U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ~~COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549~~COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

Tx ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MAY 31, ~~2010~~2011

£ o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ______________ TO ______________

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-13187

NVCN CORPORATION.

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware		13-3074570
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)
1800 Wooddale Drive, Suite 208, Woodbury, Minnesota		55125
1800 Wooddale Drive, Suite 208 Woodbury, Minnesota		55125
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number: (612) 750-5585

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes £ o No T x

Indicate by check mark whether the company has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the company was required to submit and post such files). Yes £ o No £o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of company’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K £ o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes T No £o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated file, non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer £o Accelerated filed o Non-accelerated filer £o ~~Accelerated filed £~~ Smaller reporting company Tx

The Company’s revenues for the fiscal year ended May 31, ~~2010~~2011 were zero. The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Company as of ~~February~~August 2230, 2011: $51,~~730~~378,~~018~~804. As of ~~February~~August 2230, 2011, the Company had 14,548,371 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes £ o No Tx

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1.	Business	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4
Item 2.	Properties	4
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	4
Item 4.	[REMOVED AND RESERVED]	5

PART II

Item 5.	Market for Company’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 5	5
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	6
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Plan of Operation	6
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	9
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	9
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	9
Item 9A (T).	Controls and Procedures	10
Item 9B.	Other Information	11

PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	12
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	13
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 15	14
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	15
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	15

PART IV

Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	16
Signatures		17

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~2

PART I.

~~Item~~ITEM 1. ~~Business~~ DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.

Business Development.

NVCN Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Company”), was incorporated in the State of Delaware on April 20, 1981, with the name Cardio-Pace Medical, Inc. On November 24, 1987, the Company’s name was changed to Novacon Corporation, and on February 20, 2001, the name was changed to NVCN Corporation.

The Company was incorporated in 1981 with authorized capital of 15,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.01. On February 14, 2001, the shareholders of the Company approved (and on June 20, 2002, the Company effected) a 1 for 12 reverse common stock split, a reduction of common stock par value from $0.01 to $0.001, an increase of authorized capital to 50,000,000 common shares and the board of directors to authorize preferred shares of which 10,000,000 were authorized at $0.01 per share. The accompanying financial statements reflect all share data based on the 1 for 12 reverse common stock split basis.

Business of the Company.

The Company was organized to develop, manufacture and market its proprietary Durapulse(tm) cardiac pacemaker and accessory products. Although the Company achieved sales of its pacemaker medical device and accessories products, it did not achieve profitability. The Company suspended manufacturing the cardiac pacemaker in 1990. During 1985, the Company entered into an agreement with Qinling Semiconductor to establish Qinming Medical, Inc., a Sino-American joint venture in Baoji, China, for the manufacture and distribution of cardiac pacemakers and accessory products, which are still manufactured and distributed in China. In 1992, the Company sold its 49% interest in the joint venture to Qinming.

Until August 2000, the Company designed, developed, manufactured and marketed low-cost, disposable elastomeric infusion pumps for pain management and was developing other applications for its elastomeric infusion pump technology. Substantially all of the Company's revenues since 1995 were derived from the sale of elastomeric infusion pumps that were designed to deliver small quantities of pain medication at a nominally constant flow rate. The Company’s elastomeric infusion pumps, marketed as the dib(tm) Drug Infusion Balloon Pump, were authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for sale in the United States for epidural, intravenous and percutaneous infusion of a wide range of medications, including narcotic and non-narcotic anesthetics, chemotherapy agents and antibiotics. The Company terminated its drug infusion pump business activity as of August 31, 2000.

The decision by the management of the Company to discontinue its medical products business was based on claims asserted against the Company in 1999, by I-Flow Corporation (“I-Flow”), which claimed in litigation against the Company that the Company’s products infringed proprietary rights claimed by I-Flow. The I-Flow litigation resulted in a final judgment being entered against the Company on May 26, 2000, in the amount of $1,344,582. The judgment also enjoined the Company from further sales of infringing products.

As of May 27, 2010 the judgment was not renewed as required under the statutes for it to be in effect. As of May 31, 2010 the Company wrote off the debt including principal and interest as the statutory standing of the judgment had extinguished.

The Company currently has no operations. The Company continues to evaluate alternatives in order to improve the Company’s financial condition, including merger and acquisition opportunities. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining such opportunities. If a merger or acquisition opportunity does arise, the Company’s value as a partner in a merger or other business combination will rest primarily upon the potential public market for the Company’s shares.

The Company owns no patents or trademarks, and has no employees.

~~Item~~ITEM 1A. ~~Risk~~ RISK ~~Factors~~FACTORS

Based on our current plan, we believe we may need additional financing within the next twelve months to expand and carry out our plan of operations. If we fail to obtain funds on acceptable terms, then we might be forced to delay or abandon some or all of our business plans.

From time to time, the Company will evaluate potential acquisitions of businesses, services, products, or technologies. These acquisitions may result in a potentially dilutive issuance of equity securities, the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, and recognition of expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets. In addition, acquisitions involve numerous risks, including difficulties in the assimilation of the operations, technologies, services, and products of the acquired companies; the diversion of our management’s attention from other business concerns; risks of entering markets in which we have no or limited direct prior experience; and, the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in developing and implementing a business strategy that provides for continued growth of all of our subsidiaries or business opportunities.

As of the date of this filing, the Company has one director and officer, Mr. Gary Borglund, and he has other business interests to which he currently devotes attention. He may be expected to continue to devote his attention to these other interests although management time should be devoted to our business. As a result, conflicts of interest may arise that can be resolved only through his exercise of judgment in a manner which is consistent with his fiduciary duties.

If the Company fails to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“Section 404"). Effective internal controls, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to helping prevent financial fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, then our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our stock could drop significantly.

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.

The Company is provided office space without cost by the president of the company. It currently does not own any equipment at that location.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

On September 1, 1998, the Company entered into a distribution agreement with its key supplier, DIB International Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. The agreement was in effect for a four-year period and provides for minimum purchase quantities by the Company. The Company has breached the terms of the distribution agreement, but to date, the supplier has not taken any action against such breach. At this time, management is unaware of the potential financial effect of its breach.

~~Item~~On 2July 23, 1999, the Company was served with a complaint filed in the United States District Court, Central District of California, Santa Ana, California, by I-Flow Corporation alleging various causes of action for patent interference against the Company with respect to its elastomeric infusion pump technology. ~~Properties~~ The Company took the position that the California court lacked jurisdiction and elected not to appear. I-Flow Corporation claimed the dib(tm) Drug Infusion Balloon Pump design violated its patents and was subsequently awarded damages, legal fees and costs. The Company denied the Dib(tm) design infringed any I-Flow patents and regarded this legal action as strictly anti-competitive. However, the Company was financially unable to respond to this lawsuit in California and therefore I-Flow was granted a final default judgment on May 3, 2000 which awarded I-Flow Corporation a permanent injunction restraining the Company from importing, manufacturing, and selling its dib(tm) Drug Infusion Balloon Pump in the United States. In addition, I-Flow was awarded damages and costs totaling $1,344,582. The Company believes this judgment has had a serious material adverse effect on its business and financial condition. During October 2000 the Company and I-Flow entered into a conditional settlement of the judgment. The settlement agreement provides that the Company will pay I-Flow Corporation $144,000 cash and issue to it 500,000 shares of new Company common stock. The settlement agreement provides that payment of the settlement must be made no later than December 31, 2000 or the agreement becomes null and void.

4Prior to May 26, 2010 the plaintiff did not renew the judgment they received against the Company. If a judgment is not renewed within 10 years of its issuance, the judgment is vacated by the courts and the liability of the Company ceases to exist. A search of the court records by the legal counsel of the Company found the judgment had not been renewed within the required time period. As of May 31, 2010 the Company has elected to write off the principal and interest of the judgment under the statutes of limitation on the debt.

~~Item~~ITEM 34. ~~Legal~~ [REMOVE ~~Proceedings~~AND RESERVE]

PART II.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

Market Information.

The Company’s common stock began trading publicly in January, 1985 on the NASDAQ Small Cap following its initial public stock offering. The Company’s common stock was de-listed to the Over the Counter Bulletin Board in 1987. In February, 2000, the Company’s common stock was de-listed to the National Quotation Bureaus’ Pink Sheets (now know as Pink Sheets LLC), where it continued to trade under the symbol “NVCN”. In February 2001, the name was changed to NVCN Corporation, and now trades under the symbol “NVCP”. The range of closing prices shown below is as reported by this market. The quotations shown reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. As of February 21, 2011 the Company had 14,548,371 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, of which 10,888,371 were held by none-affiliates.

Per Share Common Stock Bid Prices by Quarter

For the Fiscal Year Ended on May 31, 2011 (1)

	High		Low

Quarter Ended May 31, 2011		0.50		0.05
Quarter Ended February 28, 2011		0.50		0.04
Quarter Ended November 30, 2010		0.04		0.04
Quarter Ended August 31, 2010		0.08		0.04

(1) The Company’s common stock only traded sporadically during this fiscal year

~~Item~~Per ~~4. [REMOVED~~Share ~~AND~~Common ~~RESERVED]~~Stock Bid Prices by Quarter

5For the Fiscal Year Ended on May 31, 2010

PART II

	High		Low

Quarter Ended May 31, 2010		0.08		0.03
Quarter Ended February 28, 2010		0.03		0.03
Quarter Ended November 30, 2009		0.03		0.03
Quarter Ended August 31, 2009		0.05		0.03

~~Item~~The ~~5. Market~~Internet ~~for~~provided the above information to the Company’s. ~~Common~~These ~~Equity,~~quotations ~~Related~~may ~~Stockholder~~reflect ~~Matters~~inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up/mark-down/commission and may not reflect actual transactions.

~~and~~As ~~Issuer~~of ~~Purchases~~May of31, ~~Equity~~2011, ~~Securities~~the Company had approximately 1,146 shareholders of record.

5Dividend Information.

~~Item~~The 6Company has not declared or paid a cash dividend to stockholders since it was incorporated. ~~Selected~~ The ~~Financial~~Board ~~Data~~of Directors presently intends to retain any earnings to finance Company operations and does not expect to authorize cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends in the future will depend upon the Company's earnings, capital requirements and other factors.

Sales of Unregistered Securities.

There were no sales of unregistered (restricted) securities during the year ending May 31, 2011

ITEM 6. SELECT FINANCIAL DATA

Not Applicable.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS

Forward Looking Statements May Not Prove Accurate

When used in this Form 10-K, the words “anticipated”, “estimate”, “expect”, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions including the possibility that the Company will fail to generate projected revenues. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected.

~~Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Plan of Operation~~Overview

The following discussion of the financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2011 and 2010 should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company and related notes included therein.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since inception, the Company’s most significant change in liquidity or capital resources has been receipts of proceeds from debt offerings. Further, there exist no agreements or understandings with regard to loan agreements by or with the Officers, Directors, principals, affiliates or shareholders of the Company.

At May 31, 2011, the Company had negative working capital of $207,690 which consisted of current assets of approximately $15,028 and current liabilities of $222,718. The current liabilities of the Company at May 31, 2011 are composed primarily of accrued compensation of $23,386, accounts payable and accrued expenses of $112,609 and notes payable of $86,413.

Cash flow used in operating activities during the year ending May 31, 2011 was $53,999 compared to $24,030 for the same period in 2010. The difference was due primarily to the loss in 2011 compared to a gain due to the write down of the judgment and accrued interest that expired in 2010.

Cash flow used in investing activities was $15,000 in the period ended May 31, 2011 and zero in the same period in 2010. The issuance of a demand note in 2011 accounted for the difference between the two years.

Cash flow provided by financing was $69,101 for the period ending May 31, 2011 compared to $ 24,047 for the same period in 2010 The change from 2010 to 2011 was due primary to notes payable of $69,650 issued in 2010compared to $24,000 issued in 2010.

The Company will attempt to carry out its plan of business as discussed above. The Company cannot predict to what extent its lack of liquidity and capital resources will hinder its business plan. The Company will need additional capital to fund that proposed operation.

Need for Additional Financing

The Company’s existing capital may not be sufficient to meet the Company’s cash needs, including the costs of compliance with the continuing reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

No commitments to provide additional funds have been made by management or other stockholders. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any funds will be available to the Company to allow it to cover its expenses.

~~Item~~Twelve-Month ~~7A. Quantitative~~Plan ~~and~~of ~~Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk~~Operation.

The Company intends to take advantage of any reasonable business proposal presented which management believes will provide the Company and its stockholders with a viable business opportunity. The board of directors will make the final approval in determining whether to complete any acquisition, and unless required by applicable law, the articles of incorporation or bylaws or by contract, stockholders' approval will not be sought.

The investigation of specific business opportunities and the negotiation, drafting, and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents, and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and will require the Company to incur costs for payment of accountants, attorneys, and others. If a decision is made not to participate in or complete the acquisition of a specific business opportunity, the costs incurred in a related investigation will not be recoverable. Further, even if an agreement is reached for the participation in a specific business opportunity by way of investment or otherwise, the failure to consummate the particular transaction may result in the loss to the Company of all related costs incurred.

Currently, management is not able to determine the time or resources that will be necessary to locate and acquire or merge with a business prospect. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to acquire an interest in any such prospects, products or opportunities that may exist or that any activity of the Company, regardless of the completion of any transaction, will be profitable.

If and when the Company locates a business opportunity, management of the Company will give consideration to the dollar amount of that entity's profitable operations and the adequacy of its working capital in determining the terms and conditions under which the Company would consummate such an acquisition. Potential business opportunities, no matter which form they may take, will most likely result in substantial dilution for the Company’s shareholders due to the issuance of stock to acquire such an opportunity.

Capital Expenditures.

There were no capital expenditures during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011

Risk Factors Connected with Plan of Operation.

The Company has had limited prior operations to date. Since the Company’s principal activities recently have been limited to seeking new business ventures, it has no recent record of any revenue-producing operations. Consequently, there is only a limited operating history upon which to base an assumption that the Company will be able to achieve its business plans. In addition, the Company has only limited assets. As a result, there can be no assurance that the Company will generate significant revenues in the future; and there can be no assurance that the Company will operate at a profitable level. Accordingly, the Company’s prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered in connection with the establishment of a new business.

The Company has incurred net loss of $87,967 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 and a net income of $2,116,782 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2010. The dramatic change between the two years was due to the expiration of a judgment and the interest accrued on the judgment totaling $2,182,712. The Company’s current liabilities exceed its current assets by $207,690 as of May 31, 2011 and $519,323 as of May 31, 2010. At May 31, 2011, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $9,557,602. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

As a result of the fixed nature of many of the Company’s expenses, the Company may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected delays in the development and marketing of the Company’s products or any capital raising or revenue shortfall. Any such delays or shortfalls will have an immediate adverse impact on the Company’s business, operations and financial condition.

The working capital requirements associated with any adopted plan of business of the Company may be significant. The Company anticipates, based on currently proposed assumptions relating to its operations (including with respect to costs and expenditures and projected cash flow from operations), that it must seek financing to continue its operations (an amount which is as yet to be determined). However, such financing, when needed, may not be available, or on terms acceptable to management. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on additional sources of capital and the success of the Company’s business plan. The Company’s independent accountant audit report included in this Form 10-K includes a substantial doubt paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

If funding is insufficient at any time in the future, the Company may not be able to take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, or may be required to reduce the scope of its planned product development and marketing efforts, any of which could have a negative impact on its business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, insufficient funding may have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial condition,

The Company’s success is dependent upon the hiring and retention of key personnel. The officer and director does not have a non-competition agreement with the Company. Therefore, there can be no assurance that the personnel will remain employed by the Company. Should this individual cease to be affiliated with the Company for any reason before qualified replacements could be found, there could be material adverse effects on the Company’s business and prospects.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISKS

Not required for smaller reporting companies

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

Financial statements are audited and included herein beginning on Exhibit 1, page 1 and are incorporated herein by this reference.

ITEM 9. CHANGES AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLSOURE

On October 8, 2010, and acting upon a decision to change accountants recommended and approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, the Company dismissed Gruber & Company, LLC, of Lake Saint Louis, Missouri, which has audited the financial statements of the Company for the years ending May 31, 2008.

During our two most recent fiscal years, the Company did not consult Gruber & Company, LLC regarding either: (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements, or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K or a reportable event as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

Gruber & Company, LLC’s report on the Company's financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2008, did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified as to audit scope or accounting principles; however, such year-end report did contain a modification paragraph that expressed substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

~~Item~~During the fiscal year ended May 31 2008, the latest fiscal year audited by Gruber & Company, and during the period from May 31, 2008, to October 8~~. Financial~~, ~~Statements~~2010, the date of the Company's dismissal of Gruber & Company, (i) there were no disagreements between the Company and ~~Supplementary~~Gruber ~~Data~~& Company, LLC on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Gruber & Company, LLC, would have caused Gruber & Company, LLC to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its reports and (ii) there were no “reportable events,” as described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

9The Company has authorized without limitation Gruber & Company, LLC, its former accountant, to respond fully to the inquiries of the successor accountant concerning any matter falling within the scope of the successor accountant's services to be provided to the Company.

~~Item~~The ~~9. Changes~~Company inis ~~and~~not ~~Disagreements~~aware ~~with~~of ~~Accountants~~any onissues ~~Accounting~~that ~~and~~had ~~Financial~~not ~~Disclosure~~been resolved to the satisfaction of Gruber & Company, LLC, prior to the Company's dismissal of Gruber & Company, LLC on October 8, 2010.

During the Company's two most recent fiscal years, and any subsequent interim period prior to engaging the successor accountant identified herein, neither the Company nor anyone acting on its behalf consulted the newly engaged accountant regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; (ii) the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements; (iii) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement between the Company and Gruber & Company, LLC, or (iv) any other matter.

The Company has requested the newly engaged accountant to review the disclosure required by this Item 4.01 before it is filed with the Commission and has provided the newly engaged accountant the opportunity to furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the Commission containing any new information, clarification of the Company's expression of its views, or the respects in which it does not agree with the statements made by the Company in this Current Report. The newly engaged accountant has indicated to the Company that no such letter will be issued.

ITEM 9A. (T) CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

For purposes of this section, the term disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”) (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote. As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO has concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are not effective because of the identification of a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting which is identified below, which we view as an integral part of our disclosure controls and procedures.

~~Item~~Changes 9Ain ~~(T).~~ Internal Controls ~~and~~over ~~Procedures~~Financial Reporting

We have not yet made any changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report on Form 10-K that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate due to change in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on its evaluation, our management concluded that there is a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The material weakness relates to the lack of segregation of duties in financial reporting, as our financial reporting and all accounting functions are performed by an external consultant with no oversight by a professional with accounting expertise. Our President does not possess accounting expertise and our company does not have an audit committee. This weakness is due to the company’s lack of working capital to hire additional staff. To remedy this material weakness, we intend to engage another accountant to assist with financial reporting as soon as our finances will allow.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to the attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

The Company’s management carried out an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2011. The Company’s management based its evaluation on criteria set forth in the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of theTreadway Commission. Based on that assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of May 31, 2011

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

~~Item~~Part ~~9B. Other Information~~III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors and Executive Officers of the Company

The following sets forth the names and ages of all directors and executive officers of the Company and all persons nominated or chosen to become a director, indicating all positions and offices with the Company held by each such person and the period during which they have served as a director:

Business Experience.

The following is a brief account of the business experience for the past five years of the director and executive officer, indicating their principal occupations and employment during that period, and the names and principal businesses of the organizations in which such occupations and employment were carried out.

The principal executive officer and director of the Company are as follows:

Gary L. Borglund, CEO, CFO &Director.

Mr. Borglund, age 66, has over thirteen years of professional experience in new ventures as a principal and executive, as well as ten years as a consultant. Since 1998 to date, Mr. Borglund has worked exclusively with early stage development, high tech and Internet companies. Mr. Borglund serves on several boards of directors for public and private companies and remains in these capacities with regard to the companies to date. Mr. Borglund was Vice President of Marketing for Greenhaven Marketing from 1991 to 1996 and a Director of Red Oak Management from 1996 to 2000. Mr. Borglund was appointed to the board of directors of City Capital Corporation of America in February 2001, and served as President of that firm until May, 2007. Mr. Borglund was appointed CEO on 27, January 2002. He became a director of the Company on September 28, 2001. Mr. Borglund attended the University of Minnesota.

There are no other promoters or control persons of the Company. There are no legal proceedings involving the directors of the Company. David P. Lang resigned as an officer and director of the Company January 27, 2002; Mr. Borglund was appointed as director and officer of the company on that date prior to Mr. Lang’s resignation.

The Director and Officer of the Company will devote his time to the Company’s affairs on an “as needed” basis. As a result, the actual amount of time which each will devote to the Company’s affairs is unknown and is likely to vary substantially from month to month.

The Company has no audit or compensation committee.

~~PART~~Conflict ~~III~~of Interest

~~Item~~The ~~10. Directors~~Officer and Director of the Company will devote only a small portion of his time to the affairs of the Company, ~~Executive~~estimated ~~Officers~~to be no more than approximately 25 hours per month. There will be occasions when the time requirements of the Company’s business conflict with the demands of their other business and ~~Corporate~~investment ~~Governance~~activities. Such conflicts may require that the Company attempt to employ additional personnel. There is no assurance that the services of such persons will be available or that they can be obtained upon terms favorable to the Company.

12There is no procedure in place which would allow the Officers and Directors to resolve potential conflicts in an arms-length fashion. Accordingly, they will be required to use their discretion to resolve them in a manner which they consider appropriate.

~~Item~~The 11Company’s Officers and Directors may actively negotiate or otherwise consent to the purchase of a portion of their common stock as a condition to, or in connection with, a proposed merger or acquisition transaction. ~~Executive~~ ~~Compensation~~It is anticipated that a substantial premium over the initial cost of such shares may be paid by the purchaser in conjunction with any sale of shares by the Company’s Officers and Directors which is made as a condition to, or in connection with, a proposed merger or acquisition transaction. The fact that a substantial premium may be paid to the Company’s Officers and Directors to acquire their shares creates a potential conflict of interest for them in satisfying their fiduciary duties to the Company and its other shareholders. Even though such a sale could result in a substantial profit to them, they would be legally required to make the decision based upon the best interests of the Company and the Company’s other shareholders, rather than their own personal pecuniary benefit.

The Company previously adopted a Code of Ethics in 2004. The Company has revised the Code of Ethics and is adopting a new Code of Ethics which applies to its director as well as to its officer including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer. A copy of the Code of Ethics is also available at no charge to anyone who may send a request in writing to the Company, addressed to its CEO.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

During fiscal 2011 the Company accrued for its officer and director an aggregate of $50,000 which was not paid. The officer and director did exchange $273,600 of accrued salary for common stock assigned to 33 individuals for claims.

Directors are entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meeting of the Board of Directors.

The Company has no material bonus or profit-sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to the Company’s directors or executive officers.

The Company has no compensatory plan or arrangements, including payments to be received from the Company, with respect to any executive officer or director, where such plan or arrangement would result in any compensation or remuneration being paid resulting from the resignation, retirement or any other termination of such executive officer’s employment or from a change-in-control of the Company or a change in such executive officer’s responsibilities following a change-in-control and the amount, including all periodic payments or installments where the value of such compensation or remuneration exceeds $100,000 per executive officer.

During the last completed fiscal year, no funds were set aside or accrued by the Company to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for Directors or Executive Officers.

The Company has a written employment agreement with its sole officer and director.

Summary Compensation Table

Annual compensation

Long-term compensation

Awards

Payouts

Name and principal position

Year

Salary

($)

Bonus

($)

Other annual compen-sation

($)

Restricted

stock

award(s)

($)

Securities

under-

lying

options/

SARs

(#)

LTIP

payouts

($)

All other

compen-

sation

($) (1)

Gary Borglund,

President (1),(2)

2011

2010

2009

50,000

(1) Mr. Borglund was appointed a director and president on January 27, 2002.

(2) Mr. Borglund’s salary has been accrued but not paid.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of the Company’s common stock as of May 31, 2011 (14,548,371 issued and outstanding) by (i) all stockholders known to the Company to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock; and (ii) all officers and directors of the Company, individually and as a group (each person has sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to all of the shares shown as beneficially owned by them):

Title of Class	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Owner (1)	Percent of Class
Common Stock	Gary L. Borglund, 2535 1800 Wooddale Drive Suite 208 Woodbury, MN 55125	3,088,334	25.2%
Common Stock	Shares of all directors and executive officers as a group (1 person)	3,088,334	25.2%

(1) No security holders have the right to acquire any amount of the shares within sixty days from options, warrants, rights, conversion privilege, or similar obligations.

~~Item~~ITEM 1213. ~~Security~~ CERTAIN ~~Ownership~~RELATIONSHIPS ofAND ~~Certain~~RELATED ~~Beneficial Owners and Management~~TRANSACTIONS.

Other than as set forth below, during the last two fiscal years there have not been any transaction that have occurred between the Company and ~~Related~~its ~~Stockholder~~officers, ~~Matters~~directors, and five percent or greater shareholders.

Since January 2002, the Company has been provided office space without cost by the president of the company.

On January 24, 2011 and February 10, 2011 the Company issued 9,000,000 shares of restricted common stock to 33 individuals to whom the Company’s sole director had assigned his claims against the company for accrued compensation with a total value of $273,600.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The following table presents for each of the last two fiscal years the aggregate fees billed in connection with the audits of our financial statements and other professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm Johnson & Mattson, PA , Certified Public Accountants for the year ending May 31, 2011 and 2010.

	2011		2010
Audit fees	$	7,000	$	7,000
Audit related fees		0		0
Tax fees		0		0
All other fees		0		0

Audit fees represent the professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our financial statements included in quarterly reports, along with services normally provided by the accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. Audit-related fees represent professional services rendered for assurance and related services by the accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements that are not reported under audit fees.

Tax fees represent professional services rendered by the accounting firm for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. All other fees represent fees billed for products and services provided by the accounting firm, other than the services reported for in the other categories.

~~Item~~PART 13IV. ~~Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence~~

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

~~Item~~(a) ~~14. Principal~~Financial ~~Accounting~~Statements ~~Fees~~ and ~~Services~~Schedules

15The following financial statements and schedules are filed as part of this report:

PART IV

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			18
Balance Sheets as of December 31,2011 and 2010			19
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010			20
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010			21
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010			22
Notes to Financial Statements			23

~~Item 15.~~ Exhibits~~, Financial Statement Schedules~~.

Exhibits included or incorporated by reference herein are set forth under the Exhibit Index.

Reports on Form 8-K.

On December 20, 2010 the Company filed an 8-K appointing Johnson, Mattson, Peterson, Mathias & Co, as auditors of the Company and dismissed E Randall Gruber PCA, PA. Subsequently to their appointment the firm’s name has been changed to Johnson & Mattson, PA.

~~Signatures~~SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	NVCN Corporation

Dated: September 1, 2011	By:	/s/ Gary Borglund
		Gary Borglund, Principal Executive Officer
		and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the date indicated:

Signature	Title	Date

/s/ Gary Borglund	President (principal financial and accounting officer)/Director	September, 2011
Gary Borglund

2JOHNSON & MATTSON, PA.

~~PART~~REPORT I.OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

~~ITEM~~Board 1.of ~~DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.~~Directors

~~Business~~NVCN ~~Development.~~Corporation

~~NVCN Corporation~~Woodbury, a Delaware corporation (“Company”), was incorporated in the State of Delaware on April 20, 1981, with the name Cardio-Pace Medical, Inc. On November 24, 1987, the Company’s name was changed to Novacon Corporation, and on February 20, 2001, the name was changed to NVCN Corporation.Minnesota

~~The~~We ~~Company~~have ~~was~~audited ~~incorporated~~the inaccompanying ~~1981~~balance ~~with~~sheet ~~authorized capital~~ of ~~15,000,000~~NVCN ~~common~~Corporation ~~shares~~as ~~with a par value~~ of ~~$0.01.~~May ~~On February 14~~31, ~~2001~~2011, ~~the~~and ~~shareholders of~~ the ~~Company~~related ~~approved~~statements ~~(and~~of ~~on June 20~~operations, ~~2002,~~shareholders’ ~~the~~deficit ~~Company~~and ~~effected)~~cash aflows 1 for 12the ~~reverse~~years ~~common~~ended ~~stock~~May ~~split~~31, a2011 ~~reduction~~and ~~of common stock par value from $0~~2010.01 These tofinancial ~~$0.001,~~statements anare ~~increase of authorized capital to 50,000,000 common shares and~~ the ~~board~~responsibility of ~~directors~~the toCompany’s ~~authorize~~management. Our ~~preferred~~responsibility ~~shares~~is ofto ~~which~~express ~~10,000,000~~an ~~were~~opinion ~~authorized~~on atthese ~~$0.01 per share. The accompanying~~ financial statements ~~reflect all share data~~ based on ~~the~~our ~~1 for 12 reverse common stock split basis~~audits.

~~Business~~We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over its financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall

~~The~~In ~~Company~~our ~~was organized to develop~~opinion, ~~manufacture and market its proprietary Durapulse(tm) cardiac pacemaker and accessory products. Although~~ the ~~Company~~financial ~~achieved~~statements ~~sales~~referred ofto ~~its~~above ~~pacemaker~~present ~~medical device and accessories products~~fairly, ~~it did not achieve profitability. The Company suspended manufacturing the cardiac pacemaker~~ in ~~1990.~~all ~~During~~material ~~1985~~respects, the ~~Company~~financial ~~entered~~position ~~into~~of anNVCN ~~agreement~~Corporation ~~with~~as ~~Qinling~~of ~~Semiconductor~~May ~~to establish Qinming Medical~~31, ~~Inc.,~~2011 aand ~~Sino-American~~2010 ~~joint~~and ~~venture in Baoji, China, for~~ the ~~manufacture~~results ~~and distribution~~ of ~~cardiac~~its ~~pacemakers~~operations and ~~accessory~~its ~~products,~~cash ~~which~~flows ~~are~~for ~~still~~the ~~manufactured~~years ~~and~~then ~~distributed~~ended, in ~~China. In~~conformity ~~1992,~~with ~~the~~accounting ~~Company~~principles ~~sold~~generally ~~its~~accepted ~~49% interest~~ in the ~~joint~~United ~~venture~~States toof ~~Qinming~~America.

~~Until~~As ~~August~~discussed ~~2000,~~in ~~the~~Note ~~Company~~2 ~~designed,~~to ~~developed,~~the ~~manufactured~~financial ~~and marketed low-cost~~statements, ~~disposable elastomeric infusion pumps for pain management and was developing other applications for its elastomeric infusion pump technology. Substantially all of~~ the Company'’s ~~revenues~~recurring ~~since~~losses, ~~1995~~negative ~~were~~cash ~~derived~~flow from ~~the~~operations ~~sale~~and ofnet ~~elastomeric~~working ~~infusion~~capital ~~pumps~~deficiency ~~that~~raise ~~were~~substantial ~~designed~~doubt toabout ~~deliver~~its ~~small~~ability ~~quantities~~to ofcontinue ~~pain~~as ~~medication at~~ a ~~nominally~~going ~~constant flow rate~~concern. ~~The Company~~ Management’s ~~elastomeric~~plans ~~infusion pumps, marketed~~ as ~~the~~to ~~dib(tm)~~these ~~Drug~~matters ~~Infusion~~are ~~Balloon~~also ~~Pump,~~described ~~were~~in ~~authorized~~Note ~~by the U~~2.S. The ~~Food~~May ~~and Drug Administration for sale in the United States for epidural~~31, ~~intravenous~~2011 and ~~percutaneous~~2010 ~~infusion~~financial ofstatements ado ~~wide~~not ~~range~~include ofany ~~medications,~~adjustments ~~including~~that ~~narcotic~~might ~~and~~result ~~non-narcotic~~from ~~anesthetics,~~the ~~chemotherapy~~outcome ~~agents and antibiotics. The Company terminated its drug infusion pump business activity as~~ of ~~August~~this ~~31, 2000~~uncertainty.

The decision by the management of the Company to discontinue its medical products business was based on claims asserted against the Company in 1999, by I-Flow Corporation (“I-Flow”), which claimed in litigation against the Company that the Company’/s/ ~~products~~Johnson ~~infringed~~& ~~proprietary rights claimed by I-Flow. The I-Flow litigation resulted in a final judgment being entered against the Company on May 26~~Mattson, ~~2000, in the amount of $1,344,582~~PA. ~~The judgment also enjoined the Company from further sales of infringing products.~~

~~As of May 27~~Johnson, ~~2010 the judgment was not renewed as required under the statutes for it to be in effect. As of May 31~~Mattson, ~~2010 the Company wrote off the debt including principal and interest as the statutory standing of the judgment had extinguished~~&Co.

3Buffalo, MN

~~The~~August ~~Company currently has no operations. The Company continues to evaluate alternatives in order to improve the Company’s financial condition~~29, including merger and acquisition opportunities. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining such opportunities. If a merger or acquisition opportunity does arise, the Company’s value as a partner in a merger or other business combination will rest primarily upon the potential public market for the Company’s shares. 2011

~~The Company owns no patents or trademarks, and has no employees.~~ 18

~~ITEM~~NVCN ~~1A. RISK FACTORS~~CORPORATION

~~Based~~BALANCE on our current plan, we believe we may need additional financing within the next twelve months to expand and carry out our plan of operations. If we fail to obtain funds on acceptable terms, then we might be forced to delay or abandon some or all of our business plans. SHEET

~~From~~MAY ~~time to time~~31, the Company will evaluate potential acquisitions of businesses, services, products, or technologies. These acquisitions may result in a potentially dilutive issuance of equity securities, the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, and recognition of expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets. In addition, acquisitions involve numerous risks, including difficulties in the assimilation of the operations, technologies, services, and products of the acquired companies; the diversion of our management’s attention from other business concerns; risks of entering markets in which we have no or limited direct prior experience; and, the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in developing and implementing a business strategy that provides for continued growth of all of our subsidiaries or business opportunities.2011

	2011			2010
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash	$	28		$	17
Note receivable		15,000			--
Total current assets		15,028			17

Total assets	$	15,028		$	17

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities
Accounts payable		102,162			123,918
Accrued interest		10,447			5,088
Accrued compensation -related parties		23,386			286,621
Note payable - related parties		310			950
Notes payable – other		86,413			102,763
Total current liabilities		222,718			519,340

Long-Term liabilities		222,718			519,340

Shareholders’ deficit
Common stock,
$0.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized
14,548,371and 1,748,371 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		14,548			1,748
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value
authorized 10,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding; none		--			--
Paid in capital		9,335,364			8,948,564
Accumulated deficit		(9,557,602	)		(9,469,635	)
Total shareholders’ deficit		(207,690	)		(519,323	)

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity(deficit)	$	15,028		$	17

IfThe ~~the~~accompanying ~~Company~~notes ~~fails to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, as such standards~~ are ~~modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on~~ an ~~ongoing~~integral ~~basis~~part ~~that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404~~ of the ~~Sarbanes-Oxley~~audited ~~Act (“Section 404"). Effective internal controls, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are necessary for us to produce reliable~~ financial reports and are important to helping prevent financial fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, then our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our stock could drop significantly. statements

~~ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.~~19

~~The~~NVCN ~~Company is provided office space without cost by the president of the company. It currently does not own any equipment at that location.~~CORPORATION

4STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

~~ITEM~~FOR 3.THE ~~LEGAL~~YEARS ~~PROCEEDINGS.~~ENDED MAY 31, 2011 AND 2010

	2011			2010

Net sales	$	---		$	-

General and administrative expense		82,608			65,930

Operating loss		(82,608	)		(65,930	)

Other income(expense)
Gain on judgment expiration		--			1,344,582
Gain on interest accrued against expired judgment		--			936,415
Interest expense		(5,359	)		(98,285	)
Total other income(expense)		(5,395	)		2,182,712

Net income (loss)		(87,967	)		2,116,782

Provision for Income Taxes		--			--

Net income (loss)	$	(87,967	)	$	2,116,782

Net income (loss) per share	$	(0.01	)	$	1,21

Weighted average number of shares outstanding	5,804,992				1,748,371

OnThe ~~July~~accompanying ~~23,~~notes ~~1999,~~are ~~the~~an ~~Company~~integral ~~was~~part ~~served with a complaint filed in the United States District Court, Central District~~ of ~~California, Santa Ana, California, by I-Flow Corporation alleging various causes of action for patent interference against~~ the ~~Company~~audited with respect to its elastomeric infusion pump technology. The Company took the position that the California court lacked jurisdiction and elected not to appear. I-Flow Corporation claimed the dib(tm) Drug Infusion Balloon Pump design violated its patents and was subsequently awarded damages, legal fees and costs. The Company denied the Dib(tm) design infringed any I-Flow patents and regarded this legal action as strictly anti-competitive. However, the Company was financially unable to respond to this lawsuit in California and therefore I-Flow was granted a final default judgment on May 3, 2000 which awarded I-Flow Corporation a permanent injunction restraining the Company from importing, manufacturing, and selling its dib(tm) Drug Infusion Balloon Pump in the United States. In addition, I-Flow was awarded damages and costs totaling $1,344,582. The Company believes this judgment has had a serious material adverse effect on its business and financial condition. During October 2000 the Company and I-Flow entered into a conditional settlement of the judgment. The settlement agreement provides that the Company will pay I-Flow Corporation $144,000 cash and issue to it 500,000 shares of new Company common stock. The settlement agreement provides that payment of the settlement must be made no later than December 31, 2000 or the agreement becomes null and void. statements

Prior to May 26, 2010 the plaintiff did not renew the judgment they received against the Company. If a judgment is not renewed within 10 years of its issuance, the judgment is vacated by the courts and the liability of the Company ceases to exist. A search of the court records by the legal counsel of the Company found the judgment had not been renewed within the required time period. As of May 31, 2010 the Company has elected to write off the principal and interest of the judgment under the statutes of limitation on the debt. 20

~~ITEM~~NVCN ~~4. [REMOVED AND RESERVED]~~CORPORATION

~~PART~~STATEMENT ~~II.~~OF SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

~~ITEM~~FOR 5.THE ~~MARKET~~YEARS ~~FOR~~ENDED ~~COMMON~~MAY ~~EQUITY~~31, 2011 AND ~~RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.~~2010

Market Information.

	Common Stock				Additional					Total
	Number			$0.001	Paid-In		Accumulated			Shareholders’
	Shares			Amount	Capital		Deficit			Deficit
Balance at
May 31, 2008		1,748,371	$	1,748	$	8,948,564	$	(11,401,690	)	$	(2,451,378	)

Net Loss		--		--		--		(184,727	)		(184,727	)

Balance at
May 31, 2009		1,748,371		1,748		8,948,564		(11,586,417	)		(2,636,105	)


Net Income		--		--		--		2,116,782			2,116,782

Balance at
May 31, 2010		1,748,371		1,748		8,948,564		(9,469,635	)		(519,323	)

Stock issued for accounts payable		1,333,334		1,333		38,667					40,000
Stock issued for accrued compensation		9,000,000		9,000		264,600		--			273,600
Stock issued for convertible notes		2,466,666		2,467		83,533		--			86,000

Net Loss		--		--		--		(87,967	)		(87,967	)

May 31, 2011		14,548,371	$	14,548	$	9,335,364	$	9,557,602		$	207,960

The ~~Company’s~~accompanying ~~common~~notes ~~stock~~are ~~began~~an ~~trading~~integral ~~publicly~~part inof ~~January, 1985 on~~ the ~~NASDAQ~~audited ~~Small~~financial Cap following its initial public stock offering. The Company’s common stock was de-listed to the Over the Counter Bulletin Board in 1987. In February, 2000, the Company’s common stock was de-listed to the National Quotation Bureaus’ Pink Sheets (now know as Pink Sheets LLC), where it continued to trade under the symbol “NVCN”. In February 2001, the name was changed to NVCN Corporation, and now trades under the symbol “NVCP”. The range of closing prices shown below is as reported by this market. The quotations shown reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or statements

521

~~commission~~NVCN and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. As of February 21, 2011 the Company had 14,548,371 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, of which 10,888,371 were held by none affiliates.CORPORATION

~~Per~~STATEMENTS ~~Share~~OF ~~Common~~CASH ~~Stock Bid Prices by Quarter~~FLOWS

~~For~~FOR ~~the~~THE ~~Fiscal~~YEARS ~~Year~~ENDED ~~Ended~~MAY ~~on May~~ 31, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~(1)~~2010

	High	Low
		2011			2010
Quarter Ended May 31, 2010	0.08	0.03
Cash flows from operating activities:
Quarter Ended February 28, 2010	0.03	0.03
Net income(loss)		$	(87,967	)	$	2,116,782
Quarter Ended November 30, 2009	0.03	0.03
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
Quarter Ended August 31, 2009	0.05	0.03
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable			18,244			6,999
Accrued interest			5,359			(838,130	)
Judgment liability expiration			--			(1,344,582	)
Accrued compensation-related party			10,365			34,901
Net cash provided (used) in operating activities			(53,999	)		(24,030	)
Cash flows provided (used) in investing activities
Note receivable			(15,000	)		--
Net cash provided(used) in investing activities			(15,000	)		--
Cash flows from financing activities:
Bank overdraft			--			(903	)
Note payable-related party			(640	)		950
Proceeds from notes payable			69,650			24,000
Net cash provided (used) in financing activities			69,010			24,047
Increase (decrease) in cash			11			17
Cash – beginning of year			17			--
Cash – end of year		$	28		$	17
Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:
Interest paid		$	--		$	--
Income taxes paid		$	--		$	--
Non-Monetary Transactions
Common stock issued for:
Accounts payable, 1,333,334 shares at $0.03 per share		$	40,000		$	--
Accrued compensation, 9,000,000 shares at $0.03 per share		$	273,600		$	--
Convertible notes, 2,466,666 shares at $0.03-0.05 per share		$	86,000		$	--

~~(1)~~ The ~~Company’s~~accompanying ~~common~~notes ~~stock~~are ~~only~~an ~~traded~~integral ~~sporadically~~part ~~during~~of ~~this~~the ~~fiscal~~audited ~~year~~financial statements

~~Per Share Common Stock Bid Prices by Quarter~~22

~~For~~NVCN ~~the Fiscal Year Ended on May 31, 2009~~CORPORATION

	High	Low
Quarter Ended May 31, 2009	0.12	0.12
Quarter Ended February 28, 2009	0.15	0.05
Quarter Ended November 30, 2006	0.07	0.05
Quarter Ended August 31, 2008	0.11	0.05

(formerly Novacon Corporation)

~~The~~NOTES ~~Internet~~TO ~~provided~~FINANCIAL ~~the above information to the Company. These quotations may reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up/mark-down/commission and may not reflect actual transactions.~~STATEMENTS

AsNOTE of1: NATURE ~~May~~OF ~~31,~~BUSINESS ~~2010,~~AND ~~the~~SUMMARY ~~Company~~OF ~~had~~ACCOUNTING ~~approximately 1,146 shareholders of record.~~ POLICIES

~~Dividend~~Nature ~~Information.~~of Business

~~The~~NVCN ~~Company~~Corporation, ~~has not declared or paid~~ a ~~cash~~Delaware ~~dividend~~corporation to(“Company”), ~~stockholders since it~~ was incorporated~~. The~~ ~~Board~~in ofthe ~~Directors~~State ~~presently~~of ~~intends~~Delaware toon ~~retain~~April ~~any~~20, ~~earnings~~1981, towith ~~finance~~the ~~Company~~name ~~operations~~Cardio-Pace ~~and~~Medical, ~~does~~Inc. On ~~not~~November ~~expect~~24, to1987, ~~authorize cash dividends in~~ the ~~foreseeable~~Company’s ~~future. Any~~name ~~payment~~was ofchanged ~~cash~~to ~~dividends~~Novacon inCorporation, ~~the~~and ~~future~~on ~~will~~February ~~depend~~20, ~~upon~~2001, the ~~Company's~~name ~~earnings,~~was ~~capital~~changed ~~requirements~~to ~~and~~NVCN ~~other factors~~Corporation.

~~Sales~~The Company was incorporated in 1981 with authorized capital of ~~Unregistered~~15,000,000 ~~Securities~~common shares with a par value of $0.01. On February 14, 2001, the shareholders of the Company approved (and on June 20, 2002, the Company effected) a 1 for 12 reverse common stock split, a reduction of common stock par value from $0.01 to $0.001, an increase of authorized capital to 50,000,000 common shares and authorized the board of directors to issue preferred shares of which 10,000,000 with a par value of $0.01 were authorized. The accompanying financial statements reflect all share data based on the 1 for 12 reverse common stock split basis.

~~There~~The ~~were~~Company nowas ~~sales~~engaged in the business of ~~unregistered~~assembling ~~(restricted)~~and ~~securities~~distributing ~~during~~disposable drug infusion pumps designed for hospital and home pain management applications, under an exclusive United States manufacturing and marketing agreement with the ~~year~~purported ~~ending~~Japanese ~~May~~developer 31of the proprietary technology. In the second quarter of 2000, ~~2010~~the Company discontinued its business operations and since that date has remained inactive.

~~ITEM~~The 6decision by the management of the Company to discontinue its medical products business was based on claims asserted against the Company in 1999, by I-Flow Corporation (“I-Flow”), which claimed in litigation against the Company that the Company’s products infringed proprietary rights claimed by I-Flow. ~~SELECT~~The ~~FINANCIAL~~I-Flow ~~DATA~~litigation resulted in a final judgment being entered against the Company on May 26, 2000, in the amount of $1,344,582. The judgment also enjoins the Company from further sales of infringing products.

~~Not~~The ~~Applicable~~judgment was not renewed within the statutory limitations of 10 years as of May 27, 2010. The Company wrote off the principal and accrued interest on May 31, 2010.

6NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

~~ITEM~~Basis 7.of ~~MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS~~Presentation

~~Forward~~The ~~Looking~~accounting ~~Statements~~and ~~May~~reporting ~~Not~~policies ~~Prove~~of ~~Accurate~~the Company conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP).

~~Overview~~Going Concern

The ~~following~~accompanying ~~discussion~~financial ofstatements ~~the~~have ~~financial~~been ~~condition,~~prepared ~~changes~~ in ~~financial~~conformity ~~condition~~with ~~and~~accounting ~~results~~principles ofgenerally ~~operations~~accepted ofin the ~~Company~~United ~~for~~States ~~the~~of ~~fiscal~~America, ~~years~~which ~~ended~~contemplate ~~May~~continuation ~~31,~~of ~~2010~~the ~~and~~Company ~~2009~~as ~~should~~a begoing ~~read~~concern. inHowever, ~~conjunction with~~ the ~~financial~~Company ~~statements~~has ofno ~~the~~established ~~Company~~source ~~and~~of ~~related~~revenue. ~~notes~~This ~~included~~matter ~~therein.~~raises

~~Liquidity~~substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and ~~Capital~~classification ~~Resources~~of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

~~Since~~The ~~inception, the~~ Company’s ~~most~~intends ~~significant~~to ~~change~~pursue inacquisitions ~~liquidity~~of orvarious ~~capital~~business ~~resources~~opportunities ~~has~~that, ~~been~~in ~~receipts~~the opinion of ~~proceeds~~management, ~~from~~will ~~debt~~provide ~~offerings.~~a ~~Further~~profit to the Company; however, ~~there~~the ~~exist~~Company nodoes ~~agreements~~not orhave ~~understandings~~the ~~with~~working ~~regard~~capital to ~~loan~~be ~~agreements~~successful byin this effort or ~~with~~to ~~the~~service ~~Officers,~~its ~~Directors,~~debt. ~~principals,~~These ~~affiliates~~factors orraise ~~shareholders~~substantial ofdoubt ~~the~~about ~~Company~~its ability to continue as a going concern.

AtContinuation ~~May~~of ~~31, 2010,~~ the Company ~~had~~as ~~negative~~a going concern is dependent upon obtaining additional working capital and the management of ~~$519,323~~the ~~which~~Company ~~consisted~~has ofdeveloped ~~current~~a ~~assets~~strategy ofthat ~~approximately~~it ~~$17~~believes ~~and~~will ~~current~~accomplish ~~liabilities~~this ofobjective ~~$519,340.~~through ~~The~~additional ~~current~~equity ~~liabilities~~funding ofwhich will enable the Company atto ~~May~~operate ~~31,~~for ~~2010~~the ~~are~~coming ~~composed~~year. ~~primarily~~There ofis ~~accrued~~no ~~compensation~~guarantee ofthat ~~$286,621,~~additional ~~accounts~~funding ~~payable~~will ~~and~~be ~~accrued~~obtained ~~expenses~~or ofthat ~~$129,006~~the ~~and~~Company ~~notes~~will ~~payable~~be ofsuccessful ~~$103,712.~~in it funding efforts or acquiring any profitable business opportunities.

~~Cash~~Basic ~~flow~~and ~~used~~Diluted inEarnings ~~operating~~(Loss) ~~activities~~per ~~during the year ending May 31, 2010 was $24,030 compared to $23,947 for the same period in 2009. This was an insignificant change from 2009 to 2010.~~Share

~~Cash~~The ~~flow~~Company ~~provided~~reports byearnings ~~financing~~(loss) ~~was~~per ~~$24~~share in accordance with ASC 260,~~047~~ ~~for~~"Earnings ~~the~~per ~~period~~Share." ~~ending~~Basic ~~May~~earnings ~~31,~~(loss) ~~2010~~per ~~compared~~share are computed by dividing income (loss) available to $common ~~23,816~~stockholders ~~for~~by the ~~same~~weighted ~~period~~average innumber ~~2009~~of ~~The~~common ~~change~~shares ~~from~~available. Diluted ~~2009~~earnings (loss) per share is computed similar to ~~2010~~basic ~~was~~earnings ~~due~~(loss) ~~primary~~per share except that the denominator is increased to ~~notes~~include ~~payable~~the number of ~~$24,000~~additional ~~compared~~common toshares ~~$36,000~~that inwould ~~2009~~have ~~and~~been ~~related~~outstanding ~~party~~if ~~payments~~the ofpotential ~~$13,087~~common inshares ~~2009~~had ~~compared~~been toissued ~~related~~and ~~party~~if ~~advances~~the ofadditional ~~$950~~common inshares ~~2010~~were dilutive.

The Company ~~will~~has ~~attempt~~no topotential ~~carry~~dilutive ~~out~~instruments ~~its~~and ~~plan~~accordingly, ofbasic ~~business~~loss ~~as discussed above. The Company cannot predict to what extent its lack of liquidity~~ and ~~capital~~diluted ~~resources~~loss ~~will~~per ~~hinder~~share ~~its~~are ~~business plan~~equal. ~~The Company will need additional capital to fund that proposed operation.~~

~~Need~~Estimates ~~for~~and ~~Additional Financing~~Assumptions

~~The~~Management ~~Company’s~~uses ~~existing~~estimates ~~capital~~and ~~may~~assumptions ~~not~~in bepreparing ~~sufficient~~financial tostatements ~~meet~~in ~~the~~accordance ~~Company’s~~with ~~cash~~generally ~~needs,~~accepted ~~including~~accounting ~~the~~principles. Those ~~costs~~estimates ofand ~~compliance~~assumptions ~~with~~affect the ~~continuing~~reported ~~reporting~~amounts ~~requirements~~ of the ~~Securities~~assets ~~Exchange~~and ~~Act~~liabilities, the disclosure of ~~1934~~contingent assets and liabilities, asand ~~amended~~the reported revenues and expenses. Actual results could vary from the estimates that were assumed in preparing these financial statements.

724

NoStatement ~~commitments~~of toCash ~~provide additional funds have been made by management or other stockholders. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any funds will be available to the Company to allow it to cover its expenses.~~Flows

~~Twelve-Month~~For ~~Plan~~the purposes of ~~Operation~~the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

~~The~~Income Company intends to take advantage of any reasonable business proposal presented which management believes will provide the Company and its stockholders with a viable business opportunity. The board of directors will make the final approval in determining whether to complete any acquisition, and unless required by applicable law, the articles of incorporation or bylaws or by contract, stockholders' approval will not be sought.Taxes

The ~~investigation~~Company ofutilizes ~~specific business opportunities and~~ the ~~negotiation,~~liability ~~drafting,~~method ~~and execution~~ of ~~relevant~~accounting ~~agreements,~~for ~~disclosure~~income ~~documents,~~taxes. ~~and~~Under ~~other~~the ~~instruments~~liability ~~will~~method ~~require~~deferred ~~substantial~~tax ~~management~~assets ~~time~~ and ~~attention~~liabilities ~~and~~are ~~will~~determined ~~require~~based on the ~~Company~~differences tobetween ~~incur~~financial ~~costs~~reporting ~~for payment of accountants, attorneys,~~ and ~~others. If~~the atax ~~decision~~bases isof ~~made not to participate in or complete~~ the ~~acquisition~~assets ofand aliabilities ~~specific~~and ~~business~~are ~~opportunity,~~measured using the ~~costs~~enacted ~~incurred~~tax inrates aand ~~related~~laws ~~investigation~~that will ~~not~~ be ~~recoverable. Further~~in effect, ~~even~~when ~~if an agreement is reached for~~ the ~~participation~~differences inare aexpected ~~specific~~to ~~business~~reverse. ~~opportunity~~An byallowance ~~way~~against ofdeferred ~~investment~~tax orassets ~~otherwise~~is recorded, ~~the~~when ~~failure~~it tois ~~consummate~~more ~~the~~likely ~~particular~~than ~~transaction~~not, ~~may~~that ~~result~~such intax ~~the~~benefits ~~loss~~will tonot ~~the~~be ~~Company of all related costs incurred~~realized.

~~Currently,~~NOTE ~~management~~3: RECENT isACCOUNTING not able to determine the time or resources that will be necessary to locate and acquire or merge with a business prospect. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to acquire an interest in any such prospects, products or opportunities that may exist or that any activity of the Company, regardless of the completion of any transaction, will be profitable.PRONOUNCEMENTS

IfIn ~~and~~January ~~when~~2010, the ~~Company~~FASB ~~locates~~issued aAccounting ~~business~~Standards ~~opportunity~~Update 2010-01, ~~management~~Equity (Topic 505): Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash (A Consensus of the ~~Company~~FASB ~~will~~Emerging ~~give~~Issues ~~consideration~~Task Force). This amendment to Topic 505 clarifies the ~~dollar~~stock ~~amount~~portion of a distribution to shareholders that ~~entity's~~allows ~~profitable~~them ~~operations~~to ~~and~~elect to receive cash or stock with a limit on the ~~adequacy~~amount of ~~its~~cash ~~working~~that ~~capital~~will inbe ~~determining~~distributed ~~the~~is ~~terms~~not ~~and~~a ~~conditions~~stock ~~under~~dividend ~~which~~for ~~the~~purposes ~~Company~~of ~~would~~applying ~~consummate~~Topics ~~such~~505 anand ~~acquisition~~260. ~~Potential~~ ~~business~~This ~~opportunities,~~ASU nois ~~matter~~effective ~~which~~for ~~form~~interim ~~they~~and ~~may~~annual ~~take~~periods ending on or after December 15, ~~will~~2009, ~~most~~and ~~likely~~would ~~result~~be inapplied ~~substantial~~on ~~dilution~~a ~~for~~retrospective ~~the~~basis. The Company’s does ~~shareholders~~not ~~due~~expect the provisions of ASU 2010-01 to have a material effect on the ~~issuance~~financial position, results of ~~stock~~operations toor ~~acquire~~cash ~~such~~flows anof ~~opportunity~~the Company.

~~Capital~~In ~~Expenditures~~April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2010-13 “Stock Compensation” (Topic 718). ASU No.2010-13 provides amendments to Topic 718 to clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity's equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The amendments in this Update should be applied by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The cumulative-effect adjustment should be calculated for all awards outstanding as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the amendments are initially applied, as if the amendments had been applied consistently since the inception of the award. The cumulative-effect adjustment should be presented separately. Earlier application is permitted. The adoption of this guidance has not had and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

~~There~~In ~~were~~February no2010, ~~capital~~FASB ~~expenditures~~issued ~~during~~ASU No. 2010-09, “Subsequent Events” (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2010-09”). ASU 2010-09 amends disclosure requirements within Subtopic 855-10. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the ~~fiscal~~date ~~year~~through ~~ended~~which ~~May~~subsequent 31events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between Subtopic 855-10 and the SEC’s requirements. ASU 2010-09 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-09 to have a material impact on its unaudited interim results of operations or financial position.

~~Risk~~In ~~Factors~~January ~~Connected~~2010, ~~with~~the ~~Plan~~FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (ASU 2010-06) (codified within ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures). ASU 2010-06 improves disclosures originally required under SFAS No. 157. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of ~~Operation~~activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those years. The adoption of the guidance did not have a material effect on the Company's unaudited interim financial position, results of operations, cash flows or related disclosures.

8NOTE 4: NOTE RECEIVABLE

~~The~~On ~~Company~~December ~~has incurred net income of $2~~27,~~116,782~~ ~~for~~2010 the ~~fiscal~~Company ~~year~~issued ~~ended May 31, 2010 and~~ a ~~net loss of~~ $~~184~~15,~~727~~000 ~~for~~note ~~the~~to ~~fiscal~~a ~~year~~non-related ~~ended May 31, 2009~~party. The ~~dramatic~~note ~~change~~is ~~between the two years was due to other income of $2,280,797 due to the expiration of~~ a ~~judgment~~non ~~and the~~ interest ~~accrued~~bearing onnote ~~the~~due ~~judgment. The~~upon ~~Company’s current liabilities exceed its current assets by $519,323 as of May 31, 2010 and $2,451,378 as of May 31, 2009~~demand. ~~At May 31, 2010, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $9,469,635. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.~~

AsNOTE a5: RELATED ~~result~~PARTY of the fixed nature of many of the Company’s expenses, the Company may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected delays in the development and marketing of the Company’s products or any capital raising or revenue shortfall. Any such delays or shortfalls will have an immediate adverse impact on the Company’s business, operations and financial condition.TRANSACTIONS

~~The~~During ~~working capital requirements associated with any adopted plan of business of~~ the ~~Company~~year ~~may~~ending beMay ~~significant. The Company anticipates~~31, ~~based~~2010 on currently proposed assumptions relating to its operations (including with respect to costs and expenditures and projected cash flow from operations), that it must seek financing to continue its operations (an ~~amount~~officer ~~which is as yet to be determined). However, such financing, when needed, may not be available, or on terms acceptable to management. The ability~~ of the Company toloaned ~~continue as a going concern is dependent on additional sources of capital and~~ the ~~success of the~~ Company’s ~~business plan~~$950. ~~The~~ ~~Company’s~~As ~~independent~~of ~~accountant~~May ~~audit~~31, ~~report~~2011 ~~included~~the inoutstanding ~~this~~balance ~~Form~~due ~~10-K~~to ~~includes a substantial doubt paragraph regarding~~ the ~~Company’s~~related ~~ability~~party tois ~~continue as a going concern~~$310.

IfDuring ~~funding~~the isyear ~~insufficient~~ended atMay ~~any time in the future~~31, 2011 the Company ~~may~~was ~~not~~issued be9,000,000 ~~able~~shares ~~to take advantage~~ of ~~business~~restricted ~~opportunities~~stock ~~or respond~~ to ~~competitive~~33 ~~pressures,~~individuals ~~or may be required~~ to ~~reduce~~whom the ~~scope~~company’s ofsole ~~its~~director ~~planned~~had ~~product~~assigned ~~development~~his ~~and~~claim ~~marketing~~against ~~efforts,~~the ~~any~~Company offor ~~which~~accrued ~~could~~compensation ~~have~~with a ~~negative~~value ~~impact~~of ~~on its business~~$270,000 ~~operating results and financial condition~~($0. In03 ~~addition,~~per ~~insufficient~~share) ~~funding~~(See ~~may~~Note ~~have~~9: aCommon ~~material adverse effect on the company’s financial condition,~~ Stock)

~~The~~NOTE ~~Company’s~~6: ~~success~~NOTES is dependent upon the hiring and retention of key personnel. None of the officers or directors has any employment or non-competition agreement with the Company. Therefore, there can be no assurance that these personnel will remain employed by the Company. Should any of these individuals cease to be affiliated with the Company for any reason before qualified replacements could be found, there could be material adverse effects on the Company’s business and prospects.PAYABLE

~~ITEM~~During ~~7A.~~the ~~QUANTITATIVE~~period ~~AND~~ended ~~QUALITATIVE~~May ~~DISCLOSURE~~31, ~~ABOUT~~2011 ~~MARKET~~the ~~RISKS~~Company raised a total of $69,650 in demand notes consisting of following:

~~Not~~· ~~required~~Two ~~for~~notes ~~smaller~~totaling ~~reporting~~$14,000 ~~companies~~with an interest rate of 8%

~~ITEM~~· 8.One ~~FINANCIAL~~note ~~STATEMENTS~~of $5,000 with an interest rate of 12% and convertible to common stock at $0.03 per share

~~Financial~~· ~~statements~~One ~~are~~note ~~audited~~for ~~and included herein beginning on Exhibit 1~~$30,000 ~~page~~with 1no interest and ~~are~~convertible ~~incorporated~~to ~~herein~~common bystock ~~this~~at ~~reference~~$0.05 per share

9· One note for $15,000 with no interest convertible to common shares at $0.03 per share.

~~ITEM~~NOTE 9.7: PATENT ~~CHANGES~~INFRINGEMENT ~~AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLSOURE~~LAWSUIT

On ~~October~~July 824, ~~2010~~1999, ~~and~~the ~~acting~~Company ~~upon~~was aserved ~~decision~~with toa ~~change~~patent ~~accountants~~infringement ~~recommended~~lawsuit. The ~~and~~lawsuit ~~approved~~was brought by I-Flow Corporation (“I-Flow”), which claimed the Company’s ~~Board~~product sales had infringed two of ~~Directors~~I-Flow’s patents. The Company did not have the resources available to defend the lawsuit and as a result, I-Flow obtained summary judgment against the Company ~~dismissed~~by ~~Gruber~~default &on ~~Company~~May 26, ~~LLC~~2000, ofpursuant ~~Lake~~to ~~Saint~~which ~~Louis~~the Company was ordered to pay $1,344,582 ~~Missouri~~in damages, ~~which~~attorneys’ ~~has~~fees, ~~audited~~and ~~the~~interest, ~~financial~~and ~~statements~~further ordered to cease sales of its drug infusion pumps in the United States. . The Company ~~for~~was also required to pay interest at the ~~years~~legal ~~ending~~rate ~~May~~on ~~31,~~the ~~2008~~amount of damages.

~~Gruber~~As &of ~~Company~~May 27, ~~LLC’s~~2010 ~~report~~the judgment received by I-Flow on May 26, 2000 against the Company's ~~financial~~was ~~statements~~not ~~for~~renewed. Under the ~~year~~statutes ~~ended~~of ~~May~~limitation ~~31,~~if ~~2008,~~a ~~did~~judgment has not ~~contain~~been ~~any~~renewed ~~adverse~~within ~~opinion~~10 oryears ~~disclaimer~~of issuance the judgment expires and the Company is not liable for the amount of the judgment. It is the opinion ~~and~~of ~~was~~the Company’s legal counsel that the Company is not ~~qualified~~liable asfor tothe ~~audit~~judgment ~~scope~~and ortherefore ~~accounting~~the ~~principles;~~Company ~~however,~~as ~~such~~of the year- end ~~report~~May ~~did~~31, ~~contain~~2010 areduced ~~modification~~its ~~paragraph~~liabilities ~~that~~of ~~expressed~~$1,344,582 ~~substantial~~plus ~~doubt~~the ~~about~~accrued ~~the~~interest ~~Company's~~of ~~ability~~$936,414 tofor ~~continue~~a total of $2,280,996 as areported ~~going~~in ~~concern~~the other income section of the statement of operations.

~~During~~NOTE ~~the fiscal year ended May 31 2008, the latest fiscal year audited by Gruber & Company, and during the period from May 31, 2008, to October~~ 8,: INCOME 2010, the date of the Company's dismissal of Gruber & Company, (i) there were no disagreements between the Company and Gruber & Company, LLC on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Gruber & Company, LLC, would have caused Gruber & Company, LLC to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its reports and (ii) there were no “reportable events,” as described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.TAXES

The Company ~~has~~follows ~~authorized~~Accounting ~~without~~Standards ~~limitation~~Codification ~~Gruber & Company~~740, ~~LLC,~~Accounting ~~its~~for ~~former~~Income ~~accountant, to respond fully to the inquiries of the successor accountant concerning any matter falling within the scope of the successor accountant's services to be provided to the Company~~Taxes.

~~The~~Under ~~Company~~section is382 ~~not~~of ~~aware~~the Internal Revenue Code such a change in control negates much of ~~any~~the ~~issues~~tax ~~that~~loss ~~had~~carry ~~not~~forward ~~been~~and ~~resolved~~deferred toincome tax. Deferred income taxes reflect the ~~satisfaction~~net tax effects of ~~Gruber~~(a) &temporary ~~Company,~~differences ~~LLC~~between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax reporting purposes, ~~prior~~and to(b) net operating loss carry forwards. For federal income tax purposes, the Company's ~~dismissal~~uses ofthe ~~Gruber~~accrual &basis ~~Company~~of accounting, ~~LLC~~the onsame ~~October~~that 8,is ~~2010~~used for financial reporting purposes.

~~During~~The ~~the~~following ~~Company's~~schedule ~~two~~provides ~~most~~a ~~recent~~reconciliation ~~fiscal~~of ~~years, and any subsequent interim period prior to engaging~~ the ~~successor~~statutory ~~accountant~~income ~~identified~~tax ~~herein,~~rate ~~neither~~in ~~the~~effect ~~Company~~as ~~nor anyone acting on its behalf consulted the newly engaged accountant regarding (i) the application~~ of ~~accounting~~May ~~principles~~31, ~~to a specified transaction~~2011, ~~either~~to ~~completed or proposed; (ii)~~ the ~~type~~effective ofrate ~~audit~~as ~~opinion~~presented ~~that~~in ~~might be rendered on~~ the ~~Company's~~ financial statements~~; (iii) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement between the Company and Gruber & Company, LLC, or (iv) any other matter.~~:

Description	2011

Tax provision at statutory rates	$	422,444
Reserved for provision		(422,444	)
Total income tax provision	$	--

10For financial statement purposes, no tax benefit has been reported for 2011 as realization of the tax benefits is uncertain. Accordingly, a valuation allowance has been established for the full amount for the deferred tax asset.

~~ITEM~~At ~~9A.~~May 31, 2011, for the years indicated, the Company had approximate net operating loss (TNOL) ~~CONTROLS~~carryforwards ~~AND~~as ~~PROCEDURES~~follows for income tax purposes of $ 1,207,182 with expiration beginning in the year 2011 through 2030. The litigation amount of $1,344,582 that was incurred in May 26, 2001 and expired in May 27, 2010 has not been included in the NOL calculation.

~~Evaluation~~The utilization of ~~Disclosure~~the ~~Controls~~carryforwards ~~and~~is ~~Procedures~~dependent upon the Company’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income during the carryforward period. In addition, utilization of these carryforwards may be limited due to ownership changes as defined in the Internal Revenue Code.

~~Changes~~NOTE in9: COMMON ~~Internal Controls over Financial Reporting~~STOCK

WeOn ~~have~~May ~~not~~26, ~~yet~~2004, ~~made~~the ~~any~~Company ~~changes~~converted inservices ~~our~~of ~~internal~~$ ~~controls~~500 ~~over~~to ~~financial~~common ~~reporting~~shares. This ~~that~~transaction ~~occurred~~increased ~~during~~ the ~~period~~equity ~~covered~~ by ~~this~~ ~~report~~$ on500 ~~Form~~to ~~10-K~~$ ~~that has materially affected~~1,743 orand isdid ~~reasonably~~not ~~likely~~change ~~to materially~~the ~~affect,~~paid ~~our~~in ~~internal control over financial reporting~~capital.

~~Management’s~~On ~~Annual~~January ~~Report~~24, on2011 ~~Internal~~and February ~~Control~~10, ~~Over~~2011 ~~Financial~~the ~~Reporting~~Company entered into agreements which provided for the Company to issue an aggregate of 12,800,000 restricted common shares for the purpose of extinguishing indebtedness of the Company:

~~Our~~· ~~management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting~~9,000,000 asshares ~~such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)~~ of ~~the~~restricted ~~Exchange~~stock ~~Act.~~to ~~Our~~33 ~~internal~~individuals ~~control system was designed~~ to ~~provide~~whom ~~reasonable~~the ~~assurance~~company’s ~~regarding~~sole ~~the~~director ~~reliability~~had ofassigned ~~financial~~his ~~reporting~~claim ~~and~~against the ~~preparation~~Company ~~of financial statements~~ for ~~external~~accrued ~~purposes,~~compensation ~~in accordance~~ with ~~generally~~a ~~accepted~~value ~~accounting principles. Because~~ of ~~inherent limitations~~$270,000 ~~a system of internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements~~($0.03 ~~Also,~~per projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate due to change in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.share)

~~Our~~· management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on its evaluation1, ~~our management concluded that there is a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency~~333,334 orshares ~~a combination~~ of ~~control~~restricted ~~deficiencies,~~common instock ~~internal~~to ~~control~~two ~~over~~individuals ~~financial~~for ~~reporting~~accounts ~~such~~payable ~~that~~with ~~there is~~ a ~~reasonable~~total ~~possibility~~value ~~that a material misstatement~~ of ~~the~~$40,000 ~~Company’s~~($0.03 ~~annual~~per ~~or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.~~share)

11· 2,466,666 of restricted common stock to five individuals for the conversion of debt valued at $86,000 ($0.03-0.05 per share) (See Note 5: Related Party Transactions)

~~The~~NOTE ~~material~~10: COMMITMENTS ~~weakness~~AND relates to the lack of segregation of duties in financial reporting, as our financial reporting and all accounting functions are performed by an external consultant with no oversight by a professional with accounting expertise. Our President does not possess accounting expertise and our company does not have an audit committee. This weakness is due to the company’s lack of working capital to hire additional staff. To remedy this material weakness, we intend to engage another accountant to assist with financial reporting as soon as our finances will allow.CONTINGENCIES

~~This~~In ~~annual~~December ~~report~~2003, ~~does~~the ~~not~~Company ~~include~~executed an ~~attestation~~agreement ~~report~~with ofits ~~the~~stock ~~Company’s~~transfer ~~registered~~agent ~~public~~to ~~accounting~~settle ~~firm~~all ~~regarding~~past ~~internal~~outstanding ~~control~~obligations ~~over~~for ~~financial reporting~~$8,000. ~~Management’s~~ The ~~report~~payment was ~~not~~subsequently ~~subject~~made toin January 2004 per the ~~attestation~~terms byof the ~~Company’s~~agreement. ~~registered~~As ~~public~~part ~~accounting~~of ~~firm~~the ~~pursuant~~settlement, the Company entered into an agreement to ~~temporary~~retain ~~rules~~the ofstock transfer agent through December 2006 at the ~~SEC~~mutually ~~that~~agreed ~~permit~~rate of $625 per month. As of May 31, 2011 the Company tohas ~~provide~~an ~~only~~outstanding ~~management’s~~balance ~~report~~of in$ ~~this~~23,013 ~~annual~~with ~~report~~the stock transfer agent.

The Company’s management carried out an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2010. The Company’s management based its evaluation on criteria set forth in the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of theTreadway Commission. Based on that assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of May 31, 201028

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

Part III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors and Executive Officers of the Company

Business Experience.

The principal executive officer and director of the Company are as follows:

Gary L. Borglund, CEO, CFO &Director.

Mr. Borglund, age 65, has over thirteen years of professional experience in new ventures as a principal and executive, as well as ten years as a consultant. Since 1998 to date, Mr. Borglund has worked exclusively with early stage development, high tech and Internet companies. Mr. Borglund serves on several boards of directors for public and private companies and remains in these capacities with regard to the companies to date. Mr. Borglund was Vice President of Marketing for Greenhaven Marketing from

1991 to 1996 and a Director of Red Oak Management from 1996 to 2000. Mr. Borglund was appointed to the board of directors of City Capital Corporation of America in February 2001, and served as President of that firm until May, 2007. Mr. Borglund was appointed CEO on 27, January 2002. He became a director of the Company on September 28, 2001. Mr. Borglund attended the University of Minnesota.

The Company has no audit or compensation committee.

Conflict of Interest

The Officer and Director of the Company will devote only a small portion of his time to the affairs of the Company, estimated to be no more than approximately 25 hours per month. There will be occasions when the time requirements of the Company’s business conflict with the demands of their other business and investment activities. Such conflicts may require that the Company attempt to employ additional personnel. There is no assurance that the services of such persons will be available or that they can be obtained upon terms favorable to the Company.

There is no procedure in place which would allow the Officers and Directors to resolve potential conflicts in an arms-length fashion. Accordingly, they will be required to use their discretion to resolve them in a manner which they consider appropriate.

The Company’s Officers and Directors may actively negotiate or otherwise consent to the purchase of a portion of their common stock as a condition to, or in connection with, a proposed merger or acquisition transaction. It is anticipated that a substantial premium over the initial cost of such shares may be paid by the purchaser in conjunction with any sale of shares by the Company’s Officers and Directors which is made as a condition to, or in connection with, a proposed merger or acquisition transaction. The fact that a substantial premium may be paid to the Company’s Officers and Directors to acquire their shares creates a potential conflict of interest for them in satisfying their fiduciary duties to the Company and its other shareholders. Even though such a sale could result in a substantial profit to them, they would be legally required to make the decision based upon the best interests of the Company and the Company’s other shareholders, rather than their own personal pecuniary benefit.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

During fiscal 2010 the Company accrued for its officer and director an aggregate of $50,000 which was not paid.

Directors are entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meeting of the Board of Directors.

The Company has no material bonus or profit-sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to the Company’s directors or executive officers.

During the last completed fiscal year, no funds were set aside or accrued by the Company to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for Directors or Executive Officers.

The Company has a written employment agreement with its sole officer and director.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and principal position	Year	Annual compensation			Long-term compensation
		Salary($)	Bonus($)	Other annual compen-sation($)	Awards		Payouts	All othercompen-sation($) (1)
					Restrictedstockaward(s)($)	Securitiesunder-lyingoptions/SARs(#)	LTIPpayouts($)
Gary Borglund, President (1),(2)	2010 2009 2008	50,000 50,000 50,000	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -	- -

(1)

Mr. Borglund was appointed a director and president on January 27, 2002.

(2) Mr. Borglund’s salary has been accrued but not paid.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of the Company’s common stock as of February 21, 2011 (14,548,371 issued and outstanding) by (i) all stockholders known to the Company to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock; and (ii) all officers and directors of the Company, individually and as a group (each person has sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to all of the shares shown as beneficially owned by them):

Title of Class	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Owner (1)	Percent of Class
Common Stock	Gary L. Borglund, 2535 1800 Wooddale Drive Suite 208 Woodbury, MN 55125	3,088,334	25.2%
Common Stock	Shares of all directors and executive officers as a group (1 person)	3,088,334	25.2%

(1)

No security holders have the right to acquire any amount of the shares within sixty days from options, warrants, rights, conversion privilege, or similar obligations.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

Other than as set forth below, during the last two fiscal years there have not been any transaction that have occurred between the Company and its officers, directors, and five percent or greater shareholders.

Since January 2002, the Company has been provided office space without cost by the president of the company.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

	2010		2009
Audit fees	$	7,000	$	7,000
Audit related fees		0		0
Tax fees		0		0
All other fees		0		0

PART IV.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) Financial Statements and Schedules

The following financial statements and schedules are filed as part of this report:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			18
Balance Sheets as of December 31,2010 and 2009			19
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009			20
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009			21
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009			22
Notes to Financial Statements			23

Exhibits.

Exhibits included or incorporated by reference herein are set forth under the Exhibit Index.

Reports on Form 8-K.

On December 20, 2010 the Company filed an 8-K appointing Johnson, Mattson, Peterson, Mathias & Co, as auditors of the Company and dismissed E Randall Gruber PCA, PA.

Subsequently to their appointment the firm’s name has been changed to Johnson & Mattson, PA.

SIGNATURE

NVCN Corporation

Dated: February 22, 2011

by: /s/ Gary Borglund

Gary Borglund, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ Gary Borglund Gary Borglund	President (principal financial and accounting officer)/Director	February 22, 2011

JOHNSON & MATTSON, PA.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors

NVCN Corporation

Woodbury, Minnesota

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of NVCN Corporation as of May 31, 2010, and the related statements of operations, shareholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over its financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of NVCN Corporation as of May 31, 2010 and 2009 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company’s recurring losses, negative cash flow from operations and net working capital deficiency raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans as to these matters are also described in Note 2. The May 31, 2010 and 2009 financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Johnson & Mattson, PA.

Johnson, Mattson, &Co.

Buffalo, MN

February 21, 2011

NVCN CORPORATION

BALANCE SHEET

MAY 31, 2010

	2010	2009
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash	$ 17	$ --
Total current assets	17	--
Total assets	$ 17	$ --
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current liabilities
Bank overdraft	$ --	$ 903
Accounts payable	123,918	116,919
Accrued interest	5,088	843,218
Accrued compensation -related parties	286,621	251,720
Note Payable - related parties	950	--
Note payable – other	102,763	78,763
Accrued litigation settlement	--	1,344,582
Total current liabilities	519,340	2,636,105
Long-Term liabilities	--	--
Shareholders’ deficit
Common stock,
$0.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized
1,748,371 shares issued and outstanding	1,748	1,748
Paid-in capital	8,948,564	8,948,564
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value
authorized 10,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding; none	--	--
Accumulated deficit	(9,469,635)	(11,586,417)
Total shareholders’ deficit	(519,323)	(2,636,105)
Total liabilities and shareholders’ deficit	$ 17	$ --

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

NVCN CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED MAY 31, 2010 AND 2009

	2010	2009
Net sales	$ --	$ --
General and administrative expense	65,930	89,618
Operating loss	(65,930)	(89,618)
Other income(expense)
Gain on judgment expiration	1,344,582	--
Gain on interest accrued against expired judgment	936,415	--
Interest expense	(98,285)	(95,109)
Total other income(expense)	2,182,712	(95,109)
Net income (loss)	2,116,782	(184,727)
Provision for Income Taxes	--	--
Net income (loss)	$ 2,116,782	$ (184,727)
Net income (loss) per share	$ 1.21	$ (0.11)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding	1,748,371	1,748,371

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

NVCN CORPORATION

STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

FOR THE YEARS ENDED MAY 31, 2010 AND 2009

	Common Stock		Additional		Total
	Number	$0.001	Paid-In	Accumulated	Shareholders’
	Shares	Amount	Capital	Deficit	Deficit
Balance at
May 31, 2008	1,748,371	$ 1,748	$ 8,948,564	$ (11,401,690)	$ (2,451,378)
Net Loss	--	--	--	(184,727)	(184,727)
Balance at
May 31, 2009	1,748,371	1,748	8,948,564	(11,586,417)	(2,636,105)
Net Income	--	--	--	2,116,782	2,116,782
Balance at
May 31, 2010	1,748,371	$ 1,748	$ 8,948,564	$ (9,469,635)	$ (519,323)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

NVCN CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED MAY 31, 2009 AND 2008

	2010	2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$ 2,116,782	$ (184,727)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable	6,999	28,201
Accrued interest	(838,130)	80,859
Judgment liability expiration	(1,344,582)	--
Accrued compensation-related party	34,901	51,720
Net cash provided (used) in operating activities	(24,030)	(23,947)
Cash flows provided (used) in investing activities	--	--
Cash flows from financing activities:
Bank overdraft	(903)	903
Note payable-related party	950	(13,087)
Notes payable	24,000	36,000
Net cash provided (used) in financing activities	24,047	23,816
Increase (decrease) in cash	17	(131)
Cash – beginning of year	--	131
Cash – end of year	$ 17	$ 0
Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$ --	$ --
Income taxes paid	$ --	$ --

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

NVCN CORPORATION

(formerly Novacon Corporation)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1:

NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Business

The Company was incorporated in 1981 with authorized capital of 15,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.01. On February 14, 2001, the shareholders of the Company approved (and on June 20, 2002, the Company effected) a 1 for 12 reverse common stock split, a reduction of common stock par value from $0.01 to $0.001, an increase of authorized capital to 50,000,000 common shares and authorized the board of directors to issue preferred shares of which 10,000,000 with a par value of $0.01 were authorized. The accompanying financial statements reflect all share data based on the 1 for 12 reverse common stock split basis.

The Company was engaged in the business of assembling and distributing disposable drug infusion pumps designed for hospital and home pain management applications, under an exclusive United States manufacturing and marketing agreement with the purported Japanese developer of the proprietary technology. In the second quarter of 2000, the Company discontinued its business operations and since that date has remained inactive.

The decision by the management of the Company to discontinue its medical products business was based on claims asserted against the Company in 1999, by I-Flow Corporation (“I-Flow”), which claimed in litigation against the Company that the Company’s products infringed proprietary rights claimed by I-Flow. The I-Flow litigation resulted in a final judgment being entered against the Company on May 26, 2000, in the amount of $1,344,582. The judgment also enjoins the Company from further sales of infringing products.

The judgment was not renewed with the statutory limitations of 10 years as of May 27, 2010. The Company wrote off the principal and accrued interest on May 31, 2010.

NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP).

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, the Company has no established source of revenue. This matter raises

Going Concern, Continued

substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company intends to pursue acquisitions of various business opportunities that, in the opinion of management, will provide a profit to the Company; however, the Company does not have the working capital to be successful in this effort or to service its debt. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.

Continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon obtaining additional working capital and the management of the Company has developed a strategy that it believes will accomplish this objective through additional equity funding which will enable the Company to operate for the coming year. There is no guarantee that additional funding will be obtained or that the Company will be successful in it funding efforts or acquiring any profitable business opportunities.

Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Share

The Company reports earnings (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, "Earnings per Share." Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed similar to basic earnings (loss) per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive.

The Company has no potential dilutive instruments and accordingly, basic loss and diluted share loss per share are equal.

Estimates and Assumptions

Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of the assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses. Actual results could vary from the estimates that were assumed in preparing these financial statements.

Statement of Cash Flows

For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Income Taxes

The Company utilizes the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the liability method deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between financial reporting and the tax bases of the assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect, when the differences are expected to reverse. An allowance against deferred tax assets is recorded, when it is more likely than not, that such tax benefits will not be realized.

NOTE 3: RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-01, Equity (Topic 505): Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash (A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). This amendment to Topic 505 clarifies the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a limit on the amount of cash that will be distributed is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260. This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009, and would be applied on a retrospective basis. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-01 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2010-13 “Stock Compensation” (Topic 718). ASU No.2010-13 provides amendments to Topic 718 to clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity's equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The amendments in this Update should be applied by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The cumulative-effect adjustment should be calculated for all awards outstanding as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the amendments are initially applied, as if the amendments had been applied consistently since the inception of the award. The cumulative-effect adjustment should be presented separately. Earlier application is permitted. The adoption of this guidance has not had and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU” or “Update”) No. 2010–17, “Revenue Recognition - Milestone Method.” The objective of this Update is to provide guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions. The amendments in this Update are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this pronouncement will have a significant effect on its unaudited interim financial statements.

In February 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, “Subsequent Events” (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2010-09”). ASU 2010-09 amends disclosure requirements within Subtopic 855-10. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between Subtopic 855-10 and the SEC’s requirements. ASU 2010-09 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-09 to have a material impact on its unaudited interim results of operations or financial position.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (ASU 2010-06) (codified within ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures). ASU 2010-06 improves disclosures originally required under SFAS No. 157. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those years. The adoption of the guidance did not have a material effect on the Company's unaudited interim financial position, results of operations, cash flows or related disclosures.

NOTE 4:

RELATED PARTIES TRANSACTIONS

During the year ending May 31, 2010 an officer of the Company loaned the Company $950. As of May 31, 2010 the outstanding balance due to the related party is $950.

NOTE 5: PATENT INFRINGEMENT LAWSUIT

On July 24, 1999, the Company was served with a patent infringement lawsuit. The lawsuit was brought by I-Flow Corporation (“I-Flow”), which claimed the Company’s product sales had infringed two of I-Flow’s patents. The Company did not have the resources available to defend the lawsuit and as a result, I-Flow obtained summary judgment against the Company by default on May 26, 2000, pursuant to which the Company was ordered to pay $1,344,582 in damages, attorneys’ fees, and interest, and further ordered to cease sales of its drug infusion pumps in the United States. . The Company was also required to pay interest at the legal rate on the amount of damages.

As of May 27, 2010 the judgment received by I-Flow on May 26, 2000 against the Company was not renewed. Under the statutes of limitation if a judgment has not been renewed within 10 years of issuance the judgment expires and the Company is not liable for the amount of the judgment. It is the opinion of the Company’s legal counsel that the Company is not liable for the judgment and therefore the Company as of the year end May 31, 2010 reduced its liabilities of $1,344,582 plus the accrued interest of $936,414 for a total of $2,280,996 as reported in the other income section of the statement of operations.

NOTE 6: INCOME TAXES

The Company follows Accounting Standards Codification 740, Accounting for Income Taxes.

Under section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code such a change in control negates much of the tax loss carry forward and deferred income tax. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of (a) temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax reporting purposes, and (b) net operating loss carry forwards. For federal income tax purposes, the Company uses the accrual basis of accounting, the same that is used for financial reporting purposes.

The following schedule provides a reconciliation of the statutory income tax rate in effect as of May 31, 2010, to the effective rate as presented in the financial statements:

Description		2010
Tax provision at statutory rates		$ 391,725
Reserved for provision		(391,725)
Total income tax provision		$ --

For financial statement purposes, no tax benefit has been reported for 2010 as realization of the tax benefits is uncertain. Accordingly, a valuation allowance has been established for the full amount for the deferred tax asset.

At May 31, 2010, for the years indicated, the Company had approximate net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards as follows for income tax purposes of $ 1,119,215 with expiration beginning in the year 2011 through 2030. The litigation amount of $1,344,582 that was incurred in May 26, 2001 and expired in May 27, 2010 has not been included in the NOL calculation.

The utilization of the carryforwards is dependent upon the Company’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income during the carryforward period. In addition, utilization of these carryforwards may be limited due to ownership changes as defined in the Internal Revenue Code.

NOTE 7: CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER’S DEFICIT

On May 26, 2004, the Company converted services of $ 500 to common shares. This transaction increased the equity by $ 500 to $ 1,743 and did not change the paid in capital.

NOTE 8: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In December 2003, the Company executed an agreement with its stock transfer agent to settle all past outstanding obligations for $8,000. The payment was subsequently made in January 2004 per the terms of the agreement. As part of the settlement, the Company entered into an agreement to retain the stock transfer agent through December 2006 at the mutually agreed rate of $625 per month. As of May 31, 2010 the Company has an outstanding balance of $ 23,013 with the stock transfer agent.

NOTE 9: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

During the period from May 31, 2010 to date of this filing, the Company raised a total of $64,000 in demand notes consisting of following:

Two notes totaling $14,000 with an interest rate of 8%

One note of $5,000 with an interest rate of 12% and convertible to common stock at $0.03 per share

One note for $30,000 with no interest and convertible to common stock at $0.05 per share

One note for $15,000 with no interest convertible to common shares at $0.03 per share.

On January 24, 2011and February 10, 2011 the Company entered into agreements which provided for the Company to issue an aggregate of 12,800,000 restricted common shares for the purpose of extinguishing indebtedness of the Company:

9,000,000 shares of restricted stock to 33 individuals to whom the company’s sole director had assigned his claim against the Company for accrued compensation with a value of $270,000 ($0.03 per share)

1,333,334 shares of restricted common stock to two individuals for accounts payable with a total value of $40,000 ($0.03 per share)

2,466,666 of restricted common stock to five individuals for the conversion of debt valued at $86,000 ($0.03-0.05 per share)

Filing Compare · NVCN CORP