UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016

o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from to

Commission file numbers 000-32141

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Nevada		27-2689205
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Organization)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)

12502 West Atlantic Blvd, Coral Springs, Florida		33071
12538 West Atlantic Blvd, Coral Springs, Florida		33071
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(954) 509-0911

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.


Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, par value $0.001 per share, as of ~~November~~June 202, ~~2015~~2016 there were ~~415~~435,961,936 shares of common stock.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements 4 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2015 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2014 4 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited) 5 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited) 6 Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) 7 Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 16 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 25 Item 4. Controls and Procedures 25 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION 26 Item 1. Legal Proceedings 26 Item 1A. Risk Factors 26 Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 26 Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities 26 Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure 26 Item 5. Other Information 26 Item 6. Exhibits 26


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements		4

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2016 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2015		4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 (Unaudited)		5

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 (Unaudited)		6

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		7

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		15

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		22

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		22

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION		23

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		23

Item 1A. Risk Factors		23

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		23

Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities		23

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure		23

Item 5. Other Information		23

Item 6. Exhibits		23

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

DMH International, Inc. is referred to hereinafter as “we”, “us” or “our”

Forward Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results of to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The words or phrases "would be," "will allow, "intends to," "will likely result," "are expected to," "will continue," "is anticipated," "estimate," "project," or similar expressions are intended to identify "forward-looking statements." We are subject to risks detailed in Item 1(a). All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including: (a) any projections of revenue, gross margin, expenses, earnings or losses from operations, synergies or other financial items; and (b) any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; and (c) any statement concerning developments, plans, or performance. Unless otherwise required by applicable law, we do not undertake and we specifically disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences, developments, unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statement.

~~DMH~~PART ~~INTERNATIONAL, INC~~I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

~~Condensed~~Item ~~Consolidated~~1. ~~Balance~~Financial ~~Sheets~~Statements

	September 30,	December 31,
	2015	2014
	$	$
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash	379	984
Total Assets	379	984
LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	321,278	266,806
Accounts payable – related party	326,522	281,522
Due to related parties	631,104	529,604
Convertible debt-net of discount of $30,833 and $27,200, respectively	50,167	290,362
Derivative liability	122,776	114,649
Total Liabilities	1,451,847	1,482,943
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT )
Preferred stock
Authorized: 10,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001 per share; Issued and outstanding: 7,432,099 and 0 preferred shares at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.	7,432	-
Common stock	415,962	352,000
Authorized: 450,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share Issued and outstanding: 415,961,936 and 351,999,486 common shares at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
Preferred stock issuable	410,864	1,600,000
Common stock issuable	35,000	35,000
Additional paid-in capital	2,881,143	1,380,309
Deficit accumulated	(5,201,869)	(4,849,268)
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	(1,451,468)	(1,481,959)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	379	984

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

~~(The~~Condensed ~~accompanying~~Consolidated ~~notes~~Balance ~~are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements)~~Sheets


	March 31,	December 31,
	2016	2015
	$	$
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS

Cash	7,634	40
Total Assets	7,634	40

LIABILITIES

Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	254,008	249,965
Accounts payable – related party	356,522	341,522
Due to related parties	666,154	661,954
Notes payable	30,000	-
Convertible debt-net of discount of $5,277 and $18,055, respectively	44,723	31,945
Convertible debt in default	11,000	31,000
Derivative liability	109,417	132,287
Total Current Liabilities	1,471,824	1,448,673
Total Liabilities	1,471,824	1,448,673

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT )

Preferred stock
Authorized: 10,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001 per share; Issued and outstanding: 7,432,099 preferred shares at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015	7,432	7,432
Common stock	435,962	415,962
Authorized: 450,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share issued and outstanding: 435,961,936 and 415,961,936 common shares at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
Preferred stock issuable	410,864	410,864
Common stock issuable	35,000	35,000
Additional paid-in capital	2,885,925	2,900,662
Accumulated deficit	(5,239,373)	(5,218,553)
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	(1,464,190)	(1,448,633)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	7,634	40

~~DMH~~(The ~~INTERNATIONAL,~~accompanying ~~INC.~~notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements)

~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations~~4

~~(Unaudited)~~DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

	For the Three Months Ended		For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,		September 30,
	2015	2014	2015	2014
	$	$	$	$
Revenues	-	-	-	-
Operating Expenses
General and administrative	11,462	13,289	22,854	24,503
Management fees	15,000	15,000	45,000	45,000
Professional fees	29,924	212,135	174,170	615,285
Research and development	2,056	65,447	16,070	65,447
Total Operating Expenses	58,442	305,871	258,094	750,235
Other Expenses
Interest expense	14,822	80,584	53,444	115,965
Change in fair value of derivatives	16,464	(9,362)	18,661	39,215
Gain on settlement of debt	-	-	(30,454)	-
Imputed interest	22,017	14,777	52,856	43,849
Total Other Expenses	53,303	85,999	94,507	199,029
Net Loss	(111,745)	(391,870)	(352,601)	(949,264)
Net Loss per Share – Basic and Diluted	(0.00)	(0.00)	(0.00)	(0.00)
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding – Basic and Diluted	415,961,936	301,406,397	402,762,776	290,309,115

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements~~Unaudited)


	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2016	2015
	$	$
Revenues	-	-
Operating Expenses
General and administrative	4,249	2,677
Management fees	15,000	15,000
Professional fees	25,100	60,565
Research and development	2,077	12,007
Total Operating Expenses	46,426	90,249
Other (Income) Expense
Interest expense	12,001	26,963
Change in fair value of derivatives	15,825	(9,643)
Loss (Gain) on settlement of debt	(73,818)	637
Imputed interest	20,386	16,457
Total Other (Income) Expense	(25,606)	34,414
Net Loss	(20,820)	(124,663)
Net Loss per Share – Basic and Diluted	(0.00)	(0.00)
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding – Basic and Diluted	421,016,881	377,191,150

~~DMH~~(The ~~INTERNATIONAL,~~accompanying ~~INC.~~notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements)

~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows~~5

~~(Unaudited)~~DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

	For the nine months ended September 30,
	2015	2014
	$	$
Operating Activities
Net loss for the period	(352,601)	(949,264)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Imputed interest	52,856	43,849
Amortization of debt discount	46,367	111,271
Change in fair value of derivatives	18,661	39,215
Gain on settlement of convertible debt	(30,454)	-
Stock issued for services	-	320,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts Payable – Related Party	45,000	45,000
Accounts payable and Accrued liabilities	68,066	15,524
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities	(152,105)	(374,405)
Investing Activities
Cash acquired in merger	-	11,947
Advance paid in connection with merger	-	(20,000)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities	-	(8,053)
Financing Activities
Due to related parties – borrowings	138,000	12,865
Due to related parties – repayments	(36,500)	(64,300)
Proceeds from loan	50,000	390,000
Proceeds from common stock subscribed	-	85,000
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities	151,500	423,565
Increase(decrease) in Cash	(605)	41,107
Cash – Beginning of Period	984	-
Cash – End of Period	379	41,107
Non-cash financing activities:
Common stocks issued for debt conversions	300,156	60,157
Settlement of derivative liability due to equity conversions	60,534	-
Recognition of discount due to derivative	50,000	208,597
Preferred shares issued from payables	1,189,136	-

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements~~Unaudited)


	For the three months ended March 31,
	2016	2015
	$	$
Operating Activities
Net loss for the period	(20,820)	(124,663)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Imputed interest	20,386	16,457
Amortization of debt discount	12,778	23,174
Change in fair value of derivatives	15,825	(9,643)
Gain on settlement of convertible debt	(73,818)	637
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts Payable – Related Party	15,000	15,000
Accounts payable and Accrued liabilities	4,043	24,141
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities	(26,606)	(54,897)
Financing Activities
Due to related parties – borrowings	19,500	72,500
Due to related parties – repayments	(15,300)	(5,000)
Proceeds from notes payable	30,000	-
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities	34,200	67,500
Increase(decrease) in Cash	7,594	12,603
Cash – Beginning of Period	40	984
Cash – End of Period	7,634	13,587
Non-cash financing activities:
Common stock issued for debt conversions	20,000	281,156
Settlement of derivative liability due to equity conversions	38,695	34,765

~~DMH~~(The ~~INTERNATIONAL,~~accompanying ~~INC.~~notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements)

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~6

~~1. Description~~DMH ofINTERNATIONAL, ~~Business and Reverse Acquisition~~INC.

a)Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Description of Business and Reverse Acquisition

~~DMH International, Inc. (the “Company”~~a) ~~was incorporated in the state of Florida on March 26, 2010.~~

b)Description of Business

~~Going~~DMH ~~Concern~~International, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Florida on March 26, 2010.

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies that the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company has a working capital deficit of $1,451,468 and accumulated deficit of $5,201,869. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its management, and its ability to identify future investment opportunities and obtain the necessary debt or equity financing, and generating profitable operations from the Company’s future operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.b)

c)Going Concern

~~Reverse~~These ~~Acquisition~~financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies that the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company has a working capital deficit of $1,464,190 and accumulated deficit of $5,239,373. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its management, and its ability to identify future investment opportunities and obtain the necessary debt or equity financing, and generating profitable operations from the Company’s future operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

~~On December 11, 2012, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement with DMH International, Inc. (“DMHI”~~c), a public shell company. Pursuant to the agreement, DMHI acquired all of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company (100 common shares) by issuing 125,000,000 common shares, comprised of 100,000,000 common shares from the President and Director of the Company and 25,000,000 newly issued common shares. Furthermore, the President and Director of DMHI cancelled 100,000,000 common shares as part of the share exchange agreement. As a result of the share exchange, the former shareholders of the Company controlled approximately 78% of the issued and outstanding common shares of DMHI resulting in a change in control. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization transaction, as DMHI qualifies as a non-operating public shell company given the fact that the Company held nominal net monetary assets, consisting of only cash at the time of merger transaction. As Touch Medical Solutions, Inc. is deemed to be the purchaser for accounting purposes under recapitalization accounting, the equity of the Company is presented as the equity of the combined company and the capital stock account of the Company is adjusted to reflect the part value of the outstanding and issued common stock of the legal acquirer (DMHI) after giving effect to the number of shares issued in the share exchange agreement. Shares retained by DMHI are reflected as an issuance as of the acquisition date for the historical amount of the net assets of the acquired entity, which in this case is zero.

d)Reverse Acquisition

~~Merger~~On December 11, 2012, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement with DMH International, Inc. (“DMHI”), a public shell company. Pursuant to the agreement, DMHI acquired all of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company (100 common shares) by issuing 125,000,000 common shares, comprised of 100,000,000 common shares from the President and Director of the Company and 25,000,000 newly issued common shares. Furthermore, the President and Director of DMHI cancelled 100,000,000 common shares as part of the share exchange agreement. As a result of the share exchange, the former shareholders of the Company controlled approximately 78% of the issued and outstanding common shares of DMHI resulting in a change in control. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization transaction, as DMHI qualifies as a non-operating public shell company given the fact that the Company held nominal net monetary assets, consisting of only cash at the time of merger transaction. As Touch Medical Solutions, Inc. is deemed to be the purchaser for accounting purposes under recapitalization accounting, the equity of the Company is presented as the equity of the combined company and the capital stock account of the Company is adjusted to reflect the part value of the outstanding and issued common stock of the legal acquirer (DMHI) after giving effect to the number of shares issued in the share exchange agreement. Shares retained by DMHI are reflected as an issuance as of the acquisition date for the historical amount of the net assets of the acquired entity, which in this case is zero.

Effective July 22, 2014, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Virtual Physician's Network through issuance of 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s convertible preferred stock. Each share of our preferred stock is convertible into 20 shares of our common stock. Virtual Physician's Network was merged into the Company and became the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary. As of September 30, 2015, the 7,432,099 shares were issued, and the remaining shares have not been issued due to administrative delay. The remaining 2,567,901 shares of convertible preferred stocks were accrued in preferred stocks issuable with a fair value of $410,864. Each share of convertible preferred stock was valued at 20 times of closing price of common stock price of $0.008 on the date of merger.d)

~~2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies~~Merger

Effective July 22, 2014, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Virtual Physician’s Network through issuance of 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s convertible preferred stock. Each share of our preferred stock is convertible into 20 shares of our common stock. Virtual Physician’s Network was merged into the Company and became the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary. As of March 31, 2016, 7,432,099 shares were issued, and the remaining shares have not been issued due to administrative delay. The remaining 2,567,901 shares of convertible preferred stocks were accrued in preferred stocks issuable with a) fair value of $410,864. Each share of convertible preferred stock was valued at 20 times of closing price of common stock price of $0.008 on the date of merger.

~~Basis~~2. Summary of ~~Presentation~~Significant ~~and~~Accounting ~~Principles of Consolidation~~Policies

~~The unaudited financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”~~a) ~~and are expressed in U.S. dollars. All the intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.~~

7Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

~~2. Summary~~The financial statements of ~~Significant~~the ~~Accounting~~Company ~~Policies~~have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (~~Continued~~“US GAAP”) and are expressed in U.S. dollars. All the intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.

b)7

~~Use~~DMH ofINTERNATIONAL, ~~Estimates~~INC.

~~The~~Notes ~~preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management~~ to ~~make~~Consolidated ~~estimates~~Financial and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the useful life and valuation of long-lived assets, and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.Statements

c2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

~~Interim Financial Statements~~b)

~~These~~Use ~~interim financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and in the opinion~~ of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods shown. The results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for a full year or for any future period.Estimates

d)The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the useful life and valuation of long-lived assets, and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

~~Cash and cash equivalents~~c)

~~The~~Interim ~~Company~~Financial considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. As at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had no cash equivalents.Statements

e)These interim financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods shown. The results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for a full year or for any future period.

~~Property and Equipment~~d)

~~Property~~Cash and ~~equipment~~cash is comprised of computer equipment and is recorded at cost. The Company amortizes the cost of equipment on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of three years. The Company reviews all property and equipment for impairment annually.equivalents

f)The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. As at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had no cash equivalents.

~~Goodwill~~e)

~~The~~Property ~~Company evaluates the carrying value of goodwill during the fourth quarter of each year~~ and between annual evaluations if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to (1) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate, (2) unanticipated competition, or (3) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. When evaluating whether goodwill is impaired, the Company compares the fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit's carrying amount, including goodwill. The fair value of the reporting unit is estimated using a combination of the income, or discounted cash flows, approach and the market approach, which utilizes comparable companies' data. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then the amount of the impairment loss must be measured. The impairment loss would be calculated by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill to its carrying amount. In calculating the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the other assets and liabilities of that unit based on their fair values. The excess of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amount assigned to its other assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. An impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The Company's evaluation of goodwill completed during the 2014 year end resulted in an impairment loss of $1,610,353.Equipment

g)Property and equipment is comprised of computer equipment and is recorded at cost. The Company amortizes the cost of equipment on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of three years. The Company reviews all property and equipment for impairment annually.

~~Revenue Recognition~~f)

Revenue will be recognized only when the price is fixed and determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service has been provided, and collectability is assured. The Company is not exposed to any credit risks as amounts are prepaid prior to performance of services.Recognition

8Revenue will be recognized only when the price is fixed and determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service has been provided, and collectability is assured. The Company is not exposed to any credit risks as amounts are prepaid prior to performance of services.

~~2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued~~g)

h)Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share. ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted ~~Net~~EPS ~~Loss~~excludes ~~per~~all ~~Share~~dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive. As of March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company has 182,361,547 and 220,478,979 shares convertible under note agreements that are anti-dilutive and not included in diluted loss per share.

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share. ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive. As of September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company has 110,336,772 and 236,727,869 shares convertible under note agreements that are anti-dilutive and not included in diluted loss per share.8

i)DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial ~~Instruments~~Statements

~~The Company adopted the FASB standard related to fair value measurement at inception~~2. Summary ~~The standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure~~ of ~~fair~~Significant ~~value~~Accounting ~~measurements.~~Policies The standard applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and, accordingly, does not require any new fair value measurements. The standard clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The recorded values of long-term debt approximate their fair values, as interest approximates market rates. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the standard established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows.(continued)

Level 1.	Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2.	Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3.	Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

~~The~~Financial Company’s financial instruments are cash, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and amounts due to related parties. The recorded values of cash, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and amounts due to related parties approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature. Instruments

The ~~following~~Company ~~table~~adopted ~~presents~~the ~~assets~~FASB standard related to fair value measurement at inception. The standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and ~~liabilities~~expands disclosure of fair value measurements. The standard applies under other accounting pronouncements that ~~were~~require ~~measured~~or permit fair value measurements and, ~~recognized~~accordingly, atdoes not require any new fair value asmeasurements. ofThe ~~September~~standard 30clarifies that fair value is an exit price, ~~2015~~representing ~~and~~the ~~December~~amount 31that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, ~~2014~~fair onvalue is a ~~recurring~~market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The recorded values of long-term debt approximate their fair values, as interest approximates market rates. As a basis: for considering such assumptions, the standard established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows.

		Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2015
Level 1:	Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Description		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
Level 2:	Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
Derivative Liability	$	-	$	-	$	122,776	$	-
Level 3:	Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
Totals	$	-	$	-	$	122,776	$	-
		Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014
Description		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
Derivative Liability	$	-	$	-	$	114,649	$	-
Totals	$	-	$	-	$	114,649	$	-

j)The Company’s financial instruments are cash, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and amounts due to related parties. The recorded values of cash, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and amounts due to related parties approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature.

~~Income~~The ~~Taxes~~following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured and recognized at fair value as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 on a recurring basis:

Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has adopted ASC 740 “Accounting for Income Taxes” as of its inception. Pursuant to ASC 740, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in this financial statement because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.


		Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2016
Description		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
Derivative Liability	$	-	$	-	$	109,417	$	15,825
Totals	$	-	$	-	$	109,417	$	15,825

		Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015
Description		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
Derivative Liability	$	-	$	-	$	132,287	$	28,172
Totals	$	-	$	-	$	132,287	$	28,172

9i)

~~2. Summary~~Income ~~of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)~~Taxes

k)Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has adopted ASC 740 “Accounting for Income Taxes” as of its inception. Pursuant to ASC 740, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in this financial statement because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements~~j)

OnRecent ~~November 2014, The Financial~~ Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-16—Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update do not change the current criteria in GAAP for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required. That is, an entity will continue to evaluate whether the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative feature are clearly and closely related to those of the host contract, among other relevant criteria. The amendments clarify how current GAAP should be interpreted in evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. The effects of initially adopting the amendments in this Update should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amendments are effective. Retrospective application is permitted to all relevant prior periods.Pronouncements

On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-1716—~~Business~~Derivatives ~~Combinations~~and Hedging (Topic ~~805~~815): ~~Pushdown~~Determining ~~Accounting~~Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update ~~provide~~do annot ~~acquired~~change ~~entity~~the ~~with~~current ancriteria ~~option~~in toGAAP ~~apply~~for ~~pushdown~~determining ~~accounting~~when separation of certain embedded derivative features in ~~its~~a ~~separate~~hybrid financial ~~statements~~instrument ~~upon~~is ~~occurrence~~required. ofThat is, an ~~event~~entity inwill ~~which~~continue anto ~~acquirer~~evaluate ~~obtains~~whether ~~control~~the ofeconomic ~~the~~characteristics ~~acquired~~and ~~entity.~~risks ~~The~~of ~~amendments~~the inembedded ~~this~~derivative ~~Update~~feature are ~~effective~~clearly onand ~~November~~closely ~~18,~~related ~~2014.~~to ~~After~~those of the ~~effective~~host ~~date~~contract, anamong ~~acquired~~other ~~entity~~relevant ~~can~~criteria. ~~make~~The anamendments ~~election~~clarify tohow ~~apply~~current ~~the~~GAAP ~~guidance~~should tobe ~~future~~interpreted ~~change-~~in~~-control~~ ~~events~~evaluating orthe toeconomic ~~its~~characteristics ~~most~~and ~~recent~~risks ~~change-in-control~~of ~~event.~~a ~~However,~~host ifcontract ~~the~~in a hybrid financial ~~statements~~instrument ~~for~~that ~~the~~is ~~period~~issued in ~~which~~ the ~~most~~form ~~recent~~of ~~change-~~a share. The effects of initially adopting the amendments in~~-control~~ ~~event~~this ~~occurred~~Update ~~already~~should ~~have~~be ~~been~~applied ~~issued~~on ora ~~made~~modified ~~available~~retrospective basis to beexisting hybrid financial instruments issued, in the ~~application~~form of ~~this~~a ~~guidance~~share ~~would~~as beof athe ~~change~~beginning inof ~~accounting~~the ~~principle~~fiscal year for which the amendments are effective. Retrospective application is permitted to all relevant prior periods.

On August 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concerns (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.9

InDMH ~~June 2014~~INTERNATIONAL, ~~the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-10, “Development Stage Entities”~~INC. The amendments in this update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the ASC thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. The amendments in this update are applied retrospectively. The early adoption of ASU 2014-10 removed the development stage entity financial reporting requirements from the Company.

InNotes ~~June~~to ~~2014,~~Consolidated ~~the~~ Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.Statements

102. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

~~2. Summary~~On ofNovember ~~Significant~~2014, The Financial Accounting ~~Policies~~Standards Board (~~Continued~~FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-17—Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update provide an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. The amendments in this Update are effective on November 18, 2014. After the effective date, an acquired entity can make an election to apply the guidance to future change-in-control events or to its most recent change-in-control event. However, if the financial statements for the period in which the most recent change-in-control event occurred already have been issued or made available to be issued, the application of this guidance would be a change in accounting principle.

kOn August 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concerns (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

~~Recent~~In June 2014, the Financial Accounting ~~Pronouncements~~Standards Board (~~Continued~~“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-10, “Development Stage Entities”. The amendments in this update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the ASC thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. The amendments in this update are applied retrospectively. The early adoption of ASU 2014-10 removed the development stage entity financial reporting requirements from the Company.

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-~~10:~~12, ~~Development~~Compensation ~~Stage~~– ~~Entities~~Stock Compensation (Topic ~~915~~718): ~~Elimination~~Accounting offor ~~Certain~~Share-Based ~~Financial~~Payments ~~Reporting~~When ~~Requirements,~~the ~~Including~~Terms of an ~~Amendment~~Award toProvide ~~Variable~~That ~~Interest~~a ~~Entities~~Performance ~~Guidance~~Target inCould ~~Topic~~Be ~~810,~~Achieved ~~Consolidation~~after ,the toRequisite ~~improve~~Service ~~financial~~Period. ~~reporting~~The bynew ~~reducing~~guidance ~~the~~requires ~~cost~~that ~~and~~share-based ~~complexity~~compensation ~~associated~~that ~~with~~require ~~the~~a ~~incremental~~specific ~~reporting~~performance ~~requirements~~target ofto ~~development~~be ~~stage~~achieved ~~entities.~~in ~~The~~order ~~amendments~~for inemployees ~~this~~to ~~update~~become ~~remove~~eligible ~~all~~to ~~incremental~~vest ~~financial~~in ~~reporting~~the ~~requirements~~awards ~~from~~and ~~U.S.~~that ~~GAAP~~could ~~for~~be ~~development~~achieved ~~stage~~after ~~entities,~~an ~~thereby~~employee ~~improving~~completes ~~financial~~the ~~reporting~~requisite byservice ~~eliminating~~period ~~the~~be ~~cost~~treated ~~and~~as ~~complexity~~a ~~associated~~performance ~~with~~condition. ~~providing~~As ~~that~~such, ~~information.~~the ~~The~~performance ~~amendments~~target should not be reflected in ~~this~~estimating ~~Update~~the ~~also~~grant-date ~~eliminate~~fair anvalue ~~exception~~of ~~provided~~the toaward. ~~development~~Compensation ~~stage~~costs ~~entities~~should be recognized in ~~Topic~~the ~~810,~~period ~~Consolidation,~~in ~~for~~which ~~determining~~it ~~whether~~becomes anprobable ~~entity~~that isthe aperformance ~~variable~~target ~~interest~~will ~~entity~~be onachieved ~~the~~and ~~basis~~should ofrepresent the ~~amount~~compensation ofcost ~~investment~~attributable ~~equity~~to ~~that~~the isperiod(s) atfor ~~risk.~~which ~~The~~the ~~amendments~~requisite toservice ~~eliminate~~has ~~that~~already ~~exception~~been ~~simplify U~~rendered.S. ~~GAAP~~If bythe ~~reducing~~performance ~~avoidable~~target ~~complexity~~becomes inprobable ~~existing~~of ~~accounting~~being ~~literature~~achieved ~~and~~before ~~improve~~ the ~~relevance~~end of ~~information~~the ~~provided~~requisite toservice ~~financial~~period, ~~statement~~the ~~users~~remaining byunrecognized ~~requiring~~compensation ~~the~~cost ~~application~~should ofbe ~~the~~recognized ~~same~~prospectively ~~consolidation~~over ~~guidance~~the byremaining ~~all~~requisite ~~reporting~~service ~~entities~~period. The ~~elimination~~total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the ~~exception~~requisite ~~may~~service ~~change~~period should reflect the ~~consolidation~~number ~~analysis,~~of ~~consolidation~~awards ~~decision,~~that are expected to vest and ~~disclosure~~should ~~requirements~~be ~~for~~adjusted ato ~~reporting~~reflect ~~entity~~those awards that ~~has~~ultimately anvest. ~~interest~~The inrequisite anservice ~~entity~~period inends when the ~~development~~employee ~~stage.~~can ~~The~~cease ~~amendments~~rendering ~~related~~service toand ~~the~~still ~~elimination~~be ofeligible ~~inception-~~to~~-date~~ ~~information~~vest ~~and~~in the ~~other~~award ~~remaining~~if ~~disclosure~~the ~~requirements~~performance oftarget ~~Topic~~is ~~915~~achieved. ~~should~~This benew ~~applied~~guidance ~~retrospectively~~is ~~except~~effective for ~~the~~fiscal ~~clarification~~years toand ~~Topic~~interim ~~275~~periods within those years beginning after December 15, ~~which~~2015. ~~shall~~Early beadoption ~~applied~~is ~~prospectively~~permitted. ~~For~~Entities ~~public~~may ~~companies,~~apply ~~those~~the amendments ~~are~~in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective ~~for~~date ~~annual~~or ~~reporting~~(b) ~~periods~~retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning ~~after~~of ~~December~~the ~~15,~~earliest ~~2014,~~annual period presented in the financial statements and ~~interim~~to ~~periods~~all ~~therein.~~new ~~Early~~or ~~adoption~~modified isawards ~~permitted~~thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-1012 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

~~3. Related Party Transactions~~10

a)DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

AsNotes ~~of September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company owes $89,216~~ to ~~the~~Consolidated ~~director,~~Financial former CFO of the Company. The amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand. Imputed interest at 8% has been expensed and recorded as additional paid-in capital of $5,338 and $5,338 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, $225,000 and $165,000 included in accounts payable is the management fees owed to the director, former CFO, respectively. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, $101,522 included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities is owed to a company formerly controlled by the director, former CFO of the Company. These amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand. Imputed interest at 8% has been expensed and recorded as additional paid-in capital of $17,750 and $14,159 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.Statements

b2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

AsIn June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10: Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of ~~September~~Certain 30Financial Reporting Requirements, ~~2015~~Including ~~and~~an ~~December~~Amendment 31to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, ~~2014~~Consolidation , to improve financial reporting by reducing the ~~Company~~cost ~~owes~~and ~~$492~~complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities,~~088~~ thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and ~~$392~~complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810,~~088~~ Consolidation, ~~respectively~~for todetermining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the ~~CFO,~~basis ~~former~~of ~~CEO~~the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the ~~companies~~relevance ~~controlled~~of information provided to financial statement users by ~~him~~requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The ~~amounts~~elimination ~~owing~~of ~~are~~the ~~unsecured~~exception may change the consolidation analysis, ~~non-interest~~consolidation ~~bearing~~decision, and ~~due~~disclosure onrequirements ~~demand.~~for ~~The~~a ~~amount~~reporting ~~owing~~entity that has an ~~imputed~~ interest atin 8%an entity in the development stage. ~~Imputed~~ ~~interest~~The atamendments 8%related ~~has~~to ~~been~~the ~~expensed~~elimination of inception-to-date information and ~~recorded~~the asother ~~additional~~remaining ~~paid-in~~disclosure ~~capital~~requirements of ~~$27~~Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275,~~541~~ ~~and~~which ~~$24~~shall be applied prospectively. For public companies,~~352~~ those amendments are effective for ~~the~~annual ~~nine~~reporting ~~months~~periods ~~ended~~beginning ~~September~~after 30December 15, ~~2015~~2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014,-10 ~~respectively~~is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

c)3. Related Party Transactions

~~As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company owes $2,300 to~~ a company controlled by a shareholder of the Company. On May 12, 2015, the 850,017 convertible preferred shares were issued to this shareholder of the Company pursuant to the merger agreement at the price of $0.16 per share.)

d)As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company owes $89,216 to the director, former CFO of the Company. The amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand. Imputed interest at 8% has been expensed and recorded as additional paid-in capital of $1,779 and $1,760 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, $255,000 and $240,000 included in accounts payable is the management fees owed to the director, former CFO, respectively. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, $101,522 included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities is owed to a company formerly controlled by the director, former CFO of the Company. These amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand. Imputed interest at 8% has been expensed and recorded as additional paid-in capital of $7,111 and $5,553 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company owes $47,500 and $0, respectively to the CEO of the Company. The amount owing has an imputed interest at 8%. Imputed interest at 8% has been expensed and recorded as additional paid-in capital of $2,227 and $0 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. On May 12, 2015, the 1,133,356 preferred shares were issued to the CEO of the Company pursuant to the merger agreement at the price of $0.16 per share.b)

4As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company owes $527,138 and $522,938, respectively to the CFO, former CEO and the companies controlled by him. ~~Convertible~~ ~~Notes~~The amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand. The amount owing has an imputed interest at 8%. Imputed interest at 8% has been expensed and recorded as additional paid-in capital of $10,548 and $8,914 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

On March 3, 2014, the Company issued a convertible redeemable Note in the amount of $40,000. The proceeds were received on March 7, 2014. The Note carries interest at 9% annum and matures on March 3, 2015. The Note holder is entitled to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price of 58% the average two lowest closing bid price in the 20 trading days prior to the conversion date. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the debt holder made four conversions of a total of 22,106,486 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $40,000 of the note with a fair value of $89,441, included in the fair value of debt balance of $89,441 was settlement of derivative liability of $49,441. The Company recorded a loss of $2,324 for additional shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 6c).

11As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company owes $2,300 to a company controlled by a shareholder of the Company. On May 12, 2015, the 850,017 convertible preferred shares were issued to this shareholder of the Company pursuant to the merger agreement at the price of $0.16 per share.

~~4. Convertible Notes (Continued~~d)

OnAs ~~March 31, 2014, the Company issued a convertible redeemable Note in the amount~~ of ~~$50,000. The proceeds were received on April 2, 2014. The Note carries interest at 9% annum and matures on~~ March 31, ~~2015.~~2016 ~~The~~and Note holder is entitled to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price of 55% the average two lowest closing bid price in the 20 trading days prior to the conversion date. During the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015, the ~~debt~~Company ~~holder~~owes ~~made four conversions of a total of 19~~$47,~~893,000~~500 ~~shares~~to of the ~~company’s~~CEO ~~restricted stock satisfying $32,438~~ of the ~~note~~Company. ~~with~~The aamount ~~fair~~owing ~~value~~has ofan ~~$81,451,~~imputed ~~included~~interest inat ~~the~~8%. Imputed ~~fair~~interest ~~value~~at of8% ~~debt~~has ~~balance~~been ofexpensed ~~$81,451~~and ~~was~~recorded ~~settlement~~as ofadditional ~~derivative~~paid-in ~~liability~~capital of $~~49,013.The~~947 ~~Company~~and ~~recorded a gain of~~ $~~12,550~~230 for ~~less shares issued during~~ the ~~conversion~~three ~~than~~months ~~what~~ended ~~was~~March ~~called~~31, ~~for~~2016 inand ~~the~~2015, ~~original agreement~~respectively. On ~~During~~May ~~the nine months ended September 30~~12, 2015, the ~~debt holder made two conversions of a total of 19~~1,~~962~~133,~~450~~356 preferred shares ofwere ~~the~~issued ~~company’s~~to ~~restricted stock satisfying~~ the ~~remaining~~CEO ~~$17,562~~ of the ~~note~~Company inpursuant ~~full~~to ~~with~~the amerger ~~fair~~agreement ~~value~~at ~~of $46,450, included in~~ the ~~fair~~price ~~value~~ of ~~debt balance of~~ $~~46,450 was settlement of derivative liability of $26,488~~0.16 ~~The~~per ~~Company recorded a gain of $10,468 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 6)~~share.

~~On May 5, 2014, the Company issued a convertible redeemable Note in the amount of $50,000~~4. Convertible ~~The~~Notes proceeds were received on May 7, 2014. The Note carries interest at 9% annum and matured on May 5, 2015. The Company continued to accrue the default interest rate at 16%. The Note holder is entitled to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price of 55% the average two lowest closing bid price in the 20 trading days prior to the conversion date. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the debt holder made a conversion of a total of 19,000,000 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $19,000 of the note with a fair value of $25,769, included in the fair value of debt balance of $25,769 was settlement of derivative liability of $25,769.The Company recorded a gain of $31,091 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 6).

On ~~May~~March 1531, ~~2015~~2014, the Company issued a convertible redeemable Note in the amount of $50,000. The proceeds were received on April 2, 2014. The Note carries interest at 9% annum and matures on ~~May~~March 1531, ~~2016~~2015. The Note holder is entitled to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price of 55% the average two lowest closing bid price in the 20 trading days prior to the conversion date. In connection with the issuance of this convertible note, the Company encountered a day-one derivative loss of $13,171. The convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $63,171 on the issuance date. In addition, the proceeds of $50,000 attributable to the value of the call option embedded in the note was recorded as a debt discount and amortized over the term of the note under the interest method. Amortization for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 is $2,660 and $47,340, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the debt holder made four conversions of a total of 19,893,000 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $32,438 of the note with a fair value of $81,451, included in the fair value of debt balance of $81,451 was settlement of derivative liability of $49,013.The Company recorded a gain of $12,550 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the debt holder made two conversions of a total of 19,962,450 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying the remaining $17,562 of the note in full with a fair value of $46,450, included in the fair value of debt balance of $46,450 was settlement of derivative liability of $26,488. The Company recorded a gain of $10,468 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 7).

On July 25, 2014, the Company issued a convertible redeemable Note in the amount of $250,000. $125,000 each of the proceeds was received on June 25, 2014 and July 25, 2014, respectively (Total $250,000). The Note carries interest at 8% annum and matured on January 25, 2015. The Note holder is entitled to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price of the lower of $0.01 or 60% the average three lowest VWAP prices in the 15 trading days prior to the conversion date. The Holder shall not be entitled to convert the Note in connection with that number of shares of Common Stock which would be in excess of the sum of (i) the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by the Holder and its affiliates on a Conversion Date, and (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of the Note would result in beneficial ownership by the Holder and its affiliates of more than 4.99% of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Borrower on such Conversion Date. Also, the aggregate conversion by the Holder may not exceed 9.99% if a form 13d or equivalent is filed. On January 28, 2015, the note was satisfied in full with 25,000,000 shares of common stocks per settlement agreement with a fair value of $269,471, included in the fair value of debt balance of $269,471 was accrued interest of $11~~,194 and settlement of derivative liability of $8,277. The Company recorded a loss of $11,105 for more shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement.~~

InDMH ~~the evaluation of the financing arrangements~~INTERNATIONAL, ~~the Company concluded that the conversion features did not meet the conditions set forth in current accounting standards for equity classification~~INC. Since equity classification is not available for the conversion feature, it requires bifurcation and liability classification, at fair value. The Company elected to account for the hybrid contract under the guidance of ASC 815-15-25-4. The fair values of the Company’s derivative liabilities were estimated at the issuance date and are revalued at each subsequent reporting date, using a binomial option pricing model. In connection with the issuance of these convertible notes payable, the Company encountered a day-one derivative loss of $41,902 related to the recognition of (i) the hybrid note and (ii) the derivative instrument arising from the fair value measurement due to the fair value of the hybrid note and embedded derivative exceeding the proceeds that the Company received from the arrangement. Therefore, the Company was required to record a loss on the derivative financial instrument. In addition, the fair value will change in future periods, based upon changes in the Company’s common stock price and changes in other assumptions and market indicators used in the valuation techniques. These future changes will be recognized in changes in fair value of derivatives on the Company’s statement of operations. At September 30, 2015, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $122,776(See Note 5). Accordingly, the company recognized loss of $18,661 in changes in fair value of derivative on the Company’s statement of operations at September 30, 2015.

InNotes ~~addition, the proceeds of $208,597 and $50,000 received as a result of the issuance of these convertible notes is attributable~~ to ~~the~~Consolidated ~~value~~Financial of the call option embedded in the note as of December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2015, which was recorded as a debt discount and will be amortized over the term of the note under the interest method. Amortization for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 is $46,367 and $111,271, respectively.Statements

124. Convertible Notes (continued)

On May 5, 2014, the Company issued a convertible redeemable Note in the amount of $50,000. ~~Derivative~~ ~~Liabilities~~The proceeds were received on May 7, 2014. The Note carries interest at 9% annum and matured on May 5, 2015. The Company continued to accrue the default interest rate at 16%. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the accrued interest was $0 and $5,333, respectively. The Note holder is entitled to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price of 55% the average two lowest closing bid price in the 20 trading days prior to the conversion date. In connection with the issuance of this convertible note, the Company encountered a day-one derivative loss of $14,892. The convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $54,892 on the issuance date. In addition, the proceeds of $50,000 attributable to the value of the call option embedded in the note was recorded as a debt discount and amortized over the term of the note under the interest method. Amortization for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 is $16,528 and $33,472, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the debt holder made a conversion of a total of 19,000,000 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $19,000 of the note with a fair value of $25,769, included in the fair value of debt balance of $25,769 was settlement of derivative liability of $25,769.The Company recorded a gain of $31,091 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 7). During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the debt holder made a conversion of a total of 20,000,000 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $20,000 of the note with a fair value of $38,695, included in the fair value of debt balance of $38,695 was settlement of derivative liability of $38,695.The Company recorded a gain of $73,818 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 7).

AsOn ~~discussed~~May in15, ~~Note 4 under Convertible Notes~~2015, the Company issued a convertible ~~notes~~redeemable ~~payable~~Note ~~that~~in ~~provide for~~ the ~~issuance~~amount of ~~convertible~~$50,000. ~~notes~~The ~~with~~Note ~~variable~~carries ~~conversion~~interest ~~provisions.~~at ~~The~~9% ~~number~~annum ofand ~~shares~~matured ofon ~~common~~May ~~stock~~15, to2016. beThe ~~issued~~Note holder is ~~based~~entitled onto ~~the~~convert ~~future~~all ~~price~~or a portion of the ~~Company’s~~principal ~~common~~into ~~stock. The number of~~ shares of common stock ~~issuable~~at ~~upon~~a conversion price of 55% the ~~note~~average istwo ~~indeterminate.~~lowest ~~Pursuant~~closing tobid ~~ASC~~price ~~815-15~~in ~~Embedded~~the ~~Derivatives,~~20 ~~the~~trading ~~fair~~days ~~values~~prior ofto the ~~variable~~ conversion ~~shares~~date. toIn beconnection ~~issued~~with ~~were~~the ~~recorded~~issuance asof ~~derivative~~this ~~liabilities~~convertible onnote, the ~~issuance~~Company ~~date.~~encountered ~~The~~a ~~fair~~day-one ~~values~~derivative loss of ~~the~~$6,021. ~~Company’s~~The ~~derivative~~convertible ~~liabilities~~note ~~were~~payable, ~~estimated~~at fair value, was recorded at $56,021 on the issuance date. ~~and~~In ~~are~~addition, ~~revalued~~the atproceeds ~~each~~of ~~subsequent reporting date~~$50,000 ~~using~~attributable ato ~~binomial~~the ~~option~~value ~~pricing~~of ~~model.~~the ~~The~~call ~~changes~~option embedded in ~~fair~~the ~~value~~note ofwas ~~derivatives~~recorded ~~for~~as ~~$18,661~~a debt discount and ~~$39,215~~amortized onover the ~~Company’s~~term ~~statement~~ of ~~operations~~the asnote ofunder ~~September~~the ~~30,~~interest ~~2015~~method. ~~and~~Amortization ~~2014~~for ~~consisted~~the athree ~~loss~~months ~~attributable~~ended toMarch ~~market~~31, ~~value~~2016 ofand ~~the~~2015 ~~convertible~~is ~~notes~~$12,778 and $0, respectively.

On July 25, 2014, the Company issued a convertible redeemable Note in the amount of $250,000. $125,000 each of the proceeds was received on June 25, 2014 and July 25, 2014, respectively (Total $250,000). The ~~following~~Note carries interest at 8% annum and matured on January 25, 2015. The Note holder is entitled to convert all or a ~~summary~~portion of ~~changes~~the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price of the lower of $0.01 or 60% the average three lowest VWAP prices in the 15 trading days prior to the conversion date. The Holder shall not be entitled to convert the Note in connection with that number of shares of Common Stock which would be in excess of the sum of (i) the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by the Holder and its affiliates on a Conversion Date, and (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of the Note would result in beneficial ownership by the Holder and its affiliates of more than 4.99% of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Borrower on such Conversion Date. Also, the aggregate conversion by the Holder may not exceed 9.99% if a form 13d or equivalent is filed. In connection with the issuance of this convertible note, the Company encountered a day-one derivative gain of $68,597. The convertible note payable, at fair ~~market~~value, was recorded at $181,403 on the issuance date. In addition, the debt discount of $68,597 was amortized over the term of the note under the interest method. Amortization for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 is $8,014 and $60,583, respectively. On January 28, 2015, the note was satisfied in full with 25,000,000 shares of common stocks per settlement agreement with a fair value of $269,471, included in the fair value of debt balance of $269,471 was accrued interest of $11,194 and settlement of derivative liability of $8,277. The Company recorded a loss of $11,105 for more shares issued during the ~~nine~~conversion ~~months~~than ~~ended~~what ~~September~~was ~~30,~~called ~~2015:~~for in the original agreement.

		Derivative Liability Convertible debts
		Total
Balance, December 31, 2014	$	114,649
Increase in derivative value due to issuances of convertible promissory notes		50,000
Decrease in derivative value due to issuances of common stocks for conversions		(60,534)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities due to the mark to market adjustment		18,661
Balance, September 30, 2015	$	122,776

In the evaluation of the financing arrangements, the Company concluded that the conversion features did not meet the conditions set forth in current accounting standards for equity classification. Since equity classification is not available for the conversion feature, it requires bifurcation and liability classification, at fair value. The Company elected to account for the hybrid contract under the guidance of ASC 815-15-25-4. The fair values of the Company’s derivative liabilities were estimated at the issuance date and are revalued at each subsequent reporting date, using a binomial option pricing model. In connection with the issuance of these convertible notes payable, the Company encountered a day-one derivative loss of $41,902 related to the recognition of (i) the hybrid note and (ii) the derivative instrument arising from the fair value measurement due to the fair value of the hybrid note and embedded derivative exceeding the proceeds that the Company received from the arrangement. Therefore, the Company was required to record a loss on the derivative financial instrument. In addition, the fair value will change in future periods, based upon changes in the Company’s common stock price and changes in other assumptions and market indicators used in the valuation techniques. These future changes will be recognized in changes in fair value of derivatives on the Company’s statement of operations. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the derivative, at fair value, was recorded at $109,417 and $132,287, respectively (See Note 5). Accordingly, the company recognized loss and gain of $15,825 and $9,643, in changes in fair value of derivative on the Company’s statement of operations at March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

~~6. Common shares~~12

~~Common~~DMH ~~stock~~INTERNATIONAL, ~~issued in a private placement~~INC.

~~During~~Notes ~~January, 2014, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock~~ to aConsolidated ~~subscriber~~Financial ~~at a price per share of $0.01 for total proceeds of $50,000.~~Statements

~~During March, 2014, the Company granted 7,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a subscriber at a price per share of $0~~4.~~005~~ Convertible ~~for~~Notes ~~total proceeds of $35,000. These shares were accrued in common stock issuable as the shares were not issued as of September 30, 2015.~~(continued)

~~During~~In ~~April~~addition, ~~2014,~~ the ~~Company~~proceeds ~~issued~~of 7$208,~~000~~597 and $50,000 ~~shares~~received as a result of the ~~Company’s~~issuance ~~common~~of ~~stock~~these convertible notes is attributable to athe ~~subscriber~~value atof the call option embedded in the note as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively, which was recorded as a ~~price~~debt ~~per~~discount ~~share~~and is amortized over the term of $0the note under the interest method.~~005~~ Amortization for ~~total~~the ~~proceeds~~three ofmonths ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 is $3512,~~000.~~778 and $23,174, respectively.

~~Common~~5. Derivative ~~stock issued for services~~Liabilities

~~During~~As ~~May,~~discussed ~~2015,~~in ~~the~~Note ~~Company~~4 ~~signed~~under anConvertible ~~agreement~~Notes, ~~to pay~~ the ~~consultant~~Company ~~for~~issued aconvertible ~~monthly~~notes ~~fee~~payable ofthat ~~$2,500~~provide infor ~~cash~~the ~~and~~issuance ~~$5,000~~of inconvertible ~~stock~~notes ~~for~~with avariable ~~term~~conversion ~~of one year~~provisions. The number of shares ~~will~~of common stock to be issued is based on anthe ~~average~~future price of the ~~three lowest VWAP~~Company’s ~~for~~common ~~the~~stock. ~~last~~The ~~two~~number ~~weeks~~of shares of ~~that~~common ~~month~~stock ~~started~~issuable ~~from~~upon ~~May~~conversion ~~2015. During~~of ~~nine~~the ~~months~~note ~~ended~~is ~~September~~indeterminate. ~~30,~~Pursuant ~~2015,~~to ~~the~~ASC ~~total~~815-15 ofEmbedded 10Derivatives,~~555,556~~ ~~shares~~the ~~were~~fair ~~granted~~values ~~with~~of athe ~~fair~~variable ~~value~~conversion ofshares ~~$10,556.~~to ~~The~~be ~~shares~~issued were ~~valued~~recorded ~~using~~as ~~April~~derivative ~~21,~~liabilities ~~2015~~on ~~closing~~the ~~value~~issuance ofdate. ~~shares~~The onfair ~~date~~values of ~~agreement. The~~the ~~number~~Company’s ~~shares~~derivative ~~are~~liabilities ~~calculated~~were ~~using~~estimated anat ~~average~~the ofissuance ~~the~~date ~~three~~and ~~lowest~~are ~~VWAP’s~~revalued ~~for~~at ~~the~~each ~~last~~subsequent ~~two~~reporting ~~weeks~~date, ofusing ~~May~~a ~~and~~binomial ~~June~~option ~~2015~~pricing model. OnThe ~~August~~loss ~~25,~~(gain) ~~2015,~~in ~~the~~fair ~~agreement~~value of derivatives was ~~terminated~~for $15,825 and ($9,643) on the ~~common~~Company’s ~~stocks~~statement ~~that~~of ~~have~~operations ~~been~~as ~~granted~~of ~~were~~March ~~cancelled~~31, ~~due~~2016 toand ~~nonperformance.~~2015, respectively.

~~During~~The ~~August,~~following ~~2014,~~is ~~the Company issued~~ a ~~total~~summary of ~~5,000,000~~changes ~~shares~~in of the ~~Company’s~~fair ~~restricted~~market ~~common~~value ~~stock to two consultants for consulting services rendered. The shares were valued at $0.007 per share, the closing price~~ of the ~~stock~~derivative onliability ~~the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $35,000~~ during the ~~year~~three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.~~ 2016:

During September, 2014, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to a consultant for consulting services for a term of one year. The shares were valued at $0.006 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $60,000 during the year ended December 31, 2014. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.


		Derivative Liability Convertible Debts Total
Balance, December 31, 2015	$	$132,287
Increase in derivative value due to issuances of convertible promissory notes		-
Decrease in derivative value due to issuances of common stocks for conversions		(38,695)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities due to the mark to market adjustment		15,825
Balance, March 31, 2016	$	109,417

136. Notes payable

~~6. Common~~In ~~shares~~February and March 2016, the Company issued two promissory notes to a non-related party in the amount of $30,000 (~~Continued~~$15,000 each) bearing interest at 10% annually. The notes are due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. In the event of default, the noteholder will receive 500,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock on the date that is 10 business days after the maturity date. The interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2016 is $213.

7. Common ~~stock~~shares ~~issued for services (Continued)~~

~~During~~Common ~~February, 2014, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common~~ stock to a consultant for consulting services for a term of one year. The shares were valued at $0.02 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $100,000 during the year ended December 31, 2014. The fair value of common stock issued for services ~~was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.~~

During ~~February~~May, ~~2014~~2015, the Company ~~issued~~signed ~~5,000,000~~an ~~shares~~agreement ofto pay the ~~Company’s~~consultant ~~restricted~~for ~~common~~a ~~stock~~monthly tofee aof ~~consultant~~$2,500 ~~for~~in ~~consulting~~cash ~~services~~and $5,000 in stock for a term of one year. The ~~shares~~number ~~were~~of ~~valued~~shares atwill ~~$0.015~~be ~~per~~based ~~share,~~on ~~the~~an ~~closing~~average ~~price~~ of the ~~stock~~three onlowest VWAP’s for the ~~date~~last two weeks of ~~grant~~that month started from May 2015. During ~~The~~year ~~Company~~ended ~~recorded~~December an31, ~~equity~~2015, ~~compensation~~the ~~charge~~total of ~~$75~~10,~~000~~555,556 ~~during~~shares ~~the~~were ~~year~~granted ~~ended~~with ~~December~~a ~~31,~~fair ~~2014~~value of $10,556. The ~~fair~~shares were valued using April 21, 2015 closing value of ~~common~~shares ~~stock~~on ~~issued~~date ~~for~~of ~~services~~agreement. The ~~was~~number ~~fully~~shares ~~expensed~~are oncalculated using an average of the ~~date~~three lowest VWAP’s for the last two weeks of ~~grant~~May ~~due~~and toJune no2015. ~~clawback~~On ~~provision~~August in25, 2015, the agreement was terminated and the common stocks that have been granted were cancelled due to nonperformance.

~~During~~Convertible ~~March,~~preferred ~~2014, the Company granted a total of 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common~~ stock ~~to a consultant for consulting services for a term from six months. The 1,500,000 shares were~~ issued, and the remaining 3,500,000 shares will be issued in connection with the agreement following the filing of a new S-8 Stock Plan. The 3,500,000 shares were accrued in common stocks issuable with a fair value of $35,000. The shares were valued at $0.01 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $50,000 during the year ended December 31, 2014. The fair value of common stock issued for ~~services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.~~ merger

~~Convertible~~On July 22, 2014, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Virtual Physician’s Network through issuance of 10,000,000 shares of convertible preferred stock. ~~issued~~Each share of convertible preferred stock has the voting rights of 20 shares of the Company’s common stock. Upon the occurrence of a mandatory conversion event, which occurs immediately following the business day on which the Corporation’s shareholders have approved an amendment to the Corporation’s Articles of Incorporation which provide for a sufficient number of authorized common stock which will permit the holders of the convertible preferred stock to convert such shares into the Company’s Common Stock, the outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock shall automatically be converted at a conversion rate of 20 shares of Common Stock for every 1 share of convertible preferred stock. As of March 31, 2016, the 7,432,099 shares were issued at the price of $0.16 per share, and the remaining shares have not been issued due to administrative delay. The remaining 2,567,901 shares of convertible preferred stocks were accrued in preferred stocks issuable with a fair value of $410,864. Each share of convertible preferred stock was valued at 20 times of closing price of common stock price of $0.008 on the date of merger.

On July 22, 2014, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Virtual Physician's Network through issuance of 10,000,000 shares of convertible preferred stock. Each share of convertible preferred stock has the voting rights of 20 shares of the Company’s common stock. Upon the occurrence of a mandatory conversion event, which occurs immediately following the business day on which the Corporation’s shareholders have approved an amendment to the Corporation’s Articles of Incorporation which provide for a sufficient number of authorized common stock which will permit the holders of the convertible preferred stock to convert such shares into the Company’s Common Stock, the outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock shall automatically be converted at a conversion rate of 20 shares of Common Stock for every 1 share of convertible preferred stock. As of September 30, 2015, the 7,432,099 shares were issued at the price of $0.16 per share, and the remaining shares have not been issued due to administrative delay. The remaining 2,567,901 shares of convertible preferred stocks were accrued in preferred stocks issuable with a fair value of $410,864. Each share of convertible preferred stock was valued at 20 times of closing price of common stock price of $0.008 on the date of merger.13

~~Common~~DMH ~~Stock~~INTERNATIONAL, ~~Issued for Debt Conversions~~INC.

~~During~~Notes ~~September~~to ~~through~~Consolidated ~~December,~~Financial 2014, following the convertible note agreement in the amount of $40,000 on March 3, 2014, the debt holder made the following conversions of a total of 22,106,486 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $40,000 of the note with a fair value of $89,441, included in the fair value of $89,441 was settlement of derivative liability of $49,441. The Company recorded a loss of $2,324 for additional shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 4). Statements

Date	Number of shares converted	Fair Value of Debt Converted
9/15/2014	6,708,698	$30,634
9/22/2014	6,719,753	$29,523
10/7/2014	2,904,864	$15,155
12/4/2014	5,773,171	$14,129

7. Common shares (continued)

~~During~~Common ~~October~~Stock ~~through~~Issued December, 2014, following the convertible note agreement in the amount of $50,000 on June 30, 2014, the debt holder made the following conversions of a total of 19,893,000 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $32,438 of the note with a fair value of $81,451, included in the fair value of $81,451 was settlement of derivative liability of $49,013. The Company recorded a gain of $12,550 for ~~less~~Debt shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the debt holder made the following two conversions of a total of 19,962,450 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying the remaining $17,562 of the note in full with a fair value of $46,450, included in the fair value of debt balance of $46,450 was settlement of derivative liability of $26,488.The Company recorded a gain of $10,468 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 4). Conversions

14During the year ended December 31, 2015, the debt holder made the following two conversions of a total of 19,962,450 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying the remaining $17,562 of the note in full with a fair value of $46,450, included in the fair value of debt balance of $46,450 was settlement of derivative liability of $26,488.The Company recorded a gain of $10,468 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 4).

6. Common shares (Continued)


Date	Number of shares converted	Fair Value of Debt Converted
02/5/2015	14,400,000	$33,578
03/27/2015	5,562,450	$12,872

~~Common~~On ~~Stock~~January ~~Issued~~28, 2015, following the convertible note agreement in the amount of $250,000 on July 25, 2014, the note was satisfied in full with 25,000,000 shares of common stocks per settlement agreement with a fair value of $269,471, included in the fair value of debt balance of $269,471 was accrued interest of $11,194 and settlement of derivative liability of $8,277. The Company recorded a loss of $11,105 for ~~Debt~~more ~~Conversions~~shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (~~Continued~~See Note 4).

Date	Number of shares converted	Fair Value of Debt Converted
10/20/2014	1,724,137	$13,334
10/30/2014	1,785,714	$13,596
11/10/2014	1,851,851	$12,573
12/15/2014	14,531,298	$41,948
02/5/2015	14,400,000	$33,578
03/27/2015	5,562,450	$12,872

On April 1, 2015, following the convertible note agreement in the amount of $50,000 on May 5, 2014, the debt holder made a conversion of a total of 19,000,000 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $19,000 of the note with a fair value of $25,769, included in the fair value of debt balance of $25,769 was settlement of derivative liability of $25,769.The Company recorded a gain of $31,091 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement. On March 8, 2016, the debt holder made a conversion of a total of 20,000,000 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $20,000 of the note with a fair value of $38,695, included in the fair value of debt balance of $38,695 was settlement of derivative liability of $38,695 (See Note 4).

On January 28, 2015, following the convertible note agreement in the amount of $250,000 on July 25, 2014, the note was satisfied in full with 25,000,000 shares of common stocks per settlement agreement with a fair value of $269,471, included in the fair value of debt balance of $269,471 was accrued interest of $11,194 and settlement of derivative liability of $8,277. The Company recorded a loss of $11,105 for more shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 4).


Date	Number of shares converted	Fair Value of Debt Converted
04/01/2015	19,000,000	$19,000
03/08/2016	20,000,000	$20,000

On April 1, the debt holder made a conversion of a total of 19,000,000 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $19,000 of the note with a fair value of $25,769, included in the fair value of debt balance of $25,769 was settlement of derivative liability of $25,7698.~~The~~ Subsequent ~~Company recorded a gain of $31,091 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 4).~~Events

7In April 2016, the Company issued a promissory note to a non-related party in the amount of $15,000 bearing interest at 10% annually. ~~Subsequent~~ ~~Events~~The note is due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. In the event of default, the noteholder will receive 500,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock on the date that is 10 business days after the maturity date.

~~We have evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of the financial statements, and did not have any material recognizable subsequent events.~~14

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Introduction

The Company was incorporated in the state of ~~Florida~~Nevada on ~~March~~June 262, 2010. In ~~anticipation of a business combination, in~~ December 2012, we entered into ~~the~~a ~~merger~~share exchange agreement with Touch Medical Solutions, Inc. (TMSI), whereby we assumed TMSI’s business operations. On July 22, 2014, we ~~merged~~acquired ~~with~~all ~~Virtual~~of ~~Physician's Network (VPN). We are currently in~~ the ~~business~~outstanding ofshares ~~developing and bringing to market a suite~~ of ~~medical~~Virtual ~~software~~Physician’s ~~products. Our~~Network, ~~principal~~which ~~executive~~was ~~offices~~merged ~~are~~into ~~located~~the atCompany ~~12502~~and ~~West~~became ~~Atlantic~~our ~~Blvd.,~~wholly ~~Coral~~owned ~~Springs, Florida~~subsidiary.

We are currently in the business of developing and bringing to market a suite of medical software products. Our principal executive offices are located at 12538 West Atlantic Blvd., Coral Springs, Florida.

We have never been the subject of a bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceeding. Additionally, apart from the merger discussed herein, we have never been the subject of a material reclassification, merger, consolidation, or purchase or sale of a significant amount of assets not in the ordinary course of business.

In 2009, we began prototyping a Picture Archiving and Communication System (“PACS”) solution for market exploration. In July 2010, we were accepted as a Wake Forest University Demon Incubator startup company.Operations

~~In January 2013, we signed an exclusive agreement with MyDICOM, LLC and ChangZhou Wealth Information & Technology Co. Ltd to provide product development, deployment and support.~~ The ~~agreement~~operations ~~allows~~refer us to ~~continually improve~~ our ~~product~~subsidiaries ~~offerings~~Touch ~~while~~Medical ~~managing~~Solutions, ~~our expenses~~Inc. ~~The~~(TMSI) ~~engineers~~ and ~~employees~~Virtual ofPhysician's ~~MyDICOM~~Network ~~and ChangZhou Wealth Information & Technology Co~~(VPN). ~~Ltd were to function as a de facto arm of the company in supplying the contractual support. In May of 2013, we terminated the agreement with MyDICOM.~~

In October 2013 we announced a definitive Letter of Intent to merge with the Virtual Physician's Network (VPN), a mobile healthcare business applications company offering the first fully integrated virtual event and professional networking platform combined with proprietary practice building tools for surgeons, healthcare professionals and medical vendors. Virtual Physician's Network provides this through the Virtual Physician's Network mobile app available in the App store (Apple devices), Google Play (Droid devices) and on their web based application. The merger was completed on July 22, 2014.

On March 26, 2014 we announced that we were expanding our Advisory Board in anticipation of the completion of the announced merger with the Virtual Physician's Network (VPN). In anticipation of the closing, DMH is expanding our Advisory Board to include medical professionals that will aid in the testing, utilization and promotion of the Company's software products.

On July 24, 2014 we announced that the much-anticipated merger of DMHI and Virtual Physicians Network was completed. As anticipated, the CEO of Virtual Physicians Network, George England, assumed the same role for DMHI. The former CEO of DMH International, Rik J Deitsch, will stay on with DMHI and serve as Chairman of the Board.

On July 31, 2014 we announced that Miracle Mile Medical Center (MMMC) in Los Angeles, CA has agreed to participate in the beta launch of Virtual Physician's Network (VPN). Miracle Mile Medical Center is located in the heart of the beautiful Miracle Mile District in Los Angeles, CA. Their facility is dedicated to providing quality, clinical care in a compassionate and warm atmosphere. MMMC was founded in 2004 by Gil Tepper, M.D., F.A.C.S. and offers inpatient, outpatient and specialized services to the community. Dr. Tepper is a nationally recognized orthopedic spine surgeon and the current Chief of Staff at MMMC.

On August 5, 2014 we announced that Florida Back Institute in Boca Raton, FL had agreed to participate in the beta launch of Virtual Physician's Network (VPN). The Florida Back Institute is located in Boca Raton Florida and was founded in 1989 by Orthopedic Spine Surgeon Jeffrey Fernyhough, M.D. and Neurosurgeon Jordan Davis, M.D. For 25 years the Florida Back Institute has offered a complete multi-specialty treatment approach to spinal disorders.

On August 20, 2014 we announced that BUYINS.NET, a leading provider of Regulation SHO compliance monitoring, short sale trading statistics and market integrity surveillance, had initiated coverage on DMH International (DMHI) after releasing the latest short sale data through November 19, 2014. The total aggregate number of shares shorted since August 2013 was approximately 45 million shares. Approximately 26.42% of daily trading volume was short selling. The SqueezeTrigger price for all DMHI shares shorted was $.015.

On August 21, 2014 we announced that Michigan Head and Spine Institute (MHSI) had agreed to participate in the beta launch of Virtual Physician's Network (VPN). The Michigan Head and Spine Institute is one of Michigan's largest groups of neurosurgeons, physiatrists, and neuropsychologists. With 9 locations in the greater southeastern Michigan area, MHSI provides complete care for injuries and diseases related to the head, brain, skull and spine.

On September 10, 2014, we announced that the Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University in Huntington, West Virginia had agreed to participate in the beta launch of Virtual Physician's Network (VPN).

On October 8, 2014 we announced that we will be exhibiting at the North American Spine Society (NASS) 2014 annual meeting next month in San Francisco, CA. Our attendance is part of the national launch of the Virtual Physician's Network mobile technology. The NASS annual meeting is one of the largest academic spine meetings in the world where spine care professionals from around the globe will share the latest information, innovative techniques and procedures, best practices, and new technologies.

On October 23, 2014 we announced that we had agreed to a partnership with Rapid Improvement, Inc., a Natural Language Processing (NLP) technology company in Washington, D.C. This new added feature to the Virtual Physicians Network mobile platform will enhance the value of VPN to their users as well as add an additional revenue stream for DMHI in the form of analytics reporting.

December 2, 2014 we announced an update on the North American Spine Society (NASS) annual meeting held in San Francisco that we attended in November of 2014. NASS confirmed that attendance at the annual meeting in San Francisco surpassed the 2013 meeting in New Orleans. At the 2014 meeting there were 2,866 medical attendees, 384 non-medical attendees, 323 exhibitor companies and over 3,000 exhibitor reps.

On December 4, 2014 we announced that we have expanded our Medical Advisory Board (MAB) by adding Dr. Jonathan Hyde, M.D. who is a Board Certified Orthopaedic Surgeon specializing in spinal surgery at the South Florida Spine Institute in Miami Beach, FL.

January 7, 2015 we announced the release of version 1.2 or theVirtual Physician’s Network mobile healthcare platform that included many new features for both surgeon and vendor members. This was the first major platform enhancement since the merger of DMHI and Virtual Physicians Network.

July 28, 2015 we announced the release of version 2.1 of the Virtual Physician’s Network mobile healthcare platform. This latest 2.1 version release includes a new hospital experience, which gives hospital staff full access to the Virtual Physicians Network platform. Also in this new 2.1 version release, the administrative and management staff of medical device vendors can have full visibility to the cases their surgeon customers are scheduling with their respective sales representatives.

Operating Strategy

Management is of the opinion that the leaders of the technology market as a whole are beating their competitors by presenting a more effective end user experience and fulfillment of base requirements. We believe that products were ~~typically~~ judged by the number of features they offer; however, there has been an increasing trend towards not providing the greatest number of features, but rather to provide a simpler user interface than its competitors combined with a solid product workflow. We will attempt, as a medical device provider, to offer products that are user friendly and which have a core workflow that clients can easily implement and use. We believe that a goal of applying our product ideas efficiently will allow our customers to maintain high medical standards to help them to grow in their own individual markets.

Virtual Physician's Network

There are over 100 million surgeries and procedures performed in the United States each year in over 6,000 hospitals and 5,000 surgery centers. These staggering figures combined with the archaic use of current technology to coordinate all these events between surgeons, institutions and medical vendors and their professional societies has created a chaotic, wasteful, and inefficient system.

Virtual Physician’s Network is a HIPAA compliant and private mobile and web based app solution specifically designed to help improve clinical and financial outcomes for all the stakeholders participating in these 100 million surgical events. These stakeholders include surgeons, hospitals, surgery centers, healthcare professionals, medical device/pharma vendors and medical associations and societies.

We currently provide the Virtual Physician’s Network solutions through the App Store (IOS devices) and Google Play (Droid devices) as well as a web based solution through our Virtual Physician’s Network website www.virtualphysiciansnetwork.com.

The adoption of the Virtual Physician’s Network technology ~~will~~is becurrently ~~initially~~being driven through ~~the~~ our beta group and key industry trade shows such as NASS (North American Spine Society) and AAOS (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons). Further adoption will then be driven by sales representation from participating medical vendors.

Beta Launch

Because surgeons in their particular specialties such as Spine or Orthopedics have an incredibly strong industry influence on all the stakeholders in the healthcare space, Virtual Physician’s Network will focus their initial implementation and marketing efforts on surgeon adoption.

We are currently in the process of rolling out the Virtual Physicians Network v 12.01 mobile and web based app technology to key industry thought leaders in the orthopedic spine and neurosurgical spine markets in the U.S. These initial beta users include but are not limited to groups in FL, CA, MI, WV, NV, and NJ. Upon the successful implementation of the beta release of Virtual Physicians Network v. 12.01, we anticipate additional adoption from the peers and colleagues of these key thought leaders. ~~Our beta launch is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2015.~~

The Virtual Physician’s Network platform is designed to accommodate all surgical and procedural specialties. Our goal is to expand into general orthopedics and cardiology for all the associated stakeholders in late ~~2015~~2016.

Surgeon members experience

We currently offer surgeon members five core practice building tools through the Virtual Physician’s Network as well as an interactive HIPAA compliant surgical calendar. These tools include: Book a Case, Contact My Rep, Education, Product Info, CME. The ~~Clinical~~release ~~Outcomes~~for ~~tool~~surgeons isin ~~currently~~Q4 ~~still~~of in2014 ~~development~~provided ~~for~~additional ~~release~~availability on IOS and Android phones in ~~late~~additional ~~2015~~to iPads and Tablets.

Medical Vendor members experience

We currently offer medical ~~vendor~~vendors ~~representatives~~ four core tools to help vendor reps streamline and effectively manage their communications and requests from their surgeon customers: Confirm a Case, and My Messages, Education and Product Info. We completed the addition of Education and Product Info tools in Q4 of 2014.

WeOur ~~also~~technology ~~have~~gives ~~added,~~vendor inreps ~~version~~instant ~~2.1,~~and ~~visibility~~secure communication with their customers for ~~vendor~~case ~~administration~~booking and ~~sales~~communication. ~~management~~This tonot ~~allow~~only ~~them~~eliminates ~~access~~costly tomistakes ~~the~~but ~~cases~~also ~~their~~saves ~~surgeon~~valuable ~~customers~~time ~~who~~allowing ~~are~~them ~~booking~~to ~~surgical~~work ~~case~~more ~~with~~efficiently. ~~their~~We ~~respective~~also ~~sales~~give ~~representatives.~~the ~~This~~companies ~~visibility~~that ~~gives~~they ~~vendors~~represent ~~the~~a ~~ability~~compelling platform to ~~better~~promote ~~manage~~new ~~their~~devices ~~inventory~~and intechniques ~~regards~~ to ~~availability~~their surgeon and ~~shipping~~hospital ~~costs~~customers through marketing experiences in the app.

~~Our~~Virtual ~~technology~~Physician’s ~~gives~~Network ~~vendor~~will ~~sales~~provide ~~representatives,~~support ~~vendor administrators~~ and ~~managment~~training ~~instant~~to ~~and~~these ~~secure~~organizations ~~communication with their customers for case booking and communication. This not only eliminates costly mistakes but also saves valuable time allowing them~~ to ~~work~~effectively ~~more~~promote ~~efficiently. We also give~~ the ~~companies~~use ~~that~~of ~~they represent a compelling platform to promote new devices and techniques to~~ their ~~surgeon~~Virtual ~~and~~Physicians ~~hospital~~Network ~~customers through marketing experiences in the~~ app.

~~Virtual~~Vendor ~~Physician’s~~Admin ~~Network will provide support and training to these organizations to effectively promote the use of their Virtual Physicians Network app throughout the beta rollout in 2015.~~experience

We released the vendor admin experience in Q3 of 2015. This experience gives the customer service or senior management of any vendor the visibility of any cases that are scheduled but their sales force. It also gives them the ability to drive product information and education to anyone on their sales and admin team. The ability to have visibility to all of their customers requests in real time allows for more effective inventory management.

Healthcare Professional members experience

We ~~have successfully~~ released our Healthcare Professional experience in v. 2.1 of the Virtual Physician’s Network mobile ~~healthcare~~app ~~platform~~in Q3 of 2015. This experience has ~~four~~three core tools for healthcare professionals to effectively be linked to the surgeons and vendors that are working in their hospitals and surgery centers. These tools include: My Cases, ~~My Messages,~~ Education and Product Info.

This gives all healthcare professionals that are involved in these surgical events the ability to instantly keep track of ~~and privately respond to~~ all requests and communications between their surgeons and vendors. It also provides them with an intuitive and quick reference to industry specific education and product information.

Professional Societies and Associations

Each year there are over 2,000 medical societies and associations that have an annual meeting. These industry meetings host large numbers of their membership and are sponsored by medical device and pharma companies. They typically include surgeons that are industry thought leaders as faculty for each meeting and focus on the latest techniques, procedures, treatments and technology most relevant to their specialties.

We plan on showcasing the Virtual Physician’s Network technology at many of these key meeting over the next 18 months. These industry meetings represent an excellent marketing opportunity for Virtual Physician’s Network to gain adoption from all of their targeted stakeholders who attend these events together.

Virtual Physician’s Network also provides these organizations with a more effective way to deliver Continuing Medical Education (CME) experiences, meeting information, and other educational experiences to their membership through the Virtual Physician’s Network app.

TouchPACS

With a growing PACS market and an emergent Electronic Medical Record (“EMR”) market, we plan to provide a technically advanced but cost effective combined solution to medical practices that have been largely ignored by existing vendors. We will offer as a primary foundation technology, a digital imaging and communications in medicine (“DICOM”) viewer on innovative hardware, a fully Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology (“CCHIT”) certified EMR solution, and safe and efficient storage of diagnostic images both as individual clinical assets and as parts of a larger enterprise.

Our goal is to bring a fully integrated PACS/RIS/EMR package to market within a realistic timeframe in order to meet FDA and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) standards, starting with an innovative EMR framework as a basis for future product expansions. The stated project goal is to begin marketing a combined PACS/RIS/EMR solution in 2015. With a CCHIT qualified EMR fully integrated with TouchPACS, we will be qualified for ARRA reimbursement.16

Our goal is to bring a fully integrated PACS/RIS/EMR package to market within a realistic timeframe in order to meet FDA and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) standards, starting with an innovative EMR framework as a basis for future product expansions. The stated project goal is to begin marketing a combined PACS/RIS/EMR solution sometime in 2016. With a CCHIT qualified EMR fully integrated with TouchPACS, we will be qualified for ARRA reimbursement.

The PACS will support the DICOM v3 standards for both communication and visualization as a solution, a scope of service contained within the boundaries of the total TouchEMR package. PACS is being modularized this way in order to allow for other such future standards/relational forks as laboratory control or inpatient expansion. PACS will be deemed as v1 complete upon clearance of Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) Class2 certification with all parts intact, and EMR v1 will be considered v1 complete on receiving CCHIT certification. PACS/EMR will be implemented to include all necessary hardware and configuration for a customer, such that our expected target audience is considered “computer illiterate” and will not be expected to provide implementation equipment independently. To that end, simplification of very complex workflow and diagnostic processes is a central focus within our developed interfaces. We propose that smart implementation of clinical software as a workflow client/server process will allow us to market both products (PACS and EMR) as either standalone or paired.

Technology

Over the next 18 months Touch Medical Solutions plans:

To market both individually and combined as a full Practice Management suite the following products:

TouchERP - Medical Enterprise Resource Planning (“Medical Enterprise RP”) –Is designed for a complete solution to various business sectors, including healthcare. A combination of products providing Clinical Management, Resource Management, Financial Management, and a Practice Information System, that are critical to the medical practices in today’s healthcare industry.

TouchPMS – Practice Management Suite – This is a category of software that deals with the day-to-day operations of a medical practice. Such software frequently allows users to capture patient demographics, schedule appointments, maintain lists of insurance payers, perform billing tasks, and generate reports.

TouchEMR – Electronic Medical (Health) Record – This is a locally kept copy of the patient health information located at each applicable healthcare provider, which can then be merged with the central EHR record as diagnostic information changes. This record can be kept in any applicable form, as long as it contains the basic pieces of information necessary to resynchronize with a central provider.

TouchRIS–Radiology Information System – This is a computerized database used by radiology departments to store, manipulate and distribute patient radiological data and imagery. The system generally consists of patient tracking and scheduling, result reporting and image tracking capabilities. RIS complements HIS (Hospital Information Systems) and is critical to efficient workflow to radiology practices.

TouchPACS – Picture Archiving and Communications Systems - In medical imaging, PACS have been developed to provide economical storage, rapid retrieval of images, access to images acquired with multiple modalities, and simultaneous access at multiple sites.

TouchPHR – Personal Health Record – This is an abstract definition of copies of patient electronic health record information, such as radiology studies or lab results, which are provided to a clinic by a patient in electronic form. This is relative to any type of portable copy device, such a CDR or USB, and defines import and export guidance for merging copies into a local (practice level) EMR.

TouchTranscription – Integrates voice recording and digital scripting into the patient record.

TouchPaperlessOffice – Through the use of a Paperless Office Solution, medical providers can store, index, search, retrieve, and modify all aspects of a patient’s medical records to provide a paperless office that can eliminate bottlenecks in a patient work flow.

Our potential for success will depend upon our ability to:

(i) develop project synergy where our products are designed for projects to work both independently as well as in a multiple product suite; (ii) develop enhanced workflow and customization by creating a system workflow that will adopt an existing practices workflow as opposed to the practice needing to change their process and ideology based on the systems constraints. While the main portions of the software suite must be standardized, customization will be allowed to accomplish individual practice goals; and (iii) Training – All our customers will receive training before, during, and after implementation to fully understand how the systems are designed to be used.

develop project synergy where our products are designed for projects to work both independently as well as in a multiple product suite;

(ii)

develop enhanced workflow and customization by creating a system workflow that will adopt an existing practices workflow as opposed to the practice needing to change their process and ideology based on the systems constraints. While the main portions of the software suite must be standardized, customization will be allowed to accomplish individual practice goals; and

(iii)

Training – All our customers will receive training before, during, and after implementation to fully understand how the systems are designed to be used.

PACS

InWe ~~2015,~~are westill ~~plan~~in ~~bring~~development toof ~~market~~ our Enterprise PACS system (TouchPACS) and plan to launch in the next year at a competitive price point. The focus of TouchPACS is to keep hardware and subscription costs affordable, making it an option for any size or type of clinical practice. In addition to a traditional PACS system on-site, TouchPACS will also offer offsite content storage, automated backup solutions, and remote software access via a web based portal product. These traditionally have been separate offerings and have represented a significant integration challenge for the small to mid-sized medical practice. We plan that TouchPACS will also provide the ability to link multiple offices, providing practices the ability to have a single system supporting all sites in which they practice.

Clinical Trial Management

ByWe ~~the~~are ~~end~~still ofin ~~2015,~~development wewith ~~plan to launch~~ a Clinical Trial Management Solution or Laboratory Information System (TouchCT). Both the Clinical Trial Management Solutions and the TouchEMR product share many core requirements offering an opportunity to expand functionality of the TouchEMR product to satisfy trial management needs. An electronic Clinical Trial Management system can provide service to drug development and medical research companies who are in the process of bringing clinical products to market in a newly regulated drug certification process.

Form Factor

Our products will offer multiple suite configurations to fit customer needs. We will offer both traditional wall- mounted displays as well as portable laptops and tablet computers.

Management is of the opinion that having a portable solution will be most useful for physicians who treat patients in multiple locations as well as for other situations where the flexibility of being mobile is required.

We will also provide a web based DICOM viewer that will allow image presentation on smartphones including:

(i) ~~iPhones~~

~~(ii) Android~~iPhones

(ii)

Android

but these will be used for preliminary diagnostics only (wet read), as such devices must be FDA Class-3 approved by equipment manufacturers in order to be used for final reads in a clinical setting.

Our systems will offer a touch screen display allowing easy manipulation of images without the need to sit at a workstation with a mouse and keyboard except where this is clinically required. Utilizing modern touch screen interface technology will be attractive to physicians who want to be ahead of the technology curve, or where a physician or physician assistant will be more effective without being tied to a keyboarded workspace.

For fully integrated PACS consumers, a multi-monitor diagnostic station solution will be used to assure full conformance with DICOM and diagnostic imaging standards.

Standards

DICOM Standard

Our imaging solutions are based on the DICOM medical imaging standard, as the service is compatible with virtually every digital imaging modality and PACS in use today. This makes it a solution for orthopedists, obstetricians, family practice physicians, dentists, and chiropractors, in addition to the traditional radiology market. Increasingly, small non-radiological clinics make limited use of imaging as part of their everyday practice; we will provide a simplified, but industrial quality, answer to their software needs.

Platform

We will rely on Microsoft technologies as the backbone of our systems. By utilizing the Microsoft Visual C# development tools, and the Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2008/2010 development environments, management is of the opinion that TouchPACS will be able to leverage Microsoft’s extensive coding library and features, and to provide an assured vendor as a foundation technology partner for our customers. We will use Microsoft Team Foundation Server to enforce an Agile software development and design philosophy. This philosophy emphasizes close collaboration between the programmer team and business experts, face-to-face communication, frequent delivery of new deployable business value and tight, self-organizing teams.

DICOM Viewer

We will provide a DICOM viewer offering advanced layering, image manipulation and other features that are typically used in large-scale implementations. By utilizing touch screen technology, we will provide a feature to a physician looking to demonstrate technology advancement to its patients. We will seeking FDA Class-2 certification for diagnostic imaging modality classifications, and will publish a formal DICOM conformance statement as a function of the development process. We are not seeking certification for use with Digital Mammography (“MG”) during stage one development, but will seek to display high resolution MG in a non-diagnostic format. The viewer product typically will deploy as a multi-monitor diagnostic station, and a touch-based tablet application, and will include a module for internet-based reading as part of the EMR portal project that we are attempting to develop.

Workflow Clients

We will provide support to our clients; in addition to DICOM PACS stations, for supporting medical records as a foundation of our product suite, including but not limited to:

(i) ~~transcription,~~

~~(ii) management~~transcription,

(~~iii~~ii) ~~paperless workstation, and~~

~~(iv) export and reporting clients.~~ management,

(iii)

paperless workstation, and

(iv)

export and reporting clients.

The clients’ products will be designed to work within the touch-based format or touch-assisted in cases like transcription, and are intended to be deployed on our branded encapsulated workstations and tablets.

Servers

TouchPACS has products to serve both Health Level 7 (“HL7”), a standard for exchanging information between medical applications and DICOM formatted messages natively, and allows for implementations to be unified to a central server or split into multiple servers, based on the scale needs of each customer. TouchPACS is also developing web based portal system to allow for patient scheduling, non-diagnostic review, referring physician review, and remote diagnostic reading capabilities. The web portal system will be implemented in a compatible way with both DICOM and HL7 needs in mind, allowing for a PACS web product to be developed concurrently with the EMR web product.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) applied on a consistent basis. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.

We regularly evaluate the accounting policies and estimates that we use to prepare our consolidated financial statements. In general, management’s estimates are based on historical experience, information from third party professionals, and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates made by management under different and/or future circumstances.

We believe that our critical accounting policies and estimates include our ability to continue as a going concern, revenue recognition, accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory obsolescence, accounting for long-lived assets and accounting for stock based compensation.

Ability to Continue as a Going Concern: Our ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon our ability to secure additional financing, increase ownership equity, and attain profitable operations. In addition, our ability to continue as a going concern must be considered in light of the problems, expenses and complications frequently encountered in established markets and the competitive environment in which we operate.

Revenue Recognition: In general, we record revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered or product delivery has occurred, the sales price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Provision for sales returns will be estimated based on the Company's historical return experience.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: Our accounts receivable are stated at estimated net realizable value. Accounts receivable are comprised of balances due from customers net of estimated allowances for uncollectible accounts. In determining collectability, historical trends are evaluated and specific customer issues are reviewed to arrive at appropriate allowances.

Long-Lived Assets: The carrying value of long-lived assets is reviewed annually and on a regular basis for the existence of facts and circumstances that may suggest impairment. If indicators of impairment are present, we determine whether the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the long-lived asset in question is less than its carrying amount. If less, we measure the amount of the impairment based on the amount that the carrying value of the impaired asset exceeds the discounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposal of the impaired assets.

Derivative Financial Instrument: We do not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. Management evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as charges or credits to income. For option-based simple derivative financial instruments, we use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value the derivative instruments at inception and subsequent valuation dates. For complex embedded derivatives, we use a Dilution-Adjusted Black-Scholes method to value the derivative instruments at inception and subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

Share-Based Compensation: We record share-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC 718, Stock Compensation. FASB ASC 718 requires that the cost resulting from all share-based transactions are recorded in the financial statements over the respective service periods. It establishes fair value as the measurement objective in accounting for share-based payment arrangements and requires all entities to apply a fair-value-based measurement in accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. FASB ASC 718 also establishes fair value as the measurement objective for transactions in which an entity acquires goods or services from non-employees in share-based payment transactions.

Results of Operations

Comparison of Three Months Periods Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015

Operating Revenues

Operating revenues since the Company’s inception has been $nil.

Operating Expenses

During the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, the Company incurred operating expenses of $5846,~~442~~426 compared with $~~305~~90,~~871~~249 during the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015. The decrease in operating expenses was attributed to a decrease in professional fees of $~~182~~35,~~211~~465, a decrease in research and development of $639,~~391~~930, ~~and~~offset by a ~~decrease~~slight increase of $1,~~827~~572 in general and administrative expenses.

Other ~~expenses~~Income (expense)

Total other ~~expense~~income for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016 was $5325,~~303~~606, as compared to total other ~~expenses~~expense for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 of $8534,~~999~~414. The decrease of $3260,~~696~~020 and approximately 38174% in total other expenses was as a result of the gain of $73,818 on settlement of convertible debt, and a decrease of $6514,~~762~~962 and approximately 8255% in interest expense primarily related to amortization of discount, offset by the increase of $25,~~826~~468 and approximately ~~276~~264% in ~~loss on~~ change in fair value of derivatives relating to the fluctuation of the liability related to convertible debt carried at fair market value, and the increase of imputed interest from $1416,~~777~~457 to $2220,~~017~~386 relating to imputed interest at 8% per annum on related party loans.

Net Loss

For the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, the Company recorded a net loss of $~~111~~20,~~745~~820 compared with $~~391~~124,~~870~~663 for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015.

~~Comparison of Nine Months Periods Ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014~~20

Operating Revenues

Operating revenues since the Company’s inception has been $nil.

Operating Expenses,

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred operating expenses of $258,094 compared with $750,235 during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease in operating expenses was attributed to a decrease in professional fees of $441,115, a decrease in research and development of $49,377, and a decrease of $1,649 in general and administrative expenses.

Other expenses

Total other expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $94,507, as compared to total other expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 of $199,029. The decrease of $104,522 and approximately 53% in total other expenses was as a result of a decrease in interest expense primarily related to amortization of discount from $115,965 to $53,444, a loss on change in fair value of derivatives from $39,215 to $18,661 relating to the fluctuation of the liability related to convertible debt carried at fair market value, offset by an increase in imputed interest from $43,849 to $52,856 relating to imputed interest at 8% per annum on related party loans and an increase of gain on settlement of debt of $30,454.

Net Loss

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded a net loss of $352,601 compared with $949,264 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Working Capital

	September 30, 2015 $	December 31, 2014 $
	March 31, 2016 $	December 31, 2015 $
Current Assets	~~379~~7,634	~~984~~40
Current Liabilities	1,~~451~~471,~~847~~824	1,~~482~~448,~~943~~673
Working Deficits	(1,~~451~~464,~~468~~190)	(1,~~481~~448,~~959~~633)

Cash Flows

	Nine months ended September 30, 2015 $	Nine months ended September 30,2014 $
	Three months ended March 31, 2016 $	Three months ended March 31, 2015 $
Cash Flows used in Operating Activities	(~~152~~26,~~105~~606)	(~~374~~54,~~405~~897)
Cash Flows used in Investing Activities	-	(8,053)
Cash Flows provided by Financing Activities	34,200	67,500
Cash Flows provided by Financing Activities	151,500	423,865
Net Increase in Cash During Period	7,594	12,603
Net Increase(decrease) in Cash During Period	(605)	41,407

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, the Company’s cash and total asset balance was $~~379~~7,634 compared to $~~984~~40 at December 31, ~~2014~~2015.

As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, the Company had total liabilities of $1,~~451~~471,~~847~~824 compared with total liabilities of $1,~~482~~448,~~943~~673 at December 31, ~~2014~~2015. The ~~decrease~~increase in liabilities is primarily due to ~~settlement~~the ofpromissory ~~convertible~~notes ~~debt~~obtained ~~liabilities~~during ~~through~~the ~~conversions~~three ofmonths ~~common~~ended ~~stock~~March 31, 2016.

As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, the Company had a working capital deficit of $1,~~451~~464,~~468~~190 compared with a working capital deficit of $1,~~481~~448,~~959~~633 as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015. The ~~decrease~~increase in the working capital deficit is primarily attributed to ~~settlement~~the ofpromissory ~~convertible~~notes ~~debt~~obtained ~~liabilities~~during ~~through~~the ~~conversions~~three ofmonths ~~common~~ended ~~stock~~March 31, 2016.

Going Concern

Our ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon our ability to secure additional financing, increase ownership equity, and attain profitable operations. In addition, our ability to continue as a going concern must be considered in light of the problems, expenses and complications frequently encountered in established markets and the competitive environment in which we operate.

Uncertainties and Trends

Our operations and possible revenues are dependent now and in the future upon the following factors:

Whether we successfully develop and commercialize products from our research and development activities.

If we fail to compete effectively in the intensely competitive medical software area, our operations and market position will be negatively impacted.

If we fail to successfully execute our planned partnering and out-licensing of products or technologies, our future performance will be adversely affected.

The recent economic downturn and related credit and financial market crisis may adversely affect our ability to obtain financing, conduct our operations and realize opportunities to successfully bring our technologies to market.

Software industry related litigation is substantial and may continue to rise, leading to greater costs and unpredictable litigation.

If we fail to comply with extensive legal/regulatory requirements affecting the medical software industry, we will face increased costs, and possibly penalties and business losses.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any transaction, agreement or other contractual arrangement with an entity unconsolidated with us under whom we have:

An obligation under a guarantee contract.

A retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to the unconsolidated entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity for such assets.

Any obligation, including a contingent obligation, under a contract that would be accounted for as a derivative instrument.

Any obligation, including a contingent obligation, arising out of a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that is held by us and material to us where such entity provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to, or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or commitments (other than the potential effect of certain legal contingencies) that have a current or future effect on its financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that is material.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that, because of the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting discussed in Section 9A of our annual report on Form 10-K, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, at a reasonable assurance level, as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016. In light of this, we performed additional post-closing procedures and analyses in order to prepare the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report. As a result of these procedures, we believe our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report present fairly, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. A control system cannot provide absolute assurance, however, that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, with the company have been detected.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer, who also acted as our Principal Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the ~~third~~first quarter we continued the enhancement of our internal controls. Otherwise, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016 that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

2522

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We are not a party to any pending legal proceedings where any officer, director, affiliate of owner of 5% or more of our common stock is adverse to us or where the amount of damages claimed, exclusive of interest and costs, exceeds ten percent of our current assets. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger, responsibility for any liability emerging from our pre-merger business relies wholly with our pre-merger management.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

A smaller reporting company, as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, is not required to provide the information required by this item.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On ~~April~~March 18, ~~2015~~2016, the debt holder made a conversion of a total of 1920,000,000 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $1920,000 of the note with a fair value of $2538,~~769~~695, included in the fair value of debt balance of $2538,~~769~~695 was settlement of derivative liability of $2538,~~769~~695. The Company recorded a gain of $3173,~~091~~818 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement.

Pursuant to the merger agreement on July 22, 2014, 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s convertible preferred stock shall be issued. On May 12, 2015 and August 4, 2015, 7,372,598 shares and 59,501 shares have been issued, respectively, and the remaining shares have not been issued due to administrative delay.

With respect to the securities issuances described above, no solicitations were made and no underwriting discounts were given or paid in connection with these transactions. The Company believes that the issuance of these securities as described above were exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure

Note applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits


Exhibit No.		Title
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

2623

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
		Registrant
Dated: November 20, 2015		/s/ George England
Dated: June 2, 2016		/s/ George England
		George England
		Chief Executive Officer
Dated: November 20, 2015		/s/ Rik J. Deitsch
Dated: June 2, 2016		/s/ Rik J. Deitsch
		Rik J. Deitsch
		Chief Financial Officer

2724

Filing Compare · DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.