UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2014~~2015

— OR —

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 1-34544

Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)



Delaware		26-1191638
(State of Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201		(214) 812-4600
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)		(Registrant's Telephone Number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-Accelerated filer x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

At ~~November~~May 47, ~~2014~~2015, the outstanding membership interest in Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC was directly held by Energy Future Holdings Corp.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		PAGE
GLOSSARY		ii
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Condensed Statements of Consolidated Income (Loss) —Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013	1
	Condensed Statements of Consolidated Income (Loss) —Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 and 2014	1
	Condensed Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income (Loss) —Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013	1
	Condensed Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income (Loss) —Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 and 2014	1
	Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows —Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013	2
	Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows —Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 and 2014	2
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets —September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013	3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets —March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014	3
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	4
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2223
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3028
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3331
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	3432
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	3432
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	3432
Item 5.	Other Information	3432
Item 6.	Exhibits	3533
SIGNATURE		3634

Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC's (EFIH) annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports are made available to the public, free of charge, on the Energy Future Holdings Corp. (EFH Corp.) website at http://www.energyfutureholdings.com as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information on EFH Corp.'s website shall not be deemed a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The representations and warranties contained in any agreement that EFIH has filed as an exhibit to this quarterly report on Form 10-Q or that EFIH has or may publicly file in the future may contain representations and warranties made by and to the parties thereto at specific dates. Such representations and warranties may be subject to exceptions and qualifications contained in separate disclosure schedules, may represent the parties' risk allocation in the particular transaction, or may be qualified by materiality standards that differ from what may be viewed as material for securities law purposes.

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q and other Securities and Exchange Commission filings of EFIH and its subsidiaries occasionally make references to EFIH (or "the company"), EFH Corp., Oncor Holdings or Oncor when describing actions, rights or obligations of their respective subsidiaries. These references reflect the fact that the subsidiaries are consolidated with, or otherwise reflected in, their respective parent company's financial statements for financial reporting purposes. However, these references should not be interpreted to imply that the relevant parent company is actually undertaking the action or has the rights or obligations of the relevant subsidiary company or vice versa.

GLOSSARY

When the following terms and abbreviations appear in the text of this report, they have the meanings indicated below.

2013 Form 10-K		EFIH's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013
2014 Form 10-K		EFIH's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014
Bankruptcy Filing		Voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code (Bankruptcy Code) in the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (Bankruptcy Court) filed on April 29, 2014 by the Debtors
Chapter 11 Cases		Cases being heard in the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (Bankruptcy Court) concerning voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code (Bankruptcy Code) filed on April 29, 2014 by the Debtors
DIP Facilities		Refers, collectively, to EFIH's debtor-in-possession financing (see Note 58 to the Financial Statements) and TCEH's debtor-in-possession financing (TCEH DIP Facility).
Debtors		EFH Corp. and the substantial majority of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including EFIH, EFCH and TCEH but excluding the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities
Effective Date		the effective date of the Debtors' plan of reorganization
Disclosure Statement		Disclosure Statement for the Debtors' Joint Plan of Reorganization Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code filed by the Debtors with the Bankruptcy Court on April 14, 2015, as it may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time
EFCH		Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFH Corp. and the direct parent of TCEH, and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context
EFH Corp.		Energy Future Holdings Corp., a holding company, and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context, whose major subsidiaries include TCEH and Oncor
EFH Corp. 10.875% Notes		EFH Corp.'s 10.875% Senior Notes with a maturity date of November 1, 2017, which are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by EFIH and EFCH as discussed in Note 7 to Financial Statements
EFH Corp. Toggle Notes		EFH Corp.'s 11.25%/12.00% Senior Toggle Notes with a maturity date of November 1, 2017, which are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by EFIH and EFCH as discussed in Note 7 to Financial Statements
EFIH		Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFH Corp. and the direct parent of Oncor Holdings, and/or its subsidiaries depending on context.
EFIH Debtors		EFIH and EFIH Finance
EFIH Finance		EFIH Finance Inc., a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFIH, formed for the sole purpose of serving as co-issuer with EFIH of certain debt securities
EFIH First Lien Notes		Refers, collectively, to EFIH's and EFIH Finance's $503 million principal amount of 6.875% Senior Secured First Lien Notes and $3.482 billion principal amount of 10.000% Senior Secured First Lien Notes.
EFIH Second Lien Notes		Refers, collectively, to EFIH's and EFIH Finance's $406 million principal amount of 11% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes and $1.75 billion principal amount of 11.75% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes.
EFIH PIK Notes		EFIH's $1.566 billion principal amount of 11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes.
EFIH Second Lien Notes		Refers, collectively, to EFIH's and EFIH Finance's $322 million principal amount of 11% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes and $1.389 billion principal amount of 11.75% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes.
ERCOT		Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc., the independent system operator and the regional coordinator of various electricity systems within Texas
ERISA		Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreements		EFH Corp. and certain of its subsidiaries (including EFCH, EFIH and TCEH, but not including Oncor Holdings and Oncor) are parties to a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, executed on May 15, 2012 but effective as of January 1, 2010. EFH Corp., Oncor Holdings, Oncor, Oncor's third-party minority investor, and Oncor Management Investment LLC are parties to a separate Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement dated November 5, 2008. See Management's Discussion and Analysis, under Financial Condition.
GAAP		generally accepted accounting principles
LIBOR		London Interbank Offered Rate, an interest rate at which banks can borrow funds, in marketable size, from other banks in the London interbank market
Luminant		subsidiaries of TCEH engaged in competitive market activities consisting of electricity generation and wholesale energy sales and purchases as well as commodity risk management and trading activities, all largely in Texas
Merger		the transaction referred to in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated February 25, 2007, under which Texas Holdings agreed to acquire EFH Corp., which was completed on October 10, 2007

Merger		the transaction referred to in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated February 25, 2007, under which Texas Holdings agreed to acquire EFH Corp., which was completed on October 10, 2007
Oncor		Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC, a direct, majority owned subsidiary of Oncor Holdings, and/or its wholly owned consolidated bankruptcy-remote financing subsidiary, Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC, depending on context, that is engaged in regulated electricity transmission and distribution activities
Oncor Holdings		Oncor Electric Delivery Holdings Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFIH and the direct majority owner of Oncor, and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context
Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities		Oncor Holdings and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including Oncor
Petition Date		April 29, 2014, the date the Debtors made the Bankruptcy Filing
Plan of Reorganization		Joint Plan of Reorganization Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code filed by the Debtors with the Bankruptcy Court on April 14, 2015, as it may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time
PUCT		Public Utility Commission of Texas
REP		retail electric provider
RSA		Restructuring Support and Lock-Up Agreement
SEC		US Securities and Exchange Commission
SG&A		selling, general and administrative
Sponsor Group		Refers, collectively, to certain investment funds affiliated with Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P., TPG Global, LLC (together with its affiliates, TPG) and GS Capital Partners, an affiliate of Goldman, Sachs & Co., that have an ownership interest in Texas Holdings.
TCEH		Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFCH and an indirect subsidiary of EFH Corp., and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context, that are engaged in electricity generation and wholesale and retail energy markets activities, and whose major subsidiaries include Luminant and TXU Energy
TCEH Demand Notes		Refers to certain loans from TCEH to EFH Corp. in the form of demand notes to finance EFH Corp. debt principal and interest payments and, until April 2011, other general corporate purposes of EFH Corp., that were guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by EFCH and EFIH and were settled by EFH Corp. in January 2013.
TCEH DIP Facility		TCEH's $3.375 billion debtor-in-possession financing facility approved by the Bankruptcy Court in June 2014 (see Note 5 to Financial Statements)
Texas Holdings		Texas Energy Future Holdings Limited Partnership, a limited partnership controlled by the Sponsor Group, that owns substantially all of the common stock of EFH Corp.
Texas Holdings Group		Texas Holdings and its direct and indirect subsidiaries other than the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities
TXU Energy		TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of TCEH that is a REP in competitive areas of ERCOT and is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers
US		United States of America
VIE		variable interest entity

iii

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ENERGY FUTURE INTERMEDIATE HOLDING COMPANY LLC, A DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME (LOSS)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
	2015			2014
	(millions of dollars)
Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	(2	)	$	(511	)	$	~~(21~~	)	$	(5	)
Other deductions (Note 4)	(1270		)	—(77		)	~~(211~~		)	—
Interest income — affiliates (Note 10)	—			—			—			284
Interest expense and related charges (Note 6)	(292		)	(198		)
Interest expense and related charges (Note 8)	(58		)	(191		)	(381		)	(566		)
Reorganization items (Note 7)	(48		)	—
Reorganization items (Note 6)	(7		)	—			(235		)	—
Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary	(412		)	(286		)
Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary	(79		)	(196		)	(848		)	(287		)
Income tax benefit (Note 5)	65			72
Income tax benefit	25			68			215			100
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary (net of tax) (Note 3)	75			80
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary (net of tax) (Note 3)	123			114			276			255
Net loss	$	(272	)	$	(134	)
Net income (loss)	$	69		$	(14	)	$	(357	)	$	68

See Notes to the Financial Statements.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
	2015			2014
	(millions of dollars)
Net income (loss)	$	69		$	(14	)	$	(357	)	$	68
Net loss	$	(272	)	$	(134	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) — net of tax effects:
Reclassification to interest income of mark-to-market valuations of holdings of affiliate debt (net of tax expense of $—, $—, $— and $99) (Note 10)	—			—			—			(185		)
Net effects related to Oncor — reported in equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries (net of tax benefit of $— in all periods)	1			—
Net effects related to Oncor — reported in equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries (net of tax benefit of $— in all periods)	(1		)	1			—			1
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	1			—
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	(1		)	1			—			(184		)
Comprehensive loss	$	(271	)	$	(134	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	68		$	(13	)	$	(357	)	$	(116	)

See Notes to the Financial Statements.

ENERGY FUTURE INTERMEDIATE HOLDING COMPANY LLC, A DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013
	2015			2014
	(millions of dollars)
Cash flows — operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(357	)	$	68
Net loss	$	(272	)	$	(134	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash used in operating activities:
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary	(~~276~~75		)	(~~255~~80		)
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated subsidiary	~~128~~74			~~148~~37
Deferred income taxes, net	(20		)	(96		)
Fees paid on EFIH Second Lien Notes repayment (Note 7) (reported as financing activities)	28			—
Fees paid for EFIH DIP Facility (Notes 5 and 6) (reported as financing activities)	93			—
Interest expense on toggle notes payable in additional principal (Notes 6 and 9)	—			49
Interest expense related to pushed-down debt of parent (Notes 7 and 8)	1			5
Reserve recorded for income tax receivable from EFH Corp. (Note 4)	70			77
Interest expense on toggle notes payable in additional principal (Notes 7 and 8)	65			130
Amortization of debt related balances (Note 6)	—			(13		)
Reserve recorded for income tax receivable from EFH Corp. (Note 4)	211			—
Loss on exchange and settlement of EFIH First Lien Notes (Notes 5 and 6)	108			—
Amortization of debt related balances (Note 8)	(17		)	(39		)
Mark-to-market gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (Note 10)	—			(284		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Income taxes receivable from/payable to EFH Corp. (Note 11)	—			(6		)
Pre-petition interest related to EFIH Second Lien Notes repayment (Note 9)	(55		)	—
Accrued interest	15			38
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities, including liabilities subject to compromise	(62		)	(42		)
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities	(188		)	(6		)
Cash used in operating activities	(292		)	(106		)
Cash used in operating activities	(237		)	(297		)
Cash flows — financing activities:
Proceeds from EFIH DIP Facility before fees paid (Notes 5 and 6)	3,564			—
Fees paid on EFIH Second Lien Notes repayment (Note 7)	(28		)	—
Fees paid for EFIH DIP Facility (Note 5)	(93		)	—
Repayments/repurchases of debt (Note 8)	(445		)	—
Repayments/repurchases of debt (Note 5)	(2,312		)	—
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(473		)	—
Interest received on holdings of affiliate debt (Note 10)	—			208
Distributions to EFH Corp. (Note 10)	—			(680		)
Debt exchange and issuance costs, premiums and discounts	—			(6		)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities	1,159			(478		)
Cash flows — investing activities:
Restricted cash related to debt issuance	—			680
Cash provided by investing activities	—			—
Cash provided by investing activities	—			680
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	(765		)	(106		)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	922			(95		)
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning balance	1,157			242
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning balance	242			424
Cash and cash equivalents — ending balance	$	392		$	136
Cash and cash equivalents — ending balance	$	1,164		$	329

See Notes to the Financial Statements.

ENERGY FUTURE INTERMEDIATE HOLDING COMPANY LLC, A DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
ASSETS	(millions of dollars)
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~1,164~~392		$	~~242~~1,157
Other current assets	32			23
Total current assets	~~1,167~~394			~~244~~1,160
Investment in Oncor Holdings (Note 3)	6,~~098~~052			56,~~950~~050
Other noncurrent assets	—			58
Accumulated deferred income taxes	26			26
Total assets	$	76,~~265~~472		$	67,~~252~~236
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERSHIP INTERESTS
Current liabilities:
Trade accounts and other payables to affiliates	$	24		$	106
Notes, loans and other debt (Note 7)	—			7,877
Accumulated deferred income taxes	26			26
Accrued interest	1			~~137~~1
Other current liabilities	1123			—18
Total current liabilities	4054			~~8,050~~51
Borrowings under debtor-in-possession credit facilities (Note 5)	5,400			—
Borrowings under debtor-in-possession credit facilities (Note 8)	5,400			5,400
Liabilities subject to compromise (Note 7)	3,984			—
Liabilities subject to compromise (Note 9)	3,487			3,988
Accumulated deferred income taxes	4			24
Total liabilities	8,941			9,439
Total liabilities	9,428			8,074
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10)
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 9)
Membership interests (Note 11):
Membership interests (Note 10):
Capital account	(1,749		)	(1,482		)
Capital account	(1,489		)	(1,148		)
Affiliate debt held by EFIH (Note 11)	(635		)	(635		)
Affiliate debt held by EFIH (Note 10)	(635		)	(635		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	(85		)	(86		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	(39		)	(39		)
Total membership interests	(2,469		)	(2,203		)
Total membership interests	(2,163		)	(1,822		)
Total liabilities and membership interests	$	6,472		$	7,236
Total liabilities and membership interests	$	7,265		$	6,252

See Notes to the Financial Statements.

ENERGY FUTURE INTERMEDIATE HOLDING COMPANY LLC, A DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


1.	BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of Business

References in this report to "the company" are to EFIH and/or its direct and indirect subsidiaries, as apparent in the context. See "Glossary" for defined terms.

EFIH, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFH Corp., is a Dallas, Texas-based holding company with no operations or operating assets whose wholly owned subsidiary, Oncor Holdings, holds a majority interest (approximately 80%) in Oncor. Oncor is a regulated electricity transmission and distribution company principally engaged in providing delivery services to REPs, including subsidiaries of TCEH, that sell electricity to residential, business and other consumers in Texas. EFIH has no reportable business segments. Oncor Holdings and its subsidiaries (the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities) are not consolidated in EFIH's financial statements in accordance with consolidation accounting standards related to variable interest entities (VIEs) (see Note 3).

Various "ring-fencing" measures have been taken to enhance the credit quality of Oncor Holdings and Oncor. These measures serve to mitigate Oncor's and Oncor Holdings' credit exposure to the Texas Holdings Group, which includes EFIH, and to reduce the risk that the assets and liabilities of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities would be substantively consolidated with the assets and liabilities of the Texas Holdings Group in the event of a bankruptcy of one or more of Texas Holding Group's subsidiaries. Such measures include, among other things: Oncor's sale of a 19.75% equity interest to Texas Transmission ~~Investment LLC (a limited liability company that owns a 19.75% equity interest~~ in ~~Oncor and is not affiliated with EFH Corp., any of EFH Corp.'s subsidiaries or any member of the Sponsor Group) in~~ November 2008; maintenance of separate books and records for the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities; the board of directors of Oncor Holdings and Oncor being comprised of a majority of independent directors, and prohibitions on the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities providing credit support to, or receiving credit support from, any member of the Texas Holdings Group. The assets and liabilities of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities are separate and distinct from those of the Texas Holdings Group, including TXU Energy and Luminant, and none of the assets of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities are available to satisfy the debt or contractual obligations of any member of the Texas Holdings Group. Oncor and Oncor Holdings do not bear any liability for debt or contractual obligations of the Texas Holdings Group (including, but not limited to, EFIH's debt obligations), and vice versa. Accordingly, Oncor Holdings' operations are conducted, and its cash flows managed, independently from the Texas Holdings Group.

Consistent with the ring-fencing measures discussed above, the assets and liabilities of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities have not been, and are not expected to be, substantively consolidated with the assets and liabilities of the Debtors in the Chapter 11 Cases.

Bankruptcy Filing

AsOn ~~discussed further in Note 2, on~~ April 29, 2014 (the Petition Date), EFH Corp. and the substantial majority of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including EFIH, EFCH and TCEH but excluding the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities, (collectively, the Debtors), filed voluntary petitions for relief (the Bankruptcy Filing) under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the Bankruptcy Code) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the Bankruptcy Court). On April 14, 2015, the Debtors filed with the Bankruptcy Court the Plan of Reorganization and the Disclosure Statement. See Note 52 for further discussion regarding the Chapter 11 Cases and the Debtors' recent filing of ~~debtor-in-possession~~the ~~financing~~Plan of Reorganization and the Disclosure Statement.

Basis of Presentation, Including Application of Bankruptcy Accounting

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared as if EFIH is a going concern and contemplate the realization of assets and liabilities in the normal course of business. The condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the application of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 852~~-10~~, Reorganizations. During the pendency of the ~~Bankruptcy~~Chapter ~~Filing~~11 Cases, the Debtors will operate their businesses as "debtors-in-possession" under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. ASC 852~~-10~~ applies to entities that have filed a petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The guidance requires that transactions and events directly associated with the reorganization be distinguished from the ongoing operations of the business. In addition, the guidance provides for changes in the accounting and presentation of liabilities~~, as well as expenses and income directly associated with the Chapter 11 Cases~~. See Notes 67 and 79 for discussion of these accounting and reporting changes.

Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries, which are 50% or less owned and/or do not meet accounting standards criteria for consolidation, are accounted for under the equity method (see Note 3). Adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial position have been included therein. All intercompany items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP have been omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. Because the condensed consolidated interim financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by US GAAP, they should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related notes included in EFIH's ~~2013~~2014 Form 10-K. The results of operations for an interim period may not give a true indication of results for a full year. All dollar amounts in the financial statements and tables in the notes are stated in millions of US dollars unless otherwise indicated.

Use of Estimates

Preparation of financial statements requires estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reporting of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and the reported amounts of income and expense, including fair value measurements and estimates of expected allowed claims. In the event estimates and/or assumptions prove to be different from actual amounts, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information.

Changes in Accounting Standards

In ~~August~~April 2014, the FASB issued ~~Accounting~~ASU ~~Standards Update~~ No. 2014-~~15 (ASU 2014-15)~~08, Presentation of Financial Statements -(Topic ~~Going~~205) ~~Concern. ASU~~and ~~2014-15~~Property isPlant, ~~effective~~and ~~for~~Equipment ~~annual~~(Topic ~~reporting~~360): ~~periods~~Reporting ~~(including~~Discontinued ~~interim~~Operations ~~periods~~and ~~within~~Disclosures ~~those~~of ~~periods)~~Disposals ~~ending~~of ~~after~~Components ~~December~~of 15an Entity, ~~2016. Early~~which ~~application~~changes isthe ~~permitted~~requirements for reporting discontinued operations. The ~~amendments~~ASU instates ~~ASU~~that ~~2014-15~~a ~~create~~disposal of a ~~new~~component ~~ASC~~of ~~Sub-topic~~an ~~205-40,~~entity ~~Presentation~~or ofa ~~Financial~~group ~~Statements~~of -components ~~Going~~of ~~Concern~~an ~~and~~entity ~~requires~~is ~~management~~required to ~~assess~~be ~~for~~reported ~~each~~in ~~annual~~discontinued ~~and~~operations ~~interim~~if ~~reporting~~the ~~period~~disposal ifrepresents ~~conditions~~a ~~exist~~strategic shift that ~~raise~~has ~~substantial~~or ~~doubt~~will ~~about~~have a major effect on an entity’'s ~~ability~~operations and financial results when the component of an entity or group of components of an entity meets the criteria to ~~continue~~be classified as aheld ~~going~~for ~~concern~~sale, is disposed of by sale, or is disposed of other than by sale. The ~~rule~~amendments ~~requires~~in ~~various~~this ASU also require additional disclosures ~~depending~~about ondiscontinued operations. ASU 2014-08 is effective for the ~~facts~~Company ~~and~~for ~~circumstances~~the ~~surrounding~~first anquarter ~~entity~~of 2015. This new requirement is relevant to EFIH's ~~ability~~presentation toof ~~continue~~the asequity amethod ~~going~~investment ~~concern~~in Oncor, which has been proposed for sale within the Chapter 11 Cases. ~~EFIH~~The isnew guidance eliminated a scope exception previously applicable to equity method investments, resulting in the ~~process~~requirement of ~~assessing~~further ~~the~~analysis ~~effects~~ of the ~~application~~presentation of the ~~new~~Oncor ~~guidance~~equity method investment. Based on EFIH's analysis, ASU 2014-08 will not materially affect its results of operations, financial ~~statements~~position, or cash flows, until a plan of sale of the Oncor investment is approved by the Bankruptcy Court, at which time presentation as discontinued operations may be appropriate.

In February 2015 the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-02 (ASU 2015-02) Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The new consolidation standard changes the criteria a reporting enterprise uses to evaluate if certain legal entities, such as limited partnerships and similar entities, should be consolidated. EFIH is in the process of assessing the effects of the application of the new guidance on its financial statements.

In April 2015 the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-03 (ASU 2015-03) Simplifying Balance Sheet Presentation by Presenting Debt Issuance Costs as a Deduction from Recognized Debt Liability. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The new standard requires debt issuance costs to be classified as reductions to the face value of the related debt. EFIH does not expect ASU 2015-03 to materially affect its financial position until it issues new debt. During the Chapter 11 Cases, debt issuance costs on prepetition debt subject to compromise will continue to be reported in liabilities subject to compromise.

2. ~~BANKRUPTCY~~CHAPTER ~~FILING~~11 CASES

On the Petition Date, EFH Corp. and the substantial majority of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including EFIH, EFCH and TCEH but excluding the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities, filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. During the pendency of the ~~Bankruptcy Filing (~~Chapter 11 Cases), the Debtors will operate their businesses as "debtors-in-possession" under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Bankruptcy Filing resulted primarily from the adverse effects on EFH Corp.'s competitive businesses of lower wholesale electricity prices in ERCOT driven by the sustained decline in natural gas prices since mid-2008. Further, the natural gas hedges that TCEH entered into when forward market prices of natural gas were significantly higher than current prices had largely matured before the remaining positions were terminated shortly after the Bankruptcy Filing. These market conditions challenged the profitability and operating cash flows of EFH Corp.'s competitive businesses and resulted in the inability to support their significant interest payments and debt maturities, including the remaining debt obligations due in 2014, and the inability to refinance and/or extend the maturities of their outstanding debt.

AsProposed ~~previously~~Plan ~~disclosed, after a series~~ of discussions with certain creditors that began in 2013 and in anticipation of the Bankruptcy Filing, on April 29, 2014, the Debtors entered into a Restructuring Support and Lock-Up Agreement (RSA) with various stakeholders (Consenting Parties) in order to effect an agreed upon restructuring of the Debtors through a pre-arranged Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.Reorganization

OnA ~~July~~Chapter 2411 plan of reorganization, ~~2014~~among other things, ~~pursuant~~determines the rights and satisfaction of claims of various creditors and security holders of an entity operating under the protection of the Bankruptcy Court and is subject to the ~~RSA,~~ultimate ~~each~~outcome of ~~EFH~~stakeholder ~~Corp~~negotiations and Bankruptcy Court decisions ongoing through the date on which the Chapter 11 plan is confirmed., In ~~EFIH,~~order ~~EFCH,~~for ~~TCEH,~~the ~~EFIH~~Debtors ~~Finance~~to emerge successfully from the Chapter 11 Cases as reorganized companies, ~~Inc.~~they must obtain approval from the Bankruptcy Court and ~~TCEH~~certain ~~Finance,~~of ~~Inc.~~their ~~provided~~respective creditors for a ~~notice~~Chapter of11 ~~termination~~plan of reorganization. The Debtors currently have the ~~RSA~~exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization in ~~accordance~~the ~~with~~Chapter ~~its~~11 ~~terms~~Cases until June 23, 2015 and the exclusive right to solicit the ~~Consenting~~appropriate ~~Parties. The~~votes ~~RSA~~for ~~termination~~any ~~became~~such ~~effective~~plan onit ~~July~~files 31prior to such date until August 23, ~~2014~~2015 (i.e., collectively, the exclusivity period).

InOn ~~cooperation~~April 14, 2015, the Debtors filed with ~~various~~the ~~stakeholders~~Bankruptcy Court the Plan of Reorganization and the Disclosure Statement. In general, the ~~Debtors~~Plan ~~are~~of ~~focused~~Reorganization onproposes ~~formulating~~a structure that involves a tax-free deconsolidation or tax-free spin-off of TCEH from EFH Corp. (Reorganized TCEH) and ~~implementing~~the anreorganization ~~effective~~of EFH Corp. and ~~efficient~~EFIH either (a) as contemplated by the Debtors' previously disclosed Bankruptcy Court approved bidding procedures with respect to the potential sale of EFH Corp.'s indirect economic interest in Oncor, (b) pursuant to a standalone plan of reorganization ~~for~~or ~~each~~(c) pursuant to a creditor back-stopped plan of reorganization. Pursuant to the ~~Debtors~~Plan ~~under~~of ~~Chapter~~Reorganization, 11among other things, holders of TCEH first lien secured claims would receive 100% of the ~~Bankruptcy~~common ~~Code~~stock ~~that~~of ~~maximizes~~Reorganized ~~enterprise~~TCEH and 100% of the proceeds of new debt issued by Reorganized TCEH. Also, pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, the Debtors would select the highest or otherwise best transaction to maximize value for reorganized EFH Corp. and EFIH.

~~Proposed~~The ~~Sale~~Plan of ~~Economic~~Reorganization ~~Interest~~is subject to revision in ~~Oncor~~response to creditor and/or stakeholder claims and objections and the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code and/or the Bankruptcy Court. Unless the Plan of Reorganization receives the requisite approval from holders of claims and the Bankruptcy Court, upon expiration of the exclusivity period (unless extended by the Bankruptcy Court), any creditor or stakeholder would have the ability to file in the Chapter 11 Cases one or more Chapter 11 plans of reorganization.

InThe ~~September~~Disclosure ~~2014~~Statement contains, ~~with~~among ~~input~~other ~~and~~things, ~~support~~detailed ~~from~~information ~~several~~about ~~key stakeholders,~~ the ~~Debtors~~Plan ~~filed~~of Reorganization, a ~~motion~~historical ~~with~~profile of the ~~Bankruptcy~~Debtors' ~~Court~~businesses, ~~seeking~~a ~~the~~description ~~entry~~ of anproposed ~~order~~distributions ~~approving~~to ~~bidding~~creditors ~~procedures~~under ~~with respect to~~ the ~~potential~~Plan ~~sale~~ of ~~EFH Corp.'s/EFIH's economic interest in Oncor. During October 2014~~Reorganization, ~~the~~and ~~bankruptcy~~an ~~court~~analysis ~~held~~of ~~hearings regarding~~ the ~~motion. On~~Plan ~~November~~of 3,Reorganization's ~~2014~~feasibility, ~~the~~as ~~Bankruptcy~~well ~~Court~~as ~~conditionally~~many ~~approved~~of the ~~motion. In~~technical ~~conditionally~~matters ~~approving the motion, the Bankruptcy Court~~ required ~~that,~~for ~~among other things,~~ the Debtors ~~modify the proposed bidding procedures and order~~ to ~~(a)~~exit ~~allow~~from upbankruptcy, tosuch ~~five~~as ~~advisors~~descriptions ~~for each~~ of ~~the~~who ~~official~~will ~~unsecured~~be ~~creditor~~eligible ~~committees at TCEH and EFH Corp./EFIH~~ to ~~access~~vote ~~information~~on ~~regarding~~ the ~~bidding~~Plan ~~process~~of onReorganization ~~terms to be negotiated with these advisors, (b) allow additional time for bidders to evaluate potential transactions~~ and ~~submit bids and (c) prohibit material modifications to~~ the ~~bid~~voting ~~procedures~~process ~~without~~itself. The ~~the~~information ~~consent~~contained ofin the ~~committees~~Disclosure orStatement ~~further~~is ~~order~~subject ofto ~~the Bankruptcy Court. In addition~~change, ~~the~~for ~~Bankruptcy Court required that prior to~~ a ~~modified~~number ~~order becoming effective, the respective boards~~ of ~~directors of EFH Corp.~~reasons, ~~EFCH,~~including ~~TCEH~~amendments ~~and EFIH must vote~~ to ~~approve~~ the ~~proposed~~Plan ~~modified bidding procedures (along with an affirmative vote~~ of ~~the~~Reorganization, ~~respective~~actions ~~disinterested directors at EFIH and TCEH). The Debtors intend to continue to work closely with each~~ of ~~their~~third ~~respective~~parties, ~~stakeholders~~including tothe ~~formulate~~Bankruptcy aCourt, ~~bidding~~or ~~process that will maximize enterprise value for each of the Debtors~~otherwise.

~~Tax~~Nothing ~~Matters~~contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, a solicitation for a vote on the Plan of Reorganization, as filed or as it may be amended. The Plan of Reorganization will become effective only if it receives the requisite approval and is confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court and the conditions to consummation set forth therein are satisfied. There can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court will approve the Disclosure Statement, that the Debtors' stakeholders will approve the Plan of Reorganization, that the Bankruptcy Court will confirm the Plan of Reorganization or that the conditions to consummation of the Plan of Reorganization will be satisfied.

In June 2014, EFH Corp. filed a request with the IRS for a private letter ruling (Private Letter Ruling) that, among other things, will provide (a) that (i) the transfer by TCEH of all of its assets and its ordinary course operating liabilities to reorganized TCEH consummated through a tax-free spin (in accordance with the Private Letter Ruling) in connection with TCEH's emergence from bankruptcy (Reorganized TCEH), (ii) the transfer by the Debtors to Reorganized TCEH of certain operating assets and liabilities that are reasonably necessary to the operation of Reorganized TCEH and (iii) the distribution by TCEH of (A) the equity it holds in Reorganized TCEH and (B) the cash proceeds TCEH receives from Reorganized TCEH to the holders of TCEH first lien claims, will qualify as a "reorganization" within the meaning of Sections 368(a)(1)(G), 355 and 356 of the Code and (b) for certain other rulings under Sections 368(a)(1)(G) and 355 of the Code. The Debtors intend to continue to pursue the Private Letter Ruling in connection with any Chapter 11 plan of reorganization that is ultimately proposed. In October 2014, the Debtors filed a memorandum with the Bankruptcy Court that described tax related matters regarding restructuring alternatives.

~~Operation~~Proposed ~~and~~Sale ~~Implications~~ of ~~the~~Indirect ~~Chapter~~Economic 11Ownership ~~Cases~~Interest in Oncor

~~The~~In ~~accompanying~~September ~~consolidated~~2014, ~~financial~~the ~~statements~~Debtors ~~contemplate~~filed ~~the~~a ~~realization~~motion ofwith ~~assets~~the ~~and~~Bankruptcy Court seeking the ~~satisfaction~~entry of ~~liabilities~~an inorder approving bidding procedures with respect to the ~~normal~~potential ~~course~~sale of ~~business~~EFH Corp.'s/EFIH's indirect economic ownership interest in Oncor. ~~The~~In January 2015, the Bankruptcy Court approved the Debtors' ~~ability~~bidding toprocedures ~~continue~~motion asthat asets ~~going~~forth ~~concern~~the isprocess ~~contingent~~by ~~upon~~which ~~their~~the ~~ability~~Debtors are authorized to ~~comply~~solicit ~~with~~proposals ~~the~~(i.e., ~~financial~~bids) ~~and~~from ~~other~~third ~~covenants~~parties ~~contained~~to acquire (in ~~the~~any ~~debtor-in-possession~~form ~~financing~~and ~~(DIP~~employing ~~Facilities~~any structure, ~~described~~whether taxable (in ~~Note~~whole 5or in part), ~~the~~or ~~Bankruptcy~~tax-free) ~~Court~~EFH Corp.'s/EFIH's ~~approval~~indirect ofeconomic ~~the~~ownership ~~Chapter~~interest 11in ~~plan~~Oncor ofin ~~reorganization~~accordance ~~ultimately~~with ~~proposed~~the byBankruptcy Code. These bidding procedures contemplate that the Debtors ~~and~~select ~~their~~a ~~ability~~stalking tohorse ~~successfully~~bid ~~implement~~after ~~such~~a ~~Chapter~~two-stage 11closed ~~plan~~bidding process, and, ~~obtain~~after ~~new~~approval ~~financing~~by the Bankruptcy Court of such stalking horse bid, ~~among~~the ~~other~~Debtors ~~factors. As~~conduct a ~~result~~round of ~~the~~open ~~Chapter~~bidding 11culminating ~~Cases,~~in ~~the~~an ~~realization~~auction ofintended ~~assets~~to ~~and~~obtain ~~the~~a ~~satisfaction~~higher ofor ~~liabilities~~otherwise ~~are~~best ~~subject~~bid tofor ~~uncertainty~~a transaction. ~~While~~Initial ~~operating~~bids aswere ~~debtors-~~received in~~-possession~~ ~~under~~early ~~Chapter~~March 112015 and second round bids were received in April 2015, and each of the Debtors ~~may~~is ~~sell~~currently orassessing ~~otherwise~~those ~~dispose~~submissions. EFIH ofcannot orpredict ~~liquidate~~the ~~assets~~outcome orof ~~settle~~this ~~liabilities~~process, ~~subject~~including towhether ~~the~~EFH ~~approval~~Corp. ofwill receive any acceptable bid, whether the Bankruptcy Court orwill asapprove ~~otherwise~~any ~~permitted~~such inbid ~~the~~or ~~ordinary~~whether ~~course~~any ofsuch ~~business~~transaction will (~~and~~or ~~subject~~when toit ~~restrictions~~will) ~~contained~~ultimately inclose ~~the~~because ~~DIP~~any ~~Facilities),~~such ~~for~~transaction ~~amounts~~would ~~other~~be ~~than~~the ~~those~~subject ~~reflected~~of incustomary ~~the~~closing ~~accompanying~~conditions, ~~consolidated~~including ~~financial~~receipt ~~statements~~of all applicable regulatory approvals.

InScheduling general, the Debtors have received final bankruptcy court orders with respect to "first day motions" and other "operating motions" that allow the Debtors to operate their businesses in the ordinary course, including, among others, providing for the payment of certain pre-petition employee and retiree expenses and benefits, the use of the Debtors' existing cash management system, the continuation of customer contracts and programs at its retail electricity operations, the payment of certain pre-petition amounts to certain critical vendors, the ability to perform under certain pre-petition hedging and trading arrangements and the ability to pay certain pre-petition taxes and regulatory fees. In addition, the Bankruptcy Court has issued orders approving the DIP Facilities discussed in Note 5.Matters

~~Pre-Petition~~The ~~Claims~~Debtors filed a proposed scheduling order with respect to the Disclosure Statement and the Plan of Reorganization on April 14, 2015. On May 4, 2015, the Bankruptcy Court indicated that it would approve (a) the Debtors' request to hold a hearing on the Disclosure Statement on July 20, 2015 (and related discovery protocols) and (b) mediation between the Debtors and certain TCEH stakeholders with respect to Plan of Reorganization issues that affect the TCEH Debtors' estates. The Bankruptcy Court is expected to hold a scheduling conference on June 25, 2015 to address a Plan of Reorganization confirmation timeline (and related confirmation discovery protocols). The Disclosure Statement timeline set forth in the proposed scheduling order is subject to revision by the Bankruptcy Court, and may change based on subsequent orders entered by the Bankruptcy Court (on its own, upon the motion of a party, or upon the Debtors' request). There is no guarantee that mediation will be successful.

~~Holders~~Tax of pre-petition claims will be required to file proofs of claims by the "bar date" established by the Bankruptcy Court. A bar date is the date by which certain claims against the Debtors must be filed if the claimants wish to receive any distribution in the Chapter 11 Cases. In August 2014, the Bankruptcy Court established a bar date of October 27, 2014 for most claims. The Debtors have received numerous proofs of claim since the Petition Date. The Debtors are early in the process of reconciling those claims to the amounts listed in its schedules of assets and liabilities. The Debtors may ask the Bankruptcy Court to disallow claims that it believes are duplicative, have been later amended or superseded, are without merit, are overstated or should be disallowed for other reasons. Given the substantial number of claims filed, the claims resolution process will take considerable time to complete. Differences between liability amounts recorded by the company as liabilities subject to compromise and claims filed by creditors will be investigated and, if necessary, the Bankruptcy Court will make a final determination of the allowable claim. Differences between those final allowed claims and the liabilities recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheet will be recognized as reorganization items in the Debtors' condensed statement of consolidated income (loss) as they are resolved. The determination of how liabilities will ultimately be resolved cannot be made until the Bankruptcy Court approves a plan of reorganization or approves orders related to settlement of specific liabilities. Accordingly, the ultimate amount or resolution of such liabilities is not determinable at this time. The resolution of such claims could result in material adjustments to the company's financial statements.Matters

In June 2014, EFH Corp. filed a request with the IRS for a private letter ruling (Private Letter Ruling) that, among other things, will provide (a) that (i) the transfer by TCEH of all of its assets and its ordinary course operating liabilities to reorganized TCEH completed through a tax-free spin (in accordance with the Private Letter Ruling) in connection with TCEH's emergence from bankruptcy (Reorganized TCEH), (ii) the transfer by the Debtors to Reorganized TCEH of certain assets and liabilities that are reasonably necessary to the operation of Reorganized TCEH and (iii) the distribution by TCEH of (A) the equity it holds in Reorganized TCEH and (B) the cash proceeds TCEH receives from Reorganized TCEH to the holders of TCEH first lien claims, will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Sections 368(a)(1)(G), 355 and 356 of the Code and (b) for certain other rulings under Sections 368(a)(1)(G) and 355 of the Code. The Debtors intend to continue to pursue the Private Letter Ruling to support the Plan of Reorganization and other potential Chapter 11 plans of reorganization that could ultimately be proposed. In October 2014, the Debtors filed a memorandum with the Bankruptcy Court that described tax related matters regarding restructuring alternatives.

Implications of the Chapter 11 Cases

EFIH's ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon, among other factors, its ability to comply with the financial and other covenants contained in the DIP Facility described in Note 8, its ability to obtain new debtor in possession financing in the event the DIP Facility was to expire during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases and its ability to complete a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization in a timely manner, including obtaining creditor and Bankruptcy Court approval of such plan as well as applicable regulatory approvals required for such plan and obtaining any exit financing needed to implement such plan. These circumstances and uncertainties inherent in the bankruptcy proceedings raise substantial doubt about EFIH's ability to continue as a going concern.

Operations During the Chapter 11 Cases

In general, the Debtors have received final bankruptcy court orders with respect to first day motions and other operating motions that allow the Debtors to operate their businesses in the ordinary course, including, among others, providing for the payment of certain pre-petition employee and retiree expenses and benefits, the use of the Debtors' existing cash management system, the continuation of customer contracts and programs at its retail electricity operations, the payment of certain pre-petition amounts to certain critical vendors, the ability to perform under certain pre-petition hedging and trading arrangements and the ability to pay certain pre-petition taxes and regulatory fees. In addition, the Bankruptcy Court has issued orders approving the DIP Facilities discussed in Note 8.

Pre-Petition Claims

Holders of the substantial majority of pre-petition claims were required to file proofs of claims by the bar date established by the Bankruptcy Court. A bar date is the date by which certain claims against the Debtors must be filed if the claimants wish to receive any distribution in the Chapter 11 Cases. The Bankruptcy Court established a bar date of October 27, 2014 for the substantial majority of claims. The Debtors have received approximately 10,000 filed claims since the Petition Date. The Debtors are in the process of reconciling those claims to the amounts listed in its schedules of assets and liabilities, which includes communications with claimants to acquire additional information required for reconciliation. As of May 7, 2015, approximately 4,000 of those claims have been settled, withdrawn or expunged. To the extent claims related to EFIH are reconciled and resolved, EFIH has recorded them at the expected allowed amount. Claims that remain unresolved or unreconciled through the filing of this report have been estimated based upon management's best estimate of the likely claim amounts that the Bankruptcy Court will ultimately allow.

Beginning in November 2014, the Debtors began the process to request the Bankruptcy Court to disallow claims that they believe are duplicative, have been later amended or superseded, are without merit, are overstated or should be disallowed for other reasons. Given the substantial number of claims filed, the claims resolution process will take considerable time to complete. Differences between liability amounts recorded by the Debtors as liabilities subject to compromise and claims filed by creditors will be investigated and, if necessary, the Bankruptcy Court will make a final determination of the allowable claim. Differences between those final allowed claims and the liabilities recorded in the consolidated balance sheets will be recognized as reorganization items in the Debtors' statements of consolidated income (loss) as they are resolved. The determination of how liabilities will ultimately be resolved cannot be made until the Bankruptcy Court approves a plan of reorganization or approves orders related to settlement of specific liabilities. Accordingly, the ultimate amount or resolution of such liabilities is not determinable at this time. The resolution of such claims could result in material adjustments to EFIH's financial statements.


3.	INVESTMENT IN ONCOR HOLDINGS

EFIH has a wholly owned subsidiary, Oncor Holdings, which holds an approximate 80% equity interest in Oncor. Oncor Holdings is considered a variable interest entity (VIE). A VIE is an entity with which EFIH has a relationship or arrangement that indicates some level of control over the entity or results in economic risks to it. Accounting standards require consolidation of a VIE if EFIH has (a) the power to direct the significant activities of the VIE and (b) the right or obligation to absorb profit and loss from the VIE (i.e., EFIH is the primary beneficiary of the VIE). In determining the appropriateness of consolidation of a VIE, EFIH evaluates its purpose, governance structure, decision making processes and risks that are passed on to its interest holders. EFIH also examines the nature of any related party relationships among the interest holders of the VIE and the nature of any special rights granted to the interest holders of the VIE.

EFIH does not consolidate Oncor Holdings and instead ~~accounts~~is accounted for it as an equity method investment because the structural and operational "ring-fencing" measures discussed in Note 1 prevent it from having power to direct the significant activities of Oncor Holdings or Oncor. In accordance with accounting standards, EFIH accounts for its investment in Oncor Holdings under the equity method, as opposed to the cost method, based on its level of influence over its activities.

The carrying value of EFIH's variable interest in Oncor Holdings totaled $6.~~098~~052 billion and $56.~~950~~050 billion at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, respectively, and is reported as investment in Oncor Holdings in EFIH's condensed consolidated balance sheets. EFIH's maximum exposure to loss from this investment does not exceed its carrying value.

See Note 1112 for discussion of Oncor Holdings' and Oncor's transactions with EFH Corp. and its other subsidiaries.

Distributions from Oncor Holdings and Related Considerations — Oncor Holdings' distributions of earnings to EFIH totaled $~~128~~74 million and $~~148~~37 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. Distributions may not be paid except to the extent Oncor maintains a required regulatory capital structure as discussed below. At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, $~~193~~37 million was eligible to be distributed to Oncor's members after taking into account the regulatory capital structure limit, of which approximately 80% relates to EFIH's ownership interest in Oncor. The boards of directors of each of Oncor and Oncor Holdings can withhold distributions to the extent the applicable board determines in good faith that it is necessary to retain such amounts to meet expected future requirements of Oncor and/or Oncor Holdings.

Oncor's distributions are limited by its regulatory capital structure, which is required to be at or below the assumed debt-to-equity ratio established periodically by the PUCT for ratemaking purposes, which is currently set at 60% debt to 40% equity. At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, Oncor's regulatory capitalization ratio was 5859.78% debt and 4140.32% equity. For purposes of this ratio, debt is calculated as long-term debt plus unamortized gains on reacquired debt less unamortized issuance expenses, premiums and losses on reacquired debt. The debt calculation excludes bonds issued by Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC, which were issued in 2003 and 2004 to recover specific generation-related regulatory assets and other qualified costs. Equity is calculated as membership interests determined in accordance with US GAAP, excluding the effects of accounting for the Merger (which included recording the initial goodwill and fair value adjustments and the subsequent related impairments and amortization).

AsEFH aCorp., ~~result~~Oncor ~~of the Bankruptcy Filing~~Holdings, Oncor ~~had~~and ~~credit~~Oncor's ~~risk~~minority ~~exposure~~investor toare ~~trade~~parties ~~accounts receivable from subsidiaries of TCEH, which related~~ to ~~delivery~~a ~~services~~Federal ~~provided~~and byState ~~Oncor~~Income toTax ~~TCEH's~~Allocation ~~retail electricity operations~~Agreement. AtAdditional ~~the~~income ~~Petition~~tax ~~Date,~~amounts ~~these accounts~~ receivable ~~totaled~~or ~~$109~~payable ~~million. In~~may ~~June~~arise ~~2014,~~in the ~~Bankruptcy~~normal ~~Court~~course ~~authorized~~under ~~the~~that ~~Debtors to pay all pre-petition delivery charges due Oncor, and such amounts were paid in full~~agreement.

Oncor Holdings Financial Statements — Condensed statements of consolidated income of Oncor Holdings and its subsidiaries for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 are presented below:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Operating revenues	$	1,054		$	966		$	2,883		$	2,640
Operation and maintenance expenses	(376		)	(315		)	(1,074		)	(919		)
Depreciation and amortization	(218		)	(207		)	(638		)	(608		)
Taxes other than income taxes	(115		)	(112		)	(330		)	(315		)
Other income	3			4			10			14
Other deductions	(4		)	(2		)	(11		)	(11		)
Interest income	1			—			3			2
Interest expense and related charges	(89		)	(94		)	(266		)	(283		)
Income before income taxes	256			240			577			520
Income tax expense	(101		)	(97		)	(230		)	(199		)
Net income	155			143			347			321
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(32		)	(29		)	(71		)	(66		)
Net income attributable to Oncor Holdings	$	123		$	114		$	276		$	255

Assets and liabilities of Oncor Holdings at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are presented below:

	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	17	$	28
Restricted cash	67		52
Trade accounts receivable — net	469		385
Trade accounts and other receivables from affiliates	152		135
Income taxes receivable from EFH Corp.	—		16
Inventories	76		65
Accumulated deferred income taxes	11		32
Prepayments and other current assets	89		82
Total current assets	881		795
Restricted cash	16		16
Other investments	96		91
Property, plant and equipment — net	12,270		11,902
Goodwill	4,064		4,064
Regulatory assets — net	1,111		1,324
Other noncurrent assets	69		71
Total assets	$	18,507	$	18,263
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Short-term borrowings	$	720	$	745
Long-term debt due currently	636		131
Trade accounts payable — nonaffiliates	133		178
Income taxes payable to EFH Corp.	56		23
Accrued taxes other than income	145		169
Accrued interest	65		95
Other current liabilities	150		135
Total current liabilities	1,905		1,476
Accumulated deferred income taxes	1,839		1,905
Long-term debt, less amounts due currently	5,041		5,381
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits	1,837		1,822
Total liabilities	$	10,622	$	10,584

Oncor Holdings Financial Statements — Condensed statements of consolidated income of Oncor Holdings and its subsidiaries for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 are presented below:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
Operating revenues	$	946		$	917
Operation and maintenance expenses	(380		)	(345		)
Depreciation and amortization	(217		)	(210		)
Taxes other than income taxes	(111		)	(108		)
Other income	2			4
Other deductions	(4		)	(3		)
Interest income	1			1
Interest expense and related charges	(81		)	(88		)
Income before income taxes	156			168
Income tax expense	(61		)	(67		)
Net income	95			101
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(20		)	(21		)
Net income attributable to Oncor Holdings	$	75		$	80

Assets and liabilities of Oncor Holdings at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are presented below:



	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	18	$	5
Restricted cash	58		56
Trade accounts receivable — net	417		407
Trade accounts and other receivables from affiliates	128		118
Income taxes receivable from EFH Corp.	80		144
Inventories	79		73
Accumulated deferred income taxes	10		10
Prepayments and other current assets	92		91
Total current assets	882		904
Restricted cash	16		16
Other investments	97		97
Property, plant and equipment — net	12,626		12,463
Goodwill	4,064		4,064
Regulatory assets — net	1,349		1,429
Other noncurrent assets	71		67
Total assets	$	19,105	$	19,040
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Short-term borrowings	$	800	$	711
Long-term debt due currently	109		639
Trade accounts payable — nonaffiliates	158		202
Income taxes payable to EFH Corp.	31		24
Accrued taxes other than income	66		174
Accrued interest	56		93
Other current liabilities	117		156
Total current liabilities	1,337		1,999
Accumulated deferred income taxes	1,949		1,978
Long-term debt, less amounts due currently	5,720		4,997
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits	2,260		2,245
Total liabilities	$	11,266	$	11,219


4.	OTHER DEDUCTIONS

EFIH has income tax receivables from EFH Corp. that arose under the Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement. In consideration of the Bankruptcy Filing, EFIH fully reserved the income tax receivables because of the significant uncertainty regarding their ultimate settlement, resulting in charges of $1270 million and $~~211~~77 million in the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30~~March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

~~Further, at December 31, 2013, EFIH had an income tax receivable from EFH Corp~~5. ~~totaling~~INCOME ~~$110 million. In the fourth quarter 2013, EFIH fully reserved the income tax receivable because of the significant uncertainty regarding its ultimate settlement.~~TAXES

5EFH Corp. ~~DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION~~files ~~BORROWING~~a ~~FACILITIES~~US federal income tax return that includes the results of EFCH, EFIH, Oncor Holdings and TCEH. Oncor is a partnership for US federal income tax purposes and is not a corporate member of the EFH Corp. consolidated group.

EFH Corp. and certain of its subsidiaries (including EFCH, EFIH, ~~DIP~~and ~~Facility~~TCEH, but not including Oncor Holdings and ~~EFIH~~Oncor) ~~First~~are ~~Lien~~parties ~~Notes~~to ~~Settlement~~a —Federal ~~The~~and ~~EFIH~~State ~~DIP~~Income ~~Facility~~Tax Allocation Agreement, which provides, ~~for~~among aother $5things, that any corporate member or disregarded entity in the EFH Corp.4 ~~billion~~group ~~first-lien~~is ~~debtor-~~required to make payments to EFH Corp. in~~-possession~~ ~~financing~~an ~~facility,~~amount ~~all~~calculated to approximate the amount of ~~which~~tax ~~was~~liability ~~utilized~~such entity would have owed if it filed a separate corporate tax return. Accordingly, EFIH's income tax expense and related balance sheet amounts are recorded as if EFIH files its own corporate income tax returns. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the book and tax basis of ~~September 30,~~assets ~~2014~~and liabilities as ~~follows:~~required under accounting rules. Income tax assets and liabilities related to pushed down debt are settled as membership interests transactions.

•Deferred ~~$1.836~~income ~~billion~~taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax basis of ~~loans~~assets ~~issued~~and ~~under~~liabilities and their reported amounts in the ~~facility~~financial ~~were~~statements, ~~issued~~which aswill anresult ~~exchange~~in totaxable ~~holders~~or ofdeductible ~~$1.673~~amounts ~~billion~~in ~~principal~~the ~~amount~~future. In ofevaluating EFIH's ~~First~~ability ~~Lien~~to ~~Notes~~recover ~~plus~~its ~~accrued~~deferred ~~and~~tax ~~unpaid~~assets ~~interest~~related ~~totaling~~to ~~$78~~its ~~million.~~net ~~Holders~~operating oflosses, ~~substantially~~EFIH considers all ofavailable ~~the~~positive ~~principal~~and ~~amount~~negative ~~exchanged~~information, ~~received~~including asscheduled ~~payment~~reversals inof ~~full~~deferred atax ~~principal~~liabilities, ~~amount~~projected offuture ~~loans~~taxable ~~under~~income, ~~the~~tax-planning ~~EFIH~~strategies, ~~DIP~~and ~~Facility~~results ~~equal~~of operations. Due to ~~105%~~the significant uncertainty of the ~~principal~~ultimate ~~amount~~recovery by EFIH of the ~~notes~~benefit ~~held~~of ~~plus~~its ~~101%~~NOLs, a valuation allowance of ~~the~~$115 ~~accrued~~million ~~and~~has ~~unpaid~~been ~~interest~~recorded aton EFIH’s net deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2015. The valuation allowance reduced the ~~non-default~~income ~~rate~~tax onbenefit ~~such~~for ~~principal;~~the three months ended March 31, 2015 by $43 million.

•EFH $2Corp.~~438~~, ~~billion~~Oncor ofHoldings, ~~cash~~Oncor ~~borrowings~~and ~~were~~Oncor's ~~used~~third-party minority investor are parties to ~~repay~~a ~~all~~separate ~~remaining~~Federal ~~$2.312~~and ~~billion~~State ~~principal~~Income ~~amount~~Tax Allocation Agreement, which governs the computation of ~~EFIH~~federal ~~First~~income ~~Lien~~tax ~~Notes~~liability ~~(plus~~among ~~accrued~~such parties, and ~~unpaid~~similarly ~~interest~~provides, ~~totaling~~among ~~$128~~other ~~million)~~things, that each of Oncor Holdings and Oncor will pay EFH Corp. its share of an amount calculated to approximate the amount of tax liability such entity would have owed if it filed a separate corporate tax return.

•The ~~Remaining~~calculation ~~borrowings under the facility, net~~ of ~~fees,~~EFIH's ofeffective ~~$1.038~~tax ~~billion~~rate ~~are~~is ~~held~~ as ~~cash and cash equivalents.~~follows:

The exchange and settlement of the EFIH First Lien Notes resulted in a loss of $108 million, reported in reorganization items, which represents the excess of the principal amounts of debt issued, cash repayments and deferred financing costs associated with the exchanged and settled debt over the carrying value of the exchanged and settled debt and related accrued interest.



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	$	(412	)	$	(286	)
Exclude reserve against income tax receivable from EFH Corp. recorded without income tax benefit	70			77
Adjusted loss before income taxes and equity in earnings on unconsolidated subsidiaries	$	(342	)	$	(209	)
Income tax benefit	$	65		$	72
Effective tax rate	(19.0		)%	(34.4		)%

~~The~~For ~~principal amounts outstanding under~~ the ~~EFIH~~three ~~DIP~~months ~~Facility~~ended ~~bear interest based on applicable LIBOR rates, subject to a 1% floor, plus 3.25%. At September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, ~~outstanding borrowings under~~ the ~~EFIH~~effective ~~DIP~~tax ~~Facility~~rate ~~totaled~~was ~~$5.4~~different ~~billion~~than atthe anUS ~~annual~~Federal ~~interest~~statutory rate of ~~4.25~~35%~~. The~~ ~~timing~~due ofprimarily ~~interest~~to ~~payments~~a onvaluation ~~the~~allowance ~~EFIH~~against ~~DIP~~deferred ~~Facility~~tax isassets ~~flexible~~ and ~~can~~higher benondeductible ~~paid~~legal onand aother ~~one~~professional ~~week~~services orcosts arelated ~~one,~~to ~~two,~~the ~~three~~Chapter or11 ~~six~~Cases. For ~~month~~the ~~basis~~three ormonths asended ~~otherwise~~March, ~~agreed~~2014, ~~upon with~~ the ~~relevant~~effective ~~lenders. The~~tax ~~EFIH~~rate ~~DIP~~was ~~Facility~~different isthan athe ~~non-amortizing~~US ~~loan~~Federal ~~that~~statutory ~~may,~~rate ~~subject~~of to35% ~~certain~~primarily ~~limitations,~~due beto ~~voluntarily~~nondeductible ~~prepaid~~legal byand ~~the~~other ~~EFIH~~professional ~~Debtors,~~service incosts ~~whole~~related orto inEFIH's ~~part,~~debt ~~without~~restructuring ~~any premium or penalty~~activities.

The EFIH DIP Facility will mature on the earlier of (a) the effective date of any reorganization plan, (b) upon the sale of substantially all of EFIH's assets or (c) June 2016. The maturity date may be extended to no later than December 2016 subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the payment of a 25 basis point extension fee, a requirement that an acceptable plan of reorganization has been filed on or prior to such extension and the availability of certain metrics of liquidity applicable to EFIH and EFIH Finance.11


6.	INTEREST EXPENSE AND RELATED CHARGES



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015		2014
Interest paid/accrued on debtor-in-possession financing	$	57	$	—
Interest paid/accrued on pre-petition debt (a)	235		161
Interest expense related to pushed down debt	—		1
Interest expense on pre-petition toggle notes payable in additional principal (Note 9)	—		49
Amortization of debt exchange premiums	—		(18		)
Amortization of debt exchange discounts and issuance costs	—		5
Total interest expense and related charges	$	292	$	198

____________


(a)	For the three months ended March 31, 2015, amounts include $235 million in post-petition interest at contractual rates related to the EFIH Second Lien Notes (see Note 9).

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015 reflects interest paid on EFIH's pre-petition 11.00% Second Lien Notes due 2021 and 11.75% Second Lien Notes due 2022 as approved by the Bankruptcy Court in March 2015 (see Note 9).

The Bankruptcy Code generally restricts payment of interest on pre-petition debt, subject to certain exceptions. However, the Bankruptcy Court ordered the payment of post-petition interest payments on EFIH First Lien Notes in connection with the settlement in June 2014 as discussed in Note 8. Additionally, the Bankruptcy Court approved post-petition interest payments on the EFIH Second Lien Notes in March 2015 as discussed in Note 9. Additional payments may also be made upon approval by the Bankruptcy Court, at the federal judgment rate (see Note 10). Other than these amounts ordered or approved by the Bankruptcy Court, effective April 29, 2014, EFIH discontinued recording interest expense on outstanding pre-petition debt classified as liabilities subject to compromise (LSTC). Interest expense as calculated under the contractual terms of EFIH's debt classified as LSTC totaled $111 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015. Of the $235 million of interest paid/accrued on pre-petition debt, $50 million related to the three months ended March 31, 2015, which is $61 million lower than the contractual requirement for the period. The remaining $185 million of interest paid on pre-petition debt related to contractual interest from 2014, which was accrued and paid in 2015 upon Bankruptcy Court approval.


7.	REORGANIZATION ITEMS

Expenses and income directly associated with the Chapter 11 Cases are reported separately in the condensed statements of consolidated income (loss) as reorganization items as required by ASC 852, Reorganizations. Reorganization items also include adjustments to reflect the carrying value of liabilities subject to compromise (LSTC) at their estimated allowed claim amounts, as such adjustments are determined. The following table presents reorganization items incurred in the three months ended March 31, 2015 as reported in the condensed statements of consolidated income (loss):



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
Fees associated with repayment of EFIH Second Lien Notes (Note 9)	$	28
Expenses related to legal advisory and representation services	14
Expenses related to other professional consulting and advisory services	6
Total reorganization items	$	48


8.	DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION BORROWING FACILITIES

EFIH DIP Facility, EFIH First Lien Notes Settlement and EFIH Second Lien Notes Repayment — The Bankruptcy Court approved the EFIH DIP Facility in June 2014. The EFIH DIP Facility provides for a $5.4 billion first-lien debtor-in-possession financing facility. Since inception, the facility has been utilized as follows:

•

In June 2014, $1.836 billion of loans issued under the facility were issued as an exchange to holders of $1.673 billion principal amount of EFIH First Lien Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest totaling $78 million. Holders of substantially all of the principal amount exchanged received as payment in full a principal amount of loans under the DIP equal to 105% of the principal amount of the notes held plus 101% of the accrued and unpaid interest at the non-default rate on such principal;


•	In June 2014, $2.438 billion of cash borrowings were used to repay all remaining $2.312 billion principal amount of EFIH First Lien Notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest totaling $128 million), and


•	In March 2015, $750 million of cash borrowings were used to repay $445 million principal amount of EFIH Second Lien Notes (including accrued and unpaid pre-petition interest of $55 million and post-petition interest of $235 million) and certain fees (see Note 9).

As of March 31, 2015, remaining borrowings under the facility, net of fees, along with existing cash on hand, totaled approximately $392 million, which was held as cash and cash equivalents.

The principal amounts outstanding under the EFIH DIP Facility bear interest based on applicable LIBOR rates, subject to a 1% floor, plus 3.25%. At both March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, outstanding borrowings under the EFIH DIP Facility totaled $5.4 billion at an annual interest rate of 4.25%. The EFIH DIP Facility is a non-amortizing loan that may, subject to certain limitations, be voluntarily prepaid by the EFIH Debtors, in whole or in part, without any premium or penalty.

The EFIH DIP Facility will mature on the earlier of (a) the effective date of any reorganization plan, (b) upon the event of the sale of substantially all of EFIH's assets or (c) June 2016. The maturity date may be extended to no later than December 2016 subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the payment of a 25 basis point extension fee, a requirement that an acceptable plan of reorganization has been filed on or prior to such extension and the availability of certain metrics of liquidity applicable to EFIH and EFIH Finance.

EFIH's obligations under the EFIH DIP Facility are secured by a first lien covering substantially all of EFIH's assets, rights and properties, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the EFIH DIP Facility. The EFIH DIP Facility provides that all obligations thereunder constitute administrative expenses in the Chapter 11 Cases, with administrative priority and senior secured status under the Bankruptcy Code and, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the EFIH DIP Facility, will have priority over any and all administrative expense claims, unsecured claims and costs and expenses in the Chapter 11 Cases.

The EFIH DIP Facility provides for affirmative and negative covenants applicable to EFIH and EFIH Finance, including affirmative covenants requiring EFIH and EFIH Finance to provide financial information, budgets and other information to the agents under the EFIH DIP Facility, and negative covenants restricting EFIH's and EFIH Finance's ability to incur additional indebtedness, grant liens, dispose of assets, pay dividends or take certain other actions, in each case except as permitted in the EFIH DIP Facility. The EFIH DIP Facility also includes a minimum liquidity covenant pursuant to which EFIH cannot allow the amount of its unrestricted cash (as defined in the EFIH DIP Facility) to be less than $150 million. As of March 31, 2015, EFIH was in compliance with this minimum liquidity covenant. The Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities are not restricted subsidiaries for purposes of the EFIH DIP Facility.

The EFIH DIP Facility provides for certain customary events of default, including events of default resulting from non-payment of principal, interest or other amounts when due, material breaches of representations and warranties, material breaches of covenants in the EFIH DIP Facility or ancillary loan documents, cross-defaults under other agreements or instruments and the entry of material judgments against EFIH. Upon the existence of an event of default, the EFIH DIP Facility provides that all principal, interest and other amounts due thereunder will become immediately due and payable, either automatically or at the election of specified lenders.

The EFIH DIP Facility permits, subject to certain terms, conditions and limitations set forth in the EFIH DIP Facility, EFIH to incur incremental junior lien subordinated debt in an aggregate amount not to exceed $3 billion.

~~6. REORGANIZATION ITEMS~~13

Expenses and income directly associated with the Chapter 11 Cases are reported separately in the condensed statements of consolidated income (loss) as reorganization items as required by ASC 852-10, Reorganizations9. ~~Reorganization~~ ~~items~~LIABILITIES ~~also~~SUBJECT ~~include~~TO adjustments to reflect the carrying value of liabilities subject to compromise (LSTC) at their estimated allowed claim amounts, as such adjustments are determined. The following table presents reorganization items incurred since the Petition Date as reported in the condensed statements of consolidated income (loss):COMPROMISE

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2014		Post-Petition Period Through September 30, 2014
Loss on exchange and settlement of EFIH First Lien Notes (Note 5)	$	—	$	108
Fees associated with completion of EFIH DIP Facility	—		93
Expenses related to legal advisory and representation services	5		22
Expenses related to other professional consulting and advisory services	2		12
Total reorganization items	$	7	$	235

The amounts classified as liabilities subject to compromise (LSTC) reflect the company's estimate of pre-petition liabilities and other expected allowed claims to be addressed in the Chapter 11 Cases and may be subject to future adjustment as the Chapter 11 Cases proceed. Debt amounts include related unamortized deferred financing costs and discounts/premiums. Amounts classified to LSTC do not include pre-petition liabilities that are fully collateralized by letters of credit or cash deposits. The following table presents LSTC as reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:



	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Notes, loans and other debt per the following table	$	3,398	$	3,843
Accrued interest on notes, loans and other debt	82		138
Advances and other payables to affiliates	7		7
Total liabilities subject to compromise	$	3,487	$	3,988

7. LIABILITIES SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE

The amounts classified as liabilities subject to compromise (LSTC) reflect the company's estimate of pre-petition liabilities to be addressed in the Chapter 11 Cases and may be subject to future adjustment as the Chapter 11 Cases proceed. Debt amounts include related unamortized deferred financing costs, discounts or premiums. Amounts classified to LSTC do not include pre-petition liabilities that are fully secured by letters of credit or cash deposits. The following table presents LSTC as reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2014:

	September 30, 2014
Notes, loans and other debt per the following table	$	3,843
Accrued interest on notes, loans and other debt	137
Advances and other payables to affiliates	4
Total liabilities subject to compromise	$	3,984

Pre-Petition Notes, Loans and Other Debt Reported as Liabilities Subject to Compromise

~~All~~Amounts presented below represent principal amounts of pre-petition notes, loans and other debt reported as liabilities subject to compromise ~~represent principal amounts~~.

	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Debt issued by EFIH:
6.875% Fixed Senior Secured First Lien Notes due August 15, 2017 (a)	$	—		$	503
11% Fixed Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due October 1, 2021	$	322		$	406
10% Fixed Senior Secured First Lien Notes due December 1, 2020 (a)	—			3,482
11.75% Fixed Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due March 1, 2022	1,389			1,750
11% Fixed Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due October 1, 2021	406			406
11.75% Fixed Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due March 1, 2022	1,750			1,750
11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes due December 1, 2018	1,566			1,566
9.75% Fixed Senior Notes due October 15, 2019	2			2
Unamortized premium	243			~~284~~243
Unamortized discount	(121		)	(~~146~~121		)
Total debt issued by EFIH	3,~~846~~401			73,~~847~~846
Pushed down pre-petition debt (b):
Pushed down pre-petition debt (a):
10.875% EFH Corp. Fixed Senior Notes due November 1, 2017	17			17
11.25%/12.00% EFH Corp. Senior Toggle Notes due November 1, 2017	13			13
Total pushed down debt	30			30
Deferred debt issuance and extension costs (c)	(33		)	—
Deferred debt issuance and extension costs	(33		)	(33		)
Total debt	$	3,~~843~~398		$	73,~~877~~843

________________

(a) ~~The~~Represents 50% of the amount of these EFH Corp. securities guaranteed by EFIH ~~First~~and ~~Lien~~pushed ~~Notes~~down ~~were~~per ~~exchanged~~the ordiscussion ~~settled~~below inunder ~~June~~"Guarantees ~~2014~~and ~~(see~~Push ~~Note~~Down 5)of EFH Corp. Pre-Petition Debt."

~~(b)~~Repayment ~~Represents 50%~~ of ~~the amount of these EFH Corp. securities guaranteed by~~ EFIH ~~and~~Second ~~pushed~~Lien ~~down per the discussion below under "Guarantees and Push Down of EFH Corp. Pre-Petition Debt."~~Notes

In March 2015, with the approval of the Bankruptcy Court, EFIH used some of its cash to repay (cRepayment) ~~Deferred~~$735 ~~debt~~million, ~~issuance~~including interest at contractual rates, in amounts outstanding under EFIH's pre-petition 11.00% Fixed Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due October 1, 2021 (11.00% Notes) and ~~extension~~11.75% ~~costs~~Fixed ~~were~~Senior ~~reported~~Secured Second Lien Notes due March 1, 2022 (11.75% Notes) and $15 million in ~~other~~certain ~~noncurrent~~fees ~~assets~~and expenses of the trustee for such notes. The Repayment resulted in an $84 million reduction in the principal amount of the 11.00% Notes, a $361 million reduction in the principal amount of the 11.75% Notes and the payment of $235 million and $55 million of accrued and unpaid post-petition and pre-petition interest, respectively, at ~~December~~contractual rates. The Repayment required the requisite consent of the lenders under EFIH's DIP Facility. EFIH received such consent from approximately 97% of the lenders under the EFIH DIP Facility in consideration of an aggregate consent fee equal to approximately $13 million. As a result of the Repayment, as of March 31, ~~2013~~2015, the principal amount outstanding on the 11.00% Notes and 11.75% Notes are $322 million and $1.389 billion, respectively.

1214

Guarantees and Push Down of EFH Corp. Pre-Petition Debt

Merger-related debt of EFH Corp. and its subsidiaries consists of debt issued or existing at the time of the Merger. Debt issued in exchange for Merger-related debt is considered Merger-related. Debt issuances for cash are considered Merger-related debt to the extent the proceeds are used to repurchase Merger-related debt. EFCH and EFIH (excluding their subsidiaries) fully and unconditionally guarantee on a joint and several basis the Merger-related debt of EFH Corp. (parent). Such debt is subject to push down in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 5-J, and as a result, a portion of such debt and related interest expense is reflected in EFIH's financial statements. Merger-related debt of EFH Corp. held by its subsidiaries is not subject to push down.

Pre-petition debt guaranteed and subject to push down at ~~September 30~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 ~~totals~~totaled $60 million and ~~consists~~consisted of $33 million principal amount of EFH Corp. 10.875% Notes and $27 million principal amount of EFH Corp. Toggle Notes. The amount reflected in EFIH's condensed consolidated balances sheets as pushed down pre-petition debt ($30 million at both ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, as shown in the ~~debt~~ table above) represents 50% of the principal amount of the EFH Corp. Merger-related debt guaranteed. This percentage reflects the fact that at the time of the Merger, the equity investments of EFCH and EFIH in their respective operating subsidiaries were essentially equal amounts. Because payment of principal and interest on the debt is the responsibility of EFH Corp., EFIH records the settlement of such amounts as noncash capital contributions from EFH Corp.

There were no payments of interest by EFH Corp. on pre-petition debt pushed down for both the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30~~March 31, ~~2014. EFH~~2015 ~~Corp.~~and ~~payments of interest on debt pushed down totaled $21 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013~~2014.

Information Regarding Significant Pre-Petition Debt

The EFIH pre-petition debt described below is junior in right of priority and payment to the EFIH DIP Facility.

EFIH 6.875% Senior Secured First Lien Notes — There were no principal amounts of the EFIH 6.875% Notes outstanding at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 as the notes were exchanged or settled in June 2014 as discussed in Note 58. ~~These~~The notes bore interest at a fixed rate of 6.875% per annum. The EFIH 6.875% Notes were secured on a first-priority basis by EFIH's pledge of its 100% ownership of the membership interests in Oncor Holdings (the EFIH Collateral) on an equal and ratable basis with the EFIH 10% Notes (discussed below).

~~The~~ EFIH ~~6.875~~10% ~~Notes~~Senior ~~were~~Secured ~~senior~~First ~~obligations~~Lien ofNotes ~~EFIH~~— ~~and~~There ~~ranked equally in right of payment with all senior indebtedness of EFIH and~~ were ~~senior~~no inprincipal ~~right~~amounts of ~~payment~~the ~~to any future subordinated indebtedness of~~ EFIH~~. The~~ ~~EFIH 6.875~~10% Notes ~~were~~outstanding ~~effectively~~at ~~senior to all second lien and unsecured indebtedness of EFIH~~March 31, to2015 ~~the~~as ~~extent of~~ the ~~value~~notes ~~of the EFIH Collateral, and~~ were ~~effectively~~exchanged ~~subordinated~~or tosettled ~~any~~in ~~indebtedness~~June of2014 ~~EFIH~~as ~~secured~~discussed byin ~~assets~~Note of8. The ~~EFIH~~notes ~~other~~bore ~~than~~interest ~~the~~at ~~EFIH~~a ~~Collateral,~~fixed torate ~~the extent~~ of ~~the~~10% ~~value~~per ~~of such assets~~annum. ~~Furthermore,~~The ~~the~~notes ~~EFIH 6.875% Notes~~ were ~~structurally~~secured ~~subordinated~~by tothe ~~all indebtedness and other liabilities of~~ EFIH's ~~subsidiaries~~Collateral ~~(other~~on ~~than~~an ~~EFIH~~equal ~~Finance), including Oncor Holdings~~ and ~~its~~ratable ~~subsidiaries. The~~basis ~~holders~~with of the EFIH 6.875% Notes ~~voted as a separate class from the holders of the EFIH 10% Notes~~.

~~The~~ EFIH ~~6.875~~11% ~~Notes~~Senior ~~were~~Secured ~~issued~~Second inLien ~~private~~Notes ~~placements~~— ~~and~~The ~~are~~principal ~~not~~amount ~~registered~~of ~~under~~ the ~~Securities Act.~~ EFIH ~~had~~11% ~~agreed~~Notes tototals ~~use~~$322 ~~its~~million ~~commercially reasonable efforts to register~~ with ~~the~~interest ~~SEC~~at ~~notes~~a ~~having~~fixed ~~substantially~~rate ~~identical~~of ~~terms~~11% asper ~~the~~annum. The EFIH ~~6.875~~11% Notes ~~(except~~are ~~for~~secured ~~provisions~~on ~~relating~~a tosecond-priority ~~transfer~~basis ~~restrictions~~by ~~and~~the ~~payment~~EFIH ofCollateral ~~additional~~on ~~interest) as part of~~ an ~~offer~~equal toand ~~exchange~~ratable ~~freely~~basis ~~tradable~~with ~~notes for~~ the EFIH 611.~~875~~75% Notes. ~~Because~~See ~~the~~discussion ~~exchange~~above ~~offer~~related ~~was~~to ~~not completed,~~ the ~~annual~~Repayment ~~interest~~of ~~rate~~a onportion ~~the~~of ~~EFIH~~these ~~6.875%~~notes ~~Notes~~in ~~increased~~March ~~by 25 basis points (to 7~~2015.~~125%) on August 15, 2013 and by an additional 25 basis points (to 7.375%) on November 15, 2013.~~

EFIH 10% Senior Secured First Lien Notes — There were no principal amounts of the EFIH 10% Notes outstanding at September 30, 2014 as the notes were exchanged or settled in June 2014 as discussed in Note 5. The notes bore interest at a fixed rate of 10% per annum. The notes were secured by the EFIH Collateral on an equal and ratable basis with the EFIH 6.875% Notes.

The EFIH 10% Notes were senior obligations of EFIH and ranked equally in right of payment with all existing and future senior indebtedness of EFIH, including the EFIH 6.875% Notes. The EFIH 10% Notes had substantially the same terms as the EFIH 6.875% Notes. The holders of the EFIH 10% Notes voted as a separate class from the holders of the EFIH 6.875% Notes.

The $1.302 billion of EFIH 10% Notes issued in January 2013 were issued in private placements and are not registered under the Securities Act. EFIH had agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to register with the SEC notes having substantially identical terms as the EFIH 10% Notes (except for provisions relating to transfer restrictions and payment of additional interest) as part of an offer to exchange freely tradable notes for the EFIH 10% Notes. Because the exchange offer was not completed, the annual interest rate on the EFIH 10% Notes increased by 25 basis points (to 10.25%) on January 30, 2014 and by an additional 25 basis points (to 10.50%) on April 30, 2014.

EFIH 11% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes — The principal amount of the EFIH 11% Notes totals $406 million, with interest at a fixed rate of 11% per annum. The EFIH 11% Notes are secured on a second-priority basis by the EFIH Collateral on an equal and ratable basis with the EFIH 11.75% Notes.

The EFIH 11% Notes are senior obligations of EFIH and EFIH Finance and rank equally in right of payment with all senior indebtedness of EFIH and are effectively senior in right of payment to all existing or future unsecured debt of EFIH to the extent of the value of the EFIH Collateral. The notes have substantially the same terms as the EFIH 11.75% Notes discussed below, and the holders of the EFIH 11% Notes will generally vote as a single class with the holders of the EFIH 11.75% Notes.

EFIH 11.75% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes — The principal amount of the EFIH 11.75% Notes totals $1.~~750~~389 billion, with interest at a fixed rate of 11.75% per annum. The EFIH 11.75% Notes are secured on a second-priority basis by the EFIH Collateral on an equal and ratable basis with the EFIH 11% Notes. The EFIH 11.75% Notes have substantially the same covenants as the EFIH 11% Notes, and the holders of the EFIH 11.75% Notes will generally vote as a single class with the holders of the EFIH 11% Notes. See discussion above related to the Repayment of a portion of these notes in March 2015.

The EFIH 11.75% Notes were issued in private placements and are not registered under the Securities Act. EFIH had agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to register with the SEC notes having substantially identical terms as the EFIH 11.75% Notes (except for provisions relating to transfer restrictions and payment of additional interest) as part of an offer to exchange freely tradable notes for the EFIH 11.75% Notes. Because the exchange offer was not completed, the annual interest rate on the EFIH 11.75% Notes increased by 25 basis points (to 12.00%) on February 6, 2013 and by an additional 25 basis points (to 12.25%) on May 6, 2013.

EFIH 11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes — The principal amount of the EFIH Toggle Notes totals $1.566 billion, with interest at a fixed rate of 11.25% per annum for cash interest and 12.25% per annum for PIK Interest . The terms of the Toggle Notes include an election by EFIH, for any interest period until June 1, 2016, to pay interest on the Toggle Notes (i) entirely in cash; (ii) by increasing the principal amount of the notes or by issuing new EFIH Toggle Notes (PIK Interest); or (iii) 50% in cash and 50% in PIK Interest. EFIH made its pre-petition interest payments on the EFIH Toggle Notes by using the PIK feature of those notes.

The EFIH Toggle Notes were issued in private placements and are not registered under the Securities Act. EFIH had agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to register with the SEC notes having substantially identical terms as the EFIH Toggle Notes (except for provisions relating to transfer restrictions and payment of additional interest) as part of an offer to exchange freely tradable notes for the EFIH Toggle Notes. Because the exchange offer was not completed, the annual interest rate on the EFIH Toggle Notes increased by 25 basis points (to 11.50%) on December 6, 2013 and by an additional 25 basis points (to 11.75%) on March 6, 2014.

Material Cross Default/Acceleration Provisions — Certain of EFIH's financing arrangements contain provisions that result in an event of default if there were a failure under other financing arrangements to meet payment terms or to observe other covenants that could or does result in an acceleration of payments due. Such provisions are referred to as "cross default" or "cross acceleration" provisions. The Bankruptcy Filing triggered defaults on EFIH's debt obligations, but pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, creditors are stayed from taking any actions against the Debtors as a result of such defaults.

8. INTEREST EXPENSE AND RELATED CHARGES

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014		2013			2014			2013
Interest paid/accrued on debtor-in-possession financing	$	58	$	—		$	66		$	—
Interest paid/accrued on pre-petition debt	—		160			266			470
Interest expense related to pushed down debt	—		1			1			5
Interest expense on pre-petition toggle notes payable in additional principal (Note 7)	—		45			65			130
Amortization of debt exchange premiums	—		(20		)	(24		)	(62		)
Amortization of debt exchange discounts and issuance costs	—		5			7			23
Total interest expense and related charges	$	58	$	191		$	381		$	566

Interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 reflects interest paid and accrued on debtor-in-possession financing (see Note 5).

9The EFIH 11.75% ~~COMMITMENTS~~Notes ~~AND~~were ~~CONTINGENCIES~~issued in private placements and are not registered under the Securities Act. EFIH had agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to register with the SEC notes having substantially identical terms as the EFIH 11.75% Notes (except for provisions relating to transfer restrictions and payment of additional interest) as part of an offer to exchange freely tradable notes for the EFIH 11.75% Notes. Because the exchange offer was not completed, the annual interest rate on the EFIH 11.75% Notes increased by 25 basis points (to 12.00%) in February 2013 and by an additional 25 basis points (to 12.25%) in May 2013.

EFIH 11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes — The principal amount of the EFIH Toggle Notes totals $1.566 billion with interest at a fixed rate of 11.25% per annum for cash interest and 12.25% per annum for PIK Interest . The terms of the Toggle Notes include an election by EFIH, for any interest period until June 1, 2016, to pay interest on the Toggle Notes (i) entirely in cash; (ii) by increasing the principal amount of the notes or by issuing new EFIH Toggle Notes (PIK Interest); or (iii) 50% in cash and 50% in PIK Interest. EFIH made its pre-petition interest payments on the EFIH Toggle Notes by using the PIK feature of those notes.

The EFIH Toggle Notes were issued in private placements and are not registered under the Securities Act. EFIH had agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to register with the SEC notes having substantially identical terms as the EFIH Toggle Notes (except for provisions relating to transfer restrictions and payment of additional interest) as part of an offer to exchange freely tradable notes for the EFIH Toggle Notes. Because the exchange offer was not completed, the annual interest rate on the EFIH Toggle Notes increased by 25 basis points (to 11.50%) in December 2013 and by an additional 25 basis points (to 11.75%) in March 2014.

Material Cross Default/Acceleration Provisions — Certain of EFIH's pre-petition financing arrangements contain provisions that result in an event of default if there were a failure under other financing arrangements to meet payment terms or to observe other covenants that could or does result in an acceleration of payments due. Such provisions are referred to as "cross default" or "cross acceleration" provisions. The Bankruptcy Filing triggered defaults on EFIH's pre-petition debt obligations, but pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, the creditors are stayed from taking any actions against the Debtors as a result of such defaults.


10.	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Guarantees

See Notes 59 ~~and 7~~ for discussion of EFIH's guarantees of certain debt.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, EFIH may be involved in various legal and administrative proceedings in the normal course of business the ultimate resolutions of which, in the opinion of management, should not have a material effect upon its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

~~Makewhole~~Make-whole Claims — In May 2014, the indenture trustee for the EFIH 10% First Lien Notes initiated litigation in the Bankruptcy Court seeking, among other things, a declaratory judgment that EFIH is obligated to pay a ~~redemption~~make-whole premium in connection with the cash repayment of the EFIH First Lien Notes as discussed in Note 58 and that such ~~redemption~~make-whole premium is an allowed secured claim, or in the alternative, an allowed secured or unsecured claim for breach of contract (EFIH First Lien ~~Makewhole~~Make-whole Claims). InThe ~~the~~indenture ~~EFIH~~trustee ~~First~~has ~~Lien~~alleged ~~Makewhole~~that ~~Claims,~~ the ~~amount~~EFIH ofFirst ~~such~~Lien ~~claims~~Make-whole isClaims ~~alleged~~are tovalued beat ~~equal to~~ approximately $432 million plus reimbursement of expenses. InThe ~~June 2014, the~~ indenture trustee ~~for~~also ~~the~~filed ~~EFIH~~a ~~Second~~motion ~~Lien~~in ~~Notes~~May ~~initiated~~2014 ~~litigation~~asking in the Bankruptcy Court ~~seeking similar relief with respect~~ to lift the ~~EFIH~~automatic ~~Second~~stay ~~Lien~~for ~~Notes,~~cause ~~including~~in ~~among~~order ~~other~~to ~~things,~~allow ~~that~~the ~~EFIH~~trustee's isnotice ~~obligated~~purporting to ~~pay~~rescind athe ~~redemption~~automatic ~~premium~~acceleration ~~in connection with any repayment~~ of the EFIH ~~Second~~First Lien Notes ~~and~~to ~~that~~take ~~such~~effect. Following ~~redemption~~argument ~~premium~~and ~~would~~briefing beon ancross ~~allowed~~motions ~~secured~~for ~~claim~~summary ~~(the~~judgment, ~~EFIH~~in ~~Second~~March ~~Lien Makewhole Claims and~~2015, ~~together~~the ~~with~~Bankruptcy ~~the~~Court ~~EFIH~~issued ~~First~~a ~~Lien~~ruling ~~Makewhole~~and ~~Claims,~~order ~~the~~in ~~Makewhole~~favor ~~Claims). In~~of the EFIH ~~Second~~Debtors ~~Lien~~on ~~Makewhole~~almost ~~Claims,~~all ~~as of September 30~~issues, ~~2014,~~including denying the ~~amount~~indenture oftrustee's ~~such~~motion ~~claims~~for ~~alleged~~summary ~~would~~judgment ~~have~~in ~~been~~full ~~equal~~and togranting ~~approximately~~the ~~$652 million plus reimbursement of expenses. The~~ EFIH Debtors ~~expect~~summary tojudgment ~~seek~~on toall ~~obtain~~but ~~entry of orders from~~ the ~~Bankruptcy~~issue ~~Court disallowing each~~ of ~~the~~whether ~~Makewhole~~to ~~Claims~~lift ~~provided~~ the ~~EFIH~~automatic ~~Debtors~~stay. A ~~expect~~trial ~~they~~took ~~will~~place bein ~~required~~April to2015. The ~~pay~~Bankruptcy ~~accrued~~Court ~~interest~~has onnot ~~the~~yet ~~EFIH~~issued ~~Second~~a ~~Lien~~ruling ~~Notes~~on ~~upon~~these ~~repayment of those notes~~issues.

In addition, creditors may make additional claims in the Chapter 11 Cases for redemption premiums in connection with repayments or settlement of other pre-petition debt. There can be no assurance regarding the outcome of this litigation or the Bankruptcy Court's determination regarding the validity or the amounts payable in respect of each of the Makewhole Claims or other claims for redemption premiums.16

10In June 2014, the indenture trustee for the EFIH Second Lien Notes initiated litigation in the Bankruptcy Court seeking similar relief with respect to the EFIH Second Lien Notes, including among other things, that EFIH is obligated to pay a make-whole premium in connection with any repayment of the EFIH Second Lien Notes and that such make-whole premium would be an allowed secured claim, or in the alternative, an allowed secured or unsecured claim for breach of contract (the EFIH Second Lien Make-whole Claims). In ~~MEMBERSHIP~~the ~~INTERESTS~~EFIH Second Lien Make-whole Claims, as of March 31, 2015, the amount of such claims alleged would have been equal to approximately $539 million plus reimbursement of expenses. In December 2014, the EFIH Debtors filed counterclaims for relief against the Second Lien indenture trustee, seeking declaratory relief that, among other things, EFIH is not obligated to pay a make-whole premium in connection with any repayment of the EFIH Second Lien Notes and that such make-whole premium, if owing, would not constitute an allowed secured claim (EFIH Second Lien Counterclaims). As a result of EFIH's partial repayment of the EFIH Second Lien Notes, the indenture trustee for the EFIH Second Lien Notes amended its complaint in April 2015. The parties are currently working together on a schedule to propose to the Bankruptcy Court in order to adjudicate this matter.

In December 2014, the EFIH Debtors initiated litigation against the indenture trustee for the EFIH PIK Notes seeking, among other things, a declaratory judgment that EFIH is not obligated to pay a redemption premium in connection with the cash repayment of the EFIH PIK Notes and that any post-petition interest owing on these notes is to be paid at the statutory Federal Judgment Rate of interest. The indenture trustee for the EFIH PIK Notes filed a motion in February 2015 to dismiss the EFIH Debtors' complaint for declaratory relief, and the EFIH Debtors filed a brief in opposition to that motion in February 2015. If a redemption claim was allowed, as of March 31, 2015, such claims would be approximately $100 million. On May 4, 2015, the Bankruptcy Court heard arguments on the motion to dismiss. The Bankruptcy Court has not yet issued a ruling on this issue.

In addition, creditors may make additional claims in the Chapter 11 Cases for make-whole or redemption premiums in connection with repayments or settlement of other pre-petition debt. These claims could be material. There can be no assurance regarding the outcome of any of the litigation regarding the validity or, if deemed valid, the amount of these make-whole or redemption claims.

Potential Inter/Intra Debtor Claims — In August 2014, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order in the Chapter 11 Cases establishing discovery procedures governing, among other things, certain prepetition transactions among the various Debtors' estates. In February 2015, the ad hoc group of TCEH unsecured creditors; the official committee representing unsecured interests at EFCH and its direct subsidiary, TCEH; and the official committee representing unsecured interests at EFH and EFIH filed motions with the Bankruptcy Court seeking standing to prosecute derivative claims on behalf of TCEH relating to certain of these prepetition transactions. These motions are scheduled to be heard at a later date. In addition to the claims described above, certain of the Debtors (or creditors purporting to act derivatively in the name of a Debtor) may bring inter-Debtor or intra-Debtor claims (including claims under the Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement among EFH Corp. and certain of its subsidiaries under which TCEH and EFH Corp. have previously filed claims in the Chapter 11 Cases) that could be material in amount. Creditors who wish to seek derivative standing to prosecute claims on behalf of a Debtor relating to pre-petition transactions addressed by the discovery protocol governing the Debtors' Chapter 11 Cases are currently required to file motions seeking standing by the later of May 29, 2015 and fifteen days after approval of a disclosure statement. EFIH cannot predict the timing or outcome of future proceedings, if any, related to these transactions. The outcome of any of these claims could be material and could affect the results of operation, liquidity or financial condition of a particular Debtor.


11.	MEMBERSHIP INTERESTS

Cash Distributions

No cash distributions were made in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015. ~~In January 2013, EFIH's board of directors declared, and EFIH paid, a cash distribution to EFH Corp. of $680 million, which was used by EFH Corp. to settle the TCEH Demand Notes (see Note 11).~~

Distribution Restrictions

The agreement governing the EFIH DIP Facility generally restricts EFIH's ability to make distributions or loans to any of its parent companies or their subsidiaries unless such distributions or loans are expressly permitted under the agreement governing such facility.

Under applicable law, EFIH is prohibited from paying any ~~distribution~~dividend to the extent that immediately following payment of such ~~distribution~~dividend, itthere would be no statutory surplus or EFIH would be insolvent. In addition, due to the ~~Bankruptcy~~Chapter ~~Filing~~11 Cases, no ~~distributions~~dividends are eligible to be paid without the approval of the Bankruptcy Court.

Affiliate Debt Held by EFIH

As a result of debt exchanges in 2009 through 2013, EFIH holds debt securities of EFH Corp. and TCEH. In December 2012, management determined that some or all of these securities may be returned as dividends to EFH Corp.; accordingly, the balances were reclassified at that time from investment in debt of affiliates and reported as a reduction of membership interests. Interest received reduces the carrying value of the securities and thus increases membership interests. There was no interest received in the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Interest received for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $208 million after-tax and represented accrued interest on notes distributed to EFH Corp. in the first quarter 2013. As a result of the Bankruptcy Filing, EFIH does not expect to receive ~~further~~ interest payments on affiliate debt securities it holds.

16The principal amounts, coupon rates, maturities and carrying value of debt of affiliates held at both March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are as follows:

In the first quarter 2013, EFIH distributed to EFH Corp. $6.360 billion principal amount of EFH Corp. debt held. As a result of this distribution, EFIH reclassified to interest income $284 million (pretax) of mark-to-market gains previously reported in accumulated other comprehensive income.

The principal amounts, coupon rates, maturities and carrying value of debt of affiliates held at both September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are as follows:



	Principal Amount		Carrying Value
EFH Corp. 5.55% Fixed Senior Notes Series P due November 15, 2014	$	281	$	185
EFH Corp. 6.50% Fixed Senior Notes Series Q due November 15, 2024	545		249
EFH Corp. 6.55% Fixed Senior Notes Series R due November 15, 2034	456		194
TCEH 10.25% Fixed Senior Notes due November 1, 2015 (both periods include $48 million principal amount of Series B Notes)	79		7
Balance reported as reduction in membership interests	$	1,361	$	635

The indentures governing the EFIH Notes do not limit EFIH's ability to distribute the EFH Corp. debt securities that it holds to EFH Corp. so long as it received such securities in exchange for the issuance of EFIH debt, which applies to all the EFH Corp. debt EFIH currently holds.

Membership Interests

The following table presents the changes (all after tax) to membership interests for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015:

	Capital Accounts			Affiliate Debt Held by EFIH			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Membership Interests
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	(1,148	)	$	(635	)	$	(39	)	$	(1,822	)
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	(1,482	)	$	(635	)	$	(86	)	$	(2,203	)
Net income	(~~357~~272		)	—			—			(~~357~~272		)
Effect of debt push-down from EFH Corp.	165			—			—			165
Balance at September 30, 2014	$	(1,489	)	$	(635	)	$	(39	)	$	(2,163	)
Net effects related to Oncor	—			—			1			1
Balance at March 31, 2015	$	(1,749	)	$	(635	)	$	(85	)	$	(2,469	)

The following table presents the changes to membership interests for the nine months ended September 30, 2013:

	Capital Accounts			Affiliate Debt Held by EFIH			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Membership Interests
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	5,049		$	(5,388	)	$	160		$	(179	)
Net income	68			—			—			68
Cash distributions to EFH Corp.	(680		)	—			—			(680		)
Push-down of deferred net loss on debt exchanges, net of tax	13			—			—			13
Effect of debt push-down from EFH Corp. (a)	437			—			—			437
Distribution to EFH Corp. of debt held as investment	(5,778		)	—			—			(5,778		)
EFH Corp. debt distributed to EFH Corp. ($5.125 billion principal amount)	—			4,524			—			4,524
Net effects related to Oncor	—			—			1			1
Net affiliate debt received in debt exchanges ($31 million principal amount)	—			(23		)	—			(23		)
Interest received on holdings of affiliate debt	—			208			—			208
Income tax on interest received on holdings of affiliate debt	(73		)	—			—			(73		)
Recognition in interest income of mark-to-market valuations of investments in affiliate debt upon distribution to EFH Corp.	—			—			(185		)	(185		)
Other	—			(1		)	—			(1		)
Balance at September 30, 2013	$	(964	)	$	(680	)	$	(24	)	$	(1,668	)

________________

(a) Represents the effect of a reduction of $420 million of debt pushed down from EFH Corp and related interest and income tax effects.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

There were no material changes to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

The following table presents the changes to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. There was no other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification for the period.

	Dedesignated Cash Flow Hedges - Oncor			Changes in Fair Values of Investment in Debt Securities of Affiliates			Pension and Other Postretirement Employee Benefit Liabilities Adjustments - Oncor			Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	(23	)	$	185		$	(2	)	$	160
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reported in:
Interest income	—			(284		)	—			(284		)
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated subsidiaries	2			—			(1		)	1
Income tax benefit	—			99			—			99
Total amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) during the period	2			(185		)	(1		)	(184		)
Balance at September 30, 2013	$	(21	)	$	—		$	(3	)	$	(24	)

~~11.~~The ~~RELATED–PARTY~~following ~~TRANSACTIONS~~table presents the changes to membership interests for the three months ended March 31, 2014:

The following represent EFIH's significant related-party transactions. Also see Note 10 for a discussion of EFH Corp. and TCEH debt securities held by EFIH.



	Capital Accounts			Affiliate Debt Held by EFIH			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Membership Interests
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	(1,148	)	$	(635	)	$	(39	)	$	(1,822	)
Net income	(134		)	—			—			(134		)
Effect of debt push-down from EFH Corp.	5			—			—			5
Balance at March 31, 2014	$	(1,277	)	$	(635	)	$	(39	)	$	(1,951	)

•Accumulated ~~EFH~~Other ~~Corp.~~Comprehensive ~~allocates~~Income expense to EFIH for management fees owed by EFH Corp. to the Sponsor Group. This expense, which is reported in SG&A expenses, totaled zero and $3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. There was no allocation of fees to EFIH for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013. Beginning with the quarterly management fee due December 31, 2013, the Sponsor Group, while reserving the right to receive the fees, directed EFH Corp. to suspend payments of the management fees for an indefinite period. Accordingly, EFIH did not reimburse EFH Corp. for the allocated management fees. Effective with the Petition Date, EFH Corp. suspended allocations of such fees to EFIH. Fees accrued as of the Petition Date have been reclassified to liabilities subject to compromise (~~LSTC~~Loss).

InThe ~~addition~~following totable ~~amounts~~presents ~~paid~~the ~~directly~~changes ~~by EFIH, a subsidiary of EFH Corp. allocates costs~~ to ~~EFIH~~accumulated ~~for legal and~~ other ~~consulting~~comprehensive ~~services~~income ~~associated~~(loss) ~~with EFIH's debt restructuring activities, and EFIH reimburses the subsidiary~~ for the ~~allocated costs on a monthly basis. The allocated expense, which is reported in SG&A expenses, totaled zero and $4 million for the~~ three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014, respectively~~2015. There was no ~~allocation of legal and~~ other ~~consulting~~comprehensive ~~services~~income ~~costs~~(loss) tobefore ~~EFIH~~reclassification for the ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2013~~period.

A subsidiary of EFH Corp. bills EFIH for administrative services at cost, and EFIH reimburses the subsidiary for the allocated costs on a monthly basis. This expense, which is reported in SG&A expenses, totaled $2 million and $3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. There was no allocation of administrative service costs to EFIH for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.



	Dedesignated Cash Flow Hedges - Oncor			Changes in Fair Values of Investment in Debt Securities of Affiliates		Pension and Other Postretirement Employee Benefit Liabilities Adjustments - Oncor			Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	(19	)	$	—	$	(67	)	$	(86	)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reported in:
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated subsidiaries	1			—		—			1
Total amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) during the period	1			—		—			1
Balance at March 31, 2015	$	(18	)	$	—	$	(67	)	$	(85	)

•There ~~EFH~~were ~~Corp.~~no ~~files~~material ~~consolidated~~changes ~~federal income tax and Texas state margin tax returns, and under a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, allocates income taxes~~ to ~~EFIH~~accumulated ~~substantially~~other ascomprehensive ~~if it were filing its own corporate~~ income ~~tax returns. At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, EFIH had current income tax receivables from EFH Corp. totaling $211 million and $110 million, respectively, both of which were fully reserved~~ (~~see Note 4~~loss). ~~EFIH~~in ~~made no income tax payments to EFH Corp. for~~ the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30~~March 31, 2014. EFIH's income tax payments to EFH Corp. totaled $3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. See discussion below in this note regarding allocation of income tax liabilities to Oncor Holdings and Oncor.

• At December 31, 2012, EFH Corp. had demand notes payable (TCEH Demand Notes) to TCEH totaling $698 million arising from borrowings used to fund EFH Corp. debt principal and interest payments and net borrowings for general corporate purposes. EFIH was a guarantor of these demand notes. EFH Corp. settled the balance of the TCEH Demand Notes in January 2013 using the cash distribution from EFIH discussed in Note 10.19


12.	RELATED–PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The following represent EFIH's significant related-party transactions. Also see Note 11 for a discussion of EFH Corp. and TCEH debt securities held by EFIH.

•

EFH Corp. allocates expense to EFIH for management fees owed by EFH Corp. to the Sponsor Group. This expense, which is reported in SG&A expenses, totaled zero and $2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Beginning with the quarterly management fee due December 31, 2013, the Sponsor Group, while reserving the right to receive the fees, directed EFH Corp. to suspend payments of the management fees for an indefinite period. Accordingly, EFIH did not reimburse EFH Corp. for the allocated management fees. Effective with the Petition Date, EFH Corp. suspended allocations of such fees to EFIH. Fees accrued as of the Petition Date have been reclassified to liabilities subject to compromise (LSTC).

In addition to amounts incurred directly by EFIH, a subsidiary of EFH Corp. allocated costs to EFIH for legal and other consulting services associated with EFIH's debt restructuring activities prior to the Petition Date, and EFIH reimbursed the subsidiary for the allocated costs on a monthly basis. The allocated expense, which was reported in SG&A for the three months ended March 31, 2014 totaled $3 million. Beginning at the Petition Date, legal and other consulting services associated with EFIH's Chapter 11 Cases were directly billed to EFIH and are reported in reorganization items.

A subsidiary of EFH Corp. bills EFIH for administrative services such as accounting and finance at cost, and EFIH reimburses the subsidiary for the allocated costs on a monthly basis. This expense, which is reported in SG&A expenses, totaled $1 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

•

EFH Corp. files consolidated federal income tax and Texas state margin tax returns, and under a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, allocates income taxes to EFIH substantially as if it were filing its own corporate income tax returns. At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, EFIH had current income tax receivables from EFH Corp. totaling $70 million and $125 million, respectively, both of which were fully reserved (see Note 4). EFIH made no income tax payments to EFH Corp. for both the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. EFIH received no income tax refunds from EFH Corp. for both the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. See discussion below in this Note regarding allocation of income tax liabilities to Oncor Holdings and Oncor under the Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement.


•	Affiliates of the Sponsor Group have sold or acquired, and in the future may sell or acquire, debt or debt securities issued by EFIH in open market transactions or through loan syndications.

See Note 79 regarding guarantees and push-down of certain EFH Corp. pre-petition debt and Note 1011 regarding distributions to, and contributions from, EFH Corp.

Significant related-party transactions between Oncor Holdings (including its consolidated subsidiary Oncor) and EFH Corp., other affiliates of EFH Corp. and the Sponsor Group are as follows:

• Oncor receives payments from subsidiaries of TCEH for services it provides, principally the delivery of electricity. Revenues recorded by Oncor for these services totaled $~~281~~236 million and $~~273~~241 million for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013, respectively, and $746 million and $728 million for the nine months ended September 30,~~ 2014 ~~and 2013~~, respectively. The fees are based on rates regulated by the PUCT that apply to all REPs. These revenues from subsidiaries of TCEH represented 2625% and 2826% of Oncor Holdings' operating revenues for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. Oncor Holdings' condensed consolidated balance sheets at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 reflect current receivables from affiliates totaling $~~152~~128 million and $~~135~~118 million, respectively, consisting almost entirely of trade receivables from subsidiaries of TCEH related to these electricity delivery fees.

19• Oncor pays EFH Corp. subsidiaries for financial and other administrative services and shared facilities at cost. Such amounts increased Oncor's reported operation and maintenance expense by $6 million and $9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

• ~~Oncor~~Under ~~pays~~Texas ~~EFH~~regulatory ~~Corp.~~provisions, ~~subsidiaries~~the ~~for~~trust ~~financial~~fund ~~and~~for ~~other~~decommissioning ~~administrative~~the ~~services~~Comanche ~~and~~Peak ~~shared~~nuclear ~~facilities~~generation atfacility ~~cost.~~(reported ~~Such~~on ~~amounts increased Oncor~~TCEH's ~~reported~~condensed ~~operation~~consolidated ~~and~~balance ~~maintenance~~sheets) ~~expense~~is funded by $8a ~~million~~delivery ~~for~~fee ~~both~~surcharge ~~the~~billed ~~three~~to ~~months~~REPs ~~ended~~by ~~September 30~~Oncor, ~~2014~~as ~~and~~collection ~~2013~~agent, and ~~$23~~remitted ~~million~~monthly ~~and~~to TCEH. The delivery fee surcharges remitted to TCEH totaled $244 million for both the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013, respectively~~2014.

• Under Texas regulatory provisions, the trust fund for decommissioning the Comanche Peak nuclear generation facility (reported on TCEH's condensed consolidated balance sheets) is funded by a delivery fee surcharge collected from REPs by Oncor, as collection agent, and remitted monthly to TCEH. The delivery fee surcharges remitted to TCEH totaled $5 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 and $13 million and $12 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

• EFH Corp. files a consolidated federal income tax return that includes Oncor Holdings' results. Oncor is not a member of EFH Corp.'s consolidated tax group, but EFH Corp.'s consolidated federal income tax return includes EFH Corp.'s portion of Oncor's results as a result of EFH Corp.'s equity ownership in Oncor. EFH Corp. also files a consolidated Texas state margin tax return that includes all of Oncor Holdings' and Oncor's results. However, under a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, Oncor Holdings and Oncor record their federal income tax and Texas state margin taxes as if Oncor Holdings and Oncor were filing their own corporate income tax returns.

At September 30, 2014, Oncor Holdings had a current payable to EFH Corp. related to federal and state income taxes totaling $56 million, all of which related to Oncor. The Oncor payable to EFH Corp. represented a $38 million federal income tax payable and an $18 million state margin tax payable. At December 31, 2013, Oncor Holdings had a current payable totaling $7 million, which included $5 million payable by Oncor. Oncor's liability at December 31, 2013 consists of a $23 million state margin tax payable net of an $18 million federal income tax receivable.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, Oncor Holdings and Oncor made income tax payments to EFH Corp totaling $17 million and $163 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, Oncor Holdings and Oncor made income tax payments to EFH Corp. totaling $24 million and $60 million, respectively. The 2013 net payment included $33 million from Oncor related to the 1997 through 2002 IRS appeals settlement and a $10 million refund paid to Oncor related to the filing of amended Texas franchise tax returns for 1997 through 2001.

• Oncor has requirements in place to assure adequate creditworthiness of any REP to support the REP's obligation to collect securitization bond-related (transition) charges on behalf of Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC. Under these requirements, and as a result of TCEH's credit rating being below investment grade, TCEH is required to post collateral support in an amount equal to estimated transition charges over specified time periods. Accordingly, at both September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, TCEH had posted letters of credit and/or cash in the amount of $9 million for Oncor's benefit.

• Oncor and Texas Holdings agreed to the terms of a stipulation with major interested parties to resolve all outstanding issues in the PUCT review related to the Merger. As part of this stipulation, TCEH would be required to post a letter of credit in an amount equal to $170 million to secure its payment obligations to Oncor in the event, which has not occurred, two or more rating agencies downgrade Oncor's credit rating below investment grade.

• Affiliates of the Sponsor Group have (1) sold or acquired Oncor's debt or debt securities in open market transactions or through loan syndications, and (2) performed various financial advisory, dealer, commercial banking and investment banking services for Oncor and certain of its affiliates for which they have received customary fees and expenses.

• Oncor has participated in plans sponsored by EFH Corp. that provide pension, health care and other retiree benefits. Accordingly, Oncor Holdings' consolidated financial statements have reflected allocations to Oncor of amounts related to these retiree benefit plans. In accordance with an agreement between EFH Corp. and Oncor, Oncor ceased participation in EFH Corp.'s OPEB plan effective July 1, 2014 and established its own OPEB plan for Oncor's eligible existing and future retirees and their dependents. Additionally, the Oncor plan participants include those former participants in the EFH Corp. OPEB plan whose employment included service with both Oncor (or a predecessor regulated electricity business) and EFH Corp.'s competitive businesses (split service participants). Under the agreement, EFH Corp. will retain the liability for split service participants' benefits related to their years of service with the competitive business. The methodology for OPEB cost allocations between EFH Corp. and Oncor has not changed, and the plan separation does not materially affect the net assets or cash flows of EFIH.

•

EFH Corp. files a consolidated federal income tax return that includes Oncor Holdings' results. Oncor is not a member of EFH Corp.'s consolidated tax group, but EFH Corp.'s consolidated federal income tax return includes EFH Corp.'s portion of Oncor's results due to EFH Corp.'s equity ownership in Oncor. EFH Corp. also files a consolidated Texas state margin tax return that includes all of Oncor Holdings' and Oncor's results. However, under a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, Oncor Holdings' and Oncor's federal income tax and Texas margin tax expense and related balance sheet amounts, including EFH Corp.'s income taxes receivable from or payable to Oncor Holdings and Oncor, are recorded as if Oncor Holdings and Oncor file their own corporate income tax returns.

At March 31, 2015, Oncor Holdings had a net current receivable from EFH Corp. related to federal and state income taxes totaling $49 million, $48 million of which related to Oncor. The $48 million net receivable from EFH Corp. included a $79 million federal income tax receivable offset by a $31 million state margin tax payable. Additionally, at March 31, 2015 Oncor had a noncurrent tax receivable from EFH Corp. of $69 million and a $4 million non current tax payable recorded in other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits. At December 31, 2014, Oncor Holdings' net current receivable from EFH Corp. totaled $120 million, all of which related to Oncor. The $120 million net receivable from EFH Corp. included a $144 million federal income tax receivable offset by a $24 million state margin tax payable. Additionally, at December 31, 2014 Oncor had a noncurrent tax receivable from EFH Corp. of $64 million.

For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, Oncor Holdings made income tax payments to EFH Corp totaling $6 million and $5 million, respectively. For both the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, Oncor made no income tax payments to EFH Corp.

•

Oncor has requirements in place to assure adequate creditworthiness of any REP to support the REP's obligation to collect securitization bond-related (transition) charges on behalf of Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC. Under these requirements, and as a result of TCEH's credit rating being below investment grade, TCEH is required to post collateral support in an amount equal to estimated transition charges over specified time periods. Accordingly, at both March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, TCEH had posted letters of credit and/or cash in the amount of $9 million for the benefit of Oncor.

•

Oncor has participated in plans sponsored by EFH Corp. that provide pension, health care and other retiree benefits. Accordingly, Oncor Holdings' consolidated financial statements have reflected allocations to Oncor of amounts related to these retiree benefit plans. In accordance with an agreement between EFH Corp. and Oncor, Oncor ceased participation in EFH Corp.'s OPEB plan effective July 1, 2014 and established its own OPEB plan for Oncor's eligible existing and future retirees and their dependents. Additionally, the Oncor plan participants include those former participants in the EFH Corp. OPEB plan whose employment included service with both Oncor (or a predecessor regulated electricity business) and EFH Corp.'s competitive businesses (split service participants). Under the agreement, EFH Corp. will retain the liability for split service participants' benefits related to their years of service with the competitive business. The methodology for OPEB cost allocations between EFH Corp. and Oncor has not changed, and the plan separation does not materially affect the net assets or cash flows of EFIH.

•

Until June 30, 2014, Oncor employees participated in a health and welfare benefit program offered by EFH Corp. In connection with Oncor establishing its own health and welfare benefits program, Oncor agreed to pay EFH Corp. $1 million to reimburse EFH Corp. for its increased costs of providing benefits under the EFH Corp. program as a result of Oncor's withdrawal and to compensate EFH Corp. for the administrative work related to the transition. This amount was paid in June 2014.

Oncor's retained liability under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) relates to the nonrecoverable portion of the unfunded obligation of EFH Corp.'s pension plan. In the first quarter of 2014, ~~TCEH~~a ~~contributed~~cash contribution totaling $2084 million was made to the EFH Corp. ~~pension~~retirement plan, ~~assets~~of which $64 million was contributed by Oncor and $20 million was contributed by TCEH, ~~resulting~~which resulted in the EFH Corp. retirement plan being fully funded as calculated under the provisions of ERISA.

12• Oncor and Texas Holdings agreed to the terms of a stipulation with major interested parties to resolve all outstanding issues in the PUCT review related to the Merger. ~~SUPPLEMENTARY~~As ~~FINANCIAL~~part ~~INFORMATION~~of this stipulation, TCEH would be required to post a letter of credit in an amount equal to $170 million to secure its payment obligations to Oncor in the event, which has not occurred, two or more rating agencies downgrade Oncor's credit rating below investment grade.


13.	SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Fair Value of Debt

	September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
	March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
Debt:	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Borrowings under debtor-in-possession credit facilities (Note 5)	$	5,400	$	5,380	$	—	$	—
Borrowings under debtor-in-possession credit facilities (Note 8)	$	5,400	$	5,420	$	5,400	$	5,400
Pre-petition notes, loans and other debt (excluding capital leases) (Note 7)	3,876		4,387		7,877		7,849
Pre-petition notes, loans and other debt reported as liabilities subject to compromise (Note 9)	3,431		3,702		3,876		4,336

EFIH determines fair value in accordance with accounting standards, and at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, EFIH's fair value ~~represents~~for debt and liabilities subject to compromise represent Level 2 valuations. EFIH obtains security pricing from an independent party who uses broker quotes and third-party pricing services to determine fair values. Where relevant, these prices are validated through subscription services such as Bloomberg.

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013
	2015			2014
Cash payments related to:
Interest on EFIH debt	$	~~316~~347		$	~~423~~125
Income taxes	—			3
Reorganization items (a)	46			—
Reorganization items (a)	19			—
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Principal amount of toggle notes issued in lieu of cash interest	—			83
Parent's payment of interest on pushed-down debt accounted for as a contribution of capital (Note 7)	—			21
Reduction of debt pushed down from EFH Corp. (b)	—			(420		)
Debt exchange transactions (c)	(85		)	14
Distribution to EFH Corp. of debt held as an investment	—			(5,778		)
Income tax on interest received on holdings of affiliate debt (Note 5)	—			(73		)

____________


(a)	Represents cash payments for legal and other consulting services.

~~(b) For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, represents $838 million principal amount of EFH Corp. debt exchanged (at 50%) for EFIH debt.~~22

(c) For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, represents $1.836 billion principal amount of loans issued under the EFIH DIP Facility in excess of $1.673 billion principal amount of EFIH First Lien Notes exchanged and $78 million of related accrued interest (see Note 5). For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 represents $1.302 billion principal amount of EFIH debt issued in exchange for $1.310 billion principal amount of EFH Corp. and EFIH debt and $89 million principal amount of EFIH debt issued in exchange for $95 million principal amount of EFH Corp. debt.


Item 2.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of EFIH's financial condition and results of operations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 should be read in conjunction with its condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements. Comparisons of year-over-year results are impacted by the effects of the Bankruptcy Filing and the application of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 852~~-10~~, Reorganizations.

All dollar amounts in the tables in the following discussion and analysis are stated in millions of US dollars unless otherwise indicated.

Business

EFIH, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFH Corp., is a Dallas, Texas-based holding company whose wholly owned subsidiary, Oncor Holdings, holds a majority interest (approximately 80%) in Oncor. Oncor is a regulated electricity transmission and distribution company principally engaged in providing delivery services to REPs, including subsidiaries of TCEH, that sell electricity to residential, business and other consumers in Texas. Revenues from services provided to TCEH represented 2625% and 2826% of Oncor's total reported consolidated revenues for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. EFIH has no reportable business segments. See Notes 1 and 3 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of the reporting of EFIH's investment in Oncor Holdings as an equity method investment and a description of the "ring-fencing" measures implemented with respect to Oncor Holdings and Oncor. These measures were put in place to further enhance Oncor's credit quality and mitigate Oncor's and Oncor Holdings' exposure to the Texas Holdings Group with the intent to minimize the risk that a court would order any of the assets and liabilities of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities to be substantively consolidated with those of any member of the Texas Holdings Group in the event any such member were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case. ~~EFIH~~Consistent ~~believes,~~with asthese ~~several~~ring-fencing ~~major credit rating agencies have acknowledged~~measures, ~~that~~ the ~~likelihood~~assets ofand ~~such~~liabilities ~~substantive consolidation~~ of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities' ~~assets~~have not been, and ~~liabilities~~are isnot ~~remote~~expected into ~~consideration~~be, substantively consolidated with the assets and liabilities of the ~~ring-fencing~~Debtors ~~measures~~in ~~and~~the ~~applicable~~Chapter ~~law~~11 Cases.

Significant Activities and Events and Items Influencing Future Performance

Filing under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code — On April 29, 2014 (the Petition Date), EFH Corp. and the substantial majority of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including EFIH, EFCH and TCEH but excluding the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities, (the Debtors) filed voluntary petitions for relief (the Bankruptcy Filing) under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the Bankruptcy Code) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the Bankruptcy Court). During the pendency of the Bankruptcy Filing (the Chapter 11 Cases), the Debtors will operate their businesses as "debtors-in-possession" under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. ~~EFH Corp. intends to conduct its business operations in the normal course and maintain its focus on achieving excellence in customer service and meeting the needs of electricity consumers in Texas.~~

~~The~~For ~~Bankruptcy~~additional ~~Filing~~discussion ~~resulted primarily from the adverse effects on EFH Corp.'s competitive businesses~~ of ~~lower wholesale electricity prices in ERCOT driven by~~ the ~~sustained~~Chapter ~~decline~~11 inCases ~~natural~~and ~~gas~~their ~~prices since mid-2008. Further~~effects, ~~the~~see ~~natural~~Note ~~gas~~2 ~~hedges~~to ~~that TCEH entered into when forward market prices of natural gas were significantly higher than current prices had largely matured before~~ the ~~remaining~~Financial ~~positions were terminated shortly after the Bankruptcy Filing~~Statements. ~~These~~See ~~market~~Note ~~conditions~~8 ~~challenged~~to the ~~profitability~~Financial ~~and~~Statements ~~operating~~for ~~cash~~discussion ~~flows~~ of ~~EFH Corp.'s competitive businesses and resulted in~~ the ~~inability~~DIP to support their significant interest payments and debt maturities, including the remaining debt obligations due in 2014, and the inability to refinance and/or extend the maturities of their outstanding debtFacilities.

AsProposed ~~previously~~Restructuring ~~disclosed,~~Plan ~~after~~— aOn ~~series of discussions with certain creditors that began in 2013 and in anticipation of the Bankruptcy Filing, on~~ April 2914, ~~2014~~2015, the Debtors ~~entered~~filed ~~into~~the aPlan ~~Restructuring~~of ~~Support~~Reorganization and ~~Lock-Up~~Disclosure ~~Agreement~~Statement ~~(RSA)~~ with ~~various~~the ~~stakeholders~~Bankruptcy ~~(Consenting~~Court. For ~~Parties)~~additional indiscussion ~~order~~see toNote ~~effect~~2 anto ~~agreed upon restructuring of~~ the ~~Debtors~~Financial ~~through a pre-arranged Chapter 11 plan of reorganization~~Statements.

OnProposed ~~July~~Sale 24of EFIH's Indirect Economic Ownership Interest in Oncor — In January 2015, ~~2014~~the Bankruptcy Court approved the Debtors' bidding procedures motion that sets forth the process by which the Debtors are authorized to solicit proposals (i.e., ~~pursuant~~bids) from third parties to ~~the~~acquire ~~RSA~~(in any form and employing any structure, ~~each~~whether oftaxable (in whole or in part) or tax-free) EFH Corp.,'s ~~EFIH,~~indirect ~~EFCH,~~economic ~~TCEH,~~ownership ~~EFIH~~interest ~~Finance,~~in ~~Inc~~Oncor in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code. These bidding procedures contemplate that the Debtors select a stalking horse bid after a two-stage closed bidding process, and, ~~TCEH~~after ~~Finance~~approval by the Bankruptcy Court of such stalking horse bid, ~~Inc.~~the ~~provided~~Debtors conduct a ~~notice~~round of ~~termination~~open ofbidding ~~the~~culminating ~~RSA~~in an auction intended to obtain a higher or otherwise best bid for a transaction. Initial bids were received in ~~accordance~~early ~~with~~March ~~its~~2015 ~~terms~~and tosecond round bids were received in April 2015, and each of the ~~Consenting~~Debtors ~~Parties~~is currently assessing those submissions. ~~The~~For ~~RSA~~additional ~~termination~~discussion ~~became~~see ~~effective~~Note on2 ~~July~~to ~~31,~~the ~~2014~~Financial Statements.

In cooperation with various stakeholders, the Debtors are focused on formulating and implementing an effective and efficient plan of reorganization for each of the Debtors under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code that maximizes enterprise value.

Proposed Sale of Economic Interest in Oncor — In September 2014, with input and support from several key stakeholders, the Debtors filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court seeking the entry of an order approving bidding procedures with respect to the potential sale of EFH Corp.'s/EFIH's economic interest in Oncor. During October 2014, the bankruptcy court held hearings regarding the motion. On November 3, 2014, the Bankruptcy Court conditionally approved the motion. In conditionally approving the motion, the Bankruptcy Court required that, among other things, the Debtors modify the proposed bidding procedures and order to (a) allow up to five advisors for each of the official unsecured creditor committees at TCEH and EFH Corp./EFIH to access information regarding the bidding process on terms to be negotiated with these advisors, (b) allow additional time for bidders to evaluate potential transactions and submit bids and (c) prohibit material modifications to the bid procedures without the consent of the committees or further order of the Bankruptcy Court. In addition, the Bankruptcy Court required that prior to a modified order becoming effective, the respective boards of directors of EFH Corp., EFCH, TCEH and EFIH must vote to approve the proposed modified bidding procedures (along with an affirmative vote of the respective disinterested directors at EFIH and TCEH). The Debtors intend to continue to work closely with each of their respective stakeholders to formulate a bidding process that will maximize enterprise value for each of the Debtors.

Tax Matters — In June 2014, EFH Corp. filed a request with the IRS for a private letter ruling (Private Letter Ruling) that, among other things, will provide (a) that (i) the transfer by TCEH of all of its assets and its ordinary course operating liabilities to reorganized TCEH consummated through a tax-free spin (in accordance with the Private Letter Ruling) in connection with TCEH's emergence from bankruptcy (Reorganized TCEH), (ii) the transfer by the Debtors to Reorganized TCEH of certain operating assets and liabilities that are reasonably necessary to the operation of Reorganized TCEH and (iii) the distribution by TCEH of (A) the equity it holds in Reorganized TCEH and (B) the cash proceeds TCEH receives from Reorganized TCEH to the holders of TCEH first lien claims, will qualify as a "reorganization" within the meaning of Sections 368(a)(1)(G), 355 and 356 of the Code and (b) for certain other rulings under Sections 368(a)(1)(G) and 355 of the Code. The Debtors intend to continue to pursue the Private Letter Ruling in connection with any Chapter 11 plan of reorganization that is ultimately proposed. In October 2014, the Debtors filed a memorandum with the Bankruptcy Court that described tax related matters regarding restructuring alternatives.

Operation and Implications of the Chapter 11 Cases — The accompanying consolidated financial statements contemplate the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Debtors' ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon their ability to comply with the financial and other covenants contained in the debtor-in-possession financing (DIP Facilities, described in Note 5 to Financial Statements), the Bankruptcy Court's approval of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization ultimately proposed by the Debtors and their ability to successfully implement such Chapter 11 plan and obtain new financing, among other factors. As a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities are subject to uncertainty. While operating as debtors-in-possession under Chapter 11, the Debtors may sell or otherwise dispose of or liquidate assets or settle liabilities, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court or as otherwise permitted in the ordinary course of business (and subject to restrictions contained in the DIP Facilities), for amounts other than those reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

A Chapter 11 plan of reorganization determines the rights and satisfaction of claims of various creditors and security holders and is subject to the ultimate outcome of negotiations and Bankruptcy Court decisions ongoing through the date on which the Chapter 11 plan is confirmed. The Debtors currently expect that any proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization will provide, among other things, mechanisms for settlement of claims against the Debtors' estates, treatment of EFH Corp.'s existing equity holders and the Debtors' respective existing debt holders, potential income tax liabilities and certain corporate governance and administrative matters pertaining to a reorganized EFH Corp. Any proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization will be subject to revision prior to submission to the Bankruptcy Court based upon discussions with the Debtors' creditors and other interested parties, and thereafter in response to creditor claims and objections and the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code or the Bankruptcy Court. There can be no assurance that the Debtors will be able to secure approval for any Chapter 11 plan of reorganization it ultimately proposes from the Bankruptcy Court or that any Chapter 11 plan will be accepted by the Debtors' creditors.

In order for the Debtors to emerge successfully from the Chapter 11 Cases as reorganized companies, they must obtain approval from the Bankruptcy Court and certain of their respective creditors for a Chapter 11 plan, which will enable each of the Debtors to transition from the Chapter 11 Cases into reorganized companies conducting ordinary course operations outside of bankruptcy. In connection with an exit from bankruptcy, TCEH and EFIH will require a new credit facility, or "exit financing." TCEH's and EFIH's ability to obtain such approval, and TCEH's and EFIH's ability to obtain such financing will depend on, among other things, the timing and outcome of various ongoing matters in the Chapter 11 Cases.

Repayment of EFIH Second Lien Notes — In ~~general~~March 2015, with the ~~Debtors~~approval ~~have~~of ~~received~~the ~~final~~Bankruptcy ~~bankruptcy~~Court, ~~court~~EFIH ~~orders~~used ~~with~~some ~~respect~~of its cash to ~~"first~~repay ~~day~~(Repayment) ~~motions"~~$735 ~~and~~million, ~~other~~including ~~"operating~~interest ~~motions"~~at ~~that~~contractual ~~allow~~rates, ~~the~~in ~~Debtors~~amounts tooutstanding ~~operate~~under ~~their~~EFIH's ~~businesses~~pre-petition in11.00% ~~the~~Fixed ~~ordinary~~Senior ~~course,~~Secured ~~including,~~Second ~~among~~Lien ~~others~~Notes due October 1, ~~providing~~2021 ~~for~~(11.00% ~~the~~Notes) ~~payment~~and of11.75% ~~certain~~Fixed ~~pre-petition~~Senior ~~employee~~Secured Second Lien Notes due March 1, 2022 (11.75% Notes) and ~~retiree~~$15 ~~expenses~~million in certain fees and ~~benefits,~~expenses of the ~~use~~trustee offor such notes. The Repayment resulted in an $84 million reduction in the ~~Debtors'~~principal ~~existing~~amount ~~cash~~of ~~management~~the ~~system~~11.00% Notes, a $361 million reduction in the ~~continuation~~principal amount of ~~customer~~the ~~contracts~~11.75% Notes and ~~programs~~the atpayment ~~its~~of ~~retail~~$235 ~~electricity~~million ~~operations,~~and ~~the~~$55 ~~payment~~million of ~~certain~~accrued and unpaid post-petition and pre-petition ~~amounts~~interest, torespectively, ~~certain~~at ~~critical~~contractual ~~vendors,~~rates. The Repayment required the ~~ability~~requisite toconsent ~~perform~~of the lenders under ~~certain~~EFIH's ~~pre-petition~~DIP ~~hedging~~Facility. EFIH ~~and~~received ~~trading~~such ~~arrangements~~consent ~~and~~from approximately 97% of the ~~ability~~lenders tounder ~~pay~~the ~~certain~~EFIH ~~pre-petition~~DIP ~~taxes~~Facility and ~~regulatory~~paid ~~fees~~an aggregate consent fee equal to approximately $13 million. InAs ~~addition~~a result of the Repayment, as of the ~~Bankruptcy~~date ~~Court~~hereof, ~~has~~the ~~issued~~principal ~~orders~~amount ~~approving~~outstanding on the ~~DIP~~11.00% ~~Facilities~~Notes ~~discussed~~and in11.75% ~~Note~~Notes 5are to$322 ~~Financial~~million ~~Statements~~and $1.389 billion, respectively.

~~Pre-Petition~~Credit ~~Claims~~Risk —Exposure ~~Holders of pre-petition claims will be required~~ to ~~file~~EFH ~~proofs of claims by the "bar date" established by the Bankruptcy Court~~Corp. A ~~bar~~and ~~date~~its isSubsidiaries ~~the~~— ~~date~~EFH ~~by which certain claims against the Debtors must be filed if the claimants wish to receive any distribution in the Chapter 11 Cases~~Corp. ~~In August 2014~~, ~~the~~Oncor ~~Bankruptcy Court established a bar date of October 27~~Holdings, ~~2014~~Oncor for most claims. The Debtors have received numerous proofs of claim since the Petition Date. The Debtors are early in the process of reconciling those claims to the amounts listed in its schedules of assets and ~~liabilities. The~~Oncor's ~~Debtors~~minority ~~may~~investor ~~ask the Bankruptcy Court to disallow claims that it believes~~ are ~~duplicative,~~parties have been later amended or superseded, are without merit, are overstated or should be disallowed for other reasons. Given the substantial number of claims filed, the claims resolution process will take considerable time to ~~complete. Differences~~a ~~between~~Federal ~~liability amounts recorded by the company as liabilities subject to compromise~~ and ~~claims~~State ~~filed~~Income byTax ~~creditors~~Allocation ~~will be investigated and, if necessary, the Bankruptcy Court will make a final determination of the allowable claim~~Agreement. ~~Differences~~Additional between those final allowed claims and the liabilities recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheet will be recognized as reorganization items in the Debtors' condensed statement of consolidated income ~~(loss)~~tax asamounts ~~they~~receivable ~~are resolved. The determination of how liabilities will ultimately be resolved cannot be made until the Bankruptcy Court approves a plan of reorganization~~ or ~~approves~~payable ~~orders~~may ~~related~~arise toin ~~settlement of specific liabilities. Accordingly,~~ the ~~ultimate~~normal ~~amount~~course orunder ~~resolution~~that ~~of such liabilities is not determinable at this time~~agreement. ~~The resolution of such claims could result in material adjustments to the company's financial statements.~~

~~Regulatory~~Oncor ~~Requirements~~Matters ~~Related~~with to the ~~Bankruptcy~~PUCT — 2008 Rate Review Filing (PUCT Docket No. 35717) — ~~Pursuant~~In August 2009, the PUCT issued a final order with respect to Oncor's June 2008 rate review filing with the ~~Bankruptcy~~PUCT ~~Code~~and 204 cities based on a test year ended December 31, 2007, and new rates were implemented in September 2009. Oncor and four other parties appealed various portions of the ~~Debtors~~rate ~~intend~~review final order to ~~comply~~a ~~with~~state ~~all~~district ~~applicable~~court. In ~~regulatory~~January ~~requirements~~2011, ~~including~~the ~~all~~district ~~requirements~~court ~~related~~signed its judgment reversing the PUCT with respect to ~~environmental~~two issues: the PUCT's disallowance of certain franchise fees and ~~safety~~the ~~law~~PUCT's ~~compliance,~~decision ~~during~~that the ~~pendency~~Texas Public Utility Regulatory Act no longer requires imposition of ~~the~~a ~~Chapter~~rate 11discount ~~Cases~~for state colleges and universities. ~~Further,~~Oncor filed an appeal with the ~~Debtors~~Texas ~~have~~Third ~~been~~Court ~~complying,~~of Appeals (Austin Court of Appeals) in February 2011 with respect to the issues it appealed to the district court and ~~intend~~did not prevail upon, as well as the district court's decision to ~~continue~~reverse the PUCT with respect to ~~comply~~discounts for state colleges and universities. In August 2014, the Austin Court of Appeals reversed the district court and affirmed the PUCT with respect to the ~~various~~PUCT's ~~reporting~~disallowance ~~obligations~~of ~~that~~certain ~~are~~franchise ~~required~~fees byand the ~~Bankruptcy~~PUCT's decision that PURA no longer requires imposition of a rate discount for state colleges and universities. The Austin Court ~~during~~of Appeals also reversed the ~~pendency~~PUCT and district court's rejection of a proposed consolidated tax savings adjustment arising out of EFH Corp.'s ability to offset Oncor's taxable income against losses from other investments and remanded the ~~Chapter~~issue 11to ~~Cases~~the PUCT to determine the amount of the consolidated tax savings adjustment. Oncor filed a motion on rehearing with the Austin Court of Appeals with respect to certain appeal issues on which Oncor was not successful, including the consolidated tax savings adjustment. In ~~addition~~December 2014, the ~~Debtors~~Austin ~~will~~Court ~~seek~~of ~~all~~Appeals ~~necessary~~issued its opinion, clarifying that it was rendering judgment on the rate discount for state colleges and ~~appropriate~~universities ~~regulatory~~issue ~~approvals~~(affirming ~~necessary~~that PURA no longer requires imposition of the rate discount) rather than remanding it to ~~complete~~the ~~any~~PUCT, ~~transactions~~and ~~proposed~~dismissing the motions for rehearing regarding the franchise fee issue and the consolidated tax savings adjustment. Oncor filed a petition for review with the Texas Supreme Court in February 2015, and in April 2015 the ~~Chapter~~court 11requested ~~plan~~that the parties file responses to the petitions for review. ~~Moreover~~These responses are due by May 26, 2015 unless the parties request, and the court grants, an extension. There is no deadline for the court to act after receipt of these responses. If Oncor's appeals efforts are unsuccessful and the ~~extent~~proposed consolidated tax savings adjustment is implemented, Oncor estimates that on remand the ~~Debtors~~impact ~~either~~on ~~maintain~~earnings ~~insurance~~of ~~policies~~the orconsolidated ~~self-insure~~tax ~~their~~savings ~~regulatory~~adjustment's ~~compliance~~value ~~obligations~~could range from zero, as originally determined by the ~~Debtors~~PUCT ~~intend~~in toDocket ~~continue~~No. ~~such~~35717, ~~insurance~~to ~~policies~~a or$130 ~~self~~million loss (after-~~insurance~~tax). Oncor indoes not believe that any of the ~~ordinary~~other ~~course~~issues ruled upon by the Austin Court of ~~business~~Appeals would result in a material impact to its results of operations or financial condition.

~~Credit~~Transmission ~~Risk~~Cost ~~Exposure~~Recovery toand ~~EFH~~Rates ~~Corp.~~(PUCT ~~and~~Docket ~~its~~No. ~~Subsidiaries~~43858) — AsIn aorder ~~result~~to ofreflect ~~the~~increases ~~Bankruptcy~~or ~~Filing,~~decreases ~~Oncor~~in ~~had~~its ~~credit~~wholesale ~~risk~~transmission ~~exposure~~costs, toincluding ~~trade~~fees ~~accounts~~it ~~receivable~~pays ~~from~~to ~~TCEH~~other transmission service providers, ~~which~~PUCT ~~related~~rules allow Oncor to ~~delivery~~update ~~services~~the ~~provided~~transmission bycost ~~Oncor~~recovery tofactor ~~TCEH's~~(TCRF) component of its retail ~~electricity~~delivery ~~operations. At~~rates ~~the~~charged ~~Petition~~to ~~Date,~~REPs ~~these~~on ~~accounts~~March ~~receivable~~1 ~~totaled~~and ~~$109~~September ~~million~~1 each year. In ~~June~~December 2014, ~~the~~Oncor ~~Bankruptcy~~filed ~~Court~~an ~~authorized~~application to update the ~~Debtors~~TCRF, towhich ~~pay~~became ~~all~~effective ~~pre-petition~~March ~~delivery~~1, ~~charges~~2015. This ~~due~~application was designed to reduce Oncor,'s ~~and~~billings ~~such~~for ~~amounts~~the ~~were~~period ~~paid~~from inMarch ~~full.~~2015 through August 2015 by $27 million.

~~EFH~~Transmission ~~Corp~~Interim Rate Update Applications (PUCT Docket No. 44363) — In order to reflect changes in its invested transmission capital, PUCT rules allow Oncor ~~Holdings,~~to update its transmission cost of service (TCOS) rates by filing up to two interim TCOS rate adjustments in a calendar year. TCOS revenues are collected from load serving entities benefiting from Oncor's ~~and~~transmission system. REPs serving customers in Oncor's ~~minority~~service ~~investor~~territory are ~~parties~~billed tothrough athe ~~Federal~~TCRF ~~and~~mechanism ~~State~~discussed ~~Income~~above ~~Tax~~while ~~Allocation~~other ~~Agreement~~load serving entities are billed directly. ~~Additional~~In ~~income~~January ~~tax~~2015, ~~amounts~~Oncor ~~receivable~~filed oran ~~payable~~application ~~may~~for ~~arise~~an interim update of its TCOS rate. The new rate was approved by the PUCT and became effective in March 2015. Oncor's expected annualized revenues increased by an estimated $35 million with approximately $23 million of this increase recoverable through transmission costs charged to wholesale customers and $12 million recoverable from REPs through the ~~normal~~TCRF ~~course~~component ~~under~~of ~~that~~Oncor's ~~agreement~~delivery rates.

Oncor's Investment in Transmission and Distribution Infrastructure — Oncor expects its capital expenditures on transmission and distribution infrastructure to total approximately $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion in 2014 and 2015, respectively. Oncor's management currently expects to recommend to its board of directors capital expenditures of approximately $1.3 billion in 2016 and approximately $1.5 billion in each of the years 2017 through 2020.

Oncor Matters with the PUCT — 2008 Rate Review Filing (PUCT Docket No. 35717) — In August 2009, the PUCT issued a final order with respect to Oncor's June 2008 rate review filing with the PUCT and 204 cities based on a test year ended December 31, 2007, and new rates were implemented in September 2009. Oncor and four other parties appealed various portions of the rate review final order to a state district court. In January 2011, the district court signed its judgment reversing the PUCT with respect to two issues: the PUCT's disallowance of certain franchise fees and the PUCT's decision that PURA no longer requires imposition of a rate discount for state colleges and universities. Oncor filed an appeal with the Texas Third Court of Appeals (Austin Court of Appeals) in February 2011 with respect to the issues it appealed to the district court and did not prevail upon, as well as the district court's decision to reverse the PUCT with respect to discounts for state colleges and universities. In August 2014, the Austin Court of Appeals reversed the district court and affirmed the PUCT with respect to the PUCT's disallowance of certain franchise fees and the PUCT's decision that PURA no longer requires imposition of a rate discount for state colleges and universities. The Austin Court of Appeals also reversed the PUCT and district court's rejection of a proposed consolidated tax savings adjustment arising out of EFH Corp.'s ability to offset Oncor's taxable income against losses from other investments. The Austin Court of Appeals has remanded the issue to the PUCT to determine the amount of the consolidated tax savings adjustment. In August 2014, Oncor filed a motion on rehearing with the Austin Court of Appeals with respect to certain appeal issues on which Oncor was not successful, including the consolidated tax savings adjustment. Oncor is unable to predict the outcome of this motion on rehearing and Oncor's appeal efforts, and there is no deadline for the Austin Court of Appeals to act. If Oncor's appeals efforts are unsuccessful and the proposed consolidated tax savings adjustment is implemented, Oncor estimates that on remand the impact on earnings of the consolidated tax savings adjustment's value could range from zero, as originally determined by the PUCT in Docket No. 35717, to a $130 million loss (after-tax). Oncor does not believe that any of the other issues ruled upon by the Austin Court of Appeals would result in a material impact to its results of operations or financial condition.

Transmission Cost Recovery and Rates (PUCT Docket No. 42558) — In order to reflect increases or decreases in its wholesale transmission costs, including fees it pays to other transmission service providers, PUCT rules allow Oncor to update the transmission cost recovery factor (TCRF) component of its retail delivery rates charged to REPs on March 1 and September 1 each year. In May 2014, Oncor filed an application to update the TCRF, which became effective September 1, 2014. This application was designed to increase Oncor's billings for the period from September 2014 through February 2015 by $71 million.

Transmission Interim Rate Update Applications (PUCT Docket No. 42706) — In order to reflect changes in its invested transmission capital, PUCT rules allow Oncor to update its transmission cost of service (TCOS) rates by filing up to two interim TCOS rate adjustments in a calendar year. TCOS revenues are collected from load serving entities benefiting from Oncor's transmission system. REPs serving customers in Oncor's service territory are billed through the TCRF mechanism discussed above while other load serving entities are billed directly. In July 2014, Oncor filed an application for an interim update of its TCOS rate. The new rate was approved by the PUCT and became effective in September 2014. Oncor's annualized revenues will increase by an estimated $12 million with approximately $8 million of this increase recoverable through transmission costs charged to wholesale customers and $4 million recoverable from REPs through the TCRF component of Oncor's delivery rates.

Application for 2015 Energy Efficiency Cost Recovery Factor Surcharge (PUCT Docket No. 42559) — In May 2014, Oncor filed an application with the PUCT to request approval of the energy efficiency cost recovery factor (EECRF) for 2015. PUCT rules require Oncor to make an annual EECRF filing by the first business day in June in each year for implementation on March 1 of the next calendar year. The requested 2015 EECRF was $68 million as compared to $73 million established for 2014, and would result in a monthly charge for residential customers of $1.03 as compared to the 2014 residential charge of $1.01 per month. In October 2014, the PUCT issued a final order approving the 2015 EECRF, which is designed to recover $50 million of Oncor's costs for the 2015 program year, a $23 million performance bonus based on Oncor's 2013 results and a $5 million decrease for over-recovery of 2013 costs.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Financial Results — Three Months Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2014

Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased $39 million to $2 million in ~~2014~~2015. The $52014 ~~million~~amount inincludes ~~2013~~$8 ~~represented~~million for legal and other consulting ~~costs~~services associated with ~~EFH Corp.~~EFIH's debt restructuring activities, of which $3 million was allocated by EFH Corp. ~~Legal~~The 2014 amount also includes $2 million in allocated management fees owed to the Sponsor Group by EFH Corp. The decrease is the result of legal and other professional costs associated with the Chapter 11 Cases since the Petition Date ~~are~~ now being reported in reorganization items in EFIH's condensed statements of consolidated income (loss) (see Note 7 to the Financial Statements). Payments of Sponsor Group management fees and associated cost allocations ~~have~~were ~~been~~also suspended ~~for~~in 2014. See Note 1112 to the Financial Statements for discussion of allocations from EFH Corp.

Other deductions totaled $1270 million inand $77 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, reflecting the recording of areserves ~~reserve~~ against EFIH's income tax receivable from EFH Corp. (see ~~Note~~Notes 4 and 5 to the Financial Statements).

Interest expense and related charges ~~decreased~~increased $~~133~~94 million to $58292 million in ~~2014~~2015. The ~~decrease~~increase reflected $~~206~~24 million in ~~lower~~higher interest expense on pre-petition debt due to ~~the~~interest ~~discontinuation~~paid ofin ~~interest~~conjunction ~~upon~~with the ~~Bankruptcy~~repayment ~~Filing,~~of ~~partially~~the ~~offset~~EFIH bySecond Lien Notes, $5857 million in interest expense on debtor-in-possession financing and $1513 million in lower amortization of pre-petition debt premiums, discounts and issuance costs due to ~~reclassification~~the discontinuation of such amounts tosince ~~liabilities~~the ~~subject~~Petition toDate ~~compromise~~ (see Note 86 to the Financial Statements).

Reorganization items totaled $748 million in ~~2014~~2015 and included $514 million in legal advisory and representation services fees and $228 million in ~~other~~fees ~~professional~~associated ~~consulting~~with ~~and~~the ~~advisory~~repayment ~~services~~of ~~fees~~EFIH Second Lien Notes. See Note 67 to the Financial Statements for additional discussion.

Income tax benefit totaled $2565 million and $6872 million in ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. Excluding the effect of the reserve against the income tax receivable from EFH Corp. (see Note 4 to the Financial Statements) that was recorded without income tax benefit, the effective tax rate was 3719.30% and 34.74% in ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. The ~~increase~~decrease in the effective income tax rate ~~was~~is driven primarily by ~~minor~~a ~~changes~~valuation inallowance ~~forecasted~~against deferred tax assets and higher nondeductible legal and other professional services costs related to the Chapter 11 Cases in 2015 (see Note 5 to the Financial Statements).

Equity in earnings of EFIH's Oncor Holdings unconsolidated subsidiary (net of tax) ~~increased~~decreased $95 million to $~~123~~75 million in ~~2014~~2015. The ~~increase~~decrease in equity earnings of Oncor reflected ~~increased revenue from~~ higher ~~transmission~~operation ~~rates,~~and ~~recognition~~maintenance ofexpense ~~an energy efficiency performance bonus, growth in points of delivery~~ and ~~lower~~higher ~~interest expense~~depreciation, partially offset by ~~lower average consumption driven by the effects of milder weather,~~ higher ~~depreciation,~~revenue ~~higher~~from ~~operation~~increased ~~and~~transmission ~~maintenance expense and higher property taxes~~rates. See Note 3 to the Financial Statements.

Net ~~income~~loss ~~improved~~increased $83138 million to $69272 million in ~~net income in 2014~~2015. The change ~~was~~reflects ~~driven~~$61 ~~primarily~~million by($94 ~~lower~~million pre-tax)in higher interest expense onand charges of $31 million ($48 million pre-~~petition~~tax) ~~debt~~for reorganization items in 2015 as discussed above.

~~Financial Results — Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013~~ 25

Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased $16 million to $21 million in 2014. The 2014 amount includes $15 million for legal and other professional services associated with EFIH's debt restructuring activities prior to the Petition Date, of which $4 million was allocated by EFH Corp. The 2014 amount also includes $3 million in allocated Sponsor Group management fees and $3 million in allocated other shared services costs. Payments of Sponsor Group management fees and associated cost allocations have been suspended. The $5 million in 2013 represented legal and consulting costs associated with EFH Corp.'s debt restructuring activities. See Note 11 to Financial Statements for discussion of allocations from EFH Corp.

Other deductions totaled $211 million in 2014, reflecting the recording of a reserve against EFIH's income tax receivable from EFH Corp. (see Note 4 to Financial Statements).

Interest income - affiliates decreased $284 million to zero in 2014. The decline reflects reclassification in 2013 of mark-to-market gains on certain holdings of affiliate debt from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest income. See Note 10 to Financial Statements.

Interest expense and related charges decreased $185 million to $381 million in 2014. The decrease reflected $273 million in lower interest expense on pre-petition debt due to the discontinuation of interest upon the Bankruptcy Filing, partially offset by $66 million in interest expense on debtor-in-possession financing and $22 million in lower amortization of pre-petition debt premiums, discounts and issuance costs due to reclassification of such amounts to liabilities subject to compromise (see Note 8 to Financial Statements).

Reorganization items totaled $235 million in 2014 and included a $108 million net loss on the exchange and settlement of the EFIH First Lien Notes and $93 million in fees associated with completion of the EFIH First Lien DIP Facility (see Note 5 to Financial Statements). See Note 6 to Financial Statements for additional discussion.

Income tax benefit totaled $215 million and $100 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively. Excluding the effect of the reserve against the income tax receivable from EFH Corp. (see Note 4 to Financial Statements) that was recorded without income tax benefit, the effective tax rate was 33.8% and 34.8% in 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in the effective income tax rate was driven primarily by higher nondeductible legal and other professional services costs related to Chapter 11 Cases.

Equity in earnings of EFIH's Oncor Holdings unconsolidated subsidiary (net of tax) increased $21 million to $276 million in 2014. The increase in equity earnings of Oncor reflected increased revenue from higher transmission rates, recognition of an energy efficiency performance bonus, growth in points of delivery and lower interest expense. These favorable effects were partially offset by higher income taxes reflecting the $11 million favorable tax effect in 2013 due to resolution of certain income tax positions and an increase in non-deductible amortization of regulatory assets, higher depreciation, higher operation and maintenance expense and higher property taxes. See Note 3 to Financial Statements.

Net loss increased $425 million to $357 million in 2014. The change was driven by a decrease in interest income, the existence of reorganization items in 2014 and the reserve against the income tax receivable from EFH Corp., partially offset by lower interest expense on pre-petition debt and higher equity in earnings of Oncor Holdings.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Cash Flows — ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 Compared to ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2014 — Cash used in operating activities totaled $~~237~~292 million and $~~297~~106 million in ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. The ~~decrease~~increase in cash used of $60186 million was driven by ~~$107~~higher ~~million in lower~~ cash interest payments, ~~partially~~as ~~offset~~a byresult of the EFIH Second Lien repayment for pre-petition interest and higher legal and other professional ~~services~~fees ~~costs~~as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, partially offset by higher distributions received from Oncor.

Amortization of debt issuance costs reported in the condensed statements of consolidated cash flows relates to the debt pushed down from EFH Corp. and the debt issued by EFIH~~, including EFIH's debtor-in-possession financing~~. Remaining unamortized costs at the Petition Date were reclassified to liabilities subject to compromise (LSTC) and amortization ceased (see Note 79 to the Financial Statements). All amortized debt issuance costs are reported in interest expense and related charges in the condensed statements of consolidated income (loss).

Cash ~~provided~~used byin financing activities totaled $~~1.159~~473 ~~billion~~million in ~~2014~~2015. There ~~and~~was no cash used in ~~financing~~or ~~activities totaled $478 million in 2013. Cash~~ provided by financing activities in 2014 ~~included $3~~.~~564~~ Activity ~~billion~~ in ~~borrowings~~2015 ~~under~~reflected the ~~EFIH~~repayment ~~DIP~~of ~~Facility, partially offset by~~ $~~2.312~~445 ~~billion~~million inprincipal ~~repayments~~amount of EFIH ~~First~~Second Lien Notes and $9328 million in ~~payments for~~ fees ~~associated~~related ~~with the completion of the EFIH DIP Facility. Cash used in financing activities in 2013 reflected a cash distribution~~ to ~~EFH Corp. of $680 million for~~ the ~~purpose~~repayment ~~of EFH Corp. repaying the balance of the TCEH Demand Notes~~ (see ~~discussion~~Note ~~below~~9 ofto ~~investing~~the ~~cash~~Financial ~~flows~~Statements)~~, partially offset by $208 million of interest received on holdings of affiliate debt~~.

There was no cash used in or provided by investing activities in ~~2014. Cash~~2015 ~~provided by investing activities in 2013 totaled $680 million~~ and ~~represented a release of funds from escrow to pay a distribution to EFH Corp~~2014. ~~in January 2013. The funds represented a portion of the net proceeds from the issuance of EFIH Notes in 2012 that were placed in escrow at that time.~~

~~Subject~~Available toLiquidity ~~certain~~— ~~exceptions~~In ~~under~~March 2015, with the ~~Bankruptcy~~approval ~~Code,~~of the Bankruptcy ~~Filing~~Court, ~~automatically~~EFIH ~~enjoined~~used some of its cash to repay (Repayment) $735 million, orincluding ~~stayed~~interest at contractual rates, ~~the~~in ~~continuation~~amounts ofoutstanding ~~most~~under ~~pending~~EFIH's ~~judicial~~pre-petition or11.00% ~~administrative~~Second ~~proceedings~~Lien Notes due 2021 (11.00% Notes) and 11.75% Second Lien Notes due 2022 (11.75% Notes) and $15 million in certain fees and expenses of the ~~filing~~trustee for such notes (see Note 9). The Repayment required the requisite consent of ~~other~~the ~~actions~~lenders ~~against~~under the ~~Debtors~~EFIH orDIP ~~their~~Facility. ~~property~~EFIH toreceived ~~recover~~such ~~on,~~consent ~~collect~~from orapproximately ~~secure~~97% aof ~~claim~~the ~~arising~~lenders ~~prior~~under the EFIH DIP Facility and paid an aggregate consent fee equal to approximately $13 million. As a result of the ~~date~~Repayment, as of the ~~Bankruptcy~~date ~~Filing~~hereof, ~~(including~~the ~~with~~principal ~~respect~~amount tooutstanding ~~EFIH's~~on ~~pre-petition~~the ~~debt~~11.00% ~~instruments)~~Notes and 11.75% are $322 million and $1.389 billion, respectively.

~~The~~As ~~Bankruptcy~~of ~~Court~~March ~~approved~~31, ~~final~~2015, ~~orders~~after incompleting ~~June 2014 authorizing~~ the ~~EFIH~~Repayment ~~DIP~~of ~~Facility~~a ~~(see~~portion ~~Note~~of 5EFIH's toSecond ~~Financial~~Lien ~~Statements). The~~Notes, EFIH ~~DIP~~had ~~Facility~~$392 ~~provides~~million ~~for~~in upliquidity toconsisting ~~$5.4~~entirely ~~billion~~of incash ~~senior~~and ~~secured,~~cash ~~super-priority financing~~equivalents.

~~Available~~ Liquidity After the Bankruptcy Filing — AtSubject ~~September 30~~to certain exceptions under the Bankruptcy Code, ~~2014~~the Bankruptcy Filing automatically enjoined, ~~available~~or ~~liquidity~~stayed, ~~consisted~~the continuation of ~~cash~~most pending judicial or administrative proceedings and ~~cash~~the ~~equivalents~~filing ~~totaling~~of ~~$1.164~~other ~~billion~~actions against the EFIH Debtors or their property to recover on, ~~$1.038~~collect ~~billion~~or ofsecure ~~which~~a ~~represents~~claim ~~remaining~~arising ~~borrowings~~prior ~~under~~to the Petition Date (including with respect to EFIH's ~~DIP~~pre-petition ~~facility~~debt instruments).

~~EFIH~~The ~~believes~~Bankruptcy ~~that~~Court ~~the~~approved ~~DIP~~final ~~facility,~~orders ~~plus~~in ~~cash~~June ~~distributions~~2014 ~~received~~authorizing ~~from~~the ~~Oncor~~EFIH ~~Holdings,~~DIP ~~will~~Facility be(see ~~sufficient~~Note 8 to ~~fund its anticipated cash requirements through at least~~ the ~~maturity~~Financial ~~date of the DIP facility~~Statements). AsThe aEFIH ~~result~~First ofLien ~~the~~DIP ~~Bankruptcy~~Facility ~~Filing,~~provides ~~EFIH~~for ~~does~~up ~~not expect~~ to ~~receive~~$5.4 ~~further~~billion ~~interest~~in ~~payments~~senior onsecured, ~~affiliate~~super-priority ~~debt securities it holds~~financing.

EFIH believes that the EFIH DIP facility, plus cash distributions received from Oncor Holdings, will be sufficient to fund its anticipated cash requirements through at least the maturity date of the EFIH DIP facility. As a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, EFIH does not expect to receive further interest payments on affiliate debt securities it holds.

The EFIH DIP Facility permits, subject to certain terms, conditions and limitations, EFIH to incur incremental junior lien subordinated debt in an aggregate amount not to exceed $3 billion.

Distributions of Earnings from Oncor Holdings — Oncor Holdings' distributions of earnings to EFIH totaled $~~128~~74 million and $~~148~~37 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. ~~On October 22, 2014, we received a distribution of $74 million from Oncor Holdings.~~ See Note 3 to the Financial Statements for discussion of limitations on amounts Oncor can distribute to its members.

EFH Corp., Oncor Holdings, Oncor and Oncor's minority investor are parties to a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement. Additional income tax amounts receivable or payable may arise in the normal course under that agreement.

Income Tax Matters — EFH Corp. and its subsidiaries (including EFCH, EFIH and TCEH, but not including Oncor Holdings and Oncor) are parties to a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, which provides, among other things, that any corporate member or disregarded entity in the group is required to make payments to EFH Corp. in an amount calculated to approximate the amount of tax liability such entity would have owed if it filed a separate corporate tax return. EFH Corp., Oncor Holdings, Oncor and Oncor's third-party minority investor are parties to a separate Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, which governs the computation of federal income tax liability among such parties, and similarly provides, among other things, that each of Oncor Holdings and Oncor will pay EFH Corp. its share of an amount calculated to approximate the amount of tax liability such entity would have owed if it filed a separate corporate tax return.

28See Note 12 to the Financial Statements for discussion of income tax payments to and from EFH Corp.

Financial Covenants — The Bankruptcy Filing constituted an event of default and automatic acceleration under the agreements governing the pre-petition debt of ~~EFH Corp. and its subsidiaries, including~~ EFIH, ~~EFCH and TCEH but excluding the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities~~Debtors. The creditors are, however, stayed from taking any action against the Debtors as a result of such defaults and accelerations under the Bankruptcy Code.

The EFIH DIP Facility includes a minimum liquidity covenant pursuant to which EFIH cannot allow unrestricted cash (as defined in the EFIH DIP Facility) to be less than $150 million. EFIH is in compliance with this covenant.

Material Cross Default/Acceleration Provisions — Certain of EFIH's financing arrangements contain provisions that result in an event of default if there were a failure under other financing arrangements to meet payment terms or to observe other covenants that could or does result in an acceleration of payments due. Such provisions are referred to as "cross default" or "cross acceleration" provisions. The Bankruptcy Filing triggered defaults on the EFIH Debtors's pre-petition debt obligations, but pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, the creditors are stayed from taking any actions against the Debtors as a result of such defaults.

Guarantees — See Note 910 to the Financial Statements for discussion of guarantees.

OFF–BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

See Notes 3 and 9 to the Financial Statements regarding VIEs and guarantees, respectively.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

See Note 910 to the Financial Statements for discussion of commitments and contingencies.

CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

See Note 1 to the Financial Statements for discussion of changes in accounting standards.

2927


Item 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk is the risk that in the ordinary course of business EFIH may experience a loss in value as a result of changes in market conditions that affect economic factors such as interest rates. All of EFIH's pre-petition debt was subject to fixed interest rates. The principal amounts outstanding under the EFIH ~~First Lien~~ DIP Facility bear interest based on applicable LIBOR rates, subject to a 1% floor, plus 3.25%. EFIH expects LIBOR rates to remain below the 1% interest rate floor specified in its DIP debtor-in-possession financing during the pendency of the Chapter 11 ~~Case~~Cases.

Except as discussed herein, the information required hereunder is not significantly different from the information set forth in Item 7A, "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" included in EFIH's ~~2013~~2014 Form 10-K and is therefore not presented herein.

Credit Risk

Oncor's Credit Risk — Credit risk relates to the risk of loss associated with nonperformance by counterparties. Oncor's customers consist primarily of REPs. As a prerequisite for obtaining and maintaining certification, a REP must meet the financial resource standards established by the PUCT. Meeting these standards does not guarantee that a REP will be able to perform its obligations. REP certificates granted by the PUCT are subject to suspension and revocation for significant violation of Texas Public Utility Regulatory Act and PUCT rules. Significant violations include failure to timely remit payments for invoiced charges to a transmission and distribution utility pursuant to the terms of tariffs approved by the PUCT. PUCT rules allow for the recovery of uncollectible amounts from nonaffiliated REPs, reducing the credit risk of such receivables.

At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, Oncor's exposure to credit risk associated with accounts receivable from nonaffiliate customers totaled $~~472~~420 million. The nonaffiliated customer receivable amount is before the allowance for uncollectible accounts, which totaled $3 million, and includes trade accounts receivable from REPs totaling $~~345~~305 million, which are almost entirely below investment grade. At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, REP subsidiaries of one nonaffiliated entity collectively represented approximately 14% of the nonaffiliated trade receivable amount. No other nonaffiliated parties represented 10% or more of the total exposure. Oncor views its exposure to this customer to be within an acceptable level of risk tolerance considering PUCT rules and regulations; however, this concentration increases the risk that a default would have a material effect on cash flows.

See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Significant Activities and Events and Items Influencing Future Performance – Credit Risk Exposure to EFH Corp. and its Subsidiaries" above for discussion of Oncor's credit risk to accounts receivable from affiliates.

See Note 1112 to the Financial Statements for discussion of transactions between Oncor and TCEH and EFH Corp.

3028

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report and other presentations made by EFIH contain "forward-looking statements." All statements, other than statements of historical facts, that are included in this report, or made in presentations, in response to questions or otherwise, that address activities, events or developments that may occur in the future, including such matters as activities related to EFIH's bankruptcy, financial or operational projections, capital allocation, future capital expenditures, business strategy, competitive strengths, goals, future acquisitions or dispositions, development or operation of facilities, market and industry developments and the growth of EFIH's business and operations (often, but not always, through the use of words or phrases such as "intends," "plans," "will likely," "unlikely," "expected," "anticipated," "estimated," "should," "projection," "target," "goal," "objective" and "outlook"), are forward-looking statements. Although EFIH believes that in making any such forward-looking statement its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, any such forward-looking statement involves uncertainties and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the discussion of risk factors under Item 1A, "Risk Factors" in EFIH's ~~2013~~2014 Form 10-K, ~~Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2014~~ and ~~June 30, 2014,~~ the discussion under Item 2, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this report and the following important factors, among others, that could cause EFIH's actual results to differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements:

• ~~EFIH's~~The ~~ability~~Debtors to(including ~~propose~~the aEFIH ~~Chapter~~Debtors) 11ability ~~restructuring~~to ~~plan~~obtain ~~that will receive~~ the necessary votes from the required creditors and stakeholders and the approval from the Bankruptcy Court for the Plan of Reorganization;

• the outcome of the court-supervised bid process with respect to the restructuring of EFH Corp. and EFIH;

• EFIH's ability to obtain ~~the approval of the~~ Bankruptcy Court approval with respect to the EFIH Debtors' motions in the ~~bankruptcy~~Chapter ~~proceedings~~11 Cases, including such approvals not being overturned on appeal or being stayed for any extended period of time;

• the ~~effectiveness~~terms ofand ~~the~~conditions ~~overall~~of ~~restructuring~~any ~~activities~~Chapter ~~pursuant~~11 toplan ~~the~~of ~~Bankruptcy~~reorganization ~~Filing~~that ~~and~~is ~~any~~ultimately ~~additional~~approved ~~strategies~~by ~~EFIH~~the ~~employs~~Bankruptcy ~~to address its liquidity and capital resources~~Court;

• ~~the~~EFIH's ~~terms~~ability ~~and~~to ~~conditions~~remain ofin ~~any~~compliance ~~bankruptcy~~with ~~plan~~the ~~that~~requirements isof ~~ultimately approved by~~ the ~~Bankruptcy~~EFIH ~~Court~~DIP Facility;

• ~~the~~EFIH's ~~significant~~ability ~~time~~to ~~and~~maintain ~~effort~~or ~~required~~obtain tosufficient befinancing ~~spent~~sources byfor EFIH's ~~senior~~cash ~~management~~requirements induring ~~dealing~~the ~~with~~pendency of the ~~bankruptcy~~Chapter 11 Cases and ~~restructuring~~its ~~activities~~ability ~~rather~~to ~~than~~obtain ~~focusing~~sufficient ~~exclusively~~exit onfinancing ~~the~~to ~~business~~fund any Chapter 11 plan of reorganization;

• ~~EFIH's~~the ~~ability~~actions toand ~~remain~~decisions inof ~~compliance~~creditors, ~~with~~regulators ~~the~~and ~~requirements~~other ofthird parties that have an interest in the ~~EFIH~~Chapter ~~DIP~~11 ~~facility~~Cases or reorganization that may be inconsistent with, or interfere with, EFIH's plans;

• ~~EFIH's~~the ~~ability~~duration toof ~~maintain~~the orChapter ~~obtain~~11 ~~sufficient financing sources or to fund any bankruptcy plan and meet future obligations~~Cases;

• the actions and decisions of ~~creditors,~~regulatory ~~regulators~~authorities ~~and~~relative ~~other~~to ~~third~~any ~~parties~~Chapter ~~that~~11 ~~have~~plan anof ~~interest in the bankruptcy proceedings that may be inconsistent with EFIH's plans~~reorganization;

• restrictions on EFIH's activities due to the ~~length~~terms of ~~time~~its ~~that~~debt agreements, including the ~~Debtors~~EFIH ~~will~~DIP beFacility, ~~debtors-in-possession~~and ~~under~~restrictions imposed by the Bankruptcy ~~Code~~Court;

• ~~the~~EFIH's ~~actions~~ability ~~and~~to ~~decisions~~obtain ofany required regulatory ~~authorities~~consent ~~relative~~necessary to ~~EFIH's~~implement ~~bankruptcy~~any Chapter 11 plan of reorganization;

• ~~restrictions~~the onoutcome ~~EFIH's~~of ~~activities~~current ~~due~~or topotential ~~the~~litigation ~~terms~~regarding ofwhether ~~its~~holders ~~debt~~are ~~agreements,~~entitled ~~including~~to ~~the~~make-whole ~~EFIH~~premiums ~~DIP~~and/or ~~facility,~~post-petition ~~and~~interest ~~restrictions~~in ~~imposed~~connection bywith the ~~Bankruptcy~~treatment ~~Court~~of their claims in bankruptcy;

• ~~EFIH's~~the ~~ability~~outcome toof ~~obtain~~current ~~any~~or ~~required~~potential ~~regulatory~~litigations ~~consent~~regarding ~~necessary~~intercompany toclaims ~~implement~~and/or aderivative ~~bankruptcy plan~~claims;

• prevailing governmental policies and regulatory actions, including those of the ~~outcome~~Texas Legislature, the Governor of ~~potential~~Texas, ~~litigation~~the ~~regarding~~US ~~whether~~Congress, ~~note~~the ~~holders~~FERC, ~~are~~the ~~entitled~~NERC, tothe ~~make-whole~~TRE, ~~premiums~~the inPUCT, ~~connection~~the ~~with~~EPA and the ~~treatment~~TCEQ, ofwith ~~their~~respect ~~claims~~to, inamong ~~bankruptcy;~~other things:

•◦ ~~prevailing~~allowed ~~governmental~~rates ~~policies and regulatory actions, including those~~ of the Texas Legislature, the Governor of Texas, the US Congress, the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, the Texas Reliability Entity, Inc., the PUCT, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, with respect to, among other things:return;

◦ allowed rate of return;


◦	permitted capital structure;


◦	industry, market and rate structure;


◦	recovery of investments;


◦	acquisition and disposal of assets and facilities;

◦ ~~operation~~development, construction and ~~construction~~operation of facilities;


◦	changes in tax laws and policies, and


◦	changes in and compliance with environmental and safety laws and policies;


•	legal and administrative proceedings and settlements, including the legal proceedings arising out of the bankruptcy;


•	general industry trends;


•	economic conditions, including the impact of an economic downturn;

• weather conditions, ~~including drought~~ and ~~limitations on access to water, and~~ other natural phenomena, and acts of sabotage, wars or terrorist or cyber security threats or activities;

• unanticipated population growth or decline, or changes in market supply or demand and demographic patterns, particularly in ERCOT;


•	changes in business strategy, development plans or vendor relationships;

• unanticipated changes in interest rates or rates of inflation;

• unanticipated changes in operating expenses, liquidity needs and capital expenditures;

31• commercial bank market and capital market conditions and the potential impact of disruptions in US and international credit markets;

• ~~commercial bank and capital market conditions, access to capital,~~ the ~~cost~~amount ~~of such capital,~~ and ~~the~~timing ~~results~~ of ~~financing~~dividends ~~and~~received ~~refinancing~~from ~~efforts by EFIH and/or its subsidiaries and affiliates, including availability of funds in the capital markets and the potential impact of disruptions in US credit markets~~Oncor;

• ~~activity~~access into capital, the ~~credit~~cost ~~default~~of ~~swap~~such ~~market~~capital, ~~related~~and tothe ~~EFIH's~~results ~~debt~~of ~~securities~~financing orand ~~debt~~refinancing ~~securities~~efforts, ofincluding ~~EFH~~availability ~~Corp.~~of ~~that~~funds ~~EFIH~~in ~~guarantees~~capital markets;

~~• restrictions placed on EFIH by the agreements governing its debt instruments;~~29

• EFIH's ability to ~~generate~~obtain and maintain sufficient cash flow to make interest payments on, orand EFIH's ability to refinance, its debt instruments, including the EFIH DIP Facility;


•	changes in technology used by and services offered by EFIH and/or its subsidiaries;

• significant changes in the relationship of ~~EFIH~~Oncor ~~and/or its subsidiaries~~ with their employees, including the availability of qualified personnel, and the potential adverse effects if labor disputes or grievances were to occur;

• changes in assumptions used to estimate costs of providing employee benefits, including medical and dental benefits, pension and ~~other postretirement employee benefits~~OPEB, and future funding requirements related thereto, including joint and several liability exposure under ERISA;

• ~~significant~~ changes in ~~critical~~assumptions ~~accounting~~used ~~policies material~~ to ~~EFIH~~estimate ~~and/or~~future ~~its~~executive ~~subsidiaries~~compensation payments;

• ~~circumstances~~hazards ~~that~~customary ~~may~~to ~~contribute~~the toindustry ~~impairment~~and ofthe ~~goodwill,~~possibility ~~intangible~~that orEFIH ~~other~~may ~~long-lived~~not ~~assets~~have ofadequate ~~EFIH~~insurance ~~and/or~~to ~~its~~cover ~~subsidiaries~~losses resulting from such hazards;

• ~~restrictions~~significant ~~imposed~~changes byin ~~the~~critical ~~agreements~~accounting ~~governing EFIH's~~policies, ~~Oncor's~~ and ~~certain of EFH Corp.'s debt instruments;~~

• ~~defaults~~actions ~~under~~by ~~EFIH's~~credit ~~debt~~rating ~~agreements that could trigger cross default or cross acceleration provisions under other debt agreements;~~agencies.

• EFH Corp.'s or its subsidiaries', including, in particular, TCEH's, ability to make principal and interest payments on their debt EFIH holds as an investment or to provide sufficient capital contributions or loans to EFIH to make interest payments on its debt instruments;

• hazards customary to the industry and the possibility that EFIH and/or its subsidiaries may not have adequate insurance to cover losses resulting from such hazards;

• actions by credit rating agencies, and

• the ability of EFIH and/or its subsidiaries to effectively execute their operational strategy.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only at the date on which it is made, and except as may be required by law, EFIH undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which it is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for EFIH to predict all of them; nor can EFIH assess the impact of each such factor or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. As such, you should not unduly rely on such forward-looking statements.

3230


Item 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

AnEvaluation ~~evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation~~ of ~~EFIH's~~Disclosure ~~management,~~Controls ~~including the principal executive officer~~ and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures in effect at the end of the current period included in this quarterly report. Based on the evaluation performed, EFIH's management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective. During the most recent fiscal quarter covered by this quarterly report, there has been no change in EFIH's internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, EFIH's internal control over financial reporting.Procedures

33An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of EFIH's management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures in effect at the end of the current period included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Based on the evaluation performed as of March 31, 2015, its principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, due to the material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting related to accounting for deferred income taxes, as previously disclosed in EFIH's 2014 Form 10-K, its disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2015. In light of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, management completed substantive procedures, including validating the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used for accounting for deferred income taxes, prior to filing this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

These additional procedures have allowed EFIH to conclude that, notwithstanding the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to accounting for deferred income taxes, the consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, EFIH's financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with GAAP. Additionally, no restatement of EFIH's previously issued consolidated financial statements was required.

Previously Reported Material Weakness

As previously disclosed in EFIH's 2014 Form 10-K, its management concluded that EFIH's internal control over financial reporting and its disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of December 31, 2014 due to a material weakness in accounting for deferred income taxes. Pursuant to SEC rules and regulations, a material weakness is "a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the registrant's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis".

In response to the material weakness described above, during the three months ended March 31, 2015, EFIH began implementing a plan of remediation to strengthen its overall internal control over accounting for deferred income taxes. The remediation plan includes the following steps:


•	enhancing the formality and rigor of review and documentation related to EFIH's deferred income tax reconciliation procedures,


•	implementing additional oversight and monitoring controls over EFIH's deferred income tax review processes that are designed to operate at a level of precision to detect an error resulting from a related control failure before it results in a material misstatement of its financial statements, and


•	hiring key personnel in EFH Corp.'s tax department and further evaluating staffing levels to ensure the execution of timely and rigorous control procedures.

Management is still evaluating these new controls and procedures. Once placed in operation for a sufficient period of time, EFIH will subject these controls and procedures to appropriate tests in order to determine whether they are operating effectively.

EFIH is committed to maintaining a strong internal control environment and believe that these remediation efforts will represent improvements in its controls.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

With the oversight of senior management and EFIH's audit committee, EFIH has continued to remediate the underlying causes of the material weakness. Other than with respect to the ongoing plan for remediation of the material weakness, there has been no change to its internal control over financial reporting during its most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, EFIH's internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Reference is made to the discussion in Note 910 to the Financial Statements regarding legal proceedings.


Item 1A.	RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes from the risk factors discussed in Part I, "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in EFIH's ~~2013~~2014 Form 10-K, except as ~~amended,~~set ~~and~~forth inbelow ~~Part II, "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in EFIH's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended March 31~~ and ~~June 30, 2014, except~~ for the information disclosed elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q that provides factual updates to risk factors contained in EFIH's ~~2013~~2014 Form 10-K~~, as amended, and EFIH's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended March 31 and June 30, 2014~~. The risks described in such reports are not the only risks facing the company.

The Debtors (including EFIH) may not be able to obtain the requisite acceptances of constituencies in the Chapter 11 Cases for, or confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court of, the Plan of Reorganization, and may not be able to consummate the Plan of Reorganization.

The Debtors (including EFIH) filed a Plan of Reorganization on April 14, 2015. The Debtors (including EFIH) may not receive the requisite acceptances of constituencies in the Chapter 11 Cases for the Plan of Reorganization. Even if the requisite acceptances of the Plan of Reorganization are received, the Bankruptcy Court may not confirm the Plan of Reorganization. In addition, completion of the Plan of Reorganization is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent. There can be no assurance that such acceptance and confirmation will be obtained, or that such conditions will be satisfied, and therefore, that the Plan of Reorganization will be completed.

Furthermore, even if the requisite acceptances of constituencies in the Chapter 11 Cases for the Plan of Reorganization are received and the Plan of Reorganization is confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court, there can be no assurance as to the timing or as to whether the effective date of the reorganization contemplated therein will occur. If the Plan of Reorganization does not receive the requisite acceptances or is not confirmed or if it does receive the requisite acceptances and is confirmed but the effective date of the reorganization contemplated therein does not occur, it may become necessary to amend the Plan of Reorganization to provide for alternative treatment of claims and interests which may result in holders of claims and interests receiving significantly less or no value for their claims and interests in the Chapter 11 Cases. If any modifications to the Plan of Reorganization are material, it may be necessary to re-solicit votes from holders of claims and interests adversely affected by the modifications with respect to such Plan of Reorganization.


Item 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.


Item 5.	OTHER INFORMATION

None.

3432


Item 6.	EXHIBITS


(a)	Exhibits filed or furnished as part of Part II are:

Exhibits	Previously Filed With File Number*	AsExhibit
(3(i))	Articles of Incorporation
3(a)	333-153529Form S-4(filed September 17, 2008)	3(c)	—	Certificate of Formation of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, as amended
(3(ii))	By-laws
3(b)	1-34544Form 10-K(filed February 21, 2012)	3(b)	—	Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC
(31)	Rule 13a - 14(a)/15d - 14(a) Certifications.
31(a)			—	Certification of John F. Young, chair, president and chief executive of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31(b)			—	Certification of Paul M. Keglevic, executive vice president and chief financial officer of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(32)	Section 1350 Certifications.
32(a)			—	Certification of John F. Young, chair, president and chief executive of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32(b)			—	Certification of Paul M. Keglevic, executive vice president and chief financial officer of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(99)	Additional Exhibits
99(a)			—	Condensed Statement of Consolidated Income - Twelve Months Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015.
	XBRL Data Files
101.INS			—	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH			—	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL			—	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Document
101.DEF			—	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document
101.LAB			—	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Document
101.PRE			—	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Document

____________


*	Incorporated herein by reference

3533

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.




ENERGY FUTURE INTERMEDIATE HOLDING COMPANY LLC

	By:	/s/ TERRY L. NUTT
	Name:	Terry L. Nutt
	Title:	Senior Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: ~~November~~May 47, ~~2014~~2015

3634

Filing Compare · Energy Future Intermediate Holding CO LLC