U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ~~COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549~~COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2013~~2017

¨o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ~~______________~~_____________ TO ______________

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-15109

CALA CORPORATION

(Exact name of Company as Specified in Its Charter)

Oklahoma		73-1251800
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer or Organization Identification No.)
1314 Texas Street, Suite 400, Houston, TX		77002
701 North Post Oak Road, Suite 615 Houston TX		77024
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Company'’s telephone number: (713) ~~302~~380-~~8689~~5147

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.005 Par Value

Indicate by check mark whether the Company (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to file such reports), and (2) been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No x.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Company'’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K ¨o.

Indicate by check mark whether the Company is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filed ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company x Emerging Growth Company x

~~Indicate~~If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark ~~whether~~if the ~~Company~~registrant ishas aelected ~~shell~~not ~~company~~to ~~(as~~use ~~defined~~the inextended ~~Rule~~transition ~~12b-2~~period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act). ~~Yes ¨ No x.~~o

~~The~~Indicate ~~Company's~~by ~~revenues~~check ~~for~~mark whether the ~~fiscal~~Company ~~year~~is ~~ended~~a ~~December~~shell ~~31,~~company ~~2013~~(as ~~was~~defined ~~zero.~~in ~~The~~Rule ~~aggregate number of shares of voting stock held by non~~12b-~~affiliates~~2 ~~on June 30, 2013 was 168,795,519 with a market value~~ of ~~$675,182. As of November 6, 2015,~~ the ~~Company~~Exchange ~~had~~Act). ~~320,866,147~~Yes ~~shares~~x ofNo ~~common stock issued and outstanding~~¨.

~~Transitional~~The ~~Small~~Company’s ~~Business~~revenues ~~Disclosure~~for ~~Format~~the ~~(check~~fiscal ~~one):~~year ~~Yes~~ended ¨December ~~No x~~31, 2017 was zero. The aggregate number of shares of voting stock held by non-affiliates on June 30, 2017 was 181,795,519 with no market value as the shares had ceased trading. As of April 16, 2018, the Company had 334,866,147 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

	PART I

Item 1.	Business	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	3
Item 2.	Property	6
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	6
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure	6

	PART II

Item 5.	Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	7
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	8
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	8
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8.	Financial Statements	F-1
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	9
Item 9A. (T)	Controls and Procedures	9
Item 9B.	Other Information	10

	PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance	11
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	12
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	13
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence	13
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	14

	PART IV

Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	15

Signatures		16

Item 1.	Business	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4
Item 2.	Property	7
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	7
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure	7
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	8
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	9
Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	9
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	9
Item 8.	Financial Statements	F-1
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	11
Item 9A.	(T) Controls and Procedures	11
Item 9B.	Other Information	12
PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance	13
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	14
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	15
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence	15
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	16
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	17
Signatures		18

Table of Contents

PART I.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

Cala Corporation ~~(formerly Magnolia Foods, Inc.)~~ was incorporated on ~~September~~June 13, 1985 under the laws of the State of Oklahoma. The Company'’s sole industry segment was the business of owning, operating, licensing and joint venturing restaurants. The Company discontinued this line of business on December 31, 2006. Currently, the Company isintends into ~~the~~build ~~early stage of building~~ an underwater resort and casino. Over the next twelve months, the Company plans to secure $25 million to begin construction on the first vessel. As of the date of this filing none of the financing has been secured.

~~Business~~The ~~Development~~Undersea Resort was the idea of Joe Cala, CEO of Cala Corporation. On November 1988, while swimming offshore from Maui, he was surrounded by humpback whales. It was the most profound divine encounter that he ever experienced. From that point forward, he committed himself to developing the Undersea Resort. Integral to the design is the installation of large windows below sea level which look out to the undersea habitat.

~~The~~Since ~~Company has designed an undersea resort. The Company~~2007, ~~through~~ the ~~expertise~~company ~~of Mr. Ray Francis~~ has ~~solved~~generated ~~the~~no ~~naval engineering problems originally presented by the project~~revenues. ~~Mr.~~The ~~Francis~~company ~~brings~~has toan ~~the~~accumulated ~~table~~deficit ~~over~~of 40$17,081,888 ~~years~~as of ~~maritime~~December ~~experience~~31, ~~that~~2017, isand ~~second~~anticipates togenerating ~~none~~losses infor the ~~maritime~~next ~~industry.~~twelve Mrmonths. ~~Francis~~As ~~talents~~of ~~allow~~December ~~for~~31, ~~a design that benefits the customer's safety~~2017, ~~maximizes~~ the ~~openness~~company ~~and~~had ~~space~~cash ~~of the facility,~~ and ~~maintains~~cash ~~the~~equivalents ~~primary focus~~ of ~~human contact with marine life~~$987. ~~This~~The ~~coupled~~company ~~with~~will ~~Joseph~~need ~~Cala's~~to ~~knowledge~~raise ~~and~~capital ~~experience~~to inpay the ~~hospitality~~auditors, ~~industry~~accountant, ~~along~~attorney ~~with eight years of intensive study~~ and ~~seemingly~~transfer ~~endless~~agent. ~~trial~~The ~~and~~company ~~error,~~has ~~enabled~~been ~~the~~unable ~~Company~~ to ~~finalize~~obtain ~~two~~such ~~naval~~financing ~~engineered~~or ~~designs~~any ~~for~~financing ~~the~~to ~~Undersea~~begin ~~Resort~~any ~~and Residence~~projects. ~~The~~To ~~Company~~address ~~engaged~~this ~~Mr. Clive Jones~~concern, athe ~~former~~independent ~~senior~~public ~~executive~~accounting ~~with~~firm ~~Economic Research Associates, to help with business development. Mr. Jones~~ has ~~over~~issued 40an ~~years~~audit ofopinion, ~~experience~~which inincludes ~~worldwide~~a ~~leisure~~statement ~~travel~~that ~~and tourism development, and he was~~ the ~~visionary~~results ~~behind many~~ of ~~the~~our ~~landmark~~operations ~~resorts~~ and ~~theme~~our ~~parks.~~financial Incondition ~~addition,~~raise ~~the~~substantial ~~Company~~doubt isabout ~~working~~our ~~with~~ability ~~prestigious~~to ~~maritime~~continue ~~companies such~~ as ~~Stodga~~a ofgoing ~~Poland and FinCantieri of Italy~~concern.

The Company plans to build the first UnderSea Resort & Casino, the first Undersea Residence, and the first Residence Fractional Ownership. The development will be the residence and the fractional ownership, and the project will be financed from pre-selling individual units. Management believes that the project has a great chance of success. The Company is in discussions with members of the timeshare and fractional unit industry to explore the possibility of a partnership or contractual arrangement with the Company. The undersea residences have the entire ocean available with no purchase costs, and without the limitations of land. According to the Future Timeshare Buyers 2004 Market Profile, 13.4 million adults are interested in purchasing some form of timeshare during the next two years. The next generation of owners is well educated and the highest concentration of interest in purchasing is among GenXers. In addition, the study documents that prospective owners are experienced and enthusiastic travelers.

The Company completed the design phase of development and is seeking financing to begin the construction phase of the project. Included in the financing stage is the concept of pre-selling the vessels prior to the beginning of construction. As of this date the Company does not have any commitments for financing or purchase of any units. The Company initiated a contract with a shipyard for building the units.

Management believes that the project has a great chance of success however; there can be no assurance that (i) such individual unit or fractional ownership will be sold or significant revenue will be generated, and (ii) anticipated costs will not be significantly exceeded by actual costs incurred.

The Company owns no patents or trademarks, and has no employees.

ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS

Risk Factors Connected with Plan of Operation.

(a) Limited Prior Operations, History of Operating Losses, and Accumulated Deficit May Affect Ability of Company to Survive.

The Company has had limited prior operations to date. Since the Company'’s principal activities recently have been limited to seeking new business ventures, it has no recent record of any revenue-producing operations. Consequently, there is only a limited operating history upon which to base an assumption that the Company will be able to achieve its business plans. In addition, the Company has no assets. As a result, there can be no assurance that the Company will generate significant revenues in the future; and there can be no assurance that the Company will operate at a profitable level. Accordingly, the Company'’s prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered in connection with the establishment of a new business.

As a result of the fixed nature of many of the Company'’s expenses, the Company may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected delays in the development and marketing of the Company'’s products or any capital raising or revenue shortfall. Any such delays or shortfalls will have an immediate adverse impact on the Company'’s business, operations and financial condition.

(b) Need for Additional Financing May Affect Operations and Plan of Business.

The working capital requirements associated with any adopted plan of business of the Company may be significant. The Company anticipates, based on currently proposed assumptions relating to its operations (including with respect to costs and expenditures and projected cash flow from operations), that it must seek financing to continue its operations (an amount which is as yet to be determined). However, such financing, when needed, may not be available, or on terms acceptable to management. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on additional sources of capital and the success of the Company'’s business plan.

If3 ~~funding~~Table ~~is insufficient at any time in the future, the Company may not be able to take advantage~~ of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, or may be required to reduce the scope of its planned product development and marketing efforts, any of which could have a negative impact on its business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, insufficient funding may have a material adverse effect on the company's financial condition, which could require the company to:Contents

·If ~~curtail~~funding ~~operations~~is ~~significantly;~~insufficient ·at ~~seek~~any ~~arrangements~~time ~~with~~in ~~strategic~~the ~~partners~~future, orthe ~~other~~Company ~~parties that~~ may ~~require~~not ~~the~~be ~~company~~able to ~~relinquish~~take ~~significant~~advantage ~~rights~~of tobusiness ~~products,~~opportunities ~~technologies~~ or ~~markets;~~respond orto ·competitive ~~explore~~pressures, ~~other strategic alternatives including a merger~~ or ~~sale~~may ofbe ~~the~~required ~~company.~~to Toreduce the ~~extent~~scope ~~that~~of ~~the~~its ~~Company~~planned ~~raises~~product ~~additional~~development ~~capital~~and ~~through~~marketing ~~the~~efforts, ~~sale~~any of ~~equity~~which orcould ~~convertible~~have ~~debt~~a ~~securities,~~negative ~~the~~impact ~~issuance~~on ofits ~~such~~business, ~~securities~~operating ~~will~~results ~~result~~and infinancial ~~dilution to existing stockholders~~condition. IfIn ~~additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities~~addition, ~~these~~insufficient ~~securities~~funding may have ~~rights,~~a ~~preferences~~material ~~and~~adverse ~~privileges~~effect ~~senior to holders of common stock and the terms of such debt could impose restrictions~~ on the ~~Company'~~company’s ~~operations.~~financial ~~Regardless of whether the Company's cash assets prove to be inadequate to meet the Company's operational needs~~condition, ~~the Company may seek to compensate providers of services by issuance of stock in lieu of cash,~~ which ~~will~~could ~~also~~require ~~result~~the incompany ~~dilution~~ to ~~existing shareholders.~~:

4· curtail operations significantly; · seek arrangements with strategic partners or other parties that may require the company to relinquish significant rights to products, technologies or markets; or · explore other strategic alternatives including a merger or sale of the company. To the extent that the Company raises additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities will result in dilution to existing stockholders. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, these securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to holders of common stock and the terms of such debt could impose restrictions on the Company’s operations. Regardless of whether the Company’s cash assets prove to be inadequate to meet the Company’s operational needs, the Company may seek to compensate providers of services by issuance of stock in lieu of cash, which will also result in dilution to existing shareholders.

The Company'’s success is dependent upon the hiring and retention of key personnel. None of the officers or directors has any employment or non-competition agreement with the Company. Therefore, there can be no assurance that these personnel will remain employed by the Company. Should any of these individuals cease to be affiliated with the Company for any reason before qualified replacements could be found, there could be material adverse effects on the Company'’s business and prospects.

In addition, all decisions with respect to the management of the Company will be made exclusively by the officers and directors of the Company. Investors will only have rights associated with stockholders to make decisions which affect the Company. The success of the Company, to a large extent, will depend on the quality of the directors and officers of the Company. Accordingly, no person should invest in the shares unless he is willing to entrust all aspects of the management of the Company to the officers and directors.

(d) Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Ability of Officers and Directors to Make Decisions in the Best Interests of Company.

The officers and directors have other interests to which they devote time, either individually or through partnerships and corporations in which they have an interest, hold an office, or serve on boards of directors, and each will continue to do so notwithstanding the fact that management time may be necessary to the business of the Company. As a result, certain conflicts of interest may exist between the Company and its officers and/or directors which may not be susceptible to resolution.

In addition, conflicts of interest may arise in the area of corporate opportunities which cannot be resolved through arm'’s length negotiations. All of the potential conflicts of interest will be resolved only through exercise by the directors of such judgment as is consistent with their fiduciary duties to the Company. It is the intention of management, so as to minimize any potential conflicts of interest, to present first to the board of directors to the Company, any proposed investments for its evaluation.

Table of Contents

(e) Limitations on Liability, and Indemnification, of Directors and Officers May Result in Expenditures by Company.

The Company'’s Certificate of Incorporation contain provisions to eliminate, to the fullest extent permitted by the Oklahoma Corporation Law, as in effect from time to time, the personal liability of directors of the Company for monetary damages arising from a breach of their fiduciary duties as directors. The Certificate of Incorporation and the Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company include provisions to the effect that the Company may, to the maximum extent permitted from time to time under applicable law, indemnify any director, officer, or employee to the extent that such indemnification and advancement of expense is permitted under such law, as it may from time to time be in effect. Any limitation on the liability of any director, or indemnification of directors, officer, or employees, could result in substantial expenditures being made by the Company in covering any liability of such persons or in indemnifying them.

(f) Absence of Cash Dividends May Affect Investment Value of Company'’s Stock.

The board of directors does not anticipate paying cash dividends on the common stock for the foreseeable future and intends to retain any future earnings to finance the growth of the Company'’s business. Payment of dividends, if any, will depend, among other factors, on earnings, capital requirements and the general operating and financial conditions of the Company as well as legal limitations on the payment of dividends out of paid-in capital.

(g) Non-Cumulative Voting May Affect Ability of Some Shareholders to Influence Mangement of Company.

Holders of the shares of common stock of the Company are not entitled to accumulate their votes for the election of directors or otherwise. Accordingly, the holders of a majority of the shares present at a meeting of shareholders will be able to elect all of the directors of the Company, and the minority shareholders will not be able to elect a representative to the Company'’s board of directors.

(h) No Assurance of Continued Public Trading Market and Risk of Low Priced Securities May Affect Market Value of Company'’s Stock.

There has been only a limited public market for the common stock of the Company. The Company’s common stock ofwas ~~the~~listed ~~Company~~on isthe ~~currently~~National ~~quoted~~Quotation onBureaus’ ~~the~~ Pink Sheets ~~LLC.~~(now Asknown ~~a result, an investor may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations~~ as toPink ~~the~~Sheets ~~market value of the Company's securities. In addition~~LLC), ~~the~~under ~~common stock is subject to~~ the ~~low-priced~~symbol ~~security or so called "penny stock" rules that impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell such securities~~“CCAA”. ~~The~~On ~~Securities~~October ~~Enforcement and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990 requires additional disclosure in connection with any trades involving a stock defined as a penny stock (generally~~17, ~~according~~2016 ~~to recent regulations adopted by~~ the ~~U.S.~~Company ~~Securities~~was ~~and~~notified ~~Exchange Commission ("SEC"), any equity security that has a market price~~ of ~~less~~delisting ~~than~~due ~~$5.00 per share, subject~~ to ~~certain~~lack ~~exceptions), including the delivery, prior to any penny stock transaction,~~ of acurrent ~~disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith~~reporting. ~~The~~On ~~regulations~~March ~~governing low-priced or penny stocks sometimes limit the ability of broker-dealers to sell the Company's common stock and thus~~6, ~~ultimately,~~2017 the ~~ability~~trading ofactivity ~~the~~was ~~investors~~revoked toby ~~sell their securities in~~ the ~~secondary market~~SEC.

(i) Failure to Maintain Market Makers May Affect Value of Company'’s Stock.

If the Company is unable to maintain a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority member broker/dealers as market makers, the liquidity of the common stock could be impaired, not only in the number of shares of common stock which could be bought and sold, but also through possible delays in the timing of transactions, and lower prices for the common stock than might otherwise prevail. Furthermore, the lack of market makers could result in persons being unable to buy or sell shares of the common stock on any secondary market. There can be no assurance the Company will be able to maintain such market makers.

(j) Sale of Shares Eligible For Future Sale Could Adversely Affect the Market Price.

Table of Contents

All of the shares of common stock that are currently held, directly or indirectly, by significant shareholders of the Company as shown in the chart under Part III, Item 11 of this Form 10-K, have been issued in reliance on the private placement exemption under the Securities Act of 1933. Such shares will not be available for sale in the open market without separate registration except in reliance upon Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933. In general, under Rule 144 a person, or persons whose shares are aggregated, who has beneficially owned shares acquired in a non-public transaction for at least one year, including persons who may be deemed affiliates of the Company, as defined, would be entitled to sell within any three-month period a number of shares that does not exceed 1% of the then outstanding shares of common stock, provided that current public information is then available. If a substantial number of the shares owned by these shareholders were sold under Rule 144 or a registered offering, the market price of the common stock could be adversely affected.

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.

The Company maintains an office at ~~1314~~701 ~~Texas~~North ~~Street~~Post Oak Road, Suite ~~400~~615, Houston, TX ~~77002~~77024. ItThe ~~currently~~Company does not own any equipment atand ~~that~~the location is provided rent free by the CEO.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

On January 20, 2009, a complaint was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of California (case # CIVWS09-0049) terminating the lease at 500 Bollinger Canyon Way, San Roman, CA due to subleasing the premises without consent of the landlord. A judgment was entered giving the landlord possession of the premises with no monetary amount awarded.

On February 18, 2009 the Company received a letter demanding payment on the deficiencies of 2 notes totaling $125,000 the Company had issued. Subsequent to this an action was originated in the District Court of Jefferson County Texas (case # A-183,766). The Plaintiff contends the Company had not paid the principal or interest on promissory notes issued in 2004. In 2005 the Company issued stock of 3,400,000 and 2,500,000 shares to the plaintiff in full payment of the outstanding notes and interest to the plaintiff. The Company and principal shareholder has agreed to a judgment of $176,~~666~~667 plus attorney'’s fees of $25,000. On October 27, 2011 the ~~judgment~~judgement for cause $183,766 was lodged and entered inby ~~Jefferson~~the ~~County~~court ~~District~~making ~~Court~~the judgement effective as of that date.

The Company and its principal stockholder has agreed to a judgment in Harris Court Texas District Court (Cause# 2011-36988) with the plaintiff of the case to pay the plaintiff $115,000 plus legal costs of $5,000. The settlement calls for a $50,000 payment on January 12, 2012 plus payments of $2,000 per month thereafter none of which have been made. As of this date the judgment has not been signed by the plaintiff'’s, attorney or the judge presiding over the case so actual liability cannot yet be determine. Until the order is entered the judgment is not in effect and could change.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company has accrued $321,667 for the legal liabilities.

On March 6, 2017, under Release number 80157, the Company’s securities registration was revoked by the Commission for failure to timely file periodic reports under in violation of the Exchange Act Section 13(a) and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder. The Company had not filed since the 10-k filed for the year ending December 31, 2013. Since that date, the Company has filed a Form – 10 for December 31, 2015 and 2016.

A Desist and Refrain Order was issued by the State of California Department of Corporations against Joseph Cala and Cala Corp. on March 28, 2012 prohibiting Joseph Cala or Cala Corp. from selling securities in the State of California. This order resulted from a complaint made by an individual who made a loan to Cala Corp. for the office building purchased by the Company in Titusville, Florida. Due to the financial restraints of the Company at the time, and the costs associated with defending against the action, the Company elected not to fight the order and allowed the order to become final. The order remains in full force and effect until further order of the California Corporations Commissioner.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFTEY DISCLOSURE

Not Applicable

76 Table of Contents

PART II.

Market Information.

The Company'’s common stock ~~trades~~was listed on the National Quotation Bureaus'’ Pink Sheets (now known as Pink Sheets LLC), ~~where~~under itthe ~~continues~~symbol “CCAA”. On October 17, 2016 the Company was notified of delisting due to ~~trade~~lack ~~under~~of current reporting. On March 6, 2017 the ~~symbol~~trading ~~"CCAA"~~activity was revoked by the SEC. The range of closing prices shown below is as reported by this market. The quotations shown reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Per Share Common Stock Bid Prices by Quarter (1)

	High		Low
Quarter Ended December 31, 2013		0.0100		0.0013
Quarter Ended December 31, 2017	NA		NA
Quarter Ended September 30, 2013		0.0030		0.0020
Quarter Ended September 30, 2017	NA		NA
Quarter Ended June 30, 2013		0.0040		0.0016
Quarter Ended June 30, 2017	NA		NA
Quarter Ended March 31, 2013		0.0040		0.0021
Quarter Ended March 31, 2017	NA		NA
Quarter Ended December 31, 2012		0.0030		0.0021
Quarter Ended December 31, 2016	NA		NA
Quarter Ended September 30, 2012		0.0100		0.0007
Quarter Ended September 30, 2016		0.0030		0.0020
Quarter Ended June 30, 2012		0.0016		0.0011
Quarter Ended June 30, 2016		0.0040		0.0016
Quarter Ended March 31, 2012		0.0200		0.0014
Quarter Ended March 31, 2016		0.0040		0.0021

~~_______________~~1) The Company’s common stock only traded sporadically during this fiscal year

1) The Company's common stock only traded sporadically during this fiscal year

Holders of Common Equity

As of December 31, ~~2013~~2017, the Company had approximately 515 shareholders of record.

Dividend Information

The Company has not declared or paid a cash dividend to stockholders since it was incorporated. The Board of Directors presently intends to retain any earnings to finance Company operations and does not expect to authorize cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends in the future will depend upon the Company'’s earnings, capital requirements and other factors.

Sales of Unregistered Securities

~~The~~On ~~Company~~February ~~made~~2, no2017, ~~sales of unregistered securities (restricted stock) during~~ the ~~year~~Company ~~which~~issued ~~have~~4,000,000 ~~not~~shares ~~been~~of ~~reported~~common instock ~~the~~to 10two ~~Q's~~individuals ~~filed~~ for ~~the~~cash ~~first~~of ~~three quarters for the year ending December 31~~$20, ~~2013~~000.

~~ITEM~~On 6.May ~~SELECTED~~20, ~~FINANCIAL~~2017, ~~DATA~~the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to a related party for cash of $5,000.

~~Not~~7 ~~Applicable~~Table of Contents

ITEM 7.6: ~~MANAGEMENT'S~~SELECTED ~~DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF~~ FINANCIAL ~~CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION~~DATA

~~When~~Not ~~used~~Applicable in this Form 10-K, the words "anticipated", "estimate", "expect", and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions including the possibility that the Company will fail to generate projected revenues. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected.

~~The~~ITEM ~~following~~7: ~~discussion~~MANAGEMENT’S ofDISCUSSION ~~the~~AND ~~financial~~ANALYSIS ~~condition,~~OF ~~changes~~FINANCIAL inCONDITION ~~financial~~AND ~~condition~~RESULTS ~~and~~OF results of operations of the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company and related notes included therein.OPERATION

~~The~~When ~~Company~~used ~~incurred~~in ~~General~~this ~~and~~Form ~~Administrative~~10-K, ~~expenses~~the ofwords ~~$299~~“anticipated”,~~650~~ ~~for~~“estimate”, ~~the~~“expect”, ~~year~~and ~~ending~~similar ~~2013~~expressions ~~and~~are ~~$301~~intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks,~~728~~ ~~for~~uncertainties and assumptions including the ~~year~~possibility ~~ending~~that ~~2012~~the Company will fail to generate projected revenues. ~~Officers~~Should ~~salary~~one or more of ~~$300,000~~these ~~was~~risks ~~the~~or ~~major~~uncertainties ~~components~~materialize, ofor ~~G&A~~should ~~during~~underlying ~~the~~assumptions ~~years~~prove ~~ended~~incorrect, ~~2013~~actual ~~and~~results ~~2012.~~may ~~The~~vary ~~compensation~~materially ~~was~~from ~~accrued~~those ~~but~~anticipated, ~~not~~estimated ~~paid.~~or projected.

~~Other~~The ~~expense~~following ~~totaled~~discussion ~~$13,306~~of ~~for~~ the ~~period~~financial ~~ended December 31~~condition, ~~2013~~changes ~~compared to $12,099 for the same period~~ in ~~2012~~financial ~~The~~condition ~~amount~~and inresults ~~each~~of ~~period~~operations ~~was interest~~ of ~~$13,306~~the Company for the ~~year~~fiscal years ended December 31, ~~2013~~2017 and ~~$12,099~~2016 ~~for~~should ~~the~~be ~~same~~read ~~period~~ in ~~2012~~conjunction onwith athe ~~$60,000~~financial ~~note~~statements ~~that~~of isthe inCompany ~~default~~and related notes included therein.

The Company ~~has~~ incurred ~~net~~General ~~losses:~~and Administrative expenses of $~~312~~338,~~956~~871 for the ~~fiscal~~ year ~~ended~~ending ~~December~~2017 ~~31, 2013~~ and $313,~~827~~427 for the ~~fiscal~~ year ~~ended~~ending ~~December 31, 2012~~2016. ~~The~~Officers ~~Company's~~salary ~~current~~of ~~liabilities exceed its current assets by~~ $2300,~~257,474~~000 aswas ofthe ~~December~~major ~~31,~~component ~~2013 and $1,944,518 as~~ of ~~December~~G&A ~~31,~~during ~~2012.~~the Atyears ~~December~~ended ~~31,~~2017 ~~2013,~~and ~~the~~2016. ~~Company~~The ~~had~~compensation anwas ~~accumulated~~accrued ~~deficit~~but ofnot ~~$15,721,946~~paid.

9Other expense totaled $20,548 for the period ended December 31, 2017 compared to $18,417 for the same period in 2016 The amount in each period was interest of $20,548 for the year ended December 31, 2017 and $18,417 for the same period in 2016 on a $60,000 note that is in default.

~~Liquidity~~The Company has incurred net losses: $359,419 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 and ~~Capital~~$331,844 ~~Resources~~for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. The Company’s current liabilities exceed its current assets by $3,567,316 as of December 31, 2017 and $3,232,897 as of December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2017, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $17,081,888.

~~The~~Liquidity ~~Company's most significant change in liquidity or capital resources has been receipts of proceeds from stock offerings~~ and ~~advances~~Capital by an officer and director. Further, there exist no agreements or understandings with regard to loan agreements by or with the Officers, Directors, principals, affiliates or shareholders of the Company.Resources

The ~~net~~Company’s ~~cash~~most ~~used~~significant change in ~~operating~~liquidity ~~activities~~or ~~was~~capital ~~$9,372~~resources ~~for~~has ~~the~~been ~~year~~receipts ~~ended~~of ~~December~~proceeds 31from stock offerings and advances by an officer and director. Further, ~~2013~~there ~~compared~~exist no agreements or understandings with regard to ~~net~~loan ~~cash~~agreements ~~used~~by ofor ~~$17~~with the Officers,~~516~~ ~~for~~Directors, ~~the~~principals, ~~year~~affiliates ~~ended~~or ~~December~~shareholders ~~31,~~of ~~2012.~~the Company.

~~Net~~The net cash ~~provided~~used byin ~~financing~~operating activities was $921,~~372~~250 for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2017 ~~and~~compared ~~the~~to net cash ~~provided~~used ~~was~~of $1713,~~516~~013 for the ~~same~~year ~~period~~ended ~~ending~~ December 31, ~~2012~~2016. ~~Financing activities for the period ending December 31, 2013 was lower due to decreased amount of advances from an officer.~~

~~The~~Net ~~Company~~cash ~~will~~provided ~~attempt~~by tofinancing ~~carry~~activities ~~out~~was ~~its~~$22,237 ~~plan~~for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the net cash provided was $13,013 for the same period ending December 31, 2016. Financing activities for the period ending December 31, 2017 was higher due to the sale of ~~business~~stock asfor ~~discussed~~cash ~~above~~of $25,000. The Company, ~~cannot~~as ~~predict~~shown toin ~~what~~the ~~extent~~accompanying ~~its~~balance ~~lack~~sheets, has nominal assets and an accumulated deficit as of ~~liquidity~~December 31, 2017 and ~~capital~~2016. ~~resources~~The ~~will~~Company ~~hinder~~has not established any source of revenue to cover its ~~business~~operating ~~plan~~costs. These factors raise substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company will ~~need~~engage ~~additional~~in ~~capital~~very limited activities that must be satisfied in cash until a source of funding is secured. If the Company is unable to ~~fund~~obtain revenue producing contracts or financing or if the revenue or financing it does obtain is insufficient to cover any operating losses it may incur, it may substantially curtail or terminate its operations or seek other business opportunities through strategic alliances, acquisitions or other arrangements that ~~proposed~~may ~~operation~~dilute the interests of existing stockholders.

~~Need~~8 ~~for~~Table ~~Additional~~of ~~Financing~~Contents

~~The~~Need ~~Company's~~for ~~existing~~Additional ~~capital may not be sufficient to meet the Company's cash needs, including the costs of compliance with the continuing reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.~~ Financing

~~Twelve-Month~~The ~~Plan~~Company’s existing capital may not be sufficient to meet the Company’s cash needs, including the costs of ~~Operation~~compliance with the continuing reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

~~The~~Capital Company intends to take advantage of any reasonable business proposal presented which management believes will provide the Company and its stockholders with a viable business opportunity. The board of directors will make the final approval in determining whether to complete any acquisition, and unless required by applicable law, the articles of incorporation or bylaws or by contract, stockholders' approval will not be sought.Expenditures

The Company designed to build the first UnderSea Resort & Casino, the first Undersea Residence, and the first Residence Fractional Ownership. The first development will be the residence and the fractional ownership, and the project will be financed from pre-selling individual units. The Company estimates that the average residential development should generate approximately $600 million of revenue from the sale of the units while the total development cost should be approximately $460 million. This is based on initial estimates of unit costs and revenue generated in the sale of the vessels as it is the intent of the Company to build the vessels under the Company's design for sale to prospective buyers. The Company does not initially intend to own any of the vessels being built. Therefore, the management believes that the project has a great chance of success however there can be no assurance that (i) such individual unit or fractional ownership will be sold or significant revenue will be generated, and (ii) anticipated costs will not be significantly exceeded by actual costs incurred. The possibilities in this industry are tremendous, because demand for oceanic properties is the highest it has ever been and the supply is scarce. The undersea residences have the ocean available with no purchase costs, and without the limitations of land. None

~~The~~ITEM ~~investigation~~9: ofCHANGE ~~business~~IN ~~opportunities~~AND ~~and~~DISAGREEMENTS ~~the~~WITH ~~negotiation,~~ACCOUNTANTS ~~drafting,~~ON ~~and~~ACCOUNTING ~~execution~~AND of relevant agreements, disclosure documents, and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and will require the Company to incur costs for payment of accountants, attorneys, and others. If a decision is made not to participate in or complete the acquisition of a specific business opportunity, the costs incurred in a related investigation will not be recoverable. Further, even if an agreement is reached for the participation in a specific business opportunity by way of investment or otherwise, the failure to consummate the particular transaction may result in the loss to the Company of all related costs incurred.DISCLOSURE

10None

~~Capital~~ITEM ~~Expenditures~~9A: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

~~None~~Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

~~ITEM~~For 9purposes of this section, the term disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”) (15 U.S.C. ~~CHANGE~~78a INet ~~AND~~seq.) ~~DISAGREEMENTS~~is ~~WITH~~recorded, ~~ACCOUNTANTS~~processed, ONsummarized ~~ACCOUNTING~~and ~~AND~~reported, ~~DISCLOSURE~~within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote. As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO has concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are not effective because of the identification of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting which are identified below, which we view as an integral part of our disclosure controls and procedures.

On9 ~~February~~Table ~~28, 2014 the Company with the approval~~ of ~~its Board of Directors sent a letter to DeJoya Griffith, LLC. in which the Company dismissed and terminated the client-auditor relationship between the Company and DeJoya Griffith, LLC.~~ Contents

~~There~~Management’s ~~were~~Annual noReport ~~disagreements or adverse events or opinions~~ on ~~the~~Internal ~~reports~~Control ~~issued~~Over byFinancial DeJoya Griffith , LLC for the year ended December 31, 2010 and through the interim periods prior to the dismissal and client-audit cessation as defined in Item 304 of Regulation S-K) with DeJoya Griffith , LLC on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of DeJoya Griffith , LLC would have caused it to make reference in connection with its opinion to the subject matter of the disagreement. The report of DeJoya Griffith , LLC on the financial statements for the past two years did not contain any adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, or was qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except that the report was modified to state that there was substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Reporting

WeOur ~~provided~~management ~~DeJoya~~is ~~Griffith~~responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, ~~LLC~~as ~~with~~such aterm ~~copy~~is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the ~~above~~Exchange ~~disclosures~~Act. ~~and~~Our ~~requested~~internal ~~that~~control ~~DeJoya~~system ~~Griffith~~was ,designed ~~LLC~~to provide usreasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of inherent limitations, a ~~letter~~system ~~addressed~~of internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the ~~Securities~~risk ~~and~~that ~~Exchange~~controls ~~Commission~~may ~~stating~~become ~~whether~~inadequate itdue ~~agrees~~to change in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with ~~such~~the ~~disclosures~~policies or procedures may deteriorate.

OnOur ~~February~~management 28conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2014~~2017 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework version 2013. Based on its evaluation, our ~~Board~~management concluded that there are material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. We lack full time personnel in accounting and financial staff to sufficiently monitor and process financial transactions in an efficient and timely manner. Our history of ~~Directors~~losses ~~engaged~~has ~~MaloneBailey~~severely ~~LLP~~limited our budget to hire and train enough accounting and financial personnel needed to adequately provide this function. Consequently, ~~9801~~we ~~Westheimer~~lacked ~~Road~~sufficient ~~Houston~~technical ~~Texas~~expertise, ~~77042~~reporting asstandards ~~its~~and ~~independent~~written ~~registered~~policies ~~public~~and ~~accounting~~procedures. ~~firm~~A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

~~During~~This ~~the~~Form ~~Company's~~10-K ~~two~~does ~~most~~not ~~recent~~include ~~fiscal~~an ~~years~~attestation ~~and~~report ~~through the date preceding the engagement~~ of ~~MaloneBailey LLP neither~~ the Company’s ~~nor~~registered ~~anyone~~public ~~acting~~accounting onfirm ~~our behalf, has consulted with MaloneBailey LLP~~ regarding ~~either:~~internal ~~(i)~~control ~~the~~over ~~application~~financial ofreporting ~~accounting~~because ~~principles to a specified transaction, either contemplated or proposed, (ii)~~ the ~~type~~attestation ofreport ~~audit~~requirement ~~opinion~~has ~~that~~been ~~might~~removed befor ~~rendered~~“smaller onreporting ~~the~~companies” ~~Company's~~under ~~financial statements, or (iii) any matter that was either~~ the ~~subject~~Dodd-Frank ofWall aStreet ~~disagreement~~Reform ~~between the Company~~ and ~~DeJoya~~Consumer ~~Griffith~~Protection asAct ~~described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv)~~ of ~~Regulation S-K or a reportable event as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K~~2011.

~~ITEM~~Changes ~~9A.~~in ~~CONTROLS~~Internal ~~AND~~Controls ~~PROCEDURES.~~over Financial Reporting

~~Evaluation~~We ofhave ~~Disclosure~~not ~~Controls~~made ~~and~~any ~~Procedures~~changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Form 10-K that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

~~For~~ITEM ~~purposes~~9B ofOTHER this section, the term disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act") (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote. As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO has concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are not effective because of the identification of a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting which is identified below, which we view as an integral part of our disclosure controls and procedures. INFORMATION

11None

~~Changes~~10 inTable ~~Internal~~of ~~Controls over Financial Reporting~~Contents

WePART have not made any changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Form 10-K that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reportingIII.

Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate due to change in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on its evaluation, our management concluded that there are material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. We lack full time personnel in accounting and financial staff to sufficiently monitor and process financial transactions in an efficient and timely manner. Our history of losses has severely limited our budget to hire and train enough accounting and financial personnel needed to adequately provide this function. Consequently, we lacked sufficient technical expertise, reporting standards and written policies and procedures. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

This Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting because the attestation report requirement has been removed for "smaller reporting companies" under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2011.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None

PART III.

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS, AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.

The name, age, and respective position of the directors and executive officer of the Company are set forth below. The director named below will serve until the next annual meeting of the Company'’s stockholders or until his successors are duly elected and have qualified. Directors are elected for a term until the next annual stockholders'’ meeting. Officers will hold their positions at the will of the board of directors, absent any employment agreement, of which none currently exist or are contemplated. There are no arrangements, agreements or understandings between non-management shareholders and management under which non-management shareholders may directly or indirectly participate in or influence the management of the Company'’s affairs. There are no other promoters or control persons of the Company. There are no legal proceedings involving the directors of the Company.

Director and Executive Officer.

Joseph Cala, 5456, Director, Chairman and CEO

Mr. Cala has been an international business owner most of his professional life. He began his career at an early age rising to top management positions in some of the most prestigious and luxurious resorts in the world. Mr. Cala, as Chairman & CEO of Cala Corporation has been involved in various ventures such as: Fila Sportswear USA; Mondi Fashions, USA; L'’Italiano Restaurants and Weddings in California, Hawaii and Japan, Cala Hotels, Inc. dba Undersea Resort; and Hydrogen Future, Inc.

Larry S. Pfautsch, 6466, Director

Mr. Pfautsch is Vice President of Corporate Communications for American Century Investments, a $100 billion asset manager based in Kansas City, Mo. Previously, Mr. Pfautsch was a Partner and Senior Vice President with the international communications and public relations firm of Fleishman Hillard, Inc., where he was a member of the financial communications, investor relations, and corporate reputation management practice groups. He began his career as a newspaper reporter and editor and later worked in corporate communications for a major building materials retailer. He is a U.S. Army veteran and a longtime member of the International Association of Business Communicators.

Mark Hofius, 5254, Director

Mark Hofius is an engineer for over 25 years but works both in upper management and engineering at the same time. Mark does both mechanical and industrial electrical engineering from fully automated systems to military equipment. Mark has worked in public companies to small family owned companies. Mark is very creative by nature and has several patents. Mark currently owns an engineering consulting firm where he does industrial electrical and Mechanical design work from plastic molding to fully automated equipment. Mark experience in management ranges from president, plant manager, and director levels for both private and public companies.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act.

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of any class of the Company'’s equity securities to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("“SEC"”). Executive officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than 10% of any class of the Company'’s equity securities are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company under Rule 16a-3(d) during fiscal 2002, and certain written representations from executive officers and directors, the Company is unaware of any required reports that have not been timely filed.

1311 Table of Contents

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Summary Compensation Table

		Annual compensation						Long-term compensation
								Awards				Payouts
Name and principal position	Year	Salary ($)(2)		Bonus ($)		Other annual compensation ($)		~~Restrictedstockaward~~Restricted stock award(s) ($)		~~Securitiesunder~~Securities under-~~lyingoptions~~ lying options/ SARs (#)		~~LTIPpayouts~~LTIP payouts ($)		All ~~othercompen~~other compen- sation ($)
Joseph Cala,(1)	~~2013~~2017	~~300,000~~	300,000		-		-		-		-		-	~~300,000~~	300,000
President	~~2012~~2016		300,000		-		-		-		-		-		300,000
	2011		300,000		-		-		-		-		-		300,000
Larry S. Pfautsch,	2017		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Larry S. Pfautsch, Director	2013		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Director	2016		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	2012		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Mark Hofius,	2017		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	2011		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Director	2016		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Mark Hofius, Director	2013		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	2012		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	2011		-		-		-		-		-		-		-

~~______________~~(1) Mr Cala was appointed a director and president in 1999.

(1)	Mr. Cala was appointed a director and president in 1999.
(2)	Accrued but not paid

(2) Accrued but not paid

There are no annuity, pension or retirement benefits proposed to be paid to officers, directors, or employees of the Company in the event of retirement at normal retirement date as there is no existing plan provided for or contributed to by the Company. In addition, no remuneration is proposed to be paid in the future, directly or indirectly, by the Company to any officer or director since there is no existing plan as of December 31, ~~2013~~2017 which provides for such payment.

1412 Table of Contents

ITEM 12.: SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of the Company'’s common stock as of December 31, ~~2013~~2017 (~~320~~334,866,147 issued and outstanding) by (i) all stockholders known to the Company to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock; and (ii) all officers and directors of the Company, individually and as a group (each person has sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to all of the shares shown as beneficially owned by them):

Title of Class

~~Name and Address of Beneficial Owner~~

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

~~Amount and Nature of Beneficial Owner~~

Amount and Nature of Beneficial Owner

~~Percent of Class~~

Percent of Class

Common Stock

~~Joseph Cala1314 Texas StreetHouston, TX 77002~~

Joseph Cala 1314 Texas Street Houston, TX 77002

~~123,567,793~~

123,567,793

~~38.5~~

%36.90

Common Stock

~~Larry Pfautsch1314 Texas StreetHouston, TX 77002~~

Larry Pfautsch 1314 Texas Street Houston, TX 77002

~~15,500,000~~

15,500,000

~~4.8~~

%4.60

Common Stock

~~Mark Hofius (2)1314 Texas StreetHouston, TX 77002~~

Mark Hofius (2) 1314 Texas Street Houston, TX 77002

~~13,002,835~~

18,257,315

~~4.1~~

%5.50

Common Stock

~~Shares of all directors and executive officers as a group (3 person)~~

Shares of all directors and executive officers as a group (3 person)

~~152,070,628~~

157,325,108

~~47.4~~

%46.98

~~_____________~~(1) None of these security holders has the right to acquire any amount of the shares within sixty days from options, warrants, rights, conversion privilege, or similar obligations.

(1)	None of these security holders has the right to acquire any amount of the shares within sixty days from options, warrants, rights, conversion privilege, or similar obligations.
(2)	Mr. Hofius holds 12,757,315 shares directly and 245,520 shares are held by his family.

(2) Mr. Hofius holds 18,257,315 shares directly and 245,520 shares are held by his family.

ITEM 13.: CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

Other than as set forth below, during the last two fiscal years there have not been any transaction that have occurred between the Company and its officers, directors, and five percent or greater shareholders.

None

1513 Table of Contents

ITEM 14.: PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

Accountant Fees

The following table presents for each of the last two fiscal years the aggregate fees billed in connection with the audits of our financial statements and other professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm, MaloneBailey LLP., Certified Public Accountants and Consultants.

	2013		2012
	2017		2016
Audit fees	$	1016,~~000~~800	$	810,~~500~~000
Audit related fees		--		--
Tax fees		--		--
All other fees	$	--	$	--

Audit fees represent the professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our financial statements included in quarterly reports, along with services normally provided by the accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. Audit-related fees represent professional services rendered for assurance and related services by the accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements that are not reported under audit fees.

Tax fees represent professional services rendered by the accounting firm for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. All other fees represent fees billed for products and services provided by the accounting firm, other than the services reported for in the other categories.

Audit Committee.

The Company does not have an audit committee.

1614 Table of Contents

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

Exhibits

Exhibits included or incorporated by reference herein are set forth under the Exhibit Index.

Reports on Form 8-K.

1715 Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	Cala Corporation
Dated: November 6, 2015	By:	/s/ Joseph Cala
Dated: April 16, 2018	By:	/s/ Joseph Cala
		Joseph Cala
		Joseph Cala, President
		President

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the date indicated:

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ Joseph Cala	President (principal financial and accounting officer)/Director	~~November~~April 616, ~~2015~~2018
Joseph Cala
/s/ Mark Hofius	Director	~~November~~April 616, ~~2015~~2018
Mark Hofius
/s/ Larry Pfautsch	Director	~~November~~April 616, ~~2015~~2018
Larry Pfautsch

1816 Table of Contents

~~TABLE~~Item OF8. ~~CONTENTS~~Financial Statements

1	REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM	F-2
2	BALANCE SHEETS	F-3
3	STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS	F-4
4	STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	F-5
5	STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS	F-6
6	NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	F-7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016		F-3

Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016		F-4

Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016		F-5

Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016		F-6

Notes to Financial Statements		F-7

~~REPORT~~F-1 OFTable ~~INDEPENDENT~~of ~~REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM~~Contents

ToREPORT ~~the~~OF ~~Board~~INDEPENDENT ofREGISTERED ~~DirectorsCala~~PUBLIC ~~Corporation~~ACCOUNTING ~~Houston, Texas~~FIRM

WeTo ~~have audited~~ the ~~accompanying~~Shareholders ~~balance sheets of Cala Corporation as of December 31, 2013~~ and ~~2012,~~Board ~~and the related statements~~ of ~~operations,~~Directors stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. Cala Corporation's management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.of

WeCala conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.Corporation

InOpinion ~~our~~on ~~opinion,~~ the ~~financial~~Financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cala Corporation as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.Statements

~~MALONEBAILEY~~We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Cala Corporation, ~~LLP~~the ~~www~~“Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”).~~malone-bailey.com~~ ~~Houston~~In our opinion, ~~Texas~~the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

~~November~~Going 6,Concern ~~2015~~Matter

~~F-2~~The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

~~CALA~~Basis ~~CORPORATION~~for Opinion

~~BALANCE~~These ~~SHEETS~~financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

ASWe OFconducted ~~DECEMBER~~our 31audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

	2013			2012
ASSETS
Total assets	$	--		$	--
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expense	$	94,714		$	91,130
Advances – related party		135,894			126,522
Officer salary payable		1,633,600			1,333,600
Taxes payable		11,599			11,599
Notes payable		60,000			60,000
Contingent liabilities		321,667			321,667
Total liabilities		2,257,474			1,944,518
Stockholders' deficit
Common stock, $0.005 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized issued and outstanding 320,866,147 and 320,866,147, respectively:		1,604,329			1,604,329
Additional paid-in capital		11,861,259			11,861,259
Accumulated deficit		(15,721,946	)		(15,408,990	)
Treasury stock -56,533 shares @ cost		(1,116	)		(1,116	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(2,257,474	)		(1,944,518	)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	--		$	--

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

~~The~~/s/ ~~accompanying~~MaloneBailey, ~~notes are an integral part to the financial statements~~LLP

~~F-3~~www.malonebailey.com

~~CALA~~We ~~CORPORATION~~have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

~~STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSFOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31~~Houston, Texas

	2013			2012
Expenses
General and administrative expense		299,650			301,728
Total operating expenses		299,650			301,728
Loss from operations		(299,650	)		(301,728	)
Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(13,306	)		(12,099	)
Total other income (expense)		(13,306	)		(12,099	)
Net loss	$	(312,956	)	$	(313,827	)
Earnings per share:
Net loss per share-basic	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding-basic		320,866,147			320,866,147

April 16, 2018

~~The~~F-2 ~~accompanying~~Table ~~notes~~of ~~are an integral part to the financial statements~~Contents

~~F-4~~CALA CORPORATION

~~CALA~~BALANCE ~~CORPORATION~~SHEETS

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

	AS OF DECEMBER 31,
	2017			2016
ASSETS

Cash in trust account	$	987		$	--

Total current assets		987			--

Total assets	$	987		$	--

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expense	$	156,183		$	127,987
Advances – related party		185,254			178,044
Officer salary payable		2,833,600			2,533,600
Taxes payable		11,599			11,599
Notes payable		60,000			60,000
Contingent liabilities		321,667			321,667

Total liabilities		3,568,303			3,232,897

Stockholders’ deficit
Common stock,
$0.005 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized issued and outstanding 334,866,147 and 329,866,147, respectively:		1,674,329			1,649,329
Additional paid-in capital		11,840,859			11,840,859
Accumulated deficit		(17,081,888	)		(16,722,469	)
Treasury stock -156,533 shares at cost		(616	)		(616	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(3,567,316	)		(3,232,897	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	987		$	--

	Common Stock				Paid In		Accumulated			Treasury Stock						Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			Shares			Amount			Deficit
Balance at December 31, 2011		320,866,147	$	1,604,329	$	11,861,259	$	(15,095,163	)		(56,533	)	$	(1,116	)	$	(1,630,691	)
Net loss		--		--		--		(313,827	)		--			--			(313,827	)
Balance at December 31, 2012		320,866,147	$	1,604,329	$	11,861,259	$	(15,408,990	)		(56,533	)	$	(1,116	)	$	(1,944,518	)
Net loss								(312,956	)								(312,956	)
Balance at December 31, 2013		320,866,147	$	1,604,329	$	11,861,259		(15,721,946	)		(56,533	)	$	(1,116	)		(2,257,474	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part to the financial statements

~~The~~F-3 ~~accompanying~~Table ~~notes are an integral part~~ of ~~the financial statements~~Contents

~~F-5~~CALA CORPORATION

~~CALA~~STATEMENTS ~~CORPORATION~~OF OPERATIONS

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSFOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

	FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
	2017			2016
Operating Expenses
General and administrative expense		338,871			313,427
Total operating expenses		338,871			313,427

Loss from operations		(338,871	)		(313,427	)

Other expense
Interest expense		(20,548	)		(18,417	)
Total other expense		(20,548	)		(18,417	)

Net loss	$	(359,419	)	$	(331,844	)

Earnings per share:
Net loss per common share-basic and diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding-basic and diluted		334,118,202			329,384,958

	2013			2012
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(312,956	)	$	(313,827	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to net cash used in operating activity
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		3,584			(3,689	)
Officer salary payable		300,000			300,000
Net cash used in operating activities		(9,372	)		(17,516	)
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from advances- related party		9,372			17,516
Net cash provided by financing activities		9,372			17,516
NET CHANGE IN CASH		--			--
CASH AT BEGINNING OF YEAR		--			---
CASH AT END OF YEAR	$	--		$	--
Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	46		$	183
Income tax	$	--		$	--

The accompanying notes are an integral part to the financial statements

~~The~~F-4 ~~accompanying~~Table ~~notes are an integral part~~ of ~~the financial statements~~Contents

~~F-6~~CALA CORPORATION

~~CALA~~STATEMENTS ~~CORPORATION~~OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

~~NOTES~~FOR TOTHE ~~FINANCIAL~~YEARS ~~STATEMENTS~~ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016

NOTE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

	Common Stock						Paid In			Accumulated			Treasury Stock						Stockholders’
	Shares			Amount			Capital			Deficit			Shares			Amount			Deficit
Balance at December 31, 2015		327,866,147		$	1,639,329		$	11,849,259		$	(16,390,625	)		(56,533	)	$	(1,116	)	$	(2,903,153	)

Common stock returned to treasury		(100,000	)		(500	)		--			--			(100,000	)		500			--
Common stock issued for service		2,100,000			10,500			(8,400	)		--			--			--			2,100

Net loss		--			--			--			(331,844	)		--			--			(331,844	)

Balance at December 31, 2016		329,866,147			1,649,329			11,840,859			(16,722,469	)		(156,533	)		(616	)		(3,232,897	)

Common stock issue for cash		5,000,000			25,000			--			--			--			--			25,000
Net loss		--			--			--			(359,419	)		--			--			(359,419	)

Balance at December 31, 2017		334,866,147		$	1,674,329		$	11,840,859		$	(17,081,888	)		(156,533	)	$	(616	)	$	(3,567,316	)

~~Cala Corporation (formerly Magnolia Foods, Inc.) was incorporated on June 13, 1985 under the laws of the State of Oklahoma.~~ The ~~Company's~~accompanying ~~sole~~notes ~~industry~~are ~~segment~~an ~~was~~integral ~~the~~part ~~business~~ of owning, operating, licensing and joint venturing restaurants. The Company discontinued this line of business on December 31, 2006. The Company has completed plans for building an underwater resort but has been unable to secure the ~~financing~~financial ~~necessary to build such a facility. It is looking into other businesses which may align with the Company's objectives.~~statements

~~NOTE 2~~ F- ~~SUMMARY~~5 OFTable ~~SIGNIFICANT~~of ~~ACCOUNTING POLICIES~~Contents

~~Basis~~CALA ~~of Presentation~~CORPORATION

~~The~~STATEMENTS ~~accompanying~~OF ~~audited~~CASH financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for years presented have been reflected herein. FLOWS

Reclassifications

	FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
	2017			2016
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(359,419	)	$	(331,844	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Stock issued for services		--			2,100
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		38,169			16,731
Officer salary payable		300,000			300,000
Net cash used in operating activities		(21,250	)		(13,013	)

CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from the sale of common stock		25,000			--
Repayments on related party advances		(2,763	)		--
Proceeds from related party advances		--			13,013
Net cash provided by financing activities		22,237			13,013

NET INCREASE IN CASH		987			--

CASH AT BEGINNING OF YEAR		--			---

CASH AT END OF YEAR	$	987		$	--

Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	--		$	--
Income tax	$	--		$	--

NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS
Common stock returned to treasury	$	--		$	500
Payment of expenses by related party on behalf of the Company	$	9,973		$	--

~~Certain~~The ~~prior~~accompanying ~~year~~notes ~~amounts~~are ~~have~~an ~~been~~integral ~~reclassified~~part toof ~~conform with~~ the ~~current~~financial ~~year presentation.~~statements

~~Stock~~F-~~Based~~6 ~~Compensation~~Table of Contents

~~The~~CALA Company accounts for stock-based compensation to employees and non-employees in accordance with ASC 718 requiring employee equity awards to be accounted for under the fair value method. Accordingly, share-based compensation is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite employee service period. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation to other than employees in accordance with FASB ASC 505-50. Equity instruments issued to other than employees are valued at the earlier of a commitment date or upon completion of the services, based on the fair value of the equity instruments and is recognized as expense over the service period. The Company estimates the fair value of share-based payments using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for common stock options and the closing price of the company's common stock for common share issuances.CORPORATION

~~Cash~~NOTES ~~and~~TO ~~cash~~FINANCIAL ~~equivalents~~STATEMENTS

~~For~~FOR ~~the~~THE ~~purposes~~YEARS ofENDED ~~the~~DECEMBER ~~statement of cash flows~~31, ~~the~~2017 ~~Company~~AND ~~considers all highly liquid investments with original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.~~2016

~~Property,~~NOTE ~~Equipment~~1: ~~and~~DESCRIPTION ~~Intangible~~OF ~~Assets~~BUSINESS

~~Property~~Cala ~~and~~Corporation ~~equipment~~was ~~are~~incorporated ~~carried~~on atJune ~~cost~~13, ~~less~~1985 ~~accumulated~~under ~~depreciation~~the laws of the State of Oklahoma. ~~Additions~~The ~~are~~Company’s ~~capitalized~~sole ~~and~~industry ~~maintenance~~segment ~~and~~was ~~repairs~~the ~~are~~business ~~charged~~of toowning, ~~expense~~operating, aslicensing ~~incurred~~and joint venturing restaurants. ~~Intangible~~The ~~assets~~Company ~~consist~~discontinued this line of ~~acquired~~business ~~customer~~on ~~and~~December ~~vendor~~31, ~~databases~~2006. ~~and~~The ~~are~~Company ~~carried~~intends atto ~~cost,~~build ~~less~~an ~~accumulated~~underwater ~~amortization~~resort but has been unable to secure the financing necessary to begin construction on such a facility. It is considering other businesses which may align with the Company’s objectives.

~~Depreciation~~NOTE ~~and~~2: ~~amortization~~SUMMARY isOF ~~provided~~SIGNIFICANT ~~principally~~ACCOUNTING ~~on the straight-line basis method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.~~POLICIES

~~F-7~~Basis of Presentation

~~Income~~The ~~Taxes~~accompanying audited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for years presented have been reflected herein.

~~The~~Stock-Based Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to be recovered. The Company provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which it does not consider realization of such assets to be more likely than not.Compensation

~~Basic~~The Company accounts for stock-based compensation to employees and ~~Diluted~~non-employees ~~Earnings~~in ~~(Loss)~~accordance ~~per~~with ~~Share~~ASC 718 requiring employee equity awards to be accounted for under the fair value method. Accordingly, share-based compensation is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite employee service period. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation to other than employees in accordance with ASC 505-50. Equity instruments issued to other than employees are valued at the earlier of a commitment date or upon completion of the services, based on the fair value of the equity instruments and is recognized as expense over the service period. The Company estimates the fair value of share-based payments using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for common stock options and the closing price of the company’s common stock for common share issuances.

~~The~~Cash Company reports earnings (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, "Earnings per Share." Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed similar to basic earnings (loss) per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and ifcash ~~the additional common shares were dilutive.~~equivalents

~~Estimates~~For ~~and~~the ~~Assumptions~~purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of the assets and liabilitiesProperty, ~~the~~Equipment ~~disclosure of contingent assets~~ and ~~liabilities,~~Intangible ~~and the reported revenues and expenses. Actual results could vary from the estimates that were assumed in preparing these financial statements.~~Assets

~~Recent~~Property ~~Accounting~~and ~~Pronouncements~~equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Additions are capitalized, and maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Intangible assets consist of acquired customer and vendor databases and are carried at cost, less accumulated amortization.

~~The~~Depreciation ~~Company~~and ~~does~~amortization ~~not~~is ~~expect~~provided ~~the~~principally ~~adoption~~on ofthe ~~recently~~straight-line ~~issued~~basis ~~accounting~~method ~~pronouncements~~over tothe ~~have~~estimated auseful ~~significant~~lives ~~impact on our results~~ of ~~operations,~~the ~~financial position or cash flow~~assets.

~~NOTE~~Income ~~3 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS~~Taxes

~~During~~The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the ~~year~~financial ~~ended~~reporting ~~December~~and ~~2013,~~tax basis of assets and liabilities using the ~~Company~~enacted ~~accrued~~tax ~~$300,000~~rates ~~for~~and ~~salary~~laws ~~payable~~that are expected to anbe ~~officer~~in ofeffect when the differences are expected to be recovered. The Company; ~~resulting~~provides ina anvaluation ~~outstanding~~allowance ~~balance~~for ofdeferred ~~$1,633,600~~tax asassets for which it does not consider realization of ~~December~~such ~~31,~~assets ~~2013~~to be more likely than not.

~~During the year ended December 31, 2013, an officer advanced additional funds of $9,372 to the Company for debt reduction and operating expenses for an outstanding advances~~F-~~related~~7 ~~party~~Table ~~balance~~ of ~~$133,894 as of December 31, 2013.~~Contents

~~Additionally,~~Basic ~~in June 2009, the Company received $2,000 in other advances to meet the day to day expenses of the Company. Such advances are non-interest bearing~~ and ~~due~~Diluted onEarnings ~~demand.~~(Loss) Asper ~~of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the outstanding balance in advances was $2,000.~~Share

~~NOTE~~The 4Company ~~- COMMITMENTS~~reports &earnings ~~CONTINGENCIES~~(loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, "Earnings per Share." Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed similar to basic earnings (loss) per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive.

OnEstimates January 9, 2006, the Company entered into a lease at 3160 Danville Blvd. Suite A, Alamo, CA consisting of 4,500 square feet for a restaurant. The duration of the lease is 10 years with a renewable option for 5 more years. The monthly rent on the space is $8,500 plus taxes and common area charges. Monthly rental may be adjusted on an annual basis. On August 1, 2006, the Company assigned the lease to a non-affiliated third party but the Company remains liable for the lease until it terminates on January 8, 2016.Assumptions

~~F-8~~Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of the assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported expenses. Actual results could vary from the estimates that were assumed in preparing these financial statements.

~~Then~~Fair ~~following~~value ~~is a schedule by year~~ of ~~the~~financial ~~future minimum rental payments required under operating leases that have non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2013:~~instruments

2014		102,000
2015		102,000
2016		2,267
Total	$	206,267

The Company adopted ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”), for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. ASC 820 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to existing generally accepted accounting principles that require the use of fair value measurements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. The adoption of ASC 820 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or operating results, but did expand certain disclosures.

OnASC ~~April~~820 ~~10,~~defines ~~2006~~fair ~~the~~value ~~Company~~as ~~entered into a lease consisting of approximately 2,450 square feet for a restaurant at 500 Bollinger Canyon Way, Roman CA. The duration of~~ the ~~lease~~price isthat 10would ~~years.~~be Onreceived ~~August~~to 1,sell ~~2006,~~an ~~the~~asset ~~Company~~or ~~discontinued~~paid ~~its operations in the restaurant business. As a result, the Company assigned the lease~~ to atransfer ~~non-affiliated third party on~~ a ~~sub-lease~~liability ~~basis.~~in ~~The~~an ~~Company~~orderly istransaction ~~still~~between ~~fully~~market ~~obligated~~participants toat the ~~terms~~measurement ~~of this lease~~date. ~~However~~Additionally, ~~the~~ASC ~~nonaffiliated~~820 ~~party~~requires ~~will assume all payments. Under~~ the ~~terms~~use of ~~the~~valuation ~~agreement,~~techniques ~~the~~that ~~sub-lessee~~maximize ~~pays~~ the ~~monthly~~use ~~lease~~ of ~~$5,400~~observable ~~per~~inputs ~~month~~and ~~for~~minimize the ~~duration~~use of ~~the~~unobservable ~~lease plus an additional 60 equal monthly installments of $1,500 to the Company~~inputs. ~~The~~These ~~subleasee~~inputs ~~terminated~~are ~~payment~~prioritized ~~of the $1,500 in August 2008~~below:

The following is a schedule by year of the future minimum rental payments required under operating leases that have non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2013:

Level 1:		Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2:		Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data
Level 3:		Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the use of the reporting entity’s own assumptions.

2014		81,492
2015		83,937
2016		21,138
Total	$	186,567

The Company analyzes all financial instruments with features of both liabilities and equity under the FASB’s accounting standard for such instruments. Under this standard, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Depending on the product and the terms of the transaction, the fair value of notes payable and derivative liabilities were modeled using a series of techniques, including closed-form analytic formula, such as the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

~~NOTE~~Related ~~5- NOTE PAYABLE~~Party

InThe ~~January 2007, the~~ Company ~~issued~~follows aASC ~~note for $60~~850,~~000~~ ~~bearing~~“Related ~~interest~~Party ~~at 11% on the principal and accrued interest compounding monthly. As of December 31~~Disclosures,” ~~2013~~for ~~and December 31, 2012,~~ the ~~outstanding~~identification ~~principle balance~~ of ~~the~~related ~~note~~parties ~~was $60,000~~ and ~~had~~disclosure ~~accrued interest~~ of ~~$67,850~~related ~~and~~party ~~$54,590, respectively~~transactions. ~~The note including principal and interest is in default and still outstanding.~~

~~NOTE~~Recent 6Accounting ~~- INCOME TAXES~~Pronouncements

AtThe ~~December~~Company ~~31,~~does ~~2013~~not ~~and~~expect ~~2012,~~ the ~~Company~~adoption ~~had~~of arecently ~~federal~~issued ~~net~~accounting ~~operating~~pronouncements ~~loss~~to ~~carry~~have ~~forward~~a ofsignificant ~~approximately~~impact ~~$14,088,345~~on ~~and~~our ~~$14,075,389~~results ~~respectively~~of operations, ~~which~~financial ~~expires~~position inor ~~varying~~cash ~~amounts between 2031 and 2032~~flow.

~~Components~~NOTE of3: ~~net~~GOING ~~deferred tax assets, including a valuation allowance, are as follows at December 31:~~CONCERN

	2013			2012
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carry forward	$	4,930,921		$	4,926,386
Total deferred tax assets		4,930,921			4,926,386
Less: Valuation Allowance		(4,930,921	)		(4,926,386	)
Net Deferred Tax Assets	$	--		$	--

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern that contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company, as shown in the accompanying balance sheets, has nominal assets and an accumulated deficit and working capital deficit. The Company has not established any source of revenue to cover its operating costs. These factors raise substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company will engage in very limited activities that must be satisfied in cash until a source of funding is secured. If the Company is unable to obtain revenue producing contracts or financing or if the revenue or financing it does obtain is insufficient to cover any operating losses it may incur, it may substantially curtail or terminate its operations or seek other business opportunities through strategic alliances, acquisitions or other arrangements that may dilute the interests of existing stockholders. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

F-98 Table of Contents

~~The~~NOTE ~~valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $~~4~~,930,921~~: ~~and~~RELATED ~~$4,926,386,~~PARTY respectively. In assessing the recovery of the deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversals of future deferred tax assets, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As a result, management determined it was more likely than not the deferred tax assets would not be realized as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, accordingly, recorded a full valuation allowance.TRANSACTIONS

~~NOTE~~During 7-the ~~LEGAL~~years ~~MATTERS~~ended December 2017 and 2016, the Company accrued $300,000 each year for salary payable to an officer of the Company; resulting in an outstanding balance of $2,833,600 and $2,533,600 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

OnDuring ~~January~~the 20year ended December 31, ~~2009~~2017, aan ~~complaint~~officer ~~was~~advanced ~~filed~~additional ~~against~~funds of $9,973 to the Company infor ~~the~~debt ~~Superior~~reduction ~~Court~~and ofoperating ~~California~~expenses ~~(case~~and #was ~~CIVWS09-0049)~~repaid ~~terminating~~$2,763 ~~the~~for ~~lease~~an atoutstanding ~~500~~advance ~~Bollinger~~related ~~Canyon~~party ~~Way,~~balance ~~San~~of ~~Roman~~$185,254. CADuring ~~due~~the toyear ~~subleasing~~ended ~~the~~December ~~premises~~31, ~~without~~2016 ~~consent~~an ofofficer advanced the ~~landlord.~~Company A$13,013 ~~judgment~~for ~~was~~an ~~entered~~outstanding ~~giving~~related ~~the~~party ~~landlord~~balance ~~possession~~of $178,044 as of ~~the~~December ~~premises~~31, ~~with~~2016. noThe ~~monetary~~balances ~~amount~~are ~~awarded~~unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.

On ~~February~~May 1820, ~~2009~~2017, the Company ~~received a letter demanding payment on the deficiencies of 2 notes totaling $125,000~~ issued ~~by the Company. Subsequent to this an action was originated in the District Court of Jefferson County Texas (case # A-183~~1,~~766). The Plaintiff contends the Company had not paid the principal or interest on promissory notes issued in 2004. In 2005 the Company issued stock of 3,400,~~000 ~~and 2~~,~~500,~~000 shares ~~to the plaintiff in full payment~~ of ~~the~~common ~~outstanding~~stock ~~notes and interest~~ to ~~the plaintiff. The Company and principal shareholder has agreed to~~ a ~~judgment~~related ofparty ~~$176,667~~for ~~plus~~cash ~~attorney's fees~~ of $255,000. ~~On October 27, 2011 the judgment for cause $183,766 was lodged and entered by the court making the judgment effective as of that date.~~

The Company ~~and~~maintains ~~its~~an ~~principal~~office ~~stockholder~~at ~~has~~701 ~~agreed~~North toPost aOak ~~judgment in Harris Court Texas District Court (Cause # 2010-36988) with the plaintiff of the case to pay the plaintiff $115~~Road,~~000 plus~~ ~~legal~~Suite ~~costs of $5~~615,~~000.~~ ~~The~~Houston ~~settlement~~TX ~~calls~~77024 ~~for~~and ~~a $50,000 payment on January 12, 2012 plus payments of $2,000 per month thereafter. No payments have been made to date. As of this date~~ the ~~judgment~~location ~~has~~is ~~not~~provided ~~been~~rent ~~signed~~free by the ~~plaintiff attorney or the judge presiding over the case so actual liability is hard to determine~~CEO.

AsNOTE of5: ~~December 31, 2013 the Company has accrued $321,667 for the legal liabilities.~~EQUITY

~~F-10~~On September 8, 2016, the Company issued 2,100,000 shares of common stock to three individuals at $0.001 per share with a value of $2,100 for services.

~~EHIBIT~~During ~~INDEX~~the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company received 100,000 shares of common stock back to treasury at $0.005 per share with a value of $500.

Number		Description
31		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Joseph Cala (filed herewith).
32		Section 1350 Certification of Joseph Cala (filed herewith).
101		XBRL Interactive Data File (filed herewith).

On February 2, 2017, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock to two individuals for cash of $20,000.

19On May 20, 2017, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to a related party for cash of $5,000.

NOTE 6: COMMITMENTS & CONTINGENCIES

On January 9, 2006, the Company entered into a lease at 3160 Danville Blvd. Suite A, Alamo, CA consisting of 4,500 square feet for a restaurant. The duration of the lease was 10 years with a renewable option for 5 more years. The monthly rent on the space is $8,500 plus taxes and common area charges. Monthly rental may be adjusted on an annual basis. On August 1, 2006, the Company assigned the lease to a non-affiliated third party, but the Company remained liable for the lease until it terminated on January 8, 2016. The lease expired by January 9, 2016. The Company does not have any further obligation.

On April 10, 2006, the Company entered into a lease consisting of approximately 2,450 square feet for a restaurant at 500 Bollinger Canyon Way, Roman CA. The duration of the lease was for 10 years. On August 1, 2006, the Company discontinued its operations in the restaurant business. As a result, the Company assigned the lease to a non-affiliated third party on a sub-lease basis. The Company was fully obligated to the terms of this lease. However, the nonaffiliated party assumed all payments. Under the terms of the agreement, the sub-lessee paid the monthly lease of $5,400 per month for the duration of the lease plus an additional 60 equal monthly installments of $1,500 to the Company. The sublease terminated payment of the $1,500 in August 2008. The lease expired April 10, 2016. The Company does not have any further obligations.

F-9

Table of Contents

NOTE 7: NOTE PAYABLE

In January 2007, the Company issued a note for $60,000 bearing interest at 11% on the principal and accrued interest compounding monthly. As of December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, the outstanding principle balance of the note was $60,000 and had accrued interest of $138,115 and $117,567, respectively. The note including principal and interest is in default and still outstanding.

NOTE 8: INCOME TAXES

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had a federal net operating loss carry forward of approximately $14,277,387 and $14,217,968 respectively.

The 2017 Act reduces the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. For net operating losses (NOLs) arising after December 31, 2017, the 2017 Act limits a taxpayer’s ability to utilize NOL carryforwards to 80% of taxable income. In addition, NOLs arising after 2017 can be carried forward indefinitely, but carryback is generally prohibited. NOLs generated in tax years beginning before January 1, 2018 will not be subject to the taxable income limitation. The 2017 Act would generally eliminate the carryback of all NOLs arising in a tax year ending after 2017 and instead would permit all such NOLs to be carried forward indefinitely

Components of net deferred tax assets, including a valuation allowance, are as follows at December 31:

	2017			2016
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carry forward	$	2,988,555		$	4,969,779
Total deferred tax assets		2,988,555			4,969,779
Less: Valuation Allowance		(2,988,555	)		(4,969,779	)

Net Deferred Tax Assets	$	-		$	-

The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $2,998,555 and $4,969,779, respectively. In assessing the recovery of the deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversals of future deferred tax assets, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As a result, management determined it was more likely than not the deferred tax assets would not be realized as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, accordingly, recorded a full valuation allowance.

F-10

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s tax years from December 31, 2007 through the year ended December 31, 2017 remain subject to examination by Federal jurisdictions.

NOTE 9: LEGAL MATTERS

On February 18, 2009, the Company received a letter demanding payment on the deficiencies of 2 notes totaling $125,000 issued by the Company. Subsequent to this an action was originated in the District Court of Jefferson County Texas (case # A-183,766). The Plaintiff contends the Company had not paid the principal or interest on promissory notes issued in 2004. In 2005 the Company issued stock of 3,400,000 and 2,500,000 shares to the plaintiff in full payment of the outstanding notes and interest to the plaintiff. The Company and principal shareholder has agreed to a judgment of $176,667 plus attorney’s fees of $25,000. On October 27, 2011 the judgment for cause $183,766 was lodged and entered by the court making the judgment effective as of that date.

The Company and its principal stockholder has agreed to a judgment in Harris Court Texas District Court (Cause# 2010-36988) with the plaintiff of the case to pay the plaintiff $115,000 plus legal costs of $5,000. The settlement calls for a $50,000 payment on January 12, 2012 plus payments of $2,000 per month thereafter. No payments have been made to date. As of this date the judgment has not been signed by the plaintiff attorney or the judge presiding over the case so actual liability is hard to determine.

As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company has accrued $321,667 for the legal liabilities.

F-11

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

Number		Description
31		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Joseph Cala (filed herewith).
32		Section 1350 Certification of Joseph Cala (filed herewith).

Filing Compare · CALA CORP