UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from_____ to _____

STW RESOURCES HOLDING CORP

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

Nevada	000-52654	26-1945743
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)	(Commission File No.)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3424 South County Road 1192 Midland, Texas 79706		(432) 686-7777
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Registrant’s Telephone Number)

(Former name and address, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ X] No [X ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

[ ]

Accelerated filer

[ ]

Non-accelerated filer

[ ]

Smaller reporting company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

As of ~~December~~May 2227, ~~2014~~2015, there were 2732,~~918~~345,~~931~~817 shares of the issuer’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
		Page
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	1
Item 1.	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements:	1
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2014 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2013	1
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2015 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2014	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the three month periods ended March 31, 2015 and 2014	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit (Unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2014	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit (Unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2015	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 and 2013	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the three month period ended March 31, 2015 and 2014	4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3123
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3927
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal proceedings	4028
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4128
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	4228
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	4329
Item 5.	Other information	4430

-i-

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

STW Resources Holding Corp

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
ASSETS	(Unaudited)
Current Assets
Cash	$	~~281,931~~--		$	17123,~~301~~629
Accounts receivable, trade, net		12,~~363~~212,~~890~~806			~~532~~3,~~910~~710,180
Accounts receivable from related parties		~~681,500~~--			--519,789
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		483,235			33,370
Deferred project costs		1,629,891			821,359
Total Current Assets		2,810,556			583,581
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		210,296			344,525
Long Term Assets
Total Current Assets		4,052,993			5,519,482
Property and equipment, net		1,~~157~~050,~~770~~958			~~746~~1,~~638~~096,640
Other assets
TOTAL ASSETS	$	5,103,951		$	6,616,122
Deferred loan costs, net of $168,658 and $102,435 accumulated amortization, respectively		119,198			185,428
TOTAL ASSETS	$	4,087,524		$	1,515,647
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current Liabilities
Bank overdraft	$	--		$	30,468
Book overdraft	$	123,629		$	--
Accounts Payable		43,~~158~~902,~~918~~003			14,~~256~~523,~~043~~265
Payable to related parties:
Black Pearl Energy, LLC		137,~~277,573~~084			~~139~~1,~~763~~371,305
Crown Financial, LLC		~~150~~1,~~685~~039,545			--2,035,495
Dufrane Nuclear, Inc.		193,553			132,490
Accrued compensation - officers		918,380			873,380
Accrued consulting fees – related parties		787,166			584,666
Current portion of notes payable, net of discounts and loan costs; payable to related parties $1,661,354 and $1,700,394, respectively		7,900,661			5,793,293
Current portion of notes payable, net of discounts, $934,331 and $854,928 payable to related parties, respectively		3,709,661			4,668,492
Sales and payroll taxes payable		2,834,095			2,671,843
Sales and payroll taxes payable		2,448,509			350,074
Insurance premium finance contract payable		76,151			208,271
Insurance premium finance contract payable		362,256			--
Accrued expenses and interest		1,986,084			1,769,117
Accrued expenses and interest		1,568,083			1,839,439
Deferred Revenue		1,552,615			680,000
Accrued compensation		~~578~~397,~~609~~485			~~285~~643,~~190~~777
Accrued board compensation		~~402~~112,~~317~~500			~~491~~496,~~724~~067
Fees payable in common stock		1,~~284~~479,~~187~~073			~~231~~2,~~897~~783,711
Stock subscriptions payable		~~279~~17,~~500~~000			~~310~~27,000
Derivative liability		1,~~963~~636,~~082~~590			1802,~~630,985~~340
Total Current Liabilities		1924,~~164~~012,~~099~~895			1124,~~951~~678,~~231~~864
Notes payable, net of discount and current portion		31,~~119~~878,~~641~~430			2,~~623~~825,~~009~~295
Total Liabilities		2225,~~283~~891,~~740~~325			1427,~~574~~504,~~240~~159
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Stockholders' Deficit
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		--			--
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively		--			--
Common stock; $0.001 par value; 41,666,667shares authorized, 27,676,550 and 18,542,642 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		27,678			18,543
Common stock; $0.001 par value; 191,666,667shares authorized, 31,683,150 and 28,194,953 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively		31,686			28,197
Additional paid in capital		1721,~~985~~400,~~552~~210			1118,~~324~~383,~~131~~411
Accumulated deficit		(3541,~~997~~950,~~228~~763	)		(2439,~~355~~112,~~343~~171	)
Total Stockholders' Deficit of STW Resources Holding Corp		(1720,~~983~~518,~~998~~867	)		(1320,~~012~~700,~~669~~563	)
Non-controlling interest in subsidiary		(~~212~~268,~~218~~507	)		(45187,~~924~~474	)
Total Stockholders’ Deficit		(1820,~~196~~787,~~216~~374	)		(1320,~~058~~888,~~593~~037	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT	$	45,~~087~~103,~~524~~951		$	16,~~515~~616,~~647~~122

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

-1-

Table of Contents

STW Resources Holding Corp

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the three ~~and~~months ~~nine month periods~~ ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 (Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
	2015			2014
Revenues:
Water treatment services	$	~~162~~148,~~846~~911		$	--		$	~~172,897~~		$	~~541,000~~
Energy and construction services		42,~~567~~472,~~535~~363			903,~~209~~560,787			~~13,694,233~~			~~90,209~~
Related parties services revenue		66,000			57,408			143,378			57,408
Related parties service revenue		58,127			39,992
Net revenues		42,~~796~~679,~~381~~401			~~147~~3,~~617~~600,779			~~14,010,508~~			~~688,617~~
Cost of revenues		41,~~691~~880,~~207~~265			~~216~~3,~~607~~181,242			~~13,148,506~~			~~676,242~~
Gross Profit		~~105~~799,~~174~~136			~~(68~~419,~~990~~537	)		~~862,002~~			~~12,375~~
Operating expenses
Research and development		--6,125			5995,~~938~~490			~~151,955~~			~~69,056~~
Sales and marketing		~~296~~292,~~419~~321			--172,508			~~735,608~~			--
General and administrative		32,~~558~~428,~~352~~825			~~791~~2,~~505~~129,269			~~8,717,116~~			~~1,841,437~~
Depreciation and amortization		6545,~~880~~682			952,~~617~~684			~~182,280~~			~~9,617~~
Total operating expenses		32,~~920~~772,~~651~~953			~~861~~2,~~060~~449,951			~~9,786,959~~			~~1,920,110~~
Loss from operations		(31,~~815~~973,~~477~~817	)		(~~930~~2,~~050~~030,414	)		~~(8,924,957~~	)		~~(1,907,735~~	)
Interest expense		(619,391	)		(403,175	)		(1,564,896	)		(963,736	)
Interest expense, $29,884 and $42,719 to related parties, respectively		(1,219,588	)		(437,602	)
Loss on sale of assets		(39,860	)		--			(39,860	)		--
Change in derivative liability		273,780			13,273
Change in derivative liability		(834,930	)		(1,059,717	)		(1,278,466	)		(2,796,086	)
Net Loss	$	(2,919,625	)	$	(2,454,743	)
Net Loss	$	(5,309,658	)	$	(2,392,942	)	$	(11,808,179	)	$	(5,667,557	)
Less: Share of net loss of subsidiary attributable to non-controlling interest		(81,033	)		(41,569	)
Less: Share of net loss of subsidiary attributable to non-controlling interest		(135,366	)		(12,227	)		(166,294	)		(12,998	)
Net Loss of STW Resources Holding Corp	$	(2,838,592	)	$	(2,413,174	)
Net Loss of STW Resources Holding Corp	$	(5,174,292	)	$	(2,380,715	)	$	(11,641,885	)	$	(5,654,559	)
Loss per common share – basic and diluted	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.12	)
Loss per common share – basic and diluted	$	(0.19	)	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.49	)	$	(0.35	)
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted		29,977,880			20,538,202
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted		27,006,992			16,420,558			23,657,068			16,191,504

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

-2-

Table of Contents

STW Resources Holding Corp

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit (Unaudited)

For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015

	Common Stock $0.001 Par				Additional Paid In Capital		Accumulated Deficit				Non-Controlling Interest			Stockholders’ Deficit
	Number		Amount
Balance, December 31, 2013		18,542,642	$	18,543	$	11,324,131	$	(24,355,343	)	$	(45,924	)	$	(13,058,593	)
Balance, December 31, 2014		28,194,953	$	28,197	$	18,383,411	$	(39,112,171	)	$	(187,474	)	$	(20,888,037	)
Shares issued upon conversion of notes payable and accrued interest		2,765,752		2,766		1,585,309								1,588,075
Shares issued to Employees from Fees Payable in Common Stock		1,059,501		1,060		872,866								873,926
Shares issued upon extension of maturity dates on notes payable		124,818		125		68,491								68,616
Shares issued to Consultants from Fees Payable in Common Stock		1,104,976		1,105		941,630								942,735
Shares issued upon conversion of PIK accrued interest		946,535		947		539,830								540,777
Shares issued as board of director fees		562,500		563		449,437								450,000
Shares issued for consulting fees		788,625		789		774,786								775,575
Shares issued for subscriptions stock payable		15,385		15		9,985								10,000
Shares issued as board of director fees		930,261		930		557,227								558,157
Shares issued upon conversion of notes payable and accrued interest		220,835		221		322,406								322,627
Shares issued to employees as compensation		981,875		982		1,010,393								1,011,375
Shares issued in connection with the 2015 Transfer Agreements origination fees		525,000		525		420,475								421,000
Shares issued as a charitable contribution		166,667		167		109,833								110,000
Net loss for the period								(2,838,592	)		(81,033	)		(2,919,625	)
Proceeds from sale of common stock		2,096,042		2,096		1,089,904								1,092,000
Balance, March 31, 2015		31,683,150	$	31,686	$	21,400,210	$	(41,950,763	)	$	(268,507	)	$	(20,787,374	)
Shares issued for common stock payable		333,333		333		159,667								160,000
Value of derivative associated with converted notes payable						715,981								715,981
Value of conversion feature of JMJ convertible note						50,000								50,000
Net loss for the period								(11,641,885	)		(166,294	)		(11,808,179	)
Balance, September 30, 2014		27,676,550	$	27,678	$	17,985,552	$	(35,997,228	)	$	(212,218	)	$	(18,196,216	)

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

-3-

Table of Contents

STW Resources Holding Corp

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

For the ~~nine~~three ~~month~~months ~~periods~~ ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014

			Nine Month Periods Ended September 30:
		Three month Periods Ended March 31:
			2014				2013
		2015				2014
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss of STW Resources Holding Corp		$	$(2,919,625	~~(11,641,885~~)	)	$	$(2,454,743	~~(5,654,559~~)	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation			45,682	~~182,280~~			52,684	~~9,617~~
Loss on sale of assets				39,860				--
Change in fair value of derivative liability			(273,780	)			(13,273	)
Share of net loss of subsidiary attributable to non-controlling interest				(166,294	)			(12,998	)
Financing costs of notes payable			430,377				42,592
Change in derivative liability				1,278,466				2,796,086
Change in fair value of debt instruments converted to equity			--				(272,980	)
Value of common shares issued upon conversion of notes payable in excess of carrying value				(272,980	)			--
Amortization of discount and debt issuance costs			492,686				43,801
Financing cost of JMJ note payable				42,592				--
Share-based compensation			462,221				423,683
Amortization of discount and debt issuance costs				137,902				106,846
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Value of Share based compensation				3,486,606				--
(Increase) Decrease in accounts receivable			1,497,374				(896,702	)
Changes in working capital:
(Increase) Decrease in deferred project costs			(808,532	)			--
(Increase) Decrease in accounts receivable				(830,980	)			(87,936	)
(Increase) Decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets			134,229				(3,709	)
(Increase) Decrease in accounts receivable – related parties				(681,500	)			--
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable			(1,133,835	)			558,331
(Increase) Decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets				(449,866	)			15,472
Increase (Decrease) in sales and payroll taxes payable			162,252				969,460
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable				2,902,874				153,345
Increase (Decrease) in deferred revenue			872,615				--
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable – related parties				1,552,058				164,746
Increase (Decrease) in accrued expenses and interest			216,967				530,134
Increase (Decrease) in insurance premium finance contract payable				362,256				--
Increase (Decrease) in accrued compensation			(246,292	)			108,405
Increase (Decrease) in sales and payroll taxes payable				2,098,436				53,053
Increase (Decrease) in accrued board compensation			66,433				168,750
Increase (Decrease) in accrued expenses and interest				1,044,275				798,005
Net cash used in operating activities			(1,001,228	)			(743,567	)
Increase (Decrease) in accrued compensation				293,419				108,046
Cash flows from investing activities
Increase (Decrease) in accrued board compensation				--				424,849
Purchase of equipment, net of equipment loans			--				(43,643	)
Increase (Decrease) in deferred revenue				--				(97,346	)
Deposits			--				(14,000	)
	Net cash used in operating activities			(622,481	)			(1,222,774	)
Net cash used in investing activities			--				(57,643	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Purchase of equipment, net of equipment loans				(470,689	)			(241,876	)
Book overdraft (repayment)			--				50,084
	Net cash used in investing activities			(470,689	)			(241,876	)
Stock subscriptions payable			--				130,000
Cash flows from financing activities
Related party accounts receivables			--				837,824
Bank overdraft				(30,468	)			8,327
Related party accounts payables, credit facilities, notes, and advances			--				--
Principal payments of notes payable				(197,369	)			(51,000	)
Increase (Decrease) in insurance premium finance contract payable			(132,120	)			--
Non-controlling interest contributions				--				2,500
Proceeds from notes payable			1,284,000				80,000
Proceeds from notes payable				364,137				902,588
Principal payments of notes payable			(143,281	)			(60,698	)
Debt issuance costs				--				(35,025	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock			--				62,500
Proceeds from fees payable in common stock, net				--				668,076
Debt issuance costs			(131,000	)			--
Proceeds from issuance of common stock				1,221,500				--
Net cash provided by financing activities			877,599				1,099,710
	Net cash provided by financing activities			1,357,800				1,495,466
Net decrease/increase in cash			(123,629	)			298,500
Net increase in cash				264,630				30,816
Cash at beginning of period			123,629				17,301
Cash at beginning of period				17,301				59,870
Cash at end of period		$	--			$	315,801
Cash at end of period			$	281,931			$	90,686

(Continued)

-4-

Table of Contents

STW Resources Holding Corp

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

For the ~~nine~~three months ~~month periods~~ ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014

Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	1983,~~803~~973	$	711,~~315~~402
Cash paid for income taxes	$	--	$	--
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Related party note payable for Black Wolf investment	$	--	$	420,000
Shares issued from common stock subscriptions payable	$	10,000	$	--
Shares issued from common stock payable	$	160,000	$	542,076
Fees payable in common stock	$	--	$	423,683
Value of shares issued to consultants	$	775,575	$	126,000
Value of shares issued to employees as compensation	$	873,926	$	--
Value of shares issued to employees as compensation	$	1,011,375	$	--
Value of shares issued to consultants	$	942,735	$	145,000
Value of shares issued as board fees	$	~~558~~450,~~157~~000	$	~~302,625~~--
Value of shares issued as charitable contributions	$	110,000	$	--
Value of shares issued in connection with extension of notes payable	$	--	$	67,354
Value of shares issued in connection with extension of notes payable	$	68,616	$	--
Value of shares issued in payment of accrued PIK interest	$	--	$	510,769
Value of shares issued in payment of accrued PIK interest	$	540,777	$	--
Value of shares issued upon conversion of notes payable and accrued interest	$	322,627	$	660,684
Value of shares issued upon conversion of notes payable and accrued interest	$	1,588,075	$	66,209
Value of conversion feature of JMJ convertible note payable	$	--	$	50,000
Value of warrants issued as debt issuance costs	$	--	$	171,996
Shares issued for 2015 Transfer Agreement origination fees	$	421,000	$	--
Value of warrants issued with revenue participation notes	$	--	$	44,235
Subscriptions payable	$	--	$	150,000
Value of conversion feature of JMJ convertible note payable	$	50,000	$	--
Value of derivative associated with convertible note payable	$	715,981	$	--

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

-5-

Table of Contents

STW Resources Holding Corp

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~Nine~~Three ~~Month~~Months ~~Periods~~ Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF THE BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of STW Resources Holding Corp (“STW,” “we,” “us, “our” and “our Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, the unaudited condensed financial statements do not include all information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation. Interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, ~~2014~~2015, or for any other interim period. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for such year as filed on ~~June~~April 203, ~~2014~~2015. The December 31, ~~2013~~2014 condensed consolidated balance sheet was derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for such year as filed on ~~June~~April 203, ~~2014~~2015.

History of the Company

STW Resources Holding Corp. (“STW”) or the “Company”, ~~f/k/a Woozyfly Inc. and STW Global Inc.~~ is a corporation formed to utilize state of the art water reclamation technologies to reclaim fresh water from highly contaminated oil and gas hydraulic fracture flow-back salt water that is produced in conjunction with the production of oil and gas. STW has been working to establish contracts with oil and gas operators for the deployment of multiple water reclamation systems throughout Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana and the Appalachian Basin of Pennsylvania and West Virginia. STW, in conjunction with energy producers, operators, various state agencies and legislators, is working to create an efficient and economical solution to this complex problem. The Company is also evaluating the deployment of ~~similar~~water ~~technology~~processing technologies in the municipal wastewater and potable water industry. The Company is also involved in the desalination of brackish water and seawater for industrial and municipal use.

As of late June 2014, STW has expanded its operations in the water reclamation services business and has formed a new company called STW Water, Inc. The primary sources of income for this Company are consulting on water projects and the sale of products and equipment for water purification. All sales to date have been on a net 30 basis. Revenues for the three month period ended September 30, 2014 were from water reclamation consulting services and products.

The Company’s operations are located in the United States of America and the principal executive offices are located at 3424 South County Road 1192, Midland, Texas 79706.

-6-

Consolidation policy

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries: STW Water Process & Technologies LLC, STW Oilfield Construction LLC, STW Pipeline Maintenance Construction, LLC, and its 75% owned subsidiary STW Energy, LLC. The condensed consolidated financial statements as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2014, include STW Resources Holding Corp, STW Oilfield Construction LLC, STW Pipeline Maintenance Construction, LLC, and STW Energy, LLC as the other subsidiaries noted above were not established during the quarterly period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2014. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company also consolidates any variable interest entities (VIEs), of which it is the primary beneficiary, as defined. The Company does not have any VIEs that need to be consolidated at this time. When the Company does not have a controlling interest in an entity, but exerts a significant influence over the entity, the Company would apply the equity method of accounting.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications were made to the prior period condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation. There was no change to the previously reported net loss. The reclassifications as of December 31, 2014, are comprised of a $321,359 increase in deferred project costs, a $321,359 decrease in property and equipment, a $97,121 decrease in deferred loan fees, and a $97,121 increase in loan discounts.

Non-Controlling interest

~~Non~~On June 25, 2013, the Company invested in a 75% limited liability company (“LLC”) interest in STW Energy Services, LLC (“STW Energy”). The non-~~Controlling~~controlling interest in STW Energy is held by Crown Financial, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company (“Crown” or “Crown Financial”). As of December 31, 2014, $2,500 was recorded as the equity of the non-controlling interest in our consolidated balance sheet representing the third-party investment in STW Energy, with a cumulative net loss attributable to non-controlling interests of $187,474 for the year ended December 31, 2014. During the three month period ended March 31, 2015, a net loss attributable to the non-controlling interest of $81,033 was incurred. As of March 31, 2015, the net deficit interest in the subsidiary held by the non-controlling interest is $268,507.

On June 25, 2013, the Company invested in a 75% limited liability company (“LLC”) interest in STW Energy Services, LLC (“STW Energy”). The non-controlling interest in STW Energy is held by Crown Financial, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company (“Crown” or “Crown Financial”). As of December 31, 2013, $2,500 was recorded as the equity of the non-controlling interest in our consolidated balance sheet representing the third-party investment in STW Energy, with a net loss attributable to non-controlling interests of $48,424 for the year ended December 31, 2013. During the nine month period ended September 30, 2014, a net loss attributable to the non-controlling interest of $166,294 was incurred. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, a net income attributable to the non-controlling interest of $12,998 was incurred. As of September 30, 2014, the net deficit interest in the subsidiary held by the non-controlling interest is $212,218.

Going Concern and Management Plans

The Company’s ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements have been presented ~~assuming~~on ~~that~~ the ~~Company~~basis ~~will~~that ~~continue~~it asis a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company had an accumulated deficit of $3541,~~997~~950,~~228~~763 as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, and as of that date was delinquent in payment of $2,~~448~~834,~~509~~095 of sales, and payroll taxes~~, and penalties~~. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, $23,~~967~~664,~~305~~670 of notes payable isare in default. Since its inception in January 2008 through December 31, 2014, management has raised equity and debt financing of approximately $1520,000,000 to fund operations and provide working capital. The cash resources of the Company are insufficient to meet its planned business objectives without additional financing. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

-6-

Table of Contents

~~-7-~~There can be no assurance that the Company can successfully accomplish these steps and it is uncertain that the Company will achieve a profitable level of operations and obtain additional financing. There can be no assurance that any additional financing will be available to the Company on satisfactory terms and conditions, if at all.

The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues and profitable operations. At September 30, 2014, the Company had $281,931 of cash on hand; however, the Company raised an additional $1,055,750 via revenue participation notes on our new Upton project during the period October 1, 2014 through December 22, 2014, to sustain its operations. Management expects that the current funds on hand will not be sufficient to continue operations through December 31, 2014. Management is currently seeking additional funds, primarily through the issuance of debt or equity securities for cash to operate our business. No assurance can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, and that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to the Company. Even if the Company is able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions on our operations, in the case of debt financing or cause substantial dilution for our stockholders, in case or equity financing.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

Use of Estimates

Condensed consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Among other things, management has estimated the collectability of its accounts receivable, the valuation of long lived assets, the assumptions used to calculate its derivative liabilities, and equity instruments issued for financing and compensation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Accounts Receivable

Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts consists primarily of receivables from oil & gas services fees. Management determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical losses and current economic conditions. On a continuing basis, management analyzes delinquent receivables, and once these receivables are determined to be uncollectible, they are written off either against an existing allowance account or as a direct charge to the condensed consolidated statement of operations. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, ~~respectively,~~ the ~~Company has determined that an~~ allowance for doubtful accounts iswere ~~required~~$26,015 ~~but~~and ~~has~~$77,211, ~~determined it to be immaterial~~respectively.

Loan Discounts

The Company amortizes loan discounts ~~under~~over the term of the loan using the effective interest method.

Concentration of Credit Risk

A financial instrument that potentially subjects the Company to concentration of credit risk is cash. The Company places its cash with financial institutions deemed by management to be of high credit quality. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) provides basic deposit coverage with limits to $250,000 per owner per institution. At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, there were no account balances per institution that would have exceeded the $250,000 insurance limit.

The Company anticipates entering into long-term fixed-price contracts for its services with select oil and gas producers and municipal utilities. The Company will control credit risk related to accounts receivable through credit approvals, credit limits and monitoring procedures.

~~-8-~~As of March 31, 2015, three vendors accounted for 11%, 7% and 5% of total accounts payable. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, three vendors accounted for 86% of total purchases. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, one vendor accounted for 70% of total purchases.

AsDuring ofthe ~~September~~three 30months ended March 31, ~~2014~~2015, three ~~vendors~~customers accounted for 1268%, 98% and 74% of ~~total~~net ~~accounts payable~~revenues. ~~During~~ ~~the~~As ~~nine~~of ~~months~~March ~~ended September 30~~31, ~~2014~~2015, three ~~vendors~~ customers accounted for 8131% ~~of total purchases. During the three months ending September 30~~, ~~2014~~22% ~~three~~and ~~vendors totaled 76~~2% of ~~purchases~~accounts receivable. During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2014, ~~one~~three ~~vendor~~customers accounted for ~~100~~29%, of28% ~~purchases~~ and ~~two vendors accounted for 65~~19% of ~~total~~net ~~purchases, respectively~~revenues.

As of September 30, 2014, three customers accounted for 38%, 16% and 7% of accounts receivable. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, three customers accounted for 32%, 12% and 9% of net revenues. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, three customers accounted for 42%, 8% and 3% of net revenues. As of September 30, 2013, two customers accounted for 79% and 12% of accounts receivable. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, one customer accounted for 42% and 79% of total revenues, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

“Fair value” is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable, notes payable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and derivative liabilities. The carrying value for all such instruments except convertible notes payable and derivative liabilities approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of the instruments. Our derivative liabilities are recorded at fair value (see Note 5).

We determine the fair value of our financial instruments based on a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements under which these assets and liabilities must be grouped, based on significant levels of observable or unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect management’s use of assumptions to external and internal information. This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. These two types of inputs have created the following fair-value hierarchy:

-7-

Table of Contents

Level 1 — Valuations based on unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical securities. Currently, we do not have any items classified as Level 1.

Level 2 — Valuations based on observable inputs (other than Level 1 prices), such as quoted prices for similar assets at the measurement date; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. Currently, we do not have any items classified as Level 2.

Level 3 — Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement, and involve management judgment. We use the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model (“Black-Scholes”) to determine the fair value of the financial instruments.

If the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, a financial security’s hierarchy level is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Our derivative liabilities consist of embedded conversion features on debt, price protection features on warrants, and ~~derivatives due to insufficient authorized shares to settle outstanding contracts which~~ are ~~carried at fair value, and are~~ classified as Level 3 liabilities. We use Black-Scholes to determine the fair value of these instruments (see Note 5).

Management has used the simplified Black Scholes model to estimate fair value of derivative instruments. Management believes that as a result of the relatively short term nature of the warrants and convertibility features, a lattice model would not result in a materially different valuation.

~~-9-~~The following table presents certain financial instruments measured and recorded at fair value on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets on a recurring basis and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

The following table presents certain financial instruments measured and recorded at fair value on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets on a recurring basis and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Fair value of Derivative Liability at March 31, 2015	$	--	$	--	$	1,636,590		$	1,636,590
Fair value of Derivative Liability at December 31, 2014	$	--	$	--	$	802,340		$	802,340

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Fair value of Derivative Liability at September 30, 2014	$	--	$	--	$	1,963,082		$	1,963,082
December 31, 2013	$	--	$	--	$	1,630,985		$	1,630,985

Accounting for Derivatives Liabilities

The Company evaluates stock warrants or other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for. Financial instruments classified as a derivative instrument is marked-to-market at each balance sheet date and recorded as an asset or a liability with the change in fair value adjusted through the statement of operations. ~~In the event that the fair value is recorded as an asset or liability, the change~~ in ~~fair value is recorded in the statement of operations as~~ other income (expense). Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity. Financial instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification to a liability ~~account~~are recorded at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date.

Certain of the Company’s embedded conversion features on debt, with anti-dilution provisions, and price protection features on outstanding common stock warrants are treated as derivatives for accounting purposes. The common stock purchase warrants were not issued with the intent of effectively hedging any future cash flow, fair value of any asset or liability. The warrants do not qualify for hedge accounting, and as such, all future changes in the fair value of these warrants are recognized currently in earnings until such time as the warrants are exercised, expire or the related rights have been waived. These common stock purchase warrants do not trade in an active securities market. The Company estimates the fair value of these warrants and embedded conversion features as derivative liabilities contracts using the Black-Scholes model (see Note 5).

Equity Instruments Issued to Non-Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

Issuances of the Company’s common stock for acquiring goods or services are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued to consultants or vendors is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance to earn the equity instruments is reached (a “performance commitment” which would include a penalty considered to be of a magnitude that is a sufficiently large disincentive for nonperformance) or (ii) the date at which performance is complete. When it is appropriate for the Company to recognize the cost of a transaction during financial reporting periods prior to the measurement date, for purposes of recognition of costs during those periods, the equity instrument is measured at the then-current fair values at each of those interim financial reporting dates.

Long-lived Assets and Intangible Assets

The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their net book value may not be recoverable. When such factors and circumstances exist, the Company compares the projected undiscounted future cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amount. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value, based on market value when available, or discounted expected cash flows, of those assets and is recorded in the period in which the determination is made.

The Company had no such asset impairments during the three ~~and nine~~ months ending ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 or ~~2013~~2014. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products and services under development will continue. Either of these could result in future impairment of long-lived assets.

-108-

Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

During the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014, the Company entered into Master Services Agreements (“MSA”) with several major oil & gas companies. These MSAs contract the Company to provide a range of oil & gas support services including oilfield site construction and maintenance, pipeline maintenance, oil rig cleaning, site preparation, energy support services, and other oil & gas support services. The Company bills these customers pursuant to purchase orders issued under the MSAs. The revenues billed include hourly labor fees and equipment usage fees. The Company recognized revenues from these contracts as the services are performed under the customer purchase orders and no further performance obligations exist, generally in the form of a customer approval. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, the Company recognized $132,~~837~~530,~~611~~490 of revenues from these services contracts, which included $~~143~~58,~~378~~127 revenues from related parties. During the three months ending ~~September~~March 3031, 2014 the Company realized revenue of $43,~~633~~600,~~535~~779 from services contracts, which included $6639,~~000~~992 of the service revenue was from related parties.

Business Segments

The Company has three reportable segments, (1) water reclamation services, (2) oil & gas services and (3) corporate operations. Segment information is reported in Note 9.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company maintains a valuation allowance with respect to deferred tax assets. The Company established a valuation allowance based upon the potential likelihood of realizing the deferred tax asset in the future. Changes in circumstances, such as the Company generating taxable income, could cause a change in judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset. Any reduction in the valuation allowance will be included in income in the year of the change in estimate.

The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The Company had no accrual for interest or penalties on its condensed consolidated balance sheets at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, respectively.

Common Stock and Common Stock Warrants Issued to Employees

The Company uses the fair value recognition provision of ASC 718, “Stock Compensation,” which requires the Company to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of such instruments. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the fair value of any equity instruments on the grant date.

At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, the Company had no grants of employee common stock options or warrants outstanding.

~~-11-~~Net Loss per Share

~~Loss~~The basic net loss per ~~Share~~share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares during the period. The diluted net loss per share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding is the basic weighted average number of shares adjusted for any potentially dilutive shares arising from debt or equity instruments. Diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share due to the lack of dilutive items. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had 15,358,412 and 14,442,977 shares issuable upon conversion or exercise, respectively, which have been excluded as their effect is anti-dilutive.

The basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares during the period. The diluted net loss per share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding is the basic weighted average number of shares adjusted for any potentially dilutive debt or equity. Diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share due to the lack of dilutive items. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had 15,564,926 and 17,058,465 dilutive shares outstanding, respectively, which have been excluded as their effect is anti-dilutive.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. The cost of property and equipment is depreciated or amortized on the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:

Computer equipment and software		3 years
Furniture		3 years
Machinery		3-5 years

Stock Subscriptions Payable

The initial balance of stock subscriptions payable as of December 31, ~~2013~~2014, was $~~310~~27,000 representing ~~645~~41,~~833~~539 shares to be issued. During the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company received stock subscriptions and $1,221,500 of proceeds from~~ three ~~unit offerings of its common stock in consideration of 2,311,875 shares of its common stock. During the nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, $110,~~252,~~000 of these stock subscriptions payable were issued representing 215,~~426,042~~385 shares of common stock, ~~including~~included ~~$160,000~~in ~~, or 333,333 shares, of~~ the December 31, ~~2013~~2014 subscription payable. The remaining balance of stock subscriptions payable as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, is $~~279~~17,~~500~~000 representing ~~531~~26,~~666~~154 shares to be issued.

-9-

Table of Contents

Fees Payable in Common Stock

During the ~~nine~~three months ~~period~~ended ~~ending~~March ~~September 30~~31, ~~2014~~2015, the Company agreed to issue an aggregate of 31,~~076~~013,~~585~~ 262 shares, valued at $3834,~~017,856,~~649 ~~net of cancelling 27,783 of its common stock, valued at $11,669,~~ in payment of performance bonuses, employment signing bonuses, consulting fees, ~~interest, a loan guaranty,~~ and ~~a partial payment of a technology licensing agreement~~interest. During the three months ~~period~~ended ~~ending~~March ~~September 30~~31, ~~2014~~2015, the Company ~~agreed~~issued ~~to issue~~ an aggregate of 12,~~081~~385,~~607~~312 shares of its common stock, valued at $12,~~699~~139,~~912~~287, in payment of performance bonuses, employment signing bonuses, consulting fees, ~~interest, a loan guaranty,~~ and ainterest ~~partial payment of a technology licensing agreement and cancelled zero shares~~ which left a remaining balance in fees payable in common stock of $1,~~284~~479,~~187~~073, or 1,~~622~~987,~~880~~712 shares. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company agreed to issue 350,083 shares for consulting services, signing bonuses, and note extensions valued at $752,076. Shares were issued to consultants totaling 58,333 shares valued at $210,000. During the three months ended September 30, 2013 the company authorized 246,749 shares for consulting services, signing bonuses, and note extensions valued at $542,076. The 58,333 shares payable from the first quarter for consulting fees were issued for a value of $210,000. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had outstanding commitments to issue an aggregate of 101,380 shares of its common stock valued at $231,897.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Recent accounting pronouncements did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015 the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-1203 (ASU 2015-03) Simplifying Balance Sheet Presentation by Presenting Debt Issuance Costs as a Deduction from Recognized Debt Liability. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The new standard requires debt issuance costs to be classified as reductions to the face value of the related debt. The Company has reclassified debt issuance costs previously reported as other assets to loan discounts and debt issuance costs as a deduction of the debt liability.

NOTE 2 – PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014:

	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Office furniture and equipment	$	29,467		$	1629,~~838~~467
Tools and yard equipment		~~585~~729,~~796~~735			2729,~~302~~735
Facilities and leasehold improvements		44,739			--
Vehicles and construction equipment		502,007			502,007
Vehicles and construction equipment		660,984			798,273
Leasehold improvements		15,933			15,933
Total, cost		1,~~320~~277,~~986~~142			~~817~~1,~~413~~277,142
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization		(~~163~~226,~~216~~184	)		(70180,~~775~~502	)
Property and equipment, net	$	1,~~157~~050,~~770~~958		$	~~746~~1,~~638~~096,640

Depreciation expense for the three ~~and nine~~ month periods ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2015 and 2014 is $6545,~~880~~682 and $~~182~~52,~~280~~684, respectively. ~~Depreciation expense for both the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 was $9,617.~~

NOTE 3 – RECEIVABLE FROM FACTOR, NET OF UNAPPLIED CUSTOMER CREDITS

Accounts Purchase Agreement – Crown Financial, LLC

~~On June 21 2013,~~ STW Energy Services, LLC (“STW Energy”) entered into an accounts purchase facility with Crown Financial, LLC, pursuant to an Account Purchase Agreement (the “Accounts Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to the Texas Finance Code.

The Accounts Purchase Agreement shall continue until terminated by either party upon 30 days written notice. The Accounts Purchase Agreement is secured by a security interest in substantially all of STW Energy’s assets pursuant to the terms of a Security Agreement. Under the terms of the Accounts Purchase Agreement, Crown Financial may, at its sole discretion, purchase certain of the STW Energy’s eligible accounts receivable. Upon any acquisition of an account receivable, Crown will advance to STW Energy up to 80% of the face amount of the account receivable; provided however, that based upon when each invoice gets paid, Crown shall pay STW Energy aon ~~rebate~~the ~~percentage~~related ofinvoice ~~between~~less ~~0-18.5%~~fess ofand ~~the~~prior ~~related invoice~~advances. Each account receivable purchased by Crown will be subject to a discount fee of 1.5% of the gross face amount of such purchased account for each 30 day period (or part thereof) the purchased account remains unpaid. Crown will generally have full recourse against STW Energy in the event of nonpayment of any such purchased account. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, respectively, there were no accounts receivables subject to recourse due to nonpayment of the purchased accounts.

The Accounts Purchase Agreement contains covenants that are customary for agreements of this type and appoints Crown as attorney in fact for various activities associated with the purchased accounts receivable, including opening STW Energy’s mail, endorsing its name on related notes and payments, and filing liens against related third parties. The failure to satisfy covenants under the Accounts Purchase Agreement or the occurrence of other specified events that constitute an event of default could result in the acceleration of the repayment obligations of the Company or Crown enforcing its rights under the Security Agreement and take possession of the collateral. The Accounts Purchase Agreement contains provisions relating to events of default that are customary for agreements of this type.

-1310-

~~NOTE~~Table 4of ~~– NOTES PAYABLE~~Contents

~~The~~NOTE ~~Company’s~~4 ~~notes~~– ~~payable~~NOTES ~~at September 30~~PAYABLE, ~~2014 and December 31, 2013, consisted of the following:~~ NET

	September 30,			December 31,
Name	2014			2013
14% Convertible Notes	$	2,326,517		$	2,904,736
12% Convertible Notes		100,000			375,000
Other Short-term Debt		--			43,280
Short term note - MKM		30,000			--
Convertible note – JMJ Financial		55,556			--
GE Note		2,100,000			2,100,000
Deferred Compensation Notes		279,095			279,095
Revenue participation notes		977,702			852,702
Crown Financial note		762,440			683,036
Equipment finance contracts		111,236			137,573
Capital lease obligation		32,862			23,300
Bridge Loans		145,000			--
Unamortized debt discount		(91,106 )			(107,221)
Total debt		6,829,302			7,291,501
Less: Current Portion		(3,709,661	)		(4,668,492	)
Total long term debt	$	3,119,641		$	2,623,009

The Company’s notes payable at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, consisted of the following:

	March 31,			December 31,
Name	2015			2014
14% Convertible Notes	$	2,296,342		$	2,296,342
12% Convertible Notes		100,000			100,000
2015 Transfer Agreements		1,375,000			--
GE Note		2,100,000			2,100,000
Deferred Compensation Notes		279,095			279,095
Revenue participation notes		2,371,500			2,337,500
Crown Financial note		684,484			702,697
Dufrane Note Payable		611,561			725,000
Black Pearl Note Payable		777,096			--
Other Short-term Debt		55,000			55,000
Equipment finance contracts		100,862			110,000
Capital lease obligation		27,948			30,437
Unamortized debt discount and loan fees		(999,797	)		(117,483	)
Total debt		9,779,091			8,618,588
Less: Current Portion		(7,900,661	)		(5,793,293	)
Total long term debt	$	1,878,430		$	2, 825,295
Unamortized loan discounts are applicable to notes payable as follows:
14% convertible notes	$	--		$	20,362
Crown Financial note		82,366			97,121
2015 Transfer Agreements		917,431			--
Total unamortized loan discounts	$	999,797		$	117,483

14% Convertible Notes

~~Between~~As ~~November~~of ~~2011~~March 31, 2015 and ~~September~~December ~~2012~~31, 2014, the aggregate principal balances of the 14% notes are $2,296,342 and $2,296,342, respectively. During the three month period ended March 31, 2015, the Company ~~issued~~had ano ~~series~~activity on these notes. As March 31, 2015, the total of outstanding 14% convertible notes ~~payable~~is to$2,296,342 ~~accredited~~of ~~investors. The~~which ~~Company~~$688,210 ~~also~~matured ~~issued~~on 3or before March 31,~~361,312~~ ~~two~~2015 ~~year~~and ~~warrants~~are toin ~~purchase~~default, ~~common~~however, ~~stock~~as atof anMay ~~exercise~~27, ~~price~~2015, none of ~~$1.20~~the ~~per~~note ~~share. These~~holders have declared the notes ~~plus~~in ~~interest~~default. ~~are~~During ~~convertible~~the ~~into~~three month period ended March 31, 2014, the Company converted principal of $33,793 and accrued interest of $5,~~743~~632 (total of $39,~~480~~425) in exchange for 82,685 shares of the Company’s common stock. The value of the stock issued was $46,479 resulting in additional interest expense of $7,054 upon the conversion of convertible debt.

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, $171,892 of the 14% convertible notes is payable to related parties.

The Company valued the warrants and the embedded conversion feature at inception using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, using the following variables: annual dividend yield of 0%; expected life of 2 years; risk free rate of return of 0.17% - 0.33%; expected volatility of 100%. The estimated fair value of the warrants was $81,656 and the embedded conversion feature was $35,546 at issuance and was recorded as a derivative liability at such time in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The warrants and embedded conversion feature are included in the derivative liabilities account each reporting period as the Company has insufficient authorized shares to settle outstanding contracts (see Note 5). On July 12, 2013, the Company increased its share authorization to 41,666,667 shares (as retroactively restated, per the reverse stock split of 1 for 6), adjusted the gain or loss on the change in fair value through the statement of operations and then reclassified this derivative liability to equity due to the availability of sufficient authorized shares to settle these outstanding contracts.

As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the aggregate principal balances of these notes are $2,326,517 and $2,904,736, respectively. During the nine month period ended September 30, 2014, the Company converted principal and accrued interest of $983,437 in exchange for 1,648,267 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company also issued 2,628 shares for the extension of a note valued at $3,628. The value of the stock issued was $812,607 resulting in additional interest expense of $214,234 upon the conversion of convertible debt. During the three month period ended September 30, 2014, the Company converted principal and accrued interest of $9,568 in exchange for 19,933 shares of the Company’s common stock. Additionally, the Company issued 2,628 shares for the extension of a note valued at $3,628. The value of the stock issued was $31,270 resulting in additional interest expense of $21,702. As September 30, 2014, the total of outstanding 14% convertible notes is $2,326,517 of which $488,210 matured on or before September 30, 2014 and is in default, however, as of December 22, 2014, none of the note holders have declared the notes in default. During the nine month period ended September 30, 2013, the Company converted principal of $2,500. There was no additional activity in the three months ending September 30, 2013 in this area.

As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, $171,892 of the 14% convertible notes is payable to related parties.

-14-

12% Convertible Notes

Between April 2009 and November 2010, the Company issued a series of 12% notes payable to accredited investors that matured on November 30, 2011 and are currently in default. At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, the remaining balance is $100,000. The Company also issued 273,583 warrants to purchase common stock at an exercise price of $0.12 per share that expire at various dates through 2015. The notes and interest are convertible into 1,~~366~~422,~~553~~803 shares of the Company’s common stock.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2015, there was no activity. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company issued 1,137,417 shares of its common stock valued at $614,205 in payment of $225,000 of principal and $116,225 accrued interest (total of $341,225). The conversion of these notes payable and accrued interest for common stock resulted in a non-cash charge of $272,980 to the derivative liability upon the conversion of convertible debt. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, there was no activity. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 183,917 shares of its common stock valued at $66,209 in payment of $15,000 of principal and $6,966 accrued interest (total of $21,966). This resulted in an increase of $44,243 of interest. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, there was no activity.

-11-

Table of Contents

Other Short-Term Debt

~~Other~~On ~~short~~January ~~term~~1, ~~debt~~2014, ~~was~~the ~~comprised~~Company ofissued a ~~note~~$30,000 ~~payable~~short toterm annote ~~accredited~~from an investor, inMKM ~~the~~Capital. ~~amount~~The ofnote ~~$33,280.~~bears Ininterest ~~the~~at ~~three~~8% and ~~nine~~matured ~~months~~on ~~ending~~January ~~September 30~~1, ~~2014, the note was paid off~~2015. The Inbalance of the ~~three~~delinquent ~~and~~note ~~nine~~payable ~~months~~as ~~ending~~of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2015, ~~there~~is ~~was such no activity~~$30,000.

OnIn ~~January~~September 1, 2014, the Company ~~issued~~entered ainto short term loan agreements, which matured in October 2014, with seven accredited investors totaling $30145,000, ~~short~~to ~~term~~sustain ~~note~~daily ~~from~~operating anexpenses; ~~investor,~~the ~~MKM~~loans ~~Capital.~~had ~~The~~a ~~note~~5% ~~bears~~transaction ~~interest~~fee at 8%maturity and ~~matures~~the onlenders ~~January~~were 1,entitled ~~2015~~to receive 18% interest if the notes are not paid at maturity. ~~The~~ ~~balance~~As additional consideration for the loan, the Company agreed to issue the lenders an aggregate of 171,667 shares of common stock, which are only issuable if and when the ~~note~~Company ~~payable~~increases it authorized capital. These shares were included in the "Fees Payable in Common Stock" and were expensed as interest in the current period. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, isall but $3025,000 of the delinquent loans have been repaid, but the remaining lender has not declared a default on the payment of his note.

GE Ionics

In September 2014, the Company entered into short term loan agreements, which matured in October 2014, with seven accredited investors totaling $145,000, to sustain some of its daily operating expenses; the loans had a 5% transaction fee at maturity and the lenders were entitled to receive 18% interest if the notes are not paid at maturity. As additional consideration for the loan, the Company agreed to issue the lenders an aggregate of 171,667 shares of common stock, which are only issuable if and when the Company increases it authorized capital. These shares were included in the "Fees Payable in Common Stock" and were expensed as interest in the current period. As of the date of this Report, all but $35,000 of the loans have been repaid, but the remaining lender has not declared a default on the payment of his note. (See Note 10).

Convertible note payable with original issue discount

On March 19, 2014, the Company issued a $500,000 convertible note to JMJ Financial, an accredited private investor. The note bears interest at 6% and matures on March 19, 2016. The note is convertible under a variable conversion price formula that is based on the lesser of $0.11 per share of 60% of the lowest trade price in the 25 trading days previous to the conversion date. The note bears a $50,000 original issue discount which would yield $450,000 of net cash proceeds to the Company. As of September 30, 2014, the Company has drawn $50,000 cash proceeds from this note. The $50,000 cash draw plus the applicable pro-rata original issue discount results in a gross note payable balance of $55,556. The value of the conversion feature of this note, accounted for as a liability, was determined under the Black-Scholes pricing model to be $92,592 as of the date of issuance, of which $42,592 was recorded as a financing cost in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and $50,000 was recorded as a loan discount. The conversion feature and the original issue discount have been recorded as a loan discount of $55,556 that will be amortized as interest expense over the term of the note under the effective interest method. The effective interest rate of this note was determined to be 25.7%. In November 2014 the note and interest was paid off by the issuance of 70,477 shares of common stock valued at $0.582 per share.

-15-

GE Ionics

On August 31, 2010, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement relating to a $2,100,000 note payable that was amended on October 30, 2011. On May 7, 2012, GE informed the Company that it had failed to make any required installment payment that was due and payable under the GE Note and that the Company’s failure to make any such installment payment(s) constituted an Event of Default under the GE Note. Pursuant to the terms of the GE Note, upon the occurrence of an Event of Default for any reason whatsoever, GE shall, among other things, have the right to (a) cure such defaults, with the result that all costs and expenses incurred or paid by GE in effecting such cure shall bear interest at the highest rate permitted by law, and shall be payable upon demand; and (b) accelerate the maturity of the GE Note and demand the immediate payment thereof, without presentment, demand, protest or other notice of any kind. Upon an event of default under the GE Note, GE shall be entitled to, among other things (i) the principal amount of the GE Note along with any interest accrued but unpaid thereon and (ii) any and all expenses (including attorney’s fees and expenses) incurred in connection with the collection and enforcement of any rights under the GE Note.

Under the terms of the August 31, 2010 note, interest at the rate of WSJ prime plus 2% is due on the note, upon default, interest is due at the maximum legal rate which is 10% in the state of Texas. The note matured on September 1, 2013, and is in default. Interest on the note through ~~September 30, 2014 and~~ December 31, ~~2013~~2014, has been accrued pursuant to the terms of the note through May 6, 2012, interest upon default on May 7, 2012, has been accrued at the maximum default rate in the state of Texas which is 10%.

As of the date hereof, the Company has not repaid any principal or accrued but unpaid interest that has become due and payable under the GE Note.

On May 22, 2013, GE filed a lawsuit against STW in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Index No. 651832/2013 (the “GE Lawsuit”). Although the lawsuit arises out of STW’s obligations to GE under its Settlement Agreement with GE, (upon which STW owed GE $2.1 million plus interest, GE has elected to forgo suit on the settlement amount and sue STW for the original debt of $11,239,437, plus interest and attorneys’ fees (the “Original Debt”). As such, STW filed its Answer and, asserted that it is entitled to and shall pursue all of its available legal and equitable defenses to the Original Debt, inasmuch as GE has, among other things, failed to discount the Original Debt sued upon by the amounts that it recovered through re-use and re-sale of the equipment it fabricated for STW. Management has not accrued the original amount of the debt because the probability of recovery is remote. (See Note 98)

Deferred Compensation Notes

As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, the Company has a balance of $279,095 payable under deferred compensation, non-interest bearing, notes to its former Chief Executive Officer and its in house counsel. The notes matured December 31, 2012, and the notes are in default.

Revenue Participation Notes

As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, the Company has an outstanding balance of $~~977~~2,~~702~~371,500 and $2,337,500, respectively of Revenue Participation Notes comprised as follows:

2012 Revenue Participation Notes	$	165,000
	March 31,		December 31,
2013 Revenue Participation Notes - STW Resources Salt Water Remediation		302,500
Name	2015		2014
2013 Revenue Participation Notes - STW Energy		182,000
2012 Revenue Participation Notes	$	165,000	$	165,000
2013 Convertible Revenue Participation Notes - STW Pipeline		203,202
2013 Revenue Participation Notes - STW Resources Salt Water Remediation		302,500		302,500
2014 Revenue Participation Notes – STW Resources Upton Project		125,000
2013 Revenue Participation Notes - STW Energy		182,000		182,000
Total revenue participation notes	$	977,702
2013 Convertible Revenue Participation Notes - STW Pipeline		115,000		115,000
2014 Revenue Participation Notes, Upton Project – STW Water		1,607,000		1,573,000
Total revenue participation notes	$	2,371,500	$	2,337,500

These notes are more fully described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, which were included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-~~16-~~K as filed with the SEC on April 3, 2015.

~~These notes are more fully described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013, which were included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10~~-~~K as filed with the SEC on September 20, 2014.~~12-

Table of Contents

2014 Revenue Participation Notes – STW Resources Upton Project

On September 30, 2014, the Company issued its first note for ~~$125,000 for~~ the new Upton Project. As of ~~which~~March 31, 2015, the total principal amount of this financing ~~will~~is be $1,~~250~~607,000. The financing is a Senior Secured Master Note, with a 15% coupon and a maturity of 18 months with interest only payments paid the first three months and equal monthly payments of principal and interest paid for months four though eighteen of the Master Note with Revenue Participation Interest. Additionally, a 5% royalty is assigned to the Master Note, which will be distributed based on pro rata ownership by investors in the Master Note. Principal and interest payments will come solely from the Investors share of the revenue participation fees from water processing contracts related to brackish water. This Agreement, including but not limited to the revenue sharing arrangement, is applicable to the brackish water processing facility being built with the proceeds of the Note. At March 31, 2015, $197,365 of the principal payments is in default. As of the date of this Report the investors have not declared a default on the payment of these notes.

Note payable to Crown Financial, LLC, a related party

On June 26, 2013, STW Energy Services, LLC entered into a loan agreement with Crown Financial, LLC for a $1.0 million loan facility to purchase machinery and equipment for STW Energy Services. Crown Financial, LLC is a related party in that it holds a 25% non-controlling interest in our subsidiary: STW Energy Services, LLC. The note matures on June 25, 2016, and bears interest at 15%. Commencing November 1, 2013, monthly principal and interest payments are due on the note over a thirty-three month period. The note is secured by all assets of STW Energy Services. LLC. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, the Company had drawn down $~~762~~684,~~440~~484 and $~~683~~702,~~036~~697, respectively, of this loan facility.

InFor ~~lieu~~the ofthree amonths ~~cash~~ended ~~loan~~March ~~fee~~31, ~~the~~2015 ~~Company~~and ~~issued 666~~2014,~~667~~ ~~warrants~~interest inexpense ~~connection~~on ~~with~~all ~~this~~notes ~~loan~~payable ~~agreement.~~described ~~These~~above ~~warrants~~was ~~have an exercise price of~~ $1~~.20~~,219,588 ~~are immediately exercisable~~ and ~~have a two year maturity. The Company valued the warrants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model~~$437,602, using the following variables: annual dividend yield of 0%; expected life of 2 years; risk free rate of return of 0.25%; expected volatility of 623%. The Company estimated the value of the warrants to be $159respectively,~~996~~ ~~and~~which ~~recorded~~included ~~this loan fee as a deferred loan cost to be amortized to interest expense over the term of the loan. Related party interest expense for this loan was~~ $16475,~~252~~868 and $4843,~~756 for the three and nine months ended September 30~~801, ~~2014~~respectively, ~~respectively.~~of ~~For~~amortization ~~both~~of ~~the~~debt ~~three~~discount and ~~nine~~debt ~~months~~issuance ~~ended September 30, 2013 the related party interest expense was $16,252~~costs.

2015 Transfer Agreement Convertible Notes Payable

~~Equipment~~During ~~Finance~~the ~~Contracts~~three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company issued a $1,375,000 of convertible notes payable to four (4) accredited investors. The notes bear interest at 5% and mature at various dates through October 17, 2015. The notes are convertible, including accrued interest, into 2,141,827 shares at a conversion price of $0.65. In the event of default, the notes are convertible at a price equal to the lower of (a) $0.65 or (b) 60% multiplied by the lowest closing trade price of the common shares for the ten (10) trading days immediately prior to the applicable conversion date.

~~During~~The ~~2013,~~conversion feature of the ~~Company~~2015 ~~financed~~Transfer Agreement convertible notes payable meets the ~~purchase~~definition of ~~vehicles~~a ~~and~~derivative ~~other~~due ~~equipment~~to ~~with~~the ~~equipment~~reset ~~finance~~provision ~~contracts~~to ~~from~~occur ~~various~~upon ~~banks~~the ~~and~~issuance ~~finance~~of ~~institutions~~equity based instruments at below $0. ~~The~~65 ~~contracts~~per ~~mature~~share inor ~~three~~upon todefault ~~five~~of ~~years~~the notes and ~~bear~~is ~~interest~~accounted atfor ~~rates~~as ~~ranging~~a ~~from~~derivative 4liability.7% toThe ~~8.0%.~~Company ~~The~~has ~~contracts~~determined ~~are~~the ~~secured~~value byof the ~~associated~~conversion ~~equipment.~~feature Asupon default of ~~September~~this 30note using the Black-Scholes pricing model to be $1,108,030 ~~2014~~as ~~and~~of ~~December~~the 31date of issuance, ~~2013~~of which $479,877 ~~respectively~~was recorded as a financing cost in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and $628,153 was recorded as a loan discount. In connection with these notes, the Company ~~has~~issued an525,000 ~~aggregate~~shares ~~balance~~of its common stock to the investors valued at $470,500. The Company also incurred third party loan fees of $~~111~~151,~~238~~347 on these notes. The value of the conversion feature of $628,153 and $~~137~~746,~~573~~847. ~~payable~~will onbe ~~these~~amortized ~~equipment~~as ~~finance~~interest ~~contracts~~expense over the term of the note under the straight line method, which we believe approximates the effective interest method due to their short term nature. The effective interest rate of this note was determined to be 102.5%.

NOTE 5 - DERIVATIVE LIABILITY

Capital lease obligation

During 2013, the Company entered into a capital lease of a modular office trailer. The lease contract calls for forty eight (48) monthly payments of $593 with a purchase option at the end of the lease. The Company determined the value of the capital lease to be $23,300 with an implicit interest rate in the lease of 10%. In July of 2014, the Company entered into a lease for a commercial ice machine with Executive Leasing, Inc. The lease contract calls for Thirty six (36) monthly payments of $505 with a purchase option at the end of the lease. The Company determined the value of the capital lease to be $14,854 with an implicit interest rate in the lease of 12%. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the principal balances on these capital leases totaled $32,862 and $23,300, respectively.

-17-

For the nine month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, interest expense on all notes payable described above was $1,564,896 and $963,736, respectively, which included $137,902 and $106,846, respectively, of amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs. For the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, interest expense on all notes payable described above was $619,391 and $403,174, respectively. This included $47,061 and $49,974, respectively, of amortization of debt discount and debt issuance. There was no interest capitalized in 2014 or 2013.

NOTE 5 - DERIVATIVE LIABILITY

We apply the accounting standard that provides guidance for determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument, or embedded feature, is indexed to an entity’s own stock. The standard applies to any freestanding financial instrument or embedded features that have the characteristics of a derivative, and to any freestanding financial instruments that are potentially settled in an entity’s own common stock.

From time to time, the Company has issued notes with embedded conversion features and warrants to purchase common stock. Certain of the embedded conversion features and warrants contain price protection or anti-dilution features that result in these instruments being treated as derivatives, or there were insufficient shares to satisfy the exercise of the instruments. On July 12, 2013, the Company increased its share authorization to 41,666,667 shares and removed this derivative liability associated with the 14% convertible notes due to the availability of sufficient authorized shares to settle these outstanding contracts.

During ~~2013~~the first quarter of 2015, the Company computed a historical volatility of ~~623~~160% using daily pricing observations for recent periods. We applied a historical volatility rate during the ~~year~~period ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2013~~2015, and future periods, since the Company exited its development stage and commenced commercial operations. We believe this method produces an estimate that is representative of our expectations of future volatility over the expected term of these ~~warrants and~~ embedded conversion features.

We currently have no reason to believe that future volatility over the expected remaining life of these warrants and embedded conversion features is likely to differ materially from historical volatility. The expected life is based on the remaining term of the warrants and embedded conversion features. The risk-free interest rate is based on one-year to five-year U.S. Treasury securities consistent with the remaining term of the warrants and embedded conversion features.

~~The following table presents our warrants and embedded conversion options which have no observable market data and are derived using Black~~-~~Scholes measured at fair value on a recurring basis, using Level 3 inputs, as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:~~13-

	For the nine months ended September 30, 2014		For the year ended December 31, 2013
Annual dividend yield	0	%	0	%
Expected life (years)	0.00 - 0.50		0.00 - 0.60
Risk-free interest rate	0.11% - 0.25	%	0.11% - 0.25	%
Expected volatility	623	%	623	%

Table of Contents

	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Embedded Conversion features	$	1,732,452	$	1,467,579
Warrants		230,630		163,406
	$	1,963,082	$	1,630,985

The following table presents our warrants and embedded conversion options which have no observable market data and are derived using Black-Scholes measured at fair value on a recurring basis, using Level 3 inputs, as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

-18-

	For the three months ended March 31, 2015			For the year ended December 31, 2014
Annual dividend yield		0	%		0	%
Expected life (years)		0.00 - 0.50			0.60 - 0.47
Risk-free interest rate		0.11% - 0.25	%		0.11% - 0.25	%
Expected volatility		160	%		735	%

	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Embedded Conversion features	$	1,620,142	$	751,439
Warrants		16,448		50,901
	$	1,636,590	$	802,340

The following table presents the changes in fair value of our warrants and embedded conversion features measured at fair value (level 3 in the fair value hierarchy) on a recurring basis for each reporting period-end.

	For the nine months ended September 30, 2014			For the year ended December 31, 2013
	For the three months ended March 31, 2015			For the year ended December 31, 2014
Balance beginning	$	1802,~~630,985~~340		$	1,~~046~~630,~~439~~985
Change in derivative liability due to increased share authorization		--			(1,977,372)
Value of derivative liability associated with JMJ note payable		--			42,592
Value of derivative liability associated with JMJ note payable		42,592			--
Value of derivative liability attributable to conversion feature of Transfer Agreements		1,108,030			--
Value of derivative liability attributable to conversion of notes payable and accrued interest		~~(715,981)~~--			--(694,149	)
Change in derivative liability associated with conversion of notes payable and accrued interest		~~(272,980)~~--			--(272,980	)
Change in fair value		1(273,~~278,466~~780	)		295,~~561,918~~892
Balance ending	$	1,~~963~~636,~~082~~590		$	1802,~~630,985~~340

The ~~reduction~~increase in fair value of the derivative liability is largely attributable to the ~~effect~~derivative onliability associated with the ~~derivative~~conversion ~~liability~~feature ~~from~~of the ~~payment~~transfer ofagreement ~~$50,000~~convertible notes payable. The change in the fair value of ~~notes~~the ~~and~~derivative liability is attributable to the ~~conversion~~expiration of ~~$225,000~~some of ~~notes,~~the ~~and~~warrants ~~related~~that ~~accrued~~were ~~interest~~outstanding.

NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Officers’ Compensation

During the ~~nine~~three ~~month~~months ~~periods~~ ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, we incurred $~~112~~42,500 and $~~112~~37,500, respectively, in officers’ compensation due our Director, Chairman, and CEO, Mr. Stanley Weiner. ~~During the three month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, we incurred $37,500 and $37,500, respectively.~~ As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, the balances of $~~375~~455,583 and $~~263~~413,083, respectively, were payable to Mr. Weiner for his officers’ salary. There were no payments to Mr. Weiner during the three months ended March 31, 2015 or 2014.

During the ~~nine~~three ~~month~~months ~~periods~~ ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, we incurred ~~$75,000~~zero and $~~112~~37,500, respectively, in officers’ compensation due to one of our former Directors and former Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Lee Maddox. ~~During the three month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, we incurred zero and $37,500, respectively.~~ As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, the balances of $~~245~~205,500 and $~~170~~220,500, respectively, were payable to Mr. Maddox for his officers’ salary. During the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company paid Mr. Maddox $15,000 and zero, respectively.

During the ~~nine~~three ~~month~~months ~~periods~~ ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, we incurred $6724,~~500~~000 and ~~$67~~zero,~~500,~~ respectively, in ~~general~~officers’ ~~counsel~~compensation ~~services~~due ~~fees~~to ~~expense~~one ~~with~~of ~~Seabolt Law Group, a firm owned by~~ our ~~Director~~Directors and ~~General Counsel~~Officer, Mr. ~~Grant~~Paul ~~Seabolt~~DiFrancesco. As ~~During~~of ~~the~~March ~~three~~31, ~~month~~2015 ~~periods~~and ~~ended~~December ~~September 30~~31, 2014 ~~and 2013~~, wethe ~~incurred~~balances of $229,~~500~~000 and ~~$22~~zero,~~500,~~ respectively~~. As~~, ofwere ~~September~~payable ~~30,~~to ~~2014~~Mr. ~~and~~DiFrancesco ~~December~~for ~~31,~~his ~~2013,~~officers’ salary. During the ~~balances~~three ofmonths ~~$166~~ended March 31,~~083~~ 2015 and ~~$121~~2014,~~083,~~ ~~respectively,~~the ~~were~~Company ~~payable~~paid toMr. ~~Seabolt~~DiFrancesco ~~Law~~$15,000 ~~Group~~and ~~for~~zero, ~~these services~~respectively.

During the ~~nine~~three ~~month~~months ~~periods~~ ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, we incurred $~~369~~23,~~983~~500 and ~~none~~$22,500, respectively, in ~~CFO,~~general ~~audit~~counsel ~~preparation, tax, and SEC compliance~~ services fees expense with ~~Miranda~~Seabolt &Law ~~Associates~~Group, a ~~Professional~~firm ~~Accountancy Corporation, and Miranda CFO Services, Inc., firms~~ owned by our ~~Chief~~Director ~~Financial~~and ~~Officer~~General Counsel, Mr. ~~Robert~~Grant JSeabolt. ~~Miranda. During the three month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, we incurred $70,000 and none, respectively.~~ As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, the ~~balance~~balances of $~~195~~188,~~000~~297 and $24179,~~060~~797, respectively, were payable to ~~these~~Seabolt ~~firms~~Law Group for these services. During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2015 and 2014, ~~we paid Miranda & Associates in~~ the ~~form~~Company ofpaid ~~common stock 125,292 shares of common stock valued at $72,175 toward these fees~~Mr. AsSeabolt ~~of September 30, 2014, we have agreed to pay~~ $~~166~~15,~~667 shares of common stock valued at $100,~~000 ~~toward~~and ~~these obligations, leaving a cash payable balance due of~~ $9515,000 ~~as of September 30~~, ~~2014~~respectively.

~~-19-~~During three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we incurred $65,749 and $148,598, respectively, in CFO, audit preparation, tax, and SEC compliance services fees expense with Miranda CFO Services, Inc. and Miranda & Associates, a Professional Accountancy Corporation, firms owned by our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Robert J. Miranda. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the balances of $70,520 and $219,271, respectively, were payable to Miranda & Associates for these services.

During the nine month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, we incurred $90,000 and none, respectively, in officers’ consulting fees due to our Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Joshua Brooks. During the three month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, we incurred $30,000 and none, respectively. During the nine month period ended September 30, 2014, we also incurred with Mr. Joshua Brooks a performance bonus comprised of 333,333 million shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $120,000. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the balance of $90,000 and $30,000, was payable to Mr. Brooks for his officers’ salary. Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Brooks is paid in common stock in lieu of cash compensation. These stock awards are accrued as fees payable in common stock the awards are vested. The Company has been accruing payroll taxes on these payments.-14-

~~During~~Table ~~the nine month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, we incurred $150,000 and none, respectively, in officers’ salary due to the President~~ of our wholly-owned subsidiary, STW Pipeline Maintenance & Construction, LLC. Mr. Adam Jennings. During the three month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, we incurred $50,000 and none, respectively. During the nine month period ended September 30, 2014, we incurred with Mr. Adam Jennings a signing bonus comprised of 266,667 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $142,000. During the three month period ended September 30, 2014, we incurred with Mr. Adam Jennings a signing bonus comprised of 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $21,000. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the balance of $121,000 and $27,000, was payable to Mr. Jennings for the value of signing bonuses due under his employment agreement. These stock awards are accrued as fees payable in common stock as the awards are vested.Contents

~~Board~~During three month periods ended March 31, 2015 and ~~Advisory~~2014, ~~Board~~we ~~Compensation~~incurred $50,000 and $50,000, respectively, in officers’ salary due to the President of our wholly-owned subsidiary, STW Pipeline Maintenance & Construction, LLC. Mr. Adam Jennings. During the three month period ended March 31, 2014, we incurred with Mr. Adam Jennings a signing bonus comprised of 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $21,000. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the balance of $21,000 and $121,000, was payable to Mr. Jennings for the value of signing bonuses due under his employment agreement. These stock awards are accrued as fees payable in common stock the awards are vested.

During three month periods ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we incurred $50,000 and none, respectively, in officers’ salary due to the President of our wholly-owned subsidiary, STW Water Process and Technologies, LLC. Mr. Alan Murphy. In the second quarter of 2014, we incurred with Mr. Alan Murphy a signing bonus comprised of 333,333 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $200,000. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the balance of $200,000 and $200,000, was payable to Mr. Murphy for the value of signing bonuses due under his employment agreement. These stock awards are accrued as fees payable in common stock the awards are vested.

Board and Advisory Board Compensation

Directors are expected to timely and fully participate in all regular and special board meetings, and all meetings of committees that they serve on. In December 2011, the Board voted to authorize the issuance of shares in lieu of cash compensation for past services.

Per the Director Agreements, the Company compensates each of the directors through the initial grant of 33,333 shares of common stock and the payment of a cash fee equal to $1,000 plus travel expenses for each board meeting attended, and $75,000 per year as compensation for serving on our board of directors. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company incurred board of director fees of $468,750 and $452,849, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company incurred board of director fees of $131,250 and $178,025, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company issued zero and 930,261 shares of its common stock in payment of these fees, valued at zero and $558,157, respectively. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company has accrued compensation due to its directors (both current and former) of $402,317 and $491,724, respectively.

AsFor ofthe ~~September~~three ~~30,~~months ~~2014~~ended ~~and~~March ~~December~~ 31, ~~2013~~2015 and 2014, the Company incurred ~~has~~board of director fees of $1112,~~277,573~~500 and $~~139~~168,~~763~~750, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company issued 562,500 and zero shares of ~~related~~its ~~party~~common ~~payables~~stock toin ~~Black~~payment ~~Pearl~~of ~~Energy~~these fees, ~~LLC~~valued at $450,000 aand ~~company~~zero. ~~controlled~~As byof March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company’s ~~CEO,~~has ~~COO~~accrued compensation due to its directors (both current and former) of $112,500 and ~~General~~$496,067, ~~Counsel~~respectively.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company, had related party sales of $143,378 and $57,408, respectively. During three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company, had sales of $66,000 and $57,408, respectively. Related ~~party~~Party ~~sales are a combination of sales to three companies Black Pearl Energy, LLC, Dufrane Construction, and Dufrane Nuclear Shielding Inc.~~Sales

AsDuring ofthree ~~September~~months 30ended March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~December 31~~2014, ~~2013,~~ the Company, ~~has~~had a related party ~~payable~~sales of $~~193~~58,~~553~~127 and $~~132~~39,~~490~~992, respectively,. toRelated ~~Dufrane~~party ~~Nuclear,~~sales ~~Inc.~~are a ~~company~~combination ~~controlled~~of bysales ~~Mr.~~to ~~Joshua~~three ~~Brooks~~companies Black Pearl Energy, ~~the~~LLC, ~~Company’s~~Dufrane ~~Chief~~Construction, ~~Operating~~and ~~Officer~~Dufrane Nuclear Shielding Inc.

~~-20-~~As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company has a related party note payable of $611,561 and $725,000, respectively, to Dufrane Nuclear, Inc. a company controlled by Mr. Joshua Brooks, the Company’s Former Chief Operating Officer. During the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company made payments on the note of $113,439 and zero, respectively, in principal.

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company has $777,096 of related party notes payables and $37,084 of related party payables, respectively, to Black Pearl Energy, LLC, a company controlled by the Company’s CEO, COO, and General Counsel. (See Black Pearl note payable)

Line of credit with Black Pearl Energy, LLC

On March 19, 2014, we entered into a Line of Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement") with Black Pearl Energy, LLC ("Black Pearl"), an entity controlled by Stan Weiner and Lee Maddox, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and former Chief Operating Officer, respectively, and one of our directors: Grant Seabolt. Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, Black Pearl issued us a $2,000,000 line of credit, of which $1,~~277~~054,~~573~~944 has been advanced as of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014. The credit was issued in the form of a promissory note (the "Note"). We ~~must~~On ~~pay~~February ~~back all advanced funds on or before August 1~~26, ~~2014~~2015, ~~although such date will be extended to September 30, 2014 if we do not receive gross proceeds of no less than $6,000,000 resulting from either or both of: (a)~~ the ~~consummation~~open ofbalance ~~one or more private placements~~ of ~~debt or equity securities, not including~~ the ~~funds~~credit ~~received~~line ~~pursuant~~and toaccrued ~~the~~interest ~~Credit~~were ~~Agreement;~~converted orinto ~~(b) the filing of~~ a ~~registration~~note ~~statement~~payable, ondescribed ~~Form~~in ~~S-1 with~~ the ~~Securities~~next ~~and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for an initial public offering of our securities. Interest accrues at 11% per annum. To further induce Black Pearl to issue us the line of credit~~paragraph, ~~we agreed to issue them 250,000 restricted shares of our common stock~~ and ~~a $25,000 transaction fee to be paid on~~ the ~~final closing date of the~~ credit line was dissolved.

~~Upon an event of default, which includes nonpayment of any funds owed or bankruptcy,~~ Black Pearl ~~may~~note cease making further advances to us until such default is cured; if the default is not cured, all of Black Pearl's obligations under the Agreement and the Note shall cease and terminate, and Black Pearl may: (i) declare the outstanding principal evidenced by the Note immediately due and payable; (ii) exercise any remedy provided for in the Credit Agreement; or (iii) (iv) exercise any other right or remedy available to it pursuant to the Credit Agreement or Note, or as provided at law or in equity. Interest on the advanced funds shall increase to 18% until the default is cured.:

On February 26, 2015, the Company negotiated an extension on the note payable to Black Pearl Energy, a Related Party, and established the balance at $1,079,944 plus $105,363 in interest due. The note is to be paid on a monthly basis of $12,000 per month for 48 months and a balloon payment in February of 2019. On March 5, 2015, the note was revised to consolidate the receivables and the payable and net the note down to $805,863 and reduce the interest due to approximately $67,000. Additionally Black Pearl is to be granted 75,000 shares to cure the default and 131,704 shares of common stock to make the extension. These stock awards are accrued as fees payable in common stock the awards are vested.

Factoring Agreement with Crown Financial, LLC

On January 13, 2014, STW Resource Holding Corp entered into an accounts receivable factoring facility (the “Factoring Facility”) with Crown Financial, LLC ("Crown"), pursuant to an Account Purchase Agreement (the “Factoring Agreement”). The Factoring Agreement is secured through a Security Agreement between the Company, two of our subsidiaries: STW Pipeline Maintenance & Construction, LLC and STW Oilfield Construction, LLC (collectively, the "Subsidiaries") and Crown, by all of the instruments, accounts, contracts and rights to the payment of money, all general intangibles and all equipment of the Company and the Subsidiaries. The Factoring Facility includes a loan in the amount of $4,000,000. Although our former Chief Operating Officer, Lee Maddox, personally guaranteed our full and prompt performance of all of our obligations, representations, warranties and covenants under the Factoring Agreement, pursuant to a Guaranty Agreement for and in consideration of Crown issuing us the Factoring Facility, such guaranty was terminated when Mr. Maddox resigned as our COO in July 2014, pursuant to the terms of the related Termination Agreement.

-15-

Table of Contents

The Factoring Facility shall continue until terminated by either party upon 30 days written notice. Under the terms of the Factoring Agreement, Crown may, at its sole discretion, purchase certain of the Company’s eligible accounts receivable. Upon any acquisition of an account receivable, Crown will advance to the Company up to 80% of the face amount of the account receivable (the "Purchase Price"); although Crown maintains the right to propose a change in that rate, which we can accept in writing, orally or by accepting funding based on such changed rate. Additionally, based upon when each invoice gets paid, Crown shall pay us a rebate percentage of between 0-18% of the related invoice. Crown will generally have full recourse against us in the event of nonpayment of any such purchased account. Crown has the discretion to also accept a substitute invoice from us for uncollected invoices; if such substitute invoice is not accepted, we will be obligated to pay Crown the Purchase Price of such uncollected invoice plus interest at the maximum lawful interest rate per annum, minus any payments made on the invoice.

The Factoring Agreement contains covenants that are customary for agreements of this type and appoints Crown as attorney in fact for various activities associated with the purchased accounts receivable, including opening our mail, endorsing our name on related notes and payments, and filing liens against related third parties. The failure to satisfy covenants under the Factoring Agreement or the occurrence of other specified events that constitute an event of default could result in the acceleration of our repayment obligations or Crown enforcing its rights under the Security Agreement and taking possession of the collateral. The Factoring Agreement contains provisions relating to events of default that are customary for agreements of this type.

~~-21-~~As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company has a related party payable of $1,039,545 and $2,035,495, respectively to Crown Financial.

Service Agreement

On September 24, 2013, the Company entered into a service agreement with one of its executive officers pursuant to which the officer agreed to provide a personal guaranty to lenders and/or suppliers from which the Company's subsidiary, STW Oilfield Construction, LLC ("Oilfield Construction"), seeks to rent or purchase equipment, as specified in each agreement. In consideration for the personal guaranty, the Company agreed to issue to the officer that number of shares of its common stock, valued at $0.72 per share, as is equal to the amount of the guaranty (the "Guaranty Shares"). The value of the 63,667 shares of common stock was recorded on September 24, 2013, as fees payable in common stock. The Company maintains the right to terminate these service agreements at any time with written notice. The term of the agreement/guaranty is for 6 months. The following table provides salient information about this service agreement.

Name and Title		Date of Agreement		Amount of Personal Guaranty				Guaranty Shares
Joshua Brooks, Chief Operating Officer		September 24, 2013		$	45,800	(1)			63,667

(1) Pursuant to the service agreement with Mr. Brooks, any amounts due on a related defaulted lease in excess of 20% of the amount of the personal guaranty, shall be the Company's obligation. If Brooks' employment with the Company is terminated, the Company shall use its best commercial efforts to have it, or a third party, assume Brooks' guarantee obligations.

NOTE 7 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Preferred Stock

The Company has authorized 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001 per share. However, as of ~~the~~March ~~date~~31, ~~of this Report~~2015, no such shares are issued or outstanding and the Company does not currently have any plans to issue shares of such stock.

Common Stock

~~Common~~The ~~Stock~~Company has authorized 191,666,667 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company issued common shares as follows:

~~The Company has authorized 41,666,667 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company issued common shares as follows~~Issued:

~~During~~On January ~~2014~~15, 2015, the Company issued ~~an aggregate of 926~~62,~~603~~500 shares of ~~its~~ common stock ~~valued~~to an investor, at a unit price of $~~510~~1.56,~~769~~ in payment of ~~accrued~~interest ~~paid-in-kind~~on ~~(“PIK”)~~a ~~interest~~short term loan for a value of $97,500 and an additional 170,000 shares of common stock, at a unit price of $1.40 to ~~twelve~~a ~~(12)~~consultant ~~investors~~for services valued at $238,000.

~~During~~On January 27, ~~2014~~2015, the Company issued ~~an aggregate of 122~~281,~~190~~167 shares of ~~its~~ common stock, toat ~~twelve~~various ~~(12)~~unit ~~investors~~prices, valued at $67209,~~354~~825 asto ~~consideration~~19 employees for ~~the~~signing ~~extension~~bonuses ofand ~~the~~continued ~~maturity~~service ~~date~~ to ~~June 1, 2015, on~~ the ~~14% convertible notes that matured on November 30, 2013 and in default~~company.

~~During~~On January 28, ~~2014~~2015, the Company issued ~~an aggregate of 1~~158,~~220,101~~335 shares of ~~its~~ common stock, ~~valued~~ at ~~$660,684~~various ~~upon~~unit ~~the~~prices, ~~conversion~~to of7 ainvestors ~~14%~~valued ~~convertible~~at ~~note~~$225,128 ~~and~~in ~~two~~payment ~~12%~~of ~~convertible~~interest ~~notes~~on ~~(see~~7 ~~Note~~short 5)term loans.

~~During~~In ~~January~~the ~~and~~first week of February, ~~2014~~2015, the Company issued ~~250~~378,~~000~~334 shares of ~~its~~ common stock, at various unit prices, valued at $~~145~~344,~~000~~100 to ~~consultants~~4 ~~for~~employees ~~services~~pursuant ~~rendered~~to their employment contracts.

~~During~~On ~~March~~February ~~2014~~3, 2015, the Company issued ~~312~~15,~~500~~385 shares of ~~its~~ common stock, toat ana ~~investor~~unit ~~that~~price ~~had~~of ~~subscribed and paid~~ $~~150~~0.65,~~000~~ ~~for~~to ~~the~~an ~~shares~~accredited oninvestor ~~November~~based ~~15,~~on ~~2013.~~a ~~This~~unit ~~subscription~~offering ofat ~~shares~~$0.65 ~~was~~per ~~previously~~unit, ~~reported~~increasing asCapital ~~Stock~~of ~~Subscriptions~~the ~~Payable~~Company asby ~~of December 31~~$10, ~~2013~~000.

~~During~~On ~~March~~February ~~2014~~3, 2015, the Company issued ~~130~~100,~~208~~000 shares of ~~its~~ common stock ~~in consideration of $62~~,~~500~~ ~~cash~~at ~~proceeds~~a ~~realized~~unit ~~from~~price ~~the sale~~ of ~~stock~~$0.68, to an accredited ~~investors~~investor atfor $~~0.48~~68,000 ~~per~~in ~~share~~loan origination fees.

~~-22-~~On February 6, 2015, the Company issued 150,001 shares of fully vested common stock, at various unit prices, to 3 consultants valued at $119,500 in payment of services rendered in 2014, previously accrued, and the renewal of a 2015 contract.

~~During~~On ~~the~~February ~~period April 1~~6, ~~2014 through September 17~~2015, ~~2014, we sold an aggregate of 1,910,833 units pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement (~~the ~~"Purchase~~Company ~~Agreement")~~issued ~~to fifty (50) accredited investors (the "Investors")~~225,000 ~~each~~shares ~~consisting~~ of ~~(a) one share of~~ common stock ~~and (b) one~~, ~~2 year, common stock purchase warrant to purchase one share of common stock~~ at anvarious ~~exercise~~unit ~~price of $1.20 per share~~prices, ~~subject~~ to ~~adjustment~~3 ~~(the~~accredited ~~"Warrants,"~~investors ~~collectively~~for ~~with the shares of common stock, the "Units"). Each Unit had a purchase price of~~ $~~0.48~~187, ~~and the Company received an aggregate of $1,029,~~000 in ~~gross~~loan ~~funding~~origination ~~in the transaction (the "Offering")~~fees. ~~One of the investors, because of additional circumstances, received an additional 16,667 warrants so total warrants were 1,927,500.~~

InOn ~~April~~February ~~2014~~17, 2015, the Company issued ~~104~~100,~~166~~000 shares of common stock, onat a unit ~~share~~price ~~offering~~of at $0.~~48 for proceeds of $70~~81,~~000.~~ ~~The Company issued 930,261 shares of common stock~~ to ~~the~~an ~~Board~~accredited ofinvestor ~~Directors~~ for ~~services rendered; this was valued at~~ $~~558~~81,~~157. Additional shares of 100,~~000 ~~were issued to an employee as a signing bonus valued at $60,000. Officer’s compensation was paid by issuing 402,708 shares of common stock~~ in ~~lieu~~loan oforigination ~~paying $241,625. Consultants were issued 186,958 shares of common stock in lieu of paying $112,175 in accrued~~ fees.

On ~~May~~February 2218, ~~2014~~2015, the Company ~~converted~~issued a184,975 ~~14%~~shares ~~convertible~~of ~~note~~common ~~that~~stock ~~was~~to inan ~~default~~investment ingroup, ~~the~~at ~~amount~~a unit price of $~~544~~0.65,~~426~~ ofvalued ~~principal~~at ~~and~~ $~~197~~120,~~486~~233 offor ~~accrued~~services ~~interest~~rendered ~~into~~in ~~1,545,650~~procuring ~~shares~~investors offor ~~its~~the ~~common stock~~company.

InOn ~~May~~February ~~2014~~19, a2015, ~~consultant~~the ~~was~~Company issued 83100,~~333~~000 shares of common stock, inat ~~lieu~~a ofunit ~~fees~~price of $600.85, to an accredited investor for $85,000 in loan origination fees.

~~On June 4, 2014 the company issued 58,333 shares to a consultant at $0.10 per share in payment of $35,000 of consulting fees.~~-16-

InTable ~~June 2014 the Company issued 20,833 shares~~ of ~~common stock on a unit share offering at $0.48 for proceeds of $30,000. A charitable contribution was made of 166,667 shares of common stock valued at $110,000.~~Contents

InOn ~~July~~February ~~2014~~23, 2015, the Company issued 1562,~~104,167~~500 shares of common stock onto 6 directors, at a unit ~~share~~price ~~offering~~of at $0.4880, ~~for~~valued ~~proceeds~~at of $~~530~~450,000 for services rendered in prior year(s).

InOn ~~July~~February ~~the Company issued 41~~24,~~666~~ ~~shares for 8~~2015,~~333~~ ~~warrants~~the ~~at $1.20 for $50,000. The~~ Company ~~also~~ issued 22100,~~561~~000 shares ~~in payment~~ of ~~PIK~~common ~~interest for $10~~stock,~~829.~~ ~~Additionally,~~at ~~the Company issued 83,333 shares for~~ a ~~loan,~~unit ~~valued~~price atof $~~40,000~~0. ~~Two employees received 283~~65,~~333~~ ~~shares~~to ofa ~~stock~~consultant for ~~signing bonus and~~ services ~~to the company. These shares were~~ valued at $~~136~~65,000. ~~All of these shares were issued at fair market value at the date of issuance.~~

InOn ~~September~~February ~~2014~~27, 2015, pursuant to the ~~Company~~January ~~issued~~8, 102015 Board of Director’s Minutes, a total of 900,000 shares ofwere ~~common~~issued ~~stock~~by the Company to a1 ~~consultant~~employee inand ~~lieu~~2 ofconsultants ~~paying~~for ~~Consultant~~services ~~fees~~performed ofin ~~$4,800~~2014. ~~and~~They were issued anat ~~additional~~a ~~95,833~~unit ~~shares~~price toof ~~employees~~$0.80 asper ~~signing~~common ~~bonuses~~share at a value of $720,000.

OnAs ~~September~~of ~~23,~~March ~~2014~~31, ~~100~~2015,~~000~~ ~~shares~~the ofCompany ~~common~~had ~~stock~~the ~~were~~following ~~issued~~securities tooutstanding ~~three~~which ~~employees~~gives atthe ~~$0.72~~holder ~~per~~the ~~share~~right asto ~~part~~acquire ofthe ~~their~~Company’s ~~employment/signing~~common ~~bonuses.~~stock outstanding:

-23-

Security	Number of Underlying Common Shares		Exercise Price $	Expire
Warrants associated with the 12% Convertible Notes		25,000	.012		2015
Warrants associated with 2013 Revenue Participation Notes		180,872	1.20– 1.80		2015
Warrants issued to Crown Financial, LLC		666,667	1.20		2016
Warrants issued on $20,000 short term loan		33,333	1.20		2015
Warrants issued with 2013 Unit Share Offering		333,333	1.20		2015
Warrants issued with 2014 Unit Share Offerings		2,328,542	1.20– 1.50		2016
Warrants issued with 2014 Unit Share Offering		20,770	1.50		2017
Sub-total of Warrants outstanding		3,588,517
Common stock associated with the 12% Convertible Notes plus accrued interest		1,422,803	0.12		N/A
Common stock associated with Pipeline Convertible Revenue Participation notes		164,513	0.72		N/A
Common stock associated with 14% convertible notes plus accrued interest		6,036,040	0.48		N/A
Common stock associated with 2015 Transfer Agreements		2,141,827	0.65		N/A
Common stock associated with 2014 Unit Share Offerings		17,000	0.65		N/A
Common stock payable as fees		1,987,712	various		N/A
Total		15,358,412

As of September 30, 2014, the Company had the following securities outstanding which gives the holder the right to acquire the Company’s common stock outstanding:

	Number of
	Underlying
	Common		Exercise
Security	Shares		Price	Expire
Warrants associated with the 12% Convertible Notes		153,583	.012		2014-2015
Warrants associated with June-September 14% Convertible Notes		--	1.20		2014
Warrants associated with November 14% Convertible notes		462,917	1.20		2014
Warrants associated with 2013 Revenue Participation Notes		185,038	1.20– 1.80		2015
Warrants issued to Crown Financial, LLC		666,667	1.20		2016
Warrants issued on $20,000 short term loan		33,333	1.20		2015
Warrants issued with 2013 and 2014 Unit Share Offerings		2,974,375	1.20– 1.50		2015 - 2016
Sub-total of Warrants outstanding		4,475,913
Common stock associated with the 12% Convertible Notes plus accrued interest		1,366,553	0.12		2014
Common stock associated with Pipeline Convertible Revenue Participation notes		292,528	0.72		2015
Common stock associated with 14% convertible notes plus accrued interest		5,743,480	0.48		2015
Common stock associated with 2013 and 2014 Unit Share Offerings		2,311,875	0.48		2015
Common stock associated with the JMJ notes		64,197	various
Common stock payable as fees		1,622,880	various
Total		15,877,426

Warrants

A summary of the Company’s warrant activity and related information during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 follows:

	Number of Shares		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		~~Remaining Contractual Life (Years)~~	Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	~~Aggregate Intrinsic Value~~		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2014		3,056,788	$	4.29	1.08		$	131,320
Outstanding at January 1, 2015		3,634,350	$	1.27		1.18			$	851,313
Issued		~~2,328,542~~--		~~1.32~~--	~~1.71~~	--
Exercised		--		--
Forfeited		--		--
Cancelled		--		--
Expired		(~~909~~45,~~417~~833)		210.5622
Outstanding at September 30, 2014		4,475,913	$	1.24	1.35		$	1,203,882
Outstanding at March 31, 2015		3,588,517	$	1.29		0.94			$	792,563
Exercisable		43,~~475~~588,~~913~~517	$	1.2429	~~1.35~~	0.94	$	~~1,203,882~~	$	792,563

-2417-

Table of Contents

NOTE 8 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Commitments

The Company leased its office facilities under an operating lease that commenced on October 1, 2013 and expires on September 30, 2020. The lease calls for monthly payments of $9,750, plus payment by the Company of all operating expenses, insurance and taxes on the property. The Company has an option until September 30, 2016, to purchase the land and building for $825,500

During ~~2013~~2014, the Company entered into a capital lease of a modular office trailer. The lease contract calls for forty eight (48) monthly payments of $593 with a purchase option at the end of the lease. The Company determined the value of the capital lease to be $23,300 with an implicit interest rate in the lease of 10%. In July of 2014, the Company entered into a lease for a commercial ice machine with Executive Leasing, Inc. The lease contract calls for Thirty six (36) monthly payments of $505 with a purchase option at the end of the lease. The Company determined the value of the capital lease to be $14,854 with an implicit interest rate in the lease of 12%. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, the principal balances on these capital leases totaled $32,862 and $23,300, respectively.

Future minimum lease payments under the capital lease and operating lease as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, are as follows:

Years ending December 31:	Capital Lease		Operating Lease		Totals
2014	$	3,294	$	37,428	$	40,722
2015	$	9,882	$	87,750	$	97,632
2015		13,177		149,713		162,890
2016		13,176		117,000		130,176
2016		13,177		149,713		162,890
2017		8,960		117,000		125,960
2017		8,961		149,713		158,674
2018				117,000		117,000
Thereafter		-		~~399~~204,~~917~~750		~~399~~204,~~917~~750
Total minimum lease payments		3832,~~609~~018	$	~~886~~643,~~484~~500	$	~~925~~675,~~093~~518
Less interest		51,~~747~~580
Capital lease obligation		3230,~~862~~438
Less current portion		310,~~294~~382
Long-term capital lease obligation	$	2920,~~568~~056

Rental expense for all property, including equipment rentals ~~in the~~ cost of sales, and equipment operating leases during the ~~nine~~three ~~month~~months ~~periods~~ ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, ~~respectively,~~ was $3432,~~345,619~~754 (which includes over $~~3.2~~350,791 ~~million~~ of equipment rental used on projects and reflected in cost of revenues) and $10520,~~566. Rental expense for all property and equipment operating leases during the three month periods ended September 30~~196, ~~2014 and 2013 were $1,392,562 and $3,522,~~ respectively. Related party rental expense during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, was ~~$519,268~~zero and ~~none, respectively. Related party rental expense during the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, was~~ $~~192~~58,~~134 and none~~698, respectively.

Product Purchase and Manufacturing license agreement

On June 20, 2014, the Company entered into an exclusive product purchase and manufacturing license agreement with Salttech B.V, (“Salttech”) a company based in the Netherlands. The agreement provides exclusive rights to purchase Salttech’s DyVaR devices which are used to remove salinity from brackish/brine water streams. The agreement grant’s to the Company exclusive United States rights to purchase these products for use in the municipal and oil & gas industries. The agreement also grants to the Company the right of first refusal for this technology in North America.

-25-

The initial term of the agreement is for five years and is renewable automatically for five years and every five year period unless terminated by written notice of the parties at least three months before the termination date.

The initial royalty for the first year of the agreement is for $324,000, payable quarterly beginning with the calendar quarter starting July 1, 2014 as follows: Q3 2014 $60,000, Q4 2014 $60,000, Q1 2015 $100,000 and Q2 2015 $104,000. The Company also agreed to pay a continuing royalty of $240,000 per year for years 2-5, plus 3% of the invoice price of any products sold by the Company under the agreement. The Company also agreed to issue 66,667 shares of its common stock in consideration of this agreement. ~~Although~~These nostock ~~payments~~awards ~~have~~are ~~been~~accrued ~~made~~ as offees ~~the~~payable ~~date~~in ofcommon ~~this~~stock ~~Report,~~as the ~~Company~~awards ~~has~~are ~~not~~vested ~~received~~and ~~any~~settled ~~notices~~upon ~~from~~the ~~Salttech~~issuance ~~regarding~~of ~~same - whether to terminate~~ the ~~agreement as permitted thereunder or otherwise~~shares.

~~As of September 30, 2014, the minimum royalty obligation payable under this agreement is as follows:~~-18-

Years ending December 31:	Minimum Royalty Obligation
2014	$	160,000
2015		324,000
2016		240,000
2017		240,000
2018		240,000
Thereafter		120,000
Total minimum royalty payments		1,324,000

Table of Contents

As of March 31, 2015, the minimum royalty obligation payable under this agreement is as follows:

Years ending December 31:	Minimum Royalty Obligation
2015	$	224,000
2016		240,000
2017		240,000
2018		240,000
Thereafter		120,000

Total minimum royalty payments		1,064,000

Indemnities and Guarantees

In addition to the indemnification provisions contained in the Company’s charter documents, the Company will generally enter into separate indemnification agreements with the Company’s directors and officers. These agreements require the Company, among other things, to indemnify the director or officer against specified expenses and liabilities, such as attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlements, paid by the individual in connection with any action, suit or proceeding arising out of the individual’s status or service as the Company’s director or officer, other than liabilities arising from willful misconduct or conduct that is knowingly fraudulent or deliberately dishonest, and to advance expenses incurred by the individual in connection with any proceeding against the individual with respect to which the individual may be entitled to indemnification by the Company. These guarantees and indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. Historically, the Company has not been obligated nor incurred any payments for these obligations and, therefore, no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities and guarantees in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Employment Agreements

The Company has an employment agreement with Joshua Brooks that expired on September 19, 2014, but is renewable by mutual consent of the Company and Mr. Brooks. The agreement entitles Mr. Brooks to an annual salary of $120,000. The Company’s subsidiary, STW Pipeline Maintenance & Construction, LLC, has an employment agreement with Adam Jennings that expired on September 22, 2014, but is renewable by mutual consent of the Company and Mr. Jennings. The employment agreement for Mr. Jennings has been renewed ~~and we are currently in negotiations with Mr~~. ~~Brooks.~~

~~-26-~~Stanley T. Weiner is to be employed as Chairman and CEO for a three year term effective February 1, 2015. His base salary is $15,000 monthly ($180,000 annually) during the first year of employment, $22,000 monthly ($264,000 annually) during the second year of employment, and $29,000 monthly ($348,000 annually) during the third year of employment. He will be subject to an annual discretionary bonus up to 100% of his previous six month salary, and a signing bonus of 400,000 fully vested shares of the Company’s common stock. He will also be subject to quarterly bonuses equal to 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. He will also be subject to a twelve month severance award in the event of termination.

~~Contingencies~~Paul DiFrancesco is to be employed as Head of Finance for a three year term effective February 1, 2015. His base salary is $12,000 monthly ($144,000 annually) during the first year of employment, $16,000 monthly ($192,000 annually) during the second year of employment, and $16,000 monthly ($192,000 annually) during the third year of employment. He will be subject to an annual discretionary bonus up to 100% of his previous six month salary, and a signing bonus of 300,000 fully vested shares of the Company’s common stock. He will also be subject to quarterly bonuses equal to 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. He will also be subject to a twelve month severance award in the event of termination.

Grant Seabolt is to be employed as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for a three year term effective February 1, 2015. His base salary is $8,000 monthly ($96,000 annually) during the first year of employment, $9,500 monthly ($114,000 annually) during the second year of employment, and $9,500 monthly ($114,000 annually) during the third year of employment. He will be subject to an annual discretionary bonus up to 100% of his previous six month salary, and a signing bonus of 200,000 fully vested shares of the Company’s common stock. He will also be subject to quarterly bonuses equal to 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. He will also be subject to a twelve month severance award in the event of termination.

Contingencies

The Company is subject to various claims and contingencies in the normal course of business that arise from litigation, business transactions, or employee-related matters. The Company establishes reserves when it believes a loss is probable and is able to estimate its potential exposure. For loss contingencies believed to be reasonably possible, the Company also discloses the nature of the loss contingency and an estimate of the possible loss, range of loss, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. While actual losses may differ from the amounts recorded and the ultimate outcome of our pending actions is generally not yet determinable, the Company does not believe the ultimate resolution of currently pending legal proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. In all cases, the Company vigorously defends itself unless a reasonable settlement appears appropriate. All items, whereby the Company agrees with the amount of the claim, have been recorded in the current period and are reflected in accounts payable.

Marcus Muller and Roy Beach Promissory Notes. On March 2, 2012, counsel for Marcus Muller and Roy Beach sent a demand letter to the Company demanding payment on two 12% Convertible Notes by the Company to Messrs. Muller and Beach. The notes in an original principal amount of $25,000 each were issued on August 13 and 18, 2010 and were in a default status. Muller and Beach’s counsel threatened to initiate Chapter 7 Involuntary Bankruptcy proceedings against the Company, but did not disclose who the necessary third debtor was who had an alleged uncontested claim. Since that date, the Company has made all agreed upon payments of debt, interest and attorney fees to Muller and Beach and the related matter has been resolved.-19-

~~TCA~~Table ~~Global Credit Master Fund, LP Lawsuit. On April 04, 2014, TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP filed a lawsuit against the Company in the Circuit Court~~ of the 11th Judicial District of Miami-Dade County, Florida y, Florida, cause No. 2014-8956-CA-06, alleging the Company’s breach of an October 16, 2012 debt settlement agreement (the “TCA Lawsuit”). The Company did not have to file an answer, as it and TCA agreed to a First Addendum to the October 16, 2012 settlement agreement, wherein STW agreed to pay TCA Global the sum of $77,068 in unpaid principal, accrued interest and attorneys’ fees, and TCA Global agreed to conditionally dismiss the TCA Lawsuit. Should there be a default in the Company’s payments under the First Addendum, the Company agreed to the entry of a Final Consent Judgment for the $77,068, less amounts paid prior to filing of the Consent Judgment. The Company was previously in default under the Settlement Addendum, and still owes TCA Global $37,068 to discharge the obligation in full. At this time, TCA Global has accepted partial payments and has yet to file the Consent Judgment. The Company has paid all amounts due under the Settlement Addendum and the related matter has been finally resolved.Contents

~~Sichenzia~~GE ~~and~~Ionics, ~~Ross~~Inc. Lawsuit. On ~~June~~May 1322, ~~2014~~2013, ~~Sichenzia~~GE ~~Ross Friedman Ference LLP~~ filed a lawsuit against ~~the~~STW ~~Company~~ in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Index No. ~~155843~~651832/2013, ~~seeking~~(the ~~$180,036~~“GE inLawsuit”). ~~legal~~Although ~~fees and expenses from~~ the ~~Company. The~~lawsuit ~~legal~~arises ~~fees~~out ~~and~~of ~~expenses~~STW’s ~~related~~obligations to ~~Sichenzia~~GE ~~Ross’~~under ~~representation~~its ofSettlement ~~the~~Agreement ~~Company~~with onGE ~~SEC~~(described ~~matters. The~~more ~~parties~~fully ~~filed~~in aNote ~~stipulation~~4, ~~with~~Notes ~~the~~Payable ~~Court~~- onGE ~~August~~Ionics ~~25,~~Settlement ~~2014~~Agreement), upon which ~~extended~~STW ~~the~~owed ~~Company’s~~GE ~~date~~$2.1 tomillion ~~file~~plus aninterest, ~~Answer~~GE tohas ~~the~~elected ~~lawsuit~~ to ~~September~~forgo ~~22,~~suit ~~2014. On~~on ~~October~~the 8,settlement ~~2014,~~amount ~~the~~and ~~Parties~~sue ~~entered~~STW ~~into~~for athe ~~Settlement~~original ~~Agreement~~debt ~~whereby~~of ~~the~~$11,239,437, ~~Company~~plus ~~agreed~~interest toand ~~pay~~attorneys’ ~~Sichenzia~~fees ~~Ross~~(the ~~$80,036~~“Original Debt”).22 onAs orsuch, ~~before~~STW ~~November~~filed ~~28,~~its ~~2014~~Answer orand ~~within~~asserted ~~three~~that ~~business~~it ~~days~~is ofentitled ~~the~~to ~~Company~~and ~~closing~~shall ~~its~~pursue ~~current~~all ~~round~~ of ~~financing.~~its ~~The~~available ~~agreement~~legal toand ~~pay~~equitable ~~was~~defenses ~~secured~~to by the ~~Company~~Original ~~providing~~Debt, ~~Sichenzia~~inasmuch ~~Ross~~as anGE ~~“Affidavit~~has, ofamong ~~Judgment~~other bythings, ~~Confession”~~failed into discount the ~~amount~~Original ofDebt ~~$80,036.22~~sued toupon beby ~~filed~~the ~~only~~amounts ifthat ~~the~~it ~~Company~~recovered ~~failed~~through tore-use ~~pay~~and ~~the~~re-sale ~~$80,036.22~~of by the ~~due~~equipment ~~date,~~it ~~plus~~fabricated afor ~~five~~STW. ~~day~~Management ~~cure~~has ~~period~~not ~~ending~~accrued onthe ~~December~~original ~~03,~~amount ~~2014.~~of Onthe ~~December~~debt ~~10,~~because ~~2014,~~the ~~Sichenzia~~probability ~~Ross~~of ~~filed~~recovery ~~the~~is ~~Judgement~~remote. byThe ~~Confession~~lawsuit ~~with~~is in the ~~Court~~discovery phase of litigation.

Sichenzia and Ross Lawsuit. On June 13, 2014, Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP filed a lawsuit against the Company in the Supreme Court of New York, County of New York, Index No. 155843/2013, seeking $180,036 in legal fees and expenses from the Company. The legal fees and expenses related to Sichenzia Ross’ representation of the Company on SEC matters. The parties filed a stipulation with the Court on August 25, 2014, which extended the Company’s date to file an Answer to the lawsuit to September 22, 2014. On October 8, 2014, the Parties entered into a Settlement Agreement whereby the Company agreed to pay Sichenzia Ross $80,036.22 on or before November 28, 2014 or within three business days of the Company closing its current round of financing. The agreement to pay was secured by the Company providing Sichenzia Ross an “Affidavit of Judgment by Confession” in the amount of $80,036.22 to be filed only if the Company failed to pay the $80,036.22 by the due date, plus a five day cure period ending on December 03, 2014. On December 10, 2014, Sichenzia Ross filed the Judgement by Confession with the Court. This has been fully accrued for.

Bob J. Johnson & Associates Lawsuit. There has been one lawsuit filed on July 14, 2014 against the Company’s subsidiary, STW Water Process & Technologies, LLC (“STW Water”), Bob J. Johnson & Associates, Inc. (BJJA) v. Alan Murphy and STW Water & Process Technologies, LLC, Case No. CV50473 in the 238th District Court of Midland County, Texas (the “BJJA Lawsuit”). BJJA sought to enforce an allegedly enforceable covenant not to compete and a confidentiality agreement signed by Alan Murphy, STW Water’s recently hired President, who was a former vice president and employee of BJJA. On July 14, 2014, BJJA obtained a TRO against Alan Murphy, STW Water and those associated with the Defendants, which, by the Company’s ownership of STW Water, included the Company. The TRO temporarily prohibited the Company, STW Water and Alan Murphy from contacting two key customers of STW and STW Water, Pioneer Energy Resources and the City of St. Stockton, Texas. On July 28, 2014, the Court held a temporary injunction hearing, which resulted in the TRO being dissolved and the Court refusing to further enjoin STW, STW Water or Alan Murphy from competing with BJJA. The case is still on the docket; however, the Company, with the advice of Counsel, is confident that it will not go forward to a trial on the merits, thereby precluding any appreciable risk of a permanent injunction.

-27-

Arbitration Judgment

Viewpoint Securities, LLC Arbitration. On or about July 9, 2012, the Company and Stan Weiner, the Company's chief executive officer, received a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association. The demand was filed by Viewpoint Securities LLC ("VP") who entered into an engagement agreement, dated March 9, 2008 (as amended on March 9, 2008, November 10, 2008, January 1, 2009, February 5, 2010, and December 1, 2010), with STW whereby the Company retained VP to act as its financial and capital markets advisor regarding equity and debt introduced by VP to the Company. The demand alleged breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealings, negligence prayer for commissions and expenses incurred by VP in its efforts to provide introductions and attempt to provide financing to the Company from March 9, 2008 through February 2, 2012, the date of termination of the Agreement. VP seeks, among other things, $216,217 and a warrant to purchase 94,444 shares of the Company's common stock, payment of a $15,000 promissory note plus 3+ years of interest at 12%, attorneys' fees of $18,000 and costs of arbitration for filing fees and hearing fees. The Company believed it had valid defenses and contested these claims vigorously. On August 18, 2012, VP dismissed Stan Weiner from the claim with prejudice. A final arbitration hearing was held on February 3, 2014. On April 1, 2014, the Arbitrator issued an Award in favor of Viewpoint for $196,727 on Viewpoint's claim for $216,217 in fees and expenses, plus $5,541 in arbitration hearing fees and expenses; interest shall accrue at the rate of 10% per annum on any unpaid portion of the award ~~commending~~commencing April 1, 2014. The Arbitrator denied Viewpoint's claims related to the Company's warrants, a $15,000 promissory note plus 12% interest and for $18,000 in attorneys' fees. The Award was final on April 1, 2014, and on October 28, 2014, Viewpoint filed a lawsuit in San Diego County, California Superior Court seeking to enforce its Arbitration Award, in Case No. 37-2014-00036027-CU-PA-CTL. On December 08, 2014, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the enforcement action due to Viewpoint having forfeited its corporate rights in California due to non-payment of California corporate taxes, and that motion is still pending before the Court. The full amount of this award has been accrued for in Accounts Payable.

NOTE 9 – SEGMENT INFORMATION

We have three reportable segments, (1) water reclamation services, (2) oil & gas services, and (3) corporate overhead, as described herein.

Water reclamation services

The Company plans to provide customized water reclamation services. STW’s core expertise is an understanding of water chemistry and its application to the analysis and remediation of complex water reclamation issues. STW provides a complete solution throughout all phases of a water reclamation project including supplies, analysis, design, evaluation, implementation and operations.

Oil and Gas Services

Our subsidiaries, STW Energy, STW Pipeline Maintenance & Construction, and STW Oilfield Construction Services offer a wide a range of oilfield and pipeline construction, maintenance and support services. We employ qualified laborers with years of experience in the oil patch, and Supervisor/Sales people with particular oil patch knowledge in the Permian and Delaware Basins of West Texas, Eastern New Mexico, and in the Eagle Ford of South Texas.

-20-

Table of Contents

Corporate Operations

Corporate operations include senior management salaries and benefits, accounting and finance, legal, business development, and other general corporate operating expenses.

The accounting policies for the segments are the same as those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (see Note 1). The following is a list of methodologies that we use for segment reporting that differ from our external reporting:

●	Liabilities including accounts payable, notes payable, and other liabilities are managed at the corporate level and not included in segment operations.

●	Interest expense and change in derivative liabilities are managed at the corporate level and not included in segment operations.

-28-

Segment Operations

Nine months ended September 30, 2014

Three months ended March 31, 2015

Water Reclamation

Oil & Gas Services

Corporate Operations

Consolidated Totals

Revenues

~~172~~148,~~897~~911

132,~~837~~530,~~611~~490

142,~~010~~679,~~508~~401

Costs of revenues

~~134~~145,~~458~~526

131,~~014~~734,~~048~~739

131,~~148~~880,~~506~~265

Operating expenses

~~591~~534,~~308~~517

3796,~~071,717~~069

61,~~123~~442,~~934~~367

92,~~786~~772,~~959~~953

Other income (expense)

(2945,~~883,222~~808

)

(2945,~~883,222~~808

)

Segment income (loss)

(~~552~~531,~~869~~132

)

(~~2,248,154~~318

)

(92,~~007~~388,~~156~~175

)

(112,~~808~~919,~~179~~625

)

Three months ended September 30, 2014

Three months ended March 31, 2014

Water Reclamation

Oil & Gas Services

Corporate Operations

Consolidated Totals

Revenues

~~162,846~~--

43,~~633~~600,~~535~~779

43,~~796~~600,~~381~~779

Costs of revenues

~~134,458~~--

43,~~556~~181,~~749~~242

43,~~691~~181,~~207~~242

Operating expenses

~~371~~131,~~724~~548

1735,~~123,143~~779

21,~~425~~582,~~784~~624

32,~~920~~449,~~651~~951

Other income (expense)

(1424,~~494,181~~329

)

(1424,~~494,181~~329

)

Segment income (loss)

(~~343~~131,~~336~~548

)

(1316,~~046,357~~242

)

(32,~~919~~006,~~965~~953

)

(52,~~309~~454,~~658~~743

)

	Nine months ended September 30, 2013
	Water Reclamation		Oil & Gas Services			Corporate Operations			Consolidated Totals
Revenues	$	541,000	$	147,617		$	--		$	688,617
Costs of revenues		459,635		216,607			--			676,242
Operating expenses		--		--			1,920,110			1,920,110
Other income (expense)		--		--			(3,759,822	)		(3,759,822	)
Segment income (loss)	$	81,365	$	(68,990	)	$	(5,679,932	)	$	(5,667,557	)

	Three months ended September 30, 2013
	Water Reclamation		Oil & Gas Services			Corporate Operations			Consolidated Totals
Revenues	$	--	$	147,617		$	--		$	147,617
Costs of revenues		--		216,607			--			216,607
Operating expenses		--		--			861,060			861,060
Other income (expense)		--		--			(1,462,892	)		(1,462,892	)
Segment income (loss)	$	--	$	(68,990	)	$	(2,323,952	)	$	(2,392,942	)

-29-

Segment Assets

	September 30, 2014
	March 31, 2015
	Water Reclamation		Oil & Gas Services		Corporate Operations		Consolidated Totals
Current Assets	$	~~324~~2,~~531~~207,139	$	21,~~087~~742,~~576~~631	$	~~398~~103,~~449~~223	$	24,~~810~~052,~~556~~993
Fixed assets		~~358~~490,~~317~~230		~~684~~488,~~593~~525		~~114~~72,~~860~~203		1,~~157~~050,~~770~~958
Other assets		--		--		119,198		119,198
Segment Assets	$	2,697,369	$	2,231,156	$	175,426	$	5,103,951
Segment Assets	$	682,848	$	2,772,169	$	632,507	$	4,087,524

	December 31, 2013
	December 31, 2014
	Water Reclamation		Oil & Gas Services		Corporate Operations		Consolidated Totals
Current Assets	$	--1,710,793	$	--3,561,024	$	~~583~~247,~~581~~665	$	~~583~~5,~~581~~519,482
Fixed assets		--496,243		--524,219		~~746~~76,~~638~~178		~~746~~1,~~638~~096,640
Other assets		--		--		185,428		185,428
Segment Assets	$	2,207,036	$	4,085,243	$	323,843	$	6,616,122
Segment Assets	$	--	$	--	$	1,515,647	$	1,515,647

-21-

Table of Contents

NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On November 7, 2014, we affected a 1-to-6 reverse stock split of our common stock, or the Reverse Stock Split. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, every six shares of our pre-Reverse Stock Split common stock were combined and reclassified into one share of our common stock. The Reverse Stock Split did change the authorized number of shares but did not change the par value on our common stock. Accordingly, share and per share amounts presented in these condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, have been adjusted retrospectively, where applicable, for all periods presented, to reflect this 1-to-6 reverse stock split.

Shares Issued

On ~~October~~May 1514, ~~2014~~2015, the Company issued ~~129~~341,~~921~~667 shares of common stock to antwo ~~investor~~consultants atfor ~~a unit~~ value of $0230,501.~~72 per share for the conversion of a revenue participation offering on STW Pipeline.~~

On ~~October~~May 2315, ~~2014~~2015, the Company issued 3326,~~333~~000 shares of common stock to antwo ~~investor~~consultants atfor ~~a unit~~ value of $018,610.~~63 per share on the conversion of a short term convertible note.~~

On ~~November~~May 518, ~~2014~~2015, ~~the~~Company ~~company~~ issued 70206,~~477~~667 shares of common stock to antwo ~~investor~~consultant atfor ~~a unit~~ value of $0155,000.~~582 per share on the conversion of a short term convertible note.~~

OnFinancing November 18, 2014, it was necessary to issue an additional 206 shares to cover the rounding effect of the 1 for 6 reverse stock split. On November 21, 2014, the transfer agent returned 45 of those shares to treasury stock, for a net of 161 shares issued for the rounding effect.Arrangements

On ~~November~~April 2030, ~~2014~~2015, our wholly owned subsidiary, STW Water Process & Technologies, LLC (“STW Water”) entered into a work-in-process financing agreement with Crown Financial, LLC ("Crown"), pursuant to an Account Purchase Agreement and Guaranty (the “Account Purchase Agreement”), with the Company ~~issued~~and 8the Company’s CEO,~~333~~ ~~shares~~Stanley ofT. ~~common~~Weiner ~~stock~~as toguarantors ~~one~~for ofSTW Water’s obligations. The Account Purchase Agreement is secured through a Security Agreement between STW Water as Debtor and Crown as the ~~investors~~Secured inParty (the ~~July~~“Security ~~offering~~Agreement”), atby a ~~unit~~security ~~value~~interest in (the “Collateral”) STW Water’s instruments, accounts, contracts and rights to the payment of ~~$0.60~~money, ~~per~~all ~~share~~general intangibles and all equipment; the Security Agreement also includes a list of items that are specifically excluded from Collateral.

~~Agreements~~Crown has authorized up to a $5,000,000 credit limit to STW Water under the Account Purchase Agreement, all obligations of which are guaranteed by the Company and Mr. Weiner personally. Neither the Company nor Stanley T. Weiner has received any compensation related to their serving as Guarantors of the Account Purchase Agreement. The Account Purchase Agreement is not a securities transaction and no Company securities are issuable thereunder; therefore, the Account Purchase Agreement and transactions contemplated thereby will not have any dilutive effect on the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock.

In Under ~~September~~the ~~2014~~terms of the Account Purchase Agreement, Crown may, at its sole discretion, accept certain of STW Water’s eligible large project contracts nominated by STW Water for the ~~Company~~installation ~~entered~~of ~~into~~reverse ~~short~~osmosis ~~term~~concentrates ~~loan~~or ~~agreements~~desalination equipment with ~~seven~~cities, ~~accredited~~water ~~investors~~districts ~~totaling~~or ~~$145~~other governmental entities. The Account Purchase Agreements is implemented as a form of purchase order financing for work invoiced by STW Water to its project customers for work yet to be performed by STW Water,~~000~~ and is not factoring of invoices for work already performed by STW Water. Upon Crown’s acceptance of a nominated project contract that STW Water has invoiced its customer for a project with milestone payments due as the work progresses, Crown will advance to ~~sustain~~the ~~some~~Company 20% of the entire project contract invoice for project start-up costs. Thereafter, STW Water submits work-in-process invoices from its ~~daily~~vendors ~~operating~~which ~~expenses~~Crown pays. As ~~The~~STW ~~notes~~Water’s ~~matured~~customer makes milestone payments on ~~October~~each 3project contract, ~~2014~~Crown is repaid its advances, ~~however~~interest due and fees, with the remainder being paid to STW Water. Crown is entitled to deduct from the amounts paid to STW Water in ~~consideration~~connection ofwith anthe ~~extension~~accepted project contracts a Gross Contract Fee of 4% of the ~~maturity~~total ~~date~~amount to ~~October~~be 24billed by STW Water to its customer under the nominated/accepted project contract. As a result of the Guaranty Agreement, ~~2014~~Crown will generally have full recourse against STW Water, Mr. Weiner and the Company ~~agreed~~in the event of nonpayment of any such purchased account. Crown has the discretion to ~~issue~~require STW Water to repurchase any invoice related to an ~~aggregate~~accepted contract which has not been fully paid within 95 days of 17original invoicing,~~917~~ ~~shares~~plus ofSTW ~~its~~Water ~~common~~will ~~stock~~be obligated to ~~those~~pay ~~lenders~~Crown ~~agreeing~~the toPurchase Price of such uncollected project invoice plus interest at the ~~extension~~maximum iflawful ~~and~~interest ~~when~~rate per annum, minus any payments made on the project invoice. The Company ~~increases~~and ~~its~~Weiner ~~authorized~~are ~~capital~~also guarantors of STW Water’s repurchase obligations.

OnThe ~~September~~Account Purchase Agreement shall continue until terminated by either party upon 30, ~~2014~~days ~~the~~written ~~Company~~notice. The ~~issued~~Account ~~its~~Purchase ~~first~~Agreement ~~note~~contains covenants that are customary for ~~$125,000~~agreements of this type and appoints Crown as attorney in fact for ~~the~~various ~~new~~activities ~~Upton~~associated ~~Project.~~with ~~The~~the ~~total~~purchased ~~principal~~accounts ~~required~~receivable, isincluding $1opening our mail,~~250,000.~~ Inendorsing ~~the~~its ~~period~~name ~~from~~on ~~October~~related 1notes and payments, ~~2014~~and filing liens against related third parties. The failure to ~~December~~satisfy ~~22,~~covenants ~~2014~~under the ~~company~~Account ~~has~~Purchase ~~received~~Agreement or the occurrence of other specified events that constitute an ~~additional~~event ~~$930,750~~of ~~for~~default acould ~~total~~result ~~to-date~~in the acceleration of ~~$1,055,750~~our repayment obligations or Crown enforcing its rights under the Security Agreement and taking possession of the collateral. ~~For~~The aAccount ~~more~~Purchase ~~complete~~Agreement ~~discussion~~contains ~~see~~provisions ~~Note~~relating 4to events of default that are customary for agreements of this type.

OnOriginal ~~October~~Issue 2,Discount ~~2014,~~Bridge ~~the Company entered into a lease of two vehicles with Enterprise Leasing. The lease contract calls for thirty six (36) monthly payments of $3,293 with a purchase option at the end of the lease.~~Note

~~-30-~~On May 13, 2015, the Company issued a $385,000 original issue discount bridge note with an accredited investor. The bridge note includes $35,000 of original issue discount which yielded a net of $350,000 proceeds to the Company. The note bears interest at 5% to be paid at maturity, the note matures on June 13, 2015. In connection with the note, the Company agreed to issue 500,000 shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase up to 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.59 per share. In the event of default, the Company agreed to reserve 4,000,000 shares of its common stock that will be released if the default is not cured within a 15 day cure period.

-22-

Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

On November 7, 2014, we effected a 1-to-6 reverse stock split of our common stock, or the Reverse Stock Split. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, every six shares of our pre-Reverse Stock Split common stock were combined and reclassified into one share of our common stock. The Reverse Stock Split did change the authorized number of shares but did not change the par value on our common stock. Accordingly, share and per share amounts presented in these condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, have been adjusted retrospectively, where applicable. For all periods presented, to reflect this 1-to-6 reverse stock split.

All per share data herein has been retroactively adjusted for the 1 for 6 reverse stock split that occurred on November 7, 2014.

The following information should be read in conjunction with STW Resources Holding Corp. and its subsidiaries ("we", "us", "our", or the “Company”) condensed consolidated unaudited financial statements and the notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report. Information in this Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q that does not consist of historical facts, are "forward-looking statements." Statements accompanied or qualified by, or containing words such as "may," "will," "should," "believes," "expects," "intends," "plans," "projects," "estimates," "predicts," "potential," "outlook," "forecast," "anticipates," "presume," and "assume" constitute forward-looking statements, and as such, are not a guarantee of future performance.

Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond our control. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated as a result of the factors described in the “Risk Factors” and detailed in our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings. Risks and uncertainties can include, among others, fluctuations in general business cycles and changing economic conditions; changing product demand and industry capacity; increased competition and pricing pressures; and advances in technology that can reduce the demand for the Company's products. Consequently, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as predictive of future results.

Because of these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this report or incorporated by reference might not transpire. Factors that cause actual results or conditions to differ from those anticipated by these and other forward-looking statements include those more fully described elsewhere in this report and in the “Risk Factors” section of our annual report on Form 10-K.

The Company disclaims any obligation to update the forward-looking statements in this report.

Overview

The Company iswas aformed ~~corporation~~for ~~formed~~the deployment of multiple water reclamation systems throughout Texas to utilize state of the art water reclamation technologies to reclaim fresh water from highly contaminated oil and gas hydraulic fracture flow-back salt water that is produced inby ~~conjunction with the production of~~ oil and gas~~. The~~ ~~Company has been working to establish contracts with oil and gas~~ operators ~~for the deployment of multiple water reclamation systems throughout Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana and the Appalachian Basin of Pennsylvania and West Virginia~~. The Company, in conjunction with energy producers, operators, various state agencies and legislators, is working to create an efficient and economical solution to this complex problem. The Company is also evaluating the deployment of similar technology in the municipal wastewater industry.

~~The~~Plan ~~Company’s~~of ~~operations are located at 3424 South County Road, Midland, Texas 79706.~~Operations

~~-31-~~Due to our recurring net losses and negative cash flows from operations and negative working capital, substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern exists.

~~The~~For ~~Report~~the ofnext ~~Independent~~twelve ~~Registered~~months, ~~Public~~our ~~Accounting~~current ~~Firm~~operating ~~related~~plan is focused on providing water reclamation services to ~~our~~oil ~~December~~and ~~31,~~gas ~~2013~~producers ~~consolidated~~and ~~financial~~other ~~statements~~commercial ~~includes~~ventures anin ~~explanatory~~Texas. ~~paragraph~~Water ~~stating~~reclamation ~~that~~services ~~the~~include ~~recurring~~treating ~~losses~~brackish ~~and~~water ~~negative~~for ~~cash~~use ~~flows~~in ~~from~~fracking operations, ~~since~~landscaping ~~inception~~and other commercial applications and ~~our~~reclaiming ~~working~~produced ~~capital~~water. ~~deficiency~~During atfiscal ~~December~~2014 and the quarter ended March 31, ~~2013~~2015, ~~raise~~we ~~substantial~~earned ~~doubt~~most ~~about~~of our ~~ability~~revenue tothrough ~~continue~~our asSTW aPipeline ~~going~~Maintenance ~~concern.~~& ~~The~~Construction, ~~consolidated~~LLC ~~financial~~subsidiary ~~statements~~and dowhile ~~not~~we ~~include~~continue ~~any~~to ~~adjustments~~benefit from our ownership of that ~~might~~entity, ~~result~~we ~~from~~shall ~~the~~continue ~~outcome~~to offocus ~~this~~on ~~uncertainty~~successfully implementing our water reclamation services.

~~Results~~As is discussed further in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section below, we have limited funds to support our operations. Our continuation as a going concern subsequent to December 31, 2014, is dependent on our ability to obtain additional financing to fund the continued operation of ~~Operations~~our business model for a long enough period to achieve profitable operations. There can be no assurance, however, that such financing will be available or, if it is available, that we will be able to structure such financing on terms acceptable to us and that it will be sufficient to fund our cash requirements until we can reach a level of profitable operations and positive cash flows. If we are unable to obtain the financing necessary to support our operations, we may be unable to continue as a going concern. We currently have no firm commitments for any additional capital.

~~For~~The downturn in the ~~next~~United ~~twelve~~States ~~months,~~stock ~~our~~and ~~current~~debt ~~operating~~markets ~~plan~~could ismake ~~focused~~it onmore ~~providing~~difficult ~~water~~to ~~reclamation~~obtain ~~services~~financing through the issuance of equity or debt securities. Even if we are able to ~~oil~~raise &the ~~gas~~funds ~~producers~~required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and ~~other~~expenses, ~~commercial~~fail ~~ventures~~to incollect ~~Texas~~significant amounts owed to us, or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek alternative financing. ~~Water~~Further, ~~reclamation~~if ~~services~~we ~~include~~issue ~~treating~~additional ~~brackish~~equity ~~water~~or ~~for~~debt ~~use~~securities, instockholders ~~fracking~~may ~~operations~~experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, ~~landscaping~~preferences ~~and~~or ~~other~~privileges ~~commercial~~senior ~~applications~~to those of existing holders of our shares of common stock or the debt securities may cause us to be subject to restrictive covenants. Even if we are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and ~~reclaiming~~expenses, ~~produced~~fail ~~water~~to collect significant amounts owed to us, or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek additional financing. If additional financing is not available or is not available on acceptable terms, we will have to curtail our operations.

As is discussed further in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section below, we have limited funds to support our operations. Our continuation as a going concern subsequent to the quarter ended September 30, 2014 is dependent on our ability to obtain additional financing to fund the continued operation of our business model for a long enough period to achieve profitable operations. Based on our current business plan, we currently estimate we will need up to an additional $5 million of new capital to execute our business plan over the next nine months. There can be no assurance, however, that such financing will be available or, if it is available, that we will be able to structure such financing on terms acceptable to us and that it will be sufficient to fund our cash requirements until we can reach a level of profitable operations and positive cash flows. If we are unable to obtain the financing necessary to support our operations, we may be unable to continue as a going concern.-23-

~~Three~~Table ~~months~~of ~~ended September 30, 2014 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013~~Contents

~~Our~~Three ~~revenue,~~months ~~operating expenses, and net loss from operations for the three month period~~ ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 asCompared ~~compared~~ to the ~~three~~Three ~~month~~Months ~~period~~Ended ~~ended~~March ~~September 30~~31, ~~2013, were as follows – some balances on the prior period’s combined financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation:~~2014

	Three Months Ended September 30:									% Change Increase (Decrease)
	2014			2013			Change
NET REVENUES	$	4,796,381		$	147,617		$	4,648,764			3,149.2	%
COSTS OF REVENUES		4,691,207			216,607			4,474,600			2,065.8	%
Gross Profit		105,174			(68,990)			174,164			252.4	%
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Research & development		--			59,938			(59,938)			(100.0)	%
Sales and marketing		296,419			--			296,419			100.0	%
General and administrative		3,558,352			791,505			2,766,847			349.6	%
Depreciation		65,880			9,617			56,263			585.0	%
Total operating expenses		3,920,651			861,060			3,059,591			355.3	%
Loss from operations		(3,815,477	)		(930,050	)		(2,885,427	)		(310.2)	%
Interest expense		(619,391	)		(403,175	)		(216,216	)		53.6	%
Loss on sale of property and equipment		(39,860)			--			(39,860)			100.0	%
Change in derivative liability		(834,930	)		(1,059,717)			224,787			(21.2)	%
Share of net loss of subsidiary attributable to non-controlling interest		(135,366	)		(12,227	)		(123,139)			1,007.1	%
Net Loss	$	(5,174,292	)	$	(2,380,715	)	$	(2,793,577	)		117.3	%

Our revenue, operating expenses, and net loss from operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2015 as compared to the three month period ended March 31, 2014, were as follows – some balances on the prior period’s combined financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation:

-32-

	Three Months Ended March 31:									% Change Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Change			% Change Increase (Decrease)
Net revenues	$	2,679,401		$	3,600,779		$	(921,378	)		(25.6	%)
Cost of revenues		1,880,265			3,181,242			(1,300,977	)		(40.9	%)
Gross Profit		799,136			419,537			379,599			90.5	%
Operating expenses:
Research & development		6,125			95,490			(89,365	)		(93.6	%)
Sales and marketing		292,321			172,508			119,813			69.5	%
General and administrative		2,428,825			2,129,269			299,556			14.1	%
Depreciation		45,682			52,684			(7,002	)		(13.3	%)
Total operating expenses		2,772,953			2,449,951			323,002			13.2	%

Loss from operations		(1,973,817	)		(2,030,414	)		56,597			2.8	%

Interest expense		(1,219,588	)		(437,602	)		(781,986	)		(178.7	%)
Change in derivative liability		273,780			13,273			260,507			1962.7	%
Share of net loss of subsidiary attributable to non-controlling interest		(81,033	)		(41,569	)		(39,464	)		94.9	%
Net Loss	$	(2,838,592	)	$	(2,413,174	)	$	(425,418	)		(17.6	%)

Net Revenues: During the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, we realized $~~162~~148,~~846~~911 of revenues from our water reclamation business segment and $42,~~633~~530,~~535~~490 of revenues from our oil & gas services business segment, including $6658,~~000~~127 from a related party. During the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2014, we realized ~~147~~$3,~~617~~600,779 of revenues from oil & gas services business segment, including $5739,~~408~~992 from a related party. The ~~increase~~decrease in revenues between the quarter ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 is $4921,~~648,764~~378 or ~~3,149~~25.26%. The ~~increase~~decrease in revenues is due largely to ~~the~~reduced ~~ramp-up~~revenues offrom ~~business~~our ~~operations~~Energy ~~during~~and ~~2014,~~Oilfield ~~while~~services ~~during~~business ~~the~~units ~~quarter~~due ~~ended~~to ~~September~~a ~~30,~~downturn ~~2013~~in wethe ~~had~~sectors ~~just initially commenced operations~~nationwide.

Cost of Revenues: Costs of revenues are comprised of labor, fringe benefits, equipment rental, and other costs of providing water reclamation and oil & gas services. Total costs of revenues for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 were $41,~~691~~880,~~207~~265 as compared to $~~216~~3,~~607~~181,242 for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2014, ana ~~increase~~decrease of $41,~~474~~300,~~600~~977 or ~~2,065~~40.89%. The ~~increase~~decrease in costs of revenue is ~~largely~~ attributable to the ~~increased~~decreased revenues from our ~~oil~~STW &Energy ~~gas~~and ~~services~~Oilfield Services business ~~segment~~units as described above. Costs of revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2015 were 70% of revenues while costs of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2014 were 88% of revenues. The overall reduction of costs of revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2015, is attributable to decreased revenues combined with decreased costs of revenues as a percentage of revenues.

Gross Profit: During the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, we realized a gross profit of $~~105~~799,~~174.~~136 ~~During~~while during the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2014, we ~~incurred~~realized a ~~negative~~ gross profit of $68419,~~990~~537, ~~from~~and ~~our~~increase ~~oil~~in &gross ~~gas~~profit ~~services~~of ~~business~~$379,599 ~~segment~~or 90.5%. The increase in gross profit is attributable to improved gross profit margins of 30% during the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2015 from a gross profit margin of 12% realized during the three months ended March 31, 2014. isDuring ~~attributable~~the tothree ~~revenues~~months ~~from~~ended March 31, 2014, our ~~water~~combined ~~reclamation~~gross ~~and~~profit ~~oil~~margins &on ~~gas~~STW Energy and STW Oilfield services business ~~segments. The~~units ~~negative~~was 3% which brought our overall gross profit ~~incurred~~down ~~during~~to 12%. During the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2015, iswe ~~attributable~~have toreduced ~~the~~our ~~startup~~revenues ~~costs~~from ofSTW ~~launching~~Energy ~~our~~and STW ~~Energy~~Oilfield services and eliminated these less profitable activities. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we improved our labor efficiency in STW Pipeline ~~Maintenance~~by &reducing ~~Construction~~redundant ~~business~~supervisory ~~units~~personnel and reducing our labor cost as a percentage of revenues. We also reduced our costs of equipment rentals and fuel costs through improved management of these resources.

Research and development expenses: During the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, we incurred ~~zero~~$6,125 in research and development expenses~~. During~~ while during the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2014 we incurred $5995,~~938~~490 of research and development expenses, a decrease of $5989,~~938~~365 or ~~100~~93.06%. The research and development expenses are attributable to our water reclamation business segment that became operational during the latter part of 2014, thereby reducing the investment in research & development activities during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Sales and marketing expenses: During the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, we incurred $292,321 of sales and marketing expenses ~~increased~~while byduring ~~$296,419~~the orthree ~~100.0%~~months ~~from~~ended ~~none~~March ~~for~~31, ~~the~~2014, ~~three~~we ~~months~~incurred ~~ended~~$172,508, ~~September~~an 30increase of $119,813 ~~2013~~or 69. 5%. The increase in sales and marketing expenses are attributable to ~~increased expenses, due to increased advertising and promotions as well as~~ the addition of 16sales ~~new~~staff ~~people~~during ~~sense~~ the ~~prior~~three ~~year~~months ~~end,~~ended ~~our~~March ~~oil~~31, &2015 ~~gas~~and ~~services business segment during~~ the ~~three~~applicable ~~months~~sales ~~ended~~commission ~~September 30, 2014~~expenses.

General and Administrative Expense: General and administrative expenses increased by $2,766,847 or 349.6% to $3,558,352 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 from $791,505 for the three months ended September 30, 2013. Our general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2014 consisted of board of director fees of $131,250, professional fees of $300,397, management fees of $255,649, salaries and wages of $551,974, insurance of $116,420, penalties of $-24,183, and other general and administrative expenses (which includes expenses such as; Auto, Business Development, SEC Filing, Factoring, Investor Relations, General Office, Stock Compensation of $1,440,985, Travel, and Utilities) of $2,178,479, for a total of $3,558,352. Our general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2013 consisted of board of director fees of $150,000, professional fees of $133,865, salaries and benefits of $164,000, consulting fees of $140,133, insurance of $16,953, and other general and administrative expenses (which includes expenses such as; Auto, Business Development, SEC Filing, Factoring, Investor Relations, General Office, Stock Compensation of zero, Travel, and Utilities) of $186,554, for a total of $791,505.-

~~The~~Table ~~primary reasons for the increase in comparing the three months ended September 30, 2014 to the corresponding period for 2013 was mainly due to the rapid ramp-up~~ of the business since the prior year which caused an increase in business development expenses, increase in salaries and benefits for employees, increase in professional services and consulting fees, increase in management fees, increased penalties related to payroll taxes, and the increase in the board of director fees. During the three month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, non-cash stock based compensation expenses relating to consulting and other fees included in general and administrative expenses were $1,566,912 and $420,560, respectively.Contents

~~-33-~~General and Administrative Expense: General and administrative expenses increased by $299,556 or 14.1% to $2,428,825 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 from $2,129,269 for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Our general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2015 consisted of board of director fees of $112,500, professional fees of $253,438, management fees of $156,594, salaries and wages of $1,221,226, consulting fees of $6,500, insurance of $102,307, and other general and administrative expenses (which includes expenses such as; Auto, Business Development, SEC Filing, Factoring, Investor Relations, General Office, Stock Compensation of $416,987, Travel, and Utilities) of $576,260, for a total of $2,428,825. Our general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2014 consisted of board of director fees of $168,750, professional fees of $138,575, salaries and benefits of $262,667, consulting fees of $175,682, insurance of $45,942, penalties of $328,797, and other general and administrative expenses (which includes expenses such as; Auto, Business Development, SEC Filing, Factoring, Investor Relations, General Office, Stock Compensation of $423,683, Travel, and Utilities) of $661,006, for a total of $2,129,269.

~~Interest~~The ~~Expense: Interest~~changes ~~expense~~in ~~increased~~general byand ~~$216,216~~administrative toexpenses ~~$619~~between the three months ended March 31,~~391~~ ~~for~~2015 compared to the three ~~month~~months ~~period~~ ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2014, ~~from~~are comprised of a decrease of $~~403~~56,~~175~~250 ~~for~~in ~~the~~board ~~three~~fees ~~month~~due ~~period~~to ~~ended~~the ~~September~~departure ~~30,~~of ~~2013. The~~three ~~increase~~board ismembers, ~~due~~an ~~primarily~~increase toin ~~issuance~~professional fees of ~~short~~$114,863, ~~term~~a ~~debt.~~decrease ~~This~~of is$191,256 ~~partially~~in ~~offset~~management fees due to the ~~reduction~~departure of ~~interest~~two ~~expense~~senior ~~incurred~~management ~~during~~executives, ~~the~~an ~~three~~increase ~~months~~of ~~ended~~$958,559 ~~September~~in 30salaries and wages, ~~2014~~a ~~from~~decrease ~~the~~of ~~payment~~$169,182 orin ~~conversion~~consulting offees, ~~approximately~~an increase of $~~1.0~~56,365 ~~million~~in insurance expense, a decrease of ~~notes~~$328,797 ~~payable~~in ~~since~~penalties, ~~September~~and 30a net decrease of $84,746 ~~2013~~in other general and administrative expenses.

~~Loss~~Interest onExpense: ~~sale~~Interest ofexpense ~~property~~increased ~~and~~by ~~equipment:~~$781,986 ~~During~~to $1,219,588 for the three month period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 from $437,602 wefor ~~sold~~the ~~some~~three ofmonth ~~the~~period ~~Company’s~~ended ~~fixed~~March ~~assets~~31, at2014. The aincrease ~~loss~~is ~~totaling~~due primarily to $39479,~~860.~~877 ~~There~~of ~~was~~financing nocosts ~~such~~from ~~sale~~the inTransfer ~~the~~Agreement ~~three~~convertible ~~month~~notes ~~period~~payable ~~ended~~and ~~September~~interest ~~30,~~on ~~2013~~short term debt.

Change in derivative liability: During the three month period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, we recorded ana $~~834~~273,~~930~~780 ~~increase~~decrease in the fair value of the derivative liability from ~~June~~December 3031, 2014. During the three month period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2014, we recorded a $113,~~059,717~~273 ~~increase~~decrease in the derivative liability from ~~June~~December 3031, 2013, a net difference of $~~224~~260,~~787~~507 between the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014. The increase in the derivative liability during the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 is attributable to the effect of ~~increased~~$1,108,030 of derivative liability associated with the conversion feature of our Transfer Agreement convertible notes payable, offset by the expiration of 41,667 of warrants and a decreased share values as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 as compared to ~~June~~December 3031, 2014. The ~~reason~~decrease ~~for the increase~~ in the derivative liability ~~for~~during the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2014 ~~was~~is ~~mainly~~attributable ~~due~~ to the ~~change~~reduction inof the ~~fair~~remaining ~~value~~term of ~~derivatives~~outstanding ~~attributable~~warrants, tothe effect of conversion of $183,333 of convertible notes during the quarter, offset by an increase in ~~volatility~~the ~~rate~~derivative ~~from~~liability ~~100%~~due ~~for~~to ~~2012~~the toconversion afeature ~~historical~~on ~~rate~~the ofJMJ ~~623%~~convertible ~~for~~note ~~2013~~payable.

Non-controlling interest in Net Loss: During the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, we reported $~~135~~81,~~366~~033 and $1241,~~227~~569, respectively, as the non-controlling interest in the net loss of our STW Energy Services, LLC subsidiary. This non-controlling interest in the net loss represents of a 25% non-controlling interest in the net loss of STW Energy Services, LLC, and a subsidiary company.

Net Loss: Net loss increased by $2425,~~793~~418,~~577~~ , or ~~117~~17.36%, to a net loss of $52,~~174~~838,~~292~~592 for the three month period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 from a net loss of $2,~~380~~454,~~715~~743 for the three month period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2014. This net loss reflects the ~~increased~~decreased revenues with improved gross margin, less increased operating expenses, increased interest expense, and the change in derivative liability discussed above.

-34-

Nine months ended September 30, 2014 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013

Our revenue, operating expenses, and net loss from operations for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the nine month period ended September 30, 2013, were as follows – some balances on the prior period’s combined financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation:

	Nine Months Ended September 30:									% Change Increase (Decrease)
	2014			2013			Change
NET REVENUES	$	14,010,508		$	688,617		$	13,321,891			1,934.6		%
COSTS OF REVENUES		13,148,506			676,242			12,472,264			1,844.3		%
Gross Profit		862,002			12,375			849,627			6,865.7		%
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Research & development		151,955			69,056			82,899			120.0		%
Sales and marketing		735,608			--			735,608			100.0		%
General and administrative		8,717,116			1,841,437			6,875,679			373.4		%
Depreciation		182,280			9,617			172,663			1,795.4		%
Total operating expenses		9,786,959			1,920,110			7,866,849			409.7		%
Loss from operations		(8,924,957	)		(1,907,735	)		(7,017,222	)		(367.8	)	%
Interest expense		(1,564,896	)		(963,736	)		(601,160	)		62.4		%
Loss on sale of property and equipment		(39,860	)		--			(39,860	)		100.0		%
Change in derivative liability		(1,278,466	)		(2,796,086	)		1,517,620			54.3		%
Share of net loss of subsidiary attributable to non-controlling interest		(166,294	)		(12,998	)		(153,296	)		1,179.4		%
Net Loss	$	(11,641,885	)	$	(5,654,559	)	$	(5,987,326	)		105.9		%

Net Revenues: During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we realized $172,897 from our water reclamation business segment, $13,837,611 of revenues from our oil & gas services business segment of which $143,378 is from a related party. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we realized $541,000 of revenues from our water reclamation business segment and $147,617 of revenues from our from our oil & gas services business segment, of which $57,408 is from a related party. The increase in revenues between the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 is $13,321,891, or 1,934.6%, is attributable to a decrease of $368,103 of water reclamation services revenues offset by an increase of $13,689,994 of revenues, due to increased demand caused by our increased advertising and promotions as well as the addition of 16 new people sense the prior year end, from our oil & gas services business segments.

Cost of Revenues: Total costs of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 were $13,148,506 as compared to $676,242 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, an increase of $12,472,264 or 1,844.3%. The increase in costs of revenue is attributable to the increased revenues from our oil & gas services business segment. Costs of revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, are comprised of labor, fringe benefits, equipment rental, and other costs of providing oil & gas services. Costs of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 are attributable to contract costs to design, build and deliver a proprietary water desalinization facility and costs of our oil & gas services business segment.

Gross Profit: During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we realized a gross profit of $862,002 from our oil & gas services business segment compared to $12,375 of gross profit realized during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, an increase in gross profit of $849,627, or 6,865.7%. The increased gross profit is attributable to the increased sales volume during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Research and development expenses: Research and development expenses increased by $82,899 or 120.0% to $151,955 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 from $69,056 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The increase in research and development expenses is attributable to our water reclamation business segment.

-35-

Sales and marketing expenses: Sales and marketing expenses increased by $735,608 or 100.0%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 from none for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The increase in sales and marketing expenses are attributable to increased expenses, due to increased advertising and promotions as well as the addition of 16 new people sense the prior year end, our oil & gas services business segment.

General and Administrative Expense: General and administrative expenses increased $6,875,679 or 373.4% to $8,717,116 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 from $1,841,437 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Our general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 consisted board of director fees of $468,750, professional fees of $614,231, management fees of $1,247,752, salaries and wages of $1,502,179, consulting fees of $179,154, insurance of $212,805, penalties of $831,182, and other general and administrative expenses (which includes expenses such as; Auto, Business Development, SEC Filing, Factoring, Investor Relations, General Office, Stock Compensation of $1,446,961, Travel, and Utilities) of $3,661,063, for a total of $8,717,116. Our general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 consisted board of director fees of $455,825, professional fees of $411,011, management fees of $529,476, salaries and wages of $164,000, insurance of $35,123, and other general and administrative expenses (which includes expenses such as; Auto, Business Development, SEC Filing, Factoring, Investor Relations, General Office, Stock Compensation of $155, Travel, and Utilities) of $246,002, for a total of $1,841,437.

The primary reasons for the increase in comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2014 to the corresponding period for 2013 was mainly due to the rapid ramp-up of the business since the prior year which caused an increase in business development expenses, increase in salaries and benefits for employees, increase in professional services and consulting fees, increase in management fees, increased penalties related to payroll taxes, and the increase in the board of director fees. During the nine month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, non-cash stock based compensation expenses relating to consulting and other fees included in general and administrative expenses were $3,243,356 and $630,560, respectively.

Interest Expense: Interest expense increased by $601,160 to $1,564,896 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 from $963,736 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2013. The increase is due to additional interest expenses incurred on additional debt financing incurred by us since September 30, 2013, including $214,234 of additional interest expense attributable to the conversion of a note payable and accrued interest for common shares having a value greater than the carrying value of the note and accrued interest and $262,000 for seven short term loans in late September 2014. The increase in interest expense is partially offset by the payment or conversion of approximately $1.0 million of notes payable since September 30, 2013. Had these note payment and conversions not occurred, interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 would have been substantially greater.

Change in derivative liability: During the nine month period ended September 30, 2014, we recorded a $1,278,466 increase in the fair value of the derivative liability from December 31, 2013. During the nine month period ended September 30, 2013, we recorded a $2,796,086 increase in the derivative liability from December 31, 2012. There is a net difference of $1,517,620 between the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. The decrease in the derivative liability during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 is attributable to the reduction of the remaining term of outstanding warrants offset by the effect of an increase in the value of shares as of September 30, 2014. The reason for the increase in the derivative liability for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was mainly due to the change in the fair value of derivatives attributable to the increase in volatility rate from 100% for 2012 to a historical rate of 623% for 2013.

Non-controlling interest in Net Loss: During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, we reported $166,294 and $12,998, respectively, as the non-controlling interest in the net loss of our STW Energy Services, LLC subsidiary. This non-controlling interest in the net loss represents of a 25% non-controlling interest in the net loss of STW Energy Services, LLC, and a subsidiary company.

Net Loss: Net loss increased by $5,987,326, or 105.9%, to a net loss of $11,641,885 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 from a net loss of $5,654,559 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2013. This net loss reflects the increased revenues with improved gross margin, less increased operating expenses and change in derivative liability discussed above.

-36-

Liquidity, Capital Resources, and Management Plans

Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that we are a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As presented in the consolidated financial statements, we incurred a net loss of $112,~~641~~838,~~885~~592 during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, and losses are expected to continue in the near term. The accumulated deficit since inception is $3541,~~997~~950,~~228~~763 at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015. Refer to Note 7 for our discussion of stockholder deficit. We have been funding our operations through private loans and the sale of common stock in private placement transactions. Refer to Note 4 and Note 7 in the condensed consolidated financial statements for our discussion of notes payable and shares issued, respectively. Our cash resources are insufficient to meet our planned business objectives without additional financing. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of our company to continue as a going concern.

Management anticipates that significant additional expenditures will be necessary to develop and expand our oil & gas services and water reclamation services business units before significant positive operating cash flows can be achieved. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues and profitable operations. At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, we had ~~$281,931~~no of cash on hand and had a book overdraft of $123,629. These funds are insufficient to complete our business plan and as a consequence, we will need to seek additional funds, primarily through the issuance of debt or equity securities for cash to operate our business. No assurance can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to us. Even if we are able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions on our operations, in the case of debt financing or cause substantial dilution for our stock holders, in case or equity financing.

Management has undertaken steps as part of a plan to improve operations with the goal of sustaining our operations for the next twelve months and beyond. These steps include (a) raising additional capital and/or obtaining financing; (b) executing contracts with oil and gas operators and municipal utility districts; and (c) controlling overhead and expenses. There can be no assurance that the Company can successfully accomplish these steps and it is uncertain that the Company will achieve a profitable level of operations and obtain additional financing. There can be no assurance that any additional financing will be available to the Company on satisfactory terms and conditions, if at all. As of the date of this Report, we have not entered into any formal agreements regarding the above.

-25-

Table of Contents

In the event the Company is unable to continue as a going concern, the Company may elect or be required to seek protection from its creditors by filing a voluntary petition in bankruptcy or may be subject to an involuntary petition in bankruptcy. To date, management has not considered this alternative, nor does management view it as a likely occurrence.

Presently, due to the lack of revenues and profitability we are not able to meet our operating and capital expenses. The success of our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon successful permitting of our sites obtaining customers for water reclamation services, and maintaining a break even or profitable level of operations. We have incurred operating losses since inception, and this is likely to continue in the near future.

The financial requirements of our Company will be dependent upon the financial support through credit facilities and additional sales of our equity securities. There can be no assurance, however, that such financing will be available or, if it is available, that we will be able to structure such financing on terms acceptable to us and that it will be sufficient to fund our cash requirements until we can reach a level of profitable operations and positive cash flows. If we are unable to obtain the financing necessary to support our operations, we may be unable to continue as a going concern. We currently have no firm commitments for any additional capital.

The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues and profitable operations. At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, the Company had ~~$281,931~~no of cash on hand; however, the Company raised an additional $1385,~~055,750~~000 via ~~revenue~~a ~~participation~~note ~~notes on our new Upton project~~ during the period ~~October~~April 1, ~~2014~~2015 through ~~December~~May 2227, ~~2014~~2015, to sustain its operations. Management expects that the current funds on hand will not be sufficient to continue operations through December 31, ~~2014~~2015. Management is currently seeking additional funds, primarily through the issuance of debt or equity securities for cash to operate our business. No assurance can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, and that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to the Company. Even if the Company is able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions on our operations, in the case of debt financing or cause substantial dilution for our stockholders, in case or equity financing.

-37-

The downturn in the United States stock and debt markets could make it more difficult to obtain financing through the issuance of equity or debt securities. Even if we are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek alternative financing. Further, if we issue additional equity or debt securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our shares of common stock or the debt securities may cause us to be subject to restrictive covenants. Even if we are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek additional financing. If additional financing is not available or is not available on acceptable terms, we will have to curtail our operations.

Cash, total current assets, total assets, total current liabilities and total liabilities as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 as compared to December 31, ~~2013~~2014, were as follows:

	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Cash	$	~~281,931~~--	$	17123,~~301~~629
Total current assets	$	24,~~810~~052,~~556~~993	$	~~583~~5,~~581~~519,482
Total assets	$	45,~~087~~103,~~524~~951	$	16,~~515~~616,~~647~~122
Total current liabilities	$	1924,~~164~~012,~~099~~895	$	1124,~~951~~678,~~231~~864
Total liabilities	$	2225,~~283~~891,~~740~~325	$	1427,~~574~~504,~~240~~159

At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, we had a working capital deficit of $1619,~~353~~959,~~543~~902 compared to a working capital deficit of $1119,~~367~~159,~~650~~382 at December 31, ~~2013~~2014. Current liabilities ~~increased~~decreased to $1924,~~164~~012,~~099~~895 at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 from $1124,~~951~~775,~~231~~985 at December 31, ~~2013~~2014, primarily as a result of accrued penalties and interest, delinquent payroll taxes and payment of board compensation.

Our operating activities used net cash of $~~622~~1,~~481~~001,228 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 compared to net cash used in operations of $1743,~~222,774~~567 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2014. The net cash used in operations for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, reflects a net loss of $112,~~641~~919,~~885~~625, decreased by $41,~~728~~157,~~432~~186 in non-cash charges and by $6761,~~250,972~~210 net increase in the working capital accounts. The net cash used in operations for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2014 reflects a net loss of $52,~~654~~454,~~559~~743, decreased by $2276,~~899,551~~507 in non-cash charges and by $1,~~532~~434,~~234~~669 net increase in the working capital accounts.

Our investing activities ~~were~~used ~~$470,689~~cash of zero and $~~241~~57,~~876~~643 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2014, respectively. Our investing activities for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2014 ~~and 2013~~ are attributable to deposits and purchases of equipment, net of related equipment loans.

Our financing activities ~~resulted~~provided ~~in a~~ cash ~~inflow~~ of $1877,~~357,800~~599 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, which ~~represented~~is ~~$30,468~~comprised of ~~bank~~proceeds ~~overdraft, the repayment~~ of $~~197~~1,~~369~~284,000 offrom notes payable, ~~proceeds~~the repayment of $~~364~~143,~~137~~281 ~~from~~of notes payable, and ~~the~~debt issuance costs of $1131,~~221,500 in common stock~~000. Our financing activities resulted in cash inflow of $1,~~495~~099,~~466~~710 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2014, which is represented by $850,~~327~~084 of bank overdraft, the repayment of $5160,~~000~~698 of notes payable, ~~non-controlling~~proceeds ~~interest~~from ~~contribution~~notes payable of $280,~~500~~000, proceeds from the issuance of ~~$902,588~~common instock ~~revenue~~of ~~participating notes~~$62,500, ~~debt~~reduction ~~issuance~~of ~~costs~~stock subscriptions payable of $35130,~~025~~000, and ~~$668,076~~a innet ~~proceeds~~decrease ~~from~~in ~~fees~~related ~~payable~~party inaccounts ~~common~~receivable ~~stock~~of $837,824.

-3826-

Table of Contents

Credit Facility

On March 19, 2014, we entered into a Line of Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement") with Black Pearl Energy, LLC ("Black Pearl"), an entity controlled by Stan Weiner and Lee Maddox, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and former Chief Operating Officer, respectively, and one of our directors: Grant Seabolt. Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, Black Pearl issued us a $2,000,000 line of credit, ofapproximately ~~which~~ $1,~~277~~010,~~573~~000 of which has already been advanced asto ofus; ~~September~~the ~~30, 2014. The~~ credit was issued in the form of a promissory note (the "Note"). We must pay back all advanced funds on or before August 1, 2014, although such date ~~has~~will ~~been~~be extended to September 30, 2014 if we do not receive gross proceeds of no less than $6,000,000 resulting from either or both of: (a) the consummation of one or more private placements of debt or equity securities, not including the funds received pursuant to the Credit Agreement; or (b) the filing of a registration statement on Form S-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“ SEC ”) for ana ~~initial~~ public offering of our securities. Interest accrues at 11% per annum. To further induce Black Pearl to issue us the line of credit, we agreed to issue them 250,000 restricted shares of our common stock (after which, Black Pearl will own 250,000 (1%) of our common stock) and a $25,000 transaction fee to be paid on the final closing date of the credit line. Subsequent to our fiscal year all of this debt was rolled into a related party note.

~~Upon~~On anFebruary ~~event of default~~26, ~~which includes nonpayment of any funds owed or bankruptcy~~2015, ~~Black~~we ~~Pearl~~negotiated ~~may~~an ~~cease~~extension ~~making~~on ~~further advances to us until such default is cured; if~~ the ~~default~~note ispayable ~~not~~to ~~cured, all of~~ Black Pearl's ~~obligations~~Energy, ~~under~~a ~~the~~Related ~~Agreement~~Party, and established the ~~Note~~balance ~~shall~~at ~~cease~~$1,079,944 ~~and~~plus ~~terminate~~$105,363 ~~and~~in ~~Black~~interest ~~Pearl~~due. ~~may:~~The ~~(i)~~note ~~declare~~is ~~the~~to ~~outstanding~~be ~~principal~~paid ~~evidenced~~on bya ~~the~~monthly ~~Note~~basis ~~immediately~~of ~~due~~$12,000 ~~and~~per ~~payable;~~month ~~(ii)~~for ~~exercise~~48 ~~any~~months ~~remedy~~and ~~provided~~a ~~for~~balloon payment in ~~the~~February ~~Credit~~of ~~Agreement;~~2019. orOn ~~(iii)~~March ~~(iv)~~5, ~~exercise~~2015, ~~any~~the ~~other~~note ~~right~~was orrevised ~~remedy available~~ to itconsolidate ~~pursuant to~~ the ~~Credit~~receivables ~~Agreement~~and orthe ~~Note,~~payable orand asnet ~~provided~~the atnote ~~law~~down orto in$805,863 ~~equity. Interest~~and onreduce the ~~advanced~~interest ~~funds~~due ~~shall increase~~ to ~~18%~~approximately ~~until the default is cured~~$67,000.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company's financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014, for disclosures regarding the Company's critical accounting policies and estimates, as well as updates further disclosed in our interim financial statements as described in this Form 10-Q.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company failed to timely file its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and its quarterly reports on Form 10Q for the first two quarters of its fiscal year ending December 31, 2013, and for the first three quarters of its fiscal year ending December 31, 2014, which demonstrates that its Disclosure Controls and Procedures are inadequate.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of our fiscal quarter ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon those evaluations, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, to cause the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

-39-

Going forward from this filing, the Company intends to work on re-establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) that are designed to be effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In designing and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute assurance of achieving the desired objectives. Also, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. The design of any system of controls is based, in part, upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the quarter covered by this Report, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. No remediation has been made in this quarter.

-27-

Table of Contents

Part II – Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company may become a party to litigation or other legal proceedings that it considers to be a part of the ordinary course of its business. The Company is involved currently in legal proceedings described below that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on its business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations. The Company may become involved in other material legal proceedings in the future.

GE Ionics, Inc. Lawsuit. On May 22, 2013, GE filed a lawsuit against STW in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Index No. 651832/2013 (the “GE Lawsuit”). Although the lawsuit arises out of STW’s obligations to GE under its Settlement Agreement with GE (described more fully in Item 3, GE Ionics Settlement Agreement), upon which STW owed GE $2.1 million plus interest, GE has elected to forgo suit on the settlement amount and sue STW for the original debt of $11,239,437, plus interest and attorneys’ fees (the “Original Debt”). As such, STW filed its Answer and asserted that it is entitled to and shall pursue all of its available legal and equitable defenses to the Original Debt, inasmuch as GE has, among other things, failed to discount the Original Debt sued upon by the amounts that it recovered through re-use and re-sale of the equipment it fabricated for STW. Management has not accrued the original amount of the debt because the probability of recovery is remote. The lawsuit is in the discovery phase of litigation.

~~TCA~~Sichenzia ~~Global~~and ~~Credit~~Ross ~~Master Fund, LP~~ Lawsuit. On ~~April~~June 0413, 2014, ~~TCA~~Sichenzia ~~Global~~Ross ~~Credit~~Friedman ~~Master~~Ference ~~Fund,~~LLP LP filed a lawsuit against the Company in the ~~Circuit~~Supreme Court of ~~the~~New ~~11th~~York, ~~Judicial~~County ~~District~~ of ~~Miami-Dade~~New ~~County~~York, ~~Florida~~Index yNo. 155843/2013, ~~Florida~~seeking $180,036 ~~cause~~in ~~No.~~legal ~~2014-8956-CA-06,~~fees ~~alleging~~and expenses from the Company’s. ~~breach~~The oflegal anfees ~~October~~and ~~16,~~expenses ~~2012~~related ~~debt~~to ~~settlement~~Sichenzia ~~agreement~~Ross’ ~~(the~~representation ~~“TCA~~of ~~Lawsuit”).~~the ~~The~~ Company ~~did~~on ~~not~~SEC ~~have~~matters. toThe ~~file~~parties anfiled ~~answer,~~a asstipulation itwith ~~and~~the ~~TCA~~Court ~~agreed~~on toAugust a25, ~~First~~2014, ~~Addendum~~which toextended the ~~October~~Company’s ~~16,~~date ~~2012~~to ~~settlement~~file ~~agreement,~~an ~~wherein~~Answer ~~STW~~to ~~agreed~~the lawsuit to ~~pay~~September ~~TCA~~22, ~~Global~~2014. ~~the~~On ~~sum~~October of8, ~~$77~~2014,~~068~~ inthe ~~unpaid~~Parties ~~principal,~~entered ~~accrued~~into ~~interest~~a ~~and~~Settlement ~~attorneys’~~Agreement ~~fees,~~whereby ~~and~~the ~~TCA~~Company ~~Global~~ agreed to ~~conditionally~~pay ~~dismiss~~Sichenzia ~~the~~Ross ~~TCA Lawsuit~~$80,036. ~~Should~~22 ~~there~~on beor abefore ~~default~~November in28, ~~the~~2014 ~~Company’s~~or ~~payments~~within ~~under~~three ~~the~~business ~~First~~days ~~Addendum,~~of the Company ~~agreed~~closing toits ~~the~~current ~~entry~~round of afinancing. ~~Final~~The ~~Consent~~agreement ~~Judgment~~to ~~for~~pay ~~the~~was ~~$77,068,~~secured ~~less~~by ~~amounts~~the ~~paid~~Company ~~prior~~providing toSichenzia ~~filing~~Ross ofan ~~the~~“Affidavit ~~Consent~~of Judgment~~. The~~ ~~Company~~by ~~was~~Confession” ~~previously~~ in ~~default under~~ the ~~Settlement~~amount ~~Addendum~~of $80,036.22 ~~and~~to ~~owed~~be ~~TCA~~filed ~~Global~~only ~~$37,068~~if the Company failed to ~~discharge~~pay the ~~obligation~~$80,036.22 inby ~~full. At~~the ~~this~~due ~~time~~date, ~~TCA~~plus ~~Global~~a ~~has~~five ~~accepted~~day ~~partial~~cure ~~payments~~period ~~and~~ending ~~did~~on ~~not~~December ~~file~~03, ~~the Consent Judgment~~2014. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~On ~~has~~December ~~paid~~10, ~~all~~2014, ~~amounts~~Sichenzia ~~due~~Ross ~~under~~filed the ~~Settlement~~Judgement ~~Addendum~~by ~~and~~Confession with the ~~related~~Court, ~~matter~~and ~~has~~the ~~been~~Judgment ~~finally~~remains ~~resolved~~unsatisfied.

~~-40-~~Bob J. Johnson & Associates Lawsuit. There has been one lawsuit filed on July 14, 2014 against the Company’s subsidiary, STW Water Process & Technologies, LLC (“STW Water”), Bob J. Johnson & Associates, Inc. (BJJA) v. Alan Murphy and STW Water & Process Technologies, LLC, Case No. CV50473 in the 238th District Court of Midland County, Texas (the “BJJA Lawsuit”). BJJA sought to enforce an allegedly enforceable covenant not to compete and a confidentiality agreement signed by Alan Murphy, STW Water’s recently hired President, who was a former vice president and employee of BJJA. On July 14, 2014, BJJA obtained a TRO against Alan Murphy, STW Water and those associated with the Defendants, which, by the Company’s ownership of STW Water, included the Company. The TRO temporarily prohibited the Company, STW Water and Alan Murphy from contacting two key customers of STW and STW Water, Pioneer Energy Resources and the City of Ft. Stockton, Texas. On July 28, 2014, the Court held a temporary injunction hearing, which resulted in the TRO being dissolved and the Court refusing to further enjoin STW, STW Water or Alan Murphy from competing with BJJA. The case is still on the docket and BJJA has sought initial discovery from the Company; however, the Company is confident that it will not go forward to a trial on the merits, thereby precluding any appreciable risk of a permanent injunction.

~~Sichenzia~~Viewpoint ~~and~~Securities, ~~Ross~~LLC ~~Lawsuit~~Arbitration. On ~~June~~or 13about July 9, ~~2014~~2012, ~~Sichenzia~~the ~~Ross~~Company ~~Friedman~~and ~~Ference~~Stan ~~LLP~~Weiner, ~~filed~~the Company's chief executive officer, received a ~~lawsuit~~demand ~~against~~for arbitration with the ~~Company~~American inArbitration ~~the~~Association. ~~Supreme~~The ~~Court~~demand ofwas ~~New~~filed ~~York~~by Viewpoint Securities LLC ("VP") who entered into an engagement agreement, ~~County~~dated ofMarch ~~New~~9, ~~York~~2008 (as amended on March 9, ~~Index~~2008, ~~No.~~November ~~155843/2013~~10, ~~seeking~~2008, ~~$180~~January 1,~~036~~ in2009, ~~legal~~February ~~fees~~5, 2010, and ~~expenses~~December ~~from~~1, 2010), with STW whereby the Company~~. The~~ ~~legal~~retained ~~fees~~VP to act as its financial and ~~expenses~~capital ~~related~~markets toadvisor ~~Sichenzia~~regarding ~~Ross’~~equity ~~representation~~and ofdebt ~~the~~introduced ~~Company~~by onVP ~~SEC~~to ~~matters~~the Company. The ~~parties~~demand ~~filed~~alleged abreach ~~stipulation~~of ~~with~~contract, breach of the ~~Court~~covenant onof ~~August~~good ~~25,~~faith ~~2014~~and fair dealings, ~~which~~negligence ~~extended~~prayer ~~the~~for ~~Company’s~~commissions ~~date~~and expenses incurred by VP in its efforts to ~~file~~provide anintroductions ~~Answer~~and attempt to ~~the~~provide ~~lawsuit~~financing to ~~September~~the 22Company from March 9, ~~2014. On~~2008 ~~October~~through 8February 2, ~~2014~~2012, the ~~Parties~~date ~~entered~~of ~~into~~termination aof ~~Settlement~~the Agreement. ~~whereby~~VP seeks, among other things, $216,217 and a warrant to purchase 94,445 shares of the Company's ~~agreed~~common tostock, ~~pay~~payment ~~Sichenzia~~of ~~Ross~~a $8015,~~036.22~~000 onpromissory ornote ~~before~~plus ~~November~~3+ 28years of interest at 12%, ~~2014~~attorneys' orfees ~~within~~of ~~three~~$18,000 ~~business~~and ~~days~~costs of ~~the~~arbitration for filing fees and hearing fees. The Company ~~closing~~believed ~~its~~it ~~current~~had ~~round~~valid ofdefenses ~~financing~~and contested these claims vigorously. ~~The~~ ~~agreement~~On toAugust ~~pay~~18, ~~was~~2012, ~~secured~~VP bydismissed Stan Weiner from the ~~Company~~claim ~~providing~~with ~~Sichenzia~~prejudice. ~~Ross~~A final arbitration hearing was held on February 3, 2014. On April 1, 2014, the Arbitrator issued an ~~“Affidavit~~Award in favor of ~~Judgment~~Viewpoint byfor ~~Confession”~~$196,727 on Viewpoint's claim for $216,217 in fees and expenses, plus $5,541 in arbitration hearing fees and expenses; interest shall accrue at the ~~amount~~rate of ~~$80~~10% per annum on any unpaid portion of the award commencing April 1,~~036~~ 2014.22 toThe beArbitrator ~~filed~~denied ~~only~~Viewpoint's ifclaims related to the Company's ~~failed~~warrants, toa ~~pay~~$15,000 ~~the~~promissory note plus 12% interest and for $8018,~~036~~000 in attorneys' fees.22 byThe ~~the~~Award ~~due~~was ~~date~~final April 1, ~~plus~~2014, and on October 28, 2014, Viewpoint filed a ~~five~~lawsuit ~~day~~in ~~cure~~San ~~period~~Diego ~~ending~~County, onCalifornia ~~December~~Superior 03Court seeking to enforce its Arbitration Award, in Case No. 37-2014-00036027-CU-PA-CTL. On December 1008, 2014, ~~Sichenzia~~the ~~Ross~~Company filed a motion to dismiss the ~~Judgement~~enforcement byaction ~~Confession~~due ~~with~~to Viewpoint having forfeited its corporate rights in California due to non-payment of California corporate taxes, and that motion is still pending before the Court. The full amount of this award has been accrued for in Accounts Payable.

Bob J. Johnson & Associates Lawsuit. There has been one lawsuit filed on July 14, 2014 against the Company’s subsidiary, STW Water Process & Technologies, LLC (“STW Water”), Bob J. Johnson & Associates, Inc. (BJJA) v. Alan Murphy and STW Water & Process Technologies, LLC, Case No. CV50473 in the 238th District Court of Midland County, Texas (the “BJJA Lawsuit”). BJJA sought to enforce an allegedly enforceable covenant not to compete and a confidentiality agreement signed by Alan Murphy, STW Water’s recently hired President, who was a former vice president and employee of BJJA. On July 14, 2014, BJJA obtained a TRO against Alan Murphy, STW Water and those associated with the Defendants, which, by the Company’s ownership of STW Water, included the Company. The TRO temporarily prohibited the Company, STW Water and Alan Murphy from contacting two key customers of STW and STW Water, Pioneer Energy Resources and the City of St. Stockton, Texas. On July 28, 2014, the Court held a temporary injunction hearing, which resulted in the TRO being dissolved and the Court refusing to further enjoin STW, STW Water or Alan Murphy from competing with BJJA. The case is still on the docket; however, the Company is confident that it will not go forward to a trial on the merits, thereby precluding any appreciable risk of a permanent injunction.

Viewpoint Securities, LLC Arbitration. On or about July 9, 2012, the Company and Stan Weiner, the Company's chief executive officer, received a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association. The demand was filed by Viewpoint Securities LLC ("VP") who entered into an engagement agreement, dated March 9, 2008 (as amended on March 9, 2008, November 10, 2008, January 1, 2009, February 5, 2010, and December 1, 2010), with STW whereby the Company retained VP to act as its financial and capital markets advisor regarding equity and debt introduced by VP to the Company. The demand alleged breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealings, negligence prayer for commissions and expenses incurred by VP in its efforts to provide introductions and attempt to provide financing to the Company from March 9, 2008 through February 2, 2012, the date of termination of the Agreement. VP seeks, among other things, $216,217 and a warrant to purchase 94,445 shares of the Company's common stock, payment of a $15,000 promissory note plus 3+ years of interest at 12%, attorneys' fees of $18,000 and costs of arbitration for filing fees and hearing fees. The Company believed it had valid defenses and contested these claims vigorously. On August 18, 2012, VP dismissed Stan Weiner from the claim with prejudice. A final arbitration hearing was held on February 3, 2014. On April 1, 2014, the Arbitrator issued an Award in favor of Viewpoint for $196,727 on Viewpoint's claim for $216,217 in fees and expenses, plus $5,541 in arbitration hearing fees and expenses; interest shall accrue at the rate of 10% per annum on any unpaid portion of the award commending April 1, 2014. The Arbitrator denied Viewpoint's claims related to the Company's warrants, a $15,000 promissory note plus 12% interest and for $18,000 in attorneys' fees. The Award was final April 1, 2014, and on October 28, 2014, Viewpoint filed a lawsuit in San Diego County, California Superior Court seeking to enforce its Arbitration Award, in Case No. 37-2014-00036027-CU-PA-CTL. The full amount of this award has been accrued for in Accounts Payable.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, are not required to provide the information under this item. Please refer to our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on ~~June~~April 203, ~~2014~~2015 under item 1.A Risk Factors.

-41-

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

~~Information~~The onCompany ~~any~~has ~~and~~authorized ~~all equity securities we have sold during the period covered by this Report~~191, ~~and from such date through the date of this Report~~666,667 ~~that~~shares ~~were not registered under the Securities Act~~ of ~~1933,~~common asstock ~~amended~~with ~~and not included in~~ a ~~previously~~par ~~filed~~value ~~Current~~of ~~Report on Form 8-K is set forth below:~~ $0.001.

~~During~~Information ~~January~~on ~~2014,~~any ~~the~~and ~~Company~~all ~~issued~~equity ansecurities ~~aggregate~~we ofhave ~~926,603~~sold ~~shares~~during ofthe ~~its~~period ~~common~~covered ~~stock~~by ~~valued~~this atReport ~~$510,769~~that inwere ~~payment~~not ofregistered ~~accrued~~under ~~paid-in-kind~~the ~~(“PIK”)~~Securities ~~interest~~Act toof ~~twelve~~1933, ~~(12)~~as ~~investors.~~amended is set forth below:

During January, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 122,190 shares of its common stock to twelve (12) investors valued at $67,354 as consideration for the extension of the maturity date to June 1, 2015, on the 14% convertible notes that matured on November 30, 2013 and in default.-28-

~~During~~Table ~~January, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate~~ of ~~1,220,101 shares of its common stock valued at $660,684 upon the conversion of a 14% convertible note and two 12% convertible notes (see Note 5).~~Contents

~~During~~Recent ~~January and February, 2014, the Company issued 250,000 shares of its common stock valued at $145,000 to consultants for services rendered.~~sales:

~~During~~On ~~March~~January ~~2014~~15, 2015, the Company issued ~~312~~62,500 shares of ~~its~~ common stock to an investor, ~~that~~at ~~had~~a ~~subscribed~~unit ~~and~~price ~~paid~~of $~~150~~1.56,~~000~~ ~~for~~in ~~the~~payment ~~shares~~of interest on ~~November~~a 15short term loan for a value of $97,500 ~~2013.~~resulting ~~This~~in ~~subscription~~a reduction in expenses on settlement of ~~shares~~$43,750 ~~was~~and ~~previously~~an ~~reported~~additional as170,000 ~~Stock~~shares ~~Subscriptions~~of ~~Payable~~common asstock, at a unit price of ~~December~~$1.40, 31resulting in a reduction in interest on settlement of $91,800, ~~2013~~to a consultant for services valued at $238,000.

~~During~~On ~~March~~January ~~2014~~27, 2015, the Company issued ~~130~~281,~~208~~167 shares of ~~its~~ common stock, inat ~~consideration~~various ofunit ~~$62~~prices,~~500~~ ~~cash~~valued ~~proceeds~~at ~~realized~~$209,825 ~~from~~to ~~the~~19 ~~sale~~employees offor ~~stock~~signing tobonuses ~~accredited~~and ~~investors~~continued atservice ~~$0.48~~to ~~per~~the ~~share~~company.

~~During~~On ~~the~~January ~~period April 1~~28, ~~2014 through September 17~~2015, ~~2014, we sold an aggregate of 1,910,833 units pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement (~~the ~~"Purchase~~Company ~~Agreement")~~issued ~~to fifty (50) accredited investors (the "Investors")~~158,335 ~~each~~shares ~~consisting~~ of ~~(a) one share of~~ common stock ~~and (b) one~~, ~~2 year, common stock purchase warrant to purchase one share of common stock~~ at anvarious ~~exercise~~unit ~~price of $1.20 per share~~prices, ~~subject~~ to ~~adjustment~~7 ~~(the~~investors ~~"Warrants,"~~valued ~~collectively~~at ~~with the shares of common stock, the "Units"). Each Unit had a purchase price of~~ $~~0.48~~225,128 ~~and the Company received an aggregate of $1,029,000~~ in ~~gross~~payment ~~funding in the transaction (the "Offering"). One~~ of ~~the~~interest ~~investors,~~on ~~because~~7 ofshort ~~additional~~term ~~circumstances, received an additional 16,667 warrants so total warrants were 1,927,500~~loans\.

In ~~April 2014~~ the ~~Company~~first ~~issued~~week ~~104,166 shares~~ of ~~common~~February ~~stock on a unit share offering at $0.48 for proceeds of $70~~2015,~~000.~~ ~~The~~the Company issued ~~930~~378,~~261~~334 shares of common stock, toat ~~the~~various ~~Board~~unit ofprices, ~~Directors for services rendered; this was~~ valued at $~~558~~344,~~157. Additional shares of~~ 100~~,000~~ ~~were issued~~ to an4 ~~employee~~employees aspursuant ato ~~signing~~their ~~bonus~~employment ~~valued at $60,000~~contracts. Officer’s compensation was paid by issuing 402,708 shares of common stock in lieu of paying $241,625. Consultants were issued 186,958 shares of common stock in lieu of paying $112,175 in accrued fees.

On ~~May~~February 223, ~~2014~~2015, the Company ~~converted~~issued a15,385 ~~14%~~shares ~~convertible~~of ~~note~~common ~~that~~stock, ~~was~~at ina ~~default~~unit inprice ~~the amount~~ of $~~544~~0.65,~~426~~ ofto ~~principal~~an ~~and~~accredited ~~$197,486~~investor ofbased ~~accrued~~on ~~interest~~a ~~into~~unit 1offering at $0.65 per unit,~~545,650~~ ~~shares~~increasing Capital of ~~its~~the ~~common~~Company ~~stock~~by $10,000.

InOn ~~May~~February ~~2014~~3, a2015, ~~consultant~~the ~~was~~Company issued 83100,~~333~~000 shares of common stock, inat ~~lieu~~a ofunit ~~fees~~price of $600.68, to an accredited investor for $68,000 in loan origination fees.

InOn ~~June~~February ~~2014~~6, 2015, the Company issued 20150,~~833~~001 shares of fully vested common stock, onat avarious unit ~~share~~prices, ~~offering~~to at3 ~~$0.48~~consultants ~~for~~valued ~~proceeds~~at of $30119,~~000.~~500 Ain ~~charitable~~payment ~~contribution~~of ~~was~~services ~~made~~rendered ofin ~~166,667~~2014 ~~shares~~and ofthe ~~common~~renewal ~~stock~~of ~~valued~~a at2015 ~~$110,000~~contract.

~~-42-~~On February 6, 2015, the Company issued 225,000 shares of common stock, at various unit prices, to 3 accredited investors for $187,000 in loan origination fees.

InOn ~~July~~February ~~2014~~17, 2015, the Company issued 1100,~~104,167~~000 shares of common stock, onat a unit ~~share~~price ~~offering at $0.48 for proceeds~~ of $~~530,000~~. ~~The Company also issued 41~~80,~~667~~ ~~shares~~to ~~for~~an ~~8,333~~accredited ~~warrants~~investor ~~at $0.12~~ for $5080,000, ~~22,561 shares~~ in ~~payment of PIK interest for $10,829, and 83,333 shares for a~~ loan, ~~valued~~origination ~~at $40,000~~fees. ~~Two employees also received 283,333 shares of stock for signing bonus and services to the company; these shares were valued at $136,000.~~

InOn ~~August~~February ~~2014~~18, 2015, the Company issued ~~724~~184,~~167~~975 shares of common stock onto aan ~~unit~~investment ~~share~~group, ~~offering~~ at ~~$0.60~~a ~~for~~unit ~~proceeds~~price of $~~437,500~~0.65, ~~The~~valued ~~Company~~at ~~also issued 108~~$120,~~333~~233 ~~shares~~for toservices ~~consultants~~rendered in ~~lieu~~procuring ofinvestors ~~paying~~for ~~Consultant~~the ~~fees of $49,000~~company.

InOn ~~September~~February ~~2014~~19, 2015, the Company issued 10100,000 shares of common stock, toat a ~~consultant~~unit inprice ~~lieu~~ of ~~paying Consultant fees of~~ $40.85,~~800~~ ~~and~~to ~~issued~~ an ~~additional~~accredited ~~95,833~~investor ~~shares~~for to$85,000 ~~employees~~in asloan ~~signing~~origination ~~bonuses~~fees.

On February 23, 2015, the Company issued 562,500 shares of common stock to 6 directors, at a unit price of $0.80, valued at $450,000 for services rendered in prior year(s).

On ~~September~~February 2324, ~~2014~~2015, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock, ~~were~~at ~~issued~~a tounit ~~three~~price ~~employees~~of at $10.3265, ~~per~~to ~~share~~a asconsultant ~~part~~for ofservices ~~their~~valued ~~employment/signing~~at ~~bonuses~~$65,000.

On ~~October~~February 1527, ~~2014~~2015, pursuant to the ~~Company~~January ~~issued~~8, ~~129~~2015,~~921~~ ~~shares~~Board of ~~common~~Director’s ~~stock~~Minutes, a total of 900,000 shares were issued by the Company to an1 ~~investor~~employee and 2 consultants for services performed in 2014. They were issued at a unit price of $0.7280 per common share ~~for~~at ~~the~~a ~~conversion~~value of ~~a revenue participation offering on STW Pipeline~~$720,000.

On October 23, 2014, the Company issued 33,333 shares of common stock to an investor at a unit value of $0.63 per share on the conversion of a short term convertible note.

On November 5, 2014 the company issued 70,477 shares of common stock to an investor at a unit value of $0.582 per share on the conversion of a short term convertible note.

On November 18, 2014, it was necessary to issue an additional 206 shares to cover the rounding effect of the 1 for 6 reverse stock split. On November 21, 2014, the transfer agent returned 45 of those shares to treasury stock. That made a net of 161 shares issued for the rounding effect.

On November 20, 2014, the Company issued 8,333 shares of common stock to one of the investors in the July offering at a unit value of $0.60 per share.

All of the transactions listed above were made pursuant to the exemption from the registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act for sales not involving a public offering or Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated by the SEC. The securities issued have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

GE Ionics Settlement Agreement

On or about May 22, 2008, STW Resources Holding Corporation entered into a Teaming Agreement, as amended, with GE Ionics, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (“GE”) (STWR and GE are collectively referred to as the “Parties”). On or about April 4, 2008 STWR and GE entered into a Purchase Order (the “Purchase Order”), pursuant to which there was due and unpaid a debt by STWR to GE in the amount of $11,239,437 as of August 31, 2010 (the “Original Debt”).

On August 31, 2010, the Parties entered into a Settlement Agreement (the “GE Settlement Agreement”) pursuant to which GE permitted the Company to substitute for STWR as to all rights and obligations under the Purchase Order (including the Original Debt) and Teaming Agreement, and such that to fully discharge STW financial obligations to GE under the Purchase Order, the Company shall pay GE $1,400,000 pursuant to a senior promissory note (the “GE Note”). The GE Note bore interest at a rate of the WSJ Prime Rate (as published daily in the Wall Street Journal) plus two percent (2%) per annum. Under the terms of the GE Note, the Company had thirteen (13) months to pay off the GE Note plus all accrued interest. In addition, upon the consummation and closing of a debt or equity financing following the execution of the GE Note, the Company shall pay GE thirty percent (30%) of any and all tranches (“Tranches” being defined as the cash receipts of the proceeds of any equity investments in or loans to the Company or any affiliated entity by third parties, but excluding any conversions of pre-~~existing debt to equity by any of the Company’s then current convertible note holders or creditors) until the GE Note is paid in full, including all accrued interest. On September~~ 29~~, 2011, the Parties agreed to extend the maturity date of the GE Note from September 30, 2011 to October 30, 2011.~~-

~~-43-~~Table of Contents

On ~~October~~August 3031, ~~2011~~2010, the ~~Parties~~Company entered into ana ~~amendment to the GE~~ Settlement Agreement, ~~effective~~relating ~~October 1, 2011, pursuant~~ to ~~which,~~a ~~among other things, the Parties agreed as follows: (i) the Company will have until September 1, 2013 to pay GE~~ $2,100,000 ~~plus~~note ~~interest~~payable ~~accrued~~that ~~after~~was amended on October 130, 2011. ~~under~~On ~~the~~May GE7, ~~Note in accordance with its terms~~2012, ~~(ii) upon the consummation and closing of a debt or equity financing following the execution of the~~ GE ~~Note,~~informed the Company ~~shall~~that ~~pay~~it GEhad ~~thirty~~failed ~~percent~~to ~~(30%)~~make of any ~~and~~required ~~all~~installment ~~tranches~~payment ~~(“Tranches”~~that ~~being~~was ~~defined~~due asand ~~the~~payable ~~cash~~under ~~receipts of~~ the ~~proceeds~~GE ofNote ~~any~~and ~~equity~~that ~~investments~~the inCompany’s orfailure ~~loans~~ to ~~the~~make ~~Company or~~ any ~~affiliated~~such ~~entity~~installment bypayment(s) ~~third~~constituted ~~parties,~~an ~~but~~Event ~~excluding any conversions~~ of ~~pre-existing~~Default ~~debt~~under tothe ~~equity~~GE byNote. ~~any~~Pursuant ofto the ~~Company’s~~terms ~~then~~of ~~current convertible note holders or creditors) until~~ the GE Note ~~is paid in full~~, ~~including~~upon ~~all~~the ~~accrued~~occurrence ~~interest,~~of ~~provided~~an ~~the~~Event ~~Company~~of ~~shall~~Default ~~not~~for beany ~~obligated~~reason towhatsoever, ~~pay~~ GE ~~upon~~shall, among other things, have the ~~following:~~right to (a) ~~short~~cure ~~term~~such ~~commercial paper of $200~~defaults,~~000~~ orwith ~~less,~~the upresult tothat aall ~~cumulative~~costs ~~maximum~~and ofexpenses ~~$500,000~~incurred ~~through~~or ~~December~~paid ~~31,~~by ~~2012,~~GE ~~(b)~~in ~~commercial~~effecting ~~equipment~~such ~~leasing~~cure ~~whereby~~shall GEbear ~~is taking a secured~~ interest inat the ~~purchased~~highest ~~equipment,~~rate ~~(c)~~permitted ~~proceeds~~by ~~from project~~law, ~~lease~~ and ~~equipment~~shall ~~funding~~be topayable ~~any~~upon ~~subsidiary~~demand; ofand (b) accelerate the ~~Company~~maturity ~~provided~~of the ~~Company~~GE ~~does~~Note ~~not~~and ~~receive~~demand ~~any~~the ~~proceeds~~immediate ofpayment ~~such~~thereof, ~~funding~~without ~~and~~presentment, ~~(d)~~demand, aprotest ~~one-time~~or ~~general~~other ~~exception~~notice ~~for~~of ~~$1,500,000~~any ofkind. ~~new~~Upon ~~equity~~an ~~financing~~event of ~~the~~default ~~Company,~~under ~~(iii)~~ the ~~Company~~GE ~~shall~~Note, ~~begin~~GE ~~making~~shall abe ~~regular~~entitled ~~series~~to, ofamong ~~installment~~other ~~payments~~things ~~as follows:~~ (ai) ~~$10,000~~the ~~per~~principal ~~month~~amount ~~beginning~~of onthe ~~January~~GE 1,Note ~~2012,~~along ~~and~~with ~~(b)~~any ~~$15,000~~interest ~~per~~accrued ~~month~~but ~~beginning~~unpaid onthereon ~~June~~and 1,(ii) ~~2012~~any ~~through~~and ~~the~~all ~~maturity~~expenses ~~date~~(including ofattorney’s ~~the~~fees ~~GE Note~~ and ~~(iv~~expenses) ~~the~~incurred ~~Company~~in ~~shall~~connection bewith ~~able to prepay~~ the GEcollection ~~Note,~~and ~~without~~enforcement ~~interest,~~of onany orrights ~~before~~under the ~~maturity~~GE ~~date~~Note.

OnUnder ~~May 7, 2012, GE informed~~ the Company that it had failed to make any required installment payment that was due and payable under the GE Note and that the Company’s failure to make any such installment payment(s) constituted an Event of Default under the GE Note. Pursuant to the terms of the GEAugust ~~Note~~31, ~~upon~~2010 ~~the~~note, ~~occurrence~~interest ofat anthe ~~Event~~rate of ~~Default~~WSJ ~~for~~prime ~~any~~plus ~~reason~~2% ~~whatsoever,~~is GEdue ~~shall,~~on ~~among~~the ~~other things~~note, ~~have~~upon ~~the right to (a) cure such defaults~~default, ~~with~~interest ~~the~~is ~~result~~due ~~that all costs and expenses incurred or paid by GE in effecting such cure shall bear interest~~ at the ~~highest~~maximum legal rate ~~permitted~~which byis ~~law,~~10% ~~and~~in ~~shall be payable upon demand; and (b) accelerate~~ the ~~maturity~~state of ~~the~~Texas. GEThe ~~Note~~note ~~and~~matured ~~demand~~on ~~the~~September ~~immediate payment thereof~~1, ~~without presentment~~2013, ~~demand,~~and ~~protest~~is orin ~~other notice of any kind~~default. ~~Upon~~ anInterest ~~event~~on ofthe ~~default~~note ~~under~~through ~~the~~December GE31, ~~Note~~2014, GEhas ~~shall~~been beaccrued ~~entitled~~pursuant to, ~~among other things (i)~~ the ~~principal~~terms ~~amount~~ of the GEnote ~~Note~~through ~~along~~May ~~with~~6, ~~any~~2012, interest ~~accrued~~upon ~~but~~default ~~unpaid~~on ~~thereon~~May ~~and~~7, ~~(ii)~~2012, ~~any~~has ~~and~~been ~~all~~accrued ~~expenses~~at ~~(including~~the ~~attorney’s~~maximum ~~fees~~default ~~and~~rate ~~expenses) incurred~~ in ~~connection with~~ the ~~collection~~state ~~and enforcement~~ of ~~any~~Texas ~~rights~~which ~~under~~is ~~the GE Note~~10%.

As of the date ~~of this Report~~hereof, the Company has not repaid any principal or accrued but unpaid interest that has become due and payable under the GE Note.

On May 22, 2013, GE filed a lawsuit against STW in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Index No. 651832/2013 (the “GE Lawsuit”). Although the lawsuit arises out of STW’s obligations to GE under its Settlement Agreement with GE ~~(described more fully in Item 4 Debt~~, ~~GE Ionics Settlement Agreement),~~ upon which STW owed GE $2.1 million plus interest, GE has elected to forgo suit on the settlement amount and sue STW for the original debt of $11,239,437, plus interest and attorneys’ fees (the “Original Debt”). As such, STW filed its Answer and asserted that it is entitled to and shall pursue all of its available legal and equitable defenses to the Original Debt, inasmuch as GE has, among other things, failed to discount the Original Debt sued upon by the amounts that it recovered through re-use and re-sale of the equipment it fabricated for STW. Management has not accrued the original amount of the debt because the probability of recovery is remote.

TCA Loan

On October 16, 2012, the Company and TCA entered into a settlement agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay as follows: (i) $15,000 to be paid on October 18, 2012, (ii) $15,000 to be paid on or before November 1, 2012, (iii) five (5) equal installments of $20,000 to be paid beginning on December 1, 2012 and continuing on the first day of each month thereafter, (iv) $4,280 in principal and $9,068 of interest to be paid on or prior to May 1, 2013 and (v) $3,000 for legal fees to be paid on May 1, 2013. Under the settlement agreement, if STW is late on any installment, it has ten days after notice from TCA to make a cure payment. During 2014 and 2013, the Company has not made all of its required payments and the $43,280 balance of the note is in default.

Item 5. Other Information

InThe ~~July~~“Recent ~~2014~~Sales” ~~the~~included ~~Company~~in ~~issued~~Item ~~1,104,167~~2. Unregistered ~~shares~~Sales of ~~common~~Equity ~~stock~~Securities onand aUse ~~unit~~of ~~share~~Proceeds ~~offering~~are atincorporated ~~$0.48~~by ~~for~~references ~~proceeds~~into this Item 5 of ~~$530,000~~this Form 10-Q in lieu of reporting such transactions pursuant to Items 3.02 of Form 8-K during the period covered by this Report.

In July the Company also issued 41,666 shares for 8,333 warrants at $1.20 for $50,000, or 22,561 shares in payment of PIK interest for $10,829. Additionally, the Company issued 83,333 shares for a loan, valued at $40,000. Two employees received 283,333 shares of stock for signing bonus and services to the company. These shares were valued at $136,000. These shares were issued at fair market value at the date of issuance.-30-

~~-44-~~Table of Contents

This Report shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities, nor shall such securities be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements and certificates evidencing such securities contain a legend stating the same.

On March 26, 2015, the Company approved three Executive Long Term Agreements for Stanley T. Weiner (as President and CEO), Paul DiFrancesco (as Head of Finance) and D. Grant Seabolt, Jr. (as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary).

The terms of the employment agreements are as follows:

Stanley T. Weiner shall be employed as Chairman and CEO for a three year term effective February 1, 2015. His base salary shall be $15,000 monthly ($180,000 annually) during the first year of employment, $22,000 monthly ($264,000 annually) during the second year of employment, and $29,000 monthly ($348,000 annually) during the third year of employment. He will be subject to an annual discretionary bonus up to 100% of his previous six month salary, and a signing bonus of 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. He will also be subject to quarterly bonuses equal to 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. He will also be subject to a twelve month severance award in the event of termination.

Paul DiFrancesco shall be employed as Head of Finance for a three year term effective February 1, 2015. His base salary shall be $12,000 monthly ($144,000 annually) during the first year of employment, $16,000 monthly ($192,000 annually) during the second year of employment, and $16,000 monthly ($192,000 annually) during the third year of employment. He will be subject to an annual discretionary bonus up to 100% of his previous six month salary, and a signing bonus of 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. He will also be subject to quarterly bonuses equal to 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. He will also be subject to a twelve month severance award in the event of termination.

Grant Seabolt shall be employed as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for a three year term effective February 1, 2015. His base salary shall be $8,000 monthly ($96,000 annually) during the first year of employment, $9,500 monthly ($114,000 annually) during the second year of employment, and $9,500 monthly ($114,000 annually) during the third year of employment. He will be subject to an annual discretionary bonus up to 100% of his previous six month salary, and a signing bonus of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. He will also be subject to quarterly bonuses equal to 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. He will also be subject to a twelve month severance award in the event of termination.

On March 26, 2015, the Board approved amending certain outstanding employment agreements to clarify that any options issuable thereunder, shall only be issued at such time when the Company’s option plan is fully funded and implemented; the Company circulated these amendments to the respective employees and has no reason to believe they will not be countersigned by each such employee.

-31-

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.		Description
2.1		Order Confirming the Second Amended Plan of Re-organization of Woozyfly, Inc. (4)
2.2		Agreement and Plan of Merger for proposed merger between Woozyfly, Inc. Merger Sub, and STW Resources, Inc. dated January 17, 2010 (3)
3.1		Articles of Incorporation (1)
3.2		Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (2)
3.3		Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation – March 1, 2010 (5)
3.4		Articles of Merger between STW Acquisition, Inc. and STW Resources, Inc. (4)
3.5		Articles of Merger filed with the State of Nevada on March 3, 2010 (6)
4.1		Form of 12% Convertible Note dated August 31, 2010 (8)
4.2		Form of Warrant dated August 31, 2010 (8)
4.3		Form of Promissory Note dated August 31, 2010 (9)
4.4		Form of Warrant for December 2010 Financing (10)
4.5		Extension of Note, by and between STW Resources Holding Corp. and GE Ionics, Inc., dated October 28, 2011 (11)
4.6		Amended and Restated Note effective October 1, 2011 in favor of GE Ionics, Inc. (11)
4.7		Form of November 2011 Warrant (13)
4.8		Note Exchange Form of New Note (15)
4.9		Note Exchange Form of New Warrant (15)
4.10		Form of May 2012 Warrant (16)
10.1		Form of securities Purchase Agreement dated August 31, 2010 (6)
10.2		Form of Escrow Agreement by and between the Company, Viewpoint, and TD Bank, N.A. dated March 31, 2010 (8)
10.4		Form of Settlement Agreement by and between STW Resources Holding Corp and GE Ionics, Inc., dated August 31, 2010 (9)
10.5		Form of Subscription Agreement for December 2010 Financing (10)
10.6		Letter of Intent dated April 17, 2011 (12)
10.7		Amendments to Settlement Agreement dated October 30, 2011, by and between STW Resources Holding Corp. and GE Ionics, Inc. (11)
10.8		Form of November 2011 Subscription Agreement (13)
10.9		Note Exchange Cover Letter (15)
10.10		Note exchange Subscription Agreement Form (15)
10.11		Master Note Agreement with Revenue Participation Subscription Package (15)
10.12		Form of May 2012 Subscription Agreement (16)
10.13		Executive Long Term Agreement between the Company and Stanley Weiner (17)
10.14		Executive Long Term Agreement between the Company and Paul DiFrancesco as Head of Finance (17)
10.15		Executive Long Term Agreements between the Company and Grant Seabolt as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary (17)
16.1		Letter from Weaver & Martin LLC (7)
16.2		Letter from Weaver and Tidwell, LLP (14)
31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1		Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Exhibit No.		Description
2.1		Order Confirming the Second Amended Plan of Re-organization of Woozyfly, Inc. (4)
2.2		Agreement and Plan of Merger for proposed merger between Woozyfly, Inc. Merger Sub, and STW Resources, Inc. dated January 17, 2010 (3)
3.1		Articles of Incorporation (1)
3.2		Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (2)
3.3		Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation – March 1, 2010 (5)
3.4		Articles of Merger between STW Acquisition, Inc. and STW Resources, Inc. (4)
3.5		Articles of Merger filed with the State of Nevada on March 3, 2010 (6)
4.1		Form of 12% Convertible Note dated August 31, 2010 (8)
4.2		Form of Warrant dated August 31, 2010 (8)
4.3		Form of Promissory Note dated August 31, 2010 (9)
4.4		Form of Warrant for December 2010 Financing (10)
4.5		Extension of Note, by and between STW Resources Holding Corp. and GE Ionics, Inc., dated October 28, 2011 (11)
4.6		Amended and Restated Note effective October 1, 2011 in favor of GE Ionics, Inc. (11)
4.7		Form of November 2011 Warrant (13)
4.8		Note Exchange Form of New Note (15)
4.9		Note Exchange Form of New Warrant (15)
4.10		Form of May 2012 Warrant (16)
10.1		Form of securities Purchase Agreement dated August 31, 2010 (6)
10.2		Form of Escrow Agreement by and between the Company, Viewpoint, and TD Bank, N.A. dated March 31, 2010 (8)
10.4		Form of Settlement Agreement by and between STW Resources Holding Corp and GE Ionics, Inc., dated August 31, 2010 (9)
10.5		Form of Subscription Agreement for December 2010 Financing (10)
10.6		Letter of Intent dated April 17, 2011 (12)
10.7		Amendments to Settlement Agreement dated October 30, 2011, by and between STW Resources Holding Corp. and GE Ionics, Inc. (11)
10.8		Form of November 2011 Subscription Agreement (13)
10.9		Note Exchange Cover Letter (15)
10.10		Note exchange Subscription Agreement Form (15)
10.11		Master Note Agreement with Revenue Participation Subscription Package (15)
10.12		Form of May 2012 Subscription Agreement (16)
16.1		Letter from Weaver & Martin LLC (7)
16.2		Letter from Weaver and Tidwell, LLP (14)
31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1		Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

-32-

~~(1)~~Table ~~Incorporated~~of ~~by reference to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2, previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 26, 2006.~~Contents

(2) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Definitive Information Statement on Schedule 14C filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2008.

(1)	Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2, previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 26, 2006.
(2)	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Definitive Information Statement on Schedule 14C filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2008.
(3)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 26, 2010.
(4)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2010.
(5)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2010.
(6)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 2010.
(7)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 5, 2010.
(8)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 16, 2010.
(9)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 22, 2010.
(10)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 10, 2010.
(11)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 3, 2011.
(12)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2011.
(13)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 23, 2011.
(14)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 2, 2012.
(15)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2012.
(16)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 11, 2012.
(17)	Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2015.

~~(3) Incorporated by reference to the Form 8~~-~~K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 26, 2010.~~33-

~~(4)~~Table ~~Incorporated~~of ~~by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2010.~~Contents

(5) Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2010.

(6) Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 2010.

(7) Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 5, 2010.

(8) Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 16, 2010.

(9) Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 22, 2010.

(10) Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 10, 2010.

(11) Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 3, 2011.

(12) Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2011.

(13) Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 23, 2011.

(14) Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 2, 2012.

(15) Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2012.

(16) Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 11, 2012.

-45-

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf of the undersigned thereunto duly authorized

		STW RESOURCES HOLDING CORP
		(Registrant)
Date: December 22, 2014		By: /s/ Stanley T. Weiner
Date: May 27, 2015		By: /s/ Stanley T. Weiner
		Stanley T. Weiner
		President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: December 22, 2014		By: /s/ Robert J. Miranda
Date: May 27, 2015		By: /s/ Robert J. Miranda
		Robert J. Miranda
		Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

-31-

Filing Compare · STW RESOURCES HOLDING CORP.