UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ ☑ QUARTERLY REPORT ~~PURSUANT~~UNDER TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ~~ending~~ended: ~~September~~MARCH 3031, ~~2011~~2012

o☐ TRANSITION REPORT ~~PURSUANT~~UNDER TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________________________ to ______________________________________

Commission File ~~file~~Number: ~~no. 0~~1-~~26307~~3477

~~Catalyst~~CATALYST ~~Resource~~RESOURCE ~~Group~~GROUP, ~~Inc~~INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Florida		82-0190257
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification Number)

Florida 82-0190257

~~17011~~(State ~~Beach~~or ~~Blvd.,~~other ~~Suite~~jurisdiction ~~1230,~~of ~~Huntington~~incorporation ~~Beach,~~or CAorganization) (I.R.S. ~~92647~~Employer identification Number)

17011 Beach Blvd., Suite 1230, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) 714-843-5455 (Registrant's telephone number, including ~~zip~~ area code) N/A (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

~~714-843-5455~~Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (~~Registrant’s~~1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange ~~telephone~~Act ~~number,~~of ~~including~~1934 ~~area~~during ~~code~~the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

~~Jeantex~~Yes ☑ No ~~Group, Inc.~~☐

~~(Former~~Indicate by ~~name,~~check ~~former~~mark ~~address~~whether the registrant has submitted electronically and ~~former~~posted ~~fiscal~~on ~~year~~its corporate Web site, if ~~changed~~any, ~~since~~every ~~last~~Interactive Data ~~report~~File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (ss.232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ ☑ No o ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See ~~definition~~the definitions of “"large accelerated filer," ~~and large~~ "accelerated filer”" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o ☐ Accelerated filer o ☐ Non-accelerated filer o☐ Smaller reporting company þ ☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) ~~Yes o No þ~~ .

~~As of November 08, 2011, there were 254,069,948~~Yes ~~shares~~☐ No of the issuer's Common Stock, $.001 par value per share, Class A Common Stock, (including 20,867,000 shares to be cancelled) and 9,958 shares of the issuer's Class B Common Stock, $.001 par value, issued and outstanding.☑

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As of May 18, 2012, there were 457,120,574 shares of the issuer's non-assessable Common Stock, $.001 par value per share, (including 20,867,000 shares to be cancelled) and 9,958 shares of the issuer's Class B assessable Common Stock, $.001 par value, issued and outstanding.

CATALYST RESOURCE GROUP, INC.

(Formerly JEANTEX GROUP, INC.)

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

PART I —- FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011(Unaudited) and December 31, 2010 Statements of Operations for the Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and the period from January 1, 2007 (Inception) to September 30, 2011 (Unaudited) Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and the period from January 1, 2007 (Inception) to September 30, 2011 (Unaudited) Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk Item 4. Control and Procedures PART II – OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity and Use of Proceeds Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Item 5. Other Information Item 6. Exhibits Signatures

Item 1- Financial Statements – Unaudited

Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2011

Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and the period from January 1, 2007 (Inception) to March 31, 2012 (Unaudited

Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and the period from January 1, 2007 (Inception) to March 31, 2012 (Unaudited

Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements

Item 2 -Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 3- Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Item 4- Controls and Procedures

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1- Legal Proceedings

Item 2- Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Item 3- Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Item 4- Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Item 5- Other Information

Item 6- Exhibits

SIGNATURES

CERTIFICATIONS

CATALYST RESOURCE GROUP, INC
FORMERLY JEANTEX GROUP, INC
(DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)

		March 31,		December 31,
		2012		2011
ASSETS:

Current Assets:
Cash	$	(0)	$	0

TOTAL ASSETS	$	(0)	$	0

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:

Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expense	$	204,417	$	204,669
Interest payable		241,414		281,649
Notes payable		275,000		355,040
Convertible promissory note, net of discount $37,000 and $7,886 respectively		29,114		82,011
Payables to related parties		118,103		114,063
Derivative Liability		28,886		173,944
Total Current Liabilities	$	896,934	$	1,211,377

Stockholders' Deficit:
Common stock, non-assessable, $0.001 par value, 999,990,000 shares authorized, 432,120,574 and 255,657,250 share sissued and outstanding, respectively	$	432,122	$	255,659
Class B Common stock, assessable, $0.001 par value 10,000 shares authorized, 9,958 shares issued and outstanding		10		10
Additional paid in capital		17,027,439		16,839,161
Accumulated deficit prior to development stage		(16,770,000)		(16,770,000)
Accumulated deficit during development stage		(1,586,505)		(1,536,206)
Total Stockholders' Deficit	$	(896,934)	$	(1,211,377)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$	0	$	0


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CATALYST RESOURCE GROUP, INC
FORMERLY JEANTEX GROUP, INC
(DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011 AND THE PERIOD
FROM RE-ENTERING THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE, JANUARY 1, 2007, TO MARCH 31, 2011
(unaudited)
						From Re-entering of
						Development Stage
						January 1, 2007 to
		2012		2011		March 31, 2012

NET SALES	$	-	$	-	$	-

COST OF GOODS SOLD		-		-		-

GROSS PROFIT		-		-		-

OPERATING EXPENSES:
General and administration		5,202		20,037		421,031
Bad Debts				-		617,336
Total Operating Expenses		5,202		20,037		1,038,367

Income(Loss) from Operations		(5,202)		(20,037)		(1,038,367)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)
Interest expense		(55,791)		(39,745)		(529,147)
Change in fair value of derivative		10,694		(3,516)		(36,776)
Other Income		-		-		17,784
Total other income (expense)		(45,097)		(43,261)		(548,139)

NET INCOME(LOSS)	$	(50,299)	$	(63,298)	$	(1,586,506)

Weighted average number of Class A shares outstanding-basic and diluted		344,325,603		101,995,073

Basic and diluted net loss per share-Class A	$	(0.00)	$	(0.00)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CATALYST RESOURCE GROUP, INC
FORMERLY JEANTEX GROUP, INC
(DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011
AND THE PERIOD FROM RE-ENTERING THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE, JANUARY 1, 2007 TO MARCH 31, 2012
(unaudited)

						Period From
						January 1, 2007
						(re-entering
						development stage) to
		2012		2011		March 31, 2012
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(50,299)	$	(63,298)	$	(1,586,506)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Gain on Conversion Note				-		617,336
Imputed interest charged to equity		966		926		15,857
Amortization of Discount		43,262		25,239		242,048
Issuance of shares for consulting services		-				135,000
Changes in fair value of derivative liability		(10,694)		3,516		36,776
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease in deposits and prepaid expenses		-		-		46,816
Increase(decrease) in accounts payable		(337)		8,588		(1,187)
Increase in accrued expenses		14,603		13,697		218,009
Total adjustments		47,800		51,966		1,310,655
Net cash used in operating activities		(2,500)		(11,332)		(275,851)


Cash Flow From Financing Activities:
Proceeds from notes - related parties		4,040				150,500
Payment of Notes- related parties		-		(63,000)		(189,126)
Proceeds from notes		-		80,000		254,440
Payment on notes		(1,540)				(6,540)
Payments of lines of credit		-		-		(1,270)
Stock issued for cash		-		-		62,600
Net cash provided by financing activities		2,500		17,000		270,604

Increase(decrease) in cash		0		5,668		(5,247)
Cash - Beginning of period		-		180		5,247
Cash - End of period	$	0	$	5,848	$	0

Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid	$	-	$		$	19,177
Taxes paid	$	-	$	-	$	-
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Debt Discount	$	1,840		44,090	$	259,396
Relief of derivative liability due to conversion	$	98,000		37,000	$	185,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Catalyst Resource Group, Inc.

(Formerly Jeantex Group, Inc.)

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

~~September 30~~March 31, ~~2011~~2012

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to interim financial statements. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~ 2012 and for all the periods presented have been made.

The financial information included in this quarterly report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011.

The results of operations for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~ 30March 31, ~~2011~~2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, ~~2011~~2012.

Development Stage Company

The Company has not earned significant revenue from planned principal operations since 2006. Accordingly, effective January 1, 2007, the Company's activities have been accounted for as those of a "Development Stage Enterprise" as set forth in FASB Pronouncements. Among the disclosures required are that the Company's financial statements be identified as those of a development stage company, and that the statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows disclose activity since the date of the Company's inception of development stage.

2. GOING CONCERN

The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared using the generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, the Company has accumulated deficits of $18,~~288~~356,~~937~~ 056 at ~~September~~March 30, ~~2011~~2012. At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012, the Company’s current liabilities exceeded its current assets by $1896,~~231,857~~934. In view of the matters described above, recoverability of a major portion of the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying balance sheet is dependent upon continued operations of the Company, which in turn is dependent upon the Company's ability to raise additional capital, obtain financing and to succeed in its future operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

3. NOTES PAYABLE

At March ~~September~~ 30, ~~2011~~2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011, notes payable consisted of the following:

Total interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $99,592 and $19,543 respectively.

		March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Note Payable to ex-president of the Company, unsecured, 8% interest matured September 2006	$	250,000	$	250,000
Note Payable due to individual, unsecured, 8% interest due on demand		-		50,000
Note Payable due to individual, unsecured, 8% interest due on demand		25,000		25,000
Note Payable due to individual, unsecured, 8% interest due on demand		-		10,500
Note Payable due to individual, unsecured, 8% interest due on demand		-		7,000
Note Payable due to individual, unsecured, 8% interest due on demand		-		11,000
Note Payable due to individual, unsecured, 8% interest due on demand		-		1,540
	$	275,000	$	355,040

Total interest expense for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~ 2012 and ~~2010~~2011 was $~~167~~55,~~701~~791 and $4939,~~894~~745 respectively.

4. PAYABLES TO RELATED PARTIES

At March ~~September 30~~31, ~~2011~~2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011, notes payable to related parties consisted of the following:

	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
		March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Note Payable to PHI Group, Inc. related by ownership, unsecured, 8% interest, due on demand	$ 85,780		$ 198,049
Note Payable to PHI Group, Inc. related by ownership, unsecured, 8% interest, due on demand matured September 2006	$	85,780	$	85,780
Note Payable to PHILand Corporation, a subsidiary of PHI Group Inc.	-		1,000
Short-term loan from officer, unsecured, interest free, due on demand		32,323		28,283
Short-term loan from officer, unsecured, interest free, due on demand	21,503		47,298
	$	118,103	$	114,063
	$ 107,283		$ 246,347

~~The~~Imputed interest ~~decrease~~on the interest free short-term loan from officer in ~~note~~the ~~payable~~amount toof ~~PHI~~$ ~~Group~~966 and $3,604 ~~Inc.~~were ~~was~~included ~~due~~as an increase to ~~partial~~additional ~~repayment~~paid ofin ~~principal.~~capital at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively

Imputed interest on the interest free short-term loan from officer in the amount of $ 834 and $3,487 were included as an increase to additional paid in capital at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

5. CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES

The Company has issued a number of convertible promissory notes ~~issued~~ to Asher Enterprises, Inc. (“Asher”) insince May 2010. These notes are due and payable onnine ~~the~~months ~~due~~following issuance dates with interest of 8% per annum. These notes are convertible at the election of Asher from time to time after the issuance date, at 39% discount to the average of the lowest closing bid prices for the Company’s common stock during the ten trading day period ending on the latest complete trading prior to the conversion date. In the event of default, the amount of principal and interest not paid when due bear interest at the rate of 22% per annum and the notes become immediately due and payable. Should that occur, the Company is liable to pay Asher 150% of the then outstanding principal and interest. The note agreements contain covenants requiring Asher’s written consent for certain activities not in existence or not committed to by the Company on the issue date of the notes, as follows: dividend distributions in cash or shares, stock repurchases, borrowings, sale of assets, certain advances and loans in excess of $45,000, and certain guarantees to third-party liabilities. Outstanding note principal and interest amounts accrued thereon can be converted in whole, or in part, at any time by Asher after the issuance ~~date~~dates into an equivalent of the Company’s common stock determined by ~~58% of~~ the ~~average of the three lowest closing trading prices of the Company’s~~discount ~~common~~rates ~~stock~~mentioned ~~during~~in the ~~ten trading days prior to the date the conversion notice is sent by Asher~~notes.

~~During~~ Additionally, the ~~first~~notes ~~quarter,~~contain ~~the~~a ~~remaining $37,000~~reset ~~principal~~provision ofto the ~~convertible~~exercise ~~notes~~price ~~issued~~and inconversion ~~May~~price ~~18,~~if ~~2010~~the ~~has~~Company ~~been~~issues ~~converted~~equity ~~into~~or ~~2,477,784~~other ~~shares~~derivatives at ~~which~~a ~~extinguished~~price ~~the derivative~~less ~~liability~~than ~~resulting~~the inexercise aprice ~~credit~~set toforth ~~Paid~~ in ~~capital~~such ofwarrants ~~$41,734~~and notes. ~~The~~This ~~remaining~~ratchet ~~debt~~provision ~~discount~~results ~~was~~in ~~written~~a ~~off~~derivative ~~to interest~~liability ~~expense~~ in ~~the~~our ~~amount~~financial ~~of $18,809~~statements.

OnThe value ~~January~~of ~~11,~~the ~~2011~~derivative ~~and~~liability at March 1031, ~~2011,~~2012 ~~the~~is ~~Company issued a second and third Convertible Promissory Note to Asher for~~ $4028,~~000 each under similar terms and conditions~~886.

The fourth Convertible Promissory Note to Asher was issued on April 15, 2011 for $40,000 under similar terms and conditions.

On July 1, 2011 and July 29, 2011, the Company issued a fifth and sixth Convertible Promissory Note to Asher for $32,500 each under similar terms and conditions.

During the third quarter, $34,000 principal of the $40,000 conversion notes issued on April 15, 2011 was converted into 1,073,753 shares which extinguished a portion of the derivative liability resulting in a credit to Paid in Capital of $58,559.

All note conversions were within the terms of the agreements.

	6/30/2011	Additions	Conversions	9/30/2011	Additions	Conversions	12/31/2011	Additions	Conversions	3/31/2012
Asher Enterprise	120,000	65,000	34,000	151,000		16,000	135,000		98,000	37,000
Discount on Asher Note	-99,830	-65,000	-52,058	-112,772		-59,783	-52,989		-45,103	(7,886)

6. DERIVATIVE

The Company’s Convertible 8% Notes issued to Asher Enterprise, Inc. ~~during first and second quarters~~ contain a conversion ~~feature~~features that ~~allows~~allow for conversion into shares at a price discounted from the market price. ~~This~~For each particular note, this amount is set at ~~58%~~a offixed percentage of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices over the last 10 days. Additionally, the ~~note~~notes ~~contains~~contain a reset provision to the exercise price and conversion price if the Company issues equity or other derivatives at a price less than the exercise price set forth in such warrants and notes. This ratchet provision results in a derivative liability in our financial statements.

We valued the conversion features in its convertible notes using a binomial lattice valuation model. The lattice model values the embedded derivatives based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. This model is based on future projections of the five primary alternatives possible for settlement of the features included within the embedded derivatives, which are: (i) payments are made in cash, (ii) payments are made in stock, (iii) the holder exercises its right to convert the notes, (iv) we exercise our right to convert the notes, and (v) we default on the notes. We use the model to analyze the underlying economic factors that influence which of these events will occur, when they are likely to occur, and the price of its common stock and specific terms of the notes, such as interest rate and conversion price, that will be in effect when they occur. Based on the analysis of these factors, we use the model to develop a set of potential scenarios. Probabilities of each scenario occurring during the remaining term of the notes are determined based on management's projections. These probabilities are used to create a cash flow projection over the term of the notes and determine the probability that the projected cash flow will be achieved. A discounted weighted average cash flow for each scenario is then calculated and compared to the discounted cash flow of the notes without the compound embedded derivative in order to determine a value for the compound embedded derivative.

During the first quarter, the remaining $37,000 principal of the convertible notes was converted, which extinguished the associated derivative liability. The remaining debt discount of $18,809 was written off to interest expense at the time of conversion.

Roll-forward of Derivative Net Liabilities
Derivative balance at 12.31.2010	$ 40,205
Derivative balance at issuance (January 11, 2011)	$ 40,666
Derivative balance at issuance (March 10, 2011)	$ 39,035

Change due to Mark to Market	$ 3,516
Conversion of Note	$ (44,102)

Derivative balance at 03.31.2011	$ 79,320
Derivative balance at issuance (April 15, 2011)	$ 39,658
Change due to Mark to Market	$ 20,562

Derivative balance at 06.30.2011	$ 139,540
Derivative balance at issuance (July 1, 2011)	$ 48,760
Derivative balance at issuance (July 29, 2011)	$ 45,346
Change due to Mark to Market	$ 78,471
Conversion of Note	$ (58,559)

Derivative balance at 09.30.2011	$ 253,558
Change due to Mark to Market	(59,653)
Conversion of Note	$ (19,960)

Derivative balance at 12.31.2011	$ 173,944
Change due to Mark to Market	(10,694)
Conversion of Note	(134,363)

Derivative balance at 03.31.2012	$ 28,886

OnDuring the ~~January~~first 11quarter, ~~2011 and March 10, 2011,~~ the ~~Company~~remaining ~~issued a second and third Convertible Promissory Notes to Asher for~~ $4030,000 ~~each~~principal ~~under~~of ~~similar terms and conditions. Based on current guidance,~~ the ~~Company concluded that the~~ convertible ~~note~~notes issued toin ~~Asher~~March ~~during~~10, ~~the~~2011 ~~first~~has ~~quarter~~been isconverted ~~also~~into ~~required~~7,853,538 toshares beof ~~accounted~~non-assessable ~~for~~common asstock aof ~~derivative. This guidance requires~~ the Company, towhich ~~bifurcate~~extinguished ~~and separately account for~~ the ~~conversion features~~derivative ofliability ~~the~~resulting ~~convertible~~in ~~notes~~a ~~issued~~credit asto ~~embedded derivatives. Derivative liabilities of $40,666 and $39,035 resulted from the~~paid-in ~~January~~capital ~~11, 2011 and March 10, 2011 note issuances and an associated debt discounts~~ of $4055,~~000 and $39,035, respectively~~017.

The ~~Company issued a fourth Convertible Promissory Note to Asher for~~ $40,000 ~~under~~principal ~~similar~~of ~~terms and conditions on April 15, 2011. Based on current guidance,~~ the ~~Company concluded that the~~ convertible ~~note~~notes issued toin ~~Asher on~~ April 1505, 2011 ishas ~~also~~been ~~required~~converted tointo be14,138,272 ~~accounted~~shares ~~for~~of ~~as a derivative. This~~non-assessable ~~guidance~~common ~~requires~~stock ~~the Company to bifurcate and separately account for the conversion features~~ of the ~~convertible notes issued as embedded derivatives. Derivative liabilities of $39~~Company,~~658~~ ~~resulted~~which ~~from~~extinguished the ~~April~~derivative ~~15,~~liability ~~2011~~resulting ~~note~~in ~~issuance~~a ~~and~~credit anto ~~associated debt~~paid-in ~~discount~~capital of $3928,~~658~~832. ~~The debt discount is being amortized over the nine-month note life, using the effective interest method.~~

~~During the third quarter,~~ The $3428,000 principal of the $4032,~~000~~500 ~~Convertible Promissory~~convertible ~~Note~~notes issued onin ~~April~~July 1507, 2011 ~~was~~has been converted into 24,428,904 ~~which~~shares ~~extinguished~~of ~~substantially~~non-assessable common ~~all~~stock of the ~~associated~~Company, which extinguished the derivative liability ~~and~~ ~~unamortized~~resulting ~~discount~~in a credit to paid-in capital of $34,126.

~~On July 1, 2011 and July 29, 2011, the Company issued a fifth and~~The ~~sixth~~fair ~~Convertible~~value ~~Promissory~~of ~~Note to Asher for $32,500 each under similar terms and conditions. Based on current guidance,~~ the ~~Company concluded that the convertible note issued to Asher during the third quarter is also required to be accounted for as a~~ derivative. ~~This~~liability ~~guidance~~at ~~requires~~March ~~the Company to bifurcate and separately account for the conversion features of the convertible notes issued as embedded derivatives. Derivative liabilities of $48~~31,~~760~~ ~~and~~2012 ~~$45,346 resulted from the July 1, 2011~~ and ~~July~~December 2931, 2011 ~~note~~is ~~issuances and associated debt discounts of~~ $3228,~~500~~886 and $32173,~~500,~~944 respectively.

Total debt discount amortization for the period ending September 30, 2011 was $89,730 which was recorded as interest expense during the period.

The fair value of the derivative liability at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is $253,558 and $40,205, respectively.

7. FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING

Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table summarizes the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value, on a recurring basis as of ~~September 30~~March 31, ~~2011~~2012:

Carrying

Fair Value Measurements Using

Value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Derivative liabilities

~~253~~28,~~558~~886

Totals

~~253~~28,~~558~~886

Level 3 Valuation Techniques

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. Our Level 3 liabilities consist of the derivative liabilities associated with certain preferred stock issuances and freestanding warrants that contain down round provisions.

8. RECLASSIFICATION

For comparative purposes, prior period’s consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with report classifications of the current period.

9. STOCKHOLDERS' ~~STOCKHOLDER’S~~ EQUITY

Pursuant to the amendment of the Articles of Incorporation of the Company as filed with the Secretary of State, Florida, on October 1, 2003, the authorized common stock has been divided into two classes known as Common Stock (previously known as Class A Common Stock) and Class B assessable common stock.

Common Stock

On January 316, ~~2011~~2012, Asher Enterprises, Inc. converted $10,000 principal amount of the ~~convertible promissory~~Convertible ~~note~~Promissory Note dated March 10, 2011 into ~~819~~1,~~672~~785,714 shares of ~~the Company’s~~ common stock of the Company.

On February ~~January 19~~10, ~~2011~~2012, ~~Asher~~a ~~Enterprises,~~creditor ~~Inc.~~of the Company converted $850,000 principal amount of ~~the~~a convertible ~~promissory~~ note dated March 1, 2007 and $40,000 accrued interest thereof into ~~425~~90,~~532~~000,000 shares of ~~the Company’s~~ common stock of the Company.

OnAlso on ~~January~~February 2110, ~~2011~~2012, ~~Asher~~another ~~Enterprises,~~creditor ~~Inc.~~of the Company converted $1028,~~000~~500 ofprincipal ~~the~~amount of convertible promissory ~~note~~notes dated June 14, 2006 and $11,552.51 accrued interest and penalty thereof into ~~578~~40,~~035~~052,510 shares of ~~the Company’s~~ common stock of the Company.

On February 1713, ~~2011~~2012, Asher Enterprises, Inc. converted $98,000 principal amount of the ~~convertible promissory~~Convertible ~~note~~Promissory Note dated March 10, 2011 into ~~654~~2,~~545~~580,645 shares of ~~the Company’s~~ common stock of the Company.

On February ~~July 21~~28, ~~2011~~2012, Asher Enterprises, Inc. converted $12,000 principal amount of the ~~convertible~~Convertible Promissory Note dated March 10, ~~promissory~~2011, ~~note~~together with $1,600 accrued and unpaid interest thereto, totaling $13,600 into ~~379~~3,~~747~~487,179 shares of ~~the Company’s~~ common stock of the Company.

On March ~~July 25~~01, ~~2011~~2012, Asher Enterprises, Inc. converted $1015,000 principal amount of the ~~convertible promissory~~Convertible ~~note~~Promissory Note dated April 5, 2011 into ~~315~~3,~~457~~488,372 shares of ~~the Company’s~~ common stock of the Company.

On March ~~July 29~~07, ~~2011~~2012, Asher Enterprises, Inc. converted $12,000 principal amount of the ~~convertible promissory~~Convertible ~~note~~Promissory Note dated April 5, 2011 into ~~378~~12,~~549~~121,212 shares of ~~the Company’s~~ common stock of the Company.

AtOn March ~~September 30~~08, ~~2011~~2012, ~~the~~Asher ~~Company’s~~Enterprises, ~~authorized~~Inc. ~~capital~~converted ~~is 299~~$25,~~990,~~000 ~~shares~~ ofprincipal ~~Common~~amount ~~Stock with a par value~~ of ~~$0.001.~~the ~~Common~~Convertible ~~Stock~~Promissory ~~issued~~Note ~~and~~dated ~~outstanding~~April of5, ~~103~~2011 into 10,~~669~~640,~~948~~000 shares isof ~~fully~~common ~~paid~~stock ~~and non-assessable~~of the Company.

On March 15, 2012, Asher Enterprises, Inc. converted $16,000 principal amount of the Convertible Promissory Note dated April 5, 2011 into 12,307,692 shares of common stock of the Company.

At March 31, 2012, the Company has authorized for issue 999,990,000 shares of non-assessable Common Stock with a par value of $0.001. Common Stock issued and outstanding of 432,120,574 shares is fully paid and non-assessable.

Class B Common Stock

At December ~~September 30~~31, 2011, the Company has authorized for issue, 10,000 shares of Class B Common Stock with a par value of $0.001. Class B Common Stock issued and outstanding of 9,958 shares is assessable, provided however, that any assessments levied upon Class B shares are considered as contributions to capital and must be repaid from net profits before dividends are declared or paid to any Common Stock or Class B Common Stock shareholders. Class B capital assessments can be levied at any time by the Board of Directors at their discretion. Shareholders who fail to pay assessments levied on their Class B shares lose ownership of the shares and the shares are returned to the treasury.

Preferred Stock

The Company has ~~100~~200,000,000 shares of authorized Preferred Stock, with a par value of $0.001. As of the date of this report, the Company has not issued any Preferred Stock.

NOTE 10.- ~~AGREEMENT~~CONTRACTS ~~WITH~~AND ~~RERUN~~COMMITMENTS ~~RECOVERY, INC.~~

OnEffective March ~~May 5~~3, ~~2011~~2012, the Company ~~entered~~signed ~~into~~an aAsset ~~Business~~Purchase ~~Cooperation~~Agreement (the “Agreement ”) with ~~Rerun~~Lao ~~Recovery~~Minerals Mining, Inc. (“LMM”), a Nevada corporation, ~~according~~for tothe ~~which~~purpose ~~both~~of ~~parties~~acquiring ~~would~~80% ~~cooperate~~interest ~~with~~of ~~each~~LLM’s ~~other~~equity toownership ~~utilize~~in ~~the~~gold concessions ~~proprietary~~known ~~pre-treatment~~as ~~and~~San ~~separation~~8 ~~technologies~~and ~~owned~~San by60 ~~Rerun~~areas ~~Recovery~~of tothe ~~process~~Somsanouk ~~and~~Village ~~sell platinum group metals~~ (~~PGMs~~Phosang Noi) ~~and~~, ~~gold~~Sanakham ~~from~~District, aVientiane ~~mine~~Province, inLaos ~~Alaska~~People’s Democratic ~~and~~Republic. ~~one~~According into ~~Oregon~~the toAsset ~~industrial~~Purchase ~~and~~Agreement, ~~private~~which ~~users.~~was ~~The~~set ~~Company~~to ~~will~~close ~~share~~on ~~70%~~April ~~net~~16, ~~profits~~2012, ofupon the Closing ~~processed~~Date ~~minerals~~of ~~from~~this ~~these~~Agreement, ~~mines~~the ~~with~~Company ~~Rerun~~would ~~Recovery.~~pay Inan ~~return,~~Exclusive ~~the~~Partner ~~Company~~Fee ~~will~~(“EPF”) beof ~~responsible for~~ $~~400~~500,000 ~~related~~ to LMM for bringing the ~~operations~~concessions ofto the ~~mines,~~Company. ~~$3,500,000~~The ~~for~~Agreement ~~building~~would ~~new~~remain ~~processing~~non-exclusive ~~facilities~~until ~~and~~such ~~issuing~~time ~~150~~that the initial $200,000~~,000~~ ~~shares~~would ofbe ~~its~~paid ~~restricted common~~to ~~stock~~LMM toby ~~Rerun~~the ~~Recovery, Inc~~Company. ~~and/or~~The ~~its~~concessions ~~designees.~~would ~~The~~become ~~Company~~exclusive ~~received~~to the ~~consent~~Company ofonce athis ~~majority~~initial ofpayment ~~its~~is ~~shareholders~~transacted. ~~with~~The ~~respect~~EPF would tobe ~~the~~non-refundable, ~~Business~~however ~~Cooperation~~it ~~Agreement~~might onbe ~~May~~recouped ~~23,~~by ~~2011~~the ~~and~~Company ~~filed~~through ~~the~~mining ~~Preliminary~~revenue ~~Information~~before ~~Statement~~LMM ~~Pursuant~~would be entitled to ~~Section~~its ~~14(c)~~share of the ~~Securities~~mining ~~Exchange~~profits. ~~Act~~In ofthe ~~1934~~event onthe ~~June~~Company 1,terminated ~~2011.~~this ~~Subsequently,~~Agreement ~~the~~or ~~Company~~their ~~filed~~exploration ~~the~~activities ~~Definitive~~before ~~Information~~the ~~Statement~~EPF ~~pursuant~~would tohave ~~Section~~been ~~14(c)~~paid ofin full, the ~~Securities~~balance ~~Exchange~~would ~~Act~~be ofdue ~~1934~~within onthirty ~~June~~(30) ~~29,~~days ~~2011.~~of Onthe ~~October~~Company’s ~~24,~~termination ~~2011,~~notice ~~the~~to ~~Company~~LMM. ~~issued~~In consideration ~~150~~for the EPF,~~000,000~~ ~~shares of~~LMM ~~restricted~~would ~~common~~not, ~~stock~~without tothe ~~Rerun~~Company’s ~~Recovery~~consent, ~~Inc.~~allow ~~and~~any ~~its~~party ~~designees~~other ~~pursuant~~than toLMM and the ~~referenced~~Mining ~~Business Cooperation Agreement.~~Unit ~~Consequentially,~~of ~~Rerun~~the ~~Recovery,~~Ministry ~~Inc.~~of ~~and~~Defense ~~its~~of ~~designee~~Laos (s“MUMD”) ~~have~~to ~~become~~be ~~controlling~~involved ~~shareholders~~in of the ~~Company.~~development As of the ~~date~~concessions ~~of this~~unless ~~report,~~ the Company did ~~has~~not ~~recorded~~exercise ~~$150,000~~its asoption ~~Common~~to ~~Stock~~proceed ~~Payable~~to in the ~~accompanying~~Mining ~~financial statements~~Stage.

11Payment terms: Payment of $200,000 upon the Closing Date of the Asset Purchase Agreement. Once all necessary closing deliveries had been ~~SUBSEQUENT~~provided ~~EVENT~~to the Company by LMM, the remaining $300,000 would be paid in $100,000 monthly installments over the following 3 months. In addition, the Company would commit to sole-fund a minimum amount of $2,000,000 in exploration activities over a 2-year period upon the Closing Date of this Agreement, with a minimum of $1,000,000 for exploration activities within 1 year. The Company would prepare and submit an approvable Bankable Feasibility Study (“BFS”) to LMM within thirty (30) months following the Closing Date of this Agreement. LMM would submit the BFS to the relevant government authorities for approval. If in the Company’s opinion the BFS indicated that a commercially viable mining operation could be

Onestablished on ~~October~~the 17Concession, ~~2011,~~then ~~Asher~~the ~~Enterprises,~~Company ~~Inc~~would solely fund all mining activities. ~~converted~~If $6the Decision to Mine had been reached,~~000~~ ~~principal~~the BFS ~~amount~~approved ofand the ~~Convertible~~Mining ~~Promissory~~License ~~Note~~had ~~dated~~been ~~January 11~~granted, ~~2011,~~the ~~together~~Company ~~with~~would pay LMM a Mining Execution Fee (“MEF”) of $13,~~600~~000,000 which ~~accrued~~would give the Company an 80% interest in LMM’s shares and ~~unpaid~~LMM would maintain 20% interest ~~thereto,~~of ~~totaling~~its shares. The MEF would be paid from the initial $73,~~600~~000,000 ~~into~~in ~~400~~gross revenues earned from the extraction and sale of any of the minerals from the concessions,~~000~~ less the recoupable upfront payment and the MUMD shares. For avoidance of ~~common~~doubt, ~~stock~~the Company’s shares and LMM’s shares would mean that the net revenues received from sales of all minerals extracted from the concession would be split between the Company (80%) and LMM (20%), net of the normal pre-mining cost recovery process.

On March ~~October 24~~16, ~~2011~~2012, LMM and the Company ~~issued~~signed ~~150,000,000~~an ~~shares~~addendum of(“Addendum ~~restricted common~~A” ~~stock~~ to ~~Rerun~~the ~~Recovery,~~afore-mentioned ~~Inc.,~~Asset aPurchase ~~Nevada~~Agreement to ~~corporation,~~clarify ~~and~~the ~~its~~definitions ~~designees~~and ~~pursuant~~meanings toof the ~~Business~~“Acquired ~~Cooperation~~Assets”, ~~Agreement dated May 05~~“Concession”, ~~2011~~“Exploration ~~between Rerun Recovery~~Rights”, “Title ~~Inc.~~to ~~and~~ the ~~Company.~~Acquired ~~Consequentially~~Assets”, ~~Rerun Recovery, Inc.~~ and ~~its~~“Performance” ~~designee(s)~~previously ~~have~~stated ~~become controlling~~in ~~shareholders~~the ofAsset ~~the~~Purchase ~~Company~~Agreement.

~~Item~~NOTE 11- 2.SUBSEQUENT ~~Management's Discussion and Analysis~~EVENT

~~Forward~~On April ~~Looking~~9, ~~Information~~2012, the Company and Laos Minerals Mining, Inc. signed an Agreement for Termination of Asset Purchase Agreement to terminate the afore-mentioned Asset Purchase Agreement between Laos Minerals Mining, Inc. and the Company in its entirety effective April 9, 2012 due to certain technical reasons and indemnify each other from and against any and all claims, demands, damages, arising or relating to this Termination Agreement.

~~The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act~~On ofApril ~~1995~~13, ~~provides~~2012, ~~a "safe harbor" from liability for forward-looking statements. Certain information included in this Form 10-Q and other materials filed or to be filed by~~ the Company ~~with~~issued ~~the~~a ~~Securities~~seventh ~~and~~Convertible ~~Exchange~~Promissory ~~Commission~~Note ~~(as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or~~ to beAsher ~~made~~for ~~by or on behalf of the Company) are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans~~$15,000 ~~objectives,~~under ~~goals,~~similar ~~strategies,~~terms ~~future events or performance~~ and ~~underlying assumptions that are not statements of historical facts. This document and any other written or oral statements~~conditions ~~made~~as bycontained usin orthe onprevious ~~our~~convertible ~~behalf~~promissory ~~may include forward-looking statements, which reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance~~notes. ~~The words "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intends," "estimates," "forecast," "project" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements.~~

~~Such forward-looking statements involve important~~On ~~risks~~April ~~and~~17, ~~uncertainties~~2012, ~~many of which will be beyond~~ the ~~control of the~~ Company. ~~These~~received ~~risks~~a ~~and~~notice ~~uncertainties~~of ~~could~~default ~~significantly affect~~by ~~anticipated~~Asher ~~results in the future~~Enterprises, ~~both short-term and long-term, and accordingly, such results may differ from those expressed in forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company~~Inc. ~~These~~with ~~risks~~respect ~~and uncertainties include, but are not limited~~ to~~, changes~~ ~~in external competitive market factors or in~~ the ~~Company's~~outstanding ~~internal~~balances ~~budgeting process which might impact trends in the~~convertible ~~Company's~~promissory ~~results~~notes ofdated ~~operations~~June 17, ~~unanticipated~~2011 ~~working~~and ~~capital~~August ~~or other cash requirements~~1, ~~changes~~2011 inbetween the Company's ~~business~~and ~~strategy or~~Asher anEnterprises, ~~inability~~Inc. ~~to execute its strategy~~ due to ~~unanticipated change in~~ the ~~industries~~delay inof ~~which it operates, and various competitive factors that may prevent the~~ Company ~~from competing successfully in the marketplace. Although we believe that these assumptions~~’s ~~were~~filing ~~reasonable when made, these statements are not guarantees~~ of ~~future~~Form ~~performance~~10 ~~and~~K ~~are~~for ~~subject~~the tofiscal ~~certain~~year ~~risks~~ended ~~and~~December ~~uncertainties~~31, ~~some~~ ~~of which are beyond our control, and are difficult to predict~~2011. ~~Actual results could differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements.~~

~~Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance~~On onApril ~~any~~18, ~~forward-looking statements~~2012, ~~which reflect management's view only as of~~ the ~~date of this report. The~~ Company ~~undertakes~~issued ~~no obligation~~25,000,000 toshares ~~publicly~~of ~~revise~~restricted ~~these~~common ~~forward-looking~~stock ~~statements~~of ~~to reflect subsequence events or circumstances. Readers are also encouraged to review~~ the Company's ~~publicly~~to ~~available~~an ~~filings~~accredited ~~with~~investor ~~the~~for ~~Securities and Exchange Commission~~$25,000.00.

~~Company~~Item 2. ~~Background~~Management's Discussion and Analysis

~~Catalyst Resource Group, Inc., formerly Jeantex~~Forward ~~Group,~~Looking ~~Inc.,~~Information (the "Company") is a Florida corporation, originally incorporated as an Idaho corporation on August 23, 1947 as Western Silver Lead Corporation. Western Silver Lead Corporation (“WSL”) was organized to explore for, acquire and develop mineral properties in the state of Idaho and the western United States. During the first several years WSL's activities have been confined to annual assessment and maintenance work on its Idaho mineral properties and other general and administrative functions. As of September 30, 2000, no proven or probable reserves had been established at any of WSL's mineral properties. On November 1, 2001, WSL entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement to transfer all of its interest in its properties to WSL, LLC, an entity controlled by its former president and director, who is the father of the president and director of WSL at that time. On August 16, 2002, WSL’s shareholders ratified this agreement. On September 24, 2003 the parent Western Silver-Lead Corporation, an Idaho corporation, merged into the wholly-owned subsidiary Western Silver-Lead Corporation, a Florida corporation, whereby each shareholder of the Idaho corporation’s Class A and Class B common stock, par value $0.001, received one share of common stock and Class B common stock, respectively, par value $0.001, of the Florida corporation. The merger was between the parent and the subsidiary corporation and the subsidiary became a surviving corporation.

OnThe Private ~~September~~Securities ~~29,~~Litigation ~~2003~~Reform ~~the~~Act ~~Company~~of ~~entered~~1995 ~~into an~~provides ~~Agreement~~a of"safe ~~Merger~~harbor" ~~with~~from ~~Lexor~~liability ~~International,~~for ~~Inc,~~forward-looking ~~("Lexor")~~statements. Certain ainformation ~~Maryland~~included ~~corporation.~~in ~~Pursuant~~this Form 10-Q and other materials filed or to ~~the~~be ~~Merger~~filed ~~Agreement,~~ by the Company ~~issued~~with ~~10,867,000~~the ~~shares~~Securities ofand Exchange ~~its~~Commission ~~Class~~(as Awell ~~common~~as ~~stock~~information toincluded ~~Lexor's~~in ~~shareholders~~oral instatements ~~exchange~~or ~~for~~other ~~all~~written ~~issued~~statements ~~and~~made ~~outstanding~~or to be made by or on ~~shares~~behalf of the ~~Lexor's~~Company) ~~common~~are ~~stock~~forward-looking statements. OnForward-looking ~~October~~statements 1include statements concerning plans, ~~2003~~objectives, goals, ~~the~~strategies, ~~Company~~future ~~changed~~events ~~its~~or ~~name~~performance toand ~~Lexor~~underlying ~~Holdings,~~assumptions ~~Inc~~that are not statements of historical facts. OnThis ~~October~~document and 3any other written or oral statements made by us or on our behalf may include forward-looking statements, ~~2003 the~~which ~~board~~reflect ofour current ~~directors~~views ofwith ~~the~~respect ~~Company~~to ~~resigned~~future events and ~~Christopher~~financial ~~Long~~performance. ~~was~~The ~~appointed~~words as"believe," ~~the~~"expect," ~~new~~"anticipate," "intends," ~~president~~"estimates," of"forecast," ~~the~~"project" ~~Company~~and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements.

OnSuch forward-looking ~~March~~statements 31involve important risks and uncertainties, ~~2005~~many ~~Company~~of ~~entered~~which ~~into~~will abe ~~Rescission~~beyond the control of the Company. ~~Agreement~~These ~~with~~risks ~~Lexor~~and ~~International~~uncertainties could significantly affect anticipated results in the future, ~~Inc.~~both short-term and long-term, ~~which~~and accordingly, ~~terminated~~such ~~the~~results ~~merger~~may ~~agreement.~~differ ~~Terms~~from ofthose ~~the~~expressed ~~Rescission~~in ~~Agreement~~forward-looking ~~called~~statements ~~for~~made by or on behalf of the Company. These ~~cancellation~~risks ofand 10uncertainties include,~~867~~ but are not limited to,~~000~~ ~~shares~~changes ofin ~~its~~external ~~Class~~competitive Amarket ~~common~~factors ~~stock~~or ~~issued~~in tothe ~~Christopher~~Company's ~~Long~~internal budgeting ~~and~~process Hawhich ~~Nguyen,~~might impact trends in the ~~spouse~~Company's results of ~~Christopher~~operations, unanticipated working capital or other cash ~~Long~~requirements, changes in the ~~return~~Company's ofbusiness ~~all~~strategy or an inability to execute its ~~pre-merger~~strategy ~~assets,~~due ~~assumption~~to ofunanticipated ~~any~~change in the industries in which it operates, and ~~all~~various ~~liabilities~~competitive ~~associated~~factors ~~with~~that tomay prevent the ~~pedicure~~Company ~~spa~~from ~~business~~competing successfully byin ~~Lexor~~the ~~International~~marketplace. Although we believe that these assumptions were reasonable when made, ~~Inc. The~~these ~~spa~~statements ~~business~~are ~~was~~not ~~considered~~guarantees of future performance and are subject to becertain ~~discontinued~~risks ~~operations~~and uncertainties, some of ~~Jeantex~~which ~~Group~~are beyond our control, ~~Inc~~and are difficult to predict. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements.

OnReaders are ~~June~~cautioned ~~22,~~not ~~2005,~~to ~~the~~place ~~Company~~undue ~~entered~~reliance ~~into~~on ~~a Stock~~any ~~Purchase~~forward-looking ~~Agreement with Jeantex~~statements, ~~Inc.,~~which areflect ~~California~~management's ~~corporation.~~view Ononly ~~June~~as ~~29,~~of ~~2005,~~ the ~~transaction contemplated in the Stock~~date ~~Purchase~~of ~~Agreement~~this ~~was completed and a Closing Memorandum was executed by all parties~~report. The Company ~~agreed~~undertakes tono ~~issue~~obligation ~~20,000,000~~to ~~shares of~~publicly ~~its~~revise ~~Class~~these Aforward-looking ~~common~~statements ~~stock~~ to ~~Jeantex,~~reflect ~~Inc.'s shareholder in exchange for 100% of the issued and outstanding equity interest of~~subsequence ~~Jeantex,~~events ~~Inc.~~or ~~and issue 36,350,000 shares of its Class A common stock for consulting and reorganization expenses in connection with this transaction~~circumstances. OnReaders ~~June~~are ~~29,~~also ~~2005~~encouraged ~~the~~to ~~board~~review ~~of director of~~ the Company's ~~approved~~publicly ~~resolutions~~available tofilings ~~the~~with ~~stock transfer agent to issue shares to Jeantex pursuant to~~ the ~~Agreement. The~~Securities ~~shares of Lexor Holdings, Inc. common stock to be issued shall be~~and ~~restricted~~Exchange ~~pursuant to Rule 144~~Commission.

~~On December 20, 2005, the~~ Company ~~entered into~~ a Stock Purchase Agreement with Yves Castaldi Corporation, a California corporation. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Jeantex Group, Inc. has agreed to acquire 51% of the total issued and outstanding equity interests of Castaldi (10,408 shares of the common stock) in exchange for the payment of $650,000 in cash ($50,000 paid on December 29, 2005 and an executed promissory note for the remaining $600,000 of which $300,000 is to be used for working capital) and the issuance of 10,000,000 newly-issued shares of Jeantex Group, Inc. common stock. The 10,000,000 shares of Jeantex restricted common stock will be vested on a pro-rata basis, based on a minimum of $10,000,000 in revenues and between $2.5 and $3.0 million in net profit to be generated by Yves Castaldi Corporation in the next 12 months. The closing of this acquisition occurred December 30, 2005. In June 2006, this Stock Purchase Agreement was amended whereby the Company has agreed to reduce its stake in Castaldi from 51% to 20% of the total issue and outstanding number of shares of Castaldi. Castaldi has agreed to retain only 4,000,000 of the 10,000,000 shares originally issued to it pursuant to the Agreement and will also retain $226,650 paid to Castaldi by the Company as consideration for the Company's 20% stake in Castaldi. The four million (4,000,000) shares of common stock retained by Castaldi will be vested on a pro-rata basis based on Yves Castaldi Corporation's projected revenues of $10,000,000 and net profits of $2,000,000 in the next twenty-four months commencing July 1, 2006. In the event said target revenues and profitability are not reached within said twenty-four months, the amount of vested shares shall be adjusted accordingly on a pro-rata basis. The remaining 6,000,000 shares will be surrendered by Castaldi.Background

AsCatalyst Resource Group, Inc., formerly Jeantex Group, Inc., (the "Company") is a ~~result~~Florida corporation, oforiginally ~~Yves~~incorporated ~~Castaldi~~as ~~Corp~~an Idaho corporation on August 23, 1947 as Western Silver Lead Corporation.’s ~~filing~~Western Silver Lead Corporation (“WSL”) was organized to explore for, ~~Chapter~~acquire 11and ~~protection~~develop ~~with~~mineral properties in the state of Idaho and the western United States. ~~Bankruptcy~~During ~~Court~~the first several years WSL's activities have been confined to annual assessment and maintenance work on its Idaho mineral properties and other general and administrative functions. As of ~~the~~September ~~Central~~30, ~~District~~2000, no proven or probable reserves had been established at any of ~~California~~WSL's mineral properties. On November 1, 2001, WSL entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement to transfer all of its interest in its properties to WSL, LLC, an entity controlled by its former president and ~~naming~~director, who is the ~~Company~~father of the president and director of WSL at that time. On August 16, 2002, WSL’s shareholders ratified this agreement. asOn aSeptember ~~creditor~~24, ~~during~~2003 the ~~fourth~~parent ~~quarter~~Western ofSilver-Lead ~~Fiscal~~Corporation, ~~Year~~an ~~2006~~Idaho corporation, merged into the ~~Company~~wholly-owned ~~has~~subsidiary Western ~~written~~Silver-Lead ~~off~~Corporation, ~~its~~a ~~cash~~Florida ~~investments~~corporation, inwhereby ~~Yves~~each ~~Castaldi~~shareholder of the Idaho corporation’s Class A and ~~Corp~~Class B common stock, par value $0.001, received one share of common stock and ~~will~~Class ~~reclaim~~B ~~all~~common ~~the~~stock, 10respectively,~~000~~ par value $0.001,~~000~~ ~~shares~~of ~~that~~the ~~were~~Florida ~~issued~~corporation. toThe ~~Yves~~merger ~~Castaldi~~was ~~Corp~~between the parent and the subsidiary corporation and the subsidiary became a surviving corporation.

~~During~~On September 29, 2003 the ~~fourth~~Company ~~quarter~~entered into an Agreement of ~~fiscal~~Merger ~~year~~with ~~2006~~Lexor International, ~~Jeantex~~Inc, ("Lexor") a Maryland ~~Inc~~corporation. ~~discontinued~~Pursuant ~~its~~to ~~private~~the ~~label~~Merger ~~manufacturing~~Agreement, ~~business~~the Company issued 10,867,000 ~~sold~~shares of its ~~fully~~Class ~~depreciated~~A ~~equipment~~common ~~and~~stock ~~began~~ to ~~look~~Lexor's shareholders in exchange for ~~sourcing opportunities~~all inissued ~~Asia.~~and Asoutstanding shares of the ~~date~~Lexor's ofcommon ~~this~~stock. ~~report~~On October 1, 2003, the Company ~~has~~changed ~~not~~its ~~entered~~name to ~~into~~Lexor ~~any~~Holdings, ~~definitive~~Inc. ~~agreement~~On ~~with~~October a3, ~~sourcing partner~~2003 ~~for~~the ~~its~~board ~~private~~of ~~label~~directors ~~business.~~of ~~The~~the Company ~~has~~resigned ~~been inactive~~ and ~~seeking~~Christopher ~~for~~Long anwas ~~acquisition~~appointed ~~opportunity. The Company re-entered~~as the ~~development~~new ~~stage~~president onof ~~January~~the ~~1, 2007~~Company.

On March ~~April~~31, 052005 Company entered into a Rescission Agreement with Lexor International, ~~2010~~Inc., which terminated the ~~Company~~merger ~~changed~~agreement. Terms of the Rescission Agreement called for the cancellation of 10,867,000 shares of its ~~name~~Class A common stock issued to Christopher ~~Catalyst~~Long ~~Resource~~and ~~Group~~Ha Nguyen, ~~Inc.~~the tospouse ~~better~~of ~~reflect~~Christopher Long, the return of all its ~~new~~pre-merger ~~intended~~assets, ~~scope~~assumption of any and all liabilities associated with to the pedicure spa business by Lexor International, Inc. The spa business was considered to be discontinued operations of Jeantex Group, Inc.

~~New~~On June ~~Business~~22, ~~Focus:~~2005, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Jeantex, Inc., a California corporation. On June 29, 2005, the transaction contemplated in the Stock Purchase Agreement was completed and a Closing Memorandum was executed by all parties. The Company agreed to issue 20,000,000 shares of its Class A common stock to Jeantex, Inc.'s shareholder in exchange for 100% of the issued and outstanding equity interest of Jeantex, Inc. and issue 36,350,000 shares of its Class A common stock for consulting and reorganization expenses in connection with this transaction. On June 29, 2005 the board of director of the Company approved resolutions to the stock transfer agent to issue shares to Jeantex pursuant to the Agreement. The shares of Lexor Holdings, Inc. common stock to be issued shall be restricted pursuant to Rule 144.

~~The~~On December 20, 2005, the Company ~~has~~entered ~~taken~~into ~~various~~a ~~steps~~Stock toPurchase ~~revise~~Agreement with Yves Castaldi Corporation, a California corporation. ~~its~~Pursuant ~~operating~~to ~~and~~the ~~financial~~terms ~~plans~~of the Agreement, ~~including~~Jeantex ~~negotiating~~Group, Inc. has agreed to acquire ~~technologies~~51% ~~related~~of tothe ~~mining~~total issued and outstanding equity interests of Castaldi (10,408 ~~building~~shares ~~materials~~of the common stock) in exchange for the payment of $650,000 ~~energy~~in cash ($50,000 paid on December 29, 2005 and ~~natural~~an ~~resources~~executed promissory note for the remaining $600,000 of which $300,000 is to be used for working capital) and the issuance of 10,000,000 newly-issued shares of Jeantex Group, Inc. ~~Management~~common ~~believes~~stock. ~~that~~The ~~these~~10,000,000 ~~new~~shares ~~initiatives~~of Jeantex restricted common stock will ~~create~~be ~~long~~vested on a pro-~~term~~rata ~~value~~basis, ~~for~~based on a minimum of $10,000,000 in revenues and between $2.5 and $3.0 million in net profit to be generated by Yves Castaldi Corporation in the next 12 months. The closing of this acquisition occurred December 30, 2005. In June 2006, this Stock Purchase Agreement was amended whereby the Company ~~but~~has ~~there~~agreed isto reduce its stake in Castaldi from no51% ~~guarantee~~to ~~that~~20% of the total issue and outstanding number of shares of Castaldi. Castaldi has agreed to retain only 4,000,000 of the 10,000,000 shares originally issued to it pursuant to the Agreement and will also retain $226,650 paid to Castaldi by the Company as consideration for the Company's 20% stake in Castaldi. The four million (4,000,000) shares of common stock retained by Castaldi will ~~succeed~~be vested on a pro-rata basis based on Yves Castaldi Corporation's projected revenues of $10,000,000 and net profits of $2,000,000 in ~~its~~the ~~plans~~next twenty-four months commencing July 1, 2006. In the event said target revenues and profitability are not reached within said twenty-four months, the amount of vested shares shall be adjusted accordingly on a pro-rata basis. The remaining 6,000,000 shares will be surrendered by Castaldi.

~~Results~~As a result of ~~Operations~~Yves Castaldi Corp.’s filing for Chapter 11 protection with the United States Bankruptcy Court of the Central District of California and naming the Company as a creditor during the fourth quarter of Fiscal Year 2006, the Company has written off its cash investments in Yves Castaldi Corp. and will reclaim all the 10,000,000 shares that were issued to Yves Castaldi Corp.

~~Three~~During the ~~Months~~fourth ~~Ended~~quarter ~~September~~of 30Fiscal Year 2006, ~~2011~~Jeantex, ~~Compared~~Inc. todiscontinued ~~Three~~its ~~Months~~private label manufacturing business and began seeking ~~Ended~~an ~~September~~acquisition ~~30,~~opportunity ~~2010~~in another industry.

~~Revenues:~~On April 05, 2010, the Company changed its name to Catalyst Resource Group, Inc. to reflect its new intended scope of business.

On May 5, 2011, the Company entered into a Business Cooperation Agreement with Rerun Recovery, Inc., a Nevada corporation, to utilize the proprietary pre-treatment and separation technologies owned by Rerun Recovery to process and sell platinum group metals (PGMs) and gold from a mine in Alaska and one in Oregon to industrial and private users. The Company ~~had~~will noshare ~~revenue~~70% ~~for~~net profits of the processed ~~quarters~~minerals from these mines with Rerun Recovery. According to the Business Cooperation Agreement, the Company is responsible ~~ended~~for ~~September~~the 30costs of the operations of the mines and for building new processing facilities. On October 24, 2011, orthe ~~2010~~Company issued 150,000,000 shares of restricted common stock to Rerun Recovery, Inc. and its designees pursuant to the referenced Business Cooperation Agreement.

~~Operating~~The Company ~~Expenses:~~will also continue to investigate potential targets for acquisition and/or strategic alliance.

~~The Company incurred~~Results ~~total operating expenses~~ of $14,106 for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $6,862 for the same quarter in 2010. The operating expenses consisted of general and administration expenses. The increase is primarily due to the increase in professional fees.Operations

~~Loss~~Three Months ~~from~~Ended ~~operations:~~March 31, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

The Company had losses from operations of $14,106 for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 as compared to a loss from operations of $6,862 for the same quarter in 2010. This increase of loss was due to the increase in general and administration expense of $7,244 in the quarter ended September 30, 2011.Revenues:

~~Other~~The Company ~~Income~~had ~~(Expenses):~~no revenue for the quarters ended March 31, 2012 or 2011.

~~The Company incurred $ 99,592 in interest~~Operating ~~expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $19,543 in interest expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.~~Expenses:

~~Net~~The Company ~~loss:~~incurred total operating expenses of $5,202 for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 as compared to $20,037 for the same quarter in 2011. The operating expenses consisted of general and administration expenses. The decrease is primarily due to the decrease in professional fees.

~~The Company had a net loss of $192,169 for~~Loss ~~the~~from quarter ended September 30, 2011 as compared to a net loss of $26,405 in the same quarter in 2010. The net loss based on the basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $0.00 for both periods.operations:

~~Nine~~The Company ~~Months~~had ~~Ended~~losses ~~September~~from 30operations of $5,202 ~~2011~~for ~~Compared~~the quarter ended March 31, 2012 as compared to a loss from operations of $20,037 for the same quarter in 2011. This decrease of loss was due to ~~Nine~~the ~~Months~~decrease ~~Ended~~in ~~September~~general 30and administration expense of $14,835 in ~~2010~~the quarter ended March 31, 2012.

~~Revenues~~Other Income (Expenses):

The Company ~~had~~incurred no$ ~~revenue~~55,791 in interest expense for the ~~nine-month periods~~quarter ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 oras ~~2010~~compared to $39,745 in interest expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.

~~Operating Expenses~~Net loss:

The Company ~~incurred~~had ~~total~~a ~~operating~~net ~~expenses~~ loss of $4850,~~541~~299 for the ~~nine-month~~quarter ~~period~~ ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 as compared to a net loss of $4363,~~142~~298 ~~for~~in the same ~~period~~ quarter in ~~2010~~2011. The ~~operating expenses~~net ~~consisted~~loss ofbased ~~general~~on ~~and~~the ~~administration~~basic ~~expenses.~~and ~~The~~diluted ~~general~~weighted ~~administration~~average ~~expenses~~number ~~increased~~of incommon ~~the~~shares ~~period~~outstanding ~~ended~~for ~~September 30, 2011 compared to~~ the ~~same~~quarters ended ~~period~~March in31, ~~the~~2012 ~~prior~~and ~~year~~2011 ~~due~~was to$0.00 anfor ~~increase~~both ~~in professional fees~~periods.

~~Loss~~Liquidity and ~~from~~Capital ~~operations:~~Resources

~~The~~At March 31, 2012, the Company had ~~losses~~$0 ~~from~~in ~~operations~~cash. of The Company used $482,~~541~~500 for operating activities during the ~~nine~~three-month period ended March ~~September 30~~31, ~~2011~~2012 as compared to ~~a loss from operations of~~ $4311,~~142~~332 for the same ~~period in~~quarter ~~2010. This increase of loss was due to an increase~~ in ~~general and administration expense in the period ended September 30,~~ 2011.

~~Net~~The use ~~loss:~~of cash in operating activities in 2012 and 2011 were due to the change in value and amortization of derivatives.

~~The~~In financing activities, the Company ~~had~~obtained a$0 ~~net~~from ~~loss~~proceeds ofon ~~$301,006~~notes ~~for~~ during the ~~nine~~three-month period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 ~~as compared~~ compare to ~~a net loss of~~ $8980,~~941~~000 infrom ~~the~~proceeds ~~same period in 2010. The net loss based~~ on ~~the~~notes ~~basic~~from ~~and~~related ~~diluted~~party ~~weighted~~during ~~average number of common shares outstanding for~~ the ~~periods~~three-month period ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2011 ~~and 2010 was $0~~.~~00 for both periods.~~

~~Liquidity~~The Company ~~and~~has ~~Capital~~incurred ~~Resources~~an accumulated deficit as of March 31, 2012 of $18,356,056.

AtThe future ~~September~~of ~~30, 2011,~~ the Company ~~had~~is ~~$14 in~~dependent ~~cash.~~on ~~The~~its ~~Company~~ability ~~used~~to ~~$50,103~~generate ~~for~~cash ~~operating~~from ~~activities~~future ~~during~~acquisition ~~the~~of ~~nine-month~~a ~~period~~business. ~~ended~~There ~~September~~can ~~30,~~be ~~2011~~no ~~compared to $36,056~~assurance ~~for~~that the ~~same~~Company ~~period~~will inbe ~~2010.~~able ~~The use of cash in operating activities in 2011 and 2010 were due~~ to ~~the~~implement ~~change~~its incurrent ~~value and amortization of derivatives~~plan.

~~In financing activities, the Company obtained~~Item 3. ~~$189,000~~Quantitative ~~from proceeds on notes during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011~~ and ~~$8,836~~Qualitative ~~from~~Disclosure ~~proceeds~~about onMarket ~~notes from related party compared to $61,400 and $12,603 during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, respectively.~~Risks

~~The Company has incurred an accumulated deficit as of September 30, 2011 of $18,288,937.~~None

~~The future of the Company is dependent on its~~Item ~~ability~~4. toControls ~~generate cash from the operations of the mines using its proprietary pre-treatment~~ and ~~separation technologies. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to implement its current plan.~~Procedures

~~Item~~Evaluation of 3.Disclosure ~~Quantitative~~Controls and ~~Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk~~Procedures

~~None~~An evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, was carried out including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered in this report, the disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

~~Item~~Management, including 4the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures or its internal controls will prevent all error or fraud. A ~~Controls~~control system, no matter how well conceived and ~~Procedures~~operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. To address the material weaknesses, management performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures in an effort to ensure its consolidated financial statements included in this annual report have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements included in this report fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

~~Evaluation~~Management’s Report ofon ~~Disclosure~~Internal ~~Controls~~Control ~~and~~Over ~~Procedures~~Financial Reporting.

AnManagement is ~~evaluation,~~responsible ~~under~~for ~~the~~establishing ~~supervision~~ and ~~with the~~maintaining ~~participation~~adequate ofinternal ~~the~~control ~~Company’s~~over ~~management,~~financial ~~was~~reporting ~~carried~~as ~~out~~defined ~~including~~in ~~our~~Rule ~~principal~~13a-15(f) under ~~executive~~the ~~officer~~Securities ~~and~~Exchange ~~principal financial officer~~Act, ofas amended. Management assessed the effectiveness of ~~our~~its ~~disclosure~~internal ~~controls~~control ~~and~~over ~~procedures~~financial reporting (as ~~defined~~of inMarch ~~Exchange~~31, ~~Act~~2012. ~~Rules~~In ~~13a-15(e)~~making ~~and~~this ~~15d-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation~~assessment, ~~the~~our ~~principal~~management ~~executive~~used ~~officer~~the ~~and~~criteria ~~principal~~set ~~financial~~forth ~~officer~~by ~~concluded~~the ~~that,~~Committee as of ~~the~~Sponsoring Organizations ~~end~~ of the ~~period covered~~Treadway inCommission ~~this~~(“COSO”) ~~report,~~in ~~the~~Internal ~~disclosure~~Control-Integrated ~~controls~~Framework. A ~~and~~material weakness ~~procedures~~is ~~were~~a ~~not~~deficiency, ~~effective~~or toa ~~ensure~~combination ~~that~~of ~~information~~deficiencies, ~~required to be disclosed~~ in ~~reports~~internal ~~filed~~control ~~under~~over ~~the~~financial ~~Securities~~reporting, ~~Exchange~~such ~~Act~~that ofthere ~~1934~~ is ~~recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required~~a ~~time~~reasonable ~~periods~~possibility ~~and~~that isa ~~accumulated~~material ~~and~~misstatement ~~communicated~~of tothe ~~our~~company's ~~management,~~annual ~~including~~or ~~our~~interim ~~principal~~financial ~~executive~~statements ~~officer~~will ~~and~~not ~~principal~~be ~~financial~~prevented ~~officer,~~or asdetected ~~appropriate~~on toa ~~allow~~ timely ~~decisions~~basis. The ~~regarding~~following ~~required~~material ~~disclosure~~weaknesses were identified.

~~Management, including the principal executive~~ 1. ~~officer~~As ~~and~~of ~~principal~~March ~~financial~~31, ~~officer~~2012, ~~does~~the ~~not~~Company’s ~~expect~~control ~~that~~over ~~its~~financial ~~disclosure~~reporting ~~controls~~was ~~and~~not ~~procedures~~effective. orSpecifically, ~~its~~a ~~internal~~formally ~~controls will~~adopted ~~prevent~~a ~~all~~written ~~error~~code orof ~~fraud. A~~business ~~control~~conduct ~~system, no matter how well conceived~~ and ~~operated,~~ethics ~~can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance~~ that ~~the~~governs ~~objectives~~to of the ~~control~~Company’s ~~system are met. Further~~employees, ~~the~~officers ~~design~~and ofdirectors awas ~~control~~not ~~system must~~in ~~reflect~~place. Additionally, ~~the~~management ~~fact~~has ~~that~~not ~~there~~developed ~~are resource constraints~~ and ~~the~~effectively ~~benefits~~communicated ofto ~~controls~~its ~~must~~employees beits ~~considered~~accounting ~~relative~~policies and ~~to their costs~~procedures. ~~Due to~~This ~~the~~has ~~inherent~~resulted ~~limitations~~ in ~~all~~inconsistent ~~control systems~~practices. Further, nothe ~~evaluation~~Board of ~~controls~~Directors ~~can~~does ~~provide~~not ~~absolute~~currently have ~~assurance~~any ~~that~~independent ~~all~~members ~~control issues~~ and ~~instances~~no ofdirector ~~fraud,~~qualifies ifas ~~any,~~an ~~have~~audit ~~been~~committee ~~detected.~~financial Toexpert ~~address~~as ~~the~~defined ~~material~~in ~~weaknesses,~~Item ~~management performed additional analysis~~407(d)(5)(ii) ~~and~~of ~~other~~Regulation ~~post~~S-~~closing~~B. Since ~~procedures~~these inentity anlevel ~~effort~~programs ~~to ensure its consolidated financial statements included in this annual report~~ have ~~been~~ ~~prepared~~a inpervasive ~~accordance~~effect ~~with~~across ~~generally~~the ~~accepted accounting principles. Accordingly~~organization, management ~~believes~~has determined that ~~the~~these ~~financial statements~~circumstances ~~included~~constitute ina ~~this report fairly present in all~~ material ~~respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented~~weakness.

~~Management~~ 2. As of March 31, 2012, the Company’s ~~Report~~control onover ~~Internal~~financial ~~Control~~statement disclosure was not effective. Specifically, controls ~~Over~~were ~~Financial~~not ~~Reporting~~designed and in place to ensure that all disclosures required were originally addressed in our financial statements. Accordingly, management has determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.

~~Management is responsible for establishing and~~Because ~~maintaining~~of ~~adequate~~these ~~internal~~material ~~control~~weaknesses, ~~over~~management ~~financial~~has ~~reporting~~concluded asthat ~~defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under~~ the ~~Securities~~Company ~~Exchange~~did ~~Act, as~~not ~~amended. Management~~maintain ~~assessed~~effective ~~the effectiveness of its~~ internal control over financial reporting as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011.~~ ~~In making this assessment~~2012, ~~our~~based ~~management~~on ~~used~~ the criteria ~~set~~established ~~forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”)~~ in "Internal Control-Integrated Framework~~. A~~" ~~material weakness is a deficiency,~~issued orby ~~a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of~~ the ~~company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis~~COSO. ~~The following material weaknesses were identified.~~

~~1. As of September 30, 2011,~~Changes the Company’s control over financial reporting was not effective. Specifically, a formally adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics that governs to the Company’s employees, officers and directors was not in ~~place. Additionally, management~~Internal ~~has~~Controls not developed and effectively communicated to its employees its accounting policies and procedures. This has resulted in inconsistent practices. Further, the Board of Directors does not currently have any independent members and no director qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-B. Since these entity level programs have a pervasive effect across the organization, management has determined that these circumstances constitute a material weakness.

~~2. As~~There was ofno ~~September~~change ~~30,~~in ~~2011,~~our ~~the~~internal ~~Company’s~~ control over financial ~~statement~~reporting ~~disclosure~~that ~~was~~occurred ~~not~~during ~~effective.~~this ~~Specifically,~~fiscal ~~controls~~quarter ~~were~~that ~~not~~has ~~designed~~materially ~~and in place to ensure~~affected, ~~that~~or ~~all~~is ~~disclosures~~reasonably ~~required~~likely ~~were~~to ~~originally~~materially ~~addressed~~affect, in our ~~financial~~internal ~~statements. Accordingly, management has determined that this~~ control ~~deficiency~~over ~~constitutes~~financial ~~a material weakness~~reporting.

~~Because of these material weaknesses, management~~ITEM has concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011, based on the criteria established in "Internal Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the COSO9B. OTHER MATTERS

~~Changes in Internal Controls~~ None

~~There was no change in our internal control over financial~~PART ~~reporting~~II. ~~that~~OTHER ~~occurred during this fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.~~ INFORMATION

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Christopher Long vs. Jeantex Group, Inc. et al., Case Number 07CC02012

On January 22, 2007, Christopher Long, former President and CEO of the Company, filed a claim with the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Central Justice Center, against the Company and Henry Fahman, Interim President of the Company, for a total of $250,000 and accrued interest at 8% per annum in connection with the promissory note dated March 31, 2005 which was made to Christopher Long as a part of the Rescission Agreement between the Company and Lexor International, Inc. The Company and Christopher Long entered into a Compromise Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release on January 11, 2008 whereby the Company and Christopher Long agreed to allow a stipulation to be entered in favor of Christopher Long in the amount of $250,000 plus interest accruing at a rate of 8% per annum. These amounts have been recorded in the books of the Company.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity and Use of Proceeds

None, except as may be disclosed elsewhere in this report

Item 3. Default upon senior Securities

None, except as may be disclosed elsewhere in this report

Item 4. Submission of matters to a vote of security holders

None, except as may be disclosed elsewhere in this report

Item 5. Other information

None

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(A) Exhibits

Index to Exhibits.

31.1 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

of 2002.

31.2 Certification of the Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

of 2002.

32.1 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer of the Registrant, pursuant Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CATALYST RESOURCE GROUP, INC.

Formerly JEANTEX GROUP, INC.

(Registrant)

~~Dated~~Date: May ~~November 21~~23, ~~2011~~2012

By: /s/ ~~Douglas~~Henry ~~Berkey~~D. Fahman

~~Douglas~~Henry D. ~~Berkey~~Fahman

~~Principal~~Interim President ~~Executive~~and Chief Financial Officer

Filing Compare · CATALYST RESOURCE GROUP, INC.