UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

———————

FORM 10-Q

———————

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2011

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from: _____________ to _____________

Commission File Number: 0-10707

———————

THERMODYNETICS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

———————

Nevada	06-1042505
(State or other jurisdiction	(I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

651 Day Hill Road, Windsor, CT 06095

(Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)

860-683-2005

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

———————

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer ¨				Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨				Smaller reporting company þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Outstanding at ~~December~~July 3115, ~~2010~~2011
Common stock $.01 Par Value		46,~~600~~290,306 Shares

		Page
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	2
	Consolidated Balance Sheets
	December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010	2
	Consolidated Statements Of Income
	Three Months Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009	3
	Consolidated Statements Of Income
	Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009	4
	Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flows
	Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009	5
	Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	10
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks.	11
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures.	11
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	12
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	12
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	12
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	13
Item 5.	Other Information.	13
Item 6.	Exhibits.	13
SIGNATURES		14

INDEX

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements	1

	Consolidated Balance Sheets June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011	1

	Consolidated Statements Of Operations Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	2

	Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flows Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	3

	Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements	4

Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	7

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks.	8

Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures.	8

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	9

Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	9

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	9

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	10

Item 5.	Other Information.	10

Item 6.	Exhibits.	10

SIGNATURES		11

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

THERMODYNETICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) (in 000's)

THERMODYNETICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
(in 000's)

	June 30,			March 31,
	2011			2011

ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	50		$	325
Restricted Cash		460			460
Marketable securities		1,664			1,646
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		49			26
Total current assets		2,223			2,457

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net		1,902			1,935

OTHER ASSETS
Assets Held for Sale		850			850
Other		3			-
Total other assets		853			850

Total Assets	$	4,978		$	5,242

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Line of credit	$	870		$	877
Accounts payable		207			179
Accrued expenses and taxes		1,070			1,238
Current portion of long-term debt		1,384			1,416
Total current liabilities		3,531			3,710

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Loans to Officers		46			-
Total long-term liabilities		46			-

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES		-			-

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; authorized 25,000,000 shares		63			61
Additional paid-in capital		7,470			7,455
Accumulated other comprehensive income		307			289
Deficit		(6,439	)		(6,273	)
		1,401			1,532
	$	4,978		$	5,242

	December 31,			March 31,
	2010				2010
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	459		$	229
Cash - restricted		424			-
Marketable securities		1,126			45
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		32			14
Total current assets		2,041			288
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net		2,884			3,018
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES		-			1,200
OTHER ASSETS
Investments - at equity		-			3,198
Related party receivables		-			42
Other		32			77
Total other assets		32			3,317
	$	4,957		$	7,823
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Line of credit	$	954		$	1,087
Accounts payable		204			214
Accrued expenses and taxes		1,291			2,005
Current portion of long-term debt		1,449			1,531
Total current liabilities		3,898			4,837
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Long-term debt, less current maturities above		1			13
Long-term liabilities from discontinued operations		-			2,782
Total long-term liabilities		1			2,795
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES		-			-
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; authorized 25,000,000 shares		46			46
Additional paid-in capital		7,262			7,262
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(232	)		16
Deficit		(6,018	)		(7,133	)
		1,058			191
	$	4,957		$	7,823

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

THERMODYNETICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
(UNAUDITED)
(in 000's, except earnings per share)

	2011			2010
REVENUES
Rental income	$	72		$	154

OPERATING EXPENSES		207			385

Income (loss) from operations		(135	)		(231	)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Other, net		2			-
Interest expense		(33	)		(37	)
Loss on sale of stock		-			(97	)
		(31	)		(134	)

Loss before provision for income taxes		(166	)		(365	)

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		-			-

Net loss		(166	)		(365	)


OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS, net of tax		18			17

Comprehensive loss	$	(148	)	$	(348	)

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.08	)

THERMODYNETICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, (UNAUDITED) (in 000's, except earnings per share)

THERMODYNETICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
(UNAUDITED)
(in 000's)

	2011			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(166	)	$	(365	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		33			48
Loss on sale of stock of subsidiary		-			97
Issuance of stock		17
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(3	)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets		(23	)		(82	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		28			10
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and taxes		(168	)		(555	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(282	)		(847	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		-			-
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		-			-

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sale of stock		-			1,210
Proceeds from long-term borrowings		46			-
Principal payments on debt and capital lease obligations		(39	)		(33	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		7			1,177

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		(275	)		330

CASH, beginning of year		785			229

CASH, end of year	$	510		$	559

	2010			2009
REVENUES
Consulting fee and rental income	$	134		$	247
OPERATING EXPENSES		80			1,327
Income (loss) from operations		54			(1,080	)
EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF UNCONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY		-			(21	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Other, net		2			202
Interest expense		(37	)		(236	)
Realized Loss on Impairment		-			-
Gain on sale of stock		114			-
		79			(34	)
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes and extraordinary item		133			(1,135	)
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		(5	)		(2	)
Net income (loss)		138			(1,133	)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), net of tax		(203	)		13
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(65	)	$	(1,120	)
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE	$	0.03		$	(0.25	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

THERMODYNETICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, (UNAUDITED) (in 000's, except earnings per share)

	2010			2009
REVENUES
Consulting fee and rental income	$	442		$	742
OPERATING EXPENSES		784			2,240
Loss from operations		(342	)		(1,498	)
EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF UNCONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY		-			363
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Other, net		2			51
Interest expense		(113	)		(116	)
Realized Loss on Impairment		-			(2,196	)
Loss on sale of stock		(19	)		-
		(130	)		(2,261	)
Loss before provision for income taxes and extraordinary item		(472	)		(3,396	)
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		(5	)		2
Loss before extraordinary item		(467	)		(3,398	)
EXTRAORDINARY ITEM - Gain on extinguishment of debt net of
taxes of $1,200		1,582			-
Net income (loss)		1,115			(3,398	)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), net of tax		(248	)		(5	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	867		$	(3,403	)
EARNINGS (LOSS) BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEM PER COMMON SHARE
PER COMMON SHARE	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.78	)
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE	$	0.24		$	(0.78	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

THERMODYNETICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, (UNAUDITED) (in 000's)

	2010			2009
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)	$	1,115		$	(3,398	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		144			279
Earnings in unconsolidated subsidiary		-			(289	)
Realized Loss on Impairment					2,196
Loss on sale of stock of subsidiary		(18	)		-
Realized loss on investment in unaffiliated company		36			-
Gain on extinguishment of debt		(1,582	)		-
Issuance of stock					129
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and
other current assets		(18	)		(288	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		(10	)		5
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and taxes		(714	)		558
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(1,047	)		(808	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(1	)		(142	)
Purchases of marketable securities		-			(3	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(1	)		(145	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net (increase) decrease in related party receivable		42			768
Proceeds from sale of stock		1,887			-
Payments on short-term borrowings		(133	)		25
Principal payments on debt		(94	)		(95	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		1,702			698
NET INCREASE IN CASH		654			(255	)
CASH, beginning of year		229			475
CASH, end of period	$	883		$	220

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

THERMODYNETICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~JUNE 3130, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The financial information included herein is unaudited; however, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim period. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. The results of operations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

NOTE 2: GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, the Company has sustained substantial operating losses in recent years, has used substantial amounts of working capital in its operations and at ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2011, current liabilities exceed current assets by approximately $1,~~857~~308,000. The Company is currently in default on their line of credit and its long-term mortgages, yet at ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2011, the Company is current on both primary mortgages for each of the buildings, and is current on its interest payments against the line of credit. Rental income from the commercial buildings is now collected by the Bank and those proceeds are utilized for the principal and interest payments on the mortgages, with all remaining cash utilized to pay principal and interest on the line of credit. During June, 2010, the bank commenced two legal proceedings (Note 119). Certain of the Company’s assets are being offered for sale which, upon consummation of a successful sale, would be expected to cure the defaults.

In view of these matters, realization of a major portion of the assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet is dependent upon continued operations of the Company, which in turn is dependent upon curing defaults, satisfying current liabilities and the success of future operations. Management believes that actions presently being taken ~~(partial sale of an investment, see Note 10)~~ along with management’s future plans to raise cash through the sale of other long-term assets, provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 3: ~~SUBSIDIARY~~INVESTMENT ~~TRANSACTIONS~~IN TURBOTEC PRODUCTS, PLC

OnThe ~~May 8, 2006, the~~ Company’s ~~completed~~investment ~~the~~in ~~sale of a 43.68% minority interest of its subsidiary,~~ Turbotec Products Plc, (the “PLC”), ~~through~~is ancarried ~~offering~~at onmarket ~~the~~value ~~AIM~~at ~~Market~~June of30, ~~the~~2011 ~~London~~and ~~Stock~~is ~~Exchange. As~~included ain ~~result,~~marketable ~~the~~securities ~~Company~~on ~~began~~the tobalance ~~account~~sheet, ~~for~~as ~~Turbotec under~~ the ~~equity~~Company ~~method~~no oflonger ~~accounting~~has ~~effective~~significant ~~May 8, 2006~~influence. AtThe ~~that date, the~~ Company ~~and~~currently ~~the~~holds ~~PLC entered into~~ a ~~Relationship~~21.18% ~~Agreement~~investment ~~(RA)~~in ~~which provides for an annual administration fee; restrictions on related party transactions; restrictions on appointments to~~ the ~~board of the~~ PLC ~~and mutual confidentiality and reporting undertakings~~.

OnIncluded ~~April~~in ~~26,~~rental ~~2010,~~income on the ~~Company~~income ~~sold~~statement ~~3,400,000~~is ~~ordinary shares of Turbotec Products, Plc for~~ approximately $172,~~300,~~000 ~~before fees~~ and ~~transaction expenses. As a result~~$137,000 from the ~~RA was terminated in accordance with its terms~~PLC, asfor the ~~sale~~three ~~reduced~~months ~~the~~ended ~~Company’s~~June ~~holding~~30, in2011 ~~the~~and ~~PLC~~2010, ~~below 30%~~respectively. ~~With~~Additionally, ~~this~~included ~~sale~~in ofreceivables ~~stock~~on ~~and~~ the ~~termination~~balance ofsheet ~~the~~are ~~RA,~~net ~~the~~amounts ~~Company~~from ~~no longer had significant influence with respect to~~ the PLC ~~and~~which ~~accordingly~~represents ~~ceased~~pass-through ~~utilizing~~rent ~~the equity method of accounting for its investment in the PLC~~amounts. The ~~Company’s~~balances ~~investment~~are isapproximately ~~now~~$36,000 ~~accounted~~and ~~for~~$42,000 asat aJune ~~marketable~~30, ~~security~~2011 ~~under ASC 320~~ and is2010 ~~reflected in these financial statements as a current asset~~respectively.

OnNOTE ~~December~~4: ~~21,~~COMMERCIAL 2010, the Company sold 1,100,000 ordinary shares (the "Shares") of the PLC. The Shares were sold for an aggregate purchase price of £308,000 (approximately $480,000) before fees and transaction expenses. The Company granted an 18-month right of first refusal to the Buyers to match any other offers to purchase additional shares of Turbotec held by the Company. The net proceeds were deposited in a secured escrow account to be utilized to pay the obligation to be awarded in the London litigation, and are reflected on the balance sheet as restricted cash; the amount claimed by Turbotec is being challenged by the Company. The remaining proceeds will be used at the discretion of the Company.LEASES

6The Company and Turbotec Products, Inc. entered into a new real estate lease for approximately 52,500 square feet at 651 Day Hill Road, Windsor, CT. The lease expires December 31, 2011. Rent charges with respect to the 651 Day Hill Road property are equal to five dollars per square foot triple net; monthly rent equals $21,875 plus triple net expenses.

~~Commercial Leases:~~4

~~The~~NOTE Company and Turbotec Products, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the PLC (“Turbotec Products”), entered into real estate leases effective May 8, 2006, for approximately 54,500 square feet at 651 Day Hill Road, Windsor, CT, and approximately 17,000 square feet at 50 Baker Hollow Road, Windsor, CT. See Part II, Item 1. The leases commenced April 1, 2006 with a five-year term, and one extension option for three years, and a second extension option for two years. Rent charges with respect to the 651 Day Hill Road property (651 DHR) are equal to seven dollars per square foot in years one and two, escalating annually thereafter through each of the extension terms; monthly fixed rent in year one equals $31,792, escalating to $36,333 monthly in year five. Rent charges with respect to the 50 Baker Hollow Road property (50 BHR) are equal to $5~~.50~~: ~~per~~EARNINGS ~~square~~PER foot in year one, escalating annually thereafter through each of the extension terms; monthly fixed rent in year one equals $7,792, escalating to $9,208 monthly in year five; Turbotec has stated its plan to relocate its operations to North Carolina before December 31, 2011. The lease for 50BHR is expected to terminate on March 31, 2011 and not be renewed. The new lease for 651 DHR has been entered into through December 31, 2011 which lease TRBO will pay $5 triple net for the space it is occupying.SHARE

~~NOTE~~Earnings 4:per ~~LACK~~share OFfor ~~CURRENT~~the ~~INFORMATION~~three ~~FROM~~month ~~TURBOTEC~~periods ~~PRODUCTS~~ended ~~PLC~~June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 have been computed based on the weighted average of outstanding shares during the periods.

Certain financial information in the Company’s notes to the financial statement, as they pertain to the PLC, reflects the information at March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010. The PLC reports semi annually, as that is the requirement of the UK AIM market, and is next scheduled to report in July 2011. As such, the most recent public information that is available to be included in the Company’s financial statements reflects financial results thru September 30, 2010.

NOTE 5: INVESTMENT IN TURBOTEC PRODUCTS, PLC

The Company’s investment in the PLC is carried at market value at December 31, 2010. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the equity method of accounting was utilized whereby the investment was carried at cost and adjusted for the Company’s proportionate share of their undistributed earnings or losses. On April 26, 2010 and December 21, 2010, the Company sold 3,400,000 and 1,100,000 shares, respectively, of the stock of the PLC. Prior to the sales the Company held a 56.32% investment in the PLC and currently owns 21.18%

The market values of the common stock investment in the PLC were:

Year	Carrying Value		Per Share MV		Market Value		Cost
December 31, 2010	$	1,112	$	0.41	$	1,112	$	1,346
December 31, 2009		3,416		0.44		3,160		N/A
	September 31, 2010		March 31, 2010
Current assets	$	7,306		6,754
Property and equipment, net		10,156		5,424
Other assets, net		324		203
Total assets		17,786		12,381
Current liabilities		3,131		1,203
Long-term Debt		2,393		82
Deferred liabilities		900		781
		6,424		2,066
Stockholders’ equity		11,362		10,315
		17,786		12,381
	Six Months Ended September 31, 2010		Year Ended March 31, 2010
Sales	$	12,162	$	26,986
Net income		856		1,447

Included in consulting fee and rental income on the income statement is $413,000 and $690,000 from the PLC, for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Additionally, included in receivables on the balance sheet at March 31, 2010 are net amounts from the PLC which represents consulting fees and dividends receivable both net of an allowance and pass-through rent amounts. The balances are $0 and $42,000 at December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010 respectively.

NOTE 6: EARNINGS PER SHARE

Earnings per share for the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 have been computed based on the weighted average of outstanding shares during the periods.

The weighted average numbers of shares outstanding used in the calculations are:

	Three Months Ended December 31,					Nine Months Ended December 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009		2010		2009
		2011		2010
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding-Basic &Diluted	6,187,589	~~4,600,306~~	4,600,306		~~4,600,306~~		~~4,600,306~~		~~4,373,023~~

NOTE 76: CASH FLOW INFORMATION AND NON CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES

The following supplemental information is disclosed pursuant to the requirements of ASC 230-10.

	Nine Months Ended December 31
	Three Months Ended June 30
	(in 000's)
Cash payments for interest	2010			2009
	2011		2010
	$	113		$	116
Cash payments for interest	$	33	$	37

8NOTE 7: LINE OF CREDIT

~~NOTE~~The 8:Company’s ~~INVESTMENT/LOAN~~ $1.1 million line of credit matured on July 31, 2009 and is due in full; the Company is currently in default. The Company has continued to pay interest under the terms of the line of credit through June 30, 2011.

~~The~~On ~~fully~~June ~~reserved~~28, ~~$300,000~~2010 ~~advance~~the ~~made~~Bank tocommenced alegal ~~manufacturer~~action. See ofNotes ~~modular~~2 ~~commercial~~and 9 ~~buildings~~for ~~was~~further ~~written off during the second quarter~~discussion.

NOTE 98: ~~LINE~~SUBSEQUENT ~~OF CREDIT~~EVENTS

~~The~~Distribution ~~Company’s $1.1 million line~~ of ~~credit~~Subsidiary matured on July 31, 2009 and is due in full; the Company is currently in default. The Company has continued to pay interest under the terms of the line of credit through December 31, 2010. On June 28, 2010 the Bank commenced legal action. See Notes 2 and 11 for further discussion. Stock:

~~NOTE~~The 10Board of Directors of Thermodynetics has approved the distribution of a dividend to shareholders of record on July 15, 2011 in a spin-off transaction, with the distribution effected on or about August 5, 2011. The dividend was distributed to shareholders who, on the record date, were owners of at least 1,000 shares of Thermodynetics common stock; they received shares of TPI Systems, Inc. ("TPI") on a one-for-one (1:1) ~~EXTRAORDINARY~~pro ~~ITEM~~rata basis. All other Thermodynetics shareholders, being those holding less than 1,000 shares of Thermodynetics, received a distribution of $0.0002 per share for each of the shares, pro rata, they owned of Thermodynetics as of the record date. There is no effect on any holdings in Thermodynetics.

~~During~~The ~~the~~parent ~~fiscal~~owns ~~quarter ended September 30~~1, ~~2010, the Company extinguished debts, totaling approximately $2,800,~~000,000 ~~which~~shares reflected liabilities from Vulcan Industries, Inc. (“Vulcan”). Vulcan was closed during 2005 and all secured creditors were satisfied. The remaining liabilities were payable by Vulcan alone to unsecured creditors and, with the passing of ~~their statutory rights, those liabilities were written off resulting in a gain, net of taxes, of $1,582,000~~TPI.

NOTE 119: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

~~The~~There ~~following~~ are ~~the~~no material legal proceedings known or threatened ~~legal~~against ~~proceedings~~the Company, except:

(a) The lawsuit instituted by the Company on January 8, 2008 in England against Turbotec Products Plc was concluded in February, 2010. A judgment in favor of the Company on one count and against it on two counts was rendered on May 1010th, 2010. The net effect of the London judgment held that the Company was required to reimburse the PLC for 85% of the PLC’s legal expenses which ~~the~~was ~~PLC~~negotiated ~~has~~to ~~claimed~~a ~~approximate~~sum of £~~795~~560,000., ~~The PLC has served a Notice of Commencement of Detailed Assessment proceedings along with a Bill of Costs~~ and ~~the~~that ~~Company~~amount has ~~served~~been its Points of Dispute challenging the PLC's costs as being excessive and inappropriate. The Company believes that the costs that it will be required to pay will be reduced. On May 24, 2010 in accordance with the judgment, the Company paid; £350,000 towas ~~the~~paid ~~PLC~~in onMay ~~account~~2010, ofand ~~their costs. The Company could ultimately be responsible for up to an additional~~ £~~325~~210,000 ofwas ~~legal~~paid ~~costs claimed by the PLC~~ in ~~the~~July ~~event the Company loses its arguments~~2011.

(b) Turbotec Products, Inc. commenced a lawsuit against Thermodynetics on February 27, 2008 in the Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Hartford, alleging that Thermodynetics breached two commercial leases, and that Thermodynetics improperly withdrew funds from a sinking fund established under the leases, and for fraudulent inducement, fraudulent misrepresentation, and violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (Conn. Gen. Stat. Sect. 42-110b, et seq.). Thermodynetics denies the allegations. Thermodynetics estimated its total risk of loss would not exceed $350,000 and did not view its risk of loss in the case as probable or material. On that January 10, 2011 mutual releases were exchanged between Thermodynetics and Turbotec, and the lawsuit was dismissed without any financial obligation owed to either party. An outcome of the settlement was that Turbotec extended its leasehold interest in the Day Hill facility through December 31, 2011.5

(cb) ~~The~~Turbotec ~~Company's~~Products, ~~bank~~Inc. ~~initiated~~commenced ~~and~~a ~~served~~lawsuit ~~two~~against ~~separate~~Thermodynetics ~~lawsuits~~ on ~~June~~February 2827th, ~~2010~~2008 ~~against the Company~~ in the Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Hartford~~, alleging defaults of a line of credit and certain mortgages and seeking recovery through foreclosure of the liens against the two commercial buildings~~. ~~Negative~~The ~~outcomes~~parties insettled ~~either of such proceedings will have a material adverse effect upon~~ the ~~Company.~~lawsuit ~~At December 31, 2010, the Company was current on both primary mortgages,~~ and ~~was current~~ on ~~its~~January interest payments against the line of credit which had matured in 2009. The default initially was against the line of credit which has not been repaid and the bank has claimed a cross-default against the mortgages. The Company believes there is material equity value in the buildings exceeding the value of all of the bank debt. The current balance due under the line of credit and mortgages equals approximately $2.4 million; the Bank is claiming such balance plus costs and legal expenses of the proceeding. In the event the bank is successful in its foreclosure proceedings and a qualified buyer for the properties is not secured10th, ~~the~~2011 ~~loss~~mutual toreleases ~~the~~were ~~Company could exceed the amounts due under the line of credit and mortgages. However~~exchanged, ~~in the event of a strict foreclosure, under Connecticut foreclosure law, a court would apply a fair market value to the properties~~ and ~~buildings based upon a then to be appraised value as of~~ the ~~date~~lawsuit ~~title~~was ~~vested~~dismissed inwithout ~~the~~any ~~bank;~~financial ~~therefore,~~obligation ~~the~~owed ~~likely risk of loss~~ to ~~the~~either ~~Company would be the loss of the land and buildings but not further financial deficiency claims~~party. ~~Both properties are currently listed for sale with a commercial real estate broker, and management would also consider any long-term lease opportunities.~~

9c) The Company's bank initiated and served two separate lawsuits on June 28th, 2010 against the Company in the Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Hartford, alleging defaults of a line of credit and certain mortgages and seeking recovery through foreclosure of the liens against the two commercial buildings. Negative outcomes in either of such proceedings will have a material adverse effect upon the Company. At June 30th, 2011, the Company was current on both primary mortgages and was current on its interest payments against the line of credit which had matured in 2009. The default initially was against the line of credit which has not been repaid and the bank has claimed a cross-default against the mortgages. The Company believes there is material equity in the buildings exceeding the value of all of the bank debt. The current balance due under the line of credit and mortgages equals approximately $2.25 million at June 30, 2011; the Bank is claiming such balance plus costs and legal expenses of the proceeding. In the event the bank is successful in its foreclosure proceedings and a qualified buyer for the properties is not secured, the loss to the Company could exceed the amounts due under the line of credit and mortgages. However, in the event of a strict foreclosure, under Connecticut foreclosure law, a court would apply a fair market value to the properties and buildings based upon a then to be appraised value as of the date title vested in the bank; therefore, the likely risk of loss to the Company would be the loss of the land and buildings but not further financial deficiency claims. Both properties are currently listed for sale with a commercial real estate broker, and management would also consider any long-term lease opportunities. A trial date is set for June 12, 2012.

Item 2.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Results of Operations.

~~During~~2011 ~~the~~Compared ~~latest nine months, the Company reduced its holdings in Turbotec Products Plc (“PLC”)~~ to approximately 21%. The sales of its holdings in the PLC were precipitated by an unexpected decision resulting from the London trial which decision awarded costs to Turbotec and which preliminary amount was paid from the proceeds of the stock sales. An additional payment is due the PLC which amount is in dispute and may require the UK courts to resolve. The Company has deposited sufficient capital from the sales proceeds in a secured escrow account to be utilized to pay the obligation to be awarded in the London litigation. Other payables were also paid from the sale proceeds.2010

~~The~~Income ~~Company’s~~in ~~investment~~both inquarters ~~one~~ended ofJune ~~its~~30, ~~other~~2010 ~~holdings~~and ~~was~~2011 ~~sold~~resulted from rental income. Our smaller building has been vacant since April 1, 2011. The tenant for ~~$218~~the main building is now occupying the building under a lease that terminates December 31,~~000~~ 2011; it is not expected that they will renew their lease. Both buildings are being marketed for sale.

The Company is ~~pursuing~~engaged ~~various~~in ~~activities~~managing ~~which~~its ~~are~~real ~~designed~~estate toand ~~raise~~business ~~capital~~holdings, and toinvesting ~~generate~~in ~~income~~other companies. ~~These~~In ~~include~~June ~~seeking~~2011 ~~management~~the ~~contracts,~~Company ~~assisting~~acquired ~~other~~the ~~companies~~rights into ~~securing~~a ~~financing,~~software ~~and~~program inthat ~~the~~is ~~sale~~to orbe ~~rental~~marketed ofin the ~~two~~wagering ~~commercial~~industry. The ~~buildings~~software ~~which~~is ~~are~~designed ~~located~~to inassist aindividuals ~~highly~~in ~~desirable~~selecting ~~area~~winning ofwagers ~~north~~in ~~central~~horse ~~Connecticut~~racing events.

~~Rental~~During ~~income~~the ~~for~~first ~~the~~and ~~smaller~~third quarters ended of the ~~two~~2011 ~~buildings~~fiscal ~~owned~~year, by the Company ~~was~~disposed ~~consistent~~of ~~through~~a ~~September~~portion ~~30,~~of ~~2010;~~its ~~one~~holdings ~~tenant~~in ~~has~~Turbotec ~~vacated~~and ~~its~~now ~~leased~~owns ~~space~~approximately as21% of ~~September~~that ~~30,~~company. Net ~~2010~~proceeds of approximately $1.67 million was received and used primarily to pay litigation costs. In addition, the ~~other~~Company ~~tenant~~made ~~plans~~adjustments to ~~vacate~~its ~~upon~~investment ~~the~~portfolio ~~lease~~and ~~termination~~both onpurchased ~~March~~and ~~31,~~sold ~~2011~~securities. ~~The~~As ~~PLC~~a isresult of the ~~tenant~~sale inof the ~~larger~~Turbotec ~~building~~securities, ~~and~~the Company has ~~extended~~classified its ~~lease~~holdings ~~through~~as ~~December~~marketable ~~31,~~securities ~~2011. The~~as ~~two~~the ~~properties~~Company ~~are~~does ~~currently~~not ~~being~~have ~~marketed~~any ~~for~~significant ~~sale~~influence orover ~~lease~~that entity.

ItThe isCompany ~~believed~~recorded ~~that~~a ~~the tax~~ loss ~~carry~~in ~~forward~~both isfiscal an2010 ~~asset~~and ~~that~~2011. Operating ~~can~~expenses bedecreased ~~utilized~~ in ~~raising~~fiscal ~~capital~~2011 ~~and/or~~largely inreflecting ~~allowing~~a ~~the~~reduction ~~Company~~in tolitigation ~~merge with another organization~~costs.

~~Certain~~In ~~financial~~August ~~information~~2011, in the Company’s ~~notes~~issued toa ~~the~~dividend ~~financial~~consisting ~~statement,~~of asa ~~they~~cash ~~pertain~~payment ~~to the PLC, reflects the information at March 31, 2010~~ and ~~September~~a ~~30,~~stock ~~2010. The~~dividend ~~PLC reports semi-annually as that is the requirement~~ of ~~the~~its UKpreviously ~~AIM~~100% ~~market~~owned ~~and~~subsidiary, ~~information~~TPI ~~for the period after September 30~~Systems, ~~2010 is not available~~Inc. AsA ~~such~~cash ~~there~~distribution iswas noissued ~~public information that is available~~ to beThermodynetics ~~included~~shareholders inwho ~~the~~owned ~~Company’s~~less ~~financial~~than ~~statements subsequent to March 31~~1,000 ~~2010. Further~~shares ~~since~~of ~~the~~Thermodynetics ~~holdings~~on in the ~~PLC~~July ~~are~~15, ~~now~~2011 ~~being~~record ~~accounted~~date ~~for~~and as a ~~marketable~~share ~~security,~~for itshare isdistribution ~~not~~of ~~expected~~TPI ~~that~~Systems ~~additional~~to ~~information~~all ~~about~~other ~~the~~shareholders ~~PLC~~of ~~will~~Thermodynetics bewas ~~included~~effected in ~~future reports, other than information that is publicly disseminated by the PLC~~August.

~~The~~2010 ~~lawsuit~~Compared ~~that Turbotec Products Inc instituted against the Company was settled with neither party paying anything~~ to ~~the other. The lease extension described above resulted from and was a contributing factor in the settlement.~~2009

The Company's ~~bank~~is ~~began~~engaged ~~foreclosure proceedings~~ in ~~June~~managing ~~2010~~its asreal ~~the~~estate ~~line~~and ofbusiness ~~credit~~holdings, ~~had~~offering ~~not~~consulting ~~been~~services ~~repaid after~~to, itand ~~matured~~investing in, ~~July~~other ~~2009~~companies. The Company ~~believes~~competes ~~there~~with isother ~~material~~companies ~~equity~~which ~~value~~have inbeen ~~the~~established ~~buildings~~for ~~exceeding~~a ~~the~~longer ~~value~~period of ~~all~~time, ~~of the bank debt. Both buildings~~ are ~~currently listed for sale with a commercial real estate broker~~larger, and ~~management~~possess ~~would~~substantially ~~also~~greater ~~consider~~financial ~~any~~resources ~~long-term~~and ~~lease~~substantially ~~opportunities~~larger staffs. ~~Should~~ ~~the~~No ~~sales~~assurances ~~not~~can be ~~successful,~~given orthat ~~another means of satisfying~~ the ~~bank~~Company ~~not~~will ~~found,~~be ~~the~~able ~~resolution~~to ofsuccessfully ~~this~~compete ~~matter~~with ~~would~~such ~~have a materially adverse effect on the Company~~firms.

Income resulted from rental income in fiscal 2010.

Operating expenses increased in 2010 vs. 2009 reflecting primarily the legal costs involved in the litigation regarding the interpretation of the relationship agreement that was required to consummate the London IPO of Turbotec in May 2006.

The Company recorded a loss in fiscal 2009 primarily as a result of increased operating expenses and the reduced equity in the earnings of the PLC, partially offset by the sale of the stock of an unaffiliated company. The loss in 2010 was caused primarily by litigation expenses and the normal operating expenses of the Company.

Rental income derives from the two buildings located in Windsor, CT that were rented in the years ended 2010 and 2009. The current tenants are not expected to renew their leases and the properties are being offered for sale or rent, although there can be no assurance that a sale or rental will be consummated, nor if it is able to do so, the financial effect of such transactions, if any.

Liquidity.

The Company’s isworking ~~challenging~~capital ~~the~~position ~~PLC's~~was ~~claimed~~negative ~~costs~~at asJune ~~being~~30, ~~excessive~~2010 and ~~inappropriate~~2011. ~~The~~It ~~Company~~is ~~believes~~anticipated that ~~the~~future ~~costs~~working ~~that~~capital it will be ~~required~~generated toby ~~pay will be reduced. On May 24, 2010 in accordance with~~ the ~~judgment,~~sale ~~the Company paid £350,000 to the PLC on account~~ of ~~their~~assets ~~costs. The~~and ~~Company~~through ~~could ultimately be responsible for up to an additional £325~~rents,~~000~~ ofalthough ~~legal~~no ~~costs~~assurance ~~claimed~~can bybe ~~the~~given ~~PLC~~that inthese ~~the~~efforts ~~event~~will ~~the~~be ~~Company loses its arguments~~successful.

10At July 13, 2009, the Company’s line of credit was due to be repaid and the lender has initiated foreclosure proceedings.

~~The~~Cash ~~London~~was ~~trial~~generated ~~severely~~from ~~impacted~~short ~~the~~term ~~cash~~borrowings ~~resources~~and of the ~~Company~~sale ~~and~~of assets as awell ~~result~~as ~~the~~from ~~Company~~rents ~~sold a portion of its holdings~~received.

OnThe ~~October~~Company ~~29th,~~anticipates ~~2010,~~collection ~~the~~of ~~Company’s~~rents ~~investment~~to inbe ~~one~~applied ofagainst its ~~holdings~~defaulted ~~was~~bank ~~liquidated~~loans, ~~and~~through ~~$218~~December 31,~~000~~ ~~was~~2011. The ~~received~~Company ascurrently adoes ~~result~~not ofhave ~~the~~any ~~sale~~existing prospects to lease its facilities in 2012.

On December 21, 2010, the Company sold 1,100,000 ordinary shares (the "Shares") of the PLC. The Shares were sold for an aggregate purchase price of £308,000 which (approximately $480,000) before fees and transaction expenses. The Company granted an 18-month right of first refusal to the Buyers to match any other offers to purchase additional shares of Turbotec held by the Company. The net proceeds were deposited in a secured escrow account to be utilized to pay or reduce the outstanding obligation to be awarded in the London litigation; the amount claimed by Turbotec is being challenged by the Company. The remaining proceeds will be used at the discretion of the Company.

The Company believes there is material equity value in both of its buildings exceeding the value of all of the bank debt which are subject to the current foreclosure proceedings. Both buildings are currently listed for sale with a commercial real estate broker. Should the sales not be successful, or another means of satisfying the bank not found, the resolution of this matter would have a materially adverse effect on the Company.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains certain forward-looking statements regarding the Company, its business prospects and results of operations that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties posed by many factors and events that could cause the Company’s actual business, prospects and results of operations to differ materially from those that may be anticipated by such forward-looking statements. Factors that may affect such forward-looking statements include, without limitation: the Company’s ability to successfully and timely develop and finance new projects, the impact of competition on the Company’s revenues, the real estate market in Connecticut, and the economy as it relates to companies seeking and able to pay for consulting services.

When used, words such as "believes," "anticipates," "expects," "continue", "may", "plan", "predict", "should", "will", "intends" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may subsequently arise. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by the Company in this report, news releases, and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect the Company’s business.

~~tem~~Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks.

Not required by smaller reporting companies.

Item 4T.

Controls and Procedures.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures -

The Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers believe, based on their evaluation, that as of the end of the period covered by this report the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) were effective such that the material information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act within the specified time periods under the Exchange Act and such information is: (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls -

There were no changes made and no corrective actions taken during the quarter ended for this report with respect to the Company's internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company's internal control over its financial reporting, except the utilization of the equity method of accounting in the restated financial statements.

118

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings.

There are no material legal proceedings known or threatened against the Company, except:

(a) The lawsuit instituted by the Company on January 8, 2008 in England against Turbotec Products Plc was concluded in February, 2010. A judgment in favor of the Company on one count and against it on two counts was rendered on May 1010th, 2010. The net effect of the London judgment held that the Company was required to reimburse the PLC for 85% of the PLC’s legal expenses ~~which~~was ~~the~~negotiated ~~PLC~~to ~~has~~a ~~claimed~~sum ~~approximate~~of £~~795~~560,000~~. The~~, ~~PLC has served a Notice of Commencement of Detailed Assessment proceedings along with a Bill of Costs~~ and ~~the~~that ~~Company~~amount has ~~served~~been its Points of Dispute challenging the PLC's costs as being excessive and inappropriate. The Company believes that the costs that it will be required to pay will be reduced. On May 24, 2010 in accordance with the judgment, the Company paid; £350,000 towas ~~the~~paid ~~PLC~~in onMay ~~account~~2010, ofand ~~their costs. The Company could ultimately be responsible for up to an additional~~ £~~325~~210,000 ofwas ~~legal~~paid ~~costs claimed by the PLC~~ in ~~the~~July ~~event the Company loses its arguments~~2011.

(b) Turbotec Products, Inc. commenced a lawsuit against Thermodynetics on February 2727th, 2008 in the Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Hartford, alleging that Thermodynetics breached two commercial leases, and that Thermodynetics improperly withdrew funds from a sinking fund established under the leases, and for fraudulent inducement, fraudulent misrepresentation, and violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (Conn. ~~Gen. Stat. Sect. 42-110b, et seq.).~~ ~~Thermodynetics~~The ~~denies~~parties settled the ~~allegations. Thermodynetics~~lawsuit ~~estimated its total risk of loss would not exceed $350,000~~ and ~~did~~on ~~not view its risk of loss in the case as probable or material. On~~ January 1010th, 2011 mutual releases were exchanged ~~between Thermodynetics and Turbotec~~, and the lawsuit was dismissed without any financial obligation owed to either party. ~~An outcome of the settlement was that Turbotec extended its leasehold interest in the Day Hill facility through December 31, 2011.~~

(c) The Company's bank initiated and served two separate lawsuits on June 2828th, 2010 against the Company in the Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Hartford, alleging defaults of a line of credit and certain mortgages and seeking recovery through foreclosure of the liens against the two commercial buildings. Negative outcomes in either of such proceedings will have a material adverse effect upon the Company. At ~~December~~June 3130th, ~~2010~~2011, the Company was current on both primary mortgages, and was current on its interest payments against the line of credit which had matured in 2009. The default initially was against the line of credit which has not been repaid and the bank has claimed a cross-default against the mortgages. The Company believes there is material equity in the buildings exceeding the value of all of the bank debt. The current balance due under the line of credit and mortgages equals approximately $2.425 million at June 30, 2011; the Bank is claiming such balance plus costs and legal expenses of the proceeding. In the event the bank is successful in its foreclosure proceedings and a qualified buyer for the properties is not secured, the loss to the Company could exceed the amounts due under the line of credit and mortgages. However, in the event of a strict foreclosure, under Connecticut foreclosure law, a court would apply a fair market value to the properties and buildings based upon a then to be appraised value as of the date title vested in the bank; therefore, the likely risk of loss to the Company would be the loss of the land and buildings but not further financial deficiency claims. Both properties are currently listed for sale with a commercial real estate broker, and management would also consider any long-term lease opportunities. A trial date is set for June 12, 2012.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

Not Applicable.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

There were no unregistered sales of equity securities of the Company during the three-month period covered by this Form 10-Q report, other than: (a) on June 15, 2011 the Company issued 100,000 shares of its common stock to attorney Kenneth B. Lerman in exchange for certain legal services. Attorney Kenneth B. Lerman is the son of the president of the Company. The exemption from the registration requirements of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 claimed was under §4(2) of the Act not involving a public offering, and (b) on June 9, 2011 the Company purchased from a third party the software known as Base 5 Factor along with the intellectual property rights for 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The chairman of the Company, John F. Ferraro, was a participant in such transaction and conveyed his interest in said software but did not receive any direct remuneration from the Company. The exemption from the registration requirements of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 claimed was under §4(2) of the Act not involving a public offering.

129

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

There were no material defaults of any terms of the securities or indebtedness of the Company or any of its significant subsidiaries during the three-month period covered by this Form 10-Q report, except that the Company’s $1.1 million line of credit matured on July 31, 2009 and is due in full. The Company's bank initiated and served two separate lawsuits on June 28, 2010 against the Company alleging defaults of the line of credit and certain mortgages; see Item 1(c).

Item 5.

Other Information.

None

Item 6.

Exhibits.

(a) Exhibits:

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications:

Exhbit 31(a)

Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

Exhbit 31(b)

Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

Section 1350 Certifications:

Exhbit 32(a)

Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

Exhbit 32(b)

Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

1310

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		THERMODYNETICS, INC.
Date: February 11, 2011	By:	/s/ Robert A. Lerman
Date: August 11, 2011	By:	/s/ Robert A. Lerman
		Robert A. Lerman
		President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 10, 2011	By:	/s/ John F. Ferraro
Date: August 11, 2011	By:	/s/ John F. Ferraro
		John F. Ferraro
		Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Filing Compare · THERMODYNETICS INC