~~U.S.~~UNIED ~~SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION~~STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(dD) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 OR o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the transition period from __ to __

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

Commission file number: 000-54212

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Nevada		74-3206736
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

410 Park Avenue, 15th Floor

New York, New York 10022

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(888) 251-3422

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered ~~pursuant~~under to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered None None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, $0.0001 par value

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes xo No ox

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently ~~computed~~completed ~~second~~ fiscal quarter: $164,~~875~~540,~~000~~126 based upon $10.0005 per share which was the last price at which the common equity purchased by non-affiliates was last sold, since there is no public bid or ask price.

The number of shares of the issuer’s common stock ~~issued and~~ outstanding as of April 69, ~~2012~~2013 was ~~100~~107,~~622~~037,~~516~~834 shares.

Documents Incorporated By Reference: None

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I
Item 1	Business		3
Item 1A	Risk Factors		87
Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments		1615
Item 2	Properties		1615
Item 3	Legal Proceedings		1615
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures		1615
PART II
Item 5	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		1816
Item 6	Selected Financial Data		1917
Item 7	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		1917
Item 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		2422
Item 8	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		2523
Item 9	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		47
Item 9A	Controls and Procedures		47
Item 9B	Other Information		48
PART III
Item 10	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance		49
Item 11	Executive Compensation		5150
Item 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		54
Item 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence		5554
Item 14	Principal Accountant Fees and Services		5756
PART IV
Item 15	Exhibits, ~~and~~ Financial Statement Schedules		58
SIGNATURES			59

PART I

Item 1. Business.

As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report”), references to the “Company,” the “Registrant,” “we,” “our” or “us” refer to Mustang Alliances, Inc., unless the context otherwise indicates.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. For this purpose, any statements contained in this Report that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking information includes statements relating to future actions, prospective products, future performance or results of current or anticipated products, sales and marketing efforts, costs and expenses, interest rates, outcome of contingencies, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, business strategies, cost savings, objectives of management, and other matters. You can identify forward-looking statements by those that are not historical in nature, particularly those that use terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “contemplates,” “estimates,” “believes,” “plans,” “projected,” “predicts,” “potential,” or “continue” or the negative of these similar terms. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking information to encourage companies to provide prospective information about themselves without fear of litigation so long as that information is identified as forward-looking and is accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the information.

These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that we cannot predict. In evaluating these forward-looking statements, you should consider various factors, including the following: (a) those risks and uncertainties related to general economic conditions, (b) whether we are able to manage our planned growth efficiently and operate profitable operations, (c) whether we are able to generate sufficient revenues or obtain financing to sustain and grow our operations, (d) whether we are able to successfully fulfill our primary requirements for cash, which are explained below under “Liquidity and Capital Resources”. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements, except as otherwise required under the applicable federal securities laws.

Item 1. Business.

Corporate Background

Mustang Alliances, Inc. was incorporated on February 22, 2007, in the State of Nevada. We were focused on the business of marketing and selling anti-lock braking systems produced in China to the auto parts and auto manufacturing market of the United States. Since inception, the Company conducted virtually no business other than organizational matters, filing its Registration Statement on a Form SB-2 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, file number 333-148431 (the “Registration Statement”) in January 2008, and filing periodic reports with the SEC pursuant to the reporting requirements of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

On February 22, 2007, we issued an aggregate of 64,000,000 shares of our common stock to our officers and directors for the total consideration of $800. On January 30, 2008, the Company commenced its offering of up to a maximum of 32,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.002 per share (adjusted for the 1 for 8 stock split effective on December 27, 2010) pursuant to the Registration Statement. On February 29, 2008, we closed the offering after selling 22,400,000 shares of common stock.

On November 22, 2010, we borrowed $25,000 from Sara Laufer pursuant to the terms of a promissory note,. The $25,000 loan plus interest at the rate of 5% per annum is due and payable on November 22, 2012. The loan may be prepaid at any time without penalty or interest and is unsecured. The loan was repaid in full in August, 2011.

On November 29, 2010, Joseph Levi, the then principal shareholder of the Company, entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement which provided for the sale of 60,000,000 shares of common stock (which represented 55.97% of the then issued and outstanding share capital of the Company on a fully-diluted basis), to Leonard Sternheim for $7,500.

Effective as of November 29, 2010, in connection with the sale Joseph Levi resigned from his positions as officer and director of the Company, and the Board of Directors of the Company elected Leonard Sternheim as President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and a director of the Company.

On December 15, 2010, the Company notified the FINRA of its intention to implement a 1 for 8 share dividend or forward stock split of its issued and outstanding common stock to the holders of record as of December 27, 2010. The forward stock split became effective on January 3, 2011.

On March 17, 2011, we appointed Mark Holcombe and Mendel Mochkin as directors and Mr. Mochkin as a Vice President.

On July 22, 2011, Mr. Holcombe resigned as a director and Lawrence Wolfe was appointed a director and Chief Financial Officer and Robert Faber was appointed director and, on February 1, 2012 President of the Company.

On August 23, 2012 Messrs. Mochkin and Wolfe resigned as officers and directors of the Company.

Business Overview

Currently, we have a specific business plan that we are pursuing as aggressively as possible within the limits of our resources. We are an exploration-stage company as defined by the SEC and as a result of the execution and delivery of the Lease Agreements described below, we are now in the business of exploring, and if warranted, advancing mineral properties. Our primary focus is in the gold sector and our current mineral properties consist of the properties known as Corpus I, II, II and IV mining concessions and the Potosi concession (collectively, the “Properties”) located in Honduras.

On December 2, 2010, we executed a Lease Agreement with Compania Minera Cerros Del Sur, S.A., a corporation organized under the laws of Honduras (“Cerros”), and Mayan Gold, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Mayan Gold”) pursuant to which Cerros, the registered owner of Corpus IV, leased us the exclusive right to prospect, explore and mine for minerals in this property in Honduras. The Lease Agreement continues until the Honduran government grants Cerros the right to assign the property's mining concessions to the Company, at which time Cerros will transfer title to the mining concessions to us. In consideration for such rights, we issued an aggregate of 200,000,000 shares of common stock to Mayan Gold, the beneficial owner of 100% interest in Corpus IV. In accordance with the Lease Agreements, as further consideration for the rights granted, we agreed to pay Cerros $1,500 no later than April 1st of each year. Cerros also granted us an option to acquire exclusive rights to properties known as Corpus I, II, and III concessions and the Potosi concession.

Prior to February 9, 2010, Cerros was a wholly owned subsidiary of Mayan Gold. When Mayan Gold sold all of its shares in Cerros to Razor Resources, Inc. (“Razor”) on such date, Mayan Gold retained all mining rights to the Properties and certain other assets that were in the name of Cerros. As a part of the sales transaction, Cerros and Razor entered into an agreement pursuant to which Cerros is contractually obligated to transfer those concessions and the other assets to transferees as directed by Mayan Gold from time to time. Since Razor is the title owner of all the shares of Cerros, Razor was required to represent to Mayan Gold and us that it has absolutely no direct or indirect title or interest in any of the Properties or any of the shares being issued to Mayan Gold.

On February 22, 2011, we entered into another Lease Agreement with Cerros and Mayan Gold pursuant to which we exercised our option to acquire the exclusive rights to the properties known as Corpus I, II, and III concessions and the Potosi concession and the Potosi ground lease. The Lease Agreement continues until the Honduras government grants Cerros the right to assign these properties to the Company, at which time Cerros will transfer title to the mining concession to us. In consideration for such right, we issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock to Mayan Gold, the beneficial owner of 100% interest in these properties. As further consideration for the rights granted, we agreed to pay Cerros an annual sum of $3,200 no later than April 1st of each year with the first payment due on April 1, 2011.

We are dependent upon making a gold deposit discovery at the Properties. Should we be able to make an economic find, we would then be solely dependent upon the mining operation for our revenue and profits, if any. The probability that reserves that meet SEC guidelines will be discovered on the property is undeterminable at this time. The Properties presently do not have any mineral resources or reserves. Currently, there is no power supply to the mineral claims. A great deal of work is required on our property before a determination as to the economic and legal feasibility of a mining venture on it can be made.

Our Exploration Project

We are a natural resource company engaged in the exploration of mineral properties located in Honduras known as the Corpus I, II, II, IV mining concessions and the Potosi concession. The Properties are presently in the exploration stage.

Strategy

We are a company early in the implementation of our business plan and performing those tasks necessary to raise the appropriate funding to complete our business plan. Our primary focus in the natural resource sector is gold. Our strategic initiatives are to undertake cost efficient and effective exploration activities to discover mineralization and potentially mineral reserves.

Though it is possible to take a resource property that hosts a viable ore deposit into mining production, we believe that the costs and time frame for doing so are considerable, and the subsequent return on investment for our shareholders would be very long term. Therefore, we intend to develop joint ventures or sell any ore bodies that we may discover to a major mining company. Many major mining companies obtain their ore reserves through the purchase of ore bodies found by junior exploration companies. Although these major mining companies do some exploration work themselves, many of them rely on the junior resource exploration companies to provide them with future deposits for them to mine. We believe that selling or partnering a deposit found by us to major mining companies, would provide an immediate return to our shareholders without the long time frame and cost of putting a mine into operation ourselves and future capital for the Company to continue operations.

The Properties

Description and Location of the Properties

Honduras is bounded on the north and east by the Caribbean Sea, on the south by Nicaragua, on the south-west by the Pacific Ocean and El Salvador, and on the west by Guatemala. Honduras is the second largest country in Central America. Spanish is the country's official language, although English is widely understood and spoken. Its capital city is Tegucigalpa which hosts an international airport.

Except for two coastal strips, one extending about 640 km along the Caribbean Sea and the other 64 km on the Pacific Ocean, Honduras is a plateau consisting of broad, fertile plains broken by deep valleys and traversed by mountain ranges. The mountains, which are volcanic in origin, rise to heights of more than 2,800 m. The climate of Honduras is tropical, but is tempered by the higher elevations of the interior.

The Properties are located within the western Interior Highlands topographical province, a mountainous area that is covered mainly by short grasses and open pine and oak forests. Moderate relief with relatively steep slopes characterizes the area. The Property area occurs in one of the major mining districts in Honduras. It is located within the El Tabanco gold trend. It is in the municipality of El Corpus, in the eastern part of the state of Choluteca, SW Honduras. The Properties have a total area of approximately 11,860 acres (4,8000 hectares). It is situated approximately 85 kilometers SSE of the capital city of Tegucigalpa and approximately 30 kilometers East of a deep water port on the Gulf of Fonseca. Access to the district is by paved highway South from Tegucigalpa to Choluteca, and from there east on secondary and tertiary roads for approximately 20 kilometers.

Exploration History

In order to advance the Properties to a stage that would make the properties of interest to a major mining company we will need to undertake the early stages of exploration ourselves. There are no proven resources on the Properties.

Geology of the Properties

The region containing Honduras and Nicaragua hosts a number of mines and mineral deposits with a similar style of mineralization as the Property area. On the Property are a series of discontinuous veins and breccia zones which are all part of a single main continuous ENE trending structure. Quartz constitutes more than 90% of the ore. Sulphide mineral content is relatively high, consisting mainly of pyrite with minor chalcopyrite. Individual veins have been recognized to have strike lengths of 150 to 300 m. Major veins can have widths of from 1.5 to 3.0 m. Grades range from 1 to 15 g/T gold, with small high grade pockets of up to several thousand tonnes and up to 200 g/T gold. It was part of the Battle mountain consortium list of areas needing further exploration. The concession contains several abandoned mines.

Current State of Exploration

The Properties’ claims presently do not have any mineral resources or reserves. There is no mining plant or equipment located within the property boundaries. Currently, there is no power supply to the mineral claims. A great deal of work is required on our property before a determination as to the economic and legal feasibility of a mining venture on it can be made.

Geological Exploration Program

The Company will need to raise funds to finance geological exploration on the Properties.

Intellectual Property

We do not have any intellectual property rights.

Competition

The mineral exploration industry is intensely competitive, highly fragmented and subject to rapid change. We may be unable to compete successfully with our existing competitors or with any new competitors. We compete with many exploration companies which have significantly greater personnel, financial, managerial, and technical resources than we do. Competition from other companies with greater resources and reputations may result in our failure to maintain or expand our business.

Governmental Regulations

Mineral resource exploration, production and related operations are subject to extensive rules and regulations of governmental agencies. We may be required to obtain work permits, post bonds and perform remediation work for any physical disturbance to the land in order to comply with these laws. While our planned exploration program budgets for regulatory compliance, there is a risk that new regulations could increase our costs of doing business and prevent us from carrying out exploration program.

Failure to comply with these rules and regulations can result in substantial penalties. Our cost of doing business may be affected by the regulatory burden on the mineral industry. We believe that compliance with the laws will not adversely affect our business operations.

Environmental enforcement efforts with respect to mineral operations have increased over the years, and it is possible that regulation could expand and have a greater impact on future mineral exploration operations. Although our management intends to comply with all legislation and/or actions of local, provincial, state and federal governments, non-compliance with applicable regulatory requirements could subject us to penalties, fines and regulatory actions, the cost of which could harm our results of operations. We cannot be sure that our proposed business operations will not violate environmental laws in the future.

Employees

We currently have no employees other than our current officers. All functions including development, strategy, negotiations and administration are currently being provided by our officers.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

RISK FACTORS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS

We are an exploration stage company, have generated no revenues to date and have a limited operating history upon which we may be evaluated.

We were incorporated on February 22, 2007 and have generated no revenues from operations to date. To date, the Properties that we have leased are early stage mineral properties without known resources or reserves. It is difficult to evaluate our business because we have a limited history, do not have any resources or experience in this business before. We are an exploration stage company with no known commercially viable deposits, or “resources”, or "reserves" on the Properties. Determination of the existence of a resource or reserve will depend on appropriate and sufficient exploration work and the evaluation of legal, economic, and environmental factors. Even if we obtain the resources to mine the property, if we fail to find a commercially viable deposit on the Properties, our financial condition and results of operations will suffer. If we cannot generate income from the Properties, we will have to cease operations which will result in the loss of your investment.

We expect losses in the future because we have no revenue to offset losses.

Since inception on February 22, 2007 through December 31, ~~2011~~2012, we have incurred a net loss of $12,~~093~~175,~~452~~151 and a loss from operations of $12,~~053~~132,~~914~~674. As we have no current revenue, we are expecting losses over the next 12 months because we do not yet have any revenues to offset the expenses associated with the exploration of our Properties. We cannot guarantee that we will ever be successful in generating revenues in the future. We recognize that if we are unable to generate revenues, we will not be able to earn profits or continue operations. We can provide investors with no assurance that we will generate any operating revenues or ever achieve profitable operations.

Our success is dependent on our ability to explore and develop our mineral Properties.

We hope to generate revenues from the sale of minerals from our leased exploration Properties located in Honduras. We cannot guarantee that we will ever be successful in doing this. Currently we do not even possess sufficient funds to explore the Properties. Therefore, it is not possible for us to predict the future level of production, if any, or if we will be able to effectuate our business plan. We recognize that if we are unable to generate revenues, we will not be able to earn profits or continue operations.

Our independent auditor has issued a going concern opinion after auditing our financial statements; our ability to continue is dependent on our ability to raise additional capital and our operations could be curtailed if we are unable to obtain required additional funding when needed.

We will be required to expend substantial amounts of working capital in order to explore and develop the Properties. The Company had no revenues and incurred a net loss of $~~898~~1,~~473~~081,699 for the year ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company is attempting to address its lack of liquidity by raising additional funds, either in the form of debt or equity or some combination thereof. Any additional equity financing may involve substantial dilution to our then existing shareholders. During the year ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012, the Company borrowed $2580,~~000~~170 for working capital purposes. Notwithstanding the loans, we will continue to require additional financing to execute our business strategy. We are totally dependent on external sources of financing for the foreseeable future, of which we have no commitments and on our ability to attract and receive additional funding from the sale of securities or outside sources such as private investment or a strategic partner. We currently have no agreements or arrangements with respect to any such financing and there can be no assurance that any needed funds will be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. Our failure to raise additional funds in the future will adversely affect our business operations, and may require us to suspend our operations. After auditing our financial statements, our independent auditor issued a going concern opinion and our ability to continue is dependent on our ability to raise additional capital. If we are unable to obtain necessary financing, we will likely be required to curtail our development plans which could cause us to become dormant.

There is no assurance that we can establish the existence of any mineral resource on the Properties in commercially exploitable quantities. Until we can do so, we cannot earn any revenues from operations and if we do not do so we will lose all of the funds that we expend on exploration. If we do not discover any mineral resource in a commercially exploitable quantity, our business could fail.

Since we have not yet begun exploration work on the Properties, we have not established that such Properties contain any mineral reserve. There can be no assurances that we will be able to explore such Properties. If we are unable to do so, our business could fail.

A mineral reserve is defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in its Industry Guide 7 (which can be viewed over the Internet at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/forms/industry.htm#secguide7) as that part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. The probability of an individual prospect ever having a "reserve" that meets the requirements of the SEC's Industry Guide 7 is extremely remote; in all probability our mineral resource property does not contain any '“reserve'” and any funds that we spend on exploration will probably be lost.

Even if we do eventually discover a mineral reserve on the Properties, there can be no assurance that we will be able to develop such Property into a producing mine and extract those resources. Both mineral exploration and development involve a high degree of risk and few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines.

The commercial viability of an established mineral deposit will depend on a number of factors including, the size, grade and other attributes of the mineral deposit, the proximity of the resource to infrastructure such as a smelter, roads and a point for shipping, government regulation and market prices. Most of these factors will be beyond our control, and any of them could increase costs and make extraction of any identified mineral resource unprofitable.

Mineral operations are subject to applicable law and government regulation. Even if we discover a mineral resource in a commercially exploitable quantity, these laws and regulations could restrict or prohibit the exploitation of that mineral resource. If we cannot exploit any mineral resource that we might discover on our Properties, our business may fail.

Both mineral exploration and extraction require permits from various foreign, federal, state, provincial and local governmental authorities and are governed by laws and regulations, including those with respect to prospecting, mine development, mineral production, transport, export, taxation, ~~labour~~labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety and other matters. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain or maintain any of the permits required for the continued exploration of our mineral properties or for the construction and operation of a mine on our properties at economically viable costs or at all. To the extent such approvals are required and are not obtained, we may be delayed or prohibited from proceeding with planned exploration or development of our mineral Properties. If we cannot accomplish these objectives, our business could fail.

We believe that we are in compliance with all material laws and regulations that currently apply to our activities but there can be no assurance that we can continue to remain in compliance. Current laws and regulations could be amended and we might not be able to comply with them, as amended.

We currently do not have the resources to explore the Properties and will require capital to determine if there are resources on the Properties. If we establish the existence of a mineral resource on the Properties in a commercially exploitable quantity, we will require additional capital in order to develop the Properties into a producing mine. If we cannot raise capital, we will not be able to exploit the resource, and our business could fail.

We must raise capital to determine if there are resources on the Properties. If we do discover mineral resources in commercially exploitable quantities on our Properties, we will need to expend substantial sums of money to establish the extent of the resource, develop processes to extract it and develop extraction and processing facilities and infrastructure. Although we may derive substantial benefits from the discovery of a major deposit, there can be no assurance that such a resource will be large enough to justify commercial operations, nor can there be any assurance that we will be able to raise the funds required for development on a timely basis. If we cannot raise the necessary capital or complete the necessary facilities and infrastructure, we will not be able to effectuate our business plan and our business may fail.

Mineral exploration and development is subject to extraordinary operating risks. We do not currently insure against these risks.

Mineral exploration, development and production involve many risks which even a combination of experience, knowledge and careful evaluation may not be able to overcome. Our operations will be subject to all the hazards and risks inherent in the exploration for mineral resources and, if we discover a mineral resource in commercially exploitable quantities, our operations could be subject to all of the hazards and risks inherent in the development and production of resources, including liability for pollution, cave-ins or similar hazards against which we cannot insure or against which we may elect not to insure. Any such event could result in work stoppages and damage to property, including damage to the environment. We do not currently maintain any insurance coverage against these operating hazards. The payment of any liabilities that arise from any such occurrence would have a material adverse impact on our company.

An additional risk exists from trespassers entering the Properties and absconding with our property, both exploration equipment as well as soil and possible resources. We currently do not have anything to protect ourselves from this risk.

The loss of our executive officers or the failure to hire qualified employees or consultants would damage our business.

Because of the highly technical nature of our business, we will need to depend greatly on attracting and retaining experienced management and highly qualified and trained personnel. We compete with other companies intensely for qualified and well trained professionals in our industry. Failure to hire a sufficient number of qualified and experienced professionals, will have a material adverse effect on our capacity to sustain and grow our business .

Because of the speculative nature of exploration and development, there is a substantial risk that our business will fail.

Mineral exploration involves a high degree of risk and exploration projects are frequently unsuccessful. To the extent that we continue to be involved in mineral exploration, the long-term success of our operations will be related to the cost and success of our exploration programs. The risks associated with mineral exploration include:

·● the identification of potential mineralization based on superficial analysis;

·● the quality of our management and our geological and technical expertise; and

·● the capital available for exploration and development.

Substantial expenditures are required to determine if a project has economically mineable mineralization. It may take several years to establish proven and probable reserves and to develop and construct mining and processing facilities.

Since our Properties are located in a third world country, we are subject to additional risks.

The Company is undertaking a mining venture in Honduras, a third world country. As such, it is possible that the political environment could become unstable and a foreign operation such as our proposed one could be adversely affected by government expropriation, the inability to secure needed government permits and cooperation, and a condition not physically safe for foreign laborers or management. If any of these situations would occur, we would have to suspend operations in Honduras, which would prevent us from exploring our Properties..

We may not be able to compete with current and potential exploration companies, some of whom have greater resources and experience than we do in developing mineral reserves.

The natural resource market is intensely competitive, highly fragmented and subject to rapid change. We may be unable to compete successfully with our existing competitors or with any new competitors. We compete with many exploration companies which have significantly greater personnel, financial, managerial, and technical resources than we do. This competition from other companies with greater resources and reputations may result in our failure to maintain or expand our business.

1110

We have no meaningful assets and may not have the funds to purchase all of the supplies, manpower and materials we need to begin exploration which could cause us to delay or suspend operations.

Competition and unforeseen limited sources of supplies in the industry could result in occasional spot shortages of supplies, manpower and certain equipment such as bulldozers and excavators that we might need to conduct exploration. If there is a shortage or scarcity, we cannot compete with larger companies in the exploration industry for supplies, manpower and equipment. Currently we have no funds to explore the Properties in Honduras. In the event that the prices for such resources rise above our affordability levels, we may have to delay or suspend operations. In the event we are forced to limit our exploration activities, we may not find any minerals, even though our Properties may contain mineralized material. Without any minerals we cannot generate revenues and you may lose your investment.

The prices of metals are highly volatile and a decrease in metals prices could result in us incurring losses.

The profitability of natural resource operations are directly related to the market prices of the underlying commodities. The market prices of metals fluctuate significantly and are affected by a number of factors beyond our control, including, but not limited to, the rate of inflation, the exchange rate of the dollar to other currencies, interest rates, and global economic and political conditions. Price fluctuations in the metals markets from the time development of a mine is undertaken and the time production can commence can significantly affect the profitability of a mine. Accordingly, we may begin to develop a mineral property at a time when the price of the underlying metals make such exploration economically feasible and, subsequently, incur losses because metals prices have decreased. Adverse fluctuations of metals market price may force us to curtail or cease our business operations.

Because our business involves numerous operating hazards, we may be subject to claims of a significant size which would cost a significant amount of funds and resources to rectify.

Our proposed business is subject to the usual hazards inherent in exploring for minerals, such as general accidents, explosions, chemical exposure, and cratering. The occurrence of these or similar events could result in the suspension of operations, damage to or destruction of the equipment involved and injury or death to personnel. Operations also may be suspended because of machinery breakdowns, abnormal climatic conditions, failure of subcontractors to perform or supply goods or services or personnel shortages. The occurrence of any such contingency would require us to incur additional costs and force us to cease our operations, which will cause you a loss of your investment.

Difficulties, such as unusual or unexpected rock formations encountered by workers but not indicated on a map, or other conditions may be encountered in the gathering of samples and information, and could delay our exploration program. We do not currently carry insurance to protect against these risks and we may not obtain such insurance in the future. Even if we do obtain insurance, the nature of these risks is such that liabilities could over exceed policy limits or be excluded from coverage. There are also risks against which we cannot, or may not elect to insure. The costs, which could be associated with any liabilities, not covered by insurance or in excess of insurance coverage or compliance with applicable laws and regulations may cause substantial delays and require significant capital outlays, thereby hurting our financial position, future earnings, and/or competitive positions. We may not have enough capital to continue operations and you will lose your investment.

Damage to the environment could result from our operations which could subject us to substantial fines and penalties.

Our operations and property are subject to extensive federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection, including the generation, storage, handling, emission, transportation and discharge of materials into the environment, and relating to safety and health. These laws and regulations may do any of the following: (i) require the acquisition of a permit or other authorization before exploration commences, (ii) restrict the types, quantities and concentration of various substances that can be released into the environment in connection with exploration activities, (iii) limit or prohibit mineral exploration on certain lands lying within wilderness, wetlands and other protected areas,(iv) require remedial measures to mitigate pollution from former operations and (v) impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from our proposed operations.

Environmental enforcement efforts with respect to mineral operations have increased over the years, and it is possible that regulation could expand and have a greater impact on future mineral exploration operations. Although our management intends to comply with all legislation and/or actions of local, state and federal governments, non-compliance with applicable regulatory requirements could subject us to substantial penalties, fines and regulatory actions, the cost of which could harm our results of operations. Our cost of doing business may be affected by the regulatory burden on the mineral industry since the rules and regulations frequently are amended or interpreted. We cannot predict the future cost or impact of complying with these laws. We cannot be sure that our proposed business operations will not violate environmental laws in the future.

Access to our Properties is limited during inclement weather conditions which could result in delays in our explorations.

The business of mining for gold and other metals is generally subject to a number of risks and hazards including natural phenomena such as inclement weather conditions, floods, blizzards and earthquakes. Access to our Properties may be restricted during these weather conditions. As a result, any attempt to test or explore the property is largely limited to the times when weather conditions permits such activities. These limitations may result in significant delays in exploration efforts. Such delays may have a significant negative effect on our results of operations.

RISK FACTORS RELATING TO OUR COMMON STOCK

We may, in the future, issue additional common stock, which would reduce investors’ percent of ownership and may dilute our share value.

Our Articles of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of which ~~100~~104,~~217~~537,~~516~~834 shares were outstanding as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012. The future issuance of common stock may result in substantial dilution in the percentage of our common stock held by our then existing shareholders. We may value any common stock issued in the future on an arbitrary basis. The issuance of common stock for future services or acquisitions or other corporate actions may have the effect of diluting the value of the shares held by our investors, and might have an adverse effect on any trading market for our common stock.

Our common stock is subject to the "penny stock" rules of the SEC, which makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in our stock.

The SEC has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $54.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $54.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require: (i) that a broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks; and (ii) the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased. In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must: (i) obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and (ii) make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form: (i) sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and (ii) that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.

Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the "penny stock" rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and may cause a decline in the market value of our stock.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

Because we do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our shares of common stock, our stockholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell them.

We intend to retain any future earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Unless we pay dividends, our stockholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell them at a price higher than that which they initially paid for such shares.

The market for penny stocks has experienced numerous frauds and abuses which could adversely impact investors in our stock.

We believe that the market for penny stocks has suffered from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include:

·● Control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer;

·● Manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases;

·● "Boiler room" practices involving high pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons;

·● Excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers; and

The wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the inevitable collapse of those prices with consequent investor losses.

State securities laws may limit secondary trading, which may restrict the states in which and conditions under which you can sell the shares offered by this prospectus.

Secondary trading in common stock sold in this offering will not be possible in any state until the common stock is qualified for sale under the applicable securities laws of the state or there is confirmation that an exemption, such as listing in certain recognized securities manuals, is available for secondary trading in the state. If we fail to register or qualify, or to obtain or verify an exemption for the secondary trading of, the common stock in any particular state, the common stock could not be offered or sold to, or purchased by, a resident of that state. In the event that a significant number of states refuse to permit secondary trading in our common stock, the liquidity for the common stock could be significantly impacted thus causing you to realize a loss on your investment.

We may be exposed to potential risks resulting from new requirements under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

As a company registered with the SEC, we will be required, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to include in our annual report our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We expect to incur significant continuing costs, including accounting fees and staffing costs, in order to maintain compliance with the internal control requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Development of our business will necessitate ongoing changes to our internal control systems, processes and information systems. Currently, we have no employees, other than our officers and directors. As we engage in the exploration of our mineral claims and hire employees and consultants, our current design for internal control over financial reporting will not be sufficient to enable management to determine that our internal controls are effective for any period, or on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, as we develop our business, such development and growth will necessitate changes to our internal control systems, processes and information systems, all of which will require additional costs and expenses.

In the future, if we fail to complete the annual Section 404 evaluation in a timely manner, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny and a loss of public confidence in our internal controls. In addition, any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations.

Because we are not subject to compliance with rules requiring the adoption of certain corporate governance measures, our stockholders have limited protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rule changes proposed and enacted by the SEC, the New York and NYSE AMEX Equities exchanges and the Nasdaq Stock Market, as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley, require the implementation of various measures relating to corporate governance. These measures are designed to enhance the integrity of corporate management and the securities markets and apply to securities which are listed on those exchanges or the Nasdaq Stock Market. Because we are not presently required to comply with many of the corporate governance provisions and because we chose to avoid incurring the substantial additional costs associated with such compliance any sooner than necessary, we have not yet adopted these measures.

None of our ~~four~~two directors are independent. We do not currently have independent audit or compensation committees. As a result, the directors have the ability, among other things, to determine their own level of compensation. Until we comply with such corporate governance measures, regardless of whether such compliance is required, the absence of such standards of corporate governance may leave our shareholders without protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters and investors may be reluctant to provide us with funds necessary to expand our operations.

The costs to meet our reporting and other requirements as a public company subject to the Exchange Act of 1934 are substantial and may result in us having insufficient funds to expand our business or even to meet routine business obligations.

As a public entity subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act of 1934, we incur ongoing expenses associated with professional fees for accounting, legal and a host of other expenses for annual reports and proxy statements. We estimate that these costs will range up to $25,000 per year for the next few years and will be higher if our business volume and activity increases but lower during the first year of being public because our overall business volume will be lower, and we will not yet be subject to the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. As a result, we may not have sufficient funds to grow our operations.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None

Item 2. Properties

We currently maintain our corporate offices at 410 Park Avenue, 15th floor, New York, NY 10022. We do not pay rent for this space because the amount of the space we use at such office is de minimis. We believe that this space will be sufficient until we start generating revenues and need to hire employees.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

~~There~~Other than described below, there are no pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or in which any director, officer or affiliate of the Company, any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of any class of voting securities of the Company, or security holder is a party adverse to the Company or has a material interest adverse to the Company. The Company’s property is not the subject of any pending legal proceedings.

On July 23, 2012, the Company was named a defendant in a lawsuit George Sharp v. Mustang Alliances, Inc. et al which was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, San Diego County. The lawsuit alleges violations of California restrictions on unsolicited commercial e-mail advertisers and seeks damages and punitive damages in an unspecified amount. The Company believes that this lawsuit is without merit and intends to vigorously defend the action. Currently, a trial date has been set for March of 2014.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012, with respect to the Company’s mines located in Honduras there were:

No violations of mandatory health or safety standards that could significantly and substantially contribute to the cause and effect of a coal or other mine safety or health hazard under section 104 of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 814) for which the operator received a citation from the Mine Safety and Health Administration;

No orders issued under section 104(b) of such Act (30 U.S.C. 814(b));

No citations and orders for unwarrantable failure of the mine operator to comply with mandatory health or safety standards under section 104(d) of such Act (30 U.S.C. 814(d));

No flagrant violations under section 110(b)(2) of such Act (30 U.S.C. 820(b)(2));

No imminent danger orders issued under section 107(a) of such Act (30 U.S.C. 817(a));

No proposed assessments from the Mine Safety and Health Administration under such Act (30 U.S.C. 801 et seq. ); and

No mining-related fatalities.

No mine of which the Company or a subsidiary of the Company is an operator, that received written notice from the Mine Safety and Health Administration of:

(i) A pattern of violations of mandatory health or safety standards that are of such nature as could have significantly and substantially contributed to the cause and effect of coal or other mine health or safety hazards under section 104(e) of such Act (30 U.S.C. 814(e)); or

(ii) The potential to have such a pattern.

There are no pending legal actions before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission involving such mines.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

Our common stock is eligible to be traded on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board under the ticker symbol MSTG.

The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices for the shares of our common stock for the periods indicated.

QUARTER ENDING	HIGH		LOW
March 31, 2011	$	0.85	$	0.25
June 30, 2011		0.40		0.14
September 30, 2011		0.24		0.15
December 31, 2011		0.75		0.22
QUARTER ENDING	HIGH		LOW
March 31, 2010	$	0.25	$	0.25
March 31, 2012	$	0.041	$	0.0125
June 30, 2010		0.25		0.25
June 30, 2012		0.018		0.006
September 30, 2010		0.25		0.25
September 30, 2012		0.0185		0.009
December 31, 2010		0.25		0.25
December 31, 2012		0.0121		0.04

The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

Holders

As of April 9, ~~2012~~2013, there were ~~100~~107,~~622~~037,~~516~~834 ~~common~~ shares ~~issued and~~ outstanding, which were held by 1,~~328~~325 stockholders of record.

Dividends

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock nor do we anticipate paying any in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, we expect to retain any future earnings to finance our operations and expansion. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our earnings levels, capital requirements, any restrictive loan covenants and other factors the Board considers relevant.

Equity Compensation Plans

We currently do not have any equity compensation plans but are contemplating adopting a stock option/incentive plan.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

~~In February and March 2012, we sold an aggregate of 175,000 shares of our common stock and two-year warrants to an aggregate of 175,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1~~None.50 per share to an accredited investor in a private offering and raised gross proceeds of $175,000. The shares were issued pursuant to Regulation Spromulgated under of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

None.

On March 29, 2011, Mr. Leonard Sternheim, our principal executive and financial officer, returned 30,000,000 shares of common stock to treasury.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this Item 6.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Certain statements contained in this Annual Report, including statements regarding the anticipated development and expansion of our business, our intent, belief or current expectations, primarily with respect to our future operating performance and other statements contained herein regarding matters that are not historical facts, are "forward-looking" statements. Future filings with the SEC, future press releases and future oral or written statements made by us or with our approval, which are not statements of historical fact, may contain forward-looking statements, because such statements include risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made and reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they are made. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

1917

Plan of Operation

We are dependent upon making a gold deposit discovery at the Properties. Should we be able to make an economic find, we would then be solely dependent upon the mining operation for our revenue and profits, if any. The probability that reserves that meet SEC guidelines will be discovered on the property is undeterminable at this time. The Properties presently do not have any mineral resources or reserves. There is currently no mining plant or equipment located within the Properties boundaries. Currently, there is no power supply to the mineral claims. A great deal of work is required on the Properties before a determination as to the economic and legal feasibility of a mining venture on it can be made.

Results of Operations

Years Ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011

As of December 31, ~~2011~~2012 we had $~~891~~247 in cash and cash equivalents, and have experienced losses since inception. We did not generate any revenues from operations during the years ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011. ~~Expenses~~Operating expenses during the year ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 were $~~873~~1,~~096~~078,760 ~~for~~and a net loss of $~~898~~1,~~473~~081,699 compared to operating expenses of $63873,~~329~~096 for a net loss of $69898,~~436~~473 for the year ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011. Expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 consisted primarily of professional fees, consulting fees and mining and exploration cost relating to our organization, ~~while~~aggregating ~~expenses~~$1,078,760 ~~during~~in ~~the~~2012 ~~year~~and ~~ended December 31~~873,096 ~~2010~~in ~~were~~2011. During ~~primarily~~2012, an ~~the~~impairment ~~result~~loss of ~~professional and filing fees associated with filing our registration statements~~$106,000 ~~complying~~on ~~with~~equipment ~~our~~not ~~reporting~~in ~~requirements~~use ~~and~~was ~~general~~included ~~and~~in ~~administrative~~operating expenses. We have incurred a cumulative net loss of $12,~~093~~175,~~452~~151 for the period February 22, 2007 (inception) to December 31, ~~2011~~2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our balance sheet as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012 reflects cash in the amount of $~~891~~247. In addition, on December 31, 2012, the Company had working capital deficiency of $~~119~~492,~~097~~581 and a stockholders' deficiency of $492,581 at December 31, ~~2011~~2012 as compared to a working capital deficiency of $119,097 and a stockholders' deficiency of $144,097. at December 31, 2011. The ~~source~~increase ofin ~~which~~working capital deficiency was primarily due to ~~proceeds~~the ~~received~~increase of accounts payable resulting from ~~issuance~~mining ofcosts ~~stock~~incurred and payable at year end, and related party debt primarily from accrued consulting fees as required by certain contracts and agreements in place as well as loans to the Company to pay for certain corporate expenses during the year ended December 31, 2012.

OnIn ~~November~~August 222012, ~~2010~~ we ~~borrowed~~received an aggregate investment of $2534,000 ~~from~~in ~~Sara~~consideration ~~Laufer~~for at the ~~rate~~issuance of 5%680,000 ~~per~~shares ~~annum~~and ~~due~~five-year onwarrants ~~November~~purchasing 22340,000 ~~2011. On~~shares ~~August~~of 8,common ~~2011,~~stock weexercisable ~~repaid~~at Ms$0.20 ~~Laufer~~per ~~in full~~share.

OnCurrent ~~January~~cash ~~10,~~on ~~2011,~~hand ~~the~~is ~~Company~~insufficient ~~borrowed~~for ~~$50,000~~all ~~from~~of ~~Landolt Holdings, Inc. pursuant to~~ the ~~terms~~Company’s ofcommitments afor ~~promissory note. The $50,000 loan accrues interest at~~ the ~~rate~~next of12 ~~5% per annum and is due and payable on January 10, 2013~~months. OnWe ~~July~~anticipate ~~25,~~that ~~2011, repayment for $25,000 was made. At which time~~ the ~~note~~additional ~~was~~funding ~~assigned~~that towe ~~MeM~~require ~~Mining,~~will ~~Inc. MeM~~be isin ~~controlled by, Mendel Mochkin, a director of~~ the ~~company. As~~form of ~~December~~equity ~~31, 2011, the principle balance due was $25,000, is unsecured and is due January 2013 with accrued interest at 5%~~financing.

OnWe ~~March~~will ~~28,~~require ~~2011,~~additional ~~the~~capital ~~Company has issued for aggregate consideration of $25,000 a convertible note~~ to ~~Zegal~~mine &and ~~Ross~~explore ~~Capital, LLC, a related party. This note bears interest at~~ the ~~imputed~~Property ~~IRS~~in ~~rate~~Honduras ~~of .0054% per annum~~ and ~~was~~ ~~due~~estimate ~~September~~that ~~28,~~within ~~2011. The note is convertible into common stock of~~ the ~~Company~~next at12 ~~the~~months ~~rate~~we ~~of $.25 per share. In addition, upon conversion to common stock at maturity date, the Company~~ will ~~issue~~need aapproximately ~~2-year warrant to purchase 100~~$1,000 ~~shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $.50 per share. The Company has recorded a beneficial conversion in the amount of $19~~,~~723~~000 tofor ~~reflect~~those ~~the~~specific ~~fair~~exploration ~~value of the convertible debt~~ and amining ~~corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital~~costs. ~~As of December 31, 2011, the convertible note was repaid in full.~~

On June 15, 2011, the loans payable to First Line Capital which was a related party, including accrued interest in the amount of $97,785 was forgiven. The Company has recorded the carrying amount of debt with accrued interest as an increase to additional paid-in capital.

We will require additional capital to mine and explore the Properties in Honduras and estimate that within the next 12 months we will need approximately $1,000,000.

As a result of the sale of common stock and warrants and repayment of loans during 2011, we currently have cash on hand of approximately $891. Current cash on hand is insufficient for all of the Company’s commitments for the next 12 months. We anticipate that the additional funding that we require will be in the form of equity financing.

We cannot be certain that the required additional financing will be available or available on terms favorable to us. We currently do not have any arrangements or commitments in place for any other financings. If additional funds are raised by the issuance of our equity securities, existing stockholders will experience dilution of their ownership interest. If adequate funds are not available or not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to fund our operations.

Subsequent Events:

On February 15, 2013, the Company issued a 12% promissory note, due in sixty days for $45,000. Additionally, the note holder will be issued 2,500,000 shares of common stock. The note holder has the right to convert at any time, the unpaid principal for $0.01 per share. The Note Holder is an existing shareholder of the company.

On February 28, 2013 the Company issued two 12 % promissory notes for $100,000 each, due in sixty days, to two independent third parties. Each of the note holders have the right to convert, at any time, the unpaid principal balance for $0.01 per share.

Critical Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include the valuation of deferred tax assets and valuation of equity ~~instrument~~instruments.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, the Company had no cash equivalents.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs, which are not considered improvements and do not extend the useful life of the asset, are expensed as incurred; additions, renewals and betterments are capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts, and any gain or loss is included in the statement of operations in other income and expenses.

Depreciation is provided to recognize the cost of the asset in the results of operations. The Company calculates depreciation using the straight-line method with estimated useful life as follows:

Item	Useful Life
Mining equipments	10 years

Loss Per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share.” As of December 31, ~~2011 and 2010~~2012, the Company has 52,~~050~~175,000 ~~and 0~~ warrants and 0 options that are anti-dilutive and not included in diluted loss per share ~~respectively~~.

2119

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ~~Codification~~ASC Topic 740~~-10-25~~, Income Taxes (“ASC Topic 740~~-10-25~~”). Under ASC Topic 740~~-10-25~~, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC Topic 740~~-10-25~~, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company’s ~~2007~~2010 to ~~2011~~2012 tax returns are subject to ~~examinate~~examination by Internal Revenue Services.

Business Segments

The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.

Revenue Recognition

The Company will recognize revenue on arrangements in accordance with FASB ASC ~~No.~~ 605, “Revenue Recognition”. In all cases, revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed and determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for accounts payable and notes payable – related party approximate fair value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Mining Properties (Exploration Costs)

Costs of acquiring mining properties and any exploration costs are capitalized as incurred,in accordance with FASB ~~Accounting~~ASC ~~Standards~~Topic ~~Codification No.~~ 930, Extractive Activities – Mining, when proven and probable reserves exist and the property is a commercially mineable property. Mine exploration costs incurred either to develop new gold, silver, lead and copper deposits, expand the capacity of operating mines, or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of current production are capitalized. Costs incurred to maintain current production or to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. Costs of abandoned projects are charged to operations upon abandonment. The Company evaluates, at least quarterly, the carrying value of capitalized mining costs and related property, plant and equipment costs, if any, to determine if these costs are in excess of their net realizable value and if a permanent impairment needs to be recorded. The periodic evaluation of the carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property, plant and equipment costs are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value.

The Company capitalizes costs for mining properties by individual property and defers such costs for later amortization only if the prospects for economic productions are reasonably certain. Capitalized costs are expensed in the period when the determination has been made that economic production does not appear reasonably certain. As of December 31, 2012, the Company recorded an impairment of $106,000.

Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2004, the FASB issued ~~FASB~~ASC ~~Accounting~~Topic ~~Standards Codification No.~~ 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation~~. Under~~ ~~FASB~~(“ASC ~~Accounting~~Topic ~~Standards~~718”). ~~Codification~~Under ~~No.~~ASC Topic 718, companies are required to measure the compensation costs of share-based compensation arrangements based on the grant-date fair value and recognize the costs in the financial statements over the period during which employees are required to provide services. Share-based compensation arrangements include stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase plans. As such, compensation cost is measured on the date of grant at their fair value. Such compensation amounts, if any, are amortized over the respective vesting periods of the option grant. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~Equity ~~applies~~instruments ~~this~~(“instruments”) ~~statement~~issued ~~prospectively~~to other than employees are recorded on the basis of the fair value of the instruments, as required by ASC Topic 718.

Equity instruments (“instruments”) issued to other than employees are recorded on the basis of the fair value of the instruments, as required by FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718. FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 505, Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees defines the measurement date and recognition period for such instruments. In general, the measurement date is when either a (a) performance commitment, as defined, is reached or (b) the earlier of (i) the non-employee performance is complete or (ii) the instruments are vested. The measured value related to the instruments is recognized over a period based on the facts and circumstances of each particular grant as defined in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification20

ASC Topic 505, Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees defines the measurement date and recognition period for such instruments. In general, the measurement date is when either a performance commitment, as defined, is reached or the earlier of the non-employee performance is complete or the instruments are vested. The measured value related to the instruments is recognized over a period based on the facts and circumstances of each particular grant as defined in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Fair Value Measurement

The authoritative guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or the most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact, and (iv) willing to transact. The guidance describes a fair value hierarchy based on the levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following:

• Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

• Level 2 Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or corroborated by observable market data or substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

• Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company's financial instruments include cash and equivalents, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and notes and loans payable. All these items were determined to be Level 1 fair value measurements. The carrying amounts of cash and equivalents, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and notes and loans payable approximated fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~June,~~February ~~2011~~2013, ~~the~~ FASB issued ~~ASU~~Accounting ~~No.~~Standards ~~2011~~Update 2013-0504, ~~which~~Liabilities ~~amends~~(Topic ~~ASC~~405): ~~Topic~~Obligations ~~220,~~Resulting ~~Comprehensive~~from ~~Income.~~Joint ~~Under~~and ~~the~~Several ~~amendment,~~Liability anArrangements ~~entity~~for ~~has~~Which the ~~option~~Total toAmount ~~present~~of the ~~total~~Obligation ofIs ~~comprehensive~~Fixed ~~income,~~at the ~~components~~Reporting ofDate ~~net~~(a ~~income,~~consensus ~~and~~of the ~~components~~FASB ofEmerging ~~other~~Issues ~~comprehensive~~Task ~~income~~Force). ~~either~~This inguidance arequires ~~single~~an ~~continuous~~entity ~~statement~~to ofmeasure ~~comprehensive~~obligations ~~income~~resulting orfrom injoint ~~two~~and ~~separate~~several ~~but~~liability ~~consecutive~~arrangements ~~statements. In~~for ~~both~~which ~~choices,~~the antotal ~~entity~~amount isof ~~required~~the toobligation ~~present~~within ~~each~~the ~~component~~scope of ~~net~~this ~~income~~guidance ~~along~~is ~~with~~fixed ~~total~~at ~~net~~the ~~income,~~reporting ~~each~~date. ~~component~~This ofstipulates ~~other~~that ~~comprehensive~~(1) ~~income~~it ~~along~~will ~~with~~include athe ~~total~~amount the entity agreed to pay for ~~other~~the ~~comprehensive~~arrangement ~~income,~~between them and athe ~~total~~other ~~amount~~entities ~~for~~that ~~comprehensive~~are ~~income.~~also ~~This~~obligated ~~ASU~~to ~~eliminates~~the liability and (2) any additional amount the ~~option~~entity expects to ~~present~~pay ~~the~~on ~~components~~behalf of the other ~~comprehensive~~entities. ~~income~~The asobjective ~~part~~ of this update is to provide guidance for the ~~statement~~recognition, measurement, and disclosure of ~~changes~~obligations inresulting ~~stockholders'~~from ~~equity~~joint and several liability arrangements. The amendments in this ~~ASU~~update doare ~~not~~effective ~~change~~for ~~the~~fiscal ~~items~~periods ~~that~~(and ~~must~~interim bereporting ~~reported~~periods inwithin ~~other~~those ~~comprehensive~~years) ~~income~~beginning orafter ~~when~~December an15, ~~item~~2013. ofThis ~~other~~standard ~~comprehensive~~is ~~income~~not ~~must~~expected beto ~~reclassified~~have toa ~~net~~material ~~income. The~~impact ~~amendments~~on inthe ~~this~~Company’s ~~ASU~~reported ~~should~~results beof ~~applied~~operations ~~retrospectively~~or financial position.

~~Additionally,~~In ~~the~~February 2013, FASB issued aAccounting ~~second~~standards ~~amendment~~update to2013-02, ~~ASC~~Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): inReporting ~~December~~of ~~2011,~~Amounts ~~ASU~~Reclassified Noout of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. ~~2011-12,~~This ~~which~~update ~~allows~~requires ~~companies~~an entity to provide information amount the ~~ability~~amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. The entity is also required to ~~defer~~disclose ~~certain~~significant ~~aspects~~amounts reclassified out of ~~ASU~~accumulated ~~2011-05~~other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. ~~For~~GAAP ~~public~~to ~~entities,~~be ~~these~~reclassified ~~amendments~~to net income in its entirety in the same reporting periods. For other amounts that are ~~effective~~not ~~for~~required ~~fiscal~~under ~~years~~U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, ~~and~~an ~~interim~~entity ~~periods~~is ~~within~~required to cross-reference to other discourses required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those ~~years,~~amounts. The objective in this Update is to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendments in this update should be applied prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, ~~2011~~2013. ~~The~~This ~~amendments~~standard dois not ~~require~~expected ~~any~~to ~~transition~~have ~~disclosures~~a material impact on the Company’s reported results of operations or financial position.

On September 15, 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, which simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment. This ASU will allow an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under the ASU, an entity would not be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The ASU includes a number of factors to consider in conducting the qualitative assessment. The ASU is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted.21

Going Concern Consideration

The Company is anin the exploration stage ~~company~~ and has no revenues., ~~The~~has ~~Company~~ incurred a net loss of approximately $~~898~~1,~~473~~081,699 for the year ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and a cumulative net loss of $12,~~093~~175,~~452~~151 for the period from February 22, 2007 (inception) ~~through~~to December 31, ~~2011~~2012. In addition, at December 31, 2012, there is a working capital deficit of $492,581. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

There can be no assurance that sufficient funds ~~will~~required ~~be generated~~ during the next year or thereafter will be generated from operations or ~~that funds will be~~ available from external sources such as debt or equity financings, or other potential sources. The ~~lack~~inability ofto ~~additional~~generate cash flow from operations or to raise capital ~~could~~from external sources will force the Company to substantially curtail orand cease operations ~~and would~~, therefore, have a material adverse effect on its business. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that any ~~such required~~ funds, if available, will bepossess ~~available on~~ attractive terms or ~~that they will not~~ have a significant dilutive effect on the Company'’s existing stockholders.

The Company is attempting to address its lack of liquidity by raising additional funds, ~~through~~either in the ~~issuance~~form of ~~its~~debt, equity, ~~securities.~~or some combination thereof. There can be no assurances that the Company will be able to raise the additional funds it requires.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item 7A.

2422

Item 8. Financial Statements.

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			24

Balance Sheets			25

Statements of Operations			26

Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit			27

Statements of Cash Flows			29

Notes to the Financial Statements			30

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of:

Mustang Alliances, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance ~~sheet~~sheets of Mustang Alliances, Inc. (an “exploration company”) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related statements operations, changes in stockholders’ ~~equity~~deficit and cash flows for the ~~year~~years ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~the period February 22, 2007 (Inception) to December 31,~~ 2011. ~~The financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010~~ and the period February 22, 2007 (Inception) to December 31, ~~2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on these statements dated April 13, 2011~~2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our ~~audit~~audits.

We conducted our ~~audit~~audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the ~~audit~~audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our ~~audit~~audits ~~provides~~provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly in all material respects, the financial position of Mustang Alliances, Inc. as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the ~~year~~years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the period February 22, 2007 (Inception) to December 31, 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has a net loss of $~~898~~1,~~473~~081,699, a negative cash flow from operations of $~~740~~1,~~745~~045,558 from inception, and a working capital and stockholders’ deficiency of $~~119~~492,~~097~~581 ~~and~~as ~~a stockholders' deficiency~~ of ~~$144~~December 31,~~097~~ 2012. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

~~WEBB~~Liggett, Vogt & ~~COMPANY~~Webb, P.A.

LIGGETT, VOGT & WEBB, P.A.

Certified Public Accountants

Boynton Beach, Florida

April 9, ~~2012~~2013

~~1500 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 202 i Boynton Beach, FL 33426~~24

~~Telephone:~~MUSTANG ~~(561)~~ALLIANCES, ~~752-1721~~INC. i(AN ~~Fax:~~EXPLORATION ~~(561~~STAGE COMPANY) ~~734-8562~~BALANCE SHEETS

www.cpawebb.com

	December 31,
	2012			2011
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	247		$	891
Total current assets		247			891
Property, plant, and equipment, net		-			-
Total assets	$	247		$	891

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	96,869		$	58,488
Accrued compensation-related party		290,789			61,500
Notes payable		30,000			-
Notes payable-related party		75,020			25,000
Due to shareholder		150			-
Total current liabilities		492,828			144,988
Total liabilities		492,828			144,988

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholder's deficit:
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 104,537,834 shares issued and 104,537,834 shares outstanding at December 31, 2012, and 100,217,516 shares issued and 100,217,516 shares outstanding at December 31, 2011		10,431			9,992
Additional paid in capital		1,672,139			939,363
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage		(2,175,151	)		(1,093,452	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(492,581	)		(144,097	)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	247		$	891

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

~~REPORT~~MUSTANG OFALLIANCES, ~~INDEPENDENT~~INC. ~~REGISTERED~~(AN ~~PUBLIC~~EXPLORATION ~~ACCOUNTING~~STAGE ~~FIRM~~COMPANY) STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Board of Directors and Stockholders

	For the Years Ended December 31,						For the Period February 22, 2007 (Inception) to December 31,
	2012			2011			2012

Net revenues	$	-		$	-		$	-

Operating expenses:
Professional fees		44,188			99,282			312,566
Consulting fees		763,542			523,285			1,286,827
General and administrative expenses		18,574			67,968			98,264
Impairment loss		106,000			-			106,000
Mining and exploration costs		146,456			182,561			329,017
Total operating expenses		1,078,760			873,096			2,132,674

Operating loss		(1,078,760	)		(873,096	)		(2,132,674	)

Other expenses:
Interest expense, net		(2,939	)		(5,654	)		(22,754	)
Amortization of debt discount		-			(19,723	)		(19,723	)
Total other expenses, net		(2,939	)		(25,377	)		(42,477	)

Net loss	$	(1,081,699	)	$	(898,473	)	$	(2,175,151	)

Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding		101,744,739			103,239,507

~~Mustang~~The ~~Alliances,~~accompanying ~~Inc.~~notes are an integral part of these financial statements

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Mustang Alliances, Inc. (a Development Stage Company) (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2010, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficiency and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010, and the period February 22, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. Also, an audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Mustang Alliances, Inc. at December 31, 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010, and the period February 22, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company is a development stage company, has incurred a cumulative net loss since inception, and has a working capital deficiency and stockholders' deficiency. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

WOLINETZ, LAFAZAN & COMPANY, P.C.

Rockville Centre, New York

April 13, 2011

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.. (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 22, 2007 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2012

BALANCE SHEETS

	Common Stock								Accumulated Deficit During the Exploration			Total Stockholders's
	Shares			Amount			Paid-In Capital		Stage			Deficit
Balance, February 22 2007		-		$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-

Common Stock Issued to Founders at $.0000125 Per Share, February 22, 2007		64,000,000			6,400			(5,600		-			800

Net Loss for the Period		-			-			-		(4,498	)		(4,498	)

Balance, December 31, 2007		64,000,000			6,400			(5,600		(4,498	)		(3,698	)

Common Stock Issued to Investors at $.002 Per Share, Net of Offering Costs, February 20, 2008		22,400,000			2,240			42,724		-			44,964

Common Stock Issued for Services at $.0075 Per Share, February 25, 2008		800,000			80			5,920		-			6,000

Net Loss for the Year Ended		-			-			-		(91,106	)		(91,106	)

Balance, December 31, 2008		87,200,000			8,720			43,044		(95,604	)		(43,840	)

Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 2009		-			-			-		(29,939	)		(29,939	)

Balance, December 31, 2009		87,200,000			8,720			43,044		(125,543	)		(73,779	)

Common Stock Issued for Mining Lease at $.000125 Per Share, December 15, 2010		20,000,000			2,000			500		-			2,500

Net Loss for the Year Ended		-			-			-		(69,436	)		(69,436	)

Balance, December 31, 2010		107,200,000			10,720			43,544		(194,979	)		(140,715	)

Common Stock Issued for Mining Lease at $.000125 Per Share, February 22, 2011		20,000,000			2,000			500		-			2,500

Sale of Stock and Warrants at $.25 Per Share, March 2011		60,000			6			14,994		-			15,000

Retirement of 30,000,000 Shares of Common Stock as Contributed Capital on March 31, 2011 by Chief Executive Officer		(30,000,000	)		(3,000	)		3,000		-			-

Discount on Convertible Debt		-			-			19,723		-			19,723

Sale of Stock and Warrants at $.25 Per Share, June 2011		1,280,000			128			319,872		-			320,000

Sale of Stock and Warrants at $.25 Per Share, July 2011		1,000,000			100			249,900					250,000

Stock issued for services, July 2011		340,000			34			81,966					82,000

Debt forgiveness, July 2011								97,785					97,785

	December 31,			December 31,
	2011			2010
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash	$	891		$	6,767
Total current assets		891			6,767
Other Assets:
Mining leases		-			2,500
Total other assets		-			2,500
Total Assets	$	891		$	9,267
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY(DEFICIENCY)
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	119,988		$	39,111
Notes payable		-			56,400
Loans payable		-			23,471
Due to shareholder		-			6,000
Total current liabilities		119,988			124,982
Notes payable-related party		25,000			25,000
Total Liabilities		144,988			149,982
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholder's Equity(Deficiency)
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 5,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 500,000,000 shares
authorized, 99,920,000 shares issued and 100,217,516 shares
outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 107,200,000 at December 31, 2010, respectively		9,992			10,720
Common shares issuable (297,561 and 0 shares issuable at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively)		74,000			-
Additional paid in capital		865,363			43,544
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage		(1,093,452	)		(194,979	)
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficiency)		(144,097	)		(140,715	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity(Deficiency)	$	891		$	9,267

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.. (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 22, 2007 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2012

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	Common Stock							Accumulated Deficit During the Exploration			Total Stockholders's
	Shares		Amount		Paid-In Capital			Stage			Deficit
Consulting fees forgiveness, July 2011						12,000						12,000

Stock issued for services, Oct 2011		40,000		4		8,796						8,800

Fair value of options issued during 2011						13,283						13,283

Common shares issuable (297,516 shares) to consultants, related parties during 2011		297,516				74,000						74,000

Net Loss for the Year Ended		-		-		-			(898,473	)		(898,473	)

Balance, December 31, 2011		100,217,516		9,992		939,363			(1,093,452	)		(144,097	)

Stocks issued for mining equipments, February 2012		200,000		20		105,980						106,000

Sale of Stock and Warrants at $1.00 Per Share, March, 2012		175,000		18		174,982						175,000

Exercise of stock options at $0.50 Per Share, March, 2012		30,000		3		14,997						15,000

Stocks issued for common shares issuable to consultants, related parties, March 2012		-		30		(30	)		-			-

Fair value of options issued during six months ended June 30, 2012						47,822						47,822

Common shares issuable (235,318 shares) to consultants, related parties during 2012		235,318				88,000						88,000

Sale of stocks and warrants at $0.05 per share, Aug 2012		680,000		68		33,932						34,000

Stocks issued for services, Aug 2012		3,000,000		300		209,700						210,000

In-kind contribution of interest						393						393

Consulting fees forgiveness-related party						57,000						57,000

Net Loss for the Year Ended		-		-		-			(1,081,699	)		(1,081,699	)

Balance, December 31, 2012		104,537,834	$	10,431	$	1,672,139		$	(2,175,151	)	$	(492,581	)

							For the Period
							February 22, 2007
	For the Year Ended						(Inception) to
	December 31,						December 31,
	2011			2010			2011
Net Revenues	$	-		$	-		$	-
Cost and Expenses:
Professional fees		99,282			58,395			268,378
Consulting fees		523,285			-			523,285
General and administrative expenses		67,968			4,934			79,690
Mining and exploration costs		182,561			-			182,561
Stock compensation costs					-			-
Total costs and expenses		873,096			63,329			1,053,914
Operating Loss		(873,096	)		(63,329	)		(1,053,914	)
Other (Expenses)
Interest expense		(5,654	)		(6,107	)		(19,815	)
Amortization of debt discount		(19,723	)		-			(19,723	)
Total Other (Expense)		(25,377	)		(6,107	)		(39,538	)
Loss from operations before income taxes		(898,473	)		(69,436	)		(1,093,452	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-			-
Net Loss	$	(898,473	)	$	(69,436	)	$	(1,093,452	)
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding		103,239,507			88,241,096

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

~~FOR~~MUSTANG ~~THE~~ALLIANCES, ~~PERIOD~~INC. ~~FEBRUARY~~(AN ~~22,~~EXPLORATION ~~2007~~STAGE ~~(INCEPTION~~COMPANY) TOSTATEMENTS ~~DECEMBER~~OF ~~31,~~CASH ~~2011~~FLOWS

	Preferred Stock						Common Stock						Paid-In			Common Shares		Deficit Accumulated During the Exploration
	For the Years Ended December 31,						For the Period February 22, 2007 (Inception) to December 31,
	Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount			Capital			Issuable		Stage			Total
	2012			2011			2012
Balance, February 22 2007		-		$	-			-		$	-		$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Common Stock Issued to Founders at
Net Loss	$	(1,081,699	)	$	(898,473	)	$	(2,175,151	)
$.0000125 Per Share, February 22, 2007								64,000,000			6,400			(5,600	)				-			800
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities:
Net Loss for the Period								-			-			-					(4,498	)		(4,498	)
Common stock issued for services		210,000			90,800			306,800
Balance, December 31, 2007								64,000,000			6,400			(5,600	)				(4,498	)		(3,698	)
Common stock issuable for services		88,000			74,000			162,000
Common Stock Issued to Investors at $.002 Per
Common Stock issued for mining rights		-			2,500			2,500
Share, Net of Offering Costs, February 20, 2008								22,400,000			2,240			42,724					-			44,964
Stock compensation cost		47,822			13,283			61,105
Common Stock Issued for Services at $.0075
Amortization of debt discount		-			19,723			19,723
Per Share, February 25, 2008								800,000			80			5,920					-			6,000
Impairment of mining equipments		106,000			2,500			108,500
Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 2008								-			-			-					(91,106	)		(91,106	)
In-kind contribution of interest		393			-			393
Balance, December 31, 2008								87,200,000			8,720			43,044					(95,604	)		(43,840	)
In-kind contribution of services		57,000			-			57,000
Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 2009								-			-			-					(29,939	)		(29,939	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Balance, December 31, 2009								87,200,000			8,720			43,044					(125,543	)		(73,779	)
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses		267,670			104,791			411,572
Common Stock Issued for Mining Lease at $.000125
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(304,814	)		(590,876	)		(1,045,558	)
Per Share, December 15, 2010								20,000,000			2,000			500					-			2,500
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:		-			-			-
Net Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 2010								-			-			-					(69,436	)		(69,436	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Balance, December 31, 2010								107,200,000			10,720			43,544					(194,979	)		(140,715	)
Proceeds of borrowings from non-related party		30,000			75,000			215,871
Common Stock Issued for Mining Lease at $.000125
Proceeds of borrowings from related parties		50,170			-			50,170
Per Share, February 22, 2011								20,000,000			2,000			500					-			2,500
Proceeds from sale of common stock and warrants, net		224,000			585,000			854,764
Sale of Stock and Warrants at $.25 Per Share,
Repayment of borrowings		-			(75,000	)		(75,000	)
March 2011								60,000			6			14,994					-			15,000
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		304,170			585,000			1,045,805
Retirement of 30,000,000 Shares of Common Stock
Increase (Decrease) in Cash		(644	)		(5,876	)		247
as Contributed Capital on March 31, 2011 by Chief
Cash – Beginning of Period		891			6,767			-
Executive Officer								(30,000,000	)		(3,000	)		3,000					-			-
Cash – End of Period	$	247		$	891		$	247
Fair value of beneficial conversion								-			-			19,723					-			19,723
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Sale of Stock and Warrants at $.25 Per Share,
Interest paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
June 2011								1,280,000			128			319,872					-			320,000
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
Sale of Stock and Warrants at $.25 Per Share								1,000,000.00			100.00			249,900.00								250,000
Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
July 2011
Deferred offering costs charged to additional paid-in capital	$	-		$	-		$	25,000
Stock issued for services to a related party, July 2011								340,000.00			34.00			81,966.00								82,000
Deferred offering costs recorded in accounts payable	$	-		$	-		$	7,500
Debt forgiveness by a related party, July 2011														97,784.70								97,785
Common stock issued for mining lease	$	-		$	2,500		$	5,000
Consulting fees forgiveness by a related party, July 2011														12,000.00								12,000
Debt forgiveness	$	-		$	97,785		$	97,785
Stock issued for services to a related party, Oct 2011								40,000.00			4.00			8,796.00								8,800
Consulting fees forgiveness	$			$	12,000		$	12,000
Fair value of options issued during 2011														13,283.00								13,283
Common stock issued for mining equipments	$	106,000		$	-		$	106,000
Common shares issuable(297,516 shares)								297,516									74,000.00					74,000
Common stock issued for shares issuable	$	74,000		$	-		$	74,000
to consultants, related parties during 2011
Net Loss for the Year Ended
December 31, 2011								-			-			-					(898,473	)		(898,473	)
Balance, December 31, 2011		-		$	-			100,217,516		$	9,992		$	865,363		$	74,000	$	(1,093,452	)	$	(144,097	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	For the Year Ended						For the Period February 22, 2007
	December 31,						(Inception) to
	2011			2010			December 31, 2011
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Loss	$	(898,473	)	$	(69,436	)	$	(1,093,452	)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net
Cash Used in Operating Activities:
Common Stock Issued for Services		90,800			-			96,800
Common Stock Issuable for Services		74,000						74,000
Common Stock Issued for Mining Rights		2,500			-			2,500
Stock Compensation Cost		13,283						13,283
Amortization of Debt Discount		19,723			-			19,723
Impairment of Mining Leases		2,500			-			2,500
Changes in Assets and Liabilities:
Increase in Accrued Expenses		104,791			29,858			143,901
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(590,876	)		(39,578	)		(740,745	)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:		-			-			-
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds of Borrowings		75,000			45,741			185,871
Proceeds from Sale of Common Stock
and Warrants		585,000			-			655,800
Repayment of Borrowings		(75,000	)					(75,000	)
Payments of Deferred Offering Costs		-			-			(25,000	)
Expenses of Offering		-			-			(35	)
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		585,000			45,741			741,636
Increase in Cash		(5,876	)		6,163			891
Cash – Beginning of Period		6,767			604			-
Cash – End of Period	$	891		$	6,767		$	891
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Interest Paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
Income Taxes Paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and
Financing Activities:
Deferred Offering Costs Charged to Additional
Paid-In Capital	$	-		$	-		$	25,000
Deferred Offering Costs Recorded in Accounts
Payable	$	-		$	-		$	7,500
Common Stock Issued for Mining Lease	$	2,500		$	2500		$	5,000
Debt forgiveness	$	97,785		$	-		$	97,785
Consulting fees forgiveness	$	12,000		$	-		$	12,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - Organization and Basis of Presentation

Mustang Alliances, Inc. (“the Company”) was incorporated on February 22, 2007 under the laws of the State of Nevada.

The Company has not yet generated revenues from planned principal operations and is considered aan ~~development~~exploration stage company. The Company originally intended to market and sell anti-lock braking systems produced in China to the auto parts and ~~auto~~ manufacturing market in the United States. The Company has since abandoned its business plan and ~~was~~is seeking an operating company ~~with which~~ to merge or acquire. Currently, we are no longer a blank check company as we have a specific business plan. We are an exploration- stage mining company and as a result of the execution and delivery of the lease agreements, we are now in the business of exploring mineral properties. There is no assurance, however, that the Company will achieve its objectives or goals.

The Company has undergone a change in management in November of 2010. In December 2010 the Company entered into a mining lease agreement (see Note 3). In February 2011 the Company entered into another mining lease agreement (see Note 3). There is no assurance, however, that the Company will achieve its goals or objectives in this venture.

NOTE 2 - Going Concern and Significant Accounting Policies

Going Concern

The Company is in the exploration stage and ~~had~~has no revenues, ~~and~~ has incurred a net loss of approximately $~~898~~1,~~473~~081,699 for the year ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and a cumulative net loss of $12,~~093~~175,~~452~~151 for the period from February 22, 2007 (inception) to December 31, ~~2011~~2012. In addition, at December 31, 2012, there is a working capital deficit of $492,581. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

There can be no assurance that sufficient funds required during the next year or thereafter will be generated from operations or ~~that funds will be~~ available from external sources such as debt, or equity financings, or other potential sources. The ~~lack of additional capital resulting from the~~ inability to generate cash flow from operations or to raise capital from external sources ~~would~~will force the Company to substantially curtail orand cease operations ~~and would~~, therefore, have a material adverse effect on its business. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that any ~~such required~~ funds, if available, will bepossess ~~available on~~ attractive terms or ~~that they will not~~ have a significant dilutive effect on the Company’s existing stockholders.

The Company is attempting to address its lack of liquidity by raising additional funds, either in the form of debt, or equity, or some combination thereof. There can be no assurances that the Company will be able to raise the additional funds it requires.

3130

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - Going Concern and Significant Accounting Policies – (Continued)

Going Concern – (Continued)

The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability, or classification of asset-carrying amounts, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Use of Estimates

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs, which are not considered improvements and do not extend the useful life of the asset, are expensed as incurred; additions, renewals and betterments are capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts, and any gain or loss is included in the statement of operations in other income and expenses.

Depreciation is provided to recognize the cost of the asset in the results of operations. The Company calculates depreciation using the straight-line method with estimated useful life as follows:

Item		Useful Life
Mining equipments		10 years

Loss Per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share.” As of December 31, ~~2011 and 2010~~2012, the Company has 52,~~050~~175,000 warrants and 0 options that are anti-dilutive and not included in diluted loss per share. During 2011, the Company had 1,690,000 warrants and 360,000 options that are anti-dilutive and not included in ~~diluted~~dilutive loss per share ~~respectively~~.

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - Going Concern and Significant Accounting Policies – (Continued)

Income Taxes

Business Segments

The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.

Revenue Recognition

The Company will recognize revenue on arrangements in accordance with FASB ASC ~~No.~~ 605, “Revenue Recognition”. In all cases, revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed and determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed, and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for accounts payable and notes payable – related party approximate fair value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Mining Properties (Exploration Costs)

Costs of acquiring mining properties and any exploration costs are capitalized as incurred,in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 930, Extractive Activities – Mining, when proven and probable reserves exist and the property is a commercially mineable property. Mine exploration costs incurred either to develop new gold, silver, lead and copper deposits, expand the capacity of operating mines, or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of current production are capitalized. Costs incurred to maintain current production or to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. Costs of abandoned projects are charged to operations upon abandonment. The Company evaluates, at least quarterly, the carrying value of capitalized mining costs and related property, plant and equipment costs, if any, to determine if these costs are in excess of their net realizable value and if a permanent impairment needs to be recorded. The periodic evaluation of the carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property, plant, and equipment costs are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value.

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - Going Concern and Significant Accounting Policies – (Continued)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for accounts payable and notes payable – related party approximate fair value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Mining Properties (Exploration Costs)

Costs of acquiring mining properties and any exploration costs are capitalized as incurred,in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 930, Extractive Activities – Mining, when proven and probable reserves exist and the property is a commercially mineable property. Mine exploration costs incurred either to develop new gold, silver, lead and copper deposits, expand the capacity of operating mines, or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of current production are capitalized. Costs incurred to maintain current production or to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. Costs of abandoned projects are charged to operations upon abandonment. The Company evaluates, at least quarterly, the carrying value of capitalized mining costs and related property, plant and equipment costs, if any, to determine if these costs are in excess of their net realizable value and if a permanent impairment needs to be recorded. The periodic evaluation of the carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property, plant and equipment costs are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value.

Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2004, the FASB issued ~~FASB~~ASC ~~Accounting~~Topic ~~Standards Codification No.~~ 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation~~. Under~~ ~~FASB~~(ASC ~~Accounting~~Topic ~~Standards~~718). ~~Codification~~Under ~~No.~~ASC Topic 718, companies are required to measure the compensation costs of share-based compensation arrangements based on the grant-date fair value and recognize the costs in the financial statements over the period during which employees are required to provide services. Share-based compensation arrangements include stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase plans. As such, compensation cost is measured on the date of grant at their fair value. Such compensation amounts, if any, are amortized over the respective vesting periods of the option grant. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~Equity ~~applies~~instruments ~~this~~(“instruments”) ~~statement~~issued ~~prospectively~~to other than employees are recorded on the basis of the fair value of the instruments, as required by ASC Topic 718.

~~Equity~~ASC ~~instruments~~Topic (“instruments”) issued to other than employees are recorded on the basis of the fair value of the instruments, as required by FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718. FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 505, Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees defines the measurement date and recognition period for such instruments. In general, the measurement date is when either a ~~(a)~~ performance commitment, as defined, is reached or ~~(b)~~ the earlier of ~~(i)~~ the non-employee performance is complete or ~~(ii)~~ the instruments are vested. The measured value related to the instruments is recognized over a period based on the facts and circumstances of each particular grant as defined in the FASB ~~Accounting Standards Codification~~ASC.

Fair Value Measurement

• Level 1- Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

• Level 2- Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or corroborated by observable market data or substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

• Level 3- Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the value of the assets or liabilities.

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - Going Concern and Significant Accounting Policies – (Continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

~~Additionally,~~In ~~the~~February 2013, FASB issued aAccounting ~~second~~standards ~~amendment~~update to2013-02, ~~ASC~~Comprehensive Income Topic 220): inReporting ~~December~~of ~~2011,~~Amounts ~~ASU~~Reclassified Noout of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. ~~2011-12,~~This ~~which~~update ~~allows~~requires ~~companies~~an entity to provide information amount the ~~ability~~amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. The entity is also required to ~~defer~~disclose ~~certain~~significant ~~aspects~~amounts reclassified out of ~~ASU~~accumulated ~~2011-05~~other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. ~~For~~GAAP ~~public~~to ~~entities,~~be ~~these~~reclassified ~~amendments~~to net income in its entirety in the same reporting periods. For other amounts that are ~~effective~~not ~~for~~required ~~fiscal~~under ~~years~~U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, ~~and~~an ~~interim~~entity ~~periods~~is ~~within~~required to cross-reference to other discourses required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those ~~years,~~amounts. The objective in this Update is to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendments in this update should be applied prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, ~~2011~~2013. ~~The~~This ~~amendments~~standard dois not ~~require~~expected ~~any~~to ~~transition~~have ~~disclosures~~a material impact on the Company’s reported results of operations or financial position.

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3 - Mining Leases

On December 13, 2010, the Company entered into a lease agreement to explore certain mining concessions in Honduras. The Company issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock, with a fair ~~valued~~value of $2,500 for this lease that was charged to mining exploration costs ~~in 2011~~.

On February 22, 2011, the Company entered into a second lease agreement to explore certain mining concessions in Honduras. The Company issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock, with a fair ~~valued~~value of $2,500 for this lease that was charged to mining exploration costs.

NOTE 4 - ~~Notes~~ ~~Payable~~Property toPlant ~~Related~~and ~~Parties:~~Equipment

~~Convertible~~On ~~Debt~~February 3, 2012, the Company entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Clavo Rico, Ltd., a related party, a Turks and Caicos company (“Seller”) for the purchase of certain mining equipment from the Seller's wholly-owned subsidiary, Compania Minera Cerros del Sur, S.A., a Honduran company (“Cerros”). The Company is a party to a lease agreement with Cerros for certain exclusive mining and development rights and a ground lease in Honduras.

~~The~~As ~~Company~~consideration ~~has issued~~ for ~~aggregate~~the ~~consideration of $25~~equipment,~~000~~ athe ~~convertible~~Company ~~note~~exchanged ~~to a related party~~200, a000 ~~stockholder~~shares of ~~the~~common ~~Company. This~~stock ~~note~~to ~~bears~~the ~~interest~~Seller atwith ~~the~~a ~~imputed~~fair ~~IRS~~value ~~rate~~ of ~~.0054% per annum and was due September 28~~$106,000 ~~2011. The~~based ~~note~~on ~~is convertible into common stock of~~ the ~~Company~~value ~~at the rate~~ of $equipment.25 ~~per~~The ~~share. In~~Company ~~addition,~~also ~~upon~~agreed ~~conversion~~ to ~~common~~be ~~stock~~responsible ~~at maturity date~~for, ~~the~~among ~~Company~~other ~~will issue a 2-year warrant to purchase 100~~things,~~000~~ ~~shares of~~ the ~~Company's~~cost ~~common stock at an exercise price~~ of ~~$.50~~freight, ~~per~~insurance, ~~share. The~~packing ~~Company~~and ~~has~~transportation, ~~recorded~~and ~~a beneficial conversion in~~ the ~~amount~~risk of ~~$19,723~~loss toin ~~reflect~~shipping ~~the fair value~~ of the ~~convertible~~purchased ~~debt~~equipment. ~~and~~The aequipment ~~corresponding~~has ~~increase~~not tobeen ~~additional~~placed ~~paid-~~in ~~capital. As~~service as of December 31, ~~2011,~~2012 and the ~~convertible~~Company ~~note~~recorded ~~was~~an ~~repaid~~impairment inloss ~~full~~of $106,000.

NOTE 5 - Notes Payable

On ~~June~~July 1525, 2011, ~~the~~repayment ~~loans~~for ~~payable~~$25,000 towas ~~First~~made ~~Line~~for ~~Capital~~the ~~which~~$50,000 isnote due to Landolt, a company owned by a ~~previous~~director ~~related~~of ~~party,~~the ~~including~~Company. ~~accrued~~At ~~interest~~which intime the ~~amount~~note ofwas ~~$97,785~~assigned ~~was~~to ~~forgiven~~MeM Mining, Inc. ~~The~~MeM ~~Company~~is ~~has~~controlled ~~recorded~~by, Mendel Mochkin, a director of the ~~carrying~~company. ~~amount~~As of ~~debt~~December 31, 2012 and 2011, the principle balance due was $25,000, is unsecured and is due January 2013 with accrued interest asat an5%. ~~increase~~The Company does not expect to ~~additional~~be ~~paid-in~~able ~~capital~~to repay the loan on the maturity date, and will continue accrue the interest.

On ~~July~~March 2528, ~~2011,~~2012 ~~repayment~~the ~~for~~Company received $2530,000 ~~was~~from ~~made~~First ~~for~~Line ~~the $50~~Capital,~~000~~ ~~note~~in ~~due~~exchange tofor ~~Landolt.~~an Atunsecured ~~which time the~~ note ~~was~~bearing ~~assigned~~interest toat ~~MeM Mining, Inc~~8%. ~~MeM~~ ~~is controlled by, Mendel Mochkin, a director of the company.~~ As of December 31, ~~2011~~2012, the ~~Principle~~principal ~~balance~~ due was $2530,000, is unsecured and is due ~~January~~in ~~2013~~full ~~with~~plus accrued interest aton 5%March 28, 2013.

During 2012, the Company received a total of $50,020 from Leonard Sternheim, CEO of the Company, as an unsecured non-interest bearing loan. As of December 31, 2012, the principal due was $50,020, is unsecured and is due on demand. The Company recorded $393 of imputed interest related to Mr. Sternheim’s loan payable as in-kind contribution.

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 56 - Common Stock

In February 2007, the Company issued 64,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.0000125 per share to the Founders of the Company for $800.

In February 2008, the Company sold 22,400,000 shares of common stock at $0.002 per share pursuant to its public offering. The Company received net proceeds of $44,964.

In February 2008, the Company issued 800,000 shares of common stock with the fair value of $0.0075 per share for services rendered. The Company recorded stock based compensation expense of $6,000 in connection with this issuance.

On December 15, 2010, the Company notified ~~the~~ FINRA of its intention to implement a 1 for 8 share dividend or forward stock split of its issued and outstanding common stock to the holders of record as of December 27, 2010 (the “Shareholders”). The forward stock split became effective as of the start of business on January 3, 2011. All share and per share data have been retroactively restated to reflect this recapitalization.

On December 13, 2010, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock as payment for certain mining leases in Honduras at a fair value of $2,500.

On February 22, 2011, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock as payment for certain additional mining leases in Honduras at a fair value of $2,500.

On March 28, 2011, the Company sold 60,000 units consisting of 60,000 shares of common stock and 30,000 warrants for $15,000. The warrants are exercisable at $0.50 per share and have a two year term.

On March 31, 2011, the Company's CEO retired 30,000,000 shares of his common stock of the Company as additional paid-in capital.

On April 12, 2011, the Company sold 1,000,000 units consisting of 1,000,000 shares of common stock and 500,000 warrants for cash of $250,000. The warrants are exercisable at $0.50 per share and have a two year term.

On April 20, 2011, the Company sold 100,000 units consisting of 100,000 shares of common stock and 50,000 warrants for cash of $25,000. The warrants are exercisable at $0.50 per share and have a two year term.

On April 21, 2011, the Company sold 100,000 units consisting of 100,000 shares of common stock and 50,000 warrants for cash of $25,000. The warrants are exercisable at $0.50 per share and have a two year term.

On May 6, 2011, the Company sold 60,000 units consisting of 60,000 shares of common stock and 30,000 warrants for cash of $15,000. The warrants are exercisable at $0.50 per share and have a two year term.

On May 11, 2011, the Company sold 20,000 units consisting of 20,000 shares of common stock and 10,000 warrants for cash of $5,000. The warrants are exercisable at $0.50 per share and have a two year term.

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 56 - Common Stock - Continued

On July 19, 2011, the Company issued 40,000 units to Mark Holcombe, a director of the Company in consideration of consisting of 40,000 shares of common stock and 20,000 warrants with a fair value of $1,583. Each warrant allows Mr. Holcombe to purchase one additional share of common stock at a price of $0.50 per share for two years. The shares were valued at $10,000 ($0.25 per share), the fair value on the date of grant.

On July 21, 2011, the Company issued 100,000 shares to Lawrence H. Wolfe, our Chief Financial Officer, in consideration for the execution and delivery of a consulting agreement with Mr. Wolfe. The shares were valued at $24,000 ($0.24 per share), the fair value on the date of grant.

On July 21, 2011, the Company issued 100,000 shares to Zegal and Ross Capital LLC in consideration for the execution and delivery of a consulting agreement. The shares were valued at $24,000 ($0.24 per share), the fair value on the date of grant.

On July 25, 2011, the Company issued 100,000 shares to Mendel Mochkin, a director, in consideration for the execution and delivery of a consulting agreement ~~with~~that ~~such person which~~ replaced ~~in its entirety~~ Mr. Mochkin's employment agreement entirely. Mr. Mochkin is an accredited investor. The issuance was conducted in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The shares were valued at $24,000 ($0.24 per share), the fair value on the date of grant.

On July 27, 2011, the Company sold 1,000,000 units in consideration of $250,000 consisting of 1,000,000 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 warrants. Each warrant allows for the purchase one additional share of common stock at a price of $0.50 per share for two years.

OnDuring ~~October 24,~~ 2011, wethe ~~issued~~principal ~~20,000~~stockholder ~~shares~~forgave toconsulting ~~Ben~~fees ~~Lafazan~~of ~~and 20~~$12,000 ~~shares to Barry Wolinetz as partial settlement for services rendered~~. The ~~shares~~amount ~~were~~was ~~valued~~recorded atas ~~$.22~~an ~~per~~in-kind ~~share, the fair value on the date of grant~~contribution.

AtOn ~~December~~October 3124, 2011, the Company ~~has~~issued ~~297~~20,~~516~~000 shares ~~issuable~~ to ~~officers~~Ben Lafazan and ~~directors~~20,000 ~~with~~shares ato ~~fair~~Barry ~~value~~Wolinetz ofas ~~$74,000~~partial insettlement ~~connection~~for ~~with~~services ~~certain consulting agreements~~rendered. ~~These~~ The shares were valued at $0.22 per share, the fair value on the date of grant. ~~(See note 8).~~

At December 31, 2011, the Company has 297,516 shares issuable to officers and directors with a fair value of $74,000 in connection with certain consulting agreements. These shares were valued at the fair value on the date of grant. These shares were issued to officers and directors during March, 2012.

On February 3, 2012, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock as payment for certain mining equipments in Honduras at a fair value of $106,000 based on the value of the equipment.

In February 2012, the company issued 175,000 units and raised an aggregate of $175,000 from one investor under a Regulation S Subscription Agreement. Under this agreement, the Company is offering for sale up to $500,000 of shares and warrants at a purchase price of $1.00 per share. For each dollar invested, the investor will receive one share of common stock and one warrant. Each warrant entitles the investor to purchase one share of common stock for $1.50 per share. The warrants expire on the third anniversary date its issuance.

On March 1, 2012, an investor exercised his right to purchase 30,000 shares for $0.50 per share. The Company received proceeds of $15,000.

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 56 - Common Stock - Continued

~~Warrants~~In August 2012, the Company raised an aggregate of $34,000 from one investor under a Regulation S Subscription Agreement in exchange for 680,000 shares of common stock at $0.05 per share and 340,000 warrants exercisable at $0.20 per share. The warrants expire on the fifth anniversary date of its issuance.

~~During~~On ~~2011~~August 28, 2012, the Company issued 13,~~690~~000,000 ~~warrants~~shares ~~in connection with a private placement offering. The warrants have a term~~ of ~~two~~common ~~years~~stock ~~from~~to ~~the~~three ~~date~~consultants ofin ~~the~~consideration ~~subscription~~for ~~agreement~~services ~~and~~previously ~~allow~~provided. ~~investors~~The toshares ~~purchase~~were ~~one~~valued ~~share~~at ~~of common stock for~~ $0.~~50. At~~07 ~~December~~per 31share, ~~2011~~the ~~all~~fair ~~warrants~~value ~~have~~on athe ~~remaining~~date ~~contractual~~of ~~life~~grant of ~~approximately 1~~$210,000.~~5 years.~~

~~Information~~At ~~with~~December ~~respect~~31, to2012, ~~warrants~~the ~~outstanding~~Company has 235,318 shares issuable to officers and ~~exercisable~~directors atwith ~~December~~a 31fair value of $88,000 ~~2011~~in isconnection aswith ~~follows:~~certain consulting agreements. These shares were valued at the fair value on the date of grant.

Year Ended, December 31, 2011:
	Number Outstanding		Range of Exercise Price		Number Exercisable
Warrants outstanding, January 1, 2011		-		-		-
Issued		1,690,000	$	0.50		1,690,000
Exercised		-		-		-
Expired		-		--		-
Warrants outstanding, December 31, 2011		1,690,000	$	0.50		1,690,000

During 2012, an officer forgave consulting fees of $57,000. The amount was recorded as an in-kind contribution

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 56 - Common Stock - Continued

~~Options~~Warrants

During ~~July~~ 2011, the Company ~~granted~~issued ~~360~~1,690,000 ~~stock~~warrants ~~options~~in toconnection ~~consultants~~with ~~for services to be rendered over~~ a ~~two-year~~private ~~period~~placement offering. The ~~options~~warrants ~~are~~have ~~exercisable~~a atterm ~~$0.50 per share, half~~ of ~~the~~two ~~option~~years ~~shall~~from ~~vest on January 1 and half on June 1 following~~ the ~~grant~~ date. ~~These options had a fair value~~ of ~~$13,283 using~~ the ~~Black-Scholes~~subscription ~~option-pricing~~agreement ~~model.~~and ~~The~~allow ~~grant~~investors ~~date~~to ~~fair~~purchase ~~values~~one share of ~~the~~common ~~Company’s~~stock ~~option~~for ~~awards~~$0.50. ~~during~~At ~~the years ended~~ December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, ~~were~~all ~~estimated~~warrants ~~using~~have ~~the~~a ~~Black~~remaining ~~Scholes~~contractual ~~option~~life ~~pricing~~of ~~model~~approximately ~~with~~0.5 ~~the~~year ~~following~~and ~~assumptions:~~1.5 years, respectively.

	For the year ended			For the year ended
	December 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
Expected life (years)		2			-
Risk – free interest rate		0.40	%		-
Expected volatility		178	%		-
Dividend Yield		0.00	%		-

In February 2012, the company issued 175,000 warrants in connection with a private placement offering. The warrants have a term of three years from the date of the subscription agreement and allow investors to purchase one share of common stock for $1.50 per share. At December 31, 2012, all warrants have a remaining contractual life of approximately 2.23 years.

~~The~~In ~~Company~~August ~~has~~2012, ~~Consultancy~~the ~~agreements~~company ~~that~~issued ~~contain~~340,000 ~~provisions~~warrants ~~for~~in ~~the~~connection ~~issuance~~with ~~and~~a ~~granting~~private ofplacement ~~options~~offering. ~~aggregating~~The ~~3,000,000~~warrants ~~shares~~have ata ~~$.50~~term ~~per~~of ~~share that~~five ~~are~~years ~~predicated~~from onthe date of the ~~Company~~subscription ~~reaching~~agreement ~~certain~~and ~~milestones~~allow ininvestors ~~the~~to ~~production~~purchase ofone ~~gold. None~~share of ~~the~~common ~~milestones~~stock ~~have~~for ~~been~~$0.20 ~~met~~per ~~and~~share. ~~accordingly~~At ~~such~~December ~~options~~31, 2012, all warrants have ~~not~~a ~~been~~remaining ~~granted~~contractual orlife ~~issued~~of approximately 4.66 years.

	Number of Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Balance at December 31, 2010
Granted		360,000	$	0.50
Exercised		-		-
Forfeited		-		-
Balance at December 31, 2011		360,000	$	0.50
Options exercisable at December 31, 2011		-		-
Weighted average fair value of options granted during 2011			$	61,104.00

Information with respect to warrants outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2012 is as follows:

	Number Outstanding		Range of Exercise Price		Number Exercisable

Warrants outstanding, December 31, 2011		1,690,000	$	0.50		1,690,000
Issued		515,000	$	0.20-1.50
Exercised		(30,000)	$	0.50
Forfeited		-		-		-
Warrants outstanding, December 31, 2012		2,175,000	$	0.20-1.50		2,175,000

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 56 - Common Stock - Continued

Options ~~- Continued~~

OfDuring July 2011, the ~~total~~Company granted 360,000 stock options ~~granted~~to ~~during~~consultants ~~2011~~for services to be rendered over a two-year period. The options are exercisable at $0.50 per share, ~~none~~half of ~~them~~the isoption ~~vested,~~shall ~~exercisable~~vest on January 1 and ~~non~~half on June 1 following the grant date. These options had a fair value of $13,283 using the Black-~~forfeitable~~Scholes option-pricing model. The grant date fair values of the Company’s option awards during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were estimated at $47,822 and $13,283 using the Black Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

The following table summarizes information about stock options for the Company as of December 31, 2011:

	For the Year ended December 31, 2012		For the Year ended December 31, 2011
Expected life (years)		-		2
Risk – free interest rate		-		0.40	%
Expected volatility		-		178	%
Dividend Yield		-		0.00	%

2011 Options Outstanding								2011 Options Exercisable
		Number Outstanding at 31-Dec-11		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Exercisable at 31-Dec-11
$	0.50		360,000		1.42	$	0.50		0	$	0.50

The Company has Consultancy agreements that contain provisions for the issuance and granting of options aggregating 3,000,000 shares at $0.50 per share that are predicated on the Company reaching certain milestones in the production of gold. None of the milestones have been met and accordingly such options have not been granted or issued.

~~NOTE~~During 6the ~~- Preferred~~third ~~Stock~~quarter of 2012, all the consultancy agreements noted above were terminated. As a result, the 360,000 stock options and 3,000,000 grant options were forfeited.

The Company has 5,000,000 preferred shares authorized that the Company’s Board of Directors may, without further action by the Company’s stockholders, from time to time, direct the issuance of any authorized but unissued or unreserved shares of preferred stock in series and at the time of issuance, determine the rights, preferences and limitations of each series. The holders of preferred stock may be entitled to receive a preference payment in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company before any payment is made to the holders of the common stock. Furthermore, the board of directors could issue preferred stock with voting and other rights that could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of the common stock.

	Number of Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Balance at December 31, 2011		360,000		$	0.50
Granted		-			-
Exercised		-			-
Forfeited		(360,000	)		0.50
Balance at December 31, 2012		-			-
Options exercisable at December 31, 2012		-		$	0.50

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 7 - ~~Income~~ ~~Taxes~~Preferred Stock

The Company has 5,000,000 preferred shares authorized that the Company’s Board of Directors may, without further action by the Company’s stockholders, direct the issuance of any authorized but unissued or unreserved shares of preferred stock in series and at the time of issuance, determine the rights, preferences and limitations of each series. The holders of preferred stock may be entitled to receive a preference payment in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company before any payment is made to the holders of the common stock. Furthermore, the Board of Directors could issue preferred stock with voting and other rights that could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of the common stock.

NOTE 8 - Income Taxes

The net deferred tax liability in the accompanying balance sheets includes the following amounts of deferred tax assets and liabilities:

	December 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
	December 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
Deferred tax Liability	$	-		$	-
Deferred tax liability	$	-		$	-
Deferred tax asset
Accrued salary		20107,~~910~~368			20,910
Net operation losss Carry forward		296,707			66,000
Net operation loss carry forward		405,002			296,707
Valuation allowance		(~~317~~512,~~617~~370	)		(66317,~~000~~617	)
Net deferred tax asset		-			-
Net deferred tax liability		-			-
	$	-		$	-

The valuation allowance was established to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that will more likely than not be realized. This is necessary due to the Company’s continued operating losses and the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to utilize all of the net operating loss carryforwards before they will expire through the year ~~2031~~2032.

As of December 31, ~~2011~~2012, the Company has a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $~~872~~1,~~669~~191,183 available to offset future taxable income through December 31, ~~2031~~2032. The valuation allowance was established to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that will more likely than not be realized. This is necessary due to the Company’s continued operating losses and the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to utilize all of the net operating loss carryforwards before they will expire through the year ~~2031~~2032.

The net change in valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was an increase of $251,000 and $23,000, respectively.

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 78 - Income Taxes- Continued

The net change in valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was an increase of $194,753 and $251,000, respectively.

The components of income tax expense related to continuing operations are as follows:

	December 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
	December 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Federal
Current	$	-	$	-
Deferred		-		-
		-		-
State and Local
Current	$	-	$	-
Deferred		-		-
		-		-

The Company’s income tax expense differed from the statutory rates (federal 34% and state 0%) as follows:

	December 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
	December 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
Statutory rate applied to earnings before income taxes	$	(~~305~~367,~~480~~777	)	$	(23305,~~000~~480	)
Increase(decrease) in income taxes resulting from:
Increase in income taxes resulting from:
State income taxes		-			-
Non-deductible expenses		173,024			53,863
Change in deferred tax asset valuation allowance		~~251~~194,~~617~~753			23251,~~000~~617
Non-deductible expenses		53,863			-
Income Tax expense	$	-		$	-

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 89 - Commitment and Contingencies

Lease ~~Commitment~~Commitments

On December 13, 2010, the Company entered into a Lease Agreement (the "Lease Agreement") with Compania Minera Cerros Del Sur, S.A., a corporation organized under the laws of Honduras (“Cerros”) and Mayan Gold, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Mayan Gold”) pursuant to which Cerros, the registered owner of the Corpus I, II, III and IV mining concessions and the Potosi concession, leased usthe Company the exclusive right to prospect, explore and mine for minerals in Corpus IV. The Lease Agreement continues until the Honduras government grants Cerros the right to assign the Corpus IV mining concession to the Company, at which time Cerros will transfer title to the mining concession to the Company. In consideration for such rights, we issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock to Mayan Gold, the beneficial owner of a 100% interest in Corpus IV. The shares issued by the Company to Mayan Gold represent approximately 18.66% of the then issued and outstanding shares of the Company. As further consideration for the right granted, we agreed to pay Cerros an annual sum of $1,500 no later than April 1st of each year, beginning April 1, 2011.

Cerros also granted the Company an option to acquire the exclusive rights to properties known as Corpus I, II, and III mining concessions and the Potosi concession. If we desire to exercise such option, the Company must send written notice to Cerros and Mayan Gold on or before December 31, 2010. The consideration for the exercise of the option is an additional 20,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued to Mayan Gold no later than 30 days after the date we receive all the requested documentation from Cerros in connection with the exercise of the option.

On February 22, 2011, Company entered into a Lease Agreement (the "Lease Agreement") with Cerros and Mayan Gold pursuant to which the Company exercised its option to acquire the exclusive rights to properties known as Corpus I, II, and III mining concessions and the Potosi concession and the Potosi ground lease (collectively, referred to herein as the “Property”), with the subsequent right to participate in the development of minerals from the remaining mining concessions.

The Lease Agreement continues until the Honduras government grants Cerros the right to assign the Property to the Company, at which time Cerros will transfer title to the mining concession to us. In consideration for such right, we issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock to Mayan Gold, the beneficial owner of a 100% interest in Property. The shares issued by the Company to Mayan Gold represent an additional interest of 15.72% of the then issued and outstanding shares of the Company. As further consideration for the rights granted, we agreed to pay Cerros an annual sum of $3,200 no later than April 1st of each year with the first payment due on April 1, 2011.

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 89 - Commitment and Contingencies - Continued

Employment Agreements

On March 22, 2011, the Company entered into a two year employment agreement with Mendel Mochkin, pursuant to which he will be employed on a part time basis. Mr. Mochkin shall work at least one hundred (100) hours per month on behalf of the Company as the Company's Vice President. Pursuant to the agreement, his compensation will be $120,000 annually, which shall accrue from the date of the agreement and to be paid at such time when the Company has adequate capital. On July 25, 2011, the Company entered into a Consultancy Agreement, which replaced in its entirety the Employment Agreement between the Company and Mendel Mochkin dated March 22, 2011. (See ~~Note~~note 810).

On March 22, 2011, the Company entered into a two year employment agreement with Leonard Sternheim, pursuant to which he will be employed on a part time basis. Mr. Sternheim shall work at least one hundred fifty (150) hours per month on behalf of the Company as its Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to the agreement, his compensation will be $120,000 annually, which shall accrue from the date of the agreement and to be paid at such time when the Company has adequate capital. In July, 2011 this agreement was nullified. Mr. Sternheim is currently acting in a consultancy capacity as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. (See Note 810).

~~NOTE 9 – Related Parties~~Litigation:

In July of 2012, the Company was named as a defendant in a lawsuit titled George Sharp vs. Mustang Alliances, Inc. et al. The lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, in San Diego County. The lawsuit alleges violations of California restrictions on unsolicited commercial e-mail advertisers and seeks damages and punitive dames in an unspecified amount. The Company intends to vigorously defend this lawsuit. As of December 31, 2012, the Company has not accrued any amounts related to this lawsuit

NOTE 10 – Related Parties

Consulting Agreements

On July 21, 2011, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Lawrence H. Wolfe, pursuant to which he will work as Chief Financial Officer. Pursuant to the agreement, 100,000 shares were issued as a signing bonus for the execution and delivery of the agreement with a fair value of $24,000 (See note 56). His compensation will be $150,000 for the first 12 months, payable 60% in cash and 40% in stock. The cash portion shall be paid monthly, and the shares shall be valued based on the stock price of the last day of the preceding month and will be issued on January 1st and June 1st. On each anniversary, an option to purchase 120,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share is granted, half of ~~Option~~the option shall vest on January 1 and half on June 1 following such grant date. As a one-time bonus, the options to purchase 250,000 shares at $0.50 per share upon production of 12,000 and 24,000 ounces of gold, respectively, and an option to purchase 500,000 shares at $0.50 per share upon production of 48,000 ounces of gold. The consulting agreement has been amended to include a $0.25 ~~(cents)~~ per share price floor on the valuation of the common stock. On August 31, 2012, Mr. Lawrence H. Wolfe resigned from his position as a Chief Financial Officer. As a result of Mr. Wolfe's resignation, the Consultancy Agreement dated July 25, 2011 was terminated in its entirety. For the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, Mr. Wolfe has earned an aggregate of 139,376 shares and 122,120 shares pursuant to his consulting agreement with a fair value of $40,000 and $30,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, accrued consulting fees of $71,500 and $17,500 were including in accrued compensation- related party, respectively.

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 910 – Related Parties – Continued

On July 25, 2011, the Company entered into a Consultancy Agreement with Mendel Mochkin, which replaced in its entirety the Employment Agreement dated March 22, 2011 (See note 79). Pursuant to the agreement, his compensation will be $120,000 for the first 12 months, payable 60% in cash and 40% in stock. The cash portion shall be paid monthly, and the shares shall be valued based on the stock price of the last day of the preceding month and will be issued on January 1st and June 1st. On each anniversary, an option to purchase 120,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of 0.50 per share is granted, half of option shall vest on January 1 and half on June 1 following such grant date. As a one-time bonus, the options to purchase 250,000 shares at $0.50 per share upon production of 12,000 and 24,000 ounces of gold, respectively, and an option to purchase 500,000 shares at $0.50 per share upon production of 48,000 ounces of gold. The consulting agreement has been amended to include a $0.25 ~~(cents)~~ per share price floor on the valuation of the common stock. For the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, Mr. Mendel has been paid $44,221 and $89,935, respectively and an aggregate of 47,971 and 97,698 shares pursuant to his consulting agreement with a fair value of $24,000, respectively. On August 23, 2012, Mr. Mendel Mochkin resigned from his position as a director of the Board of Directors. As a result of Mr. Mochkin's resignation, the Consultancy Agreement dated July 25, 2011 was terminated in its entirety. The Company has agreed to indemnify Mr. Mochkin in connection with the lawsuit by George Sharp vs. Mustang Alliances, Inc. et al filed in the Superior court of the State of California, in San Diego County. As of December 31, 2012, the Company has not accrued any amounts related to this indemnification. As of December 31, 2012, total consulting fees of $57,000 owed by Company was forgiven and recorded in additional paid in capital. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, accrued consulting fees of $0 and $7,000 were including in accrued compensation- related party, respectively.

On July 21, 2011, the Company entered into a Consultancy Agreement with Zegal and Ross Capital LLC. Pursuant to the agreement, 100,000 shares was issued as a signing bonus for the execution and delivery of the agreement with a fair value of $24,000 (See note 5). The compensation will be $120,000 for the first 12 months, payable 60% in cash and 40% in stock. The cash portion shall be paid monthly, and the shares shall be valued based on the stock price of the last day of the preceding month and will be issued on January 1st and June 1st. On each anniversary, an option to purchase 120,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share is granted, half of option shall vest on January 1st and half on June 1st following such grant date. As a one-time bonus, the options to purchase 250,000 shares at $0.50 per share upon production of 12,000 and 24,000 ounces of gold, respectively, and an option to purchase 500,000 shares at $0.50 per share upon production of 48,000 ounces of gold. The consulting agreement has been amended to include a $0.25 ~~(cents)~~ per share price floor on the valuation of the common stock. On July 1, 2012, the Consultancy Agreement dated July 25, 2011 was terminated in its entirety. For the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, Zegal and Ross has earned an aggregate of 47,971 and 42,849 shares pursuant to the consulting agreement with a fair value of $24,000 and $20,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, accrued consulting fees of $48,000 and $12,000 were including in accrued compensation- related party, respectively.

Mr. Sternheim is currently on a month-to-month arrangement ~~with~~at ~~the~~a ~~company~~rate of $20,000 a month. As of December 31, 2012 and ~~has~~2011, ~~been~~the company has paid $~~179~~93,711 and $154,943, ~~for~~and ~~the~~accrued ~~year~~compensation ~~ended~~fees ~~December~~of 31$171,289 ~~2011~~and $25,000 were recorded in accrued compensation- related party, respectively.

MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1011 - – Subsequent Events

InOn February ~~and~~15, ~~March~~2013, ~~2012~~ the ~~company~~Company ~~raised~~issued ana ~~aggregate~~12% ofpromissory ~~$175~~note,~~000~~ ~~from~~due ~~one~~in ~~investor~~sixty ~~under~~days afor ~~Regulation S Subscription Agreement~~$45,000. ~~Under~~ ~~this agreement~~Additionally, the ~~Company~~note isholder ~~offering~~will ~~for~~be ~~sale~~issued ~~up to $~~2,500,000 of shares ~~and warrants at a purchase price~~ of ~~$1.00 per share. For each dollar invested, the investor will receive one share of~~ common stock. ~~and~~The ~~one~~note ~~warrant. Each~~holder ~~warrant~~has ~~entitles~~ the ~~investor~~right to ~~purchase~~convert ~~one~~at ~~share~~any oftime, ~~common~~the ~~stock~~unpaid principal for $1.5001 per share. The ~~warrants~~Note ~~expire~~Holder onis ~~the~~an ~~third~~existing ~~anniversary~~shareholder ~~date~~of ~~its~~the ~~issuance~~company.

On February 328, ~~2012,~~2013 the Company ~~entered~~issued ~~into~~two a12% ~~Purchase~~promissory ~~and~~notes ~~Sale~~for ~~Agreement~~$100,000 ~~with Clavo Rico~~each, ~~Ltd.~~due ain ~~related~~sixty ~~party~~days, ato ~~Turks~~two ~~and~~independent ~~Caicos~~third ~~company~~parties. ~~(“Seller”)~~Each ~~for~~of the ~~purchase~~note ofholders ~~certain~~has ~~mining equipment from~~ the ~~Seller's~~right ~~wholly-owned~~to ~~subsidiary~~convert, ~~Compania~~at ~~Minera~~any ~~Cerros del Sur~~time, ~~S.A.,~~the aunpaid ~~Honduran~~principal ~~company~~balance ~~(“Cerros”). The Company is a party to a lease agreement with Cerros~~ for ~~certain~~$.01 ~~exclusive~~per ~~mining and development rights and a ground lease in Honduras~~share.

As consideration for the equipment, the Company exchanged 200,000 shares of common stock to the Seller with a fair value of $26,600. The Company also agreed to be responsible for, among other things, the cost of freight, insurance, packing and transportation, and the risk of loss in shipping of the purchased equipment.

On February 28th, 2012, an investor exercised his right to purchase 30,000 shares for $.50 per share. The Company received proceeds of $15,000.

On March 5, 2012, the Company was assigned the remaining lease rights under the December 2, 2010 and February 22, 2011 lease Agreements for the Bonanza property.

On March 27, 2012 the Company received $30,000 from First Line Capital, in exchange for a Note bearing interest at 8%. The principal and interest is payable in full on March 28, 2013.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

The Company has had no disagreements with its certified public accountants with respect to accounting practices or procedures or financial disclosure.

On October 24, 2011, Mustang Alliances, Inc. (the “Registrant”) dismissed its principal independent accountants by notifying Wolinetz, Lafazan & Company, CPA's, P.C. (“Wolinetz Lafazan”) that it was terminating Wolinetz Lafazan as the Registrant’s independent registered public accounting firm. On said date, the Registrant retained Webb & Company, P.A. (“Webb”) as its principal independent accountants. The decision to terminate the services of Wolinetz Lafazan and retain Webb as the principal independent accountants was approved by the Registrant’s Board of Directors.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, ~~including~~who is also our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective at such time to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act were recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer also concluded that our disclosure controls, which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, was inappropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Additionally, based on management’s assessment, the Company determined that there were material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012.

47Therefore, our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2012 based on the material weaknesses described below:

Therefore, our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2011 based on the material weaknesses described below:

• we lacked proper procedures in place to track and record expenses;

• we lacked competent financial management personnel with appropriate accounting knowledge and training ~~prior to the engagement of our current Chief Financial Officer;~~

• we relied on an outside consultant to prepare our financial statements;

• lack of segregation of duties at the Company due to the principal executive officer dealing with general administrative and financial matters; and

• we have insufficient controls over our period-end financial close and reporting processes.

As a result of ~~these~~this material ~~weaknesses~~weakness, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, ~~2011~~2012. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness; yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the company’s financial reporting.

Because of its inherent limitations, however, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

In order to mitigate the foregoing material weakness, we engaged a CFO who has significant experience in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP and an outside accounting consultant to assist us in the preparation of our financial statements to ensure that these financial statements are prepared in conformity to U.S. GAAP. We believe that these engagements will mitigate the possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will be prevented or detected on a timely basis, and we will continue to monitor the effectiveness of this action and make any changes that our management deems appropriate. We believe that the foregoing steps will remediate the significant deficiencies identified above, and we will continue to monitor the effectiveness of these steps and make any changes that our management deems appropriate.47

As of August 31, 2012, Lawrence Wolfe resigned as the Chief Financial Officer and a director of the Company. Leonard Sternheim, our chief executive officer, has assumed the role of interim principal accounting officer and is utilizing the services of an independent accounting consultant to continue to mitigate the foregoing material weakness, to assist us in the preparation of our financial statements to ensure that these financial statements are prepared in conformity to U.S. GAAP. Management believes that this will lessen the possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will be prevented or detected on a timely basis, and we will continue to monitor the effectiveness of this action and make any changes that our management deems appropriate.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

~~During~~There ~~the~~were ~~year~~no ~~ended~~changes ~~December~~in ~~31,~~the ~~2011,~~Company’s ~~management~~internal ~~made~~control ~~the~~over ~~changes~~financial inreporting ~~their~~that ~~system~~occurred ofduring ~~internal~~the ~~control~~Company’s ~~over~~last ~~financial~~fiscal ~~reporting~~year asthat ~~described~~has ~~above~~materially affected, ~~management~~or ~~believes~~is ~~these~~reasonably ~~changes~~likely ~~will~~to ~~mitigate~~materially affect, the ~~concerns~~Company’s internal control over financial reporting ~~that has been previously identified~~.

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's report in this Annual Report.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our directors and executive officers:

Name	Age	Positions and Offices Held
Leonard Sternheim	3435	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and a director
Robert T. Faber	5354	President and a director
Mendel Mochkin	38	Vice President and a director
Lawrence H. Wolfe	49	Chief Financial Officer and a director

Leonard Sternheim has served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, a director of the Company, and President from November 29, 2010 to February 1, 2012. Since December 2007, Leonard Sternheim has been acting as a self-employed strategic consultant to various companies in the mining and oil and gas resource sector. Mr. Sternheim was CEO and President of Delek Resources, Inc., an oil exploration public company, from 2003 until November 2007. From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Sternheim was a consultant to the Stratos Group, a New York consulting business that assists emerging companies involved in mining and oil and gas with strategic planning. Based on Mr. Sternheim's prior experience management believes that he is qualified to serve as a director of the company.

Robert T. Faber has served as a director of the Company since July 22, 2011 and as President since February 1, 2012. Mr. Faber has served as a director of Comstock Mining Inc. (“Comstock”), since 2008. Mr. Faber joined Comstock in 2003 and has held several executive positions including President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Faber has more than 20 years of diverse, senior financial and operational management, business and acquisition experience, including 10 years of international experience. Mr. Faber previously served as Vice President of United Site Services, Inc., a privately held consolidator in the waste service industry. Additionally, Mr. Faber served as an executive with Allied Waste Industries, a company from overseeing a $1.2 billion, multi-state area. Prior to Allied, Mr. Faber spent 17 years with Waste Management, Inc., a publicly traded environmental services company, during which time he served in senior positions both internationally and domestically, including as Director of Finance of Waste Management’s $1.4 billion multi-country international operations based in London, England and Vice President and Controller for several $100 million plus multi-state market areas. His experience and background provide him with a broad range of expertise in public company issues. Mr. Faber is a Certified Public Accountant (currently unlicensed) and is a graduate of Saint John’s University, where he earned a B.S. in Accounting. Based on Mr. Faber's prior experience, he is deemed to be qualified to serve as an officer and director of the Company.

Mendel Mochkin has served as a Vice President and a director of the Company since March 17, 2011. Mr. was a founder of several successful companies in the natural resources and digital media sectors. In 2010, Mr. Mochkin was a founder of Israel Land Development - Energy Company, a company that acquired licenses offshore Israel and completed an initial public offering on Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. From 2007 to present, Mendel was a founder and director of Avenue Energy Israel, operating the Heletz Oil Field, Israel’s only oil field. From 2005 to present Mr. Mendel has been a director and executive vice president of Avenue Group, Inc. (AVNU), a public company, where his duties include managing SEC compliance, recruiting management and refocusing oil and gas strategy from international exploration to onshore exploitation. From 2004 to 2005, Mr. Mochkin was a co-founder and CEO of Energy Concepts International, which marketed an electric grid oriented voltage stability measurement program. From 2003 to 2004, Mr. Mochkin was the managing director of Optimize Media, an internet marketing outsourcing firm, which he co-founded. From 2002-2003, Mr. Mochkin was part of the original management team that founded RooMedia, an early entry in the video streaming space. From 1992 to 1996, Mr. Mochkin studied Chassidic Philosophy and Judaic Law at Rabbinical College of Quebec and the Yeshiva College of Boston, receiving a rabbinical ordination in 1996. Based on Mr. Mochkin's prior corporate experience, he is deemed to be qualified to serve as a director of the Company.

Lawrence H. Wolfe has served as a director and as Chief Financial Officer of the Company since July 22, 2011. Mr. Wolfe has been the partner in charge of audit and accounting, litigation support and business valuation services at Jewett, Schwartz, Wolfe & Associates, a CPA firm, since 2000. Mr. Wolfe is a CPA licensed in the States of Florida, Arizona and Nevada and New York. Mr. Wolfe graduated from Syracuse University in 1985, earning a Bachelor of Science degree with majors in accounting and finance. Based on Mr. Wolfe's prior experience as an accountant and auditor for public and private companies, he is deemed to be qualified to serve as a director and officer of the company.

Each director holds office until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successor has been duly elected and qualified. Executive officers are elected annually and serve at the discretion of our board of directors.

There are no familial relationships among any of our directors or officers. None of our directors or officers is a director in any other U.S. reporting companies other than as disclosed above. None of our directors or officers has been affiliated with any company that has filed for bankruptcy within the last ten years. The Company is not aware of any proceedings to which any of the Company’s officers or directors, or any associate of any such officer or director, is a party adverse to the Company or any of the Company’s subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to it or any of its subsidiaries.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our executive officers and directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Based solely on our review of copies of such reports and representations from our executive officers and directors, we believe that our executive officers and directors complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during the year ended December 31, 2011, except that Leonard Sternheim, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and a director, failed to timely file a two Form 4s reporting the sale of common stock and one Form 4 reporting the return of common stock to treasury; Mr2012. Mochkin, Vice President and a director, failed to timely file a Form 3 reporting his appointment as a director and an executive officer and a Form 4 reporting the acquisition of common stock by an affiliate of Mr. Mochkin; and Mr. Faber, our Chief Executive Officer and a director failed to file a Form 3 reporting his appointment as a director and an executive officer.

Code of Ethics

We do not currently have a Code of Ethics applicable to our principal executive, financial and accounting officers. We do not have a “financial expert” on the board or an audit committee or nominating committee.

Potential Conflicts of Interest

Since we do not have an audit or compensation committee comprised of independent directors, the functions that would have been performed by such committees are performed by our directors. The Board of Directors has not established an audit committee and does not have a financial expert, nor has the Board established a nominating committee. The Board is of the opinion that such committees are not necessary since the Company has only ~~three~~two directors, and to date, such directors have been performing the functions of such committees. Thus, there is a potential conflict of interest in that our directors and officers have the authority to determine issues concerning management compensation, nominations, and audit issues that may affect management decisions. We are not aware of any other conflicts of interest with any of our executive officers or directors.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

There are no legal proceedings that have occurred within the past ten years concerning our directors, or control persons which involved a criminal conviction, a criminal proceeding, an administrative or civil proceeding limiting one's participation in the securities or banking industries, or a finding of securities or commodities law violations.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The table below sets forth information concerning compensation paid, earned or accrued by our chief executive officer and our executive officer who earned compensation in excess of $100,000 during our ~~2011~~2012 or ~~2010~~2011 fiscal year (each a “named executive officer”) for the last two fiscal years.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

								Non-Equity		Nonqualified	All
Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)			Bonus ($)			Stock Awards ($)			Option Awards ($)			Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Name and					Stock		Option	Incentive Plan		Deferred	Other
Leonard Sternheim	2012		240,000	(1)														240,000
Principal		Salary		Bonus	Awards		Awards	Compensation		Compensation	Compensation		Total
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
Position	Year	($)		($)	($)		($)	($)		Earnings ($)	($)		($)
Secretary and Director	2011		179,943	(2)														179,943
Leonard Sternheim	2011	179,943(1)											179,943
Mendel Mochkin	2012		64,221	(3)					24,000	(5)		15,940	(6)					104,161
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
Former Vice President and Director	2011		89,935	(3)		24,000	(4)		24,000	(5)		4,428	(6)					142,363
Secretary and Director	2010
Lawrence Wolfe	2012		60,000	(7)					40,000	(9)		15,940	(6)					115,940
Mendel Mochkin	2011	89,935(2)		24,000(3)	24,000(4)		4,428(5)						142,363
Former Chief Financial Officer	2011		42,500	(7)		24,000	(8)		30,000	(9)		4,428	(10)					100,928
Vice President and Director	2010
Lawrence Wolfe	2011
Chief Financial Officer	2010	42,500(6)		24,000(7)	30,000(8)		4,428(9)						100,928

_____________

(1)	Represents $93,711 salary paid ($25,000 of it was for salary accrued in 2011) and $171,289 salary accrued.
(2)	Represents $154,943 salary earned and $25,000 salary accrued.
(3)	Represents salary earned and accrued pursuant to Mr.Mochkin’s consultancy agreement dated July 25, 2011

(1) Represents $159,943 salary earned and $25,000 salary accrued.

(4)	Represents signing bonus paid in stocks pursuant to Mr.Mochkin’s consultancy agreement dated July 25, 2011
(5)	Represents salary paid in common stock pursuant to Mr. Mochkin’s consultancy agreement dated July 25, 2011

(2) Represents salary earned and accrued pursuant to Mr.Mochkin’s consultancy agreement dated July 25, 2011

(6)

Represents options to purchase an aggregate of 120,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share pursuant to Mr. Mochkn’s consultancy agreement dated July 25, 2011. Half of option shall vest on January 1 and half on June 1 following the grant date. During the third quarter of 2012, Mr. Mochkin’s consultancy agreement dated July 25, 2011 was terminated. As a result, the 120,000 stock options and 1,000,000 grant options were forfeited.

(7)

Represents salary earned and accrued pursuant to Mr.Wolfe’s consultancy agreement dated July 25, 2011.

(3) Represents signing bonus paid in stocks pursuant to Mr.Mochkin’s consultancy agreement dated July 25, 2011

(8)	Represents signing bonus paid in stocks pursuant to Mr.Wolfe’s consultancy agreement dated July 25, 2011
(9)	Represents salary paid in common stock pursuant to Mr. Wolfe’s consultancy agreement dated July 25, 2011

(410) Represents ~~salary~~options ~~paid~~to inpurchase an aggregate of 120,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share pursuant to Mr. ~~Mochkin~~Wolfe’s consultancy agreement dated July 25, 2011. Half of option shall vest on January 1 and half on June 1 following the grant date. During the third quarter of 2012, Mr. Wolfe’s consultancy agreement dated July 25, 2011 was terminated. As a result, the 120,000 stock options and 1,000,000 grant options were forfeited.

(5) Represents options to purchase an aggregate of 120,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share pursuant to Mr. Mochkn’s consultancy agreement dated July 25, 2011. Half of option shall vest on January 1 and half on June 1 following the grant date.

(6) Represents salary earned and accrued pursuant to Mr.Wolfe’s consultancy agreement dated July 25, 2011.

(7) Represents signing bonus paid in stocks pursuant to Mr.Wolfe’s consultancy agreement dated July 25, 2011

(8) Represents salary paid in common stock pursuant to Mr. Wolfe’s consultancy agreement dated July 25, 2011

(9) Represents options to purchase an aggregate of 120,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share pursuant to Mr. Wolfe’s consultancy agreement dated July 25, 2011. Half of option shall vest on January 1 and half on June 1 following the grant date

We have no pension, health, annuity, bonus, insurance, stock options, profit sharing or similar benefit plans.

Employment Agreements.

On March 22, 2011, wethe Company entered into ana ~~Employment~~two ~~Agreement~~year employment agreement with ~~Leonard~~Mendel ~~Sternheim~~Mochkin, pursuant to which ~~Mr.~~he ~~Sternheim~~will ~~serves~~be asemployed ~~our Chief Executive Officer. The initial term of the Agreement expires~~ on ~~March~~a 1,part ~~2013~~time ~~and~~basis. ~~automatically~~Mr. ~~renews~~Mochkin ~~for~~shall ~~successive~~work ~~one-year terms unless~~ at least ~~120~~one ~~days~~hundred ~~prior~~(100) tohours ~~the~~per ~~end~~month ofon ~~the~~behalf ~~then current term, notice is given by either party~~ of ~~its desire not to renew~~ the ~~Agreement.~~Company ~~Under~~as the ~~Agreement,~~Company's MrVice President. ~~Sternheim~~Pursuant ~~is required~~ to ~~work~~the atagreement, ~~least~~his ~~150~~compensation ~~hours~~will ~~per~~be ~~month and is entitled to an annual salary of~~ $120,000 annually, which ~~accrues~~shall accrue from the date of the agreement, and to be paid ~~in equal monthly installments of $10,000~~ at such time aswhen wethe ~~have~~Company has adequate capital. On IfJuly ~~the~~25, ~~Agreement terminates due to Mr. Sternheim’s death~~2011, ~~his~~the ~~estate~~Company ~~will~~entered beinto ~~entitled~~a toConsultancy ~~30 days salary. If Mr. Sternheim’s employment is terminated without cause~~Agreement, hewhich ~~will~~replaced bein ~~entitled~~its toentirety ~~his salary for~~ the ~~balance~~Employment ~~of the term of the~~ Agreement. Ifbetween the ~~Agreement terminates as a result of change of control of the~~ Company, ~~he will be entitled to his salary~~ and ~~all~~Mendel ~~fully~~Mochkin ~~vested~~dated ~~stock~~March ~~options through the term of the Agreement. In July~~22, 2011. ~~this~~On ~~agreement~~August ~~was~~23, ~~nullified.~~ 2012, Mr. ~~Sternheim~~Mochkin isresigned ~~currently~~as onan aofficer ~~month-to-month~~and ~~arrangement~~director ~~with~~of the ~~company acting in a consultancy capacity as the~~ Company~~’s Chief Executive Officer~~.

On March 22, 2011, wethe Company entered into ana ~~Employment~~two ~~Agreement~~year employment agreement with ~~Mendel~~Leonard ~~Mochkin~~Sternheim, pursuant to which ~~Mr.~~he ~~Mochkin~~will ~~serves~~be asemployed ~~our~~on ~~Vice~~a ~~President.~~part ~~The~~time ~~initial~~basis. ~~term~~Mr. ofSternheim ~~the~~shall ~~Agreement~~work ~~expires~~at onleast ~~March 1, 2013 and automatically renews for successive~~ one~~-year~~ ~~terms~~hundred ~~unless~~fifty at(150) ~~least~~hours ~~120~~per ~~days~~month ~~prior~~on tobehalf ~~the end~~ of the ~~then~~Company ~~current~~as ~~term,~~its ~~notice~~Chief isExecutive ~~given~~Officer. byPursuant ~~either party of its desire not~~ to ~~renew~~ the ~~Agreement. Under the Agreement~~agreement, ~~Mr.~~his ~~Sternheim~~compensation iswill ~~required~~be ~~to work at least 100 hours per month and is entitled to an annual salary of~~ $120,000 annually, which ~~accrues~~shall accrue from the date of the agreement, and to be paid ~~in equal monthly installments of $10,000~~ at such time aswhen wethe ~~have~~Company has adequate capital. IfIn ~~the~~July ~~Agreement~~2011 ~~terminates~~this ~~due~~agreement towas Mrnullified. ~~Mochkin’s death, his estate will be entitled to 30 days salary. If~~ Mr. ~~Mochkin’s~~Sternheim ~~employment~~ is ~~terminated~~currently ~~without~~acting ~~cause,~~in hea ~~will~~consultancy becapacity ~~entitled to his salary for the balance of the term of the Agreement. If the Agreement terminates~~ as ~~a result of change of control of~~ the ~~company,~~Company’s heChief ~~will~~Executive ~~be entitled to his salary and all fully vested stock options through the term of the Agreement~~Officer.

On July 25, 2011, we entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Mochkin which superseded and replaced the March 22, 2011 Employment Agreement. Under the agreement, Mr. Mochkin is entitled to the following compensation for services to be provided to us: (i) upon execution of the agreement, 100,000 shares of restricted common stock; (ii) a consulting fee for the first 12 months of his engagement beginning July 2011 in the amount of $120,000, payable 60% in cash and 40% in shares of our common stock. The cash portion is payable monthly, and the shares, which shall be valued by reference to the last reported sales price for the common stock on the day prior to the first day of each month, will be issued on January 1st and June 1st. If we raise at least $2,500,000 in equity financing, all of such fees will be payable in cash. Such consulting fee will be increased to $180,000 commencing on July 25, 2012 and will be further increased to $240,000 per each 12-month period thereafter if our mines produce at least 12,000 ounces per annum; (iii) on each anniversary of the date of the letter agreement, a grant of a ten-year option to purchase an aggregate of 120,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, which option vests as to half of the shares on January 1 and half on June 1 following such grant date; (iv) as a one-time bonus, an option to purchase (a) an aggregate of 250,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, which option will vest and become exercisable upon the production by the Company’s mines of 12,000 ounces; (b) an aggregate of 250,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, which option will vest and become exercisable upon the production of 24,000 ounces and (c) an aggregate of 500,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, which option will vest and become exercisable upon the production of 48,000 ounces. Any such vested options will be exercisable for 30 days from the termination of the letter agreement.

Consulting Agreement

WeOn ~~entered~~July ~~into~~21, a2011, ~~Consultancy~~the ~~Agreement~~Company ~~dated~~entered ~~July~~into ~~21,~~a ~~2011~~consulting agreement with Lawrence H. Wolfe, pursuant to ~~provide~~which ~~consulting~~he ~~services~~will work as a Chief Financial Officer. Pursuant to the agreement, 100,000 shares were issued as a signing bonus for the execution and delivery of the agreement with a fair value of $24,000. His compensation will be $150,000 for the first 12 months, payable 60% in cash and 40% in stock. The cash portion shall be paid monthly, and the shares shall be valued based on the stock price of the last day of the preceding month and will be issued on January 1st and June 1st. On each anniversary, an option to purchase 120,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share is granted, half of ~~Option~~the option shall vest on January 1 and half on June 1 following such grant date. As a one-time bonus, the options to purchase 250,000 shares at $0.50 per share upon production of 12,000 and 24,000 ounces of gold, respectively, and an option to purchase 500,000 shares at $0.50 per share upon production of 48,000 ounces of gold. The consulting agreement has been amended to include a $0.25 ~~(cents)~~ per share price floor on the valuation of the common stock. On August 31, 2012, Mr. Lawrence H. Wolfe resigned from his position as a Chief Financial Officer. As a result of Mr. Wolfe's resignation, the Consultancy Agreement dated July 25, 2011 was terminated in its entirety. For the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, Mr. Wolfe has earned an aggregate of 139,376 shares and 122,120 shares pursuant to his consulting agreement with a fair value of $40,000 and $30,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, accrued consulting fees of $71,500 and $17,500 were including in accrued compensation- related party, respectively.

OnAs ~~July~~of ~~21,~~August ~~2011~~31, ~~the Company entered into a Consultancy Agreement with Zegal and Ross Capital LLC. Pursuant to the agreement~~2012, ~~100,000~~Lawrence ~~shares~~Wolfe ~~was~~resigned ~~issued~~ as ~~a signing bonus for~~ the ~~execution~~Chief ~~and~~Financial ~~delivery~~Officer ~~of the agreement with a fair value of $24,000(See note 5). The compensation will be $120,000 for the first 12 months, payable 60% in cash~~ and 40% in stock. The cash portion shall be paid monthly, and the shares shall be valued based on the stock price of the last day of the preceding month and will be issued on January 1st and June 1st. On each anniversary, an option to purchase 120,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share is granted, half of option shall vest on January 1st and half on June 1st following such grant date. As a ~~one-time~~director ~~bonus, the options to purchase 250,000 shares at $0.50 per share upon production~~ of 12,000 and 24,000 ounces of gold, respectively, and an option to purchase 500,000 shares at $0.50 per share upon production of 48,000 ounces of gold. The consulting agreement has been amended to include a $.25 (cents) per share price floor on the ~~valuation of the common stock~~Company. ~~For the year ended December 31, 2011, Zegal and Ross has earned an aggregate of 42,849 shares pursuant to the consulting agreement with a fair value of $20,000.~~

Long-Term Incentive Plans. As of December 31, 2011, we had no group life, health, hospitalization, or medical reimbursement or relocation plans in effect. Further, we had no pension plans or plans or agreements which provide compensation on the event of termination of employment or corporate change in control.52

On July 25, 2011, the Company entered into a Consultancy Agreement with Mendel Mochkin, which replaced in its entirety the Employment Agreement dated March 22, 2011. Pursuant to the agreement, his compensation will be $120,000 for the first 12 months, payable 60% in cash and 40% in stock. The cash portion shall be paid monthly, and the shares shall be valued based on the stock price of the last day of the preceding month and will be issued on January 1st and June 1st. On each anniversary, an option to purchase 120,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of 0.50 per share is granted, half of option shall vest on January 1 and half on June 1 following such grant date. As a one-time bonus, the options to purchase 250,000 shares at $0.50 per share upon production of 12,000 and 24,000 ounces of gold, respectively, and an option to purchase 500,000 shares at $0.50 per share upon production of 48,000 ounces of gold. The consulting agreement has been amended to include a $0.25 per share price floor on the valuation of the common stock. For the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, Mr. Mendel has been paid $44,221 and $89,935, respectively and an aggregate of 47,971 and 97,698 shares pursuant to his consulting agreement with a fair value of $24,000, respectively. On August 23, 2012, Mr. Mendel Mochkin resigned from his position as a director of the Board of Directors. As a result of Mr. Mochkin's resignation, the Consultancy Agreement dated July 25, 2011 was terminated in its entirety. The Company has agreed to indemnify Mr. Mochkin in connection with the lawsuit by George Sharp vs. Mustang Alliances, Inc. et al filed in the Superior court of the State of California, in San Diego County. As of December 31, 2012, the Company has not accrued any amounts related to this indemnification. As of December 31, 2012, total consulting fees of $57,000 owed by Company was forgiven and recorded in additional paid in capital. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, accrued consulting fees of $0 and $7,000 were including in accrued compensation- related party, respectively.

On July 21, 2011, the Company entered into a Consultancy Agreement with Zegal and Ross Capital LLC. Pursuant to the agreement, 100,000 shares were issued as a signing bonus for the execution and delivery of the agreement with a fair value of $24,000. The compensation will be $120,000 for the first 12 months, payable 60% in cash and 40% in stock. The cash portion shall be paid monthly, and the shares shall be valued based on the stock price of the last day of the preceding month and will be issued on January 1st and June 1st. On each anniversary, an option to purchase 120,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share is granted, half of option shall vest on January 1st and half on June 1st following such grant date. As a one-time bonus, the options to purchase 250,000 shares at $0.50 per share upon production of 12,000 and 24,000 ounces of gold, respectively, and an option to purchase 500,000 shares at $0.50 per share upon production of 48,000 ounces of gold. The consulting agreement has been amended to include a $0.25 per share price floor on the valuation of the common stock. On July 1, 2012, the Consultancy Agreement dated July 25, 2011 was terminated in its entirety. For the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, Zegal and Ross has earned an aggregate of 47,971 and 42,849 shares pursuant to the consulting agreement with a fair value of $24,000 and $20,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, accrued consulting fees of $48,000 and $12,000 were including in accrued compensation- related party, respectively.

Mr. Sternheim is currently on a month-to-month arrangement at a rate of $20,000 a month. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the company has paid $93,711 and $154,943, and accrued compensation fees of $171,289 and $25,000 were recorded in accrued compensation- related party, respectively.

Long-Term Incentive Plans. As of December 31, 202, we had no group life, health, hospitalization, or medical reimbursement or relocation plans in effect. Further, we had no pension plans or plans or agreements which provide compensation on the event of termination of employment or corporate change in control.

Compensation of Directors. Since our incorporation on February 22, 2007, no compensation has been paid to any of our directors in consideration for their services rendered in their capacity as directors.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table summarizes the outstanding equity awards to our named executive officers as of December 31, 2011:

	Option Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable		Option Exercise Price		Option Expiration Date	Fair Value of Shares Unvested on the Grant date
Mendel Mochkin		0		120,000		0.50	July 2021	$	20,368
Lawrence Wolfe		0		120,000		0.50	July 2021	$	20,368

In addition to the options reflected in the above table, we have Consultancy agreements with Mendel Mochkin and Lawrence Wolfe that contain provisions for the issuance and granting of options aggregating 3,000,000 shares at $.50 per share that are predicated on the Company reaching certain milestones in the production of gold. None of the milestones have been met and accordingly such options have not been granted or issued.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

Consultancy agreements with Mendel Mochkin and Lawrence Wolfe in July 2011 that contain provisions for the issuance and granting of options aggregating 2,000,000 shares at $0.50 per share that are predicated on the Company reaching certain milestones in the production of gold. None of the milestones have been met and accordingly such options have not been granted or issued. During the third quarter of 2012, both consultancy agreements noted above were terminated. As a result, the 240,000 stock options and 2,000,000 grant options were forfeited.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table lists, as of April 69, ~~2012~~2013, the number of shares of common stock of our Company that are beneficially owned by (i) each person or entity known to our Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock; (ii) each officer and director of our Company; and (iii) all officers and directors as a group. Information relating to beneficial ownership of common stock by our principal shareholders and management is based upon information furnished by each person using “beneficial ownership” concepts under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under these rules, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security, or investment power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security. The person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities, and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which he or she may not have any pecuniary beneficial interest. Except as noted below, each person has sole voting and investment power.

The percentages below are calculated based on ~~100~~106,~~622~~802,516 shares of our common stock issued ~~and outstanding~~ as of April 69, ~~2012~~2013. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each stockholder listed below is c/o Mustang Alliances, Inc., 410 Park Avenue, 15th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

Name of Beneficial Owner	Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned		Percent of Common Stock Beneficially Owned
Leonard Sternheim		12,500,000		12	%
Mendel Mochkin(1)		4,197,698		4	%
Robert Faber		1,000,000		1%
Lawrence Wolfe		222,120		Less than 2	%
All directors and executive officers as a group (2 persons)		13,500,000		13	%
Robert Faber		0		0
All directors and executive officers as a group (4 persons)		16,919,818		16.82	%

_________

(1) The shares are owned by both Mendel Mochkin and MEM Mining Partners LLC, a New York limited liability company, which is owned and managed by Mr. Mochkin.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

On November 29, 2010, Joseph Levi, the then principal shareholder of the Company, entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement for the sale of 60,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company to Leonard Sternheim, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and a director for $7,500.

On December 24, 2010, Mr. Sternheim sold 10,000,000 shares to Zegal & Ross Capital LLC (“Zegal”) for $1,500. The Company is indebted to Zegal & Ross Capital pursuant to the terms of a convertible note in the original principal amount of $25,000. On March 28, 2011, the Company borrowed $25,000 from Zegal, which is payable with interest at the imputed IRS rate on September 28, 2011. The note is convertible into common stock of the Company at the rate of $0.25 per share. In addition, upon conversion at maturity date, the Company will issue a 2-year warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The Company has recorded a beneficial conversion in the amount of $19,723 to reflect the fair value of the convertible debt and a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital. As of December 31, 2011, the convertible note was repaid in full.

In January 2011, Mr. Sternheim sold 4,000,000 shares to MEM Mining Partners LLC, a New York limited liability company solely owned and managed by Mendel Mochkin, our Vice President and a director, for $1,000.54

In January 2011, Mr. Sternheim sold 4,000,000 shares to MEM Mining Partners LLC, a New York limited liability company solely owned and managed by Mendel Mochkin, a former vice president and a director for $1,000.

On February 7, 2011 Mr. Sternheim sold 1,500,000 shares to Mark Holcombe for $1,500, a director of the Company at that time.

On December 2, 2010, we executed a Lease Agreement with Cerros and Mayan Gold, pursuant to which Cerros, the registered owner of Corpus IV, leased us the exclusive right to prospect, explore and mine for minerals in this property in Honduras. The Lease Agreement continues until the Honduran government grants Cerros the right to assign the property's mining concessions to the Company, at which time Cerros will transfer title to the mining concessions to us. In consideration for such rights, we issued an aggregate of 20,000,000 shares of common stock to Mayan Gold, the beneficial owner of 100% interest in Corpus IV. In accordance with the Lease Agreements, as further consideration for the rights granted, we agreed to pay Cerros $1,500 no later than April 1st of each year. Cerros also granted us an option to acquire exclusive rights to properties known as Corpus I, II, and III concessions and the Potosi concession.

Prior to February 9, 2010, Cerros was a wholly owned subsidiary of Mayan Gold. When Mayan Gold sold all of its shares in Cerros to Razor on such date, Mayan Gold retained all mining rights to the Properties and certain other assets that were in the name of Cerros. As a part of the sales transaction, Cerros and Razor entered into an agreement pursuant to which Cerros is contractually obligated to transfer those concessions and the other assets to transferees as directed by Mayan Gold from time to time. Since Razor is the title owner of all the shares of Cerros, Razor was required to represent to Mayan Gold and us that it has absolutely no direct or indirect title or interest in any of the Properties or any of the shares being issued to Mayan Gold.

On June 15, 2011, the loans payable to First Line Capital which is a company owned by a previous related party, including accrued interest in the amount of $97,784 was forgiven. The Company has recorded the carrying amount of debt with accrued interest as an increase to additional paid-in capital.

On July 2519, 2011, ~~repayment~~the ~~for~~Company ~~$25~~issued 40,000 ~~was~~units ~~made~~to ~~for~~Mark Holcombe, a director of the ~~$50~~Company until such date,~~000~~ ~~note~~in ~~due~~consideration toof ~~Landolt~~consisting of 40,000 ashares ~~company~~of ~~owned~~common bystock aand ~~director~~20,000 ofwarrants ~~the~~with ~~Company.~~a Atfair ~~which~~value ~~time~~of ~~the~~$1,583. ~~note~~Each ~~was~~warrant ~~assigned~~allows Mr. Holcombe to ~~MeM~~purchase ~~Mining,~~one ~~Inc. MeM~~additional isshare ~~controlled~~of ~~by,~~common ~~Mendel~~stock ~~Mochkin,~~at a ~~director~~price of ~~the company~~$0. As50 ofper ~~December~~share ~~31,~~for ~~2011,~~two ~~the~~years. ~~Principle~~The ~~balance~~shares ~~due~~were ~~was~~valued at $0.25~~,000,~~ isper ~~unsecured~~share, ~~and~~the isfair ~~due~~value ~~January~~on ~~2013~~the ~~with~~date ~~accrued~~of ~~interest at 5%~~grant.

On July 1921, 2011, the Company issued 40100,000 ~~units~~shares to ~~Mark~~Lawrence ~~Holcombe~~H. Wolfe, aour ~~director~~former ofChief ~~the~~Financial ~~Company until such date~~Officer, in consideration offor ~~consisting~~the ofexecution ~~40,000~~and ~~shares~~delivery of ~~common~~a ~~stock~~consulting ~~and~~agreement ~~20,000 warrants~~ with ~~a fair value of $1,583. Each warrant allows~~ Mr. ~~Holcombe to purchase one additional share of common stock at a price of $0~~Wolfe.50 ~~per share for two years.~~ The shares were valued at $0.2524 per share, the fair value on the date of grant. The consulting agreement was terminated in August 2012 upon Mr. Wolfe’s resignation from the Company.

On July 21, 2011, the Company issued 100,000 shares to ~~Lawrence~~Zegal H.& ~~Wolfe,~~Ross ~~our~~Capital ~~Chief Financial Officer,~~ in consideration for the execution and delivery of a consulting agreement ~~with Mr~~. ~~Wolfe.~~ The shares were valued at $0.24 per share, the fair value on the date of grant.

On July 21, 2011, the Company issued 100,000 shares to Zegal and Ross Capital LLC in consideration for the execution and delivery of a consulting agreement. The shares were valued at $.24 per share, the fair value on the date of grant.55

On July 25, 2011, the Company issued 100,000 shares to Mendel Mochkin, a director, in consideration for the execution and delivery of a consulting agreement with such person which replaced in its entirety Mr. Mochkin's employment agreement. Mr. Mochkin is an accredited investor. The issuance was conducted in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The shares were valued at $0.24 per share, the fair value on the date of grant.

On July 25, 2011, repayment for $25,000 was made for the $50,000 note due to Landolt, a company owned by a director of the Company. At which time the note was assigned to MeM Mining, Inc. MeM is controlled by, Mendel Mochkin, a director of the company. As of December 31, 2001, the Principle balance due was $25,000, is unsecured and is due January 2013 with accrued interest at 5%.

On August 28, 2012, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to Robert Faber and Lawrence Wolfe in consideration for services previously provided. The shares were valued at $0.07 per share, the fair value on the date of grant of $70,000 for each issuance.

On August 28, 2012, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to David Lubin in consideration for services previously provided. The shares were valued at $0.07 per share, the fair value on the date of grant of $70,000.

During 2012, the Company received a total of $50,020 from Mr. Sternheim, CEO of the Company as an unsecured non-interest bearing loan. As of December 31, 2012, the principal due was $50,020, is unsecured and is due on demand. The Company recorded $393 of imputed interest related to Mr. Sternheim’s loan payable as in-kind contribution.

During 2012, Mendel Mochkin, a former officer and director forgave consulting fees of $57,000. The amount was recorded as an in-kind contribution.

All the foregoing issuances were conducted in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended

Director Independence

We are not subject to listing requirements of any national securities exchange or national securities association and, as a result, we are not at this time required to have our board comprised of a majority of “independent directors.”

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

Our principal independent accountant was Wolinetz, Lafazan & Company, P.C. (“Wolinetz”) until October 24, 2011 when we engaged ~~Webb~~Liggett, Vogt & ~~Company~~Webb, P.A. (“~~Webb~~LVW”) as our principal independent accountant. Fees billed to the Company for the fiscal years ending December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 are set forth below:

	Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010		Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2011
	Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2012		Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2011
Audit Fees	$	2621,~~000~~423	$	31,000
Audit Related Fees	$	0	$	7,500
Tax Fees	$	03,648	$	0
All Other Fees	$	0	$	0

Audit Fees

Audit fees represent the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Wolinetz and ~~Webb~~ LVW for the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in our quarterly reports, ~~review of registration statements or services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years.~~

Audit-Related Fees

Audit-related fees represent review of registration statements or services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years, and the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under Audit Fees.

Tax Fees

Tax fees represent the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning for such years. ~~There were no such fees in fiscal 2011 and 2010.~~

All Other Fees

All other fees represent the aggregate fees billed for products and services other than the services reported in the other categories. There were no such fees in fiscal ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011.

As of December 31, ~~2011~~2012, the Company did not have a formal documented pre-approval policy for the fees of the principal accountant. The Company does not have an audit committee. The percentage of hours expended on the principal accountant's engagement to audit our financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant's full-time, permanent employees was 0%.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits. Financial Statement Schedules.

Exhibit		Description
3.1		Articles of Incorporation of Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on January 2, 2008 and declared effective on January 30, 2008, file no. 333-148431).
3.2		By-Laws of Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on January 2, 2008 and declared effective on January 30, 2008, file no. 333-148431).
4.1		Specimen Common Stock certificate (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on January 2, 2008 and declared effective on January 30, 2008, file no. 333-148431).
4.2		Promissory Note dated November 22, 2011 by the Registrant in favor of Sara Laufer (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report filed with the SEC on November 30, 2010)
4.3		Promissory Note dated January 10, 2011 in the original principal amount of $50,000 from Mustang Alliances, Inc. to Landolt Holdings, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 10, 2011)
4.4		Convertible Promissory Note dated March 28, 2011 in the original principal amount of $25,000 (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 14, 2011)
4.5		8% Promissory Note dated March 28, 2012 issued to First Line Capital. (filed as Exhibit 4.5 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 9, 2012)
10.1		Lease Agreement dated December 13, 2010, among Compana Minera Cerros Del Sur, S.A., Mayan Gold, Inc. and Mustang Alliance, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report filed with the SEC on December 14, 2010)
10.3		Lease Agreement dated February 22, 2011, among Compana Minera Cerros Del Sur, S.A., Mayan Gold, Inc. and Mustang Alliance, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report filed with the SEC on March 1, 2011)
10.4		Undertaking dated December 2010 among Compana Minera Cerros Del Sur, S.A., Mayan Gold, Inc., Razor Resources, Inc. and Mustang Alliance, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report filed with the SEC on December 14, 2010)
10.6		Employment Agreement dated March 22, 2011, between Mustang Alliances, Inc. and Leonard Sternheim (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report filed with the SEC on March 23, 2011)
10.7		Employment Agreement dated March 22, 2011, between Mustang Alliances, Inc. and Mendel Mochkin (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report filed with the SEC on March 23, 2011)
10.8		Release and Indemnification Agreement dated July 19, 2011, between Mustang Alliances, Inc. and Mark Holcombe (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Current Report filed with the SEC on July 22, 2011)
10.9		Consultancy Agreement dated July 21, 2011 between Mustang Alliances, Inc. and Lawrence Wolfe (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Current Report filed with the SEC on July 22, 2011)
10.10		Consultancy Agreement dated July 21, 2011 return Mustang Alliances Inc. and legal and his Capital, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 9, 2012)
10.11		Forum of Regulation S Subscription Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 9, 2012)
31		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley (filed herewith).

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.
Date: April 9, 2012	By:	/s/ Leonard Sternheim
Date: April 9, 2013	By:	/s/ Leonard Sternheim
		Name: Leonard Sternheim
		Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)
		Title: Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

	MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.
Date: April 9, 2012	By:	/s/ Leonard Sternheim
Date: April 9, 2013	By:	/s/ Leonard Sternheim
		Name: Leonard Sternheim
		Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chairman and Director
		Title: Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: April 9, 2012	By:	/s/ Mendel Mochkin
Date: April 9, 2013	By:	/s/ Robert T. Faber
		Name: Mendel Mochkin
		Title: Vice President and Director
Date: April 9, 2012	By:	/s/ Lawrence H. Wolfe
		Name: Lawrence H. Wolfe
		Title: Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: April 9, 2012	By:	/s/ Robert T. Faber
		Name: Robert T. Faber
		Title: President and Director

Filing Compare · MUSTANG ALLIANCES, INC.