10-K 1 grupo10k09302009.txt UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K --------- (MARK ONE) [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-30603 HIV-VAC INC. (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER) NEVADA 86-0876846 (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NUMBER) 14 LAUREL BLVD COLLINGWOOD, ONTARIO, CANADA L9Y 5A8 (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES) (705) 446 7242 (REGISTRANTS TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE) SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934: COMMON STOCK ($.001 PAR VALUE) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act Yes [ ] No [x] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.406 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ ] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [x] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [x] The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $10,430,652. The issuer has two classes of stock with 10,430,652 common shares and 300,000 preferred "B" outstanding as of September 30, 2011. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ---- PART I Item 1. Business....................................................... 3 Item 2. Properties..................................................... 9 Item 3. Legal Proceedings.............................................. 9 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security-Holders............ 9 PART II Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters........................................... 10 Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations........................... 10 Item 7. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.................... F-1 Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure........................... 14 PART III Item 9. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant............. 14 Item 10. Executive Compensation......................................... 15 Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.................................................... 16 Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions................. 17 PART IV Item 13. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K........................................... 17 Item 14. Disclosure Controls and Procedure.............................. 17 SIGNATURES................................................................ 18 2 Item 1. Business. We were originally incorporated in Nevada in 1997. We were formerly known as Persona Records Inc, ("Persona") a corporation involved in the marketing and development of music recordings. In November 1998, we merged with Nouveaux Corporation with Persona as the surviving corporation. We changed our name to HIV-VAC Inc in March 2000 and to Grupo International Inc in September 2010. Our business is the development and marketing of a proposed vaccine designed to combat HIV/AIDS. This proposed vaccine, which is called NFU.Ac.HIV, was developed by Dr. Gordon Skinner, our director of research, through the University of Birmingham, in the U.K. The proposed vaccine was licensed to Intracell Vaccines Limited from the University of Birmingham in November of 1998, and Intracell in turn entered into an assignment of the license agreement with us in April of 1999. In addition to his position as our Chairman and President, Kevin Murray was the managing Director of Intracell Vaccines Limited. Further, our Director of Research, Dr. Gordon Skinner was a Director of Intracell. Dr. Skinner, Kevin Murray and John Palethorpe, our Vice President, each owned 33.33% of the outstanding shares of the common stock of Intracell until 28 February 2006, at which time they each acquired one third of Intracell Vaccines Ltd's shareholding in the Company. Intracell owned 6,683,244 or 67.97% of the outstanding shares of our outstanding common stock and 10,000 or 100% of our outstanding Series A preferred stock at that time. See security ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. The proposed vaccine was developed in Birmingham, UK, by Dr. Skinner. The approach was based on twenty years experience of similar intracellular vaccines, one of which has shown to modulate the pattern of herpes genitalis in a multi center, placebo controlled trial in the United States and has been used prophylactically and therapeutically on a named patient basis for two decades in the UK. By 1993, the underlying concept for the vaccine had been examined for feasibility of preparation of the proposed vaccine under the guidance of Dr. Skinner. The first experimental preparation was made using a B subtype of the isolate HIV-1 or GB8 virus strain grown in a leukaemic T-lymphocyte cell line from a young male known as JM cells and was manufactured at the Centre for Applied Microbiological Research (CAMR), in Porton Down, UK. The proposed vaccine was tested for antigenic content (protein on the surface of a cell or bacterium that stimulates the production of antibody) at CAMR and for antigenic content and immunogenicity (production of an immune response) in laboratories at the Department of Infection, University of Birmingham. This work was financially supported by the Vaccine Research Trust, a Charitable Trust registered in the UK and chaired by Dr. Skinner. This led to the publication of a scientific paper entitled "Early Studies on a candidate Intracellular Subunit Vaccine NFU.AcHIV[JM] for prevention and/or modification of HIV related disease," in the Journal Intervirolgy 1994;37:259-268. Between 1993 and 1999 the proposed vaccine was the subject of a research contract between Dr. Skinner, at the time a senior lecturer at the University of Birmingham, and the Russian Federal AIDS center, Moscow, Russia. The proposed vaccine underwent initial tests to establish optimum conditions of preparation, antigenicity and immunogenicity in Russia, with additional tests for antigenicity being carried out in the UK. The proposed vaccine remained the property of the University of Birmingham during this time. Preclinical trials were undertaken at the Russian Federal AIDS center, Moscow, Russia during the period June 2000 through December 2001. The trials were undertaken in small animals. Data from the trials indicate that the vaccine appears to be safe. The vaccine was also shown to illicit an immune response in small animals. Our research activities since 2001 have been limited to small in-house projects that have allowed us to maintain our ability to continue development in the future. We have been unable to secure funding for a phase one human trial. This trial is estimated to require $6 million to complete and is required to demonstrate the safety of the vaccine through the vaccination of approximately 20 healthy individuals. To date, we have had very limited success in raising funds, and if we are unable to raise this amount, we will most likely cease all activity related to our vaccine development and marketing. We returned our rights to the vaccine back to the University of Birmingham in December 2007, as the rights to the vaccine expire in 2011, and we did not believe that we would be able to commercialize the vaccine prior to the expiration of the patents. 3 We plan, subject to funding, to continue development of the vaccine, and believe, that subject to further research, that it could be possible to develop other patents, depending on the outcome of the research. Functions of a Vaccine. ---------------------- A vaccine is part of a process that stimulates the body to mount an immune response to a harmless version of a micro-organism, or part of a micro-organism, and from this to construct a type of immune memory which would allow the immune system to mount a rapid response when and if the body is invaded by a potent version of a micro-organism. This response, ideally, is sufficiently rapid so that the micro-organism is not able to replicate to any great extent before it is eliminated, and thus the individual vaccinated is protected from disease. The immune memory induced by vaccination is usually long-lived, and creates antibodies that neutralize invading micro-organisms, by binding to them and preventing them from infecting cells, and lymphocytes, which recognize cells infected by micro-organisms (ones the antibodies did not destroy) and destroys them before other cells can be infected. A vaccine can also be therapeutic because it can stimulate both the humoral and cell mediated immunity over and above the existing immune status of a person and this is particularly important in patients who are HIV positive because it is clearly essential to initiate therapeutic strategy while there is residual functioning of immune competence in these individuals. This is presently unproven but a placebo controlled multicentre trial in the United States to look at the therapeutic value of the herpes vaccine developed by Dr. Skinner has shown that vaccination of patients who already had the infection modified the pattern of genital herpes resulting in reduction in the number and severity of recurrences. The HIV/AIDS Disease. -------------------- HIV/AIDS is a disease that has the effect of hindering the body's immune response system, allowing for opportunistic infections and diseases, such as tuberculosis, to overwhelm the body's immune response to disease. It does this by infecting and killing the T-lymphocytes of the immune system, which is consequently unable to deal with other infections, or proliferating cancer cells. There are two variants of the disease, known as HIV-1 and HIV-2, which share certain structural similarities, but differ greatly in certain types of proteins that produce the effects of AIDS. HIV-1 has a shorter time between infection and the onset of the symptoms of AIDS, and is more easily transmitted. Transmission can occur through sexual contact, maternal transmission to infants either in utero or through breastfeeding, or from receiving blood transfusion from, or sharing hypodermic needles with, infected persons. The HIV-1 virus particle has an outer envelope, which is studded with projections of clusters of glycoprotein molecules, surrounding a dense conical core containing the genomic material. Once received into the bloodstream (by any of the means described above, for example), the virus essentially "docks" with a lymphocyte cell and injects its viral core into the cell. The virus, in effect, hijacks the cell's metabolism, using it to replicate itself so that thousands of new particles are released into the bloodstream, and the cell dies. These particles go on to infect other cells, in a kind of chain reaction. Cells can also be infected by contact with infected cells, owing to certain proteins transmitted by contact. Some virus particles can become trapped in the lymph nodes, where they can remain for long periods and infect other cells. Eventually, so many lymphocyte cells are infected and destroyed that the body's immune system collapses. The HIV-1 virus is variable, in that within HIV-1 exist 3 main groups of HIV strains. According to the international AIDS charity known as AVERT, the groups are the "major" group, M; the "outlier" group, O; and the "new" group, N. Most HIV infections are part of the major or M group. Infections from the N group are rare, and O group infections occur mostly in west-central Africa. Group M has at least 9 different subtypes. The subtypes differ by slight variations in the glycoproteins, which mean that any effective vaccine will have to deal with all of these variations. It is estimated by the AVERT, and aids awareness group, that 33 million people are currently HIV /AIDS positive, 2.6 million were infected in 2009, and 1.2 million people died of HIV infection in 2009. It is estimated that 22.5 million of infected persons are located in sub-sahara Africa. It is estimated that 1.5 million residents in North America are infected with the HIV/AIDS virus. Due to all of these factors, HIV-1 has been the principal focus of vaccine development and drug treatment. 4 Governmental Regulation of Vaccines. ----------------------------------- Our proposed vaccine is subject to regulation by all countries. In the United States, the vaccine is regulated by the federal government, principally through the Food and Drug Administration under various federal laws. Regulations promulgated by various federal, state and local governments govern or influence the testing, manufacture, safety and efficacy requirements, labeling, storage, record keeping, licensing, advertising, promotion, distribution and export of our products. In general, similar regulations are found in all countries throughout the world, though we may have to demonstrate different levels of efficacy, depending on the regulatory requirements in each nation. Before we can market our proposed vaccine in the United States, since it is a biological drug product, we must take numerous steps, which include: - pre-clinical laboratory and animal testing, to evaluate product chemistry, formulation and stability, as well as the potential safety, purity and potency of the proposed vaccine; - submission to the FDA of an Investigational New Drug Application, which includes the results of the pre-clinical laboratory and animal testing, and which must become effective before clinical trials may commence; - the conduct of well-controlled clinical trials, conducted in accordance with FDA protocols (including review by an institutional review board) to adequately establish the safety, potency and purity of the biological drug product (i.e., our proposed vaccine), and trials to characterize how it behaves in the human body; - submission to the FDA of a biologics license application, and the FDA review of same; - completion of an FDA pre-approval inspection of the manufacturing facilities; and - FDA approval of the license application and all product labeling. In addition to these steps, we are required to meet with the FDA and its Vaccines and Related Biological Product Advisory Committee, which is composed of outside experts who assist the FDA in product reviews, and provide advice on various issues; in the case of our proposed vaccine, the advice would typically relate to the clinical development program and clinical study designs for our proposed vaccine. The recommendations of these committees are not binding upon the FDA, but are commonly followed by the FDA. The FDA has broad authority to suspend clinical trials, and all of the FDA's concerns must be resolved before trials may recommence. In general, the key element in the process is a demonstration by us that our proposed vaccine has meaningful efficacy at a statistically significant level, which means there must be an observed reduction in the incidence of HIV in the group receiving our proposed vaccine, compared to the control group. As noted above, the level of efficacy that we must demonstrate may vary from country to country, depending on the prevailing regulations. Our initial testing is planned to be performed in the UK and possibly Africa, there is no guarantee that the FDA will accept the results of tests completed in these other countries. If the FDA does not, this could cause substantial delays, by essentially requiring similar tests in the United States in order to satisfy FDA requirements. It is also possible that a regulatory agency, in reviewing our proposed vaccine's efficacy, might only approve the proposed vaccine for certain high risk populations, thus limiting the market for our proposed vaccine by limiting the customer base. Even after approval of the proposed vaccine for use, the manufacture of our proposed vaccine would be subject to a variety of laws relating to such matters as safe working conditions, manufacturing practices, environmental protections, fire hazard control and hazardous substance disposal, which could incur substantial costs that we cannot predict at this time. Our proposed vaccine's license would be subject to continual review, and newly discovered or developed safety or efficacy data could result in revocation of relevant licenses. 5 Our Proposed Vaccine. -------------------- General. Our proposed vaccine is designed to perform two functions. The first function, which is typical of traditional vaccines, is to develop an immune response in the vaccinated person in order to prevent HIV from infecting the human body. The second is to provide therapeutic benefits, like those described above, to people who are already infected by HIV. Process of Manufacture. Our proposed vaccine is manufactured by treating HIV-1 infected lymphocyctic cells with detergent, formaldehyde and acetone treatments. What are called envelope proteins, [that is, the outer shell of these cells] are then stripped from the newly formed viruses [within these infected cells], virus proteins are collected, and the remaining virus particulates are discarded. The virus proteins are then mixed with proteins [from other, healthy cells]. This process ensures that the proposed vaccine is inactivated (that is, the virus is not infective), but that it also contains the vital HIV-1 glycoproteins, core proteins, regulatory and intermediate proteins needed to produce the desired effects of the desired immunity and/or therapeutic effects. Importantly, the method of manufacture allows us to customize a proposed vaccine to a specific strain, including strains that may evolve over the next few years. We intend to rely on third parties to manufacture our proposed vaccine, as we do not have the facilities for the large scale manufacture of the proposed vaccine. The quality control will be carried out according to guidelines recommended by the Medicines Control Agency in the UK which includes tests on the antigenicity and immunogenicity of the preparation and safety testing in animals. The proposed vaccine was previously produced at the Russian Federal AIDS Center. Although the Russian Federal AIDS Center is the most recent group who have produced the proposed vaccine, we are not completely dependent upon this group due to the fact that we feel that our proposed vaccine can be produced elsewhere for nominal set-up costs. We believe that our proposed vaccine differs from other vaccines currently in development, in that it contains a wide spectrum of virus proteins in their natural configuration with cell proteins, but does not contain virus particles. By using this intracellular, multi-component approach, we include all possible protective antigens and possible cross strain protective antigens. The importance of this is that presentation of virus antigens in association with cell proteins may preserve the immunogenicity of virus antigens and improve their protective potential. The manufacturing process allows slotting in of any virus strain including new wild type virus strain or recombinant virus strain to the preparative process. This will exclude a prolonged dead time which would be inevitable in preparation of vaccines by more molecular methods to accommodate new virus strains. This approach has been successfully used for many years to manufacture the influenza vaccine where different strains may be involved in different years. Trials. Before any vaccine can be introduced into humans, it must be rigorously tested under scientific conditions, in order to prove its effectiveness and safety. This must be done before a country will allow a vaccine to be sold and used. Our proposed vaccine was first tested for safety, antigenicity and immunogenicity at four different centers in the U.K., these being: the Centre for Applied Microbiological Research in Porton Down, Wiltshire; the Medical Research Council Mill Hill Laboratories, London; St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London; and the Department of Infection of the University of Birmingham. Vaccines then go through a three-stage trial process. Phase I tests for safety and dosage in small groups of subjects. Phase II comprises larger scale safety testing and, in the case of vaccines, whether they elicit an immune response. Phase III comprises large scale, placebo controlled, double-blind tests for efficacy of the preparation in subjects at high risk of infection. As a standard industry practice, Phases I and II are often combined, or run concurrently in the testing of vaccines, so that the first stage of tests becomes a "Phase I/II trial." 6 We have completed initial pre- clinical trials in Russia, in conjunction with The Russia Federal Aids Center, a department of The Central Institute of Epidemiology, Moscow, Russia. We intend, subject to financing, to continue pre-clinical trials in order to establish data that will be required prior to the implementation of a PhaseI/II trial. We plan to commence a Phase I/II trial as soon as funding permits us to complete pre-clinical studies. The Phase I/II trials will involve three volunteer groups, running concurrently: a reactogenicity, safety and specific activity trial in a limited group of healthy volunteers; an evaluation of clinical effect and safety in a limited group of HIV-infected volunteers; and reactogenicity, safety and specific activity trial in a limited group of volunteers who have a concurrent illness or disease, but who are not in serious ill health. There is a specific process, involving various entry criteria, used to screen volunteers and determine their suitability for participation in the study. When the pool of appropriate volunteers is complete, ten volunteers in each group will receive four immunizations each of the proposed vaccine, at 30-day intervals, and each volunteer will be followed up for a period of one year, with monitoring for safety and immunological responses. Procedures exist for allowing volunteers to voluntarily withdraw from the trail process, or withdraw mandatorily, if there is a serious adverse effect. Subjects will be replaced until twenty subjects have completed the trial. The trial will likely be undertaken in the United Kingdom using the strain that is predominant in Europe. A separate trial using the same criteria will be necessary to teat the stain that dominates Africa. This trial would need to be undertaken in Africa after the UK trial. No trials are currently scheduled to take place in the United States. However, it is our intention to invite the National Institute of Health (NIH) through the offices of The Division of AIDS (DIADS) to assist in the planning and execution of the trials and monitor the trials described above. If the trials are successful, then we would hope to undertake a Phase I/II trial in the United States, within two years of successfully completing trials in the UK. There can be no assurance that we will be able to undertake such a trial in the United States, nor can the results of the trials in the UK or Africa be predicted. Ultimate Market. The proposed vaccine is directed at the prominent strain found in Russia, certain parts of Europe and the Americas, while the proposed vaccine we anticipate preparing for Africa would be directed at the strain prevalent in southern Africa and in India. The ability to custom-manufacture different proposed vaccines for different strains (see the caption above: Process of Manufacture) will enhance our ability to address the worldwide market, by allowing us to design proposed vaccines targeting different strains of the HIV virus present in different areas of the world. Marketing. We intend to rely on third parties for the sales and marketing of our proposed vaccine. To date, we have not entered into any marketing agreements. We intend to enter into agreements for the marketing and distribution of our proposed vaccine with partners, once we have established the effectiveness of the proposed vaccine. Competition. We estimate that approximately 30 other companies have been engaged in research to produce an HIV vaccine. To our knowledge, most of these efforts have not produced a viable vaccine. AIDSVAX, a product produced by Vaxgen Inc, completed a phase 3 trial in both the United States and Thialand during 2003, where results showed that the candidate vaccines were ineffective. ALVAC, a vaccine produced by Adventis began a trial in Thialand in the Fall of 2003, but results where disappointing. In 2006, AIDSVAX was used in another phase III trial in combination with ALVAC. The trial recruited 16,402 young adults in Thailand, but 2007 results showed that 74 trial candidates who received a placebo became infected compared to 51 who has received the vaccine candidate. A phase II trial undertaken by Merck was halted pre-maturely in 2007 when it was determined that the vaccine was not effective. The International AIDS Initiative data base shows that by July 2010, there were 2 phase II, three Phase III and seventeen Phase I on-going trials of preventative HIV vaccine candidates. 7 To our knowledge, our proposed vaccine is the only intracellular multi-component vaccine in development. It also differs from other vaccines presently in clinical trial, in that it contains a wide representation of virus proteins in their natural configuration, but does not contain virus particles. In addition, our proposed vaccine can be easily adapted to different virus strains. It is our belief that these factors give our proposed vaccine more potential for protection, therapy, and safety. Patent Protection. We had previously acquired an assignment of license agreement with Intracell Vaccines Limited, whereby we held exclusive rights to patents owned by the University of Birmingham. For a description of our obligations to the University of Birmingham under our assignment agreement see the caption below License Agreement and Consulting Agreement. These patents describe a method of manufacture of a HIV vaccine owned by the University of Birmingham (see the caption above: Process of Manufacture). We had exclusive rights to use the patents which are protected in Australia, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy, France and Great Britain. In addition, we had the right to use two United States patents owned by the University of Birmingham. The United States patents relate to a method of manufacture of a herpes vaccine. We believed that the United States patents cover all similar methods of manufacture related to the proposed HIV vaccine and would have provided reasonable assistance in enforcing these patents. Because these patents covered the method of manufacture, we believe that the patents cover all strains of the HIV virus. These patents expire in 2011, and as it was unlikely that the Company would be in a position to commercialize the vaccine prior to the expiration of the Patents, it was decided to return the patents to the University in 2007. We believe that it might be possible to make new patent applications on new developments as we continue our vaccine research. License Agreement and Consulting Agreement. ------------------------------------------ We entered into a license assignment agreement with Intracell Vaccines Limited, by agreement dated April 6, 1999. We agreed to assume all of Intracell Vaccine's obligations under its license agreement with the University of Birmingham, and issued them 57,529 shares of our common stock, and 10,000 shares of preferred stock. We also agreed to finance the development of the proposed vaccine, and entered into an anti-dilution agreement with Intracell Vaccines, so that Intracell Vaccines and its shareholders would maintain a 60% interest in our common shares (after allowing for options), up until the time we raise $5 million [in financing]. The shareholders of Intracell Vaccines also received stock options under the license assignment agreement. These options expired on April 1, 2004 without being excercised. 8 In addition, we, as the licensee, were responsible under the license agreement for carrying out all clinical trials of the proposed vaccine that may be required for patent and licensing purposes. We were also responsible for the maintenance of the patents. In the event we, or the University of Birmingham, made improvements to the patents, this would result in the extension of the royalty obligations for the life of the new patent. The agreement could be terminated if we failed to make the royalty payments within 60 days after notice, or if we have a receiver appointed for all or any part of our assets. At year end 30 September 2007, we were in arrears on the payment of license fees due under the license agreement with The University of Birmingham. We cancelled the license agreement with the University in December 2007. Under the cancellation agreement, the University agreed to waive all outstanding royalty payments, and the Company agreed to make a cancellation payment of approximately $39,529 when funds are available. We also entered into a consulting agreement with Intracell Vaccines pursuant to which Intracell Vaccines agreed to provide us with research, process science, clinical and regulatory support, primarily by making the services of certain Intracell Vaccines personnel available to us. We were also required to reimbursed Intracell Vaccines for all of its costs and expenses relating to the provision of these services. We did not incur any consulting fees from Intracell for the year ended September 30, 2009 and the year ended September 30, 2008. We currently owe Intracell Vaccines $457,405 in outstanding consulting fees. Item 2. Properties. Our administration offices are located in Collingwood, Ontario. The office is provided to us by Kevin Murray. We lease approximately 400 square feet of laboratory space in Moseley, Birmingham, United Kingdom under a lease agreement on a month to month basis at a rate of approximately $3,900 per annum. The laboratory space in Moseley is used for storage of vaccine and limited research that will allow us to maintain our ability to continue development of our proposed vaccine in the future. We do not engage in any aspects of the real estate business. Item 3. Legal Proceedings. We are not a party or subject to any legal proceedings the outcome of which management believes would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. Item 4. Submission Of Matters To A Vote Of Security-Holders. During our fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, no matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders. 9 PART II Item 5. Market For Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters. Our common shares trade under the symbol "HIVV" in July 2001. Our common shares ceased trading on the OTCBB on February 19, 2004, because we were unable to maintain our full reporting status requirements for financial reasons. We continued trading on the Pink Sheets since February 20, 2004 under the symbol HIVV. We have been unable to retrieve historical financial information for our trading activity during the period October 2006 through September 2009, but believe that our shares were trading in the range of between $0.01 and $0.05. As of September 30, 2009, there were 328 holders of record based on the records of our transfer agent. This number does not include beneficial owners of our common shares, of which we believe there are a substantial number whose shares are held in the names of various securities brokers, dealers and registered clearing agencies. We have never paid dividends on our common shares and do not intend to pay dividends on our common shares in the foreseeable future. Our board of directors intends to retain any future earnings to provide funds for the operation and expansion of our business. Any decision as to the future payments of dividends will depend on our results of operations and financial position and such other factors as our board of directors, in its discretion, deems relevant. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities We did not issued any securities during the period Item 6. Management's Discussion And Analysis Or Plan Of Operation. The following discussion regarding us and our business and operations contains forward-looking statements. Such statements consist of any statement other than a recitation of historical fact, and can be identified by the use of such forward-looking terminology such as "may," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate" or "continue" or the negative thereof or other variations thereon, or comparable terminology. The reader is cautioned that all forward-looking statements are necessarily speculative, and there are certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those referred to in such forward-looking statements. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Use of estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. Impairment of long-lived assets: The Company has adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of" ("SFAS 144"). Under SFAS 144, impairment losses on long-lived assets are recognized when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by such assets are less than their carrying value and, accordingly, all or a portion of such carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment losses are then measured by comparing the fair value of assets to their carrying amounts. Net earnings (loss) per share: The Company presents "basic" earnings (loss) per share and, if applicable, "diluted" earnings per share pursuant to the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share". Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. The calculation of diluted earnings per share is similar to that of basic earnings per share, except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all potentially dilutive common shares, such as those issuable upon the exercise of stock options, were issued during the period. 10 Foreign currency translation and transactions: British assets and liabilities are translated at current exchanges rates and expenses are translated at average exchange rates in effect during each period. Resulting translation adjustments, if material, would be recorded as a separate component of stockholders' deficiency. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses, which have not been material, are included in results of operations as incurred. Our Plan of Operation We were incorporated in January of 1997, and do not have any significant operating history or financial results. We have limited vaccine development and marketing operations, including the pre-clinical testing in Russia of our proposed vaccine designed to combat HIV/AIDS, building an infrastructure and updating our research. As a result, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 and the period from January 10, 1997 (date of inception) to September 30, 2009 we incurred approximately $21,079, and $1,814,349 in research and development costs and $21,728 and $817,030 in general and administrative expenses, respectively. We incurred a loss of $43,350 or $(.01) per share based on 9,830,652 weighted average shares outstanding for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 compared to a loss of approximately $7,195,576 or $(.99) per share based on 7,264,104 weighted average shares outstanding for the period from January 10, 1997 (date of inception) to September 30, 2009. We did not conduct any operations of a commercial nature during the period from January 10, 1997 (date of inception) to September 30, 2009 Through September 30, 2009 we have relied on advances of approximately $540,129 from our principal stockholders, trade payables of approximately $552,505, proceeds of $1,196,272 from the sale of common stock and the issue of stock for fees and/or services in the amount of $4,684,900 to support our limited operations. As of September 30, 2009, we had approximately $847 of cash and cash equivalents. We seek additional equity or debt financing of up to $7 million which we plan to use for HIV-VAC and to continue implementing pre-clinical and Phase I/II testing of our proposed vaccine. If we do not get sufficient financing, we will not be able to continue as a going concern and we may have to terminate our operations and liquidate our business (see Note 1 to financial statements). Our business plan for the next year, is dependent on raising sufficient funding to implement a Phase I/II trial in the United Kingdom through the application for a CTX exemption with the Medical Control agency. We plan to apply for a CTX exemption using the Clade B strain of the virus. The manufacture of the vaccine will be contracted out to a manufacturer located in either the UK or the USA. We also plan, subject to financing, to initiate further trials in Russia, in conjunction with The Russia Federal Aids Center, a department of The Central Institute of Epidemiology, Moscow, Russia. using in non-human primates in parallel or preceding Phase I trials. We expect the regulatory approval process to take up to twelve months to complete. The proposed primate vaccine will be manufactured in Russia or the UK, under the supervision and quality control of various parties, including independent laboratories in London and our laboratory in Birmingham and London, U.K. In addition, we anticipate, subject to financing set forth above, to initiate a Phase I/II trial in Sub-Sahara Africa using the local African HIV sub-type. These trials will be done in conjunction with local Government and would commence after a satisfactory pre-clinical trial has completed the evaluation of toxicity and immunogenicity of the local strain. However, we cannot initiate the pre-clinical or Phase I/II trials until such time as we have raised at least $9 million, which is the amount we anticipate we will need for these trials. Furthermore, in addition to restrictions due to lack of funding, we also need to manufacture a batch of the vaccine to initiate these trials. We cannot manufacture a batch until we have an agreement in place with a country in Africa that is prepared to work with us. It is estimated that these pre-clinical trials would take approximately twelve months to complete once we have an agreement in place. If these trials take place, we intend to invite the Division of AIDS of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to monitor the African trials. 11 No trials are currently scheduled to take place in the United States. However, it is our intention to invite the National Institute of Health (NIH) through the offices of The Division of AIDS (DIADS) to assist in the planning and execution of the trials and monitor the trials described above. There can be no assurance that the results of the trials in Russia and/or Africa and the UK can be predicted to be positive. We estimate that we will require approximately $6 million to $7 million to conduct our vaccine development activities through to a phase I trial.. This amount would be used to pay for vaccine manufacture, vaccine trial costs and testing, equipment and corporate overhead. We are hoping to raise a minimum of $6 million through one or more private offerings pursuant to Rule 506 or Regulation D or through an offshore offering pursuant to Regulation S; however, nothing in this annual report shall constitute an offer of any securities for sale. Such shares when sold will not have been registered under the Act and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements. To date, we have had very limited success in raising funds, and if we are unable to raise this amount, we will most likely cease all activity related to our vaccine development and marketing. We have to date relied on a small number of investors to provide us with financing for the commencement of our development program, including Intracell Vaccines Limited. Amounts owed to these individuals are payable upon demand. If we proceeded with our vaccine development, we would need to purchase approximately $500,000 in equipment to be used for research and expanding testing laboratories. In addition, we would expect to hire an additional fifteen employees for both research and administrative support over the duration of the trials.. We are anticipating that the sources of funds for the intended clinical trials will be the proceeds that we receive from the conversion of the Series B preferred stock, and possible assistance from Intracell in the form of a loan. In addition we are looking at other financing methods including finding joint venture partners who might provide substantial funding to the project or the granting of sub-licenses on payment of upfront fees and the payment of on-going royalties on sales. The Company is not currently negotiating with any potential joint venture partners and there can be no assurance that the Company will enter into any joint venture agreements. We are also looking at obtaining government or charitable grants to assist us in our funding. We are also considering the acquisition of other technologies that might make financing the Company more viable. 12 Item 7. Financial Statements. HIV-VAC, INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 AND FROM INCEPTION (JANUARY 10, 1997) THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 CONTENTS Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm F-1 Balance Sheets F-2 Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income F-3 Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) F-4 - F-10 Statements of Cash Flows F-11 - F-12 Notes to Financial Statements F-13 - F-22 13 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Stockholders of HIV-VAC, Inc. We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of HIV-VAC, Inc. (the "Company") as at September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended September 30, 2009, and cumulative from inception (January 10, 1997) through to September 30, 2009, except as explained as follows: we did not audit the cumulative date from January 10, 1997 to September 30, 2001. The cumulative data was audited by other auditors whose reports have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts in the cumulative data through September 30, 2001, is based solely on the report of other auditors. The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our audits provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of HIV-VAC, Inc. as at September 30, 2009 and 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended September 30, 2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. /s/ SF Partnership, LLP Toronto, Canada CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS July 6, 2011 F-1 HIV-VAC, INC. (A Development Stage Company) Balance Sheets September 30, 2009 and 2008 2009 2008 ASSETS Current Cash $ 847 $ 897 Furniture and Equipment, Net (Note 3) 3,746 4,289 ----------- ----------- Total Assets $ 4,593 $ 5,186 ----------- ----------- LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT Current Liabilities Accounts payable $ 87,356 $ 92,508 Accrued liabilities 222,971 184,971 Advances from related parties (Note 4) 540,129 538,899 ----------- ----------- Total Liabilities 850,456 816,378 ----------- ----------- Stockholders' Deficit Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized Series A, non-preferential; 10,000 issued and outstanding 100 100 Series B, convertible, non-preferential; 300,000 shares issued and outstanding 3,000 3,000 Common stock, $0.001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized 9,830,652 shares issued and outstanding 9,831 9,831 Additional paid in capital 6,434,160 6,434,160 Deficit accumulated during the development stage (7,205,576) (7,162,226) Accumulated other comprehensive loss (87,378) (96,057) ----------- ----------- Total Stockholders' Deficit (845,863) (811,192) ----------- ----------- Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit $ 4,593 $ 5,186 =========== =========== (The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.) F-2

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.) F-3

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.) F-10

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.) F-12 HIV-VAC, INC. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008 1. Operations HIV-VAC, Inc. (the "Company"), formerly known as Personna Records, Inc., was incorporated on January 10, 1997 in the State of Nevada. Personna Records formerly known as Sonic Records, Inc. was engaged in the production and distribution of musical records. In April 1998, Personna became the surviving corporation after a merger with Nouveaux Corporation. In March 2000, HIV-VAC, Inc. became the surviving corporation after a merger with Life Plan. The Company is currently engaged in the research and development of a vaccine to combat the Human Immunodeficiency Virus ("HIV"). The Company's headquarters are located in Ontario, Canada and the research facility is located in Birmingham, United Kingdom. 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation The Company's financial statements have been prepared following generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("U.S. GAAP"), which are expressed in United States funds. a) Use of Estimates The preparation of the Company's financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates are based on management's best knowledge of current events and actions the Company may undertake in the future. Significant areas requiring the use of estimates relate to the estimated useful lives of furniture and equipment. Actual results could differ from these estimates. These estimates are reviewed periodically and as adjustments become necessary, they are reported in earnings in the period which they become available. b) Furniture and Equipment Furniture and equipment are stated at cost. Major renewals and betterments are capitalized while maintenance and repairs, which do not extend the lives of the respective assets, are expensed when incurred. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Useful lives for furniture and equipment are as follows: Office equipment 15% Declining balance Furniture 10% Declining balance The cost and accumulated depreciation for furniture and equipment sold, retired, or otherwise disposed of are relieved from the accounts, and any resulting gains or losses are reflected in income. F-13 HIV-VAC, INC. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd) c) Long-lived Assets The Company reviews its long lived assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount. d) Financial Instruments All the Company's financial instruments are initially recorded at their fair value. The Company classifies all financial instruments as held-for-trading or other financial liabilities. Financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost. Instruments classified as held for trading are measured at fair value. The Company has designated its cash as held for trading. Accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and advances from related parties are classified as other liabilities. e) Income Tax Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for differences between the financial statement and tax basis of the asset and liabilities that will result in taxable deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are to be realized. Income tax expense is recorded for the amount of income tax payable or refundable for the period increased or decreased by the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the period. f) Translation of Foreign Currency The activity of the Company's foreign offices are translated in accordance with ASC Topic 830, "Foreign Currency Matters", which requires that foreign currency assets and liabilities be translated using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates prevailing throughout the year. Unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency translations are included in other comprehensive income for the period. g) Loss Per Share Basic loss per share, which does not include any dilutive securities, is computed by dividing the loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. In contrast, diluted loss per share considers the potential dilution that could occur from other financial instruments that would increase the total number of outstanding shares of common stock. Potentially dilutive securities, however, have not been included in the diluted loss per share computation because their effect is anti-dilutive. F-14 HIV-VAC, INC. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd) h) Comprehensive (Loss) Income The Company accounts for comprehensive loss in accordance with ASC 220, "Comprehensive Income", which establishes standards for reporting and presentation of comprehensive loss and its components. Comprehensive loss is presented in the statements of shareholders' equity, and consists of net loss and foreign currency translation adjustment. i) Stock Based Compensation The Company enters into transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments. The value of these transactions are measured and accounted for, based on the fair value of the equity instrument issued or the value of the goods or services received, whichever is more reliably measurable. The services are expensed in the periods that the services are rendered. j) Segment Reporting ASC Topic 280 "Segment Reporting" establishes standards for the manner in which public enterprises report segment information about operating segments. The Company has determined that its operations primarily involve one reportable segment. k) Recent Accounting Pronouncements In August 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2009-05 ("ASU 2009-05"), "Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value", which clarifies, among other things, that when a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, an entity must measure fair value using one or more specified techniques. ASU 2009-05 was effective for the first reporting period, including interim periods, beginning after issuance. It is anticipated that the adoption will not have a significant impact on the Company's financial statements. In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, "Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements" ("ASU 2010-06"). The standard amends Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" to require additional disclosures related to transfers between levels in the hierarchy of fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009. The standard does not change how fair values are measured, accordingly the standard will no have an impact on the Company. In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09 "Subsequent Events (Topic 855); Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements" ("ASU 2010-09"). ASU 2010-09 requires an entity that is an SEC filer to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued and removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date, in both issued and revised financial statements, through which the filer had evaluated subsequent events. The adoption did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial statements. F-15 HIV-VAC, INC. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd) k) Recent Accounting Pronouncements (cont'd) In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-13, "Compensation-Stock Compensation: Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades" ("ASU 2010-13"). This ASU provides amendments to Topic 718 to clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity's equity securities trade should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company is currently in the process of determining the impact, if any, of adoption of the provisions of ASU 2010-13. The FASB issues ASUs to amend the authoritative literature in ASC. There have been a number of ASUs to date that amend the original text of ASC. Those ASUs issued to date either (i) provide supplemental guidance, (ii) are technical corrections, (iii) are not applicable to the Company or (iv) are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company. 3. Furniture and Equipment, Net 2009 2008 Accumulated Accumulated Cost Depreciation Cost Amortization --------- ------------ --------- ------------ Furniture and equipment $ 48,416 $ 44,670 $ 48,416 $ 44,127 --------- ------------ --------- ------------ Net carrying amount $ 3,746 $ 4,289 ------------ ------------ Depreciation expenses for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were $543 and $626, respectively. F-16 HIV-VAC, INC. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008 4. Advances from Related Parties 2009 2008 Intracell Vacinnes Limited ("Intracell") $ 457,406 $ 457,406 Directors and officers of the Company 82,723 81,493 ------------ ------------ $ 540,129 $ 538,899 ============ ============ Intracell is a related party to the Company by virtue of the Company's controlling shareholders owning Intracell. These advances are non-interest bearing, unsecured and have no specified terms for repayment. 5. Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) Common and preferred stock were issued as follows: a) Sale of common stock - In April 1998, the Company issued 1,016 shares of common stock to the Company's founders for cash of $508. b) In April 1998, the Company issued 781 shares of common stock to acquire 100 percent of the issued and outstanding shares of Nouveaux Corporation. c) During the year ended September 30, 1998, stockholders contributed $342,108 in additional paid in capital. d) On February 10, 1999, the Company issued 200,103 shares of common stock for an aggregate amount of $100,000 under the Securities Act of 1993, as amended Under Regulation D, Rule 504. e) On February 23, 1999, the Company declared a 1:50 reverse split of the Company's common stock, effective March 8, 1999. f) On March 15, 1999, the Company issued 92,463 shares of common stock for a subscription receivable with an aggregate amount of $140,000 under the Securities Act of 1993, as amended Under Regulation D, Rule 504. The Company accepted a note receivable in lieu of payment. The note was paid in 2000. g) On April 6, 1999, the Company issued 57,529 shares of common stock and 10,000 shares of preferred stock, Series A, for an aggregate amount of $99,900 and $100 respectively, in exchange for the exclusive right to the worldwide license for the development and distribution of a HIV vaccine to combat aids. Each share of preferred stock has 3,000 votes per common share at any meeting of the stockholders where votes are submitted. h) On April 6, 1999, the Company purchased treasury stock for $1,767. F-17 HIV-VAC, INC. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008 5. Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (cont'd) i) On September 27, 1999, 400 shares of common stock were issued for an aggregate amount of $5,041. j) On March 8, 2000, the Company issued 1,001 shares of common stock for the merger of Scientific Life Plan ("Lifeplan") k) On May 26, 2000, the Company issued 4,548 shares of common stock for an aggregate amount of $99,990. Concurrently, the Company issued 6,835 shares of common stock with an aggregate value of $150,000 to Intracell under the terms of the anti-dilution provision of the Assignment of License Agreement. l) On June 29, 2000 the Company issued 733 shares of common stock for an aggregate amount of $23,655. Concurrently, the Company also issued 1,100 shares of common stock with an aggregate value of $35,500 to Intracell under the terms of the anti-dilution provision of the Assignment of License Agreement. m) On June 29, 2000, the Company issued 30,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate amount of $675,000 in legal services. n) On July 5, 2000 the Company issued 4,600 shares of common stock for an aggregate amount of $99,990. Concurrently, the Company issued 6,896 shares of common stock with an aggregate value of $150,000 to Intracell under the terms of the anti-dilution provision of the Assignment of License Agreement. o) On July 24, 2000, the Company issued 30,031 shares of common stock for an aggregate amount $675,000 in legal services. p) On July 27, 2000 the Company issued 4,600 shares of common stock for an aggregate amount of $99,990. Concurrently, the Company issued 6,896 shares of common stock with an aggregate value of $150,000 to Intracell under the terms of the anti-dilution provision of the Assignment of License Agreement. q) On August 21, 2000, the Company issued 6,352 shares of common stock for an aggregate amount of $99,990. Concurrently, the Company issued 9,525 shares of common stock with an aggregate value of $150,000 to Intracell Vaccines Ltd under the terms of the anti-dilution provision of the Assignment of License Agreement. r) On May 16, 2001, the Company issued 5,003 shares of common stock for an aggregate amount of $20,000 for consulting services. s) On July 6, 2001 the Company declared a 1:100 reverse split of the Company's common stock, effective March 22, 2001. F-18 HIV-VAC, INC. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008 5. Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (cont'd) t) On August 7, 2001, the Company amended its license agreement with Intracell. The amendment called for Intracell to waive its right to terminate the agreement due to the Company's failure to raise $1,500,000 pursuant to Section 9.1(b) of the agreement dated April 6, 1999 in exchange for the following: i) 3,000,000 shares of common stock, and ii) options to acquire 7,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The 3,000,000 shares were valued at the closing price on August 7, 2001 of $0.50 per share. u) On August 10, 2001, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its preferred stock, Series B, with attached warrants at par value of $0.01 per share, or $10,000. The preferred Series B stock converts to 20 million shares of the Company's common stock at 40 percent of the market value of the common stock based on a stated value. The attached warrants convert to 5,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $1.50 per share. In accordance with the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") 98-5, the Company valued the beneficial conversion feature at the amount of the proceeds received from the sale of the stock ($10,000). v) On January 7, 2002, the Company bought back the 1,000,000 preferred shares and the attached warrants that had been issued on August 10, 2001 for a total consideration of $10,000. The preferred shares were added to the treasury stock, while the warrants were cancelled. w) On March 21, 2002, the Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate amount of $22,500 for consulting services. x) On April 15, 2002, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate amount of $32,000 for consulting services. y) On May 25, 2002, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate amount of $60,000 for services rendered by the directors and officers of the Company. z) On July 29, 2002, the Company sold 300,000 preferred B series shares from treasury for a total consideration of $15,000. The Company also issued the purchaser of the preferred B series stock, 3,000,000 warrants. Each warrant is convertible into one common share at an exercise price of $1.50 and expires in December 2003. aa) On August 3, 2002, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock for cash of $20,000 to an officer of the Company. ab) On August 7, 2002, the Company issued 2,272,727 shares of common stock to Intracell, under a settlement of debt agreement valued a $500,000. F-19 HIV-VAC, INC. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008 5. Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (cont'd) ac) On August 30, 2002, the Company issued 1,323,529 shares of common stock to Intracell, under a settlement of debt agreement valued a $225,000. ad) On October 30, 2002, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate amount of $50,100 for services rendered by the directors and officers of the Company. ae) On October 31, 2002, the Company issued 1,150,000 shares of common stock under debt settlement agreements with a total value of $195,500. af) On April 23, 2003, the Company issued 140,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate amount of $51,800 for legal fees for services rendered to the Company during the previous 18 months. ag) On November 3, 2003 the Company issued 425,000 common shares for an aggregate amount of $42,500 for legal fees and consulting fees. ah) On September 30, 2005, the Company cancelled 1,016 Common shares and 700,000 Preferred Series "B" shares that were held as treasury stock. 6 Income Taxes 2009 2008 Temporary differences $ 14,741 $ 14,562 Loss carryforwards 2,064,483 1,885,254 Allowance for valuation (2,079,224) (1,899,816) ------------ ------------ $ - $ - ============ ============ Potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company can not be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years. The Company's tax returns have not yet been filed and when they are filed will be subject to audits and potential penalties and reassessments by taxation authorities. The outcome of audits can not be reasonably determined and the potential impact on the financial statements is not determinable. F-20 HIV-VAC, INC. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008 7. Related Party Transactions The following table summarizes the Company's related party transactions, that occurred in the normal course of operations for the year, which are measured at the exchange amount agreed to by the related parties: 2009 2008 Directors and officers compensation $ 36,000 $ 34,000 ============ ============ 8. Financial Instruments a) Fair Value The carrying amount of cash, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and advances from related parties approximate fair values due to the short term nature of these items. The financial instruments of the Company have been classified into levels using a fair value hierarchy. Level 1 valuation is determined by unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. The Company's cash of $847 is classified into Level 1. Level 2 valuation is based upon inputs other than quoted prices included in level 1 that are observable for the instrument either directly or indirectly. The Company's accounts payable of $87,356, accrued liabilities of $222,971 and advances from related parties of $540,129 are classified into level 2. Level 3 valuation is for assets or liabilities that are not based on observable market data. b) Currency Risk While the reporting currency is in the U.S. Dollar, 7% of expenses for the year ended are denominated in U.K. pound (2008 - 24% of expenses). As at September 30, 2009, 10% of liabilities are originally denominated in U.K. pound (2008 - 11% of liabilities). The Company is exposed to foreign exchange risk as the results of operations may be affected by fluctuations in the exchange rates between U.S. dollar and U.K. pound. F-21 HIV-VAC, INC. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 2009 and 2008 9. Stockholders' Restrictions The stockholders of the Company have a pre-emptive right regarding the purchase of stock. Furthermore, the transfer of certain stock is restricted, in accordance with the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The regulations prevent the transfer of stock, unless a registration statement is in effect, or if the stock is subject to exemption under SEC regulations. 10. Subsequent Events a) On August 23, 2010, the Company entered into an irrevocable agreement to acquire 80% of the issued and outstanding share capital of Richard Y Lange, a Mexican corporation, through the issue of 8,000,000 of the Company's common shares valued at $0.25 per common share. Under the agreement, Richard Y Lange warrants that shareholders equity in Richard Y Lange will not be less than 70,000,000 pesos ($5,995,000). Richard Y Lange is involved in construction, property development and product distribution. It also owns a block plant and a sand pit. The agreement will close as soon as Richard Y Lange has verified its assets through audit or as agreed to by the parties. The Company represents, at Closing, there will be 10,421,916 common shares and 300,000 Preferred "B" shares outstanding. Thus, the Company has agreed to reduce their common shares by 8,736 shares. b) The Company changed its name to Grupo International Inc. on September 2, 2010. F-22 Item 8. Changes In And Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting And Financial Disclosure. None PART III Item 9. Director's And Executive Officers Promoters And Control Persons, Compliance With Section 16(a) Of The Exchange Act. Directors and Executive Officers Our directors and executive officers during the period are as follows NAME AGE POSITION -------- --- -------- Kevin W Murray 57 Chairman of the Board, President and CEO Gordon R B Skinner 69 Director, Director of Research Sally Del Principe 56 Director, Resigned August 2010 John Palethorpe 65 Vice President, Resigned August 2010 There are no individuals, other than those listed above, who make a significant contribution to our business. Kevin W. Murray has served as our Vice President of Finance and Administration, and as a director, since from April of 1999 to June 2002. He was appointed our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer in June 2002. He has been a director of Intracell Vaccines Limited since September 1998. He is currently a director of numerous private companies, including Mobsafety Inc, Pipevision Inc, Bullfrog Wireless Ltd, Vision Aviation and Vaccine Research International Plc. Mr. Murray holds a Bachelor of Accounting Science degree from The University of South Africa, and completed post-graduate studies in accountancy at The University of Cape Town, prior to gaining admission to the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants. Dr. Gordon R.B. Skinner is the developer of our proposed vaccine. He served as our Chairman and President from April of 1999 to June 2002 and as our Director of Research since June 2002. He has been a director of Intracell Vaccines Limited since November of 1998. He is the Managing Director of Vaccine Research International, PLC, a corporation involved in the development of a staphylococcal vaccine. He is Chairman of the Vaccine Research Trust UK, and was previously an Honorary Consultant in Infection at The University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham. Dr. Skinner was a senior lecturer at the Department of Medical Microbiology at The University of Birmingham from 1976 to 1998. He received an MB ChB from the University of Glasgow in 1965, an MD (First Class Honors) from The University of Birmingham in 1975, and a DSc from The University of Birmingham in 1989. He is a Fellow of The Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists, and a Fellow of The Royal College of Pathologists. Dr. Skinner developed the Skinner Herpes vaccine, and is the author of more than 100 scientific and medical publications. He maintains a medical practice in the United Kingdom. Sally Del Principe served as a director of the company from June 2001 to August 13, 2010 and served as Chief Financial Officer from June 2002 to September 2004. She is a resident of United Kingdom and since 1992 has been a partner in Lupton Del Principe Associates, a private company which specializes in credit insurance brokerage. Ms Del Pricipe resigned on August 13, 1010 John Palethorpe has served as a Vice President since April of 1999. Since 1979, Mr. Palethorpe has been the Chairman and Managing Director of Stourbridge Forklift Co. Ltd., a company that acts as an agent for the sale of Desta and Hyundai Forklifts. He is also the Chairman and managing director of the following companies: Randcrown Ltd., a property and investment company incorporated in 1979; J.Rigg Construction Ltd a property maintenance and repair company incorporated in 1979; and Tionmartin Ltd., a company that sells used forklifts and has been incorporated since 1975 and Vaccine Research International Plc, a corporation involved in the development of a Staphyloccocal vaccine. He has been involved in the financing of the development of our proposed vaccine since 1993. Mr Palethorpe resigned as Vice President on August 5, 2010 14 There are no familial relationships between any of the Company's executive officers and directors. Conflicts of Interest Our management has other financial and business interests to which a significant amount of time is devoted which may pose conflicts of interest with regard to allocation of their time and efforts. Our management, together, both directly and indirectly, hold 75.63% of our common stock and 100% of our Series "A" preferred shares. There can be no assurance that management will resolve all conflicts of interest in favor of HIV-VAC. Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance . Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company's directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of the Company's outstanding common stock, to file with the SEC, initial reports of beneficial ownership and reports of changes in beneficial ownership of the Company's common stock and other equity instruments of the Company. To the Company's knowledge, the Company's directors and officers have not complied with the requirement. CODE OF ETHICS The company has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. This Code of Ethics is filed herewith as an exhibit. Item 10. Executive Compensation. As of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, we have accrued compensation to our executive officers as follows: Annual Compensation Long Term Compensation ------------------- ---------------------- Stock Awards Fiscal and Other Name and Position Year Salary Bonus Compensation Kevin Murray 2006 $ 16,000 $ - $ - Chairman and CEO 2007 $ 17,000 $ - $ - 2008 $ 18,000 $ - $ - Dr. Gordon Skinner 2006 $ 16,000 $ - $ - Director, Director of 2007 $ 17,000 $ - $ - Research 2008 $ 18,000 $ - $ - Sally Del Principe 2005 $ - $ - $ - Director and CFO 2006 $ - $ - $ - 2007 $ - $ - $ - John Palethorpe 2005 $ - $ - $ - Vice President 2006 $ - $ - $ - 2007 $ - $ - $ - -------------------------------------- No cash fees or other consideration has been paid to our directors through the date hereof. The above compensation chart reflects amounts accrued, but not paid to the officers. 15

16 Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans As of the end of the fiscal year, the Company does not have any equity securities outstanding or authorized for issuance pursuant to any equity compensation plans. Item 12. Certain Relationships And Related Transactions. As further noted above in more detail under the caption License Agreement and Consulting Agreement, we acquired the rights to our proposed vaccine from Intracell Vaccines Limited for consideration consisting of common and preferred securities. At that time, Messrs. Skinner, Murray and Palethorpe were shareholders of Intracell Vaccines, and Messrs. Skinner and Murray also served as Intracell Vaccines directors. Messers Murray, Skinner and Palethorpe acquired all of Intracell's shareholdings in equal proportions on 28 February 2006. Item 13. Exhibits And Reports On Form 8-K (a) Exhibits: Exhibit Number Description ------ ----------- 3.1 Articles of Incorporation, filed as Exhibit to the Form 10-QSB filed May 16, 2000. 3.2 Amended Articles of Incorporation, filed as Exhibit to the Form 10-QSB filed August 14, 2001. 3.3 By-laws, filed as Exhibit to Form 10-QSB filed May 16, 2000. 3.4 Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, dated as of May 15, 2001, filed as Exhibit to the Form 10-QSB filed August 14, 2001. 10.1 License agreement between University of Birmingham and Intracell Vaccines Ltd dated November 5, 1998, filed as and Exhibit to the Amended Form 10-KSB filed Oct 22, 2002. 10.2 License Agreement between HIV-VAC, Inc. and Intracell Vaccines Ltd., filed as an Exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed August 22, 2001. 10.3 Extension of Consulting Agreement between HIV-VAC, Inc. and Intracell Vaccines Ltd. dated Oct 1, 2003, filed herewith. File University termination agreement ? 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (b) Reports on Form 8-K: During the period covered by this report, we did not file any current reports on Form 8-K. Item 14. Controls and Procedures. (a) Disclosure controls and procedures. Within 90 days before filing this report, the Company evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. The Company's disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and other procedures that it designed to ensure that it records, processes, summarizes and reports in a timely manner the information it must disclose in reports that it files with or submits to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Kevin W. Murray, the Company's Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, supervised and participated in this evaluation. Based on this evaluation, Kevin W. Murray concluded that, as of the date of their evaluation, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective. (b) Internal controls. Since the date of the evaluation described above, there have not been any significant changes in the Company's internal accounting controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those controls. 17 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. HIV-VAC, Inc. By: /s/ KEVIN MURRAY --------------------------------------------------- Chairman of the Board, President & CEO Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. By: /s/ KEVIN W MURRAY Chief Executive Officer September 30, 2011 ---------------------- & Chief Financial Officer Kevin Murray 18

Grupo International Inc 10-K