UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC. 20549

FORM 10-K

þ	ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011
	For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012
o	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
~~For the transition period from _______________ to ________________~~	For the transition period from _______________ to ________________

Commission File No. 000-31639

INTERAMERICAN GAMING, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		88-0436364
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
3565 King Road, Suite 102 King City, Ontario, Canada L7B 1M3		905-833-9846
110 Yonge Street, Suite 1602 Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5C 1T4		416-727-6326
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Registrant’s Telephone No., including area code)
(Address of Principal 1Executive Offices)		(Registrant’s Telephone No., including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:		None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:		Common Stock, par value $0.00001

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:	None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:	Common Stock, par value $0.00001

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company þ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) ~~o Smaller reporting company þ~~

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes þo No o þ

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $~~364~~2,~~556~~489,397 as of March 3129, ~~2011~~2013 based on the last sale ($0.0104 per share) reported on the OTC Bulletin Board as of that date. Solely for purposes of this calculation, the term “affiliate” refers to all directors and executive officers of the registrant and all stockholders beneficially owning more than 5% of the registrant’s common stock.

As of ~~February~~July 1911, 2013, the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock was ~~169~~184,~~944~~460,~~901~~165 shares.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The following document is incorporated by reference into Part III of the Annual Report on Form 10-K: None

Explanatory Note

InterAmerican Gaming, Inc. (the “Company”) is filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, ~~2011~~2012 as part of a process by which the Company intends to remediate a number of delinquent periodic reports which were not filed by the Company for the fiscal periods ending March 31, 2010 until the present. It is the Company’s intention to remediate and file all of its delinquent periodic filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as soon as reasonably possible.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

History

The Company was incorporated on September 2, 1999 in the State of Nevada as LMC Capital Corp. and was organized for the purpose of creating a corporate vehicle to locate and acquire an operating business. On December 12, 2001, the Company changed its name to K-Tronik International Corp. ("KTI").

On June 13, 2006, KTI announced it would implement a new corporate strategy focusing on horseracing track development opportunities. An agreement was signed on June 19, 2006 to buy exclusive rights for a racetrack and casino (racino) development opportunity in Saskatchewan, Canada. As part of the new strategy the Company incorporated 6584292 Canada Inc. under which it would operate the new development opportunity. On July 5, 2006, KTI changed its name to Racino Royale, Inc. to reflect its intention to engage in the business of owning or leasing race-courses and/or conduct horse-races.

On January 28, 2008, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of InterAmerican Gaming Corp. (“InterAmerican”) a private casino management company focused on Latin America. InterAmerican provides experience in the Latin American gaming markets with specialization in implementing technology, systems and marketing programs. ~~The Company is pursuing acquisitions of existing operations as well as developing casino projects with hotel and resort partners.~~

On June 19, 2008, the Company formed a new subsidiary called IAG Peru S.A.C. (“IAG Peru”) to begin to organize the development of certain Peruvian opportunities. IAG Peru is 99% owned by InterAmerican Operations Inc. and 1% by InterAmerican Gaming, Inc.

On October 20, 2008, Racino Royale, Inc. changed its name to InterAmerican Gaming, Inc. to better reflect its business direction, to invest in Latin American horseracing and gaming opportunities.

During the 2008 fiscal year, the Company was reorganized to begin developing international gaming operations. The Company leased video lottery terminal slot machines from a related party and began deploying the assets in non-owned gaming locations. In 2009, the Company installed slot machines at Fantasy Club Del Peru SA (“Fantasy”) locations, operating under various brands throughout the country: “Slot City” in Chiclayo, “Colibri Dorado” in Chincha and “Monos Dorados” in Huacho and Huaral.

During fiscal 2010, the Company made the decision to step back from gaming operations. During the second quarter the Company began moving the slot machines into storage and by the end of the third quarter the Company no longer had machines installed in any casinos.

On August 30, 2010, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the related party, by virtue of common officers and directors, which held the lease on the slot machines resulting in the disposition of the assets and liabilities associated with the gaming operations.

On July 7, 2011, the Company entered into a letter of intent with Baron Group Ventures ("BGV") to acquire an 80.1% interest in SoFit Mobile Inc. (“SoFit”) (formerly NOWPHIT Operations Inc.).

On October 3, 2011, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with DealNet Capital Corp. (“DealNet”), a related party by virtue of common officers and directors, in which the Company transferred 10,000,000 of its common shares and 100% of its shares of IAG Peru to extinguish $457,875 in liabilities. The 10,000,000 common shares have not yet been issued. The transaction included the forgiveness of debt resulting in a $31,678 charge to equity as DealNet is a related party.

Recent Developments

On ~~August~~October 303, ~~2010~~2011, the Company ~~entered~~executed ~~into~~ a ~~settlement~~Share ~~agreement~~Exchange Agreement with ~~the~~SoFit ~~related~~and ~~party,~~its byshareholders ~~virtue~~(the of“Share ~~common~~Exchange”) ~~officers~~pursuant ~~and~~to ~~directors,~~ which ~~held~~ the ~~lease~~Company onpurchased ~~the~~80.1% ~~slot~~of ~~machines~~SoFit ~~resulting~~ in ~~the~~exchange ~~disposition~~for 77,800,000 of the ~~assets~~Company’s ~~and~~common ~~liabilities~~shares ~~associated~~valued ~~with~~at ~~the gaming operations~~$240,000.

OnIn ~~July~~conjunction with the signing of the Share Exchange, all of the directors and officers of IAG, excluding J. Graham Simmonds, resigned and were replaced by nominees of SoFit. As of October 7, 2011, the ~~Company~~Board ~~entered~~of ~~into~~Directors aof ~~letter~~IAG was made up of ~~intent~~J. ~~with~~Graham ~~Baron~~Simmonds, ~~Group~~Gary ~~Ventures~~Schwartz, ~~("BGV")~~Marc toAskenasi ~~acquire~~and anHenry 80J.1% ~~interest~~Kloepper. inMarc ~~NowPhit~~Askenasi ~~Operations~~was ~~Inc.~~also ~~(“NowPhit”)~~appointed Chief Executive Officer and President, effective as of October 7, 2011.

On October 3, 2011, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Gamecorp Ltd. (“Gamecorp”) a related party by virtue of common officers and directors, in which the Company transferred 10,000,000 of its common shares and 100% of its shares of IAG Peru to extinguish $457,875 in liabilities.

On October 3, 2011, the Company executed a share exchange agreement with NowPhit and its shareholders (the “share exchange”)pursuant to which the Company purchased 80.1% of NowPhit in exchange for 77,800,000 of the Company’s common shares valued at $240,000.

On October 21, 2011 the Company settled amounts of $106,262 owing to directors, officers and consultants with 2,500,000 common shares.

In conjunction with the signing of the Share Exchange, all of the directors and officers of IAG, excluding J. Graham Simmonds, resigned and were replaced by nominees of BGV. As of October 3, 2011, the Board of Directors of IAG were made up of J. Graham Simmonds, Gary Schwartz, and Marc Askenasi.

Officers of the Company are now as follows:

Marc Askenasi ~~President~~Director, & Chief Executive Officer and President J. Graham Simmonds Chairman & Interim Chief Financial Officer

On ~~January~~October 1721, ~~2012,~~2011 the Company ~~appointed~~settled ~~Henry~~amounts J.of ~~Kloepper~~$130,866 ~~and~~owing ~~Gerald~~to ~~Goldberg~~directors, toofficers ~~its~~and ~~Board~~consultants ofwith ~~Directors~~2,500,000 common shares.

On January 3017, 2012, ~~NowPhit~~the ~~changed~~Company ~~its~~appointed ~~name~~Gerald toGoldberg ~~SoFit Mobile Inc. (“SoFit”), short for Social Fitness, as it was determined~~ to ~~better~~its ~~reflect~~Board ~~the business~~ of ~~the Company’s subsidiary~~Directors.

On ~~April~~January 1730, 2012, ~~the~~NOWPHIT ~~Company~~Operations ~~closed~~Inc. anwas ~~equity~~renamed ~~financing~~to ofSoFit ~~$400,000~~Mobile ~~at a price of $0~~Inc.02, ~~per~~short ~~share~~ for aSocial ~~total issuance of 20~~Fitness,~~000,000~~ ~~shares. The~~as ~~equity~~it ~~financing~~ was ~~completed~~determined onto abetter ~~non-brokered~~reflect ~~basis~~the ~~and~~business ~~no warrants or options were issued. The proceeds~~ of the ~~financing are being used to advance the~~ Company'’s ~~SoFit platform and for general corporate purposes~~subsidiary.

On ~~June~~September 1330, 2012, ~~the~~four ~~Company~~consultants ~~closed~~of ~~its~~the ~~second~~Company ~~equity~~exercised ~~financing~~their ofoptions, ~~$225~~purchasing, 1,750,000 atcommon ashares ~~price~~at of $0.0302 ~~per~~and ~~share~~133,333 ~~for~~common ashares, ~~total issuance of 7~~250,~~500,~~000 common shares. ~~The~~and ~~equity~~1,389,889 ~~financing~~common ~~was~~shares ~~completed~~at on$0.03. aThese ~~non-brokered basis and no warrants or~~ options were ~~issued.~~granted ~~The~~in ~~proceeds~~fiscal of2012. ~~the~~These ~~financing~~shares were ~~being~~issued ~~used~~in ~~to complete commercialization of the SoFit platform~~June, ~~to execute SoFit’s summer 2012 launch strategy, and for general corporate purposes to update IAG’s financial reporting and accounting~~2013.

On September 30, 2012, the Company settled $4,000 in accounts payable, owing to unrelated parties with 133,333 common shares of the Company. These shares have not yet been issued.

On September 30, 2012, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with a former consultant to settle fees and expenses in the amount of $16,455 with 744,710 common shares of the Company. These shares have not yet been issued.

On October 11, 2012, Mr. John Ryan was appointed to the Board of Directors.

On ~~October~~November 3120, 2012, ~~two~~the ~~consultants~~Company’s subsidiary SoFit Mobile Inc. was served a statement of ~~the~~claim ~~Company~~by ~~exercised~~a ~~their~~human ~~options~~resources placement agency. The claim is for unpaid invoices dated September 4, ~~purchasing~~2012 1in the amount of $39,~~750,000~~550. ~~common~~This ~~shares~~amount ~~and~~has 1been fully recorded in accounts payable on the balance sheet. On July 10,~~442~~ 2013, ~~222~~the ~~common~~Company ~~shares~~and atthe other party reached a settlement in which $~~0.02~~20,000 will be paid in cash in installments over a five week period and the remaining $~~0.03~~19,550 ~~respectively. The~~will ~~options~~be ~~were~~settled ~~granted~~with inthe ~~fiscal~~issuance ~~2012~~of 1,000,000 shares.

SoFit ~~products~~is ~~include~~a ~~integrated~~social ~~mobile~~gaming ~~applications~~company ~~and~~that ~~complementary~~has ~~wireless~~developed ~~devices~~software ~~that~~to ~~enable~~empower ~~athletes~~individuals to track, train, and compete ~~with~~through ~~each~~its ~~other in real-time via the SoFit~~ platform. ~~Athletes~~Registered users can earn virtual rewards, such as trophies and medals, as well as real-life rewards, such as location-based coupons and special offers. ~~The~~ SoFit ~~platform~~products ~~also~~include ~~features~~integrated amobile ~~charity~~applications and ~~event~~complementary ~~function~~wireless devices that ~~allows~~enable ~~athletes~~connectivity to ~~raise donations for a charity of their choice and remotely compete in athletic events from anywhere around~~ the ~~world in real-time.~~ SoFit ~~mobile applications were launched in July 2012~~platform.

SoFit was developed to add gamification elements to the fitness industry by enabling individuals to virtually connect around the world to train and compete in both post and real-time. SoFit also provides the opportunity for organizations, marathons and other charitable events to host globally virtualized events by connecting participants to interact through the SoFit platform. Using SoFit, organizations are no longer constrained by the conventional nature of fundraising through locally hosted events. Going forward, the SoFit charity and event functionality plans to allow users to raise funds for a charity of their choice by remotely competing in athletic events from anywhere around the world in real-time.

SoFit products include integrated mobile applications and complementary wireless devices that enable athletes to track, train, and compete with each other in real-time via the SoFit platform. Athletes can earn virtual rewards, such as trophies and medals, as well as real-life rewards, such as location-based coupons and special offers. The SoFit platform also features a charity and event function that allows athletes to raise donations for a charity of their choice and remotely compete in athletic events from anywhere around the world in real-time. The SoFit mobile applications were launched in July 2012.

On June 6, 2013, SoFit released Version 2.0 of its mobile application. Version 2.0 features a number of key updates. Users can now walk, run and bike; challenge friends to beat their respective activity times; and participate remotely in global challenges, including races and charity events such as Augie’s Quest to Cure ALS Challenge.

Employees

As of the date of this report, the Company has 611 employees, including our current officers, and independent contractors.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to other information in this Current Report, the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our business because such factors may have a significant impact on our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition. As a result of the risk factors set forth below, actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently consider to be immaterial, may also impact our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition. If any such risks occur, our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition could be materially affected in an adverse manner. Under such circumstances, the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on the ability to further implement its business plan, raise capital, and generate revenues.

The time required for the Company to become profitable from operations is highly uncertain, and the Company cannot assure you that it will achieve or sustain operating profitability or generate sufficient cash flow to meet its planned capital expenditures. If required, the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing from other sources also depends on many factors beyond its control, including the state of the capital markets and the prospects for its business. The necessary additional financing may not be available to the Company or may be available only on terms that would result in further dilution to the current owners of its common stock.

The Company cannot assure that it will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or obtain additional financing to meet its obligations. Should any of these events not occur, its financial condition will be adversely affected.

Company’s new line of business has a limited operating history and, accordingly, you will not have any basis on which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objectives.

We are a development stage company with limited operating results to date. Since we do not have an established operating history or regular sales as of yet, you will have no basis upon which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objectives.

Our limited operating history does not afford investors a sufficient history on which to base an investment decision.

We are currently in the early stages of developing our business. There can be no assurance that at this time that we will operate profitably or will have adequate working capital to meet our obligations as they become due.

Investors must consider the risks and difficulties frequently encountered by early stage companies, particularly in rapidly evolving markets. Such risks include the following:

●	competition;

●	ability to anticipate and adapt to a competitive market;

●	ability to effectively manage expanding operations;

●	amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to expansion of our business, operations, and infrastructure; and

●	dependence upon key personnel to market and sell our services and the loss of one of our key managers may adversely affect the marketing of our services.

We cannot be certain that our business strategy will be successful or that we will successfully address these risks. In the event that we do not successfully address these risks, our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and we may not have the resources to continue or expand our business operations.

Dependence on our management, without whose services, the Company's business operations could cease.

At this time, our management is wholly responsible for the development and execution of our business plan. Our management is under no contractual obligation to remain employed by us, although they have no present intent to leave. If our management should choose to leave us for any reason before we have hired additional personnel our operations may fail. Even if we are able to find additional personnel, it is uncertain whether we could find qualified management who could develop our business along the lines described herein or would be willing to work for compensation the Company could afford. Without such management, the Company could be forced to cease operations and investors in our common stock or other securities could lose their entire investment.

Lack of additional working capital may cause curtailment of any expansion plans while the raising of capital through a sale of equity securities would dilute existing shareholders' percentage of ownership.

Our available capital resources may not be adequate to fund our working capital requirements. Any shortage of capital could affect our ability to fund our working capital requirements to sustain operations. If we require additional capital, funds may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, if we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of these securities could dilute existing shareholders. If funds are not available, we could be placed in the position of having to cease all operations.

We do not presently have a traditional credit facility with a financial institution. This absence may adversely affect our operations.

We do not presently have a traditional credit facility with a financial institution. The absence of a traditional credit facility with a financial institution could adversely impact our operations. If adequate funds are not otherwise available, we may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate portions of our operations. Without such credit facilities, the Company could be forced to cease operations and investors in our common stock or other securities could lose their entire investment.

We are subject to compliance with securities law, which exposes us to potential liabilities, including potential rescission rights.

We have offered and sold our common stock to investors pursuant to certain exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as well as those of various state securities laws. The basis for relying on such exemptions is factual; that is, the applicability of such exemptions depends upon our conduct and that of those persons contacting prospective investors and making the offering. We have not received a legal opinion to the effect that any of our prior offerings were exempt from registration under any federal or state law. Instead, we have relied upon the operative facts as the basis for such exemptions, including information provided by investors themselves.

If any prior offering did not qualify for such exemption, an investor would have the right to rescind ~~its~~their purchase of the securities if itthey so desired. It is possible that if an investor should seek rescission, such investor would succeed. A similar situation prevails under state law in those states where the securities may be offered without registration in reliance on the partial preemption from the registration or qualification provisions of such state statutes under the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996. If investors were successful in seeking rescission, we would face severe financial demands that could adversely affect our business and operations. Additionally, if we did not in fact qualify for the exemptions upon which it has relied, we may become subject to significant fines and penalties imposed by the SEC and state securities agencies.

We incur costs associated with SEC reporting compliance.

We incur certain costs of compliance with applicable SEC reporting rules and regulations including, but not limited to attorney’s fees, accounting and auditing fees, other professional fees, financial printing costs and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance costs in an amount estimated at approximately $18,000 per month. On balance, the Company determined that the incurrence of such costs and expenses was preferable to the Company being in a position where it had very limited access to additional capital funding.

We may not have adequate internal accounting controls. While we have certain internal procedures in our budgeting, forecasting and in the management and allocation of funds, our internal controls may not be adequate.

We are constantly striving to improve our internal accounting controls. While we believe that our internal controls are adequate for our current level of operations, we believe that we may need to employ additional accounting staff as our operations ramp up. We have appointed an outside director as Audit Chair, however there is no guarantee that actions undertaken by the Audit Committee will be adequate or successful or that such improvements will be carried out on a timely basis. If, in the future, we do not have adequate internal accounting controls, we may not be able to appropriately budget, forecast and manage our funds, we may also be unable to prepare accurate accounts on a timely basis to meet our continuing financial reporting obligations and we may not be able to satisfy our obligations under US securities laws.

The Company’s business is particularly dependent on the market for mobile fitness products.

A growth in the demand for mobile fitness products will be essential to the expansion of the Company’s business. Results of operations may be adversely affected by decreases in the general level of economic activity and the demand for mobile fitness products and socially disruptive technologies. Decreases in consumer spending that may result from the current global economic downturn may weaken demand for the Company’s products.

The market for mobile fitness products is relatively new and emerging. If the market develops more slowly or differently than the Company expects, the business, growth prospects and financial condition would be adversely affected.

The market for mobile fitness products is relatively new and many may not achieve or sustain high levels of demand and market acceptance. The can be no assurance that mobile fitness products will become widely adopted, or the market for the Company’s products develop as expected. If the market for mobile fitness products develops more slowly, or differently than expected, the business, growth prospects and financial condition would be adversely affected. In addition, if the Company fails to successfully market, brand and bring the products to market, the business could face material adverse effects.

The Company’s products and services are based on new and unproved technologies and are subject to the risks of failure inherent in the development of new products and services.

Because our mobile application products and services are and will be based on new technologies, they are subject to risks of failure that are particular to new technologies, including the possibility that:

●	our new approaches will not result in any products or services that gain market acceptance;

●	our products and services may unfavorably interact with other types of commonly used applications and services, this restricting the circumstances in which they may be used;

●	proprietary rights of third parties may preclude us from marketing a new product or service; or

●	third parties may market superior or more cost-efficient products or services.

As a result, the Company’s activities may not result in any commercially viable products or services, which would harm our sales, revenue and financial condition.

The Company’s market is subject to rapid technological change and, to compete, we must continually enhance our products and services.

The Company must continue to enhance and improve the performance, functionality and reliability of our products and services. The software and electronic commerce industries are characterized by rapid technological change, changes in user requirements and preferences, frequent new product and services introductions embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards and practices that could render our products and services obsolete. Since the launch of SoFit, we have discovered that some of our customers desire and would benefit from additional performance, different functionality and increased intuitiveness in regards to the user experience which are not currently offered by our products. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to both internally develop and license leading technologies to enhance our existing products and services, develop new products and services that address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our customers, and respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices on a cost-effective and timely basis. The development of our technology and other proprietary technology involves significant technical and business risks. We may fail to use new technologies effectively or to adapt our proprietary technology and systems to customer requirements or emerging industry standards. If we are unable to adapt to changing market conditions, customer requirements or emerging industry standards, we may not be able to increase our revenue and expand our business.

The Company may face intense competition and expects competition to increase in the future, which could prohibit us from developing a customer base and generating revenue.

There are many companies who will compete directly with our products and services. These companies may already have an established market in our industry. Most of these companies have significantly greater financial and other resources than us and have been developing their products and services longer than we have been developing ours. Additionally, there are not significant barriers to entry in our industry and new companies and/or products may be created that will compete with us and other, more established companies who do not now directly compete with us, may choose to enter our markets and compete with us in the future.

The market for the Company’s products is very competitive and subject to rapid technological change. There can be no assurance that the Company will be in a stronger position to respond quickly to potential acquisitions and other market opportunities, new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements. The mobile health and fitness industry competes with respect to brand recognition, brand loyalty, product quality, customer service, functionality, utility and price. Market disruption will be caused when new products or brands are able to differentiate from the market. Failure to maintain and enhance the Company’s competitive position could materially adversely affect the business and prospects.

The Company is dependent on its Directors to manage and operate the business.

The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it, based on the funds available to the Company, in order to maintain its daily operations. The Board of Directors does not establish quantitative return on capital criteria for management, but rather relies on the expertise of the Company’s management to sustain the future development of the business. In part, the Company’s success is largely dependent on the continued service of the members of the management team, who are critical in establishing corporate strategies, focus and future growth. The Company’s success will depend on the ability to attract and retain a qualified and competent management team in order to manage operations. Therefore, the Company’s operations may be severely disrupted, and may incur additional expenses to recruit and retain new officers. In addition, if any of the Company’s executives join a competitor or forms a competing business, the Company may lose existing customers.

The Company may not be able to adequately protect or enforce our proprietary technologies, and our competitors may be able to offer similar products and services that could harm our competitive advantage.

The Company’s success depends upon our proprietary technologies, particularly the protection of our trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks, trade dress, domain names and other product rights. The Company strives to protect our intellectual property rights by relying on federal, state and common law rights, as well as contractual restrictions. The Company relies primarily on service mark and trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to establish and protect our proprietary rights. As part of our confidentiality procedures, the Company enters into non-disclosure agreements with our employees, consultants and business prospects in order to limit access to, and disclosure and use of, our proprietary information. However, these contractual arrangements and the other steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property may not prevent the misappropriation of our proprietary information or deter independent development of similar technologies by others. Despite these precautions, third parties could infringe on our brand and copy or otherwise obtain and use our technology without authorization, or develop similar technology independently.

We do not own any patents or trademarks on our technologies or brands, however the Company has filed trademark applications in the U.S. and Canada. There can be no assurance that the company will be successful in its registration efforts, and until such time (if ever) the Company is at risk of third parties infringing on our brand. In addition, there can be no assurance that the protection of or proprietary rights will be adequate or that our competitors will not independently develop similar technologies, duplicate our products and services, or design around any intellectual property rights we may hold in the future.

The Company is seeking to protect our trademarks, patents and domain names in an increasing number of jurisdictions, a process that is expensive and time-consuming and may not be successful or which we may not pursue in every location. We may, over time, increase our investment in protecting our innovations through increased patent filings that are expensive and time-consuming and may not result in issued patents that can be effectively enforced. The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“the Leahy-Smith Act”), was adopted in September 2011. The Leahy-Smith Act includes a number of significant changes to United States patent law, including provisions that affect the way patent applications will be prosecuted and may also affect patent litigation. The United States Patent and Trademark Office is currently developing regulations and procedures to govern administration of the Leahy-Smith Act, and many of the substantive changes to patent law associated with the Leahy-Smith Act will not become effective until up to 18 months after its enactment. Accordingly, it is not clear what, if any, impact the Leahy-Smith Act will have on the operation of our business. However, the Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could harm our business.

Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets or determine the validity and scope of proprietary rights claimed by others. Any litigation of this nature, regardless of outcome or merit, could result in substantial costs, adverse publicity or diversion of management and technical resources, any of which could adversely affect our business and operating results. If we fail to maintain, protect and enhance our intellectual property rights, our business and operating results may be harmed.

The Company may become subject to governmental regulation and legal uncertainties that could reduce demand for the Company’s products and services or increase the cost of doing business, thereby adversely affecting the Company’s financial results.

The Company is not currently subject to direct regulation by any domestic or foreign governmental agency, other than regulations applicable to businesses generally and laws or regulations directly applicable to Internet commerce. However, due to the increasing popularity and use of mobile applications, it is possible that a number of laws and regulations may become applicable to us or may be adopted in the future with respect to mobile applications covering issues such as:

●	user privacy;

●

taxation;

●	right to access personal data;

●	copyrights;

●	distribution; and

●	characteristics and quality of services.

The applicability of existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, copyrights and other intellectual property issues, encryption, taxation, libel, export or import matters and personal privacy to mobile applications is uncertain. The vast majority of these laws were adopted prior to the broad commercial use of mobile applications and related technologies. As a result, they do not contemplate or address the unique issues raised by mobile applications and related technologies. Changes to these laws intended to address these issues, including some recently proposed changes, could create uncertainty in the marketplace. Such uncertainty could reduce demand for our services or increase the cost of doing business due to increased costs of litigation or increased service delivery costs.

Fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies could result in increased costs and operating expenses which could adversely affect our business.

For our projected international operations, the local currency will be designated as the functional currency. Accordingly, assets and liabilities must be translated into U.S. Dollars at year-end exchange rates, and revenues and expenses will be translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the year. Fluctuations in the value of other currencies in which we may generate revenues or incur costs may be difficult to predict and could cause us to incur currency exchange losses. Receivables and liabilities in currencies other than the functional currency could also move adversely to us from the date of accrual by us to the date of actual settlement of receivables or liabilities in a currency other than the functional currency. A disparity between the accrual and settlement amounts due to currency exchange costs could have a material adverse affect on our business. We cannot predict the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on our future operating results. Future fluctuations in currency exchange rates could materially and adversely affect our business.

Certain governments with whom we may do business may impose restrictions over the conversion of their currencies into U.S. dollars or other foreign currencies. There can be no assurance that we will be able to convert foreign revenues into U.S. dollars for repatriation and this may adversely affect our business.

If the Company is no longer able to distribute our applications through the Apple App Store and/or Google Play, it may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Company currently distributes its applications through a limited number of online stores that compete in a highly monopolized and self-regulated market. The Company is substantially dependent on both the Apple App Store and Google Play to distribute/sell its applications and products. If either marketplace that the Company currently relies upon to distribute its products were to shut down, in part or in whole, or the Company was prevented from distributing its products through its current means, the Company could experience significant disruptions in its services that may negatively impact the Company. The Apple App Store, owned by Apple Inc., is the only marketplace whereby customers can access “Apple Approved” applications and content. Google Play, owned by Google Inc., is the largest global marketplace for Android applications, an open source platform. Changes in business conditions, wars, governmental changes and other factors beyond the Company’s control which are not presently anticipated, could affect Apple App Store and/or Google Play’s ability to meet the Company’s needs. In the event that the Company is no longer able to distribute/sell its applications and products through an online marketplace, it would likely have a material adverse on our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

There is currently no market for our securities and there can be no assurance that any market will ever develop or that our common stock will be listed for trading. Therefore, investors may be unable to liquidate their investments in our common stock.

The Company’s securities are currently is listed for trading on the OTC Pink Sheets under the symbol "IAGM." The market for the Company’s common stock has been sporadic and there have been long periods during which there were few, if any, transactions in the common stock and no reported quotations. The Company’s offerings have only been available to accredited investors. The Company's stock has not been approved for trading on any exchange and the Company has not contacted any market makers about applying on behalf of the Company. Therefore, there has not been any established trading market for our common stock and there is currently no market for our securities. Even if we are ultimately approved for trading on an exchange, there can be no assurance as to the prices at which our common stock will trade if a trading market develops. Until an orderly market develops, (if ever) in our common stock, or that a regular trading market can be sustained, there can be no assurance that investors will be able to liquidate their investments.

Our common stock is subject to the Penny Stock Regulations.

Once it commences trading (if ever) our common stock could be subject to the SEC's "penny stock" rules to the extent that the price remains less than $5.00. Those rules, which require delivery of a schedule explaining the penny stock market and the associated risks before any sale, may further limit your ability to sell your shares.

The SEC has adopted regulations which generally define "penny stock" to be an equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share. Our common stock currently has no "market price" and when and if a trading market develops, may fall within the definition of penny stock and subject to rules that impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally those with assets in excess of $1,000,000, or annual incomes exceeding $200,000 or $300,000, together with their spouse).

For transactions covered by these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of such securities and have received the purchaser's prior written consent to the transaction. Additionally, for any transaction, other than exempt transactions, involving a penny stock, the rules require the delivery, prior to the transaction, of a risk disclosure document mandated by the Commission relating to the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and, if the broker-dealer is the sole market-maker, the broker-dealer must disclose this fact and the broker-dealers presumed control over the market. Finally, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks. Consequently, the `penny stock` rules may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to sell our common stock and may affect the ability of investors to sell their common stock in the secondary market.

Our common stock is illiquid and may in the future be subject to price volatility unrelated to our operations.

Our common stock has no market price and, if and when a market price is established, could fluctuate substantially due to a variety of factors, including market perception of our ability to achieve our planned growth, quarterly operating results of other companies in the same industry, trading volume in our common stock, changes in general conditions in the economy and the financial markets or other developments affecting our competitors or us. In addition, the stock market is subject to extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market price of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to their operating performance and could have the same effect on our common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of common stock, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock (if and when a market price is established) and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of our equity securities.

We have not voluntarily implemented various corporate governance measures, in the absence of which, shareholders may have more limited protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters.

Recent Federal legislation, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has resulted in the adoption of various corporate governance measures designed to promote the integrity of the corporate management and the securities markets. Some of these measures have been adopted in response to legal requirements. Others have been adopted by companies in response to the requirements of national securities exchanges, such as the NYSE or the Nasdaq Stock Market, on which their securities are listed. Among the corporate governance measures that are required under the rules of national securities exchanges are those that address board of directors' independence, audit committee oversight, and the adoption of a code of ethics. We have not yet adopted any of these corporate governance measures and, since our securities are not yet listed on a national securities exchange, we are not required to do so. It is possible that if we were to adopt some or all of these corporate governance measures, stockholders would benefit from somewhat greater assurances that internal corporate decisions were being made by disinterested directors and that policies had been implemented to define responsible conduct. Prospective investors should bear in mind our current lack of corporate governance measures in formulating their investment decisions.

The Company has no agreement with any securities broker or dealer that is a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., to act as a market maker for the Company’s securities.

Should the Company fail to obtain one or more market makers for the Company’s securities, the trading level and price of the Company’s securities will be materially and adversely affected. Should the Company happen to obtain only one market maker for the Company’s securities, the market maker would in effect dominate and control the market for such securities.

A significant percent of the Company’s common stock is owned by insiders of the Company.

Of the currently issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, approximately 66,929,420 shares (approximately 36.3% of the total number of shares outstanding) are owned by, or are under the direct or indirect control of Company insiders. That number of shares is enough to dominate and control the price and trading volume in the Company’s securities. Because those shares are controlled by such a limited number of persons, selling decisions can be expected to have a substantial impact upon (or “overhang” over) the market, if any, for the common stock. Any sale of a large number of shares over a short period of time could significantly depress the market price of the common stock.

Additional stock issuances by the Company may dilute investor’s ownership in the Company’s common stock, which could be materially adverse to the value of our common stock.

The board of directors of the Company has authority to issue authorized but un-issued common stock without the consent or vote of the stockholders of the Company. The issuance of these shares may dilute the interests of investors in the securities of the Company and will reduce their proportionate ownership and voting power in the Company. The Company may sell shares of common stock to raise funds to support the Company’s plan of operation. The Company also issue additional shares of common stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for common stock in connection with the hiring of personnel.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

Our executive offices are located at ~~3565~~110 ~~King~~Yonge ~~Road~~Street, Suite ~~102~~1602, ~~King City~~Toronto, Ontario, Canada, ~~L7B~~M5C ~~1M3~~1T4 (tel. ~~905~~416-~~833~~727-~~9845, fax 905-833-9847~~6326). The Company does not ~~pay~~have ~~rent~~a formal agreement for the use of these facilities. As of November 1, 2012, the Company accrues $2,500 per month for rent payable to a related party by virtue of a common officer and director.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On ~~December~~November 1820, ~~2009~~2012, the Company’s ~~wholly owned~~ subsidiary ~~IAG~~SoFit ~~Peru~~Mobile SInc.~~A.C.~~ was served a ~~labor~~statement of claim ~~for $78,750 (plus expenses)~~ by a ~~former~~human ~~general~~resources ~~manager.~~placement agency. The claim is for unpaid ~~consulting~~invoices ~~fees~~dated September 4, ~~other~~2012 ~~stock~~in ~~based~~the ~~compensation,~~amount ~~bonuses~~of $39,550. ~~vacation~~This ~~pay~~amount ~~and~~has ~~other~~been ~~employee~~fully ~~benefits.~~recorded ~~The~~in ~~dispute~~accounts ~~involves~~payable on the ~~start~~balance ~~date~~sheet. On ofJuly ~~employment~~10, ~~and~~2013, the Company ~~believes~~and itthe ~~has~~other ~~fully~~party ~~accrued~~reached ~~for~~a ~~the~~settlement ~~potential~~in ~~loss~~which $20,000 will be paid in ~~the~~cash ~~normal~~in ~~course~~installments ~~during~~over ~~fiscal~~a ~~2009.~~five ~~The~~week ~~amount~~period isand ~~recorded~~the inremaining ~~accounts~~$19,550 ~~payable~~will onbe settled with the ~~balance~~issuance ~~sheet~~of 1,000,000 shares.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

411

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

MARKET INFORMATION

Our Common Stock currently is listed for trading on the OTC Pink Sheets under the symbol "IAGM." The table below sets forth the reported high and low bid prices for the periods indicated. The bid prices shown reflect quotations between dealers, without adjustment for markups, markdowns or commissions, and may not represent actual transactions in our common stock.

2010 FISCAL YEAR:

	High		Low
1st Quarter		0.15		0.02
2nd Quarter		0.02		0.01
3rd Quarter		0.01		0.01
4th Quarter		0.00		0.00

2011 FISCAL YEAR:

	High		Low

1st Quarter		0.03		0.01
2nd Quarter		0.01		0.00
3rd Quarter		0.01		0.00
4th Quarter		0.03		0.00

At2012 ~~February~~FISCAL ~~19, 2013, the closing bid price of our Common Stock was $0.022 per share.~~YEAR:

	High		Low

1st Quarter		0.02		0.02
2nd Quarter		0.02		0.00
3rd Quarter		0.07		0.01
4th Quarter		0.05		0.00

At July 8, 2013, the closing bid price of our Common Stock was $0.01 per share.

There is currently only a limited public market for our common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board, and no assurance can be given that such a market will develop or that a stockholder will ever be able to liquidate his investment without considerable delay, if at all. If such a market should develop, the price may be highly volatile. Unless and until our common shares are quoted on the NASDAQ system or listed on a national securities exchange, it is likely that the common shares will be defined as "penny stocks" under the Exchange Act and SEC rules thereunder. The Exchange Act and penny stock rules generally impose additional sales practice and disclosure requirements upon broker-dealers who sell penny stocks to persons other than certain "accredited investors" (generally, institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000, or $300,000 jointly with spouse) or in transactions not recommended by the broker-dealer.

For transactions covered by the penny stock rules, the broker-dealer must make a suitability determination for each purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement prior to the sale. In addition, the broker-dealer must make certain mandated disclosures in penny stock transactions, including the actual sale or purchase price and actual bid and offer quotations, the compensation to be received by the broker-dealer and certain associated persons, and deliver certain disclosures required by the SEC. So long as InterAmerican Gaming, Inc. common shares are considered "penny stocks", many brokers will be reluctant or will refuse to effect transactions in InterAmerican Gaming, Inc.’s shares, and many lending institutions will not permit the use of penny stocks as collateral for any loans.

~~(a) As of September 30, 2011, there were 97 stockholders of record of our common stock, including 79 beneficial holders.~~12

5(a) As of September 30, 2012, there were 149 stockholders of record of our common stock, including 81 beneficial holders.

(b) The Company did not pay any dividends on its Common Stock during the two years ended September 30, ~~2011~~2012 and September 30, ~~2010~~2011. Pursuant to the laws of the State of Nevada, a corporation may not issue a distribution if, after giving its effect, the corporation would not be able to pay its debts as they became due in the usual course of business, or such corporation's total assets would be less than the sum of their total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed, if the corporation were to be dissolved at the time of the distribution, to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of shareholders whose preferential rights are superior to those receiving the distribution. As a result, management does not foresee that we will have the ability to pay a dividend on our Common Stock in the near future. See "Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements."

(c) At ~~September 30, 2011, there were no outstanding options to purchase, or securities convertible into our common stock although the shareholders at~~ a meeting held on July 14, 2008, the shareholders approved an Incentive Stock Option Plan ~~(under~~ which ~~no options have yet been granted) which~~ would allow the Company to grant up to 7,500,000 incentive stock options to directors and employees at the board of directors’ discretion.

During the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company issued 6,750,000 stock options exercisable at $0.02, 1,388,889 stock options exercisable at $0.03 and 60,000 stock options exercisable at $0.05 to consultants of the Company. During the year, 1,750,000 options were exercised at $0.02 and 1,388,889 options were exercised at $0.03. The shares remain unissued at the filing of these financial statements. All other unexercised stock options issued during the year expired at September 30, 2012.

(d) During fiscal 2012, the Company issued warrants to acquire 949,997 common shares. The warrants were included in units issued as part of a private placement. Each unit of the private placement was comprised of one common share of the Company and one half purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to acquire one common share of the Company at a price of $0.10 per share. The warrants expire 180 days from date of execution of the subscription agreement or 45 days from the first day of trading upon which the Company’s listed shares trade at $0.15 per share or greater for 10 consecutive trading days.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and notes thereto included herein. In connection with, and because we desire to take advantage of, the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we caution readers regarding certain forward looking statements in the following discussion and elsewhere in this report and in any other statement made by, or on our behalf, whether or not in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements are statements not based on historical information and which relate to future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments. Forward looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control and many of which, with respect to future business decisions, are subject to change. These uncertainties and contingencies can affect actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward looking statements made by, or on our behalf. We disclaim any obligation to update forward looking statements.

Overview

~~The~~On October 3, 2011, the Company’s ~~focus~~merged inwith ~~fiscal~~SoFit, ~~2009~~a ~~was~~Company onexisting ~~gaming~~under ~~opportunities~~the inlaws ~~Latin~~of ~~America~~Ontario. OnIn ~~January~~connection ~~28,~~with ~~2008~~the Merger, the Company ~~acquired~~and ~~all~~SoFit ofentered ~~the~~into ~~issued~~a ~~and~~Deferred ~~outstanding~~Share ~~InterAmerican~~Issuance ~~Gaming~~Agreement ~~Corp.~~dated October 3, a2011 ~~private~~whereby ~~casino~~the ~~management~~parties ~~company~~agreed ~~focused~~to ondefer ~~Latin~~the ~~America.~~issuance ~~The~~of ~~InterAmerican~~the ~~acquisition~~77,800,000 ~~provided~~fully ~~the~~paid ~~Company~~common ~~with~~shares of the ~~experience~~Registrant. inIt ~~Latin~~was ~~American~~agreed ~~gaming~~the ~~markets~~shares towould ~~pursue~~be ~~acquisitions~~issued ofto ~~existing~~the ~~operations~~SoFit asVendors ~~well~~from astreasury ~~develop~~no ~~projects~~longer ~~with~~than ~~hotel~~270 ~~and~~calendar ~~casino~~days ~~projects~~after closing.

OnImmediately ~~August~~prior ~~30,~~to ~~2010~~the completion of the Merger, the ~~Company~~Registrant ~~entered~~had ~~into~~67,868,234 ashares ~~settlement~~of ~~agreement~~common ~~with~~stock ~~the~~outstanding. ~~related~~As ~~party~~a ~~which~~result ~~held~~of the ~~lease~~Merger, onSoFit merged into the ~~slot~~Company ~~machines~~to ~~resulting~~become ina subsidiary of the ~~disposition~~Registrant. ofFollowing the ~~assets~~Merger, ~~and~~the ~~liabilities~~Registrant ~~associated~~had ~~with~~145,668,234 ~~the~~shares ~~gaming~~of ~~operations.~~common Asstock aoutstanding ~~result,~~which is inclusive of the ~~Company~~77,800,000 ~~classified~~unissued ~~IAG~~common ~~Peru~~shares asof ~~discontinued~~the ~~operations~~Registrant ~~for~~pursuant to the ~~year~~Deferred ~~ended~~Share ~~September~~Issuance 30Agreement dated October 3, ~~2010~~2011.

For financial purposes, the Merger represents a capital transaction of SoFit or a “reverse merger” rather than a business combination, because the sellers of SoFit effectively controlled the combined company immediately following the completion of the Merger. As such, SoFit is deemed to be the accounting acquirer in the transaction and, consequently, the transaction is being treated as a recapitalization of SoFit’s capital structure. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities and the historical operations that are reflected in IAG’s ongoing financial statements are those of SoFit and will be recorded at the historical cost basis of SoFit. IAG’s assets, liabilities and results of operations are consolidated with the assets, liabilities and results of operations of SoFit after consummation of the Merger. IAG's historic capital accounts are retroactively adjusted to reflect the equivalent number of shares issued by IAG in the Merger while SoFit’s historical retained earnings are carried forward. The historical financial statements of IAG before the Merger will be replaced with the historical financial statements of SoFit before the Merger in this and all future filings with the SEC. The Merger is intended to be treated as a tax-free exchange under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

SoFit is a social gaming company that has developed software to empower individuals to track, train and compete through its platform. Registered users can earn virtual rewards, such as trophies and medals, as well as real-life rewards, such as location-based coupons and special offers. SoFit products include integrated mobile applications and complementary wireless devices that enable connectivity to the SoFit platform.

SoFit was launched in July of 2012 and is available for mobile users to download on the Apple App Store and Google Play. SoFit’s first charitable event, Walk A Mile, was hosted in conjunction with the U.S. State Department and the International Olympic Truce Committee at the 2012 Olympic Games; a campaign that fell under Secretary of State Clinton’s 2012 Hours Against Hate Initiative.

RESULTS OF OPERATION

~~Comparison of Results of Operations for the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.~~Revenues

~~During~~From the ~~year~~date ~~ended~~of ~~September~~inception 30(January 22, ~~2011~~2010) ~~the~~to ~~Company~~September ~~recorded~~30, ~~a net loss of $7~~2012,~~192~~ ~~compared~~the toCompany adid ~~net~~not ~~loss~~generate ofany ~~$548,320 in 2010~~revenues.

~~Continuing Operations~~Expenses

~~The~~During the year ended September 30, 2012 the Company ~~had~~incurred nogeneral ~~revenues~~and ~~from~~administrative ~~continuing~~expense ~~operations~~of ~~for~~$311,672, related party management fees of $225,347, consulting fees of $268,677, director fees of $110,500, research and development expense of $455,455 and depreciation expense of $549. During the ~~years~~year ended September 30, 2011 the Company incurred general and ~~September~~administrative 30expense of $10,551 ~~2010~~and research and development expense of $13,537. The increase in expenses is attributable to the hiring of consultants and employees, new agreements with directors, development of the Company’s mobile application that was brought to market in July and other general and administrative expenses incurred to support the research, development, marketing and launch of the mobile application.

6During the period from inception, (January 22, 2010) through September 30, 2012, the Company incurred the following expenses: general and administrative of $322,223; related party management fees of $225,347; consulting fees of $268,677; director fees of $110,500; research and development fees of $468,992; and depreciation of $549.

~~Total~~During ~~expenses during~~ the year ended September 30, ~~2011 were $17~~2012,~~213~~ ~~compared to $163,204 during~~ the ~~year~~Company ~~ended~~incurred ~~September~~a ~~30,~~loss ~~2010.~~on ~~Management~~acquisition ~~fees~~of ~~to related parties were~~ $~~Nil~~875,541 inas ~~the~~a ~~current~~result ~~fiscal~~of ~~year and $88,540 in~~ the ~~prior~~reverse ~~fiscal~~merger ~~year.~~closed ~~Professional~~on ~~fees~~October ~~totaled $10~~3,~~445~~ ~~in fiscal~~ 2011 ~~compared to $26~~,~~817~~ ~~during~~see ~~fiscal~~Note ~~2010.~~3 ~~General and administrative expenses decreased $27,530 to $6,768 during fiscal 2011 from $34,298 in fiscal 2010. General and administrative costs for 2011 included miscellaneous costs~~ of ~~$6,768. The overall lower costs in fiscal 2011 are~~ the ~~result~~financial ofstatements ~~decreased~~for ~~business~~more ~~activity in relation to the Company’s exit from the Latin American gaming market~~information.

~~Gate~~The ToCompany ~~Wire~~had ~~Solutions Inc. (~~a ~~related~~foreign ~~party~~currency bygain ~~virtue~~ of ~~common~~$5,666 ~~officers~~during ~~and directors) was indebted to~~ the ~~Company~~year inended ~~the~~September ~~amount of $13~~30,~~549. During~~ ~~fiscal~~2012 ~~2010,~~compared ~~management determined the amount~~ to beNil ~~impaired~~for asthe ~~substantial~~year ~~doubt~~ended ~~exists~~September as30, to2011 ~~the~~and ~~collectability~~$5,666 offor the ~~amount. The~~period ~~Company~~from ~~provided~~inception ~~for~~to aSeptember ~~loss~~30, ~~in the full amount due~~2012.

~~The~~During the year ended September 30, 2012 the Company recorded a ~~foreign~~net ~~currency~~loss of $2,242,075, including a loss of $10231,~~021~~512 ~~for~~attributable ~~fiscal~~to ~~2011~~non-controlling ~~and~~interest. The ofnet loss attributable to InterAmerican Gaming at September 30, 2012 was $202,~~791~~010,563. The net loss for the ~~comparative~~year ~~period~~ended September 30, 2011 was $24,088. The increased loss is the result of an increase in ~~fiscal~~expenses ~~2010~~across the board as discussed above, the largest increase in expenses relate to the development of the mobile application as well as the loss on acquisition related to the reverse merger.

AsThe Company also incurred a ~~result,~~foreign ~~the~~exchange ~~Company~~translation ~~had~~adjustment afor ~~net~~the ~~loss~~period of (negative $727,~~192)~~626 ~~from~~netting ~~continuing~~a ~~operations~~comprehensive ~~during~~loss ~~the~~of ~~twelve~~$2,269,701 ~~month~~for ~~period~~the year ended September 30, ~~2011~~2012, ~~(approximately~~of which $~~0.0001~~2,032,692 ~~per~~is ~~share)~~attributable ~~compared~~ to aInterAmrican ~~net~~Gaming. The ~~loss~~foreign ofexchange ~~($183~~translation adjustment at September 30,~~995)~~ in2011 ~~the~~was ~~same~~negative ~~period~~$933 ~~ended~~netting ~~September~~a ~~30,~~comprehensive ~~2010 (approximately~~loss of $~~0.0027~~25,021 ~~per~~for ~~share)~~that period.

~~The~~During ~~Company~~the ~~expects~~period from inception (January 22, 2010) through September 30, 2012, the ~~operating~~Company ~~losses~~recorded a net loss of $2,266,163 including a loss of $231,512 attributable to ~~continue~~non-controlling ~~until~~interest. The ~~breakeven~~net ~~operations~~loss ~~are~~attributable ~~achieved~~to ~~under~~InterAmerican Gaming for the ~~new~~period ~~business’~~from ~~opportunities~~inception to September 30, 2012 was $2,034,651. The ~~Additional~~Company ~~financing~~also ~~will~~incurred bea ~~required~~foreign inexchange ~~order~~translation adjustment for the period from inception to ~~fund~~September ~~operating~~30, ~~losses~~2012 of negative $28,559, netting a comprehensive loss of $2,294,722 for the period of which $2,057,713 is attributable to InterAmerican Gaming.

~~Discontinued~~The ~~Operations~~net loss per share for the period ended September 30, 2012 was $0.012 compared to $0.025 at September 30, 2011.

Beginning in fiscal 2009, the Company began to generate revenues from slot machine operations in Latin America. Slot machines were initially deployed in Lima, Peru but were subsequently moved to the provinces of Peru (Chiclayo, Huacho, and Huaral) where the financial performance improved.14

~~During~~Liquidity ~~fiscal 2010, the Company made the decision to step back from gaming operations. During the second quarter the Company began moving the slot machines into storage~~ and byCapital ~~the end of the third quarter the Company no longer had machines installed in any casinos.~~Resources

OnAs ~~August~~at September 30, ~~2010~~2012, the Company ~~entered~~had ~~into~~total acurrent ~~settlement~~assets ~~agreement~~of ~~with~~$76,696 ~~the~~consisting of $4,559 of deposits and an HST receivable of $72,137 compared to current assets of $ 21,267 at September 30, 2011 consisting of an HST receivable of $1,452 and amounts due from related ~~party~~parties ~~which~~of ~~held~~$19,815. The ~~the~~increase ~~lease~~in oncurrent assets is the ~~slot~~result ~~machines~~of ~~resulting~~a legal retainer paid as well as an increase in ~~the~~expenses ~~disposition~~which resulted in an increase of the ~~assets~~receivable ~~and~~for ~~liabilities~~the ~~associated~~refund ~~with~~of the ~~gaming~~tax ~~operations~~the Company has paid on its goods and services.

~~LIQUIDITY~~As ~~AND~~at ~~CAPITAL~~September ~~RESOURCES~~30, 2012, the Company had a total long term assets of property and equipment of $7,056 compared to long term assets of Nil at September 30, 2011. Property and equipment consist of computer hardware; the accumulated depreciation of the computer hardware at September 30, 2012 was $549.

~~The~~Total liabilities of the Company’s ~~total~~at ~~assets~~September ~~decreased~~30, ~~from~~2012 were $30964,283 atconsisting ~~September~~of 30a bank overdraft of $2,739, ~~2010~~accounts payable of $616,914 and due to related parties of $~~Nil~~344,630. Total liabilities at September 30, 2011 were $8,642 consisting of $3 in bank overdraft and accounts payable of $8,639.

~~Assets~~At at September 30, ~~2010~~2012 ~~consisted~~the company had a working capital deficiency of ~~cash~~$887,587 and ~~cash~~an ~~equivalents~~accumulated deficit of $2,034,651 compared to working capital of $12,625 and an accumulated deficit of $24,088 at September 30, 2011.

~~The~~Net ~~Company’s~~cash ~~total~~flow ~~liabilities increased~~ from ~~$867,700~~operating at September 30, 2010 to $874,862 at September 30, 2011. Due to related parties balance decreased to $607,751 at September 30, 2011 from $618,460 at September 30, 2010. Due to related party amounts do not have specific repayment terms and it is expected that these amounts will be repaid as the financial position of the Company improves. Accounts payable increased from $197,562 at the beginning of the year to $204,988 at the end. Accrued liabilities increased from $20,000 at September 30, 2010 to $30,445 at September 30, 2011. Liabilities of $31,678 are classified as discontinued operations at both September 30, 2010 and 2011 and consisted of accounts payable of $3,500 and accrued liabilities of $28,178.activities

7From the date of inception to September 30, 2012, the Company used $541,533 in operating activities to fund administrative and research and development activities. Of this amount, $524,632 was used during the year ended September 30, 2012 and $16,901 was used in September 30, 2011.

~~The~~Net ~~stockholders’~~cash ~~deficit~~flow ~~increased~~ from ~~$867,670~~investing ~~at September 30, 2010 to $874,862 at September 30, 2011. The change in deficit is attributable to the $7,192 loss for the year.~~activities

AtNet ~~September~~cash ~~30,~~used ~~2011,~~in investing activities from the ~~Company~~date ~~had~~of ainception ~~working~~to ~~capital~~September ~~deficit~~30, of2012 was $~~874~~7,~~862~~618. ~~The~~This ~~Company~~amount is ~~largely~~entirely ~~reliant~~attributable ~~upon~~to the ~~ability~~year toended ~~arrange~~September ~~equity~~30, or2012 ~~debt~~and ~~private~~is ~~placements~~the toresult ~~pay expenses as incurred. In addition to normal accounts payable~~ of ~~$204,988,~~ the ~~Company~~purchase ~~owes~~of ~~related~~computer ~~companies $607,751without specific repayment terms~~hardware.

~~During~~Net ~~the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, the Company experienced a net decrease in~~ cash offlow ~~$30. The Company was provided $10,679 in cash~~ from ~~operating activities, arising primarily from an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and used $10,709 in cash from~~ financing activities~~, primarily as a reduction in due to related parties.~~

~~The~~Net ~~Company’s~~cash ~~sources~~provided ofby ~~cash~~financing ~~have~~activities ~~been~~for ~~loans~~the orperiod ~~private~~from ~~placements~~date of ~~common~~inception ~~stock.~~to ~~Although~~September ~~the~~30, ~~Company~~2012 ~~has~~was ~~been~~$577,728; ~~successful~~this inwas ~~limited~~primarily ~~third~~provided ~~party~~by ~~equity~~proceeds ~~financing,~~received ~~thus~~from ~~far~~ the ~~development~~issuance of ~~our~~shares ~~operations~~but ~~has~~also ~~been~~included ~~substantially~~advances ~~funded~~from byrelated ~~Gamecorp~~parties, ~~the~~bank ~~largest~~overdraft ~~single~~and ~~shareholder of~~ the ~~Company.~~proceeds ~~This~~from ~~initial~~the ~~financing~~purchase isof ~~intended~~shares tothat ~~fund~~have ~~operations~~not ~~only~~yet upbeen toissued, ~~project~~$559,863 ~~commitment~~of orthis ~~launch~~amount ~~stage. For further clarity, Gamecorp~~ is ~~generally~~attributable ~~able and willing~~ to ~~fund~~the ~~day~~year toended ~~day~~September ~~operating costs~~30, ~~travel~~2012. The ~~expenses,~~remainder ~~the costs~~ of ~~due~~the ~~diligence~~amount ~~and~~can ~~third~~be ~~party~~attributed ~~feasibility~~to ~~studies. Although Gamecorp may participate in~~ the ~~financing~~year ofended ~~project~~September ~~capital costs~~30, we2011 ~~expect~~and ~~that~~consists ~~any~~of ~~material~~proceeds ~~project~~from ~~financing~~the ~~will~~issuance ~~have~~of toshares bepartially ~~assembled~~offset by ~~the~~an ~~Company~~advance ~~itself.~~to ~~Such~~a ~~financing~~related ~~could include straight forward senior debt, convertible debt or equity~~party. ~~Shareholders may experience significant dilution.~~

OnSatisfaction ~~October~~of 3,Our ~~2011,~~Cash ~~the~~Obligations ~~Company~~for ~~entered into a settlement agreement with Gamecorp in which~~ the ~~Company~~Next ~~transferred~~12 ~~10,000,000 of its common shares and 100% of its shares of IAG Peru to extinguish $457,875 in liabilities.~~Months

OnBased ~~October~~on ~~3, 2011,~~ the Company’s ~~executed~~current amonthly ~~share~~expenses, ~~exchange~~cash ~~resulting in a reverse merger with SoFit~~ and acash ~~change~~equivalents ofon ~~business~~hand ~~for~~at ~~the~~September ~~Company. SoFit~~30, ~~products~~2012 ~~include~~was ~~integrated~~not ~~mobile~~sufficient ~~applications~~to ~~and~~meet ~~complementary~~the ~~wireless~~anticipated ~~devices~~cash ~~that~~requirements ~~enable~~for ~~athletes to track~~operations, ~~train,~~funding ~~and~~our ~~compete~~growth ~~with~~plans ~~each~~and ~~other~~repayment inof ~~real-time~~debt ~~via the SoFit platform~~obligations. ~~Athletes~~The ~~can~~Company ~~earn~~completed ~~virtual~~private ~~rewards,~~placements ~~such~~in asfiscal ~~trophies~~2013 and ~~medals,~~intends asto ~~well~~continue asto ~~real-life~~raise ~~rewards,~~additional ~~such~~funds aseither ~~location-based~~through ~~coupons~~issuance ~~and~~of ~~special~~notes ~~offers.~~payable ~~The~~or ~~SoFit~~the ~~platform~~sale ~~also~~of ~~features~~its ashares. ~~charity~~No ~~and~~assurances ~~event~~can ~~function~~be made that ~~allows~~these ~~athletes~~funds towill ~~raise~~be ~~donations~~available ~~for~~on a ~~charity~~timely ofbasis ~~their~~or ~~choice~~on ~~and~~terms ~~remotely~~acceptable ~~compete~~to ~~in athletic events from anywhere around~~ the ~~world in real-time~~Company. ~~Products were launched in July 2012.~~

The Company cannot predict to what extent our current lack of liquidity and capital resources will impair our new business operations. However, the Company believes it will incur further operating losses. There is no assurance that the Company can continue as a going concern without continued funding. In the current state of development, the Company is reliant upon the continued funding by related entities. There can be no assurance that this funding will continue in the future.15

~~The~~Related ~~Company~~Party ~~expects it will require additional financing to cover legal, accounting, consulting, management fees and the miscellaneous costs of being a reporting company in the next fiscal year.~~Transactions

~~Going~~Transactions ~~concern~~with ~~qualification:~~related ~~The~~parties ~~Company~~are ~~has~~ incurred ~~losses~~in ~~from~~the ~~operations~~normal ~~for~~course ~~the~~of ~~year~~business ~~ended~~and ~~September~~are ~~30,~~measured ~~2011~~at the exchange amount, ~~and~~which ~~such~~is ~~losses~~the ~~are~~amount ~~expected~~of toconsideration ~~continue. In~~established ~~addition,~~and weagreed ~~have~~to abetween ~~working~~the ~~capital~~related ~~deficit~~parties. ofThe ~~$874,862~~Company’s current and anformer ~~accumulated~~officers ~~deficit~~and ofstockholders ~~$10,507,174. The~~have ~~foregoing~~advanced ~~raises~~funds ~~substantial~~on ~~doubt~~a ~~about~~non-interest ~~our~~bearing ~~ability~~basis to ~~continue~~the asCompany afor ~~going~~travel ~~concern~~related and working capital purposes. The Company ~~plans~~has tonot ~~seek~~entered ~~additional~~into ~~capital~~any ~~and/or~~agreement ~~debt~~on ~~financing. There~~the isrepayment noterms ~~guarantee~~for ~~that~~these ~~additional~~advances. ~~capital~~As ~~and/or~~of ~~debt~~September ~~financing~~30, ~~will~~2012, bethe ~~available~~amounts ~~when~~due ~~and~~ to related parties were $344,630. During the ~~extent~~year ~~required~~ended September 30, or2012, ~~that~~the ifCompany ~~available~~expensed $220,000 itas ~~will~~consulting befee ~~available~~payable onto ~~acceptable~~three ~~terms. The~~directors ~~financial~~of ~~statements~~the doCompany ~~not~~and ~~include~~expensed ~~any~~$8,000 ~~adjustments~~to ~~that~~consulting ~~might~~fee ~~result~~payable ~~from~~to ~~the~~one ~~outcome~~individual who is related to a director of ~~this~~the ~~uncertainty~~Company.

During the year the Company issued 2,000,000 shares to settle $127,866 in consulting and director fees owing to related parties.

During the year ended September 30, 2012, a director of the Company advanced company $25,000 to the Company to assist in the payment of audit fees associated with bringing the Company’s filings current. The loan does not have any set repayment terms.

Share Capital

The Company has authorized capital of 200,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.00001 of which 169,944,901 and 1,000,000 shares are issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

On May 9, 2012, in connection with the reverse merger transaction, the Company issued 77,800,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for 800,991 shares of SoFit Mobile. See discussion in Note 3 “Reverse Merger Transaction and Accounting”.

During the twelve months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the company issued 168,944,901 and 63,243 shares of its common stock, respectively.

During fiscal 2012, the Company issued warrants to acquire 949,997 common shares. The warrants were included in units issued as part of a private placement. Each unit of the private placement was comprised of one common share of the Company and one half purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to acquire one common share of the Company at a price of $0.10 per share. The warrants expire 180 days from date of execution of the subscription agreement or 45 days from the first day of trading upon which the Company’s listed shares trade at $0.15 per share or greater for 10 consecutive trading days.

The Company has an Incentive Stock Option Plan which was approved at a shareholders meeting held on July 14, 2008. The Company is authorized to issue up to 7,500,000 shares of its common stock under the plan. There were no stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2011.

During the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company issued 6,750,000 stock options exercisable at $0.02, 1,388,889 stock options exercisable at $0.03 and 60,000 stock options exercisable at $0.05 to consultants of the Company. During the year, 1,750,000 options were exercised at $0.02 and 1,388,889 options were exercised at $0.03. The shares were issued on June 25, 2013. All unexercised stock options issued during the year expired at September 30, 2012.

Shares to be Issued

At September 30, 2012, the Company has $750,938 in unissued share liability consisting of the following:

●

The Company received $84,000 in cash for the purchase of 2,799,999 common shares at $0.03, including warrants to purchase 949,997 shares, 1,966,666 of the shares were issued on April 2, 2013. The transaction with one shareholder consisting of the 833,333 remaining shares was reversed and $25,000 was refunded in December 2012.

●	The Company settled $457,875 in amounts owing to a related party with 10,000,000 shares at $0.045, shares to be issued.

●	The Company settled $39,586 in consultant fees payable to unrelated parties with 1,798,042 shares of which 1,495,710 were at $0.02 and 302,332 were at $0.03, shares to be issued.

●	The Company settled $119,692 in consultant and director fees owing to related parties with 5,995,000 shares at $0.02 shares to be issued.

●

The Company settled $80,891 in consultant fees with the exercise of options for a total issuance of 3,523,222 common shares, the exercise price for the issuance of 1,750,000 of these shares was at $0.02 and the price for the remaining 1,773,222 shares was at $0.03. These shares were all issued in June 2013.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off balance sheet arrangements.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

None.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition are based upon the consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management evaluates the estimates on an on-going basis, including those related to bad debts, inventories, investments, customer accounts, intangible assets, income taxes, and contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that they believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Note 2 of the “Notes to Financial Statements” includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the financial statements. The following is a brief description of the more significant accounting policies and methods the Company uses.

8Development Stage Company

The Company complies with the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 915 Development Stage Entities and the Securities and Exchange Commission Exchange Act 7 for its characterization of the Company as development stage.

Consolidated financial statements

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its three wholly-owned subsidiaries SoFit Mobile Inc., 6584292 Canada, Inc. and InterAmerican Operations, Inc. 6584292 Canada, Inc. and SoFit Mobile Inc. are incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada, 6584292 Canada, Inc is inactive. InterAmerican Gaming, Inc. and InterAmerican Operations, Inc. are incorporated under the laws of Nevada. All inter-company transactions have been eliminated.

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company maintains its books and records in Canadian Dollars and the Company’s consolidated financial statements are converted to U.S. Dollars. The translation method used is the current rate method. Under the current rate method all assets and liabilities are translated at the current rate, stockholders’ equity accounts are translated at historical rates and revenues and expenses are translated at average rates for the reporting period. Due to the fact that items in the financial statements are being translated at different rates according to their nature, a translation adjustment is created. This translation adjustment has been included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).

The exchange rates used to translate amounts in CAD into USD for the purposes of preparing the consolidated financial statements were as follows:

	September 30, 2012		September 30, 2011
Period-end CAD-USD exchange rate	$	1.0171	$	0.9540
Average Period CAD-USD exchange rate	$	0.9927	$	1.0135

Use of estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from these estimates, and such differences could be material.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an initial maturity date of three months or less and money market accounts to be cash equivalents.

Acquisitions and Business Combinations

The Company accounts for acquisitions and business combinations under the purchase method of accounting. The Company includes the results of operations of the acquired business from the acquisition date. Net assets of the companies acquired are recorded at their fair value at the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired are included in intangible assets and goodwill in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Research and Development Cost

Expenditure on research activities, undertaken with the prospect of gaining new technical knowledge and understanding, is recognised in the income statement when it is incurred.

Expenditure on development activities, where research findings are applied to a plan or design for the production of new or substantially improved products and processes, is capitalised if the product or process is technically and commercially feasible. The expenditure capitalised includes the cost of materials and direct labour. Other development expenditure is recognised in the income statement as an expense is incurred. Capitalised development expenditure is stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, sundry assets, due to and due from related parties, bank overdraft and accounts payable approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risk arising from these financial instruments.

Fair value is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is determined based upon assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. Fair value measurements are rated on a three-tier hierarchy as follows:

●	Level 1 inputs: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;

●	Level 2 inputs: Inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

●	Level 3 inputs: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

In many cases, a valuation technique used to measure fair value includes inputs from multiple levels of the fair value hierarchy described above. The lowest level of significant input determines the placement of the entire fair value measurement in the hierarchy.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standard if currently adopted would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Going Concern

The consolidated financial statements included in our filings have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles that contemplate the continuance of our company as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on the ability to further implement its business plan, raise capital, and generate revenues. Management recognizes that it must generate additional resources and that it must successfully implement its business plan and achieves profitable operations. The Company cannot assure that it will be successful in any of these activities. Should any of these events not occur, its financial condition will be adversely affected.

Intangibles, Goodwill and Other Assets

The Company regularly reviews all of its long-lived assets, including goodwill and other intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors as considered important that could trigger an impairment review include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the Company’s overall business, and significant negative industry or economic trends. When the Company determines that an impairment review is necessary based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, the Company measures any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model. Significant judgment is required in the development of projected cash flows for these purposes including assumptions regarding the appropriate level of aggregation of cash flows, their term and discount rate as well as the underlying forecasts of expected future revenue and expense. To the extent that events or circumstances cause assumptions to change, charges may be required which could be material.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of advances to corporations, due to related parties, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risk arising from these financial instruments.

Inflation

Although our operations are influenced by general economic conditions, the Company does not believe that inflation had a material effect on our results of operations during our fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2011~~2012.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

None.

919

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL ~~STATEMENTS~~STATEMENT

1020

InterAmerican Gaming Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Index

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets as at September 30, 2012 and 2011			F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 and for the period since inception (January 22, 2010) through September 30, 2012			F-4

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity since inception (January 22, 2010) through September 30, 2012			F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 and for the period since inception (January 22, 2010) through September 30, 2012			F-8

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			F-10

F-1

~~INTERAMERICAN~~Table ~~GAMING,~~Of ~~INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~Contents

~~Consolidated~~REPORT ~~Balance~~OF ~~Sheets~~INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

ASSETS
	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	-		$	30
Total current assets		-			30
Total assets	$	-		$	30
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Due to related parties (Note 3)	$	607,751		$	618,460
Accounts payable		204,988			197,562
Accrued liabilities		30,445			20,000
Liabilities of discontinued operations		31,678			31,678
Total current liabilities		874,862			867,700
Total liabilities	$	874,862		$	867,700
STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY
Common stock, $.00001 par value; 200,000,000 shares
authorized, 67,868,234 shares issued and outstanding (September 30, 2010:67,868,234) (Note 5)	$	679		$	679
Additional paid-in capital		9,631,633			9,631,633
Accumulated deficit		(10,507,174	)		(10,499,982	)
Total stockholders’ (deficit) equity		(874,862	)		(867,670	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ (deficit) equity	$	-		$	30

To the Board of Directors and

Stockholders of InterAmerican Gaming Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of InterAmerican Gaming Inc. as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended September 30, 2012, and for the period since inception (January 22, 2010) through September 30, 2012. InterAmerican Gaming Inc.’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of InterAmerican Gaming Inc. as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended September 30, 2012, and for the period since inception (January 22, 2010) through September 30, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, these conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

/s/ EFP Rotenberg, LLP

EFP Rotenberg, LLP

Rochester, New York

July 16, 2013

F-2

~~INTERAMERICAN~~Table ~~GAMING,~~Of ~~INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~Contents

~~Consolidated~~InterAmerican ~~Statements~~Gaming ~~of Operations and Comprehensive Loss~~Inc.

	2011			2010
Expenses	$			$
Management fees – related party		-			88,540
Professional fees		10,445			26,817
General and administrative		6,768			34,298
Impairment of assets (Note 4)		-			13,549
Total Expenses		17,213			163,204
Net loss before other expenses		(17,213	)		(163,204	)
Other Expense:
Foreign Currency Loss		(10,021	)		20,791
Total other expenses		(10,021	)		20,791
(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes		(7,192	)		(183,995	)
Provision for income taxes (Note 10)		-			-
(Loss) from continuing operations	$	(7,192	)	$	(183,995	)
(Loss) from discontinued operations		-			(364,325	)
Net (loss) and comprehensive (loss)		(7,192	)		(548,320	)
Net (loss) per share, continuing operations - basic and diluted	$	(0.0001	)	$	(0.0027	)
Net (loss) per share, discontinued operations – basic and diluted		(0.0000	)		(0.0054	)
Net (loss) per share and comprehensive (loss)		(0.0001	)		(0.0081	)
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding During the Year – basic and diluted		67,868,234			67,868,234

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	September 30, 2012		September 30, 2011
ASSETS
Current assets
Deposits	$	4,559	$	-
HST receivable		72,137		1,452
Due from related parties (Note 4)		-		19,815
Total current assets		76,696		21,267

Property and equipment (Note 6)		7,056		-
Total assets	$	83,752	$	21,267

LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Bank overdraft	$	2,739	$	3
Accounts payable		616,914		8,639
Due to related parties (Note 4)		344,630		-
Total current liabilities		964,283		8,642
Total liabilities		964,283		8,642

STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY

Common stock, $0.00001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 169,944,901 shares issued and outstanding (September 30, 2011: 1,000,000) (Note 8)		1,699			10
Additional paid-in capital		664,066			38,515
Shares to be issued (Note 7)		750,938
Subscription receivable		-			(879	)
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(2,034,651	)		(24,088	)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)		(28,559	)		(933	)
Total InterAmerican stockholders’(deficit) equity		(646,507	)		12,625
Non-controlling interest		(234,024	)		-
Total (deficit) equity		(880,531	)		12,625
Total liabilities and (deficit) equity	$	83,752		$	21,267

The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

F-3

~~INTERAMERICAN~~Table ~~GAMING,~~Of ~~INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~Contents

~~Consolidated~~InterAmerican ~~Statements~~Gaming ~~of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)~~Inc.

~~Years~~(A ~~Ended~~Development ~~September~~Stage ~~30, 2011 and 2010~~Company)

	Number of Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Total Equity (Deficit)
Balance September 30, 2009		67,868,234		679		9,100,948		(9,951,662	)		(850,035	)
Settlement of director Fees with a former director of the Company		-		-		36,081		-			36,081
Settlement of consulting fees with a former officer of the Company (Note 9)		-		-		48,300		-			48,300
Settlement of liabilities owing to a related party and holder of the Company’s capital lease (Note 9)		-		-		446,304		-			446,304
Net loss for the year		-		-		-		(548,320	)		(548,320	)
Balance, September 30, 2010		67,868,234		679		9,631,633		(10,499,982	)		(867,670	)
Net loss for the year		-		-		-		(7,192	)		(7,192	)
Balance, September 30, 2011		67,868,234		679		9,631,633		(10,507,174	)		(874,862	)

Consolidated Statements of Operations

	Year ended September 30, 2012			Year ended September 30, 2011			Period from inception (January 22, 2010) through September 30, 2012

Revenues	$	-		$	-		$	-

Expenses
General and administrative		311,672			10,551			322,223
Management fees-related party		225,347			-			225,347
Consulting fees		268,677			-			268,677
Director fees		110,500			-			110,500
Research and Development (Note 5)		455,455			13,537			468,992
Depreciation		549			-			549
Loss on acquisition (Note 3)		875,541			-			875,541
Total Expenses		2,247,741			24,088			2,271,829

Net (loss) before other income		(2,247,741	)		24,088			(2,271,829	)

Other income:
Foreign currency gain		5,666			-			5,666
Total other income		5,666			-			5,666

(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes		(2,242,075	)		(24,088	)		(2,266,163	)
Provision for income taxes (Note 10)		-			-			-
Net (loss)		(2,242,075	)	$	(24,088	)	$	(2,266,163	)
Net (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest		(231,512	)		-			(231,512	)
Net (Loss) attributable to InterAmerican	$	(2,010,563	)	$	(24,088	)	$	(2,034,651	)


Net Loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.012	)	$	(0.025	)

Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding During the Year – basic and diluted		167,376,357			953,218

Comprehensive (Loss):
Net (Loss)	$	(2,242,075	)	$	(24,088	)	$	(2,266,163	)
Foreign exchange translation adjustment for the period		(27,626	)		(933	)		(28,559	)
Comprehensive (loss)		(2,269,701	)		(25,021	)		(2,294,722	)
Comprehensive (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest		(237,009	)		-			(237,009	)
Comprehensive (Loss) attributable to InterAmerican	$	(2,032,692	)	$	(25,021	)	$	(2,057,713	)

The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

F-4

~~INTERAMERICAN~~Table ~~GAMING,~~Of ~~INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~Contents

InterAmerican Gaming Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity

Since Inception (January 22, 2010) through September 30, 2011

	Number of Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-In Capital		Subscription Receivable			Deficit Accumulated During the Development Stage			Other Comprehensive Income			Non-controlling Interest		Total Equity

Balance, January 22, 2010 (Date of Inception)		-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-	$	-

Issuance of shares at $0.001 per share for subscription receivable, February 2010		936,757		9		870		(879	)		-			-			-		-

Balance, September 30, 2010		936,757	$	9	$	870	$	(879	)	$	-		$	-		$	-	$	-

Issuance of shares at $0.585 for cash, June 2011		63,243		1		37,645		-			-			-			-		37,646

Foreign currency translation (loss)		-		-		-		-			-			(933	)		-		(933	)

Net loss for the year		-		-		-		-			(24,088	)		-			-		(24,088	)

Balance, September 30, 2011		1,000,000	$	10	$	38,515	$	(879	)	$	(24,088	)	$	(933	)	$	-	$	12,625

The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

F-5

Table Of Contents

InterAmerican Gaming Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity

September 30, 2011 through September 30, 2012

	Number of Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-In Capital		Shares to be Issued		Subscription Receivable			Deficit Accumulated During the Development Stage			Other Comprehensive Income			Non-controlling Interest			Total Equity

Balance, September 30, 2011		1,000,000	$	10	$	38,515	$	-	$	(879	)	$	(24,088	)	$	(933	)	$	-		$	12,625

Effect of reverse acquisition, October 3, 2011, shares issued May 2012		144,668,234		1,446		1,744		-		-			-			-			(2,512	)		678

Shares issued for settlement of related party fees, May 2012		2,000,000		20		127,846		-		-			-			-			-			127,866

Shares issued at $0.006 for settlement of consulting fees, May 2012		500,000		5		2,995		-		-			-			-			-			3,000

Shares issued for cash at $0.02 May 2012		13,360,000		134		229,266		-		-			-			-			-			229,400

Shares issued for settlement of consulting fees, June 2012		150,000		1		4,499		-		-			-			-			-			4,500

Shares issued for cash at $0.01, June 2012		200,000		2		1,998		-		-			-			-			-			2,000

Shares issued for cash at $0.02, June 2012		2,250,000		23		44,977		-		-			-			-			-			45,000

for cash at $0.03, June 2012		5,816,667		58		174,442		-		-			-			-			--			174,500

Settlement with a related party-forgiveness of debt		-		-		31,678				-			-			-			-			31,678

F-6

Table Of Contents

Shares to be issued for settlement with a related party							457,875													457,875

Share Subscription received	-		-		-		-		879		-			-			-			879

Shares to be issued for cash received at $0.03	-		-		-		52,894		-		-			-			-			52,894

Warrants issued pursuant to private placement at $0.03	-		-		6,106		-		-		-			-			-			6,106

Shares to be issued for settlement of consulting fees with unrelated parties at $0.02	-		-		-		30,456		-		-			-			-			30,456

Shares to be issued for settlement of consulting fees with unrelated parties at $0.03	-		-		-		9,130		-		-			-			-			9,130

Shares to be issued for settlement of consulting and director fees with related parties at $0.02	-		-		-		119,692		-		-			-			-			119,692

Shares to be issued for stock options exercised	-		-		-		80,891		-		-			-			-			80,891

Foreign currency translation	-		-		-		-		-		-			(27,626	)		-			(27,626	)

Net (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest	-		-		-		-		-		-			-			(231,512	)		(231,512	)

Net (loss) attributable to InterAmerican	-		-		-		-		-		(2,010,563	)		-			-			(2,010,563	)

Balance, September 30, 2012	169,944,901	$	1,699	$	664,066	$	750,938	$	-	$	(2,034,651	)	$	(28,559	)	$	(234,024	)	$	(880,531	)

The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

F-7

Table Of Contents

SoFit Mobile Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Years Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

	For the year ended September 30, 2012			Period from Inception (January 22, 1010) through September 30, 2011			Period from Inception (January 22, 1010) through September 30, 2012
Operating activities
Net (loss)	$	(2,242,075	)	$	(24,088	)	$	(2,266,163	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash:
Depreciation and amortization		549			-			549
Loss on acquisition		875,541			-			875,541
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		500,819			8,639			509,458
Increase (decrease) in related party payables		415,778			-			415,778
Increase (decrease) in deposits		(4,559	)		-			(4,559	)
Increase (decrease) in HST receivable		(70,685	)		(1,452	)		(72,137	)
Net cash (used in) operating activities		(524,632	)		(16,901	)		(541,533	)

Investing activities
Property and equipment		(7,618	)		-			(7,618	)
Net cash (used in)investing activities		(7,618	)		-			(7,618	)

Financing activities
Bank overdraft		2,736			3			2,739
Advances from related parties		47,227			(19,784	)		27,443
Proceeds from stock subscriptions		59,000			-			59,000
Proceeds from issuance of shares		450,900			37,646			488,546
Net cash provided by financing activities		559,863			17,865			577,728

Effect of foreign exchange (loss)		(27,613	)		(933	)		(28,546	)

Increase in cash and cash equivalents		-			31			31

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		-			(31	)		(31	)

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	-		$	-		$	-

Supplemental Information
Interest paid		-			-			-
Income tax paid		-			-			-

	For the year ended September 30, 2011			For the year ended September 30, 2010
Operating activities
Net (loss)	$	(7,192	)	$	(183,995	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		7,426			(642	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities		10,445			7,000
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		10,679			(177,637	)
Financing activities
Increase in due to/from related parties		(10,709	)		177,667
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(10,709	)		177,667
Increase in cash from continuing operations		(30	)		30
(Decrease) in cash from discontinuing operations		-			(15,643	)
(Decrease) in cash		(30	)		(15,613	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		30			15,643
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	-		$	30
Supplemental information
Interest paid	$	-		$	-
Income tax paid	$	-		$	-

F-8

Table Of Contents

Non cash activities:

During the twelve months ended September 30, ~~2011~~2012 the Company ~~had no non-cash activities~~:

~~During~~● issued 77,800,000 of the ~~twelve~~Company’s ~~months~~common ~~ended~~shares ~~September~~valued 30at $240,000 ~~2010~~as a result of the ~~Company:~~reverse merger;

● ~~settled~~issued ~~$36~~2,~~081~~000,000 inshares ~~director~~to ~~fees~~settle ~~with~~$127,866 ain ~~former~~consulting and director offees ~~the~~owed ~~Company,~~to ~~the~~current ~~amount~~and ~~owing~~former ~~was~~related ~~forgiven (Note 9)~~parties;

● ~~settled~~issued ~~$48~~500,~~300~~000 inshares ~~consulting~~to ~~fees~~settle ~~with a former consultant of the Company~~$3,000 ~~the~~in ~~amount~~consulting ~~owing~~fees ~~was~~owed ~~forgiven~~to ~~(Note~~unrelated 9)parties;

● ~~settled~~issued ~~liabilities~~150,000 inshares ~~the~~to ~~amount~~settle of $~~502~~4,~~815~~500 ~~with assets~~ in ~~the~~consulting ~~amount~~fees ofowed ~~$56,511~~to asunrelated ~~per an agreement with a related party (Note 9)~~parties.

~~F-5~~● settled $457,875 in amounts owing to a related party, 10,000,000 shares to be issued;

~~INTERAMERICAN~~● ~~GAMING~~settled $39,586 ~~INC.~~in ~~AND~~consultant ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~fees payable to unrelated parties, 1,798,042 shares to be issued;

~~Notes~~● Tosettled ~~Consolidated~~$119,692 ~~Financial~~in ~~Statements~~consultant and director fees owed to related parties, 5,995,000 shares to be issued; and

~~September~~● 30settled $80,891 ~~2011~~in ~~and~~consultant ~~2010~~fees with the exercise of options, 3,523,222 shares to be issued.

~~1. Nature~~During ofthe ~~Business~~twelve ~~and~~months ~~Basis~~ended ofSeptember ~~Presentation~~30, 2011 the Company had no non-cash activities.

The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

F-9

Table Of Contents

INTERAMERICAN GAMING INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2012 and 2011

1. NATURE OF BUSINESS AND GOING CONCERN

By the agreement dated November 29, 2001 and approved by the board of directors effective December 12, 2001, KTI issued 14,285,714 shares of restricted common stock to the shareholders of K-Tronik Int'l Corporation, a Nevada corporation, in exchange for 100% interest in K-Tronik Asia Corporation ("KTA"), a Korean corporation. In connection with this transaction, K-Tronik Int'l Corporation changed its name effective December 12, 2001 to K-Tronik N.A. Inc. ("KTNA").

The acquisition resulted in the former shareholders of KTNA acquiring 93.4% of the outstanding shares of KTI and has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition with KTNA being treated as the accounting parent and KTI, the legal parent, being treated as the accounting subsidiary. Accordingly, the consolidated results of operations of KTI included those of KTNA for all periods shown and those of ~~the~~ KTI since the date of the reverse acquisition.

KTNA and KTA were engaged in the manufacture and distribution of various types of electronic stabilizers and illuminator ballasts for fluorescent lighting fixtures. KTNA granted credit, on an unsecured basis, to distributors and installers located throughout the United States.

On December 15, 2004, KTI entered into an agreement to sell all of its interest in KTNA and the fixed assets of its subsidiary, KTA. KTI is no longer engaged in the business of manufacturing, distributing or selling electronic ballasts and is considered to have re-entered the development stage at December 15, 2004.

On June 13, 2006, KTI announced it would implement a new corporate strategy focusing on horseracing track development opportunities. An agreement was signed on June 19, 2006 to buy exclusive rights for a racetrack and casino (racino) development opportunity in Saskatchewan, Canada. As part of the new strategy the Company incorporated 6584292 Canada Inc. under which it would operate the new development opportunity. On July 5, 2006, KTI changed its name to Racino Royale, Inc. (“RR” ~~or the “Company”~~) to reflect its intention to engage in the business of owning or leasing race-courses and/or conduct horse-races.

~~On October 20, 2008, Racino Royale, Inc. changed its name to InterAmerican Gaming, Inc. to better reflect its business direction to invest in Latin American horseracing and gaming opportunities.~~F-10

~~F-6~~Table Of Contents

INTERAMERICAN GAMING INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2012 and 2011

On October 20, 2008, Racino Royale, Inc. changed its name to InterAmerican Gaming, Inc. (“IAG” or the “Company”) to better reflect its business direction to invest in Latin American horseracing and gaming opportunities.

During the 2008 fiscal year, the Company leased video lottery terminal slot machines from a related party and began deploying the assets in non-owned gaming locations. In 2009, the Company installed slot machines at Fantasy Club Del Peru SA (“Fantasy”) locations, operating under various brands throughout the country: “Slot City” in Chiclayo, “Colibri Dorado” in Chincha and “Monos Dorados” in Huacho and Huaral.

On ~~October~~July 37, 2011, the Company entered into a ~~settlement~~letter ~~agreement with a related party, by virtue~~ of ~~common~~intent ~~officers~~with ~~and~~Baron ~~directors,~~Group inVentures ~~which~~("BGV") ~~the~~to ~~Company~~acquire ~~transferred~~an ~~10,000,000 of its common shares and 100~~80.1% ofinterest ~~its~~in ~~shares~~SoFit ofMobile ~~IAG~~Inc. ~~Peru~~(“SoFit”) to(formerly ~~extinguish~~NOWPHIT ~~$457,875~~Operations ~~in liabilities~~Inc.).

On October 3, 2011, the Company ~~executed~~entered into a ~~share~~settlement ~~exchange~~ agreement with ~~NowPhit~~DealNet ~~Operations~~Capital ~~Inc~~Corp. (“~~NowPhit~~DealNet”), ~~and~~a ~~its~~related ~~shareholders~~party ~~pursuant~~by tovirtue of common officers and directors, in which the Company ~~purchased~~transferred ~~80.1~~10,000,000 of its common shares and 100% of ~~NowPhit~~its shares of IAG Peru to extinguish $457,875 in ~~exchange~~liabilities. ~~for~~The 7710,~~800~~000,000 ofcommon shares have not yet been issued. The transaction included the ~~Company’s~~forgiveness ~~common~~of ~~shares~~debt ~~valued~~resulting atin a $~~240~~31,~~000~~678 charge to equity as DealNet is a related party.

On October 213, 2011, the Company ~~settled~~executed ~~amounts~~a ofShare ~~$106,262~~Exchange ~~owing~~Agreement with SoFit and its shareholders (the “Share Exchange”) pursuant to ~~directors,~~which ~~officers~~the ~~and~~Company ~~consultants~~purchased ~~with~~80.1% 2of SoFit in exchange for 77,~~500~~800,000 of the Company’s common shares valued at $240,000.

OnIn ~~January~~conjunction ~~30,~~with ~~2012~~the signing of the Share Exchange, ~~NowPhit~~all ~~changed~~of ~~its~~the ~~name~~directors toand ~~SoFit~~officers ~~Mobile~~of ~~Inc~~IAG, excluding J. (“Graham Simmonds, resigned and were replaced by nominees of SoFit”). As of October 7, ~~short~~2011, ~~for~~the ~~Social~~Board ~~Fitness~~of Directors of IAG was made up of J. Graham Simmonds, asGary itSchwartz, Marc Askenasi and Henry J. Kloepper. Marc Askenasi was ~~determined~~also toappointed ~~better~~Chief ~~reflect~~Executive ~~the~~Officer ~~business~~and President, effective as of ~~the~~October ~~company~~7, 2011.

OnOfficers ~~April~~of ~~17, 2012,~~ the Company closed an equity financing of $400,000 at a price of $0.02 per share for a total issuance of 20,000,000 shares. The equity financing was completed on a non-brokered basis and no warrants or options were issued. The proceeds of the financing are ~~being~~now ~~used~~as ~~to advance the Company's SoFit platform and for general corporate purposes.~~follows:

OnMarc ~~June~~Askenasi 13Director, ~~2012,~~Chief ~~the~~Executive ~~Company~~Officer ~~closed its second equity financing of $225,000 at a price of $0.03 per share for a total issuance of 7,500,000 shares. The equity financing was completed on a non-brokered basis~~ and noPresident ~~warrants or options were issued~~J. ~~The~~Graham ~~proceeds~~Simmonds ofChairman ~~the~~& ~~financing~~Interim ~~were~~Chief ~~being~~Financial ~~used to complete commercialization of the SoFit platform, to execute SoFit’s summer 2012 launch strategy, and for general corporate purposes to update IAG’s financial reporting and accounting.~~Officer

~~On September 30, 2012, the Company settled $4,000 in accounts payable, owing to unrelated parties with 133,333 common shares of the Company. These shares have not yet been issued.~~F-11

OnTable ~~September~~Of ~~30, 2012, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with a former consultant for full and final settlement of fees and expenses. These shares have not yet been issued.~~Contents

INTERAMERICAN GAMING INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2012 and 2011

On October 21, 2011, the Company settled amounts of $130,866 owed to directors, officers and consultants with 2,500,000 common shares.

On January 17, 2012, the Company appointed Gerald Goldberg to its Board of Directors.

On January 30, 2012, NOWPHIT Operations Inc. was renamed to SoFit Mobile Inc., short for Social Fitness, as it was determined to better reflect the business of the Company’s subsidiary.

On September 30, 2012, four consultants of the Company exercised their options, purchasing, 1,750,000 common shares at $0.02 and 133,333 common shares, 250,000 common shares and 1,389,889 common shares at $0.03. These options were granted in fiscal 2012. These shares were issued in June, 2013.

On October 11, 2012, Mr. John Ryan was appointed to the Board of Directors.

OnSoFit ~~October~~products 31include integrated mobile applications and complementary wireless devices that enable athletes to track, ~~2012~~train, ~~two~~and ~~consultants~~compete ofwith each other in real-time via the ~~Company~~SoFit ~~exercised~~platform. ~~their~~Athletes ~~options,~~can ~~purchasing~~earn 1virtual rewards,~~750,000~~ ~~common~~such ~~shares~~as trophies and 1medals,~~442~~ as well as real-life rewards, ~~222~~such ~~common~~as ~~shares~~location-based atcoupons $0and special offers.02 The SoFit platform also features a charity and ~~$0.03~~event ~~respectively~~function that allows athletes to raise donations for a charity of their choice and remotely compete in athletic events from anywhere around the world in real-time. The ~~options~~SoFit mobile applications were ~~granted~~launched in ~~fiscal~~July 2012.

F-7

Going Concern

The ~~accompanying~~Company ~~consolidated~~is in the development stage as defined by FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) subtopic 915-10 Development Stage Entities (“ASC 915-10”). As of the date of these financial statements, ~~have~~the ~~been~~Company ~~prepared~~has onnot earned any revenue, has working capital deficit of $887,587 and an accumulated deficit of $2,034,651. For the period from January 22, 2010 (date of inception) through September 30, 2012, the Company has accumulated losses of $2,034,651. Until such time that the Company generates sales, it will continue to operate at a loss. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. ~~basis,~~The inCompany ~~accordance~~has ~~with~~been ~~accounting~~financed ~~principles~~by ~~generally~~its ~~accepted~~shareholders and third party lenders to meet its obligations. The Company plans to begin earning revenue in the ~~United~~near ~~States~~future ofand ~~America~~generate profits to mitigate the above negative indicators.

~~The~~These ~~going~~financial ~~concern~~statements have been prepared on the basis of ~~presentation~~accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes that the ~~Company~~company will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities ~~and contingencies~~ in the normal course of operations. The Company’s future success is dependent upon its continued ability to raise sufficient capital either through equity financing or the sales of product, not only to finance its operating expenses, but to concentrate on its business activities. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classifications of the assets and liabilities that would be necessary if the going concern basis was not appropriate.

~~There is substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern as it has operating losses from continuing operations of $7,192 (2010~~ F- $183,995) and a working capital deficiency of $874,863 as at September 30, 2011. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company's ability to raise additional capital and successfully complete a business acquisition or business opportunity. The outcome of these matters cannot be predicted at this time.12

~~The~~Table ~~consolidated~~Of financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis and do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classifications of the assets and liabilities that would be necessary if the going concern basis was not appropriate.Contents

2.INTERAMERICAN ~~Summary~~GAMING ~~of Significant Accounting Policies~~INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2012 and 2011

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accounting policies of the Company are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Outlined below are those policies considered particularly significant:

~~Use~~Development ofStage ~~estimates~~Company

The ~~preparation~~Company ofcomplies ~~financial statements in conformity~~ with ~~generally~~the ~~accepted~~FASB ~~accounting~~ASC ~~principles~~915 ~~requires~~Development ~~management~~Stage toEntities ~~make estimates~~ and ~~assumptions that affect~~ the ~~reported~~Securities ~~amounts of assets~~ and ~~liabilities~~Exchange ~~and~~Commission ~~disclosure~~Act of7 ~~contingent~~for ~~assets~~its ~~and~~characterization ~~liabilities at the date~~ of the ~~financial~~Company ~~statements~~as ~~and~~development ~~the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period~~stage. ~~Actual results could differ from these estimates, and such differences could be material.~~

Consolidated ~~financial~~Financial ~~statements~~Statements

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its three ~~wholly-owned~~ subsidiaries, ~~6584292~~SoFit ~~Canada,~~Mobile Inc., ~~InterAmerican~~6584292 ~~Operations~~Canada, Inc. and ~~IAG~~InterAmerican ~~Peru~~Operations, SInc.~~A.C.~~ 6584292 Canada, Inc. is and SoFit Mobile Inc. are incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada. ~~and~~6584292 Canada, Inc is inactive. InterAmerican Gaming, Inc. and InterAmerican Operations, Inc. are incorporated under the laws of Nevada~~, and InterAmerican Gaming Peru S~~.~~A.C.~~ ~~is incorporated under the laws of Peru.~~ All inter-company transactions have been eliminated.

FNon-8controlling interest

Non-controlling interest represents the interests of outside shareholders in the operating results and net assets of SoFit Mobile Inc. The non-controlling interest represents 19.9% of SoFit Mobile Inc.

Foreign Currency Translation

~~Assets~~SoFit ~~and~~Mobile ~~liabilities,~~Inc.’s ~~denominated~~functional currency is in aCanadian ~~currency~~Dollars ~~other~~and ~~than~~it USmaintains ~~dollars~~its books and records in Canadian Dollars, the Company’s financial statements are ~~translated~~converted atto U.S. Dollars. The translation method used is the ~~exchange~~current rate method. Under the current rate method all assets and liabilities are translated at the ~~balance~~current ~~sheet~~rate, ~~date~~stockholders’ equity accounts are translated at historical rates and ~~revenue~~revenues and expenses are translated at average rates for the ~~exchange~~reporting ~~rate~~period. atDue to the ~~date~~fact ~~those~~that ~~elements~~items in the financial statements are ~~recognized~~being translated at different rates according to their nature, a translation adjustment is created. ~~Exchange~~This ~~gains~~translation ~~and~~adjustment ~~losses~~has ~~are~~been included in ~~income~~Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).

The exchange rates used to translate amounts in CAD into USD for the purposes of preparing the financial statements were as follows:

	September 30, 2012		September 30, 2011
Period-end CAD-USD exchange rate	$	1.0171	$	0.9540
Average Period CAD-USD exchange rate	$	0.9927	$	1.0135

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from these estimates, and such differences could be material.

F-13

Table Of Contents

INTERAMERICAN GAMING INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2012 and 2011

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an initial maturity date of three months or less and money market accounts to be cash equivalents.

~~Revenue~~HST ~~Recognition~~Receivable

The Company ~~recognizes~~is asrequired ~~gaming~~to ~~revenues~~pay ~~its~~Harmonized ~~proportionate~~Sales ~~share~~Tax of("HST") on the ~~net~~goods ~~win~~and ~~from~~services ~~slot~~provided ~~machines~~by its suppliers. ~~Net~~ This ~~win~~is a value added tax that is refunded back to the ~~difference~~Company ~~between~~by ~~coins~~the Government of Canada. The Company currently has a large receivable due as a result of this tax and ~~currency~~expects ~~deposited~~to ~~into~~receive the ~~machines~~refund ~~and~~upon ~~payments~~the ~~made~~filing toof ~~customers~~its overdue income tax returns.

Acquisitions and Business Combinations

F-9

Intangibles, goodwill and other assets

The Company follows FASB ASC 350 (prior authoritative literature, SFAS No 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”). FASB ASC 350 does not permit the amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. Instead, these assets must be reviewed annually (or more frequently under prescribed conditions) for impairment in accordance with this statement. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for an amount equal to that excess. Intangible assets that do not have indefinite lives are amortized over their useful lives.

The Company annually reviews all of its long-lived assets, including goodwill and other intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable based on undiscounted cash flows. Factors the Company considers important that could trigger an impairment review include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the Company’s overall business, and significant negative industry or economic trends and the current fair market value if available. When management determines that an impairment review is necessary based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, the Company measures any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model. Significant judgment is required in the development of projected cash flows for these purposes including assumptions regarding the appropriate level of aggregation of cash flows, their term and discount rate as well as the underlying forecasts of expected future revenue and expense. To the extent that events or circumstances cause assumptions to change, charges may be required which could be material.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts based on specifically identified amounts the management believes to be uncollectable. The criteria for allowance provision are determined based on historical experience and the Company’s assessment of the general financial conditions affecting its customer base. If the Company’s actual collections experience changes, revisions to the allowance may be required.

Capital Leases

The Company’s policy is to record leases, which transfer substantially all benefits and risks incidental to ownership of property, as acquisitions of property and equipment and to record the incurrence of corresponding obligations as liabilities. Obligations under capital leases are reduced by rental payments net of imputed interest.

Advertising Costs

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred in accordance with FASB ASC 720. During the year ended September 30, 2012 the Company expensed $83,618 as corporate promotions.

Research and Development Cost

In accordance with FASB ASC 985-Software, expenditure on research activities, undertaken with the prospect of gaining new technical knowledge and understanding, is recognized in the income statement when it is incurred.

Expenditure on development activities, where research findings are applied to a plan or design for the production of new or substantially improved products and processes, is capitalized if the product or process is technically and commercially feasible. The expenditure capitalized includes the cost of materials and direct labor. Other development expenditure is recognized in the income statement as an expense is incurred. Capitalized development expenditure is stated at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, ~~receivables~~sundry assets, ~~accounts~~due ~~payable~~to and ~~accrued~~due ~~liabilities~~ from related parties, bank overdraft and accounts payable approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. ~~The~~ ~~carrying value of long-term debt also approximates fair value.~~ Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risk arising from these financial instruments.

F-1014

Table Of Contents

INTERAMERICAN GAMING INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2012 and 2011

●	Level 1 inputs: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;

● Level 2 inputs: Inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

●	Level 3 inputs: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

Valuation of Warrants

The Company estimates that value of common shares purchase warrants issued using the Black-Scholes pricing model.

Income Taxes

The Company follows FASB ASC 740 ~~(prior authoritative literature, SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for~~ -Income Taxes”), which requires the use of the asset and liability method of accounting of income taxes. Under the assets and liability method of FASB ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and loss carry forwards and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share

The Company reports basic earnings (loss) per share in accordance with FASB ASC 260 ~~(prior authoritative literature, SFAS No. 128, “~~-Earnings Per Share”). Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share include the potentially dilutive effect of outstanding common stock options and warrants which are convertible to common shares. Diluted loss per share is not presented if the results would be “anti-dilutive”.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standard if currently adopted would have a material effect on the accompanying ~~consolidated~~ financial statements.

~~F-11~~3. REVERSE MERGER TRANSACTION AND ACCOUNTING

On October 3, 2011, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (“Share Exchange”) with SoFit, Wagerphone Inc. ~~Due~~ (D.B.A: Baron Group Ventures) (“BGV”) and the Shareholders of SoFit (“SoFit Vendors”). On October 3, 2011, the Merger contemplated by the Share Exchange by and among the Registrant, SoFit, BGV and the SoFit Vendors was completed (the “Merger”). As a condition to ~~Related~~closing, ~~Parties~~the Company issued a Secured Promissory Note to SoFit for the aggregate unpaid principal amount of up to U.S. $5,000,000 drawn in tranches of $50,000, due on or before October 3, 2016. Any amount owed at the end of the period is eliminated upon consolidation. In return, the Company received a General Security Agreement from SoFit granting the Company a security interest over all assets of SoFit until the Secured Promissory Note was duly repaid in full.

Periodically, the Company advances funds and pays expenses on behalf of related parties and funds are advanced and expenses are paid by related parties on behalf of the Company. These transactions result in nonF-~~interest bearing payables or receivables to related parties.~~15

~~Amounts~~Table ~~due~~Of ~~to related parties were:~~Contents

	September 30, 2011		September 30, 2010
Entities with common directors and /or officers	$	491,649	$	500,192
Officers and directors		116,102		118,268
Total	$	607,751	$	618,460

INTERAMERICAN GAMING INC.

~~Amounts~~(A ~~due~~Development toStage ~~related parties are non-interest bearing, unsecured and do not have any specific repayment terms.~~Company)

OnNotes October 3, 2011, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with a related party, by virtue of common officers and directors,in which the Company transferred 10,000,000 of its common shares and 100% of its shares of IAG Peru to ~~extinguish~~Consolidated ~~$457,875~~Financial ~~in related party liabilities.~~Statements

~~4. Impairment~~September of30, ~~Assets~~2012 and 2011

~~Gate~~In Toconnection ~~Wire~~with ~~Solutions~~the ~~Inc.~~Merger, (athe ~~related~~Company ~~party~~and bySoFit ~~virtue~~entered ofinto ~~common~~a ~~officers~~Deferred ~~and~~Share ~~directors)~~Issuance ~~was~~Agreement ~~indebted~~dated toOctober 3, 2011 whereby the ~~Company~~parties inagreed to defer the ~~amount~~issuance of ~~$13~~the 77,~~549. During~~800,000 ~~fiscal~~fully ~~2010,~~paid ~~management~~common ~~determined~~shares of the ~~amount~~Registrant. toIt bewas ~~impaired~~agreed asthe ~~substantial~~shares ~~doubt~~would ~~existed~~be asissued to the ~~collectability~~SoFit ofVendors ~~the~~from ~~amount~~treasury no longer than 270 calendar days after closing. The ~~Company~~77,800,000 ~~provided~~shares ~~for~~related ato ~~loss~~this intransaction ~~the~~were ~~full~~issued ~~amount~~on ~~due~~May 9, 2012.

5Immediately prior to the completion of the Merger, the Registrant had 67,868,234 shares of common stock outstanding. ~~Capital~~ ~~Stock~~As a result of the Merger, SoFit merged into the Company to become a subsidiary of the Registrant. Following the Merger, the Registrant has 145,668,234 shares of common stock outstanding which is inclusive of the 77,800,000 unissued common shares of the Registrant pursuant to the Deferred Share Issuance Agreement dated October 3, 2011.

~~The~~As ~~Company~~a ~~has~~result ~~authorized~~of ~~capital~~the ofreverse ~~200~~merger,~~000,000~~ ~~shares~~during ofthe ~~common~~year ~~stock~~ended ~~with~~September a30, ~~par~~2012, ~~value~~the ofCompany ~~$0.00001~~recorded ofa ~~which~~loss ~~67,868,234~~on ~~shares~~acquisition ~~are~~of ~~issued~~$875,541. ~~and~~The ~~outstanding~~significant ascomponents of ~~September~~the ~~30,~~transaction ~~2011~~are ~~and~~as ~~2010.~~follows:

During the twelve months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company issued no shares of its common stock.

Assets acquired:	$	-
Liabilities assumed:		874,862
Common stock retained:		679
Net	$	875,541

~~There~~In ~~was~~conjunction nowith ~~warrant~~the ~~activity~~Merger, ~~for~~two ~~fiscal~~out ~~2011~~of the three directors and noofficers ~~outstanding~~of ~~warrants~~IAG, atJohn ~~September~~G. 30Simmonds (former Director, ~~2010~~Chief Executive Officer and President) and Randy Barber (former Director), resigned from the Company, effective as of October 7, 2011. The Company replaced the Board of Directors with nominees of SoFit. Effective as of October 7, 2011, J. Graham Simmonds (a director prior to the merger) was appointed as Chairman of the Board of Directors; Gary Schwartz was appointed as Executive Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors; Marc Askenasi was appointed as Director, Chief Executive Officer and President; and Henry J. Kloepper was appointed as Director. Carrie J. Weiler remained as the Company’s Corporate Secretary.

~~The~~For ~~Company~~financial ~~has~~purposes, anthe ~~Incentive~~Merger ~~Stock~~represents ~~Option~~a ~~Plan~~capital ~~which~~transaction ~~was~~of ~~approved~~SoFit ator a ~~shareholders~~“reverse ~~meeting~~merger” ~~held~~rather onthan ~~July~~a 14business combination, ~~2008~~because the sellers of SoFit effectively controlled the combined company immediately following the completion of the Merger. ~~The~~In ~~Company~~accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805-10-40, Business Combinations; Reverse Acquisitions, SoFit Mobile was the acquiring entity for accounting purposes. While the transaction is ~~authorized~~accounted tofor ~~issue~~using upthe topurchase 7method of accounting,~~500~~ in substance the transaction was a recapitalization of SoFit’s capital structure. Accordingly,~~000~~ ~~shares~~the assets and liabilities and the historical operations that will be reflected in IAG’s ongoing consolidated financial statements will be those of ~~its~~SoFit ~~common~~and ~~stock~~will ~~under~~be recorded at the ~~plan.~~historical ~~There~~cost ~~are~~basis. noIAG’s ~~stock~~assets, ~~options~~liabilities ~~outstanding~~and asresults of ~~September~~operations 30will be consolidated with the assets, ~~2011~~liabilities and results of operations of SoFit after consummation of the ~~Company~~Merger. ~~has~~IAG's ~~not~~historic ~~recorded~~capital ~~any~~accounts ~~stock~~will ~~based~~be ~~compensation~~retroactively adjusted to reflect the equivalent number of shares issued by IAG in the ~~current~~Merger orwhile ~~any~~SoFit’s ~~prior~~historical ~~periods~~retained earnings will be carried forward. The historical financial statements of IAG before the Merger will be replaced with the historical financial statements of SoFit before the Merger in all future filings with the SEC. The Merger is intended to be treated as a tax-free exchange under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

F-1216

~~6. Obligations~~Table ~~Under~~Of ~~Capital Lease~~Contents

OnINTERAMERICAN ~~August~~GAMING ~~31, 2008 the Company obtained lease purchase financing totaling $294,000 from a related party for gaming equipment~~INC. ~~The Company was obligated to pay monthly payments of $11,275 based on a term of 36 months and an effective lease rate of 18%. The equipment was provided as security for the financing.~~

On(A ~~August~~Development ~~30,~~Stage ~~2010, the~~ Company ~~entered into a settlement agreement with the related party holding the lease, fully settling the obligation, see note 7.~~)

~~7. Related~~Notes ~~Party~~to ~~Settlements~~Consolidated Financial Statements

a)September ~~On June~~ 30, ~~2010,~~2012 the Company entered into a settlement agreement with a former director in which he forgave $36,081 in unpaid director fees owing to him from the Company. This transaction was treated as a capital contribution and ~~therefore resulted in an increase to additional paid in capital.~~2011

~~b) On June 30, 2010 the Company entered into a settlement agreement with a former officer of the Company in which he forgave $48,300 in unpaid consulting fees owing to him~~4. Related ~~This~~Party ~~transaction was treated as a capital contribution and therefore resulted in an increase to additional paid in capital.~~Transactions

c)Transactions Onwith ~~August~~related ~~30,~~parties ~~2010~~are incurred in the ~~Company~~normal ~~entered~~course ~~into~~of abusiness ~~settlement~~and ~~agreement~~are ~~with~~measured ~~Grandvue~~at ~~Inc.~~the ~~(“Grandvue”)~~exchange amount, awhich ~~related~~is ~~party~~the byamount ~~virtue~~ of ~~common~~consideration ~~officers~~established and ~~directors~~agreed ~~and~~to between the ~~holder~~related ofparties. ~~the~~The Company’s ~~capital~~current ~~lease.~~and ~~Grandvue~~former ~~was~~officers ~~owed~~and ~~$476,784~~stockholders inhave ~~advances,~~advanced ~~inter-company~~funds ~~loans,~~on ~~lease~~a ~~payments and~~ non-interest ~~for~~bearing ~~financing~~basis ~~provided~~to on the ~~slot~~Company ~~machines~~for ~~being~~travel ~~operated~~related byand ~~IAG~~working ~~Peru~~capital purposes. AsThe ~~full settlement of this amount, the~~ Company ~~transferred~~has tonot ~~Grandvue,~~entered ~~assets~~into ~~valued~~any atagreement ~~$56,511~~on ~~after~~ the ~~effects~~repayment ofterms ~~the~~for ~~first~~these ~~quarter~~advances. As ~~impairment consisting~~ of ~~all~~September of30, 2012, the ~~slot~~amounts ~~machine assets and all receivables~~ due ~~from~~to ~~slot~~related ~~machine~~parties ~~rental~~were ~~and~~$344,630. ~~revenue~~During ~~sharing.~~the ~~Grandvue~~year ~~also~~ended ~~agreed~~September to30, ~~assume~~2012, the ~~outstanding~~Company ~~Gaming~~expensed ~~tax liability of~~ $26220,~~031~~000 ~~owed~~as byconsulting ~~the~~fee ~~Company.~~payable ~~This~~to ~~transaction~~three ~~resulted~~directors inof athe ~~gain~~Company ofand expensed $~~446~~8,~~304~~000 ~~which~~to ~~was~~consulting ~~treated~~fee aspayable ato ~~capital~~one ~~contribution~~individual ~~and~~who ~~therefore~~is ~~resulted~~related ~~in an increase~~ to ~~additional~~a ~~paid~~director inof ~~capital~~the Company.

~~8. Discontinued~~During ~~Operations~~the year the Company issued 2,000,000 shares to settle $127,866 in consulting and director fees owing to related parties.

During the year ended September 30, ~~2010~~2012, a director of the Company ~~classified~~advanced ~~IAG~~company ~~Peru~~$25,000 asto ~~discontinued~~the ~~operations.~~Company ~~The~~to ~~summarized~~assist ~~operating~~in ~~results~~the ~~for~~payment ~~discontinued~~of ~~operations~~audit ~~for~~fees associated with bringing the ~~years~~Company’s ~~ended~~filings ~~September~~current. ~~30,~~The ~~2011~~loan ~~and~~does ~~2010~~not ~~are~~have asany ~~follows:~~set repayment terms.

	2011		2010
Revenues	$	-	$	74,353
Cost of revenues		-		12,839
Gross profit		-		61,514
Expenses		-		69,562
Net loss before other expenses		-		(8,048	)
Depreciation		-		19,648
Impairment of assets		-		279,922
Interest expense		-		56,707
Net (loss)	$	-	$	(364,325	)

Amounts due (to)/from related parties consisted of:

F-13

	September 30, 2012			September 30, 2011

Entities with common directors and /or officers	$	(33,775	)	$	9,272
Loan from director		(25,000	)		-
Fees payable to officers and directors		(179,386	)		-
Expenses owed to an officer of the Company		(106,469	)		10,543
Total	$	(344,630	)	$	19,815

~~Impairment~~5. Research ofand ~~assets of discontinued operations at September 30, 2010 can be segregated into the following subcategories:~~Development

	2010
Computer equipment (i)	$	3,915
IAG Peru bank account (ii)		2,685
Equipment under capital lease (iii)		273,322
	$	279.922

During the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company developed and released a commercialized version of its social gaming mobile application named SoFit. All costs associated with the development of the Application have been fully expensed as per ASC 985-Software. The Application was brought to market on July 19, 2012 and has since been available to download from both the Apple and Android marketplaces.

~~(i) The Company classified the office equipment as impaired as it was being held by the former general manager of IAG Peru with whom the Company was involved in a labor dispute, see note 11.~~F-17

~~(ii)~~Table AtOf ~~September 30, 2010, the Company no longer had access to its bank account in Peru. As a result the Company wrote off the last known account balance of $2,685.~~Contents

~~(iii)~~INTERAMERICAN InGAMING ~~the first quarter of 2010, management determined that the equipment under capital lease were impaired and as such wrote down their value recording a loss of $273,322~~INC.

~~Liabilities~~(A ofDevelopment ~~discontinued~~Stage ~~operations as at September 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized as follows:~~Company)

	2011		2010
Accounts payable		3,500		3,500
Accrued liabilities		28,178		28,178
Total liabilities		31,678		31,678

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

~~Cashflows of discontinued operations for the years ended~~ September 30, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010 are as follows:~~2011

	For the year ended September 30, 2011		For the year ended September 30, 2010
Operating activities
Net (loss) from continuing operations	$	-	$	(364,325	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		-		(39,959	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		-		54,800
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		-		(30,484	)
(Decrease) in cash from discontinuing operations		-		(15,643	)

6. Property and Equipment

~~F-14~~Property and equipment consisted of the following at September 30, 2012:

9. Contingencies

	September 30, 2012										September 30, 2011
	Cost		Accumulated Depreciation			Foreign Currency Translation			Net		Net
Computer hardware	$	7,618	$	(549	)	$	(13	)	$	7,056	$	-

Total	$	7,618	$	(549	)	$	(13	)	$	7,056	$	-

~~On December 18, 2009, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary IAG Peru S~~7.~~A.C.~~ Shares ~~was~~to ~~served~~be a labour claim for $78,750 (plus expenses) by a former general manager. The claim is for unpaid consulting fees, other stock based compensation, bonuses, vacation and other employee benefits. The dispute involves the start date of employment and the Company believes it has fully accrued for the potential loss in the normal course during the year ended September 30, 2009. Amount is recorded in accounts payable on the balance sheet.Issued

At September 30, 2012, the Company has $750,938 in unissued share liability consisting of the following:

●

●	The Company settled $457,875 in amounts owing to a related party with 10,000,000 shares at $0.045, shares to be issued.

●	The Company settled $39,586 in consultant fees payable to unrelated parties with 1,798,042 shares of which 1,495,710 were at $0.02 and 302,332 were at $0.03, shares to be issued.

●	The Company settled $119,692 in consultant and director fees owing to related parties with 5,995,000 shares at $0.02 shares to be issued.

●

8. Share Capital

F-18

Table Of Contents

INTERAMERICAN GAMING INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2012 and 2011

During the twelve months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the company issued 168,944,901 and 63,243 shares of its common stock, respectively.

During the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company issued 6,750,000 stock options exercisable at $0.02, 1,388,889 stock options exercisable at $0.03 and 60,000 stock options exercisable at $0.05 to consultants of the Company. During the year, 1,750,000 options were exercised at $0.02 and 1,388,889 options were exercised at $0.03. The shares were issued on June 25, 2013. All unexercised stock options issued during the year expired at September 30, 2012.

9. WARRANTS

The following table summarizes the changes in warrants outstanding and related prices for the shares of the Company’s common stock issued to shareholders at September 30, 2012:

Exercise Price			Number of Warrants Outstanding		Warrants Outstanding Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)		Weighted Average Exercise price			Number of Warrants Exercisable		Warrants Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price
$	0.10		949,997		0.3		$	0.10		949,997		$	0.10

The following schedule summarizes the outstanding warrants for fiscal 2012 and 2011:

	2012				2011
	No. of Warrants		WAEP		No. of Warrants		WAEP
Beginning of year		-	$	-		-	$	-
Issued		949,997		0.10
Expired		-		-		-		-
End of year		949,997	$	0.10		-	$	-

The fair value of the issued warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, however, no stock based compensation expense was recorded since the warrants were issued as a part of the private placement of common stock.

The fair value of each warrant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions at the measurement date:

Risk-free interest rate	0.14%
Expected term	180 days
Estimated volatility in the market price of the common shares	141%
Dividend yield	Nil

Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected price volatility. Changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value of the Company’s stock options

F-19

Table Of Contents

INTERAMERICAN GAMING INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2012 and 2011

10. Income Taxes

Under FASB ASC 740 ~~(prior authoritative literature, SFAS No. 109)~~ income taxes are recognized for the following: a) amount of tax payable for the current year, and b) deferred tax liabilities and assets for future tax consequences of events that have been recognized differently in the financial statements than for tax purposes.

The provision for income taxes has been computed as follows:

	2011			2010
	2012			2011
Expected income tax expense (recovery) at the statutory rate of 24.5%	$	(4549,~~217~~308	)	$	(394,~~985~~217	)
Tax effect of expenses that are not deductible for income tax purposes (net of other amounts deductible for tax purposes)		-1,702			-
		(4,217	)		(39,985	)
Loss on acquisition		214,508
Changes in valuation allowance		4,217			39,985
		(333,098	)		(4,217	)
Changes in valuation allowance		333,098			4,217
Provision for income taxes	$	-		$	-

The components of deferred income taxes ~~are~~consisted ~~as follows~~of:

	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
	September 30, 2012			September 30, 2011
Deferred income tax liabilities
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	890,067		$	885,850
Net operating loss carry forwards	$	1,223,165		$	890,067
Valuation allowance		(~~890~~1,~~067~~223,165	)		(~~885~~890,~~850~~067	)
Deferred income taxes	$	-		$	-

F-15

The Company has tax losses available to be applied against future years income. Due to the losses incurred from a predecessor business and expected future operating results, management determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset resulting from the tax losses available for carryforward will not be realized in timely manner, through the reduction of future income tax payments. Accordingly a 100% valuation allowance has been recorded for deferred income tax assets.

As at September 30, 2011, the Company had approximately $3,803,324 of Federal and State net operating loss carryovers available to offset future taxable income. Such carryovers expire through 2029. The Company’s income tax returns are subject to audit by the IRS and the years 2005 to 2012 remain open and subject to examination.F-20

Table Of Contents

INTERAMERICAN GAMING INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2012 and 2011

As of September 30, 2012, the Company had approximately $6,022,070 of Federal and State net operating loss carryovers available to offset future taxable income. Such carryovers expire through 2030. The Company’s income tax returns are subject to audit by the IRS and the years 2005 to 2012 remain open and subject to examination.

11. Subsequent Events

On October 3, 2011, the Company executed a share exchange agreement with NowPhit (the “share exchange”) and its shareholders pursuant to which the Company purchased 80.1% of NowPhit in exchange for 77,800,000 of the Company’s common shares valued at $240,000.

On October 21, 2011 the Company settled amounts of $106,262 owing to directors, officers and consultants with 2,500,000 common shares.

Officers of the Company are now as follows:

Marc Askenasi President & Chief Executive Officer J. Graham Simmonds Chairman & Interim Chief Financial Officer

On January 17, 2012, the Company appointed Henry J. Kloepper and Gerald Goldberg to its Board of Directors.

On January 30, 2012, NowPhit changed its name to SoFit Mobile Inc. (“SoFit”), short for Social Fitness, as it was determined to better reflect the business of the Company’s subsidiary.

F-16

On April 17, 2012, the Company closed an equity financing of $400,000 at a price of $0.02 per share for a total issuance of 20,000,000 shares. The equity financing was completed on a non-brokered basis and no warrants or options were issued. The proceeds of the financing are being used to advance the Company's SoFit platform and for general corporate purposes.

On June 13, 2012, the Company closed its second equity financing of $225,000 at a price of $0.03 per share for a total issuance of 7,500,000 shares. The equity financing was completed on a non-brokered basis and no warrants or options were issued. The proceeds of the financing were being used to complete commercialization of the SoFit platform, to execute SoFit’s summer 2012 launch strategy, and for general corporate purposes to update IAG’s financial reporting and accounting.

On September 30, 2012, the Company settled $4,000 in accounts payable, owing to unrelated parties with 133,333 common shares of the Company. These shares have not yet been issued.

On September 30, 2012, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with a former consultant for full and final settlement of fees and expenses. These shares have not yet been issued.

On October 11, 2012, Mr. John Ryan was appointed to the Board of Directors.

On ~~October~~November 3120, 2012, ~~two~~the ~~consultants~~Company’s subsidiary SoFit Mobile Inc. was served a statement of ~~the~~claim ~~Company~~by ~~exercised~~a ~~their~~human ~~options~~resources placement agency. The claim is for unpaid invoices dated September 4, ~~purchasing~~2012 1in the amount of $39,~~750~~550. This amount has been fully recorded in accounts payable on the balance sheet. On July 10. 2013,~~000~~ ~~common~~the ~~shares~~Company and ~~1,442,~~the ~~222~~other ~~common~~party ~~shares~~reached ata settlement in which $~~0.02~~20,000 will be paid in cash in installments over a five week period and the remaining $~~0.03~~19,550 ~~respectively. The~~will ~~options~~be ~~were~~settled ~~granted~~with inthe ~~fiscal~~issuance ~~2012~~of 1,000,000 shares.

~~SoFit products include integrated mobile applications and complementary wireless devices that enable athletes to track, train, and compete with each other in real~~F-time via the SoFit platform. Athletes can earn virtual rewards, such as trophies and medals, as well as real-life rewards, such as location-based coupons and special offers. The SoFit platform also features a charity and event function that allows athletes to raise donations for a charity of their choice and remotely compete in athletic events from anywhere around the world in real-time. Products were launched in July 2012.21

F-17

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There are not and have not been any disagreements between the Company and its accountants on any matter of accounting principles, practices or financial statement disclosure.

On May 17, 2012, with the approval of the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, EFP Rotenberg, LLP was engaged as the Company's independent registered public accountant, to audit the Company’s financial statements.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Disclosure controls and procedures refer to controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As required by Rule 13a-15(e), our management has carried out an evaluation, with the participation and under the supervision of our Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of September 30, ~~2011~~2012. Based upon, and as of the date of this evaluation.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Exchange Act defines internal control over financial reporting as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:

●	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

● Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and;

●	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

1121

The following material weaknesses were identified in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, ~~2011~~2012.

● ~~Information~~Management ~~and~~is ~~documentation~~aware ~~related~~that tothere ~~operations~~was ofa ~~the~~lack ~~Peru~~of ~~subsidiary~~accounting ~~were~~competency ~~not~~to ~~properly~~assess ~~retained~~and byrecord ~~the~~complex ~~Company~~transactions. ~~Additionally,~~Multiple ~~the~~complex ~~Company~~business notransactions ~~longer~~occurred ~~has~~during ~~contact~~and ~~persons~~subsequent into ~~Peru~~the ~~since~~fiscal ~~the~~year ~~cease~~ended ofSeptember ~~operation~~30, 2012 and ~~therefore~~the isCompany ~~unable~~did ~~ask~~not ~~questions~~formally ~~regarding~~assess ~~the~~and ~~information~~document ~~previously~~the ~~obtained~~appropriateness orof ~~request~~the ~~further~~accounting ~~information~~treatments.

● Management is aware that there was a lack of accounting ~~competency to assess and record complex transactions~~discipline. ~~Multiple~~During ~~complex business transactions occurred during and subsequent to~~ the ~~years~~fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2010~~2012, ~~and 2011 and~~ the Company ~~did~~lacked ~~not~~review ~~formally assess~~ and ~~document~~reconciliation ~~the~~in ~~appropriateness~~many areas of the accounting ~~treatments~~function.

●	Management is aware that there was a lack of completeness of the general ledger. Certain accounts and activities were manually adjusted on the Company’s consolidated statements and are not recorded in this fashion in their respective subsidiary’s general ledger.

●

Management is aware that there was improper retention of accounting records. The Company did not appropriately retain information and documents related to operations of a subsidiary. The Company encountered delays and difficulties when attempting to obtain audit evidence and performing confirmation procedures for purposes of the September 30, 2012 year end audit.

Management is working to remediate the control deficiencies noted above. Steps such as hiring a permanent Chief Financial Officer and development of accounting policies and procedures with close collaboration with the audit committee is already under way. Further, the Company is in discussions with an external bookkeeping and financial reporting service provider to establish and maintain appropriate retention and accounting records going forward.

These control deficiencies could result in a misstatement of account balances that would result in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to our consolidated financial statements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Accordingly, we have determined that these control deficiencies as described above together constitute a material weakness.

In light of this material weakness, the Company performed additional analysis and procedures in order to conclude that our consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, ~~2011~~2012 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K were fairly stated in accordance with US GAAP.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company will regularly review its system of internal control over financial reporting and make changes to our processes and systems to improve controls and increase efficiency, while ensuring that we maintain an effective internal control environment. Changes may include such activities as implementing new and more efficient systems, consolidating activities, and migrating processes.

During the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2011~~2012, there were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect materially, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

1222

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

InDirectors ~~conjunction with the signing~~ of the ~~Share~~Company ~~Exchange~~are inas October 3, 2011, all of the directors and officers of IAG, excluding Graham Simmonds, resigned and were replaced by nominees of BGV. As of October 3, 2011 the Board of Directors of IAG were made up of Graham Simmonds, Gary Schwartz, and Marc Askenasi.follows:

Directors of the Company are now as follows:

Name	Age	Position
J. Graham Simmonds	39	Chairman of the Board of Directors
Gary Schwartz	48	Executive Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors
Gerald Goldberg	69	Director, Audit and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman
Henry J. Kloepper	63	Director, Compensation Committee Chairman
Marc Askenasi	31	Director
John Ryan	59	Director

Name	Age	Position
J. Graham Simmonds	39	Chairman of the Board
Gary Schwartz	48	Vice Chairman of the Board
Gerald Goldberg	69	Audit and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman, Director
Henry J. Kloepper	63	Compensation Committee Chair, Director
Marc Askenasi	30	Director
John Ryan	59	Director

Biographical Information Regarding Directors

J. Graham Simmonds ~~has~~(Chairman ~~over 15 years~~ of ~~experience in public company management and business development projects within both~~ the ~~gaming~~Board ~~and technology sectors. Mr. Simmonds is licensed and/or registered with a number~~ of horse racing and gaming commissions in the United States and Canada. Mr. Simmonds developed and launched the first in-home digital video horseracing service in North America and is a previous Director and partner in eBet Technologies Inc., a licensed ADW operator and software developer for the online horse racing industry in the United States. He is also the founder, President and CEO of Baymount Incorporated, an innovative wagering products and horseracing properties developer and; Director and CEO of Gilla Inc., an electronic cigarette distributor in North America; and Chairman and CEO of DealNet Capital Corp., a merchant banking company focused on Business Process Outsourcing (BPODirectors) ~~and Consumer Financing.~~

Mr. Simmonds served as a Director prior to the Merger and was elected as Chairman of the Board of Directors on October 7, 2011 and is also currently the Interim Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Simmonds has over 15 years of experience in public company management and business development projects within both the gaming and technology sectors. Mr. Simmonds is licensed and/or registered with a number of horse racing and gaming commissions in the United States and Canada. Mr. Simmonds developed and launched the first in-home digital video horseracing service in North America and is a previous Director and partner in eBet Technologies Inc., a licensed ADW operator and software developer for the online horse racing industry in the United States. He is also the founder, President and CEO of Baymount Incorporated, an innovative wagering products and horseracing properties developer and; Director and CEO of Gilla Inc., an electronic cigarette distributor in North America; and Chairman and CEO of DealNet Capital Corp., a merchant banking company focused on Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) and Consumer Financing.

We believe Mr. Simmonds is well-qualified to serve as the Chairman of the Board of Directors due to his public company experience, operational experience and business contacts.

Gary Schwartz is the founder, President, and CEO of Impact Mobile, a leader in providing end-to-end mobile marketing technology solutions. Mr. Schwartz founded Impact Mobile in 2002 after having worked in the information technology and telecommunications industries for over 20 years. Over the past 9 years, Mr. Schwartz has played a leadership role in the mobile industry, running the first cross-carrier short code campaign in North America. Mr. Schwartz founded the mobile committee for the Interactive Advertising Bureau (~~IAB)~~Executive inVice ~~2006~~Chairman and has worked to publish literature such as the Mobile Buyer’s Guide helping extend the digital buy into mobile – for which he received an IAB award for industry excellence in 2009. In 2007, Mr. Schwartz began work to help establish a joint task force between the Mobile Marketing Association (MMA) and the IAB with the aid of the ~~Media~~Board ~~Rating Council (MRC) to develop global, auditable mobile measurement standards. In 2010, Mr. Schwartz was elected as the Chair~~ of ~~Mobile Entertainment Form (MEF~~Directors) North America with a remit to develop a mobile commerce practice to service brands, retailers and content owners – for which he received a MEF award for industry excellence. In 2011, in partnership with MEF and a number of industry groups including the X9 security standards body, Mr. Schwartz is working to develop m-commerce security and privacy guidelines. Mr. Schwartz is an honors graduate from Columbia University and the Stanford University Center in Tokyo. He is the recipient of the Macromedia People Choice Award as well as the Dodge Foundation award for innovation. Mr. Schwartz is the author of The Impulse Economy: Understanding Mobile Shoppers and What Makes Them Buy.

Mr. Schwartz has served as a Director of the Company since October 7, 2011 and is currently the Executive Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. Schwartz is the founder, President, and CEO of Impact Mobile, a leader in providing end-to-end mobile marketing technology solutions. Mr. Schwartz founded Impact Mobile in 2002 after having worked in the information technology and telecommunications industries for over 20 years. Over the past 9 years, Mr. Schwartz has played a leadership role in the mobile industry, running the first cross-carrier short code campaign in North America. Mr. Schwartz founded the mobile committee for the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) in 2006 and has worked to publish literature such as the Mobile Buyer’s Guide helping extend the digital buy into mobile – for which he received an IAB award for industry excellence in 2009. In 2007, Mr. Schwartz began work to help establish a joint task force between the Mobile Marketing Association (MMA) and the IAB with the aid of the Media Rating Council (MRC) to develop global, auditable mobile measurement standards. In 2010, Mr. Schwartz was elected as the Chair of Mobile Entertainment Form (MEF) North America with a remit to develop a mobile commerce practice to service brands, retailers and content owners – for which he received a MEF award for industry excellence. In 2011, in partnership with MEF and a number of industry groups including the X9 security standards body, Mr. Schwartz is working to develop m-commerce security and privacy guidelines. Mr. Schwartz is an honors graduate from Columbia University and the Stanford University Center in Tokyo. He is the recipient of the Macromedia People Choice Award as well as the Dodge Foundation award for innovation. Mr. Schwartz is the author of The Impulse Economy: Understanding Mobile Shoppers and What Makes Them Buy.

We believe Mr. Schwartz is well-qualified to serve as Executive Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors due to his mobile industry experience, operational experience and business contacts.

1323

~~Gerald~~Gerry Goldberg ~~is currently a partner at Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP and is head of SLF’s Public Company group~~(Director, ~~which~~Audit ~~specializes in servicing both domestic~~ and ~~foreign~~Corporate ~~companies~~Governance ~~listed~~Committee on US and Canadian stock exchanges. Mr. Goldberg has experience in advising/assisting businesses in securing both traditional and innovative forms of financing. He has industry expertise in the service, distribution, retail, high-tech, real estate, not-for-profit and manufacturing sectors, with a strong emphasis on taxation and business advisory services. Prior to joining SLF in 1992, Mr. Goldberg was a partner for over 10 years at Grant Thornton LLP.Chairman)

WeMr. ~~believe~~Goldberg has served as a Director of the Company since January 17, 2012 and is currently the Audit and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman. Mr. Goldberg is ~~well~~currently ~~qualified~~a topartner ~~serve~~at asSchwartz aLevitsky ~~member~~Feldman ofLLP ~~the~~and ~~Board~~is head of ~~Directors~~SLF’s ~~due~~Public toCompany ~~his~~group, ~~public~~which ~~company~~specializes in servicing both domestic and foreign companies listed on US and Canadian stock exchanges. Mr. Goldberg has experience in ~~financial~~advising/assisting ~~reporting,~~businesses ~~development~~in securing both traditional and innovative forms of ~~internal~~financing. ~~corporate~~He ~~controls~~has industry expertise in the service, distribution, retail, high-tech, real estate, not-for-profit and ~~procedures~~manufacturing sectors, with a strong emphasis on taxation and business ~~contacts~~advisory services. Prior to joining SLF in 1992, Mr. Goldberg was a partner for over 10 years at Grant Thornton LLP.

~~Henry~~We Jbelieve Mr. ~~Kloepper~~Goldberg is awell-qualified ~~leading~~to ~~financier~~serve ~~and~~as ~~has been involved in investment banking and corporate finance for over 30 years. He brings~~ a ~~rounded~~member ~~knowledge~~ of the ~~capital~~Board ~~markets, strategic growth, and investments. Mr. Kloepper is currently CEO~~ of ~~Houston~~Directors ~~Lake~~due ~~Mining~~to ~~Inc.~~his ~~and~~public acompany ~~Director~~experience ofas ~~Avieya~~well ~~Communications.~~as ~~Mr.~~his ~~Kloepper~~experience ~~was~~in ~~previously~~financial areporting ~~Director~~for ~~and~~public ~~President of Mogul Energy International Inc. and has held executive positions with Award Capital~~companies, JPdevelopment ~~Morgan,~~of ~~Citibank,~~internal ~~Bank~~corporate ofcontrols ~~America,~~ and ~~North American Trust in the US~~procedures, ~~Canada,~~ and ~~Europe~~business contacts.

Henry J. Kloepper (Director and Compensation Committee Chairman)

Mr. Kloepper has served as a Director of the Company since October 7, 2011 and is currently the Compensation Committee Chairman. Mr. Kloepper is a leading financier and has been involved in investment banking and corporate finance for over 30 years. He brings a rounded knowledge of the capital markets, strategic growth, and investments. Mr. Kloepper is currently CEO of Houston Lake Mining Inc. and a Director of Avieya Communications. Mr. Kloepper was previously a Director and President of Mogul Energy International Inc. and has held executive positions with Award Capital, JP Morgan, Citibank, Bank of America, and North American Trust in the US, Canada, and Europe.

We believe Mr. Kloepper is well-qualified to serve as a member of the Board of Directors due to his public company experience, financial markets knowledge and business contacts.

Marc Askenasi ~~was the founder~~(Director, ~~President,~~Chief ~~and~~Executive ~~CEO~~Officer ~~of Function Mobile, an innovative mobile gaming solutions provider with past operations in both North America~~ and Latin America. Founded in 2007, Mr. Askenasi led the development, launch, and strategic direction of Function Mobile’s robust gaming platform. In 2009, Mr. Askenasi orchestrated a successful exit for Function Mobile’s investors. Mr. Askenasi is also the founder of Baron Group Ventures, a corporation that provides consulting and innovate support to the technology sector. In 2010, Mr. Askenasi led all innovation, branding, and product development initiatives for Vital Hub, a technology healthcare company, created in partnership with Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto, that provides healthcare professionals more efficient access to patient information through mobile applications. Mr. Askenasi graduated with honors from McGill University, where he focused on industrial relations with a triple major in management, economics, and sociology.President)

WeMr. ~~believe~~Askenasi ~~that~~has served as Director, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company since October 7, 2011. Mr. Askenasi iswas ~~well~~the ~~qualified~~founder, toPresident, ~~serve~~and asCEO aof ~~member~~Function Mobile, an innovative mobile gaming solutions provider with past operations in both North America and Latin America. Founded in 2007, Mr. Askenasi led the development, launch, and strategic direction of Function Mobile’s robust gaming platform. In 2009, Mr. Askenasi orchestrated a successful exit for Function Mobile’s investors. Mr. Askenasi is also the ~~Board~~founder of ~~Directors~~Baron ~~due~~Group Ventures, a corporation that provides consulting and innovate support to ~~his~~the ~~experience~~technology insector. In 2010, Mr. Askenasi led all innovation, branding, and product development ~~and~~initiatives ~~business~~for ~~contacts~~Vital Hub, a technology healthcare company, created in partnership with Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto, that provides healthcare professionals more efficient access to patient information through mobile applications. Mr. Askenasi graduated with honors from McGill University, where he focused on industrial relations, management, economics, and sociology.

~~John~~We ~~Ryan~~believe ~~is a professional accountant with over 30 years of management experience in various industries.~~ Mr. ~~Ryan~~Askenasi is ~~currently~~well-qualified ~~President~~to ofserve ~~Nichange~~as ~~Enterprises Ltd.,~~ a ~~company~~member ~~that~~of ~~provides~~the ~~financial~~Board ~~consulting services to corporate and individual clients. Mr. Ryan is also President~~ of ~~Spruce~~Directors ~~Ridge~~due ~~Resources~~to ~~Ltd.,~~his ~~CEO~~experience ofin ~~Golden~~product ~~Dory~~development ~~Resources Corp.~~ and ~~CEO~~his ofbusiness ~~Metalore Resources Ltd~~contacts. ~~Furthermore, Mr. Ryan serves on the boards of several publicly listed companies.~~

WeJohn ~~believe Mr.~~ Ryan ~~is well qualified to serve as a member of the Board of Directors due to his public company experience and is business contacts.~~(Director)

Mr. Ryan has served as a Director of the Company since October 11, 2012. Mr. Ryan is a professional accountant with over 30 years of management experience in various industries. Mr. Ryan is currently President of Nichange Enterprises Ltd., a company that provides financial consulting services to corporate and individual clients. Mr. Ryan is also President of Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd., CEO of Golden Dory Resources Corp. and CEO of Metalore Resources Ltd. Furthermore, Mr. Ryan serves on the boards of several publicly listed companies.

We believe Mr. Ryan is well-qualified to serve as a member of the Board of Directors due to his public company experience and business contacts.

Board and Committee Meetings

Information concerning the Audit Committee maintained by the Board of Directors is set forth below.

The Board held ~~one~~four meetings during the ~~2011~~2012 fiscal year, including taking action by consent pursuant to the laws of the State of Nevada. Not all directors attended 100% of the Board meetings while serving as such director~~, and not all directors attended 100% of all committee meetings on which he served as a committee member~~.

The Company’s Board has three standing committees, Audit Committee, Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee. The Audit Committee and Corporate Governance Committee consist of Gerald Goldberg, J. Graham Simmonds and Henry J. Kloepper. The Compensation Committee consists of Henry J. Kloepper, Gerald Goldberg, J. Graham Simmonds and Gary Schwartz.

The Audit Committee held no meetings during fiscal ~~2011~~2012. The Audit Committee, among other things, recommends our independent auditors, reviews our financial statements, reports and recommendations regarding the adequacy of internal accounting controls made by the independent auditors and considers such other matters with respect to the accounting, auditing and financial reporting procedures as it may deem appropriate or as may be brought to its attention.

The Company’s Audit Committee is supposed to be composed of outside directors who are not officers or employees of the Company or its subsidiaries. The Audit Committee at this time is composed of two independent directors. In the opinion of the Board an “independent” is defined under current standards of the American Stock Exchange (including the heightened independence requirements of audit committee members), these directors are independent of management and free of any relationship that would interfere with their exercise of independent judgment as member of this committee.

The Compensation Committee was formed in 2012 and asheld ~~such~~no ~~did not hold any~~ meetings in fiscal ~~2011~~2012. The Compensation Committee consists of two non-employee directors, Mr. Kloepper and Mr. Goldberg. The Compensation Committee has the responsibility for allocation of cash compensation and stock options to senior executive officers of the Company.

The entire Board regularly reviews the Compensation Committee decisions relating to executive compensation. The Company’s executive compensation policies, as endorsed by the Compensation Committee, have been designed to provide a balanced compensation program that will assist the Company in its efforts to attract, motivate and retain talented executives who the Compensation Committee and senior management believe are important to the long-term financial success of the Company.

Board of Directors Independence

The Company’s Board of Directors reviews the relationships that each director has with us and other parties. Only those directors who do not have any of the categorical relationships that preclude them from being independent within the meaning of American Stock Exchange Company Guide, Part I Section 121, and who the Board of Directors affirmatively determines have no relationships that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director, are considered to be Independent Directors. The Board of Directors has reviewed a number of factors to evaluate the independence of each of its members. These factors include its members’ current and historic relationships with us and our subsidiaries; their relationships with management and other directors; the relationships their current and former employers have with us and our subsidiaries; and the relationships between us and other companies on which our board members are directors or executive officers. After evaluating these factors, the Board of Directors has determined that two of the five directors are considered “independent” as defined by American Stock Exchange Company Guide, Part I Section 121, all applicable rules and regulations of the SEC, and for purposes of Rule 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Independent members of our Board of Directors will meet in executive session without management present, and are scheduled to do so at least two times per year. The Board of Directors will designate an appropriate individual as the presiding director for these meetings.

Shareholder Communications

The Company’s Board of Directors believes that it is important for our shareholders to have a process to send confidential communications directly to the board as a whole and to the Independent Directors in particular. Accordingly, shareholders desiring to send a communication to the Board of Directors, or to a specific director, may do so by delivering a letter to our Secretary at our principal offices as set forth on the cover page to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The mailing envelope must contain a clear notation indicating that the enclosed letter is a “stockholder-board communication” or “stockholder director-specific” communication.” All such letters must identify the author and clearly state whether the intended recipients of the letter are all members of our Board of Directors or certain specified individual directors. To the extent indicated as addressed, the Secretary will observe any requests for confidentiality and forward such correspondence unopened directly to a specific director. With respect to correspondence addressed to the Board as a whole or to a group of directors or a specific committee, the Secretary will open such communications and make copies, and then circulate them to the appropriate director or directors. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company shall reserve the right to open all correspondence as it believes reasonably necessary to assure the safety and personal privacy of all directors.

Report of Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for oversight of our internal control, accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices. Specific responsibilities of the Audit Committee include:

●	reviewing and discussing the audited financial statements with management;

●	discussing with the Company’s independent auditors information relating to the auditors’ judgments about the quality of the Company’s accounting policies and financial reporting practices;

●	recommending to the Board that the Company include the audited financials in its Annual Report on Form 10-K; and

●	overseeing compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission requirements for disclosure of auditors’ services and activities.

The Audit Committee regularly meets with management to consider the adequacy of our internal controls and the integrity of our financial reporting. The Audit Committee discusses these matters with our independent auditors and with our financial personnel.

The Audit Committee regularly meets privately with management and the independent auditors. Each of the independent auditors has unrestricted access to the Committee.

The Audit Committee retains and, if circumstances warrant, replaces the independent auditors and regularly reviews their performance and independence from management. The Audit Committee also pre-approves all audit and permitted non-audit services and related fees.

The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted a written charter setting out the roles and responsibilities the Committee is to perform. The Board has determined that Gerald Goldberg, a director serving on the Audit Committee, is an “audit committee financial expert,” as such term is defined under the regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under such regulations, the designation or identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert does not impose on such person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations and liability imposed on such person as a member of the audit committee and the Board of Directors in the absence of such designation or identification nor does the designation or identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of the audit committee or Board of Directors.

Management has primary responsibility for the Company’s financial statements and the overall reporting process, including the Company’s system of internal controls.

Review of Audited Financial Statements

The Audit Committee has reviewed our financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2011~~2012, as audited by EFP Rotenberg, LLP, the Company’s independent auditors, and has discussed these financial statements with management. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with EFP Rotenberg, LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement of Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, regarding the codification of statements on auditing standards. Furthermore, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from EFP Rotenberg, LLP required by the Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 and has discussed with EFP Rotenberg, LLP its independence.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Members of the Audit Committee rely, without independent verification, on the information provided to them and on the representations made by management and the independent accountants. Accordingly, the Audit Committee’s oversight does not provide an independent basis to determine that management has maintained procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, the Audit Committee’s considerations and discussions referred to above do not assure that the audit of the Company’s financial statements has been carried out in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, that the financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that the Company’s independent accountants are in fact “independent.”

AUDIT COMMITTEE ~~Gerald Goldberg Henry J. Kloepper J. Graham Simmonds~~

16Gerald Goldberg

Henry J. Kloepper

J. Graham Simmonds

Executive Officers

The following table presents information with respect to our current executive officers:.

Name	Age	Position
Marc Askenasi	3031	~~President~~CEO and ~~CEO~~President
J. Graham Simmonds	39	Interim CFO

Marc Askenasi, Director, ~~President~~CEO and ~~CEO~~President of the Company. See “Biographical Information Regarding Directors” above for information regarding Mr. Askenasi.

Graham Simmonds, Chairman and Interim CFO of the Company. See “Biographical Information Regarding Directors” above for information regarding Mr. Simmonds.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and executive officers, as well as persons beneficially owning more than 10% of the outstanding Common Stock, to file certain reports of ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission within specified time periods. Such officers, directors and shareholders are also required by Securities and Exchange Commission rules to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely on its review of such forms, all requirements received by us, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that between October 1, ~~2010~~2011 and September 30, ~~2011~~2012, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and 10% shareholders were met.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The following table sets forth compensation for each of the past three fiscal years with respect to each person who served as our Chief Executive Officer and each of the four most highly-compensated executive officers who earned a total annual salary and bonuses that exceeded $100,000 in any of the three preceding three fiscal years.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

			Annual Compensation	~~Annual Compensation~~							~~Long-Term Compensation Awards~~		Long-Term Compensation Awards
Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)	~~Salary ($)~~		Bonus ($)		~~Restricted Stock Awards ($)~~	Restricted Stock Awards ($)		~~Stock Option Awards ($)~~		Stock Option Awards ($)	~~Securities underlying options/ SARS (#)~~		~~Non-Equity~~Securities ~~Incentive~~underlying ~~Plan~~options/ ~~Compensation~~SARS (#)		~~Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings~~	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation		~~All Other Compensation ($)~~	Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings	~~Total Compensation ($)~~		All Other Compensation ($)		Total Compensation ($)
John G. Simmonds Chief Executive Officer		2011			0		0		0			0			0		0		0		0			0
Marc Askenasi	2012			165,000			0			0				0			0			0			0			8,800		173,800
		2010			0		0		0			0			0		0		0		0			0
Chief Executive Officer	2011			0			0			0				0			0			0			0			0		0
		2009			0		0		0			0			0		0		0		0			0
	2010			0			0			0				0			0			0			0			0		0
J. Graham Simmonds	2012			27,500			0			0				0			0			0			0			0		27,500
Interim Chief	2011			0			0			0				0			0			0			0			0		0
Financial Officer	2010			0			0			0				0			0			0			0			0		0

~~Option Grants in 2011 Fiscal Year~~27

~~The~~Option ~~Company~~Grants ~~made no option grants~~ in ~~2011~~2012 ~~and~~Fiscal ~~there are no outstanding options held by any member of our management.~~Year

Compensation of Directors

The Company compensates itits directors with a monthly retainer of $1,500. The Chairman of the Board, Executive Vice Chairman and Chair of Audit receive an additional monthly retainer of $1,000 for a total of $2,500 per month. On April 1, 2012, $47,500 in director fees were settled for 2,375,000 common shares of the Company which have not yet been issued. All other amounts payable to Directors in fiscal 2012 were accrued and remain outstanding, the amounts are recorded in ‘Due to related parties” on the balance sheet.

Employment Arrangements

Our Chief Executive Officer and President, Mr. Marc Askenasi, is compensated $15,000 per month for services provided to the Company and its subsidiary pursuant to the terms of a consulting agreement. Our Interim Chief Financial Officer, Mr. J. Graham Simmonds, is compensated CDN $2,500 per month pursuant to the terms of a Consulting Agreement with the Company.

Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee consists of two non-employee directors, ~~Messrs~~Mr. Kloepper and Mr.Goldberg. The Compensation Committee has the responsibility for allocation of cash compensation and stock options to senior executive officers of the Company.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Henry J. Kloepper

Gerald Goldberg

J. Graham Simmonds

Gary Schwartz

1828

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

In ~~2011~~2012, the Company had no securities compensation plan for our officers and directors.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of ~~January~~July 3111, 2013 by (i) each of our directors, (ii) each of our officers named in the Summary Compensation Table (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”), (iii) each person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our outstanding Common Stock, and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated below, each person named has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated.

Amount and Nature of

Beneficial Ownership

Name and Address of

Options/

Beneficial Owner

Warrants (1)

~~Total (1)~~

Total (1)

~~Percent (1)~~

Percent (1)

Marc Askenasi

5652,~~370~~315,~~260~~540

~~56,370,260~~

52,315,540

~~33.2%~~

28.4%

J. Graham Simmonds

~~850~~1,300,000

~~850,000~~

1,300,000

Gerald Goldberg

21,~~150~~525,000

~~2,150,000~~

1,525,000

~~1.3%~~

Gary Schwartz

57,~~803~~053,880

~~5,803,880~~

7,053,880

~~3.4%~~

3.8%

Henry J. Kloepper

1,~~000~~375,000

~~1,000,000~~

1,375,000

John Ryan

3,360,000

~~3,360,000~~

3,360,000

1.8%

All executive officers and directors as a group (6 persons)(2)

6966,~~534~~929,~~140~~420

~~69,534,140~~

66,929,420

~~40.9%~~

36.3%

(1)	Includes options and warrants exercisable as of the date hereof or within 60 days hereafter. Holdings of less than 1% are indicated by “*”. Based upon ~~169~~184,~~944~~460,~~901~~165 shares issued and outstanding as at ~~February~~July 1911, 2013, (excluding any shares issuable under options or warrants,).
(2)	Officers and Directors as a group include Marc Askenasi, J. Graham Simmonds, Gerald Goldberg, Gary Schwartz, John Ryan and Henry J. Kloepper.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

During the past two years, there have not been any transactions that have occurred between the Company and its officers, directors, and five percent or greater shareholders, except as follows:

~~Gamecorp~~DealNet ~~Ltd~~Capital Corp. which was a shareholder of the Company had advanced amounts to the Company to help cover the Company’s operating expenses including transfer agent fees, legal and accounting fees and other expenses. During the year ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued 878,000 shares of its common stock in repayment of services worth $43,900. On October 3, 2011, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with ~~Gamecorp~~DealNet in which the Company transferred 10,000,000 of its common shares and 100% of its shares of IAG Peru to extinguish $457,875 in liabilities.

Certain officers and directors of the Company are engaged in other businesses, either individually or through partnerships and corporations in which they have an interest, hold an office, or serve on a board of directors. As a result, certain conflicts of interest may arise between the Company and its officers and directors. The Company will attempt to resolve such conflicts of interest in favor of the Company. The officers and directors of the Company are accountable to it and its shareholders as fiduciaries, which require that such officers and directors exercise good faith and integrity in handling the company’s affairs. A shareholder may be able to institute legal action on behalf of the Company or on behalf of itself and other similarly situated shareholders to recover damages or for other relief in cases of the resolution of conflicts is in any manner prejudicial to the Company.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Fees

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed by the Company’s independent auditors for fiscal years and ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2011~~2012:

Year	Audit Fees		Tax	Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees	Other Fees	Total
2011	$	10,445	$ Nil	$ Nil	$ Nil	$	10,445
2012	$	15,857	$ Nil	$ Nil	$ Nil	$	15,857
2010	$	20,000	$ Nil	$ Nil	$ Nil	$	20,000
2011	$	18,571	$ Nil	$ Nil	$ Nil	$	18,571

Note 1: Includes the review of quarterly Form 10-Qs.

2030

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Exhibit No.	Description	Form/Period/Dated	Filed

3.1	Articles of Incorporation	Form 10-SB	September 28, 2000

3.2	Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation	Form 10-SB	September 28, 2000

3.3	Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated October 13, 2000	Form 10-QSB	November 7, 2000

3.4	Bylaws	Form 10-QSB	November 7, 2000

14.1	Code of Business Conduct	Form 10-KSB	December 30, 2005

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302		Herein

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302		Herein

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906		Herein

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302		Herein

Reports on Form 8-K.

No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the year ended September 30, ~~2011~~2012.

2131

SIGNATURES

In accordance with sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized individual.

	INTERAMERICAN GAMING, INC.
Date: February 27, 2013	By:	/s/ Marc Askenasi
		Marc Askenasi, CEO, President and Director
		(principal executive officer)
	By:	/s/ J. Graham Simmonds
		J. Graham Simmonds, Interim CFO and Chairman
		(principal financial officer)

Date: July 16, 2013

	INTERAMERICAN GAMING, INC.

	By:	/s/ Marc Askenasi
		Marc Askenasi, CEO, President and Director (principal executive officer)

	By:	/s/ J. Graham Simmonds
		J. Graham Simmonds, Interim CFO and Chairman (principal financial officer)

In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name	~~Name~~	Title	~~Title~~	Date	~~Date~~
/s/ J. Graham Simmonds				July 16, 2013	~~February 27, 2013~~
J. Graham Simmonds	~~J. Graham Simmonds~~	Interim CFO/Chairman	~~Interim CFO/Chairman~~
/s/ Marc Askenasi				July 16, 2013	~~February 27, 2013~~
Marc Askenasi	~~Marc Askenasi~~	CEO/President/Director	~~CEO/President/Director~~
/s/ Gerald Goldberg				July 16, 2013	~~February 27, 2013~~
Gerald Goldberg	~~Gerald Goldberg~~	Director	~~Director~~
/s/ Gary Schwartz				July 16, 2013	~~February 27, 2013~~
Gary Schwartz	~~Gary Schwartz~~	Director	~~Director~~
/s/ Henry J. Kloepper				July 16, 2013	~~February 27, 2013~~
Henry J. Kloepper	~~Henry J. Kloepper~~	Director	~~Director~~
/s/ John Ryan				July 16, 2013
John Ryan		Director

Filing Compare · InterAmerican Gaming, Inc.