~266~~420,138 ~~for~~in the ~~three~~year ~~months~~ ended ~~March~~December 31, ~~2013 when compared to~~ 2012. There can be no assurance that: (1) existing stockholders will continue to support the operational and financial requirements of the Company, (2) that the Company will be able to raise sufficient equity or (3) that the Company will continue to be able to comply with existing covenants with creditors in future periods. While the Company has been successful to date in raising funds through sales of securities, the Company does not currently have any sources of committed funding available. The report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our December 31, 2012 financial statements included ana ~~explanatory~~ paragraph indicating that there was substantial doubt concerning the Company’s ability to operate as a going concern. X-Factor has historically incurred net losses and recurring negative cash flows from operations. Furthermore X-Factor has, in the past, defaulted on debt service payments and been in default of covenants in certain debt agreements and there are no assurances that investors will continue to support X-Factor or that X-Factor will be able to raise sufficient capital or debt financing to sustain operations. All of these conditions raise substantial doubt about X-Factor’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the carrying value of assets and liabilities that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 the Company sold ~~200~~820,~~000~~537 shares of its common stock for gross proceeds of $~~160~~560,000 (see Note 18) and an additional ~~218~~669,~~750~~644 shares of its’ common stock for gross proceeds of $~~175~~375,000 subsequent to ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 (see Note 20) .

The Company believes that the remainder of net cash proceeds received from the sale of securities in the Offerings will only provide sufficient equity to fund its operations for the next ~~two~~three to ~~three~~four months from the date of filing this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Additional significant amounts of capital will be needed to be raised to continue the Company’s operations. There are no assurances, however, that the Company will be able to raise additional capital as may be needed, or increase revenue levels and profitability. Further, if the current economic climate negatively impacts the Company, as it may, and the Company is unable to raise additional capital on acceptable terms, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, future operations and cash flows.

Note 3 - Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Interim Financial Information and Results of Operations

The consolidated financial statements as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and for the six and three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and 2012 are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013, and the results of operations for the six and three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and cash flows for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and 2012. While management of the Company believes that the disclosures presented are adequate to make the information not misleading, these consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2012, as included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2013. Results of operations and cash flows for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of those expected for a full year.

Presentation of historical membership unit, option, warrant and convertible note amounts and conversion prices – Reclassifications

~~Prior to the Merger on May 15, 2012,~~ X-Factor ~~was~~is a ~~LLC~~limited ~~and~~liability ~~the~~company with equity ~~was~~ comprised of membership units. As a result of the Merger on May 15, 2012, in which X-Factor became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, ~~and~~ all outstanding membership units of X-Factor were ~~converted~~exchanged ~~into~~for shares of common stock of Holdings. Therefore, all historical references to membership units, options, warrants and convertible notes have been adjusted to reflect the conversion into, or into the right to purchase, 5.550657 shares of Holdings’ common stock as of the beginning of the reported periods. The new conversion price applicable to each option, warrant or convertible note is equal to the conversion price in effect immediately prior to the Merger divided by 5.550657. As a result of the Merger and ~~conversion~~exchange, the number of X-Factor membership units, options, warrants and exercise prices as of December 31, 2011 were adjusted as follows:

	Common Stock After Conversion		Membership Units Before Conversion
	Common Stock After Exchange		Membership Units Before Exchange
Common		7,239,216		1,304,210
Preferred (A )		1,996,685		359,683
Total shares or units		9,235,901		1,663,893

Note A – The preferred membership units were ~~converted~~exchanged ~~into~~for shares of common stock.

	Common Stock After Conversion		Membership Units Before Conversion
	Common Stock After Exchange		Membership Units Before Exchange
Options – issued		2,161,920		389,490
Warrants – issued		1,012,757		182,457
Options – weighted average exercise price	$	0.579	$	3.210
Warrants – weighted average exercise price	$	0.229	$	1.270

Since all common and preferred membership units of X-Factor were ~~converted~~exchanged ~~into~~for shares of common stock of the Company, we have replaced all references to common and preferred membership units with a reference to common stock.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis of accounting.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Holdings and our wholly owned subsidiary, X-Factor. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates relate to the determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts, the valuation of long lived assets, the technological capabilities (and thus the valuation) of equipment, the determination of amounts owed under contingent arrangements and derivatives issued and the calculations of debt discounts and equity-based compensation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Concentration of Credit Risk (See Note 15)

At various times, certain balances at a financial institution may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's (“FDIC”) limit. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2013, the Company’s cash balances did not exceed such FDIC levels. Management regularly monitors the financial condition of the institution it works with, along with their balances in cash and endeavors to keep this potential risk at a minimum, and has not experienced any collection losses with this institution.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are uncollateralized, non interest bearing, customer obligations due under normal trade terms and are stated at the amount billed to the customer. Payments of accounts receivable are allocated to the specific invoices identified on the customer's remittance advice or, if unspecified, are applied to the earliest unpaid invoices.

The carrying amount of the Company's accounts receivable may, at times, be reduced by a valuation allowance that reflects management's best estimate of the amounts that will not be collected. Management individually reviews all accounts receivable balances periodically and based on an assessment of the current creditworthiness of the customer, estimates the portion, if any, of the balance that will not be collected.

Equipment and Leasehold Improvements

Equipment and leasehold improvements are recorded at cost. Depreciation on equipment is recorded over the estimated useful lives of the assets (five years) using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset (seven years) or the expected term of the occupancy. Included in equipment are fixed assets subject to capital leases which are depreciated over the life of the respective asset. Maintenance and repair costs are charged to expense as incurred. Upon sale or retirement, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the respective accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reported in results of operations.

Long-Lived Assets

The Company periodically evaluates the net realizable value of long-lived assets, principally equipment and leasehold improvements, relying on a number of factors including operating results, business plans, economic projections and anticipated future cash flows. Impairment in the carrying value of an asset is recognized whenever anticipated future undiscounted cash flows from an asset are estimated to be less than its carrying value. The amount of the impairment recognized is the difference between the carrying value of the asset and its fair value. There were no impairment losses recognized in the six and three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and 2012.

Loss per Share

Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common shares outstanding during the ~~year~~periods. ~~For~~Prior to the Merger in 2012, X-Factor was not obligated, as an LLC, to calculate and present loss per share. As such, it is not practicable for the Company to determine the historical net loss (and net loss per share) from January 1, 2012 through ~~March~~June 3130, 2012. However, the Company has presented unaudited pro forma loss per share for the six and three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, as if the Merger occurred on January 1, 2012 and the related shares were outstanding for the ~~entire~~six ~~period~~and three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012. Such pro forma loss per share is presented below:

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

	Six Months			Three Months
	Ended			Ended
	June 30, 2012			June 30, 2012
Pro forma net loss attributable to common stockholders:	$	(1,907,944	)	$	(716,901	)
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.05	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted		14,264,887			14,264,887

Pro forma net loss attributable to common stockholders:	$	(1,191,043	)
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.10	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted		11,773,104

9The historical loss per share for the six and three months ended June 30, 2013 is presented below:

The loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2013 is presented below:

	Six Months			Three Months
	Ended			Ended
	June 30, 2013			June 30, 2013
Historical net loss attributable to common stockholders:	$	(870,847	)	$	(265,465	)
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.01	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted		17,492,449			17,698,370

~~For~~Diluted loss per share for the ~~Three~~six ~~Months~~and ~~Ended~~three ~~March~~months 31ended June 30, 2013 is the same as basic loss per share. Potential shares of common stock associated with outstanding options and warrants and shares issuable upon conversion of our convertible notes (totaling 9,109,228 and 4,291,107 as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively) have been excluded from the calculations of diluted loss per share because the effects, as a result of our net loss, would be anti-dilutive.

Net loss attributable to common stockholders:	$	(605,382	)
Basic and diluted	$	(0.04	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted loss per share		17,284,240

Diluted loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2013 is the same as basic loss per share. Potential shares of common stock associated with outstanding options and warrants and shares issuable upon conversion of our convertible notes (totaling 8,079,416 as of March 31, 2013) have been excluded from the calculations of diluted loss per share because the effects, as a result of our net loss, would be anti-dilutive.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company has certain arrangements where it is obligated to deliver multiple products and/or services (multiple elements). In these arrangements, the Company allocates the total revenue among the elements based on the sales price of each element when sold separately using vendor-specific objective evidence. Revenue from multi-year licensing arrangements is accounted for as subscriptions, with billings recorded as unearned revenue and recognized as revenue ratably over the billing coverage period. Unearned revenue also consists of future maintenance and upgrade services that will be provided by the Company in future periods under terms of a non-refundable service contract. The revenues are principally derived from ~~two services: digital signage software and services of $82,679 and $36,615 for~~ the ~~three~~following ~~months~~two ~~ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and webcasting $56,984 and $146,314 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively~~services.

	Six Months				Three Months
	Ended				Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012

Digital media software and services	$	294,751	$	71,684	$	212,072	$	35,069
Webcasting		93,149		254,109		36,165		107,795
	$	387,900	$	325,793	$	248,237	$	142,864

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company's objectives in using debt-related derivative financial instruments are to obtain the lowest cash cost source of funds. Derivatives are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value based on the criteria specified in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 815, "Derivatives and Hedging " (“ASC Topic 815”). Under ASC Topic 815, the estimated fair value of derivative liabilities is revalued at each balance sheet date with the changes in value, if any, recorded in the ~~interest and~~ other (income) expense section of the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and in derivative financial instruments of the liability section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Financial Instruments with Anti-Dilution Features

The Company has issued 605,203 warrants that contain a weighted average anti-dilution feature that in certain circumstances could provide the warrant holders with protection against changes in the market value of the Company's common stock; accordingly, they are required under applicable accounting standards to be recorded at fair value as of the balance sheet date. On the balance sheet date, the Company evaluates the fair value of the warrants using a valuation model and the net difference, if material, between their previous periods’ fair values and their current fair values is recorded in the ~~interest and~~ other (income) expense section of the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and in derivative financial instruments of the liability section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

With the sales of common stock in the June 2013 Offering the anti-dilution feature in these warrants will require the Company to issue an additional 13,699 warrants and the Company will reduce the weighted average exercise price of the warrants from $0.757 to $0.740 per share.

Advertising and Marketing Expense

Advertising and marketing costs are expensed as incurred and included in general and administrative expenses. Advertising and marketing expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $22,857 and $14,145, respectively. Advertising and marketing expenses for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and 2012 were $319,~~157~~430 and $76,~~500~~645, respectively.

Equity-Based Compensation

Equity-based awards for common stock have been accounted for as required by FASB ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (“ASC Topic 718”). Under ASC Topic 718, equity-based awards are valued at fair value on the date of grant and that fair value is recognized over the requisite service period. The Company values its equity-based awards using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The fair value of the common stock used in these valuation models is based on the most recent sale of a share of common stock of the Company.

We periodically grant options for common stock to employees and consultants in accordance with the provisions of our stock option plans (see Note 16), with the exercise price of the options established at the price of a recent sale of a share of common stock of the Company. As a consequence of the Merger, no additional grants may be made from the 2006 and 2010 Plans and the options are exercisable into shares of the Company.

We periodically grant warrants for common stock to consultants and investors (see Note 17). The fair value of warrants for shares of common stock issued to consultants or investors are recognized over the requisite service period with a corresponding credit to Additional Paid-in Capital. Warrants issued to consultants are based on the fair value of a share of common stock related to the warrants. Warrants for common stock issued to equity investors have no effect on Additional Paid-in Capital; that is, the fair value of the warrants granted to investors and charged to Additional Paid-in Capital are entirely offset by a corresponding adjustment to Additional Paid-in Capital.

In April 2013, the Company issued 120,000 shares of common stock to an attorney in settlement of our payable to them by $90,000.

Professional Fees (see Note 18)

Professional Fees Related to the Merger have been expensed as incurred ~~through December 31, 2012~~. Professional fees related to the May 2012 Offering were capitalized at March 31, 2012 based on an assessment of the viability of the May 2012 Offering through that date. When the May 2012 Offering was consummated, the Company offset these costs against proceeds from the sale of the stock. Professional fees incurred with subsequent Offerings are offset against the proceeds from the sale of that stock.

Income Taxes

Holdings operates as a “C” corporation. Prior to the Merger, the members of X-Factor elected to be treated as a limited liability corporation, under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and State of New Jersey tax laws. Holdings uses the asset and liability method to determine our income tax expense or benefit. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Any resulting net deferred tax assets are evaluated for recoverability and an assessment of whether it is more likely than not that such amount will be realized. Based on an assessment of all available evidence, a valuation allowance has been established against net deferred tax assets of $~~940~~1,102,000 (principally composed of a $~~615~~753,000 net operating loss (“NOL”) and $~~275~~298,000 of compensation expenses) at ~~March~~June 3130, 2013. ~~For~~From the ~~period from the~~ effective date of the Merger through December 31, 2012 and the 2013 period the Company did not record a benefit for income taxes. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 the Company had Federal and New Jersey NOL carry-forwards of approximately $1,~~536~~882,000 which begin to expire in 2032 ~~and 2019, respectively~~. The utilization of our NOL for Federal income tax purposes sustained by the Company may be substantially limited annually as a result of an "ownership change" (as defined by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended). If it is determined that there is a change in ownership, or if the Company undergoes a change of ownership in the future, the utilization of the Company’s NOL carry-forwards may be materially constrained. This would result in a reduction in equal amounts to the deferred tax assets and the related valuation reserves.

FASB ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes,” clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s consolidated financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold of more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination. Measurement of the tax uncertainty occurs if the recognition threshold has been met. The standard also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition requirements. Prior to the Merger, X-Factor operated as a limited liability corporation and Federal and state taxes are passed through to the members, so too would the assessments from any tax examinations and, since the Merger, has generated an operating loss. The Company conducts business domestically and, as a result, files Federal and state income tax returns. In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by taxing authorities. There are no ongoing or pending examinations by Federal or state tax agencies. The Company has evaluated its tax positions for all currently open tax years, 2009 through 2012, and has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions for either Federal or state purposes.10

11FASB ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes,” clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s consolidated financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold of more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination. Measurement of the tax uncertainty occurs if the recognition threshold has been met. The standard also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition requirements. Prior to the Merger, X-Factor operated as a limited liability corporation and Federal and state taxes are passed through to the members, so too would the assessments from any tax examinations and, since the Merger, has generated an operating loss. The Company conducts business domestically and, as a result, files Federal and state income tax returns. In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by taxing authorities. There are no ongoing or pending examinations by Federal or state tax agencies. The Company has evaluated its tax positions for all currently open tax years, 2009 through 2011, and has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions for either Federal or state purposes.

There were no interest or penalties related to income taxes that have been accrued or recognized as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and December 31, 2012, or for the six and three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and 2012.

Fair Value Disclosures

The Company has financial instruments, principally accounts receivable, accounts payable, loans payable, notes payable and accrued expenses. We estimate that the fair value of these financial instruments at ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and December 31, 2012 does not differ materially from the aggregate carrying values of these financial instruments recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. However, because the Company presents certain common stock warrants and embedded conversion features (associated with various convertible notes—See Notes 11 and 12) and accounts for such derivative financial instruments at fair value, such derivatives are impacted by the market value of the Company's stock and therefore subject to a high degree of volatility. The Company's future results may be materially impacted by changes in the Company's closing stock price as of the date it prepares future periodic financial statements.

The Company measures fair value as required by the FASB ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC Topic 820”). ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC Topic 820 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, there exists a three-tier fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

●	Level 1 - unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
●	Level 2 - inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are directly observable for the asset or liability or indirectly observable through corroboration with observable market data.
●	Level 3 - unobservable inputs for the asset or liability only used when there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date.

This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. The Company has no financial instruments that merit classification as Level 1 or 2 assets and liabilities. The Company's liability for derivative financial instruments is considered a Level 3 liability at ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The fair value of this liability is determined using the most recent sale of a common share and the number of shares that are not considered fixed and determinable under the conversion features (see Note 13).

New Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued guidance that revises two disclosure requirements concerning fair value measurements and clarifies two others. It requires separate presentation of significant transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and disclosure of the reasons for such transfers. It will also require the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements within Level 3 on a gross basis rather than a net basis. The guidance also clarifies that disclosures should be disaggregated by class of asset or liability and that disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques should be provided for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements. These new disclosure requirements became effective for the Company's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, except for the requirement concerning gross presentation of Level 3 activity, which became effective in 2012. Since this guidance is only related to financial statement disclosures, there was no impact to the Company's consolidated financial statements as a result of the adoption of this guidance.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards” (“IFRS”) (“ASU 2011-04”), which amends ASC Topic 820. These amendments, effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (early adoption is prohibited), result in a common definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Consequently, the amendments change some fair value measurement principles and disclosure requirements. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2011-05”), which amends FASB ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income”. This guidance, effective retrospectively for the interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (early adoption is permitted), requires presentation of total comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of stockholders' and members’ deficit was eliminated. The items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income were not changed. Additionally, no changes were made to the calculation and presentation of loss per share. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements as the Company has no items that require reporting as a component of comprehensive loss.

The Company is not aware of any other pronouncements, not yet issued or adopted, that would have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 4 - Related Parties

Certain investors, officers and relatives of officers of the Company have loaned the Company funds which are evidenced by promissory notes (see Note 12) (the “Related Parties”). Related Parties and certain service providers are considered Related Parties for purposes of related party disclosures.

The President of the Company provides a guaranty on the Company's line of credit. There is no cost ascribed to the value of this service in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Related Parties who are not officers of the Company provided product development, legal and management services to the Company for $0 and $5848,~~744~~236 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These services amounted to $0 and $21,746 for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Included in accounts payable ~~and accrued expenses~~ are $~~143~~102,~~174~~745 and $103,445 as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, owed to Related Parties.

Included in ~~accounts~~accrued ~~receivable~~expenses are $74,734 and $0 as of ~~both~~June ~~March 31~~30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, ~~are $5~~respectively,~~725,~~ ~~due~~owed ~~from~~to Related Parties.

The Company leases office and technical operations space and purchases various communication services from a Related Party totaling $815,~~367~~867 and $1021,~~445~~992 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These services amounted to $7,500 and $11,547 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Note 5 – Holdings’ Capital Stock (see Notes 16, 17 and 1720)

We are authorized by our certificate of incorporation to issue an aggregate of 120,000,000 shares of capital stock, of which 100,000,000 are shares of common stock, par value $.0001 per share and 20,000,000 are shares of preferred stock, par value $.0001 per share. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013, there are 1718,~~414~~155,~~934~~471 shares of common stock outstanding and no shares of preferred stock outstanding. All outstanding shares of common stock are of the same class and have equal rights and attributes. The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. All stockholders are entitled to share equally in dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the board of directors out of funds legally available, subject to the rights of any preferred stock we issue. In the event of liquidation, the holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of all liabilities, subject to the rights of any preferred stock we issue. The stockholders do not have cumulative or pre-emptive rights.

Note 6 - Equipment and Leasehold Improvements

Equipment and leasehold improvements consist of the following as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	March 31,			December 31,
	June 30,			December 31,
	2013			2012
Equipment and software	$	515,331		$	515,331
Leasehold improvements		3,210			3,210
Equipment and leasehold improvements, at cost		518,541			518,541
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(~~498~~502,~~345~~846	)		(493,836	)
	$	2015,~~196~~695		$	24,705

13Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $9,010 and $32,109 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $4,501 and $16,044 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

~~Depreciation~~Included in equipment and ~~amortization~~software ~~expense~~as ~~totaled~~of $4both June 30,~~509~~ 2013 and December 31, 2012 is $16219,~~065~~811 ~~for~~of ~~the~~assets ~~three~~under ~~months~~capital ~~ended~~leases, ~~March~~which 31had accumulated depreciation and amortization of $218,506 and $215,172 as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Included in equipment and software as of both March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is $219,811 of assets under capital leases, which had accumulated depreciation and amortization of $216,851 and $215,172 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Note 7 – Other Current Assets

Other current assets consist of the following as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	March 31,		December 31,
	June 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
Note receivable	$	1112,~~840~~121	$	11,563
Prepaid insurance		211,~~957~~329		12,294
Prepaid leases		3,~~648~~360		3,936
	$	1826,~~445~~810	$	27,793

In August 2011, the Company entered into a $10,000 convertible note receivable with a strategic partner which originally matured in August 2012 and bears interest at prime plus 8.00% per annum (11.25% at ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and December 31, 2012). Interest is accrued and paid on the maturity date and the note is convertible into common stock of the borrower at the option of the Company. The Company has extended the maturity date of the note to December 31, 2013 and accordingly has classified this note as a current asset. This strategic partner has developed a kiosk software application that is synergistic with the Company’s digital media platform.

Note 8 – Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses consist of the following as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	March 31,		December 31,
	June 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
Compensation and payroll taxes	$	152,077	$	112,506
Compensation and payroll taxes (A)	$	220,423	$	112,506
Operating expenses payable		1015,000		2,630
Travel and related expenses		246,~~652~~388		21,771
Accrued interest payable		~~305~~6,814		306
	$	~~187~~248,~~034~~625	$	137,213

(A)	The Company has temporarily delayed the payment of some of the compensation paid to certain employees and officers. These funds will bear interest at 8.5% interest and will be paid when sufficient cash is available.

Note 9 - Unearned Revenues

Unearned, non-refundable revenues as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 are expected to be earned during the twelve months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2014.

Note 10 - Line of Credit

The Company has a revolving line of credit in the amount of $100,000 with JPMorgan Chase Bank of which $97,~~245~~836 and $97,846 was outstanding as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Interest accrues at a defined prime rate plus 0.5% (3.75% at ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and December 31, 2012). This line of credit has a secured interest in all business assets, inventory, equipment, accounts receivable, general intangibles, chattel paper, documents, instruments, and letter of credit rights. In addition, the line of credit is personally guaranteed by the President of the Company. There is no maturity date for the line of credit and there are no debt covenants.

Note 11 – Note Payable

In July 2009, X-Factor entered into a $500,000 note payable with the New Jersey Economic Development Authority (the "NJEDA") which initially was scheduled to mature in August 2014 and currently bears interest at 6.00% per annum. This note was modified in January 2011, September 2011 and February 2012, to provide for: (1) interest only payments through March 1, 2012; (2) repayment of up to $250,000 of promissory notes (the Company repaid $167,774); (3) a principal payment of $56,818 and an interest payment on April 1, 2012; and (4) beginning on May 1, 2012, twenty-eight monthly payments of interest and principal through August 2014.

Upon the closing of the Merger, the warrants issued in July 2009 in connection with the NJEDA note were converted into warrants exercisable for 160,414 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.78 per share. The $45,945 estimated fair value of the warrants in 2009 was calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model, and, together with $5,040 of closing costs, is classified as a discount of the note and is expensed, using the effective interest method, over the term of the debt.

In connection with the Merger, and as consideration for the amendment to the NJEDA note described above, the Company agreed to issue to NJEDA an additional warrant to acquire 148,942 shares of common stock exercisable as of May 15, 2012, at an exercise price of $0.78 per share with an expiration date of May 15, 2022. The $31,688 estimated fair value of the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model, and was charged to Additional Paid-in Capital with a related credit to Additional Paid-in Capital for the same amount.

With the closing of the May 2012 Offering, the Company paid NJEDA an additional principal payment of $17,808. The amended note is subordinated to the aforementioned line of credit and requires the maintenance of various non-financial covenants, such as providing consolidated financial statements and budgets on a timely basis, maintaining records and accounts and making punctual payments. The holder of the note has a secondary interest in all assets of the Company behind the holder of the Company's line of credit. The note includes certain restrictions that: (1) prevent the Company from initiating any corporate changes through merger or consolidation, (2) prevent the Company from creating or incurring new debt and (3) prevent the Company from paying dividends or distributions or redeeming outstanding stock, without the written consent of the NJEDA. The note is convertible, at the NJEDA's option, to an equity interest in the Company, the conversion price of which will be based on defined terms of a future equity offering.

In October 2012, the Company and NJEDA amended the note. The amended note extends the maturity date to August 2016. Interest will continue to accrue at 6% per annum and debt service will be an agreed upon percentage of the prior year’s revenue which will be paid on July 1st of the following year. The unpaid balance of the loan will be due on August 1, 2016. Depending on the amount of revenue, the note could be paid in full prior to August 1, 2016. As compensation for this modification the Company issued NJEDA warrants to acquire 27,521 shares of its common stock at $0.75 per share (the then determined fair value of the Company’s common stock) with an expiration date of 10 years after the grant date. Using the Black-Scholes option valuation model, with current pricing information, these warrants have a $6,250 estimated fair value.

The percentages of revenue to be used in the calculation of the debt service payment are as follows:

Debt Service Payment Based on Revenue for the year ending	% of Revenue	Date Debt Service Paid
Debt Service Payment Based on Revenue for the year ended or ending	% of Revenue	Date Debt Service Paid
December 31, 2012	4%	July 1, 2013
December 31, 2013	5%	July 1, 2014
December 31, 2014	6%	July 1, 2015
December 31, 2015	7%	July 1, 2016
	Balloon	August 1, 2016

The amendment of the NJEDA note in October 2012, which extended the maturity date to August 1, 2016, eliminated monthly principal repayments and requires annual principal payments based on a percentage of the prior year’s revenues, significantly changed the cash flows related to the NJEDA note. To determine the accounting treatment of this modification the Company followed the guidance espoused in FASB ASC Topic 470-50, “Debt – Modifications and Extinguishments” (“ASC 470-50”). ASC 470-50 requires the Company to determine the present value of the cash flows of the original and revised NJEDA note. The difference in the present value of the cash flows exceeded 10% and the modification of the NJEDA note was accounted for as an “extinguishment of debt” with the original NJEDA note effectively defeased and the modified NJEDA note treated as a new note. With the defeasement of the original NJEDA note, the Company expensed any unamortized discount costs related to those notes. The Company determined that the difference in the present value of the cash flows exceeded the 10% threshold and that the modification of the NJEDA note should be accounted for as an “extinguishment of debt”. The Company recorded a charge for this modification as a Loss on Modification or Extinguishment of Debt of $8,124 in October 2012.

15 Notes payable consisted of the following as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

Notes payable consisted of the following as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	June 30,			December 31,
	2013			2012

Notes payable	$	337,306		$	337,306
Discount		(6,976	)		(8,104	)
Note payable, net of discount		330,330			329,202
Less: current portion of notes payable, net of discount of $2,256(A)		(24,800	)		(24,800	)
Notes payable, net of current portion	$	305,530		$	304,402

	March 31,			December 31,
	2013			2012
Notes payable	$	337,306		$	337,306
Discount		(7,540	)		(8,104	)
Note payable, net of discount		329,766			329,202
Less: current portion of notes payable, net of discount of $2,256(A)		(24,800	)		(24,800	)
Notes payable, net of current portion	$	304,966		$	304,402

(A) ~~With~~The ~~the amendment of the note in October 2012 the~~ Company ~~currently~~made ~~estimates~~ a payment of $27,056 (4% of 2012’s revenue) on July 1, 2013.

Note 12 - Notes Payable – Related Parties

The following notes payable, to individuals that the Company considers to be Related Parties (as described in Note 4), are outstanding;

(A) In March 2012, the Company issued a promissory note to the President of the Company in an aggregate principal amount of $30,460 for an aggregate purchase price of $25,000. This promissory note, along with accrued interest of $183 was repaid in August 2012. This note was unsecured and beginning on August 1, 2012, bore interest at 10% per annum payable on the maturity date. The $5,460 difference between the amount lent to the Company and the face amount of the promissory note is classified as a discount of the note and was expensed; using the effective interest method, over the four month period ending on August 1, 2012, the date that interest began to accrue on the promissory note. The effective interest rate of this note was 16.4% in 2012. (B) In March 2012, the Company issued a promissory note to an acquaintance of the President in an aggregate principal amount of $60,920 for an aggregate purchase price of $50,000. In August 2012, $30,920 of this promissory note along with accrued interest of $367 was repaid and we issued 40,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.75 per share, in exchange for the conversion of the remaining $30,000 of this promissory note. This note was unsecured and beginning on August 1, 2012, bore interest at 10% per annum payable on the maturity date. The $10,920 difference between the amount loaned to the Company and the face amount of the promissory note was classified as a discount of the note and was expensed; using the effective interest method, over the four month period ending on August 1, 2012, the date that interest began to accrue on the promissory note. The effective interest rate of this note was 16.4% in 2012. (C) The Company has two notes payable outstanding to the President of the Company and another officer of the Company. The maturity date of these notes is the later of August 1, 2014 or such date when all debt owed by the Company to the NJEDA has been paid by the Company. These notes are unsecured and bear interest at 8.50% per annum. Interest is required to be paid monthly, however, when interest payments have not been paid, the Company and these Related Parties have settled such amounts by issuing additional promissory notes equivalent to the related interest expense. Unpaid interest of $3,742 and $3,777 was converted to additional promissory notes in the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In February 2012 these notes were amended to make them convertible into equity at a conversion rate of $0.595 per share of common stock of the Company. The Company recorded a charge of $52,329 associated with the amendment in February 2012. The unpaid principal and interest of these notes amounted to $182,263 and $178,521 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

(B)	In March 2012, the Company issued a promissory note to an acquaintance of the President in an aggregate principal amount of $60,920 for an aggregate purchase price of $50,000. In August 2012, $30,920 of this promissory note along with accrued interest of $367 was repaid and we issued 40,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.75 per share, in exchange for the conversion of the remaining $30,000 of this promissory note. This note was unsecured and beginning on August 1, 2012, bore interest at 10% per annum payable on the maturity date. The $10,920 difference between the amount loaned to the Company and the face amount of the promissory note was classified as a discount of the note and was expensed; using the effective interest method, over a four month period, the date that interest began to accrue on the promissory note. The effective interest rate of this note was 16.4% in 2012.
(C)	The Company has two notes payable outstanding to the President of the Company and another officer of the Company. The maturity date of these notes is the later of August 1, 2014 or such date when all debt owed by the Company to the NJEDA has been paid by the Company. These notes are unsecured and bear interest at 8.50% per annum. Interest is required to be paid monthly, however, when interest payments have not been paid, the Company and these Related Parties have settled such amounts by issuing additional promissory notes equivalent to the related interest expense. Unpaid interest of $7,605 and $7,644 was converted to additional promissory notes in the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Unpaid interest of $3,863 and $3,866 was converted to additional promissory notes in the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In February 2012 these notes were amended to make them convertible into equity at a conversion rate of $0.595 per share of common stock of the Company. The Company recorded a charge of $52,329 associated with the amendment in February 2012. The unpaid principal and interest of these notes amounted to $186,126 and $178,521 as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
(D)	The Company has two notes payable outstanding to current stockholders of the Company. When X-Factor entered into the NJEDA agreements, the Company ceased making principal payments on these notes to be in compliance with the NJEDA note. These notes were amended in February 2012 and the maturity date of these notes is the later of August 1, 2014 or such date when all debt owed by X-Factor to the NJEDA has been paid. These notes are unsecured and bear interest at a rate of 8.5% per annum and were initially convertible into equity at a conversion rate of $0.649 per share of common stock. In February 2012, these notes were amended to make them convertible into equity at a conversion rate of $0.595 per share of common stock of the Company. The Company recorded a charge of $60,668 associated with the amendment in February 2012. In addition, beginning in March 2012, interest was paid quarterly in arrears in the form of additional convertible promissory notes. In August 2012 these stockholders sold $123,427 of these promissory notes to investors and in September 2012 we issued 207,440 shares of our common stock to the investors at a price of $0.595 per share, in exchange for the conversion of those promissory notes along with $856 of accrued interest. Unpaid interest of $3,442 and $5,512 was converted to additional promissory notes in the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Unpaid interest of $1,748 and $4,118 was converted to additional promissory notes in the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The unpaid principal and interest of these notes amounted to $84,212 and $80,770 as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The effective interest rate of these notes was 11.7% in 2012. Detachable warrants to acquire 48,216 shares common stock of the Company at $0.819 with an expiration date of January 2018 were issued in connection with the above mentioned notes. The $16,346 estimated fair value of the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The $16,346 fair value is classified as a discount of the notes and was expensed, using the effective interest method, over the original terms of the debt. When the notes were amended in February 2012 the unamortized discount of $841 was expensed to Loss on Modification or Extinguishment of Debt. The unamortized discount related to these warrants amounted to $0 and $1,188 as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

(D)

The Company has two notes payable outstanding to current stockholders of the Company. When X-Factor entered into the NJEDA agreements, the Company ceased making principal payments on these notes to be in compliance with the NJEDA note. These notes were amended in February 2012 and the maturity date of these notes is the later of August 1, 2014 or such date when all debt owed by X-Factor to the NJEDA has been paid. These notes are unsecured and bear interest at a rate of 8.5% per annum and were initially convertible into equity at a conversion rate of $0.649 per share of common stock. In February 2012, these notes were amended to make them convertible into equity at a conversion rate of $0.595 per share of common stock of the Company. The Company recorded a charge of $60,668 associated with the amendment in February 2012. In addition, beginning in March 2012, interest was paid quarterly in arrears in the form of additional convertible promissory notes. In August 2012 these stockholders sold $123,427 of these promissory notes to investors and in September 2012 we issued 207,440 shares of our common stock to the investors at a price of $0.595 per share, in exchange for the conversion of those promissory notes along with $856 of accrued interest. Unpaid interest of $1,694 and $1,394 was converted to additional promissory notes in the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The unpaid principal and interest of these notes amounted to $82,464 and $80,770 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The effective interest rate of these notes was 11.7% in 2012. Detachable warrants to acquire 48,216 shares common stock of the Company at $0.819 with an expiration date of January 2018 were issued in connection with the above mentioned notes. The $16,346 estimated fair value of the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The $16,346 fair value is classified as a discount of the notes and was expensed, using the effective interest method, over the original terms of the debt. When the notes were amended in February 2012 the unamortized discount of $841 was expensed to Loss on Modification or Extinguishment of Debt. The unamortized discount related to these warrants amounted to $0 and $1,188 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

(E)

In 2011, the Company issued promissory notes, each in the principal amount of $25,000, to two stockholders of the Company. These notes initially matured in three months and bore interest at 10% on any overdue principal. One note was repaid in 2011 while the maturity date of the other note was amended to the later of August 1, 2014 or such date when all debt owed to the NJEDA has been paid by the Company. In February 2012, this note was amended to make it convertible into equity at a conversion rate of $0.595 per share of common stock of the Company, with interest to be paid quarterly in arrears in the form of additional convertible promissory notes. Unpaid interest of $490 and $652 was converted to additional promissory notes in the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company recorded a charge of $8,299 associated with the amendment in February 2012. In June 2012, $4,700 due from this investor, which was included in accounts receivable, was offset against this note. The unpaid principal and interest of this note amounted to $23,879 and $23,389 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Detachable warrants to acquire 29,606 shares of common stock of the Company at $0.002 with an expiration date of May 2021 were issued in connection with the above mentioned notes. The $24,200 estimated fair value of the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The $24,200 fair value was classified as a discount of the notes and was expensed, using the effective interest method, over the original three month terms of the debt. The effective interest rate of these notes and the related warrants was 245%.

(E)

In 2011, the Company issued promissory notes, each in the principal amount of $25,000, to two stockholders of the Company. These notes initially matured in three months and bore interest at 10% on any overdue principal. One note was repaid in 2011 while the maturity date of the other note was amended to the later of August 1, 2014 or such date when all debt owed to the NJEDA has been paid by the Company. In February 2012, this note was amended to make it convertible into equity at a conversion rate of $0.595 per share of common stock of the Company, with interest to be paid quarterly in arrears in the form of additional convertible promissory notes. Unpaid interest of $962 and 1,321 was converted to additional promissory notes in the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Unpaid interest of $472 and $669 was converted to additional promissory notes in the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company recorded a charge of $8,299 associated with the amendment in February 2012. In June 2013 and 2012, respectively, $2,333 and $4,700 due from this investor, which was included in accounts receivable, was offset against this note. The unpaid principal and interest of this note amounted to $22,128 and $23,389 as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Detachable warrants to acquire 29,606 shares of common stock of the Company at $0.002 with an expiration date of May 2021 were issued in connection with the above mentioned notes. The $24,200 estimated fair value of the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The $24,200 fair value was classified as a discount of the notes and was expensed, using the effective interest method, over the original three month terms of the debt. The effective interest rate of these notes and the related warrants was 245%.

(F) In 2011, the Company raised $800,000 by issuing convertible notes to certain stockholders of the Company (the “Bridge Notes”). The Bridge Notes bear interest at 6.00% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears, and are convertible at the option of the Company into additional Bridge Notes. Unpaid interest of $~~19,932~~0 and $419,~~906~~068 was converted to additional promissory notes in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Unpaid interest of $0 and $126,~~175was~~892 was converted to additional promissory notes in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Bridge Notes originally matured on the first anniversary of their issuance ($600,000 of the principal amount) or on August 1, 2014 ($200,000 of the principal amount), or could be prepaid at the Company’s option, and are subordinated to the Company’s NJEDA debt. These notes were amended in February 2012 and the related maturity date of these notes was amended to be the later of: (a) August 1, 2014 or (b) such date when all debt owed to the NJEDA has been paid by the Company. The Bridge Notes are convertible to an equity interest in the Company using a conversion price which will be based on defined terms of a future equity offering. In connection with the issuance of the Bridge Notes, for each $100,000 of notes issued, holders of Bridge Notes received 163,182 shares of common stock of the Company (the “Issued Shares”). As a result of the issuance of the Issued Shares we considered the Bridge Note investors to be Related Parties; $600,000 of the Bridge Notes are convertible into shares of common stock of the Company at the option of the holders, while $200,000 of the Bridge Notes must be converted to equity of the Company in the event of a future equity offerings. We also paid our investment bankers a fee of 10% of the gross proceeds of the financing. The $80,000 fee was classified as prepaid financing costs and was expensed, using the effective interest method, over the terms of the Bridge Notes and expensed as a component of Loss on Modification or Extinguishment of Debt. Upon the closing of the Merger, $728,049 of Bridge Notes ($700,000 of principal and $28,049 of unpaid interest) was converted into 970,733 shares of common stock of the Company. In August 2012, $105,845 owed for the remaining Bridge Notes ($100,000 of principal and $5,845 of unpaid interest) was repaid. We accounted for the issuance of the Bridge Notes and the Issued Shares by allocating the $800,000 of proceeds received to each of the instruments based on their relative fair value. The fair value of the Issued Shares was based on recent sales of shares of common stock. Since the redemption amount of the Bridge Notes is convertible into shares of common stock, we recorded the effects of a beneficial conversion feature. The value of the beneficial conversion feature was limited to the proceeds allocated to the Bridge Notes. The $457,600 value of the Issued Shares and the $342,400 value of the beneficial conversion feature was classified as a discount of the Bridge Notes and expensed, using the effective interest method, over the terms of the Bridge Notes. The effective interest rate of the Bridge Notes and the beneficial conversion features (adjusted for the amended terms of the maturity date of the Bridge Notes) was approximately 41%. To determine the accounting treatment of the conversion of the $728,049 of Bridge Notes, the Company followed the guidance espoused in FASB ASC Topic 470-20, “Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options” (“ASC 470-20”). ASC 470-20 requires that the conversion of the Bridge Notes should be accounted for as an “extinguishment of debt”. The Company recorded a charge for this extinguishment of debt as a Loss on Modification or Extinguishment of Debt of $168,430 in May 2012.

~~We accounted for the issuance of the Bridge Notes and the Issued Shares by allocating the $800,000 of proceeds received to each of the instruments based on their relative fair value.~~ The fair value of the Issued Shares was based on recent sales of shares of common stock. Since the redemption amount of the Bridge Notes is convertible into shares of common stock, we recorded the effects of a beneficial conversion feature. The value of the beneficial conversion feature was limited to the proceeds allocated to the Bridge Notes. The $457,600 value of the Issued Shares and the $342,400 value of the beneficial conversion feature are classified as a discount of the Bridge Notes and was expensed, using the effective interest method, over the terms of the Bridge Notes. The effective interest rate of the Bridge Notes and the beneficial conversion features (adjusted for the amended terms of the maturity date of the Bridge Notes) was approximately 41%. To determine the accounting treatment of the conversion of the $728,049 of Bridge Notes, the Company followed the guidance espoused in FASB ASC Topic 470-20, “ Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options” (“ASC 470-20”). ASC 470-20 requires that the conversion of the Bridge Notes should be accounted for as an “extinguishment of debt”. The Company recorded a charge for this extinguishment of debt as a Loss on Modification or Extinguishment of Debt of $168,430 in May 2012. The amendment of the Bridge Notes in February 2012, which extended the maturity date for $600,000 of the Bridge Notes from the first anniversary of their issuance to August 1, 2014, significantly changed the cash flows related to the original and modified Bridge Notes. To determine the accounting treatment of this modification the Company followed the guidance espoused in ASC 470-50. ASC 470-50 requires the Company to determine the present value of the cash flows of the original and revised Bridge Notes. The difference in the present value of the cash flows exceeded 10% and the modification of the Bridge Notes was accounted for as an “extinguishment of debt” with the original Bridge Notes effectively defeased and the modified Bridge Notes treated as a new note. With the defeasement of the original Bridge Notes, the Company expensed any discounts or prepaid financing costs related to those notes. The Company determined that the difference in the present value of the cash flows exceeded the 10% threshold and that the modification of the Bridge Notes should be accounted for as an “extinguishment of debt”. The Company recorded a charge for this modification as a Loss on Modification or Extinguishment of Debt of $298,147 in February 2012.

Note 13 – Derivative Financial Instruments

The holders of Notes Payable – Related Parties, with $~~288~~292,~~606~~466 and $282,680 of principal as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, have the option to convert the notes to equity at a conversion rate of $0.595. When the notes were issued, the fair value of a share of common stock of the Company was $0.819. The related fair value of the embedded beneficial conversion feature is treated as a derivative liability. The derivative liability is periodically measured as the difference between the conversion price and the then current fair value of a share of common stock multiplied by the number of shares of common stock that will be issued at the conversion price. Any change in the fair value of a share of common stock or any increase in the notes will cause a change in the derivative liability, which is then recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Consolidated Balance ~~Sheets~~Sheet. The amendment of certain Notes Payable – Related Parties in February 2012 to make them convertible into equity at a conversion rate of $0.624 per share of common stock of the Company or to reduce their conversion rate from $0.649 to $0.624, required the recording of the $121,296 fair value of this embedded beneficial conversion feature. The $39,130 derivative liability was reclassified to Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficit when the related notes were amended in February 2012. The conversion of certain Notes Payable – Related Parties in August 2012 caused the $123,823 derivative liability related to those notes to be reclassified to the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficit. For the purposes of calculating the derivative liability we used the stock price of $0.56 and $0.75 based on recent private sales of the Company’s common stock as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

18In 2012, the Company issued 605,203 warrants to the Placement Agent (428,740 with a three year term) and NJEDA (176,463 with a ten year term) that contain a weighted average anti-dilution feature that in certain circumstances could provide the holders with protection against changes in the market value of the Company's common stock; accordingly, they are required under applicable accounting standards to be recorded at fair value as of the balance sheet date. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company evaluated the fair value of the warrants using a valuation model and the net difference was not significant between their previous periods’ carrying values and their current fair values on June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

InPursuant ~~2012, the Company issued 605,203 warrants~~ to the ~~Placement~~requirements ~~Agent~~of ~~(428,740 with~~ASC aTopic ~~three year term) and NJEDA (176~~820,~~463~~ ~~with~~the aCompany ~~ten~~has ~~year~~provided ~~term)~~fair ~~that~~value ~~contain~~disclosure ainformation ~~weighted~~for ~~average~~relevant ~~anti-dilution~~assets ~~feature~~and ~~that~~liabilities in ~~certain circumstances could provide~~ the ~~holders~~accompanying ~~with~~financial ~~protection~~statements. The ~~against~~following ~~changes~~summarizes inliabilities ~~the~~which ~~market~~have ~~value~~been ofaccounted ~~the~~for ~~Company's common stock; accordingly, they are required under applicable accounting standards to be recorded~~ at fair value ason ofa ~~the~~recurring ~~balance~~basis ~~sheet~~as ~~date.~~of AtJune ~~March 31~~30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, ~~the~~along ~~Company~~with ~~evaluated~~ the ~~fair~~bases ~~value~~for of the ~~warrants~~determination ~~using~~of ~~a valuation model and the net difference was not significant between their previous periods’ carrying values and their current~~ fair ~~values on March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.~~value:

Pursuant to the requirements of ASC Topic 820, the Company has provided fair value disclosure information for relevant assets and liabilities in the accompanying financial statements. The following summarizes liabilities which have been accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, along with the bases for the determination of fair value:

	Quoted Prices		Observable		Unobservable
	In Active		Measurement		Measurement
	Markets		Criteria		Criteria			Total
June 30, 2013:
Derivative instruments (A )		—		—	$	(27,006	)	$	(27,006	)

December 31, 2012:
Derivative instruments (A )		—		—	$	(165,640	)	$	(165,640	)

	Quoted Prices		Observable		Unobservable
	In Active		Measurement		Measurement
	Markets		Criteria		Criteria			Total
March 31, 2013:
Derivative instruments (A )		—		—	$	(167,183	)	$	(167,183	)
December 31, 2012:
Derivative instruments (A )		—		—	$	(165,640	)	$	(165,640	)

Note (A) – Embedded beneficial conversion and anti-dilution features.

The changes in Level 3 instruments, which are comprised of the embedded conversion feature included in the notes, are measured on a recurring basis for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 and are presented below:18

	March 31,		March 31,
	2013		2012
Derivative financial instruments, beginning of period	$	165,640	$	39,130
Cancellation of derivative – reclassified to stockholders’ deficit		—		(39,130	)
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments (recognized in the results of operations)		1,543		121,296
Derivative financial instruments, at end of period	$	167,183	$	121,296

The changes in Level 3 instruments, which are comprised of the embedded conversion feature included in the notes, are measured on a recurring basis for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and are presented below:

	June 30,			June 30,
	2013			2012
Derivative financial instruments, beginning of period	$	165,640		$	39,130
Cancellation of derivative – reclassified to stockholders’ deficit		—			(39,130	)
Recognition of beneficial conversion feature of notes after modification of debt (recognized in results of operations)		—			121,296
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments (recognized in the results of operations)		(138,634	)		(41,079	)
Derivative financial instruments, at end of period	$	27,006		$	80,217

Note 14 – Interest Expense

The components of interest expense for the six and three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and 2012 are presented below:

	2013			2012
	Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended
Notes payable – Related Parties	$	5,925		$	20,831
	June 30,						June 30,
Notes payable - Related Parties – discount amortization		—			106,342
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Note payable – NJEDA		5,060			6,894
Notes payable – Related Parties	$	12,009		$	36,377		$	6,084		$	15,546
Note payable - NJEDA – discount amortization		564			2,729
Notes payable - Related Parties – discount amortization		—			126,945			—			20,602
Amortization of prepaid financing costs		—			11,011
Note payable – NJEDA		10,175			12,783			5,115			5,889
Obligations under capital leases		424			923
Unpaid compensation		4,309			—			4,309			—
Line of credit		316			927
Accounts payable		3,386			11,719			1,966			7,940
Other interest expense		1,143			3,498
Note payable - NJEDA – discount amortization		1,128			5,194			564			2,466
	$	13,432		$	153,155
Amortization of prepaid financing costs		—			11,869			—			858
Obligations under capital leases		1,133			1,687			709			764
Line of credit		1,442			1,855			1,126			928
Interest income – notes receivable		(558	)		(561	)		(281	)		(280	)
	$	33,024		$	207,868		$	19,592		$	54,713

Note 15 - Concentrations

Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of accounts receivable and revenues. The majority of the Company’s revenues and accounts receivable are generated by 4 or 5 customers and, at times, the concentrations of such transactions and balances are in excess of 10% of consolidated totals.

Note 16 - Stock Option Plans

Prior to the Merger, X-Factor approved the 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "2006 Plan") and the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "2010 Plan"). These plans provided for the granting of options to purchase a share of common stock in X-Factor to individuals selected by X-Factor's managing member. Awards under the these plans consist of a specified number of options awarded subject to the satisfaction of various vesting conditions specified by X-Factor at the time of the award. Awards have been granted to employees, consultants and investors. With the Merger no additional grants may be made from these plans and the options are exercisable into shares of common stock of the Company.

In August 2012 the Company’s Board of Directors approved a 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "2012 Plan"). This plan reserved 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to be used for the purpose of making awards under the 2012 Plan. Options granted under the 2012 Plan to employees are non-statutory stock options unless the plan is approved by the stockholders of the Company by August 2013, in which case the grants will be incentive stock options. Options granted under the 2012 Plan to consultants are non-statutory stock options. There are 1,~~279~~070,~~172~~672 options available for granting under the 2012 Plan as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013.

The exercise price of a grant was established by the Company at its discretion, but could not be less than the fair value, as determined through historical transactions or an annual valuation, of a share of common stock as of the date of grant. Common stock options, subject to certain restrictions, may be exercisable for a defined period of time from the date of the grant after full vesting occurs. Upon termination of employment any unvested options are immediately cancelled, while vested options are exercisable for a defined period. Upon cessation of services performed by consultants any unvested options are immediately cancelled, while vested options are exercisable until the expiration of the option term. The vesting period for awards was established by the Company at its discretion on the date of grant. The various grants can vest immediately upon issuance or up to three years after the grant.

~~The~~A ~~fair~~summary ~~value~~ of ~~each~~options ~~option~~ granted, isexercised, ~~estimated~~forfeited onand ~~the~~outstanding ~~date~~for ~~of grant using~~ the ~~Black-Scholes~~six ~~option~~month ~~valuation~~period ~~model~~ended ~~with~~June ~~the~~30, ~~following~~2013, ~~weighted~~which ~~average~~are ~~activity~~convertible ~~and~~into ~~assumptions~~common ~~during~~shares ~~the~~of ~~three~~common ~~months~~stock ~~ended~~of ~~March~~the 31Company, ~~2013~~is ~~(there~~presented ~~were no option granted in 2012)~~below:

Number of options granted		85,000
	Outstanding					Exercisable
Exercise price	$	0.750
				Weighted			Weighted
Risk-free interest rate		1.3	%
	Number			Average		Number	Average
Expected lives in years		7.0
	of			Exercise		of	Exercise
Expected volatility		26.3	%
	Options			Price		Options	Price
Expected dividend yields		None
Outstanding, January 1, 2013		5,600,590		$	0.689	4,414,828	$	0.671
Fair value of common stock	$	0.75
Granted		173,500			0.740
Fair value per option	$	0.215
Forfeited or expired		—			—
Fair value of options granted	$	18,275
June 30, 2013		5,774,090		$	0.691	5,125,756	$	0.683

~~Prior~~Additional toinformation ~~the~~as ~~Merger, the Company’s common stock was not traded and since the Merger the Company’s common stock has had a limited number~~ of ~~trades. As~~June ~~a result~~30, the Company calculated expected volatility for an equity-based grant based on the Standard & Poor’s North American Technology Software Index during the period immediately preceding the grant that is equal in length to the expected term of the grant. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury yields for securities in effect at the time of grants2013, with ~~terms~~respect ~~approximating~~to ~~the~~all ~~expected~~outstanding ~~period of the grants. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option valuation model are inherently highly subjective, and can materially affect the resulting valuation.~~options:

		Outstanding				Exercisable
			Weighted
			Average	Weighted				Weighted
		Number	Remaining	Average		Number		Average
		of	Contractual	Exercise		of		Exercise
Range of Price		Options	Life (In Years)	Price		Options		Price

$	0.364	1,134,499	3.5	$	0.364		1,134,499	$	0.364
	0.659 – 0.780	3,427,157	9.0		0.744		2,828,823		0.743
	0.825 – 0.865	1,212,434	8.0		0.846		1,162,434		0.847
	0.364 – 0.865	5,774,090	7.7		0.691		5,125,756	$	0.683

A summary of nonvested options as of and changes during the six month period ended June 30, 2013, is presented below:

				Weighted
	Number			Average
	of			Exercise
	Options			Price

Outstanding, January 1, 2013		1,185,762			$	0.759
Granted		173,500				0.740
Vested		(710,928	)			0.758
Forfeited or expired		—				—
December 31, 2012		648,334				0.756

The ~~non-cash~~fair ~~compensation~~value ~~expense~~of ~~related~~each tooption ~~all~~granted ~~options~~is ~~was~~estimated ~~allocated~~on asthe ~~follows~~date ~~for~~of grant using the ~~three~~Black-Scholes ~~months~~option ~~ended~~valuation ~~March~~model ~~31,~~with ~~2013~~the ~~(there~~following ~~was~~weighted noaverage ~~option~~activity ~~expense~~and ~~for~~assumptions during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 (there were no options granted in the 2012 periods):

	2013
	Six Months
Salaries and fringe benefits	$	32,244
	Ended
General and administrative		119,013
	June 30, 2013
	$	151,257
Number of options granted		173,500
Exercise price	$	0.74
Risk-free interest rate		1.2	%
Expected lives in years		7.0
Expected volatility		26.3	%
Expected dividend yields	None
Fair value of common stock	$	0.74
Fair value per option	$	0.218
Fair value of options granted	$	37,823

~~There~~Prior isto ~~$145~~the Merger,~~188~~ ofthe ~~additional~~Company’s ~~compensation~~common ~~expense~~stock ~~related~~was tonot ~~all~~traded ~~options,~~and ~~assuming~~since ~~that~~the Merger the ~~options~~Company’s ~~vest~~common stock has had a limited number of trades. As a result, the Company calculated expected volatility for an equity-based grant based on the Standard & Poor’s North American Technology Software Index during the period immediately preceding the grant that is equal in length to bethe ~~recognized~~expected asterm of ~~March~~the 31grant. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury yields for securities in effect at the time of grants, ~~2013~~with ~~over~~terms approximating the ~~next~~expected ~~two~~period ~~years~~of the grants. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option valuation model are inherently highly subjective, and can materially affect the resulting valuation.

The non-cash compensation expense related to all options was allocated as follows for the six and three months ended June 30, 2013 (there was no option expense for the six and three months ended June 30, 2012:

	Six Months		Three Months
	Ended		Ended
	June 30, 2013		June 30, 2013
Salaries and fringe benefits	$	50,799	$	18,555
General and administrative		158,436		39,423
	$	209,235	$	57,978

There is $106,725 of additional compensation expense related to all options, assuming that the options vest, to be recognized as of June 30, 2013 over the next two years.

Note 17 - Warrants

~~The~~A ~~fair~~summary ~~value~~ of ~~each~~warrants ~~warrant~~ granted, isexercised, ~~estimated~~forfeited onand ~~the~~outstanding ~~date~~as of, ~~grant~~and ~~using~~for the ~~Black-Scholes~~six ~~valuation~~month ~~model~~period ~~with~~ended ~~the~~June ~~following~~30, ~~weighted~~2013, ~~average~~which ~~activity~~are ~~and~~convertible ~~assumptions~~into ~~during~~common ~~the~~shares ~~three~~of ~~months~~common ~~ended~~stock ~~March~~of 31the Company, ~~2013~~is ~~and~~presented ~~2012~~below (all warrants are exercisable upon date of grant):

	2013			2012
				Weighted
Number of warrants granted		120,000			20,815
				Average
Exercise price	$	0.900		$	0.002
				Exercise
Risk-free interest rate		0.8	%		1.4	%
	Warrants			Price
Expected lives in years		5.0			7.0
Outstanding, January 1, 2013		1,788,775		$	0.461
Expected volatility		29.1	%		25.8	%
Granted		1,054,824			1.471
Expected dividend yields	None			None
Forfeited or expired		—			—
Fair value of common stock	$	0.730		$	0.780
Outstanding, June 30, 2013		2,843,599		$	0.836
Fair value per warrant	$	0.143		$	0.778
Fair value of warrants granted	$	17,101		$	16,194

The fair value of each warrant granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model with the following weighted average activity and assumptions during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

	Six Months
	Ended
	June 30, 2013

Number of warrants granted		1,054,824
Exercise price	$	1.471
Risk-free interest rate		1.0	%
Expected lives in years		4.2
Expected volatility		26.7	%
Expected dividend yields		None
Fair value of common stock	$	0.600
Fair value per warrant	$	0.038
Fair value of warrants granted	$	39,851

Prior to the Merger the Company’s common stock was not traded and since the Merger has had a limited number of trades, the Company calculated expected volatility for an equity-based grant based on the Standard & Poor’s North American Technology Software Index during the period immediately preceding the grant that is equal in length to the expected term of the grant. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury yields for securities in effect at the time of grants, with terms approximating the expected period of the grants. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option valuation model are inherently highly subjective, and can materially affect the resulting valuation.

~~The~~Additional ~~non-cash~~information ~~compensation expense related to warrants was allocated~~ as ~~follows~~of ~~for~~June ~~the~~30, ~~three~~2013, ~~months~~with ~~ended~~respect ~~March~~to ~~31,~~all ~~2013~~outstanding ~~and 2012~~warrants:

		2013			2012
			Outstanding
General and administrative		$	—		$	1,485
				Weighted
Loss on modification or extinguishment of debt			—			841
				Average			Weighted
Interest expense – amortization of warrants			408			4,392
			Number	Remaining			Average
		$	408		$	6,718
			Of	Contractual			Exercise
Range of Price			Warrants	Life (In Years)			Price
$	0.002		743,939		7.8		$	0.002
	0.750 – 0.90		1,296,086		3.8			0.810
	1.100		401,787		3.0			1.100
	2.200		401,787		5.0			2.220
$	0.002 – 2.200		2,843,599		4.9			0.836

~~There~~The is803,574 nowarrants ~~additional~~with ~~compensation~~exercise ~~expense~~prices ~~related~~of to$1.10 ~~warrants~~and ~~that~~$2.20 isper toshare, beissued ~~recognized~~in asthe ofJune ~~March~~2013 31Offering, ~~2013~~include ~~(excluding~~a mandatory redemption clause in which the ~~$5,434~~Company has the right to redeem any of ~~amortization~~these unexercised warrants for $0.01 per warrant when the Company’s stock price has met certain defined criteria The Company will provide the warrant holder with 20 days notice of their intention to redeem the warrants and during that period the holder has the right to ~~debt~~exercise ~~holders)~~all or a portion of the warrants.

The non-cash compensation expense related to warrants was allocated as follows for the six and three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

	Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012

General and administrative	$	—	$	3,960	$	—	$	2,475
Loss on modification or extinguishment of debt		—		841		—		—
Interest expense – amortization of warrants		916		6,613		408		2,221
	$	916	$	11,414	$	408	$	4,696

There is no additional compensation expense related to warrants that is to be recognized as of June 30, 2013 (excluding the $5,026 of amortization of warrants to debt holders).

Note 18 – Offerings

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013, we ~~issued~~sold ~~an aggregate of 200,000~~ shares of our common stock ~~at a price of $0.80 per share~~ and warrants to ~~acquire~~investors ~~100,000~~to acquire shares of common stock atin anthe ~~exercise~~following ~~price of $0~~offerings.~~90, with a five year term, for gross proceeds of $160,000.~~

	December 2012 Offering		June 2013 Offering		Total

Shares sold		418,750		401,787		820,537
Gross proceeds	$	335,000	$	225,000	$	560,000
Warrants issued – exercise price of $0.90		209,375		—		209,375
Warrants issued – exercise price of $1.10		—		401,787		401,787
Warrants issued – exercise price of $2.20		—		401,787		401,787

The following is a summary of the cash and equity-based compensation costs of the December 2012 Offerings for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013:

	Number of		Cost or
	Warrants		Valued at
Cash costs:
Placement Agent 10% fee of proceeds		—	$	16,000
Placement Agent 10% fee of proceeds (Note A)		—	$	33,500
Other costs		—		18
Legal fees		—		24,738
Total cash costs		—		1658,~~018~~238
Equity-based compensation:
Warrants issued to Placement Agent (Note A)		20,000		2,850
Warrants issued to Placement Agent (Note B)		41,875		5,918
Warrants issued to investors in December 2012 Offering (Note B)		100,000		14,251
Warrants issued to investors in December 2012 Offering (Note C)		209,375		29,594
Potential shares to be issued for the December 2012 Offering (Note 19)		—		—
Warrants issued to investors in June 2013 Offering (Note D)		803,574		4,339
Total equity-based compensation		~~120~~1,~~000~~054,824		1739,~~101~~851
Total costs		~~120~~1,~~000~~054,824	$	3398,~~119~~089

Note A – the Placement Agent ~~received~~receives ~~warrants~~the ~~equal to~~ 10% offee ~~the~~on ~~shares~~customers ~~issued~~that inthey ~~the~~introduce ~~December~~to ~~2012~~the ~~Offering~~Company. ~~The~~ All ~~warrants~~of ~~issued~~the investors in the December 2012 ~~Offerings~~Offering ~~had~~were anintroduced ~~exercise~~by ~~price~~the ofPlacement ~~$0.90~~Agent ~~per~~while ~~share~~none ~~and~~of athe ~~five~~investors ~~year~~in ~~term. The~~the ~~$2,850~~June ~~estimated~~2013 ~~fair~~Offering ~~value~~were ofintroduced ~~the~~by ~~warrants was calculated using~~ the ~~Black-Scholes~~Placement ~~option valuation model~~Agent.

Note B – the ~~investors~~Placement ~~that~~Agent ~~purchased~~receives ~~shares in the December 2012 Offerings received~~ warrants equal to 5010% of the shares issued into ~~the~~investors ~~December~~that ~~2012~~they ~~Offering~~introduce to the Company. The warrants issued in ~~connection with~~ the December 2012 ~~Offering~~Offerings had an exercise price of $0.90 per share and a five year term. The $145,~~251~~918 estimated fair value of the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model.

~~The~~Note ~~$16,018~~C of– ~~cash~~the ~~costs~~investors ofthat purchased shares in the December 2012 ~~Offerings~~Offering ~~were~~received ~~charged~~warrants equal to ~~Additional~~50% ~~Paid-~~of the shares issued in ~~Capital~~the December 2012 Offering. The ~~$17,101~~warrants ofissued ~~equity-based~~in ~~compensation~~connection ~~costs,~~with ~~related~~the toDecember ~~the~~2012 ~~warrants~~Offering ~~issued~~had toan ~~the~~exercise ~~Placement~~price ~~Agent~~of ~~and~~$0.90 ~~investors,~~per ~~was~~share ~~charged~~and toa ~~Additional~~five ~~Paid-in~~year ~~Capital~~term. The ~~with~~$29,594 aestimated ~~related~~fair ~~credit~~value toof ~~Additional~~the ~~Paid-in~~warrants ~~Capital~~was ~~for~~calculated using the ~~same~~Black-Scholes ~~amount~~option valuation model.

Note D – the investors that purchased shares in the June 2013 Offering received warrants equal to 200% of the shares issued in the June 2013 Offering. Fifty percent of the warrants issued in connection with the June 2013 Offering had an exercise price of $1.10 per share and a three year term while the remaining warrants had an exercise price of $2.20 and a five year term. The $4,339 estimated fair value of the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model.

The $58,238 of cash costs of the offerings were charged to Additional Paid-in Capital. The $39,851 of equity-based compensation costs, related to the warrants issued to the Placement Agent and investors, was charged to Additional Paid-in Capital with a related credit to Additional Paid-in Capital for the same amount.

Note 19 - Commitments and Contingencies

Lease Commitments

The Company leases equipment under a non-cancelable lease arrangement at an interest rate of 17.6% per annum. The Company also leases its primary office facility from a Related Party under a non-cancelable operating lease that expired on February 28, 2011. Upon the expiration of the original term, the lease term was modified to provide for the facility rental on a month-to-month basis. Rent expense totaled $510,~~400~~800 for each of the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Rent expense totaled $5,400 for each of the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and 2012~~, respectively~~.

The future minimum payments for the capital lease as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 are as follows:

Total future minimum lease payments in 2013	$	85,~~483~~303
Amount representing interest		(~~534~~228	)
Present value of future minimum lease payments (all current)	$	75,~~949~~075

Placement Agent Agreement

In December 2012, and amended in June 2013, the Company entered into an Investment Banking Agreement with its Placement Agent,. For ~~pursuant~~investors introduced to ~~which~~ the Company isby ~~obligated to pay~~ the Placement Agent athey ~~monthly retainer of $5,000. The Placement Agent~~ will receive 10% of the gross proceeds raised in ~~the~~an ~~December 2012 Offering~~offering, 10% warrant coverage with an exercise price equal to the price of any warrants granted in the ~~December 2012 Offering~~offering. The Placement Agent has the potential to receive shares of common stock based on the total amount raised in the December 2012 Offering. The Placement Agent will receive if the gross proceeds of the December 2012 Offering equal or exceed $1,000,000, as additional compensation, 250,000 shares of common stock of the Company and, if the gross proceeds of the December 2012 Offering are between $1,000,001 and $2,000,000, .25 shares of common stock of the Company for each $1.00 raised in gross proceeds in excess of $1,000,000, up to a maximum of 250,000 additional shares, for a total of 500,000 potential shares of common stock. The initial term of this agreement was for three months and was extended by the Company for an additional three month term and the agreement shall continue on a month to month basis. Either the Company or the placement Agent may cancel this agreement upon thirty days notice. For a year following the cancellation of the agreement the Company will still be obligated to pay fees for any leads introduced by the Placement Agent for financing, investors, or acquisitions.

In June 2011 the Company entered into an Investment Banking Agreement with its Placement Agent, pursuant to which the Company was obligated to pay the Placement Agent a monthly retainer of $5,000. This agreement was cancelled by the Company in August 2012 upon completion of the May 2012 Offerings. But for two years following the cancellation of the agreement the Company will still be obligated to pay fees for any leads introduced by the Placement Agent for financing, investors, or acquisitions. For arranging financing for the Company, the Placement Agent received 10% of the gross proceeds raised in the May 2012 Offerings, 10% warrant coverage with an exercise price equal to the effective price of the equity securities sold or, in the case of publicly traded equity securities, the closing stock bid on the date the transaction closes and common equities resulting in a total ownership percentage of the Company’s then outstanding equity equal to 9.9%.

Sales Agreement

In August 2012 the Company entered into a sales agreement with an individual who was granted options to purchase 335,000 shares of common stock that will vest upon the attainment of certain sales goals by December 31, 2013. Options not vested will expire on that date.

Software Development Agreement

In April 2012 the Company entered into Software Development Agreements with two individuals ~~with~~and aas ~~minimum fee commitment~~ of ~~approximately~~June ~~$21~~30,~~000. As~~ ~~of March 31,~~ 2013 the services have been provided under these agreements and options to purchase 370,000 shares of common stock that were granted in 2012 to these individuals vested.

Note 20 - Subsequent Events

Management evaluated subsequent events through the date that the Company's consolidated financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, the Company has determined that no subsequent events have occurred which require disclosure through the date that these consolidated financial statements were issued, other than the following:

Additional amounts raised in ~~December~~June ~~2012~~2013 Offering

In connection with the ~~December~~June ~~2012~~2013 Offering ~~efforts~~, subsequent to ~~the~~June ~~first~~30, ~~quarter~~2013 we issued an aggregate of ~~218~~669,~~750~~644 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.8056 per share, for gross proceeds of $~~175~~375,000. The purchasers also received warrants to acquire ~~109~~669,~~375~~644 shares at $01.9010 with a three year term and warrants to acquire 669,644 shares at $2.20 with a five year term in connection with this raise. The Placement Agent received $1725,~~500~~000 (10% of the gross proceeds of investors they introduced) and warrants to acquire 2122,~~875~~322 shares at $01.9010 with a five year term ~~were~~and ~~issued~~warrants to acquire 22,322 shares at $2.20 with a five year term in connection with this raise.

~~Common~~Appointment ~~shares~~of ~~issues~~new tomember ~~Attorney~~of Board of Directors

InOn ~~April~~July ~~2013~~16, 2013 the Board of Directors of the Company ~~issued~~appointed ~~120~~a new director who will receive a restricted grant of 140,000 shares of the common stock toand an ~~attorney~~option into ~~settlement~~purchase ofan ~~$90~~additional 140,000 shares of ~~our~~common ~~payable~~stock toat ~~them~~an (exercise price of $~~179,615~~0.56 ~~payable~~per asshare. These ofrestricted ~~March~~common 31shares and options will vest over the two year period ending July 1, ~~2013)~~2015.

2324

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited balance sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the related statements of operations and members’ deficit and cash flows for each of the years then ended and the notes attached thereto and the unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and the related unaudited consolidated statements of operations and stockholders’ deficit for the six and ~~members’~~three ~~deficit~~months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and 2012 and the notes attached thereto. Such ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 financial statements exclude the effects of the Merger and the related reorganization. This interim financial information reflects, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and changes in estimates, where appropriate) to present fairly the results for the interim periods. The results of operations and cash flows for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of those expected for a full year.

All statements contained herein that are not historical facts, including, but not limited to, statements regarding anticipated future capital requirements, our future development plans, our ability to obtain debt, equity or other financing, and our ability to generate cash from operations, are based on current expectations. The discussion of results, causes and trends should not be construed to imply any conclusion that such results or trends will necessarily continue in the future. The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.

The statements contained herein, other than historical information, are or may be deemed to be forward-looking statements and involve factors, risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results in future periods to differ materially from such statements. These factors, risks and uncertainties are discussed below and include market acceptance and availability of digital media communication services, rapid technological change affecting demand for our services, competition from other digital media communication service providers, deteriorating economic conditions, the availability of sufficient financial resources to enable us to pay our existing obligations and expand our operations, adequacy of internal controls, being an early stage software development company, as well as other risks and uncertainties that may be detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Overview

Liquidity and Capital Resources

24During the six months ended June 30, 2013 the Company sold 820,537 shares of its common stock for gross proceeds of $560,000 (see Note 18) and an additional 669,644 shares of its’ common stock for gross proceeds of $375,000 subsequent to June 30, 2013 (see Note 20) .

During the three months ended March 31, 2013 the Company sold 200,000 shares of its common stock for gross proceeds of $160,000 (see Note 18) and an additional 218,750 shares of its’ common stock for gross proceeds of $175,000 subsequent to March 31, 2013 (see Note 20) . 25

Critical Accounting Policies

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Equipment and Leasehold Improvements

Long-Lived Assets

Revenue Recognition

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company's objectives in using debt-related derivative financial instruments are to obtain the lowest cash cost source of funds. Derivatives are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value based on the criteria specified in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 815, "Derivatives and Hedging " (“ASC Topic 815”). Under ASC Topic 815, the estimated fair value of derivative liabilities is revalued at each balance sheet date with the changes in value, if any, recorded in the interest and other expense section of the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and in derivative financial instruments of the liability section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Financial Instruments with Anti-Dilution Features

The Company has issued ~~warrants~~605,203warrants that contain a weighted average anti-dilution feature that in certain circumstances could provide the warrant holders with protection against changes in the market value of the Company's common stock; accordingly, they are required under applicable accounting standards to be recorded at fair value as of the balance sheet date. On the balance sheet date the Company evaluates the fair value of the warrants using a valuation model and the net difference, if material, between their previous periods’ fair values and their current fair values is recorded in the ~~interest and~~ other (income) expense section of the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and in derivative financial instruments of the liability section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Equity-Based Compensation

Income Taxes

Holdings operates as a “C” corporation. Prior to the Merger, the members of X-Factor elected to be treated as a limited liability corporation, under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and State of New Jersey tax laws. Holdings uses the asset and liability method to determine our income tax expense or benefit. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Any resulting net deferred tax assets are evaluated for recoverability and an assessment of whether it is more likely than not that such amount will be realized. Based on an assessment of all available evidence, a valuation allowance has been established against net deferred tax assets of $~~940~~1,102,000 (principally composed of a $~~615~~753,000 net operating loss (“NOL”) and $~~275~~298,000 of compensation expenses) at ~~March~~June 3130, 2013. For the period from the effective date of the Merger through December 31, 2012 and 2013 periods the Company did not record a benefit for income taxes. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 the Company had Federal and New Jersey NOL carry-forwards of approximately $1,~~536~~882,000 which begin to expire in 2032 ~~and 2019, respectively~~. The utilization of our NOL for Federal income tax purposes sustained by the Company may be substantially limited annually as a result of an "ownership change" (as defined by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended). If it is determined that there is a change in ownership, or if the Company undergoes a change of ownership in the future, the utilization of the Company’s NOL carry-forwards may be materially constrained. This would result in a reduction in equal amounts to the deferred tax assets and the related valuation reserves.

~~There were no interest or penalties related to income taxes that have been accrued or recognized as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, or for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.~~27

There were no interest or penalties related to income taxes that have been accrued or recognized as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, or for the six and three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Emerging Growth Company

We are an “emerging growth company” under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”). We have elected to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards under Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act. This election allows us to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. Though the Company made this election, we have adopted all new or revised accounting standards at the effective dates that for apply public companies.

Results of Operations

~~Three~~Six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 (the “2013 ~~Quarter~~Period”) compared to the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 (the “2012 ~~Quarter~~Period”)

Revenues - Revenues ~~decreased~~increased $4362,~~266~~107, or 2319.71%, in the 2013 ~~Quarter~~Period to $~~139~~387,~~663~~900 from $~~182~~325,~~929~~793 in the 2012 ~~Quarter~~ Period. The primary reason in the increase was completion of our new version of our digital media software partially offset by a decrease in Webcasting revenues which was caused by two major customers transitioning their business to their in-house systems. The following are the changes in the components of X-Factor’s ~~revenue~~revenues:

Favorable

March 31,

(Unfavorable)

June 30,

(Unfavorable)

2013

2012

Change

Digital media software and services

82294,~~679~~751

3671,~~615~~684

46223,~~064~~067

Webcasting

5693,~~984~~149

~~146~~254,~~314~~109

(89160,~~330~~960

)

Total revenues

~~139~~387,~~663~~900

~~182~~325,~~929~~793

~~(43~~62,~~266~~107

)

Cost of revenues – Cost of revenues decreased $314,~~597~~075, or 410.86% in the 2013 ~~Quarter~~Period to $71119,~~437~~083 from $75133,~~034~~158 in the 2012 ~~Quarter~~Period. Cost of revenues, as a percentage of revenues, were 5130.17% in the 2013 ~~Quarter~~Period and 4140.09% in the 2012 ~~Quarter~~Period. This ~~increase~~decrease in the cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues is primarily related to ~~development~~the ~~costs~~sale of ~~approximately~~high ~~$45,000~~margin ~~for~~ digital media software.

Gross Profit – Gross profit ~~decreased~~increased $3976,~~669~~182, or 3639.85% in the 2013 ~~Quarter~~Period to $68268,~~226~~817 from $~~107~~192,~~895~~635 in the 2012 ~~Quarter~~Period. Gross profit, as a percentage of revenues, was 4869.93% in the 2013 ~~Quarter~~Period and 59.01% in the 2012 ~~Quarter~~Period.

Salaries and fringe benefits expenses – Compensation costs increased $~~144~~234,~~652~~897, or ~~154~~106.73% in the 2013 ~~Quarter~~Period to $~~238~~455,~~134~~772 from $93220,~~482~~875 in the 2012 ~~Quarter~~Period. Compensation costs, as a percentage of revenues, were ~~170~~117.5% in the 2013 ~~Quarter~~Period and 5167.18% in the 2012 ~~Quarter~~Period. The primary reason for the increase in costs during the 2013 ~~Quarter~~Period was the increase to 6 employees in the 2013 ~~Quarter~~Period from 3 employees in the 2012 ~~Quarter~~Period.

					Favorable
	June 30,				(Unfavorable)
	2013		2012		Change
Salaries	$	348,085	$	163,458	$	(184,627	)
Equity-based compensation		50,799		—		(50,799	)
Commissions and bonuses		387		31,489		31,102
Employee insurance		9,390		9,576		186
Payroll taxes		47,111		16,352		(30,759	)
Total salaries and fringe benefits	$	455,772	$	220,875	$	(234,897	)

					Favorable
	March 31,				(Unfavorable)
	2013		2012		Change
Salaries	$	177,947	$	76,250	$	(101,697	)
Equity-based compensation		32,244		—		(32,244	)
Commissions and bonuses		387		4,458		4,071
Employee insurance		5,527		4,128		(1,399	)
Payroll taxes		22,029		8,646		(13,383	)
Total salaries and fringe benefits	$	238,134	$	93,482	$	(144,652	)

General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses decreased $3763,~~839~~442, or 87.46% in the 2013 ~~Quarter~~Period to $~~414~~775,~~048~~241 from $~~451~~838,~~887~~683 in the 2012 ~~Quarter~~Period. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenues, were ~~296~~199.59% in the 2013 ~~Quarter~~Period and ~~247~~257.04% in the 2012 ~~Quarter~~Period. The following are the significant changes in the components of the Company’s general and administrative expenses:

Favorable

March 31,

(Unfavorable)

June 30,

(Unfavorable)

2013

2012

Change

Professional fees and consultants – Operations

~~169~~287,~~230~~402

~~170~~333,~~669~~980

146,~~439~~578

Professional fees and consultants – Legal (A)

1637,~~031~~301

59107,~~164~~166

4369,~~133~~865

Professional fees and consultants – Accounting (A)

34114,~~275~~302

~~121~~182,~~896~~647

8768,~~621~~345

Professional fees and consultants – equity based (B)

119,013

1,485

(117,528

)

Professional fees and consultants – Equity based (B)

158,436

3,960

(154,476

)

Travel (A)

1643,~~963~~194

3164,~~237~~021

1420,~~274~~827

Communication expenses

716,~~952~~144

1426,~~394~~315

610,~~442~~171

Insurance (C)

1532,~~707~~559

~~467~~13,311

(1519,~~240~~248

)

SEC printing and filing fees

511,~~817~~674

321,~~844~~424

(19,~~973~~750

)

Computer and office supplies

1631,~~696~~391

2946,~~895~~586

1315,~~199~~195

Advertising and marketing

322,~~157~~587

714,~~500~~145

4(8,~~343~~442

)

Miscellaneous expenses

920,~~207~~251

1125,~~336~~128

24,~~129~~877

Total general and administrative

~~414~~775,~~048~~241

~~451~~838,~~887~~683

3763,~~839~~442

Note A – 2012 expenses are primarily related to the preparation required to becoming a “Public Company”.

Note B -– In 2013 aman individual received equity based compensation in lieu of cash compensation for performing software development services.

Note C – Increase is primarily related to a Directors and Officers liability insurance policy the Company obtained upon becoming a “Public Company”.

~~Note~~Depreciation Dand amortization – ~~Decreases~~Depreciation ~~are~~and ~~primarily~~amortization ~~related~~expenses decreased $23,099, or 71.9%, in the 2013 Period to $9,010 from $32,109 in the ~~Company~~2012 ~~scaling~~Period. ~~back~~The ~~operations~~decrease was due to ~~conserve~~some ~~cash~~assets being fully depreciated and the absence of equipment and leasehold improvement additions in all periods.

~~Depreciation~~Loss ~~and~~from ~~amortization~~operations – ~~Depreciation~~Loss ~~and~~from ~~amortization~~operations ~~expenses~~increased ~~decreased~~by $1172,~~556~~174, or 718.90%, in the 2013 ~~Quarter~~Period to $4971,~~509~~206 from $16899,~~065~~032 in the 2012 ~~Quarter~~Period. ~~The decrease was due to some assets being fully depreciated and the absence of equipment and leasehold improvement additions in all periods.~~

~~Loss~~Other ~~from~~(income) ~~operations~~expense – ~~Loss~~Other ~~from~~expense ~~operations~~decreased ~~increased~~ by $~~134~~1,~~926~~109,271 ~~or 29.7%~~ in the 2013 ~~Quarter~~Period to income of $~~588~~100,~~465~~359 from a loss of $~~453~~1,~~539~~008,912 in the 2012 ~~Quarter~~Period. In the 2012 Period, amendments to, and the conversion of various Notes Payable to Related Parties, caused the related unamortized discounts and financing costs to be expensed and shown as a Loss on Extinguishment or Modification of Debt., due to amendments to Notes Payable, the related unamortized discount costs was expensed and shown as a Loss on Extinguishment or Modification of Debt. Professional fees related to the Merger were expensed as incurred. Amendments to various Notes Payable to Related Parties, required the recording of the change in fair value of derivative financial instruments. The following are the changes in the components of the Company’s other expenses:

						Favorable
	June 30,					(Unfavorable)
	2013			2012		Change
Loss on Extinguishment or Modification of Debt	$	—		$	515,135	$	515,135
Professional fees related to Merger		—			202,867		202,867
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments for Related Parties		(138,634	)		80,217		218,851
Interest		31,896			63,860		31,964
Accretion of discount on notes		1,128			132,139		131,011
Amortization of prepaid financing costs		—			11,869		11,869
Other expenses		5,251			2,825		(2,426	)
Total other (income) expenses	$	(100,359	)	$	1,008,912	$	1,109,271

Other expense – Other expense decreased by $720,587 in the 2013 Quarter to $16,917 from $737,504 in the 2012 Quarter. In the 2012 Quarter, amendments to, and the conversion of various Notes Payable to Related Parties, caused the related unamortized discounts and financing costs to be expensed and shown as a Loss on Extinguishment or Modification of Debt., due to amendments to Notes Payable, the related unamortized discount costs was expensed and shown as a Loss on Extinguishment or Modification of Debt. Professional fees related to the Merger were expensed as incurred. Amendments to various Notes Payable to Related Parties, required the recording of the change in fair value of derivative financial instruments. The following are the changes in the components of the Company’s other expenses:

					Favorable
	March 31,				(Unfavorable)
	2013		2012		Change
Loss on Extinguishment or Modification of Debt	$	—	$	329,862	$	329,862
Professional fees related to Merger		—		133,191		133,191
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments for Related Parties		1,543		121,296		119,753
Interest		12,868		33,073		20,205
Accretion of discount on notes		564		109,071		108,507
Amortization of prepaid financing costs		—		11,011		11,011
Other expenses		1,942		—		(1,942	)
Total other expenses	$	16,917	$	737,504	$	(720,587	)

Income taxes - As a result of X-Factor being a limited liability company all profits and losses of X-Factor prior to the Merger flowed through to the individual members of X-Factor. Accordingly, X-Factor did not record a tax provision, incur any liability for incomes taxes nor record a benefit for income taxes or any deferred tax assets or liabilities for Federal or state tax purposes.

Holdings operates as a “C” corporation. Net deferred tax assets are evaluated for recoverability and an assessment of whether it is more likely than not that such amounts will be realized. Based on an assessment of all available evidence, a valuation allowance has been established against net deferred tax assets (principally net operating losses) at March 31, 2013 and for the period from the Merger Date through March 31, 2013 the Company did not record a benefit for income taxes.29

Holdings operates as a “C” corporation. Net ~~loss~~deferred –tax ~~The~~assets ~~decrease~~are inevaluated ~~gross~~for ~~profit~~recoverability and ~~increase~~an inassessment ~~operating~~of ~~expenses~~whether ~~partially~~it ~~offset~~is bymore ~~the~~likely ~~decrease~~than innot ~~other~~that ~~expenses~~such ~~caused~~amounts ~~primarily~~will bybe ~~non-recurring~~realized. ~~expenses~~Based ~~related~~on toan ~~the~~assessment ~~change~~of inall ~~fair~~available ~~value~~evidence, ofa ~~derivative~~valuation ~~financial~~allowance ~~instruments~~has ~~and~~been ~~loss~~established onagainst ~~extinguishment~~net ofdeferred ~~debt~~tax ~~caused~~assets ~~the~~(principally net ~~loss~~operating tolosses) ~~decrease~~at byJune ~~$585~~30,~~661~~ in2013 and for the ~~2013~~period ~~Quarter~~from tothe ~~$605,382~~Merger ~~from~~Date $1through June 30,~~191,043~~ in2013 the ~~2012~~Company ~~Quarter~~did not record a benefit for income taxes.

Net loss – The increase in gross profit and increase in operating expenses plus the decrease in other expenses caused primarily by non-recurring expenses related to the change in fair value of derivative financial instruments and loss on extinguishment of debt caused the net loss to decrease by $1,037,097 in the 2013 Period to $870,847 from $1,907,944 in the 2012 Period.

Three months ended June 30, 2013 (the “2013 Quarter”) compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012 (the “2012 Quarter”)

Revenues - Revenues increased $105,373, or 73.8%, in the 2013 Quarter to $248,237 from $142,864 in the 2012 Quarter. The primary reason in the increase in revenues were customer purchases which had been deferred until the completion of our new version of our digital media software partially offset by a decrease in Webcasting revenues which was caused by two major customers transitioning their business to their in-house systems. The following are the changes in the components of X-Factor’s revenue:

					Favorable
	June 30,				(Unfavorable)
	2013		2012		Change
Digital media software and services	$	212,072	$	35,069	$	177,003
Webcasting		36,165		107,795		(71,630	)
Total revenues	$	248,237	$	142,864	$	105,373

Cost of revenues – Cost of revenues decreased $10,478, or 18.0% in the 2013 Quarter to $47,646 from $58,124 in the 2012 Quarter. Cost of revenues, as a percentage of revenues, were 19.2% in the 2013 Quarter and 40.7% in the 2012 Quarter. This decrease in the cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues is primarily related to the sale of high margin digital media software.

Gross Profit – Gross profit decreased $115,851, or 136.7% in the 2013 Quarter to $200,591 from $84,740 in the 2012 Quarter. Gross profit, as a percentage of revenues, was 80.8% in the 2013 Quarter and 59.3% in the 2012 Quarter. This increase in gross profit is primarily related to the sale of high margin digital media software

Salaries and fringe benefits expenses – Compensation costs increased $90,245, or 70.8% in the 2013 Quarter to $217,638 from $127,393 in the 2012 Quarter. Compensation costs, as a percentage of revenues, were 87.7% in the 2013 Quarter and 89.2% in the 2012 Quarter. The primary reason for the increase in costs during the 2013 Quarter was the increase to 6 employees in the 2013 Quarter from 4 employees in the 2012 Quarter.

					Favorable
	June 30,				(Unfavorable)
	2013		2012		Change
Salaries	$	170,138	$	87,209	$	(82,929	)
Equity-based compensation		18,555		—		(18,555	)
Commissions and bonuses		—		27,031		27,031
Employee insurance		3,863		5,447		1,584
Payroll taxes		25,082		7,706		(17,376	)
Total salaries and fringe benefits	$	217,638	$	127,393	$	(90,245	)

General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses decreased $25,603, or 6.6% in the 2013 Quarter to $361,193 from $386,796 in the 2012 Quarter. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenues, were 145.5% in the 2013 Quarter and 270.7% in the 2012 Quarter. The following are the significant changes in the components of the Company’s general and administrative expenses:

					Favorable
	June 30,				(Unfavorable)
	2013		2012		Change
Professional fees and consultants – Operations	$	118,172	$	164,152	$	45,980
Professional fees and consultants – Legal (A)		21,270		47,160		25,890
Professional fees and consultants – Accounting		80,027		60,751		(19,276	)
Professional fees and consultants – Equity based (B)		39,423		2,475		(36,948	)
Travel (A)		26,231		32,782		6,551
Communication expenses		8,192		11,921		3,729
Insurance (C)		16,852		12,844		(4,008	)
SEC printing and filing fees		5,857		17,851		11,994
Computer and office supplies		14,695		16,692		1,997
Advertising and marketing		19,430		6,645		(12,785	)
Miscellaneous expenses		11,044		13,523		2,479
Total general and administrative	$	361,193	$	386,796	$	25,603

Note A – 2012 expenses are primarily related to the preparation required to becoming a “Public Company”.

Note B – In 2013 an individual received equity based compensation in lieu of cash compensation for performing software development services.

Note C – Increase is primarily related to a Directors and Officers liability insurance policy the Company obtained upon becoming a “Public Company”.

Depreciation and amortization – Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $11,543, or 71.9%, in the 2013 Quarter to $4,501 from $16,044 in the 2012 Quarter. The decrease was due to some assets being fully depreciated and the absence of equipment and leasehold improvement additions in all periods.

Loss from operations – Loss from operations decreased by $62,752, or 14.1% in the 2013 Quarter to $382,741 from $445,493 in the 2012 Quarter.

Other (income) expense – Other expense decreased by $388,684 in the 2013 Quarter to income of $117,276 from a loss of $271,408 in the 2012 Quarter. In the 2012 Quarter, amendments to, and the conversion of various Notes Payable to Related Parties, caused the related unamortized discounts and financing costs to be expensed and shown as a Loss on Extinguishment or Modification of Debt., due to amendments to Notes Payable, the related unamortized discount costs was expensed and shown as a Loss on Extinguishment or Modification of Debt. Professional fees related to the Merger were expensed as incurred. Amendments to various Notes Payable to Related Parties, required the recording of the change in fair value of derivative financial instruments. The following are the changes in the components of the Company’s other expenses:

							Favorable
	June 30,						(Unfavorable)
	2013			2012			Change
Loss on Extinguishment or Modification of Debt	$	—		$	185,273		$	185,273
Professional fees related to Merger		—			69,676			69,676
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments for Related Parties		(140,177	)		(41,079	)		99,098
Interest		19,028			30,787			11,759
Accretion of discount on notes		564			23,068			22,504
Amortization of prepaid financing costs		—			858			858
Other expenses		3,309			2,825			(484	)
Total other expenses	$	(117,276	)	$	271,408		$	388,684

Holdings operates as a “C” corporation. Net deferred tax assets are evaluated for recoverability and an assessment of whether it is more likely than not that such amounts will be realized. Based on an assessment of all available evidence, a valuation allowance has been established against net deferred tax assets (principally net operating losses) at June 30, 2013 and for the period from the Merger Date through June 30, 2013 the Company did not record a benefit for income taxes.

Net loss – The decrease in gross profit and increase in operating expenses partially offset by the decrease in other expenses caused primarily by non-recurring expenses related to the change in fair value of derivative financial instruments and loss on extinguishment of debt caused the net loss to decrease by $451,436 in the 2013 Quarter to $265,465 from $716,901 in the 2012 Quarter.

Cash flows

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2013, the Company had a working capital deficit of $~~969~~720,~~783~~583, compared to a working capital deficit of $670,657 at December 31, 2012, an increase in the deficit of $~~299~~49,~~126~~926. The Company had $~~105~~185,~~515~~556 in cash at ~~March~~June 3130, 2013, compared to $311,843 at December 31, 2012, a decrease of $~~206~~126,~~328~~287.

Net cash used in operating activities was $~~346~~622,~~971~~409 for the 2013 ~~Quarter~~Period. The components of the use of funds were a net loss of $~~605~~870,~~382~~847 (~~net~~ $~~441~~776,~~860~~957 excluding non-cash charges and credits) and a $1464,~~312~~934 increase in accounts receivable partially offset by a $81211,~~743~~782 net increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses, a $176,~~833~~159 increase in unearned revenues and a $91,~~625~~541 decrease in other current assets. Net cash used in operating activities was $61916,~~536~~543 for the 2012 ~~Quarter~~Period. The components of the use of funds were a net loss of $1,~~191~~907,~~043~~944 ($~~584~~1,~~537~~099,231 excluding non-cash charges and credits), $2043,~~811~~217 from a reduction in unearned revenues and a $3029,~~000~~922 increase in other current assets partially offset by a decrease of $~~148~~153,~~137~~821 in accounts receivable and a $~~425~~102,~~675~~006 increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses.

Cash provided by investing activities in the 2012 ~~Quarter~~Period consisted of a $75,000 reimbursement by the Controlling Stockholders of the deposit advanced by X-Factor towards the acquisition of control of the Company for the purpose of consummating the Merger.

Cash provided by financing activities in the 2013 ~~Quarter~~Period totaled $~~140~~496,~~643~~122 and was comprised of $~~160~~560,000 of gross proceeds from the sale of common stock in the ~~December~~offerings ~~2012 Offering~~ partially offset by $1658,~~000~~238 in direct costs relating to the ~~December 2012 Offering~~offerings, $25,~~756~~630 of principal repayments of lease obligations, and $~~601~~10 of principal repayments towards the line of credit. Cash provided by financing activities in the 2012 ~~Quarter~~Period totaled $441,~~436~~011,303 and was comprised of $75560,000 of gross proceeds from the ~~proceeds~~sale of ~~notes~~common ~~payable~~stock –in ~~related~~the ~~parties~~offerings and $~~316~~75,000 from anthe ~~increase~~proceeds inof ~~the~~notes ~~Line~~payable of– ~~Credit~~related parties and partially offset by $27209,~~983~~407 in direct costs ~~related~~relating to ~~obtaining~~ the ~~notes~~offerings, ~~payable~~$85,227 –of ~~related~~principal ~~parties~~repayments of notes payable and $25,~~897~~313 of principal repayments of lease obligations.

Inflation

Inflation has a minimal impact on the operations of the Company

Contractual Obligations

			Payments Due By Period
Obligations	Total		Less Than 1 Year		2 – 3 Years		4 – 5 Years
Notes payable – Note A	$	337,306	$	27,056	$	206,834	$	103,416
Notes payable – related parties		~~288~~292,~~606~~466		—		—		~~288~~292,~~606~~466
Capital leases		85,~~483~~303		85,~~483~~303		—		—
Line of credit – Note B		97,~~245~~836		97,~~245~~836		—		—
	$	~~731~~732,~~640~~911	$	~~132~~130,~~784~~195	$	206,834	$	~~392~~395,~~022~~882

Note A –

Payments are based on a percentage of the prior year’s revenues with any unpaid principal due on August 1, 2016. For purposes of this table we were unable to estimate our revenues for the next three years so we have assumed that the unpaid principal balance, after our payment in July 2013, will be paid equally in years 2, 3 and 4.

Note B –

There is no maturity date for the Line of Credit; however the Company has classified this obligation as a current liability.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued guidance that revises two disclosure requirements concerning fair value measurements and clarifies two others. It requires separate presentation of significant transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and disclosure of the reasons for such transfers. It will also require the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements within Level 3 on a gross basis rather than a net basis. The guidance also clarifies that disclosures should be disaggregated by class of asset or liability and that disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques should be provided for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements. These new disclosure requirements became effective for the Company’s financial statements for the period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, except for the requirement concerning gross presentation of Level 3 activity, which became effective for our 2011 year end. Since this guidance is only related to financial statement disclosures, there was no impact to the Company’s financial statements as a result of the adoption of this guidance.

In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards” (“IFRS”) (“ASU 2011-04”), which amends FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement.” These amendments, effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (early adoption is prohibited), result in a common definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Consequently, the amendments change some fair value measurement principles and disclosure requirements. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have an impact on the Company’s ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” which amends FASB ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income.” This guidance, effective retrospectively for the interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (early adoption is permitted), requires presentation of total comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of stockholders’ and members’ deficit was eliminated. The items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income were not changed. Additionally, no changes were made to the calculation and presentation of loss per share. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 did not have an impact on the Company’s ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 financial statements as the Company has no items that require reporting as a component of comprehensive loss.

The Company is not aware of any other pronouncements, not yet issued or adopted, that would have a material effect on its future financial statements.

Other Recent Developments

The Company has recently added the following new products and solutions to its product base:

The C4 "Corporate Communications Control Center" (the "C4 Solution") is an easy to use software-based solution for multi-media, multi-channel and multi-dimensional internal and external corporate communications. C4 is an advanced and intuitive content creation and management system that supports emergency messaging, conventional publishing as well as interactive applications.

The C4 solution is complementary to other in-place systems, including intranet sites and Microsoft SharePoint, adding greater functionality and ease of use including the automated transformation of PowerPoint documents into desktop signs and alerts, for example. Content distributed over C4 is optimized for all end-points, whether large lobby displays, interactive kiosks including wayfinding capabilities, or mobile tablets and smart phones.

MACC "Marketing and Advertising Control Center" builds upon over five years of experience developing, implementing and managing multimedia "immersive" digital media networks.

MACC makes it easier than ever to participate in the rapidly growing "Digital-Out-Of-Home" marketing trend and enables marketers and their agency partners to:

- Sell and deliver targeted advertising;

- Provide product information and spur cross-selling and up-selling;

- Promote features and benefits;

- Help ensure consistency of messaging in multiple languages and geographies; and

- Control costs via a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) delivery model

MACC is a high-impact delivery platform integrated into the way people shop, learn and play, presented at the most appropriate moments in the most interesting venues (retail shops, stadiums, public transportation hubs, on trains and buses, at medical centers, in malls, and much more). Displays can deliver messaging that is customized by geography, time of day, specific location and more in real-time, and data collected informs the real-time grooming of campaigns to ensure the highest conversion rates and ROI.

X-Factor's "Enterprise Desktop" makes it possible to distribute content to desktops, intranet sites including SharePoint and mobile devices in real-time, including notifications, promotions, emergency alerts and more. Desktop signage takes content usually available on the intranet or digital signs and delivers it to a large employee community in a way that is hard to miss. While employees typically have access to a wealth of internal corporate information, due to the demands on their time, they often do not take the time to look for information unless it is related to a topic that they are specifically interested in. X-Factor's Enterprise Desktop enables company leaders to get key messages out, whether in screensaver mode or seeing content within the desktop player. Employees simply click for more information on any particular subject or to view a live webcast. X-Factor's Enterprise Desktop complements existing publishing systems including Microsoft SharePoint.

X-Factor's mobile interactive capabilities extend the power of Digital Media to audiences' mobile devices. Through X-Factor's enhanced mobile engagement solutions, its mobile applications augment point of display to deliver information, marketing, ads, coupons and offers directly to an individual's smartphone or tablet. X-Factor's product range can be combined to support large scale "real world" and "virtual world" campaigns. For example, users can be sent to one of X-Factor's unique digital players, optimized for their mobile device. After enjoying an entertaining experience at a media wall or other digital sign, consumers can download the player and its contents to enjoy after leaving the venue. At interactive kiosks, consumers can receive wayfinding directions through a simple SMS text, or can receive an e-ticket or coupon instantly.

X-Factor has developed a multimedia player which can be easily branded and customized to aggregate content of all types (photos, animations, videos, audio files, interactive applications, and more) into a single, intuitive user experience. The player that runs automatically, without having the user download a special application, and brings multiple content feeds together in an exciting user experience. X-Factor's digital media and creative services teams can easily and cost-efficiently design and deploy custom branded media players, and because the players are fed by X-Factor's dmcp:// platform, all the advantages of our related products, including the company's advertising sales monetization products dscp:// Storefront and DMAX are easily included.

Working with companies who provide hardware and network infrastructure, X-Factor has released advanced interactive kiosks software, enabling audience engagement and interaction, advertising and marketing content creation, publishing, distribution and management. This software allows remote monitoring of kiosks from a single location, multi-user privileges for hierarchal (local and national) publishing, targeted advertising and transparent kiosk management and collection of user information. The Company works with other companies to ensure clients' goals for their customized interactive kiosk network are met, ensuring that all the elements in the solution meet stringent guidelines -- from the hardware and the kiosk interface and features to the appropriate network connectivity and uptime.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

None.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified by the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by Holdings in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2013, and, based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these controls and procedures are not effective in providing reasonable assurance of compliance, due largely to the limited amount of Company personnel and the inherent limitations on the segregation of duties and supervisory reviews.34

~~However,~~Under the ~~Company~~supervision ~~believes~~and ~~that~~with the ~~consolidated~~participation ~~financial~~of ~~statements~~management, ~~fairly~~including ~~present,~~the inChief ~~all~~Executive ~~material~~Officer ~~respects~~and Interim Chief Financial Officer, the Company’s ~~consolidated~~has ~~balance~~evaluated ~~sheet~~the aseffectiveness of ~~March~~its ~~31,~~disclosure ~~2013~~controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the ~~related~~Exchange ~~consolidated~~Act) ~~statements~~as of ~~operations~~June 30, ~~stockholders’ deficit~~2013, and, ~~cash~~based ~~flows~~upon ~~for~~this evaluation, the ~~periods~~Chief ~~ended~~Executive inOfficer ~~conformity~~and ~~with~~Chief ~~generally~~Financial ~~accepted~~Officer ~~accounting~~have ~~principles~~concluded that these controls and procedures are not effective in providing reasonable assurance of compliance, ~~notwithstanding~~due largely to the ~~material~~limited ~~weaknesses~~amount weof ~~identified~~Company personnel and the inherent limitations on the segregation of duties and supervisory reviews.

However, the Company believes that the consolidated financial statements fairly present, in all material respects, the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2013 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the periods ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, notwithstanding the material weaknesses we identified.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Holdings has evaluated changes in internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and have concluded that no change has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

3235

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None

Item 1A. Risk Factors

As a smaller reporting company we are not required to provide this information.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Sales of Common Stock

During the quarter ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013, at a purchase price of $0.8056 per share, the Company issued an aggregate of ~~200~~401,~~000~~787 shares of common stock and three-year warrants to purchase 401,787, shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.10 per share and five-year warrants to purchase ~~100~~401,~~000~~787, shares of common stock at an exercise price of $02.9020 per share, for gross proceeds of $~~160~~225,000 to accredited investors. Also, during the quarter ended June 30, 2013, at a purchase price of $0.80 per share, the Company issued an aggregate of 218,750 shares of common stock and five-year warrants to purchase 109,375, shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.90 per share for gross proceeds of $175,000 to accredited ~~investor~~investors. The Company paid $1617,~~000~~500 and issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of ~~$20~~21,~~000~~875 shares of common stock to the placement agent at an exercise price of $0.90 per share as commission for the sale of the shares and warrants. The issuance of the shares of common stock and warrants were made pursuant to the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) in accordance with Section 4(2) and Regulation D promulgated thereunder in that the securities were issued to accredited investors without any form of general solicitation or advertising and all of the foregoing securities are deemed restricted securities for purposes of the Securities Act.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificate of Chief Executive Officer
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.1	Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

3336

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	X-FACTOR COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
Date: May 24, 2013	By:	/s/ Charles Saracino
Date: August 14, 2013	By:	/s/ Charles Saracino
		Charles Saracino, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: May 24, 2013	By:	/s/ Edwin F. Heinen
Date: August 14, 2013	By:	/s/ Edwin F. Heinen
		Edwin F. Heinen, Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

34 37

Filing Compare · X-Factor Communications Holdings, Inc.