UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington , DC 20549

FORM 6-K

~~REPORT~~ OF Report ~~FOREIGN~~of ~~PRIVATE~~Foreign ~~ISSUER~~Private Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 CIK # 1342645 ~~Filed as at June 26, 2007~~

~~FARALLON~~As ~~RESOURCES~~ at ~~LTD. 800~~September ~~West Pender Street~~10, ~~Suite~~2007 ~~1020~~ Vancouver , British Columbia Canada V6C 2V6 (address of principal executive offices) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

FARALLON RESOURCES LTD. 800 West Pender Street, Suite 1020 Vancouver , British Columbia Canada V6C 2V6 (address of principal executive offices) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F...X.... Form 40-F......... Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in ~~paper~~ paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____ Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1) only permits the submission in paper of of a Form 6-K if submitted solely to provide an attached annual report to security holders. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in ~~paper~~ paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____ Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in in this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ..... No ..... If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________ Signatures Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the ~~registrant~~ registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. By: /s/ Jeffrey R. Mason Director and Chief Financial Officer Date: ~~June~~September 2610, 2007 Print the name and title of the signing officer under his signature. --------------------- Ste. 1020 - 800 West Pender Street Vancouver , BC V6C 2V6 Tel: 604-684-6365 Fax: 604-684-8092 www.farallonresources.com FARALLON ANNOUNCES FAVOURABLE LEGAL RULING IN MEXICO COURT DISMISSES HERMISTON CIVIL CASE, AWARDS COSTS TO FARALLON

~~June 26, 2007 Vancouver, BC - Dick Whittington, President~~ ~~and CEO of Farallon Resources Ltd. ("Farallon" or the "Company")~~ ~~(TSX: FAN) is pleased to announce that the civil court in~~ ~~Mexico City has dismissed the civil case initiated by David L~~ Ste. ~~Hermiston~~1020 in September 2004. In addition, the court has awarded legal costs to Farallon. This is the fourth time that the courts have ruled on this issue and in all instances and all jurisdictions Mr. Hermiston has failed to prove his allegations of being defrauded of an ownership position in the Campo Morado property. This ruling, and particularly the awarding of costs to Farallon, once again vindicates the Company's position in all respects. As reported in a news release dated September 14, 2004, a writ was filed by Hermiston in the Federal Court of Mexico on September 6, 2004, wherein Farallon was named as a defendant along with 15 other parties, including the Government of Mexico, in a series of claims filed by David L. Hermiston as Plaintiff. This writ alleged Hermiston was defrauded of certain ownership rights in shares of Minera Summit de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., the prior owner of the Campo Morado property. In previous lawsuits by the same David L. Hermiston and/or his associates, various ownership allegations had been dismissed by law courts in Canada, the United States and Mexico, as being without merit and/or deficient for a myriad of substantive and technical reasons. A chronology of the various events surrounding all these cases, including the current one, is shown below. As mentioned above, the Company's 100%-~~owned~~ ~~Campo~~800 ~~Morado~~West ~~ownership~~Pender ~~rights~~Street ~~have been challenged by Mr. Hermiston in the legal courts of British Columbia,~~ ~~Nevada~~ Vancouver ~~and Mexico. The legal actions heard in British Columbia and Nevada were decided in the Company's favour in 1998~~, ~~1999~~BC ~~and~~V6C ~~2001.~~2V6 ~~An appeal~~ of the Nevada ruling was denied by the Nevada Supreme Court in November 2005. The decision by the Nevada Supreme Court is final and conclusive and included a US$646,991 default judgement (plus accruing interest) against Mr. Hermiston personally for compensatory damages was awarded to a wholly owned subsidiary of Farallon. Having failed to prove his allegations in Canada and the United States, Mr. Hermiston moved to a new jurisdiction - Sonora State, Mexico. On October 25, 2001, the Third District Court in Hermosillo, Sonora ruled in favour of Farallon. The Court found that Mr. Hermiston's share ownership claim was without merit and ordered him to pay Farallon's legal costs. This ruling was subsequently appealed by Mr. Hermiston and on April 5, 2002, the First Unitary Tribunal for the Fifth Circuit in Sonora, Mexico, set aside the original ruling of October 25, 2001 and declared the case a nullity, based on technical and legal omissions on the part of Mr. Hermiston. Farallon unsuccessfully appealed this ruling to the Second Collegial Court for the Fifth Circuit in Sonora, following which the case was terminated. On September 7, 2004, the Company was notified of a new lawsuit launched by Mr. Hermiston in the jurisdiction of the 11th District Court, Mexico City, D.F., making essentially the same allegations and seeking essentially the same remedies as his previous lawsuits in other jurisdictions. The current judgement (received on June 22, 2007) dismisses these claims and awards legal costs to Farallon. Dick Whittington said Tel: "This ruling is welcome news but is not unanticipated. Mr. Hermiston has failed to advance his claims to the Campo Morado property. It is unfortunate that shareholders have had to put up with this type of action over the years. Mr. Hermiston has continually exploited the goodwill embodied within the Mexican legal system. The Company has at all times proceeded according to the law and is without question the 100% holder of the Campo Morado Property. We will continue to vigorously defend any and all actions to challenge our ownership position, now and into the future. Our legal team is to be commended for patiently making progress in the face of numerous tactics to delay a judgement on the merits of the case. Once again, our ownership rights have been validated. Meanwhile, these proceedings have in no way deterred Farallon from its development efforts. The Company will continue to remain fully focused on the development of a mine at the G-9 deposit in a socially responsible, environmentally sustainable manner with local stakeholder and community interests at heart, and a target production date of July 1, 2008." For further details on Farallon Resources Ltd. and its Campo Morado property, please visit the Company's website at www.farallonresources.com or contact Investor Services at (604) -684-6365 or Fax: ~~within North America at 1~~604-~~800~~684-~~667-2114.~~ 8092

ON ~~BEHALF~~ FARALLON OFUPDATES ~~THE~~DRILLING ~~BOARD~~AT OFG-9 ~~DIRECTORS~~DEPOSIT: J HIGH GRADE ZINC GRADES CONTINUE 6.~~R.H.~~0 ~~(Dick)~~METRES ~~Whittington~~AT 23% ZINC AND ~~President~~ 2.5% &COPPER ~~CEO~~LOCAL CONCENTRATIONS OF HIGH GRADE PRECIOUS METALS EMERGING

NoSeptember ~~regulatory~~10, ~~authority~~2007, ~~has~~Vancouver, ~~approved~~BC - Dick Whittington, President and CEO of Farallon Resources Ltd. (TSX: FAN; OTCBB: FRLLF) ("Farallon" or ~~disapproved~~the "Company"), is pleased to provide a further update on the core ~~information~~drilling program on the G-9 deposit at the Campo Morado polymetallic ~~contained~~ (zinc, gold, silver, copper, lead) project in ~~this~~Guerrero ~~news~~State, ~~release~~Mexico. The latest results are from infill drilling in the high grade Southeast zone ~~Forward~~ of ~~Looking~~G-9. ~~Information~~ These results are from 14 new holes. Results from the new holes are included in the Table of Assay Results - G-9 Deposit and hole locations are shown on the G-9 Drill Hole Location Map, both of which are attached. Assays are pending from a further 17 infill holes that will be released when received. Highlights are tabulated below:

This release includes certain statements that may be deemed "forward-looking statements." All statements in this release, other than statements of historical facts, that address future production, reserve potential, exploration drilling, exploitation activities and events or developments that the Company expects are forward-looking statements. The likelihood of future mining at Campo Morado is subject to a large number of risks, including changes in government policies regarding mining and natural resource exploration and exploitation, and will also require achievement of a number of technical, economic and legal objectives, including obtaining necessary mining and construction permits, completion of pre-feasibility and final feasibility studies, preparation of all necessary engineering for underground workings and processing facilities as well as receipt of significant additional financing to fund these objectives as well as funding mine construction. Such funding may not be available to the Company on acceptable terms or on any terms at all. There is no known ore at Campo Morado and there is no assurance that the mineralization at Campo Morado will ever be classified as ore. For more information on the Company, Investors should review the Company's annual Form 20-F filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and its home jurisdiction filings that are available at www.sedar.com.

Drill Hole Number	From (metres)	To (metres)	Interval (metres)	True Width (metres)	Au g/t	Ag g/t	Cu %	Pb %	Zn %
634	444.09	451.00	6.91	6.04	1.82	157	2.45	2.91	23.47
634	477.00	488.00	11.00	9.62	12.24	731	0.33	3.06	5.39
639	325.50	335.70	10.20	10.16	2.03	234	2.61	2.51	19.08
642	327.40	333.30	5.90	5.81	0.89	167	3.25	0.88	21.78

These new results continue to substantiate both the grade ~~Chronology~~ and size of ~~Events~~the high grade Southeast starter zone of the G-9 deposit. Hole 634 is approximately 40 metres from hole 498 that had two significant intersections - 16.8 metres of 21.3% zinc and 1.93% copper and 4.4 metres of 16.0 grams of gold and 682 grams of silver (See News Release dated January 12, 2006) - and successfully extends the southern portion of the Southeast zone. Hole 639 extends the western portion of the Southeast zone and is approximately 50 metres from hole 598 that intersected 8.7 metres of 24.3% zinc and 1.52% copper. (See News Release dated March 15, 2007). Hole 642 is a step-out from hole 639, further extending this portion of the Southeast zone.

1992	Minera Summit de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. ("Minera Summit") was incorporated with Lic. J. Pedro Villagran O., the registered owner of 51 Class A shares and David L. Hermiston, the registered owner of 49 Class B shares as required by Mexican law at the time.
1993	Villagran and Hermiston reviewed various mineral prospects in Mexico on behalf of Minera Summit. One of these prospects was Campo Morado; other mineral concessions in the Campo Morado area were then acquired by staking. The principal Campo Morado mineral concessions were owned by the Consejo de Recursos de Minerales ("CRM"), now Servicio Geologico Mexicano.
1994	During 1994, the CRM put the Campo Morado concession up for bid and Minera Summit submitted a successful bid. The bid required Minera Summit to spend approximately MP15 million on the concessions over a three year period. Hermiston could not raise the money to fund his portion of the expenditures. As a result, Villagran and Hermistion entered into an arrangement with Summex Mines Ltd. ("Summex Canada"), a Canadian company listed on the Vancouver Stock Exchange and Hermiston ceded title to his 49 Class B shares to Villagran.
1995	In view of Hermiston's default, Villagran subsequently converted ownership and title of the 49 Class B shares to his son. Villagran then sought alternate arrangements with other mineral exploration companies to fulfill the terms of the bid obligations for the Campo Morado concessions. These negotiations took place with several exploration and mining companies in Mexico, United States and Canada, including the Hunter Dickinson Group.
1996	In January, Villagran entered into an agreement whereby Farallon Resources Ltd. ("Farallon") acquired an option to purchase a 100% interest in the Campo Morado concessions from Minera Summit by fulfilling the required expenditures and paying cash and shares to Minera Summit. All of the above was fulfilled in 2 years and Farallon became the registered owner of 100% of the Campo Morado and related mineral concessions. In October, Hermiston filed a lawsuit in Hermosillo against Villagran, Farallon and various related parties, seeking the return of the 49 Class B shares and a reversal of the sale of the Campo Morado mineral concessions to Farallon.
1999	The Judge in the Federal District Court in Hermosillo, Sonora, ordered all parties to the litigation to submit their evidence to the courts. Defendants all complied within the time limits prescribed by Mexican law. Hermiston did not appear nor did he or his counsel present any evidence at trial. Hermiston ultimately submitted material that was beyond the time of compliance and did not meet the standard of evidenciary material for Mexican judicial purposes. The Judge in the Federal District Court in Hermosillo, Sonora, ordered all parties to the litigation to submit their evidence to the courts. Defendants all complied within the time limits prescribed by Mexican law. Hermiston did not appear nor did he or his counsel present any evidence at trial. Hermiston ultimately submitted material that was beyond the time of compliance and did not meet the standard of evidenciary material for Mexican judicial purposes.
2000	The Federal District Court in Hermosillo ordered the trial to take place in September and ruled that Hermiston's evidence did not comply with judiciary requirements and was rejected for trial purposes. The trial was held in a single day in less than 3 hours. Hermiston was the only witness to take the stand, as he was the only person to be questioned on evidence, which evidence was supplied by the Defendants. Hermiston appealed the Court's decision to reject his evidence to the Federal District Court in Hermosillo. The Court granted Hermiston's request for an appeal and the appeal was sent to another Federal Court in Hermosillo. The second Federal Court upheld the decision to reject the evidence on the same grounds as it was originally rejected. Hermiston did not file any further appeals on the rejection of his evidence; as a consequence he had no evidence at trial.
2001	The Federal District Court in Hermosillo made a number of minor rulings on old motions by Hermiston's former attorneys dating back to 1998 and 1999; in all cases, ruling against the motions and thus, effectively, against Hermiston. On October 25, 2001, the 3rd Federal District Court of Hermosillo, Sonora State, Mexico ruled in favour of Farallon and the other Defendants in the litigation initiated by David Hermiston. The Court found Hermiston's allegations without merit and in addition awarded costs and expenses of the Defendants against Hermiston. Hermiston appealed the decision.
2002	On April 5, 2002, Farallon received a ruling of the First Unitary Court for the Fifth Circuit in respect of this appeal. The Court ruled to set aside the October 25 judgment on a procedural technicality relating to a deficiency on the part of Hermiston. The deficiency related to Hermiston's failure to include certain Notaries Public as defendants. The April 5th ruling of the Unitary Court for the Fifth Circuit did not change the lack of merits or substantive failings of Hermiston's case. As a consequence, Hermiston did not pursue the case in Hermosillo, Sonora any further.
2004	On September 6th, one month after drilling resumed on the Campo Morado property, the Company was notified that a writ had been filed before the 11th District Federal Court, Mexico City, wherein it was named as defendant along with various other parties, including the Government of Mexico, in a series of claims filed by David L. Hermiston as Plaintiff. The claims were substantively the same assertions made previously by Mr. Hermiston in Hermosillo, Sonora, only this time Hermiston filed in a different jurisdiction.
2005	Farallon vigorously pursued the case; however, Hermiston's legal counsel registered several procedural items before the Court that effectively frustrated the early resolution of the case.
2006	Farallon entered all evidence on time but continued to be frustrated by Hermiston in the ability to resolve the case in a timely manner.
2007	On June 21st, the 11th District Federal Court, Mexico City, ruled that Hermiston's claims were unfounded and that costs were awarded to Farallon. The Company received the said judgment on June 22nd.

Furthermore, another trend appears to be emerging: there are localised concentrations of high grade precious metals at G-9. The deeper intersection in Hole 634 may extend the deeper high grade gold and silver intersection discovered in hole 498, and mentioned above. Similarly, holes 486 and 510 were drilled close together, as were holes 628 and 467. The high grade precious metal intercepts of these holes, given below, provide initial evidence of this new trend.

Drill Hole Number	From (metres)	To (metres)	Interval (metres)	True Width (metres)	Au g/t	Ag g/t	Cu %	Pb %	Zn %
486	551.30	559.30	8.00	7.80	45.89	1555	0.29	1.34	2.46
510	582.00	585.00	3.00	2.90	34.95	1930	0.70	2.86	5.78

628	341.40	345.40	4.00	4.00	32.75	1488	0.28	3.03	2.99
467	328.05	331.05	3.00	2.76	10.94	997	1.29	15.50	8.30

634	481.00	485.00	4.00	3.50	14.69	861	0.34	3.68	5.01
498	468.90	473.30	4.40	3.80	15.99	682	0.33	3.42	5.73

President and CEO Dick Whittington said: "We are pleased by the ongoing results from our infill drilling program. The Southeast zone is continuing to provide impressive results and high grade precious metal zones would add significant by-product credits to any future mine production. These infill holes will continue to be the highest priority of our ongoing drilling program in the immediate future; however, before the end of September, we hope to also be exploring north of the San Raphael fault once again. We will then start focusing on expanding our exploration efforts to untested targets with the objective of advancing our second key corporate objective: finding another G-9 deposit."

The in-house qualified person for the drilling program and selection of samples for metallurgical testwork at Campo Morado is Daniel Kilby, P.Eng. ALS Chemex is the analytical laboratory for the project; sample preparation is done in Guadalajara, Mexico and analysis is done in Vancouver, BC. All samples are assayed for gold by fire assay fusion with a gravimetric or Atomic Absorption (AA) finish. Silver, copper, lead, zinc and 27 to 30 additional elements are determined for all samples by acid digestion, followed by an AA or ICP finish. Duplicates are analyzed by Acme Analytical Laboratories in Vancouver.

Farallon is advancing the exploration and development of the G-9 deposit. The Company's 2007 parallel track program has been very successful to date. Exploration drilling is expanding the high-grade G-9 deposit, and mine planning and design, equipment acquisition and site preparation activities are also taking place with the goal of beginning production in July 2008.

For further details on Farallon Resources Ltd. and its Campo Morado property, please visit the Company's website at www.farallonresources.com or contact Investor Services at (604) 684-6365 or within North America at 1-800-667-2114.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

/s/ J.R.H. Whittington

J.R.H. (Dick) Whittington
President & CEO

No regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained in this news release.

Forward Looking Information

This release includes certain statements that may be deemed "forward-looking statements." All statements in this release, other than statements of historical facts, that address future production, reserve potential, continuity of mineralization, exploration drilling, exploitation activities and events or developments that the Company expects are forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that the expectations expressed in such forward looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward looking statements. The likelihood of future mining at Campo Morado is subject to a large number of risks and may require achievement of a number of technical, economic and legal objectives, including obtaining lower than expected grades and quantities of mineralization and resources, recovery rates and mining rates, changes in and the effect of government policies with respect to mineral exploration and exploitation, the possibility of adverse developments in the financial markets generally, delays in exploration, development and construction projects, fluctuations in the prices of zinc, gold, silver, copper, lead and other commodities, obtaining additional mining and construction permits, completion of pre-feasibility and final feasibility studies, preparation of all necessary engineering for underground and processing facilities as well as receipt of additional financing to fund mine construction. Such funding may not be available to the Company on acceptable terms or on any terms at all. There is no known ore at Campo Morado and there is no assurance that the mineralization at Campo Morado will ever be classified as ore. For more information on the Company and the risk factors inherent in its business, investors should review the Company's Annual Information Form at www.sedar.com and the Company's annual report on Form 20-F at www.sec.gov.

TABLE OF NEW ASSAY RESULTS
G-9 DEPOSIT (SEPTEMBER 10, 2007)

Drill Hole Number		From (metres)	To (metres)	Interval (metres)	True Width (metres)	Au g/t	Ag g/t	Cu %	Pb %	Zn %
634		444.09	451.00	6.91	6.04	1.82	157	2.45	2.91	23.47
634		451.00	458.90	7.90	6.91	1.65	50	1.29	0.96	11.69
634		466.05	468.65	2.60	2.27	2.52	149	0.49	0.66	13.26
634		473.35	477.00	3.65	3.19	8.38	417	0.35	1.06	0.30
634		477.00	488.00	11.00	9.62	12.24	731	0.33	3.06	5.39
634	Incl.	481.00	485.00	4.00	3.50	14.69	861	0.34	3.68	5.01
634		524.00	526.00	2.00	1.75	0.24	23	1.97	0.12	7.76
639		325.50	335.70	10.20	10.16	2.03	234	2.61	2.51	19.08
639	Incl.	325.50	333.45	7.95	7.92	2.19	283	2.63	3.11	21.16
642		327.40	333.30	5.90	5.81	0.89	167	3.25	0.88	21.78
642	Incl.	327.40	332.40	5.00	4.92	0.99	189	3.55	0.97	24.40
643		260.93	262.20	1.27	1.25	0.84	68	0.76	1.47	8.30
644		267.50	272.50	5.00	4.73	0.80	72	1.05	0.44	7.17
647		284.60	287.60	3.00	2.95	10.25	578	2.72	0.64	0.43
647		290.60	306.40	15.80	15.56	3.57	175	0.75	0.94	12.99
647	Incl.	293.60	302.60	9.00	8.86	4.58	213	0.31	0.96	16.04
648		290.45	298.30	7.85	7.75	1.73	91	1.06	0.48	18.23

No significant intersections in Holes 637, 638, 640, 641, 645, 646 and 649

Filing Compare · Farallon Mining Ltd.