UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~ 2010

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____

Commission file number 005-82677

IMMUNOSYN CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware	20-5322896
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

10815 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 101, San Diego, CA	92127
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

(888) 853-3663

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark ifwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer ¨ Accelerated Filer x ¨ Non-Accelerated Filer ¨ x Smaller reporting Company ¨ x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of ~~December~~ 14May 24, ~~2009~~2010, the Company had ~~269~~267,~~381~~552,~~869~~719 shares of Common Stock issued and ~~267,692,869~~ ~~shares of Common Stock~~ outstanding.

PART I

Item 1.

Financial Statements.

Immunosyn Corporation

(A Development Stage Company)

Balance Sheets

(unaudited)

	September 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
	March 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash	$	~~1,101~~843		$	~~2,052~~976
Prepaid expenses		3,~~234~~233			413,~~455~~233
Total Current Assets		4,~~335~~076			434,~~507~~209
Property and equipment		6,433			6,433
Accumulated depreciation		(34,~~431~~074	)		(23,~~466~~752	)
License rights		400,000			400,000
Deposits		2,791			2,825
Deposits		2,825			2,825
Total Assets	$	9,226		$	9,715
Total Assets	$	410,162		$	450,299
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current Liabilities
Note payable	$	35,105		$	35,105
Accounts payable	$	896,964		$	604,417
Accounts payable		777,281			320,352
Accounts payable – related party					251,716
Accrued expenses		6,060			-6,060
Accrued compensation to affiliate		40,500			14,268
Accrued compensation-related party		58,500			49,500
Advances from affiliates		1,029,101			893,663
Accrued legal settlement payable		1,948,000			1,948,000
Total Liabilities		1,888,047			1,263,388
Advances from affiliates		713,786			668,834
Total Current Liabilities		3,623,310			3,528,527
Shareholders’ Deficit
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 425,000,000 shares authorized, 272,332,612 and 272,200,976 shares issued and 270,643,612 and 272,200,976 shares outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively		27,233			27,220
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 425,000,000 shares authorized, 267,552,719 issued and outstanding		26,755			26,755
Additional paid-in capital		1,~~164~~576,~~619~~334			1,~~094~~563,~~630~~870
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(25,~~669~~217,~~568~~173	)		(15,~~934~~109,~~939~~437	)
Less: treasury stock, at cost (1,689,000 shares at $.0001)		(169	)		-
Total Shareholders’ Deficit		( 3,614,084	)		(3,518,812	)
Total Shareholders’ Deficit		(1,477,885	)		(813,089	)
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Deficit	$	9,226		$	9,715
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	410,162		$	450,299

See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.

Immunosyn Corporation

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Expenses

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2009			Three Months Ended September 30, 2008			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008			August 3, 2006 (inception) Through September 30, 2009
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2010			Three Months Ended March 31, 2009			August 3, 2006 (inception) Through March 31, 2010
EXPENSES
General & Administrative	$	~~162~~83,~~682~~469		$	~~141~~183,~~051~~619		$	~~672~~5,~~370~~011,860		$	~~946,567~~		$	~~2,519,926~~
Interest Expense		2724,~~005~~267			1617,~~034~~275			62205,~~259~~313			~~44,724~~			~~149,642~~
NET LOSS	$	(~~189~~107,~~687~~736	)	$	(~~157~~200,~~085~~894	)	$	(~~734~~5,~~629~~217,173	)	$	~~(991,291~~	)	$	~~(2,669,568~~	)
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted	$	(0.00	)		(0.00	)		~~(0.00~~	)		~~(0.00~~	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding	$	270,~~619~~671,~~398~~853		$	~~272~~271,~~164~~940,~~837~~184			~~271,037,499~~N/A			~~272,033,560~~			~~N/A~~

See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.

Immunosyn Corporation

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008			August 3, 2006 (inception) through September 30, 2009
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2010			Three Months Ended March 31, 2009			August 3, 2006 (inception) through March 31, 2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(~~734~~107,~~629~~736)	)	$	(~~991~~200,~~291~~894	)	$	(25,~~669~~217,~~568~~173)	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:								400,000
Depreciation		~~964~~322			~~964~~322			34,~~431~~074
Imputed interest on advances from affiliates		5412,~~483~~464			4417,~~725~~275			~~141~~171,~~869~~630
Services rendered for stock		~~15,350~~-			~~547~~6,~~751~~349			~~637~~618,~~313~~664
Changes in:								-
Prepaid expenses		38,223			42,380			(3,234	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		34			30,333			(6,024)
Other assets		-			(1,661	)		(2,825	)
Accounts payable		40,831			64,350			896,964
Accounts payable		456,929			116,317			812,387
Accrued expenses		9,000			11,300			2,012,560
Accrued expenses		6,060			( 9,149	)		6,060
Net cash used in operating activities		45,085			(70,965	)		(1,119,305)
Accrued compensation to affiliate		26,232			-			40,500
Net cash used in operating activities		(136,388	)		(249,964	)		(1,034,067	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		-			-			(6,433)	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			-			(6,433)	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net advances from affiliates		~~135~~44,~~437~~952			~~226~~70,~~158~~263			1,~~029~~114,~~101~~081
Sale of common stock		-			-			12,500
Net cash provided by financing activities		~~135~~44,~~437~~952			~~226~~70,~~158~~263			1,~~041~~126,~~601~~581
Net change in cash		(~~951~~133)	)		(~~23,806~~702	)		~~1,101~~843
Cash at beginning of period		~~2,052~~976			242,~~115~~052			-
Cash at end of period	$	~~1,101~~843		$	~~309~~1,350		$	~~1,101~~843
Supplemental Disclosures
Cash paid for interest	$	-		$	-		$	-
Cash paid for income taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities
Stock issued for license rights	$	-		$	-		$	400,000
Treasury stock acquired with a purchase price of zero	$	-		$	169		$	169

See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.

Immunosyn Corporation

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes To Unaudited Interim Financial Statements

Note 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements of Immunosyn Corporation (“Immunosyn” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and should be read in conjunction with Immunosyn’s audited ~~2008~~2009 year end financial statements and notes thereto contained in Immunosyn’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim period have been reflected herein. The results of operations for interim periods are, however, not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Notes to the financial statements which substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the audited financial statements for fiscal ~~2008~~2009 as reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009 have been omitted.

~~Treasury Stock~~The –Company ~~Treasury~~does ~~stock~~not isexpect ~~accounted~~any ~~for~~recent ~~using~~accounting ~~the~~pronouncements ~~cost~~to ~~method~~have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Effective during the second quarter of 2009, the Company implemented ASC 855, Subsequent Events (“ASC 855”). This standard establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. The adoption of ASC 855 did not impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations. The Company evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after September 30, 2009 up through December 14, 2009, the date the Company issued these financial statements. During this period, the Company did not have any material recognizable subsequent events.

Note 2 - GOING CONCERN

During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 and since inception, Immunosyn has been unable to generate cash flows sufficient to support its operations and has been dependent on advances from its affiliates. Advances from affiliates have not been sufficient to cover the Company’s expenses including the salary of its Chief Executive Officer which the Company has been unable to pay since August 2008. In addition to negative cash flow from operations, Immunosyn has experienced recurring net losses, and has a negative working capital. These factors raise substantial doubt about Immunosyn’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if Immunosyn is unable to continue as a going concern.

These factors raise substantial doubt about Immunosyn’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if Immunosyn is unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 3 - ADVANCES FROM AFFILIATES

As of ~~September~~ 30March 31, ~~2009~~2010, $1705,~~020,542~~227 is owed by Immunosyn to Argyll Equities, LLC and Argyll Biotechnologies, LLC who together own approximately 6059% of Immunosyn’s common stock. These advances are unsecured and are todue ~~be repaid~~ on demand. Interest expense ~~in the amount~~ of $5412,~~483~~464 was imputed using an interest rate of 7.5% for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 and is included in additional paid-in capital. Advances from Stephen D. Ferrone, CEO and President of Immunosyn, ~~in the amount~~ of $8,559 as of March 31, 2010 are due and payable on demand and are included in advances from affiliates. These advances are unsecured and carry no interest rate. The Company has accrued for an additional $409,~~500~~000 in compensation to Mr. Ferrone for a total balance of $58,500 at March 31, 2010.

Note 4 –- ~~COMMON~~SUBSEQUENT ~~STOCK~~EVENTS

~~Pursuant to~~The aCompany ~~contract~~evaluated ~~entered~~all ~~into~~events onor ~~October 12,~~transactions ~~2007~~that ~~for~~occurred ~~The~~after ~~Blaine~~March ~~Group~~31, ~~(TBG) to~~2010 ~~provide~~up ~~financial~~through ~~relations~~the ~~and~~date ~~investor~~the ~~relations~~Company ~~services~~issued tothese ~~Immunosyn,~~financial ~~TBG earned~~statements. During ~~121~~this period,~~636~~ ~~restricted shares of Immunosyn common stock in~~ the ~~nine~~Company ~~months ended~~did ~~September~~not ~~30,~~have ~~2009~~any ~~valued~~material atrecognizable ~~$13,500~~subsequent events.

Pursuant to a contract entered into on September 29, 2008 for Bear Creek Advisors to provide consulting services to Immunosyn, Bear Creek earned 10,000 restricted share of Immunosyn common stock in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 valued at $1,850.

Note 5 – TREASURY STOCK

1,689,000 shares of common stock of the Company were acquired and put into treasury stock on March 16, 2009 as part of a settlement agreement with a shareholder. The purchase price was zero.

Note 6 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

On October 12, 2007, Immunosyn agreed to a 12 month contract with The Blaine Group, Inc. (TBG) for TBG to undertake a national financial public relations and investors relations campaign for Immunosyn. As part of this contract, TBG agreed to handle all public relations matters, as agreed upon, for Immunosyn. This contract continues until terminated by either party with thirty days written notice. Immunosyn agreed to pay TBG $10,000 as a monthly retainer fee. $8,500 of this retainer is payable in cash and $1,500 in stock to be valued at current market value on the date of issue.

On August 25, 2009, a complaint was filed by Myron W. Wentz, a shareholder of the Company, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California that names as defendants Argyll Biotech, Immunosyn and Does 1-10. The complaint alleges, among other things, that Argyll Biotech breached its contract with the plaintiff and that Immunosyn tortiously interfered with Argyll Biotech’s contract with the plaintiff. The complaint seeks damages in the amount of $1,948,000 plus pre- and post-judgment interest; consequential damages and attorneys fees in an amount to be proven at trial against Argyll Biotech for breach of contract; an order compelling Argyll Biotech to provide 14,984,615 shares of common stock of the Company to Dr. Wentz; and attorneys fees in an amount to be proven at trial. The parties, including Immunosyn, have not filed an answer to the complaint and the time to do so has officially passed. The defendants are seeking a settlement with the plaintiff although there can be no assurance that they will be able to successfully settle the matter. It is possible that the plaintiff will seek to obtain a default judgment against the defendants.

On August 24, 2009, a complaint was filed by Denise Campbell on behalf of a putative class in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas that names as defendants Immunosyn, Argyll Biotech, James T. Miceli, Douglas A. McClain, Jr., Frank Morales, Argyll Equities, LLC, Stephen Ferrone and Douglas A. McClain, Sr. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants have made false and/or misleading statements concerning Immunosyn and SF-1019 in filings with the SEC in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including Section 10b-5 thereof, including, without limitation, that the Food & Drug Administration had not approved SF-1019 for human injection, that SF-1019 had not received compassionate waiver status, that SF-1019 was on clinical hold, that SF-1019 had negative results in certain safety studies, that SF-1019 was being sold by the defendants outside of the exclusive license held by Immunosyn and that Alan Osmond was being paid to promote SF-1019; defendants have committed fraud in their SEC disclosures and on their websites; defendants have engaged in civil conspiracy; defendants have been unjustly enriched through the sale of Immunosyn stock; and James T. Miceli, Douglas McClain, Sr. and Douglas McClain Jr. have committed RICO violations and conspired to violate RICO. The complaint seeks damages in an amount to be proven at trial, plus interest, costs and attorneys fees. The parties, including Immunosyn, answered the complaint on October 16, 2009. An initial pretrial conference is expected to be held in December 2009 and discovery is expected to commence in early 2010. Immunosyn intends to vigorously defend against the allegations contained in the complaint which it believes to be untrue and without merit.

Note 7- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On December 19, 2007, a shareholder of Immunosyn, Leon S. Segen, commenced an action in the Southern District of New York derivatively on behalf of Immunosyn to recover alleged short-swing profits from several alleged statutory insiders of Immunosyn, including Immunosyn officer and director Douglas A. McClain Jr. The action included Immunosyn as a nominal defendant only and did not allege any claims of liability against Immunosyn. On December 4, 2009, the parties entered into a settlement agreement, which was approved by the court on December 15, 2009, pursuant to which the defendants agreed to pay Immunosyn the sum of $475,000 consisting of a cash payment of $75,000 (for legal fees for plaintiff’s counsel) and the forgiveness of $400,000 of indebtedness of Immunosyn to defendant Argyll Equities and to retire 2,950,000 shares of Immunosyn common stock held by defendant Argyll Equities to the treasury of Immunosyn. Argyll Equities reduced the outstanding Advances from Affiliates which Immunosyn owes to Argyll Equities by $400,000 effective as of December 4, 2009. Argyll Equities paid $75,000 on Immunosyn’s behalf for legal fees for plaintiff’s counsel. On December 11, 2009, Argyll Equities effectively retired 2,950,000 shares of common stock held by it to Immunosyn’s treasury.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

Immunosyn is a development stage company that was formed in August 2006 and is headquartered in San Diego, California. In September 2006, it executed an exclusive license agreement with an affiliated company, Argyll Biotechnologies, LLC (“Argyll Biotech”), in exchange for 147,000,000 shares of its Common Stock or approximately 54% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The license agreement was amended and restated in October 2007 and amended and restated again in May 2010. Pursuant to the terms of the license agreement, as amended, the Company has an exclusive worldwide license to market, distribute and sell a biopharmaceutical drug product, currently referred to as SF-1019, for multiple uses including the treatment of a variety of diseases, subject to the receipt of appropriate regulatory approval in each jurisdiction where SF-1019 will be marketed, none of which has been applied for or received. Under the terms of its exclusive license, Immunosyn also has a right of first offer to extend its exclusive license to include variants of SF-1019 that may be approved by various regulatory authorities for treatment of other diseases and pathologies. Argyll Biotech is responsible for all research and product development, clinical testing, regulatory approvals, production and product support. In accordance with the amended license agreement, the parties agreed that the cost of SF-1019 to the Company will be 40% of the gross sales price of SF-1019 as sold to a third party customer by the Company.

As a sales, marketing, and distribution channel for SF-1019, Immunosyn’s primary business strategy is to build a sales and marketing force and related resources so that if SF-1019 is approved for human use it can be sold; and secondly, to increase awareness and acceptance of SF-1019 in the medical community.

As of the date of this report, we have no revenue and limited operations. Those operations have been principally funded by ~~loans~~advances from affiliates. Our ability to obtain additional funding will determine our ability to continue as a going concern. From time to time, we have retained investment bankers and other financial advisors to assist us with our fundraising efforts; however, those efforts have not been successful to date. We have one principal asset, our exclusive license from Argyll Biotech which is recorded on our books at zero, and one full-time and one part-time employee. We do not expect to commence full scale operations or generate revenue unless and until Argyll Biotech ~~completes~~ accomplishes development and obtains regulatory approval for SF-1019. Since incorporation, we have not made any significant purchases or sale of assets (other than our exclusive license from Argyll Biotech), nor have we been involved in any mergers, acquisitions or consolidations.

Results of Operations

To date, the Company has had no revenue and limited operations. During the ~~nine~~ three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 and since inception, Immunosyn has been unable to generate cash flows sufficient to support its operations and has been dependent on advances from its affiliates. In addition to negative cash flow from operations, Immunosyn has experienced recurring net losses, and has a negative working capital. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~ 30March 31, ~~2009~~2010, the Company had a net loss of $~~734~~107,~~629~~736, ~~and~~an aaccumulated ~~loss~~deficit of $~~189~~5,~~687~~217,173 ~~for~~and ~~the~~a ~~three~~working ~~months~~capital ~~ended~~deficit ~~September~~of 30$3,619,234. In ~~2009~~addition, anthe ~~accumulated~~Company ~~deficit~~ has accounts payable and accrued expenses of $2894,~~669,568~~964 and a$6,060, ~~working~~respectively, ~~capital~~as ~~deficit~~ of $1March 31,~~883,712~~ 2010. See Note 2 of Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements for our going concern.

Currently, an affiliated company provides general support services to the Company, without charge. In addition, ~~since~~as ~~inception,~~of ~~Immunosyn~~March ~~has~~31, ~~borrowed $1~~2010,~~020,542~~ ~~from~~Immunosyn owes Argyll Equities, LLC and Argyll Biotech, who together own approximately 6059% of Immunosyn’s Common Stock, an aggregate of $713,786, including $~~135~~44,~~437~~952 which was borrowed during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010. Interest expense in the amount of $54171,~~483~~630 was imputed on the aggregate advances, ~~using~~including ~~an interest~~$12,464 ~~rate of 7.5%~~ for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010, using an interest rate of 7.5% and is included in additional paid-in capital. These advances are unsecured and ~~will~~repayable ~~be repaid~~ on demand. In October 2007, the Company hired a Chief Executive Officer. The Company has advances from the CEO in the amount of $8,559 as well which are due and payable on demand. These advances are unsecured and carry no interest rate. The Company has accrued for an additional $4058,500 in compensation to ~~Mr.~~the ~~Ferrone~~CEO. ~~The~~ In addition, the Company’s ~~funds~~accrued ~~have~~for ~~not~~a ~~been~~default ~~sufficient~~judgment torendered ~~cover~~against ~~its~~it ~~expenses~~on ~~resulting~~February 1, 2010 in ~~a net~~the ~~loss~~amount of $1,948,000 anplus ~~accumulated~~post ~~deficit~~judgment ~~and~~interest ain ~~working~~accordance ~~capital~~with ~~deficit. See Note~~the 3law ofin ~~Notes~~its to2009 ~~Unaudited~~audited ~~Financial~~financial ~~Statements~~statements.

The Company’s funds have not been sufficient to cover its expenses resulting in a net loss, an accumulated deficit and a working capital deficit as described above. See Note 2 of Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company needs additional financing to continue its current limited operations and may raise funds in the future privately or publicly if it is able to do so or will continue to look to advances from affiliates who are under no obligation to provide funds to the Company.

In addition, the Company intends to raise working capital through one or more financings to meet the following requirements before it commences full scale operations if and when Argyll Biotech completes development and obtains regulatory approval for SF-1019:6

In addition, the Company intends to raise working capital through one or more financings to meet the following requirements before it commences full scale operations if and when Argyll Biotech accomplishes development and obtains regulatory approval for SF-1019:

Paying current administrative staff;

hiring staff, a full-time controller and five sales and marketing personnel;

purchasing capital equipment, including securing its principal offices, both executive and sales, and distribution facilities;

monitoring the progress of the research and development effort conducted by Argyll Biotech;

developing a marketing plan for the sale and distribution of SF-1019;

hiring industry consultants to assist in developing a channel strategy for sales and marketing of SF-1019, including direct sales, third party distributors, and strategic partnerships;

developing market awareness in the patient and medical community and educating those effected with various diseases including CIDP, diabetic neuropathy and diabetic ulcers and other diseases; and

selecting and compensating board members.

The Company requires substantial future sources of capital in order to meet such anticipated expenditures and to continue its operations during the period Argyll Biotech ~~completes~~accomplishes development of SF-1019 and seeks regulatory approval from US and/or foreign regulatory authorities. The Company currently anticipates this process to be between three and five years and the amount of funds required to be between $14 million and $24 million.

The Company believes that significant funding will be required to provide adequate sources of working capital during that period. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise any or all the capital required for its operations. See Note 2 to Unaudited Financial Statements. Failure to obtain future financing will require the Company to delay or substantially curtail its operations or close its business, resulting in a material adverse effect on the Company and its shareholders.

See “Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward Looking Information” below and Item 1A – “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this report, regarding the Company’s financial position, business strategy, plans and objectives, are forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements and the assumptions upon which such forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations and assumptions will prove to have been correct.

In addition, from time to time in the future, the Company may publish “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act or make oral statements that constitute forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may relate to such matters as anticipated financial performance, future revenues or earnings, business prospects, projected ventures, new products, anticipated market performance, and similar matters.

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company cautions readers that a variety of factors could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, include, but are not limited to: (i) the Company’s ability to raise financing to fund its development and allow it to continue as a going concern; (ii) the effects of the economy on the Company’s ability to find and maintain financing options and liquidity; (iii) general economic conditions, both domestic and international; (iv) Argyll Biotech’s ability to ~~complete~~accomplish development of SF-1019 and other products it may acquire or develop and license to the Company; (v) Argyll Biotech’s ability to obtain FDA and/or other regulatory approvals for SF-1019 and other products it may acquire or develop and license to the Company; (vi) competition from existing pharmaceutical, chemical and biotech companies and other participants in the drug and related markets; (vii) legal developments affecting the litigation experience of the Company including the results of any subpoenas issued to the Company or its affiliates by the SEC and any pending lawsuits involving the Company; (viii) the effectiveness of the Company’s efforts to hire qualified personnel; (ix) changes in regulatory requirements which could affect the cost and method of doing business; (x) the Company’s ability to achieve its business plan; (xi) corporate governance issues; (xii) credit, operations, legal and regulatory risks; (xiii) risks related to foreign operations; and (xiv) risks related to disclosure controls and/or internal controls or the lack thereof. There can be no assurance that the Company has correctly or completely identified and assessed all of the factors affecting the Company’s business. The Company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. See also Item 1A – Risk Factors in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We do not presently enter into any transactions involving derivative financial instruments for risk management or other purposes.

Our available cash balances are held in our corporate bank account which is non-interest bearing but is insured by the FDIC. We do not currently have any cash flows that arise outside of the United States and today we are not subject to market risk associated with changes in foreign exchange rates.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.

Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, and under the supervision and with the participation of management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, who are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act, such persons conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation and subject to the foregoing, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer concluded that these controls are not effective because there are material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.

Immunosyn recognizes the importance of internal controls. As Immunosyn is currently a development stage company with limited ongoing financial operations, management is making an effort to mitigate this material weakness to the fullest extent possible. At present this is done by having the Chief Executive Officer review Immunosyn’s financial statements, account reconciliations and accounts payable reports that have been prepared by Chief Financial Officer for reasonableness. All unexpected results are investigated. At any time, if it appears that any control can be implemented to continue to mitigate such weakness, it will be immediately implemented. As Immunosyn grows in size and as its finances allow, management will hire sufficient accounting staff and implement appropriate procedures for monitoring and review of work performed by our Chief Financial Officer.

Changes in Internal Controls

In our efforts to continuously improve our internal controls, management intends to take steps, when funding permits, to enhance controls and procedures as part of our remediation efforts in addressing the material weaknesses described above and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009. One of the steps management intends to take is to increase documentation around certain authorization and review controls.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings.

Pursuant to a subpoena dated January 20, 2006 issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission to an affiliate of Argyll Biotech in proceedings captioned In the Matter of Directors Financial Group, Ltd. and In The Matter of Prime Bank Securities, and pursuant to subpoenas issued by the SEC to affiliates of Argyll Biotech on March 30, 2006 and to Immunosyn on December 15, 2006 in a proceeding captioned In The Matter of The Argyll Group, LLC, Immunosyn and its affiliates have been asked to produce all documents concerning a wide variety of topics including many related directly to Immunosyn. Immunosyn and Argyll Biotech’s affiliates actively cooperated with the SEC and produced documents responsive to these subpoenas, completing their responses in early August 2007. The Directors Financial Group matter was resolved in June 2006 through a settlement between the SEC and the parties to the proceeding, and, accordingly, Immunosyn will not be required to respond further to that subpoena. Immunosyn had had no further communication with the SEC regarding the remaining subpoenas since January 2007 until March 2009. On or about March 17, 2009, representatives of both Immunosyn and Argyll Biotech became aware that they had received additional subpoenas from the SEC on or about March 6, 2009 (the “March 2009 Subpoenas”). In addition, on or about June 4, 2009, Immunosyn directors and officers, Douglas A. McClain, Jr. and Stephen Ferrone, received subpoenas from the SEC (the “June 2009 Subpoenas”) as did James T. Miceli, a director and officer of Argyll Biotech, and Douglas A. McClain, Sr. Immunosyn and Argyll Biotech subsequently learned from the SEC that the March 2009 Subpoenas and the June 2009 Subpoenas would be treated as voluntary requests. On or about September 11, 2009, Immunosyn and Immunosyn directors and officers, Douglas A. McClain, Jr. and Stephen Ferrone, received additional subpoenas from the SEC as did James T. Miceli, a director and officer of Argyll Biotech, and Douglas A. McClain, Sr. The Company and its affiliates have responded to these subpoenas

On August 24, 2009, a complaint was filed by Denise Campbell on behalf of a putative class in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas that names as defendants Immunosyn, Argyll Biotech, James T. Miceli, Douglas A. McClain, Jr., Frank Morales, Argyll Equities, LLC, Stephen Ferrone and Douglass A. McClain, Sr. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants have made false and/or misleading statements concerning Immunosyn and SF-1019 in filings with the SEC in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including Section 10b-5 thereof, including, without limitation, that the Food & Drug Administration had not approved SF-1019 for human injection, that SF-1019 had not received compassionate waiver status, that SF-1019 was on clinical hold, that SF-1019 had negative results in certain safety studies, that SF-1019 was being sold by the defendants outside of the exclusive license held by Immunosyn and that Alan Osmond was being paid to promote SF-1019; defendants have committed fraud in their SEC disclosures and on their websites; defendants have engaged in civil conspiracy; defendants have been unjustly enriched through the sale of Immunosyn stock; and James T. Miceli, Douglas McClain, Sr. and Douglas McClain Jr. have committed RICO violations and conspired to violate RICO. The complaint seeks damages in an amount to be proven at trial, plus interest, costs and attorneys fees. The parties, including Immunosyn, answered the complaint on October 16, 2009. An initial pretrial conference is expected to be held in December 2009 and discovery is expected to commence in early 2010. Immunosyn intends to vigorously defend against the allegations contained in the complaint which it believes to be untrue and without merit.

On December 19, 2007, a shareholder of Immunosyn, Leon S. Segen, commenced an action in the Southern District of New York derivatively on behalf of Immunosyn to recover alleged short-swing profits from several alleged statutory insiders of Immunosyn, including Immunosyn officer and director Douglas A. McClain Jr. The action includes Immunosyn as a nominal defendant only and does not allege any claims of liability against Immunosyn. On December 4, 2009, the parties entered into a settlement agreement, which was approved by the court on December 15, 2009, pursuant to which the defendants agreed to pay Immunosyn the sum of $475,000 consisting of a cash payment of $75,000 (for legal fees for plaintiff’s counsel) and the forgiveness of $400,000 of indebtedness of Immunosyn to defendant Argyll Equities and to retire 2,950,000 shares of Immunosyn common stock held by defendant Argyll Equities to the treasury of Immunosyn. See Note 7 to unaudited financial statements.

On March 19, 2008, a shareholder of the Company, Deborah Donoghue, commenced two actions — one in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California and the other in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York – derivatively on behalf of the Company to recover alleged short-swing profits from several alleged statutory insiders of the Company, including Company officer and director Douglas A. McClain Jr. The actions include the Company as a nominal defendant only and do not allege any claims of liability against the Company. Donoghue withdrew the New York action in April 2008 and the California action was dismissed without prejudice in March 2009 subject to reopening the action nunc pro tunc to the date of dismissal upon ex parte application or noticed motion by any party to reopen the action.

On March 16, 2007, Frank Bramante and Salvatore Bramante commenced an action in the United Stated District Court for the Southern District of California against various defendants including Immunosyn seeking amongst other relief an injunction to prevent the transfer and/or sale of the patents and/or proprietary information relating to SF-1019 to third parties. The case was stayed by Order dated January 17, 2008 pending resolution of a largely duplicative action filed in the United Stated District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division, by the same plaintiffs against the same defendants excluding Immunosyn on July 28, 2006. The Texas action was dismissed with prejudice in September 2008 and a stipulation dismissing the California action was filed with the Court and the entire California action was dismissed with prejudice on or about June 3, 2009.

On or about July 27, 2006, Daval filed suit in the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division in London, England against Argyll Biotech and five of Argyll Biotech’s research scientists and others, including Douglas McClain, Sr., seeking an injunction and damages or an account of profits based on allegations of breach by the scientists and Mr. McClain of confidentiality agreements with Daval, breaches by such persons of their fiduciary duties and conspiracy by Argyll Biotech and certain of its shareholders to wrongfully disclose and use Daval’s alleged trade secrets. These proceedings do not allege infringement of any Daval patent whether by Argyll Biotech or any of the other defendants. Argyll Biotech has filed its defenses and continues to investigate the merits of the suit and the basis of its defenses including, among other grounds, that one of the active ingredients in SF-1019 disclosed in Argyll Biotech’s 603 Application is based on independent research by Argyll Biotech’s research scientists, and the method of producing SF-1019 is materially different from Daval’s process. The action had been listed for trial in the UK in January 2009 but, in December 2008, the High Court in London ordered that the trial be rescheduled for a later date, likely to be during 2010. Immunosyn is not involved in this litigation.

On August 25, 2009, a complaint was filed by Myron W. Wentz, a shareholder of the Company, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California that named as defendants Argyll Biotech, Immunosyn and Does 1-10. The complaint alleged, among other things, that Argyll Biotech breached its contract with the plaintiff and that Immunosyn tortiously interfered with Argyll Biotech’s contract with the plaintiff. The complaint sought damages in the amount of $1,948,000 plus pre- and post-judgment interest; consequential damages and attorneys fees in an amount to be proven at trial against Argyll Biotech for breach of contract; an order compelling Argyll Biotech to provide 14,984,615 shares of common stock of the Company to Dr. Wentz; and attorneys fees’ in an amount to be proven at trial. On February 1, 2010, a default judgment was entered against Immunosyn in favor of the plaintiff, Dr. Wentz, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in the amount of $1,948,000.00 plus post-judgment interest in accordance with the law. The Company accrued for this default judgment in its 2009 audited financial statements. A default judgment was also entered against Argyll Biotech.

On August 24, 2009, a complaint was filed by Denise Campbell on behalf of a putative class in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas that names as defendants Immunosyn, Argyll Biotech, James T. Miceli, Douglas A. McClain, Jr., Frank Morales, Argyll Equities, LLC, Stephen Ferrone and Douglass A. McClain, Sr. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants have made false and/or misleading statements concerning Immunosyn and SF-1019 in filings with the SEC in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including Section 10b-5 thereof, including, without limitation, that the Food & Drug Administration had not approved SF-1019 for human injection, that SF-1019 had not received compassionate waiver status, that SF-1019 was on clinical hold, that SF-1019 had negative results in certain safety studies, that SF-1019 was being sold by the defendants outside of the exclusive license held by Immunosyn and that Alan Osmond was being paid to promote SF-1019; defendants have committed fraud in their SEC disclosures and on their websites; defendants have engaged in civil conspiracy; defendants have been unjustly enriched through the sale of Immunosyn stock; and James T. Miceli, Douglas McClain, Sr. and Douglas McClain Jr. have committed RICO violations and conspired to violate RICO. The complaint seeks damages in an amount to be proven at trial, plus interest, costs and attorneys’ fees. The parties, including Immunosyn, answered the complaint on October 16, 2009. An initial telephonic pretrial conference among attorneys was held on January 19, 2010 and discovery has commenced. The defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss upon which the Court has not yet ruled. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is based on lack of federal jurisdiction and plaintiff’s failure to allege sufficient facts to establish a class action. Immunosyn intends to vigorously defend against the allegations contained in the complaint which it believes to be untrue and without merit.

On November 24, 2009, a complaint was filed by Robert Albergo and David Irwin in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California that names as defendants, amongst others, the Company and its directors and officers, Douglas A. McClain, Jr. and Stephen Ferrone. The complaint was not served until March 15, 2010. On May 10, 2010, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint alleges, among other things, that certain of the defendants, including the Company, McClain and Ferrone, have made false and/or misleading statements concerning Immunosyn and SF-1019 in filings with the SEC in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including Section 10b-5 thereof, have committed RICO violations and conspired to violate RICO and have engaged in civil conspiracy. The amended complaint seeks multiple forms of relief including compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at trial, punitive damages and treble damages, plus interest, costs and attorneys’ fees. An initial conference with the judge is currently scheduled for May 25, 2010. Immunosyn intends to vigorously defend against the allegations contained in the complaint which it believes to be untrue and without merit and to have been brought against it for an improper purpose.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010, there were no material changes to the information contained in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009, but see “CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION” in Part I, Item 2, above.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

(A) and (B) ~~During~~ ~~the~~Not ~~nine months ended September 30, 2009, The Blaine Group (TBG) earned 121,636 shares of restricted common stock of the Company valued at $13,500 (and having a per share value of approximately $0~~applicable.111 on the due date) pursuant to a contract entered into on October 12, 2007 for TBG to provide financial relations and investor relations services to the Company. Immunosyn agreed to pay TBG $10,000 as a monthly retainer fee. $8,500 of this retainer is payable in cash and $1,500 in restricted stock to be valued at the current market value on the date of issue. See Notes 4 and 6 to Unaudited Financial Statements.

~~These shares~~(C) ~~would~~The beCompany ~~issued~~has ~~pursuant~~no torepurchase ~~the~~plans ~~exemption~~or ~~provided~~programs. As bypreviously ~~Section~~disclosed, ~~4(2)~~1,689,000 shares of ~~the Securities~~common ~~Act~~stock of ~~1933~~the Company were acquired and put into treasury stock on March 16, 2009 as part of a ~~transaction~~settlement byagreement anwith ~~issuer~~a ~~not~~shareholder. The ~~involving~~purchase ~~any~~price ~~public offering~~was zero.

As previously disclosed, pursuant to a contract entered into on September 29, 2008 for Bear Creek Advisors to provide consulting services to Immunosyn, Bear Creek earned 10,000 restricted share of Immunosyn common stock in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 valued at $1,850. See Note 4 to Unaudited Financial Statements.

(C) The Company has no repurchase plans or programs. As previously disclosed, 1,689,000 shares of common stock of the Company were acquired and put into treasury stock on March 16, 2009 as part of a settlement agreement with a shareholder. The purchase price was zero. See Note 5 to Unaudited Financial Statements.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not applicable.

Item 4. ~~Submission~~Other ~~of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~Information.

~~None~~On May 21, 2010, Argyll Biotechnologies, LLC (“Argyll Biotech”) and Immunosyn entered into a Second Amended and Restated License Agreement effective as of September 26, 2006 (the “Second Amended License Agreement”). Pursuant to the original License Agreement, Immunosyn issued 147,000,000 shares of its common stock to Argyll Biotech in 2006 as a license fee (the “License Fee”). The License Fee was earned when paid and there are no restrictions on the release or use of the proceeds received by Argyll Biotech from the sale of Immunosyn’s shares, and these proceeds may be used at Argyll Biotech’s sole discretion for any purpose. No refund will be owed by Argyll Biotech in the event the cost of development and regulatory approval is substantially less than the fee, nor are there any penalties owed by Argyll Biotech if it fails to complete product development or obtain regulatory approval for its distribution. Pursuant to the Second Amended License Agreement, all payments to Argyll Biotech shall be final and non-refundable, regardless of any termination or suspension of such agreement; provided, however, that the parties may agree to the return, repayment or refund by Argyll Biotech to Immunosyn of all or any agreed portion of the License Fee previously paid by Immunosyn to Argyll Biotech in the event that Argyll Biotech shall have breached or defaulted in the performance of one or more of its material obligations under the Second Amended License Agreement, and such default shall have continued for 45 days after written notice thereof was provided to Argyll Biotech by Immunosyn (or, if such default cannot be cured within such 45-day period, if Argyll Biotech does not commence and diligently continue actions to cure such default during such 45-day period). Argyll Biotech agreed to such change in consideration for an increase in the royalty fee payable to Argyll Biotech from 3.5% to 4.5% of its gross receipts from sale of SF-1019 for the licensed use until Argyll Biotech's development costs have been reimbursed in full if and to the extent that the proceeds received by Argyll Biotech from the disposition of Immunosyn's stock are insufficient to fund Argyll Biotech's clinical budget for obtaining regulatory approval for sale of SF-1019 in the United States and the United Kingdom.

11Argyll Biotech owns approximately 54% of the Company’s common stock and is the Company’s largest shareholder. The Second Amended License Agreement is between related entities and was not negotiated in an arms length transaction.

~~Item 5. Other Information.~~10

~~As previously~~Item reported, in November 2008, a physician submitted a physician-sponsored Investigational New Drug (IND) application to the US Food & Drug Administration (“FDA”) for a Phase II clinical trial for the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis with SF-10195. In mid-September 2009, an officer of Immunosyn learned from a third party that the FDA had previously notified the physician-sponsor that his proposed study was on full clinical hold and could not be initiatedExhibits. The officer further learned that this full clinical hold listed approximately nine specific clinical hold deficiencies, one of which is related to Argyll Biotech’s need to complete full animal toxicity studies of SF-1019 as described in FDA guidelines, and the information needed to resolve the deficiencies.

~~Item~~(d) The 6.following ~~Exhibits~~exhibits are filed with this Report.

The following exhibits are filed with, or incorporated by reference into, this Report.

Exhibit Number	Description

10.1*	Second Amended and Restated License Agreement between Immunosyn Corporation and Argyll Biotechnologies, LLC, dated as of May 21, 2010 and effective as of September 26, 2006.
31.1*	Certification of Stephen D. Ferrone, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*	Certification of Douglas A. McClain, Jr., Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1*	Certification of Stephen D. Ferrone, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2*	Certification of Douglas A. McClain, Jr., Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit Number	Description
31.1*	Certification of Stephen D. Ferrone, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*	Certification of Douglas A. McClain, Jr., Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1*	Certification of Stephen D. Ferrone, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2*	Certification of Douglas A. McClain, Jr., Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

____________________________

*	Filed Herewith.

1211

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: ~~December 16~~May 24, ~~2009~~2010

	IMMUNOSYN CORPORATION

	By:	/s/ Douglas A. McClain, Jr.
		Douglas A. McClain, Jr. Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

Filing Compare · IMMUNOSYN CORP