UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


[X]	Quarterly report pursuant Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
	For the quarterly period ended February 28, 2015.

[ ]	Transition report pursuant Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
	For the transition period from _______ to _______.

000-53506

(Commission file number)

[hdyx10q_022815final001.jpg]

HYDRODYNEX, INC.

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)


Nevada	20-4903071	702-722-9496
(State or other jurisdiction	(IRS Employer	(Registrant’s telephone number)
of incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

451 W. 21st Ave. Spokane, WA 99203

(Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES [ ] NO [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ]	Smaller reporting company [X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES [X] NO [ ]

On April 17, 2015, there were 3,144,880 outstanding shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $.001 per share.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	20
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	24
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	24
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION		25
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	25
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	25
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	25
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	25
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure [Not Applicable]	25
Item 5.	Other Information	25
Item 6.	Exhibits	25
SIGNATURES		26

- 2 -

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item1. Financial Statements

Hydrodynex, Inc.

February 28, 2015 and 2014

Index to the Financial Statements


CONTENTS	Page
Balance Sheets at February 28, 2015 (Unaudited) and May 31, 2014	4
Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)	5
Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)	6
Notes to the Financial Statements (Unaudited)	7

- 3 -


Hydrodynex, Inc.
Balance Sheets


				February 28, 2015	May 31, 2014
Assets				(Unaudited)
Current Assets
		Cash		$ 142	$ 162
		Prepaid expenses		1,000	1,000
			Total Current Assets	1,142	1,162
Total Assets				$ 1,142	$ 1,162


Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
Current Liabilities
		Accounts payable		$ 9,370	$ 9,123
		Due from related party		1,000	-
Licenses Fees Payable				22,630	27,267
		Notes payable -related party		-	6,000
			Total Current Liabilities	33,000	42,390

Total Liabilities				33,000	42,390

Commitments and Contingencies

Stockholders' Deficit
	Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized,
		none issued or outstanding		-	-
	Common stock, $0.001 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized,
			3,144,880 and 2,874,880 shares issued and outstanding, respectively	3,145	2,875
	Additional paid-in capital			323,098	309,868
	Accumulated deficit			(358,101)	(353,971)
			Total Stockholders' Deficit	(31,858)	(41,228)

	Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit			$ 1,142	$ 1,162

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

- 4 -


Hydrodynex, Inc.
Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)


			For the Three Months Ended		For the Nine Months Ended
			February 28, 2015	February 28, 2014	February 28, 2015	February 28, 2014
Operating Expense
	General and administrative		$ 1,652	$ 667	$ 2,501	$ 812
	Professional fees		1,120	2,283	6,711	7,243
		Total Operating Expenses	2,772	2,950	9,212	8,055

Loss from Operations			(2,772)	(2,950)	(9,212)	(8,055)

Other (Income) Expenses
	Foreign currency transaction (gain) loss		(2,266)	155	(4,637)	1,390
	Forgiveness of debt		-	-	(791)	-
	Interest expense		346	-	346	82
		Total Other (Income) Expenses	(1,920)	155	(5,082)	1,472

Loss Before Income Taxes			(852)	(3,105)	(4,130)	(9,527)

Income Tax Provision					-	-

Net Loss			$ (852)	$ (3,105)	$ (4,130)	$ (9,527)

Net Loss per Share - Basic and Diluted			$ (0.00)	$ (0.00)	$ (0.00)	$ (0.00)

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding, Basic and Diluted			2,874,880	2,854,318	2,874,880	2,667,637

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

- 5 -


Hydrodynex, Inc.
Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)


			For the Nine Months Ended
			February 28, 2015	February 28, 2014
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
	Net loss		$ (4,130)	$ (9,527)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations
		Accounts payable	247	265
		License fees payable	(4,637)	1,390
Net cash used in operating activities			(8,520)	(7,872)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities			-	-

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
	Advances from related party		1,000
	Proceeds from sale of common stock and warrants		-	3,000
	Proceeds from convertible notes payable-related party		7,500	3,000
Net cash provided by financing activities			8,500	6,000

Net Change in Cash			(20)	(1,872)
Cash, Beginning of Period			162	2,076
Cash, End of Period			$ 142	$ 204

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flows Information
	Interest paid		$ -	$ -
	Income taxes paid		$ -	$ -

Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities
	Common shares issued for conversion of notes payable		$ 13,500	$ -
	Common shares issued for conversion of advance from officer		$ -	$ 27,250

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

- 6 -

Hydrodynex, Inc.

February 28, 2015 and 2014

Notes to the Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 - Organization and Operations

Hydrodynex, Inc. (a development stage company) (“Hydrodynex” or the “Company”) was incorporated on May 12, 2006 under the laws of the State of Nevada for the purpose of the marketing and distribution of AO-System (Anodic Oxidation) water treatment units under an exclusive license agreement for the Territory of North America comprising the United States, Canada and Mexico.

Note 2 - Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices

The Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results, and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Unaudited interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2014 and notes thereto contained in the information as part of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on September 15, 2014.

Fiscal Year

The Company elected June 30 as its fiscal year ending date upon formation.

On December 21, 2012, a board resolution authorized the change of the Company’s fiscal year end date from June 30 to May 31.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

(i)

Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business;

(ii)

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

- 7 -

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:


Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, and license fee payable, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include a. affiliates of the Company(“Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act); b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners

- 8 -

of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.

Foreign Currency Transactions

The Company applies the guidelines as set out in Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Section 830-20-35) for foreign currency transactions. Pursuant to Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, foreign currency transactions are transactions denominated in a currency other than U.S. Dollar, the Company’s functional currency. Foreign currency transactions may produce receivables or payables that are fixed in terms of the amount of foreign currency that will be received or paid. A change in exchange rates between the functional currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated increases or decreases the expected amount of functional currency cash flows upon settlement of the transaction. That increase or decrease in expected functional currency cash flows is a foreign currency transaction gain or loss that generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the exchange rate changes. Likewise, a transaction gain or loss (measured from the transaction date or the most recent intervening balance sheet date, whichever is later) realized upon settlement of a foreign currency transaction generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the transaction is settled. The exceptions to this requirement for inclusion in net income of transaction gains and losses pertain to certain intercompany transactions and to transactions that are designated as, and effective as, economic hedges of net investments and foreign currency commitments. Pursuant to Section 830-20-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the following shall apply to all foreign currency transactions of an enterprise and its investees: (a) At the date the transaction is recognized, each asset, liability, revenue, expense, gain, or loss arising from the transaction shall be measured and recorded in the functional currency of the recording entity by use of the exchange rate in effect at that date as defined in section 830-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification; and (b) At each balance sheet date, recorded balances that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the recording entity shall be adjusted to reflect the current exchange rate.

- 9 -

Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services

The Company accounts for its stock based compensation in which the Company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 718-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-30-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:


·	Expected term of share options and similar instruments: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding. Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the simplified method, i.e., expected term = ((vesting term + original contractual term) / 2), if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
·	Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility. If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
·	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends. An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
·	Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

- 10 -

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).

Pursuant to ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:


·	Expected term of share options and similar instruments: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
·	Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility. If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
·	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends. An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
·	Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-25-7, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached. A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services. Section 505-50-30 provides guidance on the determination of the measurement date for transactions that are within the scope of this Subtopic.

- 11 -

Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a share option and similar instrument that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-30-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision

The Company follows paragraph 740-10-30-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13.addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to its income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the reporting period ended February 28, 2015 or 2014.

Net Income (Loss) per Common Share

Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to paragraph of 260-10-45-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options and warrants.

The following table shows number of potentially outstanding dilutive shares excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per share calculation as they were anti-dilutive:

- 12 -


	Potentially Outstanding Dilutive Common Shares
	For the Reporting Period Ended February 28, 2015		For the Reporting Period Ended February 28, 2014

Warrant Shares

Warrants issued in connection with the conversion of consulting fees on September 30, 2011 with an exercise price of $0.01 per share and expiring four (4) years from the date of issuance		752,000		752,000

Warrants issued in connection with the conversion of a vendor payable on September 30, 2011 with an exercise price of $0.01 per share and expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance		-		167,700

Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares		752,000		919,700

Cash Flows Reporting

The Company has adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.

Subsequent Events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”).

This guidance amends the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification, creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:

Identify the contract(s) with the customer

Identify the performance obligations in the contract

Determine the transaction price

Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract

Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligations

The ASU also provides guidance on disclosures that should be provided to enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue recognition and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about the following:

- 13 -

Contracts with customers – including revenue and impairments recognized, disaggregation of revenue, and information about contract balances and performance obligations (including the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations)

Significant judgments and changes in judgments – determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations (over time or at a point in time), and determining the transaction price and amounts allocated to performance obligations

Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.

ASU 2014-09 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period for all public entities. Early application is not permitted.

In June 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12 “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) : Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period” (“ASU 2014-12”).

The amendments clarify the proper method of accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The Update requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered.

The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted.

In August 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 “Presentation of Financial Statements— Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) (Topic 718): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (“ASU 2014-15”).

The Update provides guidance to an organization’s management, with principles and definitions that are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of disclosures that are commonly provided by organizations today in the financial statement footnotes.

This Update is intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures.

The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Earlier adoption is permitted.

In November 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-16 “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815):

Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity” (“ASU 2014-16”).

The amendments in ASU No. 2014-16 clarify that an entity must take into account all relevant terms and features when reviewing the nature of the host contract. Additionally, the amendments state that no one term or feature would define the host contract’s economic characteristics and risks. Instead, the economic characteristics and risks of the hybrid financial instrument as a whole would determine the nature of the host contract.

The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption, including adoption in an interim period, is permitted.

In January 2015, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01 “Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items” (“ASU 2015-01”).

This Update eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items and the requirements in Subtopic 225-20 for reporting entities to separately classify, present, and disclose extraordinary events and transactions.

The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption.

- 14 -

In February 2015, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02 “Consolidation (Topic 810) - Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis” (“ASU 2015-02”) to improve certain areas of consolidation guidance for reporting organizations (i.e., public, private, and not-for-profit) that are required to evaluate whether to consolidate certain legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations, and securitization structures (e.g., collateralized debt/loan obligations).

All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments:

Eliminating the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership.

Eliminating the indefinite deferral of FASB Statement No. 167, thereby reducing the number of Variable Interest Entity (VIE) consolidation models from four to two (including the limited partnership consolidation model).

Clarifying when fees paid to a decision maker should be a factor to include in the consolidation of VIEs. Note: a VIE is a legal entity in which consolidation is not based on a majority of voting rights.

Amending the guidance for assessing how related party relationships affect VIE consolidation analysis.

Excluding certain money market funds from the consolidation guidance.

The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements

Note 3 – Going Concern

The Company has elected to adopt early application of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”) .

The financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the financial statements, the Company had a deficit accumulated at February 28, 2015, and had a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the reporting period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company is attempting to commence operations and generate revenue; however, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 4 – Exclusive Technology License

On September 3, 2007 (“Effective Date”), the Company acquired an exclusive technology license (“Agreement”) for the Territory of North America, comprising Canada, the United States and Mexico to manufacture or assemble and market the AO-System water treatment system (AO – Anodic Oxidation) from Hydrosystemtechnik, GmbH (“Grantor”), a German corporation. The Company has agreed to pay a licensing fee as follows: (i) €10,000 (equivalent to $13,635 at September 3, 2007) within 120 days of the Effective Date; (ii) €20,000 (equivalent to $27,270 at September 3, 2007) on November 30, 2008; and (iii) €20,000 (equivalent to $27,270 at September 3, 2007) upon AO-System being certified and approved by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) for selling on a commercial basis in the United States, or €50,000 (equivalent to $68,175 at September 3, 2007) in aggregate, all of which are non-refundable and may be recouped from the future Product Royalty in perpetuity at ten percent (10%) of the Net Selling Price on all AO water treatment systems assembled or manufactured by the Company or a subcontract manufacture utilized by the Company and paid for by customers of the Company due and payable quarterly within 30 days from the last day of the quarter provided the Company exercises its right to manufacture or assemble AO-Systems. In the event the Company does not manufacture or assemble AO-Systems, the Company pays no royalty on finished units purchased from the licensor and resold to customers of the Company, the license fees will no longer be considered prepaid royalties and the Company will amortize prepaid royalties over the remaining legal life of the patent of AO System, or estimated useful life, or the term of the contract, whichever is shorter in the event that the Company decides not to manufacture or assemble AO-System.

- 15 -

The Company’s exclusive license right to sell finished AO Units in the territory is contingent upon the Company achieving minimum annual sales volume as defined in Table 1 of Appendix B of this Agreement among other terms and conditions at the end of each business year, beginning with the third (3^rd) anniversary after the effective date of this Agreement. In the event the objectives defined in years three (3) through five (5) of Table 1 in Appendix B are not attained at the end of each business year, this agreement shall, at the option of the GRANTOR, automatically revert to a non-exclusive marketing agreement and the Company will no longer have the right in manufacturing or assembling of AO Systems.

The Company determined that the (iii) payment required under the exclusive license agreement upon approval of U.S. EPA is a contractual liability instead of contingent liability as the AO system has been certified and approved by the European Union for selling on a commercial basis in Europe and the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s certification and approval for selling on a commercial basis in the United States is a matter of procedure and recorded deferred license fees and related license fees payable of $68,175, €50,000 measured in U.S. Dollar at September 3, 2007, the transaction date upon signing of the Exclusive License Agreement.

The Company paid the first installment of €10,000 with $14,892 on December 17, 2007 and the second installment of €20,000 due on November 30, 2008 was paid with $26,486 on January 26, 2009. The due date for the third installment of €20,000 is undeterminable pending on EPA approval.

The Company determined that since it is currently unable to secure EPA approval of the AO-System in order to begin selling in the United States within the time period specified in the agreement, the agreement has reverted to a non-exclusive marketing agreement. Consequently, the Company impaired the entire balance of $68,175 of the deferred licensing fee on June 30, 2010.

Note 5 – Stockholders’ Deficit

Shares Authorized

Upon formation the aggregate number of shares which the Company shall have authority to issue is eighty million (80,000,000) shares, consisting of two classes to be designated, respectively, “Common Stock” and “Preferred Stock,” with all of such shares having a par value of $.001 per share. The total number of shares of Preferred Stock that the Company shall have authority to issue is five million (5,000,000) shares. The total number of shares of Common Stock that the Company shall have authority to issue is seventy five million (75,000,000) shares.

Common Stock

The Company was incorporated on May 12, 2006. In May 2006, 200,000 shares of its common stock were sold to the Company’s founder and President at $0.01 per share for $2,000 in cash.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, the Company sold 300,000 shares of its common stock to the Company’s founder and President at $0.01 per share for $3,000 in cash.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share for $100,000 in cash.

On November 25, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a Regulation D, Rule 504 stock sale and entered into a definitive agreement relating to the private placement of $7,500 of its securities through the sale of 15,000 shares of its common stock at $0.50 per share inclusive of a stock warrant to purchase 15,000 shares of its common stock exercisable at $1.00 expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance with Ryan Edington, the brother of Jerod Edington, the then Vice-president and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. The fair value of these warrants granted, estimated on the date of grant, was $3,300, which has been recorded as additional paid-in capital, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:


Expected option life (year)	3

Expected volatility	163.00	%

Risk-free interest rate	3.34	%

Dividend yield	0.00	%

- 16 -

On January 23, 2009, the Company sold 250,000 shares of its common stock at $0.20 per share to Ron Kunisaki, the then president of the company, for $50,000 in cash.

On July 25, 2009, pursuant to the Bridge Loan Agreement entered into by an entity and Hydrodynex, Inc., dated July 24, 2008, Triax Capital Management exercised the conversion rights of the promissory note at the agreed rate of $0.25 per share. The original loan to the Company was in the amount of $4,000, and the 365 days of interest at 8% per annum of $320, equates to a conversion value of 17,280 shares.

On August 23, 2009, pursuant to the Bridge Loan Agreement entered into by a non-affiliated individual and Hydrodynex, Inc., dated August 22, 2008, the loaner exercised the conversion rights of the promissory note at the agreed rate of $0.25 per share. The original loan to the Company was in the amount of $5,000, and the 365 days of interest at 8% per annum of $400, equates to a conversion value of 21,600 shares.

On September 26, 2009, the Company sold 30,000 shares of common stock at $0.25 per share for $7,500 in cash.

On November 9, 2009, the Company sold 140,000 shares of common stock at $0.25 per share for $35,000 in cash.

On September 30, 2011, the Company converted $16,300 in advances from an officer into 326,000 shares of common stock at $0.05 per share.

On September 30, 2011, the Chief Operating Officer of the company forgave a debt of $275 which was recorded as additional paid in capital.

On August 30, 2013, two creditors of the Company converted their loans due in the aggregate of $27,250 into common shares of the Company at $0.05 per share. A total of 545,000 shares were issued in exchange for the loans.

On January 31, 2014, the Company entered into a definitive agreement relating to the private placement of $3,000 of its securities through the sale of 30,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share to an investor.

On February 28, 2015, CEO, Jerod Edington, converted $13,500 in notes payable to common stock at $0.05 per share for a total of 270,000 issued.

Stock Option Plan

On May 19, 2006, the Company’s board of directors approved the adoption of the “2006 Non-Qualified Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan” (“2006 Plan”) by unanimous consent. The 2006 Plan was initiated to encourage and enable officers, directors, consultants, advisors and key employees of the Company to acquire and retain a proprietary interest in the Company by ownership of its common stock. A total of 1,000,000 of the authorized shares of the Company’s common stock may be subject to, or issued pursuant to, the terms of the plan. The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Additionally, the Company’s policy is to issue new shares of common stock to satisfy stock option exercises.

There are no outstanding and exercisable stock options as of November 30, 2014:

As of February 28, 2015, there were 1,000,000 shares remaining available for issuance under the 2006 Plan.

Warrants

(i) Warrants issued in 2011

On September 30, 2011, the Company converted $37,600 in accrued expenses - officer into warrants to purchase 752,000 shares of its common stock exercisable at $0.01 per share and expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance. The Company valued these warrants issued at $30,080 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, and recorded both (i) the fair value of warrants of $30,080 and (ii) the difference between the fair value of warrants and accrued expenses – officer, the forgiveness of debt from officer of $7,520 as additional paid-in capital. These warrants have been extended for one year.

On September 30, 2011, the Company converted $8,385 in accounts payable into warrants to purchase 167,700 shares of its common stock exercisable at $0.01 per share, expiring thee (3) years from the date of issuance. The Company valued these warrants issued at $6,708 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, and recorded (1) the fair value of warrants of $6,708 as additional paid-in capital and (2) the difference between the fair value of warrants and accounts payable of $1,677 forgiveness of debt.

- 17 -

The fair value of each warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:


	September 30, 2011
Expected option life (year)		3

Expected volatility		100.00	%

Risk-free interest rate		0.42	%

Dividend yield		0.00	%

The table below summarizes the Company’s warrants activity though February 28, 2015:


	Number of Warrant Shares			Exercise Price Range Per Share			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Fair Value at Date of Issuance		Aggregate Intrinsic Value

Balance, May 31, 2013		919,700			$	0.01		$	0.01	$	36,788		$	-

Granted		-				-			-		-			-
Canceled		-				-			-		-			-
Exercised		-				-			-		-			-
Expired		-				-			-		-			-
Balance, May 31, 3014		919,700			$	0.01		$	0.01	$	36,788		$	-

Granted														-
Canceled														-
Exercised														-
Expired		(167,700	)								(6,708)			-
Balance, February 28, 2015		752,000			$	0.01		$	0.01	$	30,080		$	-

Earned and exercisable, February 28, 2015		752,000			$	0.01		$	0.01	$	30,080		$	-

Unvested, February 28, 2015		-			$	0.01		$	0.01	$	-		$	-

The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable warrants as of February 28, 2015:


	Warrants Outstanding						Warrants Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding		Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable		Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$0.01		752,000		0.59	$	0.01		752,000		0.59	$	0.01

- 18 -

Note 6 – Related Party Transactions

Advances from Officer

On October 11, 2011, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $2,000 with no interest and an extended maturity date to June 30, 2013. $200 of this advance was paid back on November 9, 2012.

On February 17, 2012, a related party of the Company advanced the Company $5,000 with no interest and a maturity date of June 30, 2012, which was subsequently extended to December 31, 2013.

On April 3, 2012, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $10,000 with no interest and an extended maturity date to December 31, 2013.

On December 28, 2012, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $1,000 with no interest and a maturity date of December 31, 2013.

On January 22, 2013, $500 was repaid on the advances due to the Chief Executive Officer.

On February 12, 2013, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $2,000 with no interest and a maturity date of December 31, 2013.

On May 9, 2013, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $5,600 with no interest and a maturity date of December 31, 2013.

On May 17, 2013, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $300 with no interest and a maturity date of December 31, 2013.

On May 29, 2013, a related party of the Company advanced the Company $2,000 with no interest and a maturity date of December 31, 2013. On August 30, 2013, the advance was satisfied.

On August 30, 2013, the Company issued 545,000 unregistered shares of its common stock, par value $0.001, at $0.05 per share to two creditors in exchange for aforementioned outstanding loans in aggregate of $27,250 and aggregate interest accrued of $0. A total of 405,000 shares were issued to affiliate Jerod Edington, Officer and Director of the Company, in exchange for the loans due to him. A total of 140,000 shares were issued to a related party in exchange for the loans due to it.

On September 15, 2014, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $1,000 for a term of one year at 0% interest.

Notes Payable - Officer

On September 20, 2013, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $1,000 with no interest and a maturity date of September 20, 2014.

On October 23, 2013, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $2,000 with no interest and a maturity date of October 23, 2014.

On April 19, 2014, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $3,000 for a term of one year at 0% interest.

On August 8, 2014, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $500 for a term of one year at 0% interest.

On September 22, 2014, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $3,000 for a term of one year at 0% interest.

On October 10, 2014, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $2,000 for a term of one year at 0% interest.

On January 20, 2014, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $2,000 for a term of one year at 0% interest.

- 19 -

Notes Payable Converted to Common Stock - Officer

On February 28, 2015, CEO, Jerod Edington, converted $13,500 in notes payable to common stock at $0.05 per share for a total of 270,000 issued.

Free Office Space from Its Stockholder and Chief Operating Officer

The Company has been provided office space by its stockholder and Chief Executive Officer at no cost. The management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize the rent expense in its financial statements.

Note 7 – Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated all events that occur after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent events to be disclosed.

- 20 -

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q CONTAINS “FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 AND INVOLVE A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY. ALL STATEMENTS, OTHER THAN STATEMENTS OF HISTORICAL FACTS, INCLUDED IN OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THIS FORM 10-Q ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. IN ADDITION, WHEN USED IN THIS DOCUMENT, THE WORDS “ANTICIPATE,” “ESTIMATE,” “PROJECT,” AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS ARE INTENDED TO IDENTIFY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. OUR ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE PROJECTED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS DUE TO RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT EXIST IN OUR OPERATIONS. THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND ASSUMPTIONS INCLUDING AMONG OTHERS, THE RISK THAT OUR PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS WILL NOT PROVE SUCCESSFUL, THAT WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO OBTAIN FINANCING TO COMPLETE ANY FUTURE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT, THAT OUR PRODUCTS WILL NOT PROVE COMPETITVE IN THEIR MARKETS. THESE RISKS AND OTHERS ARE MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN OUR ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K. SHOULD ONE OR MORE OF THESE RISKS OR UNCERTAINTIES MATERIALIZE, OR SHOULD UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS PROVE INCORRECT, ACTUAL RESULTS MAY VARY MATERIALLY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED, ESTIMATED OR PROJECTED.

ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE THAT THE EXPECTATIONS INCLUDED IN SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE REASONABLE, WE CANNOT GIVE ANY ASSURANCES THAT THESE EXPECTATIONS WILL PROVE TO BE CORRECT. WE UNDERTAKE NO OBLIGATION TO PUBLICLY RELEASE THE RESULT OF ANY REVISIONS TO SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT MAY BE MADE TO REFLECT EVENTS OR CIRCUMSTANCES AFTER THE DATE HEREOF OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE OF UNANTICIPATED EVENTS.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes thereto appearing in Part I, Item 1.

A. General.

Hydrodynex, Inc. was organized under the laws of the state of Nevada on May 12, 2006 to develop a business as a marketer of the AO-Systems^® water treatment units. We intend to sell and distribute the AO-System^® products in North America under the terms of our license agreement with Hydrosystemtechnik GmbH. Since commencement of operations in 2006, substantially all of our efforts to date have been devoted to and limited primarily to organization, initial capitalization, market research, producing marketing materials and a website, securing a marketing agreement, preparing a comprehensive business and operating plan, evaluating the regulatory requirements to sell water treatment systems in the U.S., Canada and Mexico, and undertaking a marketing feasibility study. Extensive research has been done on competing technologies and the water contaminants that most adversely affect water systems at the present time. Legionella protection is the strongest market opportunity identified by Hydrodynex to date. We plan to make Legionella our primary target market because of its wide prevalence and the high percentage of death resulting from infection.

Under our license agreement with our licensor Hydrosystemtechnik, we paid non-refundable license fees creditable to royalty payments in the aggregate amount of €30,000 in 2007 and 2009. A third license fee in the amount of €20,000 will be due upon certification and approval of the AO-Systems^®by the US Environmental Protection Agency for commercial sales in the United States.

Due to the fact that we did not meet certain milestones and minimum annual sales targets under the license agreement with Hydrosystemtechnik, our right to manufacture the AO-System products has automatically expired and our licensor may change the agreement from an exclusive agreement to a non-exclusive agreement and may terminate the agreement at any time. In order to remedy this situation we need to raise at least $400,000 and re-negotiate the terms of the license agreement.

Our plan of operation for the next 12 months, if we are able to raise sufficient capital resources and re-negotiate our license agreement, will be the execution of our strategic business plan. Hydrodynex intends to operate in two phases as follows:

Phase 1: Finalization of the Strategic Marketing Plan, initial start-up capital realization through asecond private stock offering, paying for the AO-System^®test reactor unit, undertaking independent testing, securing EPA and State certification, and hiring/training sales and technical personnel.

Phase 2: Initiation of marketing and sales activities in selected markets in North America (U.S., Canada, and Mexico). Full scale commercialization of the AO-System^®, including industrialization and after-sale service agreements, for the markets covered by Hydrodynex. As part of its effort to commercialize the AO-System^®, Hydrodynex plans to offer mobile systems which may use a film pouch packaging system.

- 21 -

We need to raise a minimum of $400,000 to complete the first phase of our plan of operations and $2,000,000 to complete the second phase, for a total of $2,400,000 to implement both phases of our business plan.

Subject to raising additional capital, our projected monthly rate of expenditure is estimated at $3,000 for general and administrative costs. We anticipate that supporting our operations and implementing Phase I of our business plan for the next 12 months will require a minimum capital raising of $400,000. This includes approximately $30,000 for accounting, legal and auditing fees. The balance of the funds would be utilized for independent testing, purchase of equipment for testing, marketing materials, advertising, insurance, employee training, travel, office lease, licenses, shipping and import costs, employee salary, and other budgeted costs.

Hydrodynex’ Exclusive Technology License Agreement

We entered into a Marketing, Distribution and License Agreement with Hydrosystemtechnik GmbH September 3, 2007. On August 30, 2008, we entered into an Amended Marketing, Distribution and License Agreement, or amended license agreement, with Hydrosystemtechnik, which has the same effective date as the original license agreement, September 3, 2007, and supersedes the original license agreement. Under the amended license agreement, we were granted the right to sell water disinfection systems based on the AO-System^® technology in all markets (except the dental market) in Canada, the United States, and Mexico on an exclusive basis for a period of three years after the effective date of the license agreement. The license was to remain exclusive subject to Hydrodynex achieving certain milestones. The main milestones were (a) leasing or purchasing an AO-System^® prior to November 30, 2009, as extended by the licensor, and (b) obtaining, by March 3, 2010, verification and certification of the AO-System^® technology by the U.S. EPA necessary for commercialization and selling water disinfection systems in whole or in part within the United States, (c) make application to six states in the Western U.S. for certification of the AO-System^®technology within 90 days after receiving the NSF and EPA verification, (d) sell, deliver and install at least one AO-System^® in the U.S. in the two year exclusivity period following technology verification, and (e) we are required to demonstrate financial responsibility in the form of a bank credit line or equity funding of not less than $500,000 The milestones were not satisfied, but the licensor has not as of this time notified us that the exclusive license has been reduced to a non-exclusive status.

We were also required, beginning in the year beginning September 3, 2009, to meet certain minimum annual sales targets, based on net purchase value, for sales of AO-System^®products in the North American territory, which increase from €30,000 in year three to €500,000 in year six and thereafter, in order to maintain the exclusivity of the license. We have failed to meet the minimum annual sales targets at in each year and the licensor, Hydrosystemtechnik GmbH, has the option to revert the license agreement to a non-exclusive marketing agreement and under the terms of the license agreement our right to manufacture has automatically expired.

We have paid a non-refundable license fees in the aggregate amount of €30,000 and a third license fee in the amount of €20,000 will be due upon certification and approval of the AO-Systems^® by the US Environmental Protection Agency for commercial sales in the United States which is indicated as a license fee payable of $25,157 in our balance sheet. We are obligated to pay a royalty on the products actually assembled or manufactured and sold to third parties in the amount of 10% of the net selling price on all AO-Systems^®. We are not obligated to pay a royalty on finished AO-Systems^® purchased from Hydrosystemtechnik and resold. We are obligated to pay fifty percent of the direct costs related to preparing and prosecution of patents and patent applications in the U.S., Canada or Mexico, including legal fees, filing fees, maintenance fees, and transaction costs, so long as the license agreement remains in effect. We have paid $6,997 for patent fees thus far and expensed the entire balance of $6,997 of the prepaid patent application costs on June 30, 2011 since we are currently unable to finance the patent application process and secure EPA approval of the AO-System in order to begin selling in the United States within the time period specified in the agreement.

We plan to re-negotiate the license agreement with Hydrosystemtechnik to get the exclusive rights extended, but that is a forward looking statement and is not likely to be successful unless certain funding can be brought into Hydrodynex and reasonable terms can be reached with the licensor.

The license agreement terminates after ten years, in September 2017, with an option by us to extend the license for an additional ten years on an exclusive basis, as long as the required minimum annual sales volume is maintained. The licensor, Hydrosystemtechnik GmbH, has the right to terminate the license agreement, after a notice and cure period, if we are in default of any obligation in the agreement, The sales volume requirements were not been reached for the three consecutive years and the agreement can be terminated by the licensor at any time.

If we can raise sufficient funds and re-negotiate the license agreement, we plan to undertake to secure technology verification from NSF, an independent third party testing laboratory, accredited by the EPA, to legally sell AO-Systems^® in the United States, but we have not initiated this process because we have yet to pay the remaining balance of €17,625 for the AO-System® test reactor unit owed to our licensor Hydrosystemtechnik. When we have sufficient funds to pay the remaining balance due on the test unit, arrangements for payment and shipping to the U.S. of the test reactor unit will be made.

- 22 -

Product Research and Development Plans

We do not plan to engage in any research and development at this time. The product has been developed by our licensor, Hydrosystemtechnik, GmbH and is ready for sale to the consumer.

Results of Operations

Since Hydrodynex was formed on May 12, 2006, it has not earned any revenues and has incurred a net loss since its inception of $358,101 through February 28, 2015. The following table provides selected financial data about our company for the interim period ended February 28, 2015 and May 31, 2014, respectively.


Balance Sheets Data	February 28, 2015		May 31, 2014
Cash	$	142	$	162
Prepaid expenses		1,000		1,000

Total assets	$	1,142	$	3,076
Total liabilities	$	33,000	$	42,390
Stockholders’ deficit	$	(31,858)	$	(41,228)

For the nine months ended February 28, 2015, our total operating expenses were $9,212 as compared to $8,055 for the nine months ended February 28, 2014. Our operating expenses have increased only slightly between these time periods by $1,157 and until the company receives additional financing, we do not presently expect our expenses to increase throughout this current fiscal year as compared to the previous fiscal year. The nine months ended February 28, 2015 included the following expenses:

1. Professional fees including legal and Accounting - $6,711

2. General and Administrative Fees - $2,501

Our cash in the bank at February 28, 2015 was $142. Net cash used in operating activities during the nine months ended February 28, 2015 was $8,520, compared to net cash used in operating activities during the nine months ended February 28, 2014 of $7,872, a difference of $648.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended February 28, 2015 was $8,500 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $6,000 for the nine months ended February 28, 2014.

In their report on our May 31, 2014 audited financial statements, our auditors express an opinion that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty. We have been in the developmental stage and have had no revenues since inception. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon future events, including our ability to raise additional capital and to generate positive cash flows. There can be no assurances to that effect.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since inception, we have financed our operations from private placements of equity securities and loans from shareholders. We do not have any available lines of credit. As of February 28, 2015, we had cash in the amount of $142. Net cash provided by financing activities was $8,500 during the nine months ended February 28, 2015. We will need to raise additional capital, take loans, or generate revenue in April 2015 or curtail or cease our basic operations. We need to raise a minimum of $400,000 to implement and complete the first phase of our business plan, as well as to renegotiate the terms of our license agreement, if possible, to allow us to continue our business plan.

On August 8, 2014, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $3,000 for a term of one year at 0% interest.

On September 15, 2014, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $1,000 for a term of one year at 0% interest.

On September 22, 2014, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $3,000 for a term of one year at 0% interest.

- 23 -

On October 10, 2014, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $2,000 for a term of one year at 0% interest.

On January 20, 2015, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company advanced the Company $2,000 for a term of one year at 0% interest.

On February 28, 2015, CEO, Jerod Edington, converted $13,500 in notes payable to common stock at $0.05 per share for a total of 270,000 issued. As of February 28, 2015, the total amount of advances due to our Chief Executive officer and director was $0. As of February 28, 2015, the total amount of advances due to a related party, other affiliates, or non-affiliates was $0.

We do not have sufficient capital resources to carry on operations past April 2015. We cannot assure you that we will generate sufficient additional capital or revenues, if any, to fund our operations beyond April 2015, but we plan to raise additional capital in a private stock offering to secure funds needed to finance our plan of operation for at least the next twelve months, or enter into loans from existing shareholders to support operations. We are pursuing potential equity financing, sub-licensing and other collaborative arrangements that may generate additional capital for us. However, these are forward-looking statements, and there may be changes that could consume available resources before such time. Our long term capital requirements and the adequacy of our available funds will depend on many factors, including the reporting company costs, public relations fees, technology verification costs, among others.

If we cannot generate sufficient financing or revenues to continue operations, we will have to suspend or cease operations. By virtue of our inability to secure financing or generate revenues over the preceding year, we will begin to seek out other sources of cash, including new investors, joint venture and strategic partners or loans from our officers or directors. If we cease operations, we do not know what we would do subsequently and we have no plans to do anything in such event. We have no plans to dissolve statutorily at this time, under any circumstances. We are engaged in general discussions with multiple companies who may be interested in acquiring us. As of this date there is no definitive agreement signed and there is no assurance that any acquisition will be feasible in the future and in the event there is an acquisition, there is no assurance that it will be in the best interest of our shareholders.

Subsequent Events

None.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements that have been prepared under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. All significant accounting policies have been disclosed in Note 2 to the financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not required.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was carried out by our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of February 28, 2015. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of February 28, 2015. The material weaknesses we identified in our annual report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ending May 31, 2014, have not been remedied due to our lack of sufficient capital resources.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

As of February 28, 2015, there have been no changes in internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the period ended February 28, 2015, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our company’s internal control over financial reporting.

- 24 -

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

There have been no material changes from the disclosure provided in Part 1, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2014.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure

[Not Applicable]

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits


Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit

3.1	Articles of Incorporation of Registrant(1)

3.2	Bylaws of Registrant(1)

31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer).


(1)	Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2008 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-152052), which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.
(2)	Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2009, as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Form 8-K (file no. 000-53506), which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.
(3)	Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 9, 2012, as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Form 8-K (file no. 000-53506), which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.

- 25 -

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	Hydrodynex, Inc.

April 21, 2015	By:	/s/ Jerod Edington
		Jerod Edington President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) VP, Secretary, and Chief Operating Officer

- 26 -

Hydrodynex, Inc. 10-Q