UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
or
¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____

Commission File Number: 0-21304

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST II

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware		22-3206429
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1314 King Street, Wilmington, Delaware		19801
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

	(302) 888-7444
	(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x þ No ¨o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ o No ¨o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See ~~definition~~ the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨o Accelerated filer ¨o Non-accelerated filer ¨o Smaller reporting company xþ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨o No xþ

As of ~~October~~ 31April 30, ~~2009~~2010, there were 235.3775 Investor Shares outstanding.

Table of Contents

FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	Page
Item 1.	Financial Statements	1
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	84
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	95
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	95
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	95
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	95
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	95
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	95
Item 4.	~~Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~Reserved	105
Item 5.	Other Information	106
Item 6.	Exhibits	106
SIGNATURES		117

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST II
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF NET ASSETS
(Liquidation Basis)
(in thousands)
	September 30,		December 31,
	March 31,		December 31,
	2009		2008
	2010		2009
ASSETS	(unaudited)
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,~~677~~399	$	~~4,149~~-
Due from affiliates		-		~~170~~1,553
Other current assets		182		616
Total assets	$	1,~~695~~401	$	41,~~380~~559
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	~~158~~134	$	~~422~~278
Net assets in liquidation	$	1,537	$	3,958
Due to affiliates		17		31
	$	151	$	309
Net assets in liquidation	$	1,250	$	1,250

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST II
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
(Liquidation Basis)
(unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)
Net assets in liquidation, December 31, 2008	$	3,958
Settlement of litigation		500
Estimated site reclamation accrual		(100	)
Liquidation distribution		(2,589	)
Adjustments to liquidation accruals		(25	)
Other changes in working capital components, net		(207	)
Net assets in liquidation, June 30, 2009		1,537
Change in net assets in liquidation from June 30, 2009 to September 30, 2009		-
Net assets in liquidation, September 30, 2009	$	1,537
Distributions per Investor Share during nine months ended September 30, 2009	$	11,000
Distributions per Investor Share during three months ended September 30, 2009		-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST II
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Going Concern Basis)
(unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)
	Nine Months Ended			Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2008			September 30, 2008
Cost of revenues	$	193		$	52
Gross loss		(193	)		(52	)
Operating expenses:
General and administrative expenses		588			73
Management fee to Managing Shareholder		58			20
Total operating expenses		646			93
Loss from operations		(839	)		(145	)
Other income:
Interest income		62			11
Other income		26			-
Total other income		88			11
Net loss	$	(751	)	$	(134	)
Managing Shareholder - Net loss	$	(8	)	$	(1	)
Shareholder - Net loss		(743	)		(133	)
Net loss per Investor Share		(3,158	)		(563	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST II
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Going Concern Basis)
(unaudited, in thousands)
	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(947	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		5,250
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	4,303

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST II

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited, dollar amounts in thousands)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Ridgewood Electric Power Trust II (the “Trust”) is a Delaware trust formed inon November 20, 1992. The Trust began offering shares in January 1993 and concluded its offering in January 1994. The objective of the Trust ~~was~~is ~~organized~~to ~~primarily~~provide benefits to ~~make~~its ~~investments~~shareholders ~~in projects~~through ~~and~~a ~~businesses~~combination inof ~~the~~distributions ~~energy~~of operating cash flow and ~~infrastructure~~capital ~~sectors~~appreciation. The Managing Shareholder of the Trust is Ridgewood Renewable Power LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company (the “Managing Shareholder” or “RRP”). Historically, athe ~~New~~Trust ~~Jersey~~focused ~~limited~~primarily ~~liability company,~~on isindependent ~~the~~power ~~Managing~~generation ~~Shareholder~~facilities located in the US.

The Trust’s accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Trust and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Sunnyside Cogeneration Partners, L.P. (“Monterey”). Monterey operated a 5.5 megawatt cogeneration project located in California, which suspended its operations in January 2006. ~~The~~ ~~plant~~In ~~has~~2009, ~~since~~the ~~been~~plant was dismantled and the site ishas ~~undergoing~~been ~~final~~reclaimed ~~site reclamation.~~after the settlement of a dispute with its only customer, Pacific Gas and Electric Company. The Trust has not had any operating revenues since it suspended Monterey’s operations, though it ~~continues~~continued to incur certain expenses such as ground lease and maintenance expenses relating to its idle facility.

~~On December~~Monterey ~~26,~~had ~~2008,~~a ~~the~~non-cancelable ~~Trust’s~~ground ~~shareholders~~lease ~~approved~~covering ~~the~~its ~~dissolution~~site, ~~and liquidation~~which ofwas ~~the~~scheduled ~~Trust pursuant~~ to ~~the~~expire ~~Plan~~in ofMay ~~Dissolution~~2021 ~~and~~with ~~Liquidation~~minimum ~~of Ridgewood~~annual ~~Electric~~lease ~~Power Trust II (the “Plan of Dissolution”). Under the Plan of Dissolution~~payments, ~~the~~including ~~business of~~ the ~~Trust~~delivery ~~has shifted, and has become limited to the disposal~~ of ~~its~~cogeneration ~~remaining assets and resolution of its remaining liabilities~~steam. ~~Upon~~Effective ~~the~~March ~~completion~~31, ~~of these activities~~2010, ~~the~~Monterey ~~Managing~~terminated ~~Shareholder expects to distribute any remaining cash to the Trust’s shareholders and then proceed to terminate the Trust and~~ its ~~reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934~~ground-lease, aswithout ~~amended (the “Exchange Act”)~~penalty.

On ~~March 6~~December 26, ~~2009~~2008, the Trust’s ~~made~~Plan anof ~~initial~~Liquidation ~~liquidation~~and ~~distribution~~Dissolution of $2Ridgewood Electric Power Trust II (the “Plan of Dissolution”) became effective. Under the Plan of Dissolution,~~589~~ the business of the Trust shifted, and became limited to the ~~holders~~ disposal of ~~investor~~its ~~shares~~remaining assets and resolution of ~~beneficial~~its ~~interest~~remaining liabilities. Upon the completion of these activities, if successful, the Managing Shareholder expects to distribute any remaining cash to the Trust’s shareholders and then proceed to terminate the Trust and its reporting obligation under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Trust is required to make adequate provisions to satisfy its known and unknown liabilities, which could substantially delay or limit the Trust’s ability to make future distributions to shareholders. The process of accounting for the Trust’s liabilities, including those that are presently unknown, may involve difficult valuation decisions, which could adversely impact the Trust’s ability to make distributions in a timely manner.

The Plan of Dissolution gives sole authority to the Managing Shareholder to conduct the Trust’s dissolution, liquidation and termination without additional shareholder approval. As of ~~November~~May 412, ~~2009~~2010, the Trust has not been liquidated primarily due to ~~certain~~ ~~environmental~~on-going ~~issues~~litigation ~~regarding the winding down activities of Monterey, as~~ discussed in Note 65.

There was no activity during the 2010 period that resulted in a change in total net assets in liquidation since December 31, 2009.

The Trust has evaluated subsequent events and transactions through the date of the issuance of its financial statements, and concluded that except for the distribution of $1,177 made on April 15, 2010, to the holders of investor shares of beneficial interest (“Investor Shares”), there were no events or transactions that require adjustment to, or disclosure in the notes to, the condensed consolidated financial statements.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared pursuant to the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2008~~ 2009, filed with the SEC on ~~March~~April 2712, ~~2009~~2010 (the “~~2008~~2009 Form 10-K”). No significant changes have been made to the Trust’s accounting policies and estimates disclosed in its ~~2008~~2009 Form 10-K.

The condensed consolidated financial statements for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2008, were prepared on the going concern basis of accounting, which contemplates realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As a result of the approval of the Trust’s Plan of Dissolution, the Trust adopted the liquidation basis of accounting, effective December 27, 2008. This basis of accounting is considered appropriate when, among other things, liquidation of the Trust is probable. Under this basis of accounting, assets are valued at their net realizable values and liabilities are valued at their estimated settlement amounts. The conversion from going concern to liquidation basis of accounting required management to make significant estimates and assumptions. On an ongoing basis, the Trust evaluates the estimates and assumptions that can have a significant impact on the Trust’s reported net assets in liquidation. Actual costs and income may differ from these estimates. If there are delays in liquidating the Trust, actual costs incurred during the liquidation process may increase, reducing the amounts available for future distribution.2

Table of Contents

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST II

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited, dollar amounts in thousands)

~~The~~Upon the effectiveness of the Trust ~~has~~’s ~~evaluated~~Plan ~~subsequent~~of ~~events~~Dissolution, ~~and~~the ~~transactions~~Trust ~~through~~prepared ~~November~~its 4consolidated financial statements on liquidation basis of accounting, ~~2009~~effective December 27, ~~the date~~2008. This basis of ~~the~~accounting ~~issuance~~is considered appropriate when, among other things, liquidation of ~~its~~the ~~financial~~Trust ~~statements~~is probable. Under this basis of accounting, assets are valued at their net realizable values and ~~concluded~~liabilities ~~that~~are ~~there~~valued ~~were no~~at ~~such~~their ~~events~~estimated settlement amounts. The valuation of assets and ~~transactions~~liabilities ~~that~~requires ~~require~~management ~~adjustment~~to make significant estimates and assumptions. Upon conversion to, orthe ~~disclosure~~liquidation inbasis of accounting, the ~~notes~~ Trust accrued known estimated values of assets expected to be received and known estimated costs to be incurred in liquidation. On an ongoing basis, the ~~condensed~~Trust ~~consolidated~~evaluates ~~financial~~the ~~statements~~estimates and assumptions that can have a significant impact on the Trust’s reported net assets in liquidation. Actual amounts may differ materially and adversely from these estimates.

3. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The Trust considers all highly liquid investments with maturities, when purchased, of three months or less as cash and cash equivalents. At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010, ~~cash~~ ~~and~~bank ~~cash~~balances ~~equivalents~~ exceeded federal insured limits by $1,~~000~~005, all of which was invested either in US Treasury bills or money market accounts that invest solely in US government securities.

4. TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGING SHAREHOLDER

The Trust ~~operates~~ ~~pursuant~~records short-term payables to ~~the~~and ~~terms~~receivables offrom acertain ~~management~~of ~~agreement~~its ~~whereby~~affiliates in the ~~Trust~~ordinary ~~is obligated~~course of business. The amounts payable to ~~pay~~and ~~the~~receivable ~~Managing~~from ~~Shareholder~~its anaffiliates, ~~annual~~other ~~management~~than ~~fee~~amounts ~~equal~~relating to ~~1.5% of~~management ~~the~~fees, ~~Trust’s~~do ~~prior~~not ~~year~~bear ~~net~~interest. ~~asset~~At ~~value.~~December ~~Management~~31, ~~fees~~2009, ~~recorded~~the ~~were~~Trust ~~$47~~had ~~and~~ transferred $581,544 ~~for~~to the ~~nine~~Managing ~~months~~Shareholder ~~ended~~to ~~September~~fund ~~30,~~a ~~2009 and~~distribution ~~2008,~~to ~~respectively~~its shareholders, ~~and~~ ~~$16~~but ~~and~~the ~~$20~~money ~~for~~was ~~the~~returned ~~three~~back ~~months~~to ~~ended~~the ~~September~~Trust ~~30,~~in ~~2009~~January ~~and 2008, respectively~~2010.

In5. COMMITMENTS ~~March 2009,~~AND ~~the Managing Shareholder contributed $152 to the Trust representing its negative tax basis capital account at December 31, 2008.~~CONTINGENCIES

5On August 16, 2006, the Trust and several affiliated entities, including the Managing Shareholder, filed lawsuits against the former independent registered public accounting firm for the Trust and several affiliated entities, Perelson Weiner LLP (“Perelson Weiner”), in New Jersey Superior Court. ~~LITIGATION~~ ~~SETTLEMENT~~The suit alleged professional malpractice and breach of contract in connection with audit and accounting services performed for the Trust and other plaintiffs by Perelson Weiner. On October 20, 2006, Perelson Weiner filed a counterclaim against the Trust and other plaintiffs, alleging breach of contract due to unpaid invoices with a combined total of approximately $1,200. Discovery is ongoing and a trial date is currently scheduled for May 17, 2010. The costs and expenses of this litigation, including adverse judgments, if any, are being paid by the Managing Shareholder and affiliated management companies and not the underlying investment funds.

In March 2008, Monterey and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (“PG&E”) reached a settlement agreement with respect to a dispute under a long-term electricity supply contract whereby PG&E would pay Monterey $500, each party would release the other from all claims and the electricity contract with PG&E would terminate. This settlement was contingent upon receipt of final and non-appealable approval from the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”). CPUC granted the approval on December 4, 2008, but was subject to CPUC appeal procedures which expired in January 2009. On January 12, 2009, PG&E paid $500 to Monterey and since then, both PG&E and Monterey have filed final dismissals of their lawsuits.

6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Trust will continue to incur expenses through the liquidation process. The Trust will continue to evaluate the estimates and assumptions that can have a significant impact on the net assets of the Trust during liquidation.

Monterey has a non-cancelable operating ground lease which expires in May 2021. Future minimum lease payments as of September 30, 2009 are approximately $12 per annum along with the delivery of by-product steam. In connection with this lease, Monterey has not delivered by-product steam since it was shut down in January 2006. As a result, Monterey may be subject to penalties by the lessor. No claims have been asserted by the lessor as of November 4, 2009.

In November 2008, Monterey entered into an agreement to terminate the ground lease whereby among other things, Monterey agreed to remove the equipment and complete any required environmental clean-up. Monterey has since removed the equipment, and in February 2009, as part of its wind down activities, Monterey identified a potential soil contamination issue that has been reported to the County of Monterey Board of Health, as required under applicable regulations. Remediation expenses are estimated at $100 and have been reflected as a reduction in net assets in the first quarter of 2009. Actual expenses could vary significantly from this estimate. Monterey is coordinating these activities with the Board of Health. Upon completion of the clean-up work, Monterey anticipates terminating the ground lease, without penalty.

On August 16, 2006, the Trust and several affiliated entities, including the Managing Shareholder, filed lawsuits against the former independent registered public accounting firm for the Trust and several affiliated entities, Perelson Weiner LLP (“Perelson Weiner”), in New Jersey Superior Court. The suit alleged professional malpractice and breach of contract in connection with audit and accounting services performed for the Trust and other plaintiffs by Perelson Weiner. On October 20, 2006, Perelson Weiner filed a counterclaim against the Trust and other plaintiffs, alleging breach of contract due to unpaid invoices with a combined total of approximately $1,200. Discovery is ongoing and the trial date was rescheduled to February 1, 2010. The costs and expenses of this litigation, including adverse judgments, if any, are being paid by the Managing Shareholder and affiliated management companies and not the underlying investment funds.

Table of Contents

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST II

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited, dollar amounts in thousands)

The Trust may become subject to legal proceedings involving ordinary and routine claims related to its business. The ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to all such matters cannot be estimated with certainty and requires the use of estimates in recording liabilities for potential litigation settlements. Estimates for losses from litigation are disclosed if considered reasonably possible and accrued if considered probable after consultation with outside counsel. If estimates of potential losses increase or the related facts and circumstances change in the future, the Trust may be required to record additional litigation expense. While it is not possible to predict the outcome of the litigation discussed in this Note with certainty and some lawsuits, claims or proceedings may be disposed of unfavorably to the Trust, based on its evaluation of matters which are pending or asserted, the Trust’s management believes the disposition of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Trust’s business or its financial condition or results of operations.

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This discussion and analysis of the Trust as of March 31, 2010 is intended to help readers analyze the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, notes and other supplemental information contained in this document. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, notes and other supplemental information included elsewhere in this report as well as the consolidated financial statements, notes and other supplemental information and Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in the Trust’s 2009 Form 10-K.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements discussed in this item and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements generally relate to the Trust’s plans, objectives and expectations for future events and include statements about the Trust’s expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, intentions, assumptions and other statements that are not historical facts. These statements are based upon management’s expectations, opinions and estimates as of the date they are made. Although management believes that the expectations, opinions and estimates reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may be beyond the Trust’s control, which could cause actual results, performance and achievements to differ materially from the results, performance and achievements projected, expected, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Examples of events that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated include:

·	possible contingent liabilities and risks associated with the dissolution and liquidation of the Trust, including without limitation the matters discussed in Part 1, Item 1, Note 6. “Commitments and Contingencies” of this report,·	possible contingent liabilities and risks associated with the dissolution and liquidation of the Trust, including, without limitation, settlement of the Trust’s liabilities and obligations, and the outcome of the matters described in Part I, Item 1, Note 5. “Commitments and Contingencies” of this report,
·	~~costs incurred in connection with carrying out the Plan of Dissolution,~~·	costs incurred in connection with the carrying out of the plan of liquidation and dissolution of the Trust, and

·	the actual timing of the completion of the liquidation process and any liquidating distributions, and
·	the outcome of the matters described in Part I, Item 1, Note 6. “Commitments and Contingencies” of this report.

the actual timing of the completion of the liquidation process, including the amount and timing of any liquidating distributions.

Additional information concerning the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in this report and in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in the Trust’s ~~2008~~2009 Form 10-K. Any forward-looking statement that the Trust makes, speaks only as of the date of this report. The Trust undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or cautionary factors, as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

Liquidation Basis of Accounting

~~The condensed~~Upon ~~consolidated financial statements for~~ the ~~nine~~effectiveness ~~and three months ended September 30, 2008, were prepared on the going concern basis~~ of ~~accounting, which contemplates realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in~~ the ~~normal~~ ~~course of business. As a result of the approval of the~~ Trust’s Plan of Dissolution, the Trust ~~adopted~~prepared ~~the~~its consolidated financial statements on liquidation basis of accounting, effective December 27, 2008. This basis of accounting is considered appropriate when, among other things, liquidation of the Trust is probable. Under this basis of accounting, assets are valued at their net realizable values and liabilities are valued at their estimated settlement amounts. The valuation of assets and liabilities requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions.

Upon conversion to the liquidation basis of accounting, the Trust accrued known estimated values of assets expected to be received and known estimated costs to be incurred in liquidation. ~~The Trust will continue to incur operating costs and receive income from its cash and cash equivalents.~~ On an ongoing basis, the Trust evaluates the estimates and assumptions that can have a significant impact on the Trust’s reported net assets in liquidation. Actual ~~costs~~amounts ~~and income~~ may differ materially and adversely from these estimates. If there are delays in liquidating the Trust, actual costs incurred during the liquidation process may increase, reducing ~~the~~net ~~amounts~~assets available ~~for~~in ~~future distribution~~liquidation.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of the Trust’s financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Trust’s condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with GAAP. In preparing these financial statements, the Trust is required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amount of the Trust’s assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses including the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, as well as the reported amounts of changes in net assets. The estimates also affect the reported estimated value of net realizable assets and settlement of liabilities. The Trust evaluates these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. The Trust bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that the Trust believes to be reasonable at the time the estimates and assumptions are made. However, future events and their effects cannot be predicted with absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions under different circumstances or conditions, and such differences may be material to the condensed consolidated financial statements. No material changes have been made to the Trust’s critical accounting policies and estimates disclosed in its ~~2008~~ 2009 Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations and Changes in Financial Condition

As the Trust adopted the liquidation basis of accounting effective December 27, 2008, any costs incurred and income received in 2009 will be included in the condensed consolidated statements of changes in net assets. There was no activity during the ~~second~~2010 ~~and~~period ~~third quarter of 2009~~ that resulted in a change in total net assets in liquidation assince ~~compared~~December to31, ~~the first quarter of~~ 2009. Condensed consolidated statement of operations and statement of cash flows are presented on a going concern basis of accounting and therefore only include results for the 2008 period and as a result, no comparative discussion is presented.

Future Liquidity and Capital Resource Requirements

The Trust believes that it has sufficient ~~remaining~~ cash and cash equivalents to provide working capital ~~while~~for the ~~Trust~~next is12 ~~in liquidation~~months. The Trust intends to distribute excess cash, ~~if any,~~ to its shareholders after liquidating its remaining assets and satisfying its liabilities. In April 2010, the Trust made a distribution of $1.2 million to the holders of Investor Shares.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The Trust has no off-balance sheet arrangements and ~~there~~has ~~have been~~ no ~~material changes in the~~ contractual obligations and commitments ~~disclosed~~since in the ~~Trust's 2008~~ ~~Form~~termination 10of Monterey ground-Klease in March 2010.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not required.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act, the Trust’s management, with the participation of the Trust’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Trust’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based on this evaluation, the Trust’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Trust’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Trust in reports filed pursuant to the Exchange Act ~~are~~ is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed by the Trust is accumulated and communicated to senior management so as to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Trust’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that there was no change in the Trust's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There have been no material changes to the legal proceedings disclosed in the Trust’s ~~Current~~ ~~Report~~2009 on Form 10-~~Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on May 6, 2009~~K.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Not required.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

9ITEM 4. RESERVED

Table of Contents

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.		Description
31.1	*	Certification of Randall D. Holmes, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).
31.2	*	Certification of Jeffrey H. Strasberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).
32	*	Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Randall D. Holmes, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Jeffrey H. Strasberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant.

_____________________

* Filed herewith.

106

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST II
Date: November 4, 2009	By:	/s/ Randall D. Holmes
Date: May 12, 2010	By:	/s/ Randall D. Holmes
		Randall D. Holmes
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 4, 2009	By:	/s/ Jeffrey H. Strasberg
Date: May 12, 2010	By:	/s/ Jeffrey H. Strasberg
		Jeffrey H. Strasberg
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

117

Filing Compare · RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST II