UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to Commission file number: 002-29311

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



State of Incorporation		I.R.S. Employer Identification No.
		94-3248415
Delaware
601 Travis Street, Suite 1400
Houston, Texas		77002
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(713) 507-6400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ý		Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso No ý

All of the registrant’s outstanding membership interests are owned directly by Dynegy Inc.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS



		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:
June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011		3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss:
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011		4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011		5


Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		6

Item 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	41
Item 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	64
Item 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	65

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	67
Item 1A.	RISK FACTORS	67

Item 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	67
Item 6.	EXHIBITS	68

Table of Contents

DEFINITIONS

As used in this Form 10-Q, the abbreviations contained herein have the meanings set forth below.



ASC		Accounting Standards Codification
ASU		Accounting Standards Update
BACT		Best available control technology
BART		Best available retrofit technology
BTA		Best technology available
CAA		Clean Air Act
CAIR		Clean Air Interstate Rule
CAISO		The California Independent System Operator
CAMR		Clean Air Mercury Rule
CARB		California Air Resources Board
CAVR		The Clean Air Visibility Rule
CCR		Coal Combustion Residuals
CEQA		California Environmental Quality Act
CERCLA		The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended
CO2		Carbon Dioxide
CSAPR		Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
CWA		Clean Water Act
DH		Dynegy Holdings, LLC (formerly known as Dynegy Holdings Inc.)
DMSLP		Dynegy Midstream Services L.P.
EBITDA		Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
EGU		Electric generating unit
EMT		Executive Management Team
EPA		Environmental Protection Agency
FASB		Financial Accounting Standards Board
FERC		Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
GAAP		Generally Accepted Accounting Principles of the United States of America
GEN Finance		Dynegy Gen Finance Company, LLC
GHG		Greenhouse Gas
HAPs		Hazardous air pollutants, as defined by the Clean Air Act
ICC		Illinois Commerce Commission
IMA		In-market asset availability
ISO		Independent System Operator
ISO-NE		Independent System Operator New England
MACT		Maximum achievable control technology
MGGA		Midwest Greenhouse Gas Accord
MGGRP		Midwestern Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program
MISO		Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
MMBtu		One million British thermal units
MW		Megawatts
MWh		Megawatt hour
NOL		Net operating loss
NOx		Nitrogen oxide
NPDES		National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NRG		NRG Energy, Inc.
NSPS		New Source Performance Standard

Table of Contents



NYISO		New York Independent System Operator
NYSDEC		New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
OAL		Office of Administrative Law
OTC		Over-the-counter
PJM		PJM Interconnection, LLC
PPEA		Plum Point Energy Associates, LLC
PPEA Holding		Plum Point Energy Associates Holding Company, LLC
PSD		Prevention of significant deterioration
RACT		Reasonably available control technology
RCRA		Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RFO		Request for offer
RGGI		Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative
RMR		Reliability Must Run
SEC		U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
SIP		State Implementation Plan
SO2		Sulfur dioxide
SPDES		State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
VaR		Value at Risk
VIE		Variable Interest Entity
WCI		Western Climate Initiative

iii

Item 1—FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(unaudited) (in millions)



	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	656		$	398
Restricted cash and investments	259			159
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $12 and $12, respectively	164			147
Accounts receivable, affiliates	—			26
Interest receivable, affiliates	—			8
Inventory	132			65
Assets from risk-management activities	1,271			2,615
Assets from risk-management activities, affiliates	—			2
Broker margin account	43			23
Prepayments and other current assets	377			126
Total Current Assets	2,902			3,569
Property, Plant and Equipment	4,416			3,911
Accumulated depreciation	(1,126		)	(1,090		)
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net	3,290			2,821
Other Assets
Restricted cash and investments	339			455
Assets from risk-management activities	17			26
Intangible assets	149			92
Undertaking receivable, affiliate	—			1,250
Deferred income taxes	50			44
Other long-term assets	52			54
Total Assets	$	6,799		$	8,311

See the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(unaudited) (in millions)



	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER'S EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	92		$	80
Accounts payable, affiliates	1			47
Accrued interest	27			1
Deferred income taxes	50			50
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities	119			64
Liabilities from risk-management activities	1,367			2,798
Liabilities from risk-management activities, affiliates	—			4
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt	16			7
Total Current Liabilities	1,672			3,051
Liabilities subject to compromise	4,315			4,012
Long-term debt	1,665			1,069
Other Liabilities
Liabilities from risk-management activities	44			20
Liabilities from risk-management activities, affiliates	—			3
Other long-term liabilities	267			124
Total Liabilities	7,963			8,279
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 11)
Member's Equity (Deficit)	(1,164		)	32
Total Liabilities and Member's Equity (Deficit)	$	6,799		$	8,311

See the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited) (in millions)



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Revenues	$	290		$	326		$	565		$	831
Cost of sales	(179		)	(225		)	(365		)	(503		)
Gross margin, exclusive of depreciation shown separately below	111			101			200			328
Operating and maintenance expense, exclusive of depreciation shown separately below	(63		)	(106		)	(112		)	(216		)
Depreciation and amortization expense	(43		)	(75		)	(65		)	(201		)
Impairment and other charges	—			(1		)	—			(1		)
General and administrative expenses	(17		)	(23		)	(37		)	(64		)
Operating loss	(12		)	(104		)	(14		)	(154		)
Bankruptcy reorganization charges	(22		)	—			(269		)	—
Interest expense	(42		)	(89		)	(73		)	(178		)
Impairment of Undertaking receivable, affiliate	—			—			(832		)	—
Other income and expense, net	6			3			30			4
Loss before income taxes	(70		)	(190		)	(1,158		)	(328		)
Income tax benefit (Note 14)	1			75			7			133
Net loss	$	(69	)	$	(115	)	$	(1,151	)	$	(195	)

See the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(unaudited) (in millions)



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
Net loss	$	(69	)	$	(115	)
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost and actuarial loss (net of tax expense of zero and $1)	—			1
Total Other comprehensive income, net of tax	—			1
Comprehensive loss	$	(69	)	$	(114	)



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
Net loss	$	(1,151	)	$	(195	)
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost and actuarial loss (net of tax expense of zero and $1)	(1		)	2
Total Other comprehensive income, net of tax	(1		)	2
Comprehensive loss	$	(1,152	)	$	(193	)

See the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited) (in millions)



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(1,151	)	$	(195	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	69			209
Bankruptcy reorganization charges	247			—
Impairment and other charges	—			1
Impairment of Undertaking receivable, affiliate	832			—
Risk-management activities	(49		)	127
Risk-management activities, affiliate	(1		)	—
Deferred income taxes	(7		)	(132		)
Other	35			22
Changes in working capital:
Accounts receivable	(14		)	60
Inventory	1			(4		)
Broker margin account	(12		)	(92		)
Prepayments and other assets	(73		)	1
Affiliate transactions	6			—
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	34			(54		)
Changes in non-current assets	(10		)	(33		)
Changes in non-current liabilities	(14		)	4
Net cash used in operating activities	(107		)	(86		)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures	(37		)	(128		)
Maturities of short-term investments	—			201
Purchases of short-term investments	—			(235		)
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash and investments	134			53
DMG acquisition	256			—
Payments received for Undertaking, receivable affiliate	16			—
Other investing	3			10
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	372			(99		)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from long-term borrowings, net of financing costs of $1	—			399
Repayments of borrowings	(7		)	(113		)
Debt extinguishment costs	—			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(7		)	286
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	258			101
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	398			253
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	656		$	354
Other non-cash investing activity:
Non-cash capital expenditures	$	1		$	(7	)
Other non-cash financing activity:
Deferred financing fees	$	—		$	(4	)

See the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

EXPLANATORY NOTE

As explained herein, on November 7, 2011, we and four of our wholly owned subsidiaries, Dynegy Northeast Generation, Inc. (“Dynegy Northeast Generation”), Hudson Power, L.L.C. (“Hudson”), Dynegy Danskammer, L.L.C. (“Danskammer”) and Dynegy Roseton, L.L.C. (“Roseton”, and together with us, DNE, Hudson and Danskammer, the “DH Debtor Entities”) filed voluntary petitions (the “DH Chapter 11 Cases”) for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, Poughkeepsie Division (the "Bankruptcy Court"). Since filing the DH Chapter 11 Cases, we have not filed our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or our annual report on Form 10-K with the SEC. On the filing date hereof, we are simultaneously filing our quarterly report for the third quarter of 2011, our annual report for the year ended December 31, 2011, and our quarterly reports for the first and second quarters of 2012. In each of these reports, in a note to the financial statements, we have disclosed recent material developments with respect to our business, including with respect to the DH Chapter 11 Cases and other legal proceedings, in each case, as of the date of the filing of such reports. In this report, please see Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases. Further, additional disclosures regarding such developments can be found throughout each of these reports.

Note 1—Basis of Presentation and Organization

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to interim financial reporting as prescribed by the SEC. Unless the context indicates otherwise, throughout this report, the terms "DH," “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “ours” are used to refer to Dynegy Holdings, LLC and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The term “Dynegy” refers to our parent company, Dynegy Inc., unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited consolidated financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These interim financial statements should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed on September 17, 2012, which we refer to as our “Form 10-K”.

Our current business operations are focused primarily on the power generation sector of the energy industry. We report the results of our power generation business as three segments in our consolidated financial statements: (i) the Coal segment ("Coal"); (ii) the Gas segment ("Gas") and (iii) the Dynegy Northeast segment ("DNE"). Prior to the third quarter 2011, we reported results for the following segments: (i) Gen-MW (ii) GEN-WE and (iii) GEN-NE. Our consolidated financial results also reflect corporate-level expenses such as interest and depreciation and amortization. General and administrative expenses are allocated to each reportable segment.

The Gas segment includes Dynegy Power, LLC ("DPC"), which owns, directly and indirectly, substantially all of our wholly-owned natural gas-fired power generation facilities. DPC, a bankruptcy remote entity, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries are organized into a ring-fenced group for the benefit of the creditors of DPC.

The Coal segment includes Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLC ("DMG"), which owns directly and indirectly, substantially all of the coal-fired power generation facilities. DMG, a bankruptcy remote entity, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries are organized into a ring-fenced group for the benefit of the creditors of DMG. On September 1, 2011, we sold 100% of the outstanding membership interests of Dynegy Coal Holdco ("Coal Holdco") to Dynegy (the "DMG Transfer"). On June 5, 2012, we reacquired the Coal segment (including DMG) from Dynegy (the"DMG Acquisition"). Therefore, the results of our Coal segment are only included in our consolidated results for the period from June 5, 2012 through June 30, 2012. Please read Note 4—DMG Acquisition for further discussion.

Chapter 11 Filing by Certain Subsidiaries. On November 7, 2011, the DH Debtor Entities filed the DH Chapter 11 Cases. The DH Chapter 11 Cases were assigned to the Honorable Cecelia G. Morris and are being jointly administered for

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

procedural purposes only. On July 6, 2012, Dynegy filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court (the "Dynegy Chapter 11 Case," and together with the DH Chapter 11 Cases, the “Chapter 11 Cases”). The Dynegy Chapter 11 Case was also assigned to the Honorable Cecilia G. Morris, but it is being separately administered under the caption In re: Dynegy Inc., Case No. 12-36728. Only the DH Debtor Entities and our parent Dynegy filed voluntary petitions for relief under the Bankruptcy Code, and none of our other direct or indirect subsidiaries are debtors thereunder. Consequently, they continue to operate their business in the ordinary course. Dynegy and the DH Debtor Entities (together, the "Debtor Entities") remain in possession of their property and continue to operate their business as “debtors in possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. The Dynegy Chapter 11 Case is a necessary step to facilitate the restructuring contemplated by the Plan, the Settlement Agreement and the Plan Support Agreement (each as defined and described in Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases), including the planned merger of Dynegy and DH (the “Merger”).

We are a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dynegy and we have historically been consolidated by Dynegy in its consolidated financial statements. However, as a result of the DH Chapter 11 Cases, on November 7, 2011, Dynegy deconsolidated its investment in us and, instead, began accounting for its investment in us as an equity method investment.

Going Concern

Our accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared assuming that we would continue as a going concern, and therefore contemplate realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business for the twelve month period following the date of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. However, continued low power prices over the past several years have had a significant adverse impact on our business and continue to negatively impact our projected future liquidity.

On November 7, 2011, the DH Debtor Entities filed the DH Chapter 11 Cases. On July 6, 2012, Dynegy filed the Dynegy Chapter 11 Case. Only the DH Debtor Entities and our parent Dynegy filed voluntary petitions for relief, and none of our other direct or indirect subsidiaries are debtors under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. Please read Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases for further information.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on many factors, including, among other things, the generation by DPC and DMG of sufficient positive operating results to enable DPC and DMG to make certain restricted distributions to their parents, the terms and conditions of an approved plan of reorganization that allows us to emerge from bankruptcy (as described in Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases), execution of any further restructuring strategies, and the successful execution of the company-wide cost reduction initiatives that are ongoing. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Settlement Agreement and Plan of Reorganization are not successful.

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Note 2—Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make informed estimates and judgments that affect our reported financial position and results of operations based on currently available information. Actual results could differ materially from our estimates. The results of operations for the interim periods presented in this Form 10-Q are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or any other interim period due to seasonal fluctuations in demand for our energy products and services, changes in commodity prices, timing of maintenance and other expenditures and other factors.

Accounting Principles Adopted During the Current Period

Fair Value Measurement Disclosures. In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04—Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS (“ASU No. 2011-04”). This authoritative guidance changes the wording used to describe the requirements in GAAP for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosure about fair value measurements. ASU No. 2011-04 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The implementation of this guidance has been reflected in our fair value disclosures.

Presentation of Comprehensive Income. In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05—Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income (“ASU No. 2011-05”). The FASB’s objective in issuing this guidance is to improve the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. ASU No. 2011-05 eliminates the option of presenting components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The standard requires that all nonowner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. We have elected to present comprehensive income as two separate consecutive statements.

Accounting Principles Not Yet Adopted

Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11—Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. This statement requires entities to disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offsetting in the statement of financial position, as well as instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. Implementation of this guidance would affect disclosures around financial derivative contracts, however would have no impact on the statement of financial position or the statement of operations. This guidance is effective for the quarter ending March 31, 2013

Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases

On November 7, 2011, the DH Debtor Entities commenced the DH Chapter 11 Cases. On July 6, 2012, our parent, Dynegy commenced the Dynegy Chapter 11 Case. Dynegy and the DH Debtor Entities (together, the "Debtor Entities") remain in possession of their property and continue to operate their business as “debtors in possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. The Dynegy Chapter 11 Case is a necessary step to facilitate the restructuring contemplated by the Plan and the Agreements (as defined and discussed below), including the planned merger of Dynegy and DH (the “Merger”).

Only the Debtor Entities sought relief under the Bankruptcy Code, and none of our other direct or indirect subsidiaries are debtors thereunder. Coal Holdco and Dynegy GasCo Holdings, LLC and their indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries (including DMG and DPC) are not included in the Chapter 11 Cases. The normal day-to-day operations of the coal-fired power generation facilities held by DMG and the gas-fired power generation facilities held by DPC continue without interruption. The commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases did not constitute an event of default under either the DMG Credit Agreement or the

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

DPC Credit Agreement.

Lease Rejection. On November 7, 2011, the DH Debtor Entities filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court for authorization to reject the leases of the Roseton and Danskammer power generation facilities (the “Facilities”) and sought to impose a cap on the lease rejection damages under Section 502(b)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code. On December 13, 2011, Dynegy and the DH Debtor Entities entered into a binding term sheet with Resource Capital Management Corporation (“RCM”), Resources Capital Asset Recovery, L.L.C., Series DD and Series DR, Roseton OL LLC, Danskammer OL LLC, Roseton OP LLC and Danskammer OP LLC (collectively with RCM, the “PSEG Entities”), as the owners and lessors of the Roseton and a portion of the Danskammer facilities, to settle and resolve issues among them in lieu of further litigation, regarding, among other things, the Roseton and Danskammer leases and all of the parties' rights and claims arising under the related lease documents, including certain tax indemnity agreements (the “PSEG Settlement”).

On December 20, 2011, the Bankruptcy Court entered a stipulated order (as amended by a stipulated order entered by the Bankruptcy Court on December 28, 2011) approving the rejection of the Roseton and Danskammer leases subject to certain conditions. The rejection damages claim of RCM was stipulated and allowed by the Bankruptcy Court in the amount of $110 million. The applicable DH Debtor Entities have operated and plan to continue operating the Facilities until such Facilities can be sold in accordance with the terms of the Agreements (as defined below) and in compliance with applicable federal and state regulatory requirements. Please read the section entitled “Settlement Agreement and Plan Support Agreement” below for further discussion.

Adversary Proceeding and Examiner Report. On November 11, 2011, U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”), in its capacity as successor lease indenture trustee (the “Lease Trustee”) under the Indenture of Trust, Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents and Security Agreement related to Roseton Units 1 and 2, dated as of May 8, 2001, and the Indenture of Trust, Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents and Security Agreement related to Danskammer Units 3 and 4, dated as of May 8, 2001 (collectively, the “Lease Indentures”), commenced an adversary proceeding against Danskammer, Roseton and DH (the “Adversary Proceeding”). The Lease Indentures govern the terms of the notes issued by Roseton OL LLC and Danskammer OL LLC, as owner lessors of the Facilities, to the pass through trust established under the Roseton-Danskammer 2001-Series B Pass Through Trust Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2001 (the “Pass Through Trust Agreement”). The Adversary Proceeding sought, among other things, a declaration that: (i) the leases of the Facilities to Roseton and Danskammer are not leases of real property; (ii) the leases are financings, not leases; (iii) notwithstanding the lease rejection claims, claims arising from DH's guaranty of certain of the Facilities' lease obligations are not subject to a cap pursuant to section 502(b)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code; and (iv) a determination of the allowed amount of the Lease Trustee's claims against Danskammer, Roseton, and DH.

Danskammer, Roseton and DH contested the claims made in the Adversary Proceeding, including the attempt to re-characterize the leases of the Facilities as financings and not as leases of real property and the applicability of Section 502(b)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code. The parties to the Adversary Proceeding filed motions seeking judgment on the pleadings and subsequently agreed to an informal stay of the proceedings, pending further settlement negotiations among the parties as discussed below under “Settlement Agreement and Plan Support Agreement.”

On November 11, 2011, the Lease Trustee also filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court seeking the appointment of an examiner. On December 29, 2011, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order directing the appointment of the examiner (the “Examiner”), which order provided, among other things, that the Examiner investigate (i) the DH Debtor Entities' conduct in connection with the prepetition 2011 restructuring and reorganization of the DH Debtor Entities and their non-debtor affiliates (the "Reorganization"), (ii) any possible fraudulent conveyances and (iii) whether DH was capable of confirming a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization. On March 9, 2012, the Examiner filed a report with the Bankruptcy Court and on March 20, 2012, Dynegy filed a preliminary response to such report.

All disputes and claims related to the Adversary Proceeding or otherwise related to the rejection of the Lease Documents have been resolved by the Settlement Agreement (as defined and discussed below). Upon the effectiveness of the Settlement Agreement, the Adversary Proceeding was dismissed with prejudice and any potential claims relating to or arising from disputes with respect to, among other things, the Adversary Proceeding and the Lease Documents were released. In addition, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Dynegy, DH and the other settling parties have released any potential claims relating to

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

or arising from disputes with respect to the matters investigated by the Examiner, including, among other things, the Reorganization and including, without limitation, any claims that have been or could have been brought in connection with the DMG Transfer, the related Undertaking Agreement or the DH note.

Settlement Agreement and Plan Support Agreement. On May 1, 2012, Dynegy, DGIN, Coal Holdco, the DH Debtor Entities, certain beneficial holders of approximately $1.9 billion of our outstanding senior notes (the “Consenting Senior Noteholders”), the PSEG Entities and the Lease Trustee, as directed by a majority of, and on behalf of all holders of those certain pass through trust certificates issued pursuant to the Pass Through Trust Agreement (the “Lease Certificate Holders” and, collectively the “Original Settlement Parties”) entered into a settlement agreement (the "Original Settlement Agreement”). On May 30, 2012, the Original Settlement Parties, holders of a majority of the outstanding subordinated notes (the "Consenting Sub Debt Holders") and, solely with respect to certain sections of the Settlement Agreement (as defined below), the successor trustee under our subordinated notes indenture ("Wells Fargo" and collectively, with the Original Settlement Parties and the Consenting Sub Debt Holders, the "Settlement Parties") entered into an amended and restated settlement agreement (the "Settlement Agreement").

Also on May 1, 2012, DGIN, Coal Holdco, the Debtor Entities, the Consenting Senior Noteholders, the PSEG Entities and certain Lease Certificate Holders (the "Consenting Lease Certificate Holders") entered into a plan support agreement (the “Original Plan Support Agreement”). On May 30, 2012, the parties to the Original Plan Support Agreement entered into an amended and restated plan support agreement including the Consenting Sub Debt Holders (the “Plan Support Agreement” and, together with the Settlement Agreement, the “Agreements”), providing for, among other things, the treatment of claims and certain rights and obligations of the supporting creditor parties as well as the Consenting Senior Noteholders thereunder. Additionally, pursuant to the Plan Support Agreement, DH and Dynegy each agreed, subject to the terms of the Plan Support Agreement, to amend the then existing plan of reorganization for DH to reflect the terms contained in the Plan Support Agreement. On July 31, 2012, Dynegy, DH, the Consenting Senior Noteholders, the Consenting Lease Certificate Holders and RCM (the “Amendment Parties) entered into the First Amendment to the Plan Support Agreement (the “First Amendment”). The First Amendment makes certain modifications and conforming changes to the Plan Support Agreement related to the modifications made to the Plan (as defined and discussed below). The material terms of the Plan are described below under the heading “Plan of Reorganization.” As of the date of the Original Plan Support Agreement, the earlier noteholder restructuring support agreement, dated November 7, 2011, which was entered into in connection with the filing of the DH Chapter 11 Cases, and amended and restated on December 26, 2011, was terminated.

The Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the Settlement Agreement on June 1, 2012 (the “Approval Order”) and the Settlement Agreement became effective on June 5, 2012 (the "Settlement Effective Date"). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Dynegy and DH entered into a Contribution and Assignment Agreement (the “Contribution Agreement”), pursuant to which Dynegy contributed and assigned to us all of its right, title, and interest in and to one hundred percent (100%) of the issued and outstanding membership interests of Coal Holdco (the "DMG Acquisition"). In full consideration for such contribution and in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement and the Approval Order, (i) Dynegy received an allowed administrative claim pursuant to sections 503(b) and 507(a) of the Bankruptcy Code in an unliquidated amount against us in the DH Chapter 11 Cases (the “Administrative Claim”), (ii) the Prepetition Litigation (as defined below), the Adversary Proceeding and the affiliate payable to DH were dismissed with prejudice or released and (iii) the parties to the Settlement Agreement issued and received the releases set forth in the Settlement Agreement and described above under "-Adversary Proceeding and Examiner Report." Also pursuant to the Settlement Agreement on June 5, 2012, the Undertaking Agreement and the DH note were terminated with no further obligations thereunder.

Plan of Reorganization. On December 1, 2011, Dynegy and DH, as co-plan proponents (the “Plan Proponents”), filed a proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization and a related disclosure statement for DH with the Bankruptcy Court, which was subsequently amended and filed with the Bankruptcy Court on each of January 19, 2012, March 6, 2012 and June 8, 2012, as the proposed amended plan, the proposed second amended plan and the proposed third amended plan of reorganization for DH. On June 18, 2012, the Plan Proponents filed a proposed modified third amended plan of reorganization (the "Third Amended Plan") and related disclosure statement (the “Third Amended Disclosure Statement”) for DH with the Bankruptcy Court. Like earlier versions, the Third Amended Plan addressed claims against and interests in DH only and did not address claims against and interests in the other DH Debtor Entities. On July 3, 2012, in the DH Chapter 11 Cases, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order (i) approving (a) the Third Amended Disclosure Statement, and (b) solicitation and voting procedures and (ii) scheduling the plan confirmation process (the “DH Disclosure Statement Order”), which authorized DH and Dynegy, in the event Dynegy

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

later commenced a Chapter 11 case in the Bankruptcy Court, among other things, to modify the Third Amended Plan and Third Amended Disclosure Statement as necessary to constitute a plan of reorganization and disclosure statement for both DH and Dynegy, as debtors.

On July 6, 2012, upon the commencement of the Dynegy Chapter 11 Case, Dynegy submitted a first day motion to the Bankruptcy Court seeking to have certain relief entered in the DH Chapter 11 Cases made applicable to the Dynegy Chapter 11 Case, including the DH Disclosure Statement Order. On July 10, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order in the Dynegy Chapter 11 Case (i) approving (a) the Third Amended Disclosure Statement, and (b) solicitation and voting procedures and (ii) scheduling the plan confirmation process in the Dynegy Chapter 11 Case (the “Dynegy Disclosure Statement Order,” and together with the DH Disclosure Statement Order, the “Disclosure Statement Orders”), which, among other things, authorized DH and Dynegy to modify the Third Amended Plan and Third Amended Disclosure Statement as necessary to constitute a plan of reorganization and disclosure statement for both DH and Dynegy, as debtors.

In accordance with the Disclosure Statement Orders, Dynegy and DH (together, the “Plan Debtors”) made certain modifications to the Third Amended Plan (as so modified, the “Plan”) and the Third Amended Disclosure Statement (as so modified, the “Disclosure Statement”), to reflect the commencement of the Dynegy Chapter 11 Case and to have such documents constitute a plan of reorganization and disclosure statement for both Plan Debtors. On July 12, 2012, the Plan and Disclosure Statement were filed with the Bankruptcy Court [Dynegy Case Docket No. 28; DH Case Docket No. 861] and the Plan Debtors commenced solicitation of votes to accept or reject the proposed Plan in accordance with the Disclosure Statement Orders.

The material terms of the Plan have been agreed upon by Dynegy, DH, a majority of the Consenting Senior Noteholders, the Consenting Sub Debt Holders, the Lease Trustee and the official committee of creditors holding unsecured claims appointed in the DH Chapter 11 Cases (the “Creditors' Committee”) and include, among other things:


•	on or prior to the effective date of the Plan (such date, the "Effective Date"), Dynegy and DH will be merged (the entity surviving such merger being the "Surviving Entity") and, by virtue of the Merger, all our equity interests issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger will be canceled;


•	the initial Board of Directors of the Surviving Entity will be selected pursuant to a process agreed upon among a majority of the Consenting Senior Noteholders, the Lease Trustee and the Creditors' Committee with existing Board members eligible for service on the new Board of the Surviving Entity;


•	holders of allowed general unsecured claims will receive their pro rata share of: (a) 99% of the fully-diluted common shares of the Surviving Entity to be outstanding immediately following the Plan Effective Date (subject to dilution), (b) any amounts to which they may be entitled as a result of the sale of the Facilities, and (c) a cash payment of $200 million;


•	holders of equity interests in Dynegy, DH or the Surviving Entity shall not receive any distribution or retain any interest or property under the Plan on account of such holder's equity interest; and

•

the Administrative Claim will be satisfied in full under the Plan with: (a) 1.0% of the fully-diluted common shares of the Surviving Entity to be outstanding immediately following the Effective Date (subject to dilution by the Warrants (as defined below)) and options, restricted stock or other equity interests issued as equity compensation to officers, employees or directors of the Surviving Entity or its affiliates, and (b) warrants with a 5-year term to purchase an aggregate of 13.5% of the fully-diluted common shares of the Surviving Entity (the “Warrants”) (subject to dilution) for an exercise price to be determined based on a net equity value of the Surviving Entity of $4 billion, and containing customary anti-dilution adjustments, as provided in the Settlement Agreement.

The parties to the Plan Support Agreement as amended by the First Amendment (the "Amended Plan Support Agreement") agreed to use their commercially reasonable efforts to support the Plan and complete the transactions contemplated thereby.

On August 27, 2012, the results of the vote on the Plan were filed with the Bankruptcy Court, with creditors holding

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

over $3.5 billion of claims, or more than 99% of the value of the claims that voted, approving the Plan (this reflects approximately 87% of the number of creditors who voted). Further, Dynegy announced that the Consenting Senior Noteholders, the Lease Trustee and the Creditors' Committee selected the initial directors to be appointed to Dynegy's Board. At a hearing on September 5, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court found that DH and Dynegy had met all Plan confirmation requirements under the Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, on September 10, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court entered its order confirming the Plan (the "Confirmation Order"). The occurrence of the Effective Date of the Plan and the emergence of the Surviving Entity from bankruptcy remain subject to certain conditions precedent set forth in Section 11.2 of the Plan, including, among other things, that no “Non-Conforming Plan Assertion” (as defined in the Amended Plan Support Agreement) has been made, or the Bankruptcy Court has ruled on such Non-Conforming Plan Assertion and determined that the Plan is a “Conforming Plan” (as defined in the Amended Plan Support Agreement). As mentioned above, the Plan addressed claims against and interests in Dynegy and DH only and did not address claims against and interests in the other DH Debtor Entities. The remaining DH Debtor Entities, with the cooperation of the PSEG Entities, will use commercially reasonable efforts to sell the Facilities with the proceeds of any sale to pay transaction expenses and to be distributed as set forth in the Settlement Agreement and Amended Plan Support Agreement.

Financial Obligations. The direct financial obligations of the DH Debtor Entities and obligations under their off-balance sheet arrangements, and the approximate principal amount of debt currently outstanding thereunder, include the following:

•

The following outstanding unsecured notes and debentures issued by us: (i) 8.75 percent senior unsecured notes due February 15, 2012; (ii) 7.5 percent senior unsecured notes due June 1, 2015; (iii) 8.375 percent senior unsecured notes due May 1, 2016; (iv) 7.75 percent senior unsecured notes due June 1, 2019; (v) 7.125 percent senior debentures due May 15, 2018; and (vi) 7.625 percent senior debentures due October 15, 2026 (collectively, the “Old Notes”), issued under the Indenture dated September 26, 1996, as amended and restated as of March 14, 2001, and under the First through Sixth Supplemental Indentures thereto (the "Old Notes Indenture"), between us and Wilmington Trust Company (as successor to JP Morgan Chase Bank, N .A., successor to Bank One Trust Company, National Association), as trustee, in the outstanding aggregate principal amount of approximately $3,370 million;


•	Our Series B 8.316 percent Subordinated Capital Income Securities issued under the Indenture dated May 28, 1997, between NGC Corporation (a predecessor of ours) and the First National Bank of Chicago, as trustee, as amended and restated, in the outstanding aggregate principal amount of $200 million (the "Subordinated Capital Income Securities");


•	Our approximately $26 million cash collateralized letter of credit facility, which is collateralized by $27 million in restricted cash; and

•

The sale-leaseback arrangements for the Roseton and Danskammer power generation facilities under which the rent payments paid by each of them are assigned to an indenture trustee for the respective facility. The indenture trustee then pays a portion of those payments to each of two pass-through trusts, and such pass-through trusts pay these amounts to holders of certificates in the pass-through trusts. The current total outstanding principal of the certificates is approximately $550 million.

Upon the commencement of the DH Chapter 11 Cases, we reclassified our senior notes and debentures, including the Subordinated Capital Income Securities reflected as Liabilities subject to compromise on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet. Please read Note 12 - Liabilities subject to Compromise for further discussion.

Note 4—DMG Acquisition

On June 5, 2012, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, we completed the DMG Acquisition. We accounted for the DMG Acquisition as a business combination, as although we are a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dynegy, we are not controlled by Dynegy as a result of the DH Chapter 11 Cases. Accordingly, assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their fair value as of the acquisition date.

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

The purchase price was approximately $466 million which consists of (i) approximately $402 million for the fair value of the Undertaking receivable, affiliate that was extinguished in connection with the transaction and (ii) approximately $64 million for the fair value of the Administrative Claim issued to Dynegy.

The following table summarizes the preliminary fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition (in millions):



Cash	$	256
Restricted cash (including $75 million current)	117
Accounts receivable	3
Inventory	69
Assets from risk management activities (including $84 million current)	85
Prepaids and other current assets	46
Property, plant and equipment	514
Intangible assets (including $162 million current)	257
Total assets acquired	1,347
Current liabilities and accrued liabilities	(60		)
Liabilities from risk management activities (including $66 million current)	(76		)
Long-term debt (including $9 million current)	(610		)
Asset retirement obligations	(53		)
Unfavorable coal contract (including $15 million current)	(38		)
Pension liabilities	(44		)
Total liabilities assumed	(881		)
Net assets acquired	$	466

Pro Forma Results.

Revenue and net loss attributable to the DMG Acquisition is included in our consolidated condensed statements of income since the date of the acquisition of June 5, 2012. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the DMG Acquisition contributed approximately $40 million to our revenue and increased our net loss by approximately $20 million.

The unaudited pro forma financial results for the six months ended June 30, 2012 show the effect of the DMG Acquisition as if the acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2012. We did not include pro forma financial results for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as DMG is included in our consolidated results for that period. DH completed the DMG Transfer effective September 1, 2011. The pro forma financial results presented below do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the acquisition. This is presented for informational purposes only and is not indicative of future operations or results that would have been achieved had the acquisitions been completed as of January 1, 2012.



	Six months ended June 30,
	2012
	(in millions)
Revenue	$	793
Net loss	$	(408	)

Note 5—Condensed Combined Financial Statements of the Debtor Entities

Condensed combined financial statements of the Debtor Entities are set forth below (in millions):

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Condensed Combined Balance Sheet



	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Cash	$	53		$	33
Restricted cash and investments (including $27 million current)	27			27
Accounts receivable	7			8
Inventory	31			34
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries	4,712			5,568
Risk management, affiliate	3			—
Accrued interest from affiliate	—			8
Undertaking receivable from affiliate	—			1,250
Deferred income taxes	50			44
Other	8			14
Total assets	$	4,891		$	6,986

Current liabilities and accrued liabilities	$	34		$	10
Risk management, affiliate	2			—
Liabilities subject to compromise	4,315			4,012
Intercompany payable	1,514			1,587
Long-term debt to affiliates	12			1,262
Deferred income taxes	50			50
Other	128			33
Total liabilities	$	6,055		$	6,954
Total member's equity	$	(1,164	)	$	32
Total liabilities and member's equity	$	4,891		$	6,986

See Note 13—Liabilities Subject to Compromise for additional discussion of liabilities subject to compromise.

Condensed Combined Statement of Operations



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012			Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Revenues	$	19		$	26
Cost of sales	(8		)	(14		)
Operating expenses	(15		)	(30		)
General and administrative expenses	(2		)	(4		)
Operating loss	(6		)	(22		)
Bankruptcy reorganization charges	(22		)	(269		)
Equity losses	(1,310		)	(1,327		)
Interest expense, affiliate	(1		)	(1		)
Other income and expense, net	1,269			461
Income tax expense	1			7
Net loss	$	(69	)	$	(1,151	)

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Condensed Combined Statement of Cash Flows



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	20
Investing activities	—
Financing activities	—
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	20
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	33
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	53

Basis of Presentation. The condensed combined financial statements only include the financial statements of the Debtor Entities. Transactions and balances of receivables and payables among the Debtor Entities are eliminated in consolidation. However, the condensed combined balance sheet includes receivables from related parties and payables to related parties that are not Debtor Entities. Actual settlement of these related party receivables and payables is, by historical practice, made on a net basis.

Interest Expense. The Debtor Entities have discontinued recording interest on unsecured or undersecured liabilities subject to compromise ("LSTC"). Contractual interest on LSTC not reflected in the condensed combined financial statements was approximately$70 million and $141 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

Bankruptcy Reorganization Charges. Bankruptcy reorganization charges represent the direct and incremental costs of bankruptcy, such as professional fees, pre-petition liability claim adjustments and losses related to terminated contracts that are probable and can be estimated. Bankruptcy reorganization charges, as shown in the condensed combined statement of operations above, consist of expense or income incurred or earned as a direct and incremental result of the bankruptcy filings. The table below lists the significant items within this category for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012		Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
	(in millions)
Adjustments of estimated allowable claims:
DNE Leases (1)	$	—	$	395
Subordinated notes (1)	—		(161		)
Write-off of note payable, affiliate (2)	—		(10		)
Other	—		4
Total adjustments for estimated allowable claims	—		228
Change in value of Administrative Claim (3)	8		8
Professional fees (4)	14		33
Total Bankruptcy reorganization charges	$	22	$	269

_______________________________________________________________


(1)	The estimated allowable claims related to the Facilities and the Subordinated Capital Income Securities were adjusted based on the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Please read Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases—Settlement Agreement and Plan Support Agreement for further discussion.


(2)	It was determined that no claim related to a Note payable, affiliate would be made. Therefore, the estimated amount was reduced to zero.


(3)	The Administrative Claim was issued on the effective date of the Settlement Agreement. Please read Note 7—Fair Value Measurements—Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases—Settlement Agreement and Plan Support Agreement for further discussion.

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010


(4)	Professional fees relate primarily to the fees of attorneys and consultants working directly on the Chapter 11 Cases.

Note 6—Risk Management Activities, Derivatives and Financial Instruments

The nature of our business necessarily involves market and financial risks. Specifically, we are exposed to commodity price variability related to our power generation business. Our commercial team manages these commodity price risks with financially settled and other types of contracts consistent with our commodity risk management policy. Our commercial team also uses financial instruments in an attempt to capture the benefit of fluctuations in market prices in the geographic regions where our assets operate. Our treasury team manages our financial risks and exposures associated with interest expense variability.

Our commodity risk management strategy gives us the flexibility to sell energy and capacity through a combination of spot market sales and near-term contractual arrangements (generally over a rolling 1 to 3 year time frame). Our commodity risk management goal is to protect cash flow in the near-term while keeping the ability to capture value longer-term. Increasing collateral requirements and our liquidity position could impact our ability to effectively employ our risk management strategy.

Many of our contractual arrangements are derivative instruments and must be accounted for at fair value as part of Revenues in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. We also manage commodity price risk by entering into capacity forward sales arrangements, tolling arrangements, RMR contracts, fixed price coal purchases and other arrangements that do not receive fair value accounting treatment because these arrangements do not meet the definition of a derivative or are designated as “normal purchase normal sales." As a result, the gains and losses with respect to these arrangements are not reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations until the delivery occurs.

Quantitative Disclosures Related to Financial Instruments and Derivatives

The following disclosures and tables present information concerning the impact of derivative instruments on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations. In the table below, commodity contracts primarily consist of derivative contracts related to our power generation business that we have not designated as accounting hedges that are entered into for purposes of economically hedging future fuel requirements and sales commitments and securing commodity prices. We elect not to designate any of our commodity instruments as accounting hedges. As of June 30, 2012, our commodity derivatives were comprised of both purchases and sales of commodities. As of June 30, 2012, we had net purchases and sales of commodity derivative contracts and notional interest swaps outstanding in the following quantities:



Contract Type	Hedge Designation	Quantity		Unit of Measure	Net Fair Value
		(in millions)			(in millions)
Commodity contracts:
Electric energy (1)	Not designated	(34	)	MWh	$	49
Natural gas (1)	Not designated	15		MMBtu	$	(140	)
Heat rate derivatives	Not designated	(3)/22		MWh/MMBtu	$	(8	)
Crude oil	Not designated	—		BBL	$	1
Interest rate contracts:
Interest rate swaps	Not designated	1,100		Dollars	$	(27	)
Interest rate caps	Not designated	1,400		Dollars	$	2

_______________________________________________________________

(1) Mainly comprised of swaps, options and physical forwards.

Derivatives on the Balance Sheet. We execute a significant volume of transactions through futures clearing managers. Our daily cash payments (receipts) to (from) our futures clearing managers consist of three parts: (i) fair value of open

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

positions (exclusive of options) (“Daily Cash Settlements”); (ii) initial margin requirements of open positions (“Initial Margin”); and (iii) fair value related to options (“Options”, and collectively with Daily Cash Settlements and Initial Margin, “Collateral”). We do not offset fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a master netting agreement and we do not elect to offset the fair value amounts recognized for the Daily Cash Settlements paid or received against the fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a master netting agreement. As a result, our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets present derivative assets and liabilities, as well as related Collateral, as applicable, on a gross basis.

In addition to the transactions we execute through the futures clearing managers, we also execute transactions through multiple bilateral counterparties. Our transactions with these counterparties are collateralized using only cash collateral. As of June 30, 2012, we had $98 million posted with these counterparties, which is included in Prepayments and other current assets on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The following table presents the fair value and balance sheet classification of derivatives in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011 segregated by type of contract segregated by assets and liabilities.



Contract Type	Balance Sheet Location	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
		(in millions)
Derivative Assets:
Commodity contracts	Assets from risk management activities	1,286			2,639
Commodity contracts, affiliates	Assets from risk management activities, affiliates	—			2
Interest rate contracts	Assets from risk management activities	2			2
Derivative Liabilities:
Commodity contracts	Liabilities from risk management activities	(1,373		)	(2,810		)
Commodity contracts, affiliates	Liabilities from risk management activities, affiliates	—			(7		)
Interest rate contracts	Liabilities from risk management activities	(38		)	(8		)
Total derivatives, net		$	(123	)	$	(182	)

Impact of Derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Operations

The following discussion and table presents the location and amount of gains and losses on derivative instruments in our consolidated statements of operations segregated between designated, qualifying hedging instruments and those that are not, by type of contract. We had no derivatives that were designated in qualifying hedging relationships during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

Financial Instruments Not Designated as Hedges. We elect not to designate derivatives related to our power generation business and interest rate instruments as cash flow or fair value hedges. Thus, we account for changes in the fair value of these derivatives within the consolidated statements of operations (herein referred to as “mark-to-market accounting treatment”). As a result, these mark-to-market gains and losses are not reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations in the same period as the underlying activity for which the derivative instruments serve as economic hedges.

For the three-month period ended June 30, 2012, our revenues included approximately $2 million of unrealized mark-to-market losses related to this activity compared to $129 million of unrealized mark-to-market losses in the same period in the prior year. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, our revenues included approximately $70 million of unrealized mark-to-

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

market gains related to this activity compared to $127 million of unrealized mark-to-market losses in the same period in the prior year.

The impact of derivative financial instruments, including realized and unrealized gains and losses, that have not been designated as hedges on our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is presented below. Note that this presentation does not reflect the expected gains or losses arising from the underlying physical transactions associated with these financial instruments. Therefore, this presentation is not indicative of the economic gross margin we expect to realize when the underlying physical transactions settle.



Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging	Location of Gain ( Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives for the Three Months Ended June 30,						Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives for the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2012			2011			2012			2011
		(in millions)
Commodity contracts	Revenues	$	(48	)	$	(89	)	$	9		$	(70	)
Interest rate contracts	Interest Expense	(13		)	—			(17		)	—

Note 7—Fair Value Measurements

The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. These financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010



	Fair Value as of June 30, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3			Total
	(in millions)
Assets:
Assets from commodity risk management activities:
Electricity derivatives	$	—	$	248		$	11		$	259
Electricity derivatives, affiliates	—		—			—			—
Natural gas derivatives	—		1,024			—			1,024
Other derivatives	—		3			—			3
Total assets from commodity risk management activities	$	—	$	1,275		$	11		$	1,286
Assets from interest rate contracts	—		—			2			2
Total	$	—	$	1,275		$	13		$	1,288
Liabilities:
Liabilities from commodity risk management activities:
Electricity derivatives	$	—	$	(207	)	$	(3	)	$	(210	)
Electricity derivatives, affiliates	—		—			—			—
Natural gas derivatives	—		(1,164		)	—			(1,164		)
Heat rate derivatives	—		—			(8		)	(8		)
Other derivatives	—		(2		)	—			(2		)
Total liabilities from commodity risk management activities	$	—	$	(1,373	)	$	(11	)	$	(1,384	)
Liabilities from interest rate contracts	—		—			(27		)	(27		)
Administrative Claim (1)	—		—			(73		)	(73		)
Total	$	—	$	(1,373	)	$	(111	)	$	(1,484	)

_______________________________________________________________


(1)	Amount represents the fair value of the Administrative Claim that was issued to Dynegy upon the effective date of the Settlement Agreement. Please read Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases—Settlement Agreement and Plan Support Agreement for further discussion.

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010



	Fair Value as of December 31, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3			Total
	(in millions)
Assets:
Assets from commodity risk management activities:
Electricity derivatives	$	—	$	211		$	26		$	237
Electricity derivatives, affiliates	—		1			1			$	2
Natural gas derivatives	—		2,387			—			2,387
Other derivatives	—		15			—			15
Total assets from commodity risk management activities:	$	—	$	2,614		$	27		$	2,641
Assets from interest rate contracts	—		—			2			2
Total	$	—	$	2,614		$	29		$	2,643
Liabilities:
Liabilities from commodity risk management activities:
Electricity derivatives	$	—	$	(169	)	$	(2	)	$	(171	)
Electricity derivatives, affiliates	—		(2		)	(5		)	(7		)
Natural gas derivatives	—		(2,607		)	—			(2,607		)
Heat rate derivatives	—		—			(17		)	(17		)
Other derivatives	—		(15		)	—			(15		)
Total liabilities from commodity risk management activities	$	—	$	(2,793	)	$	(24	)	$	(2,817	)
Liabilities from interest rate contracts	—		—			(8		)	(8		)
Total	$	—	$	(2,793	)	$	(32	)	$	(2,825	)

Level 3 valuation methods:

The electricity contracts classified within level 3 are primarily financial swaps executed in illiquid trading locations and capacity contracts. The curves used to generate the fair value of the financial swaps are based on basis adjustments applied to forward curves for liquid trading points, while the curves for the capacity deals are based upon auction results in the marketplace, which are infrequently executed. Additionally, FTRs are classified within the electricity contracts, which are also an illiquid product. The forward market price of FTRs is derived using historical congestion patterns within the marketplace. Heat rate option valuations are derived using a Black-Sholes spread model, which uses forward natural gas and power prices, market implied volatilities and modeled power/natural gas correlation values. The interest rate contracts classified within Level 3 include an implied credit fee that impacted the day one value of the instruments. We revalue the credit fee each quarter in conjunction with revaluing the actual interest rate derivative. The interest rate derivatives are revalued using the forward LIBOR curve each period and the credit fee is revalued by determining the change in credit factors, such as credit default swaps, period over period.

Sensitivity to Changes in Significant unobservable inputs for level 3 valuations:

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measure of our commodity instruments categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are estimates of future price correlation, future market volatility, estimates of forward congestion power price spreads, assumptions of illiquid power location pricing basis to liquid locations, and estimates of counterparty credit risk and our own non-performance risk. These assumptions are generally independent of each other. Volatility curves and power prices spreads are generally based on observable markets where available, or derived from historical prices and forward market prices from similar observable markets when not available. Increases in the price or volatility of the spread on a long/short position in isolation would result in a higher/lower fair value measurement. A change in the assumption used for the probability of default is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the adjustment to reflect the estimated default risk of counterparties on their contractual obligations, or the estimated risk of default on our own contractual obligations to

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

counterparties. Any change in the value of the unobservable inputs used for level 3 valuations could have a significant impact on the calculated fair value.

We primarily apply the market approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavor to utilize the best available information. Accordingly, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. For example, assets and liabilities from risk management activities may include exchange-traded derivative contracts and OTC derivative contracts. Some exchange-traded derivatives are valued using broker or dealer quotations, or market transactions in either the listed or OTC markets. In such cases, these exchange-traded derivatives are classified within Level 2. OTC derivative trading instruments include swaps, forwards, options and complex structures that are valued at fair value. In certain instances, these instruments may utilize models to measure fair value. Generally, we use a similar model to value similar instruments. Valuation models utilize various inputs that include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, other observable inputs for the asset or liability, and market-corroborated inputs. Where observable inputs are available for substantially the full term of the asset or liability, the instrument is categorized in Level 2. Certain OTC derivatives trade in less active markets with a lower availability of pricing information. In addition, complex or structured transactions, such as heat-rate call options, can introduce the need for internally-developed model inputs that might not be observable in or corroborated by the market. When such inputs have a significant impact on the measurement of fair value, the instrument is categorized in Level 3. We have consistently used this valuation technique for all periods presented. Please read Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Fair Value Measurements in our Form 10-K for further discussion.

The finance organization monitors commodity risk through the CRCG. The EMT monitors interest rate risk. The EMT has delegated the responsibility for managing interest rate risk to the CFO. The CRCG is independent of our commercial operations and has direct access to the Audit and Compliance Committee of our parent. The Finance and Risk Management Committee, chaired by the CFO, meets periodically and is responsible for reviewing our overall day-to-day energy commodity risk exposure. as measured against the limits established in our Commodity Risk Policy.

Each quarter, as part of its internal control processes, representatives from the CRCG review the methodology and assumptions behind the pricing of the forward curves. As part of this review, liquidity periods are established based on third party market information, the basis relationship between direct and derived curves is evaluated, and changes are made to the forward power model assumptions.

The CRCG reviews changes in value on a daily basis through the use of various reports. The pricing for power, natural gas and fuel oil curves is automatically entered into our commercial system nightly based on data received from our market data provider. The CRCG reviews the data provided by the market data provider by utilizing third party broker quotes for comparison purposes. In addition, our traders are required to review various reports to ensure accuracy on a daily basis.

The following tables set forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of financial instruments classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy:

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
	Electricity Derivatives			Heat Rate Derivatives			Administrative Claim			Interest Rate Swaps			Total
	(in millions)
Balance at March 31, 2012	$	22		$	(11	)	$	—		$	(9	)	$	2
Total losses included in earnings	(18		)	1			(9		)	(9		)	(35		)
Settlements	—			2			—			—			2
Issuance of Administrative Claim	—			—			(64		)				(64		)
DMG Acquisition	4			—			—			(7		)	(3		)
Balance at June 30, 2012	$	8		$	(8	)	$	(73	)	$	(25	)	$	(98	)
Unrealized gains (losses) relating to instruments (net of affiliates) held as of June 30, 2012	$	7		$	1		$	(9	)	$	(17	)	$	(18	)



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
	Electricity Derivatives			Heat Rate Derivatives			Administrative Claim			Interest Rate Swaps			Total
	(in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	20		$	(17	)	$	—		$	(6	)	$	(3	)
Total gains (losses) included in earnings	(16		)	3			(9		)	(17		)	(39		)
Settlements	—			6			—			—			6
Issuance of Administrative Claim	—			—			(64		)	—			(64		)
DMG Acquisition	4			—			—			(2		)	2
Balance at June 30, 2012	$	8		$	(8	)	$	(73	)	$	(25	)	$	(98	)
Unrealized gains (losses) relating to instruments (net of affiliates) held as of June 30, 2012	$	10		$	1		$	(9	)	$	(17	)	$	(15	)



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
	Electricity Derivatives			Natural Gas Derivatives			Heat Rate Derivatives			Total
	(in millions)
Balance at March 31, 2011	$	48		$	5		$	(26	)	$	27
Total losses included in earnings	(12		)	(5		)	(1		)	(18		)
Settlements	(1		)	—			4			3
Balance at June 30, 2011	$	35		$	—		$	(23	)	$	12
Unrealized losses relating to instruments (net of affiliates) held as of June 30, 2011	$	(5	)	$	(4	)	$	(2	)	$	(11	)

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
	Electricity Derivatives			Natural Gas Derivatives			Heat Rate Derivatives			Total
	(in millions)
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	49		$	5		$	(31	)	$	23
Total losses included in earnings	(8		)	(5		)	—			(13		)
Settlements	(6		)	—			8			2
Balance at June 30, 2011	$	35		$	—		$	(23	)	$	12
Unrealized gains (losses) relating to instruments (net of affiliates) held as of June 30, 2011	$	2		$	(3	)	$	—		$	(1	)

Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) for Level 3 recurring items are included in Revenues, Interest expense and Bankruptcy reorganization charges on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for commodity derivatives, interest rate swaps and the Administrative Claim, respectively. We believe an analysis of commodity instruments classified as Level 3 should be undertaken with the understanding that these items generally serve as economic hedges of our power generation portfolio. We did not have any transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments. We have determined the estimated fair-value amounts using available market information and selected valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions or valuation methodologies could have a material effect on the estimated fair-value amounts.

The carrying values of financial assets and liabilities (cash, accounts receivable, restricted cash and investments, short-term investments and accounts payable) not presented in the table below approximate fair values due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The $846 million Accounts receivable, affiliate balance with Dynegy classified within member's equity as of December 31, 2011 does not have a fair value as there are no defined payment terms, are not evidenced by any promissory notes, and there has never been an intent for payment to occur. The Accounts receivable, affiliate balance was settled on June 5, 2012. Please read Note 14—Related Party Transactions—Accounts receivable, affiliate for further discussion. Unless otherwise noted, the fair value of debt as reflected in the table has been calculated based on the average of certain available broker quotes for the periods ending June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.



	June 30, 2012						December 31, 2011
	Carrying Amount			Fair Value			Carrying Amount			Fair Value
	(in millions)
Undertaking receivable, affiliate (1)	$	—		$	—		$	1,250		$	728
Interest rate derivatives not designated as accounting hedges(2)	(36		)	(36		)	(6		)	(6		)
Commodity-based derivative contracts not designated as accounting hedges (2)	(87		)	(87		)	(176		)	(176		)
DPC Credit Agreement due 2016 (3)	(1,073		)	(1,138		)	(1,076		)	(1,118		)
DMG Credit Agreement due 2016 (4)	(608		)	(611		)	—			—
Administrative Claim (5)	(73		)	(73		)	—			—

_______________________________________________________________

(1)

The fair value of the Undertaking receivable is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Our December 31, 2011 estimate of the fair value of the Undertaking receivable represents the $750 million fair value as of November 7, 2011, less the $22 million payment in December 2011. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement on June 5, 2012, the Undertaking Agreement was terminated. Please read Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases and Note 4—DMG Acquisition for further discussion.


(2)	Included in both current and non-current assets and liabilities on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010


(3)	Carrying amount includes unamortized discounts of $19 million and $21 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.


(4)	Includes unamortized premiums of $12 million as of June 30, 2012. We completed the DMG Acquisition on June 5, 2012.


(5)	Amount represents the fair value of the Administrative Claim that was issued to Dynegy upon the effective date of the Settlement Agreement. Please read Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases—Settlement Agreement and Plan Support Agreement for further discussion.

We recorded the Administrative Claim granted in the DMG Acquisition at its estimated fair value of $64 million. We estimated the fair value of the Administrative Claim using the market capitalization of Dynegy as of the date of the DMG Acquisition. We believe the market capitalization of Dynegy represents a reasonable estimate of the fair value of the Administrative Claim because the current holders of Dynegy's common stock will be the beneficiaries of the Administrative Claim upon our emergence from bankruptcy. The Administrative Claim can be settled in cash under certain circumstances, as such we account for the Administrative Claim as a liability and adjust the carrying amount of the claim to its estimated fair value each reporting period. As of June 30, 2012, the fair value of the Administrative claim was approximately $73 million; therefore, we recorded a charge of approximately $9 million in Other income and expense, net on our consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. The fair value of the Administrative Claim is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Please read Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases for further discussion.

Note 8—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, is included in member's equity on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets as follows:



	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(in millions)
Cash flow hedging activities, net	$	—		$	1
Unrecognized prior service cost and actuarial loss, net	(40		)	—
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax	$	(40	)	$	1

Note 9—Inventory

A summary of our inventories is as follows:



	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	(in millions)
Materials and supplies	$	60	$	40
Coal	62		16
Fuel	9		8
Emissions allowances	1		1
Total	$	132	$	65

Note 10—Property, Plant, & Equipment

A summary of our property, plant and equipment is as follows:

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010



	June 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011
	(in millions)
Generation assets:
Coal (1)	$	523		$	—
Gas	3,528			3,532
DNE	268			268
IT systems and other	97			111
Property, plant and equipment	4,416			3,911
Accumulated depreciation	(1,126		)	(1,090		)
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	3,290		$	2,821

_______________________________________________________________________________


(1)	Amounts related to the Coal segment (including DMG) were acquired effective June 5, 2012. Please read Note 4—DMG Acquisition for further discussion.

Total interest costs incurred were $30 million and $56 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and $86 million and $173 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Interest capitalized related to costs of construction projects in process totaled $1 million and $1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and $5 million and $9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.

Note 11—Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

Set forth below is a summary of our material ongoing legal proceedings. We record accruals for estimated losses from contingencies when available information indicates that a loss is probable and the amount of the loss, or range of loss, can be reasonably estimated. In addition, we disclose matters for which management believes a material loss is reasonably possible. In all instances, management has assessed the matters below based on current information and made judgments concerning their potential outcome, giving consideration to the nature of the claim, the amount, if any, and nature of damages sought and the probability of success. Management regularly reviews all new information with respect to each such contingency and adjusts its assessment and estimates of such contingencies accordingly. Because litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties including unfavorable rulings or developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of our legal proceedings could involve amounts that are different from our currently recorded accruals and that such differences could be material.

In addition to the matters discussed below, we are party to other routine proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business or related to discontinued business operations. Any accruals or estimated losses related to these matters are not material. In management’s judgment, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Creditor Litigation. On September 21, 2011, an ad-hoc group of our bondholders (the “Avenue Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, captioned Avenue Investments, L.P. et al v. Dynegy Inc., Dynegy Holdings, LLC, Dynegy Gas Investments, LLC, Clint C. Freeland, Kevin T. Howell and Robert C. Flexon (Index No. 652599/11) (the “Avenue Investments Litigation”). The Avenue Plaintiffs challenged the DMG Transfer. On September 27, 2011, the Lease Trustee filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, captioned The Successor Lease Indenture Trustee et al v. Dynegy Inc., Dynegy Holdings, LLC, Dynegy Gas Investments, LLC, E. Hunter Harrison, Thomas W. Elward, Michael J. Embler, Robert C. Flexon, Vincent J. Intrieri, Samuel Merksamer, Felix Pardo, Clint C. Freeland, Kevin T. Howell, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, Etc. (Index No. 652642/2011) (the “Lease Trustee Litigation”). On November 4, 2011, certain of the PSEG Entities as owner-lessors of the Facilities filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, captioned Resources Capital Management Corp., Roseton OL, LLC and Danskammer OL, LLC, v. Dynegy Inc., Dynegy Holdings, Inc., Dynegy Holdings, LLC, Dynegy Gas Investments, LLC, Thomas W. Elward, Michael J. Embler, Robert C. Flexon, E. Hunter Harrison, Vincent J. Intrieri, Samuel J. Merksamer, Felix Pardo, Clint C. Freeland, Kevin T. Howell, Icahn Capital LP, and Seneca Capital Advisors, LLC (Index No. 635067/11) (the "PSEG Litigation"). The Avenue Investments

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Litigation, the Lease Trustee Litigation and the PSEG Litigation are collectively referred to as the "Prepetition Litigation".

The Prepetition Litigation challenged the DMG Transfer. Plaintiffs in all three actions alleged, among other claims, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duties, and violations of prohibitions on fraudulent transfers in connection with the DMG Transfer and also sought to have the DMG Transfer set aside, and requested unspecified damages as well as attorneys' fees. We filed motions to dismiss the Avenue Investments Litigation and Lease Trustee Litigation on October 31, 2011. The complaint in the PSEG Litigation was never served on the Defendants. On November 7, 2011, Dynegy, DH and the Consenting Noteholders (as defined and discussed in Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases) agreed to enter into a stipulation staying the Avenue Investments Litigation.

On November 21, 2011, the Prepetition Litigation defendants filed in each case a Notice of Filing of Bankruptcy Petition and of the Automatic Stay, which provided, among other things, that (i) “pursuant to section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, this lawsuit is stayed in its entirety, as to all claims and all defendants (the “Automatic Stay”),” and (ii) “actions taken in violation of the Automatic Stay are void and may subject the person or entity taking such actions to the imposition of sanctions by the Bankruptcy Court.” In addition, on November 21, 2011, the defendants filed two stipulations in the Avenue Investments Litigation and the Lease Trustee Litigation, pursuant to which the parties agreed, among other things, (i) to stay or take no action in the lawsuits, including the pending motions to dismiss, until further application, and (ii) to reserve all rights and/or arguments with respect to the scope or effect of the Automatic Stay.

Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, on the Settlement Effective Date, the plaintiffs or parties (as applicable) to the Prepetition Litigation filed necessary papers to dismiss and discontinue with prejudice each of the Avenue Investments Litigation, the Lease Trustee Litigation and the PSEG Litigation and any potential claims relating to or arising from disputes with respect to such actions were released by the parties thereto. For additional information see Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases.

On April 2, 2012, a putative class action lawsuit on behalf of bondholders was filed in the Southern District of New York captioned Shirlee Schwartz v. Dynegy Inc., et al, however, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the case shortly after filing.

Gas Index Pricing Litigation. We, several of our affiliates, our former joint venture affiliate and other energy companies were named as defendants in numerous lawsuits in state and federal court claiming damages resulting from alleged price manipulation and false reporting of natural gas prices to various index publications in the 2000-2002 timeframe. Many of the cases have been resolved. All of the remaining cases contain similar claims that individually, and in conjunction with other energy companies, we engaged in an illegal scheme to inflate natural gas prices in four states by providing false information to natural gas index publications. In July 2011, the court granted defendants' motions for summary judgment, thereby dismissing all of plaintiffs' claims. Plaintiffs have appealed the decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals which has set oral argument for October 19, 2012.

Pacific Northwest Refund Proceedings. Dynegy Power Marketing, LLC (“DYPM”), along with numerous other companies that sold power in the Pacific Northwest in 2000-2001, are parties to a complaint filed in 2001 with FERC challenging bilateral contract pricing by claiming manipulation of the electricity market in California produced unreasonable prices in the Pacific Northwest. DYPM previously settled all California refund claims, but did not settle with certain complainants seeking refunds in the Pacific Northwest. In December 2011, DYPM received a Notice of Settlement from The City of Seattle (“Seattle”) claiming that it paid approximately $2 million to DYPM above the mitigated market clearing price set for the California market in 2000-2001. In May 2012, Seattle made an initial settlement demand of $744 thousand plus interest. Trial has been set for April 2013 and the parties are currently engaged in discovery. DYPM intends to continue to defend its position in the proceeding vigorously. In addition to Seattle's claim, there is the risk for “ripple claims” from other sellers, but the efficacy of these claims is currently being litigated and any potential impact to DYPM from ripple claims is impossible to predict at this stage.

Other Commitments and Contingencies

In conducting our operations, we have routinely entered into long-term commodity purchase and sale commitments, as well as agreements that commit future cash flow to the lease or acquisition of assets used in our businesses. These commitments have been typically associated with commodity supply arrangements, capital projects, reservation charges

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

associated with firm transmission, transportation, storage and leases for office space, equipment, plant sites, power generation assets and LPG vessel charters. The following describes the more significant commitments outstanding at June 30, 2012.

Consent Decree. In 2005, we settled a lawsuit filed by the EPA and the United States Department of Justice in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois that alleged violations of the Clean Air Act and related federal and Illinois regulations concerning certain maintenance, repair and replacement activities at our Baldwin generating station. A consent decree (the “Consent Decree”) was finalized in July 2005. Among other provisions of the Consent Decree, we are required to not operate certain of our power generating facilities after specified dates unless certain emission control equipment is installed. As of June 30, 2012, only Baldwin Unit 2 has material Consent Decree work yet to be performed, which is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2012. We have spent approximately $902 million through June 30, 2012 related to these Consent Decree projects.

Vermilion and Baldwin Groundwater. We have implemented hydrogeologic investigations for the CCR surface impoundment at our Baldwin facility and for two CCR surface impoundments at our Vermilion facility in response to a request by the Illinois EPA. Groundwater monitoring results indicate that these CCR surface impoundments impact onsite groundwater at these sites.

At the request of the Illinois EPA, in late 2011 we initiated an investigation at the Baldwin facility to determine if the facility's CCR surface impoundment impacts offsite groundwater. Results of the offsite groundwater quality investigation at Baldwin, as submitted to the Illinois EPA on April 24, 2012, indicate two localized areas where Class I groundwater standards were exceeded. If these offsite groundwater results are ultimately attributed to the Baldwin CCR surface impoundment and remediation measures are necessary in the future, we may incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. At this time we cannot reasonably estimate the costs of corrective action that ultimately may be required at Baldwin.

On April 2, 2012, we submitted to the Illinois EPA proposed corrective action plans for two of the CCR surface impoundments at the Vermilion facility. The proposed corrective action plans reflect the results of a hydrogeologic investigation, which indicate that the facility's old east and north CCR impoundments impact groundwater quality onsite and that such groundwater migrates offsite to the north of the property and to the adjacent Middle Fork of the Vermilion River. The proposed corrective action plans include groundwater monitoring and recommend closure of both CCR impoundments, including installation of a geosynthetic cover. In addition, we submitted an application to the Illinois EPA to establish a groundwater management zone while impacts from the facility are mitigated. The preliminary estimated cost of the recommended closure alternative for both impoundments, including post-closure care, is approximately $14 million. The Vermilion facility also has a third CCR surface impoundment, the new east impoundment that is lined and is not known to impact groundwater. Although not part of the proposed corrective action plans, if we decide to close the new east impoundment by removing its CCR contents concurrent with the recommended closure alternative for the old east and north impoundments, the preliminary total estimated closure cost for all three impoundments would be approximately $16 million. If the proposed corrective action plans are timely approved by the Illinois EPA, detailed proposed closure plans would be submitted to the Illinois EPA by year-end 2012 for approval.

In July 2012, the Illinois EPA issued violation notices alleging violations of groundwater standards onsite at the Baldwin and Vermilion facilities. In response, we have submitted to the Illinois EPA a proposed compliance agreement for each facility. For Vermilion, we proposed to implement the previously submitted corrective action plans and, for Baldwin, we proposed to perform additional studies of hydrogeologic conditions and apply for a groundwater management zone in preparation for submittal, as necessary, of a corrective action plan.

Cooling Water Intake Permits. The cooling water intake structures at several of our power generation facilities are regulated under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act. This provision generally provides that standards set for power generation facilities require that the location, design, construction and capacity of cooling water intake structures reflect the BTA for minimizing adverse environmental impact. These standards are developed and implemented for power generating facilities through the NPDES permits or individual SPDES permits on a case-by-case basis.

The environmental groups that participate in our NPDES and SPDES permit proceedings generally argue that only closed

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

cycle cooling meets the BTA requirement. The issuance and renewal of NPDES or SPDES permits for three of our power generation facilities (Danskammer, Roseton and Moss Landing) have been challenged on this basis. The Danskammer SPDES permit, which was renewed and issued in June 2006, does not require installation of a closed cycle cooling system; however, it does require aquatic organism mortality reductions resulting from NYSDEC's determination of BTA requirements under its regulations. All appeals of this permit have been exhausted. The Moss Landing NPDES permit, which was issued in 2000, does not required closed cycle cooling and was challenged by a local environmental group. In August 2011, the Supreme Court of California affirmed the appellate court's decision upholding the permit. One permit challenge is still pending.

Roseton SPDES Permit - In April 2005, the NYSDEC issued a Draft SPDES Permit renewal for the Roseton plant. The permit is opposed by environmental groups challenging the BTA determination. In October 2006, various holdings in the administrative law judge's ruling admitting the environmental group petitioners to party status and setting forth the issues to be adjudicated in the permit renewal hearing were appealed to the Commissioner of NYSDEC by the petitioners, NYSDEC staff and us. The permit renewal hearing will be scheduled after the Commissioner rules on those appeals. We believe that the petitioners' claims lack merit and we have opposed those claims vigorously. In connection with the DH Chapter 11 Cases, the DH Debtor Entities rejected these long-term leases at the Roseton and Danskammer facilities. The applicable DH Debtor Entities have operated and plan to continue operating the leased facilities until such facilities can be sold in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement and Plan Support Agreement and in compliance with applicable federal and state regulatory requirements. Please see Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases for further information.

Other future NPDES or SPDES proceedings could have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows; however, given the numerous variables and factors involved in calculating the potential costs associated with installing a closed cycle cooling system, any decision to install such a system at any of our facilities would be made on a case-by-case basis considering all relevant factors at such time. If capital expenditures related to cooling water systems become great enough to render the operation of the plant uneconomical, we could, at our option, and subject to any applicable financing agreements or other obligations, reduce operations or cease to operate that facility and forego the capital expenditures.

SCE Termination. In May 2012, Southern California Edison (“SCE”) notified Dynegy Morro Bay, LLC (“Morro Bay”) and Dynegy Moss Landing, LLC (“Moss Landing”) that it was terminating certain energy and capacity contracts with those entities. The validity of the purported terminations and subsequent actions by SCE are being disputed by Dynegy. We intend to vigorously pursue all remedies and amounts due to us under these contracts.

Guarantees and Indemnifications

In the ordinary course of business, we routinely enter into contractual agreements that contain various representations, warranties, indemnifications and guarantees. Examples of such agreements include, but are not limited to, service agreements, equipment purchase agreements, engineering and technical service agreements, asset sales agreements and procurement and construction contracts. Some agreements contain indemnities that cover the other party’s negligence or limit the other party’s liability with respect to third party claims, in which event we will effectively be indemnifying the other party. Virtually all such agreements contain representations or warranties that are covered by indemnifications against the losses incurred by the other parties in the event such representations and warranties are false. While there is always the possibility of a loss related to such representations, warranties, indemnifications and guarantees in our contractual agreements, and such loss could be significant, in most cases management considers the probability of loss to be remote. Related to the indemnifications discussed below, we have accrued approximately $1 million as of June 30, 2012.

LS Power Indemnities. In connection with the LS Power Transactions we agreed in the purchase and sale agreement to indemnify LS Power against claims regarding any breaches in our representations and warranties and certain other potential liabilities. Claims for indemnification shall survive until twelve months subsequent to closing with exceptions for tax claims, which shall survive for the applicable statute of limitations plus 30 days, and certain other representations and potential liabilities, which shall survive indefinitely. The indemnifications provided to LS Power are limited to $1.3 billion in total; however, several categories of indemnifications are not available to LS Power until the liabilities incurred in the aggregate are equal to or exceed $15 million and are capped at a maximum of $100 million. Further, the purchase and sale agreement provides in part that we may not reduce or avoid liability for a valid claim based on a claim of contribution. In addition to the

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

above indemnities related to the LS Power Transactions, we have agreed to indemnify LS Power against claims related to the Riverside/Foothills Project for certain aspects of the project. Namely, LS Power has been indemnified for any disputes that arise as to ownership, transfer of bonds related to the project, and any failure by us to obtain approval for the transfer of the payment in-lieu of taxes program already in place. The indemnities related solely to the Riverside/Foothills Project are capped at a maximum of $180 million and extend until the earlier of the expiration of the tax agreement or December 26, 2026. At this time, we have incurred no significant expenses under these indemnities. Please read Note 5—Dispositions, Contract Terminations and Discontinued Operations—Dispositions and Contract Terminations—LS Power Transactions in our Form 10-K for further discussion.

West Coast Power Indemnities. In connection with the sale of our 50 percent interest in West Coast Power to NRG on March 31, 2006, an agreement was executed to allocate responsibility for managing certain litigation and provide for certain indemnities with respect to such litigation. The indemnification agreement in relevant part provides that NRG assumes responsibility for all defense costs and any risk of loss, subject to certain conditions and limitations, arising from a February 2002 complaint filed at FERC by the California Public Utilities Commission alleging that several parties, including West Cost Power subsidiaries, overcharged the State of California for wholesale power. FERC found the rates charged by wholesale suppliers to be just and reasonable; however, this matter was appealed and ultimately remanded back to FERC for further review. On May 24, 2011 and May 26, 2011, FERC issued two orders in these dockets. The first order denied the request of the California Parties for consolidation of various dockets and denied their request for summary disposition on market manipulation issues. The second order addressed treatment of settled parties and the scope of hearing issues in the ongoing proceedings. In April 2012, NRG and West Coast Power settled all claims brought by the California Parties. The settlement does not exceed NRG’s indemnity obligation to Dynegy, therefore, we have no exposure in connection with the settlement.

Targa Indemnities. During 2005, as part of our sale of our midstream business (“DMSLP”), we agreed to indemnify Targa Resources, Inc. (“Targa”) against losses it may incur under indemnifications DMSLP provided to purchasers of certain assets, properties and businesses disposed of by DMSLP prior to our sale of DMSLP. We have incurred no material expense under these prior indemnities. We have recorded an accrual of less than $1 million for remediation of groundwater contamination at the Breckenridge Gas Processing Plant sold by DMSLP in 2001. The indemnification provided by DMSLP to the purchaser of the plant has a limit of $5 million.

Black Mountain Guarantee. Through one of our subsidiaries, we hold a 50 percent ownership interest in Black Mountain (Nevada Cogeneration) (“Black Mountain”), in which our partner is a Chevron subsidiary. Black Mountain owns the Black Mountain power generation facility and has a power purchase agreement with a third party that extends through April 2023. In connection with the power purchase agreement, pursuant to which Black Mountain receives payments which decrease in amount over time, we agreed to guarantee 50 percent of certain payments that may be due to the power purchaser under a mechanism designed to protect it from early termination of the agreement. At June 30, 2012, if an event of default due to early termination had occurred under the terms of the mortgage on the facility entered into in connection with the power purchase agreement, we could have been required to pay the power purchaser approximately $53 million under the guarantee.

Other Indemnities. We entered into indemnifications regarding environmental, tax, employee and other representations when completing asset sales such as, but not limited, to the Rolling Hills, Calcasieu, CoGen Lyondell and Heard County power generating facilities. As of June 30, 2012, no claims have been made against these indemnities. There is no limitation on our liability under certain of these indemnities. However, management is unaware of any existing claims.

Note 12—Debt

A summary of our long-term debt is as follows:

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010



	June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Carrying Amount			Fair Value	Carrying Amount			Fair Value
	(in millions)
DPC Credit Agreement, due 2016 (1)	1,091			1,138	1,097			1,118
DMG Credit Agreement, due 2016 (2)	596			611	—			—
	1,687				1,097
Unamortized premium (discount) on debt, net	(6		)		(21		)
	1,681				1,076
Less: Amounts due within one year, including non-cash amortization of basis adjustments	16				7
Total Long-Term Debt	$	1,665			$	1,069

_______________________________________________________________________________


(1)	Please read Note 20—Debt in our Form 10-K for further discussion.


(2)	Please read DMG Credit Agreement below for further discussion.

DMG Credit Agreement. As a result of the DMG Acquisition, we recorded DMG's senior secured term loan facility with an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $597 million. The DMG Credit Agreement will mature on August 5, 2016 and will amortize in equal quarterly installments in aggregate annual amounts equal to 1.00 percent of the original principal amount of the DMG Credit Agreement with the balance payable on the fifth anniversary of the closing date.

All obligations of DMG under (i) the DMG Credit Agreement (the “DMG Borrower Obligations”) and (ii) at the

election of DMG, Hedging/Cash Management Arrangements are unconditionally guaranteed jointly and severally on a senior secured basis (the “DMG Guarantees”) by each existing and subsequently acquired or organized direct or indirect material domestic subsidiary of DMG (the “DMG Guarantors”), in each case, as otherwise permitted by applicable law, regulation and contractual provision and to the extent such guarantee would not result in adverse tax consequences as reasonably determined by DMG. None of DMG's parent companies are obligated to repay the DMG Borrower Obligations.

The DMG Borrower Obligations, the DMG Guarantees and any Hedging/Cash Management Arrangements are secured by first priority liens on and security interests in 100 percent of the capital stock of DMG and substantially all of the present and after-acquired assets of DMG and each DMG Guarantor. Accordingly, such assets are only available for the creditors of DCIH and its subsidiaries.

The DMG Credit Agreement bears interest, at DMG's option, at either (a) 7.75 percent per annum plus LIBOR, subject to a LIBOR floor of 1.50 percent, with respect to any Eurodollar term loan or (b) 6.75 percent per annum plus the alternate base rate with respect to any ABR term loan. DMG may elect from time to time to convert all or a portion of the term loan from any ABR Borrowing into a Eurodollar Borrowing or vice versa. With some exceptions, the DMG Credit Agreement is non-callable for the first 2 years and is subject to a prepayment premium.

The DMG Credit Agreement contains mandatory prepayment provisions. The outstanding loan under the DMG Credit Agreement is to be prepaid with (a) 100 percent of the net cash proceeds of all asset sales by DMG and its subsidiaries, subject to the right of DMG to reinvest such proceeds if such proceeds are reinvested (or committed to be reinvested) within 12 months and, if so committed to reinvestment, reinvested within 6 months after such initial 12 month period, (b) 50 percent of the net cash proceeds of issuance of equity securities of DMG and its subsidiaries (except to the extent used (x) to prepay the Loans, (y) for capital expenditures and (z) for permitted acquisitions), (c) commencing with the first full fiscal year of DMG to occur after the closing date, 100 percent of excess cash flow; provided that (i) excess cash flow shall be determined after reduction for amounts used for capital expenditures, and restricted payments made and (ii) any voluntary prepayments of the term loans shall be credited against excess cash flow prepayment obligations and (d) 100 percent of the net cash proceeds of issuances, offerings or placements of debt obligations of DMG and its subsidiaries (other than all permitted debt).

The DMG Credit Agreement contains customary events of default and affirmative and negative covenants including, subject to certain specified exceptions, limitations on amendments to constitutive documents, liens, capital expenditures,

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

acquisitions, subsidiaries and joint ventures, investments, the incurrence of debt, fundamental changes, asset sales, sale-leaseback transactions, hedging arrangements, restricted payments, changes in nature of business, transactions with affiliates, burdensome agreements, amendments of debt and other material agreements, accounting changes and prepayment of

indebtedness or repurchases of equity interests.

The DMG Credit Agreement contains a requirement that DMG shall establish and maintain a segregated account,

subject to the control of the Collateral Trustee (the “DMG Collateral Posting Account”), into which a specified collateral posting amount shall be deposited. DMG may withdraw amounts from the DMG Collateral Posting Account: (i) for the purpose of meeting collateral posting requirements of DMG and the DMG Guarantors; (ii) to prepay the term loan under the DMG Credit Agreement; (iii) to repay certain other permitted indebtedness; and (iv) to the extent any excess amounts are determined to be in the DMG Collateral Posting Account.

The DMG Credit Agreement limits distributions to $90 million per year provided the borrower and its subsidiaries

possess at least $50 million of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments as of the date of the proposed distribution.

Letter of Credit Facility. We also acquired DMG's $100 million fully cash collateralized Letter of Credit Reimbursement and Collateral Agreement pursuant to which letters of credit will be issued at DMG’s request provided that DMG deposits in an account an amount of cash sufficient to cover the face value of such requested letter of credit plus an additional percentage thereof.

Restricted Cash and Investments

The following table depicts our restricted cash:



	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	(in millions)
DPC LC facilities (1)	$	297	$	455
DH LC facility (1)	27		27
DPC Collateral Posting Account (2)	167		132
DMG LC Facility (3)	42		—
DMG Collateral Posting (2)	65		—
Total restricted cash	$	598	$	614

_______________________________________________________________________________


(1)	Includes cash posted to support the respective letter of credit reimbursement and collateral agreement.


(2)	Amounts are restricted and may be used for future collateral posting requirements or released per the terms of the applicable credit agreement.


(3)	Includes cash posted to support the letter of credit reimbursement and collateral agreements under the DMG LC facility. Please read "Letter of Credit Facility" above for further discussion.

Note 13—Liabilities Subject to Compromise

A summary of our LSTC as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is as follows:

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010



	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	(in millions)
DNE lease termination claim (1)	$	695	$	300
Senior Notes:
8.75 percent due 2012	88		88
7.5 percent due 2015	785		785
8.375 percent due 2016	1,047		1,047
7.125 percent due 2018	175		175
7.75 percent due 2019	1,100		1,100
7.625 percent due 2026	175		175
Subordinated Debentures payable to affiliates, 8.316 percent, due 2027 (2)	55		200
Interest accrued on Senior Notes and Subordinated Debentures as of November 7, 2011 (2)	116		132
Note payable, affiliate (3)	—		10
Administrative Claim (4)	73		—
Other	6		—
Total Liabilities subject to compromise	$	4,315	$	4,012

_______________________________________________________________________________


(1)	The estimated amount of the allowed claim related to the Facilities was increased to approximately $695 million during 2012 as a result of entering into the Settlement Agreement. Please read Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases—Settlement Agreement and Note 4—DMG Acquisition for further discussion.

(2) The estimated amount of the allowed claim related to the Subordinated Capital Income Securities payable to affiliate, including accrued interest, was reduced to $55 million during the second quarter 2012 as a result of an amendment to the Settlement Agreement. Please read Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases—Settlement Agreement and Note 4—DMG Acquisition for further discussion.


(3)	During the first quarter 2012, it was determined that no claim related to the Note payable, affiliate would be made. Therefore, the estimated amount of the allowed claim was reduced to zero.


(4)	Amount represents the fair value of the Administrative Claim that was issued to Dynegy upon the effective date of the Settlement Agreement.

Note 14—Related Party Transactions

The following tables summarize the Accounts receivable, affiliates, and Accounts payable, affiliates, on our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and cash received for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 related to various agreements with Dynegy Inc., as discussed below:



	June 30, 2012				Three Months Ended June 30, 2012		Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
	Accounts Receivable, Affiliates		Accounts Payable, Affiliates		Cash Received (Paid)		Cash Received (Paid)
	(in millions)
Service Agreements	$	—	$	1	$	4	$	15
EMA Agreements	—		—		—		1
Total	$	—	$	1	$	4	$	16

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010



	December 31, 2011
	Accounts Receivable, Affiliates		Accounts Payable, Affiliates
	(in millions)
Service Agreements	$	4	$	6
EMA Agreements	22		41
Total	$	26	$	47

Service Agreements. Dynegy and certain of our subsidiaries (collectively, the "Providers") provide certain services (the "Services") to Dynegy Coal Investments Holdings, LLC ("DCIH") and certain of its subsidiaries, and certain of our subsidiaries (collectively, the "Recipients"). Service Agreements between Dynegy and the Recipients, which were entered into in connection with the Reorganization, govern the terms under which such Services are provided.

The Providers act as agents for the Recipients for the limited purpose of providing the Services set forth in the Service Agreements. The Providers may perform additional services at the request of the Recipients, and will be reimbursed for all costs and expenses related to such additional services. Prior to the beginning of each fiscal year in which Services are to be provided pursuant to the Service Agreements, the Providers and the Recipients must agree on a budget for the Services, outlining, among other items, the contemplated scope of the Services to be provided in the following fiscal year and the cost of providing each Service. The Recipients will pay the Providers an annual management fee as agreed in the budget, which shall include reimbursement of out-of pocket costs and expenses related to the provision of the Services and will provide reasonable assistance, such as information, services and materials, to the Providers.

Energy Management Agreements. Certain of our subsidiaries have entered into an Energy Management Agency Services Agreement (an "EMA") with DMG. Pursuant to the EMA, our subsidiaries will provide power management services to DMG, consisting of marketing power and capacity, capturing pricing arbitrage, scheduling dispatch of power, communicating with the applicable ISOs or RTOs, purchasing replacement power, and reconciling and settling ISO or RTO invoices. In addition, certain of our subsidiaries will provide fuel management services, consisting of procuring the requisite quantities of fuel and emissions credits, assisting with transportation, scheduling delivery of fuel, assisting DMG with development and implementation of fuel procurement strategies, marketing and selling excess fuel and assisting with the evaluation of present and long-term fuel purchase and transportation options. Our subsidiaries will also assist DMG with risk management by entering into one or more risk management transactions, the purpose of which is to set the price or value any commodity or to mitigate or offset any change in the price or value of any commodity. Our subsidiaries may from time to time provide other services as the parties may agree. Our consolidated statement of operations includes $69 million and $198 million of power purchased from affiliates, which is reflected in Revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. Our consolidated statement of operations also includes $24 million and $79 million of coal sold to affiliates, which is reflected in Costs of sales, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. This affiliate activity is presented net of third party activity within revenue and cost of sales. Also, please read Note 6—Risk Management Activities, Derivatives and Financial Instruments for derivative balances with affiliates. As a result of the DMG Acquisition, transactions executed under the Energy Management Agreement are not considered related party transactions subsequent to June 5, 2012.

Tax Sharing Agreement. Under U.S. federal income tax law, Dynegy is responsible for the tax liabilities of its subsidiaries, because Dynegy files consolidated income tax returns, which will necessarily include the income and business activities of the ring-fenced entities and Dynegy's other affiliates. To properly allocate taxes among Dynegy and each of its entities, Dynegy and certain of its entities, including us and our subsidiaries, have entered into a Tax Sharing Agreement under which Dynegy agrees to prepare consolidated returns on behalf of itself and its entities and make all required payments to relevant revenue collection authorities as required by law. Additionally, DPC agreed to make payments to Dynegy of the tax amounts for which DPC and its respective subsidiaries would have been liable if such subsidiaries began business on the restructuring date (August 5, 2011) and were eligible to, and elected to, file a consolidated return on a stand-alone basis beginning on the restructuring date. Further, each of Dynegy GasCo Holdings, LLC, Dynegy Gas Holdco, LLC, and Dynegy Gas Investments Holdings, LLC, agreed to make payments to Dynegy of amounts representing the tax that each such subsidiary would have paid if each began business on the restructuring date and filed a separate corporate income tax return (excluding from income any subsidiary distributions) on a stand-alone basis beginning on the restructuring date.

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Cash Management. The Prepetition Restructurings created new companies, some of which are "bankruptcy remote." These bankruptcy remote entities have an independent manager whose consent is required for certain corporate actions and such entities are required to present themselves to the public as separate entities. They maintain separate books, records and bank accounts and separately appoint officers. Furthermore, they pay liabilities from their own funds, they conduct business in their own names (other than any business relating to the trading activities of us and our subsidiaries), they observe a higher level of formalities, and they have restrictions on pledging their assets for the benefit of certain other persons. In addition, as part of the prepetition Restructurings, some companies within our portfolio were reorganized into "ring-fenced" groups. The upper-level companies in such ring-fenced groups are bankruptcy-remote entities governed by limited liability company operating agreements which, in addition to the bankruptcy remoteness provisions described above, contain certain additional restrictions prohibiting any material transactions with affiliates other than the direct and indirect subsidiaries with the ring-fenced group without independent manager approval.

Pursuant to our Cash Management Agreement, our ring-fenced entities maintain cash accounts separate from those of our non-ring-fenced entities. Cash collected by a ring-fenced entity is not swept into accounts held in the name of any non-ring-fenced entity and cash collected by a non-ring-fenced entity is not swept into accounts held in the name of any ring-fenced entity. The cash in deposit accounts owned by a ring-fenced entity is not used to pay the debts and/or operating expenses of any non-ring-fenced entity, and the cash in deposit accounts owned by a non-ring-fenced entity is not used to pay the debts and/or operating expenses of any ring-fenced entity. There were no material payments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 related to the Cash Management Agreement.

DMG Transfer and Undertaking Agreement. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized $24 million in interest income related to the Undertaking Agreement which is included in Other income and expense, net, in our consolidated statement of operations. We did not recognize any interest income during the three months ended June 30, 2012 as we impaired the value of the Undertaking as of March 31, 2012 and the valuation as of that date considered the interest payments received during the second quarter of 2012. We received payments of $48 million from Dynegy during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 related to the Undertaking Agreement. We had approximately $8 million as of December 31, 2011 in interest receivable related to the undertaking, which is reflected in Interest receivable, affiliates on our consolidated balance sheet. The Undertaking Agreement was terminated on June 5, 2012 in connection with the Settlement Agreement. Please read Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases—Settlement Agreement and Plan Support Agreement for further discussion.

Note payable, affiliates. On August 5, 2011, Dynegy Coal Holdco, LLC made a loan to the company of $10 million with a maturity of 3 years and an interest rate of 9.25 percent per annum.

The Note payable, affiliate was written off during the first quarter 2012 as it was determined that no claim would be filed related to the note.

Accounts receivable, affiliates. We have historically recorded intercompany transactions in the ordinary course of business, including the reallocation of deferred taxes between legal entities in accordance with applicable IRS regulations. As a result of such transactions, we have recorded and adjusted over time an affiliate receivable balance in the amount of $846 million at December 31, 2011. This receivable is classified within equity as there are no defined payment terms, it is not evidenced by any promissory note, and there was never an intent for payment to occur. The Accounts receivable, affiliate was settled on June 5, 2012. Please read Note 3—Chapter 11 Cases—Settlement Agreement and Plan Support Agreement for further discussion.

Employee benefits. Our employees participate in the pension plans of our parent, Dynegy.

Note 15—Income Taxes

Effective Tax Rate. We compute our quarterly taxes under the effective tax rate method based on applying an anticipated annual effective rate to our year-to-date income or loss, except for significant unusual or extraordinary transactions. Income taxes for significant unusual or extraordinary transactions are computed and recorded in the period that the specific transaction occurs.

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(in millions, except rates)
Income tax benefit	$	1		$	75		$	7		$	133

Effective tax rate	1		%	39		%	1		%	41		%

For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, our overall effective tax rate on continuing operations was different than the statutory rate of 35 percent due primarily to the impact of state taxes.

For the six month period ended June 30, 2012, the difference between the effective rate of 1 percent and the statutory rate of 35 percent resulted primarily from a valuation allowance to eliminate our net deferred tax assets partially offset by the impact of state taxes. As of June 30, 2012, we do not believe we will produce sufficient future taxable income, nor are there tax strategies available, to realize our net deferred tax assets not otherwise realized by reversing temporary differences.

For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the difference between the effective rates of 41 percent and the statutory rate of 35 percent resulted primarily from the impact of state taxes including a benefit of $6 million related to an increase in state NOLs due to the acceptance of amended returns, which we filed as a result of a change in a tax position, partially offset by an expense of $2 million related to an increase in the Illinois statutory rate.

Note 16—Employee Compensation, Savings and Pension Plans

Our parent, Dynegy, sponsors and administers defined benefit plans and defined contribution plans for the benefit of our employees and also provides other post retirement benefits to retirees who meet age and service requirements which are more fully described in Note 24—Employee Compensation, Savings and Pension Plans in our Form 10-K.

The following are inclusive of net periodic benefit costs related to the Dynegy multi-employer pension and other post-retirement benefit plans. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, one month of Dynegy multi-employer plans are included within net periodic benefit costs. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 six months of Dynegy multi-employer pension and other post-retirement benefit plans are included within net periodic benefit costs. Please read Note 4—DMG Acquisition for further discussion.

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost. The components of net periodic benefit cost were:



	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012		2011
	(in millions)
Service cost benefits earned during period	$	1		$	3		$	—	$	—
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation	1			3			1		1
Expected return on plan assets	(1		)	(4		)	—		—
Recognized net actuarial loss	—			2			—		—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	1		$	4		$	1	$	1

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010



	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012		2011
	(in millions)
Service cost benefits earned during period	$	1		$	6		$	1	$	1
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation	1			7			1		2
Expected return on plan assets	(1		)	(8		)	—		—
Recognized net actuarial loss	—			3			—		—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	1		$	8		$	2	$	3

Contributions. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 we made $7 million in contributions through certain service agreements to our pension plans and less than $1 million to our other post-retirement benefit plans. We made $6 million in contributions to our pension plans or other post-retirement benefit plans during the six months ended June 30, 2011. We expect to make no contributions to our pension plans and to our other benefit plans during the remainder of 2012.

Note 17—Segment Information

As reflected in this report, we have changed our reportable segments. Prior to this report, we reported results for the following segments: (i) GEN-MW, (ii) GEN-WE and (iii) GEN-NE. Beginning with the third quarter 2011, as a result of the Reorganization, our reportable segments are: (i) the Coal segment (“Coal”); (ii) the Gas segment (“Gas”) and (iii) the Dynegy Northeast segment (“DNE”). Accordingly, we have recast the corresponding items of segment information for all prior periods. Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial results also reflect corporate-level expenses such as interest and depreciation and amortization. General and administrative expenses are allocated to each reportable segment.

Additionally, on September 1, 2011, we completed the DMG Transfer; therefore, the results of our Coal segment were not included as of September 1, 2011. On June 5, 2012, we completed the DMG Acquisition; therefore the results of our Coal segment were included for the period of June 6, 2012 through June 30, 2012. Please read Note 4—DMG Acquisition for further discussion of the DMG Acquisition.

Reportable segment information, including inter-company transactions accounted for at prevailing market rates, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is presented below:

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Segment Data as of and for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012

(in millions)



	Coal			Gas			DNE			Other and Eliminations			Total
Unaffiliated revenues:
Domestic	$	40		$	230		$	20		$	—		$	290
Total revenues	$	40		$	230		$	20		$	—		$	290

Depreciation and amortization	$	(4	)	$	(36	)	$	—		$	(3	)	$	(43	)
General and administrative expense	(5		)	(15		)	(1		)	4			(17		)

Operating income (loss)	$	(22	)	$	13		$	(5	)	$	2		$	(12	)

Bankruptcy reorganization charges													(22		)
Other items, net													6
Interest expense													(42		)
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes													(70		)
Income tax benefit													1
Net loss													$	(69	)

Identifiable assets (domestic)	$	1,340		$	5,254		$	42		$	163		$	6,799
Capital expenditures	$	(11	)	$	(12	)	$	—		$	(5	)	$	(28	)

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Segment Data as of and for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011

(in millions)



	Coal			Gas			DNE			Other and Eliminations			Total
Unaffiliated revenues:
Domestic	$	128		$	178		$	20		$	—		$	326
Total revenues	$	128		$	178		$	20		$	—		$	326

Depreciation and amortization	$	(40	)	$	(33	)	$	—		$	(2	)	$	(75	)
Impairment and other charges	—			—			(1		)	—			(1		)
General and administrative expense	(10		)	(12		)	(3		)	2			(23		)

Operating loss	$	(47	)	$	(32	)	$	(24	)	$	(1	)	$	(104	)

Other items, net	2			1			—			—			3
Interest expense													(89		)
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes													(190		)
Income tax benefit													75
Net loss													$	(115	)

Identifiable assets (domestic)	$	3,617		$	4,265		$	520		$	1,394		$	9,796
Capital expenditures	$	(44	)	$	(17	)	$	(1	)	$	—		$	(62	)

Table of Contents

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC

(A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Interim Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Segment Data as of and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

(in millions)



	Coal			Gas			DNE			Other and Eliminations			Total
Unaffiliated revenues:
Domestic	$	40		$	498		$	27		$	—		$	565
Total revenues	$	40		$	498		$	27		$	—		$	565

Depreciation and amortization	$	(4	)	$	(56	)	$	—		$	(5	)	$	(65	)
General and administrative expense	(5		)	(30		)	(2		)	—			(37		)
Operating income (loss)	$	(22	)	$	32

DYNEGY HOLDINGS, LLC 10-Q