UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission File Number: 333-174222

Puissant Industries, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Florida		27-0543309
(State of incorporation)		(IRS Employer ID Number)

520 Whitley Street, London, Kentucky 40743

(Address of principal executive offices)

Telephone (606) 864-3161

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

All Correspondence to:

Frederick M. Lehrer, Esquire

Attorney and Counselor at Law

285 Uptown Road, 402

Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701

Office: (321) 972-8060

Cell: (561) 706-7646

E-Fax (561) 423-3753

Email: flehrer@securitiesattorney1.com

Website: www.securitiesattorney1.com

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (ss.232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of ~~June~~November 304, 2013, there were 8 9,~~778~~449,~~005~~201 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements		3
	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012		3
	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012		3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)		4
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)		4
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Balance at December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011, December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013) (unaudited)		5
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Balance at December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011, December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2013) (unaudited)		5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)		6
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)		6
	Notes to consolidated financial statements		7
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		19
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		19
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		2324
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		2324
PART II
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		2425
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		2425
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		2425
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		2425
Item 5.	Other Information		2425
Item 6.	Exhibits		2526
Signatures			2627

PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Puissant Industries, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition

	June 30,			December 31,
	September 30,			December 31,
	2013			2012
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash	$	2257,~~541~~092		$	20,625
Accounts receivable		4348,~~253~~000			48,183
Prepaid expenses		~~214~~182,~~478~~252			310,000
Total current assets		~~280~~287,~~272~~344			378,808
Properties and equipment at cost, based on successful
efforts method:
Producing oil and natural gas properties		~~462~~494,~~091~~407			343,875
Non-producing oil and natural gas properties		83103,~~521~~043			56,521
		545,612			400,396
		597,450			400,396
Less: accumulated depreciation and depletion		5877,~~781~~310			30,908
Net properties and equipment		486,831			369,488
		520,140			369,488
Total assets	$	767,103		$	748,296
Net properties and equipment
Total assets	$	807,484		$	748,296
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts and accrued expenses payable	$	2328,~~934~~492		$	30,778
Notes payable, current portion		34,~~981~~051			3,845
Due related parties		4,000			4,000
Total current liabilities		3136,~~915~~543			38,623
Long-term debt		-			-
Bonds payable - related parties		28,000			28,000
Notes payable, less current portion		3938,~~470~~431			41,495
Total liabilities		99102,~~385~~974			108,118
Stockholders' equity
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 authorized,
none outstanding at June 30, 2013		-			-
none outstanding at September 30, 2013		-			-
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 90,000,000 shares
authorized, 8,778,005 and 6,644,200 issued and outstanding at
authorized, 9,228,005 and 6,644,200 issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively		8,778			6,644
September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively		9,228			6,644
Paid-in capital		1,~~037~~126,~~233~~783			885,097
Accumulated deficit		(~~378~~431,~~293~~501	)		(251,563	)
Total stockholders' equity		~~667~~704,~~718~~510			640,178
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	~~767~~807,~~103~~484		$	748,296

The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Puissant Industries, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

	Three Months Ended						~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	September						September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Revenues:
Oil and gas production	$	~~111~~113,~~622~~628		$	~~128,480~~-		$	~~213~~326,~~007~~635		$	-
Royalty income		1011,~~667~~098			-113,032			2031,~~229~~327			~~245~~358,~~320~~352
		122,289			128,480			233,236			245,320
		124,726			113,032			357,962			358,352
Costs and Expenses
Lease operating expenses		2023,~~492~~738			8094,~~405~~825			3760,~~027~~765			~~171~~266,~~300~~125
Administrative expenses		~~116~~131,~~194~~743			8682,~~430~~778			~~290~~422,~~974~~717			~~166~~249,~~243~~021
Depreciation and depletion		1820,~~475~~645			-			2546,~~757~~402			-
Total costs and expenses		~~155~~176,~~161~~126			~~166~~177,~~835~~603			~~353~~529,~~758~~884			~~337~~515,~~543~~146
Net loss from operations		(32,872	)		(38,355	)		(120,522	)		(92,223	)
Net loss loss from operations		(51,400	)		(64,571	)		(171,922	)		(156,794	)
Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(1,~~818~~808	)		(~~710~~963	)		(68,~~208~~016	)		(23,~~242~~205	)
Total other expenses		(1,~~818~~808	)		(~~710~~963	)		(68,~~208~~016	)		(23,~~242~~205	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(3453,~~690~~208	)		(3965,~~065~~534	)		(~~126~~179,~~730~~938	)		(94159,~~465~~999	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-			-			-
Net income (loss)	$	(3453,~~690~~208	)	$	(3965,~~065~~534	)	$	(~~126~~179,~~730~~938	)	$	(94159,~~465~~999	)
Net loss per weighted share,
Net loss per weighted share, basic and fully diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.03	)
basic and fully diluted	$	-		$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.02	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and fully diluted		8,985,148			6,041,800			8,009,159			5,994,181
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding, basic and fully diluted		8,378,743			5,998,467			7,511,471			5,969,977

The Accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Puissant Industries, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

(Unaudited)

									Additional			Common
	Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Paid-in			Stock		Accumulated
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Capital			Subscribed		Deficit			Total
Balance, December 31, 2010		-		-		50,000	$	50	$	3,191		$	-	$	(245,119	)	$	(241,878	)
Shares issued in connection
with conversion of notes payable						128,000		128		63,872								64,000
Shares issued in exchange																		-
for land leases						5,200,000		5,200		(5,200	)							-
Share issued in exchange for
professional services						320,000		320		159,680								160,000
Shares issued for services
Shares issued for services rendered						80,000		80		39,920								40,000
rendered						80,000		80		39,920								40,000
Sale of common stock for cash						3,800		4		1,896								1,900
Shares issued in exchange for
professional services						160,000		160		319,840								320,000
Net income (loss)															37,659			37,659
Balance, December 31, 2011		-		-		5,941,800		5,942		583,199			-		(207,460	)		381,681
Shares issued in exchange for
professional services						100,000		100		199,900								200,000
Shares issued in connection
with purchase of support equipment						410,400		410		102,190								102,600
Shares issued in exchange for						192,000		192		(192	)							-
warrants
Net income (loss)															(44,103	)		(44,103	)
Balance, December 31, 2012		-		-		6,644,200		6,644		885,097			-		(251,563	)		640,178
Shares issued in payment of
vendor invoices						618,722		619		55,246								55,865
Sale of common stock for cash						250,000		250		49,750								50,000
Shares issued in exchange for
professional services						200,000		200		39,800								40,000
Shares issued in exchange for
professional services						250,000		250		22,250								22,500
Shares issued in payment of
unpaid wages						1,265,083		1,265		74,640								75,905
Net income (loss)															(~~126~~179,~~730~~938	)		(~~126~~179,~~730~~938	)
Balance, June 30, 2013		-		-		8,778,005	$	8,778	$	1,037,233		$	-	$	(378,293	)	$	667,718
Balance, September 30, 2013		-		-		9,228,005	$	9,228	$	1,126,783		$	-	$	(431,501	)	$	704,510

The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Puissant Industries, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,
	September 30,
	2013			2012
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operations
Net income (loss)	$	(~~126~~179,~~730~~938	)	$	(94159,~~465~~999	)
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) to cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
Stock-based compensation		~~118~~190,~~022~~249			81153,~~685~~334
Depreciation and depletion		2546,~~757~~402			-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		~~4,930~~183			(1,347	)
Prepaid expenses		~~133~~62,~~886~~500			-
Accounts and accrued expenses payable		(62,~~844~~286	)		~~5,089~~
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		~~149~~117,~~021~~110			(98,~~038~~012	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Additions to oil and gas properties		(~~145~~128,~~216~~078	)		-
Net cash used by financing activities		(~~145~~128,~~216~~078	)		-
Cash flows from investing activities
Payment on notes payable		(12,~~889~~858	)		(1318,~~690~~304	)
Procceds from sale of common stock		50,000			-
Proceeds from related party loans, net		-			20,000
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(147,~~889~~142	)		61,~~310~~696
Net increase (decrease) in cash		136,~~916~~174			(26,~~728~~316	)
Cash, beginning of period		20,625			26,160
Cash, end of period	$	2256,~~541~~799		$	2319,~~432~~844
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Income taxes	$	-		$	-
Interest	$	1,818		$	2,242
Non-Cash investing and financing transactions:
Issuance of 618,722 shares of common stock in payment
Issuance of 618,722 shares of common stock in payment of vendor invoices.	$	55,865		$	-
of vendor invoices.	$	55,865		$	-
Issuance of 250,000 shares of common stock in exchange for professional services.	$	22,500		$	-
Issuance of 250,000 shares of common stock in exchange
Issuance of 1,265,083 shares of common stock for unpaid wages.	$	75,905		$	-
for professional services.	$	22,500		$	-
Issuance of 200,000 shares of common stock in exchange for professional services.	$	40,000		$	-
Issuance of 1,265,083 shares of common stock for
unpaid wages.	$	75,905		$	-

The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Puissant Industries, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012

Note 1—Basis of Presentation

We are providing herein the consolidated interim statements of financial condition of Puissant Industries, Inc. and its subsidiary, ~~ARM Operating Company~~ (~~"ARM") (~~collectively the "Company"), as of ~~June~~September 30, 2013, and the related consolidated interim statements of operations and cash flows for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated interim statements of changes in stockholders equity for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012. The consolidated interim financial statements presented herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's financial statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2012, which are included in the Company's Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on April 15, 2013.

The information furnished in this report reflects all adjustments consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, which are in the opinion of management necessary for a fair presentation of results for the interim periods. Prior interim period data has been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on previously reported results of operations. The results of operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013.

Note 2—Nature of Operations

Organization

Puissant Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) was organized as a Wyoming corporation on July 6, 2009. As of December 31, 2010, the Company was located in Columbia, Kentucky, in Adair County.

The Company is an oil and natural gas exploration, production and development company geographically focused on the onshore United States. The Company currently has 39 wells assigned to it with over 34,~~905~~735 acres available for drilling and exploration. The Company redomiciled to the state of Florida and changed its name from American Resource Management, Inc. to Puissant Industries, Inc. on March 17, 2011.

The Company owns 100% of ARM Operating Company (“ARM”). ARM was formed on July 12, 2011, primarily to manage all oil and gas properties of the Company, which includes the operation, development, and maintenance of all oil and gas wells, leases, and reserve activities. ARM will be registered as the operator of wells with all relevant governmental agencies, and it will be responsible for maintaining production and maintenance reports for all wells and facilities of the Company.

Accounting period

The Company has adopted an annual accounting period of January through December.

Puissant Industries, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012

Note 3—Summary of significant accounting principles

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP’) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates particularly significant to the financial statements include the following:

●. Estimates of our reserves of oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids ("NGL"); ●. Future cash flows from oil and gas properties; ●. Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense; ●. Asset retirement obligations; ●. Fair values of derivative instruments; ●. Fair values of assets acquired and ~~liabilites~~liabilities assumed from business combinations; and ●. Natural gas imbalances.

As fair value is a market-based measurement, it is determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Such estimates and assumptions are adjusted when facts and circumstances dictate. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ from these estimates. Any changes in estimates resulting from continuous changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the financial statements in future periods.

There are numerous uncertainties in estimating the quantity of reserves and in projecting the future rates of production and timing of development expenditures, including future costs to dismantle, dispose and restore our properties. Oil and gas reserve engineering must be recognized as a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and gas that cannot be measured in an exact way.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers short-term interest bearing investments with initial maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash in banks, free credit on investment accounts and money market accounts.

Foreign currency translation

The Company complies with Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 830, “Foreign Currency Matters.” Monetary items are translated at the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date; non-monetary items are translated at historical exchange rates. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rate for the year. Transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in the results of operations as incurred.

Puissant Industries, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three ~~Six~~and Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012

Note 3—Summary of significant accounting principles (continued)

Property and equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred while betterments and improvements are capitalized. When items are sold or retired, the related cost and accumulated depreciation is removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in operations.

The Company provides for depreciation and amortization over the following estimated useful lives:

Building	39	years
Furniture and fixtures			5-7	years
Land improvements	10	years
Building			39	years
Machinery and equipment	5-7	years
Land improvements			10	years
Computer equipment	3	years
Machinery and equipment			5-7	years
Office equipment	7	years
Computer equipment			3	years
Trucks and trailers	5	years
Office equipment			7	years
Trucks and trailers			5	years

Oil and Gas Properties

Oil and gas investments are accounted for by the successful efforts method of accounting. Accordingly, the costs incurred to acquire property (proved and unproved), all development costs, and successful exploratory costs are capitalized, whereas the costs of unsuccessful exploratory wells are expensed.

Depletion

The provision for depletion of proved oil and gas properties is calculated on the units-of-production method, whereby capitalized costs, as adjusted for future development costs and asset retirement obligations, are amortized over the total estimated proved reserves. The Company calculates depletion on a quarterly basis.

Inventories

Inventories, consisting primarily of tubular goods and other well equipment held for use in the development and production of natural gas and crude oil reserves, are carried at the lower of cost or market, on a first-in first-out basis. Adjustments are made from time to time to recognize, as appropriate, any reductions in value.

Puissant Industries, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012

Note 3—Summary of significant accounting principles (continued)

Unproved Properties

Investments in unproved properties are not depleted pending determination of the existence of proved reserves. Unproved properties are assessed periodically to ascertain whether there is a probability of obtaining proved reserves in the future. When it is determined these properties have been promoted to a proved reserve category or there is no longer any probability of obtaining proved reserves from the properties, the costs associated with these properties is transferred into the amortization base to be included in depletion calculations. Unproved properties whose costs are individually significant are assessed individually by considering the primary lease terms of the properties, the holding period of the properties, and geographic and geological data obtained relating to the properties. Where it is not practicable to assess properties individually as their costs are not individually significant, such properties are grouped for purposes of the periodic assessment.

Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 360 “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” the Company records impairment losses on long-lived assets such as oil and gas properties and equipment used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. There ~~were~~was no impairment charges during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Impairment of unproved oil and gas properties are determined by FASB ASC Topic 932, “Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas.”

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities that qualify as financial instruments under FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” approximate their carrying amounts presented in the accompanying balance sheet at ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Market Risk

Our activities primarily consist of acquiring, owning, enhancing and producing oil and gas properties. The future results of our operations, cash flows and financial condition may be affected by changes in the market price of oil and natural gas. The availability of a ready market for oil and natural gas products in the future will depend on numerous factors beyond our control, including weather, imports, marketing of competitive fuels, proximity and capacity of oil and natural gas pipelines and other transportation facilities, any oversupply or undersupply of oil, natural gas and liquid products, the regulatory environment, the economic environment and, other regional and political events, none of which can be predicted with certainty.

Puissant Industries, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June 30~~September, 2013 and 2012

Note 3—Summary of significant accounting principles (continued)

Oil and Gas Reserve Quantities

Reserves and their relation to estimated future net cash flows impact our depletion and impairment calculations. As a result, adjustments to depletion are made concurrently with changes to reserve estimates. We disclose reserve estimates, and the projected cash flows derived from these reserve estimates, in accordance with SEC guidelines. Our independent engineers will also adhere to the SEC definitions when preparing their reserve reports.

Asset Retirement Obligations

We have significant obligations to plug and abandon oil and natural gas wells and related equipment at the end of oil and natural gas production operations. We incur these liabilities upon acquiring or drilling a well. GAAP requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) in the period in which it is incurred with a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, changes in the present value of the liability are accreted and expensed. The capitalized asset costs are depleted as a component of the full cost pool. The fair values of additions to the ARO liability are estimated using present value techniques that convert future cash flows to a single discounted amount. Significant inputs to the valuation include estimates of: (i) plug and abandonment costs per well based on existing regulatory requirements; (ii) remaining life per well; (iii) inflation factors; and (iv) a credit-adjusted risk free rate. Future revisions to ARO estimates will impact the present value of existing ARO liabilities and corresponding adjustments will be made to the capitalized asset retirement costs balance. Upon settlement of the liability, we report a gain or loss to the extent the actual costs differ from the recorded liability.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes,” which requires accounting for deferred income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred income tax asset and liabilities are computed for the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on the enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce the deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

The determination of the Company’s provision for income taxes requires significant judgment, the use of estimates, and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. Significant judgment is required in assessing the timing and amounts of deductible and taxable items and the probability of sustaining uncertain tax positions. The benefits of uncertain tax positions are recorded in the Company’s financial statements only after determining a more-likely-than-not probability that the uncertain tax positions will withstand challenge, if any, from tax authorities. When facts and circumstances change, the Company reassesses these probabilities and records any changes in the financial statements as appropriate. Accrued interest and penalties related to income tax matters are classified as a component of income tax expense.

Puissant Industries, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three and ~~Six~~ Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012

Note 3—Summary of significant accounting principles (continued)

Income Taxes (continued)

In accordance with GAAP, the Company is required to determine whether a tax position of the Company is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company files an income tax return in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and may file income tax returns in various U.S. state and local jurisdictions. The tax benefit to be recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. De-recognition of a tax benefit previously recognized could result in the Company recording a tax liability that would reduce stockholders’ equity. This policy also provides guidance on thresholds, measurement, de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition that is intended to provide better financial statement comparability among different entities. It must be applied to all existing tax positions upon initial adoption and the cumulative effect, if any, is to be reported as an adjustment to stockholder’s equity as of January 1, 2009. Based on its analysis, the Company has determined that the adoption of this policy did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption. However, management’s conclusions regarding this policy may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, on-going analyses of and changes to tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof.

Interest and Penalty Recognition on Unrecognized Tax Benefits

The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.

Comprehensive Income

The Company complies with FASB ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income,” which establishes rules for the reporting and display of comprehensive income (loss) and its components.

Loss Per Common Share

The Company complies with the accounting and disclosure requirements of FASB ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share.” Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share incorporates the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents on an average basis during the period.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company complies with FASB ASC Topic 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” which establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. FASB ASC Topic 718 focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. FASB ASC Topic 718 requires an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). No compensation costs are recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service. The grant-date fair value of employee share options and similar instruments will be estimated using option-pricing models adjusted for the unique characteristics of those instruments (unless observable market prices for the same or similar instruments are available). If an equity award is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation cost will be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification. For the nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded compensation expense of $-0- and $-0-, respectively.

Puissant Industries, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012

Note 3—Summary of significant accounting principles (continued)

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation (continued)

~~transactions. FASB~~Nonemployee ASC Topic 718 requires an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). No compensation costs are recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service. The grant-date fair value of employee share options and similar instruments will be estimated using option-pricing models adjusted for the unique characteristics of those instruments (unless observable market prices for the same or similar instruments are available). If an equity award is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation cost will be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification. For the three month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded compensation expense of $118,022 and $81,685, respectively.awards

The fair value of equity instruments issued to a nonemployee is measured by using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the date of either: (i) a commitment for performance by the nonemployee has been reached; or (ii) the counterparty’s performance is complete. Expenses related to nonemployee awards are generally recognized in the same period and in the same period as the Company incurs the related liability for goods and services received. The Company recorded stock compensation of approximately $190,249 and $153,334 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to professional services.

Valuation of Investments in Securities at Fair Value—Definition and Hierarchy

FASB ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” provides a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and requires expanded disclosures regarding fair value measurements. ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the “exit price”) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

In determining fair value, the Company uses various valuation approaches. In accordance with GAAP, a fair value hierarchy for inputs is used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are those that market based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s assumptions about the inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. FASB ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-tiered fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used in fair value calculations, as follows:

Level 1 - Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Valuation adjustments and block discounts are not applied to Level 1 securities. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market, valuation of these securities does not entail a significant degree of judgment.

Level 2 - Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 - Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

Puissant Industries, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012

Note 3—Summary of significant accounting principles (continued)

Valuation of Investments in Securities at Fair Value—Definition and Hierarchy (continued)

Level 2 - Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 - Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

The availability of valuation techniques and observable inputs can vary from security to security and is affected by a wide variety of factors including, the type of security, whether the security is new and not yet established in the marketplace, and other characteristics particular to the transaction. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Those estimated values do not necessarily represent the amounts that may be ultimately realized due to the occurrence of future circumstances that cannot be reasonably determined.

Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, those estimated values may be materially higher or lower than the values that would have been used had a ready market for the securities existed. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for securities categorized in Level 3. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even when market assumptions are not readily available, the Company’s own assumptions are set to reflect those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The Company uses prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date, including periods of market dislocation. In periods of market dislocation, the observability of prices and inputs may be reduced for many securities. This condition could cause a security to be reclassified to a lower level within the fair value hierarchy.

Valuation Techniques

The Company values investments in securities that are freely tradable and are listed on a national securities exchange or reported on the NASDAQ national market at their last sales price as of the last business day of the year. At ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company had no investments classified as securities owned on the balance sheet.

Certificate of Deposits

The fair values of the bank certificate of deposits are based on the face value of the certificate of deposits.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2012, the FASB issued ASU No 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements.” This Update makes technical corrections, clarifications, and limited-scope improvements to various topics throughout the Codification. The changes clarify the Codification or correct unintended application of guidance and are not expected to have a significant impact on current accounting practices. The majority of the amendments in this Update are effective immediately with a few limited scope amendments (mainly related to Plan Accounting) that will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2012 for public companies. This guidance had no significant impact on the Company’s financials since it was primarily issued to provide corrections and/or clarifications of currently issued guidance.

Puissant Industries, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012

Note 3—Summary of significant accounting principles (continued)

Certificate of Deposits

The fair values of the bank certificate of deposits are based on the face value of the certificate of deposits.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2012, the FASB issued ASU No 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements.” This Update makes technical corrections, clarifications, and limited-scope improvements to various Topics throughout the Codification. The changes clarify the Codification or correct unintended application of guidance and are not expected to have a significant impact on current accounting practices. The majority of the amendments in this Update are effective immediately with a few limited scope amendments (mainly related to Plan Accounting) that will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2012 for public companies. This guidance had no significant impact on the Company’s financials since it was primarily issued to provide corrections and/or clarifications of currently issued guidance.

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-01, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” The main purpose of this Update is to clarify that the disclosures regarding offsetting assets and liabilities per ASU 2011-11 apply to derivatives including embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing and lending transactions that are offset or subject to a master netting agreement. Other types of transactions are not impacted. This Update is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and for all interim periods within that fiscal year. The Company does not expect this update to impact the Company’s financials since it does not have instruments noted in the update that are offset.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” The main purpose of this update is to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The update requires that the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income be reported on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified in its entirety to net income. Furthermore, information about amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income must be shown by component. This update is effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012 for public companies. The Company does not expect this update to impact its financials since it does not have any comprehensive income items. However, if any are noted in the future, the appropriate disclosures will be incorporated.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in bank deposit accounts, which, at times may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. Management believes the Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk related to cash and cash equivalents.

The Company extends credit, primarily in the form of uncollateralized oil and gas sales to various companies in the oil and gas industry, which results in concentrations of credit risk. Concentrations of credit risk may be affected by changes in economic or other conditions within our industry and may impact our overall credit risk. However, we believe that the risk of these unsecured receivables is mitigated by the size, reputation, and nature of the companies to which we extend credit.

Historically, the Company has sold its oil and natural gas production to a relatively small number of purchasers. We are not dependent upon, or confined to, any one purchaser or small group of purchasers. Due to the nature of oil and natural gas markets and because oil and natural gas are commodities and there are numerous purchasers in the areas in which we sell production, we do not believe the loss of a single purchaser, or more than one purchaser, would materially affect our ability to sell our production.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, revenues from four customers accounted for 100% of oil and gas production revenues.

Puissant Industries, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012

Note 3—Summary of significant accounting principles (continued)

Concentration of Credit Risk (continued)

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, revenues from four customers accounted for 100% of oil and gas production revenues.

Note 4—Convertible Bonds Payable–Related Parties

During April 2012 and September 2012, the Company received $20,000 and $8,000, respectively, of proceeds from the issuance of convertible bonds to related parties. The convertible bonds bear interest at 15% per annum and are due 60 months from the date of the bonds. The bond holder at his sole option may convert all of the principal due into common stock at a price per share of $2.00 per share.

Note 5—Notes Payable – Property and Mineral Rights

On August 1, 2011, the Company entered into a property and mineral and property rights purchase agreement (“Agreement”) in exchange for $25,000. The Agreement provided for a $1,000 down payment, with the balance of $24,000 to be paid in twelve monthly payments of approximately $2,077, which includes interest at 7% per annum. The note was paid in full during the year ended December 31, 2012.

On October 13, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement (“Agreement) to ~~acquire~~acquired property and property and mineral rights, in exchange for $50,000. The Agreement provided for a $500 down payment, with the balance of $49,500 to be paid in 120 payments of approximately $575, which includes interest at 7% per annum.

Maturities for these two notes payable are as follows at December 31:
Maturities for the note payable is as follows at December 31:
2013	$	~~1,911~~942
2014		4,100
2015		4,400
2016		4,700
2017		5,000
Thereafter		23,340
	$	4342,~~451~~482

Note 6—Notes Payable - Shareholders

Note 7—Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 90,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001. At June 30, 2013 and 2012, 8,778,005 and 6,644,200 shares were issued and outstanding, respectively.

Puissant Industries, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three and ~~six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012

Note 6—Notes Payable - Shareholders

Note 7—Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 90,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001. At September 30, 2013 and 2012, 9,228,005 and 6,041,800 shares were issued and outstanding, respectively.

Note 8—Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001. At ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012, no shares were issued or outstanding.

Note 9—Equity

On May 10, 2012, the Company issued 100,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to a professional service organization in exchange for professional services. We valued these shares at $2.00 per share. The shares were deemed to have been issued pursuant to an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Act, which exempts from registration "transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering."

On August 15, 2012, the Company issued 192,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in exchange for warrants held by shareholders. The shares were deemed to have been issued pursuant to an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Act, which exempts from registration "transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering."

On December 15, 2012, the Company issued a total of 410,400 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock for the purchase of support equipment from three related party companies (136,800 issued to each company). We valued these shares at $0.25 per share. The shares were deemed to have been issued pursuant to an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Act, which exempts from registration "transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering."

On April 15, 2013, the Company issued 618,722 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in payment of vendor invoices. We valued these shares at $0.09 per share. The shares were deemed to have been issued pursuant to an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Act, which exempts from registration "transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering."

On April 19, 2013, the Company issued 250,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in exchange for professional services. We valued these shares at $0.09 per share. The shares were deemed to have been issued pursuant to an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Act, which exempts from registration "transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering."

On April 19, 2013, the Company issued 1,265,083 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in payment of unpaid wages due to two of its officers. The shares were valued at $0.06 per share. The shares were deemed to have been issued pursuant to an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Act, which exempts from registration "transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering."

Note 10—Related Party

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company borrowed a total of $15,000 from related party shareholders, repaying $11,000 during the year, leaving a balance due of $4,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company borrowed an additional $20,000 from related party shareholders. These borrowings are non-interest bearing and due on demand.

Puissant Industries, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three and ~~six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012

Note 109—~~Related~~Equity ~~Party~~ (continued)

On August 16, 2013, The Company issued 250,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock for a cash payment of $50,000. These shares were valued at $0.20 per share. The shares were deemed to have been issued pursuant to an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Act, which exempts from registration "transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering."

On August 23, 2013, the Company issued 200,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in exchange for professional services. These shares were valued at $0.20 per share. The shares were deemed to have been issued pursuant to an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Act, which exempts from registration "transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering."

Note 10—Related Party

On December 15, 2012, the Company issued a total of 410,400 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock for the purchase of support equipment from three related party companies. A total of 136,800 shares were issued to each of the following related parties: Sovereign One, Inc., Logos Resources, Inc. and McCrome International, Inc. We valued these shares at $0.25 per share.

On April 15, 2013, the Company issued a total of 618,722 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to ADID Corporation in payment of invoices totaling $55,865.

On April 19, 2013, the Company issued 1,265,083 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in payment of unpaid wages of $75,905 due to two of its officers. Mark Holbrook, ~~President/Chief~~president ~~Executive~~and ~~Officer~~CEO, received 1,216,250 shares and Cora Holbrook, ~~Secretary/Treasurer~~secretary and treasurer, received 48,833 shares. The shares were valued at $0.06 per share.

The Company is related to several other entities by virtue of common ownership and control, which includes stockholders, employees, attorneys, consultants or companies owned by attorneys, consultants, and family members.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

A Smaller Reporting Company, as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, is not required to provide the information required by this item.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

As used in this Form 10-Q, references to “we,” “our” or “us” refer to Puissant Industries, Inc. unless the context otherwise indicates.

Forward-Looking Statements

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q (the “Report”). This Report contains forward-looking statements that relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggested herein. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

Corporate History

Corporate Overview.

We were incorporated on July 6, 2009, in the state of Wyoming as American Resource Management, Inc. We changed our domicile to the State of Florida on March 17, 2011 and simultaneously changed our name to Puissant Industries, Inc.. Our principal offices are located at 520 Whitley Street, London Kentucky and our telephone number is (606) 864-3161

Business Description.

We are engaged in oil and gas exploration and development activities in fractured formations located in Kentucky.

On or about January 15, 2005, Sovereign One, Inc., a company controlled by Mark Holbrook, McCrome International Inc., a company controlled by Cora J Holbrook and Logos Resources, Inc., a company controlled by Marshall Holbrook entered into an agreement with A.D.I.D. Corporation, a Kentucky corporation controlled by Marshall Holbrook ("A.D.I.D.") whereby A.D.I.D. agreed to acquire oil and gas leases and properties and assign such oil and gas leases and properties as specified by Sovereign One Inc., McCrome International, Inc., and Logos Resources, Inc.

In exchange for our issuance of an aggregate of 5,250,000 shares of our common stock representing 1,750,000 common shares to each Sovereign One Inc., McCrome International, Inc. and Logos Resources, Inc., A.D.I.D. assigned the following interests to us:

(i) On August 9, 2010, 100% ownership in (a) 34,000 of 2-inch natural gas pipeline and 60,000 feet of 4-inch natural gas pipeline, compressor stations, right of ways and easements located in Clay and Laurel Counties, Kentucky, and (b) 59,000 feet of 2-inch natural gas pipeline and 10,000 feet of 4-inch natural gas pipeline, compressor stations, right of ways and easements located in Whitley County, Kentucky; and (ii) On February 15, 2010, a 100% working interest and an 85% net revenue interests of 39 oil and gas wells and leases (the “Wells”) in Kentucky.

The working interest gives us the ability to explore for and to produce and own oil, gas or other minerals from the wells in which we have an interest. As the working interest owner, we bear the exploration, development, and operating costs. The net revenue interest provides us with 85% of the proceeds from any oil and gas production on the Wells after payment of all operating and development costs.

Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2011, we commenced recompletion of old wells by connecting the wells to our existing pipeline. During this period, we located the first purchaser of the natural gas from the recompleted wells, Seminole Energy Services.

In the fourth quarter of 2011, we acquired the surface mineral and property rights to 100 acres and subsurface rights to 175 acres in Clay County Kentucky.

On July 12, 2011, we formed our wholly owned subsidiary, ARM Operating Company (“ARM”), a Kentucky corporation which manages all of our oil and gas properties and oversees the operation, development, and maintenance of all our oil and gas wells, leases, and reserve activities. ARM is registered as the operator of wells with all relevant governmental agencies, and is responsible for maintaining production and maintenance reports for all of our wells and facilities. Our officers and Board of Directors makes all decisions concerning ARM.

Report by Independent Engineering Firm

An independent petroleum-engineering firm provided the following information with respect to the proved reserves attributable to our properties as of December 31, 2012.

		Proved Developed Producing		Proved Undeveloped		Total Proved
Net Reserves
Natural Gas	-MMcf		3,004.348		11,839.560		14,843.908
Oil / Condendsate	-Mbbl		39.317		137.606		176.923

Income Data
Future Gross Revenue	-M$		10,152.982		38,494.999		48,647.980
Deductions	-M$		2,477.669		9,849.277		12,326.946
Future Net Income
Undiscounted	-M$		7,675.312		28,645.722		36,321.034
Discounted @10% (Net Present Value)	-M$		4,402.887		13,681.708		18,084.595

The foregoing estimated proved reserve data was prepared using unweighted average first-day-of-the-month prices for the year ended December 31, 2012. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pricing guidelines were used to set the oil and gas prices. An oil price of $94.71 per barrel (Bbl) and a gas price of $2.752 per million British Thermal Unit (MMbtu) were used in this study. The prices were adjusted for energy content, price differentials, and other expenses as needed.

Our proved natural gas reserves were 14.843 billion cubic feet (Bcf), or 2.473 million barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) (1Bbl = 6 Mcf basis). The proved oil reserves were .177 million barrels, for a total of 2.650 million barrels of oil equivalent (BOE). The Net Present Value, discounted at 10%, of the estimated future net cash flow before income taxes (PV-10) of our total proved reserves at December 31, 2012 was $18.084 million.

There are many uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities and values of proved reserves and projecting future rates of production and timing of development. The reserve data set forth herein, although prepared by an independent petroleum engineer in a manner customary in the industry, are estimates only, and the actual quantities and values of oil and gas are likely to differ from the estimated amounts set forth herein. In addition, the reserve estimates for our properties will be affected by future changes in sales prices of oil and gas produced. Other than those filed with the SEC, our estimated reserves have not been filed with or included in any reports to any federal agency.

Results of operations

Three-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 compared to the three-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, we generated total revenues of $~~122~~124,~~289~~726, consisting of $~~111~~113,~~622~~628 in oil and gas production revenues and $1011,~~667~~098 in royalty income. For the three-ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012, we generated total revenues of $~~128~~113,~~480~~032 consisting entirely of ~~oil~~royalty ~~and gas production revenues~~income. The $611,~~191~~694 ~~decrease~~increase in our total revenues for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 compared to the ~~June~~September 30, 2012 quarter is primarily attributable to the $1611,~~858~~098 ~~decrease~~of inroyalty income for the three months ended September 30, 2013 given that the oil and gas production ~~revenues~~for ~~during~~ the ~~June~~three months ended September 30, 2013 ~~quarter~~and ~~offset~~royal byincome of $10113,~~667~~032 offor ~~royalty related revenues during~~ the ~~quarter~~three months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2013~~2012, were approximately the same. For the three month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and ~~June~~September 30, 2012, we incurred total costs and expenses of $~~155~~176,~~161~~126 and $~~166~~177,~~835,~~603 respectively. The total costs and expenses for these 2013 and 2012 periods only represents a $111,~~674~~477 decrease in our operating expenses during the ~~June~~September 30, 2013 quarter compared to the ~~June~~September 30, 2012 quarter; ishowever, ~~primarily~~there ~~attributable~~are ~~to:~~material ~~(a)~~differences ~~$59,913~~in ~~decrease~~the incomparisons ~~lease~~of ~~operating~~type costs and expenses ~~during~~between the 2013 quarter ~~ended~~and ~~June~~2012 30quarter, ~~2013~~as ~~compared~~follows: to(a) ~~the~~a ~~quarter~~$71,087 ~~ended~~decrease ~~June~~in ~~30,~~lease ~~2012~~operating ~~offset~~expenses; by(b) a $2948,~~764~~965 increase in ~~our~~ administrative expenses; and (c) a $1820,~~475~~645 ofincrease in depreciation and depletion ~~expense during the quarter ended quarter June 30, 2013 quarter~~ with $0 of depreciation anand depletion expense during the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012.

~~Six~~Nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 compared to the ~~six~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012

For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, we generated total revenues of $~~233~~357,~~236~~962, consisting of $~~213~~325,~~007~~635 in oil and gas production revenues and $2031,~~229~~327 in royalty income. We reported $~~245~~358,~~320~~352 of total revenues for the ~~six~~nine-months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 , consisting entirely of royalty income~~. The $12~~,~~804~~ ~~decrease~~whereas in ~~our revenues for~~ the ~~six months ended June 30,~~ 2013 ~~compared~~period torevenues ~~the~~were ~~six months ended June 30, 2012 is~~ primarily attributable to ~~the~~ $~~225~~325,~~091~~635 ~~decrease in our royalty revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012 period offset by $213,007~~ of oil and gas production revenues. ~~during~~There ~~the~~is ~~six~~an ~~months~~immaterial ~~ended~~decrease ~~June~~in ~~30,~~total ~~2013~~revenues ~~with~~of no$390 ~~such~~between total revenues ~~during~~from the ~~six~~2013 ~~months~~period ~~ended~~to ~~June~~the ~~30,~~ 2012 period. For the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and ~~June~~September 30, 2012, we incurred operating expenses of $~~353~~529,~~758~~884 and $~~337~~357,~~543~~962, respectively, representing increased expenses of $16171,~~215~~922. This increase is primarily attributable to a $~~124~~337,~~731~~630 increase in administrative expenses offset by a $~~134~~205,~~273~~360 decrease in lease operating expenses ~~and $25,757 of depreciation and depletion expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to no such expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2012~~.

Liquidity

At June 30, 2013, we had total current assets of $280,272 consisting of $22,541 in cash, $43,253 in accounts receivable and $214,478 in prepaid expenses for professional services. Total current liabilities at June 30, 2013 were $31,915, consisting of accounts and accrued expenses payable of $23,934, notes payable - current portion of $3,981 and due to related parties of $4,000. At June 30, 2013, we had positive working capital of $248,357.

~~Our material sources and uses of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:~~Liquidity

	2013			2012
Cash (used in) operating activities	$	149,021		$	(9,038	)
Proceeds from related party loans, net	$	0		$	20,000
Payments on notes payable	$	(1,889	)	$	6,310
Pr
Increase (decrease) in cash	$	1,916		$	(2,728	)

At September 30, 2013, we had total current assets of $287,344 consisting of $57,092 in cash, $48,000 in accounts receivable and $182,252 in prepaid expenses for professional services. Total current liabilities at September 30, 2013 were $36,543, consisting of accounts and accrued expenses payable of $28,492, notes payable - current portion of $4,051 and due to related parties of $4,000. At September 30, 2013, we had positive working capital of $250,801.

Our ~~net~~material ~~loss~~sources ofand ~~$34,690~~uses ~~for the three months ended June 30, 2013 represents a decreased net loss~~ of $4,375 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012. Our net loss of $126,730 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 represents an increased net loss of $32,265 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012. The primary component of our negative operating cash ~~flow~~ for the ~~three~~nine months ended September ~~June~~ 30, 2013 ~~were our administrative expenses of $290,974, which amount primarily consisted of matters pertaining to the exploitation of our existing properties~~ and ~~continued~~2012 ~~concentration~~are ofas ~~our planning efforts in the Appalachian Basin Devonian Shale area.~~follows:

	2013		2012
Net cash (used in) operating activities	$	117,110	$	8,012
Proceeds from related party loans, net	$	0	$	20,000
Payments on notes payable	$	2,858	$	18,304
Pr
Increase (decrease) in cash	$	36,174	$	(6,316	)

Our net loss of $179,938 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to a net loss of $159,999 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 represents an increased net loss of $19,939 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The primary component of our negative operating cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were our administrative expenses of $422,717, which amount primarily consisted of matters pertaining to the exploitation of our existing properties and continued concentration of our planning efforts in the Appalachian Basin Devonian Shale area.

TRENDS AND UNCERTAINTIES

Our operations are subject to certain trends and uncertainties:

·o Supply and demand factors in the oil and gas industry;

·o Actions by United States policy makers in the oil and gas industry, particularly those that impact upon supply, demand and price;

·o Whether we are able to obtain adequate financing to expand our operations;

·o Fluctuating changes in the market price of oil and natural gas; and

·o Weather, imports, marketing of competitive fuels, proximity and capacity of oil and natural gas pipelines and other transportation facilities, any oversupply or undersupply of oil, natural gas and liquid products, the regulatory environment, the economic environment and, other regional and political events, none of which can be predicted with certainty;

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

We report revenues and expenses using the accrual method of accounting for financial and tax reporting purposes.

USE OF ESTIMATES

Management uses estimates and assumption in preparing these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses.

INCOME TAXES

We account for income taxes under ASC 740 “Income Taxes” which codified SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” and FIN 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” Under the asset and liability method of ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC 740, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs. A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that we will not realize tax assets through future operations.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, “Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” requires the Company to disclose, when reasonably attainable, the fair market values of its assets and liabilities, which are deemed to be financial instruments. Our financial instruments consist primarily of cash.

PER SHARE INFORMATION

We compute net loss per share accordance with FASB ASC 205 “Earnings per Share”. FASB ASC 205 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement.

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS excludes all potentially dilutive shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.

STOCK OPTION GRANTS

We have not granted any stock options to our officers and directors since our inception. Upon the further development of our business, we will likely grant options to directors and officers consistent with industry standards for junior oil and gas companies.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that are material to investors.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Inapplicable. We have no market sensitive instruments.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this Report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the 1934 Act). Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the 1934 Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 240.15d-15 that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

2324

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

On ~~April~~August 15, ~~2013~~2012, we issued ~~618~~192,~~722~~000 shares of our ~~common~~$0.001 ~~stock~~par invalue ~~payment~~common ofstock ~~vendor~~pursuant ~~invoices. We~~to ~~valued~~warrants ~~these~~exercised ~~shares~~by ~~at $0~~shareholders.~~09 per share.~~

On ~~April~~August 1916, 2013, we issued 250,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock infor ~~exchange~~a ~~for~~cash ~~professional~~payment ~~services~~of $50,000. WeThese ~~valued~~shares ~~these~~were ~~shares~~valued at $0.0920 per share.

On ~~April~~August 1923, 2013, we issued 1200,~~265,083~~000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock in ~~payment~~exchange offor ~~unpaid~~professional ~~wages due to two of its officers~~services. ~~The~~ These shares were valued at $0.0920 per share.

All of the foregoing issuances were deemed to have been issued pursuant to an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which exempts from registration "transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering."

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Inapplicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

2425

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit No.		Description

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d14(a) Certifications of Mark Holbrook Chief Executive Officer and Director (attached hereto)

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d14(a) Certifications of Cora J. Holbrook, the CFO (attached hereto)

32.1		Section 1350 Certifications of Mark Holbrook, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (attached hereto)

32.2		Section 1350 Certifications Cora Holbrook (attached hereto)

101.INS**		XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT

101.SCH**		XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA

101.CAL**		XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE

101.DEF**		XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE

101.LAB**		XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE

101.PRE**		XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE

_____________

** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

2526

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Puissant Industries Inc.
Dated: August 12, 2013	By:	/s/ Mark Holbrook
Dated: November 18, 2013	By:	/s/ Mark Holbrook
	Name	Mark Holbrook
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer

2627

Filing Compare · Puissant Industries, Inc.