10-K 1 f10k_free-2005.txt UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-24652 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER) Delaware 13-3533987 -------------------------------- --------------------- (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 625 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022 ---------------------------------------- -------------- (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code (212) 317-5700 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Title of Class Beneficial Assignment Certificates and Limited Partnership Interests Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X] The approximate aggregate book value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of September 30, 2004 was $789,309 based on Limited Partner equity as of such date. Registrant's voting and non-voting common equity is not publicly traded. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE None CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 WHEN USED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, THE WORDS "BELIEVES," "ANTICIPATES," "EXPECTS" AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS ARE INTENDED TO IDENTIFY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. STATEMENTS LOOKING FORWARD IN TIME ARE INCLUDED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K PURSUANT TO THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISION OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995. SUCH STATEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES WHICH COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THOSE SET FORTH IN "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS." READERS ARE CAUTIONED NOT TO PLACE UNDUE RELIANCE ON THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, WHICH SPEAK ONLY AS OF THE DATE HEREOF. 2 PART I Item 1. Business General ------- Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership which was formed under the laws of the State of Delaware on August 28, 1989. The General Partners of the Partnership are Related Freedom Associates L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the "Related General Partner"), and Freedom GP Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Freedom General Partner" and together with the Related General Partner, the "General Partners"). The general partner of the Related General Partner is Related Freedom Associates Inc., a Delaware corporation. The General Partners are both affiliates of Related Capital Company. On November 25, 1997, an affiliate of the Related General Partner purchased 100% of the stock of the Freedom General Partner. On November 17, 2003, CharterMac acquired Related Capital Company, which is the indirect parent of RCC Manager L.L.C., the sole shareholder of Related Freedom Associates, Inc., the general partner of the Related General Partner. Pursuant to the acquisition, CharterMac acquired controlling interests in the General Partners. This acquisition did not affect the Partnership or its day-to-day operations, as the majority of the General Partners' management team remained unchanged. On February 9, 1990, the Partnership commenced a public offering (the "Offering") of Beneficial Assignment Certificates ("BACs") representing assignments of limited partnership interests in the Partnership ("Limited Partnership Interests"), pursuant to a prospectus dated February 9, 1990, as supplemented by supplements thereto, dated December 7, 1990, May 10, 1991, July 10, 1991 and July 23, 1991 (as so supplemented, the "Prospectus"). The Partnership received $72,896,000 of the gross proceeds of the Offering from 4,780 investors, and the Offering was terminated on August 8, 1991. (See Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data," Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.) The Partnership was formed to invest as a limited partner in other limited partnerships ("Local Partnerships"), each of which owns one or more leveraged low-income multi-family residential complexes ("Apartment Complexes" or "Properties") that are eligible for the low-income housing tax credit ("Housing Tax Credit") enacted in the Tax Reform Act of 1986, and some of which may also be eligible for the historic rehabilitation tax credit ("Historic Tax Credit"; together with Housing Tax Credits, the "Tax Credits"). The Partnership's investment in each Local Partnership represents 98% to 99% of the partnership interests in the Local Partnership. As of March 31, 2005, the Partnership has acquired interests in forty-two Local Partnerships. As of March 31, 2005, approximately $58,000,000 of net proceeds had been invested in such Local Partnerships, representing all of the Partnership's net proceeds available for investment. Subsequent to March 31, 2005 and as of the date of this filing, there have been no additional investments, nor are any other investments expected. See Item 2, "Properties," below. The investment objectives of the Partnership are described below. 1. Entitle qualified BACs holders to Housing Tax Credits over the Credit Period (as defined below) with respect to each Apartment Complex. 2. Preserve and protect the Partnership's capital. 3. Participate in any capital appreciation in the value of the Properties and provide distributions of sale or refinancing proceeds upon the disposition of the Properties. 4. Allocate passive losses to individual BACs holders to offset passive income that they may realize from rental real estate investments and other passive activities, and allocate passive losses to corporate BACs holders to offset business income. One of the Partnership's objectives is to entitle qualified BACs holders to Housing Tax Credits over the period of the Partnership's entitlement to claim Tax Credits (for each Property, generally ten years from the date of investment or, if later, the date the Property is leased to qualified tenants; referred to herein as the "Credit Period"). Each of the Local Partnerships in which the Partnership has an interest has been allocated by the relevant state credit agency the authority to recognize Housing Tax Credits during the Credit Period, provided that the Local Partnership satisfies the rent restriction, minimum set-aside and other requirements for recognition of the Housing Tax Credits at all times during the 15-year period (the "Compliance Period"). Once a Local Partnership has become eligible to recognize Housing Tax Credits, it may lose such eligibility and suffer an event of "recapture" if its Property fails to remain in compliance with the Housing Tax Credit requirements. None of the Local Partnerships in which the Partnership has acquired an interest has suffered an event of recapture. Housing Tax Credits with respect to a given Apartment Complex are available for a ten-year period that commences when the property is leased to qualified tenants. However, the annual Housing Tax Credits available in the year in which the Apartment Complex is leased to qualified tenants must be prorated based upon the months remaining in the year. The amount of the annual Housing Tax Credits not available in the first year will be available in the eleventh year. Internal Revenue Code Section 42 regulates the use of the Apartment Complexes as to occupancy, eligibility, and unit gross rent, among other requirements. Each Apartment Complex must meet the provisions of these regulations during each of fifteen consecutive years (the "Compliance Period") in order to remain qualified to receive the credits. Certain Apartment Complexes have extended compliance periods of up to fifty years. A loss on impairment of assets is recorded when management estimates amounts recoverable through future operations and sale of the property on an undiscounted basis are below depreciated cost. At that time the property investments themselves are reduced to estimated fair value (generally using the discounted cash flow valuation method). Through March 31, 2005, the Partnership has not recorded any loss on impairment of assets or reduction to estimated fair value. While the value of the remaining Tax Credits are a factor in calculating fair value, the expiration of the Tax Credit Period, in and of itself, is not the only factor in determining whether there is an impairment and generally does not have any adverse impact on the fair value of the Local Partnerships. The Partnership generated $1,710,233 in Tax Credits during the 2002 Fiscal Year. As of December 31, 2002, all the Local Partnerships have completed their Tax Credit Periods and the Partnership has met its primary objective of generating Tax Credits for qualified BACs holders. However, each Local Partnership must 3 continue to comply with the Tax Credit requirements until the end of the Compliance Period in order to avoid recapture of the Tax Credits. The Compliance Period will end between December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2007 with respect to the Properties depending upon when the Credit Period commenced. The Partnership continues to meet its objective of allocating passive losses to individual BACs holders to offset passive income that they may realize from rental real estate investments and other passive activities, and allocating passive losses to corporate BACs holders to offset business income. As of March 31, 2005, cash distributions received from the Local Partnerships have been immaterial. Management expects that the distributions received from the Local Partnerships will increase, although not to a level sufficient to permit cash distributions to BACs holders. The Partnership does not anticipate providing cash distributions to BACs holders in circumstances other than refinancings or sales. Segments -------- The Partnership operates in one segment, which is the investment in multi-family residential property. Competition ----------- The real estate business is highly competitive and substantially all of the properties acquired are subject to active competition from similar properties in their respective vicinities. In addition, various other limited partnerships may, in the future, be formed by the General Partners and/or their affiliates to engage in businesses which may compete with the Partnership. Employees --------- The Partnership does not have any direct employees. All services are performed for the Partnership by its General Partners and their affiliates. The General Partners receive compensation in connection with such activities as set forth in Items 11 and 13. In addition, the Partnership reimburses the General Partners and certain of their affiliates for expenses incurred in connection with the performance by their employees of services for the Partnership in accordance with the Partnership's Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership (the "Partnership Agreement"). Item 2. Properties The Partnership holds a 99%, 98.99% and 98% limited partnership interest in nine, ten and twenty-three Local Partnerships, respectively. Set forth below is a schedule of these Local Partnerships including certain information concerning the Apartment Complexes (the "Local Partnership Schedule"). Further information concerning these Local Partnerships and their Properties, including any encumbrances affecting the Properties, may be found in Item 15 (a) 2; Schedule III.

Local Partnership Schedule -------------------------- % of Units Occupied at May 1, Name ~~and~~of Location ------------------------------------------------ (Number of Units) Date Acquired 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 ~~2000 1999~~ ---------------------------------- -------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Parkside Townhomes York, PA (53) September 1990 8992% 8798% 9489% 9887% ~~100~~94% Twin Trees Layton, UT (43) October 1990 9593% 9895% ~~100~~95% 98% 100% Bennion (Mulberry) Taylorsville, UT (80) October 1990 8895% 9693% 9488% 9096% 9894% Hunters Chase Madison, AL (91) October 1990 9580% 9380% 95% 8993% 95% Wilshire Park Huntsville, AL (65) October 1990 8885% 9491% 9588% 94% 8995% Bethel Park Bethel, OH (84) October 1990 8983% 8096% 8689% 9580% 8886% Zebulon Park Owensville, OH (66) October 1990 9486% 9594% 9794% 9695% 8597% Tivoli Place Murphreesboro, TN (61) October 1990 9295% 8990% 8892% 9589% 9888% Northwood (Hartwood) Jacksonville, FL (110) October 1990 9293% ~~100~~97% 9592% 96100% 9795% Oxford Trace Aiken, SC (29) October 1990 9790% 7996% 97% 9379% 97% ~~Ivanhoe Apts. Salt Lake City, UT (19) January 1991 79% 95% 95% 100% 100%~~

Local Partnership Schedule -------------------------- ~~(continued) -----------~~ % of Units Occupied at May 1, Name ~~and~~of Location ------------------------------------------------ (Number of Units) Date Acquired 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 ~~2000 1999~~ ---------------------------------- -------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Ivanhoe Apts Salt Lake City, UT (19) January 1991 95% 100% 79% 95% 95% Washington Brooklyn Brooklyn, NY (24) January 1991 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Manhattan B (C.H. Development) New York, NY (35) January 1991 100% ~~100~~97% 97100% 94100% 9497% Davidson Court Staten Island, NY (38) March 1991 100% ~~100~~97% 100% 95100% 97100% Magnolia Mews Philadelphia, PA (63) March 1991 9897% ~~100~~95% ~~100~~98% 100% 100% Oaks Village Whiteville, NC (40) March 1991 98100% 100% 98% 98100% 9398% Greenfield Village Dunn, NC (40) March 1991 98% ~~100~~98% 9598% 100% ~~100~~95% Morris Avenue (CLM Equities) Bronx, NY (58) April 1991 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Victoria Manor Riverside, CA (112) April 1991 ~~100~~98% 100% 100% 98100% 94100% Ogontz Hall Philadelphia, PA (35) April 1991 97% 90% 100% 65%(a) 100% ~~84% 97%~~ Eagle Ridge Stoughton, WI (54) May 1991 8983% 9387% 9689% 9193% 96% Nelson Anderson Bronx, NY (81) June 1991 9893% 9698% 98% 9996% 9798% Abraham Lincoln Apts. Irondequoit, NY (69) September 1991 8388% 9486% 9183% ~~100~~94% 9991% Wilson ~~Street~~Stree ~~Apts.~~ (Middletown)t Apts Middletown, PA (44) September 1991 9889% 9598% 9198% ~~100~~95% 9891% Lauderdale Lakes Lauderdale Lakes, FL (172) October 1991 97100% 9699% 9597% 9496% 9495% Flipper Temple Atlanta, GA (163) October 1991 97100% 100% ~~96%~~ 97% 100% 96% 220 Cooper Street Camden, NJ (29) December 1991 ~~100~~90% 93100% 97100% ~~100~~93% 7097% Pecan Creek Tulsa, OK (47) December 1991 85% 96% 92% 94% 98% Vendome Brooklyn, NY (24) December 1991 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rainer Villas New Augusta, MS (20) December 1991 90% 100% 85% 100% 100% Pine Shadow Apts Waveland, MS (48) December 1991 100% 100% 98% 91100% 100% Windsor Place Wedowee, AL (24) December 1991 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

None of the Local Partnership's assets or revenue balances are greater than 10% of the Partnership's total assets or revenue balances. All leases are generally for periods not greater than one to two years and no tenant occupies more than 10% of the rentable square footage. Commercial tenants (to which average rental per square foot applies) comprise less than 5% of the rental revenues of the Local Partnerships. Rents for the residential units are determined annually by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") and reflect increases, if any, in consumer price indices in various geographic areas. Management of the General Partners periodically reviews the physical state of the Properties and suggests to the respective Local General Partners budget improvements which are generally funded from cash flow from operations or release of replacement reserve escrows. Management of the General Partners periodically reviews the insurance coverage of the Properties and believes such coverage is adequate. See Item 1, Business, above for the general competitive conditions to which the Properties described above are subject. Real estate taxes are calculated using rates and assessed valuations determined by the township or city in which the Property is located. Such taxes have approximated 1% of the aggregate cost of the Properties as shown in Schedule III to the financial statements included herein. The General Partners generally required that the general partners of the Local Partnerships ("Local General Partners") undertake an obligation to fund operating deficits of the Local Partnership (up to a stated maximum amount) during a limited period of time (typically three to five years) following the achievement of break-even operations ("Operating Deficit Guarantees"). Under the terms of the Operating Deficit Guarantees, amounts funded are treated as operating loans, which do not bear interest and which will be repaid only out of 50% of available cash flow or out of available net sale or refinancing proceeds. As of March 31, 2005, all Operating Deficit Guarantees have expired. Item 3. Legal Proceeding Washington Brooklyn ------------------- In or about September 2003, two putative mortgagees commenced a mortgage foreclosure action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kings County (the "Court"), entitled 150 Beach 120th Street Inc. v. Washington Brooklyn Limited Partnership, Index No. 35255/2003, seeking to foreclose on an alleged $100,000 loan and mortgage against the real property (the "Apartment Complex") owned by Washington Brooklyn Limited Partnership ("Washington"). Apparently, the former general partner of Washington, BUFNY Houses of Brooklyn, Inc. ("BUFNY"), allegedly granted two mortgages in the amounts of $225,000 and $100,000 secured by the Apartment Complex. Each of the foregoing mortgages was granted without the knowledge of Freedom SLP, L.P. (the "Special Limited Partner") or the Partnership (collectively the "Freedom LPs") or the consent of the Special Limited Partner, as required by Washington's Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (the "Partnership Agreement"). The Freedom LPs believe that 6 BUFNY did not use the alleged loan proceeds for the benefit of Washington or the Apartment Complex. For these and other reasons, the Freedom LPs contend that the alleged mortgages are invalid. In addition, BUFNY allegedly failed to comply with the terms of either mortgage, which resulted in the holders of the alleged $100,000 mortgage commencing the foreclosure proceedings. BUFNY did not appear in or otherwise respond to the foreclosure proceedings. The holders of the alleged $225,000 mortgage have not yet, to the knowledge of the Freedom LPs, commenced any foreclosure proceedings. Shortly after the Freedom LPs became aware of these foreclosure proceedings, their counsel contacted counsel for the plaintiffs and mortgagees in an effort to learn more about the alleged mortgages and to resolve the disputes relating to the mortgages. When those efforts failed, the Freedom LPs filed a motion to intervene in the foreclosure action and for leave to file a late answer on behalf of themselves and Washington. The Freedom LPs contend that the mortgages are invalid and that Washington is not liable for them or the underlying indebtedness. In an order dated September 7, 2004, the Court granted the Freedom L.P.s' motion to intervene and to file a late answer on behalf of the Partnership. On or about September 21, 2004, the Freedom LPs, on behalf of themselves and the Partnership, served an answer, counterclaims and crossclaims in defending against the action. The answer denied the material allegations of the complaint and asserted certain affirmative defenses, counterclaims and crossclaims. Among other things, the Freedom LPs, on behalf of themselves and the Partnership, added The Levites Organization, one of the two co-holders of the $225,000 mortgage for which the plaintiffs' complaint did not seek foreclosure, as an additional counterclaim defendant, and the Freedom LPs assert that both the $100,000 and $225,000 mortgages are invalid and void ab initio. The parties are currently engaged in taking discovery. The Freedom LPs intend to defend the action and prosecute their counterclaims and crossclaims vigorously. The final outcome of this case, however, cannot be determined at this time. If the Court were to reject the Freedom LPs defenses and counterclaims, then it is possible that the Apartment Complex might be foreclosed upon and the Partnership might lose its title to and interests in the Apartment Complex. In addition, due to BUFNY's breach of fiduciary duties and breaches of the Partnership Agreement, the Special Limited Partner exercised its rights under the Partnership Agreement to remove BUFNY as Washington's general partner and to substitute itself as the new replacement general partner, effective April 26, 2004. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders None 7 PART II Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Security Holder Matters And Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities As of March 31, 2005, the Partnership had issued and has outstanding 72,896 Limited Partnership Interests, each representing a $1,000 capital contribution to the Partnership, or an aggregate capital contribution of $72,896,000. All of the issued and outstanding Limited Partnership Interests have been issued to Freedom Assignor Inc. (the "Assignor Limited Partner"), which has in turn issued 72,896 BACs to the purchasers thereof for an aggregate purchase price of $72,896,000. Each BAC represents all of the economic and virtually all of the ownership rights attributable to a Limited Partnership Interest held by the Assignor Limited Partner. BACs may be converted into Limited Partnership Interests at no cost to the holder (other than the payment of transfer costs not to exceed $100), but Limited Partnership Interests so acquired are not thereafter convertible into BACs. As of May 5, 2005, the Partnership has 4,146 registered holders of an aggregate of 72,896 BACs. Neither the BACs nor the Limited Partnership Interests are traded on any established trading market. The Partnership does not intend to include the BACs for quotation on NASDAQ or for listing on any national or regional stock exchange or any other established securities market. The Revenue Act of 1987 contained provisions which have an adverse impact on investors in "publicly traded partnerships." Accordingly, the General Partners have imposed restrictions limiting the transferability of the BACs and the Limited Partnership Interests in secondary market transactions. These restrictions should prevent a public trading market from developing that would adversely affect the ability of an investor to liquidate his or her investment quickly. It is expected that such procedures will remain in effect until such time, if ever, as further revision of the Revenue Act of 1987 may permit the Partnership to lessen the scope of the restrictions. All of the Partnership's general partnership interests, representing an aggregate capital contribution of $2,000, are held by the two General Partners. There are no material restrictions in the Partnership Agreement on the ability of the Partnership to make distributions. The Partnership has made no distributions to the BACs holders as of March 31, 2005. The Partnership does not anticipate providing cash distributions to its BACs holders other than from net refinancing or sales proceeds. Item 6. Selected Financial Data. The information set forth below presents selected financial data of the Partnership. Additional financial information is set forth in the audited consolidated financial statements in Item 8 hereof.

For the ~~Years~~Year ~~ended~~Ended March 31, -----------------------------------------------------------------------------~~-------~~ OPERATIONS 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 ~~2000 1999~~ --------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Revenues $ 16,579,681 $ 16,373,601 $ 15,732,226 $ 15,417,026 $ 14,946,838 $Expenses 14(20,~~333~~842,~~134~~844) ~~$ 13~~(20,~~968~~165,~~742~~525) ~~Expenses~~ (19,523,423) (19,207,657) (19,238,172) ~~(18,617,952) (18,748,002)~~ Loss on impairment of assets 0 0 0 0 (2,065,000) ~~(500,000) 0~~ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Loss before minority interest (34,~~791~~263,~~197~~163) (3,~~790~~791,~~631~~924) (63,~~356~~791,~~334~~197) (43,~~784~~790,~~818~~631) (46,~~779~~356,~~260~~334) Minority interest 43,525 36,960 37,450 39,461 48,280 ~~50,054 50,809~~ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Net loss $ (34,~~753~~219,~~747~~638) $ (3,~~751~~754,~~170~~964) $ (63,~~308~~753,~~054~~747) $ (43,~~734~~751,~~764~~170) $ (46,~~728~~308,~~451~~054) ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ Per BAC: Net loss ~~(50.98)~~$ (5057.9431) $ (8551.6700) $ (6450.3098) $ (6450.2294) ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ March 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ OPERATIONS 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Total assets $ ~~93,667,833 $ 97,175,105 $100,937,211 $107,181,062 $111,946,154 ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ Mortgage notes payable $~~ (85.67~~,366,819~~) ~~$ 68,063,227 $ 69,021,892 $ 69,914,088 $ 70,447,844~~ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ Total liabilities $ 79,736,876 $ 79,553,880 $ 79,602,583 $ 79,522,764 $ 79,491,693 ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ Total partners' capital $ 5,851,700 $ 9,605,982 $ 13,357,152 $ 19,669,754 $ 24,407,636 ============ ============ ============ ============ ============

~~ASSETS~~For ~~2003~~the ~~2002~~Year Ended March 31, ------------ ----------- ~~Property and equipment~~ ------------------------------------------------------ ~~(at~~FINANCIAL ~~cost,~~POSITION ~~net~~2005 of2004 ~~accumulated~~2003 ~~depreciation~~2002 of2001 ~~$58,927,642~~--------------------------------- ~~and~~------------ ~~$54,178,153,~~------------ ~~respectively)~~------------ (Notes 4 and 6) $84,274,411 $88,272,567 Cash and cash equivalents 2,247,128 1,833,843 Investment in marketable securities (Note 2) 109,498 109,005 Cash held in escrow 4,654,612 4,671,259 Deferred costs (net of accumulated amortization of $1,821,322 and $1,655,647, respectively) (Note 5) 1,141,493 1,286,292 Other assets 1,240,691 1,002,139 ------------ ------------ Total ~~Assets~~assets $ 85,974,318 $ 89,939,866 $ 93,667,833 $ 97,175,105 $100,937,211 ============ ============ ~~LIABILITIES~~============ ~~AND~~============ ~~PARTNERS'~~============ ~~CAPITAL (DEFICIT) Liabilities:~~ Mortgage notes payable ~~(Note~~$ 6)65,119,347 $ 66,285,158 $ 67,366,819 $ 68,063,227 ~~Accounts~~$ ~~payable and other liabilities 1~~69,~~411~~021,~~077~~892 ~~1,649,957~~============ ~~Due~~============ to============ ~~local~~============ ~~general~~============ ~~partners~~Total ~~and~~liabilities ~~affiliates~~$ ~~(Note 7) 4~~80,~~025~~056,~~449~~413 ~~3,819,933~~$ ~~Due to general partners and affiliates (Note 7) 6~~79,~~933~~841,~~531~~161 ~~6,020,763~~$ ~~----------- ----------- Total Liabilities~~ 79,736,876 $ 79,553,880 ~~-----------~~$ ~~----------- Minority interests 8~~79,~~079~~602,~~257~~583 ~~8,015,243~~============ ~~-----------~~============ ~~-----------~~============ ~~Partners'~~============ ~~Capital~~============ ~~(Deficit):~~Total ~~Limited~~ partners' (~~72,896 BACs issued and outstanding~~deficit) ~~6,470,255~~capital ~~10,186,465~~$ ~~General partners~~ (~~622~~2,~~165) (584~~122,~~628~~902) ~~Accumulated~~$ ~~other comprehensive income: Unrealized gain on marketable securities 3~~2,~~610 4~~096,~~145~~736 ~~-----------~~$ ~~----------- Total Partners' Capital (Deficit)~~ 5,851,700 $ 9,605,982 ~~----------- ----------- Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 7 and 9) Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital (Deficit)~~ $~~93,667,833~~ ~~$97~~13,~~175~~357,~~105~~152 ============ ============ ~~See~~============ ~~accompanying~~============ ~~notes to consolidated financial statements.~~============

8 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources ------------------------------- General ------- During the year ended March 31, 2005, the primary sources of liquidity included working capital, interest earned on working capital, and distributions received from the Local Partnerships. None of these sources generated substantial amounts of funds. Working capital of approximately $81,000, exclusive of Local Partnerships' working capital, remains as of March 31, 2005. It is used to pay operating expenses of the Partnership, including Partnership management fees payable to the General Partners and advances to Local Partnerships if warranted. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, cash and cash equivalents of the Partnership and its forty-two Local Partnerships decreased approximately $342,000 due to capital improvements ($568,000), a net decrease in due to local general partners and affiliates relating to investing and finance activities ($322,000) and net repayments of mortgage loans ($1,166,000) which exceeded cash provided by operating activities ($1,626,000), an increase in deferred costs ($5,000) and an increase in capitalization of consolidated subsidiaries attributable to minority interest ($82,000). Included in the adjustments to reconcile the net loss to cash provided by operating activities is depreciation and amortization ($5,074,000). During the years ended March 31, 2005 ("Fiscal Year 2005"), March 31, 2004 ("Fiscal Year 2004"), and March 31, 2003 ("Fiscal Year 2003") the amounts received from the Local Partnerships were $138,247, $15,544 and $54,651, respectively. Cash distributions from Local Partnerships are not expected to reach a level sufficient to permit cash distributions to BACs holders. These distributions, as well as the working capital reserves referred to in the paragraph above, will be used to meet the operating expenses of the Partnership. Total expenses for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, excluding depreciation and amortization, interest and general and administrative - related parties, totaled $9,696,515 and $9,006,457. Accounts payable and other liabilities totaled $2,455,386 and $1,771,574, which is comprised of the following amounts:

~~----------------------------------------~~March ~~2003 2002 2001 ----------- ----------- ----------- Revenues: Rental income $14~~31,~~282,724~~ ~~$13,742,506 $13,339,955 Other 1,449,502 1,674,520 1,606,883~~ ----------- ----------- ----------- ~~Total~~2005 ~~Revenues~~2004 ~~15,732,226 15,417,026 14,946,838~~ ----------- ----------- -~~----------~~ ~~Expenses:~~Accounts ~~Repairs~~payable ~~and~~$ ~~maintenance 2~~234,~~534,896~~182 ~~2,569,601~~$ 2(291,~~417,802~~828) ~~Operating~~Accrued ~~and~~interest ~~other~~payable ~~2,094,185~~ 1,~~791~~484,~~861~~260 1,~~756~~336,~~607~~537 ~~Real~~Security ~~estate~~deposits ~~taxes~~payable ~~995~~736,~~566~~944 ~~986~~726,~~059~~865 1,008,991 Interest 4,509,840 4,565,170 4,647,954 Depreciation and amortization (Notes 4 and 5) 4,915,164 5,009,392 5,103,725 General and administrative 2,767,712 2,677,059 2,674,584 General and administrative-~~related parties (Note 7) 1,706,060 1,608,515 1,628,509 Loss on impairment of assets (Note 4) 0 0 2,065,000~~ ----------- ----------- ~~-----------~~ Total ~~Expenses~~accounts ~~19,523,423~~payable 19,207,657 21,303,172 ----------- ----------- ----------- Loss before minority interest (3,791,197) (3,790,631) (6,356,334) Minority interest in loss of subsidiaries 37,450 39,461 48,280 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net loss $~~(3,753,747)~~ ~~$(3~~2,~~751~~455,~~170)~~386 $ (61,~~308~~771,~~054)~~574 =========== =========== =========== Net loss - limited partners $(3,716,210) $(3,713,658) $ (6,244,973) =========== =========== =========== Number of BACs outstanding 72,896 72,896 72,896 =========== =========== =========== Net loss per BAC $ (50.98) $ (50.94) $ (85.67) =========== =========== ===========

Accounts payable are short term liabilities which are expected to be paid from operating cash flows, working capital balances at the Local Partnership level, local general partner advances and in certain circumstances advances from the Partnership. Because the provisions of the secondary loans defer the payment of accrued interest of the respective Local Partnerships, the Partnership believes it (and the applicable Local Partnerships) has sufficient liquidity and ability to generate cash and to meet existing and known or reasonably likely future cash requirements over both the short and long term. As indicated in the above table, accrued interest payable comprised approximately 60% and 75% of the total accounts payable and other liabilities amount at March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Such amount represents the accrued interest on all mortgage loans, which include primary and secondary loans. Certain secondary loans have provisions such that interest is accrued but not payable until a future date. The Partnership anticipates the payment of accrued interest on the secondary loans (which make up the majority of the accrued interest payable amount indicated in the above table and which have been accumulating since the Partnership's investment in the respective Local Partnership) will be made from future refinancings or sales proceeds of the respective Local Partnerships. In addition, each Local Partnership's mortgage notes are collateralized by the land and buildings of the respective Local Partnership, and are without further recourse to the Partnership. Security deposits payable are offset by cash held in security deposits, which are included in "Cash held in escrow" on the financial statements. Partnership management fees owed to General Partners amounting to approximately $6,884,000 and $6,208,000 were accrued and unpaid as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Without the General Partners continued accrual without payment, the Partnership will not be in a position to meet its obligations. The General Partners have continued allowing the accrual without payment of these amounts, but are under no obligation to continue to do so. The Partnership is dependent upon the support of the General Partners and certain of its affiliates in order to meet its obligations at the Partnership level. The General Partners and these affiliates have agreed to continue such support for the foreseeable future. Effective January 1, 1999 the State of California requires owners of a property benefiting from FHA insured mortgages under Section 236 or 221(a)(3) to provide a nine month notice of contract termination or prepayment of the FHA insured loan. In addition, with respect to the Partnership's California investments, the owner must offer the properties for sale to those entities who agree to maintain the property as affordable housing. On October 20, 1999 President Clinton signed the Fiscal Year 2000 VA, the HUD Independent Agencies Appropriations Act (the "Appropriations Act"). The Appropriations Act contains revisions to the HUD Mark-to-Market Program and other HUD programs concerning the preservation of the HUD housing stock. On December 29, 1999 HUD issued Notice H99-36 addressing "Project Based Section 8 Contracts Expiring in Fiscal Year 2000," reflecting the changes in the Appropriations Act and superceding earlier HUD Notices 98-34, 99-08, 99-15, 99-21 and 99-32. Notice 99-36 clarifies many of the earlier uncertainties with respect to the earlier HUD Section 8 Mark-to-Market Programs and continued the Mark-to-Market Program which allows owners with Section 8 contracts to increase the rents to market levels where contract rents are currently below market. As 9 of March 31, 2005, none of the Local Partnerships have opted to enter the Mark-to-Market Program and therefore this has no impact on the Partnership. Except as described above, management is not aware of any trends or events, commitments or uncertainties, which have not otherwise been disclosed, that will or are likely to impact liquidity in a material way. Management believes the only impact would be from laws that have not yet been adopted. The portfolio is diversified by the location of the Properties around the United States so that if one area of the country is experiencing downturns in the economy, the remaining Properties in the portfolio may not be affected. However, the geographic diversification of the portfolio may not protect against a general downturn in the national economy. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations --------------------------------------------- The following table summarizes the Partnership's commitments as of March 31, 2005 to make future payments under its debt agreements and other contractual obligations.

~~Accumulated~~Less ~~Other~~than ~~Limited~~1 ~~General Comprehensive Comprehensive Total Partners Partners Income (Loss) Loss~~ -~~--------~~ ~~--------~~3 ~~--------~~3 -~~------------~~5 ~~-------------~~More ~~Partners'~~than ~~capital~~Total ~~(deficit)~~1 -Year ~~$19,669,754~~Years ~~$20,145,096~~Years $5 ~~(484,035)~~Years ~~$ 8,693 March 31, 2000 Comprehensive Loss: Net Loss (6,308,054) (6,244,973) (63,081) 0 (6,308,054) Other Comprehensive Loss: Net unrealized loss on marketable securities (4,548) 0 0 (4,548) (4,548)~~ ----------- -~~----------~~ ----------- --~~--------~~ ---------- ~~Total Comprehensive Loss $ (6,312,602) ============ Partners' capital (deficit)~~ - ~~March 31, 2001 13,357,152 13,900,123 (547,116) 4,145 Comprehensive Loss: Net Loss (3,751,170) (3,713,658) (37,512) 0 (3,751,170)~~ -~~----------~~ ----------- -~~----------~~ ---------- --~~----------~~ ~~Total~~Mortgage ~~Comprehensive~~notes ~~Loss~~payable $ (~~3,751,170~~a) ~~============~~$ ~~Partners' capital (deficit) - March 31~~65, ~~2002 9~~119,~~605,982~~347 10,186,465 (584,628) 4,145 Comprehensive Loss: Net Loss (3,753,747) (3,716,210) (37,537) 0 (3,753,747) Other Comprehensive Loss: Net unrealized loss on marketable securities (535) 0 0 (535) (535) ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ------------ Total Comprehensive Loss $ (31,~~754~~232,~~282)~~658 ~~============ Partners' capital (deficit) - March 31, 2003~~ $ 521,~~851~~677,~~700~~629 $ 61,~~470~~808,~~255~~003 $ ~~(622~~40,~~165) $ 3~~401,~~610 =========== =========== =========== ==========~~057

(a) The mortgage notes are payable in aggregate monthly installments of approximately $438,000 including principal and interest with rates varying from 0% to 13.50% per annum and have maturity dates ranging from 2005 through 2042. The loans are collateralized by the land and buildings of the subsidiary partnerships, the assignment of certain subsidiary partnerships' rents, leases, and replacement reserves, and are without further recourse. Off Balance Sheet Arrangements ------------------------------ The Partnership has no off-balance sheet arrangements. Critical Accounting Estimates ----------------------------- In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has made estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Set forth below is a summary of the accounting policies that management believes are critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. a) Property and Equipment/Valuation of Long-Lived Assets Property and equipment to be held and used are carried at cost which includes the purchase price, acquisition fees and expenses, and any other costs incurred in acquiring the properties. The cost of property and equipment is depreciated over their estimated useful lives using accelerated and straight-line methods. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred; major renewals and betterments are capitalized. At the time property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the assets and accumulated depreciation accounts and the profit or loss on such disposition is reflected in earnings. The Partnership complies with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144 "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets". A loss on impairment of assets is recorded when management estimates amounts recoverable through future operations and sale of the property on an undiscounted basis are below depreciated cost. At that time property investments themselves are reduced to estimated fair value (generally using discounted cash flows) when the property is considered to be impaired and the depreciated cost exceeds estimated fair value. Through March 31, 2005, the Partnership has not recorded any loss on impairment of assets or reductions to estimated fair value. b) Revenue Recognition Rental income is earned under standard residential operating leases and is typically due the first day of each month, but can vary by property due to the terms of the tenant leases. Rental income is recognized when earned and charged to tenants' accounts receivable if not received by the due date. Rental payments received in advance of the due date are deferred until earned. Rental subsidies are recognized as rental income during the month in which it is earned. The Partnership received rental subsidies which amounted to approximately $3,488,027, $3,326,225 and $3,178,000 for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The related rental subsidy programs have expiration dates that terminate upon total disbursement of the assistance obligation. Other revenues are recorded when earned and consist of the following items: Interest income earned on cash and cash equivalent balances and cash held in escrow balances, income from forfeited security deposits, late charges, laundry and vending income and other rental related items. Other revenues include the following amounts at both the Partnership and Local Partnership level:

March 31, ------------------------------------------ ~~2003~~2005 2002*2004 2001*2003 ----------- ----------- ----------- ~~Cash~~Interest ~~flows from operating activities: Net loss~~ $~~(3,753,747)~~ ~~$(3~~146,~~751,170)~~855 $~~(6,308,054)~~ ~~Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 4~~142,~~915,164~~223 ~~5,009,392~~$ 5259,~~103,725~~247 ~~Loss~~Other on impairment of assets 0 0 2,065,000 Minority interest in loss of subsidiaries (37,450) (39,461) (48,280) (Increase) decrease in other assets (238,552) (5,698) 85,256 Decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities (238,880) (205,198) (254,461) Decrease (increase) in cash held in escrow 16,647 (303,649) (55,973) Increase in due to general partners and affiliates 912,768 918,843 995,253 Increase in due to local general partners and affiliates 47,959 147,805 75,577 Decrease in due to local general partners and affiliates (134,954) (27,862) (10,278) ----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by operating activities 1,~~488~~401,~~955~~069 1,~~743~~434,~~002~~220 1,~~647~~190,~~765~~255 ----------- ----------- ----------- ~~Cash~~Total ~~flows~~other ~~from~~revenue ~~investing activities: Additions to property and equipment (751~~$1,~~333) (772~~547,~~121)~~924 ~~(771,026) Increase in marketable securities (~~$1,~~028) 0 0 Increase in due to local general partners and affiliates 0 3~~576,~~570~~443 11$1,~~012 Decrease in due to local general partners and affiliates (17~~449,~~863)~~502 ~~(12,255)~~========== 0========== ~~----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash used in investing activities (770,224) (780,806) (760,014) ----------- ----------- -----------~~==========

10 c) Related Parties Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement , the General Partners and their affiliates are entitled to receive compensation from the Partnership in consideration of certain services rendered to the Partnership by such parties. In addition, the General Partners collectively hold a 1% interest in all profits, losses and distributions attributable to operations and a subordinated 15% interest in such items attributable to sales and refinancings. Certain directors and officers of the General Partners receive compensation from the General Partner and their affiliates for services performed for various affiliated entities which may include services performed for the Partnership. The maximum annual partnership management fee paid to the General Partner is 0.5% of invested assets. See Note 7 to the Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference. New Accounting Pronouncements ----------------------------- On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets - An Amendment of APB Opinion NO. 29 ("SFAS No. 153"). The Amendments made by SFAS No. 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the narrow exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replace it with a broader exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have "commercial substance." SFAS No. 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Partnership does not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 153 on June 15, 2005 will have a material effect on the Partnership's consolidated financial statements. In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46"). FIN 46 is applicable immediately for variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. For variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN 46 were originally applicable no later than December 15, 2003. The Partnership has not created any variable interest entities after January 31, 2003. In December 2003 the FASB redeliberated certain proposed modifications and revised FIN 46 ("FIN 46 (R)"). The revised provisions are applicable no later than the first reporting period ending after March 15, 2004. The adoption of FIN 46 (R) does not have a material impact on the Partnership's financial reporting and disclosures. In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity." SFAS No. 150 changes the accounting for certain financial instruments that, under previous guidance, could be classified as equity or "mezzanine" equity, by now requiring those instruments to be classified as liabilities (or assets in some circumstances) in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Further, SFAS No. 150 requires disclosure regarding the terms of those instruments and settlement alternatives. The guidance in SFAS No. 150 generally was effective for all financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and was otherwise effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Partnership has evaluated SFAS No. 150 and determined that it does not have an impact on the Partnership's financial reporting and disclosures. Results of Operations --------------------- Property and equipment to be held and used are carried at cost which includes the purchase price, acquisition fees and expenses, construction period interest and any other costs incurred in acquiring the Properties. The cost of property and equipment is depreciated over their estimated useful lives using accelerated and straight-line methods. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred; major renewals and betterments are capitalized. At the time property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the assets and accumulated depreciation accounts and the profit or loss on such disposition is reflected in earnings. A loss on impairment of assets is recorded when management estimates amounts recoverable through future operations and sale of the property on an undiscounted basis are below depreciated cost. At that time property investments themselves are reduced to estimated fair value (generally using discounted estimated future cash flows) when the property is considered to be impaired and the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value. During the years ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Partnership did not record a loss on impairment of assets. Through March 31, 2005, the Partnership has recorded an aggregate of $3,665,000 of losses on impairment of assets. The Partnership's primary source of income continues to be rental income with the corresponding expenses being divided among operations, depreciation, and mortgage interest. 2005 vs. 2004 ------------- Rental income increased approximately 2% for the year ended March 31, 2005 as compared to 2004, primarily due to rental rate increases. Total expenses, excluding real estate taxes and general and administrative, remained fairly consistent with an increase of less than 1% for the year ended March 31, 2005, as compared to 2004. Real estate taxes increased approximately $108,000 for the year ended March 31, 2005 as compared to 2004, primarily due to an increase in state property taxes in 2004 at one Local Partnership and an increase in the assessment value due to a property revaluation at another Local Partnership. General and administrative increased approximately $411,000 for the year ended March 31, 2005 as compared to 2004, primarily due to the recognized loss on the write-off of an amount due from the former Local General Partner at one Local Partnership, the payment of an incentive supervisory management fees to the Local General Partner at a second Local Partnership and an increase in legal fees relating to the Washington Brooklyn legal proceeding at the Partnership level (Item 3). 11 2004 vs. 2003 ------------- Rental income increased approximately 4% for the year ended March 31, 2004 as compared to 2003, primarily due to rental rate increases. Total expenses, excluding repairs and maintenance, remained fairly consistent with an increase of approximately 2% for the year ended March 31, 2004 as compared to 2003. Repairs and maintenance increased approximately $298,000 for the year ended March 31, 2004 as compared to 2003, primarily due to exterior painting and the replacement of awnings at one Local Partnership and the replacement of carpets, interior painting and fire damage repairs at a second Local Partnership. Other ----- As of December 31, 2002, the Tax Credit Period for all of the Properties has expired, although each Local Partnership must continue to comply with the Tax Credit requirements until the end of the Compliance Period in order to avoid recapture of the Tax Credits. During the years ended March 31, 2003, the Housing Tax Credits received by the Partnership for income tax purposes totaled $1,710,233. The Compliance Period will end between December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2007 with respect to the Properties depending upon when the Tax Credit Period commenced. The Partnership's investments as limited partners in the Local Partnerships are subject to the risks incident to the management and ownership of improved real estate. The Partnership's investments also could be adversely affected by poor economic conditions generally, which could increase vacancy levels, rental payment defaults and operating expenses, any or all of which could threaten the financial viability of one or more of the Local Partnerships. There are also substantial risks associated with the operation of Apartment Complexes receiving government assistance. These include governmental regulations concerning tenant eligibility, which may make it more difficult to rent apartments in the complexes; difficulties in obtaining government approval for rent increases; limitations on the percentage of income which low and moderate income tenants may pay as rent; the possibility that Congress may not appropriate funds to enable HUD to make the rental assistance payments it has contracted to make; and that when the rental assistance contracts expire there may not be market demand for apartments at full market rents in a Local Partnership's Apartment Complex. The Local Partnerships are impacted by inflation in several ways. Inflation generally allows for increases in rental rates to reflect the impact of higher operating and replacement costs. Inflation also affects the Local Partnerships adversely by increasing operating costs as a result of higher costs of such items as fuel, utilities and labor. However, continued inflation may result in appreciated values of the Local Partnerships' Apartment Complexes over a period of time as rental revenues and replacement costs continue to increase. The Partnership does not anticipate that it will be in a position to make cash distributions at any time prior to the disposition of the Properties. If distributions of operating cash flow are made, it is expected that they will be limited. As of March 31, 2005, no such distributions have been made. Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk The Partnership has mortgage notes that are payable in aggregate monthly installments including principal and interest at rates varying from 0% to 13.50% per annum. The Partnership does not believe there is a material risk associated with the various interest rates associated with the mortgage notes as the majority of the Local Partnership mortgage notes have fixed rates. The Partnership currently discloses in Item 8, Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the fair value of the mortgage notes payable. The Partnership does not have any other market sensitive instruments. 12 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

~~----------------------------------------~~Sequential ~~2003~~Page 2002* 2001* ----------- ~~----------- ----------- Cash flows from financing activities: Increase in deferred costs~~ (~~20,876~~a) ~~(3,071)~~1. 0Consolidated ~~Repayments~~Financial ofStatements ~~mortgage~~Report ~~loans~~of -Independent ~~net~~Registered ~~(696,408)~~Public ~~(958,665)~~Accounting ~~(892,196)~~Firm ~~Increase~~14 inConsolidated ~~due~~Balance toSheets ~~local~~as ~~general~~of ~~partners~~March ~~and affiliates 547~~31,~~880~~ ~~241,400~~2005 ~~221,346 Decrease in due to local general partners~~ and ~~affiliates~~2004 ~~(237,506)~~107 ~~(156,341)~~Consolidated ~~(66,434)~~Statements ~~Increase in capitalization~~ of ~~consolidated~~Operations ~~subsidiaries~~for ~~attributable~~the toyears ~~minority~~ended ~~interest~~March ~~101~~31,~~464~~ 772005,~~228~~ ~~37,212~~2004 ~~-----------~~and ~~-----------~~2003 ~~-----------~~108 ~~Net~~Consolidated ~~cash~~Statements ~~used~~of Changes in ~~financing~~Partners' ~~activities~~Capital (~~305,446~~Deficit) ~~(799,449)~~for ~~(700,072)~~the ~~-----------~~years ~~-----------~~ended ~~-----------~~March ~~Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 413~~31,~~285~~ ~~162~~2005,~~747~~ ~~187,679~~2004 ~~Cash~~ and ~~cash~~2003 ~~equivalents~~109 atConsolidated ~~beginning~~Statements of ~~year 1,833,843 1,671,096 1,483,417 ----------- ----------- -----------~~ Cash ~~and~~Flows ~~cash~~for ~~equivalents~~the atyears ~~end~~ended ofMarch ~~year $ 2~~31,~~247,128~~ ~~$ 1~~2005,~~833,843~~ $2004 ~~1,671,096~~and ~~===========~~2003 ~~===========~~110 ~~===========~~Notes ~~Supplemental~~to ~~disclosure~~Consolidated ofFinancial ~~cash~~Statements ~~flow information: Cash paid during the year for interest $ 3,303,877 $ 3,477,748 $ 3,531,298 =========== =========== ===========~~111

13 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ------------------------------------------------------- TO THE PARTNERS OF FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in partners' capital (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of forty-two, forty-two and forty subsidiary partnerships, whose losses aggregated $3,170,560, $2,809,693 and $3,382,460 for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and whose assets constituted 99% of consolidated assets at March 31, 2005 and 2004. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose reports have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for these subsidiary partnerships, is based solely on the reports of the other auditors. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the reports of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of the other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Friedman LLP New York, New York June 10, 2005 14 [Letterhead of McKonly & Asbury LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT The Partners of Parkside Townhomes Associates Lancaster, Pennsylvania We have audited the accompanying Balance Sheets of Parkside Townhomes Associates (a limited partnership), as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of Income, Partners' Equity (Deficit), and Cash Flows, for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and standards applicable to financial audits contained in GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Parkside Townhomes Associates at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations, and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency's Financial Reporting Manual, we have also issued a report dated February 4, 2005, on our consideration of Parkside Townhomes Associates' internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements, and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and should be considered in assessing the results of our audits. /s/ McKonly & Asbury LLP Harrisburg, Pennsylvania February 4, 2005 15 [Letterhead of McKonly & Asbury LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT The Partners of Parkside Townhomes Associates Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency Lancaster, Pennsylvania Harrisburg, Pennsylvania We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Parkside Townhomes Associates (a limited partnership), PHFA Project No. 0 - 90 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of profit and loss, partners' equity, and cash flows, for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Parkside Townhomes Associates at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and its profit and loss, partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency's Financial Reporting Manual, we have also issued our report dated January 27, 2004 on our consideration of Parkside Townhomes Associates' internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, PHFA regulations, contracts and grants and have rendered our reports thereon on pages 25 and 26. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audits. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplementary information on pages 18 through 24 is presented for the purpose of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ McKonly & Asbury LLP Harrisburg, Pennsylvania January 27, 2004 16 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Twin Trees Apartments, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Twin Trees Apartments, A Limited Partnership (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of loss, partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Twin Trees Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 4, 2005 17 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Twin Trees Apartments, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Twin Trees Apartments, A Limited Partnership (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of loss, partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Twin Trees Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 6, 2004 18 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Bennion Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Bennion Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of loss, partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bennion Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 4, 2005 19 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Bennion Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Bennion Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related statements of loss, partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bennion Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 6, 2004 20 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Hunters Chase Apartments, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Hunters Chase Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of loss, partners' capital (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hunters Chase Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 4, 2005 21 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Hunters Chase Apartments, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Hunters Chase Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related statements of loss, partners' capital (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hunters Chase Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 6, 2004 22 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Wilshire Apartments, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Wilshire Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of loss, partners' deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Wilshire Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 4, 2005 23 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Wilshire Apartments, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Wilshire Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of loss, partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Wilshire Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 6, 2004 24 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Bethel Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Bethel Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of loss, partners' capital (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bethel Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 4, 2005 25 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Bethel Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Bethel Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of loss, partners' capital (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bethel Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 6, 2004 26 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Zebulon Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Zebulon Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2004, and 2003, and the related statements of loss, partners' capital (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Zebulon Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 4, 2005 27 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Zebulon Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Zebulon Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2003, and 2002, and the related statements of loss, partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Zebulon Park Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 6, 2004 28 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Tivoli Place Apartments, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Tivoli Place Apartments, A Limited Partnership (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related statements of loss, partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tivoli Place Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004and 2003 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 4, 2005 29 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Tivoli Place Apartments, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Tivoli Place Apartments, A Limited Partnership (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2003, and 2002, and the related statements of loss, partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tivoli Place Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 6, 2004 30 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Northwood Apartments of Georgia, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Northwood Apartments of Georgia, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Northwood Apartments of Georgia, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 4, 2005 31 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Northwood Apartments of Georgia, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Northwood Apartments of Georgia, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related statements of loss, partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Northwood Apartments of Georgia, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 6, 2004 32 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Oxford Trace Apartments, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Oxford Trace Apartments, A Limited Partnership (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related statements of loss, partners' capital (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Oxford Trace Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 4, 2005 33 [LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Oxford Trace Apartments, A Limited Partnership: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Oxford Trace Apartments, A Limited Partnership (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related statements of loss, partners' capital (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Oxford Trace Apartments, A Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 6, 2004 34 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners of Ivanhoe Apartments Limited Partnership We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Ivanhoe Apartments Limited Partnership (a Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ivanhoe Apartments Limited Partnership at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Lake, Hill & Myers Salt Lake City, Utah January 13, 2005 35 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners of Ivanhoe Apartments Limited Partnership We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Ivanhoe Apartments Limited Partnership (a Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ivanhoe Apartments Limited Partnership at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Lake, Hill & Myers Salt Lake City, Utah January 13, 2004 36 [Letterhead of Koch Group & Company, LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Partners Washington Brooklyn Limited Partnership We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Washington Brooklyn Limited Partnership (A State of Delaware Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2004, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain a reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to in the first paragraph, present fairly in all material respects, the financial position of Washington Brooklyn Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying information in Schedule I is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statement. Such information has been subjected to the procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ Koch Group & Company, LLP Certified Public Accountants New York, New York February 23, 2005 37 [Letterhead of AGBIMSON & CO., PLLC] INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Partners Washington Brooklyn Limited Partnership (A State of Delaware Limited Partnership) We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Washington Brooklyn Limited Partnership (A State of Delaware Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted the audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain a reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to in the first paragraph, present fairly in all material respects, the financial position of Washington Brooklyn Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplementary information in Schedule I is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statement. Such information has been subjected to the procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ AGBIMSON & CO., PLLC Rockville Centre, New York March 31, 2004 38 [Letterhead of Richard J. Klinkowitz] To the Partners C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES (A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP) 625 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10022-1801 Gentlemen: I have audited the accompanying balance sheet of C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES (a New York Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2004 and the related statement of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on the audit. I conducted the audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain a reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that the audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion. In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES as of December 31, 2004 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Richard J. Klinkowitz Far Rockaway, New York February 11, 2005 39 [Letterhead of Richard J. Klinkowitz] To the Partners C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES (A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP) 625 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10022 Gentlemen: I have audited the accompanying balance sheet of C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES (a New York Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2003 and the related statement of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on the audit. I conducted the audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain a reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that the audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion. In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES as of December 31, 2003 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Richard J. Klinkowitz Far Rockaway, New York February 18, 2004 40 [Letterhead of Richard J. Klinkowitz] To the Partners C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES (A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP) 625 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10022 Gentlemen: I have audited the accompanying balance sheet of C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES (a New York Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2002 and the related statement of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on the audit. I conducted the audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain a reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that the audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion. In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of C-H DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES as of December 31, 2002 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Richard J. Klinkowitz Far Rockaway, New York February 22, 2003 41 [Letterhead of Reznick Group, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'REPORT To the Partners Davidson Court, L.P. We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Davidson Court, L.P. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of income, partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Davidson Court, L.P., as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations, the changes in partners' equity and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Reznick Group, P.C. Bethesda, Maryland February 1, 2005 42 [Letterhead of Reznick Fedder & Silverman] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'REPORT To the Partners Davidson Court, L.P. We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Davidson Court, L.P. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of income, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Davidson Court, L.P., as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations, the changes in partners' equity (deficit) and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Reznick Fedder & Silverman Bethesda, Maryland January 23, 2004 43 [Letterhead of Haefele, Flanagan & Co., p.c.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Magnolia Mews Limited Partnership Philadelphia, Pennsylvania We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of MAGNOLIA MEWS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (a Pennsylvania Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2004, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MAGNOLIA MEWS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP as of December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Haefele, Flanagan & Co., p.c. Moorestown, New Jersey February 8, 2005 44 [Letterhead of Haefele, Flanagan & Co., p.c.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Magnolia Mews Limited Partnership Philadelphia, Pennsylvania We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of MAGNOLIA MEWS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (a Pennsylvania Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MAGNOLIA MEWS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP as of December 31, 2003, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Haefele, Flanagan & Co., p.c. Moorestown, New Jersey February 9, 2004 45 [Letterhead of Haefele, Flanagan & Co., p.c.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Magnolia Mews Limited Partnership Philadelphia, Pennsylvania We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of MAGNOLIA MEWS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (a Pennsylvania Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MAGNOLIA MEWS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP as of December 31, 2002, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Haefele, Flanagan & Co., p.c. Moorestown, New Jersey February 7, 2003 46 [Letterhead of Snipes, Gower & Associates, P.A.] To the Partners The Oaks Village Limited Partnership We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of The Oaks Village Limited Partnership, RHS Project No. 38-024-561572445 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Oaks Village Limited Partnership, RHS Project No. 38-024-561572445 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations, the changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 12, 2005, on our consideration of The Oaks Village Limited Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards, and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplemental information on page 14 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of the partnership. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ Snipes, Gower & Assoc., P.A. Dunn, North Carolina January 12, 2005 47 [Letterhead of Snipes, Gower & Associates, P.A.] To the Partners The Oaks Village Limited Partnership We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of The Oaks Village Limited Partnership, RHS Project No. 38-024-561572445 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Oaks Village Limited Partnership, RHS Project No. 38-024-561572445 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations, the changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplemental information on Page 14 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of the partnership. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 28, 2004 on our consideration of The Oaks Village Limited Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards, and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Snipes, Gower & Assoc., P.A. Dunn, North Carolina January 28, 2004 48 [Letterhead of Snipes, Gower & Associates, P.A.] To the Partners Greenfield Village Limited Partnership We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Greenfield Village Limited Partnership, RHS Project No. 38-043-561614646, as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Greenfield Village Limited Partnership, RHS Project No. 38-043-561614646 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations, the changes in partners' equity (deficit) and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 19, 2005, on our consideration of Greenfield Village Limited Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplement information on page 14 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of the partnership. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ Snipes, Gower & Associates, P.A. Dunn, North Carolina January 19, 2005 49 [Letterhead of Snipes, Gower & Associates, P.A.] To the Partners Greenfield Village Limited Partnership We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Greenfield Village Limited Partnership, RHS Project No.: 38-043-561614646, as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Greenfield Village Limited Partnership, RHS Project No.: 38-043-561614646 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations, the changes in partners' equity (deficit) and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplement information on Page 14 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of the partnership. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 20, 2004 on our consideration of Greenfield Village Limited Partnership's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Snipes, Gower & Associates, P.A. Dunn, North Carolina January 20, 2004 50 [Letterhead of KOCH GROUP & CO., LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Partners CLM Equities We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of CLM Equities (A Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2004 and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CLM Equities (A Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2004 and the results of its operations, changes in its partners' equity and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Koch Group & Co., LLP Certified Public Accountants New York, New York January 14, 2005 51 [Letterhead of KOCH GROUP & CO., LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Partners CLM Equities We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of CLM Equities (A Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2003 and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CLM Equities (A Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2003 and the results of its operations, changes in its partners' equity and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Koch Geringer & Co., LLP Certified Public Accountants New York, New York January 23, 2004 52 [Letterhead of KOCH GERINGER & CO., LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Partners CLM Equities We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of CLM Equities (A Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2002 and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CLM Equities (A Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2002 and the results of its operations, changes in its partners' equity and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Koch Geringer & Co., LLP Certified Public Accountants New York, New York January 9, 2003 53 [Letterhead of DAUBY O'CONNOR & ZALESKI] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners of Victoria Manor Associates (A California Limited Partnership) We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Victoria Manor Associates (a California Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2004, and the related statement of income (loss), changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Victoria Manor Associates (a California Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2004 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The accompanying information is presented for additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the same auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is presented fairly in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ Dauby O'Connor & Zaleski, LLC Certified Public Accountants March 4, 2005 Carmel, Indiana 54 [Letterhead of NSBN LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Victoria Manor Associates Los Angeles, California We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Victoria Manor Associates (a California limited partnership), as of December 31, 2003, and the related statements of partners' equity, operations and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Victoria Manor Associates as of December 31, 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ NSBN LLP March 19, 2004 Beverly Hills, California 55 [Letterhead of NSBN LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Partners Victoria Manor Associates Los Angeles, California We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Victoria Manor Associates (a California limited partnership), as of December 31, 2002, and the related statements of partners' equity, operations and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Victoria Manor Associates as of December 31, 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ NSBN LLP January 23, 2003 Beverly Hills, California 56 [Letterhead of LARSON, ALLEN, WEISHAIR & CO., LLP] INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT Partners Ogontz Hall Investors Philadelphia, Pennsylvania We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Ogontz Hall Investors (A Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of profit and loss, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The financial statements of Ogontz Hall Investors as of December 31, 2003, were audited by Joyce Miller and Associates, P.C. (whose practice became part of Larson, Allen, Weishair & Co., LLP Effective June 1, 2004), whose report dated February 15, 2004, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ogontz Hall Investors (A Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have issued our report dated March 24, 2005, on our consideration of Ogontz Hall Investors' internal control over financial reporting and our test of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. Our audit was performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary information on pages 16 to 28 is presented for the purposes of additional analysis, including supplementary information required by PHFA, and is not a required part of the financial statements of Ogontz Hall Investors (A Limited Partnership). The 2004 information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The 2003 supplementary information was reported upon by Joyce Miller and Associates, P.C., as referenced in the first paragraph. Their report, dated February 15, 2004, stated that, in their opinion, such 2003 information was fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as whole. /s/ LARSON, ALLEN, WEISHAIR & CO., LLP Blue Bell, Pennsylvania March 24, 2005 57 [Letterhead of Joyce Miller & Associates, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To The Partners Ogontz Hall Investors Philadelphia, Pennsylvania We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Ogontz Hall Investors (A Limited Partnership), PHFA changes in Project #O-116, as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of profit and loss, changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ogontz Hall Investors (A Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' capital, and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The supporting data included in the report (shown on pages 23 to 26) is presented for the purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of Ogontz Hall Investors (A Limited Partnership). Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have issued a separate report dated February 15, 2004, on our consideration of Ogontz Hall Investors' internal control over financial reporting and our test of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Joyce Miller & Associates, P.C. Glenside, Pennsylvania February 15, 2004 58 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Eagle Ridge Limited Partnership Madison, Wisconsin We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Eagle Ridge Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eagle Ridge Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information provided, as identified in the table of contents, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ Virchow, Krause & Company, LLP Madison, Wisconsin March 8, 2005 59 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Eagle Ridge Limited Partnership Madison, Wisconsin We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Eagle Ridge Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related statements of operations, partners' capital (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eagle Ridge Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information provided, as identified in the table of contents, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ Virchow, Krause & Company, LLP Madison, Wisconsin January 21, 2004 60 [Regen, Benz & MacKenzie C.P.A.'s, P.C. Letterhead] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Nelson Anderson Affordable Housing Limited Partnership We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Nelson Anderson Affordable Housing Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards used in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Nelson Anderson Affordable Housing Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations, the changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles used in the United States of America. /s/ Regen, Benz & MacKenzie C.P.A.'s, P.C. New York, New York February 25, 2005 61 [Regen, Benz, MacKenzie & Anopolsky, C.P.A.'s, P.C. Letterhead] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Nelson Anderson Affordable Housing Limited Partnership We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Nelson Anderson Affordable Housing Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards used in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Nelson Anderson Affordable Housing Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003, and the results of its operations, the changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles used in the United States of America. /s/ Regen, Benz, MacKenzie & Anopolsky, C.P.A.'s, P.C. New York, New York February 25, 2004 62 [Regen, Benz, MacKenzie & Anopolsky, C.P.A.'s, P.C. Letterhead] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Nelson Anderson Affordable Housing Limited Partnership We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Nelson Anderson Affordable Housing Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2002, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards used in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Nelson Anderson Affordable Housing Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2002, and the results of its operations, the changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles used in the United States of America. /s/ Regen, Benz, MacKenzie & Anopolsky, C.P.A.'s, P.C. New York, New York February 21, 2003 63 [Letterhead of Insero, Kasperski, Ciaccia & Co., P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Conifer Irondequoit Associates (A Limited Partnership) Irondequoit, New York We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Conifer Irondequoit Associates (A Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related statements of changes in partners' equity, operations and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Conifer Irondequoit Associates (A Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Partnership will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements, the Partnership has lost a major tenant. This condition raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans regarding this matter are described in Note 8. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Insero, Kasperski, Ciaccia & Co., P.C. Certified Public Accountants Rochester, New York February 9, 2005 64 [Letterhead of Insero, Kasperski, Ciaccia & Co., P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Conifer Irondequoit Associates (A Limited Partnership) Irondequoit, New York We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Conifer Irondequoit Associates (A Limited Partnership), as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related statements of changes in partners' equity, operations and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Conifer Irondequoit Associates (A Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Insero, Kasperski, Ciaccia & Co., P.C. Rochester, New York January 28, 2004 65 [Letterhead of REZNICK GROUP, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners of Middletown Associates We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Middletown Associates as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of profit and loss, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Middletown Associates as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 21, 2005, on our consideration Middletown Associates' internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of it compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with the report in considering the results of our audit. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The 2004 supplemental information on pages 24 through 27 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ REZNICK GROUP, P.C. Baltimore, Maryland January 21, 2005 66 [Letterhead of REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners of Middletown Associates We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Middletown Associates as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of profit and loss, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Middletown Associates as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity (deficit) and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report for the year ended December 31, 2003, dated January 16, 2004, on our consideration Middletown Associates' internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of it compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with the report in considering the results of our audit. Our audits was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 25 through 28 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN Baltimore, Maryland January 16, 2004 67 [Letterhead of REZNICK GROUP, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Lauderdale Lakes Associates, Ltd. We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Lauderdale Lakes Associates, Ltd. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lauderdale Lakes Associates, Ltd. at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on page 19 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material aspects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ Reznick Group, P.C. Atlanta, Georgia February 7, 2005 68 [Letterhead of REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Lauderdale Lakes Associates, Ltd. We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Lauderdale Lakes Associates, Ltd., as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lauderdale Lakes Associates, Ltd. at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Reznick Fedder & Silverman Atlanta, Georgia January 27, 2004 69 [REZNICK GROUP, P.C. LETTERHEAD] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Flipper Temple Associates, L.P. We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Flipper Temple Associates, L.P. as of December 31, 2004, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Flipper Temple Associates, L.P. as of December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations, the changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the "Consolidated Audit Guide for Audits of HUD Programs," (the "Guide") we have also issued reports dated January 21, 2005 on our consideration of Flipper Temple Associates, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with specific requirements applicable to major HUD programs and fair housing and non-discrimination. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplemental information on pages 24 through 36 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of the partnership. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ Reznick Group, P.C. Taxpayer Identification Number: 52-1088612 Bethesda, Maryland January 21, 2005 Lead Auditor: Nelson D. Gomez 70 [REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN LETTERHEAD] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Flipper Temple Associates, L.P. We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Flipper Temple Associates, L.P., as of December 31, 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Flipper Temple Associates, L.P., as of December 31, 2003, and the results of its operations, the changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the "Consolidated Audit Guide for Audits of HUD Programs," we have also issued reports dated January 22, 2004 on our consideration of Flipper Temple Associates, L.P.'s internal control and on its compliance with specific requirements applicable to major HUD programs and fair housing and non-discrimination. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplemental information on pages 24 through 37 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of the partnership. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ Reznick Fedder & Silverman Taxpayer Identification Number: 52-1088612 Bethesda, Maryland January 22, 2004 Lead Auditor: James P. Martinko 71 [REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN LETTERHEAD] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Flipper Temple Associates, L.P. We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Flipper Temple Associates, L.P., as of December 31, 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Flipper Temple Associates, L.P., as of December 31, 2002, and the results of its operations, the changes in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the "Consolidated Audit Guide for Audits of HUD Programs," we have also issued reports dated January 22, 2003 on our consideration of Flipper Temple Associates, L.P.'s internal control and on its compliance with specific requirements applicable to major HUD programs and fair housing and non-discrimination. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplemental information on pages 23 through 27 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of the partnership. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ Reznick Fedder & Silverman Taxpayer Identification Number: 52-1088612 Bethesda, Maryland January 22, 2003 Lead Auditor: James P. Martinko 72 [Letterhead of Heffler, Radetich & Saitta L.L.P] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners of 220 Cooper Street, L.P. We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of 220 Cooper Street, L.P. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of 220 Cooper Street, L.P. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Heffler, Radetich & Saitta L.L.P. Mount Laurel, NJ January 26, 2005 73 [Letterhead of Heffler, Radetich & Saitta L.L.P] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners of 220 Cooper Street, L.P. We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of 220 Cooper Street, L.P., as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of 220 Cooper Street, L.P. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Heffler, Radetich & Saitta L.L.P. Mount Laurel, NJ January 26, 2004 74 [ARCHAMBO, MUEGGENBORG & DICK, INC. LETTERHEAD] INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Partners PECAN CREEK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Bartlesville, Oklahoma We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of PECAN CREEK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, HUD Project No. 118-35121 (a limited partnership), as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related statements of income, changes in partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Project's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and standards applicable to financial audits contained in GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of PECAN CREEK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations, changes in its partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have issued reports dated February 2, 2005, and January 30, 2004, on our consideration of PECAN CREEK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP'S internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of those reports is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting on compliance. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary information on pages 15-17 is presented for the purpose of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of PECAN CREEK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ Archambo, Mueggenborg & Dick, Inc. Deborah E. Mueggenborg, Audit Partner Certified Public Accountants 73-1439902 Bartlesville, Oklahoma February 2, 2005 75 [ARCHAMBO, MUEGGENBORG & DICK, INC. LETTERHEAD] INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Partners Pecan Creek Limited Partnership Bartlesville, Oklahoma We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Pecan Creek Limited Partnership, HUD Project No. FHA 118-35121 (a limited partnership), as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related statements of income, changes in partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Project's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pecan Creek Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations, changes in its partners' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the Consolidated Audit Guide for Audits of HUD Programs issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, we have also issued reports dated January 30, 2004 on our consideration of Pecan Creek Limited Partnership's internal control, on its compliance with specific requirements applicable to major HUD programs, specific requirements applicable to non-major HUD program transactions, and specific requirements applicable to Fair Housing and Non-Discrimination. Those reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information shown on pages 15-17 and the information transmitted to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is prepared for the purpose of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements of Pecan Creek Limited Partnership. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly presented in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ Archambo, Mueggenborg & Dick, Inc. Deborah E. Mueggenborg, Audit Partner Certified Public Accountants 73-1439902 Bartlesville, Oklahoma January 30, 2004 76 [Letterhead of AGBIMSON & CO., PLLC] INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Partners 363 Grand Vendome Associates, Limited Partnership We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of 363 Grand Vendome Associates, Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2004, and the related statements of Loss, Partners' Capital and Cash Flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of 363 Grand Vendome Associates, Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Agbimson & Co., PLLC Rockville Centre, New York January 31, 2005 77 [Letterhead of AGBIMSON & CO., PLLC] INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Partners 363 Grand Vendome Associates, Limited Partnership We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of 363 Grand Vendome Associates, Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2003, and the related statements of Loss, Partners' Capital and Cash Flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of 363 Grand Vendome Associates, Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Agbimson & Co., PLLC Rockville Centre, New York January 30, 2004 78 [Letterhead of AGBIMSON & CO., PLLC] INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Partners 363 Grand Vendome Associates, Limited Partnership We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of 363 Grand Vendome Associates, Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2002, and the related statements of Loss, Partners' Capital and Cash Flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. Except as discussed in the following paragraph, we conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. We are unable to obtain adequate support for the carrying value for the building construction and rehabilitation costs included in the fixed assets at December 31, 2002, which also affected material amounts included in the Statements of Loss and Partners' Capital for the year then ended as described in Note 10. In our opinion, except for the effects on the financial statements of such adjustments, if any, as might have been determined to be necessary had we been able to examine evidence regarding the carrying value of building and rehabilitation costs, the financial statements referred to in the first paragraph above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of 363 Grand Vendome Associates, Limited Partnership, as of December 31, 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Agbimson & Co., PLLC Rockville Centre, New York January 30, 2003 79 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners New Augusta Associates, Ltd. New Augusta, Mississippi We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of New Augusta Associates, Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 28-056-640665470 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of New Augusta Associates, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 28-056-640665470 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10 through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued a report dated February 18, 2005 on our consideration of New Augusta Associates, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 18, 2005 80 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners New Augusta Associates, Ltd. New Augusta, Mississippi We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of New Augusta Associates, Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 28-056-640665470 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of New Augusta Associates, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 28-056-640665470 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10 through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 8, 2004 on our consideration of New Augusta Associates, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 8, 2004 81 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Pine Shadow, Ltd. Waveland, Mississippi We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Pine Shadow, Ltd. a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 28-023-640661063 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pine Shadow, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 28-023-640661063 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10 through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued a report dated February 18, 2005 on our consideration of Pine Shadow, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 18, 2005 82 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Pine Shadow, Ltd. Waveland, Mississippi We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Pine Shadow, Ltd. a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 28-023-640661063 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pine Shadow, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 28-023-640661063 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10 through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 27, 2004 on our consideration of Pine Shadow, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama January 27, 2004 83 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Windsor Place, L.P. Wedowee, Alabama We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Windsor Place, L.P. a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-056-631024917 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Windsor Place, L.P., RHS Project No.: 01-056-631024917 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 11 through 14 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued a report dated February 19, 2005 on our consideration of Windsor Place, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 19, 2005 84 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Windsor Place, L.P. Wedowee, Alabama We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Windsor Place, L.P. a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-056-631024917 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Windsor Place, L.P., RHS Project No.: 01-056-631024917 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 11 through 14 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 26, 2004 on our consideration of Windsor Place, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama January 26, 2004 85 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Brookwood Associates, Ltd. Foley, Alabama We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Brookwood Associates, Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-002-621394754 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Brookwood Associates, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 01-002-621394754 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 11 through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued a report dated February 22, 2005 on our consideration of Brookwood Associates, Ltd.,'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 22, 2005 86 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Brookwood Associates, Ltd. Foley, Alabama We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Brookwood Associates, Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-002-621394754 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Brookwood Associates, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 01-002-621394754 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10 through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 21, 2004 on our consideration of Brookwood Associates, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 21, 2004 87 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Heflin Hills Apartments, Ltd. Heflin, Alabama We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Heflin Hills Apartments, Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-015-631039371 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Heflin Hills Apartments, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 01-015-631039371 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10 through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 27, 2005 on our consideration of Heflin Hills Apartments, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama January 27, 2005 88 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Heflin Hills Apartments, Ltd. Heflin, Alabama We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Heflin Hills Apartments, Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-015-631039371 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Heflin Hills Apartments, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 01-015-631039371 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10 through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 8, 2004 on our consideration of Heflin Hills Apartments, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 8, 2004 89 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Shadowood Apartments, Ltd. Stevenson, Alabama We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Shadowood Apartments, Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-036-631030182 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, In all material respects, the financial position of Shadowood Apartments, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 01-036-631030182 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10 through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued a report dated February 20, 2005 on our consideration of Shadowood Apartments, Ltd.'s., internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 20, 2005 90 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Shadowood Apartments, Ltd. Stevenson, Alabama We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Shadowood Apartments, Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-036-631030182 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' deficit and capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, In all material respects, the financial position of Shadowood Apartments, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 01-036-631030182 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10 through 13 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 20, 2004 on our consideration of Shadowood Apartments, Ltd.'s., internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 20, 2004 91 [Letterhead of Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Brittany Associates, L.P. Dekalb, Mississippi. We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Brittany Associates, L.P., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 28-035-581896085 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Brittany Associates, L.P. RHS Project No.: 28-035-581896085 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on page 10 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued a report dated February 21, 2005 on our consideration of Brittany Associates, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 21, 2005 92 [Letterhead of Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Brittany Associates, L.P. Dekalb, Mississippi. We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Brittany Associates, L.P., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 28-035-581896085 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Brittany Associates, L.P. RHS Project No.: 28-035-581896085 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10 through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 20, 2004 on our consideration of Brittany Associates, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 20, 2004 93 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Hidden Valley Apartments, Ltd. Brewton, Alabama We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Hidden Valley Apartments, Ltd. a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-027-631025600 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hidden Valley Apartments, Ltd. RHS Project No.: 01-027-631025600 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 11 and 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued a report dated February 23, 2005 on our consideration of Hidden Valley Apartments, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 23, 2005 94 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Hidden Valley Apartments, Ltd. Brewton, Alabama We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Hidden Valley Apartments, Ltd. a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-027-631025600 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hidden Valley Apartments, Ltd. RHS Project No.: 01-027-631025600 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 11 through 14 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 23, 2004 on our consideration of Hidden Valley Apartments, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 23, 2004 95 [Letterhead of Matthews, Cutrer & Lindsay, P.A.] To the Partners Westbrook Square, LP INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Westbrook Square, LP (a Mississippi limited partnership), RHS Project No. 28-040-640770978, as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Westbrook Square, LP as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued a report dated February 1, 2005, on our consideration Westbrook Square, LP's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grants, agreements, and other matters. The purpose of this report is to describe the scope of our testing on internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. This reports are an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplemental information is presented for the purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. We have prepared the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (RHS Form RD 18930-8) and the Multiple Family Housing Project Budget (RHS Form RD 1930-7). Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ Matthews, Cutrer & Lindsay, P.A. Ridgeland, Mississippi February 1, 2005 96 [Letterhead of Bob T. Robinson] To the Partners of Westbrook Square, Ltd. INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT I have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Westbrook Square, Ltd. (RD Case number 28-040-640770978) as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related statements of income, partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audit. I conducted my audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audits provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Westbrook Square, Ltd. as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued my report dated February 14, 2003 on my consideration of Westbrook Square, Ltd.'s internal control and on my tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants. This report is an integral part of the audits performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of my audits. My audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information is presented for the purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements of Westbrook Square, Ltd. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, in my opinion, is fairly presented in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. The annual budgets of Westbrook Square, Ltd. included in the accompanying prescribed form RD 1930-7 (Rev 7-00) have not been compiled or examined by me, and I do not express any form of assurance on them. In addition they may contain departures from guidelines for presentation of prospective financial information established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The actual results may vary from the presentation and the variations may be material. /s/ Bob T. Robinson Jackson, Mississippi February 14, 2003 97 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY, CPA, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Partners Warsaw Elderly Housing, Ltd. Warsaw, Kentucky I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Warsaw Elderly Housing, Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 20-039-621409235 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits. I conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion. In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Warsaw Elderly Housing, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 20-039-621409235 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 9 through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in my opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, I have also issued a report dated February 25, 2005 on my consideration of, Warsaw Elderly Housing, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on my tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. Donald W. Causey, CPA, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 25, 2005 98 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY, CPA, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Partners Warsaw Elderly Housing, Ltd. Warsaw, Kentucky I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Warsaw Elderly Housing, Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 20-039-621409235 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits. I conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion. In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Warsaw Elderly Housing, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 20-039-621409235 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 9 through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in my opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, I have also issued a report dated February 25, 2004 on my consideration of Warsaw Elderly Housing, Ltd., internal control over financial reporting and on my tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. Donald W. Causey, CPA, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 25, 2004 99 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners West Hill Square, Ltd. Gordo, Alabama We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of West Hill Square, Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-054-631010865 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of West Hill Square, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 01-054-631010865 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 11 through 14 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued a report dated February 12, 2005 on our consideration of West Hill Square, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 12, 2005 100 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners West Hill Square, Ltd. Gordo, Alabama We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of West Hill Square, Ltd., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 01-054-631010865 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of West Hill Square, Ltd., RHS Project No.: 01-054-631010865 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 11 through 14 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 12, 2004 on our consideration of West Hill Square, Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 12, 2004 101 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Elmwood Associates, L.P. Picayune, Mississippi We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Elmwood Associates, L.P., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 28-055-640804193 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Elmwood Associates, L.P., RHS Project No.: 28-055-640804193 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on page 10 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS, we have also issued a report dated February 22, 2005 on our consideration of Elmwood Associates, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 22, 2005 102 [Letterhead of DONALD W. CAUSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C.] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Partners Elmwood Associates, L.P. Picayune, Mississippi We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Elmwood Associates, L.P., a limited partnership, RHS Project No.: 28-055-640804193 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted the audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration Audit Program. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that the audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Elmwood Associates, L.P., RHS Project No.: 28-055-640804193 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 10 through 12 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information presented in the Multiple Family Housing Borrower Balance Sheet (Form FmHA 1930-8) Parts I and II for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, is presented for purposes of complying with the requirements of the Rural Housing Services and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audit procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 21, 2004 on our consideration of Elmwood Associates, L.P.'s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the results of our audit. /s/ Donald W. Causey & Associates, P.C. Gadsden, Alabama February 21, 2004 103 [Letterhead of Holthouse Carlin & Van Trigt LLP] REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the Partners of Harmony Associates, L.P.: We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Harmony Associates, L.P. as of December 31, 2004, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal controls over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Harmony Associates, L.P. as of December 31, 2004 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The information included in the accompanying Schedule I is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. /s/ Holthouse Carlin & Van Trigt LLP Santa Monica, California February 3, 2005 104 [Letterhead of Grant Thornton LLP] REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the Partners Harmony Associates, L.P. We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Harmony Associates, L.P. as of December 31, 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Harmony Associates, L.P. as of December 31, 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. /s/ Grant Thornton LLP Los Angeles, California January 14, 2004 105 [Letterhead of Grant Thornton LLP] REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the Partners Harmony Associates, L.P. We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Harmony Associates, L.P. as of December 31, 2002, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Harmony Associates, L.P. as of December 31, 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Grant Thornton LLP Los Angeles, California January 24, 2003 106 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS MARCH 31, 2005 and 2004 ASSETS

~~March~~2005 ~~31,~~2004 ~~2003 March 31, 2002~~ ------------ ------------ Property and equipment - (at cost, net of accumulated depreciation of $68,560,673 and $63,733,516, respectively) (Notes 4 and 6) $ 76,216,658 $ 80,476,651 Cash and cash equivalents 2,150,450 2,492,636 Cash held in escrow 5,549,963 4,743,491 Deferred costs (net of accumulated amortization of $2,098,661 and $1,988,501, respectively) (Note 5) 727,764 979,385 Other assets 1,329,483 1,247,703 ------------ ------------ ~~Carrying~~Total ~~Carrying~~Assets ~~Amount~~$ ~~Fair~~85,974,318 ~~Value~~$ ~~Amount~~89,939,866 ~~Fair~~============ ~~Value~~============ LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) Liabilities: Mortgage notes payable (Note 6) $ 65,119,347 $ 66,285,158 Accounts payable and other liabilities 2,455,386 1,771,574 Due to local general partners and affiliates (Note 7) 3,628,588 3,922,555 Due to general partners and affiliates (Note 7) 8,853,092 7,861,874 ------------ ------------ Total Liabilities 80,056,413 79,841,161 ------------ ------------ ~~Mortgage~~Minority ~~Notes~~interests ~~Payable~~8,040,807 ~~for~~8,001,969 ~~which~~------------ it------------ isPartners' Capital (Deficit): ~~Practicable~~Limited topartners ~~estimate~~(72,896 ~~fair~~BACs ~~value~~issued ~~$40~~and outstanding) (1,~~794~~421,~~694~~027) ~~$41~~2,~~312~~756,~~953~~415 ~~$42~~General partners (701,~~466~~875) (659,~~269~~679) ~~$43~~------------ ------------ Total Partners' Capital (Deficit) (2,~~494~~122,~~924~~902) ~~Not~~2,096,736 ~~Practicable~~------------ ------------ Commitments and Contingencies (aNotes 7 and 9) Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital (Deficit) $26 85,~~572~~974,~~125~~318 $25 89,~~596~~939,~~958~~866 ============ ============

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 107 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

~~March~~2005 ~~31,~~2004 2003 ------------ ------------ ------------ ~~2003~~Revenues: ~~2002~~Rental income $ 15,031,757 $ 14,797,158 $ 14,282,724 Other 1,547,924 1,576,443 1,449,502 ------------ ------------ ------------ Total Revenues 16,579,681 16,373,601 15,732,226 ------------ ~~Land~~------------ $------------ 5Expenses: Repairs and maintenance 2,~~720~~881,~~520~~570 $2,832,897 52,~~720~~534,~~520~~896 ~~Buildings~~Operating and ~~improvements~~other ~~130~~2,~~371~~349,~~548~~565 ~~130~~2,267,403 2,094,185 Real estate taxes 1,068,~~090~~210 ~~Other~~959,803 995,566 Interest 4,244,176 4,335,979 4,509,840 Depreciation and amortization (Notes 4 and 5) 5,074,408 4,978,566 4,915,164 General and administrative 3,357,170 2,946,354 2,767,712 General and administrative-related parties (Note 7) 1,~~109~~867,~~985~~745 61,~~662~~844,~~110~~523 1,706,060 ------------- ------------ ------------ ~~143~~Total Expenses 20,~~202~~842,~~053~~844 ~~142~~20,~~450~~165,~~720~~525 ~~Less:~~19,523,423 ~~Accumulated~~------------ ~~depreciation~~------------ ------------ Loss before minority interest (584,~~927~~263,~~642~~163) (543,~~178~~791,~~153~~924) (3,791,197) Minority interest in loss of subsidiaries 43,525 36,960 37,450 ------------ ------------ ------------ Net loss $ (4,219,638) $ (3,754,964) $ (3,753,747) ============ ============ ============ Net loss - limited partners $ 84(4,~~274~~177,~~411~~442) $ 88(3,~~272~~717,~~567~~414) $ (3,716,210) ============ ============ ============ Number of BACs outstanding 72,896 72,896 72,896 ============ ============ ============ Net loss per BAC $ (57.31) $ (51.00) $ (50.98) ============ ============ ============

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 108 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

~~March~~Accumulated 31Other Limited General Comprehensive Comprehensive Total Partners Partners Income (Loss) Loss ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- Partners' capital (deficit) - April 1, 2002 $ 9,605,982 $ 10,186,465 $ (584,628) $ 4,145 Comprehensive Loss: Net Loss (3,753,747) (3,716,210) (37,537) 0 $ (3,753,747) Other Comprehensive Loss: Net unrealized loss on marketable securities (535) 0 0 (535) (535) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Total Comprehensive Loss (3,754,282) ============ Partners' capital (deficit) - March 31, 2003 ~~2002~~5,851,700 6,470,255 (622,165) 3,610 Comprehensive Loss: Net Loss (3,754,964) (3,717,414) (37,550) 0 (3,751,426) Other Comprehensive Loss: Net unrealized loss on marketable securities 0 3,574 36 (3,610) 3,610 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ~~Financing~~------------ ~~expenses~~Total $Comprehensive 2Loss (3,~~962~~747,~~815~~816) $============ Partners' capital (deficit) - March 31, 2004 2,~~941~~096,~~939~~736 ~~Less~~2,756,415 (659,679) 0 Comprehensive Loss: ~~Accumulated~~Net ~~amortization~~Loss (14,~~821~~219,~~322~~638) (14,~~655~~177,~~647~~442) (42,196) 0 (4,219,638) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Total Comprehensive Loss: $ 1(4,~~141~~219,~~493~~638) ============ Partners' Capital (Deficit) - March 31, 2005 $ (2,122,902) $ (1,~~286~~421,~~292~~027) $ (701,875) $ 0 ============ ============ ============ ============

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 109 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

~~Fiscal~~2005 ~~Year~~2004 ~~Ending~~2003 ~~March~~----------- 31----------- ----------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss $(4,219,638) ~~Amount~~$(3,754,964) $(3,753,747) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 5,074,408 4,978,566 4,915,164 Minority interest in loss of subsidiaries (43,525) (36,960) (37,450) Increase in other assets (81,783) (7,012) (238,552) Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities 683,812 360,497 (238,880) (Increase) decrease in cash held in escrow (806,472) (88,879) 16,647 Increase in due to general partners and affiliates 991,218 928,343 912,768 Increase in due to local general partners and affiliates 119,303 247,420 47,959 Decrease in due to local general partners and affiliates (91,390) (26,314) (134,954) ----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by operating activities 1,625,933 2,600,697 1,488,955 ----------- ----------- ~~2004~~----------- $Cash flows from investing activities: Additions to property and equipment (567,870) (1,~~015~~013,~~860~~627) ~~2005~~(751,333) Decrease (increase) in marketable securities 0 109,498 (1,~~089~~028) Decrease in due to local general partners and affiliates (662,~~231~~425) ~~2006~~(213,462) (17,863) ----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash used in investing activities (1,~~211~~230,~~969~~295) ~~2007~~(1,117,591) (770,224) ----------- ----------- ----------- Cash flows from financing activities: Decrease (increase) in deferred costs 5,079 (5,071) (20,876) Repayments of mortgage loans (1,~~286~~165,~~602~~811) ~~2008~~(1,081,661) 19(696,~~721~~408) Increase in due to local general partners and affiliates 418,~~864~~782 ~~Thereafter~~140,400 43547,~~041~~880 Decrease in due to local general partners and affiliates (78,~~293~~237) (250,938) (237,506) Increase (decrease) in capitalization of consolidated subsidiaries attributable to minority interest 82,363 (40,328) 101,464 ----------- ~~Total~~----------- ----------- Net cash used in financing activities (737,824) (1,237,598) (305,446) ----------- ----------- ----------- Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (342,186) 245,508 413,285 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 2,492,636 2,247,128 1,833,843 ----------- ----------- ----------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $67 2,~~366~~150,~~819~~450 $ 2,492,636 $ 2,247,128 =========== =========== =========== Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid during the year for interest $ 2,879,716 $ 2,992,620 $ 3,303,877 =========== =========== ===========

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 110 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MARCH 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 NOTE 1 - General Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the "Partnership"), was organized on August 28, 1989 and commenced its public offering on February 9, 1990 (the "Offering"). The general partners of the Partnership are Related Freedom Associates L.P. (the "Related General Partner"), a Delaware limited partnership, and its affiliate, Freedom GP Inc. (the "Freedom General Partner"), a Delaware corporation, together (the "General Partners"). On November 17, 2003, CharterMac acquired Related Capital Company, which is the indirect parent of RCC Manager LLC, the sole shareholder of Related Freedom Associates, Inc., the general partner of the Related General Partner. Pursuant to the acquisition, CharterMac acquired controlling interests in the General Partners. This acquisition did not affect the Partnership or its day-to-day operations, as the majority of the General Partners' management team remained unchanged. The Partnership will terminate on December 31, 2030, unless terminated sooner under the provisions of the partnership agreement. The Partnership's business is to invest in other partnerships ("Local Partnerships," "subsidiaries" or "subsidiary partnerships") owning leveraged apartment complexes that are eligible for the low-income housing tax credit ("Tax Credit") enacted in the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and to entitle qualified BACs holders to Tax Credits over the period of the Partnership's entitlement to claim Tax Credits (for each Property, generally ten years from the date of investment or, if later, the date the Property is leased to qualified tenants; referred to herein as the "Credit Period"). Each of the Local Partnerships in which the Partnership has an interest has been allocated by the relevant state credit agency the authority to recognize Tax Credits during the Credit Period, provided that the Local Partnership satisfies the rent restriction, minimum set-aside and other requirements for recognition of the Tax Credits at all times during the 15-year period (the "Compliance Period"). As of December 31, 2002, the Credit Period for all of the apartment complexes have expired, although each Local Partnership must continue to comply with the Tax Credit requirements until the end of the Compliance Period in order to avoid recapture of the Tax Credits. During Fiscal Year 2003, the Partnership generated $1,710,233 in Housing Tax Credits. The Compliance Period will end between December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2007 with respect to the Properties depending upon when the Tax Credit Period commenced. The Partnership was authorized to issue a total of 200,000 Beneficial Assignment Certificates ("BACs"), which had been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission for sale to the public. As of August 8, 1991 (the date on which the Partnership held the final closing of the sale of BACs and on which the offering was terminated), the Partnership had received $72,896,000 of gross proceeds of the Offering from 4,780 investors. The terms of the Partnership's Limited Partnership Agreement provide, among other things, that net profits or losses and distributions of cash flow are, in general, allocated 99% to the limited partners and BACs holders and 1% to the General Partners. NOTE 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies a) Basis of Accounting and Presentation The Partnership's fiscal year ends on March 31. All subsidiaries have calendar year ends. Accounts of the subsidiaries have been adjusted for intercompany transactions from January 1 through March 31. The Partnership's fiscal year ends March 31 in order to allow adequate time for the subsidiaries financial statements to be prepared and consolidated. The books and records of the Partnership are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. b) Basis of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Partnership and 42 subsidiary partnerships, in which the Partnership is a limited partner, with an ownership interest ranging from approximately 98% to 99%. All intercompany accounts and transactions with the subsidiary partnerships have been eliminated in consolidation. Through the rights of the Partnership and/or an affiliate of the General Partners, which affiliate has a contractual obligation to act on behalf of the Partnership, to remove the general partner of the subsidiary partnerships and to approve certain major operating and financial decisions, the Partnership has a controlling financial interest in the subsidiary partnerships. Increases (decreases) in the capitalization of consolidated subsidiaries attributable to minority interest arises from cash contributions and cash distributions to the minority interest partners. The Partnership's investment in each subsidiary is equal to the respective subsidiary's partners' equity less minority interest capital, if any. c) Cash and Cash Equivalents For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash in banks, and investments in short-term money market accounts (which were purchased with original maturities of three months or less). d) Investment in Marketable Securities Available-for-sale securities were carried at fair value with net unrealized gain (loss) reported as a separate component of other comprehensive income until realized. A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale security below cost, that is deemed other than temporary, was charged to earnings resulting in the establishment of a new cost basis for the security. In 2004, the Partnership sold its marketable securities. 111 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MARCH 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 e) Cash Held in Escrow Cash held in escrow includes cash held in escrow, replacement reserves and tenant security deposits. f) Property and Equipment Property and equipment to be held and used are carried at cost which includes the purchase price, acquisition fees and expenses, construction period interest and any other costs incurred in acquiring the properties. The cost of property and equipment is depreciated over their estimated useful lives using accelerated and straight-line methods. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred; major renewals and betterments are capitalized. At the time property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the assets and accumulated depreciation accounts and the profit or loss on such disposition is reflected in earnings. The Partnership complies with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144 "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets". A loss on impairment of assets is recorded when management estimates amounts recoverable through future operations and sale of the property on an undiscounted basis are below depreciated cost. At that time property investments themselves are reduced to estimated fair value (generally using estimated future discounted net cash flows) when the property is considered to be impaired and the depreciated cost exceeds estimated fair value. At the time management commits to a plan to dispose of assets, said assets are adjusted to the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. These assets are classified as property and equipment-held for sale and are not depreciated. There are no assets classified as property and equipment-held for sale through March 31, 2005. Through March 31, 2005, the Partnership has not recorded any loss on impairment of assets or reductions to estimated fair value. g) Revenue Recognition Rental income is earned under standard residential operating leases and is typically due the first day of each month, but can vary by property due to the terms of the tenant leases. Rental income is recognized when earned and charged to tenants' accounts receivable if not received by the due date. Rental payments received in advance of the due date are deferred until earned. Rental subsidies are recognized as rental income during the month in which it is earned. The Partnership received rental subsidies which amounted to approximately $3,488,027, $3,326,225 and $3,178,000 for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The related rental subsidy programs have expiration dates that terminate upon total disbursement of the assistance obligation. Other revenues are recorded when earned and consist of the following items: Interest income earned on cash and cash equivalent balances and cash held in escrow balances, income from forfeited security deposits, late charges, laundry and vending income and other rental related items. Other revenues include the following amounts at both the Partnership and Local Partnership level:

March 31, ------------------------------------------ ~~2003~~2005 ~~2002~~2004 2003 ---------- --- ------- ---------- ~~Operating~~Interest ~~advances~~ $1 146,~~730,281~~855 $1 142,~~499,261~~223 ~~Development~~$ ~~fees~~259,247 Other 1,~~485~~401,~~911~~069 1,~~503~~434,~~774~~220 ~~Operating deficit loans (i) 314~~1,~~838 319~~190,~~638~~255 ~~Long~~-~~term note payable 84,154 0 Management and other fees 410,265 497,260~~ --------- ---- ------ ---------- Total other revenue $41,~~025~~547,~~449~~924 $31,~~819~~576,~~933~~443 $1,449,502 ========== === ======= ===== 117 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MARCH 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 (continued) (i) Operating deficit loans consist of the following: March 31, --------------------------------- 2003 2002 ------------- ------------ Oxford Trace $ 0 $ 18,650 Wilshire Park 191,775 191,775=====

h) Income Taxes The Partnership is not required to provide for, or pay, any federal income taxes. Net income or loss generated by the Partnership is passed through to the partners and is required to be reported by them. The Partnership may be subject to state and local taxes in jurisdictions in which it operates. For income tax purposes, the Partnership has a fiscal year ending December 31 (see Note 8). i) Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions relating to reporting of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses disclosed in the consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. j) Net Loss per BAC Net loss per BAC is computed based on the net loss for the period attributed to BAC Holders, divided by the number of BACs outstanding for the period. 112 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MARCH 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 k) New Accounting Pronouncements On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets - An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29 ("SFAS No. 153"). The amendments made by SFAS No. 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the narrow exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replace it with a broader exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have "commercial substance." SFAS No. 153 is effective for nonmonetary assets exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 153 on June 15, 2005. The Company does not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 153 on June 15, 2005 will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46"). FIN 46 is applicable immediately for variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. For variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN 46 were originally applicable no later than December 15, 2003. The Partnership has not created any variable interest entities after January 31, 2003. In December 2003 the FASB redeliberated certain proposed modifications and revised FIN 46 ("FIN 46 (R)"). The revised provisions are applicable no later than the first reporting period ending after March 15, 2004. The adoption of FIN 46 (R) does not have a material impact on the Partnership's financial reporting and disclosures. In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity." SFAS No. 150 changes the accounting for certain financial instruments that, under previous guidance, could be classified as equity or "mezzanine" equity, by now requiring those instruments to be classified as liabilities (or assets in some circumstances) in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Further, SFAS No. 150 requires disclosure regarding the terms of those instruments and settlement alternatives. The guidance in SFAS No. 150 generally was effective for all financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and was otherwise effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Partnership has evaluated SFAS No. 150 and determined that it does not have an impact on the Partnership's financial reporting and disclosures. NOTE 3 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments In accordance with SFAS No. 107 "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments," the following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value: Cash and Cash Equivalents, Cash Held in Escrow, Accounts Payable and Other -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Liabilities, Due to Local General Partners and Affiliates, and Due to General -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Partners and Affiliates ----------------------- The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, cash held in escrow, accounts payable and other liabilities approximates fair value. The fair values of Due to Local General Partners and Affiliates and Due to General Partners and Affiliates are not readily determinable because no market exists for these instruments. Mortgage Notes Payable ---------------------- The fair value of mortgage notes payable is estimated, where practicable, based on the borrowing rate currently available for similar loans. The estimated fair values of the Partnership's mortgage notes payable are as follows:

March 31, 2005 March 31, 2004 ------------------------- ------------------------- ~~2003~~Carrying ~~2002~~Carrying Amount Fair Value Amount Fair Value ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ~~Parkside~~Mortgage ~~Townhomes~~Notes Payable for which it is: Practicable to estimate fair value $48,409,326 84$49,~~635~~519,246 $51,901,654 84$51,~~635~~768,160 ~~Ogontz~~Not ~~Hall~~Practicable 38$16,~~428~~710,021 24(*) $14,~~578~~383,504 (*)

(*) Management believes it is not practicable to estimate the fair value of the mortgage notes payable because mortgage programs with similar characteristics are not currently available to the Local Partnerships. 113 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MARCH 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 NOTE 4 - Property and Equipment The components of property and equipment are as follows:

~~Year Ended~~ March 31, ----------------------------------~~----~~ ~~2003~~2005 ~~2002~~2004 ~~2001~~ ----------- -- --------- -----~~------~~ ~~Partnership~~Land ~~management fees (a)~~ $ ~~676~~5,~~000 $ 676~~720,~~000~~520 $ ~~676~~5,~~000~~720,520 ~~Expense~~Buildings ~~reimbursement~~and ~~(b)~~improvements ~~155~~130,~~977 118~~972,~~659~~585 ~~243~~130,~~998~~814,666 ~~Local~~Other ~~administrative fee (d) 53~~8,~~000 53~~084,~~000~~226 537,~~000~~674,981 ---------- --- ------- ------~~----~~ ~~Total general and administrative- General Partners 884~~144,~~977 847~~777,~~659~~331 ~~972~~144,~~998~~210,167 ~~----------~~Less: ~~----------~~Accumulated ~~----------~~depreciation ~~Property management fees incurred to affiliates of the subsidiary partnerships' general partners~~ (c68,560,673) ~~821~~(63,~~083 760~~733,~~856~~516) ~~655,511~~ ---------- --- ------- ------~~----~~ ~~Total general and administrative- related parties~~ $~~1,706,060~~ $176,~~608~~216,~~515~~658 $1 80,~~628~~476,~~509~~651 ========== === ======= ======~~====~~

Depreciation expense for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 amounted to $4,827,863, $4,811,387 and $4,749,489, respectively. Additionally, $706 and $5,513 of accumulated depreciation on dispositions of assets was written-off for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. NOTE 5 - Deferred Costs The components of deferred costs and their periods of amortization are as follows:

~~Year~~March ~~Ended December~~ 31, -------------------------------~~-------~~ ~~2002~~2005 ~~2001~~2004 ~~2000~~ ----------- ----------- -~~----------~~ ~~Financial~~Financing ~~statement~~expenses ~~Net loss~~ $~~(3,753,747)~~ ~~$(3~~2,~~751~~826,~~170)~~425 $~~(6,308,054)~~ ~~Difference resulting from parent company having a different fiscal year for income tax and financial reporting purposes 4~~2,~~268 (56~~967,~~796)~~886 ~~(35,552)~~Less: ~~Difference~~Accumulated ~~between depreciation and~~ amortization ~~expense recorded for financial statement and income tax reporting purposes~~ (~~682,390) (657,137) (1,367,593) Loss on impairment 0 0~~ 2,~~065~~098,~~000 Tax-exempt interest income (39~~661) (~~86) (~~1,~~276) Other 1~~988,~~317,852 (146,329~~501) ~~257,222~~ ----------- ----------- ~~----------- Net loss as shown on the Partnership's income tax returns~~ $~~(3,114,056)~~ ~~$(4~~727,~~611,518)~~764 $(5 979,~~390,253)~~385 =========== =========== ~~===========~~

Financing expenses are being amortized over the life of the related mortgages, ranging from 15 to 50 years, using a method approximating the interest method. Amortization of deferred costs for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 amounted to $246,545, $167,179 and $165,675, respectively. In addition, $136,385 of accumulated amortization has been written-off due to mortgage refinancing of the Abraham Lincoln property in the year ended March 31, 2005. NOTE 6 - Mortgage Notes Payable The mortgage notes are payable in aggregate monthly installments of approximately $438,000 including principal and interest with rates varying from 0% to 13.50% per annum and have maturity dates ranging from 2005 through 2042. The loans are collateralized by the land and buildings of the subsidiary partnerships, the assignment of certain subsidiary partnerships' rents, leases, and replacement reserves, and are without further recourse. Annual principal payments on the permanent debt requirements for mortgage notes payable for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter are as follows:

~~Quarter~~Fiscal ~~Ended~~Year ~~-----------------------------------------------------------------------~~Ending ~~OPERATIONS June 30, September 30, December 31,~~ March 31, ~~2002~~Amount ~~2002 2002 2003~~ ---------- ----------- -------~~-----~~ ----------- -~~----------~~ ~~Revenues~~2005 $ ~~3,801,174 $ 3,949,289 $ 3,921,013 $ 4,060,750 Operating expense (4,855,206) (4,915,151) (4,810,530) (4,942,536) ----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Loss before minor- ity interest (~~1,~~054~~232,~~032)~~658 ~~(965,862)~~2006 ~~(889~~2,~~517) (881~~031,~~786)~~135 ~~Minority~~2007 ~~interest in loss of subsidiar- ies 10~~19,~~814 9~~646,~~219~~494 ~~9,468~~2008 7882,~~949~~528 ~~-----------~~2009 ~~------------ ----------- ----------- Net loss $(1~~925,~~043,218)~~475 $Thereafter ~~(956~~40,~~643) $ (880~~401,~~049)~~057 $ (873,837) =========== ============ =========== =========== Net loss per limited partnership unit $ (14.17) $ (12.99) $ (11.95) $ (11.87) =========== ============ =========== =========== Quarter Ended -----------~~------------------------------------------------------------~~ ~~OPERATIONS~~Total ~~June 30, September 30, December 31, March 31, 2001 2001 2001 2002 ---------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Revenues~~ $ 365,~~715~~119,~~507~~347 $ 3,800,395 $ 3,757,715 $ 4,143,409 Operating expense (4,809,744) (4,712,251) (4,731,953) (4,953,709) ----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Loss before minor- ity interest (1,094,237) (911,856) (974,238) (810,300) Minority interest in loss of subsidiar- ies 12,089 9,223 9,687 8,462 ----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Net loss $(1,082,148) $ (902,633) $ (964,551) $ (801,838) =========== ~~============ =========== =========== Net loss per limited partnership unit $ (14.70) $ (12.26) $ (13.09) $ (10.89) =========== ============ =========== ===========~~

On June 17, 2004, the Abraham Lincoln property modified its original mortgage to reduce the principal balance to $1,945,000. The new mortgage payable to New York State HFA in monthly installments of $15,382, with an interest rate of 6.64% per annum, will mature in June 2022. 114 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MARCH 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 Accrued interest payable as of March 31, 2005 and 2004 was approximately $1,484,000 and $1,337,000, respectively. Interest accrues on all mortgage loans, which include primary and secondary loans. Certain secondary loans have provisions such that interest is accrued but not payable until a future date. The Partnership anticipates the payment of accrued interest on the secondary loans (which make up the majority of the accrued interest payable amount and which have been accumulating since the Partnership's investment in the respective Local Partnership) will be made from future refinancings or sales proceeds of the respective Local Partnerships. NOTE 7 - Related Party Transactions and Transactions with General Partners and Affiliates Freedom SLP L.P., an affiliate of the General Partners, has either a .01% or 1% interest, as a special limited partner, in each of the Local Partnerships. The General Partners and their affiliates and the Local General Partners and their affiliates perform services for the Partnership and the Local Partnerships, respectively. The costs incurred are as follows: a) Due to Local General Partners and Affiliates Due to Local General Partners and affiliates at March 31, 2005 and 2004 consists of the following:

~~Signature~~March ~~Title~~31, ~~Date~~ ------------------- --------- 2005 2004 ----------~~----------------------------------~~ ----------~~---~~ ~~/s/~~Operating ~~Alan~~advances P.$1,963,493 ~~Hirmes~~$1,666,763 ~~President~~Development ~~(Principal~~fees ~~Executive and Financial Officer~~(i) ~~------------------ of Related Freedom Associates~~610,024 ~~Inc. Alan P. Hirmes and Freedom GP Inc. June 23~~1,272,449 ~~2003~~Operating ~~/s/~~deficit ~~Glenn~~loans ~~F. Hopps Treasurer~~ (~~Principal~~ii) ~~Accounting~~297,172 ~~Officer)~~288,259 Long-~~-----------------~~term ofnote ~~Related~~payable ~~Freedom~~98,615 ~~Associates~~63,713 ~~Inc.~~Management ~~Glenn F. Hopps~~ and ~~Freedom~~other GPfees ~~Inc.~~659,284 ~~June 23~~631,371 ~~2003 /s/ Stephen M. Ross Director of Related~~ ---------- ---------- ~~Freedom Associates~~$3,628,588 ~~Inc. June 23~~$3,922,555 ~~2003~~========== ~~Stephen M. Ross~~==========

(i) Development fees were incurred in connection with the development of the property and have been included in the basis of the property. (ii) Operating deficit loans consist of the following:

~~ASSETS~~ March 31, ------------------------- ~~2003 2002~~ ---~~--------~~ ~~-----------~~2005 ~~Cash~~2004 ~~and cash equivalents $ 45,019 $ 21,177 Investment in subsidiary partnerships, carried on an equity basis 12,382,543 15,246,156~~ ----------- ----------- ~~Total~~Wilshire ~~assets~~Park $~~12,427,562~~ ~~$15~~191,~~267,333~~775 ~~=========== =========== LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL Due to general partner and affiliates~~ $ 6191,530,020 $ 5,609,252 Accounts payable and other liabilities 45,307 52,099 ----------- ----------- Total liabilities 6,575,327 5,661,351 Partners' capital 5,852,235 9,605,982 ----------- ----------- Total liabilities and partners' capital $12,427,562 $15,267,333 =========== ===========775

This loan to fund operating deficits is unsecured, non-interest bearing and is payable out of available surplus cash of the respective subsidiary partnership, or at the time of sale or refinancing.

~~CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS Year Ended~~ March 31, ----------------------------~~----------~~ ~~2003~~2005 ~~2002~~2004 ~~2001~~ ----------- ----------- ~~-----------~~Parkside ~~Income~~Townhomes ~~Other income~~ $ ~~237 $ 10~~87,~~245~~035 $ ~~956 ----------- ----------- ----------- Expenses Equity in losses of subsidiary partnerships 2~~87,~~808,962~~035 ~~2,839,620~~Ogontz ~~5,263,891~~Hall General and administrative 60,045 74,136 72,121 General and administrative-related parties 884,977 847,659 972,998 ----------- ----------- ---------- Total Expenses 3,753,984 3,761,415 6,309,010 ----------- ----------- ---------- Net loss $~~(3,753,747)~~ ~~$(3~~18,~~751,170)~~362 $~~(6,308,054)~~ ~~=========== =========== ===========~~9,449

These loans to fund operating deficits are unsecured, non-interest bearing and are subordinate to the second mortgage and are payable out of available surplus cash of the respective subsidiary partnership, or at the time of sale or refinancing. 115 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MARCH 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 b) Other Expenses The costs incurred to related parties for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:

Year Ended March 31, -------------------------------------- ~~2003~~2005 ~~2002~~2004 ~~2001~~2003 ----------- ----------- ----------- ~~Net~~Partnership ~~loss~~management $fees (~~3,753,747~~a) $(3 676,~~751,170)~~000 $~~(6,308,054)~~ ~~----------- ----------- ----------- Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Equity in losses of subsidiary partnerships 2~~676,~~808,962~~000 ~~2,839,620~~$ 5676,~~263,891~~000 ~~Increase~~Expense reimbursement (~~decrease~~b) ~~in liabilities: Due to general partner and affiliates 920~~223,~~768~~042 ~~894~~178,~~743~~723 ~~932~~155,~~453~~977 ~~Accounts~~Local ~~payable~~administrative ~~and~~fee ~~other liabilities~~ (~~6,792~~d) (451,~~501)~~193 853,~~089~~000 53,000 ----------- ----------- ----------- Total ~~adjustments~~general ~~3,722,938~~and ~~3,729,862~~administrative ~~6,204,433~~ -~~----------~~ ~~-----------~~General ~~----------- Net cash used in operating activities (30~~950,~~809)~~235 ~~(21~~907,~~308)~~723 ~~(103~~884,~~621)~~977 ~~-----------~~Partners ----------- ----------- ~~Cash flows from investing activities: Distributions from subsidiaries 54,651 3,635 26,797~~ ----------- ~~-----------~~Property ~~-----------~~management ~~Net~~fees ~~increase~~incurred ~~(decrease)~~to inaffiliates ~~cash~~of ~~and~~the ~~cash~~subsidiary ~~equivalents~~partnerships' ~~23,842~~general ~~(17,673)~~partners (~~76,824~~c) ~~Cash and cash equivalents~~917,510 ~~beginning of year 21~~936,~~177~~800 38821,~~850~~083 ~~115,674~~ ----------- ----------- ----------- ~~Cash~~Total general and ~~cash~~administrative ~~equivalents,~~- ~~end~~related ~~of year~~ $ 451,~~019~~867,745 $ 211,~~177~~844,523 $ 381,~~850~~706,060 parties =========== =========== ===========

(a) The General Partners are entitled to receive a partnership management fee, after payment of all Partnership expenses, which together with the annual local administrative fees will not exceed a maximum of 0.5% per annum of Invested Assets (as defined in the Partnership Agreement), for administering the affairs of the Partnership. Subject to the foregoing limitation, the partnership management fee will be determined by the General Partners in their sole discretion based upon their review of the Partnership's investments. Unpaid partnership management fees for any year will be accrued without interest and will be payable from working capital reserves or to the extent of available funds after the Partnership has made distributions to the Limited Partners and BACs holders of sale or refinancing proceeds equal to their original capital contributions plus a 10% priority return thereon (to the extent not theretofore paid out of Cash Flow). Partnership management fees owed to General Partners amounting to approximately $6,884,000 and $6,208,000 were accrued and unpaid as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Without the General Partners continued accrual without payment, the Partnership will not be in a position to meet its obligations. The General Partners have continued allowing the accrual without payment of these amounts, but are under no obligation to continue to do so. The Partnership is dependent upon the support of the General Partner and certain of its affiliates in order to meet its obligations at the Partnership level. The General Partner and these affiliates have agreed to continue such support for the foreseeable future. (b) The Partnership reimburses the General Partners and their affiliates for actual Partnership operating expenses incurred by the General Partners and their affiliates on the Partnership's behalf. The amount of reimbursement from the Partnership is limited by the provisions of the Partnership Agreement. Another affiliate of the General Partners performs asset monitoring for the Partnership. These services include site visits and evaluations of the subsidiary partnerships' performance. (c) Property management fees incurred by subsidiary partnerships amounted to $1,036,574, $1,108,295 and $1,071,815 for the 2005, 2004 and 2003 Fiscal Years, respectively. Of these fees, $917,510, $936,800 and 821,083 were incurred to affiliates of the subsidiary partnerships. (d) Freedom SLP L.P., a special limited partner of the subsidiary partnerships, is entitled to receive an annual local administrative fee of up to $2,500 from each Local Partnership. NOTE 8 - Income Taxes A reconciliation of the financial statement net loss to the income tax loss for the Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries follows:

~~Initial~~2004 ~~Cost~~2003 to2002 ~~Partnership Cost Purchase Price~~ -----------~~-----------------~~ ~~Capitalized Adjustment(B) Buildings and Subsequent to Building and Description Encumbrances Land Improvements Acquisition) Imporvements~~ ----------- ------------ ~~----------~~Financial ~~-------------~~statement ~~--------------~~Net ~~--------------~~loss ~~Properties: Parkside Townhouses York, PA~~ $ ~~1,594,756 $ 263,231 $~~ (4,~~439~~219,~~564~~638) $ ~~51,289 $ 0 Twin Trees Layton, UT 1,119,498 112,401 2,668,179 171,518~~ (473,~~642) Bennion (Mulberry) Taylorsville~~754, ~~UT 2,131,828 258,000 4,934,447 648,830 (22,842~~964) ~~Hunters Chase Madison, AL 2,454,551 411,100 5,616,330~~ $(13,~~481~~753,~~123~~747) ~~(713,028)~~Difference ~~Bethel~~resulting ~~Park~~from ~~Bethel,~~parent OHcompany ~~1,879,539~~having ~~141,320~~a ~~5,365,882~~different ~~391,733~~fiscal ~~(846,229)~~year ~~Zebulon~~for ~~Park~~income ~~Owensville,~~tax OHand ~~1,580,352~~financial ~~165,000~~reporting ~~4,187,880~~purposes ~~350~~376,~~537~~180 (~~542~~17,~~936~~957) ~~Tivoli Place Murphreesboro, TN 1,506,347 267,500~~ 4,~~146,759~~268 ~~324,289~~Difference ~~(207,625)~~between ~~Northwood~~depreciation ~~Jacksonville,~~and FLamortization ~~2,720,541~~expense ~~494,900~~recorded ~~6,630,321~~for ~~464,249~~financial ~~(294,886)~~statement ~~Oxford~~and ~~Trace~~income ~~Aiken,~~tax SCreporting ~~703,539~~purposes ~~162~~468,~~000~~213 1386,~~725,512~~864 (~~616~~682,~~147~~390) ~~(161,049)~~Tax-exempt ~~Wilshire~~interest ~~Huntsville,~~income ~~AL 1,683,016 178,497 4,014,281~~ (~~872,648~~40) (~~432,405~~25) ~~Ivanhoe Salt Lake City, UT 434,832 41,000 1,136,915 33,554 0 Washington Avenue Brooklyn, NY 0 42,485 2,843,351 73,904 0 C.H. Development~~ (~~Manhattan B~~39) ~~New~~Other ~~York~~(154,830) ~~NY 1~~48,~~491,164~~724 ~~3 3,294,688 46,902 0 Davidson Court Staten Island, NY 0 96,892 773,052 37,064 0 Magnolia Mews Philadelphia, PA~~ 1,~~643~~317,~~565~~852 200,000 668,007 2,345,777 0 Oaks Village Whiteville, NC 1,455,867 63,548 1,799,849 192,215 0 Greenfield Village Dunn, NC 1,464,452 78,296 1,806,126 158,113 0 Morris Avenue (CLM Equities) Bronx, NY 2,323,703 2 4,767,049 319,306 0 Victoria Manor Riverside, CA 2,326,878 615,000 5,340,962 (153,198) 0 Gross Amount at which Carried At Close of Period -----------~~-------------------------------------~~ ~~Building and Accumulated Description Land Improvements Total(A) Depreciation~~ ----------- --------- --~~----------~~ ~~---------~~Net ~~------------~~loss ~~Properties:~~as ~~Parkside~~shown ~~Townhouses~~on ~~York,~~the PAPartnership's $income ~~265,796~~tax $returns ~~4,488,288~~ $ ~~4,754,084 $ 1,996,181 Twin Trees Layton, UT 115,125 2,789,331 2,904,456 1,345,741 Bennion~~ (~~Mulberry) Taylorsville, UT 260,565 5,557,870 5,818,435 2,730,653 Hunters Chase Madison, AL 413,665~~ 3,419,614 3,833,279 2,386,726 Bethel Park Bethel, OH 143,885 4,908,821 5,052,706 2,528,432 Zebulon Park Owensville, OH 167,565 3,992,916 4,160,481 1,988,396 Tivoli Place Murphreesboro, TN 270,065 4,260,858 4,530,923 2,094,612 Northwood Jacksonville, FL 497,465 6,797,119 7,294,584 3,314,805 Oxford Trace Aiken, SC 164,564 945,752 1,110,316 772,025 Wilshire Huntsville, AL 181,060 2,706,665 2,887,725 1,618,190 Ivanhoe Salt Lake City, UT 42,677 1,168,792 1,211,469 475,698 Washington Avenue Brooklyn, NY 44,162 2,915,578 2,959,740 1,125,811 C.H. Development (Manhattan B115) ~~New York, NY 1,680~~ $(3,~~339~~337,913 3,341,593 1,657,713 Davidson Court Staten Island, NY 98,569 808,439 907,008 295,627 Magnolia Mews Philadelphia, PA 201,677 3,012,107 3,213,784 1,197,023 Oaks Village Whiteville, NC 65,225 1,990,387 2,055,612 876,498 Greenfield Village Dunn, NC 79,973 1,962,562 2,042,535 858,407 Morris Avenue (CLM Equities358) Bronx, NY 1,679 5,084,678 5,086,357 2,116,311 Victoria Manor Riverside, CA 616,677 5,186,087 5,802,764 2,179,595 Life on which Depreciation in Year of Latest Income Construction/ Date Statement are Description Renovation Acquired Computed$(~~C)(D) ----------- ------------- ---------- --------------- Properties: Parkside Townhouses York~~3, ~~PA 1989 Sept. 1990 27.5 Twin Trees Layton~~114, ~~UT 1989 Oct. 1990 27.5 Bennion (Mulberry~~056) ~~Taylorsville,~~=========== UT=========== 1989 Oct. 1990 27.5 Hunters Chase Madison, AL 1989 Oct. 1990 27.5 Bethel Park Bethel, OH 1989 Oct. 1990 27.5 Zebulon Park Owensville, OH 1989 Oct. 1990 27.5 Tivoli Place Murphreesboro, TN 1989 Oct. 1990 27.5 Northwood Jacksonville, FL 1989 Oct. 1990 27.5 Oxford Trace Aiken, SC 1989 Oct. 1990 27.5 Wilshire Huntsville, AL 1989 Oct. 1990 27.5 Ivanhoe Salt Lake City, UT 1991 Jan. 1991 27.5 Washington Avenue Brooklyn, NY 1991 Jan. 1991 27.5 C.H. Development (Manhattan B) New York, NY 1991 Jan. 1991 27.5 Davidson Court Staten Island, NY 1991 Mar. 1991 27.5 Magnolia Mews Philadelphia, PA 1991 Mar. 1991 27.5 Oaks Village Whiteville, NC 1991 Mar. 1991 27.5 Greenfield Village Dunn, NC 1991 Mar. 1991 27.5 Morris Avenue (CLM Equities) Bronx, NY 1991 Apr. 1991 27.5 Victoria Manor Riverside, CA 1991 Apr. 1991 27.5===========

116 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MARCH 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 NOTE 9 - Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) The following table summarizes the Partnership's quarterly results of operations for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.

~~Initial~~Quarter ~~Cost~~Ended ~~to Partnership Cost Purchase Price~~ -------------------------------------------------------- ~~Capitalized~~June ~~Adjustment(B)~~30, ~~Buildings~~September ~~and~~30, ~~Subsequent~~December to31, ~~Building~~March ~~and~~31, ~~Description~~OPERATIONS ~~Encumbrances~~2004 ~~Land~~2004 ~~Improvements~~2004 ~~Acquisition~~2005 ~~Improvements~~ ----------- ------------ ---------- -------- ----- ------ ------------- ----------- ----------- ~~Ogontz~~Revenues ~~Hallz~~$ ~~Philadelphia~~4, ~~PA 2~~065,~~201,751~~553 0$ ~~328~~4,~~846 3~~192,~~388,898~~866 0$ ~~Eagle Ridge Stoughton~~4, ~~WI 1~~063,~~549,438~~547 ~~321,594~~$ 24,~~627~~257,~~385~~715 ~~108,943~~Operating 0expenses ~~Nelson Anderson Bronx~~(5, ~~NY 3~~134,~~445,557 2 6,524,096 66,467 0 Conifer Irondequoit (Abraham Lincoln~~170) ~~Irondequoit, NY 2,815,000 20,000~~ (5,~~407~~130,~~108 96,415 0 Wilson Street Apts. (Middletown~~072) ~~Middletown, PA 1,673,496 38,449 0 3,400,788 0 Lauderdale Lakes Lauderdale Lakes, FL~~ (4,~~873~~993,~~709~~540) ~~873,973 3,976,744~~ (5,~~663~~585,225 0 Flipper Temple Atlanta, GA 2,529,780 70,519 4,907,110 699,720 0 220 Cooper Street Camden, NJ 962,463 41,000 0 3,664,197 0 Vendome Brooklyn, NY 2,605,666 12,000 4,867,584 220,536 0 Pecan Creek Tulsa, OK 1,019,001 50,000 1,484,923 232,054 0 New Augusta Ltd. (Rainer Villas062) New Augusta, AL 709,337 15,000 939,681 89,557 0 Pine Shadow Apts. Waveland, MS 1,624,988 74,550 2,117,989 158,826 0 Windsor Place Apts. Wedowee, AL 757,617 40,000 904,888 53,111 0 Brookwood Apts. Foley, AL 1,254,538 68,675 1,517,190 73,185 0 Heflin Hills Apts. Heflin, AL 735,525 50,000 841,300 45,016 0 Shadowood Apts. Stevenson, AL 738,686 27,000 898,800 11,575 0 Brittany Associates DeKalb, MS 681,830 20,000 843,592 26,646 0 Hidden Valley Apts. Brewton, AL 1,232,499 68,000 1,637,840 63,973 0 Westbrook Square L.P. Carthage, MS 1,017,223 40,000 1,254,957 28,302 0 Warsaw Elderly Housing Ltd. Warsaw, KY 1,127,507 98,819 1,333,606 11,828 0 West Hill Square Apts. Ltd. Gordo, AL 761,843 60,000 954,020 44,337 0 Gross Amount at which Carried At Close of Period -----------~~-------------------------------------~~ ~~Building and Accumulated Description Land Improvements Total(A) Depreciation~~ ----------- --------- --~~----------~~ --------- --~~----------~~ ~~Ogontz~~Loss ~~Hallz~~before ~~Philadelphia,~~minority PAinterest (1,~~677 3~~068,~~716,067~~617) ~~3,717,744 1,463,134 Eagle Ridge Stoughton, WI 323,271 2,734,651 3,057,922 1,464,569 Nelson Anderson Bronx, NY 1,679 6,588,886 6,590,565 2,692,683 Conifer Irondequoit~~ (~~Abraham Lincoln~~937,206) ~~Irondequoit, NY 21,677 5,501,846 5,523,523 2,324,158 Wilson Street Apts.~~ (~~Middletown~~929,993) ~~Middletown, PA 40,126 3,399,111 3,439,237~~ (1,~~283~~327,~~717~~347) ~~Lauderdale~~Minority ~~Lakes~~interest ~~Lauderdale~~in ~~Lakes,~~loss FLof ~~875,668~~subsidiaries ~~9,638,274~~ 10,~~513,942~~363 28,~~771,061~~484 ~~Flipper Temple Atlanta~~9,222 GA 72,196 5,605,153 5,677,349 2,029,048 220 Cooper Street Camden, NJ 42,677 3,662,520 3,705,197 1,490,769 Vendome Brooklyn, NY 13,677 5,086,443 5,100,120 2,707,755 Pecan Creek Tulsa, OK 50,161 1,716,816 1,766,977 571,907 New Augusta Ltd. (Rainer Villas) New Augusta, AL 15,~~161~~456 1,029,077 1,044,238 318,159 Pine Shadow Apts. Waveland, MS 74,711 2,276,654 2,351,365 864,362 Windsor Place Apts. Wedowee, AL 40,161 957,838 997,999 300,116 Brookwood Apts. Foley, AL 68,836 1,590,214 1,659,050 513,265 Heflin Hills Apts. Heflin, AL 50,161 886,155 936,316 296,824 Shadowood Apts. Stevenson, AL 27,161 910,214 937,375 291,699 Brittany Associates DeKalb, MS 20,161 870,077 890,238 280,677 Hidden Valley Apts. Brewton, AL 68,161 1,701,652 1,769,813 551,884 Westbrook Square L.P. Carthage, MS 40,161 1,283,098 1,323,259 411,413 Warsaw Elderly Housing Warsaw, KY 98,980 1,345,273 1,444,253 403,683 West Hill Square Apts. Gordo, AL 60,161 998,196 1,058,357 308,585 Depreciation in Year of Latest Income Construction/ Date Statement are Description Renovation Acquired Computed(C)(D) ----------- ------------- ----------- -----------~~-----~~ ~~Ogontz~~Net ~~Hallz~~loss ~~Philadelphia~~$(1, ~~PA 1990 Apr. 1991 27.5 Eagle Ridge Stoughton~~058,254) WI$ ~~1991 May 1991 27.5 Nelson Anderson Bronx, NY 1991 June 1991 27.5 Conifer Irondequoit~~ (~~Abraham Lincoln~~928,722) ~~Irondequoit,~~$ ~~NY 1991 Sept. 1991 27.5 Wilson Street Apts.~~ (~~Middletown~~920,771) ~~Middletown~~$(1, ~~PA 1991 Sept. 1991 27.5 Lauderdale Lakes Lauderdale Lakes~~311,891) F=========== ~~1991~~=========== ~~Oct.~~=========== ~~1991~~=========== 40Net ~~Flipper~~loss ~~Temple~~per ~~Atlanta,~~BAC GA$ ~~1991 Oct~~(14.37) ~~1991~~$ 27(12.561) ~~220~~$ ~~Cooper Street Camden, NJ 1991 Dec~~(12.51) ~~1991~~$ ~~27.5 Vendome Brooklyn, NY 1991 Dec. 1991 20 Pecan Creek Tulsa, OK 1991 Dec. 1991 27.5 New Augusta Ltd.~~ (~~Rainer Villas~~17.82) ~~New~~=========== ~~Augusta,~~=========== AL=========== 1991 Dec. 1991 27.5 Pine Shadow Apts. Waveland, MS 1991 Dec. 1991 27.5 Windsor Place Apts. Wedowee, AL 1991 Dec. 1991 27.5 Brookwood Apts. Foley, AL 1991 Dec. 1991 27.5 Heflin Hills Apts. Heflin, AL 1991 Dec. 1991 27.5 Shadowood Apts. Stevenson, AL 1991 Dec. 1991 27.5 Brittany Associates DeKalb, MS 1990 Dec. 1991 27.5 Hidden Valley Apts. Brewton, AL 1991 Dec. 1991 27.5 Westbrook Square L.P. Carthage, MS 1990 Dec. 1991 27.5 Warsaw Elderly Housin Warsaw, KY 1991 Dec. 1991 27.5 West Hill Square Apts Gordo, AL 1991 Dec. 1991 27.5===========

~~Initial~~Quarter ~~Cost~~Ended ~~to Partnership Cost Purchase Price~~ ---------------------------- ~~Capitalized Adjustment(B) Buildings and Subsequent to Building and Description Encumbrances Land Improvements Acquisition) Improvements~~ ----------- ------------ -----~~-----~~ ~~-------------~~June ~~-------------- -------------- Elmwood Assoc. Picayune~~30, MSSeptember ~~702~~30,~~294~~ ~~81,500~~December ~~829~~31,~~183~~ ~~33,383~~March ~~0 Harmony Gate Assoc. Los Angeles~~31, CAOPERATIONS ~~3,832,643~~2003 02003 ~~9,757,807~~2003 ~~27,490~~2004 0 ----------------------------------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------- Revenues $ 673,~~366~~991,~~819~~288 $5 4,~~662~~037,~~256~~962 $ ~~120~~4,~~113~~035,~~803~~354 $ 204,~~694~~308,~~636~~997 $Operating expenses (35,~~268~~057,~~642~~470) ~~==============================================================================~~(4,973,610) ~~Gross~~(4,881,673) ~~Amount at which Carried At Close of Period ------------------------------------------------ Building and Accumulated Description Land Improvements Total~~(A5,252,772) ~~Depreciation~~ ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ ~~------------~~Loss ~~Elmwood~~before ~~Assoc.~~minority ~~Picayune,~~interest ~~MS 81~~(1,~~661~~066,182) ~~862~~(935,~~405~~648) ~~944~~(846,~~066~~319) ~~257~~(943,~~621~~775) ~~Harmony~~Minority ~~Gate~~interest ~~Assoc.~~in ~~Los~~loss ~~Angeles,~~of CAsubsidiaries ~~161~~11,698 9,~~785,136~~275 97,~~785,297~~923 38,~~772,109~~064 ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------~~-------------~~ $Net 5loss $(1,~~720~~054,~~520~~484) $~~137~~ (926,~~481,533~~373) $~~143~~ (838,~~202,053~~396) $ 58(935,~~927,642~~711) =========== =========== =========== ===========~~=============~~ ~~Life~~Net onloss ~~which~~per ~~Depreciation~~BAC in$ ~~Year of Latest Income Construction/ Date Statement are Description Renovation Acquired Computed~~(C14.32)~~(D)~~ ~~-----------~~$ ~~------------- ---------- ---------------- Elmwood Assoc~~(12.58) ~~Picayune,~~$ ~~MS 1991 Dec~~(11.39) ~~1991~~$ 27(12.571) ~~Harmony~~=========== ~~Gate~~=========== ~~Assoc.~~=========== ~~Los Angeles, CA 1992 Jan. 1992 27.5~~===========

NOTE 10 - Commitments and Contingencies Washington Brooklyn ------------------- In or about September 2003, two putative mortgagees commenced a mortgage foreclosure action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kings County (the "Court"), entitled 150 Beach 120th Street Inc. v. Washington Brooklyn Limited Partnership, Index No. 35255/2003, seeking to foreclose on an alleged $100,000 loan and mortgage against the real property (the "Apartment Complex") owned by Washington Brooklyn Limited Partnership ("Washington"). Apparently, the former general partner of Washington, BUFNY Houses of Brooklyn, Inc. ("BUFNY"), allegedly granted two mortgages in the amounts of $225,000 and $100,000 secured by the Apartment Complex. Each of the foregoing mortgages was granted without the knowledge of Freedom SLP, L.P. (the "Special Limited Partner") or the Partnership (collectively the "Freedom LPs") or the consent of the Special Limited Partner, as required by Washington's Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (the "Partnership Agreement"). The Freedom LPs believe that BUFNY did not use the alleged loan proceeds for the benefit of Washington or the Apartment Complex. For these and other reasons, the Freedom LPs contend that the alleged mortgages are invalid. In addition, BUFNY allegedly failed to comply with the terms of either mortgage, which resulted in the holders of the alleged $100,000 mortgage commencing the foreclosure proceedings. BUFNY did not appear in or otherwise respond to the foreclosure proceedings. The holders of the alleged $225,000 mortgage have not yet, to the knowledge of the Freedom LPs, commenced any foreclosure proceedings. Shortly after the Freedom LPs became aware of these foreclosure proceedings, their counsel contacted counsel for the plaintiffs and mortgagees in an effort to learn more about the alleged mortgages and to resolve the disputes relating to the mortgages. When those efforts failed, the Freedom LPs filed a motion to intervene in the foreclosure action and for leave to file a late answer on behalf of themselves and Washington. The Freedom LPs contend that the mortgages are invalid and that Washington is not liable for them or the underlying indebtedness. In an order dated September 7, 2004, the Court granted the Freedom L.P.s' motion to intervene and to file a late answer on behalf of the Partnership. On or about September 21, 2004, the Freedom LPs, on behalf of themselves and the Partnership, served an answer, counterclaims and crossclaims in defending against the action. The answer denied the material allegations of the complaint and asserted certain affirmative defenses, counterclaims and crossclaims. Among other things, the Freedom LPs, on behalf of themselves and the Partnership, added The Levites Organization, one of the two co-holders of the $225,000 117 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MARCH 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 mortgage for which the plaintiffs' complaint did not seek foreclosure, as an additional counterclaim defendant, and the Freedom LPs assert that both the $100,000 and $225,000 mortgages are invalid and void ab initio. The parties are currently engaged in taking discovery. The Freedom LPs intend to defend the action and prosecute their counterclaims and crossclaims vigorously. The final outcome of this case, however, cannot be determined at this time. If the Court were to reject the Freedom LPs defenses and counterclaims, then it is possible that the Apartment Complex might be foreclosed upon and the Partnership might lose its title to and interests in the Apartment Complex. In addition, due to BUFNY's breach of fiduciary duties and breaches of the Partnership Agreement, the Special Limited Partner exercised its rights under the Partnership Agreement to remove BUFNY as Washington's general partner and to substitute itself as the new replacement general partner, effective April 26, 2004. Other ----- The Partnership is subject to risks incident to potential losses arising from the management and ownership of improved real estate. The Partnership can also be affected by poor economic conditions generally, however no more than 24% of the properties are located in any single state. There are also substantial risks associated with owning properties receiving government assistance, for example the possibility that Congress may not appropriate funds to enable HUD to make rental assistance payments. HUD also restricts annual cash distributions to partners based on operating results and a percentage of the owners' equity contribution. The Partnership cannot sell or substantially liquidate its investments in subsidiary partnerships during the period that the subsidy agreements are in existence, without HUD's approval. Furthermore there may not be market demand for apartments at full market rents when the rental assistance contract expires. Except as described above, management is not aware of any trends or events, commitments or uncertainties, which have not otherwise been disclosed, that will or are likely to impact liquidity in a material way. Management believes the only impact would be from laws that have not yet been adopted. The portfolio is diversified by the location of the properties around the United States so that if one area of the country is experiencing downturns in the economy, the remaining properties in the portfolio may not be affected. However, the geographic diversification of the portfolio may not protect against a general downturn in the national economy. 118 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure None Item 9A. Controls and Procedures (a) EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Freedom Associates L.P. and Freedom G.P. Inc., the general partners of the Partnership, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act") as of the end of the period covered by this report. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and our management necessarily applied its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Freedom Associates L.P. and Freedom G.P. Inc., the general partners of the Partnership, concluded that, as of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were (1) designed to ensure that material information relating to us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Freedom Associates L.P. and Freedom G.P. Inc., the general partners of the Partnership by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report was being prepared and (2) effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. (b) Changes in INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING. There have not been any changes in the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal year to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting. 119 PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant The Partnership has no directors or executive officers. The Partnership's affairs are managed and controlled by the General Partners. On November 25, 1997, an affiliate of the Related General Partner purchased 100% of the stock of the Freedom General Partner. Prior to such purchase the Freedom General Partner was an affiliate of Lehman Brothers. The Partnership has not adopted a separate code of ethics because the Partnership has no directors or executive officers. However, the parent company of Related Capital Company, which controls the General Partners, has adopted a code of ethics. See http://www.chartermac.com. On November 17, 2003, CharterMac acquired Related Capital Company ("RCC"), which is the indirect parent of RCC Manager LLC, the sole shareholder of the general partner of the Related General Partner. RCC Manager LLC is also the Managing Member of the Freedom General Partner. Pursuant to the acquisition, CharterMac acquired controlling interests in the General Partners. Alan P. Hirmes replaced Stephen M. Ross as Director of the Related General Partner and also replaced Michael Brenner as Director of the Freedom General Partner, each effective April 1, 2004 as a result of this acquisition. This acquisition did not affect the Partnership or its day-to-day operations, as the majority of the General Partners' management team remained unchanged. Certain information concerning the directors and executive officers of each of the General Partners is set forth below. The Related General Partner --------------------------- Related Freedom Associates Inc., ("RFAI") is the sole general partner of Related Freedom Associates L.P. Name Position ------------------------ --------------------- Alan P. Hirmes Director and President Stuart J. Boesky Senior Vice President Marc D. Schnitzer Vice President Denise L. Kiley (1) Vice President Glenn F. Hopps Treasurer Teresa Wicelinski Secretary (1) On February 25, 2005, Ms. Kiley announced her retirement as Chief Credit Officer and trustee of CharterMac, the indirect parent of RCC Manager LLC, the sole shareholder of the Related General Partner and Managing Member of the Freedom General Partner. Upon her retirement, she will also resign from her position as Vice President of the Related General Partner and the Freedom General Partner. ALAN P. HIRMES, 50, is the Director and President of the Related General Partner. Mr. Hirmes has been a certified public accountant in New York since 1978. Prior to joining RCC in October 1983, Mr. Hirmes was employed by Weiner & Co., certified public accountants. Mr. Hirmes is also the Managing Director of Related. Mr. Hirmes graduated from Hofstra University with a Bachelor of Arts degree. Mr. Hirmes also serves on the Board of Trustees of CharterMac and American Mortgage Acceptance Company ("AMAC"). STUART J. BOESKY, 49, practiced real estate and tax law in New York City with the law firm of Shipley & Rothstein from 1984 until February 1986 when he joined RCC. From 1983 to 1984, Mr. Boesky practiced law with the Boston law firm of Kaye, Fialkow, Richard & Rothstein (which subsequently merged with Strook & Strook & Lavan) and from 1978 to 1980 was a consultant specializing in real estate at the accounting firm of Laventhol & Horwath. Mr. Boesky graduated from Michigan State University with a Bachelor of Arts degree and from Wayne State School of Law with a Juris Doctor degree. He then received a Master of Laws degree in Taxation from Boston University School of Law. Mr. Boesky also serves on the Board of Trustees of CharterMac and AMAC. MARC D. SCHNITZER, 44, is responsible both for financial restructurings of real estate properties and directing Related's acquisition of properties generating Housing Tax Credits. Mr. Schnitzer received a Masters of Business Administration from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania in December 1987 before joining RCC in January 1988. From 1983 to January 1986, he was a financial analyst for the First Boston Corporation in New York. Mr. Schnitzer graduated summa cum laude with a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from the School of Management at Boston University in May 1983. Mr. Schnitzer also serves on the Board of Trustees of CharterMac. DENISE L. KILEY, 45, is responsible for overseeing the due diligence and asset management of all multifamily residential properties invested in Related-sponsored corporate, public and private equity and debt funds. Prior to joining RCC in 1990, Ms. Kiley had experience acquiring, financing and asset managing multifamily residential properties. From 1981 through 1985 she was an auditor with PricewaterhouseCoopers. Ms. Kiley holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Boston College. Ms. Kiley also serves on the Board of Trustees of CharterMac. As noted above, Ms. Kiley is retiring from CharterMac. GLENN F. HOPPS, 42, joined RCC in December, 1990, and prior to that date was employed by Marks Shron & Company and Weissbarth, Altman and Michaelson, certified public accountants. Mr. Hopps graduated from New York State University at Albany with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Accounting. TERESA WICELINSKI, 39, joined RCC in June 1992, and prior to that date was employed by Friedman LLP formerly Friedman, Alpren & Green LLP, certified public accountants. Ms. Wicelinski graduated from Pace University with a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Accounting. 120 The Freedom General Partner --------------------------- The officers and directors of the Freedom General Partner are as follows: Name Position ---------------------------- ----------------------- Alan P. Hirmes Director and President Stuart J. Boesky Executive Vice President Marc D. Schnitzer Vice President Denise L. Kiley (1) Vice President Glenn F. Hopps Treasurer Teresa Wicelinski Secretary Biographical information with respect to Messrs. Hirmes, Boesky, Schnitzer, Hopps, Ms. Kiley and Ms. Wicelinski is set forth above. Item 11. Executive Compensation The Partnership has no officers or directors. The Partnership does not pay or accrue any fees, salaries or other forms of compensation to directors or officers of the General Partners for their services. However, under the terms of the Partnership Agreement , the General Partners and their affiliates are entitled to receive compensation from the Partnership in consideration of certain services rendered to the Partnership by such parties. In addition, the General Partners collectively hold a 1% interest in all profits, losses and distributions attributable to operations and a subordinated 15% interest in such items attributable to sales and refinancings. Certain directors and officers of the General Partners receive compensation from the General Partner and their affiliates for services performed for various affiliated entities which may include services performed for the Partnership. The maximum annual partnership management fee paid to the General Partner is 0.5% of invested assets. See Note 7 to the Financial Statements in Item 8 above, which is incorporated herein by reference. Tabular information concerning salaries, bonuses and other types of compensation payable to executive officers has not been included in this annual report. As noted above, the Partnership has no executive officers. The levels of compensation payable to the General Partners and/or their affiliates is limited by the terms of the Partnership Agreement and may not be increased therefrom on a discretionary basis. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Security Holder Matters

~~Cost~~Name and address of ~~Property~~Amount and ~~Equipment~~Nature ~~Accumulated~~of ~~Depreciation~~Title ~~--------------------------------------------~~of ~~-----------------------------------------~~Class ~~Year~~Beneficial ~~Ended~~Ownership ~~March~~Beneficial ~~31,~~Ownership Percentage of Class -------------------------- -------------------------~~--------------------------------------~~ ~~2003 2002 2001 2003 2002 2001~~ ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------- ~~-----------~~General ~~-----------~~Partnership ~~Balance~~Related atFreedom ~~beginning of year~~ $~~142~~1,~~450,720~~000 ~~$141,678,599~~capital ~~$142,977,169~~50% ~~$54,178,153~~Interest ~~$49,344,006~~in ~~$44,409,197~~the ~~Additions~~Partnership ~~during~~Associates ~~year:~~L.P. ~~Improvements~~contribution ~~751,333~~- ~~772,121~~625 ~~772,704~~Madison ~~Dispositions~~Avenue 0directly 0owned ~~(6,274)~~New ~~0 0 (4~~York,~~596)~~ ~~Depreciation~~NY ~~expense~~10022 ~~4,749,489~~General ~~4,834,147~~Partnership ~~4,939,405~~Freedom ~~Loss~~GP onInc. ~~impairment of asset 0 0 (2~~$1,~~065,~~000) ~~------------~~capital ~~------------~~50% ~~------------~~Interest ~~-----------~~in ~~-----------~~the ~~-----------~~Partnership ~~Balance~~625 atMadison ~~close~~Avenue ofcontribution ~~year~~- ~~$143,202,053~~New ~~$142~~York,~~450,720~~ ~~$141,678,599~~NY ~~$58,927,642~~10022 ~~$54,178,153~~directly ~~$49,344,006 ============ ============ ============ =========== =========== ===========~~owned

Freedom SLP L.P., a limited partnership whose general partners are the General Partners of the Partnership and which acts as the special limited partner of each Local Partnership, has either a .01% or 1% interest in each Local Partnership. Except as set forth below, no person (other than the Assignor Limited Partner) was known by the Partnership to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Limited Partnership Interests and/or BACs and neither the General Partners nor any director or officer of the General Partners owns any Limited Partnership Interests or BACs.

(1) The address for each of the persons in the table is 625 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022. 121 (2) As set forth in schedule 13D filed by the Partnership, Lehigh Tax Credit L.L.C. (Lehigh) and Lehigh Tax Credit Partners, Inc. (the "Managing Member") on October 24, 1997 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") and pursuant to a letter agreement dated August 26, 1997 among the Partnership, Lehigh and Related Freedom Associates L.P. ("RFA") (the "Standstill Agreement"), Lehigh agreed that, prior to August 26, 2007 (the "Standstill Expiration Date"), it will not and it will cause certain affiliates (including Lehigh Tax Credit Partners II, LLC ("Lehigh II")), not to (i) acquire, attempt to acquire or make a proposal to acquire, directly or indirectly, more than 45% (including BACs acquired through all other means) of the outstanding BACs, (ii) seek to propose to enter into, directly or indirectly, any merger, consolidation, business combination, sale or acquisition of assets, liquidation, dissolution or other similar transaction involving the Partnership, (iii) make, or in any way participate, directly or indirectly, in any "solicitation" of "proxies" or "consents" (as such terms are used in the proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission")) to vote any voting securities of the Partnership, (iv) form, join or otherwise participate in a "group" (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Act) with respect to any voting securities of the Partnership, except that those affiliates bound by the Standstill Agreement will not be deemed to have violated it and formed a "group" solely by acting in accordance with the Standstill Agreement, (v) disclose in writing to any third party any intention, plan or arrangement inconsistent with the terms of the Standstill Agreement, or (vi) loan money to, advise, assist or encourage any person in connection with any action inconsistent with the terms of the Standstill Agreement. In addition, Lehigh agreed that until the Standstill Expiration Date it will not sell any BACs acquired by it unless the buyer of such BACs agrees to be bound by the Standstill Agreement; provided, however, Lehigh may make transfers in the secondary market to any purchaser which represents that following such sale it will not own three (3%) percent or more of the BACs outstanding. By the terms of the Standstill Agreement, Lehigh also agreed to vote its BACs in the same manner as a majority of all voting BACs holders; provided, however, Lehigh is entitled to vote its BACs as it determines with regard to any proposal (i) to remove RFA as a general partner of the Partnership or (ii) concerning the reduction of any fees, profits, distributions or allocations for the benefit of RFA or its affiliates. (3) As of May 17, 2005, Lehigh held 4,192.83 BACs and Lehigh II held 4,182.83 BACs which constitutes approximately 11.5% of the outstanding BACs owned. (4) Each such party serves as a director and executive officer of the Managing Member and owns an equity interest therein, except J. Michael Fried who owns only an economic interest. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions The Partnership has and will continue to have certain relationships with the General Partners and their affiliates, as discussed in Item 11 which is incorporated herein by reference thereto. However, there have been no direct financial transactions between the Partnership and the directors and officers of the General Partners. Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services Audit Fees ---------- The aggregate fees by Friedman LLP and their respective affiliates (collectively, "Friedman") for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the reviews of the financial statements included in the Registrant's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for those years were $59,500 and $52,000, respectively. Audit Related Fees ------------------ None Tax Fees -------- The aggregate fees by Weiser LLP (formerly, Rubin and Katz LLP) and their respective affiliates (collectively, "Weiser") for professional services rendered for the preparation of our annual tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $8,700 and $8,300, respectively. All Other Fees -------------- None The Partnership is not required to have, and does not have, a stand-alone audit committee. 122 PART IV

123 Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules (continued)

124 SIGNATURES ---------- Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. By: RELATED FREEDOM ASSOCIATES L.P. a general partner By: RELATED FREEDOM ASSOCIATES INC., general partner Date: June 13, 2005 By: /s/ Alan P. Hirmes ------------------ Alan P. Hirmes, Director and President By: FREEDOM GP INC. a general partner Date: June 13, 2005 By: /s/ Alan P. Hirmes ------------------ Alan P. Hirmes Director and President Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf by the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OR RULE 15D-14(A) I, Alan P. Hirmes, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Related Freedom Associates L.P. and Freedom GP Inc. (the "General Partners"), each of which is a general partner of Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P. (the "Partnership"), hereby certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2005 of the Partnership; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Partnership and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) disclosed in this report any change in the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Partnership's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership's auditors and to the boards of directors of the General Partners: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Partnership's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting. Date: June 13, 2005 By: /s/ Alan P. Hirmes ------------------ Alan P. Hirmes Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B) AND SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with the Annual Report of Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan P. Hirmes, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Related Freedom Associates L.P. and Freedom GP Inc., each of which is the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request. By: /s/ Alan P. Hirmes ------------------ Alan P. Hirmes Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer June 13, 2005 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ------------------------------------------------------- ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES -------------------------------- TO THE PARTNERS OF FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements of FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES included in the Form 10-K as presented in our opinion dated June 10, 2005, which is based in part on the reports of other auditors, we have also audited supporting Schedule I as of March 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and Schedule III as of March 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of the other auditors, these schedules present fairly, when read in conjunction with the related financial statements, the financial data required to be set forth therein. /s/ Friedman LLP New York, New York June 10, 2005 129 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. SCHEDULE I CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT Summarized condensed financial information of registrant (not including consolidated subsidiary partnerships) CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS ASSETS

130 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. SCHEDULE I CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

131 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. SCHEDULE I CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

132 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION MARCH 31, 2005

133 FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P. AND CONSOLIDATED PARTNERSHIPS SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION MARCH 31, 2005 (continued)

(A) Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes, $146,576,191. (B) Rental guarantees and development deficit guarantees for GAAP purposes are treated as a reduction of the asset. (C) Furniture and fixtures, included with buildings and improvements, are depreciated primarily by the straight line method over the estimated useful lives ranging from 5 to 7 years. (D) Since all properties were acquired as operating properties, depreciation is computed using primarily the straight line method over the estimated useful lives determined by the Partnership from date of acquisition. (E) Reconciliation of Real Estate owned:

At the time the local partnerships were acquired by Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P., the entire purchase price paid by Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P. was pushed down to the local partnerships as property and equipment with an offsetting credit to capital. Since the projects were in the construction phase at the time of acquisition, the capital accounts were insignificant at the time of purchase. Therefore, there are no material differences between the original cost basis for tax and GAAP. 134

Filing Compare · FREEDOM TAX CREDIT PLUS LP