UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For fiscal year ended: December 31, ~~2014~~2015

o☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _______________ to _______________

Commission file number: 000-51697

~~Bridgetech~~Global ~~Holdings International, Inc~~2.0 Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

	Delaware		2181-~~1992090~~0927556
	(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

	2705 Garnet Avenue, Suite 2A San Diego, California		92109
	(Address of principal executive offices)		(Postal Code)

Registrant’'s telephone number, including area code: (858) 847-9090

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, Par Value of $0.001 Per Share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’'s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10K or any amendment to this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ xX ]

1Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer o

Non-Accelerated Filer o Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No o☐

On ~~June~~December 3028, ~~2014~~2015, the ~~last~~initial business day offor the registrant’'s ~~most recently completed second fiscal quarter~~, 97673,~~937,044~~071_shares ~~shares~~ of its Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share (its only class of voting or non-voting common equity) were held by non-affiliates of the registrant. The market value of those shares was $0.00 based on the last sale price of $0.00 per share of the Common Stock on that date. For this purpose, shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by each executive officer and director of the registrant and each beneficial owner of 10% or more of the Common Stock outstanding have been excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As of ~~February~~April 126, ~~2015~~2016, there were 973,~~937~~595,~~044~~ 117 shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $0.001, issued and outstanding and ~~100,000~~200 shares of Series A preferred stock, par value $0.002, issued and outstanding.

APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes o No x

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None

Global 2.0 Corporation

Bridgetech Holdings International, Inc.

FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2014 and 2012~~2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	~~BUSINESS~~	1	1
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	~~RISK FACTORS~~	13	7
ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	~~UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS~~	13	7
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	~~PROPERTIES~~	13	7
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	~~LEGAL PROCEEDINGS~~	13	8
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	~~MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES~~	13	8
PART II
ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	~~MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES~~	14	9
ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	~~SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA~~	15	10
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	~~MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~	15	11
ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	~~QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK~~	16	12
ITEM 8.	CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	~~CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA~~	17	13
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	~~CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE~~	18	14
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	~~CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES~~	18	14
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	~~OTHER INFORMATION~~	19	16
PART III
ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.	~~DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.~~	20	17
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	~~EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~	22	19
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	~~SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS~~	25	22
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	~~CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE~~	27	24
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES	~~PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES~~	27	24
PART IV				24
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	~~EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES~~	28	26
	SIGNATURES	~~SIGNATURES~~	29	27
CERTIFICATIONS
		Exhibit 31 – Management certification
		Exhibit 32 – Sarbanes-Oxley Act

3CERTIFICATIONS


Exhibit 31		Management certification
Exhibit 32		Sarbanes-Oxley Act

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Forward Looking Statements — Cautionary Language

Certain statements made in these documents and in other written or oral statements made by ~~Bridgetech~~Global ~~Holdings International, Inc~~2.0 Corporation or on ~~Bridgetech~~Global ~~Holdings International, Inc~~2.’0 Corporation's behalf are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA"). A forward-looking statement is a statement that is not a historical fact and, without limitation, includes any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements, and may contain words like: "believe", "anticipate", "expect", "estimate", "project", "will", "shall" and other words or phrases with similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, trends in our businesses, prospective products, future performance or financial results. ~~Bridgetech~~Global ~~Holdings International, Inc~~2.0 Corporation claims the protection afforded by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the PSLRA. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from the results contained in the forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to vary materially, some of which are described in this filing. The risks included herein are not exhaustive. This annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and other documents filed with the SEC include additional factors which could impact ~~Bridgetech~~Global ~~Holdings International, Inc~~2.0 Corporation's business and financial performance. Moreover, ~~Bridgetech~~Global ~~Holdings International, Inc~~2.0 Corporation operates in a rapidly changing and competitive environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors. Further, it is not possible to assess the impact of all risk factors on ~~Bridgetech~~Global ~~Holdings International, Inc~~2.0 Corporation's business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. In addition, ~~Bridgetech~~Global ~~Holdings International, Inc~~2.0 Corporation disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of the report.

PART I

As used in this annual report, “"we”", “"us”", “"our”", ~~“Bridgetech”~~"Global 2.0", ~~“Bridgetech~~"Global 2.0 Holdings”" “"Company”" or “"our company”" refers to ~~Bridgetech~~Global ~~Holdings International, Inc~~2.0 Corporation and all of its subsidiaries.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

Except for historical information contained herein, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding future events and the Company’'s plans and expectations. Actual results could differ materially from those discussed herein. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-K or incorporated herein by reference, including those set forth in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

Our company, Global 2.0 Corporation (formally referred to as Global Seafood Acquisition Corporation prior to the Merger Agreement as discussed in Corporate History below) is engaged in the Procurement and Distribution of Seafood internationally. [The predecessor company, Bridgetech Holdings International, Inc., was a company focused primarily on the business of facilitating the transfer of medical drugs, devices and diagnostics from the United States to China and other international locations. WeThis ~~are~~business noceased ~~longer~~all operation in ~~this business~~2008.]

Other than as set out in this annual report, we have not been involved in any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings, nor have we been a party to any material reclassification, merger, consolidation or purchase or sale of a significant amount of assets not in the ordinary course of our business.1

4TABLE OF CONTENTS

Other than as set out in this quarterly report and any prior reports, we have not been involved in any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings, nor have we been a party to any material reclassification, merger, consolidation or purchase or sale of a significant amount of assets not in the ordinary course of our business.

Corporate History

The entity that is the original predecessor of ~~the~~our ~~Company~~company, ~~was~~ originally named "Huggie Heart, Inc.," was incorporated in Delaware on June 4, 1991. ~~From~~In ~~1991~~November ~~through~~ 2002, this ~~predecessor,~~entity ~~which~~acquired ~~was originally named “Huggie Heart~~Parentech, Inc.,” ~~engaged~~a inDelaware ~~several~~corporation, ~~different~~and ~~businesses,~~changed aour ~~merger~~name ~~and~~to ~~several~~"Parentech, ~~similar~~Inc.". Effective ~~corporate~~May ~~transactions~~18, ~~and~~2015, the original predecessor changed ~~its~~their name ~~several~~to ~~times.~~"Global InSeafood ~~November~~Holdings ~~2002,~~Corporation." ~~this~~On ~~entity~~December ~~acquired Parentech~~28, ~~Inc.~~2015, athrough ~~Delaware~~the ~~corporation,~~Merger ~~and~~Agreement ~~changed~~described ~~its~~below, ~~name~~we tobecame ~~“Parentech,~~"Global ~~Inc~~2.”0 Corporation".

~~From~~Global ~~its~~2.0 ~~acquisition~~Corporation ofwas ~~Parentech~~incorporated on December 28, ~~Inc~~2015 as a Delaware corporation under Delaware General Corporation Laws ("Delaware Act"). ~~until~~On the ~~end~~day of ~~2004~~Global 2.0 Corporation incorporation, ~~the~~it became a Holding Company’s ~~primary~~pursuant ~~business~~to ~~was~~Section ~~designing,~~251(g) ~~developing~~of the Delaware Act under an Agreement and ~~marketing~~Plan ~~products~~of ~~intended~~Merger to(the ~~enhance~~"Merger Agreement") with Global Seafood Holding Corporation ("GSHC") and BGTH Pre Inc. ("Merger Corp.") dated the ~~well-being~~same ofdate ~~infants~~(the "Reorganization"). ~~This~~ ~~business~~Under the Merger Agreement, ~~however~~GSHC merged into Merger Corp. and ceased to exist, ~~generated~~wherein ~~only~~the ~~minimal~~Merger ~~revenues~~Corp. became and ~~could~~is ~~not~~the ~~support~~survivor and successor under Section 251(g) of the ~~Company’~~Delaware Act, having acquired all GSHC's ~~ongoing~~assets, ~~operations~~rights and liabilities as the constituent or resulting corporation. ByGlobal 2.0 Corporation became the ~~end~~parent and the Holding Company of ~~2004,~~Merger Corp. under the ~~Company~~Reorganization ~~had~~which ~~begun~~was toin ~~wind~~compliance ~~down~~with ~~its~~Section ~~operations~~251(g) of the Delaware Act and Section 368(a)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

OnUpon ~~January~~consummation ~~10,~~of ~~2005~~the Reorganization, ~~Herbert~~each ~~Wong~~issued and ~~Scott~~outstanding ~~Landow~~equity ~~formed~~of ~~Bridgetech~~the ~~Holdings~~former ~~International,~~GSHC ~~Inc.~~was ~~under~~transmuted ~~the~~into ~~laws~~and ofexchanged ~~the~~for ~~State~~an ofidentical ~~Florida~~equity structure from Global 2.0 Corporation (~~“Old~~on ~~Bridgetech”~~a share-for-share basis). ~~Old~~having ~~Bridgetech~~the same designations, ~~which~~rights, ~~was~~powers ~~privately-held~~and preferences, ~~was~~and ~~formed~~qualifications, tolimitations ~~facilitate~~and ~~the~~restrictions. ~~transfer~~Upon ofconsummation, ~~medical~~Global ~~drugs~~2.0 Corporation, ~~devices~~is ~~and~~the ~~diagnostics~~issuer ~~from~~since the ~~United~~former ~~States~~GSHC equity structure was transmuted pursuant to ~~China~~Section 251(g) into the current issued and ~~other~~outstanding ~~international~~equities ~~locations~~of Global 2.0 Corporation.

InThe ~~February~~Reorganization ~~2005~~was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Act") as there was no "offer" or "sale" as defined in Section 2(3) of the Act so as to invoke the requirements of Rule 145 also under the Act.. Global 2.0 Corporation, as the ~~Company~~issuer, ~~entered~~was ~~into~~given a ~~transaction~~new ~~with~~CUSIP ~~Old~~and ~~Bridgetech~~tax ~~whereby~~identification number. Pursuant to Rule 144(d)(3)(ix) of the ~~Company~~Act, the holding periods for the issued ~~shares~~equities of ~~common~~Global ~~stock~~2.0 toCorporation are the ~~shareholders~~same and "tack" of ~~Old~~the ~~Bridgetech~~original inholding ~~exchange~~periods ~~for~~of ~~all~~the equities transmuted from the former GSHC. Upon consummation of the ~~outstanding~~Merger Agreement, GSHC's common stock was deemed to be registered under Section 12(b) of ~~Old~~the ~~Bridgetech~~Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a) promulgated thereunder. InFor ~~connection~~purposes ~~with~~of ~~this~~Rule ~~transaction~~12g-3(a), GSHC is the ~~Company~~successor ~~changed~~issuer ~~its~~to ~~name~~Global 2.0 Corporation. Subsequent to ~~“Bridgetech~~the ~~Holdings~~completion ~~International~~of the Reorganization, ~~Inc~~the ownership by Global 2.”0 Corporation in Merger Corp was canceled and the shares evidencing ownership in Merger Corp were returned and canceled.

WeGlobal ~~are~~2.0 ~~not~~Corporation ~~actively~~no ~~developing~~longer ~~this~~has ~~business~~any ~~and~~interest ~~have~~or ~~ceased~~ownership ~~operations~~in Merger Corp as the Board of ~~all~~Directors ~~other~~are ~~businesses~~now ~~conducted~~conducting byall ~~Parentech,~~of ~~Inc.~~their ~~prior~~operations tothrough ~~the~~Global ~~transaction~~2.0 ~~with~~Corporation ~~Old~~and ~~Bridgetech~~subsidiaries.

AsGlobal ~~of January 1, 2009, the Company ceased operations of its medical imaging business and has discontinued operations of all of the Company’s activity including of Retail Pilot, Inc~~2.,0 ~~MedLink International, Inc~~Corp. ~~and Clarity Imaging International, Inc.~~

OnA ~~August~~Holding 1,Company ~~2014,~~pursuant weto ~~formed~~Section ~~Global~~251(g) ~~Seafood AC Corporation.~~of the Delaware Act

~~Global~~2015 was an extremely turbulent for the Seafood ACIndustry, ~~Corporation~~as seen by the $5 Billion drop in turnover by the World's 100 Largest Seafood Companies [undercurrent news 10/6/15]. This 'perfect storm' can be attributed to Currency fluctuations (the dollar strengthened a good deal vs. several heavy Seafood Producing currencies including Chile's ; Indonesia's ; the Philippian's ; and Viet Nam's; Political Issues (the Russian Embargo); a renewed focus on illegal and unregulated fishing, (primarily Thailand); the carryover effect of several large bankruptcy filings in 2013-2015, resulting from overpriced acquisitions and the expensive debt that enabled them to be completed[Undercurrent news 10/6/15].

Global Seafood A.C. was established as a wholly owned subsidiary to develop and pursue a strategy to participate in the International Seafood Industry, taking advantage of the current consolidation going on in the overall food industry. The company will look to enter the industry through the acquisition of a recognized industry player that brings with it, the ‘industry infrastructure’ to establish an immediate presence in the market. There is no guarantee that the financing to accomplish this can be assembled. 2

~~Historically,~~TABLE weOF ~~were able to raise a limited amount of capital through private placements of our equity stock, but we are uncertain about our continued ability to raise funds privately.~~CONTENTS

~~During~~This ~~the~~'Perfect ~~year~~Storm' ~~ended~~set ~~December~~a ~~31,~~unique ~~2014,~~landscape ~~our~~on ~~management~~which ~~has~~to ~~been~~execute ~~analyzing~~a ~~the~~Roll-up ~~various~~Strategy ~~alternatives~~and ~~available~~build toa ~~our~~vertically ~~company~~integrated toInternational ~~ensure~~Seafood ~~our~~enterprise. Through ~~survival~~the ~~and~~acquisition toof ~~preserve~~established ~~our~~companies, ~~shareholder's~~now ~~investment~~ in ~~our~~need ~~common~~of ~~shares.~~a ~~This~~safe ~~analysis~~harbor ~~has~~to ~~included~~join ~~sourcing~~and ~~additional~~providing ~~forms~~an ofimmediate ~~financing~~desk tofor ~~continue~~displaced ~~our~~talent ~~business~~from ascompanies ~~is,~~that orcompletely ~~mergers~~imploded, ~~and/or~~the ~~acquisitions.~~Company Athas ~~this~~positioned ~~stage~~itself into ~~our~~acquire ~~operations,~~assets weat ~~believe~~a ~~either~~substantial ~~course~~discount isto ~~acceptable,~~the aspremium ~~our~~normally ~~operations~~expected ~~have~~for ~~not~~acquisitions ~~been profitable~~ and ~~our~~is ~~future~~some ~~prospects~~cases, ~~for~~a ~~our~~discount ~~business~~to ~~are~~today's ~~not~~market ~~good without further financing~~values.

Background - Global Seafood Holdings Corporation, (GSHC), Global Seafood International, Inc. and Global 2.0 Corporation.

On August 1, 2014, Global Seafood Holdings Corporation was established as a wholly owned subsidiary to develop and pursue a strategy to participate in the international seafood industry, taking advantage of the current consolidation going on in the overall food industry.

In January of 2015, Global Seafood Holdings Corporation began to develop a new seafood business opportunity in Chile.

Chilean Aquaculture

Chilean aquaculture began in experimentation in the early 1970's. Industrial level production began in the late 1970's, grew through the 1980's & 1990's until it represented 34% of the world's production by 2003. In 2005, Chile expected to export $1.5 billion worth of fresh-packed salmon, with 40 percent of it coming to the United States.

In 2007, Chile's salmon industry faced the worst crisis in its history. The virus, infectious salmon anemia ("ISA"), was first reported at a Chilean salmon farm owned by a Norwegian company. It quickly spread through southern Chile, wracking a fishing business that had become one of the country's biggest exporters during the past 15 years. The Chilean industry suffered more than $2 billion in losses and saw its production of Atlantic salmon fall by half and subsequently laid off 26,000 workers. In 2007, Salmon reached its highest point, exporting about 76,500,000 tons. Following the outbreak, in 2010, the figures dropped substantially to 30,317,339 tons. [Undercurrent News 10.6.15]

The solution was a massive Antibiotic/Anti-parasitic program initiated by the largest farms and producers in 2009. Mortality rates dropped from a high of 25% to an average of 15.2% in 2014. Chilean salmon farms use on average 700 grams of antibiotics per metric ton of harvested salmon compared to less than 10 grams in Norway.

In mid-2014, the negative impact of Chilean salmon industry's use of the antibiotic oxytetracycline, (put into the feed to fight against the persistent and widespread disease) began surfacing when agencies started to report increasing evidence that resistance had built up in salmon, with the result that the antibiotic was no longer working effectively. Of equal concern, the resistance buildup to oxytetracycline is particularly problematic since the World Health Organization lists the antibiotic as being 'highly important' to use for human health, to fight infections due to chlamydia and brucella. Algal Scientific called it the 'biggest example of egregious use in aquaculture'.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In May 2015, Walmart said it was immediately transitioning to 100% 'antibiotic free' Salmon. Chilean salmon has disappeared from Costco stores as they started selling Norwegian salmon labeled 'raised without antibiotics'. It will inevitably take several 5-10 years to reverse the damage to the industry.

[Undercurrent News June 11, 2015].

Some of the best investment opportunities come after the 'bubble' bursts. We believe that what differentiates our vision and skill set is our strength to begin looking for opportunities when indicators turn bleak and our ability to recognize the viable collateral damage worth pursuing when the 'burst' happens.

Collateral damage is defined as the unexpected harm to things that are incidental to the damaging event, having not been the cause of/nor the intended target of the results.

In the Chilean salmon business, the collateral damage is found in the area south of the Strait of Magellan, known for being prime conditions for salmon farming due to the frigid temperatures. This area is considered Antarctic waters, isolated from the warmer productive areas further north that have been heavily hit by

the ISA virus and now it is dealing with business fall out due to the extensive use of antibiotics. This region does not require antibiotics; however, it has been seriously caught up in the severe reduction in global sales, because it is a salmon product from Chile.

Having not participated in the original wave of investments developing the Chilean salmon industry and fortunately missing the billion dollar losses resulting from the ISA virus and subsequent second round of losses from the antibiotic quagmire, this opportunity, ideally tailored to Global Seafood, was presented to us in February 2015. We believe that Chilean salmon represents a tremendous opportunity for our Company to expand horizontally.

On July 1st, 2015, the first order for products under Global Seafood exceeding 60,000 lbs. and was immediately sold at a profit. During the initial six-month test to assess the opportunity and understand the nuances of the salmon industry, the Company generated $843,245 in revenues, with gross profits before expenses of approximately $125,000.

On December 12, 2015, Global Seafood Holdings Corporation ceased taking orders and all accounts were subsequently settled.

On December 14, 2015, business operations were established and conducted under Global 2.0 (and Global Seafood International, Inc. as a wholly owned subsidiary) to pursue opportunities in the Seafood business. As discussed above, Global 2.0 was formalized on December 28, 2015.

Going forward, the company has conducted business under Global Seafood International, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Global 2.0.

Opportunities that have arisen from the consolidation with the Food Industry/Specifically Seafood

One can debate the reason the Food Industry is consolidating, but not the ripple effect…

At the Brand/Production Level: Hillshire Brands to buy Pinnacle Foods for $6.6 Billion

In July of 2015, the merger between Kraft and Heinz was completed.

In September of 2015, the merger between AB InBev and SABMiller was announced.

At the Distribution Level: US Foods attempted to buy Sysco in 2015, which would have created a $65 billion entity. The Offer was rescinded …

At the Retail Level: Albertsons acquired Safeway for $9 billion

TABLE OF CONTENTS

An industry experiences a consolidation as it matures and sales/revenues can't be increased in the foreseeable future by adding new customers. To keep and support earnings momentum, (and avoid price discounting), larger companies acquire their competition.

Why Seafood vs. Beef; Poultry; Swine or Produce?

WeTABLE ~~are~~OF focusing our preliminary merger/acquisition activities on potential business opportunities with established business entities for the merger of a target business with our company. In certain instances, a target business may wish to become a subsidiary of our company or may wish to contribute assets to our company rather than merge. We anticipate that any new acquisition or business opportunities by our company will require additional financing. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to acquire the financing necessary to enable us to pursue our plan of operation. If our company requires additional financing and we are unable to acquire such funds, our business may fail.CONTENTS

InThe ~~implementing~~Seafood aIndustry: ~~structure~~Background ~~for~~and a particular business acquisition or opportunity, we may become a party to a merger, consolidation, reorganization, joint venture, or licensing agreement with another corporation or entity. We may also acquire stock or assets of an existing business. Upon the ~~consummation~~important ofrole ~~a transaction, it is likely that our present management will no longer be in control~~ of ~~our~~Vertical ~~company and our existing business will close down~~Integration. ~~In addition, it is likely that our officers and directors will, as part of the terms of the acquisition transaction, resign and be replaced by one or more new officers and directors.~~

WeThe ~~anticipate~~Seafood ~~that~~Industry ~~the~~is ~~selection~~Diverse ofand aFragmented ~~business~~with ~~opportunity~~an inestimated ~~which~~$400 toBillion ~~participate~~in ~~will~~Annual beRevenues ~~complex and without certainty of success~~globally. Historically, ~~Management~~Companies ~~believes~~have ~~that~~specialized ~~there~~in ~~are~~a ~~numerous~~single ~~firms~~seafood inspecies ~~various~~segments ~~industries~~within ~~seeking~~ the ~~perceived~~Value ~~benefits of being a publicly registered corporation~~chain. ~~Business~~[FAO ~~opportunities~~(Food ~~may~~Outlook beGlobal ~~available~~Market inAnalysis) ~~many~~2014. ~~different~~The ~~industries~~State ~~and at various stages~~ of ~~development,~~World ~~all~~Fisheries ofand ~~which~~Aquaculture ~~will~~2014.] The ~~make~~Industry ~~the~~is ~~task~~broken ofdown ~~comparative~~into ~~investigation~~three ~~and~~main ~~analysis~~segments ofwith ~~such~~a ~~business~~fourth ~~opportunities~~rapidly ~~extremely difficult and complex.~~emerging:

Wev may seek a business opportunity with entities whom have recently commenced operations, or entities who wish to utilize the public marketplace in order to raise additional capital in order to expand business development activities, to develop a new product or service, or for other corporate purposes. We may acquire assets and establish wholly-owned subsidiaries in various businesses or acquire existing businesses as subsidiaries.Harvesting

At· ~~this~~Commercial stage, we can provide no assurance that we will be able to locate compatible business opportunities, what additional financing we will require to complete a combination or merger with another business opportunity or whether the opportunity's operations will be profitable.Fishing

If· weAquaculture ~~are~~Production ~~unable~~(Farming tovs. ~~secure~~Wild ~~adequate capital to continue our business or alternatively, complete a merger or acquisition, our shareholders will lose some or all of their investment and our business will likely fail.~~Catch)

~~Other~~v than as set out herein, we have not entered into any formal written agreements for a business combination or opportunity. If any such agreement is reached, we intend to disclose such an agreement by filing a current report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Processing

On· ~~July~~Primary 6,– ~~2011,~~cleaning; ~~our~~sorting; ~~Company~~freezing; ~~and~~filleting all of our U.S. subsidiaries (the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions for relief (the “Bankruptcy Filing”) under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California (the “Bankruptcy Court”), which are being jointly administered under Case # 11-11264-PB11. Management's decision to initiate the Bankruptcy Filing was in response to, among other things, our company’s deteriorating liquidity and management's conclusion that the challenges of successfully implementing additional financing initiatives and of obtaining necessary cost concessions from our company’s debtors, was negatively impacting our Company’s ability to implement any turnaround strategy. Pre-petition liabilities that were subject to compromise were reported at the amounts expected to be allowed, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. The amounts classified at December 31, 2011 as “Liabilities subject to compromise” were subject to adjustments depending on bankruptcy court actions, developments with respect to disputed claims, determinations of the secured status of certain claims, the values of any collateral securing such claims, or other events. packaging

Secondary – creation of processed products for ready meals or meal components

Distribution

Wholesale – U.S. Foods/Sysco Distributors

Retail – Supermarkets; Specialty Seafood Stores

In-Trade – Hotels; Restaurants & Institutional

Emerging Fourth Segment - Fish Feed – as Aquaculture continues to grow, the Fish Feed sub-category is expected to produce annual growth of 11.7%. [OECD (The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) and FAO Secretariats.]

The Vision for Global 2.0: Utilizing a public entity, become one of the limited number of remaining 'buyers' in the growing number of motivated sellers in the small-middle tier entities.

During a consolidation market, which management contends began in the seafood industry several years ago and continues to get stronger, the size of the potential buyers group shrinks but the supply of inventory at the small and medium size business categories for sale actually grows, creating, in our opinion, a very inefficient 'Buyer's Market'. Management's vision is to utilize our status as a public entity to attract those smaller and medium entities, who are coming to grips with their rapidly diminishing ability to compete in light of the current seafood industry consolidation, necessitating pursuit of some kind of alliance or merger opportunity just to survive. Effecting this model, we anticipate becoming one of the limited number of remaining 'buyers' among the growing number of motivated sellers in the small-middle tier operators.

AsTABLE aOF ~~result of the Court dismissing the bankruptcy proceeding on June 5, 2012, these liabilities are now reported based on the nature of the liability.~~CONTENTS

~~THERE~~Strategic CAN BE NO ASSURANCES THAT NEGOTIATIONS WITH ANY PROSPECTIVE BUSINESS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE ENTITIES DISCUSSED ABOVE, WILL RESULT IN A MERGER WITH OUR COMPANY OR THAT SUCH MERGER WILL RESULT IN PROFITABILITY.Timing:

~~Patents~~Implementing ~~and~~a ~~Trademarks~~'2nd Wave Strategy' to affect an Industry roll-up:

WeInvesting dotends to be a game of 'Follow the Leader'; hence Bubble's and Bursts. New trends get over-invested normally due to supply and demand. A concept is solid, but the new industry is not ~~own~~ready ~~any~~for ~~patents~~a ordearth ~~trademarks~~of cash; so poorly conceived and executed projects get funded in the crowd and eventually fail. The bubbles will end only when the greater fool becomes the greatest fool who pays the top price for the overvalued asset and can no longer find another buyer to pay for it at a higher price.

Some of the best investment opportunities come after the 'Bubble' bursts; as speculative money moves on and legitimate projects have a difficult time finding growth capital.

As an industry grows through various stages, sometimes the best skill is the ability to wait until the crowd moves on!

Strategic investments can be identified during each stage/cycle as an industry develops;

Origination: A 'Hot' new Product/Category is introduced

Market Development/Expansion/Penetration: if demand is validated, competitors emerge; discounting is established; The successful entrants will pursue revenue growth with Product Line/Brand extension;

Market Capacity: Eventually, markets mature; margins erode; oversupply of Parts/Materials may occur; and Finished Goods Inventories exceed demand; weaker Brands Exit Market and then Consolidation.

… But the best risk/reward opportunities come during Consolidation. When Industries Consolidate there will always be Change; Disruption and Opportunities. Industry consolidation forces movement. Companies can't stand still because the market itself changes. It becomes simple economics... shop when there are more sellers than buyers. It is a byproduct opportunity that comes with an Industry Consolidation.

Look at it similar to waiting to do your holiday gift shopping beginning Dec. 26^th, (the 'After Christmas Sales'); that period directly after Christmas where retailers are trying to keep sales going via discounting and promotions. Since the primary purchase stimulator is over, (gift giving), the size of the group still looking to make purchases is significantly smaller. It is actually a complete reverse in the shopping equation as retailers are now looking to sell off what's remaining to those who are not motivated by delivering a gift on time but solely by price.

In an Industry Consolidation market; the size of the potential buyers group does shrink, but the supply of inventory at the Small and Medium size business categories for sale actually grows, creating a very inefficient 'Buyer's Market'.

This occurs because of three irreversible changes that take effect as a result of Consolidation:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Size: Initially, a few Key Large target companies will be purchased at a substantial premium in order to create size quickly. The New combined entity will continue to make acquisitions but the target size requirement will get larger as smaller 'bites' can no longer have any significant effect on economies of scale; revenues and profits. Immediately after the initial purchases, it stops being feasible for the new Large Companies to pursue Small and Middle market acquisition opportunities. They can't justify the allocating the resources for acquisitions that will not have a discernable effect on revenues and their bottom line.

Margins: Since Consolidation is often the result of markets maturing experiencing fewer growth opportunities, additional profits are now pursued by taking advantage of economies of scale by expanding a company's footprint:

By acquiring competitors, (effectively reducing supply choices for their customers), they minimize discounting; stabilize the market; and can slowly begin to increase prices.

As the major sources continue to grow in size, so does their purchasing power, putting pressure on component suppliers to reduce their prices, lured by the attraction of higher volumes or simply staying viable.

Dynamics: To achieve the expected cost savings and economies of scale, the new combined entity will eliminate infrastructure duplications. This can be accomplished by reducing the number of resources they purchase from per category; which will enable a reduction in the buying staff and their support system. To stay viable, suppliers will be expected to grow in both size and vertical integration. Those suppliers that survive the cuts, will be expected to handle larger volumes; additional categories; covering more territories; at lower price points. (Example: four resources for product X might require oversight by a staff of eight, but encouraging one source to grow in capacity and selection could reduce that staff number to four.)

This 2^nd Wave Strategy could also be called 'The art of buying undervalued businesses in sectors others are desperate to escape'.

Buy Low/Sell High, but always be in the Market: In almost every market, opportunity moves from the Buy side to the Sell side and back again. By positioning Global Seafood A.C. as one of the only remaining 'Ready Buyers' to vulnerable and displaced Small and Medium size entities, the Company will maintain its 'Buy Low' strategy. At the same time, each acquisition dramatically increases revenues, gradually attracting the attention of the remaining large entities. At some level, the Company will move from 'acquirer' to 'potential target', potentially attracting bidding wars and premium offers that the few available targets in the size range enjoy.

On the Buy Side: Under normal circumstances, to gain control of a target, acquirers must pay its shareholders a premium over the current market value. Although premiums can vary widely, the average ones for corporate control have been fairly stable: almost 30 percent of the pre-offer price of the target's equity. For targets pursued by multiple acquirers, the premium rises dramatically, creating the so-called winner's curse. If several companies evaluate a given target and all identify roughly the same potential synergies, the pursuer that overestimates them most will offer the highest price. Since it is based on an overestimation of the value to be created, the winner pays too much—and is ultimately a loser.

Instead of competing for the largest acquisition targets attracting premium prices, Global Seafood will focus its purchases among the remaining entities that are now too small to be of interest to the largest buyers and no longer viable as a stand-alone entity competing in the overall market.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

These are the historically solid businesses that in all likelihood not able to continue to complete and survive with what is left in the marketplace. With owners in their 60's and 70's with either no family members wanting to, or capable of, taking over the business, they now discover there are few buyers looking to cash out their lifetime of work.

The challenge for smaller companies is that retailers only want to stock a certain number of brands on their shelves. Access to retail shelf space and management succession issues are all making it more difficult for small independent companies to complete with the bigger players.

With few if any alternatives, these pieces will sell at discounts to historical values before the consolidation began and be very flexible with regards to terms and accepting the majority of the price in paper.

The acquisitions made in the small to medium size of a category tend to be completed at smaller premiums. Private companies get valued substantially lower because there is no public market where, which adds value because of the liquidity factor. Private acquisitions often stem from the seller's desire to get out rather than the buyer's desire for a purchase.

Increase the Company's Market Value:

Growth by rolling up middle tier companies, enables the acquisition company to consistently deliver increased EBITDA, even if growth slows in the overall market.

The Value Arbitrage; if a public company trading at 20x earnings buys a small private company for 5x earnings, the earnings of the latter automatically trade at 20x as part of the whole entity. When the public company reports earnings the first time after making the acquisition, the tranche of its earnings from the acquisition naturally trades at the same multiple as the whole entity, 20x instead of 5x, completing the arbitrage.

Maintaining a Buy/Sell Position in the Market

Keeping the acquisition window limited to the Small and Medium size target companies give Global Seafood the unique flexibility to be a Strategic Buyer and Seller… at the same time.

With each additional acquisition, the Company grows closer to the size of a Top Tier. At some level of revenues, the Company becomes an attractive target. Having grown without getting saddled with expensive long term debt, the Company will be easier to finance for a buyer. If purchase premiums rise to a high enough level, selling becomes a very positive exit strategy.

Acquisitions in Discussion with Letters of Intent:

Blue Star Foods

The Management Team of Global 2.0 set out to build the company's strategy for growth around access to and the guidance of the management group at John Keeler & Co. d/b/a Blue Star Foods. The primary focus of Blue Star and current source of revenue is importing blue and red swimming crab meat primarily from Indonesia, Philippines and China and distributing it in the United States, Mexico, Canada, the Caribbean, United Kingdom, France, Singapore and Hong Kong under several brand names such as Blue Star, Seassentials, Oceanica, Pacifika and Harbor Banks. To that end, it planned to acquire and utilize the infrastructure as the central base from which to build. (John Keeler & Co., Ltd.' audited results submitted in the Company's DEF 14C Filing dated April 22, 2015, John Keeler & Co. reported 'Net revenues were approximately $49,246,767 in fiscal 2014 and Gross Profit increased to $6,913,676.)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

On February 18, 2015, a Merger Agreement was executed between Global Seafood Holdings Corp, and John Keeler & Co., Inc., (subsequently amended on July 24, 2015), restructured for an initial purchase of nineteen percent (19%) of John Keeler & Co., Inc. and the option to purchase the remaining eighty-one percent (81%) on or before December 31, 2016. That option remained in Global Seafood Holdings Corp and a subsequent agreement with Global 2.0 had not been entered into as of Dec 31, 2015.

Philippian Manufacturing Facilities Acquisitions

On November 11, 2015, Global Seafood Holdings Corp entered into a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding to acquire the majority of the equity (not less than 95% of each entity) of two seafood packaging companies located in the Philippians, with represented historical revenues exceeding $15 million per year. The consideration for this negotiated transaction will be our restricted common shares and we expect to close on the acquisitions in stages beginning in 2016. That Memorandum of Understanding remains in Global Seafood Holdings Corp. and a subsequent agreement with Global 2.0 had not been entered into as of Dec 31, 2015.

Model Objectives and Exit Strategy

Focus on the Supply Side:

Vertical Integration: Moving forward, a successful roll-up strategy in the Seafood industry must include Vertical Integration as a core element to effectively drive revenues and profits. Building a business that incorporates ownership and control from Harvesting to Processing and Distribution can enable the Company to:

Achieve operational synergies, cost reductions and higher margins

Maintain quality control as traceability of the end product has become a major emphasis for food safety

Establish faster distribution to customers and have the built in ability to adapt quickly to the changing demands of customers

Improve the acquired company's performance: Improving the performance of the target company is one of the most common value-creating acquisition strategies. Put simply, you buy a company and radically reduce costs to improve margins and cash flows. In some cases, the acquirer may also take steps to accelerate revenue growth.

Size: The increase in size will also enable the Company to meet the expectations of the top customers who are looking for vendors who can deliver product in larger enough volumes to accommodate their growth and market coverage.

Margins: The aim of these deals is to take advantage of greater size, bring on more sophisticated management and reduce costs. Additional profits are now achieved by taking advantage of economies of scale from expanding a company's footprint. Larger companies have stronger negotiating clout; (example: more buying power to purchase goods in bulk). Fewer vendor choices can reduce discounting; stabilize margins and create the opportunity to and increase pricing.

Dynamics: To achieve the expected cost savings and economies of scale, the new combined entity will eliminate infrastructure duplications.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Ability to be more aggressive with key acquisition targets by minimizing overall debt: The best way to create value from an acquisition is to buy cheap—in other words, at a price below a company's intrinsic value. Such opportunities can be brief moments when Markets, for example, sometimes overreact to negative news, such as a unavoidable worldwide event, (weather, nature, political change) or the failure of a single product in a portfolio with many strong ones.

With the majority of the purchase price to be paid in securities, the Company can make superior offers to a potential acquisition because they are not reliant on finding additional capital for a higher offer.

Less Debt than competing companies of similar size, not only delivers stronger earnings with less constraints due to a heavy debt load. It also keeps 'dry powder' available when time is limited and flexibility is needed to take advantage of market dynamics, which may cause a short term drop in the cost of raw materials or speed up a sense of urgency to a potential target due to cash flow issues.

Accelerate market access for the new and existing companies' products; Often relatively small companies with innovative products have difficulty reaching the entire potential market for their products. By adding access to the existing customer base of the core company itself, new products can reach cost effective production levels and profitability sooner

Management

The biggest impediment that occurs transitioning from a company that has grown 'organically' to 'growth through acquisition/roll up' is the drain on existing management. Beginning a roll up strategy can be a daunting task to even the most experienced and savvy management team if acquisitions have never before been part of their corporate development plans.

In 2014, John Keeler, (the founder of John Keeler & Co. d/b/a Blue Star Foods), recognized the emerging consolidation within the Seafood Industry and began to explore growth opportunities. (Located in Miami, Florida, John Keeler & Co., Inc. has been in business since 1995. The primary focus of Blue Star and current source of revenue is importing blue and red swimming crab meat.

Keeler, utilizing the management expertise developed over the past nineteen years, recruited select professionals with extensive experience in Seafood procurement/distribution and implementing 'roll-up' strategies to round out the management team that would build Global 2.0, a new business strategy for a vertically integrated International Premium Seafood company that would focus on several categories of both 'shell' and 'fin' fish. Conducting business under the name of Global Seafood International, Inc., the Management team will utilize their respective reputation and skill sets to establish a universal footprint within the industry, (beyond the Crab Meat category).

Global 2.0's business model addresses the immediate/transitional requirements for its management team, as well as builds the necessary talent pool to run the entity long term as it grows exponentially.

John Keeler – Founding Partner of John Keeler & Co. d/b/a Blue Star Foods:

In 1995, Mr. Keeler started a seafood import company from scratch that has grown to become one of the leading Marketers of Imported Blue Swimming Crabmeat in the US. He has successfully built sales over the past 20 years to $36 million annually through 2013, without ever pursuing outside investment capital. Now recognized as a leader and innovator in the seafood industry, this US based operation delivered 2014 sales exceeding $50 million, primarily sourced from East Asia. Having not lost his passion for how he began, he still oversees operating facilities in the Philippines and Indonesia with production potential of close to 10 million lbs. annually.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pedro Veganzones – Managing Director

Since 2001, Mr. Veganzones has held senior positions in the Chilean Seafood Industry, where he was personally responsible for the development of new relationships with some of the largest wholesale/retail seafood procurement companies in the US and Asia. His skills negotiating with clients and managing interdepartmental teams have proven key to increasing the value of companies through improved management strategies. His expertise includes fresh and frozen Salmon, Steelhead, Coho, Mussels and Crab products. Mr. Veganzones had risen to the position of National Sales Director, USA, prior to joining Global Seafood Holdings Corp in 2015 and establishing his founding role in Global 2.0.

Scott D. Landow – Founding Partner:

A serial entrepreneur with over 30 years' experience building and executing business plans in Investment Banking; Specialty Retail; Medical Equipment; Beverages & Sports Nutrition, successfully conducting business from the primarily from East Asia, U.S. to China, Japan, Korea and the Middle East. Mr. Landow specializes in building business strategies for emerging growth companies that have plateaued using their own momentum. He has been the CEO/Chairman of several public companies, typically in a 'transitional role' for a few years, aggregating and integrating new resources and managerial expertise to lead the next evolution and growth. For the past several years he has also been an Adjunct Professor of Entrepreneurship at California State University.

Employees

WeAs ~~currently~~of ~~have~~the nodate ~~employees~~of ~~other~~this ~~than our sole officer and director. We expect to use consultants~~filing, ~~attorneys~~we ~~and~~have ~~accountants~~no ~~as necessary, and do not anticipate a need to engage any full-time~~ employees.

Research and Development

We have incurred $Nil in research and development expenditures over the last two fiscal years.

Purchase of Significant Equipment

We do not intend to purchase any significant equipment over the twelve months.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

You are advised to read this Form 10-K in conjunction with other reports and documents that we file from time to time with the SEC. In particular, please read our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K that we file from time to time. You may obtain copies of these reports directly from us or from the SEC at the SEC’'s Public Reference Room at 100 F. Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549, and you may obtain information about obtaining access to the Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains information for electronic filers at its website http://www.sec.gov.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS

As a “"smaller reporting company”", we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

As a “"smaller reporting company”", we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

We are currently operating from 2705 Garnet Ave Suite 2a San Diego, CA 92109. Our office services and office space ~~are~~was provided without charge by the sole officer and director of our company through December 31, 2015. On February 1,2016 we entered into a sublease agreement for two offices located in Doral, Florida. Monthly rent is $782.44. We do not anticipate that we will require any additional premises in the foreseeable future.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are currently not involved in any litigation that we believe could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our company’'s or our company’'s subsidiaries’' officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

813

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTANT’'S COMMON STOCK, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUERS PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

~~Bridgetech~~Global Seafood Holdings Corp common stock was traded in the over-the-counter market, and quoted in the National Association of Securities Dealers Inter-dealer Quotation System (“"Electronic Bulletin Board) www.otcmarkets.com under the symbol “"BGTH.~~” Bridgetech~~" Global Seafood Holdings Corp. common stock ceased trading in the over-the-counter market on April 14, 2013. Global 2.0's common stock is not traded on any exchange.

At December 31, 2014, there were 97,937,044 shares of common stock of Bridgetech outstanding and there were approximately 618 shareholders of record of the Company’s common stock.

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low bid quotations for Bridgetech’s common stock when it was trading. These quotations represent inter-dealer quotations, without adjustment for retail markup, markdown or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

Periods	High		Low
Fiscal Year 2014
First Quarter (January – March 2014)	$	--	$	--
Second Quarter (April – June 2014)	$	--	$	--
Third Quarter (July – September 2014)	$	--	$	--
Fourth Quarter (October – December 2014)	$	--	$	--
Fiscal Year 2013
First Quarter (January – March 2013)	$	.01	$	.01
Second Quarter (April – June 2013)	$	.01	$	.01
Third Quarter (July – September 2013)	$	--	$	--
Fourth Quarter (October – December 2013)	$	--	$	--

Dividends

We may never pay any dividends to our shareholders. We did not declare any dividends for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015. Our Board of Directors does not intend to distribute dividends in the near future. The declaration, payment and amount of any future dividends will be made at the discretion of the Board of Directors, and will depend upon, among other things, the results of our operations, cash flows and financial condition, operating and capital requirements, and other factors as the Board of Directors considers relevant. There is no assurance that future dividends will be paid, and if dividends are paid, there is no assurance with respect to the amount of any such dividend.

Transfer Agent

~~Bridgetech~~Global ‘2.0 's Transfer Agent and Registrar for the common stock is Colonial Stock Transfer located in Salt Lake City, Utah.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

~~The~~Global ~~Company~~Seafood ~~has~~Holdings Corp had two stock option plans: the 2001 Stock Option Plan (the “"2001 Plan”") and the 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “"2005 Plan”"). There are currently no options outstanding under the 2001 Plan, ~~and~~or ~~5,000,000 options remain available for future issuance under~~ the 2005 Plan. ~~The~~Both ~~Company~~Plans ~~does~~are ~~not~~terminated ~~intend~~and toneither ~~grant~~plan ~~any~~was ~~more~~carried ~~options~~forward ~~under~~into ~~the~~Global ~~2001 Plan~~2.0 ~~The Company’s 2005 Plan, which was implemented after the reverse split, provides for the grant of options to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of the~~ Corporation.

Plan Category	Number of Securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
	(a)		(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		- 0 -		- 0 -	- 0 -
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		- 0 -		- 0 -	- 0 -
Total		- 0 -		- 0 -	_______

Company’s common stock at consideration to be determined from time-to-time by the Company’s Board of Directors. Both plans have been approved by the Company’s Board of Directors and shareholders.14

ATABLE ~~total~~OF of 5,000,000 shares were reserved for issuance from time to time under the 2005 Plan. This number would be adjusted in the event of any change in the outstanding common stock of the Company by reason of any stock dividend, stock split or similar corporate change. If an option granted under the 2005 Plan expires or otherwise terminates without having been exercised, the shares of common stock subject to such option shall be available for grant again under the 2005 Plan. In July 2007, the Company granted 4,660,000 options under the 2005 Plan. As of February 12, 2015 none of these options were still outstanding.CONTENTS

The 2005 Plan is administered by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Board of Directors may grant options to any employee, consultant or director of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. On the date of grant, the board of directors will determine the vesting schedule, expiration date and option exercise price for each option. The per-share exercise price of any incentive stock option, or ISO, may not be less than the fair market value of a share of the Company’s stock on the date of grant, as determined in accordance with the terms of the 2005 Plan. The per-share exercise price of any non-qualified stock option, or NSO, may not be less than 85% of the fair market value of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Any increase in the maximum number of shares for which options may be granted under the 2005 Plan must be approved by the Company’s shareholders.

Plan Category	Number of Securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
	(a)	(b)	(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	- 0 -	- 0 -	10,000,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	- 0 -	- 0 -	- 0 -
Total	- 0 -	- 0 -	10,000,000

Recent sales of unregistered securities

WeThere ~~did~~were ~~not~~no ~~sell~~sales ~~any~~of ~~equity~~unregistered securities ~~which~~between ~~were~~the ~~not~~commencement ~~registered~~of ~~under~~business ~~the~~for ~~Securities~~Global ~~Act~~2.0 ofCorporation ~~1933~~and ~~during~~ the ~~year~~date ~~ended~~of ~~December~~this ~~31, 2014~~filing.

Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

We did not purchase any of our shares of common stock or other securities during our fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

As a “"smaller reporting company”", we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OR PLAN OF OPERATION.

The following is management’'s discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected our financial position and operating results during the periods included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, as well as information relating to the plans of our current management. This report includes forward-looking statements. Generally, the words “"believes,”" “"anticipates,”" “"may,”" “"will,”" “"should,”" “"expect,”" “"intend,”" “"estimate,”" “"continue,”" and similar expressions or the negative thereof or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including the matters set forth in this report or other reports or documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time, which could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those projected. Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto and other financial information contained elsewhere in this Form 10-K

Critical Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenues in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 605, "Revenue Recognition", and with the guidelines of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 104 "Revenue Recognition".

Under SAB 104, four conditions must be met before revenue can be recognized: (i) there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or service has been rendered, (iii) the price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collection is reasonably assured.

The Company recognizes revenue on brokered product sales at the time when the product is shipped to the customer. The Company evaluates the criteria outlined in ASC Topic 605-45, Principal Agent Considerations, in determining whether it is appropriate to record the gross amount of product sales and related costs or the net amount earned as commissions. Since the Company is the primary obligor in the transaction, does take custody of the product, amounts earned are determined based on an amount per pound of fish sold, and the sales price is determined by the Company, revenue is recorded on a gross basis.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“"GAAP”") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, (ii) the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and (iii) the reported amount of net sales and expenses recognized during the periods presented. Adjustments made with respect to the use of estimates often relate to improved information not previously available. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of financial statements; accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates.

These estimates and assumptions also affect the reported amounts of revenues, costs and expenses during the reporting period. Management evaluates these estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are provided based on the provisions of ASC Topic 740, "Accounting for Income Taxes", to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

The Company adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 740; "Accounting For Uncertainty In Income Taxes-An Interpretation Of ASC Topic 740 ("ASC Topic 740"). ASC Topic 740 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not, that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount, which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating the Company's tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments. At December 31, ~~2014~~2013, the Company did not record any liabilities for uncertain tax positions.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~Fiscal~~Global ~~Year~~2.0 ~~Ended~~began operations in December of 2015. For the period from December 28, 2015 through December 31, ~~2014~~2015, ~~Compared~~we togenerated ~~Fiscal~~revenues ~~Year~~of ~~Ended~~$59,776, ~~December~~with 31cost of revenues at $38,425 ~~2013~~for a gross profit of $21,351. Our operating expenses during this period were $26,947 resulting in a net loss of $5,596.

We currently have no operating activities. As of January 1, 2009, we ceased operations of our medical imaging business and had discontinued the prior operations of Retail Pilot, Inc., MedLink International, Inc. and Clarity Imaging International, Inc. On August 1, 2014, we formed Global Seafood AC Corporation but, to date, it has no operations.

We presently have no operations but our plan of operation is to identify and merge with a potential merger candidate/candidates to create new shareholder value and reestablish the Company going forward.

General and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) totaled $154,111 for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $271,763 for the year ended December 31, 2013. SG&A costs in 2014 and 2013 include the salary of our sole officer and director.

Interest Expense decreased to $40,951 for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to $338,583 for the year ended December 31, 2013. Interest Expense in 2014 and 2013 reduced due to the reduction in debt through debt mitigation.

Gain on extinguishment of debt decreased to $1,600,303 from $8,194,406 for year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The gain is from the extinguishment of debt through debt mitigation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

WeAs ~~have incurred an accumulated deficit~~ of ~~approximately $52,129,442 as of~~ December 31, ~~2014~~2015, ~~current~~we ~~assets~~had ~~were~~cash ~~$30,004 and current liabilities were approximately $509,708 as~~ of ~~December 31, 2014~~$500. ~~We are currently in default on our convertible notes payable,~~ and ~~have~~accounts ~~been~~receivable ~~unable~~of ~~to raise the capital to pay such notes. Should the note holders call their notes~~$59, ~~we would be unable to pay them~~776. Our Asliabilities ~~of December 31, 2014, the total principal and interest arising from unpaid debt to unrelated third parties and related parties~~ totaled ~~approximately~~ $~~509~~65,~~708~~372.

We do not presently generate any revenue to fund the planned development of our business. In order to develop our business plan, we will require funds for working capital. We do not presently have any firm commitments for additional working capital and there are no assurances that such capital will be available to us when needed or upon terms and conditions which are acceptable to us. If we are able to secure additional working capital through the sale of equity securities, the ownership interests of our current stockholders will be diluted. If we raise additional working capital through the issuance of debt our future interest expense will increase. We are currently in default on all of our outstanding debt to unrelated third parties and have been unable to raise the capital to pay such notes. Should the debt holders call their notes, we would be unable to pay them.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, the Company has a working capital deficit and has not generated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we incurred a net income of $1,405,241 (primarily through the extinguishment of debt) and at December 31, 2014 has an accumulated deficit of $52,129,442. These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

We are dependent upon funds from private investors and the support of certain stockholders. Management is proposing to raise any necessary additional funds through loans and additional sales of its common stock. There is no assurance that we will be successful in raising additional capital. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

Contractual Obligations

As a “"smaller reporting company”", we are not required to provide tabular disclosure obligations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a “"smaller reporting company”", we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

1216

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~BRIDGETECH~~GLOBAL ~~HOLDINGS INTERNATIONAL, INC~~2.0 CORPORATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS		Page
REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM		F-1
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
	Balance Sheet at December 31, 2015	F-2
	Statement of Operations for the period from December 28, 2015 to December 31, 2015	F-3
	Statement of Stockholders' Deficit for the period from December 28, 2015 to December 31, 2015	F-4
	Statement of Cash Flows for the period from December 28, 2015 to December 31, 2015	F-5
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		F-6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS	F-1
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2014 and 2013	F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 2014 and 2013	F-3
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit for the years ended
December 31, 2014 and 2013	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2014 and 2013	F-5
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	F-6

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

~~Bridgetech~~REPORT ~~Holdings~~OF ~~International,~~INDEPENDENT ~~Inc.~~REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

~~San~~To ~~Diego,~~the CABoard of Directors and Stockholders of

WeGlobal ~~have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bridgetech Holdings International, Inc~~2.,0 and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended. Bridgetech Holdings International, Inc.’s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.Corporation

WeSan conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to haveDiego, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.California

InWe ~~our~~have ~~opinion,~~audited the accompanying consolidated ~~financial~~balance ~~statements~~sheet ~~referred~~of toGlobal ~~above~~2.0 ~~present~~Corporation ~~fairly,~~(the in"Company") ~~all~~as ~~material~~of ~~respects~~December 31, 2015, and the related consolidated ~~financial~~statement ~~position~~ of ~~Bridgetech Holdings International~~operations, ~~Inc.~~stockholders' deficit and ~~its~~cash ~~subsidiaries~~flows asfor ofthe ~~December~~period ~~31,~~from ~~2014~~December ~~and 2013~~28, ~~and~~2015 ~~the~~through ~~consolidated~~December ~~results~~31, of2015. ~~their~~These ~~operations~~financial ~~and~~statements ~~their~~are ~~consolidated~~the ~~cash~~responsibility ~~flows~~of ~~for~~ the ~~year~~Company's ~~then~~management. ~~ended,~~Our inresponsibility ~~conformity~~is ~~with~~to ~~accounting~~express ~~principles~~an ~~generally~~opinion ~~accepted~~on inthese ~~the~~financial ~~United~~statements ~~States~~based ofon ~~America~~our audit.

~~The~~We ~~accompanying~~conducted ~~consolidated~~our ~~financial~~audit ~~statements~~in ~~have~~accordance ~~been~~with ~~prepared~~the ~~assuming~~standards of the Public Company ~~will~~Accounting ~~continue~~Oversight asBoard a(United ~~going concern~~States). AsThose ~~discussed~~standards inrequire ~~Note~~that 1we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements, ~~the~~are free of material misstatement. The Company ~~has~~is ~~suffered~~not ~~recurring~~required ~~losses~~to ~~from~~have, ~~operations~~nor were we engaged to perform, ~~has~~an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a ~~working~~basis ~~capital~~for ~~deficiency,~~designing ~~and~~audit ~~has~~procedures ~~not~~that ~~generated~~are ~~revenues~~appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the ~~year~~purpose ~~ended~~of ~~December~~expressing ~~31,~~an ~~2014~~opinion ~~and~~on ~~2013~~the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. ~~Those~~Accordingly, ~~conditions~~we ~~raise~~express ~~substantial~~no ~~doubt~~such ~~about~~opinion. ~~its~~An ~~ability~~audit toincludes ~~continue~~examining, ason a ~~going~~test ~~concern.~~basis, ~~The~~evidence ~~consolidated~~supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. doAn ~~not~~audit ~~include~~also ~~any~~includes ~~adjustments~~assessing ~~that~~the ~~might~~accounting ~~result~~principles ~~from~~used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the ~~outcome~~overall offinancial ~~this~~statement ~~uncertainty~~presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Global 2.0 Corporation as of December 31, 2015, and the results of its consolidated operations and its cash flows for the period from December 28, 2015 through December 31, 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered losses from operation and has a working capital deficit as of December 31, 2015. These conditions raise significant doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in this regard are described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP

MaloneBailey, LLP

www.malonebailey.com

Houston, Texas

~~February~~April 126, ~~2015~~2016

F-1

~~BRIDGETECH~~TABLE ~~HOLDINGS~~OF ~~INTERNATIONAL, INC.~~CONTENTS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
GLOBAL 2.0 CORPORATION
	December 31,			December 31,
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
	2014			2013
FOR THE PERIOD FROM DECEMBER 28, 2015 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015
Cash	$	30,004		$	116
	December 31,
TOTAL ASSETS	$	30,004		$	116
	2015
LIABILITES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Cash		500
Accrued interest	$	25,198		$	501,426
Accounts Receivable		59,776
Accrued interest - related party		36,578			19,703
TOTAL ASSETS		60,276
Notes payable - related party		50,000			-
LIABILITES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Convertible notes payable		53,000			1,153,000
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Revolving line of credit - related party		344,932			210,932
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities		65,372
Total liabilities		509,708			1,885,061
TOTAL LIABILITIES		65,372
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES		-			-
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT):
Series A 8% cumulative convertible preferred stock, $0.002 par value
Series A 8% cumulative convertible preferred stock, $.002 par value
10,000,000 shares authorized, 100,000 issued and outstanding		200			200
5,000,000 shares authorized, 200 issued and outstanding		-
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized;
Series B convertible preferred stock, $.02 par value
97,937,044 and 97,937,044 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		97,937			97,937
2,000,000 shares authorized, 0 issued and outstanding		-
Additional paid-in capital		51,551,601			51,551,601
Common stock, $.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized;
Accumulated deficit		(52,129,442	)		(53,534,683	)
3,595,117 shares issued and outstanding		3,595
Total stockholders' deficit		(479,704	)		(1,884,945	)
Additional paid-in capital		(3,095	)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$	30,004		$	116
Accumulated deficit		(5,596	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(5,096	)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT):		60,276
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2

BRIDGETECH HOLDINGS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 AND 2013
	For the Years Ended
	December 31,
	2014			2013
OPERATING EXPENSES:
General and administrative expenses	$	154,111		$	271,763
Total operating expenses		154,111			271,763
OPERATING LOSS		(154,111	)		(271,763	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Gain on sale of assets		-			25,579
Interest expense		(40,951	)		(338,583	)
Gain on extinguishment of debt		1,600,303			8,194,406
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)		1,559,352			7,881,402
NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	1,405,241		$	7,609,639
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic and Diluted	$	0.01		$	0.08
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
Basic and Diluted		97,937,044			97,937,044
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GLOBAL 2.0 CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE PERIOD FROM DECEMBER 28, 2015 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015

	For the Period Ended
	December 31,
	2015

REVENUE	$	59,776

COST OF REVENUE		38,425

GROSS PROFIT		21,351

OPERATING EXPENSES:
Selling, general and administrative expenses		26,947
Total operating expenses		26,947

OPERATING LOSS		(5,596	)


NET LOSS	$	(5,596	)

NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic and Diluted	$	(0.00	)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
Basic and Diluted		3,595,117

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-3

BRIDGETECH HOLDINGS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER' DEFICIT
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 AND 2013
									Additional
	Series A Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Paid-in		Accumulated
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			Total
DECEMBER 31, 2012		100,000	$	200		97,937,044	$	97,937	$	49,950,366	$	(61,144,322	)	$	(11,095,819	)
Exstinguisment of related party debt										1,601,235					1,601,235
Net income		-		-		-		-		-		7,609,639			7,609,639
DECEMBER 31, 2013		100,000	$	200		97,937,044	$	97,937	$	51,551,601	$	(53,534,683	)	$	(1,884,945	)
Net income		-		-		-		-		-		1,405,241			1,405,241
DECEMBER 31, 2014		100,000	$	200		97,937,044	$	97,937	$	51,551,601	$	(52,129,442	)	$	(479,704	)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GLOBAL 2.0 CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE PERIOD FROM DECEMBER 28, 2015 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015

	Series A Preferred Stock				Common Stock
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital			AccumulateDeficit			Total

DECEMBER 28, 2015		-		-		-		-		-			-			-

Capital Contribution										500						500
Founder Shares		200		-		3,595,117		3,595		(3,595	)		-			-
Net Loss		-		-		-		-		-			(5,596	)		(5,596	)

DECEMBER 31, 2015		200		-		3,595,117		3,595		(3,095	)		(5,596	)		(5,096	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-4

BRIDGETECH HOLDINGS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 AND 2013
	For years ended
	December 31,
	2014			2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	1,405,241		$	7,609,639
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
used in operating activities:
Gain on extinguishment of debt		(1,600,303	)		(8,194,406	)
Gain on the sale of E-Cash stock		-			(25,579	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		-			119,972
Accrued interest		40,950			338,583
Net cash used in operating activities		(154,112	)		(151,791	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from sale of investment		-			25,579
Net cash provided by financing activities		-			25,579
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from notes payable - related party		50,000			-
Proceeds from line of credit - related party		134,000			178,807
Repayment of line of credit - related party		-			(52,479	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		184,000			126,328
NET CHANGE IN CASH		29,888			116
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD	$	116		$	-
CASH, END OF PERIOD	$	30,004		$	116
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-
Interest paid	$	-		$	-
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Extinguishment of related party debt	$	-		$	1,601,235

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GLOBAL 2.0 CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE PERIOD FROM DECEMBER 28, 2015 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015

	For the Period Ended
	December 31,
	2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(5,596	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
from operating activities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(59,776	)
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities		65,372
Net cash used in operating activities		-

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Capital Contribution		500

Net cash provided by financing activities		500

NET CHANGE IN CASH		500
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		-
CASH, END OF PERIOD	$	500

NON CASH TRANSACTIONS:
Founder Shares	$	(3,595	)

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Income taxes paid	$	-
Interest paid	$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-5

~~NOTE~~TABLE ~~1 – BUSINESS AND NATURE~~ OF ~~OPERATIONS AND GOING CONCERN~~CONTENTS

~~Bridgetech~~NOTE Holdings International, Inc. (the “Company”) was a company previously focused primarily on the business of facilitating the transfer of medical drugs, devices and diagnostics from the United States to China and other international locations. We are no longer in this business. The entity that is the original predecessor of the Company was originally incorporated in Delaware on June 4, 1991. As of January 1, ~~2009,~~– ~~the~~BUSINESS ~~Company~~AND ~~ceased~~NATURE ~~operations~~OF of its medical imaging business and discontinued operations of all of the its business activity including those of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Parentech, Inc., Retail Pilot, Inc., International MedLink, Inc., and Clarity Imaging International, Inc. as well Amcare (67% held by the Company). The Company currently has no operations. As of the date hereof, the Company has not been successful in any of its prior business operations.OPERATIONS

OnGlobal ~~August~~2.0 1Corporation (formally referred to as Global Seafood Acquisition Corporation prior to the Merger Agreement as discussed in Corporate History below) was incorporated on December 28, ~~2014~~2015 as a Delaware corporation and is engaged in the Procurement and Distribution of Seafood internationally. Global 2.0 Corporation, while formally incorporated on December 28, 2015, commenced business on December 14, 2015 and these financial statements reflect the pre-incorporation business. On the day of Global 2.0 Corporation incorporation it became a Holding Company ~~formed~~pursuant to Section 251(g) of the Delaware Act under an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with Global Seafood ACHolding Corporation ("GSHC") and BGTH Pre Inc. ("Merger Corp.") dated the same date (the "Reorganization"). Under the Merger Agreement, GSHC merged into Merger Corp. and ceased to exist, wherein the Merger Corp. became and is the survivor and successor under Section 251(g) of the Delaware Act, having acquired all GSHC's assets, rights and liabilities as the constituent or resulting corporation. Global 2.0 Corporation became the parent and the Holding Company of Merger Corp. under the Reorganization which was in compliance with Section 251(g) of the Delaware Act and Section 368(a)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Upon consummation of the Reorganization, each issued and outstanding equity of the former GSHC was transmuted into and exchanged for an identical equity structure from Global 2.0 Corporation (on a share-for-share basis) having the same designations, rights, powers and preferences, and qualifications, limitations and restrictions. Upon consummation, Global 2.0 Corporation, is the issuer since the former GSHC equity structure was transmuted pursuant to ~~date~~Section 251(g) into the current issued and outstanding equities of Global 2.0 Corporation. The Reorganization was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Act") as there was no "offer" or "sale" as defined in Section 2(3) of the Act so as to invoke the requirements of Rule 145 also under the Act. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, ~~has~~the shareholders and equity holders of the former GSHC have no appraisal rights or rights to a shareholder vote and consequently no investment decision was made by the shareholders. Global 2.0 Corporation, as the issuer, was given a new CUSIP and tax identification number. Pursuant to Rule 144(d)(3)(ix) of the Act, the holding periods for the issued equities of Global 2.0 Corporation are the same and "tack" of the original holding periods of the equities transmuted from the former GSHC. Upon consummation of the Merger Agreement, GSHC's common stock was deemed to be registered under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a) promulgated thereunder. For purposes of Rule 12g-3(a), GSHC is the successor issuer to Global 2.0 Corporation. Subsequent to the completion of the Reorganization, the ownership by Global 2.0 Corporation in Merger Corp was canceled and the shares evidencing ownership in Merger Corp were returned and canceled. Global 2.0 Corporation no longer has any interest or ownership in Merger Corp as the Board of Directors are now conducting all of their operations through Global 2.0 Corporation.

Global Seafood A.C. was established as a wholly owned subsidiary to develop and pursue a Strategy to participate in the International Seafood Industry, taking advantage of the current ongoing consolidation in the overall food industry. We intend to enter the industry through the acquisition of a recognized industry player that brings with it, the ‘industry infrastructure’ to establish an immediate presence in the market. There is no guarantee that the financing to accomplish this can be procured. There have been no operations from inception to December 31, 2014.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, the Company has a working capital deficit, has limited cash on hand, is in default of its outstanding debt agreements, and has not generated revenues for years. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company incurred a net income of $1,405,241 and $7,609,639, respectively, and at December 31, 2014, has an accumulated deficit of $52,129,442. These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

Bankruptcy Filing

On July 6, 2011, the Company and all of its U.S. subsidiaries (the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California, which were being jointly administered under Case # 11-11264-PB11. Management's decision to initiate the bankruptcy filing was in response to, among other things, the Company’s deteriorating liquidity and management's conclusion that the challenges of successfully implementing additional financing initiatives and of obtaining necessary cost concessions from the Company’s creditors, was negatively impacting our Company’s ability to implement any turnaround strategy. On June 5, 2012, the Court dismissed the bankruptcy proceeding. The Bankruptcy was dismissed since the Company was unable to find a suitable merger partner during the process to obtain a successful reorganization.

NOTE 2 –SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

~~The~~This summary of significant accounting policies of the Company ~~has~~is ~~elected~~presented to ~~early~~assist ~~adopt~~in ~~Accounting~~understanding ~~Standards~~the ~~Update~~Company's Nofinancial statements. ~~2014-10,~~The ~~Development~~financial ~~Stage~~statements ~~Entities~~and ~~(Topic~~notes ~~915):~~are ~~Elimination~~representations of ~~Certain~~the ~~Financial~~Company's ~~Reporting~~management, ~~Requirements.~~which ~~The~~is ~~adoption~~responsible offor ~~this~~their ~~ASU~~integrity ~~allows~~and ~~the~~objectivity. ~~company~~These accounting policies conform to ~~remove~~GAAP ~~the~~and ~~inception~~have tobeen ~~date~~consistently ~~information~~applied ~~and~~in ~~all~~the ~~references~~preparation toof ~~development~~the ~~stage~~financial statements.

~~Principles~~Principal of Consolidation:

~~The~~Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ~~Bridgetech~~Global ~~Holdings International, Inc~~2.,0 ~~Parentech,~~Corporation ~~Inc.,~~and ~~Retail~~its ~~Pilot,~~subsidiary: ~~Inc.~~Global ~~D/B/A~~Seafood ~~Healthcare Pilot,~~ International ~~MedLink~~, Inc., ~~Amcare and Clarity International, Inc, and Global Seafood AC Corporation. None of the Company’s subsidiaries have current operations.~~ All ~~significant~~inter-company ~~intercompany~~balance ~~transactions~~has ~~have~~ been eliminated.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

Management evaluates these estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash Equivalents:

Cash equivalents are represented by operating accounts or money market accounts maintained with insured financial institutions, including all highly-liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The Company had no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2015

F-6

~~Cash~~TABLE ~~and~~OF ~~Cash Equivalents~~CONTENTS

~~The~~Revenue Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and cash in the bank. The Company maintains its cash in accounts held by large, globally recognized banks which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits as guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The FDIC insures these deposits up to $250,000.Recognition

For the year ended December 31, 2015, Company's revenues earned from sale of products included 96% of the Company's total revenues from one customer.

Accounts Receivable

The Company records trade receivables when revenue is recognized. When appropriate, the Company will record an allowance for doubtful accounts, which is primarily determined by review of specific trade receivables. Those accounts that are doubtful of collection are included in the allowance. These provisions are reviewed to determine the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Trade receivables are charged off when there is certainty as to their being uncollectible. Trade receivables are considered delinquent when payment has not been made within contract terms. At December 31, 2015, the Company had no allowance for doubtful accounts.

Income Taxes

~~Deferred~~The Company accounts for income taxes ~~are~~under ~~provided~~an toasset ~~reflect~~and ~~the~~liability ~~tax~~approach. ~~consequences~~This inprocess ~~future~~involves ~~years~~calculating ofthe temporary and permanent differences between the ~~tax~~carrying ~~bases~~amounts of the assets and liabilities ~~and~~for ~~their~~ financial reporting purposes and the amounts ~~based~~used onfor ~~enacted~~income tax ~~laws~~purposes. ~~and~~The ~~statutory~~temporary differences result in deferred tax ~~rates~~assets ~~applicable~~and toliabilities, which would be recorded on the ~~periods~~Company's balance sheets in accordance with ASC 740, which ~~the~~established ~~differences~~financial ~~are~~accounting ~~expected~~and toreporting ~~affect~~standards ~~taxable~~for the effect of income taxes. ~~Valuation~~ ~~allowances~~The ~~are~~Company ~~established~~must ~~when~~assess ~~necessary~~the tolikelihood ~~reduce~~that its deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the ~~amount~~extent ~~expected~~the toCompany bebelieves ~~realized~~that recovery is not likely, the Company must establish a valuation allowance. Changes in the Company's valuation allowance in a period are recorded through the income tax provision on the consolidated statements of operations.

~~The~~From ~~Company~~the ~~follows~~date of its inception the ~~two-step~~Company ~~approach~~adopted toASC ~~recognizing~~740-10-30. ~~and~~ASC ~~measuring~~740-10 ~~uncertain~~clarifies ~~tax~~the ~~positions. The~~accounting ~~first~~for ~~step~~uncertainty isin toincome ~~evaluate~~taxes ~~the~~recognized ~~tax~~in ~~position~~an ~~for~~entity's ~~recognition~~financial bystatements ~~determining~~and ifprescribes ~~the~~a ~~weight~~recognition ofthreshold ~~available~~and ~~evidence~~measurement ~~indicates~~attributes itfor isfinancial ~~more~~statement ~~likely~~disclosure ~~than~~of ~~not,~~tax ~~that~~positions ~~the~~taken ~~position~~or ~~will~~expected to be ~~sustained~~taken on ~~audit~~a tax return. Under ASC 740-10, ~~including~~the ~~resolution~~impact of ~~related~~an ~~appeals~~uncertain orincome ~~litigation~~tax ~~processes,~~position ifon ~~any.~~the ~~The~~income ~~second~~tax ~~step~~return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to ~~measure~~be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax ~~benefit~~position aswill ~~the~~not ~~largest~~be ~~amount,~~recognized ~~which~~if isit ~~more~~has less than a 50% ~~likely~~likelihood of being ~~realized~~sustained. ~~upon~~Additionally, ~~ultimate~~ASC ~~settlement. The~~740-10 ~~Company~~provides ~~considers~~guidance ~~many~~on ~~factors~~derecognition, ~~when~~classification, ~~evaluating~~interest and ~~estimating~~penalties, ~~the~~accounting ~~Company's~~in ~~tax~~interim ~~positions~~periods, disclosure and ~~tax~~transition. ~~benefits,~~As ~~which~~a ~~may~~result ~~require~~of ~~periodic~~the ~~adjustments.~~implementation Atof ~~December~~ASC 31740-10, ~~2014,~~ the Company ~~did~~recognized ~~not~~no ~~record~~material ~~any~~adjustment ~~liabilities~~in the liability for ~~uncertain~~unrecognized income tax ~~positions~~benefits.

~~Earnings~~Fair ~~Per~~Value ~~Share~~of Financial Instruments

~~Basic~~The ~~income~~Company ~~(loss)~~applies ~~per~~the ~~share~~provisions isof ~~computed~~accounting byguidance, ~~dividing~~FASB ~~net~~Topic ~~income~~ASC ~~(loss)~~820 ~~available~~that torequires ~~common~~all ~~shareholders~~entities byto disclose the ~~weighted~~fair ~~average~~value ~~number~~ of ~~common~~financial ~~shares~~instruments, ~~outstanding~~both ~~during~~assets ~~the~~and ~~reporting~~liabilities ~~period.~~recognized ~~Diluted~~and ~~earnings~~not ~~per~~recognized ~~share~~on ~~reflects~~ the ~~potential~~balance ~~dilution~~sheet, ~~that~~for ~~could~~which ~~occur~~it ifis ~~stock~~practicable ~~options,~~to ~~warrants~~estimate fair value, and ~~other~~defines ~~commitments~~fair tovalue ~~issue~~of ~~common~~a ~~stock~~financial ~~were~~instrument ~~exercised~~as orthe ~~equity~~amount ~~awards~~at ~~vest~~which ~~resulting in~~ the ~~issuance~~instrument ~~of common stock that~~ could ~~share~~be exchanged in ~~the~~a ~~earnings~~current oftransaction ~~the~~between ~~Company~~willing parties. ~~Diluted~~As ~~loss~~of ~~per~~December ~~share~~31, is2015, the ~~same~~fair asvalue ~~basic~~of ~~loss~~cash, ~~per~~and ~~share~~accounts ~~for~~receivable ~~all~~approximated ~~periods~~carrying ~~presented~~value ~~because~~due to the ~~effects~~short maturity of the ~~additional~~instruments, ~~securities~~quoted ~~would~~market beprices ~~anti-dilutive~~or interest rates which fluctuate with market rates.

~~Subsequent~~Related ~~Events~~Parties:

~~The~~A party is considered to be related to the Company ~~evaluated~~if ~~subsequent~~the ~~events~~party directly or indirectly or through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the ~~date~~Company. ~~these~~Related ~~financial~~parties ~~statements~~also ~~were~~include ~~issued~~principal ~~for~~owners ~~disclosure~~of ~~consideration~~the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal owners of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. A party which can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or if it has an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests is also a related party.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company’s management does not believe that any recently issued effective pronouncements, or pronouncements issued but not yet effective, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

NOTE 3 – NOTES PAYABLE AND RELATED PARTY DEBT

Notes payable consist of the following as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

	December 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Unsecured convertible notes payable (promissory notes from unrelated third parties bearing interest at 8%; all are in default)	$	53,000	$	1,153,000
Secured notes payable from related party at 8% interest rate, due on March 15, 2015		50,000
Secured line of credit – related party, at 8% interest rate due March 30, 2015		344,932		210,932
Total of Notes Payable	$	447,932	$	1,363,932

Line of Credit Related Party

On August 10, 2012, the Company converted an advance from shareholders to a promissory note agreement with a related note holder at 8% interest rate. The promissory note is due on December 31, 2013, and is extended to March 30, 2015. The Company analyzed the modification of the term under ASC 470-60 “Trouble Debt Restructurings” and ASC 470-50 “Extinguishment of Debt”. The Company determined the modification is not substantial and did not result in an extinguishment.

The line of credit is secured by all of the assets of the Company such as intellectual property, trademarks, formulations, and all equipment. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company received proceeds of $134,000. During the year ended December 31, 2013 the Company received proceeds of $178,807 and made payment of $52,479. The balance of this note as of December 31, 2014, and 2013 were $344,932, and $210,932, respectively.

F-7

~~Notes~~TABLE ~~Payable~~OF ~~Related Party~~CONTENTS

OnWe ~~December~~are ~~15,~~currently ~~2014,~~operating ~~the~~from ~~Company~~2705 ~~issued~~Garnet aAve ~~$50,000~~Suite ~~note~~2a toSan ~~a related party~~Diego, ~~bearing~~CA ~~interest~~92109. Our ~~rate~~office atservices ~~8% per annum,~~ and ~~due~~office onspace ~~March~~was ~~15,~~provided ~~2015.~~without ~~The~~charge ~~note~~by ~~has~~the asole ~~secured~~officer ~~lien~~and ondirector ~~all~~ of ~~the~~our ~~assets~~company ~~held~~through byDecember ~~the Company~~31, ~~subordinated only to the secured line of credit as described above.~~2015

~~Convertible~~Recent ~~Notes~~Accounting ~~Payable~~Pronouncements

AtThe any time prior to the payment in full of the entire balance of the convertible notes payable, the holders have the option of converting all or any portion of the unpaid balance of the convertible notes payable and any related accrued interest into shares of the Company’'s ~~common~~management ~~stock~~does atnot ~~conversion~~believe ~~prices~~that ~~ranging~~any ~~from~~recently ~~$0.25~~issued toeffective ~~$1.50 per share~~pronouncements, ~~subject~~or topronouncements ~~adjustment~~issued ~~upon~~but ~~certain~~not ~~events.~~yet The conversion price was based on the market price at the time of issuance of the convertible notes. The Company evaluated the terms of the convertible notes payable and concluded that none of the convertible notes payable had an embedded derivative; howevereffective, ~~the~~if ~~Company concluded that certain convertible notes payable contained beneficial conversion features~~adopted, ~~since~~would ~~the~~have ~~convertible notes payable were convertible into shares of Company common stock at~~ a ~~discount~~material toeffect the market value of the common stock at the time of issuance. The discounts related to the beneficial conversion features were valued at approximately $2.0 million for 2006, $2.2 million for 2007, and $0 for 2008, 2009 and 2010 based on the ~~intrinsic~~accompanying ~~values~~financial ~~of the discounts~~statements. ~~The discounts were fully amortized at December 31, 2008 due to the short-term nature of the convertible notes payable (all notes had maturity dates prior to December 31, 2008).~~

~~During~~NOTE ~~the~~3 ~~year~~– ~~ended~~GOING December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company conducted analysis on past due notes payable to creditors, and determined that the statute of limitations for certain notes has elapsed or the related parties waived the balance. Therefore the creditor liabilities for which the statute of limitations has elapsed were either written off as a gain on extinguishment of debt or re-classed to additional paid in capital for related party’s notes payable. See note 4.CONCERN

~~For~~The ~~the~~accompanying ~~notes~~financial ~~that~~statements ~~are~~have ~~still~~been ~~outstanding~~prepared ason ofa ~~December~~going ~~31,~~concern ~~2014~~basis, ~~all~~which ~~notes~~contemplates ~~are~~the inrealization ~~default~~of ~~except~~assets ~~for~~and the ~~secured~~satisfaction ~~line~~of liabilities in the normal course of ~~credit~~business. ~~and~~As shown in the ~~notes~~accompanying ~~payable~~financial statements during the period from ~~related~~December ~~party~~28, ~~and~~2015 ~~there~~through isDecember ~~currently~~31, no2015, ~~plan~~the ~~for~~Company ~~repayment~~incurred a net loss of ~~these~~$5,596, ~~obligations~~had assets totaling $60,276, and liabilities of $65,372. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

~~NOTE~~The 4Company's –existence ~~DEBT~~is ~~MITIGATION~~dependent ~~PROGRAM~~upon management's ability to develop profitable operations and to obtain additional funding sources. There can be no assurance that the Company's financing efforts or revenue stream will result in profitable operations. The accompanying statements do not include any adjustments that might result should the Company.

~~The~~NOTE ~~Company~~4 ~~has~~– ~~significant~~EARNINGS ~~liabilities.~~PER In order to attract potential capital, the Company has conducted analysis on past due obligations to creditors. We determined that the statute of limitations for certain of our creditors to enforce collection of any amounts they might be owed has now elapsed. We also obtained waivers on certain liabilities wherein the creditors waived the right to collect any amounts them might be owed. Based on our determinations and findings, during the year ended December 31, 2013, we eliminated $9,795,641 in creditor liabilities which were all previously included in current liabilities in the balance sheet. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we eliminated $1,600,303 in creditor liabilities. The Company will continue to conduct this analysis going forward and eliminate obligations when such obligations are no longer enforceable based on applicable law.SHARE

~~The~~FASB ~~following~~ASC ~~liabilities~~Topic 260, Earnings asPer ~~received~~Share, ~~from~~requires ~~the~~a ~~company,~~reconciliation ~~could~~of bethe ~~determined~~numerator byand denominator of the ~~company~~basic asand ~~unenforceable~~diluted earnings (loss) per share (EPS) computations.

	December 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Debt Mitigation Program:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$			$	2,129,832
Accrued expenses related party					1,039,724
Accrued interest on notes		500,303			1,841,705
Unsecured convertible notes payable (promissory notes from unrelated third parties bearing interest at 8%; all are in default)		1,100,000			4,222,869
Unsecured notes payable to related parties bearing no interest and due on demand					561,511
Total debt mitigation program	$	1,600,303		$	9,795,641
Gain on extinguishment of debt	$	(1,600,303	)	$	(8,194,406	)
Re-classification to additional paid in capital (related parties)	$	-		$	(1,601,235	)
Total liabilities written off		(1,600,303	)		(9,795,641	)

Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. In periods where losses are reported, the weighted-average number of common stock outstanding excludes common stock equivalents, because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

~~NOTE~~The 5total –number ~~EQUITY~~of potential additional dilutive warrants outstanding for all periods presented was none since the Company had net losses for all periods presented and had no additional potential common shares that have an anti-dilutive effect.

~~Warrants~~The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share:

	December 31, 2015
Net loss attributable to the common stockholders	$	5,596

Basic weighted average outstanding shares of common stock		3,595,117
Dilutive effect of options and warrants		-
Diluted weighted average common stock and common stock equivalents		3,595,117
Loss per share:
Basic and diluted	$	0.00

NOTE 5 – Equity

At December 31, 2015, there were 3,595,117 shares of common stock of Global 2.0 outstanding, par value $.001, outstanding and 200 shares of Series A preferred stock, par value $0.002, issued and there were approximately 618 shareholders of record of the Company's common stock. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement (see Note 1), all equity of Global Seafood Holdings Corporation (authorized as well as issued and outstanding shares) were carried over to Global 2.0 Corporation and, accordingly, were recorded as founders shares.

F-8

~~The~~TABLE ~~Company~~OF ~~has the following warrants outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2014:~~ CONTENTS

	Warrants		Exercise		Expiration
Date issued	Issued		Price		Date
December 23, 2006		240,000	$	1.50	None

The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.002. The designations, rights, and preferences of such preferred stock are to be determined by the Board of Directors. Subsequently, 200 shares were designated as Series A Preferred Stock.

In addition, the Chief Executive Officer contributed the sum of $500 as a capital contribution to the Company. The ~~outstanding~~Company also retained four hundred and eighty thousand (480,000) three year common stock purchase warrants atwith ~~December~~an 31exercise price of $1.50 per share, ~~2014~~twenty ~~have~~six nothousand ~~intrinsic~~five ~~value~~hundred ~~and~~(26,500) three year common stock purchase warrants with an exercise price of $1.50 per share, all of which expire August 3, 2018. In addition, there are 480 common stock purchase warrants with no expiration date and an exercise price of $7.50.

The Board of Directors authorized 5,000,000 shares of the preferred stock classified as Series A, and 2,000,000 shares of the preferred stock classified as Series B. All of the preferred stock of the Company is convertible into common shares. The Series A stock conversion ratio is 1 to 1 common shares. The Series B stock conversion ratio is 1 to 10 common shares. Each share of the Preferred A Stock ~~Option~~shall ~~Plans~~have 500 votes on all matters presented to be voted by the holders of Common Stock. Each share of the Preferred B Stock shall have 100 votes on all matters presented to be voted by the holders of Common Stock. The Series A stock is entitled to 8% cumulative dividends rights. None of the preferred stock is redeemable, participating nor callable.

~~The~~NOTE ~~Company~~6 ~~has~~– ~~two~~INCOME stock option plans: the 2001 Stock Option Plan (the “2001 Plan”) and the 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “2005 Plan”). There are currently no options outstanding under the 2001 Plan or the 2005 Plan, and 5,000,000 and 5,000,000 options remain available for future issuance under the 2001 Plan and 2005 Plan, respectively. The Company does not intend to grant any more options under the 2001 Plan. The Company’s 2005 Plan provides for the grant of options to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at consideration to be determined from time-to-time by the Company’s Board of Directors.TAXES

~~NOTE~~During 6year –ended ~~OTHER~~December ~~INCOME~~31, 2015, the Company incurred a net operating loss of $5,596, which will expire in 20 years.

~~During~~Deferred ~~the~~tax ~~year~~assets ~~ended~~consist ~~December~~of ~~31, 2013,~~ the ~~Company~~tax ~~sold~~effect ~~3,900 common shares~~ of ~~securities~~NOL ~~the~~carry-forwards. The Company ~~held~~has asprovided ana ~~investment.~~full ~~The~~valuation ~~Company~~allowance ~~had~~on ~~previously~~the ~~impaired~~deferred ~~this~~tax ~~asset~~assets ~~among~~because ~~other~~of ~~assets~~the ~~and~~uncertainty ~~recorded~~regarding ~~this~~its ~~sale~~realizability. asDeferred ~~other~~tax ~~income~~assets consist of ~~$25,579.~~the following:

NOTE 7 – INCOME TAXES

	December 31, 2015
Deferred tax assets	$	1,959
Valuation allowance		(1,959	)
	$	-0-

The difference between income tax expense computed by applying the federal statutory corporate tax rate and actual income tax expense is as follows:

	December 31,
	2014			2013
Statutory federal income tax rate		(34.0	%)		(34.0	%)
State income taxes and other		(8.9	%)		(8.9	%)
Valuation allowance		42.9	%		42.9	%
Effective tax rate		0.0	%		0.0	%

At December 31, 2014 and 2013 deferred tax assets consist of the following:

	December 31,
	2014			2013
Net operating loss carryforward	$	16,654,941		$	17,132,723
Valuation allowance	$	(16,654,941	)		(17,132,723	)
Net deferred income tax asset	$	-		$	-

The Company has established a valuation allowance equal to the full amount of the deferred tax asset primarily due to uncertainty in the utilization of the net operating loss carry forwards. The Company has a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $49 million available to offset future taxable income through 2032. However, Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that may be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone significant changes in its stock ownership. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to utilize any net operating loss carryforwards in the future.

F-9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

Effective December 19, 2014, the Registrant dismissed GBH CPAs, PC as its independent registered public accounting firm. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011, and 2012, and through the date of the termination of GBH CPAs, PC there have been no disagreements with GBH CPAs, PC (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K) on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of GBH CPAs, PC, would have caused them to make reference thereto in their report on financial statements for such years. On December 19, 2014, and effective the same date, on the recommendation of the Registrant’'s Board of Directors, the Registrant engaged MaloneBailey LLP as its independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Registrant’'s financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 and to perform procedures related to the financial statements included in the Registrant’'s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2014.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were not effective such that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance, however, that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets;

· provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the board of directors; and ~~provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.~~

14· provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Because of their inherent limitations, any system of internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management, including the chief executive officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015, based on the framework defined in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Management's assessment of the control environment included all significant locations and subsidiaries.

Material Weaknesses

Based on our evaluation under COSO, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015, due to control deficiencies in two areas that we believe should be considered material weaknesses. A material weakness is defined within the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board's Auditing Standard No. 5 as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

We did not sufficiently segregate duties over incompatible functions at our corporate headquarters.

Our inability to sufficiently segregate duties is due to a small number of personnel at the corporate headquarters, which management expects to remedy when the acquisition of an operating company is completed.

In conjunction with the lack of segregation of duties, we did not institute specific anti-fraud controls.

While management found no evidence of fraudulent activity, certain individuals have access to both accounting records and corporate assets, principally the operating bank account. Management believes this exposure to fraudulent activity is not material either to the operations of the company or to the financial reporting; however, management has instituted Key Controls specifically designed to prevent and detect-on a timely basis-any potential loss due to fraudulent activity.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures

Our management, including our chief executive officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include, but are not limited to, the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm regarding Internal Control over Financial Reporting. The Company's Internal Control over Financial Reporting was not subject to attestation by the Company's independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that permit the Company to provide only management's report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during our fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect its internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

1619

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.

Director and Executive Officer

Set forth below is information regarding the Company’'s current directors and executive officers. There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers. The directors are elected annually by stockholders. Set forth below are the directors and officers of the Company as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015.

Scott Landow 5960 President and Chief Executive Officer, Director, Principal Accounting Officer

The chief executive officer and sole director and officer of the Company will hold office until additional members or officers are duly elected and qualified. The background and principal occupations of the sole officer and director of the Company is as follows:

Scott D. Landow is our sole director, CEO and CFO since May, 2008. In 2004, Mr. Landow co-founded the Company leveraging significant relationships in China & the U.S. to capitalize on proprietary opportunities in high growth segments of the healthcare industry. He served as CEO and President until the completion of Q2 2005. In July 2005 Mr. Landow founded Bond Laboratories, Inc., a publicly traded company that manufactures innovative nutritional supplements and beverages where he served as CEO until August of 2009 and ~~remained~~remains Chairman of the board of directors ~~until 2011~~. From August 2000 through February 2005, Mr. Landow was President of Parentech Inc., an emerging medical device company for newborns and infants that he merged to become publicly traded.

Compensation of Directors

Our bylaws provide that, unless otherwise restricted by our certificate of incorporation, our Board of Directors has the authority to fix the compensation of directors. The directors may be paid their expenses, if any, related to attendance at each meeting of the board of directors and may be paid a fixed sum for attendance at each meeting of the board of directors or a stated salary as our director. Our bylaws further provide that no such payment will preclude any director from serving our company in any other capacity and receiving compensation therefore. Further, members of special or standing committees may be given compensation for attending committee meetings.

Conflicts of Interest

Members of our management are associated with other firms involved in a range of business activities. Consequently, there are potential inherent conflicts of interest in their acting as officers and directors of our company. Although the officers and directors are engaged in other business activities, we anticipate they will devote an important amount of time to our affairs.

Our officers and directors are now and may in the future become shareholders, officers or directors of other companies, which may be formed for the purpose of engaging in business activities similar to ours. Accordingly, additional direct conflicts of interest may arise in the future with respect to such individuals acting on behalf of us or other entities. Moreover, additional conflicts of interest may arise with respect to opportunities which come to the attention of such individuals in the performance of their duties or otherwise. Currently, we do not have a right of first refusal pertaining to opportunities that come to their attention and may relate to our business operations.

1720

~~Currently,~~TABLE weOF ~~do not have a right of first refusal pertaining to opportunities that come to their attention and may relate to our business operations.~~CONTENTS

Our officers and directors are, so long as they are our officers or directors, subject to the restriction that all opportunities contemplated by our plan of operation which come to their attention, either in the performance of their duties or in any other manner, will be considered opportunities of, and be made available to us and the companies that they are affiliated with on an equal basis. A breach of this requirement will be a breach of the fiduciary duties of the officer or director. If we or the companies with which the officers and directors are affiliated both desire to take advantage of an opportunity, then said officers and directors would abstain from negotiating and voting upon the opportunity. However, all directors may still individually take advantage of opportunities if we should decline to do so. Except as set forth above, we have not adopted any other conflict of interest policy with respect to such transactions.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Company does not have an audit committee or a compensation committee of its ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors. In addition, the Company’'s board of directors has determined that the Company does not have an audit committee financial expert serving on the board. When the Company develops its operations, it will create an audit and a compensation committee and will seek an audit committee financial expert for its board and audit committee.

Compliance with Section 16(A) Of The Exchange Act 9.A. Directors And Executive Officers, Promoters, And Control Persons:

The Company is aware that all filings of Form 4 and 5 required of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act of Directors, Officers or holders of 10% of the Company's shares have not been timely and the Company has instituted procedures to ensure compliance in the future.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our executive officers, directors and employees. Code of ethics codifies the business and ethical principles that govern all aspects of our business. This document will be made available in print, free of charge, to any shareholder requesting a copy in writing from the Company and it attached to our annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.

Indemnification of Officers and Directors

As permitted by Delaware law and our Certificate of Incorporation provide that we will indemnify its directors and officers against expenses and liabilities they incur to defend, settle, or satisfy any civil or criminal action brought against them on account of their being or having been Company directors or officers unless, in any such action, they are adjudged to have acted with gross negligence or willful misconduct.

Pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in that Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

1821

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 compensation awarded to, paid to, or earned by, Mr. Scott Landow, our sole Director and Chief Executive Officer, and our other most highly compensated executive officers whose total compensation during the last fiscal year exceeded $100,000, if any. Scott Landow ~~defers~~deferred his entire salary ~~and~~through ~~expense reimbursement~~12/31/15.

~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal Position	~~Year~~	Year	~~Salary ($)~~		~~Bonus~~Salary ($)		~~Stock Awards ($)~~	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	~~Option Awards ($)~~		Option Awards ($)	~~Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation- ion ($)~~		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation- ion ($)	~~Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)~~		~~All~~Change ~~Other~~in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation- ~~ion~~Earnings ($)		~~Total ($)~~	All Other Compensation- ion ($)	Total ($)
Scott Landow Chairman	~~2014~~		2015 2014	~~120,000~~		120,000 120,000		0		0 0	0		0 0	0		0 0	0		0 0		~~120,000~~	120,000 120,000
	2013			120,000				0			0			0			0				120,000

1922

~~2014~~TABLE ~~and~~OF ~~2013 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END TABLE~~CONTENTS

		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)				Option Exercise Price ($)				Option Expiration Date				Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)				Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Scott Landow			0				0				0				0				0				0				0				0				0

2015 and 2014 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END TABLE

2014 and 2013 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

(#)

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

(#)

Option
Exercise
Price
($)

Option
Expiration
Date

Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested

(#)

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested

($)

Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That
Have Not
Vested

(#)

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested

($)

Name

Exercisable

Un-exercisable

Scott Landow

		Option Awards				Stock Awards
Name	Year	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)		Value Realized on Exercise ($)		Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)		Value Realized on Vesting ($)
Scott Landow	2014		0		0		0		0
	2013		0		0		0		0

2015 and 2014 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE

2014 and 2013 PENSION BENEFITS TABLE

		Option Awards		Stock Awards
Name	Year	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)	Value Realized on Exercise ($)	Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)	Value Realized on Vesting ($)
Scott Landow	2015	0	0	0	0
	2014	0	0	0	0

2015 and 2014 PENSION BENEFITS TABLE

Name

Plan

Name

Number of

Years

Credited Service

(#)

Present

Value of Accumulated

Benefit

($)

Payments During Last

Fiscal Year

($)

Scott Landow

~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014NONQUALIFIED ~~NONQUALIFIED~~ DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE


Name	Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)		Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)		Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)		Aggregate Withdrawals / Distributions ($)		Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End ($)
Scott Landow		0		0		0		0		0

2023

~~2014~~TABLE ~~and~~OF ~~2013 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE~~CONTENTS

2015 and 2014DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)				Stock Awards ($)				Option Awards ($)				Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)				Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)				All Other Compensation ($)				Total ($)
Scott Landow			0				0				0				0				0				0				0

~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 ALL OTHER COMPENSATION TABLE

Name	~~Year~~	Year	~~Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits ($)~~		Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits ($)	~~Tax Reimbursements ($)~~		Tax Reimbursements ($)	~~Insurance Premiums ($)~~		Insurance Premiums ($)	~~Company Contributions to Retirement and 401(k) Plans ($)~~		Company Contributions to Retirement and 401(k) Plans ($)	~~Severance Payments / Accruals ($)~~		Severance Payments / Accruals ($)	~~Change in Control Payments / Accruals ($)~~		Change in Control Payments / Accruals ($)	~~Total ($)~~		Total ($)
Scott Landow	~~2014~~		2015 2014	0		0 0	0		0 0	0		0 0	0		0 0	0		0 0	0		0 0	0		0 0
	2013			0			0			0			0			0			0			0

2124

~~2014~~TABLE ~~and~~OF ~~2013 PERQUISITES TABLE~~CONTENTS

Name	Year	Personal Use of Company Car/Parking		Financial Planning/ Legal Fees		Club Dues		Executive Relocation		Total Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
Scott Landow	2014		0		0		0		0		0
	2013		0		0		0		0		0

2015 and 2014 PERQUISITES TABLE

2014 and 2013 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

Name		Year				Personal Use of Company Car/Parking				Financial Planning/ Legal Fees				Club Dues				Executive Relocation				Total Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
Scott Landow			2015 2014				0 0				0 0				0 0				0 0				0 0

2015 and 2014 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

Name	Benefit	Before Change in Control Termination w/o Cause or for Good Reason	After Change in Control Termination w/o Cause or for Good Reason	Voluntary Termination	Death	Disability	Change in Control
Scott Landow	Basic salary								-

Compensation of Directors

We currently have one director. Our current compensation policy for directors is to compensate him through options to purchase common stock or issuance of common stock as consideration for his joining our board and/or providing continued services as a director. We do not currently provide our directors with cash compensation, although we do reimburse their expenses, with exception for a chairman of the board. No additional amounts are payable to the Company’'s directors for committee participation or special assignments. There are no other arrangements pursuant to which any directors was compensated during the Company’'s last completed fiscal year for any service provided.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.

The following table lists stock ownership of our Common Stock as of December 31, ~~2014,~~2015 based on 973,~~937~~595,~~044~~117 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, 200 shares of Series A 8% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, $0. 002 par value (100,000 voting shares; convertible into 200 shares), and 506,980 warrants (if all shares are converted to common stock) for a cumulative amount of 4,102,297 shares. The information includes beneficial ownership by (i) holders of more than 5% of our Common Stock, (ii) each ~~of two~~director ~~directors~~ and executive ~~officers~~officer and (iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. Except as noted below, to our knowledge, each person named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our Common Stock beneficially owned by them.

2225

Name and Address of Owner	Title of Class	Number of Shares Owned (1)	Percentage of Class
WWFD, LLC 1350 E Flamingo Rd. #711 Las Vegas, NV 89119	Common Stock	21,250,000 (1)	22%
Small World Traders, LLC 1350 E Flamingo Rd. #711 Las Vegas, NV 89119	Common Stock	21,250,000 (2)	22%
Small World Traders, LLC 1350 E Flamingo Rd. #711 Las Vegas, NV 89119	Common Stock	18,378,141(2)	19%
Scott D Landow 777 S Hwy 101 Suite 215 Solana Beach, CA 92075	Common Stock	225,000(3)	<1%
All Officers and Directors As a Group (1 persons)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(1) (2) (3) Mr. Landow is the Manager of WWFD, LLC and indirectly is a minority beneficial owner Small World Trader, LLC has made a revolving line of credit available to the company that currently exceeds $200,000 and has a secured lien against the assets of the Company. Michael K. Low is the Manager of and Control Person with regards to the LLC’s activities. Includes 100,000 shares of Series A 8% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock held by Landow Revocable Trust which Mr. Landow controls. Each share is convertible into one share of Common Stock.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount of Beneficial Ownership	Percentage of Class

Scott Landow (1)	40,450	0.98%

All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (1 Person)	40,450	0.98%
Small World Traders, LLC (2)	1,381,596	33.68%
Ovidium, LLC(3)	500,000	12.18%
Brandwine LLC(4)	250,000	6.09%
2nd Wave Strategies, Inc.(5)	500,000	12.18%
TRLT LLC (6)	250,000	6.09%

(1)

Includes 200 shares of Series A 8% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock held by Landow Revocable Trust which Mr. Landow controls. Each share is convertible into one share of Common Stock.

(2)

Small World Traders, LLC is controlled by Michael Low and is located at 1350 E. Flamingo Rd. #711 Las Vegas, NV 89119.

(3)

Ovdium, LLC is controlled by Jorge Rincon and is located at 12502 SW 122 Court Miami, FL 33186

(4)

Brandwine LLC is controlled by Neil Montanari and is located at 6386 Old Medinah Circle Lake Worth, FL 33463.

(5)

2nd Wave Strategies, Inc. is controlled by Michael Low and is located at 1350 E. Flamingo Rd. #711 Las Vegas, NV 89119.

(6)

TRLT LLC is controlled by Neil Montanari and is located at 6386 Old Medinah Circle Lake Worth, FL 33463.

Changes in Control

We are not aware of any arrangements that may result in a change in control of the Company.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

General

Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $ .001, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred A stock, par value $ .002 and 95,000 shares of Series B Preferred Convertible Shares.

Common Stock

The shares of our common stock presently outstanding, and any shares of our common stock issues upon exercise of stock options and/or warrants, will be fully paid and non-assessable. Each holder of common stock is entitled to one vote for each share owned on all matters voted upon by shareholders, and a majority vote is required for all actions to be taken by shareholders. In the event we liquidate, dissolve or wind-up our operations, the holders of the common stock are entitled to share equally and ratably in our assets, if any, remaining after the payment of all our debts and liabilities and the liquidation preference of any shares of preferred stock that may then be outstanding. The common stock has no preemptive rights, no cumulative voting rights, and no redemption, sinking fund, or conversion provisions. Since the holders of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights, holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares can elect all of our Directors, and the holders of the remaining shares by themselves cannot elect any Directors. Holders of common stock are entitled to receive dividends, if and when declared by the Board of Directors, out of funds legally available for such purpose, subject to the dividend and liquidation rights of any preferred stock that may then be outstanding.

2326

~~legally~~TABLE ~~available~~OF ~~for such purpose, subject to the dividend and liquidation rights of any preferred stock that may then be outstanding.~~CONTENTS

Preferred Stock

Voting Rights

Each holder of Common Stock is entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders.

SERIES A 8% CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK, $.002
PAR VALUE
	Landow Revocable Trust	100,000 (1)	100%

SERIES A 8% CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK, $.002

PAR VALUE

Landow Revocable Trust

200 (1)

100%

(1)

Each share is convertible into one share of Common Stock and for voting purposes represents 500 shares of Common Stock.

Dividends

Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any then-outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, if any, and any other restrictions, holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive ratably those dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the Company’'s board of directors out of legally available funds. The Company and its predecessors have not declared any dividends in the past. Further, the Company does not presently contemplate that there will be any future payment of any dividends on Common Stock.

Amendment of our Bylaws

When Global 2.0 was formed, we adopted the bylaws of Global Seafood Holdings Corp. Our bylaws may be adopted, amended or repealed by the affirmative vote of a majority of our outstanding shares. Subject to applicable law, our bylaws also may be adopted, amended or repealed by our Board of Directors.

Transfer Agent

On August 31, 2006, the Company engaged Colonial Transfer Agent to serve in the capacity of transfer agent. Their mailing address and telephone number Colonial Stock Transfer, 66 Exchange Place, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 - Phone is (801) 355-5740.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDPENDENCE.

The Company is managed by its key shareholder.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The following table sets forth fees related to services performed by ~~GBH~~MaloneBailey ~~CPAs, PC~~ for ~~2013~~2014 ~~Reviews and~~ Audit; and ~~MaloneBailey for~~ 2013 ~~Audit and 2014~~ Reviews and Audit:

24(1) Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of our financial statements and review of our quarterly financial statements.

Audit/Review Fees
			2014		2013
Audit Fees	(1	)	$	9,000	$	4,500
Review Fees	(2	)		-		8,200
Tax	(3	)		-		-
All Other	(4	)		-		-
Total			$	9,000	$	12,700

(2)	During 2015, we did not incur fees for assurance services related to the audit of our financial statements and for services in connection with audits of our benefit plans, which services would be reported in this category.

(1)	Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of our financial statements and review of our quarterly financial statements.
(2)	During 2014, we did not incur fees for assurance services related to the audit of our financial statements and for services in connection with audits of our benefit plans, which services would be reported in this category.
(3)	During 2014, we did not incur fees for tax advice, tax planning and tax return preparation.
(4)	During 2014, we did not incur fees for other services.

(3)	During 2015, we did not incur fees for tax advice, tax planning and tax return preparation.

(4)	During 2015, we did not incur fees for other services.

The Board has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the independence letter from its the independent registered public accounting firm as required by standards and regulations, and has discussed with its auditors its independence from the Company. The Board has considered whether the provision of services other than audit services is compatible with maintaining auditor independence. Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Board approved all services provided by its independent registered public accounting firm.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS.

Exhibits

3.1	Certificate of Incorporation (3)	~~Articles of Incorporation (1)~~
3.2	Bylaws of the Corporation (1)	~~Amendments to Articles of Incorporation (1)~~
3.1		Bylaws of the Corporation (1)
3.3	Amended and Restated Bylaws (3)
21		Subsidiaries (2)
10.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Global Seafood Holdings Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and BGTH Pre Inc. and Global 2.0 Corporation(2)
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (2)
21	Subsidiaries)(3)
31.2		Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (2)
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (3)
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (2)
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (3)
32.2		Certification of Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (2)
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (3)
32.2	Certification of Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (3)

__________________________________________________

(1) Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3(i) to the Company's Form 10-SB/12g filed on February 13, 2008. (2) Incorporated by reference to the Company's filing on Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2016. (3) Filed herein

2628

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, there unto duly authorized.

Registrant Date: February 12, 2015		Bridgetech Holdings International, Inc. By: /s/ Scott Landow
Registrant Date: April 6, 2016		Global 2.0 Corporation By: /s/ Scott Landow
		Scott Landow
		Chief Executive Officer (Principle Executive Officer), President, Sole Board Member (Principle Accounting Officer)
		Chief Executive Officer (Principle Executive Officer), President, Director, Principle Accounting Officer

In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Date: February 12, 2015		By: /s/ Scott Landow
Date: April 6, 2016		By: /s/ Scott Landow
		Scott Landow
		Chairman
		Director

2729

Filing Compare · Global 2.0