UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017

o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ~~____________~~___________to ~~to ____________~~___________

Commission File No.: 000-55659

Buscar Company

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

Nevada		68-0681435
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)
(State or other jurisdiction of		(IRS Employer Identification No.)
4325 Glencoe Ave Ste C9Marina Del Rey, CA		90292-9991
incorporation or organization)
4325 Glencoe Ave Ste C9 Marina Del Rey, CA		90292-9991
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(661) 418-7842

(Registrant'’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Title of each class registered:		Name of each exchange on which registered:
None		None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant'’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "“large accelerated filer,"” "“accelerated filer"” and "“smaller reporting company"” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

~~Large~~Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, oan ~~Accelerated~~accelerated filer, oa ~~Non~~non-accelerated filer, osmaller ~~Smaller~~ reporting company, xor ~~(Do~~an ~~not~~emerging ~~check~~growth ifcompany. aSee the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company),” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	x
		Emerging Growth Company	x

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of ~~the~~Common ~~voting~~Stock ~~and non-voting stock~~ held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, ason of September 30, ~~2015~~2016, the last business day of the Registrant'’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was ~~approximately~~ $314,~~435~~557,~~040. Solely for purposes of this disclosure~~841, ~~shares~~based ofon ~~common~~a ~~stock~~$3.32 ~~held~~average bybid ~~executive officers~~ and ~~directors~~asked ofprice ~~the Registrant as~~ of such ~~date~~common ~~have~~equity, ~~been~~as ~~excluded~~of ~~because~~the ~~such~~last ~~persons~~business ~~may~~day ~~be deemed to be affiliates. This determination~~ of ~~executive~~the ~~officers~~registrant’s ~~and~~most ~~directors~~recently ascompleted ~~affiliates~~second isfiscal ~~not necessarily a conclusive determination for any other purposes~~quarter.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

18,681,321 common shares as of June 30, 2017.

CAUTIONARY NOTE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this "“Report"”) contains "“forward-looking statements"” within the meaning of the Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "“Securities Act"”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "“Exchange Act"”). Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts. Because they discuss future events or conditions, forward-looking statements may include words such as "“anticipate,"” "“believe,"” "“estimate,"” "“intend,"” "“could,"” "“should,"” "“would,"” "“may,"” "“seek,"” "“plan,"” "“might,"” "“will,"” "“expect,"” "“predict,"” "“project,"” "“forecast,"” "“potential,"” "“continue"” negatives thereof or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are found at various places throughout this Report and include information concerning possible or assumed future results of our operations; business strategies; future cash flows; financing plans; plans and objectives of management; any other statements regarding future operations, future cash needs, business plans and future financial results, and any other statements that are not historical facts.

From time to time, forward-looking statements also are included in our other periodic reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K, in our press releases, in our presentations, on our website and in other materials released to the public. Any or all of the forward-looking statements included in this Report and in any other reports or public statements made by us are not guarantees of future performance and may turn out to be inaccurate. These forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions and beliefs about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Many of those factors are outside of our control and could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different time than we have described. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Report. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning other matters addressed in this Report and attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this Report.

Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, a change in events, conditions, circumstances or assumptions underlying such statements, or otherwise.

PART I

Item 1. Business

Buscar Company. ("“Buscar"”, "“we"”, "“us"”, "“our"”, the "Company") was incorporated in Nevada as Cascade Springs Ltd. on January 19, 2010. In 2012, we amended our Articles of Incorporation to change our name to Colorado Gold Mines, Inc. On June 18, 2014, changed our name to Buscar Oil, Inc. On May 19, 2015, the Company changed ~~it's~~its name to Buscar Company. Buscar is domiciled in the state of Colorado, and its corporate headquarters are located in Los Angeles, CA. The Company selected March 31 as its fiscal year end.

The Company's business is the buying, selling and racing of thoroughbreds that can race in the allowance and stakes levels of thoroughbred racing; however, the Company will initially begin in the claiming level of thoroughbred racing. The Company intends to acquire in its claiming division before acquiring horses for its allowance/stakes division. These horses will provide the Company with revenue and a foundation to build out a stakes level stable. The Company's main focus will be acquiring horses that will be capable of racing in stake races throughout the Country.

Allowance races are a race other than claiming for which the racing secretary drafts certain conditions (see below for more details). Stakes races are the top level races. The purse money is significantly higher in allowance and stakes level races. Claiming refers to the process by which a licensed person may purchase a horse entered in a race designated as a "claiming race" for a predetermined price. When a horse has been claimed, its new owner assumes title after the starting gate opens although the former owner is entitled to all purse money earned in that race. Claiming races are lowest level in thoroughbred racing. Stakes and allowance races are races in which the horses are not for sale. The Company also engages in the business of thoroughbred research.

The Company is a developmental stage company. Additionally, the Company's management has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The Company needs to raise additional capital to continue operations and to implement its plan of operations. The Company has insufficient capital to continue operations for the next 12 months. The Company requires up to $40,000 to continue its current operations for the next 12 months.. The company needs to raise capital in the amount of $1,600,000 to fully execute on its business plan on claiming at least 12-15 thoroughbreds over the next 18 months. The Company initially needs to raise $200,000 to begin implementing its business plan and acquiring thoroughbreds to race in claiming races. The Company needs the additional $1,400,000 to acquire a total of 8 thoroughbreds for its claiming division and 3-5 for its allowance/stakes division. The Company has not secured the financing necessary to execute timetables and/or acquisitions stated above. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that the Company will be able to raise the funds discussed in this paragraph.

Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion and the reasons noted for issuing the opinion are our lack of revenues and capital.

This is the current corporate organization:

Business of Registrant

The Company's primary business is the breeding and selling of thoroughbreds. The Company will breed in California. The Company’s ~~expects~~main ~~that~~focus itis ~~will~~building ~~need~~and togrowing ~~raise a minimum of an additional $2,000,000 to fully execute~~ its breeding ~~program~~operations. The ~~breeding program consists of the~~ Company ~~acquiring~~has ~~broodmares~~acquired ~~and~~3 ~~paying~~mares ~~stud~~for ~~fees~~its ~~to farms who own the studs. The~~ breeding ~~season~~operations, ~~typically~~Milania, ~~runs~~Sweet ~~from~~Dreams ~~February~~and ~~through~~Meta ~~May~~Mu. ~~Under~~Milania ~~the~~and ~~rules~~Sweet ofDreams ~~racing,~~were ~~every~~pregnant ~~foal~~when (athe ~~baby~~company ~~thoroughbred)~~acquired isthem ~~given~~while aMeta ~~birthday~~Mu ofwas ~~January~~not. 1For of the ~~year~~2017 ofbreeding ~~its~~seasons ~~birth~~the ~~regardless~~mares ~~of its actual date of birth. The Company~~ will ~~generate~~be ~~revenue~~breed ~~from~~as ~~its~~follows: ~~breeding~~Milania ~~operations~~to ~~through~~War ~~the~~Front, ~~sale~~Sweet ofDreams ~~the~~to ~~foals~~Tapit and ~~purse~~Meta ~~winnings~~Mu ~~from~~to ~~the~~American ~~foals~~Pharoah ~~the~~(currently ~~Company~~being ~~keeps~~negotiated). InThe ~~July~~table ~~2016,~~below represents the ~~Company~~company’s ~~agreed~~investment ~~to purchase its first broodmare~~ and ~~expects~~expected toinvestment ~~stud~~for ~~her~~each ~~in the next breeding season.~~ mare:

The Company expects to need to raise $2,000,000 to fully implement its breeding division. The Company would expect to acquire 10 - 15 broodmares for approximately $1,000,000. The Company expects to pay approximately $750,000 in stud fees to the owners of the stallions we decide to breed the mares with. The Company also expects to spend $250,000 to be used to pay for the upkeep of the broodmares at the farm we decide to maintain the broodmares at. The Company does not need to acquire or build its own facilities to begin its breeding program as we may maintain the broodmares at various farms in California which charge a daily rate per thoroughbred. The Company expects its on-going monthly expenses directly associated to the thoroughbreds in its breeding division to be approximately $10 to $17 per day for each broodmare. The fee depends on the location of the farm and the amount of vet bills each broodmare may require.

Name	Purchase Price		Stud Fee			Stallion	Stud Insurance			Total
Milania	$	310,000	$	330,000		War Front	$	91,528	(2)	$	731,528
Sweet Dreams	$	180,000	$	318,000	(1)	Tapit	$	0		$	498,000
Meta Mu	$	30,000	$	85,000	(1)	American Pharoah	$	0		$	115,000
Totals	$	520,000	$	733,333			$	91,528		$	1,344,528

(1) The ~~Company is dependent on obtaining the necessary financing to acquire broodmares and pay the necessary~~ stud ~~fees~~fee for ~~its~~Sweet ~~breeding~~Dreams ~~division.~~and ~~The~~Meta ~~Company~~Mu ~~will~~are ~~acquire~~only ~~begin~~paid ~~the~~once ~~breeding program as our capital position permit. Although~~ the ~~Company~~foal ~~expects~~is itborn ~~needs~~and ~~$2,000,000~~is toable ~~acquire the 10-15 broodmares, we will begin acquiring broodmares as soon as our capital position allows the Company~~ to dostand ~~so. As such, the faster the Company can raise the necessary capital the quick we can acquire the broodmares~~ and ~~pay~~nurse ~~for~~from the ~~stud fees~~mother. ~~The Company currently does not have a minimum amount that would be required.~~

~~While~~(2) ~~the~~The ~~Company~~stud isfee ~~building~~for ~~its~~Milania ~~breeding~~was ~~operations,~~paid ~~the Company will own~~ and ~~manage~~was ~~thoroughbreds~~a ~~that~~no ~~will race in allowance or stakes races~~guarantee. ~~This~~The ~~will allow the~~ Company topurchased ~~begin~~insurance to ~~develop~~cover ~~relationships with other owners and trainers for~~ the ~~benefit~~stud offee ~~its breeding operations.~~

~~Financing Requirements~~3

The ~~company~~Company’s ~~needs~~total expense to ~~raise~~acquire ~~capital in~~ the ~~amount~~mares ofwas $2520,000~~,000~~ towith ~~fully execute on its breeding operations. The~~ $2733,~~000,000~~333 isand ~~broken down as follows:~~ $191,~~000,000~~528 to ~~acquire~~insure ~~5-10~~the ~~broodmares, $750,000 in~~ stud ~~fees,~~fee ~~and~~for ~~$250,000~~War toFront. beThe ~~used~~Company’s toagreement ~~pay~~ for ~~the~~War ~~upkeep~~Front ofis ~~the~~a ~~broodmares~~non-guaranteed atfee ~~the~~of ~~farm~~$330,000 wewhich ~~decide~~was topaid ~~maintain~~in ~~the~~December ~~broodmares at~~2016. The Company ~~has~~insured ~~not secured~~ the ~~financing~~$330,000 ~~necessary~~stud fee to ~~execute~~convert onthe ~~its~~non-guarantee ~~business~~into ~~plan~~a aslive ~~stated~~foal ~~above.~~that Ifstands ~~the~~and ~~Company~~nurses ~~cannot~~guarantee. ~~raise~~The ~~the~~stud ~~full~~fees ~~amount~~for ofSweet ~~capital~~Dreams ~~necessary,~~and ~~then~~Meta itMu ~~will~~are ~~take~~Live ~~longer~~Foal ~~than~~Stands ~~expected~~and ~~for~~Nurses ~~the~~(LSFN) ~~Company~~from tothe ~~implement~~stallion ~~its growth plan~~farms.

Milania gave birth to her Pioneer of the Nile foal in January 2017. Sweet Dreams is expected to give birth to her Street Car in March 2017. The Company's ~~Thoroughbreds~~will sell the foals at the Keeneland sale in November 2017 or July 2018.

Name		DOB/Sex
Mr. Ability		2014/Colt
Sheza Superstar		2014/Filly
Tsunami		2014/Colt

Below is overview of the stallions the Company has chosen for its mares:

4War Front is North America’s #1 sire by Stake Winners and the Worlds #1 sire for 2-Year Olds Stake Winners. The True Nicks report on the mating between the two is an “A++” rating which makes it an ideal pairing. War Front’s weanlings sold for an average of $580,000 in 2016 with his colt weanlings averaging $808,750. At the Keenland sale, War Front had 19 yearlings sell for an average of $633,947. Two of his progeny sold for more than $1 million and 14 sold for $500,000 or more. With the top prices of $1.9 million for a colt out of stakes winner Prize Catch (A.P. Indy) and $1.3 million for a colt out of multiple grade I winner Love and Pride (A.P. Indy).

~~Breeding~~Tapit, currently the leading North American sire with 14 graded stakes winners and 5 Grade 1 stakes winner, for the third consecutive season, has broken his own North American single-season progeny earnings record of $18,848,029. Tapit ranks #1 in the United States and #2 in the world for average price of weanlings sold in 2016. Tapit’s average weanling sold for $692,000 and mares sold in foal to Tapit sold for an average of $1,700,000 in 2016.

~~The~~Tapit ~~Company's~~was ~~breeding~~also ~~division~~represented ~~will~~by ~~consist~~31 ofyearlings ~~those~~at ~~thoroughbreds~~the ~~breed~~2016 toKeeneland beYearling ~~sold in private transactions or auctions. The Company will breed in California those thoroughbreds that it intends to race and will breed in Kentucky those that it intends to~~ sale. ~~The~~which ~~Company~~sold ~~expects~~for ~~that~~an itaverage ~~will~~price ~~need to raise a minimum~~ of ~~an additional~~ $2639,~~000,000 to begin its breeding programs~~839. ~~The~~Among ~~breeding~~those ~~programs~~sold, ~~consist~~four ofbrought ~~the~~more ~~Company~~than ~~acquiring~~$1 ~~broodmares~~million and ~~paying~~19 ~~stud~~brought ~~fees to farms who own the studs. The breeding season typically runs from February through May. Under the rules of racing~~$500,000 ~~every~~or ~~foal (a baby thoroughbred) is given a birthday of January 1 of the year of its birth regardless of its actual date of birth~~more. ~~The~~Tapit's ~~Company~~top ~~will~~seller ~~generate~~sold ~~revenue~~for ~~from~~$2 ~~its breeding division through the sale of the foals and purse winnings from the foals the Company keeps~~million.

~~The~~American ~~Company expects to begin its breeding program in January 2015. However~~Pharoah, wewas ~~are dependent on raising~~ the ~~necessary~~first ~~capital~~Triple toCrown ~~begin~~winner ~~our breeding program. As a result, we may have to delay the date we begin if we are unable to raise sufficient capital. Any delay~~ in ~~raising~~37 ~~the~~years ~~capital~~and ~~may cause significant delays in beginning~~ the ~~program~~2015 ~~since~~Horse ~~the~~Of ~~breeding~~The ~~season~~Year ~~only~~& ~~runs~~2014 ~~from~~Eclipse ~~February~~Champion ~~through May~~Juvenile. ~~The~~He ~~Company~~was ~~expects~~a towinner ~~need~~of 9 toraces ~~raise~~and almost $29,000,000 toin ~~fully~~earnings including ~~implement~~the ~~its~~Breeders ~~breeding~~Cup ~~division~~Classic-Gr.1, ~~The~~Kentucky ~~Company would expect to acquire 10~~ Derby-Gr.1, 15Preakness ~~broodmares for approximately $~~S.-Gr.1,~~000,000.~~ ~~The~~Belmont ~~Company expects to pay approximately $500~~S.-Gr.1,~~000~~ inHaskell ~~stud fees to the owners of the stallions we decide to breed the mares with~~Invitational-Gr.1, ~~The~~Arkansas ~~Company also expects to spend $500~~Derby-Gr.1,~~000~~ toDel beMar ~~used~~Futurity-Gr.1 to& ~~pay~~FrontRunner ~~for the upkeep of the broodmares at the farm we decide to maintain the broodmares at~~S.-Gr.1. ~~The~~His ~~Company~~first ~~does~~crop ~~not~~of ~~need~~foals tois ~~acquire~~being orborn ~~build its own facilities to begin its breeding program as we may maintain the broodmares at various farms~~ in ~~California or Kentucky~~2017. ~~The~~He ~~Company~~has ~~expects~~generated ~~its~~an ~~on-going~~average ~~monthly~~price ~~expenses~~of ~~directly~~$420,000 ~~associated~~for tomares ~~the thoroughbreds~~ in ~~its~~foal ~~breeding division~~ to ~~be approximately $10 to $17 per day for each broodmare~~him. ~~The fee depends on the location of the farm and the amount of vet bills each broodmare may require.~~

~~The~~Pioneerof ~~Company is dependent on obtaining~~ the ~~necessary~~Nile ~~financing~~is toamong ~~acquire broodmares and pay~~ the ~~necessary~~leading ~~stud~~sires ~~fees~~with ~~for~~4 ~~its~~crops ~~breeding~~of ~~division.~~racing ~~The~~age ~~Company~~that ~~will~~includes ~~acquire~~the ~~begin~~following: ~~the~~329 ~~breeding~~foals, ~~program~~174 asstarters, ~~our~~16 ~~capital~~black-type ~~position~~winners, ~~permit.~~128 ~~Although~~winners ~~the~~of ~~Company~~271 ~~expects~~races itand ~~needs~~earning $219,~~000~~914,~~000 to acquire 5-10 broodmares for this division~~401, weincluding ~~will~~triple ~~begin~~crown ~~acquiring~~champion American ~~broodmares as soon as our capital position allows the Company to do so~~Pharoah. AsPioneerof ~~such,~~ the ~~faster~~Nile’s ~~the~~colt ~~Company~~weanlings ~~can~~sold ~~raise the necessary capital the quick we can acquire the broodmares and pay~~ for ~~the~~an ~~stud~~average ~~fees.~~of $360,000 in 2016.

Revenue from Breeding Division

The Company will generate revenue from the sale of the foals from the Company's broodmares. The foals may be sold as yearlings (1 year old) or as 2 years old. They may be sold at an auction or private party transaction. The Company does not expect to begin generating revenue from its breeding division until 2018.

Allowance/Stakes Level Racing

Stakes and allowance races are races in which the horses are not for sale. Allowance races are a race other than claiming for which the racing secretary drafts certain conditions. The racing secretary for each track drafts certain conditions that a horse must satisfy to be entered into allowance races at the track. These conditions are set forth in a "condition book" that is generally prepared every two weeks. Stakes races are the top level races. Stakes races are the top level races and normally have a nomination and entry fee to be entered into the race. Additionally, there may be a starting fee. A starting fee is the final fee to be paid when the horse is declared a starter after the starting gate opens. The purse money is significantly higher in allowance and stakes level races. Allowance and stakes races may only account for 1-3 races per day at a track instead of the 5-9 claiming races a day at a track. The higher the level in racing the fewer the number of races there are on an average day.

Claiming

A claiming race is one in which all horses entered are eligible to be purchased by a licensed owner or indirectly through a trainer for the specified claiming price. For example, in a $32,000 Claiming race all the horses are for sale for the purchase price of $32,000 plus applicable taxes. The procedure for a claiming race is as follows: the trainer puts a claim in for the horse prior to the race. Immediately upon the start of the race the horse is considered sold to the new owner, however, the previous owner maintains any purse winnings from that race. If two or more owners/trainers put a claim in on a horse than a "shake" occurs to determine who has purchased the horse. A shake is when each claiming owner is assigned a number. Then a racing official draws a number at random and the owner with corresponding number has purchased the horse. Claiming races account for up to 80% of all thoroughbred races on a given day. Allowance and stakes thoroughbred typically only race every 30 days and may race as often as every two weeks.

Timing Between Races

Allowance and stakes thoroughbred typically only race every 45-60 days and may travel outside California to race. Claiming thoroughbreds typically only race every 30 days and may race as often as every two weeks. Claimers race more often than allowance/stakes thoroughbreds due mainly to the smaller purses in claiming races. The expenses related to training a claiming thoroughbred versus an allowance or stakes thoroughbred are approximately the same amount. However, allowance/stakes thoroughbred's purse typically will range from $50,000 to $5,000,000 while claiming purses typically range from $10,000 to $32,000. The higher the average purse money in races that a thoroughbred runs in will allow the Company to provide more time for that thoroughbred to rest in between races since the revenue generated is higher from that thoroughbred.

Eligibility to Enter Races

Eligibility to enter a horse into a particular race is determined by the conditions applicable to the race as set forth on the racing card established by the racing secretary. Conditions take into account such factors as age, sex, winnings (including the number of races won, if any, the most recent win(s) and dollar amount of winnings) and state of birth. For claiming races, the claiming price represents, effectively, an additional racing condition because only horses with values consistent with the claiming price will be entered by their owners. We believe that there will be ample opportunities for our horses to race and we do not believe an absence of racing opportunities will limit our revenues.

Purse Money Distribution

In both allowance/stakes level races and claiming races, purse earnings received by the owner are typically net of commissions. Commissions are customarily 10% of purse earnings for the jockey, if the horse places in first, second or third, and 10% of purse earnings for the trainer and barn staff, if the horse places in first, second, third, fourth or fifth. Otherwise, commissions for the jockey, trainer and barn staff are a flat fee of typically $250. The purse winnings are typically distributed as follows: 1st: 60%; 2nd: 20%; 3rd: 12%; 4th: 6%; 5th: 2%. The rest of the field receives $250 per start.

Training and Development of Horses

The Company's training program will not differ significantly between the claiming division and allowance/stakes division. Each thoroughbred will follow essentially the same training program with the difference being in what distances the horses is expected to race. The main difference between a claiming thoroughbred and an allowance/stakes is essentially the speed and talent of the thoroughbred. As any athlete, some thoroughbreds are blessed with more natural talent than others.

The trainer is the most significant person on the racing team with respect to the development of a thoroughbred. The primary responsibilities of a trainer are the development of the racing abilities of a thoroughbred and the execution of a racing strategy for generating racing revenues. In some cases, the strategy for a horse considered to have early racing potential may be to have it entered into races quickly to take advantage of its early maturation. In other cases, horses may be entered into races more selectively in order to develop them at a more conservative pace. The trainer and our chief executive officer will select the races into which each horse is to be entered at the racetrack.

Once a thoroughbred has been entered in a race, a period of a few weeks to two months may elapse before the thoroughbred has recovered and is ready to race again. The factors relating to the length between races include the endurance, shape and health of the thoroughbred, the skill level and competition experience of the other thoroughbreds in the race and purse money typically ran by the thoroughbred. Trainers typically use these factors to determine where and when to race the thoroughbreds they are training in an effort to create attractive opportunities for the thoroughbred to win and generate revenues. Between races, thoroughbreds are generally ridden or walked every day. Training typically includes jogging, cantering or galloping most days and running (which is referred to as a workout or "fast work") every seven days that it does not race. A workout consists of a timed run from three to five furlongs (one furlong equals 1/8 of a mile) and simulates a race for the thoroughbred.

Another key consideration in racing development is the selection of a jockey. Generally speaking, the trainer is responsible for jockey selection and the stature of the trainer is therefore important from the perspective of jockey selection as well. However, if our horses become eligible for and are entered into a Grade I stakes race, the jockey will be selected or approved by our chief executive officer. In each race, a jockey weight is assigned to each horse and that horse's jockey must weigh in at the required weight in order for the horse to start (or within a number of pounds over the specified weight if a range is permitted by the racing secretary). Jockey weights are assigned based on a variety of factors that may include the horse's age and prior win level. The jockey is generally entitled to a commission equal to 10% of the purse earning of a horse ridden by the jockey, if the horse places in first, second or third. The jockey is also entitled to a modest (for example, $100) flat fee that must be paid from the horseman's account with the racing track.

Overview of the Horse Racing Industry in the U.S. and Canada

During 2010, there were 52,771 active thoroughbred racehorses in the U.S. and Canada. Those horses raced in a total of 5,918 thoroughbred races and earned approximately $1.1 billion in purse winnings. Thoroughbred horse races in 2010 attracting millions of spectators and aggregate handle of more than $11.9 billion at tracks and at off-site locations. The US Gross Domestic Product for thoroughbred racing, breeding, and related activities alone is over $39 billion, with the total horse industry contributing over $101 billion.

Pari-mutuel wagering is the prevalent form of wagering on horse racing events. Pari-mutuel wagering is a form of wagering in which wagers on horse races are aggregated in a commingled pool of wagers, called a mutual pool, and the payoff to winning customers is determined by both the total dollar amount of wagers in the mutual pool and the allocation of those dollars among the various kinds of bets. Unlike casino gaming, the customers bet against each other, and not against the operator, and therefore the operator bears no risk of loss with respect to wagering conducted except in the case of minimum payout bets. The pari-mutuel operator retains a pre-determined percentage of the total amount wagered, called the takeout, on each event, regardless of the outcome of the wagering event, and the remaining balance of the mutual pool is distributed to the winning customers. Of the percentage retained by the pari-mutuel operator, a portion is paid to the horse owners in the form of purses or winnings, which encourage the horse owners and their trainers to enter their horses in a track's races. Pari-mutuel wagering on horse racing is the largest form of pari-mutuel wagering, and it is currently authorized in over 40 states of the United States and all provinces of Canada.

Over the past twenty years, live attendance at horse racetracks in the U.S. and Canada has declined substantially. The total number of races declined from 81,279 in 1990 to 52,771 in 2010. Pari-mutuel wagering on thoroughbred horseracing has declined by approximately 24% from a peak of $15.7 billion in 2003 to $11.9 billion in 2010. U.S. and Canadian purses, which represent the amount of available winnings in United States and Canadian thoroughbred horse races (including monies not won and returned to state breeder and other funds), have shown a more modest decrease, declining by about 4.8% over the same period, as illustrated in the table below:

The number of race days has also declined significantly. Since 1999, more than 25% of races, excluding major racing events such as the Kentucky Derby, the Belmont Stakes, the Preakness Stakes and the Breeder's Cup and other racing events held on the same day, have been inadequately funded, meaning that the live handle contribution from all sources to the tracks and purse account was less than the purse paid out to horsemen, and approximately 49% of race days have not generated sufficient revenue to cover purses and the cost of running the day. Major racing events, however, continue to draw large crowds, earn high television ratings and attract substantial total handle.

Size of Thoroughbred Business

The US Gross Domestic Product for thoroughbred racing, breeding, and related activities alone is over $39 billion, with the total horse industry contributing over $101 billion. There are an estimated 50,000 thoroughbred races each year attracting 60 million spectators and bets of more than $13 billion at the tracks and at off-site locations.

Deciding on Horse

When deciding on acquiring the horse the main pieces of information the Company relies on are breeding, past performance charts and race replays.

When deciding to claim a horse, the Company relies mostly on the thoroughbred's past performance. This is because unlike a private sell or an auction, the Company cannot have a veterinarian check the horse prior to acquiring the thoroughbred. The past performance will provide evidence to the soundness of the thoroughbred, the thoroughbred's willingness and ability to win and the length of race and turf types that the thoroughbred prefers. The Company's officers believe that the past performance indicates the level of competition the thoroughbred can win at and therefore it does indicate its value. However, the past performance may not accurately predict the future performance of the thoroughbred. In addition, to the thoroughbreds past performance the Company reviews the thoroughbred's pedigree, conformation, and dosage rating of the thoroughbred. Once the Company has made initial decisions to acquire a thoroughbred, we review race replays and/or watch the thoroughbred gallop in morning workouts. During this phase we review athleticism to assist in determining whether to claim a particular horse. The qualities that make up the athleticism of a horse include its physical proportionality, its temperament and its balance. Unlike a private transaction or auction the Company cannot have a vet check out for the thoroughbred for soundness issues prior to the company acquiring the thoroughbred. The Company relies on the past performance, race replays and watching morning workouts and/or gallops to determine the soundness of a particular thoroughbred it intends to acquire. The Company also will have a veterinarian check the thoroughbred prior to acquiring the thoroughbred thereby provide the Company with a comprehensive report on the health and condition of the thoroughbred. At an auction, the thoroughbred typically has not raced before and therefore does not have any past performances to rely on. Therefore, the Company relies on ancestry, or bloodline, and the confirmation of the thoroughbred.

Breeding

The Company expects to begin its breeding program in January 2015. The Company's breeding division will consist of those thoroughbreds breed to be sold in private transactions or auctions. The Company will breed in California those thoroughbreds that it intends to race and will breed in Kentucky those that it intends to sale. The Company expects that it will need to raise a minimum of an additional $2,000,000 to begin its breeding programs. The breeding programs consist of the Company acquiring broodmares and paying stud fees to farms who own the studs. The breeding season typically runs from February through May. Under the rules of racing, every foal (a baby thoroughbred) is given a birthday of January 1 of the year of its birth regardless of its actual date of birth. The Company will generate revenue from its breeding division through the sale of the foals and purse winnings from the foals the Company keeps.

The Company expects to begin its breeding program in January 2015. However, we are dependent on raising the necessary capital to begin our breeding program. As a result, we may have to delay the date we begin if we are unable to raise sufficient capital. Any delay in raising the capital may cause significant delays in beginning the program since the breeding season only runs from February through May. The Company expects to need to raise $2,000,000 to fully implement its breeding division. The Company would expect to acquire 10 - 15 broodmares for approximately $1,000,000. The Company expects to pay approximately $500,000 in stud fees to the owners of the stallions we decide to breed the mares with. The Company also expects to spend $500,000 to be used to pay for the upkeep of the broodmares at the farm we decide to maintain the broodmares at. The Company does not need to acquire or build its own facilities to begin its breeding program as we may maintain the broodmares at various farms in California or Kentucky. The Company expects its on-going monthly expenses directly associated to the thoroughbreds in its breeding division to be approximately $10 to $17 per day for each broodmare. The fee depends on the location of the farm and the amount of vet bills each broodmare may require.

The Company is dependent on obtaining the necessary financing to acquire broodmares and pay the necessary stud fees for its breeding division. The Company will acquire begin the breeding program as our capital position permit. Although the Company expects it needs $2,000,000 to acquire 5-10 broodmares for this division, we will begin acquiring broodmares as soon as our capital position allows the Company to do so. As such, the faster the Company can raise the necessary capital the quick we can acquire the broodmares and pay for the stud fees.

Allowance/Stakes Level Racing

Stakes and allowance races are races in which the horses are not for sale. Allowance races are a race other than claiming for which the racing secretary drafts certain conditions (see below for more details). Stakes races are the top level races. The purse money is significantly higher in allowance and stakes level races. Allowance and stakes races may only account for 1-3 races per day at a track instead of the 5-9 claiming races a day at a track. The higher the level in racing the fewer the number of races there are on an average day.

The Company intends to acquire horses that it believes could compete at these levels. The Company intends to acquire horses not only in the United States but other countries as well. Few claimers ever will be able to consistently compete at the allowance or stakes level. Therefore, the Company acquires horses through private purchases in an attempt to acquire horses that can race in these levels. Typically, once a horse is acquired in a private sale it will be run in an allowance race to help gauge the talent level of the horse and then depending on the results the Company will move the horse or down in class as needed.

The Company does not expect to begin acquiring thoroughbreds capable of running in allowance or stakes races until it has obtained at least 8 thoroughbreds in its claiming division. Thereby, the Company will have sufficient operations to maintain a stable cable of competing in the allowance/stakes level of racing. The Company expects to begin acquiring thoroughbreds for its allowance/stakes division in March 2014 and will be required to raise additional capital of $600,000 (for a total of $1,100,000 need for this division) to fully build out an allowance/stakes division. The Company expects that it will be able to acquire 3-5 thoroughbreds for its allowance/stakes division, with the average thoroughbred costing approximately $150,000 - $200,000. The Company will acquire its allowance/stakes horses through private purchases and auctions. The Company expects to generate revenue from its allowance/stakes division through the purse winnings of its thoroughbreds; however, at this time this division is not generating any revenue.

Thoroughbreds in our allowance/stakes division may have 45 - 60 days in between races. Typically, there is a longer period between races the higher the level the thoroughbred races. This is primary due to the fact that the thoroughbred needs to be in better condition at the higher levels and that there are fewer races in the allowance/stakes divisions. Thoroughbreds in this division follow the same training pattern as the thoroughbreds in our claiming division. We believe that there will be ample opportunities for our horses to race and we do not believe an absence of racing opportunities will limit our revenues.

The Company expects to spend approximately $875,000 on the acquisition of the 3-5 thoroughbreds with the remaining $225,000 to be used for training and vet fees and any necessary travel to races outside of California. The Company expects its on-going monthly expenses directly associated to the thoroughbreds in its claiming division to be approximately $50 to $125 per day for each thoroughbred the Company owns. The fee depends on the trainer's fee and the amount of vet bills each thoroughbred requires. The Company expects that it will incur expenses related to shipping a thoroughbred to race outside of California. These expenses may range from $10,000 to $50,000.

The Company is dependent on obtaining the necessary financing to acquire thoroughbreds for its allowance/stakes division. The Company expects that it will take up to 7 months to acquire the 5-6 thoroughbreds. The Company will acquire its thoroughbreds as our capital position permit. Although the Company expects it needs $1,100,000 to acquire 3-5 thoroughbreds for this division, we will begin acquiring the thoroughbreds as soon as our capital position allows the Company to do so. As such, the faster the Company can raise the necessary capital the quick we can acquire the thoroughbreds. The Company currently does not have an amount that would be required to acquire its initial thoroughbred for this division as our ability to acquire such thoroughbred is at least 8-9 months away. As the Company gets closer to obtaining its 5 thoroughbreds in the claiming division, we will begin to identify possible thoroughbred to acquire for this division and then be able to calculate the minimum amount needed to acquire its initial thoroughbred cable or running allowance/stakes races.

The Company generates revenue from its allowance/stakes division from the purse winnings of the thoroughbred. The Company does not expect to sell these thoroughbreds. The Company expects that a thoroughbred will begin to generate revenue from purse winnings within 45-60 days from acquiring the thoroughbred. The Company further expects that it will continue to receive revenue from the thoroughbred every 45-60 days from additional purse winnings. The Company is currently not generating revenue from this division. The 45-60 day period between races affects the company's cash flow by not providing monthly revenue from the particular thoroughbred; however, the higher purse values are expected to offset this.

Claiming

The Company's initially expects to acquire its initial 8 thoroughbreds through claiming race. The company expects to maintain a stable of 8-10 thoroughbreds that will mainly run in claiming races; however, the Company expects to primarily focus its operations on acquiring thoroughbreds that are capable of running in allowance and stakes level races and developing a breeding program.

A claiming race is one in which all horses entered are eligible to be purchased by a licensed owner or indirectly through a trainer for the specified claiming price (see below for levels of claiming races). For example, in a $32,000 Claiming race all the horses are for sale for the purchase price of $32,000 plus applicable taxes. The procedure for a claiming race is as follows: the trainer puts a claim in for the horse prior to the race. Immediately upon the start of the race the horse is considered sold to the new owner, however, the previous owner maintains any purse winnings from that race. If two or more owners/trainers put a claim in on a horse than a "shake" occurs to determine who has purchased the horse. A shake is when each claiming owner is assigned a number. Then a racing official draws a number at random and the owner with corresponding number has purchased the horse. Claiming races account for up to 80% of all thoroughbred races on a given day.

The intent behind claiming is to claim horses that are performing below the ability or have been mismanaged by the current owners or trainers. Thereby, allowing the Company to move the horse up in class and make a profit on the horse being claimed for an amount higher than the Company paid.

Once the Company acquires a thoroughbred in its claiming division it may take up to 30 days before the thoroughbred may be able to race again. The factors relating to the length between races include the endurance and shape of the thoroughbred, the availability of races and the skill level of the other thoroughbreds in the race. The Company, along with our trainer, uses these factors to decide on where and when to race the thoroughbred so we can put the thoroughbred in the best possible position to win. During this time the thoroughbred is usually ridden everyday as part of their training. Thoroughbreds will jog or cantor most days. The thoroughbred will typically gallop every 7 days that it does not race; this is referred to as a work out. A work out consists of a timed run from 3 furlongs up to 5 furlongs ( 1 furlong equals 1/8 of a mile) and simulates a race for the thoroughbred.

The Company expects the on-going monthly expenses directly associated to the thoroughbreds in its claiming division to be approximately $50 to $125 per day for each thoroughbred. The fee depends on the trainer's fee and the amount of vet bills each thoroughbred requires.

The Company will acquire thoroughbreds as our capital position permits. As such, even though the Company states that it needs $200,000 to acquire up to 8 thoroughbreds for its claiming division, the Company will begin acquiring thoroughbreds as its capital position allows it to do so. If the Company is able to raise capital quicker than we currently expect, than we would acquire thoroughbreds at a faster pace. Likewise, if we raise money at a slower rate, than we expect than we will acquire thoroughbreds at a slower pace. Our ability and timing of the acquisition of the additional thoroughbreds is dependent on the Company raising the required capital to acquire the thoroughbred and to maintain the stable until our revenue is sufficient to cover the monthly costs of the thoroughbreds. The Company expects to acquire the 8-10 thoroughbreds by the end of June 2013 and therefore provide the Company with the infrastructure and revenue to support our expansion of the allowance/stakes division; however, this is dependent on our ability to raise the required capital.

Revenue from Claiming Division

The Company generates revenue from its Claiming Division in two ways: (1) purse winnings and (2) sale of a thoroughbred. The Company expects that a thoroughbred will begin to generate revenue from purse winnings within 30 days from acquiring the thoroughbred. The Company further expects that it will continue to receive revenue from the thoroughbred every 30 days from additional purse winnings. The Company will also generate revenue if our thoroughbred is claimed by another stable. The Company expects that most thoroughbreds in its claiming division will be claimed from the Company within 12 months from the date we acquired the thoroughbred. For example, at the Del Mar meet 207 thoroughbreds, for $4,488,500, have been claimed from July 17 through August 29, 2013. A copy of the claims reports can be found at http://www.dmtc.com/racinginfo/claims/index.pdf. If a thoroughbred is claimed from the Company, we expect to use the revenue from the sale of the thoroughbred to acquire an additional thoroughbred to replace it. The main factor the Company uses when deciding to claim a thoroughbred is its past performance. The past performance will provide evidence to the soundness of the thoroughbred, the thoroughbred's willingness and ability to win and the length of race and turf types that the thoroughbred prefers. The Company's officers believe that the past performance indicates the level of competition the thoroughbred can win at and therefore its indicate its value. However, the past performance may not accurately predict the future performance of the thoroughbred. This is explained in more detail above in the section "Deciding on Horse." However, the Company may decide that a horse running a claiming race can race in allowance or stakes races. This usually occurs when a horse to dropped into a claimer race or has been poorly trained. For example, Mr. Wade acquired Rock Off by claiming him in February 2013 with the intention of racing him in allowance races and not in claiming races. The Company acquired Rock Off from Mr. Wade with the intention of also racing him in allowance races as well. The Company does not expect that Rock Off will be claimed from the Company within the next 12 months. As such, the company does not consider Rock Off to be part of the claiming division.

Emerging Growth Company Status

We are an "“emerging growth company,"” as defined in the JOBS Act. For as long as we are an "“emerging growth company,"” we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not "“emerging growth companies,"” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding advisory "“say-on-pay"” votes on executive compensation and shareholder advisory votes on golden parachute compensation.

104

Under the JOBS Act, we will remain an "“emerging growth company"” until the earliest of:

· the last day of the fiscal year during which we have total annual gross revenues of $1 billion or more; · the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the effective date of this registration statement; · the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1 billion in non- convertible debt; and · the date on which we are deemed to be a "“large accelerated filer"” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act.

We will qualify as a large accelerated filer as of the first day of the first fiscal year after we have (i) more than $700 million in outstanding common equity held by our non-affiliates and (ii) been public for at least 12 months. The value of our outstanding common equity will be measured each year on the last day of our second fiscal quarter.

The Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that we may elect to utilize the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards and such election is irrevocable if made. As such, we have made the election to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards under Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act. Please refer to a discussion on page 13 under "“Risk Factors"” of the effect on our financial statements of such election.

Going Concern

Our auditor has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered losses and has experienced negative cash flows from operations, which raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to those matters are also described in Note 3 to the financial statements. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Competition

The thoroughbred industry is highly competitive. Our competitors and potential competitors include major stables companies and individuals with high net worth'’s. Most of our competitors have greater financial, personnel and other resources than we have. Accordingly, a high degree of competition in these areas will continue.

Governmental Regulation

Horse racing is governed by the individual states through which mainly focus on regulating the pari-mutual wagering in horse racing. In California, horse racing is regulated by the California Horse Racing Board and governed by the Business and Professions Code of California. The Company's California owner'’s license number is 321870and it expires in December 2018.

Employees

There are no persons other than our executive officers who are expected by us to make a significant contribution to our business.

Proprietary Rights

We do not have any proprietary rights.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Our executive, administrative and operating offices are located at 4325 Glencoe Ave Ste C9-9902, Marina Del Rey, California 90292. The Company uses this address for mailing purposes since the Company's operations will be at the various racing tracks that its thoroughbreds are racing at. The thoroughbreds claimed by the Company will be housed at facilities provided by the Company's trainers.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise, in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. We are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

126

PART II

Set forth below are the range of high and low quotations for our common stock for the periods indicated as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board. The market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Our common stock began trading the OTC Markets under the symbol "“CGLD"”.

Quarter Ending*	Quarter Ending*	High*	High*		Low*	Low*
03/31/2016		$	124		$	54
	3/31/2017		$	1.54		$	0.40
12/31/2015		$	110		$	66
	12/31/2016		$	3.49		$	0.99
09/30/2015		$	140		$	80
	9/30/2016		$	3.69		$	0.30
06/30/2015		$	238		$	32
	6/30/2016		$	157		$	0.69
03/31/2015		$	46		$	32
	3/31/2016		$	124		$	54
	12/31/2015		$	110		$	66
	9/30/2015		$	140		$	80
	6/30/2015		$	238		$	32

~~________________~~____________

* On June 28, 2016, with an effective date of July 13, 2016, the Company filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State to effect a 1-for-200 share Reverse Split of the Company'’s issued and outstanding common stock. Common share amounts and per share amounts in these financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this reverse split.

Holders

As of ~~July~~June 1, ~~2016~~2017 we had ~~372~~18,~~375~~681,321 shares of our common stock outstanding held by 1215 shareholders of record, 8,000,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock outstanding held by 1 shareholder of record ~~(our CEO)~~, and 109,~~000~~965,000 shares of our Series B Preferred Stock outstanding held by 1 shareholder of record (our CEO), respectively.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

Empire Stock Transfer is currently the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock. Its address is 1859 Whitney Mesa Drive, Henderson Nevada 89014. Its phone number is 702-818-5898.

Authorized Capital Stock

We are authorized to issue 500,000,000 shares of common stock and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, of which 10,000,000 shares are designated as Series A Preferred Shares and 10,000,000 shares are designated as Series B Preferred Shares. As of March 31, ~~2016~~2017, we had ~~372~~18,~~375shares~~581,321 shares of common stock outstanding. As of March 31, ~~2016~~2017, we had 8,000,000 Series A Preferred Shares outstanding and no9,965,000 shares of Series B Preferred Shares outstanding.

137

Common Stock

On June 28, 2016, with an effective date of July 13, 2016, the Company filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State to effect a 1-for-200 share Reverse Split of the Company'’s issued and outstanding common stock. Common share amounts and per share amounts in ~~this~~these ~~annual~~financial ~~report~~statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this reverse split.

Each share of our common stock entitles its holder to one vote in the election of each director and on all other matters voted on generally by our stockholders, other than any matter that (1) solely relates to the terms of any outstanding series of preferred stock or the number of shares of that series and (2) does not affect the number of authorized shares of preferred stock or the powers, privileges and rights pertaining to the common stock. No share of our common stock affords any cumulative voting rights. This means that the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares voting for the election of directors can elect all directors to be elected if they choose to do so.

Holders of our common stock will be entitled to dividends in such amounts and at such times as our Board of Directors in its discretion may declare out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends. We currently intend to retain our entire available discretionary cash flow to finance the growth, development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future.

Any future dividends will be paid at the discretion of our Board of Directors after taking into account various factors, including:

	·	general business conditions;
	·	industry practice;
	·	our financial condition and performance;
	·	our future prospects;
	·	our cash needs and capital investment plans;
	·	our obligations to holders of any preferred stock we may issue;
	·	income tax consequences; and
	·	the restrictions Nevada and other applicable laws and our credit arrangements then impose.

14If we liquidate or dissolve our business, the holders of our common stock will share ratably in all our assets that are available for distribution to our stockholders after our creditors are paid in full and the holders of all series of our outstanding preferred stock, if any, receive their liquidation preferences in full.

IfOur ~~we liquidate or dissolve our business, the holders of our~~ common stock ~~will~~has ~~share~~no ~~ratably~~preemptive inrights ~~all~~and ~~our~~is ~~assets~~not ~~that~~convertible ~~are~~or ~~available~~redeemable ~~for~~or ~~distribution~~entitled to ~~our stockholders after our creditors are paid in full and~~ the ~~holders~~benefits of ~~all series of our outstanding preferred stock, if~~ any, ~~receive~~sinking ~~their~~or ~~liquidation~~repurchase ~~preferences in full~~fund.

~~Our common stock has no preemptive rights and is not convertible or redeemable or entitled to the benefits of any sinking or repurchase fund.~~Dividends

~~Dividends~~Since inception we have not paid any dividends on our common stock. We currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future on our common stock, when issued pursuant to this offering. Although we intend to retain our earnings, if any, to finance the exploration and growth of our business, our Board of Directors will have the discretion to declare and pay dividends in the future. Payment of dividends in the future will depend upon our earnings, capital requirements, and other factors, which our Board of Directors may deem relevant.

Since inception we have not paid any dividends on our common stock. We currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future on our common stock, when issued pursuant to this offering. Although we intend to retain our earnings, if any, to finance the exploration and growth of our business, our Board of Directors will have the discretion to declare and pay dividends in the future. Payment of dividends in the future will depend upon our earnings, capital requirements, and other factors, which our Board of Directors may deem relevant.8

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

We presently do not have any equity based or other long-term incentive programs. In the future, we may adopt and establish an equity-based or other long-term incentive plan if it is in the best interest of the Company and our stockholders to do so.

Preferred Shares

Series A Preferred Shares

We have 8,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding which have the rights, designations and preferences below:

	·	each one (1) share of Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to zero (0) dividends;
	·	each one (1) share of Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to zero (0) votes on all matters submitted to a vote of our common stockholders;
	·	each one (1) share of Series A Preferred Stock shall be convertible into zero (0) shares of our common stock; and
	·	upon our Liquidation, dissolution or winding up the holders of the Series A Preferred Shares shall be entitled to receive $.01 per share held;

The provisions in our Articles of Incorporation relating to the preferred stock allows our directors to issue preferred stock with rights to multiple votes per share and dividend rights which would have priority over any dividends paid with respect to our Common Stock. The issuance of preferred stock with such rights may make more difficult the removal of management even if such removal would be considered beneficial to shareholders generally, and will have the effect of limiting shareholder participation in certain transactions such as mergers or tender offers if such transactions are not favored by incumbent management.

15Series B Preferred Shares

We have 9,965,000 shares of Series B Preferred ~~Shares~~Stock outstanding, which have the rights, designations and preferences below:

~~Subsequent~~· each one (1) share of Series B Preferred Stock is entitled to ~~March~~zero ~~31,~~(0) ~~2016~~dividends; ~~and~~· aseach one (1) share of ~~this~~Series ~~filing,~~B wePreferred ~~issued~~Stock ~~10,000,000~~is ~~shares~~entitled to four hundred (400) Common Share votes on all matters submitted to a vote of our common stockholders; · each one (1) share of Series B Preferred Stock shall be convertible into zero (0) shares of our common stock; and · upon our Liquidation, ~~which~~dissolution ~~have~~or winding up the ~~rights,~~holders ~~designations~~of ~~and~~the ~~preferences~~Series ~~below:~~B Preferred Shares shall be entitled to receive $.01 per share held;

·During ~~each~~the ~~one~~2017 ~~(1)~~fiscal ~~share~~year, 35,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock iswere ~~entitled~~converted toat ~~zero~~rate ~~(0)~~of ~~dividends; · each one (~~1) preferred share ~~of Series B Preferred Stock is entitled~~ to ~~four hundred (~~400) ~~Common Share votes on all matters submitted to a vote of our~~ common ~~stockholders;~~shares, ·resulting ~~each~~in ~~one~~the ~~(1)~~issuance ~~share~~ of ~~Series~~14,000,000 ~~B Preferred Stock shall be convertible into zero (0)~~ shares of ~~our~~ common stock;, ~~and~~for ·a ~~upon~~value ~~our~~of ~~Liquidation~~$1,400, ~~dissolution or winding up the holders~~ of ~~the~~which ~~Series~~$1,397 Bwas ~~Preferred~~recorded ~~Shares~~as ~~shall~~a bedeemed ~~entitled to receive $~~dividend.~~01 per share held;~~

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 7. Management's Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Plan Of Operation

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements, which we have prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate estimates and judgments, including those described in greater detail below. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

As used in this "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation," except where the context otherwise requires, the term "we," "us," or "our," refers to the business of Buscar Company.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

~~Our~~In ~~significant~~the ~~accounting~~ordinary ~~policies~~course ~~are~~of ~~described~~business, we make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial condition in the ~~notes~~preparation toof our ~~accompanying~~ financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We base our estimates on historical experience, when available, and on other various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

We have identified below the accounting policies that are of particular importance in the presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows and which require the application of significant judgment by management.

Stock-Based Compensation

We periodically issue stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services and for financing costs. We account for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to employees based on Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation”, whereas the award is measured at its fair value at the date of grant and is amortized ratably over the service period. We account for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to non-employees in accordance with ASC Topic 505, “Equity”, whereas the value of the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either (a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or (b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Footnote 2 in our included audited financial statements - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Emerging Growth Company Status

Pursuant to the JOBS Act of 2012, as an emerging growth company, we can elect to opt out of the extended transition period for any new or revised accounting standards that may be issued by the PCAOB or the SEC.

We have elected not to opt out of such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the standard for the private company. This may make comparison of the our financial statements with any other public company which is not either an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible as possible different or revised standards may be used.

16Although we are still evaluating the JOBS Act, it currently intends to take advantage of some or all of the reduced regulatory and reporting requirements that will be available to it so long as it qualifies as an “emerging growth company”. We have elected not to opt out of the extension of time to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards available under Section 102(b) of the JOBS Act. Among other things, this means that our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting so long as it qualifies as an emerging growth company, which may increase the risk that weaknesses or deficiencies in the internal control over financial reporting go undetected. Likewise, so long as it qualifies as an emerging growth company, we may elect not to provide certain information, including certain financial information and certain information regarding compensation of executive officers that would otherwise have been required to provide in filings with the SEC, which may make it more difficult for investors and securities analysts to evaluate us. As a result, investor confidence in us and the market price of our common stock may be adversely affected.

~~Although~~Going we are still evaluating the JOBS Act, it currently intends to take advantage of some or all of the reduced regulatory and reporting requirements that will be available to it so long as it qualifies as an "emerging growth company". We have elected not to opt out of the extension of time to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards available under Section 102(b) of the JOBS Act. Among other things, this means that our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting so long as it qualifies as an emerging growth company, which may increase the risk that weaknesses or deficiencies in the internal control over financial reporting go undetected. Likewise, so long as it qualifies as an emerging growth company, we may elect not to provide certain information, including certain financial information and certain information regarding compensation of executive officers that would otherwise have been required to provide in filings with the SEC, which may make it more difficult for investors and securities analysts to evaluate us. As a result, investor confidence in us and the market price of our common stock may be adversely affected.Concern

~~Use~~We ofhave ~~Estimates~~not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon obtaining financing to pursue any extensive exploration activities. For these reasons our auditors stated in their report that they have substantial doubt we will be able to continue as a going concern.

~~Financial~~Results ~~statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts~~ of ~~assets~~Operations and ~~liabilities~~Financial atCondition ~~the~~for ~~date of~~ the ~~financial~~years ~~statements~~ended ~~and~~March ~~the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Among other things~~31, ~~management~~2017 ~~makes estimates relating to the fair value of financial instruments~~ and ~~the valuation allowance related to deferred income tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.~~2016

Stock-Based Compensation

	Years Ended March 31,						Changes
	2017			2016			Amount			%

Revenue	$	-		$	-		$	-			-

Operating expenses:
General and administrative		3,372,540			402,656			2,969,884			738	%
Total expenses		3,372,540			402,656			2,969,884			738	%

Loss from operations		(3,372,540	)		(402,656	)		(2,969,884	)		738	%
Other expense:
Loss on debt settlement		-			(122,541	)		122,541			(100	%)
Total other expense		-			(122,541	)		122,541			(100	%)
Loss before income taxes		(3,372,540	)		(525,197	)		(2,847,343	)		542	%
Provision for income taxes		-			-			-			-
Net loss	$	(3,372,540	)	$	(525,197	)	$	(2,847,343	)		542	%

We ~~periodically~~have ~~issue~~not ~~stock~~generated ~~options~~any ~~and~~revenues ~~warrants~~as to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services and for financing costs. We account for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to employees based on Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ASC Topic 718, "Compensation - Stock Compensation", whereas the award is measured at its fair value at the date of ~~grant~~March ~~and is amortized ratably over the service period. We account for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to non-employees in accordance with ASC Topic 505~~31, "Equity", whereas the value of the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either (a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or (b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete2017.

~~Results of Operations and Financial Condition for the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015~~11

	Year Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			Change			%
Costs and expenses
Management and consulting fees	$	357,000		$	553,280		$	(196,280	)		(35	%)
General and administrative		45,656			41,423			4,233			10	%
Total operating expenses		402,656			594,703			(192,047	)		(32	%)
Loss from operations		(402,656	)		(594,703	)		192,047			(32	%)
Other expense
Loss on debt settlement		(122,541	)		-			(122,541	)		-
Net loss	$	(525,197	)	$	(594,703	)	$	69,506			(12	%)

The increase in operating expenses by $2,969,884 during the year ended 2017, is primarily due to the increase in management and consulting fees that resulted from stock issuances, increased legal and professional fees and maintenance fees for our thoroughbreds.

We have not generated any revenues as of March 31, 2016.

Operating expense decreased to $402,656 from $594,703 for the year ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The decrease in operating expenses is primarily due to the decrease in management and consulting fees of $196,280.

Other expense increased to $122,541 for the year ended March 31, 2016 due to a loss on settlement of debt, from the issuance of our common stock.

There is no assurance that we will ever be profitable. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

	March 31,			March 31,
	March, 31			March 31,
	2016			2015			Change			%
	2017			2016			Change			%
Cash	$	-		$	-		$	-			-
Total Assets	$	1,273,734		$	-		$	1,273,734			-
Total Assets	$	-		$	-		$	-			-
Total Liabilities	$	207,560		$	222,926		$	(15,366	)		(7	%)
Total Liabilities	$	222,926		$	415,524		$	(192,598	)		(46	%)
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)	$	1,066,174		$	(222,926	)	$	1,289,100			578	%
Stockholders' Deficit	$	(222,926	)	$	(415,524	)	$	192,598			(46	%)

	Year Ended March 31,
	2016		2015			Change		%
Cash Flows used in Operating Activities	$	-	$	(25	)	$	25		(100	%)
Cash Flows used in Investing Activities		-		-			-		-
Cash Flows from Financing Activities		-		-			-		-
Net Decrease in Cash During the Year	$	-	$	(25	)	$	25		(100	%)

Total assets increased as of March 31, 2017, due to cash of $286,527, prepaid expense of $45,764 and thoroughbreds net of depreciation of $941,443. Total liabilities, decreased $15,366 as of March 31, 2017, primarily due to a reduction in amounts owing to related parties paid during the year ended 2017.

During the year ended March 31, 2016, cash used in operating activities was $0. This was primarily the result of our net loss of $525,197, offset by an increase in accrued liability of $5,485, due to related parties of $40,171, stock based compensation of $357,000 and loss on debt settlement of $122,541. During the year ended March 31, 2015, cash used in operating activities was $25. This was primarily the result of our net loss of $594,703, offset by an increase in due to related party of $204,678 and share based compensation of $390,000.

	March, 31		March 31,
	2017		2016			Change			%
Cash	$	286,527	$	-		$	286,527			-

Current Assets	$	332,291	$	-		$	332,291			-
Current Liabilities		207,560		222,926			(15,366	)		(7	%)
Working Capital (Deficiency)	$	124,731	$	(222,926	)	$	347,657			156	%

~~During~~Our ~~the~~cash ~~year~~position ~~ended~~is ~~March~~insufficient ~~31,~~and ~~2016~~as such we plan to raise additional debt and ~~2015~~equity financing to meet our obligations as they become due. Our working capital increased as of March 31, ~~cash~~2017 ~~used~~primarily indue ~~investing~~to ~~activities~~the ~~was~~increase $0in cash.

During the year ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, cash provided by financing activities amounted to $0.

	Year Ended March 31,
	2017			2016			Change
Cash Flows used in Operating Activities	$	(619,183	)	$	(40,171	)	$	(579,012	)
Cash Flows used in Investing Activities		(1,035,630	)		-			(1,035,630	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities		1,941,340			40,171			1,901,169
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash During the Year	$	286,527		$	-		$	286,527

~~As of March 31, 2016 and 2015, we had no cash available. We plan to raise additional debt and equity financing to meet our obligations as they become due.~~12

During the year ended March 31, 2017, cash used in operating activities was $619,181. This was primarily the result of our net loss of $3,372,540, reduced by stock based compensation of $2,686,000, depreciation of $94,189, and increased from an increase in prepaid expenses of $45,764 and decreased from an increase accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $18,934.

During the year ended March 31, 2016, cash used in operating activities was $40,171. This was primarily the result of our net loss of $525,197, offset by stock based compensation of $357,000, loss on debt settlement of $122,541, and an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $5,485.

During the year ended March 31, 2017, cash used in investing activities was for the purchase of thoroughbreds.

During the year ended March 31, 2017, cash provided by financing activities was $1,941,340 from the issuance of 1,760,643 shares of common stock for $1,981,000, reduced $26,800 for net repayments to a related party, reduced $7,500 for repayments on a note payable, and reduced by $5,360 for the payment of a dividend.

As of March 31, 2017, we had cash available of $286,527. We plan to raise additional debt and equity financing to meet our obligations as they become due.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We did not have any off balance sheet arrangements as of March 31, ~~2016~~2017.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are not required to provide the information required by this Item because we are a smaller reporting company.

Item 8. Financial Statements

See the financial statements attached to the end of this report. Our financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, included in this report have been audited by Benjamin & Young, LLP and Anton & Chia, LLP, respectively, as set forth in this Report.

Item 9. Changes In And Disagreements With Accountants

There have been no disagreements with our auditor regarding accounting and financial disclosure.

On January 10, 2017, the Board of Directors of Buscar Company (the "Company"), acting as the Company’s Audit Committee, announces that it has appointed Benjamin & Young, LLP ("B&Y") as Buscar Company’s independent auditors for the 2017 fiscal year, replacing Anton & Chia ("Anton"). B&Y’s address is 1100 N. Tustin Avenue, 2nd floor Anaheim, CA 92807

This action effectively dismissed Anton & Chia as the Company's independent auditor for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2017. The report of Anton & Chia on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except that each such report included an explanatory paragraph raising substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and stated that the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, were prepared assuming that we would continue as a going concern.

Item 9A. Controls And Procedures

~~Management's~~Evaluation ~~Report~~of on Disclosure ~~Control~~Controls and Procedures

~~Under~~We ~~the~~maintain ~~direction and with the participation of our management, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our~~ disclosure controls and procedures (as ofdefined ~~March~~in ~~31,~~Rule ~~2016.~~13a-15(e) Weunder ~~maintain~~the ~~disclosure~~Exchange ~~controls~~Act ~~and procedures~~ that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed inby ~~our~~us ~~periodic~~in reports ~~with~~that ~~the~~we ~~Securities~~file ~~and~~under the Exchange ~~Commission~~Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported ~~within~~as ~~the time periods~~ specified in the SEC'’s rules and ~~regulations,~~forms and that such information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our ~~principal~~Chief ~~executive~~Executive ~~officer~~Officer and ~~principal~~Chief ~~financial~~Financial ~~officer~~Officer, ~~as appropriate,~~ to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. ~~Our~~Management, ~~disclosure~~with ~~controls~~the ~~and~~participation ~~procedures~~of ~~are~~our ~~designed~~Chief toExecutive ~~provide~~Officer aand ~~reasonable~~Chief ~~level~~Financial ofOfficer, ~~assurance~~performed an evaluation of ~~reaching~~the ~~our~~effectiveness ~~desired~~of our disclosure ~~control~~controls ~~objectives~~and procedures as of March 31, 2017. Based ~~upon~~on ~~this~~that evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, ~~2016~~2017 for the reasons discussed below.

Management'’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

~~Our~~Management ~~management~~is ~~evaluated~~responsible for the ~~effectiveness~~preparation of our ~~internal control over~~ financial ~~reporting~~statements asand ofrelated ~~March~~information. ~~31,~~Management ~~2016~~uses ~~based~~its onbest ~~criteria~~judgment ~~established~~to inensure ~~Internal~~that ~~Control - Integrated Framework issued by~~ the ~~Committee~~financial ofstatements ~~Sponsoring~~present ~~Organizations~~fairly, ofin ~~the~~material ~~Treadway Commission~~respects, ~~or the COSO Framework. Management's assessment included an evaluation of the design of~~ our ~~internal control over~~ financial ~~reporting~~position and ~~testing~~results of ~~the~~operations ~~operational~~in ~~effectiveness~~conformity ofwith ~~those~~generally ~~controls~~accepted accounting principles.

~~Based~~Management onis ~~this~~responsible ~~assessment,~~for ~~management~~establishing ~~concluded~~and ~~that~~maintaining ~~our~~adequate internal control over financial reporting ~~was~~as ~~not~~defined ~~effective~~in asthe Exchange Act. These internal controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the reported financial information is presented fairly, that disclosures are adequate and that the judgments inherent in the preparation of ~~March~~financial 31statements are reasonable. There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal controls including the possibility of human error and overriding of controls. Consequently, ~~2016~~an ineffective internal control system can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance with respect to reporting financial information.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to maintaining records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect our transactions; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that the receipts and expenditures of company assets are made in accordance with our management and directors authorization; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention of or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Under the supervision of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and subsequent guidance prepared by the Commission specifically for smaller public companies. Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of March 31, 2017 because it identified the following material weakness and significant deficiencies:

	●	Material Weakness – The Company did not maintain effective controls over certain aspects of the financial reporting process because we lacked a sufficient complement of personnel with a level of accounting expertise and an adequate supervisory review structure that is commensurate with our financial reporting requirements.

	●	Significant Deficiencies – Inadequate segregation of duties.

A material weakness is a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

We expect to be materially dependent upon third parties to provide us with accounting consulting services for the foreseeable future which we believe mitigates the impact of the material weaknesses discussed above. Until such time as we have a chief financial officer with the requisite expertise in U.S. GAAP and establish an audit committee and implement internal controls and procedures, there are no assurances that the material weaknesses and significant deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures will not result in errors in our financial statements which could lead to a restatement of those financial statements.

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to SEC rules that permit us to provide only management’s report on internal control over financial reporting in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Controls.

There have been no changes to our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

Not applicable.

1915

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters And Control Persons

Our officers and directors as of the year ending March 31, ~~2016~~2017, are set forth below.

Name	Age	Position
Anastasia Shishova	30	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Troy Grant	42	Chief Operating Officer

Anastasia Shishova

Ms. Shishova was appointed as our sole officer and director on June 19, 2015. Since 2012, Ms. Shishova has been involved in owning and racing thoroughbreds in California. Since June 2011, Ms. Shishova has worked as an independent marketing consultant for businesses. Ms. Shishova has a Master'’s Degree in Marketing and a Bachelors Degree from Samara State University in Samara, Russia.

Troy Grant

Mr. Grant was appointed as our sole officer and director on July 1, 2013 and resigned all his positions as an president, CEO and director on June 19, 2015 but remained on as the Company's COO. From June 19, 2015, Mr. Grant assumed the role of Chief Operating Officer (COO). Since May 2011, Mr. Grant has been the Chief Executive Office of Elcora Resources. Between May 2010 and September 2010, Mr. Grant was employed by Grafton Securities in its Institutional Sales department. Between September 2007 and August 2010, Mr. Grant was Vice President of Corporate Finance for Citadel Securities.

Term of Office

Our directors'’ serve in such capacity until the annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Our officers serve at the discretion of our directors.

Legal Proceedings

Our directors and officers have not been convicted in a criminal proceeding, excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors, nor have been a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding during the past ten years that resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining the person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, federal or state securities laws, or a finding of any violation of federal or state securities laws, except for matters that were dismissed without sanction or settlement. Except as set forth in our discussion below in "“Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,"” our directors and officers have not been involved in any transactions with us or any of our affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

20Except as set forth in our discussion below in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” none of our directors or executive officers has been involved in any transactions with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Except as set forth in our discussion below in "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions," none of our directors or executive officers has been involved in any transactions with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Code of Ethics

To date, we have not adopted a code of business conduct and ethics for our management and employees. We do not intend to adopt one in the near future. We do not believe we requires a Code of Ethics since we have only one officer.

Board Committees

Our Board of Directors has no separate committees and our Board of Directors acts as the audit committee and the compensation committee. We do not have an audit committee financial expert serving on our Board of Directors. We do not have a compensation or an audit committee. We do not have a financial expert.

Ms. Shishova is not independent as that term is defined in section 803 of listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.

As of March 31, ~~2016~~2017, our sole director acts as our compensation committee. During the year ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017, our sole officer was not a member of the compensation committee or a director of another entity, which other entity had one of its executive officers serving as our director or as a member of our compensation committee.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth certain compensation information for:

·● our principal executive officer or other individual serving in a similar capacity during the year ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017, · our two most highly compensated executive officers other than our principal executive officer who were serving as executive officers at March 31, 2016 whose compensation exceed $100,000, and · up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been required but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer at March 31, 2016.

21● our two most highly compensated executive officers other than our principal executive officer who were serving as executive officers at March 31, 2017 whose compensation exceed $100,000, and

						Stock		All other
Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary		Bonus		Awards		Compensation		TOTAL
Anastasia Shishova,	2016	$	0		0		0		0		0
President, CEO, Director (1)	2015	$	0		0		0		0		0
Troy Grant,	2016	$	0		0		0		300,000		300,000
COO (2)	2015	$	0		0		0		0		0

●

up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been required but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer at March 31, 2017.

________________

Name and						Stock		All other
Principal Position	Year	Salary		Bonus		Awards		Compensation		TOTAL
Anastasia Shishova, President, CEO, Director (1)	2017 2016	$ $	0 0		0 0		0 0		0 0		0 0

Troy Grant, COO (2)	2016 2017	$ $	0 0		0 0		0 0		300,000 0		300,00 0

(1) Ms. Shishova became our CEO, CFO and director on June 15, 2015. (2) Mr. Grant resigned as our CEO, CFO and director on June 15, 2015. Mr. Grant assumed the role of our COO, as of June 15, 2015. On June 8, 2015, Mr. Grant received 325,000 shares for stock-based compensation for accrued salaries, bonus, and expenses totaling $300,000.

~~On June 8, 2015, Troy Grant, the Company's chief executive officer and sole member of the Board of Directors was issued 325,000~~ (~~65,000,000 pre-split~~2) ~~shares of restricted Common Stock in exchange for accrued salaries, bonus and expenses of $300,000.~~ Mr. Grant ~~did~~resigned ~~not~~as ~~receive~~our ~~any~~CEO, ~~cash~~CFO ~~payments~~and ~~for~~director ~~salaries or bonuses. As previously disclosed,~~ on ~~August~~June 115, ~~2014~~2015. ~~the Company entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with~~ Mr. ~~Troy~~ Grant. ~~Whereby,~~assumed the ~~Company~~role ~~shall pay Mr. Grant a base salary~~ of ~~$22,000~~our ~~per month~~COO, ~~plus applicable bonuses~~ as ~~are awarded by the Board~~ of ~~Directors~~June ~~from time to time based on performance~~15, ~~which may either be paid in stock or cash at the discretion of the Board~~2015. NoOn ~~shares~~June ~~have~~8, ~~been~~2015, ~~issued to~~ Mr. Grant ~~prior~~received to325,000 ~~June~~shares 9,for ~~2015~~stock-based ~~with~~compensation ~~regard~~for toaccrued ~~deferred~~salaries, ~~salary~~bonus, and ~~bonus~~expenses totaling $300,000.

On June 8, 2015, Troy Grant, the Company’s former chief executive officer and sole member of the Board of Directors was issued 65,000,000 shares of restricted Common Stock in exchange for accrued salaries, bonus and expenses of $300,000. Mr. Grant did not receive any cash payments for salaries or bonuses. As previously disclosed, on August 1, 2014 the Company entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with Mr. Troy Grant, wherein the the Company was to pay Mr. Grant a base salary of $22,000 per month, plus applicable bonuses as are awarded by the Board of Directors from time to time based on performance, which may either be paid in stock or cash at the discretion of the Board. No shares have been issued to Mr. Grant prior to June 9, 2015 with regard to deferred salary and bonus. The Executive Employment Agreement terminated upon Mr. Grant's resignation as our chief executive officer and chief financial officer.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table

We do not have any equity compensation plans and therefore no equity awards are outstanding as of March 31, ~~2016~~2017.

Compensation of Directors

Our directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred by them in connection with attending board of directors'’ meetings. They do not receive any other compensation for serving on the board of directors, but may participate in our incentive compensation program, once such a program is established.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Our Board of Directors does not have a compensation committee and our sole director performs the functions of a compensation committee.

Item 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management And Related Stockholders Matters

The following table lists, as of ~~July~~June 1, ~~2016~~2017, those persons owning beneficially 5% or more of our common stock, the number and percentage of outstanding shares owned by each of our directors and officers and by all officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, each owner has sole voting and investment powers over his shares of common stock.

Name and Address	Number ~~ofShares~~of Shares		Percent ~~ofClass~~of Class
Common Stock (1)
Anastasia Shishova		~~325~~14,~~000~~196,429		8776.34	%
CEO
Troy Grant (1)		688		0.0	%
COO
Series A Preferred Stock
Troy Grant		8,000,000		100	%
COO
Series B Preferred Stock
Anastasia Shishova		109,~~000~~965,000		100	%
CEO
Other 5% Holders:
None.

~~________________~~(1) Common shares reflect the 1:200 reverse stock split as effective on July 13, 2016. Percentage of common shares is based on post-split shares outstanding as of June 1, 2017.

(1) Common shares reflect the 1:200 reverse stock split as effective on July 13, 2016. Percentage of common shares is based on 372,375 post-split shares outstanding as of July 1, 2016.

OnNo ~~August~~transactions 1,occurred ~~2014~~between the Company entered into an office rental agreement with Mr. Grant for 700 square feet of office space located at his residence in Nova Scotia, Canada. The Company shall occupy the Premises on a month-to-month basis for $500 per month. Rent shall accrue from August 1, 2014 until July 31, 2015, and onits ~~such~~officers ~~date,~~or ~~the Tenant shall pay owner the sum outstanding ($500 monthly) for all accrued rents~~directors. $4,000 has been expensed to date. These agreements have been terminated and Mr. Grant received 325,000 shares of common stock, which included payment for the accrued salaries, bonus and rental expenses.

23We do not have any independent directors. Because our common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange, we have used the definition of “independence” of The NASDAQ Stock Market to make this determination. NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) provides that an “independent director” is a person other than an officer or employee of the company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the Company’s Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The NASDAQ listing rules provide that a director cannot be considered independent if:

On August 1, 2014 the Company entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with Mr. Troy Grant. Starting on August 1, 2014, the Company shall pay Mr. Grant a base salary of $22,000 per month, full or part, plus applicable bonuses as are awarded by the Board of Directors from time to time based on performance, which may either be paid in stock or cash at the discretion of the Board.. These agreements have been terminated and Mr. Grant received 325,000 shares of common stock, which included payment for the accrued salaries, bonus and rental expenses. 18

On· ~~March~~the ~~21,~~director ~~2016~~is, or at any time during the ~~Company~~past ~~issued~~three 3years was,~~750~~ ~~shares~~an employee of ~~common~~the ~~stock~~company; to· the director or a ~~consultant~~family member of the director accepted any compensation from the company in excess of $120,000 ~~who~~during isany ~~married~~period of 12 consecutive months within the three years preceding the independence determination (subject to ~~our~~certain ~~CEO~~exclusions, ~~with~~including, among other things, compensation for board or board committee service); · a ~~fair~~family ~~value~~member of ~~$225~~the director is,~~000~~ ~~for~~or ~~consulting~~at ~~services.~~any ~~Consultant~~time during the past three years was, an executive officer of the company; · the director or a family member of the director is ~~being~~a ~~retained~~partner in, controlling stockholder of, or an executive officer of an entity to ~~assist~~which the ~~Company~~company made, or from which the company received, payments in ~~acquiring~~the ~~and~~current ~~locating~~or ~~thoroughbreds~~any toof ~~acquire~~the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenue for ~~its~~that ~~stable~~year ~~and~~or $200,000, whichever is greater (subject to ~~perform~~certain ~~any~~exclusions); ~~and~~· ~~all~~the ~~duties~~director or a family member of the director is employed as ~~requested~~an byexecutive officer of an entity where, at any time during the ~~Company's~~past ~~CEO.~~three ~~Additionally~~years, ~~Consultant~~any ~~shall~~of ~~provide~~the ~~use~~executive officers of ~~his~~the ~~thoroughbred~~company toserved ~~obtain~~on ~~Buscar~~the ~~Stables~~compensation ~~license~~committee inof ~~California.~~such ~~This~~other ~~contract~~entity; ~~shall~~or ~~expire~~· onthe ~~April~~director 30or a family member of the director is a current partner of the company’s outside auditor, ~~2016~~or at any time during the past three years was a partner or employee of the company’s outside auditor, and who worked on the company’s audit.

We do not have any independent directors. Because our common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange, we have used the definition of "independence" of The NASDAQ Stock Market to make this determination. NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) provides that an "independent director" is a person other than an officer or employee of the company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the Company's Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The NASDAQ listing rules provide that a director cannot be considered independent if:

· the director is, or at any time during the past three years was, an employee of the company; · the director or a family member of the director accepted any compensation from the company in excess of $120,000 during any period of 12 consecutive months within the three years preceding the independence determination (subject to certain exclusions, including, among other things, compensation for board or board committee service); · a family member of the director is, or at any time during the past three years was, an executive officer of the company; · the director or a family member of the director is a partner in, controlling stockholder of, or an executive officer of an entity to which the company made, or from which the company received, payments in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the recipient's consolidated gross revenue for that year or $200,000, whichever is greater (subject to certain exclusions); · the director or a family member of the director is employed as an executive officer of an entity where, at any time during the past three years, any of the executive officers of the company served on the compensation committee of such other entity; or · the director or a family member of the director is a current partner of the company's outside auditor, or at any time during the past three years was a partner or employee of the company's outside auditor, and who worked on the company's audit.

We do not currently have a separately designated audit, nominating or compensation committee.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees And Services

~~Anton~~The &following ~~Chia,~~table ~~LLP,~~shows ~~audited~~the ~~our~~fees ~~financial~~that ~~statements~~were billed for the ~~year~~audit ~~ended~~and ~~March~~other ~~31,~~services ~~2016.~~provided ~~The~~by ~~following~~independent ~~table~~auditors ~~shows~~for the ~~aggregate~~fiscal ~~fees~~years ~~billed to us during the year~~ ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 byand ~~Anton & Chia, LLP~~2016.

Audit fees	$	18,000
	2017		2016
Audit-related fees		--
Audit fees	$	23,347	$	18,000
Tax fees		--
Audit-related fees		--		--
All other fees		--
Tax fees		--		--
Total	$	18,000
All other fees		--		--
Total	$	23,347	$	18,000

~~Anton~~Audit &Fees — ~~Chia,~~This ~~LLP,~~category ~~audited~~includes the audit of our annual financial statements, ~~for~~review of financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the ~~year~~independent ~~ended~~registered ~~March~~public ~~31,~~accounting ~~2015~~firm in connection with engagements for those fiscal years. ~~The~~This ~~following~~category ~~table~~also ~~shows~~includes ~~the~~advice ~~aggregate~~on ~~fees~~audit ~~billed~~and toaccounting usmatters that arose during, ~~the~~or ~~year~~as ~~ended~~a ~~March~~result 31of, ~~2015~~the byaudit ~~Anton~~or &the ~~Chia,~~review ~~LLP~~of interim financial statements.

Audit fees	$	18,000
Audit-related fees		--
Tax fees		--
All other fees		--
Total	$	18,000

Audit-Related Fees — This category consists of assurance and related services by the independent registered public accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported above under “Audit Fees.” The services for the fees disclosed under this category include consultation regarding our correspondence with the SEC and other accounting consulting.

~~Audit~~Tax ~~fees~~Fees — ~~and~~This ~~audit~~category ~~related~~consists ~~fees~~of ~~represent amounts billed for~~ professional services rendered ~~for~~by ~~the~~our ~~audit~~independent ofregistered ~~our~~public ~~annual~~accounting ~~financial~~firm ~~statements.~~for ~~Before~~tax ~~Anton~~compliance &and ~~Chia,~~tax ~~LLP~~advice. ~~was~~The ~~engaged~~services byfor usthe tofees ~~render~~disclosed ~~these~~under ~~services,~~this ~~the~~category ~~engagement~~include ~~was~~tax ~~approved~~return bypreparation ~~our~~and ~~Directors~~technical tax advice.

~~Tax~~All Other Fees — This category consists of fees for other miscellaneous items.

~~N/A~~Our Board of Directors has adopted a procedure for pre-approval of all fees charged by our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the procedure, the Board approves the engagement letter with respect to audit, tax and review services. Other fees are subject to pre-approval by the Board, or, in the period between meetings, by a designated member of the Board. Any such approval by the designated member is disclosed to the entire Board at the next meeting.

~~Pre-Approval of Services~~19

We do not have an audit committee. As a result, our Board of Directors performs the duties of an audit committee. Our Board of Directors evaluates and approves in advance the scope and cost of the engagement of an auditor before the auditor renders the audit and non-audit services. We do not rely on pre-approval policies and procedures.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits

Exhibit Number		Exhibit Name
3.1		Articles of Incorporation(1)
3.2		Bylaws(1)
3.3		Amendment to Articles(2)
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications*
3.4		Amendment to Articles(3)
32.1		Section 1350 Certifications**
3.5		Certificate of Designation of Preferred Stock (4)
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document.*
3.6		Amendment to Articles(5)
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.*
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.*
32.1		Section 1350 Certifications
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.*
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document.
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.*
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.*
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

~~_____________~~______________

(1)	Incorporated by reference to the same exhibit filed with the Company's registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission on on June 30, 2011.
(2)	Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission on June 6, 2012.
(3)	Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission on January 22, 2013.
(4)	Incorporated by reference to the Company's Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2014.
(5)	Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission on July 16, 2014.

* Filed herewith

26** Furnished herewith

(1) Incorporated by reference to the same exhibit filed with the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission on July 29, 2016.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms			F-2
Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2016 and 2015	F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2017 and 2016		F-4
Statements of Operations for the years ended and March 31, 2016 and 2015	F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016		F-5
Statement of Stockholders' Deficit for the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015	F-4
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016		F-6
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015	F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016		F-7
Notes to Financial Statements	F-6
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements		F-8

27F-1 Table of Contents

1100 N. Tustin Avenue, 2^nd floor

Anaheim, CA 92807

Office: (714) 238-0000

E-Fax: (714) 451-4160

www.bycpas.com

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Buscar Company

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Buscar Company (the "Company") as of March 31, 2017, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders' deficit and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2017, and the results of its operations, changes in stockholders' deficit and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, these conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

/s/ Benjamin & Young, LLP

Anaheim, California

July 14, 2017

F-2

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Buscar Company

We have audited the accompanying balance ~~sheets~~sheet of Buscar Company (the "Company") as of March 31, 2016 ~~and March 31~~, ~~2015,~~ and the related ~~statement~~statements of operations, changes in stockholders' deficit and cash flows for the ~~years~~year ~~ended~~then ~~March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015~~ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our ~~audits~~audit.

We conducted our ~~audits~~audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company was not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our ~~audits~~audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our ~~audits~~audit ~~provide~~provided a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2016 ~~and March 31~~, ~~2015,~~ and the results of its operations, changes in stockholders' deficit and its cash flows for the ~~years~~year then ended ~~March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015,~~ in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Anton & Chia, LLP

Newport Beach, California

July 14, 2016

F-1 Table of Contents

BUSCAR COMPANY (Formerly BUSCAR OIL, INC.) Balance Sheets

	March, 31			March, 31
	2016			2015
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	-		$	-
TOTAL ASSETS	$	-		$	-
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Due to related parties	$	40,171		$	238,254
Accrued liabilities		5,485			-
Contingent liabilities		177,270			177,270
TOTAL LIABILITIES	$	222,926		$	415,524
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Preferred stock, par value $0.00001; authorized 50,000,000 shares authorized;
Series A preferred stock, $0.00001 par value, 10,000,000 shares designated; 8,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively		80			80
Series B preferred stock, $0.00001 par value, 10,000,000 shares designated; no shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively		-			-
Common stock, $0.00001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 372,375, and 1,125 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015, respectively (1)		4			-
Common stock payable		-			390,000
Additional paid-in capital		15,038,381			13,930,590
Accumulated deficit		(15,261,391	)		(14,736,194	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$	(222,926	)	$	(415,524	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$	-		$	-

__________

(1) All common share amounts and per share amounts in these financial statements reflect the 1-for-200 share reverse split of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, effective July 13, 2016, including retroactive adjustment of common share amounts.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-2 Table of Contents

BUSCAR COMPANY (Formerly BUSCAR OIL, INC.) Statements of Operations

	Year Ended			Year Ended
	March 31,2016			March 31,2015
Costs and expenses:
Management and consulting fees	$	357,000		$	553,280
General and administrative		45,656			41,423
Total expenses		402,656			594,703
Loss from operations		(402,656	)		(594,703	)
Other expense
Loss on debt settlement		(122,541	)		-
Total other expense		(122,541	)		-
Loss before income taxes		(525,197	)		(594,703	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-
Net loss	$	(525,197	)	$	(594,703	)
Net loss per common share: Basic and diluted	$	(1.80	)	$	(528.62	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding: Basic and diluted (2)		292,492			1,125

__________

(2) All common share amounts and per share amounts in these financial statements reflect the 1-for-200 share reverse split of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, effective July 13, 2016, including retroactive adjustment of common share amounts.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3

Table of Contents

BUSCAR COMPANY ~~(Formerly~~Consolidated ~~BUSCAR~~Balance ~~OIL, INC.) STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT~~Sheets

											Common			Additional					Total
	March, 31			March, 31
	Preferred Stock						Common Stock				Stock			Paid-in		Accumulated			Stockholders'
	2017			2016
	Shares			Amount			Shares		Amount		Payable			Capital		Deficit			Deficit
ASSETS
Balance, March 31, 2014 (3)		8,000,000		$	80			1,125	$	-	$	-		$	13,930,590	$	(14,141,491	)	$	(210,821	)
Current Assets:
Stock based Compensation		-			-			-		-		390,000			-		-			390,000
Cash	$	286,527		$	-
Net loss		-			-			-		-		-			-		(594,703	)		(594,703	)
Prepaid expense		45,764			-
Balance, March 31, 2015 (3)		8,000,000		$	80			1,125	$	-	$	390,000		$	13,930,590	$	(14,736,194	)	$	(415,524	)
Total Current Assets		332,291			-
Common stock issued for services		-			-			3,750		-		-			225,000		-			225,000
Thoroughbreds, net		941,443			-
Common stock issued for debt settlement		-			-			6,500		-		-			187,541		-			187,541
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,273,734		$	-
Common stock issued exchanged for common stock payable		-			-			36,000		-		(390,000	)		390,000		-			-
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Common Stock issued to CEO for debt settlement		-			-			325,000		4		-			299,996		-			300,000
Current Liabilities:
Debt settlement		-			-			-		-		-			5,254		-			5,254
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	24,419		$	5,485
Net loss		-			-			-		-		-			-		(525,197	)		(525,197	)
Due to related party		-			26,800
Balance, March 31, 2016 (3)		8,000,000		$	80			372,375	$	4	$	-		$	15,038,381	$	(15,261,391	)	$	(222,926	)
Note payable		5,871			13,371
Contingent liabilities		177,270			177,270
Total current liabilities		207,560			222,926
Total liabilities		207,560			222,926
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit):
Preferred stock, par value $0.0001; authorized 50,000,000 shares authorized;		-			-
Series A preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares designated; 8,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively		800			800
Series B preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares designated; 9,965,000 and 0 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively		997			-
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 18,581,321 and 372,375 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively		1,858			37
Additional paid-in capital		19,703,207			15,037,628
Accumulated deficit		(18,640,688	)		(15,261,391	)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		1,066,174			(222,926	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$	1,273,734		$	-

~~__________~~ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

~~(3) All common share amounts and per share amounts in these financial statements reflect the 1~~F-~~for-200~~4 ~~share~~Table ~~reverse split~~ of ~~the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, effective July 13, 2016, including retroactive adjustment of common share amounts.~~Contents

~~The~~BUSCAR ~~accompanying~~COMPANY ~~notes~~Consolidated ~~are~~Statements ~~an integral part~~ of ~~these financial statements.~~Operations

F-4Table of Contents

	Year Ended March 31,
	2017			2016

Revenue	$	-		$	-

Operating expenses:
General and administrative		3,372,540			402,656
Total operating expenses		3,372,540			402,656

Loss from operations		(3,372,540	)		(402,656	)

Other expenses:
Loss on debt settlement		-			(122,541	)
Total other expenses		-			(122,541	)

Loss before income taxes		(3,372,540	)		(525,197	)

Provision for income taxes		-			-

Net loss		(3,372,540	)		(525,197	)

Deemed dividend on Series B convertible preferred stock		(1,397	)		-

Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(3,373,937	)	$	(525,197	)

Net loss per common share: basic and diluted	$	(0.28	)	$	(1.80	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding: basic and diluted		12,179,422			292,492

~~BUSCAR~~The ~~COMPANY~~accompanying ~~(Formerly~~notes ~~BUSCAR~~are ~~OIL,~~an ~~INC.)~~integral ~~Statements~~part of ~~Cash~~these ~~Flows~~consolidated financial statements.

	Year Ended March 31,
	2016			2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(525,197	)	$	(594,703	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Share based compensation		357,000			390,000
Loss on debt settlement		122,541			-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accrued liability		5,485			-
Due to related parties		40,171			204,678
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		-			(25	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net cash used in Investing Activities		-			-
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net cash provided by Financing Activities		-			-
Net cash increase for period		-			(25	)
Cash at beginning of period		-			25
Cash at end of period	$	-		$	-
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for income taxes	$	-		$	-
Cash paid for interest	$	-		$	-
NON CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
The issuance of 36,000 shares of common stock in exchange for common stock payable	$	390,000		$	-
The issuance of 3,750 shares of common stock for consulting services.	$	225,000		$	-
The issuance of 325,000 shares of common stock in exchange for $300,000 of debt settlement to a related party	$	300,000		$	-
The issuance of 6,500 shares of common stock in exchange for $65,000 of debt settlement to an unrelated party	$	187,541		$	-
Debt settlement by related party	$	5,254		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5

Table of Contents

~~Buscar~~BUSCAR ~~Company~~COMPANY Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) For the Years Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016

(Formerly Buscar Oil, Inc.)

															Common			Additional						Total
	Series A Preferred Stock				Series B Preferred Stock						Common Stock				Stock			Paid-in			Accumulated			Stockholders’
	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			Shares		Amount		Payable			Capital			Deficit			Deficit

Balance, March 31, 2015		8,000,000	$	800		-		$	-			1,125	$	-	$	390,000		$	13,929,870		$	(14,736,194	)	$	(415,524	)

Common stock issued for services		-		-		-			-			3,750		-		-			225,000			-			225,000
Common stock issued for debt settlement		-		-		-			-			6,500		1		-			187,540			-			187,541
Common stock issued exchanged for common stock payable		-		-		-			-			36,000		4		(390,000	)		389,996			-			-
Common Stock issued to CEO for debt settlement		-		-		-			-			325,000		32		-			299,968			-			300,000
Debt settlement		-		-		-			-			-		-		-			5,254			-			5,254
Net loss		-		-		-			-			-		-		-			-			(525,197	)		(525,197	)

Balance, March 31, 2016		8,000,000	$	800		-		$	-			372,375	$	37	$	-		$	15,037,628		$	(15,261,391	)	$	(222,926	)

Adjustment for reverse split		-		-		-			-			803		-		-			-			-			-
Series B Preferred stock issued to CEO		-		-		10,000,000			1,000			-		-		-			(1,000	)		-			-
Common stock issued for cash		-		-		-			-			1,760,643		176		-			1,980,824			-			1,981,000
Common stock issued for services		-		-		-			-			2,447,500		245		-			2,685,755			-			2,686,000
Common stock issued for conversion of Series B Preferred Stock		-		-		(35,000	)		(3	)		14,000,000		1,400		-			-			(1,397	)		-
Net loss		-		-		-			-			-		-		-			-			(3,372,540	)		(3,372,540	)
Dividend Paid		-		-		-			-			-		-		-			-			(5,360	)		(5,360	)

Balance, March 31, 2017		8,000,000	$	800		9,965,000		$	997			18,581,321	$	1,858	$	-		$	19,703,207		$	(18,640,688	)	$	1,066,174

~~Notes~~The toaccompanying ~~Financial~~notes ~~Statements~~are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

Table of Contents

BUSCAR COMPANY

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	Year Ended March 31,
	2017			2016

Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(3,372,540	)	$	(525,197	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Stock based compensation		2,686,000			357,000
Depreciation		94,189			-
Loss on debt settlement		-			122,541
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses		(45,764	)		-
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		18,934			5,485
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(619,181	)		(40,171	)

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Purchases of thoroughbreds		(1,035,632	)		-
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		(1,035,632	)		-

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Proceeds from issuances of common stock		1,981,000			-
Borrowings under due to related party		231,304			26,800
Repayments of due to related party		(258,104	)		-
Proceeds from note payable		-			13,371
Repayment of note payable		(7,500	)		-
Dividend paid		(5,360	)		-
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		1,941,340			40,171

Net cash increase for the year		286,527			-
Cash at beginning of year		-			-
Cash at End of Year	$	286,527		$	-

Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash paid for income taxes	$	-		$	-
Cash paid for interest	$	-		$	-

Non Cash Investing And Financing Activities
Series B Preferred shares issued to related party	$	1,000		$	-
Conversion of Series B Preferred stock into common stock	$	1,400		$	-
Issuance of 36,000 shares of common stock in exchange for common stock payable	$	-		$	390,000
Issuance of 3,750 shares of common stock for consulting services	$	-		$	225,000
Issuance of 325,000 shares of common stock in exchange for $300,000 of debt settlement to a related party	$	-		$	300,000
Issuance of 6,500 shares of common stock in exchange for $65,000 of debt settlement to an unrelated party	$	-		$	187,541
Debt settlement by related party	$	-		$	5,254

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7

Table of Contents

BUSCAR COMPANY

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2017 and 2016

Note 1 - Business

Buscar Company. ("“Buscar"”, "“we"”, "“us"”, "“our"”, the "“Company"”) was incorporated in Nevada as Cascade Springs Ltd. on January 19, 2010. In 2012, we amended our Articles of Incorporation to change our name to Colorado Gold Mines, Inc. On June 18, 2014, changed our name to Buscar Oil, Inc. On May 19, 2015, the Company changed ~~it's~~its name to Buscar Company. Buscar is domiciled in the state of Colorado, and its corporate ~~headquarters~~headquarter ~~are~~is located in Los Angeles, CA. The Company selected March 31 as its fiscal year end.

The Company'’s business is the buying, selling and racing of thoroughbreds that can race in the allowance and stakes levels of thoroughbred racing; however, the Company will initially begin in the claiming level of thoroughbred racing. The Company intends to acquire in its claiming division before acquiring horses for its allowance/stakes division. These horses will provide the Company with revenue and a foundation to build out a stakes level stable. The Company'’s main focus will be acquiring horses that will be capable of racing in stake races throughout the Country.

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant accounting policies are as follows:

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("“GAAP"”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect ~~(i)~~ the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, ~~(ii) the~~and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities ~~known~~at tothe ~~exist~~date as of the ~~date the~~ financial statements ~~are published,~~ and ~~(iii)~~ the reported ~~amount~~amounts of ~~net~~ revenues and expenses ~~recognized~~ during the ~~periods~~reporting ~~presented~~period. ~~Adjustments~~Actual ~~made~~results ~~with~~could ~~respect~~materially todiffer ~~the~~from ~~use~~those of estimates. ~~often~~It ~~relate~~is toreasonably ~~improved~~possible ~~information~~that ~~not~~a ~~previously~~change ~~available.~~in ~~Uncertainties~~the ~~with~~Company’s ~~respect to such~~ estimates ~~and~~will ~~assumptions~~occur ~~are inherent~~ in the ~~preparation~~near ofterm ~~financial~~and ~~statements;~~such ~~accordingly,~~change ~~actual~~could ~~results~~be ~~could~~material ~~differ~~as ~~from~~information ~~these~~becomes ~~estimates~~available. The Company'’s ~~most significant~~ estimates ~~relate~~include tothoroughbreds ~~the~~reserve ~~valuation~~for ofpotential ~~its~~impairment, ~~contingent liabilities~~ and ~~the~~contingent ~~valuation of its common stock~~liabilities.

~~Cash~~Consolidation ~~and Cash Equivalents~~Policy

The ~~Company~~consolidated ~~considers~~financial ~~all~~statements ~~highly~~of ~~liquid~~the ~~investments~~Company ~~with~~include anthe ~~original~~accounts ~~maturity~~ of ~~three~~the ~~months~~Company orand ~~less~~its towholly beowned ~~cash~~subsidiary, ~~equivalents.~~Buscar ~~At March 31~~Stables, ~~2016~~Inc. ~~and~~All ~~2015,~~significant ~~the~~intercompany ~~Company~~balances ~~did~~and ~~not~~transactions have ~~any~~been ~~cash~~eliminated orin ~~cash or cash equivalents~~consolidation.

Cash

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had $286,527 and $0 of cash, respectively.

Income Taxes

~~F-6~~We ~~Table~~account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of ~~Contents~~existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are recorded, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

AsF-8 aTable ~~result~~ of the implementation of certain provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes ("ASC 740"), which clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertainty in tax positions, as defined, ASC 740 seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspects of the recognition and measurement related to accounting for income taxes. We adopted the provisions of ASC 740 as of January 1, 2007, and have analyzed filing positions in each of the federal and state jurisdictions where we are required to file income tax returns, as well as all open tax years in these jurisdictions. We have identified the U.S. federal and California as our "major" tax jurisdictions. Generally, we remain subject to Internal Revenue Service examination of our 2012 through 2015 U.S. federal income tax returns, and remain subject to California Franchise Tax Board examination of our 2012 through 2015 California Franchise Tax Returns. However, we have certain tax attribute carryforwards which will remain subject to review and adjustment by the relevant tax authorities until the statute of limitations closes with respect to the year in which such attributes are utilized.Contents

As a result of the implementation of certain provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), which clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertainty in tax positions, as defined, ASC 740 seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspects of the recognition and measurement related to accounting for income taxes. We adopted the provisions of ASC 740 and have analyzed filing positions in each of the federal and state jurisdictions where we are required to file income tax returns, as well as all open tax years in these jurisdictions. We have identified the U.S. federal and California as our “major” tax jurisdictions. Generally, we remain subject to Internal Revenue Service examination of our 2012 through 2016 U.S. federal income tax returns, and remain subject to California Franchise Tax Board examination of our 2012 through 2016 California Franchise Tax Returns. However, we have certain tax attribute carryforwards which will remain subject to review and adjustment by the relevant tax authorities until the statute of limitations closes with respect to the year in which such attributes are utilized.

Thoroughbreds

The Company depreciates thoroughbreds via straight-line depreciation over its useful life of 3 years.

The thoroughbreds are stated at the lower of cost or market value. The cost was deemed to be the best evidence of market value and the company’s thoroughbreds were therefore stated at cost. Costs of maintaining horses prior to maturity and entered into a race or disposition are capitalized as additional costs of the horse. When a horse is sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and associated accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is recognized in the statement of operations.

The company evaluates the recoverability of its Long Term Assets in accordance with ASC topic 360, which requires recognition of impairments of long lived assets in the event an indication of impairment exists and the net book value of such assets exceeds the expected future value net cash flows attainable to such assets. The Company did not recognize any impairment losses for any periods presented.

	March 31, 2017			March 31, 2016
Thoroughbreds	$	625,101		$	-
Cost of development		410,529			-
		1,035,630			-
Accumulated depreciation		(94,187	)		-
Thoroughbreds, net	$	941,443		$	-

Cost of Development represent stud fee, boarding, training, blacksmith, veterinary and land use for the horses. These specific costs are capitalized until the horse reaches maturity.

During the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded depreciation of $94,187 and $0, respectively.

Thoroughbred Revenue Recognition

The Company pursues opportunities to realize revenues from a principal activity: breeding the thoroughbreds. It is the Company’s policy that revenues and gains will be recognized in accordance with ASC Topic 605-10-25, “Revenue Recognition.” Under ASC Topic 605-10-25, revenue earning activities such as selling the horses and the Company has substantially accomplished all it must do to be entitled to the benefits represented by the revenue. Gains or losses from the sale of the horses are recognized when the horse is sold, and the cost and associated accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is recognized in the statement of operations.

F-9

Table of Contents

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

The Company computes basic and diluted earnings per share amounts in accordance with ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share.” Basic ~~loss~~earnings per share is computed ~~using~~by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted ~~loss~~earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options and other commitments to issue common stock were exercised or equity awards vest resulting in the issuance of common stock that could share in the earnings of the Company. The Company has ~~not~~no ~~been~~potentially ~~provided~~dilutive securities, such as itoptions ~~would~~or bewarrants, ~~anti-dilutive~~currently issued and outstanding.

The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used for the computation of basic and diluted net loss per common shares:

	Year Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
Numerator:
Net loss available to stockholders	$	(3,372,540	)	$	(525,197	)

Denominator:
Weighted average number of common shares – Basic and Diluted		12,179,422			292,492

Net loss per common share – Basic and Diluted	$	(0.28	)	$	(1.80	)

Stock-Based Compensation

WeASC ~~periodically~~718, ”Compensation ~~issue~~– ~~stock~~Stock ~~options~~Compensation,” ~~and~~prescribes ~~warrants~~accounting toand ~~employees~~reporting ~~and~~standards ~~non-employees~~for inall ~~non~~share-~~capital~~based ~~raising~~payment transactions ~~for~~in ~~services~~which ~~and~~employee ~~for~~services ~~financing~~are ~~costs~~acquired. WeTransactions ~~account~~include ~~for~~incurring ~~stock~~liabilities, ~~option~~or ~~and~~issuing ~~warrant~~or ~~grants~~offering ~~issued~~to ~~and~~issue ~~vesting~~shares, tooptions, ~~employees~~and ~~based~~other onequity ~~Financial~~instruments ~~Accounting~~such ~~Standards~~as ~~Board~~employee ~~(FASB)~~stock ~~ASC~~ownership ~~Topic~~plans ~~718,~~and ~~"Compensation~~stock appreciation rights. Share-based ~~Stock~~payments ~~Compensation"~~to employees, ~~whereas~~including ~~the~~grants ~~award~~of isemployee ~~measured~~stock atoptions, ~~its~~are ~~fair~~recognized ~~value~~as atcompensation ~~the~~expense ~~date~~in ofthe ~~grant~~consolidated ~~and~~financial isstatements ~~amortized~~based ~~ratably~~on ~~over~~their ~~the~~fair ~~service period~~values. WeThat ~~account~~expense ~~for~~is ~~stock~~recognized ~~option~~over ~~and~~the ~~warrant~~period ~~grants~~during ~~issued~~which ~~and~~an ~~vesting~~employee is required to ~~non-employees~~provide services in ~~accordance~~exchange ~~with~~for ~~ASC~~the ~~Topic 505~~award, ~~"Equity",~~known ~~whereas~~as the ~~value~~requisite ofservice period (usually the ~~stock~~vesting ~~compensation~~period). isAccordingly, ~~based~~all ~~upon~~of the ~~measurement~~stock ~~date~~compensation vested as ~~determined~~of atMarch ~~either~~31, ~~(a)~~2017 ~~the~~as ~~date~~services atwere ~~which~~rendered aand ~~performance~~fulfilled ~~commitment~~as isof ~~reached~~March 31, or2017 ~~(b)~~and atstocks ~~the~~were ~~date~~issued ~~at which the necessary performance~~ to ~~earn~~employees ~~the~~and ~~equity instruments is complete~~consultants.

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation issued to non-employees and consultants in accordance with the provisions of ASC 505-50, ”Equity – Based Payments to Non-Employees.” Measurement of share-based payment transactions with non-employees is based on the fair value of whichever is more reliably measurable: (a) the goods or services received; or (b) the equity instruments issued. The fair value of the share-based payment transaction is determined at the earlier of performance commitment date or performance completion date.

Share-based expense totaled $2,686,000 and $357,000 for the years ending March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company did not have any stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company'’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and debt. The carrying amounts of such financial instruments approximate their respective estimated fair value due to the short-term maturities and approximate market interest rates of these instruments.

The Company adopted ASC Topic 820, ”Fair Value Measurements ("“ASC Topic 820"”),” which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The standard provides a consistent definition of fair value which focuses on an exit price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The standard also prioritizes, within the measurement of fair value, the use of market-based information over entity specific information and establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based on the nature of inputs used in the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date.

F-10

Table of Contents

The three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements is defined as follows:

?· Level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets; liabilities in active markets; ?· Level 2 - inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability other than quoted prices, either directly or indirectly, including inputs in markets that are not considered to be active; or directly or indirectly including inputs in markets that are not considered to be active; ?· Level 3 - inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement

~~F-7 Table of Contents~~Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation for comparative purposes.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

InThe ~~March~~FASB ~~2016,~~has ~~the~~issued ~~FASB~~Accounting ~~issued~~Standards Update (ASU) ~~2016~~No. 2017-09, " ”Compensation - —Stock Compensation (Topic 718): ~~Improvements~~— Scope of Modification Accounting.” ASU 2017-09 applies to ~~Employee~~entities ~~Share~~that change the terms or conditions of a share-~~Based~~based ~~Payment~~payment ~~Accounting"~~award. The ~~amendments~~FASB ~~are~~adopted ~~effective~~ASU ~~for~~2017-09 ~~public~~to ~~companies~~provide ~~for~~clarity ~~annual~~and ~~periods~~reduce ~~beginning~~diversity ~~after~~in ~~December~~practice 15as well as cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, Compensation—Stock ~~2016~~Compensation, to the modification of the terms and ~~interim~~conditions ~~periods~~of ~~within~~a ~~those~~share-based ~~annual~~payment ~~periods~~award. ~~Several~~The ~~aspects~~amendments ofprovide guidance on determining which changes to the ~~accounting~~terms ~~for~~and conditions of share-based payment ~~award~~awards ~~transactions~~require ~~are~~an ~~simplified~~entity to apply modification accounting under Topic 718. Effective for all entities for annual periods, including: ~~(a)~~interim ~~income~~periods ~~tax~~within ~~consequences;~~those ~~(b)~~annual ~~classification~~periods, ofbeginning ~~awards~~after asDecember ~~either~~15, ~~equity~~2017. orEarly ~~liabilities;~~adoption ~~and~~is ~~(c)~~permitted, ~~classification~~including onadoption ~~the~~in ~~statement~~any ofinterim ~~cash~~period, ~~flows~~for public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company isdoes ~~currently~~not inanticipate the ~~process~~adoption of ~~evaluating~~ASU ~~the~~2017-09 ~~impact~~will ofhave ~~the~~a ~~adoption~~material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

InThe ~~February~~FASB ~~2016,~~has ~~the~~issued ~~FASB~~Accounting ~~issued~~Standards Update (ASU) No. ~~2016~~2017-0201, ”Business ~~"Leases~~Combinations (Topic ~~842~~805)": ~~("ASU~~Clarifying ~~2016-02").~~the ~~ASU~~Definition ~~2016-02~~of ~~requires~~a anBusiness,” clarifying ~~entity~~the todefinition ~~recognize~~of ~~assets~~a business. The amendments affect all companies and ~~liabilities~~other ~~arising~~reporting ~~from~~organizations athat ~~lease~~must ~~for~~determine ~~both~~whether ~~financing~~they ~~and~~have ~~operating~~acquired ~~leases~~or sold a business. The ~~ASU~~definition ~~will~~of ~~also~~a ~~require~~business ~~new~~affects ~~qualitative~~many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and ~~quantitative~~consolidation. ~~disclosures~~The amendments are intended to help ~~investors~~companies and other ~~financial~~organizations ~~statement~~evaluate ~~users~~whether ~~better~~transactions ~~understand~~should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments provide a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities is a business. They also provide more consistency in applying the ~~amount~~guidance, ~~timing~~reduce the costs of application, and ~~uncertainty~~make ofthe ~~cash~~definition ~~flows~~of ~~arising~~a ~~from~~business ~~leases~~more operable. ~~ASU~~For ~~2016-02~~public iscompanies, the amendments are effective for ~~fiscal~~annual ~~years~~periods beginning after December 15, ~~2018~~2017, ~~with~~including ~~early~~interim ~~adoption~~periods ~~permitted~~within those periods. The Company isdoes ~~currently~~not ~~evaluating~~anticipate the ~~impact~~adoption of ~~adopting~~ASU ~~this~~2017-01 ~~guidance~~will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, which amends the guidance in U.S. GAAP on the classification and measurement of financial instruments. Changes to the current guidance primarily affect the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, the ASU clarifies guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The new standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and upon adoption, an entity should apply the amendments by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet at the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. Early adoption is not permitted except for the provision to record fair value changes for financial liabilities under the fair value option resulting from instrument-specific credit risk in other comprehensive income. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, "Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement -Period Adjustments." Changes to the accounting for measurement-period adjustments relate to business combinations. Currently, an acquiring entity is required to retrospectively adjust the balance sheet amounts of the acquiree recognized at the acquisition date with a corresponding adjustment to goodwill as a result of changes made to the balance sheet amounts of the acquiree. The measurement period is the period after the acquisition date during which the acquirer may adjust the balance sheet amounts recognized for a business combination (generally up to one year from the date of acquisition). The changes eliminate the requirement to make such retrospective adjustments, and, instead require the acquiring entity to record these adjustments in the reporting period they are determined. The new standard is effective for both public and private companies for periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

Note 3 - Going Concern

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes that the Company will be able to meet its obligations and continue its operations for its next fiscal year. Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and these consolidated financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary to the carrying values and classification of assets and liabilities should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. At March 31, ~~2016~~2017, the Company had not yet achieved profitable operations, has accumulated losses of $1518,~~261~~640,~~391~~688 since its inception, ~~has a working capital deficiency of $222,926~~ and expects to incur further losses in the development of its business, all of which raise substantial doubt about the Company'’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company'’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management has no formal plan in place to address this concern but considers that the Company will be able to obtain additional funds by equity financing and/or related party advances, however there is no assurance of additional funding being available or on terms acceptable to the Company.

F-811 Table of Contents

Note 4 - Due to Related Party

AsDuring atthe year ended March 31, ~~2015~~2017, athe ~~related~~Company ~~party~~borrowed ~~were~~a ~~owed~~total amount of $~~238~~191,~~254,~~796 ~~for funds~~ from ~~related~~a ~~parties for paying its accounting~~shareholder, ~~consulting~~who ~~and legal fees. The amount due did not bear any interest and~~ is ~~due~~also onmarried ~~demand.~~to ~~During~~ the ~~year~~CEO ~~ended~~of ~~March~~the 31Company, ~~2016,~~and ~~the~~repaid ~~amounts~~$218,596 ~~were~~for ~~cancelled~~payments ~~against~~of ~~the~~operating ~~issuance~~expenses ~~for~~and ~~shares~~purchase of ~~common~~thoroughbreds ~~stock~~and in$39,508 ~~the~~for ~~Company~~a management fee.

On ~~August~~March 121, ~~2014~~2016, the Company ~~entered~~issued ~~into~~3,750 anshares ~~Executive~~of ~~Employment~~common ~~Agreement~~stock ~~with~~to ~~Mr.~~a ~~Troy~~cons ~~Grant. Starting on August 1~~ultant, ~~2014,~~who ~~the~~is ~~Company~~married ~~shall~~to ~~pay~~our ~~Mr.~~CEO, ~~Grant~~with a ~~base~~fair ~~salary~~value of $22225,000 ~~per~~for ~~month,~~consulting ~~full~~services. orConsultant ~~part,~~was ~~plus~~being ~~applicable~~retained ~~bonuses~~to asassist ~~are awarded by~~ the ~~Board~~Company ofin ~~Directors~~acquiring ~~from~~and ~~time~~locating thoroughbreds to ~~time~~acquire ~~based~~for onits ~~performance,~~stable ~~which~~and ~~may~~to ~~either~~perform beany ~~paid~~and inall ~~stock~~duties oras ~~cash~~requested atby the ~~discretion~~Company’s ~~of the Board~~CEO.. ~~These~~Additionally, ~~agreements~~Consultant ~~have~~provided ~~been~~use ~~terminated~~of ~~and~~his ~~Mr.~~thoroughbred ~~Grant~~to ~~received~~obtain ~~325,000~~Buscar ~~shares~~Stables oflicense ~~common~~in ~~stock,~~California. ~~which~~This ~~included~~contract ~~payment~~expired ~~for~~on ~~the~~April ~~accrued salaries~~30, ~~bonus and rental expenses~~2016.

OnAs ~~August 1, 2014 the Company entered into an office rental agreement with Mr. Grant for 700 square feet~~ of ~~office~~March ~~space located at his residence in Nova Scotia, Canada. The Company shall occupy the Premises on a month-to-month basis for $500 per month. Rent shall accrue from August 1, 2014 until July~~ 31, ~~2015,~~2017 and ~~on such date~~2016, the ~~Tenant~~Company ~~shall~~had ~~pay~~due ~~owner~~to ~~the~~related ~~sum~~part ~~outstanding~~of ($~~500~~0 ~~monthly)~~and ~~for all accrued rents.~~ $426,~~000 has been expensed to date. These agreements have been terminated and Mr. Grant received 325~~800,~~000~~ ~~shares of common stock, which included payment for the accrued salaries, bonus and rental expenses~~respectively.

OnNote 5 ~~March~~– ~~21,~~Note 2016, the Company issued 3,750 shares of common stock to a consultant, who is married to our CEO, with a fair value of $225,000 for consulting services. Consultant is being retained to assist the Company in acquiring and locating thoroughbreds to acquire for its stable and to perform any and all duties as requested by the Company's CEO. Additionally, Consultant shall provide use of his thoroughbred to obtain Buscar Stables license in California. This contract shall expire on April 30, 2016.payable

~~Note~~ During the year ended March 31, 2017, the Company repaid $7,500 to a former officer of the Company. During the year ended March 31, 2016, the Company borrowed a total amount of $13,371 for payments of operating expense on behalf of the Company. As of March 31, 2017, and 2016, the Company recorded note payable of $5,871 -and ~~Commitments~~$13,371, respectively. The note bears no interest and ~~Contingencies~~is due upon demand.

AsNote 6 of- ~~March~~Commitments 31, 2016, the Company had a total of $222,926 of outstanding liabilities. As of this date, the Company recognizes $177,270 of outstanding liabilities related to previous Company directors, Robert Sawatsky and Kelly Fielder. The Company's legal counsel believes that the outstanding liabilities are expected to be paid back to the previous Company directors, Robert Sawatsky and Kelly Fielder, who had originally loaned money to the Company. However, there has been no resolution of this event.Contingencies

~~Note 6~~As -of ~~Equity~~March 31, 2017, the Company had a total of $207,560 of outstanding liabilities. As of this date, the Company recognizes $177,270 of outstanding liabilities related to previous Company directors, Robert Sawatsky and Kelly Fielder. The Company’s legal counsel believes that the outstanding liabilities are expected to be paid back to the previous Company directors, Robert Sawatsky and Kelly Fielder, who had originally loaned money to the Company. However, there has been no resolution of this event.

Note 7 - Equity

Preferred Stock

The Company has authorized 50,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.~~00001~~0001 per share. Board of Directors are authorized to divide the authorized shares of Preferred Stock into one or more series, each of which shall be so designated as to distinguish the shares thereof from the shares of all other series and classes.

Series A Preferred Stock

The Company has designated 10,000,000 preferred shares of Series A Preferred Stock with a par value of $0.~~00001~~0001 per share. As at March 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, the Company had 8,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.

F-12

Table of Contents

Series B Preferred Stock

~~F-9~~The ~~Table~~Company has designated 10,000,000 preferred shares of ~~Contents~~Series B Preferred Stock with a par value of $0.0001 per share.

During the year ended March 31, 2017, 10,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock were issued to our CEO for par value as there is no stated value.

During the year ended March 31, 2017, 35,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock were converted at rate of 1 preferred share to 400 common shares, resulting in the issuance of 14,000,000 shares of common stock, for a value of $1,400, of which $1,397 was recorded as a deemed dividend.

As at March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had 9,965,000 and 0 shares of Series B Preferred Stock issued and outstanding, respectively.

Common Stock

OnThe ~~June~~Company ~~28,~~has ~~2016,~~authorized ~~with an effective date of July 13~~500, ~~2016~~000,000 ~~the~~shares ~~Company filed Amended and Restated Articles~~ of ~~Incorporation~~common stock with ~~the Nevada Secretary of State to effect~~ a ~~1-for-200~~par ~~share~~value ~~Reverse Split~~ of ~~the Company's issued and outstanding common stock~~$0.0001 ~~Common share amounts and~~ per share ~~amounts in these financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this reverse split~~.

On ~~April~~June 128, ~~2014~~2016, ~~the~~with ~~Company~~an ~~entered~~effective ~~into~~date aof ~~consulting~~July ~~services~~13, ~~contract~~2016, ~~with~~the ~~Theo~~Company ~~van~~filed ~~der~~Amended ~~Linde.~~and ~~The~~Restated ~~contract~~Articles ~~terminated~~of onIncorporation ~~October~~with ~~31,~~the ~~2014.~~Nevada ~~Mr.~~Secretary ~~van~~of ~~der~~State ~~Linde~~to ~~received~~effect ~~15,000~~a ~~shares~~1-for-200 share Reverse Split of the Company'’s issued and outstanding common stock. Common ~~representing~~share ~~payment~~amounts ofand ~~$100,000~~per ~~for~~share ~~services~~amounts ~~rendered~~in ~~for~~these ~~the~~consolidated ~~term~~financial ofstatements ~~the~~have ~~agreement.~~been retroactively adjusted to reflect this reverse split.

OnDuring ~~April 1, 2014~~ the ~~Company~~year ~~entered~~ended ~~into~~March ~~a consulting services contract with Jack Bakker. The contract terminated on October~~ 31, ~~2014. Mr. Bakker received 15~~2017,~~000~~ ~~shares of~~ the Company's issued common ~~stock representing payment of $100~~shares,~~000~~ ~~for~~as ~~services rendered for the term of the agreement.~~ follows:

On · 2,447,500 ~~April~~shares 3for services, ~~2014~~with ~~the~~a ~~Company~~fair ~~issued~~value 6of $2,~~500~~686,000 ~~shares~~as ofcompensation · 1,760,000 ~~its~~shares ~~common~~issued ~~stock~~for to$1.10 ~~two~~per ~~(2)~~share, ~~consultants~~ for ~~debt~~$1,936,000. · 643 ~~settlement~~shares ofissued for $6545,000. · 803 Asshares afor ~~result,~~rounding up adjustment on the ~~Company~~reverse ~~recorded~~split. · 14,000,000 ashares ~~loss~~were onissued ~~debt~~for ~~settlement~~the conversion of ~~$122~~35,~~541.~~000 ~~These~~ shares ~~were~~of ~~issued~~Series inB ~~June~~Preferred ~~2015~~Stock.

OnDuring ~~September 1, 2014~~ the ~~Company~~year ~~entered~~ended ~~into~~March an31, ~~Executive~~2016, ~~Employment Agreement with Mr. Terry Christopher. Mr. Christopher a geologist served as an advisor to~~ the Company ~~since~~issued ~~September~~common ~~of 2014. Mr. Christopher received 6~~shares,~~000~~ ~~shares of the Company's common stock~~ as ~~part of the agreement.~~ follows:

· On June 8, 2015, Troy Grant, the Company'’s former chief executive officer and sole member of the Board of Directors and current Chief Operating Officer, was issued 325,000 shares of restricted Common Stock in exchange for accrued salaries, bonus and expenses of $300,000. No shares have been issued to Mr. Grant prior to June 9, 2015 with regard to deferred salary and bonus. · On March 21, 2016, the Company issued 3,750 shares of common stock to a consultant, who is married to the CEO, with a fair value of $225,000 for consulting services (see Note 4). · In June 2015, 6,500 shares of common stock, having a market value of $187,514, were issued to two consultants to settle debt of $65,000. The Company recognized a loss on debt settlement of $122,541 and recorded this amount to additional paid in capital.

OnAs of March 2131, 2017 and 2016, the Company ~~issued~~had 318,~~750~~581,321 and 372,375 shares of common stock toissued aand ~~consultant~~outstanding, ~~who is married to the CEO, with a fair value of $225,000 for consulting services (see Note 4)~~respectively.

AsNote 8 of- ~~March~~Income ~~31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had 372,375 and 1,125 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, respectively.~~Taxes

~~Loss~~The onsignificant ~~Debt~~components ~~Settlement~~of the Company’s deferred tax assets are as follows:

In June 2015, 6,500 shares of common stock, having a market value of $187,514, were issued to two consultants to settle debt of $65,000 (April 3, 2014 above). The Company reconginzed a loss on debt settlement of $122,541 and recorded this amount to additional paid in capital.

	March 31, 2017			March 31, 2016
Deferred tax assets
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	18,640,688		$	15,261,391
Less: Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset		(18,640,688	)		(15,261,391	)
	$	-		$	-

~~Note 7~~ F-13 ~~Income~~Table ~~Taxes~~of Contents

~~The~~Reconciliation ~~significant~~between ~~components~~the ofprovision ~~the~~for ~~Company's~~income ~~deferred~~taxes and the expected tax ~~assets~~benefit ~~are~~using the federal statutory rate of 34% and state statutory rate of 6.9% for 2017 and 2016 is as follows:

	March 31,2016			March 31,2015
	March 31, 2017			March 31, 2016
Deferred tax assets
Income tax benefit at federal statutory rate		(34.00	)%		(34.00	)%
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	15,261,391		$	14,736,194
State income tax benefit, net of effect on federal taxes		(6.90	)%		(6.90	)%
Less: valuation allowance for deferred tax asset		(15,261,391	)		(14,736,194	)
Increase in valuation allowance		40.90	%		40.90	%
	$	-		$	-
Income tax expense (benefit)		0.0	%		0.0	%

Reconciliation between the provision for income taxes and the expected tax benefit using the federal statutory rate of 34% and state statutory rate of 6.9% for 2016 and 2015 is as follows:

	March 31,2016			March 31,2015
Income tax benefit at federal statutory rate		(34.00	)%		(34.00	)%
State income tax benefit, net of effect on federal taxes		(6.90	)%		(6.90	)%
Increase in valuation allowance		40.90	%		40.90	%
Income tax expense (benefit)		0.0	%		0.0	%

F-10 Table of Contents

The amount taken into income as deferred tax assets must reflect that portion of the net operating loss carryforwards that is more likely-than-not to be realized from future operations. The Company has chosen to provide an allowance of 100% against all available income tax loss carryforwards, due to the uncertainty surrounding their realization.

No provision for income taxes has been provided in these consolidated financial statements due to the net loss. The effective tax rate differs from the 34% statutory rate for the year ended March 31, ~~2016~~2017 due to the change in valuation allowance.

~~Note 8~~Due -to ~~Subsequent~~the ~~Events~~change in ownership provisions of the Income Tax laws of United States of America, net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $18,640,688 for federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. When a change in ownership occurs, net operating loss carry forwards may be limited as to use in future years. They typically expire 20 years from when incurred.

OnNote 9 ~~April~~- ~~13,~~Subsequent ~~2016, the Company acquired an 4% interest in the thoroughbred Sheza Superstar for $2,048. Sheza Superstar is managed by Dare To Dream Stables.~~Events

OnSubsequent ~~May~~to ~~11, 2016,~~ the ~~Company~~year ~~acquired~~end, a100,000 4%shares ~~interest~~of incommon ~~the~~stock ~~thoroughbred~~were ~~Tsunami~~issued for ~~$2,620~~services. ~~Tsunami is managed by Dare To Dream Stables.~~

~~On June 24, 2016, the Company acquired majority interest in Mr. Ability for $51,590. Mr. Ability is managed by Radley Equine.~~F-14

In May 2016, the Company obtained its California Horse Racing Board license to own and race thoroughbreds in California.

Subsequent to March 31, 2016, 10,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock were issued to our CEO.

F-11

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act, the Registrant has caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the ~~15th~~14th day of July ~~2016~~2017.

BUSCAR COMPANY By: /s/ Anastasia Shishova Anastasia Shishova, President/CEO

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of l934, this Report has been signed below by the following person on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

	Title	Date
/s/ Anastasia Shishova	Principal Executive	July 1514, ~~2016~~2017
Anastasia Shishova	Financial and Accounting
	Officer and Director

2821

Filing Compare · Buscar Co