UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to ________

Commission file number: 000-52530

Omni Bio Pharmaceutical, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

~~Colorado~~	Colorado	~~20-8097969~~	20-8097969
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
	(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
	incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

181 W. Boardwalk Drive, Suite 202, Fort Collins, CO 80525

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(970) 237-5178

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [ ]			Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ]	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of ~~November~~February 1317, ~~2014~~2015 was 3940,~~106~~462,~~638~~602.

OMNI BIO PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION		Page
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements.
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets – September 30, 2014 and March 31, 2014 (unaudited)	1
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets – December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2014 (unaudited)	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations – For the three and six months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations – For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit – For the six months ended September 30, 2014 (unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit – For the nine months ended December 31, 2014 (unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – For the six months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – For the nine months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)	4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	1112
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	1718
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Items 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	18
Item 5.	Other Information.	18
Item 6.	Exhibits.	19
SIGNATURES		20

i PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	19

Item 6.	Exhibits	20

SIGNATURES		21

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

OMNI BIO PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	September 30,			March 31,
	December 31,			March 31,
	2014			2014*	2014*
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~709~~852,~~915~~372		$	271,427
Other current assets		~~111~~69,~~021~~517			32,201
Total Current Assets		~~820~~921,~~936~~889			303,628
Other Assets
Debt issuance costs, net		7751,~~295~~012			129,859
Intangible assets, net		6159,~~037~~810			63,494
Total Other Assets		~~138~~110,~~332~~822			193,353
Total Assets	$	~~959~~1,~~268~~032,711		$	496,981
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	-		$	8,701
Accrued liabilities		80150,~~795~~591			87,637
Notes payable-related parties, net of discounts of $703,169 and $-0-, respectively		1,296,831			-
Notes payable-related parties, net of discounts of $172,723 and $-0-, respectively		927,277			-
Notes payable, net of discounts of $117,221 and $-0-, respectively		345,279			-
Notes payable, net of discounts of $43,900 and $-0-, respectively		206,100			-
Accrued interest, including $160,547 and $-0-, respectively, for related parties		267,187			-
Accrued interest, including $260,603 and $-0-, respectively, for related parties		318,635			-
Derivative liabilities-related parties		227,708			-
Total Current Liabilities		1,602,603			96,338
Total Current Liabilities		2,217,800			96,338
Notes payable-related parties, net of discounts of $344,260 and $358,043, respectively		1,655,740			741,957
Notes payable-related parties, net of discounts of $114,350 and $358,043, respectively		485,650			741,957
Notes payable, net of discounts of $-0- and $180,733, respectively		-			281,767
Accrued interest, include $115,069 and $177,726, respectively, for related parties		115,069			261,177
Accrued interest, include $91,231 and $177,726, respectively, for related parties		91,231			261,177
Total Liabilities		2,818,519			1,381,239
Derivative liabilities-related parties		505,863			-
Total Liabilities		3,855,437			1,381,239
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders' Equity
Stockholders' Deficit
Preferred stock, $0.10 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; -0- issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 39,006,638 and 38,656,638 shares, respectively, issued and outstanding		39,006			38,656
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 40,205,880 and 38,656,638 shares issued and outstanding		40,206			38,656
Additional paid-in-capital		46,~~456~~891,~~687~~012			45,608,679
Accumulated deficit		(4849,~~354~~753,~~944~~945	)		(46,531,593	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(12,~~859~~822,~~251~~727	)		(884,258	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' deficit	$	~~959~~1,~~268~~032,711		$	496,981

* Derived from ~~March~~Marach 31, 2014 Audited Financial Statements

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

OMNI BIO PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED ~~STATEMENT~~STATEMENTS OF ~~OPERATION~~OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	For the three months ended,						For the six months ended,
	For the Three Months Ended						For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	December 31,						December 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Operating expenses
Operating expenses:
General and administrative (including share-based compensation of $121,467 and $167,964 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 respectively; $195,835 and $371,305 for the six months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 respectively		475,069			539,582			788,053			1,042,770
General and administrative (including share-based compensation of $106,884 and $102,768 respectively and $302,719 and $474,073 respectively)	$	410,258		$	410,248		$	1,198,311		$	1,453,018
Research and development		~~138~~111,~~444~~906			9836,~~750~~250			~~358~~470,~~782~~687			~~126~~162,~~588~~838
Total operating expenses		~~613~~522,~~513~~164			~~638~~446,~~332~~498			1,~~146~~668,~~835~~999			1,~~169~~615,~~358~~856
Loss from operations		(~~613~~522,~~513~~164	)		(~~638~~446,~~332~~498	)		(1,~~146~~668,~~835~~999	)		(1,~~169~~615,~~358~~856	)
Non-operating income (expenses)
Non-operating income (expenses):
Change in estimated fair value in derivative liability - related party		(7257,~~107~~621	)		97(63,~~875~~531	)		(16273,~~006~~627	)		8522,~~630~~099
Change in estimated fair value in derivative liability		-			39(44,~~413~~060	)		-			34(9,~~192~~868	)
Amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs		(~~117~~10,~~722~~742	)		(53112,~~571~~974	)		(~~181~~192,~~543~~285	)		(~~104~~217,~~460~~434	)
Amortization of debt discount - related party		(~~180~~386,~~573~~538	)		(4347,~~964~~771	)		(~~358~~744,~~282~~820	)		(84132,~~460~~231	)
Interest expense, net of interest income		(270	)		(13,672	)		(22,795	)		(27,424	)
Extinguishment of debt		(134,259	)		-			(134,259	)		-
Interest expense - related party		(70,465	)		(27,726	)		(97,890	)		(55,151	)
Interest expense, net of interest income		(11,458	)		(12,837	)		(34,254	)		(40,261	)
Total non-operating expenses		(376,137	)		(1,645	)		(676,516	)		(151,673	)
Interest expense - related party		(76,218	)		(27,726	)		(174,108	)		(82,877	)
Net loss	$	(989,650	)	$	(639,977	)	$	(1,823,351	)	$	(1,321,031	)
Total non-operating expenses		(876,837	)		(308,899	)		(1,553,353	)		(460,572	)
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.04	)
Net loss	$	(1,399,001	)	$	(755,397	)	$	(3,222,352	)	$	(2,076,428	)
Weighted average shares outstanding- basic and diluted		38,892,508			38,196,380			38,856,092			36,167,844
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.06	)
Weighted average shares outstanding basic and diluted		39,216,590			38,397,721			39,027,240			36,913,839

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

OMNI BIO PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

For the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014

(Unaudited)

	Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Additional Paid-in		Accumulated			Total Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		~~Paid-in~~ Capital		Deficit			~~Equity~~Deficit
Balance at March 31, 2014		-	$	-		38,656,638	$	38,656	$	45,608,679	$	(46,531,593	)	$	(884,258	)
Common Stock issued in exchange for services		-		-		~~200~~450,000		~~200~~450		52109,~~800~~050		-			53109,~~000~~500
Debt discount on convertible note sold to a related party in private placement offering		-		-		-		-		671,523		-			671,523
Share based compensation		-		-		-		-		11117,~~618~~128		-			11117,~~618~~128
Net Loss												(833,701	)		(833,701	)
Common stock issued for convertible notes						1,089,242		1,090		382,543		-			383,633
Balance at June 30, 2014		-	$	-		38,856,638	$	38,856	$	46,344,620	$	(47,365,294	)	$	(981,818	)
Conversion of warrants to common stock						10,000		10		2,090		-			2,100
Common Stock issued in exchange for services						150,000		150		37,350					37,500
Net Loss		-		-		-		-		-		(3,222,352	)		(3,222,352	)
Share based compensation										74,717					74,717
Balance at December 31, 2014		-	$	-		40,205,880	$	40,206	$	46,891,013	$	(49,753,945	)	$	(2,822,726	)
Net Loss												(989,650	)		(989,650	)
Balance at September 30, 2014		-	$	-		39,006,638	$	39,006	$	46,456,687	$	(48,354,944	)	$	(1,859,251	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

OMNI BIO PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. & SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	For the six months ended
	For the nine months ended
	September 30,
	December 31,
	2014			2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(13,~~823~~222,~~351~~352	)	$	(12,~~321~~076,~~031~~427	)
Adjustments used to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Change in estimated fair value of derivative liabilities- related parties		16273,~~006~~627			(8522,~~630~~099	)
Change in estimated fair value of derivative liabilities		-			~~(34~~9,~~192~~868	)
Share-based compensation		~~176~~226,~~835~~628			~~371~~474,~~305~~073
Amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs		~~181~~192,~~543~~285			~~104~~217,~~460~~434
Amortization of debt discount - related parties		~~358~~744,~~282~~820			84132,~~460~~231
Depreciation and amortization of intangibles		23,~~457~~685			23,~~457~~685
Extinguishment of debt		134,259
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Other current assets		(7837,~~820~~316	)		(6427,~~782~~636	)
Accounts payable		(8,701	)		(3729,~~823~~741	)
Accrued liabilites		(6,842	)		(27,000	)
Accrued liabilities		62,954			(25,150	)
Accrued interest, related parties		97174,~~890~~108			-
Accrued interest, net		2334,~~189~~848			83124,~~353~~189
Net cash used in operating activities		(1,~~061~~421,~~512~~155	)		(~~924~~1,~~423~~219,573	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from the sale of convertible note - related parties		12,~~500~~000,000			-1,361,398
Proceeds from the sale of common stock		-			1,361,398
Proceeds from exercise of common stock warrants		2,100			-
Net cash provided by financing activities		12,~~500~~002,~~000~~100			1,361,398
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		438,488			436,975
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		580,945			141,825
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		271,427			343,279
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	~~709~~852,~~915~~372		$	~~780~~485,~~254~~104
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Conversion Feature and warrants recorded as debt discount	$	746,583		$	-
Conversion feature of senior secured promissory notes reclassified from liability to equity at estimated fair value	$	-		$	270,340
Common stock issued from conversion of senior secured convertible promissory note plus accrued interest	$	383,633		$	114,521

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 1 – OVERVIEW AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Overview

We are a biopharmaceutical company that was formed to explore new methods of use of alpha-1 antitrypsin (“AAT”), also referred to as “plasma-derived AAT” (“p-AAT”). p-AAT is purified from human blood and has been found to have significant anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and tissue protective effects in numerous animal models of human disease. More recently, clinical data have emerged showing p-AAT’s potential utility in the treatment of Type 1 diabetes, post-myocardial infarction heart disease and Graft vs Host Disease (“GvHD”). In 2012, we began to fund the research and development of several synthetic recombinant proteins involving the fusion of AAT and an Fc component of immunoglobulin (“AAT-Fc”).

The focus of our research and development efforts is now on advancing our first recombinant molecule (“AAT-Fc 2”) into clinical trials. We believe the successful characterization and development of a recombinant AAT-Fc fusion molecule would afford us with a patented composition of matter that could be introduced into the current p-AAT market as well as for a wide variety of clinical indications, including but not limited, to, Type 1 diabetes, graft vs host disease (GvHD) following bone marrow transplantation, and chronic gout.

We are considering several options for the initial clinical trials of AAT-Fc 2, with Type 1 diabetes and GvHD currently being among the most likely. To facilitate this effort, in April 2014 we announced the execution of a multi-phase contract manufacturing services agreement with Gallus BioPharmaceuticals LLC, now Patheon Biologics (“Patheon”), under which certain cell line optimization has been performed, and process development work ~~are~~is contemplated for our AAT-Fc 2 molecule. The ultimate goal is to have Patheon manufacture sufficient material for use in preclinical toxicology studies and early trials in humans.

We hold a license to an issued method of use patent for the treatment of diabetes using p-AAT with a privately-held company, Bio Holding, Inc. In addition, we hold licenses with the Regents of the University of Colorado (“RUC”) for method of use patents and patent applications (“Use Patents”) covering the use of p-AAT in the following indications: cellular transplantation and graft rejection, certain bacterial and viral diseases, and myocardial remodeling. We also hold licenses with RUC for patent applications covering composition of matter for various AAT-Fc constructs.

In November 2013, we received a Notice of Allowance from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for a patent for the composition of matter of AAT-Fc 2. The claims contained in this Notice of Allowance cover full-length AAT nucleic acid constructs that encode polypeptide components of the AAT-Fc 2 molecule as well as other AAT fusion polypeptides. The patent was issued in January 2014. In October 2014 we received notice that a third party has requested a reexamination of the patent challenging its validity. All of the claims of the patent will remain valid and in force during the reexamination proceedings. WeOn ~~plan~~February to6, ~~vigorously~~2015 ~~defend~~we ~~our~~were ~~patent~~informed ~~and~~that ~~believe~~the ~~that~~USPTO had reviewed the ~~challenge~~third ~~presented~~party bysubmission and issued a non-final office action. Within this office action, the ~~reexamination~~USPTO ~~request~~has ~~will~~upheld ~~bolster~~the ~~our~~validity of the patent’s ~~novelty~~claims ~~and~~for ~~non~~our specific recombinant alpha-~~obviousness,~~1 antitrypsin constructs now in development (including AAT-Fc 2) and ~~ultimately~~several ~~render~~alternative itAAT ~~stronger~~constructs. Although the Office Action has rejected some of the broader more generic patented claims, we will now have the opportunity to argue around these rejections in the coming months. Similar patent applications covering AAT-Fc 2 remain under review in Europe and Canada. Regardless of the outcome of the reexamination, if AAT-Fc 2 is successful in being brought to market, we expect that we would have market exclusivity under applicable intellectual property laws for a minimum of 12 years from the time of introduction in the U.S. and 10 years in Europe. These periods of market exclusivity would extend beyond the life of any AAT-Fc patent currently issued or under review. We believe we are the only company with a fusion protein construct of the p-AAT molecule in active development.

In November 2014, we announced that with our manufacturing partners, Patheon and Sigma-Aldrich Fine Chemicals (SAFC), we successfully identified several high-expression cell lines able to produce AAT-Fc in large enough quantities to be considered commercially viable. This is a significant milestone on our path toward IND-enabling toxicology studies with what we believe to be the first and only pharmaceutically feasible recombinant AAT candidate in 2015.

In December 2014, we entered into the second phase of the work plan with Patheon that covers final clone selection, process, purification and formulation development, and ultimately the manufacture of material appropriate for use in animal toxicology and early human testing. The work entailed in this plan was begun in January 2015 and is estimated to take up to 18 months and $3.7 million to complete. Due to the Company’s limited cash position, in early February 2015 we reached an agreement with Patheon to temporarily suspend our work plan until such time as the Company can raise sufficient funds to confidently continue the effort without interruption. We have incurred a total of $320,000 in billable expenses related to second phase work performed up to the time of suspension and intend to make this payment to Patheon in late February 2015.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are comprised of Omni Bio Pharmaceutical, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Omni Bio Operating, Inc., and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual audited consolidated financial statements, and reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation in accordance with US GAAP. The results of operations for interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in connection with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014 (the “2014 Form 10-K”). The balances as of March 31, 2014 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements.

Except as the context otherwise requires, the terms “Company,” “Omni,” “we,” “our” or “us” means Omni Bio Pharmaceutical, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Omni Bio Operating, Inc. (“Omni Bio”).

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”), which contemplate our continuation as a going concern, whereby the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities are in the ordinary course of business. We are currently in the development stage as we have not realized any revenue since inception. To date, our business efforts have been largely dedicated to pursuing additional capital to fund Sponsored Research Agreements (“SRAs”), the initial funding of BioMimetix Pharmaceutical, Inc., an equity investee (“BioMimetix”), prosecution of patent applications, a human clinical ~~trial~~trials to evaluate the therapeutic effects of p-AAT in the treatment of Type 1 diabetics and GvHD, and preclinical drug development activities for advancement of our recombinant AAT-Fc 2 molecule.

We have incurred net losses since inception, and as of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, had cash and cash equivalents of $~~709~~852,~~915~~372, a working capital deficit of $680,714, and an accumulated deficit of approximately $4849.48 million, which included non-cash charges of approximately $3637.98 million. ~~These~~As of the date of this filing, the Company estimates that it will have spent approximately $600,000 to fund its operating and R&D activities in January and February of 2015. In addition, the face value of all convertible notes outstanding as of the date of this filing totals $3.3 million, of which $1.3 million matures in May, June and October of 2015, and the remaining $2.0 million matures in December 2017 (see Note 2). The Company is continuing its efforts to raise sufficient capital to fund operations and repay outstanding notes as they mature, and we have presented terms to the holders of outstanding convertible notes maturing in 2015 to encourage each to convert their respective notes, and accrued interest, into shares of the Company’s common stock prior to maturity. There is no assurance, however, that we will be successful in these efforts. Taken together, these conditions raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be different should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Recently Issued Accounting Standard Updates

In ~~June~~August 2014, the FASB issued ASU ~~No.~~ 2014-1015, “Disclosure of Uncertainties About an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (the “Update”), which amended Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic ~~915~~205 ~~Development~~Presentation ~~Stage~~of ~~Entities~~Financial Statements. The ~~amendment~~Update ~~eliminates~~provides ~~certain~~guidance ~~financial~~to ~~reporting~~management ~~requirements~~on ~~surrounding~~determining ~~development~~when ~~stage~~and ~~entities,~~how ~~including~~to andisclose ~~amendment~~going-concern touncertainties in the ~~variable~~financial ~~interest~~statements. ~~entities~~The ~~guidance~~Update inrequires ~~ASC~~management ~~Topic~~to ~~810,~~perform ~~Consolidation.~~interim ~~The~~and ~~amendment~~annual ~~removes~~assessments ~~the~~of ~~definition~~an ofentity’s ability to continue as a ~~development~~going ~~stage~~concern ~~entity~~within ~~from~~one ~~the~~year ~~ASC,~~of ~~thereby~~the ~~removing~~date the financial ~~reporting~~statements ~~distinction~~are ~~between~~issued, ~~development~~and ~~stage~~to ~~entities~~make ~~and~~certain ~~other~~disclosures ~~entities~~if ~~from~~“conditions ~~U.S.~~or ~~GAAP.~~events ~~Consequently,~~raise ~~the~~substantial ~~amendment~~doubt ~~eliminates~~about the ~~requirements~~entity’s ~~for~~ability ~~development~~to ~~stage~~continue ~~entities~~as toa ~~(1) present~~going ~~inception-~~concern.” In making its assessment, management is required to~~-date~~ ~~information~~evaluate in“relevant ~~the~~conditions ~~statements~~and ofevents ~~income,~~that ~~cash~~are ~~flows~~known and ~~shareholder~~reasonably ~~equity,~~knowable ~~(2) label~~at the date that the financial statements asare issued.” Reasonably knowable conditions or events are those ofthat acan ~~development~~be ~~stage~~identified ~~entity,~~without ~~(3) disclose~~undue acost ~~description~~and ofeffort. Specific amendments contained within the ~~development~~Update ~~stage~~provide ~~activities~~a indefinition ~~which~~of the ~~entity~~term issubstantial ~~engaged~~doubt, ~~and~~as ~~(4) disclose~~well ~~the~~as ~~first~~specific ~~year~~principles infor ~~which~~considering the ~~entity~~mitigating effect of management’s plans. The amendments require certain additional disclosures when substantial doubt is noalleviated ~~longer~~as a ~~development~~result ~~stage~~of ~~entity~~consideration ~~that~~of inmanagement’s ~~prior~~plans. ~~years~~Also itrequired ~~had~~are ~~been~~an inexpress ~~the~~statement ~~development~~and ~~stage.~~other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated by management’s plans.

This amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early application of each of the amendments is permitted for any annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity’s financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company has made the election to early adopt this amendment effective June 30, 2014 and, as a result, the Company is no longer presenting or disclosing the information previously required under Topic 915. The early adoption was made to reduce data maintenance by removing all incremental financial reporting requirements for development stage entities. The adoption of this amendment alters the disclosure requirements of the Company, but it does not have any material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations for the current or any prior reporting periods.

In August, 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties About an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which amended Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 205 Presentation of Financial Statements. The Update provides guidance to management on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements. The Update requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued, and to make certain disclosures if “conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.” In making its assessment, management is required to evaluate “relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued.” Reasonably knowable conditions or events are those that can be identified without undue cost and effort. Specific amendments contained within the Update provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, as well as specific principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans. The amendments require certain additional disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans. Also required are an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated by management’s plans.

The Update applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter. While early adoption is permitted, the Company has elected not to adopt at this time and is still evaluating the reporting effect of the Update.

We have reviewed other FASB’s Accounting Standard Updates through the filing date of this report and ~~have~~currently ~~concluded~~do ~~that~~not ~~none~~expect ~~will~~any to have a material impact on our future consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 2 – FINANCING TRANSACTIONS

In April 2014, we secured ~~additional~~ financing under a private placement offering ~~(“the 2014 Private Placement”)~~ with Bohemian Investments LLC (“Bohemian”) that ~~enables~~enabled the Company to borrow up to $2,000,000 through April 15, 2015. The financing iswas in the form of a senior secured note (the “Bohemian Note”) due April 24, 2015, convertible into common stock of the Company at the lower of $0.20 per share or 65% of the stock price offered in connection with a public offering of the Company’s common stock. As of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, we have borrowed the full $12,~~500~~000,000 ~~from~~available ~~Bohemian~~to ~~and~~us weunder ~~have~~the ~~remaining~~Bohemian ~~$500,000~~Note. ~~which~~In ~~may~~late beJanuary ~~borrowed~~2015, ~~under~~ the ~~note,~~Bohemian ~~subject~~Note was amended to ~~Bohemian’s~~change ~~approval~~certain ofconversion ~~such~~provisions ~~borrowing~~and inextend its ~~sole~~maturity ~~discretion~~date to December 31, 2017 (see Note 6).

AsAt ~~additional~~the ~~consideration~~time ~~for~~ the Bohemian Note was issued in April 2014, as additional consideration we issued 3,000,000 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock to BOCO Investments LLC, (“BOCO”), an entity related to Bohemian, at an exercise price of $0.01 per share with an April 15, 2015 expiration date, and 1,000,000 warrants to Bohemian at an exercise price of $0.25 per share with an April 15, 2019 expiration date. We also extended the term of three existing warrant agreements with BOCO to December 31, 2019 and reset the exercise price on such warrants to $0.25 per share from prior exercise prices ofwhich ranged from $0.50 to $1.50. All new and revised warrants have anti-dilution provisions which would be triggered if the Company subdivides its outstanding common stock shares by recapitalization, reclassification or split-up, or if the Company declares a stock dividend or distributes common stock shares to its shareholders.

We concluded that the conversion feature of the Bohemian Note (the “Conversion Feature”) met the criteria of an embedded derivative and should be bifurcated from the underlying convertible note (host contract) and accounted for as a derivative liability and calculated at fair value. We estimated the fair value of the Conversion Feature on the date of issuance using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The difference between the value assigned to the convertible note and the estimated fair value of the Conversion Feature was assigned to the convertible note. The amount assigned to the Conversion Feature was recorded as a derivative liability with a corresponding debit to debt discount. This discount is amortized over the life of the convertible note. We also concluded that the attached two sets of warrants that were issued to BOCO and Bohemian were “detachable” from the convertible note. The warrant costs are to be included in debt discount and amortized over the life of the convertible note which is one year from the date of the first draw. The estimated fair value of the new warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model based on the following assumptions: closing stock price on the date of the first draw from the convertible note, exercise prices as stated above, expected term of the warrants is one to five years, volatility of ~~160~~161.0342% and a risk-free interest rate of 1.64%. The incremental fair value of the warrant modifications were all recorded as a debt discount. ~~The total amount recorded as a debt discount as a result of this transaction was $509,629 during the quarter ended September 30, 2014.~~

In 2012, Omni issued a total of $1,662,500 Units of debt to twelve investors (including Bohemian) in a private placement at a purchase price of $1.00 per Unit. Each Unit was comprised of a convertible promissory note secured by 0.09 shares of BioMimetix stock owned by the Company, with a principal amount of $1.00, convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.25 per share (the “2012 Notes”), and a warrant exercisable at $1.50 per share through October 31, 2017 (the “2012 Warrants”).

Future Debt Maturities

All of the 2012 Notes mature in 2015. In November 2013, a 2012 Note with a face value of $100,000 was converted into shares of the Company’s common stock, leaving $1,562,500 in 2012 Notes then outstanding. As of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, six of the ~~future~~eleven ~~maturities~~remaining holders of the 2012 Notes, with a combined face value of $212,500, converted their respective 2012 Notes, plus all accrued interest, into 1,089,242 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company accounted for these conversions as extinguishment of debt and ~~amounts~~recognized ~~owed~~a onloss of $134,259, equal to the ~~Bohemian~~difference ~~Note~~between the fair market value of the 1,089,242 shares at their respective date of conversion and ~~other~~the ~~convertible~~stated ~~note~~conversion ~~agreements~~price weper ~~consummated~~share inof ~~2012~~$0.25. Additionally, ~~(together~~the 2012 Warrants relating to the ~~“Convertible~~2012 Notes”) ~~over~~that were converted in December 2014 may now be exercised for 212,500 shares of the ~~succeeding~~Company’s ~~five~~common ~~years~~stock for a price of $0.25 per share, ~~including~~in ~~accrued~~lieu ~~interest~~of tothe ~~maturity~~original $1.50 per share. As a result of the re-pricing of these Warrants, ~~are~~the asCompany ~~follows:~~recorded an expense of approximately $13,000 in the quarter ending December 31, 2014.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2016		$	3,725,944

In January 2015, Omni and Bohemian entered into an agreement to amend the Bohemian Note extending its original maturity to December 31, 2017 (see Note 6). As a result of this agreement the Company has reclassified approximately $1.65 million in debt associated with the Bohemian Note from short-term liability to long-term liability in its December 31, 2014 balance sheet.

As of the date of this filing, the future maturities and face amounts owed on all remaining outstanding convertible notes (together, the “Convertible Notes”) over the succeeding five years are as follows:

In calendar year:
2015	$	1,300,000
2016	$	-
2017	$	2,000,000
2018	$	-
2019	$	-
	$	3,300,000

NOTE 3 – CONTRACTUAL COMMITMENTS

In April 2014, we announced the execution of a multi-phase contract manufacturing services agreement with Gallus ~~BioPharmceuticals~~BioPharmaceuticals, LLC, now Patheon, (“Services Agreement”) under which certain cell line optimization was performed and further process development work ~~are~~is contemplated for our AAT-Fc 2 molecule. The ultimate goal is to have Patheon manufacture material for use in preclinical toxicology studies and early trials in humans. ItThe isfirst ~~anticipated~~phase ~~that~~of these activities was performed and completed over a 9 month period ending January 2015. In December 2014, we executed the ~~first~~second phase of these activities which we expect will to be performed and completed over a 716-18 ~~to 8~~ month period at aan estimated cost of upapproximately to $~~700~~3.7 million. The Services Agreement may be terminated by either party with sixty days’ notice,~~000~~ and its timeline for work activity may be delayed or suspended by Omni upon request. As of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, we ~~have~~ recorded approximately $~~303~~410,~~444~~149 in total expenses associated with the ~~Patheon~~Services ~~contract manufacturing services agreement~~Agreement.

Effective April 1, 2014, the Company signed a consulting agreement with Dr. Charles Dinarello, our Chief Scientific Officer. The term of the ~~Consulting~~consulting ~~Agreement~~agreement is twelve months (12) or as long as a Statement of Work (“SOW”) is in effect and has not been completed, and may be terminated by either party upon 90 days’ written notice. In consideration for his services under the SOW, he will earn 25,000 warrants per month beginning April 1, 2014 for as long as the contract is in force. The warrants will be granted and issued in 150,000 increments on a semiannual basis starting October 1, 2014. The exercise price of the warrants will equal the fair market value of the Company’s closing stock price at the time of issue. The ~~Consulting~~consulting ~~Agreement~~agreement also contains customary confidentiality provisions. AsWe ofrecorded ~~September 30, 2014, we have accrued~~ $25,149 of share-based compensation expense for 150,000 warrants. ~~The~~granted ~~accrued~~and ~~share-based~~issued ~~compensation~~to ~~expense~~Dr. ~~recorded~~Dinarello ~~for these warrants is adjusted based~~ on ~~the~~October ~~fair~~1, ~~market~~2014 ~~value~~in ofaccordance ~~the~~with ~~Company’s~~this ~~common~~agreement, ~~stock~~and onhave ~~September~~accrued 30$22,581 ~~2014. The description~~ of ~~the~~share-based ~~consulting~~compensation ~~agreement~~expense ~~set~~for ~~forth~~an ~~above~~additional is75,000 ~~qualified~~warrants, inthe ~~its~~value ~~entirety by reference to a copy~~ of ~~such~~which ~~agreement~~were ~~filed~~based ason anthe ~~exhibit~~fair tomarket ~~this~~value of the Company’s ~~Form~~common ~~10-Q~~stock ~~for~~on ~~the~~December ~~quarter ended June 30~~31, 2014.

~~Effective~~On ~~September~~April 117, 2014, the Company ~~signed~~entered into a financial advisory and consulting agreement with ~~Dr.~~Dawson ~~Soohyun~~James ~~Kim~~Securities, Inc. ~~The~~(“Dawson”). ~~term~~Dawson ofwill ~~the~~provide ~~Consulting~~financial ~~Agreement~~advisory isservices ~~twelve months (12) or~~ as ~~long~~outlined asin athe ~~Statement~~agreement, ofwhich ~~Work (“SOW”)~~ is in effect ~~and~~until ~~has~~April ~~not been completed~~17, ~~and~~2015 ~~may~~unless ~~be terminated by either party upon 90 days’ written notice~~modified. InOn ~~consideration~~April ~~for~~17, ~~his services under the SOW~~2014, hewe ~~will~~issued ~~earn 15~~200,000 ~~warrants~~of ~~per month beginning September 1, 2014 for as long as~~ the ~~contract~~Company’s ~~is in force~~$0.001 ~~The~~par ~~warrants~~value ~~will~~common bestock ~~granted and issued~~ in ~~90,000~~payment ~~increments~~of on a ~~semiannual~~nonrefundable ~~basis starting March 1, 2015~~retainer. ~~The~~Based ~~exercise~~on ~~price of~~ the ~~warrants will equal the fair~~ market value of the Company’s ~~closing~~common stock ~~price~~on atApril ~~the~~17, ~~time~~2014 of ~~issue~~$0.265 ~~The~~per ~~Consulting~~share, ~~Agreement~~we ~~also~~recorded ~~contains~~a ~~customary~~shared-based ~~confidentiality~~compensation ~~provisions.~~expense As of ~~September 30~~$53,000. ~~2014,~~On weOctober ~~have~~17, ~~accrued $2~~2014,~~515~~ ofan ~~share-based~~additional ~~compensation expense for 15~~100,000 ~~warrants.~~shares ~~The~~of ~~accrued~~common ~~share-based~~stock ~~compensation~~were ~~expense~~issued ~~recorded~~to ~~for~~Dawson ~~these~~as ~~warrants~~final ispayment ~~adjusted~~under ~~based~~this onagreement, ~~the~~at ~~fair~~which ~~market~~time ~~value~~we ofrecorded ~~the~~a ~~Company’s~~share-based ~~common~~compensation ~~stock~~expense onof ~~September 30~~$19, ~~2014~~000.

On April 17, 2014, the Company entered into a financial advisory and consulting agreement with Dawson James Securities, Inc. (“Dawson”). Dawson will provide financial advisory services as outlined in the agreement. This agreement is in effect for twelve months unless modified. On April 17, 2014, we issued 200,000 shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock in payment of a nonrefundable retainer. Based on the market value of the Company’s common stock on April 17, 2014 of $0.265 per share, we recorded a shared-based compensation expense of $53,000. An additional 100,000 shares of common stock will be issued six months from the April 17, 2014 effective date. As of September 30, 2014, we recorded an accrual of $19,000 consulting expense associated with the 100,000 shares.

On August 1, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with Tiberend Strategic Advisors, Inc. (“Tiberend”). Tiberend will provide investor relations and corporate communication services as outlined in the agreement in exchange for a fee of $6,600 a month and warrants. This agreement is in effect for twelve months unless modified by both parties. The warrants will be earned at a rate of 25,000 a month and will be granted and issued in 150,000 increments on a semiannual basis starting February 1, 2015. The exercise price of the warrants will equal the fair market value of the Company’s closing stock price at the time of issue. The Consulting Agreement also contains customary confidentiality provisions. As of September 30, 2014, we have accrued $8,383 of share-based compensation expense for 50,000 warrants. The accrued share-based compensation expense recorded for these warrants will be adjusted based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the end of every fiscal quarter.

Effective August 1, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with Tiberend Strategic Advisors, Inc. (“Tiberend”). Tiberend will provide investor relations and corporate communication services as outlined in the agreement in exchange for a fee of $6,600 a month and warrants. This agreement is in effect for twelve months unless modified by both parties. The warrants will be earned at a rate of 25,000 a month and will be granted and issued in 150,000 increments on a semiannual basis starting February 1, 2015. The exercise price of the warrants will equal the fair market value of the Company’s closing stock price at the time of issue. The agreement also contains customary confidentiality provisions. As of December 31, 2014, we have accrued $45,223 of share-based compensation expense for 125,000 warrants. The accrued share-based compensation expense recorded for these warrants was adjusted based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2014.

Effective September 1, 2014, the Company signed a consulting agreement with Dr. Soohyun Kim. The term of the Consulting Agreement is twelve months (12) or as long as a Statement of Work (“SOW”) is in effect and has not been completed, and may be terminated by either party upon 90 days’ written notice. In consideration for his services under the SOW, he will earn 15,000 warrants per month beginning September 1, 2014 for as long as the contract is in force. The warrants will be granted and issued in 90,000 increments on a semiannual basis starting March 1, 2015. The exercise price of the warrants will equal the fair market value of the Company’s closing stock price at the time of issue. The Consulting Agreement also contains customary confidentiality provisions. As of December 31, 2014, we have accrued $18,065 of share-based compensation expense for 60,000 warrants. The accrued share-based compensation expense recorded for these warrants was adjusted based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2014.

On November 3, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with Destum Partners, Inc. (“Destum”), whereby Destum is to act as our consultant in an effort to identify strategic partners (“Strategic Partners”) with whom we may enter into a business arrangement(s) and from whom we may obtain additional, possibly non-dilutive, capital to advance the commercialization of our lead molecule, AAT-Fc2. Should we be successful in consummating such a transaction with one or more Strategic Partners, with Destum’s participation, we agreed to pay Destum a “success fee” of between 1% and 5% of aggregate consideration received over the ensuing five years, depending on the nature and size of the resulting transaction.

Effective December 1, 2014, the Company and the RUC entered into an agreement whereby Dr. Dinarello, through his affiliation with the University of Colorado, is to perform scientific research in connection with the preclinical development of AAT-Fc. In consideration for work to be performed, Omni agreed to pay the RUC $210,000 in quarterly payments over the term of the agreement. The term of the agreement is twelve months, but may be cancelled by either party upon thirty days’ notice. As of December 31, 2014, we have accrued $17,500 in Research and Development expense related to this agreement.

NOTE 4 – NET LOSS PER SHARE

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period presented. In addition to common shares outstanding, any shares issuable for little or no cash consideration are considered outstanding shares as of the beginning of a reporting period and are included in the calculation of the weighted-average number of common shares.

Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of common shares that would be issued assuming exercise or conversion of all outstanding potentially dilutive ~~common shares~~securities. Potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the calculation when their effect would be anti-dilutive. For all periods presented in the consolidated financial statements, all potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the diluted share calculations as they were anti-dilutive as a result of the net losses incurred for the respective periods. Accordingly, basic shares equal diluted shares for all periods presented.

As of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, potentially dilutive securities included approximately 2625.19 million common stock purchase warrants, and approximately 1517.43 million shares issuable from conversion of the Convertible Notes and all related accrued interest. As of ~~September~~December 3031, 2013, potentially dilutive securities included approximately 23.10 million common stock purchase warrants, and 76.03 million shares issuable from conversion of the then outstanding Convertible Notes, including accrued interest~~, issued in 2012~~.

NOTE 5 – SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

From inception, we have not had an employee stock option plan, but have issued stock purchase warrants on a discretionary basis to employees, directors and outside consultants. The fair value of each warrant award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Historically, the expected life of a warrant has been equal to its contractual term, as all of the warrants granted have underlying shares that are not registered and have additional trading restrictions. Further, for warrants granted to directors and officers, vested warrants are not forfeited in the circumstance of departure from the Company. Expected volatility is estimated based on a review of the Company’s historical stock price volatility. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield on the grant measurement date of a traded zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond, as reported by the U.S. Federal Reserve, with a term ~~equal~~approximating to the expected term of the respective warrant.

For a description of the following agreements with share-based compensation provisions, see “NOTE 3 – CONTRACTUAL COMMITMENTS” which descriptions are herein incorporated by reference: Dr. Charles Dinarello, Dr. Soohyun Kim, Dawson, and Tiberend.

OnThe ~~August~~weighted-average 5,grant ~~2014,~~date ~~the~~fair ~~Company~~value ~~entered~~of ~~into~~warrants anissued ~~executive~~as ~~search~~stock-based ~~agreement~~compensation ~~with~~during ~~Solomon~~the ~~Edwards,~~three ~~LLC~~months toended ~~conduct~~December ~~a personnel search for Omni’s then open Chief Financial Officer’s position~~31, ~~as outlined in the agreement. On September 8,~~ 2014, weand ~~issued~~2013 ~~150,000~~was ~~shares of the Company’s common stock as payment in full for all fees in connection with this agreement~~$0.21 ~~Based~~and ~~on the market value of the Company’s common stock on September 8, 2014 of~~ $0.~~25,~~0 weper ~~recorded a shared-based compensation expense of $37~~share,~~500~~ respectively.

OnShare-based ~~September~~compensation 1,related ~~2014, we granted~~ to ~~John~~warrants ~~Riccardi,~~and ~~our~~restricted ~~newly appointed Chief Financial Officer, a warrant to purchase 750,000 shares of our common~~ stock atunits anissued ~~exercise~~or ~~price~~accrued offor ~~$0.24 per share. The warrant has a seven year life and 250,000 of~~ the ~~shares~~three ~~underlying~~months ~~the warrant vested~~ and ~~became~~nine ~~exercisable~~months ~~immediately~~ended onDecember ~~September 1~~31, 2014. ~~The remaining shares underlying the warrant vest~~ and ~~become~~2013 ~~exercisable~~was ~~in two equal annual installments on September 1, 2015 and September 1, 2016, provided Mr. Riccardi remains in continuous service with Omni~~ as ~~of each vesting date. We valued this warrant using the Black Scholes pricing model based on the vesting schedule and the following assumptions~~follows: closing stock price on date of grant of $0.24, exercise price of $0.24, expected term of the warrant of seven years, volatility of 161.42%, and risk free interest of 0.11%. The estimated fair value ascribed to the vested shares underlying the warrant was $50,288, or $0.24 per share; the total fair value ascribed to the remaining unvested shares underlying the warrants, not recognized in this quarter, was $114,114, or $0.23 per share.

	For the three months				For the nine months
	ended December 31,				ended December 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Employee and directors	$	20,550	$	102,768	$	82,200	$	412,259
Outside consultants	$	86,334	$	-	$	220,519	$	61,814
	$	106,884	$	102,768	$	302,719	$	474,073

The weighted-average grant date fair value of warrants issued or accrued as stock-based compensation during the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $0.23 and $0.29 per share, respectively.

Share-based compensation related to warrants and restricted stock units issued or accrued for the three months and six months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was as follows:

	For the three months				For the six months
	ended September 30,				ended September 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Employees and directors	$	50,288	$	135,336	$	50,288	$	309,491
Outside consultants		71,179		32,628		145,547		61,814
	$	121,467	$	167,964	$	195,835	$	371,305

A summary of activity related to warrants issued to employees, directors and consultants under share-based compensation agreements for the six months ended September 30, 2014 is as follows:

						Weighted
						Average
				Weighted		Remaining
				Average		Contractual		Aggregate
				Exercise		Term (in		Intrinsic
	Shares			Price		years)		Value
Outstanding at March 31, 2014		9,529,678		$	0.89		4.2		-
Granted		750,000		$	0.24		6.9		-
Exercised		-		$	-		-		-
Forfeited/expired/cancelled		(48,000	)	$	1.25	n/a			-
Ouststanding at September 30, 2014		10,231,678		$	0.89		4.1		-
Vested and exercisable at September 30, 2014		9,731,678		$	0.84		4.1		-

A summary of activity related to warrants issued to ~~investors~~employees, directors and consultants under share-based compensation agreements for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 is as follows:

	Number of
						Weighted
	Investor
						Average
	Warrants
				Weighted		Remaining
Outstanding at March 31, 2014		13,143,458
				Average		Contractual		Aggregate
Granted		4,000,000
				Exercise		Term (in		Intrinsic
Exercised		-
	Shares			Price		years)		Value
Forfeited/expired/cancelled		(650,000	)
Outstanding at March 31, 2014		9,259,678		$	0.89		4.40		235,500
Ouststanding at September 30, 2014		16,493,458
Granted		900,000		$	0.24		6.27		203,568
Exercised		(10,000	)	$	0.21		4.25		1,600
Forfeited/expired/cancelled		(198,000	)	$	2.58		n/a		-
Outstanding at December 31, 2014		9,951,678		$	0.80		3.99		437,468
Vested and exercisable at December 31, 2014		9,451,678		$	0.85		3.95		372,468

A summary of activity related to warrants issued to investors for the nine months ended December 31, 2014 is as follows:

	Number of
	Investor
	Warrants
Outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2014		13,143,458
Granted		4,000,000
Exercised		-
Forfeited/expired/cancelled		(1,444,260	)
Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2014		15,699,198

NOTE 6 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

OnEffective ~~October~~January 161, ~~2014~~2015, Omni ~~received~~and ~~notice~~Bruce ~~from~~E. Schneider, Chief Executive Officer of the ~~United~~Company, ~~States~~entered ~~Patent~~into ~~and~~an ~~Trademark~~Amendment ~~Office~~to Employment Agreement (the “~~USPTO~~Amendment”), ~~that~~pursuant to which the ~~USPTO~~employment ~~has~~agreement ~~granted~~between athe ~~Request~~Company ~~for~~and ExDr. ~~Parte~~Schneider ~~Reexamination~~was amended to (i) extend the ~~“Request”)~~term of ~~our~~the ~~issued~~employment ~~composition~~agreement ofto ~~matter~~December ~~patent~~31, ~~that~~2015; ~~covers~~(ii) ~~various~~revise ~~recombinant~~the ~~AAT~~per ~~forms~~share ~~connected~~price ~~with~~under ~~the~~which ~~polypeptide~~Dr. ~~AAT-Fc~~Schneider ~~molecule.~~may ~~The~~exercise ~~Request~~his existing 1,500,000 ~~submitted~~performance byinvestment anwarrant ~~unidentified~~from ~~third~~$1.00 ~~party,~~to ~~contains~~the ~~various~~lower ~~prior~~of ~~art~~the ~~references~~closing ~~alleged~~market toprice ~~invalidate~~of ~~our~~the ~~patent.~~Company’s ~~The~~common ~~reexamination~~stock ~~process~~on ~~requires~~the date of the ~~USPTO~~respective tovesting ~~consider~~milestone or $0.20, contingent upon his continued employment with the ~~scope~~Company on each milestone date; and ~~validity~~(iii) ofto ~~the~~award ~~patent~~Dr. ~~based~~Schneider onan ~~what~~additional ittime ~~deems~~vesting warrant with a seven year term to bepurchase ~~substantial~~up ~~new~~to ~~questions~~1,500,000 shares of ~~patentability~~Omni ~~raised~~common bystock ~~the~~at ~~third~~a ~~party~~per share exercise price of $0.37, ~~All~~the ~~claims~~closing price of the ~~patent~~common stock on January 1, 2015. The warrant will ~~remain~~vest ~~valid~~in one-third increments on January 1, 2015, January 1, 2016 and inJanuary ~~force~~1, ~~during~~2017 with the ~~reexamination~~latter ~~proceedings~~two vestings contingent upon Dr. WeSchneider’s ~~plan~~continued toemployment ~~vigorously~~with ~~defend~~the ~~our~~Company ~~patent~~on ~~and~~each ~~believe~~milestone date. The warrant is subject to an anti-dilution feature that causes the ~~challenge~~issuance ~~presented~~of byadditional warrants to Dr. Schneider to compensate for the ~~Request~~dilution ~~will~~of ~~bolster~~the ~~our~~warrant ~~patent’s~~from ~~novelty~~the ~~and~~sale ~~non-obviousness,~~or ~~and~~issuance ~~ultimately~~of ~~render~~securities itin ~~stronger~~future equity or equity-based offerings.

~~Regardless~~In January 2015, Omni and Bohemian amended the Bohemian Note as follows: (i) the maturity date of April 25, 2015 was extended to December 31, 2017 (the ~~ultimate~~“Revised ~~outcome~~Maturity Date”), (ii) Bohemian will have the option, but not the obligation, to convert the full amount of the ~~reexamination~~Bohemian Note amount into shares of Omni’s common stock at the fixed conversion price of $0.20 per share (replacing its existing option to convert into lesser of $0.20 or, ifin ~~our~~the ~~AAT~~event of a follow-Fcon 2public ~~lead~~offering ~~molecule~~of isthe ~~successful~~company’s Omni’s common stock effected in ~~being~~conjunction ~~brought~~with the “up-listing” of the company’s Omni stock to ~~market,~~the itNASDAQ isCapital ~~expected~~Market ~~that~~or wethe ~~would~~NYSE ~~have~~MKT ~~market~~exchange, ~~exclusivity~~on ~~for~~lender-approved aterms, ~~minimum~~sixty-five percent (65%) of ~~twelve~~the ~~years~~price ~~from~~per share of common stock offered to the ~~time~~public); ofand ~~introduction~~(iii) in the ~~U.S.~~event that Omni issues securities and ~~ten~~raises ~~years~~capital in ~~Europe.~~excess ~~These~~of ~~periods~~$6 ofmillion ~~market~~prior ~~exclusivity~~to ~~would~~the ~~extend~~Revised ~~beyond~~Maturity Date (“New Securities”), the ~~life~~total amount will automatically convert into, at Bohemian’s selection, either (a) shares of ~~any~~Omni’s ~~AAT-Fc~~common ~~patent~~stock ~~currently~~at ~~issued~~a ~~and~~conversion ~~under~~price ~~review~~of $0.20 ~~Nonetheless~~per share, aor ~~narrowing~~(b) orthe ~~elimination~~New ofSecurities at the ~~patent~~lowest ~~claims~~price inpaid ~~our~~for ~~AAT~~the New Securities. In exchange for these modifications, Omni has agreed to the following additional debt covenants: (i) the Company is to timely file with the Securities and Exchange Commission all annual and quarterly reports on Form 10-FcK ~~patent~~and Form 10-Q as may ~~have~~be arequired ~~negative~~under ~~impact~~the onSecurities ~~future~~Exchange ~~business~~Act of 1934, as amended; (ii) Omni is to complete its annual audit for the preceding fiscal year no later than ninety days after the end of such fiscal year; and ~~operating~~(iii) ~~results~~Omni is to ensure that the Company’s accounts payable do not exceed its cash position and provide monthly verification to Bohemian regarding the same.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements regarding us, our patent position, business prospects, strategies, results of operations and cash flows that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties posed by many factors and events that could cause our actual patent position, business prospects, strategies, results of operations and cash flows to differ materially from those that may be anticipated by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, without limitation, our ability to successfully defend the Request; our ability to raise funds for our operations and to retire all maturing debt not converted; our ability to successfully develop products and services that are commercially successful; our ability to successfully develop new products and services for new markets; the impact of competition on our business, changes in law or regulatory requirements that adversely affect our ability to market our products; the cost and success of our research and development efforts; delays in the introduction of our products or services into the market; our ability to maintain our patents and to protect the intellectual property we license; and our failure to keep pace with our competitors. We undertake no obligation to revise any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may subsequently arise. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business. For additional factors that may affect the validity of our forward-looking statements, see the risk factors set forth in Part I. Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of our 2014 Form 10-K.

~~When~~In ~~used~~January in2015, ~~this~~the ~~report~~Company engaged Spencer Edwards, ~~words~~Inc. ~~such~~to asoffer ~~“believes,”~~and ~~“anticipates,”~~sell ~~“expects~~to qualified,” accredited investors up to $1 million of Units consisting of 12% Secured Convertible Promissory Notes (“~~intends~~2015 Notes”) and ~~similar~~warrants ~~expressions~~to ~~are~~purchase ~~intended~~shares toof ~~identify~~Omni’s ~~forward-looking~~common ~~statements,~~stock ~~but~~equal ~~are~~to ~~not~~10% of the ~~exclusive~~face ~~means~~value of ~~identifying~~2015 ~~forward-looking~~Notes ~~statements.~~sold ~~Readers~~(“2015 ~~are~~Warrants”). ~~cautioned~~The ~~not~~offering is to ~~place~~be ~~undue~~conducted ~~reliance~~ on ~~these~~a ~~forward~~“best-~~looking~~efforts” ~~statements~~basis. In consideration for its services, ~~which~~Spencer ~~speak~~Edwards ~~only~~will asreceive a sales commission of 10% of the ~~date~~gross proceeds of ~~this~~the ~~report~~total face value of 2015 Notes sold by it or its selected brokers. WeAs ~~undertake~~additional noconsideration, ~~obligation~~Spencer Edwards will also receive warrants to ~~revise~~purchase ~~any~~common ~~forward-looking~~shares ~~statements~~equal in ~~order~~number to ~~reflect~~10% ~~events~~of orthe ~~circumstances~~total ~~that~~number ~~may~~of ~~subsequently~~common ~~arise~~shares to be issued upon conversion of the 2015 Notes and 2015 Warrants. Spencer Edwards’ warrants will contain a “cashless” provision, piggy-back registration rights, and customary anti-dilution provisions (for splits and dividends).

As of December 31, 2014, six of the eleven remaining holders of 2012 Note Holders, with a combined face value of $212,500, converted their respective 2012 Notes, plus all accrued interest, into 1,089,242 shares of the Company’s common stock. In January 2015, one of the remaining five 2012 Note Holders, owning a note with a face value of $50,000, converted his note, plus all accrued interest, into 256,722 shares of the Company’s common stock.

On February 6, 2015 we were informed that the USPTO had reviewed the third party request for reexamination of our issued composition of matter patent covering AAT-FC 2 and issued a non-final office action. Within this office action, the USPTO has upheld the validity of the patent’s claims for our specific recombinant alpha-1 antitrypsin constructs now in development (including AAT-Fc 2) and several alternative AAT constructs. Although the Office Action has rejected some of the broader more generic patented claims, we will now have the opportunity to argue around these rejections in the coming months.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements regarding us, our business, prospects, strategies, results of operations and cash flows that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties posed by many factors and events that could cause our actual business, prospects and results of operations to differ materially from those that may be anticipated by such forward-looking statements. Factors that may affect such forward-looking statements include, without limitation: our ability to raise funds for our operations and to retire all maturing debt not converted; our ability to successfully develop products and services that are commercially successful; our ability to successfully develop new products and services for new markets; the impact of competition on our business, changes in law or regulatory requirements that adversely affect our ability to market our products; the cost and success of our research and development efforts; delays in the introduction of our products or services into the market; our ability to maintain our patents and to protect the intellectual property we license; and our failure to keep pace with our competitors. For additional factors that may affect the validity of our forward-looking statements, see the risk factors set forth in Part I. Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of our 2014 Form 10-K.

When used in this report, words such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to revise any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may subsequently arise. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business.

Overview

We are a biopharmaceutical company that was formed to explore new methods of use of alpha-1 antitrypsin (“AAT”). AAT is a naturally occurring protein that is essential for normal liver and lung function and has historically been purified from human blood (“p-AAT”) to treat patients suffering from emphysema due to AAT-deficiency. Marketed forms of p-AAT have demonstrated an excellent safety record in over 25 years of use. Recent research has shown that AAT has profound anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and tissue protective effects in various animal models suggestive of use in the treatment of a variety of important medical conditions.

We hold licenses for method of use issued patent claims for the use of p-AAT in the treatment of diabetes, certain bacterial and viral diseases, and cellular transplantation and graft rejection, which include reducing the risk of a non-organ transplant rejection, reducing the risk of developing graft versus host disease (“GvHD”) and for treating GvHD in patients who have received a cornea, bone marrow, stem cell or pancreatic islet cell transplant. In addition, we hold licenses for method of use patent application claims for the use of p-AAT in the treatment of myocardial remodeling. Our goal is to sublicense these patents and patent applications to various p-AAT manufacturers, of which there are four. The timing of such sublicensing is likely to be dependent upon the generation of robust clinical data sufficient to warrant label claims to the existing package inserts for the currently marketed p-AAT products.

In 2011, we began funding research and development of a synthetic form of AAT (“AAT-Fc”). We believe the successful characterization and development of a recombinant AAT-Fc fusion molecule would afford us with a patentable composition of matter that could be introduced into the current p-AAT market as well as for a wide variety of clinical indications, including but not limited to, Type 1 diabetes, graft vs host disease following bone marrow transplantation and chronic gout. The currently manufactured versions of p-AAT require weekly IV dosing in a doctor’s office or infusion clinic and cost in excess of $100,000 per year. We believe our recombinant form of AAT will provide significant advantages over p-AAT in terms of duration of action, cost to manufacture, purity and selling price. Most importantly, our recombinant form of AAT has been shown to be 40-50x more potent than p-AAT in animal models of gout, inflammatory bowel disease and myocardial infarction, suggesting the potential for simple subcutaneous dosing.

We are considering several options for the initial clinical trials of AAT-Fc 2, with Type 1 diabetes and GvHD currently being among the most likely. To facilitate this effort, in April 2014 we announced the execution of a multi-phase contract manufacturing services agreement with Patheon under which certain cell line optimization and process development work ~~are~~have ~~contemplated~~been, or will be performed for our AAT-Fc 2 molecule. The ultimate goal is to have Patheon manufacture material for use in preclinical toxicology studies and early trials in humans.

In November 2013, we received a Notice of Allowance from the USPTO for a patent for the composition of matter of AAT-Fc 2; the patent was issued in January 2014. The claims contained in the issued patent cover full-length AAT nucleic acid constructs that encode polypeptide components of the AAT-Fc 2 molecule as well as other AAT fusion polypeptides. Similar patent applications covering AAT-Fc 2 remain under review in Europe and Canada. Patent applications for a series of follow-on AAT-Fc constructs are also pending on a worldwide basis. We believe we are the only company with a fusion protein construct of the p-AAT molecule in active development. Earlier attempts by others to make stand-alone recombinant versions of the molecule have not been successful. While we believe our fusion protein approach is viable, there is no assurance that we will be successful or be able to obtain the funding needed to develop such a molecule.

On October 16, 2014, Omni received notice from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) that the USPTO has granted a Request for Ex Parte Reexamination (the “Request”) of composition of matter patent issued in January 2014 that covers various recombinant AAT forms connected with the polypeptide AAT-Fc molecule. The Request, submitted by an unidentified third party, contains various prior art references alleged to invalidate our patent. The reexamination process requires the USPTO to consider the scope and validity of the patent based on what it deems to be substantial new questions of patentability raised by the third party. All claims of the patent will remain valid and in force during the reexamination proceedings. We plan to vigorously defend our patent and believe that the challenge presented by the Request will bolster our patent’s novelty and non-obviousness, and ultimately render it stronger. 13

12On October 16, 2014, Omni received notice from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) that the USPTO has granted a Request for Ex Parte Reexamination (the “Request”) of composition of matter patent issued in January 2014 that covers various recombinant AAT forms connected with the polypeptide AAT-Fc molecule. The Request, submitted by an unidentified third party, contains various prior art references alleged to invalidate our patent. The reexamination process requires the USPTO to consider the scope and validity of the patent based on what it deems to be substantial new questions of patentability raised by the third party. All claims of the patent will remain valid and in force during the reexamination proceedings. On February 6, 2015 we were informed that the USPTO had reviewed the third party submission and issued a non-final office action. Within this office action, the USPTO has upheld the validity of the patent’s claims for our specific recombinant alpha-1 antitrypsin constructs now in development (including AAT-Fc 2) and several alternative AAT constructs. Although the Office Action has rejected some of the broader more generic patented claims, we will now have the opportunity to argue around these rejections in the coming months. Regardless of the ultimate outcome of the reexamination, if our AAT-Fc 2 lead molecule is successful in being brought to market, it is expected that we would have market exclusivity under applicable intellectual property laws for a minimum of twelve years from the time of introduction in the U.S. and ten years in Europe. These periods of market exclusivity would extend beyond the life of any AAT-Fc patent currently issued and under review. Nonetheless, a narrowing or elimination of the patent claims in our AAT-Fc patent may have a negative impact on future business and operating results.

~~Potential~~In ~~indications~~November ~~for~~2014, we announced that with our manufacturing partners, Patheon and Sigma-Aldrich Fine Chemicals (SAFC), we successfully identified several high-expression cell lines able to produce Omni Bio’s novel recombinant alpha-1 antitrypsin molecule (AAT-Fc) 2in ~~molecule~~large ~~and~~enough quantities to be considered commercially viable. This is a significant milestone on our ~~estimates~~path oftoward ~~peak~~IND-enabling ~~annual~~toxicology ~~sales~~studies ~~volumes~~with inwhat ~~the~~we ~~combined~~believe ~~U.S.~~to be the first and ~~European~~only ~~markets~~pharmaceutically ~~are:~~feasible recombinant AAT candidate in 2015.

In December 2014, we entered into the second phase of the work plan with Patheon that covers final clone selection, process, purification and formulation development, and ultimately the manufacture of material appropriate for use in animal toxicology and early human testing. The work entailed in this plan was begun in January 2015 and is estimated to take up to 18 months and $3.7 million to complete. Due to the Company’s limited cash position, in early February 2015 we reached an agreement with Patheon to temporarily suspend our work plan until such time as the Company can raise sufficient funds to confidently continue the effort without interruption. We have incurred a total of $320,000 in billable expenses related to second phase work performed to the time of suspension and intend to make this payment to Patheon in late February.

Potential therapeutic indications for our AAT-Fc 2 molecule and our estimates of the molecule’s potential peak annual sales in the combined U.S. and European markets are:

●

Type 1 diabetes (early onset) – $1 billion+

●

Complications due to bone marrow transplantation (GvHD) - $500 million+

●

Gout (treatment refractory) - $1 billion+

These revenues could be realized by Omni if it were solely responsible for commercialization and marketing AAT-Fc; alternatively, Omni could potentially receive a portion of such revenues in the form of royalties if AAT-Fc was commercialized and brought to market by a third party. Other significant therapeutic markets could include rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (“COPD”) and cardiac remodeling.

Significant Trends, Uncertainties and Challenges

We believe that the significant trends, uncertainties and challenges that directly or indirectly affect our financial performance and results of operations include, but are not limited to:

● Our ability to raise sufficient capital ~~in a timely manner~~ to fund our operations, future research and development of AAT-Fc 2, and ~~the~~repay ~~retirement~~our ~~of maturing~~ Convertible Notes, ~~not~~over ~~converted~~the next one to two quarters;

●

The continued expected growth in the biopharmaceutical sector;

●

Our ability to obtain and protect patents covered under our license agreements;

● Our ability to file and receive additional patent applications for new AAT-Fc compounds that we may discover ~~and to successfully defend the Request~~;

● Our ability to file for an Investigational New Drug (IND) application for AAT Fc 2 with the FDA;

● Our ability to devote our resources to therapies that are the most likely to result in commercialization; and

● Our ability to shepherd potential therapies through the FDA approval process~~; and~~.

●Results ~~Our~~of ~~ability~~Operations to– ~~compete~~For ~~against~~the ~~companies~~Three inMonths ~~our~~Ended ~~industry~~December ~~with~~31, ~~greater~~2014 ~~resources.~~Compared to the Three Months Ended December 31, 2013

~~Results~~The offollowing ~~Operations~~discussion –relates ~~For~~to our operations for the ~~Three~~three ~~Months~~months ~~Ended~~ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 ~~Compared~~(the “December 2014 quarter”) as compared to the ~~Three~~three ~~Months~~months ~~Ended~~ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2013 (the “December 2013 quarter”).

The following discussion relates to our operations for the three months ended September 30, 2014 (the “September 2014 quarter”) as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013 (the “September 2013 quarter”).

General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses for the September 2014 quarter were $475,069, which included $121,467 of share-based compensation, as compared to $539,582 for the September 2013 quarter, which included $167,964 of share-based compensation. As we have disclosed in prior filings, management views the exclusion of share-based compensation from general and administrative expense as an important non-GAAP measure. As a development stage company, we believe that excluding the impact of share-based compensation better reflects the recurring economic characteristics of our business to shareholders and potential investors. Accordingly, excluding share-based compensation, general and administrative expenses for the September 2014 quarter were $353,602 as compared to $371,618 for the September 2013 quarter, a decrease of $18,016, or approximately 5%. This decrease was primarily due to lower expenses in the September 2014 quarter in certain expense categories, most notably scientific and regulatory consulting fees of $23,346 and officer salaries and related taxes of $23,825. These lower expenses were partially offset by higher royalty payments of $25,000.

Research and development expenses – Research and development expenses for the September 2014 quarter were $138,444 as compared to $98,750 for the September 2013 quarter. This increase of $39,694 was primarily due to the execution of a multi-phase contract manufacturing services agreement in April 2014 with Gallus BioPharmaceuticals, LLC, now Patheon, under which certain cell line optimization and process development work are contemplated for our AAT-Fc 2 molecule.

Non-operating income (expenses) – Net non-operating expenses for the September 2014 quarter were $376,138 as compared to $1,645 for the September 2013 quarter, an increase of $374,493, related to amortization of debt discounts and debt issuance costs, interest expense and the net changes in the estimated fair values of derivative liabilities associated with the Convertible Notes.

Results of Operations – For the Six Months Ended September 30, 2014 Compared to the Six Months Ended September 30, 2013

The following discussion relates to our operations for the six months ended September 30, 2014 (the “September 2014 six months”) as compared to the six months ended September 30, 2013 (the “September 2013 six months”).

General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses for the September 2014 six months were $788,053, which included $195,835 of share-based compensation, as compared to $1,042,770 for the September 2013 six months, which included $371,305 of share-based compensation. As we have disclosed in prior filings, management views the exclusion of share-based compensation from general and administrative expense as an important non-GAAP measure. As a development stage company, we believe that excluding the impact of share-based compensation better reflects the recurring economic characteristics of our business to shareholders and potential investors. Accordingly, excluding share-based compensation, general and administrative expenses for the September 2014 six months were $592,218 as compared to $671,465 for the September 2013 six months, a decrease of $79,247, or approximately 12%. This change was primarily due to decreases in officer salaries and related taxes of $57,555, Chief Science Officer consulting of $60,000, and regulatory consulting of $15,000. These decreases were partially offset by higher expenses for the period in certain expense categories, such as accounting and audit of $18,349, and legal expenses of $17,436.

Research and development expenses – Research and development expenses for the September 2014 six months were $358,782 as compared to $126,588 for the September 2013 six months. This increase of $232,194 was primarily due to the execution in April, 2014 of a multi-phase contract manufacturing services agreement with Patheon under which certain cell line optimization and process development work are contemplated for our AAT-Fc 2 molecule.

Non-operating income (expenses) – Net non-operating expenses for the September 2014 six months were $676,516 as compared to $151,673 for the September 2013 six months, an increase of $524,843, related to amortization of debt discounts and debt issuance costs, interest expense and the net changes in the estimated fair values of derivative liabilities associated with the Convertible Notes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

~~Failure~~General ofand ~~the~~administrative ~~holders~~expenses to- ~~convert~~General ~~substantially~~and ~~all~~administrative ofexpenses for the ~~Convertible~~December ~~Notes~~2014 ~~prior~~quarter towere ~~maturity~~$410,258, ~~beginning~~which ~~April~~included ~~2015~~$106,884 orof ~~our~~share-based ~~inability~~compensation, as compared to ~~raise~~$410,248 ~~sufficient~~for ~~capital~~the toDecember ~~retire~~2013 ~~these~~quarter, ~~notes~~which ~~would~~included ~~likely~~$102,768 ~~result~~of share-based compensation. As we have disclosed in ~~our~~prior ~~defaulting~~filings, onmanagement ~~substantially~~views ~~all~~the exclusion of ~~these~~share-based ~~secured~~compensation ~~obligations~~from general and administrative expense as an important non-GAAP measure. As ofa ~~September~~development ~~30,~~stage ~~2014~~company, we ~~had~~believe athat ~~deficit~~excluding ~~accumulated~~the ~~from~~impact ~~inception~~of share-based compensation better reflects the recurring economic characteristics of ~~$48.4~~our ~~million,~~business ~~which~~to ~~included~~shareholders ~~total~~and ~~non~~potential investors. Accordingly, excluding share-~~cash~~based ~~charges~~compensation, ~~from~~general ~~inception~~and ofadministrative ~~approximately~~expenses ~~$36.9~~for ~~million.~~the ~~These~~December ~~conditions~~2014 ~~raise~~quarter ~~substantial~~were ~~doubt~~$303,374 as compared to ~~our~~$ ~~ability~~$307,481 tofor ~~continue~~the asDecember a2013 ~~going~~quarter, ~~concern.~~a ~~These~~decrease ~~unaudited~~of ~~consolidated~~$4,107, ~~financial~~or ~~statements~~approximately do1.3%. ~~not~~This ~~include~~decrease ~~any~~was ~~adjustments~~primarily ~~relating~~due to lower expenses in the ~~recoverability~~December ~~and~~2014 ~~classification~~quarter ofmost ~~recorded~~notably ~~asset~~in ~~amounts,~~royalty orexpenses ~~amounts~~which were lower by approximately $40,000 and ~~classification~~accounting offees ~~liabilities~~which ~~that~~were ~~might~~lower beby ~~different~~approximately ~~should~~$22,500. weDecreases bein ~~unable~~these expenditures, however, were partially offset by period to ~~continue~~period ashigher ainvestor ~~going~~relations ~~concern~~expense of approximately $50,300, and higher business insurance premiums of $4,337.

Research and development expenses – Research and development expenses for the December 2014 quarter were $111,906 as compared to $36,250 for the December 2013 quarter. The increase of $75,656 was primarily due to the execution in April 2014 of a multi-phase contract manufacturing services agreement with Patheon, under which certain cell line work was performed for our AAT-Fc 2 molecule.

Non-operating income (expenses) – Net non-operating expenses for the December 2014 quarter were $876,837 as compared to $308,899 for the December 2013 quarter, an increase of $567,938 that was associated with the 2012 Notes and the Bohemian Note issued in 2014. The total increase in expenses was related to the amortization of debt discounts and debt issuance costs, interest expense, the net changes from period to period in the estimated fair values of embedded derivative liabilities, and loss on the extinguishment of debt realized upon conversion of certain 2012 Notes.

Results of Operations – For the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2013

The following discussion relates to our operations for the nine months ended December 31, 2014 (the “December 2014 nine months”) as compared to the nine months ended December 31, 2013 (the “December 2013 nine months”).

General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses for the December 2014 nine months were $ 1,198,311 which included $302,719 of share-based compensation, as compared to $1,453,018 for the December 2013 nine months, which included $474,073 of share-based compensation. As we have disclosed in prior filings, management views the exclusion of share-based compensation from general and administrative expense as an important non-GAAP measure. As a development stage company, we believe that excluding the impact of share-based compensation better reflects the recurring economic characteristics of our business to shareholders and potential investors. Accordingly, excluding share-based compensation, general and administrative expenses for the December 2014 nine months were $895,592 as compared to $978,945 for the December 2013 nine months, a decrease of $83,353 or approximately 8.5%. This change was primarily due to decreases in officer salaries and related taxes of approximately $58,700, and consulting fees of approximately $77,900. Decreases in these expenditures were partially offset by higher period to period expenses of $39,300 related to investor relations activities, and $13,300 related to higher business insurance premiums paid.

Research and development expenses – Research and development expenses for the December 2014 nine months were $470,687 as compared to $162,838 for the December 2013 nine months. This increase of $307,849 was primarily due to the execution in April 2014 of a multi-phase contract manufacturing services agreement with Patheon under which certain cell line work was performed for our AAT-Fc 2 molecule.

Non-operating income (expenses) – Net non-operating expenses for the December 2014 nine months were $1,553,353 as compared to $460,572 for the December 2013 nine months, an increase of $1,092,781 that was associated with the 2012 Notes and the Bohemian Note issued in April 2014. The total increase in expenses was related to amortization of debt discounts and debt issuance costs, interest expense, the net changes in the estimated fair values of embedded derivative liabilities, and loss on the extinguishment of debt realized upon conversion of certain 2012 Notes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with US GAAP, which contemplate our continuation as a going concern, whereby the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities are in the ordinary course of business. However, the report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our consolidated financial statements, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2014, contains an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. The “going concern” qualification resulted from, among other things, our development-stage status, no revenue recognized since inception, our net losses since inception and the outstanding and currently anticipated contractual commitments for research and development efforts. As of December 31, 2014, our focus continues to be on raising capital to fund current operations and research and development efforts on AAT-Fc through to submission of our IND to the FDA. There is no assurance that we will be able to raise additional or sufficient capital to meet these purposes. Additionally, the Company continues to be focused on realizing the conversion of all of our Convertible Notes which mature in 2015, but there is no assurance that we will be successful. Failure to convert all of the Convertible Notes or to raise sufficient additional capital to retire these notes would likely result in our defaulting on these secured obligations. As of December 31, 2014, we had a deficit accumulated from inception of approximately $49.8 million, which included total non-cash charges from inception of approximately $37.8 million, and we had a working capital deficit of $680,714. These conditions raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. These unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be different should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Prior Financings

We continue to amortize prior debt discounts and interest related to ~~the~~prior ~~Convertible Notes~~financings. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, we recorded non -cash transactions ~~associated~~related ~~with~~to the amortization of debt discounts and debt issuance costs of $~~181~~937,~~543~~105, ~~and~~of which $~~358~~744,~~282~~802 ofwas associated with related party debt ~~discounts~~. In addition, for this period we recorded total accrued interest of ~~$22~~208,~~795~~955 ~~and~~of which $97174,~~890~~108 ~~for~~was ~~unrelated~~associated ~~parties~~with ~~and~~ related ~~parties,~~party ~~respectively~~debt.

Prior Placement Agreement with Bohemian Investments, LLC

As of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, we have borrowed $12,~~500~~000,000 from Bohemian under the Bohemian Note and have recorded $4291,~~739~~231 of accrued related party interest associated with ~~that~~this borrowing. In addition, we have ~~recorded~~amortized ~~non cash transactions~~ related toparty ~~the~~debt ~~amortization~~discounts ofassociated ~~debt~~with ~~discounts~~this ~~for~~borrowing ~~related~~in ~~parties~~the amount of $~~577~~291,~~629~~531. ~~The~~Company ~~remaining~~expects ~~funds~~to ~~borrowed~~use tofunds ~~date~~remaining ~~will~~from bethis ~~used~~borrowing to pay ~~the~~our ~~Company’s~~ monthly administrative expenses and fund ongoing research and development efforts, most notably those associated with the Patheon manufacturing and services agreement. ToAs ~~date~~of December 31, 2014, we have no commitments for additional financing ~~beyond that provided by the Bohemian Note~~.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all liquid investments purchased within 90 days of their original maturity to be cash equivalents. Our cash and cash equivalents at ~~September~~December 3031, 2014 and March 31, ~~2104~~2014 were $~~709~~852,~~915~~372 and $271,427, respectively.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

For the ~~six~~nine months ending ~~September 30~~December, 2014, total net cash used in operating activities was $1,~~061~~421,~~512~~155, of which $~~358~~470,~~782~~678 in cash payments were made for Research and Development, and ~~approximately~~ $~~592~~950,~~218~~477 were ~~for~~used ~~general~~to ~~and~~fund ~~administrative~~operating ~~cash~~ expenses, ~~including~~which included $~~202~~229,~~615~~550 for royalty and patent related expenses, $~~107~~186,~~784~~470 for payroll and related expenses, $56109,~~424~~625 for ~~accounting~~various ~~and~~consulting ~~auditing~~ services, $87,370 related to public investor relations, and another $7557,~~589~~424 infor ~~various~~accounting ~~consulting~~ and ~~investor~~auditing ~~relations~~related ~~fees~~services. Other uses of cash for this period included anthe ~~increase~~payment ~~in prepaid expenses~~ of $78124,~~800,~~389 ~~primarily~~representing ~~related~~annual topremiums ~~the payment of the full premium~~ on the Company’s director and officer liability insurance and the Company liability and umbrella policies.

For the six months ending September 30, 2013, net cash used in operating activities was $924,423, of which $126,588 in cash payments were for Research and Development expenses, and approximately $671,465 were for general and administrative cash expenses, including $170,665 for royalty and patent related expenses, $165,479 for payroll and related expenses, and another $120,000 related to various consulting and advisory fees. Other uses of cash included an increase in prepaid expenses of $64,782, primarily related to the payment of the full premium on the Company’s director and officer liability insurance policy in June 2013, and a reduction in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $64,823 as a result of paying off certain past due obligations in the September 30, 2013 period. 16

For the nine months ending December 2013, total net cash used in operating activities was $1,219,573, of which $162,838 in cash payments was used to fund Research and Development activities and $1,056,735 was used to fund operating expenditures. Cash operating expenditures for this period included $236,496 for royalty and patent expenses, $245,175 for payroll and related expenses, $187,500 for consulting and advisory services, $111,127 for annual premium on the Company’s director and officer liability insurance policy, and $61,600 for accounting and auditing fees.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

For the ~~six~~nine months ending ~~September~~December ~~30,~~ 2014, we had net cash provided by financing activities of $12,~~500~~002,~~000~~100. This was related primarily to the Bohemian Note described above. ~~As of the quarter ended September 30, 2014, we have remaining $500,000 to draw on the Bohemian Note (subject to approval by Bohemian in its sole discretion) and have a cash balance of $709,915.~~ For the ~~six~~nine months ending ~~September~~December ~~30,~~ 2013, we generated $1,361,398 of cash from the sale of common stock through a private placement ~~of common stock completed on May 31~~, ~~2013. This amount was~~ net of offering costs of approximately $179,000.

Current Cash Commitments

WeIn ~~expect~~April ~~that our cash on hand~~2014, ~~in addition to the funds~~ we ~~expect~~announced ~~to draw on~~ the ~~Bohemian~~execution ~~Note, will allow us to fund our operations and limited research and development initiatives into the beginning~~ of ~~the~~a ~~fourth~~multi-phase ~~quarter~~contract ofmanufacturing ~~the~~services ~~fiscal~~agreement ~~year~~with ~~ending~~Gallus ~~March 31~~BioPharmaceuticals, ~~2015~~LLC, ~~based~~now onPatheon ~~current~~(“Services ~~operating~~Agreement”) ~~levels~~under ~~and~~which ~~currently~~certain ~~budgeted~~cell ~~research~~line ~~and~~optimization ~~development projects. However, we will need additional capital to continue operations~~ and ~~the~~process ~~full preclinical~~ development ~~and~~work ~~early~~are ~~clinical~~contemplated ~~development~~for of our AAT-Fc ~~program~~2 molecule. ~~Funding~~The ofultimate ~~the~~goal ~~AAT-Fc program~~ is ~~anticipated~~ to ~~require~~have ~~additional~~Patheon ~~capital~~manufacture inmaterial ~~the~~for ~~range~~use ofin ~~$15~~preclinical ~~million~~toxicology ~~through~~studies ~~phase~~and 1early trials ~~currently targeted to take place~~ in ~~2016~~humans. ~~Additional~~The ~~capital~~first phase of ~~approximately~~these ~~$3.7~~activities ~~million~~was isperformed ~~also~~and ~~required~~completed toover ~~retire~~an ~~the~~8 ~~secured~~month ~~Convertible~~period ~~Notes~~ending asJanuary ~~they~~2015. ~~mature~~In inDecember ~~2015~~2014, ifwe ~~not~~executed ~~already~~the ~~then~~second ~~converted.~~phase ~~There~~of isthese noactivities ~~assurance~~which ~~that~~ we expect will to be ~~successful~~performed inand ~~raising~~completed ~~this~~over ~~level~~a of16-18 ~~additional~~month ~~capital~~period onat ~~acceptable~~an ~~terms~~estimated orcost atof ~~all~~approximately $3.7 ~~Failure~~million. Due to ~~obtain~~the ~~additional~~Company’s ~~capital~~limited ~~would~~cash ~~have~~position, ain ~~material~~early ~~adverse~~February ~~impact~~2015 onwe ~~our~~reached ~~ability~~an toagreement ~~continue~~with ~~our~~Patheon ~~research~~to ~~and~~temporarily ~~development~~suspend ~~efforts and fund~~ our ~~operating~~work ~~expenses~~plan ~~beyond~~until ~~March~~such ~~31,~~time ~~2015,~~as ~~and~~the ~~such~~Company ~~failure~~can ~~would~~raise ~~likely~~sufficient ~~cause~~funds us to ~~cease~~confidently ~~operations and not~~ continue asthe aeffort ~~going~~without ~~concern~~interruption. ~~Additionally,~~We ~~failure~~have ofincurred ~~the~~a ~~holders~~total ~~to convert substantially all~~ of ~~the~~$320,000 ~~Convertible~~in ~~Notes~~billable orexpenses ~~for~~related us to ~~raise~~second ~~sufficient~~phase ~~capital~~work toperformed ~~retire~~up ~~substantially~~to ~~all of~~ the ~~Convertible~~time ~~Notes~~of assuspension ~~they~~and ~~mature~~intend into ~~2015~~make ~~would~~this ~~have~~payment ~~a material adverse impact on our ability~~ to ~~continue~~Patheon asin alate ~~going~~February ~~concern~~2015.

WeEffective ~~intend~~December to1, ~~approach~~2014, ~~other~~the ~~pharmaceutical~~Company orand ~~life~~the ~~science~~RUC ~~companies~~entered ~~for~~into ~~funding~~an aagreement ~~portion~~whereby ofDr. ~~our~~Dinarello, ~~AAT-Fc~~through ~~program,~~his ~~and~~affiliation ~~potentially~~with ~~funding~~the ~~initial~~University ~~human~~of ~~studies~~Colorado, ifis weto ~~are~~perform ~~successful~~scientific research in ~~obtaining~~connection anwith ~~IND~~the preclinical development of AAT-Fc. ~~Such~~In aconsideration ~~partnership(s)~~of orwork ~~strategic~~to ~~investment~~be ~~would~~performed, ~~potentially~~Omni ~~reduce~~agreed ~~our~~to ~~need~~pay RUC $210,000 which we intend to ~~raise~~pay ~~external~~quarterly ~~capital~~over the term of the agreement. ~~There~~The isagreement nohas ~~guarantee~~a ~~that~~term weof ~~will~~twelve bemonths, ~~successful~~but inmay ~~creating~~be orcancelled ~~maintaining~~by aeither ~~strategic~~party ~~partner~~upon ~~for~~thirty ~~our~~days’ ~~AAT-Fc~~notice. ~~program~~As orof ~~that~~December 31, 2014, we ~~would~~have ~~obtain~~accrued ~~adequate~~$17,500 orin ~~any~~Research ~~funding~~and ~~from~~Development ~~such~~expense arelated ~~relationship~~to this agreement.

We expect that our cash on hand will allow us to fund our operations and limited research and development initiatives through the fiscal year ending March 31, 2015. However we will need additional capital to continue operations and the preclinical development and early clinical development of our AAT-Fc program. Funding of the AAT-Fc program is anticipated to require additional capital in the range of $10 million through phase 1 trials currently targeted to begin in 2016. Additional capital of approximately $1.73 million is also required to retire the secured Convertible Notes as they mature in 2015, if not already then converted or their maturity dates extended. There is no assurance that we will be successful in raising a sufficient level of capital to meet these purposes in a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. Failure to obtain additional capital would have a material adverse impact on our ability to continue our research and development efforts and fund our operating expenses beyond March 31, 2015, and such failure would likely cause us to cease operations and not continue as a going concern. Additionally, failure to realize the conversion of the Convertible Notes or sufficiently extend their maturity or raise adequate capital to retire the Convertible Notes as they mature would have a material adverse impact on our ability to continue as a going concern.

We continue to approach other pharmaceutical or life science companies for funding a portion of our AAT-Fc program, and potentially funding initial human studies. Such a partnership(s) or strategic investment could potentially reduce our need to raise external capital. There is no guarantee that we will be successful in creating or maintaining a strategic partner for our AAT-Fc program or that we would obtain adequate or any funding from such a relationship.

Contractual Obligations

The following table presents our contractual obligations as of the date of this filing. Long-Term Debt Obligations relates to Convertible Notes and Purchase Obligations are invoices received which are associated with the Services Agreement with Patheon.

	Payments due by period
	Total		Less than one year		1-3 years
Long-Term Debt Obligations, including accrued interest	$	4,095,492	$	1,730,300	$	2,365,192
Purchase Obligations	$	320,000	$	320,000	$	-
	$	4,415,492	$	2,050,300	$	2,365,192

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with US GAAP. Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements contained in our 2014 Form 10-K. The accounting policies most fundamental to the understanding of our financial statements are our use of estimates, including the computation of share-based compensation; research and development cost; capitalization of license agreements and impairment analysis of long-term assets; and the valuation, classification and recording of debt and equity transactions, including those that include stock purchase warrants and derivatives.

In ~~June~~August, 2014, the FASB issued ASU ~~No.~~ 2014-1015, Disclosure of Uncertainties About an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (the “Update”), which amended Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic ~~915~~205 ~~Development~~Presentation ~~Stage~~of ~~Entities~~Financial Statements. The ~~amendment~~Update ~~eliminates~~provides ~~certain~~guidance ~~financial~~to ~~reporting~~management ~~requirements~~on ~~surrounding~~determining ~~development~~when ~~stage~~and ~~entities,~~how ~~including~~to andisclose ~~amendment~~going-concern touncertainties in the ~~variable~~financial ~~interest~~statements. ~~entities~~The ~~guidance~~Update inrequires ~~ASC~~management ~~Topic~~to ~~810,~~perform ~~Consolidation.~~interim ~~The~~and ~~amendment~~annual ~~removes~~assessments ~~the~~of ~~definition~~an ofentity’s ability to continue as a ~~development~~going ~~stage~~concern ~~entity~~within ~~from~~one ~~the~~year ~~ASC,~~of ~~thereby~~the ~~removing~~date the financial ~~reporting~~statements ~~distinction~~are ~~between~~issued, ~~development~~and ~~stage~~to ~~entities~~make ~~and~~certain ~~other~~disclosures ~~entities~~if ~~from~~“conditions ~~U.S.~~or ~~GAAP.~~events ~~Consequently,~~raise ~~the~~substantial ~~amendment~~doubt ~~eliminates~~about the ~~requirements~~entity’s ~~for~~ability ~~development~~to ~~stage~~continue ~~entities~~as toa ~~(1) present~~going ~~inception-~~concern.” In making its assessment, management is required to~~-date~~ ~~information~~evaluate in“relevant ~~the~~conditions ~~statements~~and ofevents ~~income,~~that ~~cash~~are ~~flows~~known and ~~shareholder~~reasonably ~~equity,~~knowable ~~(2) label~~at the date that the financial statements asare issued.” Reasonably knowable conditions or events are those ofthat acan ~~development~~be ~~stage~~identified ~~entity,~~without ~~(3) disclose~~undue acost ~~description~~and ofeffort. Specific amendments contained within the ~~development~~Update ~~stage~~provide ~~activities~~a indefinition ~~which~~of the ~~entity~~term issubstantial ~~engaged~~doubt, ~~and~~as ~~(4) disclose~~well ~~the~~as ~~first~~specific ~~year~~principles infor ~~which~~considering the ~~entity~~mitigating effect of management’s plans. The amendments require certain additional disclosures when substantial doubt is noalleviated ~~longer~~as a ~~development~~result ~~stage~~of ~~entity~~consideration ~~that~~of inmanagement’s ~~prior~~plans. ~~years~~Also itrequired ~~had~~are ~~been~~an inexpress ~~the~~statement ~~development~~and ~~stage.~~other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated by management’s plans.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of ~~September~~December 3031, 2014, and our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of that date.

Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

WeThe ~~provided~~Committee ~~our~~of ~~new~~Sponsoring ~~Chief~~Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) was formed in 1985 and is a joint initiative of several private sector organizations to support the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial ~~Officer~~Reporting ~~with~~(the ~~certain~~Treadway ~~oversight~~Commission). The organization is currently recognized in the United States as providing leading guidance for designing, implementing and ~~signing~~conducting ~~authority~~internal control and assessing its effectiveness. In May 2013, COSO published an update to its original 1992 “Internal Control Framework” which webroadens ~~believe~~the ~~strengthened~~application ~~our~~of internal control ~~over~~in ~~financial~~addressing operations and reporting ~~during~~objectives, and expounds on the ~~quarter~~requirements ~~ended~~for ~~September~~determining ~~30,~~what ~~2014~~constitutes effective internal control. ~~There~~In ~~was~~response noto ~~other~~this ~~change~~update, inOmni initiated and completed the reevaluation of its internal control ~~that~~policies ~~materially~~in ~~affected~~November 2014 and, oras isa ~~reasonably~~consequence, ~~likely~~updated its internal controls to ~~materially~~formalize ~~affect,~~oversight of our ~~internal~~external ~~control~~consultants ~~over~~and ~~financial~~vendors, and clarify internal reporting structures.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

On August 1, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with Tiberend Strategic Advisors, Inc. (“Tiberend”). Tiberend will provide investor relations and corporate communication services in exchange for cash payment and warrants that accrue at a rate of 25,000 a month and will be granted and issued in 150,000 increments on a semiannual basis starting February 1, 2015, at an exercise price equal to the Company’s closing stock price at the time of issue.

On August 5, 2014, the Company entered into an executive search agreement with Solomon Edwards, LLC to conduct a personnel search for Omni’s then open Chief Financial Officer’s position. As payment in full for all fees in connection with this agreement, we issued to Solomon Edwards, LLC 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on September 8, 2014.

On September 1, 2014 we signed a 12 month consulting agreement with Dr. Soohyun Kim. He will accrue 15,000 warrants per month as long as the agreement is in force. The warrants will be granted and issued on a semiannual basis, beginning March 1, 2015, at an exercise price equal to the Company’s closing stock price at the time of issue.

On September 1, 2014, Omni’s Board of Directors appointed John Riccardi as our Chief Financial Officer. On September 1, 2014, we granted Mr. Riccardi a warrant to purchase 750,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.24 per share. The warrant has a seven year life and 250,000 of the shares underlying the warrant vested and became exercisable immediately on September 1, 2014. The remaining shares underlying the warrant vest and become exercisable in two equal annual installments on September 1, 2015 and September 1, 2016, provided Mr. Riccardi remains in continuous service with Omni as of each vesting date.

The issuance of the securities described above was effected in reliance on the exemption for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set forth in Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as mended (the “Securities Act”) and in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

Item 5. Other Information.

~~Item~~PART 6II. ~~Exhibits.~~OTHER INFORMATION

EXHIBIT #			DESCRIPTION
3.1			Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on March 2, 2007).
3.2			Amended and Restated Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 5, 2010).
3.3			Articles of Amendment for Across America Financial Services, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2009).
10.1			Loan and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated April 24, 2014, between Bohemian Investments, LLC and Omni Bio Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2014).
10.2			Warrant dated April 23, 2014 issued to Bohemian Investments, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2014).
10.3			Warrant dated April 23, 2014 issued to BOCO Investments, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2014).
10.4			Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated April 25, 2014 issued to Bohemian Investments, LLC.
10.5			Development and Manufacturing Services Agreement, dated April 24, 2014, between Gallus BioPharmaceuticals, LLC and Omni Bio Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2014).
10.6			Consulting Agreement dated April 1 2014, between Charles Dinarello and Omni Bio Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2014).
10.7			Warrant dated September 1, 2014, granted to John Riccardi (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 14, 2014).
31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
31.2			Certification of Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
32.1			Certification of Chief Executive and Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
101.INS			XBRL Instance Document**
101.SCH			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

In October 2014, Dr. Charles Dinarello, the CSO and an officer of the Company, exercised 10,000 warrants granted to him on October 1, 2014 at the contractual price of $0.21 per share. As a result of his exercise, the Company issued 10,000 additional shares of its common stock.

In December 2014, certain holders of the 2012 Notes with an aggregate face value of $212,500 converted their respective notes, plus accrued interest, into 1,089,242 shares of the Company’s common stock. In January 2015, an additional 2012 Note Holders, owning a note with a face value of $50,000, converted his note, plus all accrued interest, into 256,722 shares of the Company’s common stock. The 262,500 warrants that were originally issued to these note holders in connection with their respective notes may now be exercised for a price of $0.25 per share of the Company’s common stock, in lieu of the original $1.50 per share.

The issuance of the securities described above were effected in reliance on the exemption for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set forth in Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as mended (the “Securities Act”) and in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

~~SIGNATURES~~Item 6. Exhibits

~~Pursuant~~EXHIBIT to# DESCRIPTION ~~the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.~~

	OMNI BIO PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
3.1		Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on March 2, 2007).
November 13, 2014	By:	/s/ Bruce E. Schneider
3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 5, 2010).
	Bruce E. Schneider
3.3		Articles of Amendment for Across America Financial Services, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2009).
	Chief Executive Officer
4.1		Amended Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated April 25, 2014 issued to Bohemian Investments, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on form 8-K filed on February 2, 2015).
	(Principal Executive Officer)
10.1		Loan and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated April 25, 2014 between Bohemian investments, LLC. and Omni Bio Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on form 8-K filed on April 25, 2014).
10.2		Modification and Exchange Agreement dated January 23, 2015 between Bohemian Investments, LLC. and Omni Bio Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on form 8-K filed on February 2, 2014).
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive and Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document**
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	OMNI BIO PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
November 13, 2014	By:	/s/ John Riccardi
February 17, 2015	By: /s/ Bruce E. Schneider
	John Riccardi
		Bruce E. Schneider
	Chief Financial Officer
		Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
		(Principal Executive Officer)

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	OMNI BIO PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.


February 17, 2015	By: /s/ John Riccardi
		John Riccardi
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Filing Compare · OMNI BIO PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.