UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

~~WASHINGTON~~Washington, D.C. 20549

(Mark One)

Form 10-Q

[√]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________________ to __________________________

Commission file number: 0-27828

TN-K ENERGY GROUP INC.

(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE	13-3779546
Delaware	13-3779546
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

649 SPARTA HIGHWAY, SUITE 102, CROSSVILLE, TN	38571
649 Sparta Highway, Suite 102, Crossville, TN	38571
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(931) 707-9599

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

~~NOT~~not ~~APPLICABLE~~applicable (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)

Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. 38,176,085 shares of common stock are issued and outstanding as of ~~November~~August 147, ~~2014~~2015.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No.
PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements.	4
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	17
Item 3.	Quantative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	19
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	19
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	2019
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	2019
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	2019
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	20
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.	20
Item 5.	Other Information.	20
Item 6.	Exhibits.	20

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This report contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:

•

our ability to continue as a going concern,

•

our business and growth strategies,

•

risks associated with the external factors that impact our operations,

•

our ability to satisfy our debt obligations which predate our existing business,

•

volatility in oil prices,

•

risks associates in general with oil and gas operations,

•

our ability to find additional reserves, and

•

the impact of government regulation and the impact of possible changes in tax laws.

Forward-looking statements are typically identified by use of terms such as “may”, “could”, “should”, “expect”, “plan”, “project”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “predict”, “potential”, “pursue”, “target” or “continue”, the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology, although some forward-looking statements may be expressed differently. The forward-looking statements contained in this report are largely based on our expectations, which reflect estimates and assumptions made by our management. These estimates and assumptions reflect our best judgment based on currently known market conditions and other factors. Although we believe such estimates and assumptions to be reasonable, they are inherently uncertain and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that are beyond our control. In addition, management’s assumptions about future events may prove to be inaccurate. Management cautions all readers that the forward-looking statements contained in this report are not guarantees of future performance, and we cannot assure any reader that such statements will be realized or the forward-looking events and circumstances will occur. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including:

•

significant unforeseen events that have global or national impact such as major political disruptions, extended economic depression, and technological breakthroughs in producing oil and natural gas or in producing alternative forms of energy,

•

unanticipated future changes in oil or natural gas prices, and

•

other uncertainties inherent in the production of oil and natural gas.

You should consider the areas of risk described in connection with any forward-looking statements that may be made herein. You should also consider carefully the statements under Item 1A. Risk Factors appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014 and other sections of this report, which address additional factors that could cause our actual results to differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information under the Federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements, to report events or to report the occurrence of unanticipated events. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report, and you should not rely on these statements without also considering the risks and uncertainties associated with these statements and our business.

OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION

Unless specifically set forth to the contrary, when used in this report the terms “TN-K", "we"", "our", the "Company" and similar terms refer to TN-K Energy Group Inc., a Delaware corporation. In addition, when used herein and unless specifically set forth to the contrary, “~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2014~~2015” refers to the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, “~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2013~~2014” refers to the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2014, “~~2014~~2015” refers to the year ending December 31, ~~2014~~2015, and “~~2013~~2014” refers to the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014.

PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements.

TN-K Energy Group Inc

Condensed Balance Sheets

	September 30,			December 31,
	March 31,			December 31,
	2014			2013
	2015			2014
	(unaudited)
ASSETS:
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~257~~111,~~865~~366		$	~~514~~157,~~003~~830
Accounts receivable		2052,~~989~~688			17,~~318~~572
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		~~278~~164,~~854~~054			~~531~~175,~~321~~402
OIL AND GAS PROPERTY (Successful efforts method), at cost		1,~~704~~583,~~500~~583			1,~~691~~546,~~756~~885
EQUIPMENT, net of depreciation		~~102~~89,~~411~~282			~~122~~95,~~105~~846
OTHER ASSETS		42,000			42,000
TOTAL ASSETS	$	21,~~127~~878,~~765~~919		$	21,~~387~~860,~~182~~133
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	2,~~877~~931,~~120~~105		$	2,~~889~~888,~~819~~728
Accrued expenses		~~536~~565,~~572~~195			~~558~~550,~~167~~655
Convertible note payable - related party		170,000			~~180~~170,000
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		3,~~583~~666,~~692~~300			3,~~627~~609,~~986~~383
LONG TERM LIABILITIES:
Asset retirement obligation		3233,~~840~~640			3133,~~640~~240
Deferred income taxes payable		285,097			285,097
TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES		~~317~~318,~~937~~737			~~316~~318,~~737~~337
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued, and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $.03 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 38,176,085 and 38,176,085 issued and outstanding, respectively		1,145,282			1,145,282
Additional Paid - In Capital		13,~~601~~640,~~316~~113			13,~~437~~601,~~513~~316
Accumulated deficit		(16,~~520~~891,~~462~~514	)		(16,~~140~~814,~~336~~185	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT		(12,~~773~~106,~~864~~119	)		(12,~~557~~067,~~541~~587	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$	21,~~127~~878,~~765~~919		$	21,~~387~~860,~~182~~133

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

TN-K Energy Group, Inc.

Condensed Statement of Operations

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended September,						For the Nine Months Ended September,
	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
	2015			2014
Revenue:
Oil sales		192,~~016~~775			4212,~~639~~886			~~56,607~~			~~128,027~~
Well Services		-			23,143			-			27,693
Well Equipment Rental		20,300			-
Well Equipment Rental		500			-			500			-
Sale of oil and gas leases		94,500			-
Sale of oil and gas leases		42,500			316,250			86,500			363,250
Total Revenue		117,575			12,886
Total Revenue		62,016			382,032			143,607			518,970
Expense:
Expense:
Oil lease operating expense		39,266			50,038
Oil lease operating expense		52,973			59,881			152,830			172,797
Cost of oil and gas leases sold		29,258			-
Cost of oil and gas leases sold		-			21,552			2,087			33,245
Sales, general and administrative		122,836			58,082
Sales, general and administrative		60,709			50,444			355,631			185,069
Total Operating Expenses		191,360			108,120
Impairment of developed properties		-			63,872			2,318			68,694
Loss From Operations		(73,785	)		(95,234	)
Total Operating Expenses		113,682			195,749			512,866			459,805
Other Income (Expense):
Income / (Loss) From Operations		(51,666	)		186,283			(369,259	)		59,165
Interest expense		(3,544	)		(3,618	)
Other Income (Expense):
Total Other Income (Expense)		(3,544	)		(3,618	)
Interest expense		(3,614	)		(3,803	)		(10,810	)		(11,297	)
Net loss before taxes	$	(77,329	)		(98,852	)
Other expense		(57	)		0			(57	)		0
Income taxes		-			-
Other income		-			-			-			24
Net Loss	$	(77,329	)	$	(98,852	)
Total Other Income (Expense)		(3,671	)		(3,803	)		(10,867	)		(11,273	)
Basic Loss per common share	$	-		$	-
Net Income / (Loss) before taxes		(55,337	)		182,480			(380,126	)		47,892
Diluted Loss per common share	$	-		$	-
Income taxes		-			-			-			-
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding -
Net Income / (Loss)	$	(55,337	)	$	182,480		$	(380,126	)	$	47,892
Basic		38,176,085			38,176,085
Basic Income/(Loss) per common share	$	-		$	-		$	(0.01	)	$	-
Diluted		38,176,085			38,176,085
Diluted Income/(Loss) per common share	$	-		$	-		$	(0.01	)	$	-
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding -
Basic		38,176,085			38,176,085			38,176,085			38,176,085
Diluted		38,176,085			38,697,590			38,176,085			38,837,701

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

TN-K Energy Group Inc

Condensed Statement of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013
	2015			2014
Cash Flow From Operating Activities:
Net Income / (Loss)	$	(380,126	)	$	47,892
Net Loss	$	(77,329	)	$	(98,852	)
Adjustments to Net Income / (Loss)
Adjustments to reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash (Used by) Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and depletion		~~167~~44,~~728~~999			~~182~~54,~~715~~987
Impairment loss on developed oil property		2,318			68,694
Change in fair fair of asset retirement obligation		400			400
Change in fair fair of asset retirement obligation		1,200			1,200
Equity based compensation		38,797			-
Equity based compensation		163,803			-
Adjustments to reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Net Cash (Used by) Operating Activities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(335,~~671~~116	)		(173,~~167~~751	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(34,294	)		(21,700	)
Sale of oil and gas rights		27,426			-
Net Cash Provided by (Used by) Operating Activities		(83,043	)		261,634
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		56,917			(11,854	)
Net Cash Provided by (Used by) Operating Activities		56,094			(59,070	)
Cash Flow From Investing Activities:
Purchase and development of oil and gas rights		(~~163~~102,~~095~~558	)		(~~199~~58,~~854~~713	)
Sale of oil and gas rights		-			33,246
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities		(102,558	)		(58,713	)
Purchase of fixed assets		-			(9,797	)
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities		(163,095	)		(176,405	)
Cash Flow From Financing Activities:
Payment on convertible note payable-related party		(10,000	)		-
Repayment of notes payable		-			(10,000	)
Net Increase (Decrease) In Cash and Cash Equivalents		(256,138	)		85,229
Net Cash Used by Financing Activities		-			(10,000	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		514,003			486,464
Net (Decrease) In Cash and Cash Equivalents		(46,464	)		(127,783	)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	257,865		$	571,693
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		157,830			514,003
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	111,366		$	386,220
Cash paid for interest	$	20,033		$	7,150
Cash paid for income taxes	$	-		$	-
Cash paid for interest	$	-		$	-

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

TN-K ENERGY GROUP INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014

NOTE 1 — ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION.

Organization

TN-K Energy Group Inc. is an independent energy company engaged in the acquisition and development of crude oil reserves and production in the Appalachian Basin and to conduct directly and indirectly through third parties, operations on the properties. In these Notes, the terms “Company”, “TN-K”, “we”, “us”, “our” and terms of similar import refer to TN-K Energy Group Inc.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and the footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three ~~month~~months ~~and nine month periods~~ ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, ~~2014~~2015. The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014 which was filed on ~~April~~June 115, ~~2014~~2015.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. Going concern contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business over a reasonable length of time. The Company has incurred losses since inception and has negative cash flows from operations and a substantial portion of the debt is in default and has a stockholders’ deficit of $(12,~~773~~106,~~864~~119) as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015. The future of the Company is dependent upon its ability to obtain additional equity and/or debt financing and upon the continued development of commercially viable producing wells at levels which significantly increase the Company’s revenues and net income. Management cannot assure that the Company will be able to secure such financing or obtain financing on terms beneficial to the Company or that the Company will be able to significantly increase its revenues and net income. Failure to achieve these goals may result in the Company’s inability to continue as a going concern and the impairment of the recorded long-lived assets.

These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classifications of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES.

Cash and Cash Equivalents — For purposes of reporting cash flows, we consider cash equivalents to be all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase. The Company typically has cash in banks in excess of federally insured amounts.

Use of Estimates - Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. Preparation in accordance with GAAP requires us to (1) adopt accounting policies within accounting rules set by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and (2) make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and other disclosed amounts. This Note describes our significant accounting policies. Our management believes the major estimates and assumptions impacting our financial statements are the following:

• estimates of proven (i.e., reasonably certain) oil and gas reserve quantities, which affect the calculations of amortization and impairment of capitalized costs of oil and gas properties; • estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties we own, particularly properties that we have not yet explored, or fully explored, by drilling and completing wells; • estimates of the fair value of stock options at date of grant; • estimates as to the future realization of deferred income tax assets; and • the assumption required by GAAP that proved reserves and generally proved reserve value for measuring capitalized cost impairment be based on the prices of oil and gas at the end of the reporting period.

•

estimates of the fair value of oil and gas properties we own, particularly properties that we have not yet explored, or fully explored, by drilling and completing wells;

•

estimates of the fair value of stock options at date of grant;

•

estimates as to the future realization of deferred income tax assets; and

•

the assumption required by GAAP that proved reserves and generally proved reserve value for measuring capitalized cost impairment be based on the prices of oil and gas at the end of the reporting period.

TN-K ENERGY GROUP INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued).

The estimated fair values of our unevaluated oil and gas properties affect the calculation of gain on the sale of material properties and affect our assessment as to whether portions of unevaluated capitalized costs are impaired, which also affects the calculation of recorded amortization and impairment expense with regards to our capitalized costs of oil and gas properties.

The fair value of stock options at the date of grant to employees and members of our Board of Directors is based on judgment as to expected future volatility of our common stock and expected future choices by option holders as to when options are exercised.

Actual results may differ from estimates and assumptions of future events. Future production may vary materially from estimated oil and gas proved reserves. Actual future prices may vary significantly from price assumptions used for determining proved reserves and for financial reporting.

Fair Value — The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash, and accounts receivable approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. Predominately most of the payables are the results of operations and financings of our prior business which ceased operations in 2005, as a result of the undercapitalized nature of our Company and the age of these delinquent payables, we are unable to determine the fair value of these payables.

Accounts Receivable and Credit Policies — We have certain trade receivables consisting of oil and gas sales obligations due under normal trade terms. Our management regularly reviews trade receivables and reduces the carrying amount by a valuation allowance that reflects management’s best estimate of the amount that may not be collectible. At December 31, ~~2013~~2014 and March 31, 2015, management had determined no allowance for uncollectible receivables was necessary. At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, we had accounts receivable and receivables from the production of oil sale of $2052,~~989~~688, of which $0 was accounts receivable-related party, and $17,~~318~~572, of which $0 was accounts receivable-related party, respectively.

Asset Retirement Obligations — When we incur an obligation for future asset retirement costs, we record as a liability and as a cost of the acquired asset the present value of the estimated future asset retirement obligation. For example, when we drill a well, we record a liability and an asset cost for the present value of estimated costs we will incur at the end of the well’s life to plug the well, remove surface equipment and provide restoration of the well site’s surface. Over time, accretion of the liability is recognized as an operating expense, and the capitalized cost is amortized over the expected useful life of the related asset. Our asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) relate primarily to the plugging, dismantlement, removal, site reclamation and similar activities of our oil and gas properties.

The following table reflects the change in ARO at:

	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Asset retirement obligation beginning of period	$	3133,~~640~~240	$	3031,~~040~~640
Liabilities incurred		-		-
Liabilities settled		-		-
Accretion		~~1,200~~400		1,600
Revisions in estimated liabilities		-		-
Asset retirement obligation end of period	$	3233,~~840~~640	$	3133,~~640~~240
Current portion of obligation end of period	$	-	$	-

Oil and Gas Properties — We use the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas activities. Under this method, subject to a limitation based on estimated value, all costs are capitalized directly associated with property acquisition, exploration and development. Internal costs that are capitalized at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, were nil as such costs have been limited to costs directly identifiable with acquisition, exploration and development activities for the Company’s account and exclude indirect costs and costs related to production or general corporate overhead.

The Company follows the successful efforts method of accounting for its oil and gas activities. Accordingly, costs associated with the acquisition, drilling and equipping of successful exploratory wells are capitalized. Geological and geophysical costs, delay and surface rentals and drilling costs of unsuccessful exploratory wells are charged to expense as incurred. Costs of drilling development wells are capitalized. Upon the sale or retirement of oil and gas properties, the cost and accumulated depreciation or depletion are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is credited or charged to operations.

TN-K ENERGY GROUP INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued).

Capitalized costs of oil and gas properties evaluated as having, or not having, proved reserves are amortized in the aggregate by country using the unit-of-production method based upon estimated proved oil and gas reserves. The Company currently does not have any gas production, which is sold, but we have developed policies to be inclusive of such production, if and when the Company becomes capable of selling such gas. For amortization purposes, relative volumes of oil and gas production and reserves are converted at the energy equivalent conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of crude oil. Amortizable costs include estimates of future development costs of proved undeveloped reserves. The costs of properties not yet evaluated are not amortized until evaluation of the property. We make such evaluations for a well and associated lease rights when it is determined whether or not the well has proved oil and gas reserves. Other unevaluated properties are evaluated for impairment as of the end of each calendar quarter based upon various factors at the time, including drilling plans, drilling activity, management’s estimated fair values of lease rights by project, and remaining lives of leases.

Capitalized costs of oil properties (net of related deferred income taxes) may not exceed a ‘ceiling’ amount equal to the present value, discounted at 10% per annum, of the estimated future net cash flows from proved oil reserves plus the cost of unevaluated properties (adjusted for related income tax effects). Should capitalized costs exceed this ceiling, the excess is charged to earnings as an impairment expense, net of its related reduction of the deferred income tax provision. The present value of estimated future net cash flows is computed by applying period-end oil prices of oil to estimated future production of proved oil gas reserves as of period-end, less estimated future expenditures (at period-end rates) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves and assuming continuation of economic conditions existing at period-end. SEC guidance allows the ceiling to be increased for subsequent events occurring reasonably before the filing date of the affected financial statements and indicative that capitalized costs were not impaired at period-end. Such subsequent events are increased oil prices and the proving up of additional reserves on properties owned at period-end. The present value of proved reserves’ future net cash flows excludes future cash outflows associated with settling asset retirement obligations that have been accrued on the balance sheet.

Equipment — We record at cost any long-lived tangible assets that are not oil properties. Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets of three to seven years. Expenditures for replacements, renewals, and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Long-lived assets, other than oil and properties, are evaluated for impairment to determine if current circumstances and market conditions indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. We have not recognized any impairment losses on non oil and gas long-lived assets.

Impairment — The accounting guidance, Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, requires that long-lived assets to be held and used be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Oil properties accounted for using the successful efforts method of accounting (which we use) are excluded from this requirement but continue to be subject to the successful efforts method’s impairment rules.

Revenue Recognition — We recognize oil revenues from our interests in producing wells when production is delivered to, and title has transferred to, the purchaser and to the extent the selling price is reasonably determinable. We recognize the sale of the partial interests in our oil wells once the terms of such contract have been fulfilled.

Major Customers — During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, we had two customers, respectively accounting for 100% of oil sales. Because there are other purchasers that are capable of and willing to purchase our oil and because we have the option to change purchasers on our properties if conditions so warrant, we believe that our oil production can be sold in the market in the event that it is not sold to our existing customers, but in some circumstances a change in customers may entail significant transition costs and/or shutting in or curtailing production for weeks or even months during the transition to a new customer.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share — Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted number of common shares outstanding during the period. ~~Diluted~~Any ~~net~~common ~~income~~shares ~~(loss)~~issued ~~per~~as ~~share~~a ~~reflects~~result ~~per~~of ~~share~~the ~~amounts~~exercise ~~that~~of ~~would~~stock ~~have~~options ~~resulted~~and ifwarrants ~~dilutive~~would ~~potential~~come ~~common~~from ~~stock~~newly ~~had~~issued ~~been converted to~~ common ~~stock.~~shares ~~Stock~~from ~~options~~our ofremaining ~~4,953,000~~authorized ~~and 3,993,000 and~~ shares. ~~issuable~~For ~~for~~the ~~convertible~~year ~~debt~~ended ofDecember 131,~~235,238~~ 2014 and ~~1,269,524 have been excluded for diluted per share computation for~~ the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014 and 2103~~2015, ~~respectively,~~there ~~as they~~ were ~~antidilutive. As of September 30~~3, ~~2014~~215,000 ~~the~~stock ~~convertible~~options ~~debt~~outstanding ~~had~~and ~~conversation prices ranging from~~ $~~0.12 to $0.18 for $150~~170,000 of ~~such~~convertible debt., Asexcluded afrom ~~result~~the ancomputation ~~additional~~of ~~521,505~~dilutive ~~and~~securities ~~661,616~~as ~~are considered outstanding for~~ the ~~three~~effect ~~and~~would ~~nine~~have ~~months~~been ~~September 30, 2013~~anti-dilutive.

Concentration of Credit Risk — Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash. We maintain substantially all cash assets at one financial institution. We periodically evaluate the credit worthiness of financial institutions, and maintain cash accounts only in large high quality financial institutions. We believe that credit risk associated with cash is remote. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonpayment by counter parties, a significant portion of which are concentrated in energy related industries. The creditworthiness of customers and other counter parties is subject to continuing review.

TN-K ENERGY GROUP INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued).

Share-Based Compensation — We adopted the accounting guidance for, Share-Based Payments, on a modified prospective basis. The accounting guidance requires publicly-held companies to recognize in their statements of operations the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation to employees, consistent with the rules for options to non-employees.

~~The~~Reclassification ~~fair~~— ~~value~~Certain ofamounts in the ~~options~~2015 isand ~~estimated~~2014 onconsolidated ~~the~~financial ~~date~~statements ofhave ~~the~~been ~~grant~~reclassified ~~using~~to conform to the ~~Black-Scholes~~March ~~option~~31, ~~pricing~~2015 ~~model~~financial ~~with~~statement ~~the~~presentation. ~~following~~Such ~~assumptions:~~reclassifications have had no effect on net income (loss).

	Nine months Ended September 30, 2014
Dividends per year		0
Volatility percentage		175	%
Risk free interest rate		2.00	%
Expected life (years)		4-8

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

InAll ~~August~~other ~~2014,~~newly ~~the FASB~~ issued ~~Accounting~~but ~~Standards~~not ~~Update~~yet ~~“ASU”~~effective ~~2014-15~~accounting onpronouncements ~~“Presentation~~have ofbeen ~~Financial~~deemed ~~Statements Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) – Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability~~ to ~~Continue~~either asnot abe ~~Going~~relevant ~~Concern”. Currently, there is no guidance in U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern~~ or toimmaterial ~~provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this Update provide that guidance. In doing so, the amendments are intended~~ to ~~reduce diversity in~~ the ~~timing~~operations and content of footnote disclosures. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting ~~period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain~~ disclosures ~~when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result~~ of ~~consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after~~ the ~~date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued)~~Company. ~~The amendments in this Update are effective for public and nonpublic entities for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted.~~

~~All~~In ~~newly~~June 2014, FASB issued byAccounting ~~not~~Standards ~~yet~~Update ~~effective~~(“ASU”) ~~accounting~~No. ~~pronounements~~2014-09, ~~have~~“ ~~been~~Revenue ~~deemed~~from Contracts with Customers”. The update gives entities a single comprehensive model to ~~either~~use ~~not~~in bereporting ~~relevant~~information about the amount and timing of revenue resulting from contracts to provide goods or ~~immaterial~~services to customers. The proposed ASU, which would apply to any entity that enters into contracts to provide goods or services, would supersede the ~~operations~~revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and ~~reporting~~most ~~disclosures~~industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the ~~Company~~Codification. Additionally, the update would supersede some cost guidance included in Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition – Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts. The update removes inconsistencies and weaknesses in revenue requirements and provides a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues and more useful information to users of financial statements through improved disclosure requirements. In addition, the update improves comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets and simplifies the preparation of financial statements by reducing the number of requirements to which an entity must refer. The update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. We are currently reviewing the provisions of this ASU to determine if there will be any impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

~~NOTE~~ASU 32014 —-15 ~~OIL~~issued ~~AND~~August ~~GAS~~2014 ~~PROPERTIES AND EQUIPMENT.~~

~~Oil~~In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU” 2014-15 on “Presentation of Financial Statements Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) – Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. Currently, there is no guidance in U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this Update provide that guidance. In doing so, the amendments are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and ~~Gas~~content ~~Properties~~of footnote disclosures. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and ~~equipment~~expanding ~~consisted~~upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the ~~following:~~term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued).

	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
Oil and gas properties, successful efforts method
Unevaluated costs, not yet subject to amortization	$	1,325,405		$	1,325,405
Evaluated costs		1,703,815			1,525,122
Asset retirement costs		39,600			39,600
		3,008,410			2,890,127
Well equipment, furniture and software		183,809			183,809
		3,192,219			3,073,936
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization		(1,445,718	)		(1,260,075	)
Oil and gas property and equipment	$	1,806,911		$	1,813,861

The amendments in this Update are effective for public and nonpublic entities for annual period’s ending after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted.

TN-K ENERGY GROUP INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014

NOTE 3 — OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES AND EQUIPMENT ~~(continued)~~.

Oil and Gas Properties and equipment consisted of the following:

	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Oil and gas properties, successful efforts method
Unevaluated costs, not yet subject to amortization	$	1,212,701		$	1,212,701
Evaluated costs		1,944,669			1,869,537
Asset retirement costs		39,600			39,600
		3,196,970			3,121,839

Well equipment, furniture and software		183,809			183,809
		3,380,779			3,305,648
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization		(1,707,914	)		(1,662,916	)

Oil and gas property and equipment	$	1,672,865		$	1,642,731

Unevaluated Oil Properties

Costs directly associated with the acquisition and evaluation of unproved properties are excluded from the amortization computation. The following table shows, by year incurred, the unevaluated oil and gas property costs (net of transfers to evaluated costs and net of sales proceeds) excluded from the amortization computation:

	Net Costs Incurred
Year Incurred	Net Costs Incurred
Year Incurred
Three months ended March 31, 2015	$	0
Nine months ended September 30, 2014	$	-
Year ended December 31, 2014		(112,704	)
Year ended December 31, 2013		(67,274	)
Year ended December 31, 2012		842,811
Year ended December 31, 2011		(592,569	)
Year ended December 31, 2010		916,532
Year ended December 31, 2009		225,905
	$	1,~~325~~212,~~405~~701

Costs associated with unevaluated properties are primarily lease acquisition costs. At December 31, ~~2013~~2014, we drilled 3 dry holes and recorded an impairment expense of $~~120~~37,~~557~~145, associated with dry holes. There were no pending costs for wells-in-progress ~~existed~~ at December 31, ~~2013~~2014. During the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~March 31, 2014, we recorded an impairment expense of $0 and $~~63,872,~~0 respectively, and $2,318 and $68,694, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013; respectively, as a result of well rework efforts and further evaluation of some wells plugged due to insufficient production. There are no unevaluated costs relating to significant development activities. Reclassification of other unproved property costs to evaluated costs is largely dependent on (i) how quickly we drill on the unevaluated property, (ii) the results of such drilling, (iii) if third-parties pay drilling costs to earn a portion of our interest, and (iv) quarterly assessments of such costs for impairments.

Prospect leasing and acquisition normally require one to three years, and the subsequent evaluation normally requires an additional one to three years.

Acquisitions of oil properties

On January 23, 2013, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 25% working interests as the operator in the Betty McCoomas Well #7 at the cost of $18,500 and is responsible for 32% of the all costs associated with the well.

On April 17, 2013 per Memorandum of Understanding the Company sold 27.5% working and royalty interest to two individuals and/or entities in the Millard Willis Well #1 for $22,000 and is responsible for 35% of all the costs associated with the well.

On April 23, 2013, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 60% working interests as the operator in the Millard Willis Well #1 at the cost of $18,500 and is responsible for 65% of the all costs associated with the well.

On May 16, 2013 per Memorandum of Understanding the Company sold 27.5% working and royalty interest to two individuals and/or entities in the Millard Willis Well #2 for $22,000 and is responsible for 35% of all the costs associated with the well.

On May 16, 2013, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 60% working interests as the operator in the Millard Willis Well #2 at the cost of $18,500 and is responsible for 65% of the all costs associated with the well.

On July 9, 2013 per Memorandum of Understanding the Company sold 37.5% working and royalty interest to two individuals and/or entities in the Millard Willis Well #3 for $30,000 and is responsible for 45% of all the costs associated with the well.

On July 9, 2013, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 50% working interests as the operator in the Millard Willis Well #3 at the cost of $18,500 and is responsible for 55% of the all costs associated with the well.

On July 9, 2013 per Memorandum of Understanding the Company sold 37.5% working and royalty interest to two individuals and/or entities in the Millard Willis Well #4 for $30,000 and is responsible for 45% of all the costs associated with the well.

TN-K ENERGY GROUP INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013

NOTE 3 — OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES AND EQUIPMENT (continued).

On July 9, 2013, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 50% working interests as the operator in the Millard Willis Well #4 at the cost of $18,500 and is responsible for 55% of the all costs associated with the well.

On September 11, 2013, the Company completed the sale to Aquilo Resources, LLC of its 60% working and operating interests in the Millard Willis Well #1 for a cash payment of $229,250, which included a commission payment of $5,000 to Beaver Excavating.

On September 17, 2013, per a Bill of Sale the Company purchased a truck to add to their fleet for approximately $12, 000.

On September 30, 2013 per Memorandum of Understanding the Company sold 37.5% working and royalty interest to two individuals and/or entities in the Millard Willis Well #5 for $30,000 and is responsible for 45% of all the costs associated with the well.

On September 30, 2013, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 50% working interests as the operator in the Millard Willis Well #5 at the cost of $18,500 and is responsible for 55% of the all costs associated with the well.

On October 11, 2013 per Memorandum of Understanding the Company sold 37.5% working and royalty interest to two individuals and/or entities in the Millard Willis Well #7 for $30,000 and is responsible for 45% of all the costs associated with the well.

On October 11, 2013, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 50% working interests as the operator in the Millard Willis Well #7 at the cost of $18,500 and is responsible for 55% of the all costs associated with the well.

On October 25, 2013, per a Bill of Sale the Company purchased a new truck to add to their fleet for approximately $15, 500.

On December 19, 2013, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 43.75% working interests as the operator in the William Johnson Well #1 in Fentress County, Tennessee at the cost of approximately $16,500 and is responsible for 50% of the all costs associated with the well. The Company is responsible for 50% of the costs on this well and Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page is responsible for the remaining 50% of such costs.

On January 4, 2014, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 87.5% working interests as the operator in the Todd Anderson Well #4 at the cost of approximately $27,500 and is responsible for 100% of the all costs associated with the well.

On February 16, 2014, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 43.75% working interests as the operator in the Gerald Norrad Well #3 at the cost of approximately $15,000. The Company is responsible for 50% of the costs on this well and Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page is responsible for the remaining 50% of such costs.

On March 26, 2014 per Memorandum of Understanding the Company sold 37.5% working and royalty interest to two individuals and/or entities in the Millard Willis Well #8 for approximately $12,000 and is responsible for 45% of all the costs associated with the well.

On March 31, 2014, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 43.75% working interests as the operator in the Alvin Parrish Well #1 in Clinton County, Kentucky at the cost of approximately $16,500 and is responsible for 50% of the all costs associated with the well. The Company is responsible for 50% of the costs on this well and Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page is responsible for the remaining 50% of such costs. 11

On May 9, 2014, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 43.75% working interests as the operator in the Lester Clark #1 in Fentress County, Tennessee at the cost of approximately $16,500 and is responsible for 50% of the all costs associated with the well. The Company is responsible for 50% of the costs on this well and Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page is responsible for the remaining 50% of such costs.

TN-K ENERGY GROUP INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014

NOTE 3 — OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES AND EQUIPMENT (continued).

On May 29, 2014, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 43.75% working interests as the operator in the Alvin Parrish Well #2 in Clinton County, Kentucky at the cost of approximately $16,500 and is responsible for 50% of the all costs associated with the well. The Company is responsible for 50% of the costs on this well and Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page is responsible for the remaining 50% of such costs.

On June 4, 2014, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 50% working interests as the operator in the Millard Willis Well #8 at the cost of $18,500 and is responsible for 55% of the all costs associated with the well.

On June 30, 2014 per Memorandum of Understanding the Company sold 37.5% working and royalty interest to two individuals and/or entities in the Millard Willis Well #9 for $35,000 and is responsible for 45% of all the costs associated with the well.

On August 4, 2014, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 50% working interests as the operator in the Millard Willis Well #9 at the cost of $18,500 and is responsible for 55% of the all costs associated with the well.

On August 15, 2014, the Company entered into a 50% interest in an 87.5% working interest lease named the Johnny Ringley Lease between the Company and Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page, a related party, for an initial cost to the Company of $1,000. The lease is of approximately 68 acres, located in Cumberland County, Kentucky.

On August 20, 2014, per a Memorandum of Understanding, the Company participated in 20% working interest in the Kyle Padgett Well #7 at the cost of $4,250 and is responsible for 25% of all the costs associated with the well.

On September 8, 2014, the Company entered into an 87.5% working interest lease named the William Warren II Lease between the Company for an initial cost to the Company of $10. The lease is of approximately 640 acres, located in Overton County, Kentucky.

On September 8, 2014, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 43.75% working interests as the operator in the Lester Clark #1 in Fentress County, Tennessee at the cost of approximately $16,500 and is responsible for 50% of the all costs associated with the well. The Company is responsible for 50% of the costs on this well and Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page is responsible for the remaining 50% of such costs.

On September 26, 2014, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 43.75% working interests as the operator in the David Wright in Fentress County, Tennessee at the cost of approximately $16,500 and is responsible for 50% of the all costs associated with the well. The Company is responsible for 50% of the costs on this well and Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page is responsible for the remaining 50% of such costs.

On September 30, 2014 per Memorandum of Understanding the Company sold 50% working and royalty interest to four individuals and/or entities in the William Warren II Well #1 for $35,000 and is responsible for 50% of all the costs associated with the well.

On November 18, 2014 per Memorandum of Understanding the Company sold 50% working and royalty interest to four individuals and/or entities in the Billy Walker Well #1 for $35,000 and is responsible for 50% of all the costs associated with the well.

On January 1, 2015 per Memorandum of Understanding the Company sold 50% working and royalty interest to two individuals and/or entities in the Millard Willis Well #10 for $35,000 and is responsible for 50% of all the costs associated with the well.

TN-K ENERGY GROUP INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014

NOTE 3 — OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES AND EQUIPMENT (continued).

On January 2, 2015 per Memorandum of Understanding the Company sold 50% working and royalty interest to two individuals and/or entities in the Johnny Ringley Well #1 for $17,500 and is responsible for 50% of all the costs associated with the well.

On January 31, 2015 per Memorandum of Understanding the Company sold 50% working and royalty interest to four individuals and/or entities in the William Warren Well #2 for $35,000 and is responsible for 50% of all the costs associated with the well.

On March 31, 2015 per Memorandum of Understanding the Company sold 50% working and royalty interest to two individuals and/or entities in the Sherrie Miles Well #1 for $7,000 and is responsible for 50% of all the costs associated with the well.

Impairment of Oil Properties

We use the successful efforts-cost accounting method, which requires recognition of an impairment of oil and gas properties when the total capitalized costs (net of related deferred income taxes) exceed a “ceiling” as described in Note 3.

Amortization Rate

Amortization of oil property is calculated quarterly based on the quarter’s production in barrels of oil equivalent (“BOE”) times an amortization rate. The amortization rate is an amortization base divided by the BOE sum of proved reserves at the end of the quarter and production during the quarter. The amortization base consists of (i) the capitalized evaluated oil costs at the end of the quarter before recording any impairment at quarter’s end, plus (ii) estimated future development costs for the proved reserves, less (iii) accumulated amortization at the beginning of the quarter.

The following table shows by type of asset the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization (“DD&A”) expense for three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014:

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	Three months ended March 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
	2015		2014
Amortization of costs for evaluated oil properties	$	4938,~~674~~435	$	5648,~~172~~422	$	~~148,034~~	$	~~166,438~~
Depreciation of office equipment, furniture and software		6,565		56,~~041~~565		~~19,694~~		~~16,277~~
Total DD&A expense	$	5644,~~239~~999	$	6154,~~213~~987	$	~~167,728~~	$	~~182,715~~

The resulting depletion and depreciation costs of $44,999 and $54,987 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and have been recorded under the caption heading “oil lease operating expense” on our Statement of Operations.

NOTE 4 – LOAN PAYABLE, CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE, CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE – RELATED PARTY.

In April 2007 we executed an agreement with Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page whereby we received $250,000 in funds to be advanced through a line of credit which was evidenced by a convertible promissory note. The note bears interest at a rate of 7.5% per annum and had an original maturity date of April 23, 2008. The initial $250,000 advanced under the credit line is convertible at any time into shares of our common stock at a price per share equal to $0.35. We pay interest only payments until the maturity date of the convertible note, unless it is converted or prepaid. Upon maturity or the conversion of the initial $250,000 principal amount and interest due under the note, we also agreed to issue to Mr. Page a four year warrant to purchase shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.35 per share in an amount equal to 20% of the total shares issued upon conversion of the note. On September 27, 2007, Mr. Page amended the note to provide an additional $100,000 of working capital to us. Under the terms of the amendment, the additional $100,000 is convertible into shares of our common stock at a price per share equal to $0.18. As consideration for this increase of availability under the credit line, at such time as the note matures or he converts the additional $100,000 into common stock, we agreed to issue him a warrant to purchase shares of common stock equal to 20% of the total shares to be issued upon the conversion of that portion of the note with an exercise price of $0.18 per share. On May 1, 2009 we entered into a second amendment of the note to provide for an additional $50,000 of working capital to us, bringing the total amount available under the credit line to $400,000. Under the terms of the amendment, the additional $50,000 is convertible into shares of our common stock at a price per share equal to $0.12. As consideration for this extension, upon maturity of the note or at such time as he converts the note we agreed to issue him a warrant to purchase shares of common stock equal to 20% of the total share amount issued upon conversion of the note, with an exercise price of $0.12 per share, solely as it relates to this additional $50,000.

TN-K ENERGY GROUP INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014

NOTE 34 —– ~~OIL~~LOAN ~~AND~~PAYABLE, ~~GAS~~CONVERTIBLE ~~PROPERTIES~~NOTES ~~AND~~PAYABLE, ~~EQUIPMENT~~CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE – RELATED PARTY (continued).

On December 8, 2009 Mr. Page extended the due date of the note to June 30, 2010. The ~~resulting~~warrants ~~depletion~~we ~~and~~will ~~depreciation~~issue ~~costs~~Mr. Page will expire four years from the date of ~~$56~~issuance,~~239~~ which shall be deemed to be on the earlier of (i) the maturity date of the note; (ii) the date on which the funds are advanced in full and ~~$61,213~~owing by us; or (iii) the date on which we elect to pay off the note in full during the term. We agreed to register for resale the ~~three~~shares ~~months~~underlying ~~ended~~the ~~September~~convertible 30note and warrants, ~~2014~~but ~~and~~we ~~2013~~have not filed the required registration statement. On June 29, ~~respectively~~2010, ~~and~~Mr. ~~$167~~Page extended the due date of the note to December 31,~~728~~ ~~and~~2010. ~~$182~~Effective December 13,~~715~~ ~~for~~2010, the ~~nine~~Company ~~months~~entered ~~ended~~into ~~September~~a ~~30,~~Fifth ~~2014~~Amendment ~~and~~to ~~2013~~the ~~have~~Convertible ~~been~~Line ~~recorded~~of Credit Note with Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page pursuant to which he extended the due date of all amounts due under the ~~caption~~Convertible ~~heading~~Line ~~“oil~~of ~~lease~~Credit ~~operating~~from ~~expense”~~December 31, 2011. The Convertible Line of Credit is now due on ~~our~~demand. ~~Statement~~In April 2012, the Company entered into a Security Agreement with Mr. Page pursuant to which it granted him a security interest in all of ~~Operations~~the Company’s assets as collateral for the amounts due under the Convertible Line of Credit. Although this line of credit has matured, Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page has not demanded payment on this credit line to date.

~~NOTE~~At 4March –31, ~~LOAN~~2015 ~~PAYABLE~~and December 31, ~~CONVERTIBLE~~2014, ~~NOTES~~we ~~PAYABLE~~owed Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page $170,000 ~~CONVERTIBLE~~and ~~NOTES~~$170,000, ~~PAYABLE~~respectively –of ~~RELATED~~principal ~~PARTY~~and approximately $6,358 and $3,218, respectively of accrued but unpaid interest under this credit line. Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page, a principal shareholder of our Company, is the father of Mr. Ken Page, currently our sole officer and a member of our Board of Directors. We have also entered into a number of joint ventures with Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page. See Note 6- Related Party Transactions.

to issue him a warrant to purchase shares of common stock equal to 20% of the total share amount issued upon conversion of the note, with an exercise price of $0.12 per share, solely as it relates to this additional $50,000.

On December 8, 2009 Mr. Page extended the due date of the note to June 30, 2010. The warrants we will issue Mr. Page will expire four years from the date of issuance, which shall be deemed to be on the earlier of (i) the maturity date of the note; (ii) the date on which the funds are advanced in full and owing by us; or (iii) the date on which we elect to pay off the note in full during the term. We agreed to register for resale the shares underlying the convertible note and warrants, but we have not filed the required registration statement. On June 29, 2010, Mr. Page extended the due date of the note to December 31, 2010. Effective December 13, 2010, the Company entered into a Fifth Amendment to the Convertible Line of Credit Note with Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page pursuant to which he extended the due date of all amounts due under the Convertible Line of Credit from December 31, 2011. The Convertible Line of Credit is now due on demand. In April 2012, the Company entered into a Security Agreement with Mr. Page pursuant to which it granted him a security interest in all of the Company’s assets as collateral for the amounts due under the Convertible Line of Credit.

At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we owed Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page $170,000 and $180,000, respectively of principal and approximately $0 and $0, respectively of accrued but unpaid interest under this credit line. Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page, a principal shareholder of our Company, is the father of Mr. Ken Page, currently our sole officer and a member of our Board of Directors. We have also entered into a number of joint ventures with Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page. See Note 6- Related Party Transactions.

Convertible notes payable and loans payable are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Convertible line of credit note payable to a related party with an interest rate of 7.5% per annum, due December 31, 2013		170,000		~~180~~170,000
	$	170,000	$	~~180~~170,000

NOTE 5 — STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT.

Stock Options

On March 22, 2004 our Board of Directors adopted, subject to stockholder approval, the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”). The 2004 Plan was approved by our stockholder in May 2004. No award could be granted under the 2004 Plan subsequent to the 10th anniversary of the date on which the plan was approved by our stockholders. The number of shares of our common stock available for issuance under the 2004 Plan was 3,500,000.

On September 29, 2009 our Board of Directors adopted our 2009 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2009 Plan”). The plan authorizes the grant of (i) options which qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (ii) non-qualified options which do not qualify as incentive stock options, (iii) awards of our common stock (iv) and rights to make direct purchases of our common stock which may be subject to certain restrictions. We have reserved 4,800,000 shares of our common stock for issuance upon grants made under the plan.

In May 2014, this employment agreement was amended to reduce the monthly salary to be $3,500 a month and the Company opting to pay health insurance in the amount of $524.02. In addition, on June 27, 2014 our Board of Directors granted Mr. Ken Page five year non-qualified options under to purchase 1,560,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.16 per share. The Options were valued using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, annual volatility of 175%, risk free interest rate of 2.0%, and expected life of 4.5 years.

On June 27, 2014 our Board of Directors granted Mr. Ken Page five year non-qualified options under to purchase 1,560,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.16 per share. The Options were valued using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, annual volatility of 234%, risk free interest rate of 1.64%, and expected life of 4.5 years.

TN-K ENERGY GROUP INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014

NOTE 5 — STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT. (continued).

In September 2010, 3,000,000 options exercisable at $0.20 a share held by Mr. Ken Page, expired. On December 14, 2010 our Board of Directors granted Mr. Ken Page five year non-qualified options under to purchase 1,500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.30 per share. The Options were valued using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, annual volatility of 234%, risk free interest rate of 0%, and expected life of 4.5 years.

On June 27, 2014 our Board of Directors granted Mr. Ken Page five year non-qualified options under to purchase 1,560,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.16 per share. The Options were valued using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, annual volatility of 175%, risk free interest rate of 2%, and expected life of 4.5 years.

Compensation based stock option and warrant activity for warrants and qualified and unqualified stock options are summarized as follows:

	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at December 31, 2012		3,393,000		$	0.31
Outstanding at December 31, 2013		3,393,000		$	0.31
Granted		-			.00
Exercised		-			.00
Expired or cancelled		-			.00
Outstanding at December 31, 2013		3,393,000		$	.31
Granted		1,560,000			.16
Exercised		-			.00
Expired or cancelled		(1,738,000	)		.00
Outstanding at December 31, 2014		3,215,000		$	.31
Granted		-			-
Exercised		-			-
Expired or cancelled		-			-
Outstanding at September 30, 2014		4,953,000		$	.26
Outstanding at March 31, 2015		3,215,000		$	.26

NOTE 6 –RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS.

The Company ~~has~~ entered into a one year employment arrangement with its CEO, in September 2007, with automatic annual renewals. The employment arrangement required an annual salary of $40,000 and a monthly expense allowance of $1,000, with 3,000,000 stock options issued. These stock options vest from March 2008 to September 2008 and have a $0.20 exercise price for three years. In September 2009, this employment agreement was amended to reduce the monthly salary to be $4,167.67 a month and an additional 120,000 options were issued with an exercise price of $0.25, vesting 10,000 options monthly commencing in September 2009. On December 14, 2010, our Board of Directors granted Mr. Ken Page five year non-qualified options under to purchase 1,500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.30 per share. The options were valued using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 01.64%, annual volatility of 407%, risk free interest rate of 0%, and expected life of 4.5 years. In July 2013 we increased Mr. Page's compensation to $46,000 annually under the terms of an oral agreement. We also provided Mr. Page with the use of company-owned vehicles as an additional compensation.

InDuring ~~May 2014~~2012, ~~this~~Mr. ~~employment~~Ken ~~agreement~~Page ~~was~~forgave ~~amended~~accrued ~~to reduce the monthly~~ salary todue ~~be $3,500 a month and the Company opting to pay health insurance~~ in the amount of $~~524.02. In addition~~85, ~~on June 27~~076, ~~2014~~which ~~our~~had ~~Board~~been ofaccrued ~~Directors~~pursuant ~~granted Mr. Ken Page five year non-qualified options under~~ to ~~purchase~~the ~~1,560,000~~terms ~~shares~~ of ~~our~~his ~~common~~employment ~~stock at an exercise price of $0~~agreement.16 ~~per~~Such ~~share.~~monies ~~The~~have ~~Options~~been ~~were~~recorded ~~valued~~as ~~using~~a ~~the~~contribution ~~Black-Scholes~~to ~~Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, annual volatility of 175%, risk free interest rate of 2~~capital.~~0%, and expected life of 4.5 years.~~

OnIn ~~December~~May 192014, ~~2013,~~this ~~per~~employment aagreement ~~Memorandum~~was ofamended ~~Understanding~~to reduce the ~~Company~~monthly ~~participated~~salary ~~and~~to ~~permitted~~be ~~43.75%~~$3,500 ~~working~~a ~~interests~~month asand the ~~operator~~Company opting to pay health insurance in the ~~William~~amount ~~Johnson~~of ~~Well~~$524.02. #1In inaddition, ~~Fentress~~on ~~County~~June 27, ~~Tennessee~~2014 atour ~~the~~Board ~~cost~~of Directors granted Mr. Ken Page five year non-qualified options under to purchase 1,560,000 shares of ~~approximately~~our common stock at an exercise price of $0.16~~,500~~ ~~and~~per isshare. ~~responsible~~The ~~for~~Options ~~50%~~were ofvalued using the ~~all~~Black-Scholes ~~costs~~Option ~~associated~~Pricing Model with the ~~well.~~following ~~The~~assumptions: ~~Company~~dividend isyield ~~responsible~~of ~~for 50~~0%, annual volatility of ~~the~~175%, ~~costs~~risk onfree ~~this~~interest ~~well~~rate of 2.0%, and Mrexpected life of 4.5 ~~Daniel~~years. ~~(Allen)~~The ~~Page~~fair value of these options was determined to be $313,192, which is ~~responsible~~being ~~for~~amortized over the ~~remaining~~five ~~50%~~year ofvesting ~~such costs~~period.

On March 31, 2014, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 43.75% working interests as the operator in the Alan Parrish Well #1 in Clinton County, Kentucky at the cost of approximately $16,500 and is responsible for 50% of the all costs associated with the well. The Company is responsible for 50% of the costs on this well and Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page is responsible for the remaining 50% of such costs.

TN-K ENERGY GROUP INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014

NOTE 6 –RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS. (continued).

On May 29, 2014, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 43.75% working interests as the operator in the Alan Parrish Well #2 in Clinton County, Kentucky at the cost of approximately $16,500 and is responsible for 50% of the all costs associated with the well. The Company is responsible for 50% of the costs on this well and Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page is responsible for the remaining 50% of such costs.

AtOn ~~September~~August 3015, 2014 ~~and December 31~~, ~~2013~~the weCompany ~~owed~~entered ~~Mr.~~into ~~Page~~a ~~$170,000~~50% ~~and~~interest ~~$180,000,~~in ~~respectively~~an of87.5% ~~principal~~working ~~and~~interest ~~approximately~~lease $0named ~~and~~the ~~$0,~~Johnny ~~respectively~~Ringley ofLease ~~accrued~~between ~~but~~the ~~unpaid~~Company ~~interest~~and ~~under~~Mr. ~~this~~Daniel ~~credit~~(Allen) ~~line.~~Page, Ata ~~September~~related 30party, ~~2014~~for ~~and~~an ~~December~~initial ~~31,~~cost ~~2013~~to wethe ~~owed~~Company ~~Mr.~~of ~~Page~~ $341,~~366~~000. ~~and~~The ~~$56,820,~~lease ~~respectively~~is of ~~accrued~~approximately ~~consulting~~68 ~~expenses~~acres, located in Cumberland County, Kentucky.

On August 21, 2014, we entered into an agreement with Mr. Page pursuant to which certain terms of his Employment Agreement were amended at his request in an effort to assist our company during development of our new business. Under Amendment No. 2 to Mr. Page’s Employment Agreement, his base salary was reduced from $46,000 annually to $42,000 and we agreed to pay his health insurance premiums initially at the rate of $524 per month, which such amount may be increased or decreased upon a change in cost of such insurance based upon a subsequent policy providing identical coverage. This amendment memorialized an oral agreement between parties entered into in May 2014.

At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 we owed Mr. Page $170,000 and $170,000, respectively of principal and approximately $6,358 and $3,218, respectively of accrued but unpaid interest under this credit line. At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we owed Mr. Page $57,366 and $51,768, respectively of accrued consulting expenses.

NOTE 7 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES.

The Company may be subject to various possible contingencies, which are derived primarily from interpretations of federal and state laws and regulations affecting the oil and gas industry. Although management believes it has complied with the various laws and regulations, new rulings and interpretations may require the Company to make future adjustments.

The Company continually evaluates its leasehold interests, therefore certain leases may be abandoned by the Company in the normal course of business.

The Company has been involved in litigation from time to time as a result of the failure to make payments on certain of its past due debts. Overall management believes the net recorded value of its past due payables adequately cover the total financial exposure of the past due payables.

NOTE 8 ─ SUBSEQUENT EVENTS.

On October 6, 2014, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 50% working interests as the operator in the Millard Willis Well #10 at the cost of $18,500 and is responsible for 55% of the all costs associated with the well.

On October 15, 2014, the Company entered into a 50% interest in an 87.5% working interest lease named the Billy Walker Lease between the Company and Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page, a related party, for an initial cost to the Company of $10. The lease is of approximately 61.4 acres, located in Overton County, Tennessee.

On October 24, 2014, per a Memorandum of Understanding the Company participated and permitted 43.75% working interests as the operator in the Billy Walker well #1 in Clinton County, Kentucky at the cost of approximately $16,500 and is responsible for 50% of the all costs associated with the well. The Company is responsible for 50% of the costs on this well and Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page is responsible for the remaining 50% of such costs.

Item 2.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operation for the ~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2014~~2015 and the ~~first~~First ~~nine~~Quarter ~~months of~~ 2014 should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements and the notes to those statements that are included elsewhere in this report. Our discussion includes forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those set forth under the Item 1A. Risk Factors appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014 as previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.

Overview

We are an independent oil exploration and production company, engaged in acquiring oil leases and exploring and developing crude oil reserves and production in the Appalachian basin. We concentrate our operations in Kentucky and Tennessee primarily in the Murfreesboro, Knox and Wells Creek formations, although we also have assets located in the Granville, Stones River and Sunnybrook formations. All of these formations are primary known producing formations. Our growth strategy is to focus on our operational growth in our core area, to convert our unproved reserves to ~~prove~~proved reserves and to continue our acreage acquisitions while maintaining balanced, prudent financial management. In the past three ~~recent~~ years, we have realized substantial benefits from the sale of concentrations of our reserves, although this is not a focus, we do evaluate from time to time potential sales of our reserves for strategic and capital reasons.

Our Operations

Our operations are divided between leases in which we have a participation interest/overriding royalty interest and leases in which we are the operator. Interests owned by participation leases means we have a working or royalty interest in a property that is operated or maintained by another interest owner under an agreement. Overriding royalty interest means we assisted in the negotiations between the buyers and sellers of lease sales which we retained a royalty interest, and are provided options for additional participation of future wells. For participation leases, we receive payments for our oil sales from the operator and we are billed by the operator for a percentage of joint expenses relative to the costs of drilling and transporting the oil from the wells to the sales point. Since 2010, we have entered into a number of participation leases and working interest leases with third parties in which Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page, a related party, is also a party.

For drilling operations on leases in which we are the operator, we hire third parties to provide contract drilling services to us on an as needed basis. We have been able to reduce or eliminate our financial exposure in the initial drilling in our projects by creating joint venture arrangements that provide for others to pay for all or a disproportionate share of the initial drilling costs in exchange for a working or royalty interest in the well. We expect to continue to use these types of relationships to partially or completely fund initial drilling of future wells.

During ~~2014~~2015, we have continued to expand our acreage position in our core area, focusing on acreage we will operate. In the Third Quarter of 2014, the Company entered into an agreement between the Company and Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page, a related party, of 50% interest in an 87.5% working interest lease with approximately 68 acres named the Johnny Ringley Lease located in Cumberland County, Kentucky. The Company also entered into an operating agreement of an 87.5% working interest lease with approximately 640 acres named the William Warren II Lease located in Overton County, Kentucky. In addition to the challenges faced by small independent oil and gas companies, we continue to face a number of challenges in executing our business model which are particular to our company. Our revenues ~~decreased~~increased 84812% for the ~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2014~~2015 from the ~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2013, and 75% for the first nine months of~~ 2014 ~~from the comparable period of 2013~~. ~~These decreases are attributed to the natural depletion of wells and downtime.~~

At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, our balance sheet includes approximately $3.4199 million and $3.4593 million of obligations, a substantial portion of which relates to the prior business of our company before those operations were discontinued in 2005. Other than the secured credit line due a related party, none of the remaining obligations represent secured debt, although a number of the creditors have obtained judgments against our company. We do not have the resources to satisfy these obligations. If one or more of these judgment creditors should seek to enforce the judgment, our ability to continue our operations as they are presently conducted is in jeopardy.

We also face the challenge of limited personnel and diversion of our management’s time and attention. In 2011 we hired a part-time accountant and in 2014 we hired a full-time project coordinator, but as our company continues to grow, we need to hire additional staff to handle the increasing needs of our company, including from an administrative standpoint, and we need to invest in internal systems to ensure that our financial statements are properly prepared. Lastly, we need to raise additional capital to fund these necessary infrastructure increases and our continued expansion, as well as to provide adequate funds to satisfy our obligations. We have been relying on funding available to us under a secured line of credit extended by Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page, a related party, which matured in December 2011 and is due on demand. In April 2012 we granted Mr. Daniel (Allen) Page a security interest in all of our assets as collateral for this obligation. At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, $170,000 is outstanding under this facility which is the maximum amount available as the credit line matured in December 2011. The amount is convertible into shares of our common stock at various prices, but there are no assurances the holder will convert the obligation.

We do not have any external sources of liquidity. Our working capital is not sufficient to fund our operations and pay our obligations, many of which are past due, and may impede our ability to further grow our company. Although we need to raise additional working capital, we do not have any commitments for capital from third parties. Given the small size of our company, the quotation of our stock in the over-the-counter market and the significant liabilities on our balance sheet, we expect to encounter significant obstacles in raising equity or debit capital. If we are unable to access capital as needed, our ability to grow our company is in jeopardy and absent a significant increase in our revenues we may be unable to continue as a going concern.

Going Concern

For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, we reported a net loss of $~~(380~~77,~~126)~~329 ~~and~~compared atto ~~September~~a 30net loss of $98,852, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2014. At March 31, 2015 we have an accumulated deficit of $16.59 million. The report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 contains an explanatory paragraph regarding our ability to continue as a going concern based upon our operating losses and need to raise additional capital. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. There are no assurances we will be successful in our efforts to increase our revenues and report profitable operations or to continue as a going concern, in which event investors would lose their entire investment in our company.

Results of Operations

Our revenues can include revenues from oil sales generated both from wells in which we are the operator as well as those in which we have a working interest, as well as from non-recurring well services and sales of interest in oil and gas leases to third parties and finder’s fees for the culmination of the sale of oil well interests between third parties. While oil sales revenues are constant from period to period, revenues from sales of oil and gas leases and finder’s fees are transaction based on one-time for the particular transaction. As such, we may not report revenues from those sources in all periods. Oil sales revenues decreased 5579% in the ~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2014~~2015 compared to the ~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2013, and 56% for the nine months ended September 30,~~ 2014 ~~from the comparable period in 2013~~, ~~both~~ due to low production income as the weather conditions were unfavorable for pumping during the period and the lower than industry average sales price per unit of oil extracted. During the ~~Third~~First Quarters ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, the average sales price (including transfers) per unit of oil extracted from wells drilled by us was approximately $9395.7414 and approximately $~~103~~45.~~14,~~35 respectively, for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013 and approximately $96.15 and approximately $94.89, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30,~~ 2014 ~~and 2013~~.

During the ~~Third~~First ~~Quarters~~Quarter ~~2014~~2015 compared to the ~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2013~~2014, the average number of barrels sold was approximately ~~3,560~~730 and 4928,~~607,~~ respectively, for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013 and approximately 8,809 and 19,587, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30,~~ 2014 ~~and 2013~~. Revenues from the sale of oil and gas leases ~~declined 87%~~ for ~~each of~~ the ~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2014~~2015 was $94,500 as compared to $0 the ~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2013, and 76% for the nine months ended September 30,~~ 2014 ~~from the comparable period in 2013~~.

Our total operating expenses during the ~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2014~~2015 ~~decreased~~increased approximately 4276% from the comparative period in ~~2013~~2014. The ~~decrease~~increase is directly related to ~~no recorded impairment of developed properties and cost associated with~~ the ~~sale~~recording of ~~oil~~annual ~~and~~accounting ~~gas leases. The total operating expenses increased approximately 12% for the nine months ended September 30~~fees, ~~2014 from~~ the ~~comparable period in 2013. The increases is directly related to the~~ non-cash stock compensation expense incurred with the issuance of stock options and the cost of oil and gas leases sold. Oil lease operating expenses, which include our portion of the cost of contract drillers, and other expenses associated with the drilling operations and depletion expense, were ~~279~~1400% ~~and 270%~~ of oil sales revenues for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014 as compared to 140% and 135% for the three and nine months ended September 30~~2015, ~~2013 and 2013,~~ respectively, which is attributable to our lower than usual amount of production and increased participation in drilling activities.

Cost of oil and gas leases sold ~~declined~~were ~~100%~~$29,258 for ~~each~~First ~~of the Third~~ Quarter ~~2014~~2015 ~~as compared to the Third Quarter 2013,~~ and ~~94%~~$0 for the ~~nine~~First ~~months~~Quarter ~~ended September 30,~~ 2014 ~~from the comparable period in 2013~~. ~~These decreases are attributed to a minimal amount of oil and gas leases/well interest sold during 2014 compared to the sale of oil and gas leases during the 2013 period.~~

Our sales, general and administrative expenses increased approximately 20111% during the ~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2014~~2015 from the comparative period in ~~2013~~2014. The ~~increases~~increase is directly related to ~~an increase in payroll in~~ the ~~2014~~recording ~~period.~~of ~~Sales,~~annual ~~general~~accounting ~~and administrative expenses increased approximately 92% for the nine months ended September 30~~fees, ~~2014, respectively, from~~ the ~~comparable periods in 2013. The increases is directly related to the~~ non-cash stock compensation expense incurred with the issuance of stock options. We anticipate our operating expenses will increase during the balance of ~~2014~~2015 which will be reflective of our increased operations. We are not able at this time, however, to quantify the amount of the expected increase.

During ~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, we did not recognized anany impairment expense ~~of $0 and $63,872, respectively, and $2,318 and $68,694, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013~~. These impairment expenses are related to impairment of developed properties as we have determined that the carrying value of these assets is likely not recoverable. Given the nature of our operations it is likely we will recognize comparable expenses in future periods.

18 Our interest expense during First Quarter 2015 and 2014 was $3,544 and $3,618. The decreased is the result of the decreased amounts outstanding principal under the line of credit provided by a related party which provides funding for our operations.

Our interest expense during Third Quarter 2014 and 2013 was $3,614 and $3,803; respectively, and $10,810 and $11,297, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. The decreased is the result of the decreased amounts outstanding principal under the line of credit provided by a related party which provides funding for our operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is the ability of a company to generate sufficient cash to satisfy its needs for cash. At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, we had a working capital deficit of $3,~~304~~502,~~838~~246 as compared to a working capital deficit of $3,~~096~~433,~~665~~981 at December 31, ~~2013~~2014. Our current assets at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 include accounts receivable and receivables from the sale of a partial interest in oil wells of $2052,~~989~~688 compared to $17,~~318~~572 at December 31, ~~2013~~2014, respectively, which are due 30 days from invoicing. Our current liabilities includes approximately $3.415 million of accounts payable and accrued expenses, as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, compared to $3.4543 million of accounts payable and accrued expenses, as of March 31, 2014. Included in our accrued expenses, as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 is approximately $3457,366 of consulting expenses due a related party, and approximately $154,000 of accrued taxes. In addition, at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 we owe a related party $170,000 of principal and $06,358, of accrued interest under a secured line of credit.

Net cash used by operating activities for the Third Quarter 2014 was ($93,043) as compared to the net cash provided in the Third Quarter of 2013 was $261,634. During the Third Quarter 2014, cash was used in equity based compensation. Net cash used in investing activities in the Third Quarter 2014 reflects the purchase of oil and gas leases and fixed assets, as compared to net cash used in investment activities in Third Quarter 2013 reflects the purchase of oil and gas leases and fixed assets. There were no net cash used in financing activities in the Third Quarter 2014 or the Third Quarter of 2013.18

Net cash provided by operating activities for the First Quarter 2015 was $28,668 as compared to the net cash used in the First Quarter 2014 was ($59,070). During the First Quarter 2015 and 2014, $38,797 and $0 was used in equity based compensation, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities in the First Quarter 2015 reflects the purchase of oil and gas leases and sales of oil and gas rights, as compared to net cash used in investment activities in First Quarter 2014 reflects the purchase of oil and gas leases and fixed assets. There was no net cash used in financing activities in the First Quarter 2015 as compared to the repayment of notes payable for the First Quarter of 2014.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

All new accounting pronouncements issued but not yet effective have been evaluated and determined to be not applicable or immaterial to the financial statement of the Company.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not applicable for a smaller reporting company.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Based on his evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, our Chief Executive Officer who also serves as our principal financial and accounting officer has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective such that the information relating to our company, required to be disclosed in our Securities and Exchange Commission reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure as a result of continuing material weaknesses.

The material weakness identified for the period ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014 were related to insufficient personnel and accounting resources are were adequate to allow sufficient time to (i) perform a review of the consolidation and supporting financial statement disclosure schedules independent of the preparer (ii) adequately prepare for our quarterly reviews and annual audit and (iii) research all applicable accounting pronouncements as they relate to our financial statements and underlying disclosures. These material weaknesses have not been remediated and continued through the end of the ~~Third~~First Quarter ~~2014~~2015. Due to these material weaknesses, in preparing our financial statements for the period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 we performed additional analysis and other post close procedures to ensure that such financial statements were stated fairly in all material respects in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Until such time as we remediate these material weaknesses, we expect that the material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures will continue.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

~~Item1~~Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

None.

~~Item1A~~Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Not applicable for a smaller reporting company.

~~Item2~~Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

~~Item3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.~~19

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

~~Item4~~Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable to our company’s operations.

~~Item5~~Item 5. Other Information.

None.

~~Item6~~Item 6. Exhibits.

No.	Description
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer *
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a) Certification of principal financial and accounting officer *
32.1	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and principal financial and accounting officer *

101.INS XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT **

101.INS	XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT **
101.SCH	XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA **
101.CAL	XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE **
101.DEF	XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE **
101.LAB	XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE **
101.PRE	XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE **

101.SCH XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA **

101.CAL XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE **

101.DEF XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE **

101.LAB XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE **

101.PRE XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE **

*	filed herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	TN-K ENERGY GROUP INC.
November 14, 2014	By: /s/ Ken Page
August 7, 2015	By: /s/ Ken Page
	Ken Page, Chief Executive Officer, principal financial and accounting officer

Filing Compare · TN-K ENERGY GROUP INC.