UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 000-30819

Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		20-1563395
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

5611 Baird Court

Houston, Texas 77041

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

713-223-3031

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, $.001 par value, outstanding as of ~~February~~May 31, 2009 was 3536,~~740~~596,~~349~~234.

PARTICLE DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(a development stage enterprise)

FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~ MARCH 31, ~~2008~~2009

INDEX

Part I - Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) at December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008	3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) at March 31, 2009 and September 30, 2008	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) - Three Months Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and from June 9, 2003 (date of inception) to December 31, 2008	4
	Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) – Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, and from June 9, 2003 (date of inception) to March 31, 2009	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - Three Months Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and from June 9, 2003 (date of inception) to December 31, 2008	5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - Six Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, and from June 9, 2003 (date of inception) to March 31, 2009	5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1113
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	1516
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	1516
Part II - Other Information		1517
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	1517
Item 6.	Exhibits	16
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	18
	Signatures	17
Item 5.	Other Information	18
Item 6.	Exhibits	19
	Signatures	19

PARTICLE DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(a development stage enterprise)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31, 2008			September 30, 2008
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,167,987		$	2,296,143
Prepaid expenses		167,178			260,686
Total current assets		1,335,165			2,556,829
Property, plant & equipment, net		453,823			1,213,918
Intangibles, net		1,655,681			1,552,266
Other assets		41,144			41,144
Total assets	$	3,485,813		$	5,364,157
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	772,014		$	850,944
Short-term notes payable		48,542			84,277
Current portion of long-term debt		5,989			8,651
Accrued liabilities		117,608			353,881
Total current liabilities		944,153			1,297,753
Long-term debt		14,310			15,381
Deferred rent		138,029			135,531
Commitments and contingencies - Note 8
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 38,743,435 shares issued and 35,740,349 shares outstanding at December 31, 2008, and 38,767,018 shares issued and 35,763,932 shares outstanding at September 30, 2008		38,744			38,768
Additional paid-in capital		46,711,173			46,217,538
Treasury stock at cost, 3,003,086 shares		(1,511,817	)		(1,511,817	)
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(42,848,779	)		(40,828,997	)
Total stockholders’ equity		2,389,321			3,915,492
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	3,485,813		$	5,364,157

(Unaudited)

	March 31, 2009			September 30, 2008


ASSETS

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	503,925		$	2,296,143
Accounts receivable		10,000			—
Deferred financing costs, net		71,296			—
Prepaid expenses		142,131			260,686

Total current assets		727,352			2,556,829

Property, plant & equipment, net		410,330			1,213,918

Intangibles, net		1,705,780			1,552,266

Other assets		41,144			41,144

Total assets	$	2,884,606		$	5,364,157

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	900,435		$	850,944
PIK Note payable, net of discount of $304,623		170,377			—
Short-term notes payable		8,253			84,277
Current portion of long-term debt		4,229			8,651
Accrued liabilities		172,323			353,881

Total current liabilities		1,255,617			1,297,753

Long-term debt		13,203			15,381
Deferred rent		139,694			135,531

Commitments and contingencies - Note 11

Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 38,743,435 shares issued and 35,740,349 shares outstanding at March 31, 2009, and 38,767,018 shares issued and 35,763,932 shares outstanding at September 30, 2008		38,743			38,768
Additional paid-in capital		47,369,458			46,217,538
Treasury stock at cost, 3,003,086 shares		(1,511,817	)		(1,511,817	)
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(44,420,292	)		(40,828,997	)

Total stockholders’ equity		1,476,092			3,915,492

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,884,606		$	5,364,157

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

PARTICLE DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(a development stage enterprise)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

							~~Period from~~						Period from
							~~June 9, 2003~~						June 9, 2003
							~~(date of~~						(date of
							~~inception) to~~						inception) to
	Three Months Ended December 31,						December 31,
	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,						March 31,
	2008			2007			2008
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2009
Revenues	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Operating expenses:
Research and development		~~965~~813,~~662~~521			1,~~780~~546,~~812~~200			221,~~361~~779,~~907~~183			3,327,012			23,175,428
General and administrative		1756,~~146,125~~939			1,~~479~~434,~~105~~859			221,~~089~~903,~~353~~064			2,913,964			22,846,292
Impairment of asset		—			—			~~295,260~~—			—			295,260
Gain on sale of assets		(86,971	)		—			(843,440	)
(Gain)/loss on sale of assets		747			(641,721	)		(86,224	)		(641,721	)		(842,693	)
Total operating expenses		21,~~024~~571,~~816~~207			32,~~259~~339,~~917~~338			433,~~903~~596,~~080~~023			5,599,255			45,474,287
Loss from operations		(21,~~024~~571,~~816~~207	)		(32,~~259~~339,~~917~~338	)		(433,~~903~~596,~~080~~023	)		(5,599,255	)		(45,474,287	)
Other income (expenses)
Interest income		~~6,866~~863			3511,~~704~~803			~~949~~7,~~457~~729			47,507			950,320
Rental income - related party		—			—			~~73,727~~—			—			73,727
Gain on debt extinguishment		—			—			~~35,283~~—			—			35,283
Gain on assignment of lease - related party		—			—			~~55,614~~—			—			55,614
Interest expense		(1,~~832~~169	)		(21,~~323~~539	)		(593,~~780~~001	)		(3,862	)		(60,949	)
Total other income		5,034			33,381			1,054,301
Total other income (expense)		(306	)		10,264			4,728			43,645			1,053,995
Net loss	$	(21,~~019~~571,~~782~~513	)	$	(32,~~226~~329,~~536~~074	)	$	(423,~~848~~591,~~779~~295	)	$	(5,555,610	)	$	(44,420,292	)
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted	$	(0.0605	)	$	(0.1008	)	$	(10.7910	)	$	(0.18	)	$	(1.82	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic and diluted		34,~~570~~651,~~348~~201			30,~~734~~851,~~703~~502			2334,~~920~~595,~~600~~330			30,819,479			24,422,879

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

PARTICLE DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(a development stage enterprise)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

							Period from
							June 9, 2003
							(date of
	Three Months Ended December 31,						inception ) to December 31,
	Six Months Ended March 31,						inception ) to March 31,
	2008			2007			2008
	2009			2008			2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(23,~~019~~591,~~782~~295	)	$	(35,~~226~~555,~~536~~610	)	$	(4244,~~848~~420,~~779~~292	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Gain on debt extinguishment		—			—			(35,283	)
Impairment of asset		—			—			295,260
Gain on assignment of lease - related party		—			—			(55,614	)
Gain on sale of assets		(86,~~971~~224	)		—(641,721	)		(~~843~~842,~~440~~693	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		96156,~~262~~468			~~166~~301,~~855~~824			2,~~683~~743,~~560~~766
Amortization of deferred financing costs		6,482			—			6,482
Amortization of discount on notes payable		13,756			—			13,756
Short-term note issued for services		—			—			44,000
Common stock issued for services		—			—			931,500
Warrants issued for services		—			—			63,829
Stock-based employee compensation		~~493~~908,~~611~~513			~~713~~1,~~958~~418,797			8,~~305~~720,~~154~~056
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in note receivable		—			—			385,839
(Increase) in accounts receivable - related party		—			—			(40,819	)
(Increase) Decrease in prepaid expenses		93,508			(7,804	)		198,797
(Increase) in accounts receivable		(10,000	)		—			(10,000	)
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable		(78,930	)		67,551			432,076
(Increase) Decrease in prepaid expenses		118,556			51,046			223,845
Increase (Decrease) in accrued liabilities		(236,273	)		437,060			214,405
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable		49,491			(259,297	)		560,497
(Increase) Decrease in other assets		—			2,018			(26,494	)
Increase (Decrease) in accrued liabilities		(259,335	)		397,457			191,343
Increase in other liabilities		2,498			35,499			138,029
(Increase) Decrease in other assets		—			11,418			(26,494	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(1,736,077	)		(1,811,399	)		(30,157,980	)
Increase in other liabilities		4,163			60,996			139,694
Net cash used in operating activities		(2,689,425	)		(4,215,090	)		(31,111,328	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Payments to purchase property and equipment		(7685,~~575~~492	)		(2637,~~726~~332	)		(3,~~434~~442,~~077~~994	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		~~840~~850,~~000~~050			—686,620			1,~~712~~722,~~574~~624
Payments to purchase intangibles		(~~116~~184,~~036~~727	)		(3583,~~294~~989	)		(1,~~147~~216,~~798~~489	)
Payments to purchase other assets		—			—			(419,504	)
Payments issued for note receivable		—			—			(300,783	)
Payments issued for note receivable - related party		—			—			(56,784	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		~~647~~579,~~389~~831			~~(62~~565,~~020~~299	)		(3,~~646~~713,~~372~~930	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		—			113,200			36,839,575
Repurchase of common stock		—			—			(1,511,817	)
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes		—			—			553,500
Repayments of notes payable		(3982,~~468~~624	)		(4082,~~725~~242	)		(~~908~~952,~~919~~075	)
Proceeds from borrowings under loan agreements, net of financing costs		400,000			—			400,000
Proceeds from borrowings under loan agreements - related parties		—			—			23,195
Repayment of borrowings under loan agreements - related parties		—			—			(23,195	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		~~(39~~317,~~468~~376	)		(3969,~~525~~042	)		3435,~~972~~329,~~339~~183
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(1,~~128~~792,~~156~~218	)		(13,~~912~~718,~~944~~833	)		1503,~~167,987~~925
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period		2,296,143			4,461,929			—
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period	$	1503,~~167,987~~925		$	2743,~~548,985~~096		$	1503,~~167,987~~925
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	1,832		$	23,~~323~~862		$	5960,~~780~~949
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Prepaid insurance acquired with note payable	$	—		$	—		$	586,629
Common stock issued as consideration for account payable		—			—			6,000
Common stock issued as consideration for note payable		—			—			50,000
Related party note receivable issued for property and equipment		—			—			56,783
Note payable converted into common stock		—			—			553,500
Property and equipment acquired with assumed liabilities		—			—			479,610
Intangibles acquired with assumed liabilities		—			—			757,792
Property and equipment acquired with note payable		—			—			30,487
Short-term investments reclassified from other assets		—			—			385,839
Property and equipment reclassified from other assets		—			—			19,015
Deferred financing costs on notes payable		77,778			—			77,778
Discount on note payable warrant recorded in APIC		243,379			—			243,379

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

PARTICLE DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(a development stage enterprise)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1.	BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, which include the accounts of Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc. (which is referred to herein as “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”) and its subsidiary, Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP have been condensed or omitted in accordance with such rules and regulations. The information furnished in the unaudited interim ~~consolidated~~ consolidated financial statements includes normal recurring adjustments and reflects all adjustments, which in the opinion of management are necessary for a ~~fair~~ fair presentation of such financial statements. Although management believes the disclosures and information presented are adequate to make the information not misleading, these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s September 30, 2008 audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in its Annual Report on Form 10-K. Operating results for the three and six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~ 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the ~~year~~ year ending September 30, 2009.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Certain reclassifications have been made to conform prior period amounts to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net loss, net loss per share, or stockholders’ equity.

2.	GOING CONCERN

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared on the basis of accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the condensed consolidated financial statements, for the three and six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009, the Company reported a net ~~loss~~losses of approximately $21.06 million and $3.6 million, respectively, as compared to a net ~~loss~~losses of approximately $2.3 million and $5.26 million for the three and six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2007~~2008, respectively. The consolidated financial statements also show an accumulated deficit of approximately $4244.84 million from inception (June 9, 2003) through the period ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009.

The Company is currently a development stage company and its continued existence is dependent upon the Company’s successful development of the Particle Impact Drilling (“PID”) technology and its ability to successfully commercialize this technology. The Company has yet to generate cash flow from operations, and until revenues commence, the Company is highly dependent upon debt and equity funding. Based on the Company’s current liquidity position, the Company will need to raise additional capital through debt or equity funding within the next twelve months. Management cannot provide any assurance that any such financing will be available on acceptable terms or at all. Should continuing funding requirements not be met, the Company’s operations may cease to exist.

These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. We evaluate our long-lived assets for indicators of possible impairment by comparison of the carrying amounts to future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by such assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Should an impairment exist, the impairment loss would be measured based on the excess carrying value of the asset over the asset’s fair value or discounted estimates of future cash flows. We also evaluate the capitalized costs for patents and patent applications filed but not issued for possible impairments. The evaluation of capitalized costs for patents and patent applications is based on a subjective cash flow forecast which is subject to change. We will reassess our cash flow forecast each time there are fundamental changes in the underlying potential use of the patents or patent applications in terms of performance, customer acceptance or other factors that may affect such cash flow forecasts.

New Accounting Pronouncements. In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, “SFAS” No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. Under the standard, fair value measurements would be separately disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company has adopted SFAS No. 157 and it has not had a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company adopted SFAS No. 159 on October 1, 2008 and it has not had a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations (SFAS 141R), which replaces SFAS 141, Business Combinations. SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for determining how an enterprise recognizes and measures the fair value of certain assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination, including noncontrolling interests, contingent consideration, and certain acquired contingencies. SFAS 141R also requires acquisition-related transaction expenses and restructuring costs be expensed as incurred rather than capitalized as a component of the business combination. SFAS 141R will be applicable prospectively to business combinations beginning in the Company’s 2010 fiscal year.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – An Amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary. SFAS 160 also requires that a retained noncontrolling interest upon the deconsolidation of a subsidiary be initially measured at its fair value. SFAS 160 is effective for the Company’s 2010 fiscal year. Upon adoption of SFAS 160, the Company will be required to report its noncontrolling interests, if any, as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. The Company will also be required to present net income allocable to the noncontrolling interests, if any, and net income attributable to the shareholders of the Company separately in its consolidated statements of income. Currently, noncontrolling interests (minority interests) are reported as a liability in a Company’s statement of financial position and the related income attributable to minority interests is reflected as an expense in arriving at net income. SFAS 160 requires retroactive adoption of the presentation and disclosure requirements for existing minority interests. All other requirements of SFAS 160 shall be applied prospectively. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 160 to significantly impact its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosure related to derivatives and hedging activities and thereby seeks to improve the transparency of financial reporting. Under SFAS No. 161, entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures relating to: (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) how derivative instruments and related hedge items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS No. 133”), and its related interpretations; and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 must be applied prospectively to all derivative instruments and non-derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments and related hedged items accounted for under SFAS No. 133 for all financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application permitted. The Company ~~does~~adopted ~~not~~SFAS ~~expect~~No. ~~the~~161 ~~adoption~~on January of1, ~~SFAS~~2009 ~~No. 161~~and toit has ~~significantly~~not ~~impact~~had ~~its~~a ~~financial~~material ~~position,~~impact ~~results~~on ofits ~~operations~~consolidated orfinancial ~~cash flows~~statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This Statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements. This Statement is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact the new pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.” This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141R, and other GAAP. This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact the new pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements.

4.	PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

The following is a summary of property and equipment, at cost less accumulated depreciation, at ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009 and September 30, 2008:

	December 31, 2008			September 30, 2008
	March 31, 2009			September 30, 2008
Office furniture and equipment	$	~~268~~269,~~527~~735		$	278,350
Machines and equipment		~~990~~941,~~391~~779			1,813,816
Leasehold improvements		243,164			243,164
Total cost of property and equipment		1,~~502~~454,~~081~~678			2,335,330
Less: accumulated depreciation		(1,~~048~~044,~~257~~348	)		(1,121,412	)
Total property and equipment, net	$	~~453~~410,~~823~~330		$	1,213,918

In November 2008, the Company sold its remaining frac pump for net proceeds of $~~840~~850,~~000~~050 ~~for~~and recognized a gain of $9086,~~000~~224.

5. ~~NET~~INTANGIBLE ~~LOSS PER COMMON SHARE~~ASSETS

The ~~Company~~following ~~has~~is ~~presented~~a ~~basic~~summary ~~and~~of ~~diluted~~intangibles, ~~net~~at ~~loss~~cost ~~per~~less ~~share~~accumulated ~~pursuant to SFAS No. 128~~amortization, ~~Earnings Per~~at ~~Share. In accordance with SFAS No.~~March ~~128~~31, ~~basic~~2009 and ~~diluted~~September net loss per share has been computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Dilutive net loss per share would give effect to the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents consisting of options and warrants. Potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the net loss per common share calculation as the effects would be antidilutive. Potentially dilutive securities not included in the computation of weighted average diluted shares of common stock because the impact of these potentially dilutive securities were antidilutive were none and 130,~~475,230~~ ~~shares for the three months ended December 31,~~ 2008 ~~and 2007, respectively.~~:

6. COMMON STOCK

	March 31, 2009			September 30, 2008

Patents granted, at cost	$	177,018		$	—
Patents filed and related costs		1,797,256			1,789,548
Less: accumulated amortization		(268,494	)		(237,282	)

Total intangibles, net	$	1,705,780		$	1,552,266

AtDuring ~~December 31, 2008,~~ the ~~Company~~three ~~had 35,740,349 shares of common stock outstanding~~ and ~~had~~six ~~outstanding~~months ~~options~~ended ~~and~~March ~~warrants~~31, ~~to purchase up to 5~~2009,~~737,341~~ ~~additional shares of~~ the Company’s ~~common~~incurred ~~stock~~direct ~~in the aggregate. During the~~costs ~~three~~of ~~months~~$68,691 ~~ended~~and ~~December 31~~$184,726, ~~2008~~respectively, ~~there~~for ~~were~~patents afiled ~~total~~but ~~of 23,583 restricted~~not ~~shares cancelled~~issued.

As of March 31, 2009, the estimated annual amortization expense for patents, licenses and trademarks for each of the succeeding five years total $296,670 as follows:

Year ending September 30,

2010 $59,334

2011 59,334

2012 59,334

2013 59,334

2014 59,334

76. ~~STOCK-BASED~~SHORT ~~EMPLOYEE~~TERM ~~COMPENSATION~~NOTES PAYABLE

~~In April 2004,~~A ~~the Board of Directors adopted the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan~~summary ~~(the “2004 Plan”). The 2004 Plan provides for the issuance~~ of ~~incentive~~ ~~stock options, non-statutory stock options and restricted stock to directors, employees and consultants of PDTI. Provisions under~~ the ~~2004 Plan allow for the issuance of up to 3,500,000 shares of common stock pursuant to awards under this plan. As of December 31, 2008, the~~ Company ~~had 3,250 awards available for grant under the 2004 Plan. Under the 2004 Plan, the exercise price of each option is equal to the market value of the Company~~’s ~~common~~notes ~~stock~~payable onoutstanding ~~the~~as ~~date~~ of ~~grant~~March ~~and~~31, ~~the~~2009 ~~maximum term for the options~~ is ~~ten years.~~as follows:

In March 2005, the Board of Directors adopted the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”). The 2005 Plan provides for the issuance of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options and restricted stock grants to directors, employees and consultants of PDTI. Provisions under the 2005 Plan allow for the issuance of options and restricted stock awards to purchase or issue up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had 52,458 shares of common stock available for issuance pursuant to awards under the 2005 Plan. Under the 2005 Plan, the exercise price of each option is equal to the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and the maximum term for the options is ten years.

	March 31, 2009			September 30, 2008

10% Senior Secured PIK Notes due 2010		475,000
Unamortized discount on 10% Secured PIK Notes		(304,623	)

Short-term note at 6.40% interest, unsecured with monthly principal and interest payments of $12,298		8,253			84,277


Total short-term notes payable	$	178,630		$	84,277

InOn March ~~2007~~3, 2009, the ~~shareholders~~Company ~~adopted~~issued ~~the~~$475,000 ~~2007~~aggregate ~~Stock~~principal ~~Incentive~~amount ~~Plan~~of its 10% Senior Secured PIK Notes due 2010 (the “~~2007~~Notes”) to LC Capital Master Fund, Ltd., ~~Plan~~a Cayman Islands exempted company (“LC”), Edward F. ~~The~~ ~~2007~~Heil ~~Plan~~and ~~provides~~Don ~~for~~A. Sanders, as purchasers (each, a “Purchaser” and collectively, the ~~issuance~~“Purchasers”), pursuant to the terms of ~~incentive~~the ~~stock~~purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), dated February ~~options~~11, ~~non-statutory~~2009, ~~stock~~among ~~options~~the ~~and~~Company ~~restricted~~as ~~stock~~Issuer, tothe ~~directors~~Purchasers and LC, ~~employees~~ as agent and collateral ~~consultants~~agent for the holders of ~~PDTI.~~the ~~Provisions~~securities ~~under~~issued (the “Agent”). The ~~2007~~Purchase ~~Plan~~Agreement ~~allow~~provides for the issuance of notes of up to $1,~~500~~200,000 ~~shares~~aggregate ofprincipal ~~common~~amount ~~stock~~in ~~pursuant~~three toincremental ~~awards~~draws ~~under this~~of ~~plan~~$400,000 each. AsOn ofMarch ~~December 31~~3, ~~2008~~2009, the Company, ~~had~~the ~~662,250~~Purchasers ~~awards~~and the ~~available~~Agent ~~for~~entered ~~grant~~into ~~under~~a letter agreement whereby the ~~2007~~Company ~~Plan.~~agreed ~~Under~~to issue an additional note (the ~~2007~~“Additional ~~Plan,~~Note”) to LC in the ~~exercise~~aggregate ~~price~~principal amount of ~~each~~$75,000 ~~option~~(such isamount ~~equal~~being toincluded in the ~~market~~$475,000 ~~value~~aggregate ofprincipal amount referred to above) which reduces the Company’s ~~common~~obligation ~~stock~~to issue, and LC’s obligation to purchase, notes on the second draw down by ~~date~~$75,000. Proceeds offrom ~~grant~~the ~~and~~issuance of the ~~maximum~~Additional ~~term~~Note ~~for~~were used to pay certain transaction fees of the ~~options~~lender. The isCompany ~~ten~~incurred an ~~years~~additional $77,778 of transaction costs related to the financing.

~~Stock-based~~The Notes ~~employee~~bear ~~compensation~~a ~~expense~~stated ~~recorded~~interest ~~for~~rate ~~awards~~of ~~issued~~10.0% ~~under~~per ~~the~~annum, ~~2004~~with ~~Plan,~~interest payable quarterly ~~the~~in ~~2005~~arrears ~~Plan,~~on ~~and~~each ~~the~~quarterly ~~2007~~payment ~~Plan~~date ~~for~~with ~~the~~no ~~three~~amortization. Each quarterly ~~months~~interest ~~ended~~payment ~~December~~will ~~31,~~be ~~2008~~made by the Company by issuing additional ~~and~~Notes ~~2007~~in ~~was~~the ~~$493,611~~amount ~~and~~of ~~$713,958,~~the ~~respectively~~applicable interest payment. ~~Stock-based~~The Notes ~~employee~~mature ~~compensation~~on ~~expense~~March ~~recorded~~3, ~~for~~2010. The ~~awards~~Notes ~~issued~~are ~~under~~secured ~~the~~by ~~2004~~substantially ~~Plan,~~all of the ~~2005~~assets ~~Plan,~~of ~~and~~ the ~~2007~~Company ~~Plan~~and ~~since~~its ~~inception~~subsidiary ~~(June 9,~~pursuant ~~2003)~~ to ~~December~~the terms of a ~~31,~~Security ~~2008~~Agreement ~~was~~among $8the Company,~~305,154. The~~ ~~remaining~~its ~~stock-based~~sole ~~compensation~~subsidiary and the ~~expense~~Purchasers. The toproceeds beof ~~amortized~~the asnotes ofare ~~December~~required ~~31,~~to ~~2008~~be isused ~~$1,765,829.~~for working

~~The~~capital ~~following~~and ~~table~~to ~~summarizes~~complete ~~information~~the ~~about~~Company’s ~~stock~~obligations ~~options~~under ~~outstanding~~its contract with Shell Exporation and Production Company (Shell). Payment of the Notes is ~~exercisable~~subject atto ~~December~~acceleration 31in the event of default by the Company under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, ~~2008:~~including failure of the Company to perform its obligations under its contract with Shell.

Options Outstanding					Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price	Number of Shares Underlying Options	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number of Shares Underlying Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price
$0.12 to $1.75	2,547,700	5.4 years	$	0.47	2,547,700	$	0.47
$1.76 to $6.73	1,410,500	7.2 years	$	4.44	1,086,666	4.73
	3,958,200	6.0 years	$	1.89	3,634,366	$	1.76

The Company granted warrants to the Purchasers which provide the right to purchase 7,130,200 shares of Common Stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.105 per share. The warrants are immediately exercisable. The warrants expire on February 12, 2012. The warrants have a fair value of $499,114 calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

The following table summarizes information about warrants outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2008:

Expected life (in years)	1.5
Expected volatility	130.18	%
Risk-free interest rate	0.96	%
Expected dividend	—

Warrants Outstanding

Warrants Exercisable

Range of Exercise Price

Number of Shares Underlying Warrants

Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life

Weighted Average Exercise Price

Number of Shares Underlying Warrants

Weighted Average Exercise Price

$0.12 to $3.00

1,779,141

3.0 years

1.99

1,779,141

1.99

A $243,379 discount was recorded on the notes based on the the relative fair values of the warrants issued and the $475,000 principal amount of the Notes. The total discount of $318,379 includes the $75,000 of transaction fees paid directly to the Purchasers. The Company’s transaction costs of $77,778 were recorded as deferred financing costs. Both the discount on the note and the deferred financing costs are being amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the notes. The effective interest rate of the Notes is 135.7%.

At December 31, 2008, the intrinsic value of all outstanding and exercisable options and warrants was zero.

87. ~~COMMITMENTS~~COST ~~AND CONTINGENCIES~~REIMBURSEMENT

~~In April 2007~~On December 4, we2008, the Company entered into aan ~~60-month~~agreement ~~lease~~with Shell ~~agreement~~and ~~that~~certain ~~commenced~~of ~~in September~~its ~~2007~~affiliates for athe development of new ~~corporate~~drill ~~office~~bits ~~and~~for use ~~operating~~with ~~facility~~the ~~and~~Company’s ~~delivered to~~PID ~~the~~System ~~lessor~~and afor ~~security~~the ~~deposit~~PID ofbits ~~$41,144. The~~to ~~new~~be ~~facility~~tested ~~combines~~in ~~the~~a field ~~corporate~~trial ~~office~~at ~~personnel~~a ~~and~~drilling ~~the~~site ~~operations~~designated ~~personnel~~by ~~into~~Shell. The ~~one~~initial ~~location~~term atof the ~~5611~~Agreement ~~Baird~~runs ~~Court,~~from ~~Houston~~December 1, ~~Texas~~2008 ~~77041. The~~through ~~total~~November ~~future~~30, ~~minimum~~2010, ~~lease payments~~but ~~under~~may ~~this~~be terminated ~~lease~~by ~~were~~Shell ~~$1,741,443~~ at ~~December~~any ~~31, 2008~~time.

9Under the Agreement, the Company will design, test and manufacture four PID bits, ranging in size from 6 inches to 6.5 inches, as determined by Shell. ~~INCOME~~Shell ~~TAXES~~has agreed to pay the Company $200,000 upon completion of technical review, $150,000 for the design and development work prior to the first field trial and up to an additional $50,000 within 30 business days following the completion of the first field trial based on certain agreed performance indicators. The amounts are not refundable to Shell in the event the additional milestones have not been met. As of March 31, 2009, the Company had completed the technical review and was paid $200,000 for this milestone. The Company has accounted for the $200,000 milestone payment received as a reimbursement of research and development costs for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2009. Future milestone payments received pursuant to the first field trial will be accounted for in the same manner.

~~The~~Any time ~~Company~~within ~~follows~~the ~~Statements~~first oftwo ~~Financial~~years ~~Accounting~~following ~~Standards~~the ~~(“SFAS”)~~completion ~~No.~~and ~~109 Accounting~~evaluation ~~for~~of ~~Income~~the results ~~Taxes.~~of ~~This~~the ~~statement~~first ~~requires~~field antrial, ~~asset~~Shell and ~~liability approach~~the ~~for~~Company ~~financial~~will ~~accounting~~determine ~~and~~if further ~~reporting~~field ~~for~~trials ~~income~~are ~~tax purposes~~necessary. ~~This~~At ~~statement~~Shell’s ~~recognizes~~discretion, ~~the~~up ~~amount~~to oftwo additional ~~taxes~~field ~~payable~~trials ~~or refundable~~may ~~for~~be ~~the~~undertaken ~~current~~and ~~year~~Shell ~~and~~estimates ~~deferred~~that ~~tax~~each ~~liabilities~~trial would ~~and~~result ~~assets~~in ~~for future~~payments ~~tax~~to ~~consequences~~the ofCompany ~~events~~for ~~that~~costs ~~have~~as follows; $159,000 ~~been~~prior ~~recognized~~to inmobilization to the ~~consolidated~~respective field ~~financial~~trial; ~~statements~~and up orto ~~tax~~$50,000 ~~returns. Provisions~~within ~~(benefits)~~30 ~~for~~business ~~income taxes~~days ~~result~~following ~~from~~completion of ~~permanent~~the ~~and~~field ~~temporary~~trial ~~differences~~based inon the ~~recognition~~performance of ~~accounting~~ ~~transactions~~the ~~for~~PID ~~tax~~System and ~~financial~~the ~~reporting~~PID bits ~~purposes. Valuation~~with ~~allowances~~respect ~~are~~to ~~established~~certain ~~when~~key ~~necessary~~performance ~~to reduce~~indicators. The ~~deferred~~Company ~~tax~~will perform ~~assets~~the tosecond ~~the~~and ~~amount~~third ~~expected~~field totrials beat ~~realized~~cost.

~~The Company~~In ~~adopted~~addition, ~~FIN~~any 48time inwithin ~~fiscal year 2008 and there was no effect on~~ the ~~financial~~ ~~statements. FIN 48 prescribes a minimum recognition~~first ~~threshold~~two ~~and~~years ~~measurement~~following ~~methodology~~completion ~~that~~of athe ~~tax~~first ~~position~~field ~~taken~~trial, orShell ~~expected~~shall tohave the beexclusive ~~taken~~right ~~in a tax return is required~~ to ~~meet~~use ~~before being recognized in~~ the ~~financial~~ ~~statements.~~first Ittwo ~~also~~commercial ~~provides~~PID ~~guidance~~systems built for ~~de-recognition,~~a period ~~classification,~~of ~~interest~~two ~~and~~years ~~penalties,~~at ~~accounting~~cost inplus ~~interim~~ten ~~periods, disclosure,~~percent ~~and transition~~(10%). ~~The~~ In ~~Company~~the ~~recognizes~~event ~~interest~~Shell ~~and penalties~~does ~~related~~not toutilize ~~unrecognized~~or ~~tax~~plan ~~benefits~~to ~~within~~utilize the ~~provision~~systems for ~~income~~50% ~~taxes~~or ~~on continuing~~more ~~operations in~~ the ~~consolidated~~time ~~statements~~during ofany two ~~income.~~months ~~There~~during ~~are~~the ~~no unrecognized~~two ~~tax~~year ~~benefits~~exclusive asperiod, of the ~~date~~company ofmay ~~adoption. There~~offer ~~are~~the noPID ~~unrecognized~~systems ~~tax~~to ~~benefits~~other ~~that~~clients. Shell ifalso ~~recognized~~retains ~~would affect~~ the ~~tax~~right ~~rate.~~to ~~There~~cancel isthe nocontract ~~interest~~within orthe ~~penalties~~first ~~recognized~~two asyears offollowing ~~the~~completion ~~date~~ of ~~adoption or for~~ the ~~three months~~first ~~ended December 31~~field trial, ~~2008.~~

~~The Company has filed its income tax return for the tax year ended September 30, 2008~~8. ~~The~~ ~~tax~~NET ~~years~~LOSS ~~ended~~PER ~~September~~COMMON ~~30, 2007, September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 are open for examination by the U.S. and State taxing authorities.~~SHARE

The Company ~~anticipates~~has ~~recording~~presented nobasic ~~tax~~and ~~benefit~~diluted ~~for~~net ~~the~~loss ~~year~~per share pursuant to SFAS No. 128, ~~based~~Earnings ~~upon~~Per ~~management’s~~Share. ~~assessment~~In ~~that~~accordance with SFAS No. 128, basic and diluted net loss per share has been computed using the ~~realization~~weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the ~~anticipated~~period. ~~financial~~Diluted net loss per share would ~~for~~give effect to the ~~year~~dilutive iseffect of common stock equivalents consisting of options and warrants. Potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the net loss per common share calculation as the effects would be antidilutive. Potentially dilutive securities not included in the computation of weighted average diluted shares of common stock because the impact of these potentially dilutive securities were antidilutive were none and 131,275 atshares ~~this~~for ~~point~~the three months ended March 31, ~~reasonably~~2009 ~~assured;~~and ~~accordingly~~2008, norespectively ~~benefit has~~and ~~been~~none ~~recorded~~and 988,584 for the six ~~period~~months ended ~~December~~March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

~~For~~9. ~~the period~~COMMON ~~ended December 31, 2008, there were permanent and temporary differences of approximately $3,000 and $(505,000), respectively, which in aggregate increased the loss for the current year.~~STOCK

At ~~December~~ March 31, ~~2008~~2009, the Company ~~has~~had ~~cumulative net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $~~35,~~985~~740,~~000~~349 ~~which~~shares ~~expire~~of incommon ~~years~~stock ~~2010~~outstanding ~~through~~and ~~2028. No effect~~had ~~has~~outstanding ~~been~~options ~~shown~~and inwarrants ~~the~~to ~~financial~~purchase ~~statements~~up ~~for~~to ~~the~~12,848,541 ~~net~~additional ~~operating loss~~shares ~~carryforwards~~of as the ~~likelihood~~Company’s ofcommon ~~future~~stock ~~tax~~in ~~benefit~~the ~~from such net operating loss carryforwards is not determinable at this time~~aggregate. During ~~Accordingly,~~ the ~~potential tax~~six ~~benefits of the net operating loss carryforwards, estimated based upon~~months ~~current~~ended ~~tax~~March ~~rates at December~~ 31, ~~2008~~2009, ~~have~~there ~~been~~were ~~offset~~a bytotal ~~valuation reserves~~ of ~~the same amount. The valuation allowance increased approximately $510~~23,~~000~~583 ~~from~~restricted ~~September 30, 2008 to December 31, 2008~~shares cancelled.

10.	STOCK-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION

In April 2004, the Board of Directors adopted the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”). The 2004 Plan provides for the issuance of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options and restricted stock to directors, employees and consultants of PDTI. Provisions under the 2004 Plan allow for the issuance of up to 3,500,000 shares of common stock pursuant to awards under this plan. As of March 31, 2009, the Company had 3,250 awards available for grant under the 2004 Plan. Under the 2004 Plan, the exercise price of each option is equal to the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and the maximum term for the options is ten years.

In March 2005, the Board of Directors adopted the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”). The 2005 Plan provides for the issuance of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options and restricted stock grants to directors, employees and consultants of PDTI. Provisions under the 2005 Plan allow for the issuance of options and restricted stock awards to purchase or issue up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock. As of March 31, 2009, the Company had 52,458 shares of common stock available for issuance pursuant to awards under the 2005 Plan. Under the 2005 Plan, the exercise price of each option is equal to the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and the maximum term for the options is ten years.

In March 2007, the shareholders adopted the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan provides for the issuance of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options and restricted stock to directors, employees and consultants of PDTI. Provisions under the 2007 Plan allow for the issuance of up to 1,500,000 shares of common stock pursuant to awards under this plan. As of March 31, 2009, the Company had 662,250 share awards available for grant under the 2007 Plan. Under the 2007 Plan, the exercise price of each option is equal to the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and the maximum term for the options is ten years.

Stock-based employee compensation expense recorded for awards issued under the 2004 Plan, the 2005 Plan, and the 2007 Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $493,611 and $704,839, respectively. Stock-based employee compensation expense recorded for awards issued under the 2004 Plan, the 2005 Plan, and the 2007 Plan for the six months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $908,513 and $1,418,797, respectively. Stock-based employee compensation expense recorded for awards issued under the 2004 Plan, the 2005 Plan, and the 2007 Plan since inception (June 9, 2003) to March 31, 2009 was $8,720,056. The remaining stock-based compensation expense to be amortized as of March 31, 2009 is $1,359,879.

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2009:

Options Outstanding					Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price	Number of Shares Underlying Options	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number of Shares Underlying Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price

$0.12 to $1.75	2,547,700	5.2 years	$	0.47	2,547,700	$	0.47
$1.76 to $6.73	1,410,500	6.9 years	$	4.44	1,190,833	4.81
	3,958,200	5.8 years	$	1.89	3,738,533	$	1.85

The following table summarizes information about warrants outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2009:

Warrants Outstanding

Warrants Exercisable

Range of Exercise Price

Number of

Underlying

Warrants

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

Number of

Underlying

Warrants

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

$0.105 to $3.00

8,890,341

4.5 years

0.39

8,890,341

0.39

No options or warrants were granted or exercised during the six months ended March 31, 2009. At March 31, 2009, the intrinsic value of all outstanding and exercisable options and warrants was zero.

11.	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In April 2007, we entered into a 60-month lease agreement that commenced in September 2007 for a new corporate office and operating facility and delivered to the lessor a security deposit of $41,144. The new facility combines the corporate office personnel and the operations personnel into one location at 5611 Baird Court, Houston, Texas 77041. The total future minimum lease payments under this lease were $1,633,754 at March 31, 2009.

In connection with the acquisition of the PID technology in January 2004, PDTI entered into a Royalty Agreement with ProDril Services, Incorporated (“PSI”) pursuant to which we are obligated to pay PSI a royalty on a quarterly basis equal to 18% of our earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) derived from the use of the PID technology, until an aggregate of $67,500,000 has been paid. PDTI also entered into a Royalty Agreement in January 2004 with ProDril Services, International, Ltd. (“PSIL”) pursuant to which we are obligated to pay PSIL a royalty on a quarterly basis equal to 2% of our EBITDA derived from the use of the PID technology, until an aggregate of $7,500,000 has been paid. In addition, we are obligated to pay CCORE Technology and Licensing, Ltd. (“CTL”), PSI and PSIL a royalty equal to 1.6%, 1.2% and 1.2%, respectively, of our quarterly gross revenue, derived from the use of the PID technology. As of March 31, 2009, we had no revenues or EBITDA; therefore no royalties have been paid or accrued.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

12. INCOME TAXES

The Company follows Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes. This statement requires an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income tax purposes. This statement recognizes the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Provisions (benefits) for income taxes result from permanent and temporary differences in the recognition of accounting transactions for tax and financial reporting purposes. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

The Company adopted FIN 48 in fiscal year 2008 and there was no effect on the financial statements. FIN 48 prescribes a minimum recognition threshold and measurement methodology that a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. It also provides guidance for de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes on continuing operations in the consolidated statements of income. There are no unrecognized tax benefits as of the date of adoption. There are no unrecognized tax benefits that if recognized would affect the tax rate. There is no interest or penalties recognized as of the date of adoption or for the three and six months ended March 31, 2009.

The Company has filed its income tax return for the tax year ended September 30, 2008. The tax years ended September 30, 2007, September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 are open for examination by the <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />U.S. and State taxing authorities.

The Company anticipates recording no tax benefit for the year, based upon management’s assessment that the realization of the anticipated financial loss for the year is not, at this point, reasonably assured; accordingly no benefit has been recorded for the period ended March 31, 2009.

For the period ended March 31, 2009, there were permanent and temporary differences of approximately $6,000 and $(123,000), respectively, which in aggregate increased the loss for the current year.

At March 31, 2009, the Company has cumulative net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $37,386,000 which expire in years 2010 through 2028. No effect has been shown in the financial statements for the net operating loss carryforwards as the likelihood of future tax benefit from such net operating loss carryforwards is not determinable at this time. Accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net operating loss carryforwards, estimated based upon current tax rates at March 31, 2009, have been offset by valuation reserves of the same amount. The valuation allowance increased approximately $1.2 million from September 30, 2008 to March 31, 2009.

13.	SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On April 2, 2009, the Company exchanged with a holder of options of the Company all of such holder’s outstanding options to purchase 760,000 shares of common stock in the aggregate at a purchase price of $0.12 per share for the issuance by the Company of 250,000 shares of common stock. On April 14, 2009, the Company exchanged with a different holder of options of the Company all of such holder’s outstanding options to purchase 600,000 shares of common stock in the aggregate at a purchase price of $0.12 per share for the issuance by the Company of 200,000 shares of common stock.

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes that are included elsewhere in this report. This discussion may contain forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Please see “Forward-Looking Statements” below. References to “us,” “we”, and the “Company”, refer to Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiary, Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents. We are devoting substantially all of our efforts to product development and commercializing the Particle Impact Drilling ("“PID"”) technology. In the course of our development activities, we have sustained operating losses and expect that such losses ~~could~~will continue through fiscal 2009. We intend to finance our operations primarily through cash and cash equivalents on hand, through ~~cash~~cashflow ~~flow~~ from operations if we are able to successfully engage in commercial operations that generate revenue, and other potential capital raising transactions. However, we have yet to generate any revenues, and can provide no assurance of future revenues. To management’s knowledge, no company has yet marketed a salable product using the technology we are developing. Even if marketing efforts are successful, substantial time may pass before revenues are realized.

In management’s opinion, based on available cash and cash equivalents on hand as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009, we do not have the ability to maintain sufficient liquidity to to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the next 12 months. Management must raise additional outside capital in order to improve our liquidity position. The equity and debt capital markets have recently experienced adverse conditions and extreme volatility which may, if such conditions persist, impair our ability to raise capital on satisfactory terms, or at all. Our continued existence depends on our ability to raise additional outside capital and the successful development of the PID technology and our ability to successfully commercialize this technology. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.

Since inception on June 9, 2003 through ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009, we have financed our operations through private sales of our equity, a subscription rights offering, ~~and~~ the issuance of convertible notes payable, and the issuance of a PIK note payable totaling net proceeds of $3537,~~397~~793,~~913~~075. As of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~ 2009, we had $1503,~~167,987~~925 in cash and cash equivalents.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities. Cash flow used for operations is primarily affected by our research and development progress and business development. Net cash flows used in operating activities during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~ March 31, 2009 ~~2008~~ were $12,~~736~~689,~~077~~425 compared to $14,~~811~~215,~~399~~090 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~ March 31, ~~2007~~ 2008. The decrease from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009 was primarily the result of our decreased level of research and development costs associated with the construction of the PID System.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Cash flows provided by ~~(used in)~~ investing activities for the ~~three~~ six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009 were $~~647~~579,~~389~~831 compared to $~~(62~~565,~~020)~~ 299 for the ~~three~~ six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2007~~2008. The cash flows used in ~~investing~~ investing activities during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009 consisted of $7685,~~575~~492 for the purchase of property, plant and equipment and $~~116~~184,~~036~~727 for costs associated with filing new and protecting existing patents. In addition, we sold our frac pump and various other non-core assets for net proceeds of $~~840~~850,~~000~~ 050 during the three months ended December 31, 2008.

Cash Flow from Financing Activities. Net cash ~~used~~provided inby financing activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009 was $39317,~~468~~376 compared to $3969,~~525~~042 of net cash used in financing activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~ March 31, ~~2007~~2008. During the ~~three~~ six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009, cash flows consisted of $82,624 for repayments of notes payable, and ~~2007~~$400,000 ~~the~~proceeds, ~~financing~~net ~~activities~~of ~~consisted~~issuance ~~primarily~~costs, from an issuance of $475,000 ~~repayments~~principal amount of our 10% Senior Secured PIK notes due 2010 ~~payable~~(described in greater detail below).

11Contractual Obligations. In April 2007, we entered into a 60-month lease agreement that commenced in September 2007 for a new corporate office and operating facility and delivered to the lessor a security deposit of $41,144. The new facility combines the corporate office personnel and the operations personnel into one location at 5611 Baird Court, Houston, Texas 77041. The total future minimum lease payments under this lease are $1,633,754 at March 31, 2009.

~~Contractual Obligations. In~~We ~~April 2007,~~also ~~we entered into a 60-month~~have ~~lease~~long-term ~~agreement~~debt ~~that commenced in September 2007 for a new corporate office~~ and ~~operating~~ ~~facility~~purchase ~~and~~obligations ~~delivered~~as ~~to the lessor a security deposit of~~described $41,144. The new facility combines the corporate office personnel and the operations personnel into one location at 5611 Baird Court, Houston, Texas 77041. The total future minimum lease payments under this lease are $1,741,443 at December 31, 2008.below:

Payments Due by Period

Contractual Obligations

Total

Less than 1 year

1 - 3 years

3 - 5 years

More than 5 years

Long-Term Debt Obligation and Short Term Notes Payable (including current portion)

68196,~~841~~063

54182,~~531~~860

1413,~~310~~203

—

Purchase Obligations

103,~~585~~150

—

Operating Lease Obligations

1,~~741~~633,~~443~~754

~~436~~441,~~757~~257

1,~~304~~192,~~686~~497

—

Total

1,~~820~~832,~~869~~967

~~501~~627,~~873~~267

1,~~318~~205,~~996~~700

—

On March 3, 2009, the Company issued $475,000 aggregate principal amount of its 10% Senior Secured PIK Notes due 2010 (the “Notes”) to LC Capital Master Fund, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company (“LC”), Edward F. Heil and Don A. Sanders, as purchasers (each a “Purchaser” and collectively, the “Purchasers”), pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), dated February 11, 2009, among the Company as Issuer, the Purchasers and LC, as agent and collateral agent for the holders of the securities issued hereunder (the “Agent”). On March 3, 2009, the Company, the Purchasers and the Agent entered into a letter agreement whereby the Company agreed to issue an additional note (the “Additional Note”) to LC in the aggregate principal amount of $75,000 (such amount being included in the $475,000 aggregate principal amount referred to above) which reduces the Company’s obligation to issue, and LC’s obligation to purchase, notes on the second draw down by $75,000. Proceeds from the issuance of the Additional Note were used to pay certain transaction fees.

The Purchase Agreement provides for the issuance of notes of up to $1,200,000 aggregate principal amount in three incremental draws of $400,000 each with each incremental draw being subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, including the performance by the Company of certain obligations under the terms of its contract with its existing customer. Each note will bear interest at a stated rate of 10.0% per annum, with interest being payable quarterly in arrears on each quarterly payment date with no amortization. Each quarterly interest payment will be made by the Company by issuing additional Notes in the amount of the applicable interest payment. All of the Notes will mature on the first anniversary of the first incremental draw down under the Purchase Agreement. The Notes are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiary pursuant to the terms of a Security Agreement among the Company, its sole subsidiary and the Purchasers.

Overview

On January 14, 2005, we acquired Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc., a privately-held Delaware corporation (“PDTI”). As a result of this acquisition, our company, which previously had no material operations, acquired the business of PDTI and we are now engaged in the development of the Particle Impact Drilling System, a patented system utilizing a specially designed “fit for purpose” drill bit fitted with jetting nozzles and polycrystalline diamond compact cutting structures for use in the oil and gas drilling industry.

We are a development-stage company and have a limited operating history. Our predecessor company for financial reporting purposes was formed on June 9, 2003 to acquire the technology related to the Particle Impact Drilling System (the “PID System” or “PID technology”). We are still developing this technology, and to date, we have not generated any revenues from our operations. Currently, we have limited liquidity and therefore our business activities have been curtailed. We are currently reviewing strategic alternatives and hope that any such transaction would assist us in accelerating the commercialization of our technology. Our Board of Directors has determined it would be in the best interest of our company and its shareholders to evaluate all available strategic alternatives, including a strategic industry joint venture, technology licensing arrangement, sale of the company, and other available alternatives. If we are able to identify a strategic partner that can provide additional capital, resources, test facilities and drilling opportunities, we will continue to execute our operations plan which will likely result in increases to our development and operating expenses.

The PID System is expected to result in higher rates of penetration than current conventional drilling methods, thereby reducing drilling costs and lowering finding and development costs to improve the overall economics to the oil and gas industry in certain geologic intervals.

On December 8, 2008, we announced that we have entered into an agreement with a fully integrated, multi-national energy company (the “Operator”). The contract has a total potential value to us of up to $818,000 in connection with the performance of up to three field trials. Pursuant to this contract, the Operator will provide us funding to develop and manufacture one or more smaller bit designs apart from those bits we normally use, and for us to provide those bits along with our patented PID System in connection with as many as three trials at one of the Operator’s drilling areas in the onshore United States. The contract specifies that an initial $350,000 will be paid in ~~advance~~ ofincrements at specific milestones for the first field trial. The initial term of the agreement runs from December 1, 2008 through November 30, 2010, but can isbe ~~terminable~~terminated by the Operator at any time. At any time within two years following the completion of the initial field trial, the Operator has preferred access to the initial two PID Systems for a 2-year period, subject to the satisfaction of certain minimum ~~utilization~~ utilization requirements. Currently, we only have one prototype PID System.

12Research and development. We have made and expect to continue to make substantial investments in research and development activities in order to develop and market the PID technology. Research and development costs consist primarily of general and administrative and operating expenses related to research and development activities. We expense research and development costs as incurred except for property, plant and equipment related to research and development activity that have an alternative future use. Property, plant and equipment for research and development activity that have an alternative future use are capitalized and the related depreciation is expensed as research and development costs.

~~Research~~ Our ~~and~~primary ~~development. We~~products ~~have~~still ~~made~~need ~~and~~to ~~expect~~demonstrate tocommercial ~~continue~~reliability in order to ~~make~~fully ~~substantial~~realize ~~investments~~the inpotential ~~research~~of ~~and~~the ~~development~~PID ~~activities~~technology. inFurther, ~~order~~we believe we need to ~~develop~~obtain ~~and~~a ~~market~~better understanding of the ~~PID~~drill ~~technology~~bit ~~subject~~cutting pattern in order to further improve the ~~availability~~drilling ofperformance. We ~~cash~~have constructed a ~~resources. Research~~small ~~and~~drill ~~development~~bit ~~costs~~test ~~consist~~facility ~~primarily~~to ofallow us to better evaluate the bottom hole ~~general~~pattern, ~~and~~the ~~administrative~~development ~~and~~of ~~operating~~a ~~expenses~~new ~~related~~smaller toPID ~~research~~bit, testing of that bit and a ~~development~~field ~~activities.~~trial Weusing ~~expense~~the ~~research~~preferred ~~and~~bit ~~development~~design. Poor ~~costs~~performance asof ~~incurred~~our ~~except~~new ~~for~~particle ~~property,~~injection ~~plant~~system ~~and~~or ~~equipment~~other ~~related~~unexpected toevents ~~research~~while ~~and~~conducting ~~development~~future ~~activity~~commercial ~~that~~trials ~~have~~could anfurther ~~alternative~~extend ~~future~~the ~~use.~~shop ~~Property~~and laboratory testing phase, which ~~plant~~would delay the full commercialization of the PID System and ~~equipment~~increase ~~for~~the funds needed to complete our research and development. ~~activity~~This ~~that~~would have anthe effect ~~alternative~~of ~~future~~slowing ~~use~~our ~~are~~advancement as funds otherwise intended to build new PID ~~capitalized~~Systems and ~~the~~expand ~~related~~our ~~depreciation~~operations. ismay ~~expensed~~be asneeded ~~research~~to conduct additional research and development ~~costs~~.

Our primary products still need to demonstrate commercial reliability in order to fully realize the potential of the PID technology. Further, we believe we need to obtain a better understanding of the drill bit cutting pattern in order to further improve the drilling performance. We have constructed a small drill bit test facility to allow us to better evaluate the bottom hole pattern, the development of a new smaller PID bit, testing of that bit and a field trial using the preferred bit design. Poor performance of our new particle injection system or other unexpected events while conducting future commercial trials could further extend the shop and laboratory testing phase, which would delay the full commercialization of the PID System and increase the funds needed to complete our research and development. This would have the effect of slowing our advancement as funds otherwise intended to build new PID Systems and expand our operations may be needed to conduct additional research and development.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits, office expense, professional services, and other corporate overhead costs. We have experienced and expect to continue to experience increases in general and administrative expenses as a result of: (1) reporting and compliance obligations applicable to publicly-held companies; (2) our continuing efforts to develop, test and prepare the PID technology for commercialization; and (3) the hiring of additional personnel.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2007~~2008

Research and development. Research and development expenses were $~~965~~813,~~662~~521 and $1,~~780~~546,~~812~~200 for the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008, respectively, representing a decrease of $~~815~~732,~~150~~679. The decrease in research and ~~development~~ development expenses for the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009 as compared to the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2007~~2008 is ~~attributed~~attributable to much higher costs associated with the construction of the PID unit incurred in the prior year and the receipt during the 2009 period of $200,000 in connection with the field trial contract discussed above, which has been accounted for as a reimbursement of research and development expense.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses were $1756,~~146,125~~939 and $1,~~479~~434,~~105~~859 for the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008, respectively, representing a decrease of $~~332~~677,~~980~~920. This decrease was primarily the result of decreased costs related to stock-based compensation expense and bonus expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008.

Gain on sale of assets. ~~Gain~~Loss on sale of assets ~~were~~was $~~86,971~~747 ~~and $-0-~~ for the three ~~months~~ months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009, ~~and~~compared ~~2007,~~to ~~respectively,~~a ~~representing~~gain anon ~~increase~~ sale of assets of $86641,~~971.~~721 ~~The~~for ~~majority of~~ the ~~gain~~three ~~was~~months ~~from~~ended ~~the~~March ~~sale~~31, of2008, ~~our~~representing ~~frac pump in~~a ~~November~~difference ~~2008~~of $642,468. The ~~gain~~majority ~~from~~of the ~~sale~~gain ofduring the ~~frac~~three ~~pump~~months ~~was~~ended March ~~$90~~31,~~000 and~~ ~~this~~2008, ~~amount~~ was ~~offset~~from bythe ~~several~~one-time ~~small~~sale ~~losses~~of ~~from~~our ~~the~~frac ~~sale~~pump ofin ~~several~~February ~~non-core assets~~2008.

Other income (expenses). Other ~~income~~expenses was $5306 for the three months ended March 31,~~034~~ ~~and~~2009, compared to other income of $3310,~~381~~264 for the three months ended ~~December~~ March 31, 2008 ~~and 2007~~, ~~respectively,~~ representing a decrease in other income of $2810,~~347~~570 from the prior period. The decrease was primarily attributable to ~~the~~less ~~decrease~~interest inincome collected on a declining cash and cash equivalents ~~between~~balance for the ~~two~~three ~~periods~~months ~~resulting~~ended inMarch ~~substantially less~~31, ~~interest~~2009, ~~income~~compared to the prior period.

Six Months Ended March 31, 2009 Compared to Six Months Ended March 31, 2008

Research and development. Research and development expenses were $1,779,183 and $3,327,012 for the six months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, representing a decrease of $1,547,829. This decrease was primarily related to higher expenses in the six months ended March 31, 2008 from the development of the new particle injection system, construction of the new PID Unit (which expenses have not been capitalized since we have yet to achieve commercial revenues), higher PID bit expenses. During the six months ended March 31, 2009, these expenses were less due to the substantial completion of the new PID Unit and new injector system and the receipt during the 2009 period of $200,000 in connection with the field trial contract discussed above, which has been accounted for as a reimbursement of research and development expense.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses were $1,903,064 and $2,913,964 for the six months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, representing a decrease of $1,010,900. This decrease was primarily the result of decreased costs related to stock-based compensation expense and bonus expense for the six months ended March 31, 2009, compared to the prior period.

Gain on Sale of Assets. The gain on sale of assets for the six months ended March 31, 2009 relates to the sale of our frac pump in November 2008. The gain from the one-time sale of the frac pump was $90,000 and this amount was offset by several small losses from the sale of several non-core assets. The gain on sale of assets for the six months ended March 31, 2008 relates to the disposal on our older frac pump, a tractor trailor and a machine shop lathe that were sold for net proceeds of $686,620.

Other Income. Other income was $4,728 and $43,645 for the six months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, representing a decrease of $38,917. The decrease was primarily attributable to less interest income collected on a declining cash and cash equivalents balance.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In ~~connection~~ connection with the acquisition of the PID technology in January 2004, PDTI ~~entered~~ entered into a Royalty Agreement with ProDril Services, Incorporated (“PSI”) pursuant to which we are obligated to pay PSI a royalty on a quarterly basis equal to 18% of our earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and ~~amortization~~ amortization (“EBITDA”) derived from the use of the PID technology, until an aggregate of $67,500,000 has been paid. PDTI also entered into a Royalty Agreement in January 2004 with ProDril Services, International, Ltd. (“PSIL”) pursuant to which we are obligated to pay PSIL a royalty on a quarterly basis equal to 2% of our EBITDA derived from the use of the PID technology, until an aggregate of $7,500,000 has been paid. In addition, we are obligated to pay CCORE Technology and Licensing, Ltd. (“CTL”), PSI and PSIL a royalty equal to 1.6%, 1.2% and 1.2%, respectively, of our quarterly gross revenue, derived from the use of the PID technology. As of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009, we had no revenues or EBITDA; therefore no royalties have been paid or accrued.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Stock-Based Compensation. In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a revision to SFAS No. 123, Share-Based Payment. This statement establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. This statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. This statement does not change the accounting guidance for share-based payment transactions with parties other than employees provided in SFAS No. 123 as originally issued. This statement is effective for new awards and those modified, repurchased or cancelled in interim or annual reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We ~~early~~ adopted this standard upon inception.

Research and Development. The costs of materials and equipment or facilities that are acquired or constructed for research and development activities and that have alternative future uses are capitalized as tangible assets when acquired or constructed. The cost of such materials consumed in research and development activities and the depreciation of such equipment or facilities used in those activities are research and development costs. However, the costs of materials, equipment, or facilities acquired or constructed for research and development activities that have no alternative future uses are considered research and development costs and are expensed at the time the costs are incurred.

Income Taxes. We follow SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This statement requires an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income tax purposes. This statement recognizes the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Provisions (benefits) for income taxes result from permanent and temporary differences in the recognition of accounting transactions for tax and financial reporting purposes. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

We adopted FIN 48 in fiscal year 2008 and there was no effect on our financial statements. FIN 48 prescribes a minimum recognition threshold and measurement methodology that a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. It also provides guidance for derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes on continuing operations in the consolidated statements of income. There are no unrecognized tax benefits as of the date of adoption. There are no unrecognized tax benefits that if recognized would affect the tax rate. There isare no interest or penalties recognized as of the date of adoption or for the three ~~months~~and ~~ended~~six months ~~December~~ended March 31, ~~2008~~2009.

We filed our income tax return for the tax year ended September 30, 2008. The tax years ended September 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are open for examination by the U.S. and State taxing authorities.

We anticipate recording no tax benefit for the year, based upon management’s assessment that the realization of the anticipated financial loss for the year is not at this point reasonably assured; accordingly no benefit has been recorded for the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009.

Net Loss per Share. We have presented basic and diluted net loss per share pursuant to SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. In accordance with SFAS No. 128, basic and diluted net loss per share has been computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Dilutive net loss per share would give effect to the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents consisting of options and warrants. Potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the net loss per common share calculation as the effects would be antidilutive. Potentially dilutive securities not included in the computation of weighted average diluted shares of common stock because the impact of these potentially dilutive securities were antidilutive were none and 1131,~~475,230~~275 shares for the ~~three~~ three months ended ~~December~~March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively and ~~2007~~none and 988,584 for the six months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts (including any statements concerning plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions or forecasts related thereto) are forward-looking statements subject to Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology including “forecast,” “may,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “continue” or other similar words. These statements discuss future expectations, contain projections of results of operations or of ~~financial~~ financial condition or state other “forward-looking” information. We and our representatives may from time to time make other oral or written statements that are also forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements are made based upon our management’s current plans, expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events impacting us and therefore involve a number of risks and uncertainties. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees and that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to dependence upon energy industry spending, the volatility of oil and gas prices, weather interruptions, the results of testing of our products, the availability of capital resources and the other factors described under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008 filed with the SEC on December 15, 2008 and in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements except as required by law.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We believe that we do not have any material exposure to financial market risk and we do not enter into foreign currency or interest rate transactions.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009.

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our first quarter of fiscal 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II—Other Information

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

WeThe “Risk ~~may~~Factors” below should be ~~delisted~~read ~~from~~in ~~The~~connection ~~NASDAQ~~with ~~Capital~~the ~~Market~~“Risk ~~for~~Factors” ~~failure~~disclosed toin the ~~satisfy~~Company’s Form 10-K filing, filed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the ~~continued~~year ~~listing~~ended ~~requirements~~September 30, 2008 filed with the SEC on December 15, 2008.

~~Our~~We ~~common~~are ~~stock~~in ~~currently~~the ~~trades~~process ~~on The NASDAQ Capital Market. If we fail to meet any~~ of ~~the~~being ~~continued~~delisted ~~listing~~from ~~standards of~~ The NASDAQ Capital Market, ~~our~~for ~~common stock will be delisted. NASDAQ’s continued listing~~failure standards include specifically enumerated criteria, such as a $1.00 minimum closing bid price, shareholders’ equity of $2.5 million or market value of publicly held shares of $35 million or net income from continuing operations of at least $500,000 in the latest fiscal year or in two of the last three fiscal years, 500,000 shares of common stock publicly held and market value of publicly held shares of at least $1 million, as well as additional or more stringent criteria that may be applied in the exercise of NASDAQ’s discretionary authority to ~~maintain~~satisfy the ~~quality~~continued oflisting ~~and public confidence in the NASDAQ market, prevent fraudulent and manipulative practices, promote just and equitable principles of trade, and protect investors and the public interest~~requirements.

15Our common stock currently trades on The NASDAQ Capital Market; however, the closing price of our common stock on February 2, 2009 was $0.11 per share. As a result, we failed to satisfy the continuing listing standards for NASDAQ, which require a $1.00 minimum closing bid price. NASDAQ granted temporary relief from this requirement and the market value of publicly held shares requirement until January 19, 2009 in a release dated October 16, 2008. In a release dated December 19, 2009, NASDAQ extended this temporary relief until April 20, 2009. Additionally, as of March 31, 2009, our stockholders’ equity fell below the minimum continued listing standard of $2.5 million. Prior to that date, the market value of our publicly held shares of common stock had fallen below $35 million and we have not recognized any net income in the preceding three fiscal years. As a result, we were not in compliance with the continued listing standards of the NASDAQ Capital Market.

~~The~~In a ~~closing~~letter ~~price~~dated ofMarch ~~our~~31, ~~common~~2009 ~~stock~~from onNASDAQ, we were informed that the Company did not comply with Marketplace Rule 4350(i)(1)(B). On February 211, 2009, ~~was~~the Company entered into an agreement to sell up to $01.112 ~~per~~million aggregate principal ~~share~~amount of its 10% Senior Secured PIK Notes due 2010. AsIn aconnection with ~~result~~the note issuance, wethe ~~currently~~Company ~~fail~~agreed to ~~satisfy~~grant ~~the~~warrants ~~continuing~~to purchase an ~~listing~~aggregate ~~standard~~of ~~related~~up to a7,130,200 ~~$1.00~~shares ~~minimum~~of ~~closing~~common ~~bid~~stock with an exercise price of $0.105 per share. ~~NASDAQ~~LC Capital Master Fund, Ltd., a Cayman Islands ~~granted~~exempted ~~temporary~~company ~~relief~~(“LC”), ~~from~~an ~~this~~investor ~~requirement~~in the transaction and the ~~market~~Company’s largest ~~value~~shareholder and beneficial owner of ~~publicly held~~approximately ~~shares~~17.5% ~~requirement~~of ~~until~~the ~~January~~total shares 19outstanding, ~~2009~~received inwarrants ato ~~release~~purchase ~~dated~~6,060,670 ~~October~~shares ~~16,~~of the ~~2008~~Company’s common stock in the offering. InThe aCompany ~~release~~structured ~~dated~~the warrant ~~December~~agreement ~~19,~~with ~~2009,~~LC ~~NASDAQ~~to ~~extended~~restrict ~~this~~its voting power by requiring the shares ~~temporary~~of ~~relief~~common ~~until~~stock ~~April~~issued ~~20,~~upon ~~2009~~exercise of the warrants to be voted in the same proportion as all other votes cast for all matters put before shareholders. WeThe ~~cannot~~warrant ~~assure~~agreement ~~you~~did ~~that~~not, however, limit the ~~NASDAQ~~ability ~~will~~of ~~continue~~LC to ~~extend~~acquire ~~this~~beneficial ~~temporary~~ownership ~~relief~~of ~~from~~the shares of common stock subject to the ~~continued~~warrant. As ~~listing~~a result, because LC has the ability to ~~requirements~~exercise orthe ~~that~~warrants ~~our~~and beneficially own approximately 29% of the Company’s common stock, ~~price~~the ~~will~~Nasdaq ~~return~~staff tohas ~~compliance~~taken ~~with~~the position upon review that the transaction ~~minimum~~resulted in a change of control and, therefore, required shareholder ~~closing~~approval ~~bid~~under ~~price~~Marketplace ~~requirement~~Rule 4350(i)(1)(B).

~~Furthermore,~~ In asa ofletter ~~December~~dated ~~31,~~April ~~2008~~16, ~~our~~2009 ~~stockholders’~~from ~~equity~~NASDAQ, ~~fell~~we ~~below~~were ~~the~~informed ~~minimum continued listing standard of $2.5 million. Prior to~~ that ~~date,~~ the ~~market~~ ~~value~~Company ~~of our publicly held shares of common stock had fallen below $35~~did ~~million and we have~~ not ~~recognized~~comply ~~any~~with ~~net~~Listing ~~income~~Rule ~~in the preceding three fiscal years~~5210(d). As aNASDAQ ~~result,~~has weinformed ~~are~~the ~~currently~~Company ~~not~~that ~~in compliance with the~~it ~~continued~~would ~~listing~~be ~~standards~~subject ofto ~~the~~delisting ~~NASDAQ~~proceedings ~~Capital~~if ~~Market. The temporary~~it ~~relief~~did ~~described above does~~ not ~~provide~~pay ~~relief~~its ~~from~~outstanding ~~these continued~~fees ~~listing~~in ~~standards~~full. ~~If we are unable to regain compliance with these continued listing requirements~~Accordingly, ~~our~~the ~~common stock could be delisted from The~~ NASDAQ ~~Capital~~staff ~~Market. We~~notified ~~can~~the ~~give~~Company ~~no assurance~~ that ~~NASDAQ will not~~this inmatter ~~the~~serves ~~future~~as ~~seek~~an toadditional ~~delist~~basis us for ~~our~~delisting ~~failure~~the toCompany’s ~~meet~~securities ~~the enumerated~~from ~~conditions~~The ~~for~~NASDAQ ~~continued~~Stock ~~listing~~Market.

IfNASDAQ recently provided notice to the Company that it would be delisted from NASDAQ on May 12, 2009 due to its failure to meet the listing requirements as provided above. As a result of this, trading of our common stock ~~were~~most ~~delisted~~likely will ~~from~~be ~~The~~conducted ~~NASDAQ~~in ~~Capital~~the ~~Market~~over-the-counter market on an electronic bulletin board established for unlisted securities such as the “pink sheets” or the OTC Bulletin Board. Such trading will reduce the market liquidity of our common stock. As a result, ~~you~~an ~~may~~investor will likley find it more difficult to dispose of, ~~your~~or ~~shares~~obtain accurate quotations for the price of, our common stock. In addition, if our common stock is delisted, we will find it more difficult to obtain additional financing in the future.

IfAdditionally, if the trading price remains below $5.00 per share, trading in our common stock might ~~were~~also become subject to bethe ~~delisted~~requirements ~~from~~of ~~The~~certain ~~NASDAQ~~rules ~~Capital~~promulgated ~~Market,~~under the ~~trading~~Securities Exchange Act of ~~our~~1934, which require additional disclosure by ~~common~~broker-dealers in connection with any trade involving a stock ~~most~~defined ~~likely~~as ~~will~~a “penny bestock” ~~conducted~~(generally, inany ~~the~~equity ~~over-the-counter~~security ~~market~~not listed on ana national ~~electronic~~securities ~~bulletin~~exchange ~~board~~or ~~established~~quoted ~~for~~on ~~unlisted~~NASDAQ ~~securities~~that ~~such~~has asa market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions). Many brokerage firms are reluctant to recommend low-priced stocks to their clients. Moreover, various regulations and policies restrict the ability of shareholders to borrow against or “~~pink sheets~~margin” orlow-priced stocks, and declines in the ~~OTC~~stock ~~Bulletin~~price ~~Board~~below certain levels may trigger unexpected margin calls. ~~Such~~Additionally, ~~trading~~because ~~will~~brokers’ ~~reduce~~commissions on low-priced stocks generally represent a higher percentage of the stock price than ~~market~~commissions ~~liquidity~~on higher priced stocks, the current price of ~~our~~the common stock~~. As~~ a can result, in an ~~investor~~individual ~~would find~~shareholder itpaying ~~more~~transaction ~~difficult~~costs tothat ~~dispose~~represent a higher percentage of, ortotal ~~obtain~~share ~~accurate~~value ~~quotations~~than ~~for~~would be the case if our share price were higher. This factor may also limit the willingness of, investors to purchase our common stock. ~~In addition~~Finally, ifthe additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by these requirements could discourage broker-dealers from facilitating trades in our common stock, iswhich could severely limit the market ~~delisted~~liquidity of the stock and the ability of investors to trade our common stock. As a result, due to the fact that we will ~~find~~be itdelisted ~~more~~from ~~difficult~~the NASDAQ, tothe ~~obtain~~value ~~additional~~of ~~financing~~our securities could decline in ~~the~~value or become ~~future~~worthless.

If our common stock is delisted from The NASDAQ Capital Market and the trading price remains below $5.00 per share, trading in our common stock might also become subject to the requirements of certain rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which require additional disclosure by broker-dealers in connection with any trade involving a stock defined as a “penny stock” (generally, any equity security not listed on a national securities exchange or quoted on NASDAQ that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions). Many brokerage firms are reluctant to recommend low-priced stocks to their clients. Moreover, various regulations and policies restrict the ability of shareholders to borrow against or “margin” low-priced stocks, and declines in the stock price below certain levels may trigger unexpected margin calls. Additionally, because brokers’ commissions on low-priced stocks generally represent a higher percentage of the stock price than commissions on higher priced stocks, the current price of the common stock can result in an individual shareholder paying transaction costs that represent a higher percentage of total share value than would be the case if our share price were higher. This factor may also limit the willingness of investors to purchase our common stock. Finally, the additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by these requirements could discourage broker-dealers from facilitating trades in our common stock, which could severely limit the market liquidity of the stock and the ability of investors to trade our common stock.17

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On April 2, 2009, we exchanged with a holder of options of the Company all of such holder’s outstanding options to purchase 760,000 shares of common stock in the aggregate at a purchase price of $0.12 per share for the issuance by the Company of 250,000 shares of common stock. On April 14, 2009, we exchanged with a different holder of options of the Company all of such holder’s outstanding options to purchase 600,000 shares of common stock in the aggregate at a purchase price of $0.12 per share for the issuance by the Company of 200,000 shares of common stock.

The issuances of the shares of common stock described above were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) under the Securities Act of 1933 as well as the exemption from registration afforded by Rule 506 under the Securities Act and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Item 5. Other Information

In a letter dated March 31, 2009 from NASDAQ, we were informed that the Company did not comply with Marketplace Rule 4350(i)(1)(B). On February 11, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement to sell up to $1.2 million aggregate principal amount of its 10% Senior Secured PIK Notes due 2010. In connection with the note issuance, the Company agreed to grant warrants to purchase an aggregate of up to 7,130,200 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.105 per share. LC Capital Master Fund, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company (“LC”), an investor in the transaction and the Company’s largest shareholder and beneficial owner of approximately 17.5% of the total shares outstanding, received warrants to purchase 6,060,670 shares of the Company’s common stock in the offering. The Company structured the warrant agreement with LC to restrict its voting power by requiring the shares of common stock issued upon exercise of the warrants to be voted in the same proportion as all other votes cast for all matters put before shareholders. The warrant agreement did not, however, limit the ability of LC to acquire beneficial ownership of the shares of common stock subject to the warrant. As a result, because LC has the ability to exercise the warrants and beneficially owns approximately 29% of the Company’s common stock, the Nasdaq staff has taken the position upon review that the transaction resulted in a change of control and, therefore, required shareholder approval under Marketplace Rule 4350(i)(1)(B).

In a letter dated April 16, 2009 from NASDAQ, we were informed that the Company did not comply with Listing Rule 5210(d). NASDAQ has informed the Company that it would be subject to delisting proceedings if it did not pay its outstanding fees in full. Accordingly, the NASDAQ staff notified the Company that this matter serves as an additional basis for delisting the Company’s securities from The NASDAQ Stock Market.

NASDAQ recently provided notice to the Company that it would be delisted from NASDAQ on May 12, 2009 due to its failure to meet the listing requirements as provided above. As a result of this, trading of our common stock most likely will be conducted in the over-the-counter market on an electronic bulletin board established for unlisted securities such as the “pink sheets” or the OTC Bulletin Board. Such trading will reduce the market liquidity of our common stock. As a result, an investor will likley find it more difficult to dispose of, or obtain accurate quotations for the price of, our common stock. In addition, if our common stock is delisted, we will find it more difficult to obtain additional financing in the future. As a result, due to the fact that we will be delisted from the NASDAQ, the value of our securities could decline in value or become worthless.

Item 6.

Exhibits

Exhibits:

Exhibit No.	~~Description~~	Description
10.1	Development Agreement, dated December 4, 2008, by and between the Company and Shell Exploration and Production Company and certain of its affiliates.*
4.1(1)			Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement dated February 11, 2009
31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.*
10.1			Development Agreement, dated December 4, 2008, by and between the Company and Shell Exploration and Production Company and certain of its affiliates.*
31.2	Certification of the Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.*
10.2(1)		Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 11, 2009, among Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc., as Issuer, LC Capital Master Fund, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company, Edward F. Heil and Don A. Sanders, as purchasers, and LC Capital Master Fund, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company, as agent and collateral agent for the holders of the securities issued hereunder.
32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**
10.3(1)		Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated February 11, 2009 issued to LC Capital Master Fund, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company.
32.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**
10.4(1)		Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated February 11, 2009 issued to Edward F. Heil.
10.5(1)		Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated February 11, 2009 issued to Don A. Sanders.
10.6(2)		Delayed Draw Note in the principal amount of $340,000 issued to LC Capital Master Fund, Ltd.
10.7(2)		Delayed Draw Note in the principal amount of $30,000 issued to Don A. Sanders.
10.8(2)		Delayed Draw Note in the principal amount of $30,000 issued to Edward F. Heil
10.9(2)		Delayed Draw Note in the principal amount of $75,000 issued to LC Capital Master Fund, Ltd.
10.10(2)		Letter Agreement, dated March 3, 2009, among Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc., LC Capital Master Fund, Ltd., Edward F. Heil, and Don A. Sanders
31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.*
31.2		Certification of the Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.*
32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**
32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

* Filed herewith.

** Furnished herewith.

16(1) Filed as exhibits to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on February 12, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.

(2) Filed as exhibits to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on March 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	PARTICLE DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
	(Registrant)
Date: February 9, 2009	/s/ JASON D. DAVIS
Date: May 11, 2009	/s/ JASON D. DAVIS
	Jason D. Davis
	Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer (authorized officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

1719

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description
4.1(1)		Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement dated February 11, 2009
10.1		Development Agreement, dated December 4, 2008, by and between the Company and Shell Exploration and Production Company and certain of its affiliates.*
10.2(1)		Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 11, 2009, among Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc., as Issuer, LC Capital Master Fund, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company, Edward F. Heil and Don A. Sanders, as purchasers, and LC Capital Master Fund, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company, as agent and collateral agent for the holders of the securities issued hereunder.
10.3(1)		Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated February 11, 2009 issued to LC Capital Master Fund, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company.
10.4(1)		Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated February 11, 2009 issued to Edward F. Heil.
10.5(1)		Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated February 11, 2009 issued to Don A. Sanders.
10.6(2)		Delayed Draw Note in the principal amount of $340,000 issued to LC Capital Master Fund, Ltd.
10.7(2)		Delayed Draw Note in the principal amount of $30,000 issued to Don A. Sanders.
10.8(2)		Delayed Draw Note in the principal amount of $30,000 issued to Edward F. Heil
10.9(2)	Delayed Draw Note in the principal amount of $75,000 issued to LC Capital Master Fund, Ltd.
10.10(2)	Letter Agreement, dated March 3, 2009, among Particle Drilling Technologies, Inc., LC Capital Master Fund, Ltd., Edward F. Heil, and Don A. Sanders
10.1	Development Agreement, dated December 4, 2008, by and between the Company and Shell Exploration and Production Company and certain of its affiliates.*
31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.*
31.2	Certification of the Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.*
32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**
32.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

* Filed herewith.

** Furnished herewith.

(1) Filed as exhibits to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on February 12, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.

(2) Filed as exhibits to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on March 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.

Filing Compare · PARTICLE DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES INC/NV