UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)



þ	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to __________

Commission file number 0-53962

Resource Real Estate Investors 7, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		26-2726308
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

One Crescent Drive, Suite 203, Navy Yard Corporate Center, Philadelphia, PA 19112

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(215) 231-7050

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Limited Partnership Units

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	o		Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

There is no public market for the Registrant' securities.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: None

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 7, L.P.

INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT

ON FORM 10-K

			Page
PART I
	Item 1:	Business	4
	Item 1A:	Risk Factors	5
	Item 1B:	Unresolved Staff Comments	5
	Item 2:	Properties	5
	Item 3:	Legal Proceedings	5
	Item 4:	Mine Safety Properties	5
PART II
	Item 5:	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters andIssuer Purchases of Equity Securities	6
	Item 6:	Selected Financial Data	6
	Item 7:	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	67
	Item 7A:	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	11
	Item 8:	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	12
	Item 9:	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting andFinancial Disclosure	2627
	Item 9A:	Controls and Procedures	2627
	Item 9B:	Other Information	2627
PART III
	Item 10:	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	2728
	Item 11:	Executive Compensation	2930
	Item 12:	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	2930
	Item 13:	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	2930
	Item 14:	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	3132
PART IV
	Item 15:	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	3233
SIGNATURES			3334

(Back to Index)

PART I

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report”) include “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expects,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “should,” “will” and “would” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.

Forward-looking statements contained in this Report are based on our beliefs, assumptions and expectations for our future performance, taking into account all information currently available to us. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us or are within our control. If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements we make in this Report are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary from our forward-looking statements, including:


•	changes in our industry, interest rates or the general economy;


•	decrease in tenant occupancy rates;


•	increased rates of tenant default


•	availability, terms and deployment of debt funding for any property we may acquire;


•	increase in operating expenses at our properties;


•	increase in capital expenditures to maintain or enhance our properties;


•	the timing of cash flows, if any, from our investments and payments for debt service;


•	the degree and the nature of our competition in the geographic areas in which our properties are located; and


•	availability and retention of qualified personnel to manage and operate out properties.

We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date of this Report. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, we undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this filing or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

As used herein, the terms “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to Resource Real Estate Investors 7, L.P.

(Back to Index)

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

General

Resource Real Estate Investors 7, L.P., is a Delaware limited partnership which was formed on March 28, 2008 and commenced operations on June 16, 2008. We ~~own~~previously owned in fee, ~~operate~~operated and ~~invest~~invested in multifamily residential rental properties, which we refer to as the Properties~~, located in South Carolina and Texas~~. We ~~may~~currently ~~also~~do ~~invest~~not inown ~~interests~~any in real ~~estate~~property ~~mortgages~~or ~~and~~real ~~other~~estate debt ~~instruments~~investments ~~that~~and ~~are~~do ~~secured,~~not ~~directly~~anticipate orowning ~~indirectly,~~any byreal aestate ~~multifamily~~debt ~~residential~~investments. ~~rental~~We ~~property~~have ordisposed anof ~~interest~~all inProperties anand ~~entity~~are ~~that~~in ~~directly~~the ~~owns~~process ~~such~~of aliquidating ~~property. We~~the ~~currently do not own any real estate debt investments~~partnership.

Our general partner, Resource Capital Partners, Inc. ("RCP", or the "General Partner", ~~(the~~or "GP"), is in the business of sponsoring and managing real estate investment limited partnerships and tenant in common programs, or TICs. Our General Partner ~~operates~~operated and ~~manages~~managed our Properties on our behalf, and iswas responsible for evaluating, managing, refinancing, and selling our Properties on our behalf. Our General Partner is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Resource America, Inc., (or "RAI"), a ~~publicly traded~~ company ~~(NASDAQ: REXI)~~ operating in the real estate, financial fund and commercial finance management sectors.

~~Our~~On ~~goals~~September 8, ~~are~~2016, toRAI ~~generate~~was ~~regular~~acquired ~~cash~~by ~~distributions~~C-III ~~from~~Capital ~~our~~Partners ~~operations~~LLC ("C-III"), ~~gains~~a ~~from~~leading ~~the~~commercial ~~potential~~real ~~appreciation~~estate inservices ~~the~~company ~~value~~engaged ofin ~~our~~a ~~Properties,~~broad ~~and~~range ~~cash~~of ~~for~~activities. ~~our~~C-III ~~partners’~~indirectly ~~distributions~~controls ~~from~~RCP ~~the~~and ~~sale~~all orof ~~refinancing~~the units of the ~~Properties~~Partnership currently owned by RCP.

InOur ~~accordance~~General ~~with~~Partner ~~the~~has ~~First~~complete ~~Amended~~ and ~~Restated~~exclusive ~~Agreement~~discretion in the management of ~~Limited~~our ~~Partnership~~business. ~~(the~~On ~~“Agreement”)~~February 12, ~~the~~2016, GPby ~~has~~written ~~the~~notice ~~right~~ to ~~extend~~ the ~~Partnership~~partners, ~~term~~the ~~for~~General aPartner ~~maximum~~elected ofto ~~two~~extend ~~years in~~ the ~~aggregate~~partnership's ~~following~~term ~~the~~for ~~initial~~one ~~termination~~year ~~date.~~to InMarch ~~February 2016~~28, ~~the~~2017. GPWe ~~extended~~will ~~the~~terminate ~~Partnership's~~on ~~term~~March 28, ~~for~~2017, ~~one~~unless ~~year~~we ~~until~~are ~~March~~sooner ~~28,~~dissolved ~~2017~~or terminated.

Our Management

As we do not have any officers, directors or employees, we ~~rely~~relied ~~solely~~entirely on the officers and employees of our General Partner and its affiliates for the management of our former Properties. Our General Partner and its affiliates, Resource Real Estate Management, LLC and Resource Real Estate, Inc., also conduct business activities of their own in which we have no economic interest. Employees of our General Partner and its affiliates who provide us with services are not required to work full-time on our affairs. These employees devote significant time to the affairs of our General Partner and its affiliates and are compensated by our General Partner and its affiliates for the services rendered to them. There may be significant conflicts between us and our General Partner and its affiliates regarding the availability of those employees to manage us and our former Properties.

Real Estate Manager

Resource Real Estate Management, LLC, or ("Resource Real Estate Management"), a wholly owned subsidiary of our General Partner, ~~manages~~managed or ~~supervises~~supervised the management of our former Properties under a real estate management agreement with us or our subsidiary holding legal title to a particular Property. Resource Real Estate Management is a Delaware limited liability company that was formed in 2005 for the purpose of managing the real estate investments of our General Partner and its affiliates either for their own account or for other real estate programs. In October 2007, Resource Real Estate Management, Inc., d/b/a Resource Residential, a subsidiary of US Residential Group LLC ("USRG"), a Dallas based property manager that is a wholly owned subsidiary of ~~Resource America~~C-III, was formed to manage residential real estate investments for Resource Real Estate Management. For a discussion of the management fees payable under these arrangements, see Item 13 "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence".

Distribution Allocations

Distributable cash, which includes both distributable cash from operations as well as from capital transactions, will be distributed as described below.

Distributable cash from operations will be distributed in the following order of priority:

• first, 100% to the limited partners until they have each received distributions from us, including distributions of distributable cash from capital transactions, equal to their respective preferred return of 8.25% if they subscribed for their units on or before December 31, 2007, or 8% if they subscribed for their units after December 31, 2007, which we refer to as their Preferred Return; and

• thereafter, 80% to the limited partners and 20% to our General Partner, as a Promote.

Distributable cash from capital transactions, which includes cash received from the sale or refinancing of a Property, or the sale or repayment in full of all outstanding principal and interest due and owing to us on a real estate debt investment, will be distributed in the following order of priority:

• first, 100% to our limited partners until they have each received distributions from us, including distributions of distributable cash from operations, equal to their respective Preferred Return;

(Back to Index)


•	first, 100% to our limited partners until they have each received distributions from us, including distributions of distributable cash from operations, equal to their respective Preferred Return;


•	second, 100% to our limited partners until their respective adjusted capital contribution has been reduced to zero; and


•	thereafter, 80% to our limited partners and 20% to our General Partner.

An adjusted capital contribution is the amount originally paid for the limited partnership ~~interest~~units, less previous distributions of distributable cash from capital transactions.

Redemption of Units

We are permitted, in our General Partner’s sole discretion, to redeem units upon a unitholder’s request. However, we have no obligation to redeem units at any time, and we can decline to redeem units for any reason. For example, if our General Partner determines that we do not have the necessary cash flow, taking into account future distributions to our other limited partners, investments, and foreseeable operating expenses, a unitholder’s request may be declined. In addition, our General Partner may not approve the redemption of units if it concludes that the redemption might cause our total unit transfers in the year, subject to certain exceptions, to exceed 2% of our total capital or profits interests. All of these determinations are subjective and will be made in our General Partner’s sole discretion. We will also determine the redemption price based on provisions set forth in the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership~~, or the Partnership Agreement~~. To the extent the formula for arriving at the redemption price has any subjective determinations, they will fall within the sole discretion of our General Partner. If we lack the requisite liquidity to redeem the units, our General Partner, in its sole discretion, may purchase the units on generally the same terms as we would have redeemed the units. As of the date of this Report, 5,000 units have been redeemed. During the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~December 31~~2015, ~~2014,~~ we did not receive any redemption requests.

Available Information

We file annual, quarterly and current reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The internet address of the SEC site is http://www.sec.gov.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Omitted as permitted under rules applicable to smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Omitted as permitted under rules applicable to smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

See Item 7 - “Overview.”

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are a party to various routine legal proceedings arising out of the ordinary course of our business. Management believes that none of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY PROPERTIES

Not applicable.

(Back to Index)

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCK MATTERS

AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our limited ~~partner~~partnership units are not publicly traded. There is no established market for our limited ~~partner~~partnership units and it is unlikely that any will develop. As of ~~March~~December 2931, 2016 there were ~~596~~594 holders of record of our limited partnership units.

We ~~pay~~have paid distributions monthly. During ~~2015~~2016, we paid to the General Partner a total of $2.19 million: of$157,000 ~~the~~represented investment management ~~fee~~fees and $2.7 million represented the promote due to the ~~sale~~sales of ~~two~~four of the Properties. Total distributions paid to the General and Limited Partners were $1739.17 million and $117.61 million in ~~2015~~2016 orand ~~2014~~2015, respectively. The following table details these distributions by month:

December 31, 2015

December 31, 2014

December 31, 2016

December 31, 2015

Distributions

Per Unit

Distributions

Per Unit

January

~~136~~76,~~871~~532

0.~~042~~023

136,~~495~~871

0.042

February

~~136~~76,~~871~~577

0.~~042~~023

136,~~495~~871

0.042

March

986,~~067,732~~453

20.~~773~~026

~~136~~9,~~495~~067,732

02.~~042~~773

April

~~126~~76,~~669~~577

0.~~039~~023

~~136~~126,~~495~~669

0.~~042~~039

May

~~126~~76,~~669~~577

0.~~039~~023

~~136~~126,~~494~~669

0.~~042~~039

June

~~126~~76,~~669~~577

0.~~039~~023

~~136~~126,~~869~~669

0.~~042~~039

July

~~126~~76,~~670~~577

0.~~039~~023

~~136~~126,~~870~~670

0.~~042~~039

August

~~126~~76,~~676~~577

0.~~039~~023

~~136~~126,~~870~~676

0.~~042~~039

September

~~126~~76,~~677~~577

0.~~039~~023

~~136~~126,~~870~~677

0.~~042~~039

October

~~126~~28,~~677~~576,633

08.~~039~~740

~~136~~126,~~870~~677

0.~~042~~039

November

~~126~~135,~~677~~966

0.~~039~~042

~~136~~126,~~870~~677

0.~~042~~039

December

610,~~775~~327,~~463~~881

23.~~072~~159

~~136~~6,~~871~~775,463

02.~~042~~072

Total distributions for the year

1739,~~130~~739,~~321~~504

512.~~239~~151

117,~~640~~130,~~564~~321

05.~~504~~241

We do not have any equity compensation plans.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Selected financial data ~~have~~has been omitted as permitted under rules applicable to smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion relates to our financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Report. Statements contained in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” that are not historical facts may be forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to materially differ from those projected. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

Overview

We are a Delaware limited partnership that was formed on March 28, 2008 and commenced operations on June 16, 2008. Through wholly owned subsidiaries, we own in fee, operate and invest in multifamily residential rental properties located in South Carolina and Texas. We also may invest in interests in real estate mortgages and other debt instruments that are secured, directly or indirectly, by a multifamily residential rental property or an interest in an entity that directly owns such a property. As of December 31, 2015, we did not own any real estate debt investments. If we were to acquire mortgages or other real estate debt investments in the future, these investments would be in an amount that would not cause us to become an investment company within the meaning of Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act of 1940.

(Back to Index)

AsITEM ~~of December 31, 2015, we own four multifamily residential rental Properties through our 100% owned subsidiaries~~7. ~~During~~MANAGEMENT’S ~~the~~DISCUSSION ~~year~~AND ~~ended~~ANALYSIS ~~December~~OF ~~31,~~FINANCIAL ~~2015~~CONDITION weAND ~~sold~~RESULTS 2OF ~~multifamily properties. The following table presents our multifamily residential rental properties:~~OPERATIONS

Subsidiary / Property	Purchase Date	Leverage Ratio (1)	Number of Units	PropertyLocation
RRE Tamarlane Holdings, LLC, or Tamarlane (3)	07/31/2008	68%	—	—
RRE Bent Oaks Holdings, LLC, or Bent Oaks	12/10/2008	57%	146	Austin, TX
RRE Cape Cod Holdings, LLC, or Cape Cod	12/10/2008	57%	212	San Antonio, TX
RRE Woodhollow Holdings, LLC, or Woodhollow	12/12/2008	60%	108	Austin, TX
RRE Woodland Hills Holdings, LLC, or The Hills (2)	12/19/2008	65%	—	—
RRE Woodland Village Holdings, LLC, or Village	03/07/2012	77%	308	Columbia, SC
			774

~~(1) Original face value of mortgage divided by total property capitalization, including reserves, escrows, fees and closing costs.~~Overview

~~(2)~~We ~~The~~are ~~Hills~~a Delaware limited partnership that was formed on March 28, a2008 ~~228~~and ~~unit~~commenced ~~multifamily~~operations ~~apartment~~on ~~complex~~June 16, 2008. Through our wholly owned subsidiaries, we previously owned in ~~Georgia~~fee, ~~was~~operated ~~sold~~and oninvested ~~March~~in 19multifamily residential rental properties. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, we did not own any real property or real estate debt investments.

~~(3)~~During ~~Tamarlane~~the year ended December 31, a2016, ~~115~~we ~~unit~~sold ~~multifamily~~our ~~apartment~~four ~~complex~~remaining inmultifamily ~~Maine,~~properties ~~was~~(the ~~sold~~"Properties"). onAs of December 31, 12016, ~~2015~~we no longer own any multifamily residential rental Properties. The following table presents our former multifamily residential rental properties:

The following table sets forth operating statistics about our multifamily residential rental properties. This table does not include information with respect to two properties, Woodland Hills and Tamarlane, which were sold during fiscal year 2015:



Subsidiary / Property	Purchase Date	Disposition Date
RRE Tamarlane Holdings, LLC, or Tamarlane ⁽¹⁾	07/31/2008	12/01/2015
RRE Bent Oaks Holdings, LLC, or Bent Oaks ⁽²⁾	12/10/2008	09/12/2016
RRE Cape Cod Holdings, LLC, or Cape Cod ⁽³⁾	12/10/2008	11/21/2016
RRE Woodhollow Holdings, LLC, or Woodhollow ⁽⁴⁾	12/12/2008	09/12/2016
RRE Woodland Hills Holdings, LLC, or The Hills ⁽⁵⁾	12/19/2008	03/19/2015
RRE Woodland Village Holdings, LLC, or Village ⁽⁶⁾	03/07/2012	09/30/2016

	AverageOccupancy Rate (1)		Average Effective Rentper Square Foot (2)				Ratio of OperatingExpense to Revenue (3)
	December 31,		December 31,				December 31,
Apartment Complex	2015	2014	2015		2014		2015	2014
Bent Oaks	93.1%	95.9%	$	1.24	$	1.22	59%	52%
Cape Cod	94.8%	94.1%	$	1.01	$	0.96	59%	58%
Woodhollow	94.1%	93.9%	$	1.08	$	1.06	63%	56%
Village	94.4%	94.3%	$	0.55	$	0.54	63%	59%

(1) Tamarlane was a 115 unit multifamily apartment complex in Maine.

(12) ~~Number~~Bent ofOaks ~~occupied~~was ~~units~~a ~~divided~~146 byunit ~~total~~multifamily ~~units~~apartment ~~adjusted~~complex ~~for~~in ~~any unrentable units; average calculated on a weekly basis~~Texas.

(23) ~~Average~~Cape ~~rental~~Cod ~~revenue~~was ~~divided~~a by212 ~~total~~unit ~~rentable~~multifamily ~~square~~apartment ~~footage.~~complex ~~We calculate average rental revenue by dividing gross rental revenue by the number of months~~ in ~~the period~~Texas.

(34) ~~Rental~~Woodhollow ~~operating~~was ~~expenses, excluding certain one-time expenses funded from reserves for capital expenditures, and general and administrative expenses, excluding asset management fees and transaction expenses, as~~ a ~~percentage~~108 ofunit ~~rental~~multifamily ~~income,~~apartment ~~excluding~~complex ~~any~~in ~~adjustment for concessions~~Texas.

(5) The Hills was a 228 unit multifamily apartment complex in Georgia.

(6) Woodland Village was a 308 unit multifamily apartment complex in South Carolina.

Results of Operations

We ~~generate~~generated our income from the net revenues we ~~receive~~received from our Properties. In addition to the rental revenues, we also ~~generate~~generated funds from the sales or refinancing of our Properties ~~as seen with the sale of the Hills in the first quarter of 2015 and the sale of Tamarlane in the fourth quarter of 2015~~. Should economic conditions in the areas in which our Properties are located deteriorate, we could experience lower occupancy, lower rental revenues and higher operating costs, all of which could harm our operations and financial condition, reduce the value of our Properties and limit our ability to make distributions to our limited partners.

Our operating results and cash flows from our Properties ~~are~~were affected by ~~four~~five principal factors:


•	occupancy and rental rates,


•	property operating expenses,


•	interest rates on the related financing, and


•	capital expenditures.


•	net proceeds from property dispositions

~~The~~Prior to their sales, the amount of rental revenues from our Properties ~~depends~~was dependent upon their occupancy rates and concessions granted. We ~~seek~~sought to maximize our occupancy rates through aggressive property-level programs, including, in particular, our Lease Rent Optimizer, or LRO, program which includes rent concessions. Under our LRO program, we ~~seek~~sought to price our rents for apartment units on a daily basis, based upon inventory in the marketplace and competitors’ pricing. Our Properties experienced an overall decrease in the average occupancy rate during the year ended December 31, 2016 of approximately 0.59%, with an average occupancy of 93.5%, as compared to an average occupancy rate of 94.1% during the same

(Back to Index)

units on a daily basis, based upon inventory in the marketplace and competitors’ pricing. Our Properties experienced an overall decrease in the average occupancy rate during the year ended December 31, 2015 of approximately 0.45%, with an average occupancy of 94.1% as compared to an average occupancy rate of 94.6% during the same period of ~~2014~~2015. Our Properties also experienced an overall ~~increase~~decrease in the average effective rent per square foot of $0.0221 during the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 compared to the same period in ~~2014~~2015 for the same properties. The net impact of the lower average occupancy rate offset by the higher average effective rent per square foot during the year ending December 31, 2015 was to increase rental revenue for the year for the remaining properties.

We ~~seek~~sought to control operating expenses through our General Partner’s automated purchase order system that compares actual to budgeted expenses and requires management approval of variances, and through the use of third-party service providers to seek best available pricing.

~~Our~~Year ~~existing~~Ended ~~financing~~December 31, is2016 atCompared ~~fixed~~to ~~rates~~Year ofEnded ~~interest and~~December 31, ~~accordingly,~~2015 our interest cost has remained relatively stable during the period of our ownership of the Properties. Based upon current economic conditions we expect that our financing costs will remain relatively stable during fiscal year 2016.

~~Year~~The ~~Ended~~following ~~December 31,~~table ~~2015~~sets ~~Compared~~forth tothe ~~Year~~results ~~Ended~~of ~~December 31~~our operations for the periods indicated (in thousands, ~~2014~~except per unit data):

	December 31,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount			Percent
	2016			2015			Amount			Percent
Revenues:
Rental income	$	106,~~341~~359		$	1210,~~278~~341		$	(13,~~937~~982	)	(1639	)%
Expenses:
Rental operating	53,~~385~~788			65,~~097~~385			(~~712~~1,597		)	(1230	)%
Management fees – related parties	~~768~~450			~~935~~768			(~~167~~318		)	(1841	)%
General and administrative	~~503~~463			~~574~~503			(7140		)	(128	)%
Depreciation and amortization	~~1,872~~856			21,~~706~~872			(~~834~~1,016		)	(3154	)%
Total expenses	85,~~528~~557			108,~~312~~528			(12,~~784~~971		)	(1735	)%
Income before other income (expenses)	~~1,813~~802			1,~~966~~813			(~~153~~1,011		)	(856	)%
Other Income (expenses):
Other income (expenses):
Interest expense, net	(1,~~957~~223		)	(21,~~529~~957		)	~~(572~~734		)	23(38	)%
Gain on sale of rental properties	17,645			—			17,645			100	%
Loss on extinguishment of debt	(2,379		)	—			(2,379		)	100	%
Loss on disposal of fixed assets	(16		)	(37		)	(21		)	57	%
Gain on sale of rental properties	33,965			17,645			16,320			92	%
Total other income (expenses)	15,672			(2,566		)	18,238			(711	)%
Loss on disposal of fixed assets	(2		)	(16		)	14			(88	)%
Net income (loss)	$	17,485		$	(600	)	$	18,085		(3,014	)%
Total other income (expenses)	30,361			15,672			14,689			94	%
Weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding	$	3,270		$	3,270
Net income	$	31,163		$	17,485		$	13,678		78	%
Net income (loss) per weighted average limited partner unit, basic and diluted	$	5.35		$	(0.18	)
Weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding	3,270			3,270
Net income per weighted average limited partner unit, basic and diluted	$	9.53		$	5.35

Revenues

We attribute the $14.90 million decrease in revenues principally to the sale of ~~the~~Bent ~~Hills~~Oaks, ~~and~~Woodhollow, ~~Tamarlane~~Woodland ~~properties~~Village inand ~~the~~Cape ~~first~~Cod ~~and~~during ~~fourth~~the ~~quarter~~year ofended ~~2015,~~2016 ~~respectively.~~as ~~Average~~well ~~effective~~as ~~rent~~the ~~per~~sale ~~square~~of ~~foot~~the Hills and ~~occupancy~~Tamarlane ~~rates~~during ~~have~~the ~~varied~~year ~~within~~ended ~~our expected range~~2015.

Expenses

We attribute the ~~$1.8 million~~ decrease in expenses set forth below, principally to the sale of Properties:

• a $~~712,000~~1.6 million decrease in rental operating expenses primarily due to:

▪ a $~~112~~85,000 overall decrease in insurance expense ~~as a result of limited losses in the property and general liability insurance portfolio pool managed by RAI,~~;


▪	$445,000 decrease in operating expenses; and


▪	$1.1 million decrease in real estate tax expense.


•	a $318,000 decrease in management fees corresponding to the decrease in revenues attributable to the sale of Properties.


•	a $1.0 million decrease in depreciation and amortization due to the disposal of assets and sale of Properties.

(Back to Index)

▪ a $501,000 decrease in operating expenses due to sale of the Hills and Tamarlane in the first and fourth quarter of 2015, respectively, and

▪ a $99,000 decrease in real estate taxes primarily attributable to the sale of the Hills in the first quarter of 2015.

• a $167,000 decrease in management fees corresponding to the decrease in revenues attributable to the sale of the Hills and Tamarlane.

• a $834,000 decrease in depreciation and amortization of which $677,000 related to the sale of the Hills and $147,000 related to Tamarlane.

Other income (expense)

•The a $1814.27 million increase in other income (expense) is ~~principally~~ due primarily to the ~~gain~~gains on sale of ~~rental~~the ~~properties~~Properties ofduring $92016.6 ~~million~~Other ~~and~~income also increased due to a $8734,000 decrease in interest expense, net, as a result of property sales, offset by a $2.04 million ~~realized~~increase onin defeasance costs as a result of the ~~disposition~~prepayment of the ~~Hills~~mortgages ~~and~~in ~~Tamarlane,~~conjunction ~~respectively~~with the sale of Properties.

•The afollowing ~~$572,000~~table ~~decrease~~sets inforth ~~interest~~our ~~expense~~gains ~~is related to the amortization of principal balances~~ on ~~our~~sale ~~mortgage notes and the payoff~~ of ~~the~~Properties ~~Hills~~included ~~and~~in ~~Tamarlane~~Other ~~mortgages~~income ~~upon~~(expense) ~~sales~~(in ~~of the Properties.~~thousands):



Multifamily Community	Location	Sale Date	Contract Sales Price		Gain on Sale
2016 Dispositions:
Bent Oaks	Austin, TX	9/12/2016	$	15,765	$	9,108
Woodhollow	Austin, TX	9/12/2016	12,420		6,685
Woodland Village	Columbia, SC	9/30/2016	20,650		9,122
Cape Cod	San Antonio, TX	11/21/2016	15,700		9,040
Tamarlane - additional gain recognized					10
			$	64,535	$	33,965

2015 Dispositions:
Hills	Decatur, GA	3/19/2015	$	25,200	$	9,603
Tamarlane	Portland, ME	12/1/2015	18,300		8,042
			$	43,500	$	17,645

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table sets forth our net sources and uses of cash (in thousands):

	Years Ended
	December 31,
	2015			2014
	2016			2015
Net cash provided by operating activities (1)	$	~~656~~27		$	~~2,446~~368
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	19,222			(622		)
Net cash provided by investing activities	37,310			19,510
Net cash used in financing activities	(1742,~~659~~469		)	(217,~~298~~659		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash	$	2,219		$	(474	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash	$	(5,132	)	$	2,219


(1)	Includes changes in operating assets and liabilities.

Our liquidity needs consist principally of funds used to pay the Properties’ debt service, operating expenses, capital expenditures and monthly distributions to the limited partners. Our ability to meet our liquidity needs will be subject to our ability to generate cash from both operations and sales, and to control property operating expenses. The ability to generate cash from operations will depend on the occupancy rates, rates charged to tenants compared with competing properties in the area and the ability of tenants to pay rent. Occupancy rates can fluctuate based on changes in local market conditions where the Properties are located such as: excessive building resulting in an oversupply of similar properties, deterioration of surrounding areas, a decrease in market rates or local economic conditions including unemployment rates. The rental rates charged to tenants compared to competing properties can be impacted by a lack of perceived safety, convenience and attractiveness of a property. We have retained a portion of the proceeds from the sales of the ~~Hills~~Properties ~~and Tamarlane~~ to ensure adequate operating liquidity for the remaining term of the Partnership~~, pay off related debt and make distribution to investors~~. We also have retained a portion of the proceeds from the sales of the Hills and Tamarlane to ensure adequate funding for the future capital expenditures which we may determine to be necessary to position the remaining properties for eventual sale.

During the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016, we recognized net income of $1731.52 million. Our results are substantially affected by gains of $9.1 million, $6.7 million, $9.1 million, and $89.0 million realized on the sales of ~~the~~Bent ~~Hills~~Oaks, Woodhollow , Woodland Village, and ~~Tamarlane~~Cape Cod, respectively. In comparison to the same period in ~~2014~~2015 when we ~~incurred~~recognized a net ~~loss~~income of $~~600~~17.5 million,~~000,~~ our ~~2014~~2015 results were primarily affected by ~~non-cash~~gains ~~expenses,~~of ~~principally~~$9.6 ~~depreciation~~million and ~~amortization~~$8.0 ~~expense,~~million asrealized ison ~~common~~the ~~for~~sales ~~entities~~of ~~that~~the ~~own~~Hills ~~real~~and ~~properties~~Tamarlane, respectively. Our non-cash expenses for the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 included $~~1.9~~856,000 ~~million~~ and $21.79 million, respectively, of depreciation and amortization. Also included in non-cash expenses are amortization of deferred financing costs, losses on disposal of fixed assets, and loss on extinguishment of debt. Excluding these non-cash expenses, our operations generated $~~1.9~~696,000 ~~million~~ and $21.59 million, respectively, of positive adjusted cash flow from operations for the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively. We define adjusted cash flow from operations, a non-GAAP liquidity measure, as net cash provided by operating activities as adjusted for net changes in operating assets and liabilities. ~~Management~~ Adjusted ~~views adjusted~~ cash flow from operations asis not a ~~useful~~measure ~~and~~under ~~appropriate supplement to cash provided by operating activities, since distributions to the limited partners depend upon this measure~~U. ~~Unless~~S. ~~our~~generally ~~properties~~accepted ~~are~~accounting ~~affected~~principles by("GAAP") ~~the factors referred to above in this discussion~~ and inshould ~~“Results~~not ofbe ~~Operations,”~~considered wean ~~anticipate~~alternative ~~that~~to ~~we will generate positive adjusted~~ cash flow from operations ~~for the year ending December 31, 2016~~.

(Back to Index)

The following table reconciles net cash provided by operating activities to adjusted cash flow from operations, a non-GAAP measure, as described in the paragraph above (in thousands):

	Years Ended
	December 31,
	2015		2014
	2016		2015
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	~~656~~27	$	~~2,446~~368
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities	~~1,198~~669		~~100~~1,486
Adjusted cash flow from operations (non-GAAP)	~~1,854~~$	696	~~2,546~~$	1,854

~~Under~~The ~~our~~following ~~capital~~table ~~improvements~~sets ~~program,~~forth wethe ~~could~~capital ~~potentially~~expenditures ~~spend~~incurred ~~approximately $1.8 million~~ during the ~~remaining~~year ~~partnership~~ended ~~term for property improvements intended to increase the Properties’ appeal to tenants and prospective purchasers.~~December ~~As we implement planned improvements to our Properties~~31, ~~we seek to maintain our occupancy rates and~~2016, ~~potentially,~~which toare ~~increase~~discretionary ~~our~~in ~~rental~~nature ~~rates~~(in ~~and our cash flow from operating activities.~~thousands):

We are planning improvements to the Properties for the next two years based on the assumption that the General Partner will exercise its right to extend the term of the partnership through March of 2018. At this time, we expect that the General Partner will, in fact, do so in order to maximize the return to our investors.



Subsidiaries	Capital Expenditures
Bent Oaks	$	26
Cape Cod	38
Woodhollow	23
Village	216
Total	$	303

~~The~~As ~~following~~of ~~table~~December 31, ~~sets~~2016, ~~forth~~we ~~the~~no ~~capital~~longer ~~expenditures~~owned ~~incurred~~any ~~during~~Properties ~~the~~and ~~year~~we ~~ended~~anticipate ~~December 31,~~the ~~2015~~dissolution ~~and~~of ~~estimated~~the ~~future~~Partnership ~~capital~~to ~~expenditures,~~be ~~which~~completed ~~are~~during ~~discretionary~~2017. ~~in nature (in thousands):~~

Subsidiaries	Capital Expenditures		Future DiscretionaryCapital Expenditures
Tamarlane	$	83	$	—
Bent Oaks	62		439
Cape Cod	148		418
Woodhollow	107		422
Hills	6		—
Village	257		533
Total	$	663	$	1,812

We have no mortgage financing outstanding as of December 31, 2016. For more information regarding mortgage financing with respect to each Property, see Note 4 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

Our ~~capital~~payables ~~expenditures~~to ~~were~~related ~~$663,000~~parties ~~during~~primarily ~~the~~consist ~~year~~of ~~ended~~investment ~~December 31,~~management ~~2015. We~~fees ~~have~~due ~~planned~~to aour ~~series~~General ofPartner, ~~future~~payable ~~capital~~monthly, ~~projects~~equal ~~for~~to ~~our~~1% ~~Properties,~~of ~~including~~the ~~further~~gross ~~landscaping~~offering proceeds, ~~parking~~net ~~lot~~of ~~paving,~~any ~~signage~~limited ~~upgrades,~~partnership ~~upgrades~~interest toowned ~~exterior~~by ~~structures,~~the ~~replacing~~General ~~the~~Partner. ~~HVAC~~The ~~condensing~~General ~~units~~Partner ~~and~~must ~~replacing~~subordinate ~~water~~up ~~heaters. We~~to ~~review~~100% ~~future~~of ~~expenditures~~its ~~periodically~~annual ~~and~~investment ~~adjust~~management ~~them~~fee ~~based~~to onthe ~~both~~receipt ~~operating~~by ~~results~~the ~~and~~limited ~~local~~partners ~~market~~of ~~conditions. If~~their ~~market~~Preferred ~~conditions~~Return. ~~improve~~The ~~and~~limited ~~there~~partners isreceived antheir ~~acceptable~~Preferred ~~return~~Return onduring the ~~additional~~year ~~expenditures~~ended December 31, we2016 ~~will~~due ~~consider~~to ~~restoring~~the asales ~~previously~~of ~~contemplated~~the ~~interior~~Bent ~~upgrade~~Oaks, ~~program. We~~Cape ~~cannot~~Cod, ~~assure~~Woodhollow ~~you~~and ~~that~~Woodland weVillage. ~~will~~As ~~complete~~a ~~projects~~result, ~~currently~~$157,000 ~~planned~~of orthe ~~that~~accrued wesubordinated ~~will~~investment ~~not~~management ~~change~~fee ~~our~~was ~~plans~~paid induring ~~response~~the toyear ~~changes~~ended inDecember 31, ~~market conditions~~2016.

In connection with the acquisitions of our Properties, we have $25.9 million of total mortgage financing outstanding. For information regarding mortgage financing with respect to each Property, see Note 5 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

Our payables to related parties primarily consist of investment management fees due to our General Partner, payable monthly, equal to 1% of the gross offering proceeds, net of any limited partnership interest owned by the General Partner. The General Partner must subordinate up to 100% of its annual investment management fee to the receipt by the limited partners of their Preferred Return. The limited partners received their Preferred Return during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 due to the sales of the Hills and Tamarlane. As a result, $1.9 million of the subordinated investment management fees was paid in March 2015 and $159,000 was paid in December 2015. The investment management fee continues to accrue for the remaining rental properties.

The aggregate debt service requirement for all our loans for 2016 is $1.8 million, including principal payments of $451,000. In addition to annual principal payments on the mortgage notes payable, total aggregate required escrow payments are $4.6 million through April 1, 2019.

Redemption of Units

We are permitted, in our General Partner’s sole discretion, to redeem units upon a unitholder’s request. However, we have no obligation to redeem units at any time, and we can decline to redeem units for any reason. See Item 1, "Redemption of Units." Cumulatively through December 31, 2016, a total of 5,000 units have been redeemed at an aggregate price of $46,710. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we did not receive any redemption requests.

(Back to Index)

Units." Cumulatively through December 31, 2015, a total of 5,000 units have been redeemed at an aggregate price of $46,710, although were no units were redeemed in the year then ended.

Legal Proceedings

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenues and cost and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to certain accrued liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

(Back to Index)

We have identified the following policies as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations.

Property Acquisitions. We allocated the purchase price of acquired properties to the acquired tangible assets and liabilities, consisting of land, building, tenant improvements, long-term debt and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, the value of in-place leases, the value of unamortized lease origination costs and the value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their relative fair values. The value of in-place leases is amortized over the average remaining term of the respective lease on a straight line basis.

Impairment. We ~~review~~reviewed the carrying value of each Property to determine if circumstances that indicate impairment in the carrying value of the investment exist or that depreciation periods should be modified. If we ~~determine~~determined that an asset’s estimated future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover its carrying amount, we ~~will~~would record an impairment charge to reduce the carrying amount for that asset to its estimated fair value. We have not recognized any impairments of our Properties for the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015.

Revenue Recognition. We ~~derive~~derived our revenue primarily from rental of residential housing units with lease agreement terms of generally one year or less. We ~~recognize~~recognized rent as income on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease. Additionally, any incentives included in the lease ~~are~~were amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease.

Included within rental income are other income amounts such as utility reimbursements, late fees, parking fees, pet fees and lease application fees which ~~are~~were recognized when earned.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, we dodid not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or obligations, including contingent obligations, other than guarantees by the General Partner of certain limited standard exceptions to the non-recourse nature of the mortgage notes which are secured by the Properties.


ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

Omitted ~~pursuant~~as permitted under rules applicable to ~~Regulation~~the ~~S-K,~~small ~~Item~~reporting ~~305(e)~~companies.

(Back to Index)

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

(Back to Index)

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Partners of

Resource Real Estate Investors 7, L.P.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Resource Real Estate Investors 7, L.P. (a Delaware partnership) and subsidiaries (the “Partnership”) as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016. Our audits of the basic consolidated financial statements included the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)2. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Resource Real Estate Investors 7, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, ~~present~~presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 2928, ~~2016~~2017

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 7, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)

	December 31,
	2015			2014
	2016			2015
ASSETS
Rental properties, at cost:
Land	$	~~4,201~~—		$	84,~~715~~201
Buildings and improvements	~~31,920~~—			5831,~~624~~920
Personal property	~~1,551~~—			21,~~127~~551
Identifiable intangible assets	~~1,497~~—			21,~~378~~497
Total rental properties, at cost	39,169			71,844
	—			39,169
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	~~(9,634~~—		)	(169,~~255~~634		)
Total rental properties, net	~~29,535~~—			5529,~~589~~535
Cash	61,~~702~~570			46,~~483~~702
Restricted cash	~~1,600~~—			1,~~989~~600
Tenant receivables, net	70			20
Accounts receivable	59			70
Accounts receivable due from related parties	~~171~~121			99171
Prepaid expenses and other assets	71—			~~140~~71
Deferred financing costs, net	261			430
Total assets	$	1,750		$	38,149
Total assets	$	38,410		$	62,750
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
Liabilities:
Mortgage notes payable	$	~~25,891~~—		$	4825,~~692~~630
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	~~574~~46			~~548~~574
Real estate taxes payable	~~1,132~~—			~~988~~1,132
Accrued interest	~~116~~—			~~196~~116
Payables to related parties	~~138~~5			~~2,010~~138
Prepaid rents	~~114~~—			~~122~~114
Security deposits	~~170~~—			~~273~~170
Total liabilities	~~28,135~~51			5227,~~829~~874
Partners’ capital	101,~~275~~699			910,~~921~~275
Total liabilities and partners’ capital	$	381,~~410~~750		$	6238,~~750~~149

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 7, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per unit data)

	Years Ended
	December 31,
	2015			2014
	2016			2015
Revenues:
Rental income	$	106,~~341~~359		$	1210,~~278~~341
Expenses:
Rental operating	53,~~385~~788			65,~~097~~385
Management fees – related parties	~~768~~450			~~935~~768
General and administrative	~~503~~463			~~574~~503
Depreciation and amortization	~~1,872~~856			21,~~706~~872
Total expenses	85,~~528~~557			108,~~312~~528
Income before other income (expenses)	~~1,813~~802			1,~~966~~813
Other Income (expenses):
Other income (expenses):
Interest expense, net	(1,~~957~~223		)	(21,~~529~~957		)
Gain on sale of rental properties	17,645			—
Loss on extinguishment of debt	(2,379		)	—
Loss on disposal of fixed assets	(16		)	(37		)
Gain on sale of rental properties	33,965			17,645
Total other income (expenses)	15,672			(2,566		)
Loss on disposal of fixed assets	(2		)	(16		)
Net income (loss)	$	17,485		$	(600	)
Total other income (expenses)	30,361			15,672
Net income	$	31,163		$	17,485
Weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding	3,270			3,270
Net income (loss) per weighted average limited partner unit, basic and diluted	$	5.35		$	(0.18	)
Net income per weighted average limited partner unit, basic and diluted	$	9.53		$	5.35

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 7, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016 AND ~~2014~~2015

(in thousands, except units)

	General			Limited Partners
	Partner			Units	Amount			Total
Balance at January 1, 2014	$	1		3,269,655	$	12,160		$	12,161
Balance at January 1, 2015	$	1		3,269,655	$	9,920		$	9,921
Distributions	—			—	(1,640		)	(1,640		)
Net loss	—			—	(600		)	(600		)
Balance at December 31, 2014	1			3,269,655	9,920			9,921
Distributions	—			—	(17,131		)	(17,131		)
Net income	—			—	17,485			17,485
Balance at December 31, 2015	$1	1		3,269,655	$10,274	~~10,274~~		$10,275	~~10,275~~
Distributions	(2,773		)	—	(36,966		)	(39,739		)
Net income	3,112			—	28,051			31,163
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	340		3,269,655	$	1,359		$	1,699

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this consolidated financial statement.

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 7, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

	Years Ended
	December 31,
	2015			2014
	2016			2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	17,485		$	(600	)
Net income	$	31,163		$	17,485
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on sales of rental properties	(1733,~~645~~965		)	—(17,645		)
Depreciation and amortization	1,872			2,706
Loss on extinguishment of debt	2,379			—
Amortization of deferred financing costs	126			204
Depreciation and amortization	856			1,872
Losses on disposal of fixed assets	16			37
Amortization of deferred financing costs	261			126
Losses on disposal of fixed assets	2			16
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash	~~324~~119			~~(277~~36		)
Tenant receivables, net	11			2
Accounts receivable	95			11
Prepaid expense and other assets	26(29		)	1226
Accounts receivable - related parties	(72		)	96
Accounts receivable due from related parties	50			(72		)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	~~244~~(451		)	~~(149~~244		)
Real estate taxes payable	~~144~~(206		)	12144
Accrued interest	(2534		)	(425		)
Payables to related parties	(~~1,872~~133		)	~~365~~(1,872		)
Prepaid rents	25(76		)	3425
Security deposits	(34		)	8(3		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	~~656~~27			~~2,446~~368
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures	(~~663~~303		)	(~~622~~663		)
Proceeds from sale of rental property	19,885			—
Restricted cash	(126		)	288
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	19,222			(622		)
Proceeds from sale of rental properties, net	37,739			19,885
Net cash provided by investing activities	37,310			19,510
Cash flows from financing activities:
Distributions to limited partners	(1739,~~131~~739		)	(117,~~640~~131		)
Principal payments on mortgage notes payable	(~~528~~351		)	(~~658~~528		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(17,659		)	(2,298		)
Payment of defeasance costs on extinguishment of debt	(2,379		)	—
Net increase (decrease) in cash	2,219			(474		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(42,469		)	(17,659		)
Cash at beginning of period	4,483			4,957
Net (decrease) increase in cash	(5,132		)	2,219
Cash at end of period	6,702			4,483
Cash at beginning of period	6,702			4,483
Cash at end of period	$	1,570		$	6,702
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities
Settlement of mortgage notes payable with proceeds from sale of rental properties	~~22,272~~$	25,540		—$	22,272

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 7, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016

NOTE 1 - NATURE OF BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS

Resource Real Estate Investors 7, L.P. (“R-7” or the “Partnership”) is a Delaware limited partnership which, ~~owns~~until ~~and~~November ~~operates~~21, ~~multifamily~~2016, ~~residential~~owned ~~rental properties located in Texas~~ and ~~South~~operated ~~Carolina (the “Properties”). The Partnership also may invest in interests in real estate mortgages and other debt instruments that are secured, directly or indirectly, by~~ multifamily residential rental properties~~, although the Partnership had no such investments as of December 31, 2015 and 2014~~. The Partnership was formed on March 28, 2008 and commenced operations on June 16, 2008. The ~~General~~Partnership's ~~Partner~~general partner, Resource Capital Partners, Inc. (“RCP”, the “General Partner”, or “GP”), is in the business of sponsoring and managing real estate investment limited partnerships and tenant in common programs. RCP contributed $1,000 in cash as its minimum capital contribution to the Partnership. In addition, during the ~~years~~year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, RCP held a 5.62% limited partnership interest in the Partnership. RCP is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Resource America, Inc. (“RAI”), a ~~publicly traded~~ company ~~(NASDAQ: REXI)~~ operating in the real estate, financial fund management and commercial finance sectors.

InOn ~~accordance~~September 8, ~~with~~2016, ~~the~~RAI ~~First~~was ~~Amended~~acquired ~~and~~by ~~Restated~~C-III ~~Agreement~~Capital Partners LLC ("C-III"), a leading commercial real estate services company engaged in a broad range of ~~Limited~~activities. ~~Partnership~~C-III (indirectly controls RCP and all of the ~~“Agreement”),~~general and limited units of the GPPartnership ~~has~~currently owned by RCP.

~~the~~The ~~right~~General toPartner, in its discretion, may extend the Partnership's term for aup ~~maximum~~to an aggregate of two years. The General Partner has complete and exclusive discretion in the ~~aggregate~~management ~~following~~of the ~~initial~~Partnership's ~~termination~~business. ~~date~~Pursuant to the Partnership's limited partnership agreement, the Partnership's term was set to expire on March 28, 2016. InOn February 12, 2016, by written notice to the partners, the General Partner elected to extend the term for one year to March 28, 2017.

~~February~~The First ~~2016~~Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (the "Agreement") provides that income is allocated as follows: first, to the Limited Partners (“LPs”) and the GP ~~extended~~(collectively, the ~~Partnership~~“Partners”) ~~for~~in ~~one~~proportion ~~year~~to and to the extent of the deficit balances, if any, in their respective capital accounts; second, to the Partners in proportion to the allocations of Distributable Cash (as defined in the Agreement); and third, 100% to the LPs. All losses are allocated as follows: first, 100% to the LPs until ~~March~~the 28LPs have been allocated losses equal to the excess, ~~2017~~if any, of their aggregate capital account balances over the aggregate Adjusted Capital Contributions (as defined in the Agreement); second, to the Partners in proportion to and to the extent of their respective remaining positive capital account balances, if any; and third, 100% to the LPs.

~~The~~Distributable ~~Agreement~~cash ~~provides~~from ~~that~~operations, ~~income~~payable ismonthly, ~~allocated~~ as ~~follows:~~determined ~~first,~~by to the ~~Limited Partners (“LPs”) and the~~ GP ~~(collectively~~, ~~the~~is ~~“Partners”)~~first inallocated ~~proportion~~100% to ~~and to~~ the ~~extent~~LPs ofuntil the ~~deficit~~LP’s ~~balances,~~have ifreceived ~~any, in~~ their ~~respective~~Preferred ~~capital~~Return ~~accounts; second, to the Partners in proportion to the allocations of Distributable Cash~~ (as defined in the Agreement); and ~~third~~thereafter, ~~100~~80% to the LPs~~. All~~ ~~losses~~and ~~are allocated as follows: first, 100~~20% to the ~~LPs until the LPs have been allocated losses equal to the excess~~GP, ~~if any, of their aggregate capital account balances over the aggregate Adjusted Capital Contributions (~~as ~~defined~~a ~~in the Agreement); second, to the Partners in proportion to and to the extent of their respective remaining positive capital account balances, if any; and third, 100% to the LPs~~Promote.

Distributable cash from ~~operations,~~capital ~~payable monthly~~transactions, as determined by the GP, is first allocated 100% to the LPs until the ~~LP’s~~LPs have received their Preferred Return; ~~(as~~second, ~~defined~~100% into the ~~Agreement)~~LPs until their Adjusted Capital Contributions have been reduced to zero; and thereafter, 80% to the LPs and 20% to the GP, as a Promote.

~~Distributable~~As ~~cash~~of ~~from capital transactions~~December 31, as2016 ~~determined by~~ the ~~GP,~~Partnership ishad ~~first~~disposed ~~allocated~~of ~~100%~~all toreal ~~the~~estate ~~LPs~~assets ~~until the LPs have received their Preferred Return; second, 100% to the LPs until their Adjusted Capital Contributions have been reduced to zero;~~ and ~~thereafter,~~is ~~80%~~in to the ~~LPs~~process ~~and~~of ~~20%~~liquidating toits ~~the GP~~operations.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements follows:

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Partnership and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, as follows:

Subsidiaries	Number of Units	Location
RRE Tamarlane Holdings, LLC, or Tamarlane Apartments (“Tamarlane”)(2)	—	—
RRE Bent Oaks Holdings, LLC, or Bent Oaks Apartments (“Bent Oaks”)	146	Austin, TX
RRE Cape Cod Holdings, LLC, or Cape Cod Apartments (“Cape Cod”)	212	San Antonio, TX
RRE Woodhollow Holdings, LLC, or Woodhollow Apartments (“Woodhollow”)	108	Austin, TX
RRE Woodland Hills Holdings, LLC, or Woodland Hills Apartments (“The Hills”)(1)	—	—
RRE Woodland Village Holdings, LLC, or Woodland Village Apartments (“Village”)	308	Columbia, SC
	774

(1) The Hills, a 228 unit multifamily apartment complex in Georgia, was sold on March 19, 2015.

(2) Tamarlane, a 115 unit multifamily apartment complex in Maine, was sold on December 1, 2015.

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 7, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements follows:

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Partnership and its wholly owned subsidiaries, as follows:



Subsidiaries	Purchase Date	Disposition Date
RRE Tamarlane Holdings, LLC, or Tamarlane Apartments (“Tamarlane”)⁽¹⁾	07/31/2008	12/01/2015
RRE Bent Oaks Holdings, LLC, or Bent Oaks Apartments (“Bent Oaks”)⁽²⁾	12/10/2008	09/12/2016
RRE Cape Cod Holdings, LLC, or Cape Cod Apartments (“Cape Cod”)⁽³⁾	12/10/2008	11/21/2016
RRE Woodhollow Holdings, LLC, or Woodhollow Apartments (“Woodhollow”)⁽⁴⁾	12/12/2008	09/12/2016
RRE Woodland Hills Holdings, LLC, or Woodland Hills Apartments (“The Hills”)⁽⁵⁾	12/19/2008	03/19/2015
RRE Woodland Village Holdings, LLC, or Woodland Village Apartments (“Village”)⁽⁶⁾	03/07/2012	09/30/2016

(1) Tamarlane was a 115 unit multifamily apartment complex in Maine.

(2) Bent Oaks was a 146 unit multifamily apartment complex in Texas.

(3) Cape Cod was a 212 unit multifamily apartment complex in Texas.

(4) Woodhollow was a 108 unit multifamily apartment complex in Texas.

(5) The Hills was a 228 unit multifamily apartment complex in Georgia.

(6) Woodland Village was a 308 unit multifamily apartment complex in South Carolina.

All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Geographic Concentration Risk

As of December 31, 2015, the Partnership's net investments in real estate in Texas and South Carolina represented 66% and 34%, respectively, of the Partnership’s total assets. As a result, the geographic concentration of the Partnership’s portfolio makes it particularly susceptible to adverse economic developments in Texas and South Carolina real estate market. Any adverse economic or real estate developments in this market could adversely affect the Partnership’s operating results.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Partnership estimates the allowance for uncollectible receivables and adjusts the balance quarterly. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information

During the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, the Partnership paid $1.91 million and $21.39 million, respectively, in cash for interest.

Advertising

The Partnership expenses advertising costs as they are incurred. Advertising costs, which are included in rental operating expenses, totaled $~~124~~105,000 and $~~131~~124,000 for the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively.

Deferred Financing Costs

Costs incurred to obtain financing ~~have~~were ~~been~~ capitalized and ~~are~~were being amortized over the term of the related debt using the effective yield method. In accordance with adoption of Financial Accounting Standard Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2015-03 "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs", the Partnership recorded deferred financing costs as a direct reduction of the related mortgage notes payable.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Partnership to concentration of credit risk, consist of periodic temporary deposits of cash. At December 31, 2015, the Partnership had $6.9 million of deposits at various banks, of which $5.3 million was over the insurance limit of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. No losses have been experienced on such deposits.

With respect to the tax and insurance account that bank maintains, the FDIC will provide up to $250,000 insurance coverage for the interest of each mortgagor. If an individual mortgagor has interests in more than one mortgage account held in bank T & I account, those interests would be aggregated for insurance purposes. At December 31, 2015, the Partnership had $1.6 million of restricted cash related to escrow deposits at various banks, $600,000 of which was over the insurance limit of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. No losses have been experienced on such deposits.

Income Taxes

Income taxes or credits resulting from earnings or losses are payable by or accrue to the benefit of the partners; accordingly, no provision has been made for income taxes in these consolidated financial statements. At December 31, 2015 there is a GAAP book basis to tax basis difference of $1.1 million due to different depreciation methods utilized.

The Partnership evaluates the benefits of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in its tax returns under a two-step recognition and measurement process. Only the largest amount of benefits from the tax positions that will more likely than not be sustainable upon examination are recognized by the Partnership. The Partnership does not have any unrecognized tax benefits, nor interest and penalties, recorded in the consolidated balance sheets or consolidated statements of operations and does not anticipate significant adjustments to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.

The Partnership is subject to examination by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and by the taxing authorities in those states in which the Partnership has significant business operations. The Partnership is not currently undergoing any examinations

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 7, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016

byFinancial ~~taxing~~instruments, ~~authorities. The~~which ~~Partnership~~potentially ~~may~~subject bethe ~~subject~~Partnership to Uconcentration of credit risk, consist of periodic temporary deposits of cash.S At December 31, 2016, the Partnership had $1.9 ~~federal~~million ~~income~~of ~~tax~~deposits ~~and~~at ~~state/local~~various ~~income~~banks, ~~tax~~of ~~examinations~~which ~~for~~$1.3 ~~years~~million ~~2012~~was ~~through~~over ~~2015~~the insurance limit of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. No losses have been experienced on such deposits.

Income Taxes

The Partnership evaluated the benefits of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in its tax returns under a two-step recognition and measurement process. Only the largest amount of benefits from the tax positions that will more likely than not be sustainable upon examination are recognized by the Partnership. The Partnership did not have any unrecognized tax benefits, nor interest and penalties, recorded in the consolidated balance sheets or consolidated statements of operations and does not anticipate significant adjustments to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.

The Partnership was subject to examination by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and by the taxing authorities in those states in which the Partnership had significant business operations. The Partnership was not currently undergoing any examinations by taxing authorities. The Partnership may be subject to U.S. federal income tax and state/local income tax examinations for years 2013 through 2016.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue iswas primarily derived from the rental of residential housing units with lease agreement terms of generally one year or less. The Partnership ~~recognizes~~recognized revenue in the period that rent iswas earned, which iswas on a monthly basis. The Partnership ~~recognizes~~recognized rent as income on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease. Additionally, any incentives included in the lease ~~are~~were amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease.

Included within rental income ~~are~~were other income amounts such as utility reimbursements, late fees, parking fees, pet fees and lease application fees which ~~are~~were recognized when earned or received.

The future minimum rental payments to be received from noncancelable operating leases is approximately $4.3 million and $107,000 for the years ending December 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively, and none thereafter.

Long-Lived Assets

The Partnership ~~reviews~~reviewed long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances ~~indicate~~indicated that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If it iswas determined that an asset’s estimated future cash flows ~~will~~would not be sufficient to recover its carrying amount, an impairment charge ~~will~~would be recorded to reduce the carrying amount for that asset to its estimated fair value. The Partnership ~~has~~had estimated that the future cash flows from its Properties ~~will~~would be sufficient to recover their carrying amounts and, as a result, the Partnership did not recognize any impairment losses with respect to its Properties for either of the years ended December 31, 2016 or 2015.

carrying amounts and, as a result, the Partnership did not recognize any impairment losses with respect to its Properties for either the years ended December 31, 2015 or 2014.

Rental Properties

Rental properties are carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Buildings and improvements and personal property are depreciated for financial reporting purposes on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. The value of in-place leases is amortized over the average remaining term of the respective leases on a straight-line basis. Useful lives used for calculating depreciation for financial reporting purposes are as follows:

	Buildings and improvements	5 - 27.5 years
	Personal property	3 - 15 years

Tenant Receivables

Tenant receivables ~~are~~were stated at amounts due from tenants net of an allowance for uncollectible receivables. Payment terms vary and receivables outstanding longer than the payment terms are considered past due. The Partnership ~~determines~~determined its allowance by considering a number of factors, including the length of time receivables are past due, security deposits held, the Partnership’s previous loss history, the tenants’ current ability to pay their obligations to the Partnership, the general condition of the economy and the industry as a whole. The Partnership ~~writes~~wrote off receivables when they ~~become~~became uncollectible. At December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, there were $0no ~~and~~balances ~~$44, respectively,~~ in allowances for uncollectible receivables.

Redemptions

The LPs may request redemption of their units at any time. The Partnership has no obligation to redeem any units and will do so only at the GP’s discretion. If the Partnership redeems units, the redemption price is generally the amount of the initial investment less all distributions from the Partnership to the LP, and less all organization and offering expenses charged to the LP.

~~Recent~~Adoption of New Accounting Standards

In ~~April~~August 2014, ~~the~~FASB ~~Financial~~issued ~~Accounting~~ASU ~~Standards~~No. ~~Board~~2014-15, ("~~FASB"~~Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): ~~issued~~Disclosure ~~authoritative~~of ~~guidance~~Uncertainties toabout ~~change~~an ~~the~~Entity’s ~~criteria~~Ability ~~for~~to ~~reporting~~Continue ~~discontinued~~as ~~operations~~a Going Concern." Under the new guidance, ~~only~~an ~~disposals~~entity ~~representing~~should aevaluate ~~strategic~~whether ~~shift~~there inare aconditions ~~company's~~or ~~operations~~events, ~~and~~considered ~~financial~~in ~~results~~the ~~should be reported as discontinued operations~~aggregate, ~~with~~that ~~expanded~~raise ~~disclosures.~~substantial Indoubt ~~addition,~~about ~~disclosure of~~ the ~~pre-tax~~entity’s ~~income~~ability ~~attributable~~ to acontinue ~~disposal~~as of a ~~significant~~going ~~part~~concern ofwithin anone ~~organization~~year ~~that~~after ~~does~~the ~~not~~date ~~qualify~~that asthe ~~discontinued~~financial ~~operations~~statements isare ~~required~~issued. ~~This~~The guidance is effective for ~~the Partnership as of January 1, 2015.~~

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 7, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016

the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. The adoption had no impact on the Partnership's consolidated financial statements.

In January 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-01, "Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20), Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items" ("ASU 2015-01"). The amendments in ASU 2015-01 eliminate from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. Although the amendment will eliminate the requirements for reporting entities to consider whether an underlying event or transaction is extraordinary, the presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently will be retained and will be expanded to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring. On January 1, 2016, the Partnership adopted ASU 2015-01; the adoption had no impact on the Partnership's consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, "Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis" (“ASU 2015-02”), which makes certain changes to both the variable interest model and the voting model, including changes to (1) the identification of variable interests (fees paid to a decision maker or service provider), (2) the variable interest entity characteristics for a limited partnership or similar entity and (3) the primary beneficiary determination. ASU 2015-02 is effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2016. On January 1, 2016, the Partnership adopted ASU 2015-02; the adoption had no impact on the Partnership's consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, FASB issued No. ASU 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs" ("ASU 2015-03"), which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected. Upon adoption, the Partnership applied the new guidance on a retrospective basis and adjusted the balance sheet of each individual period presented to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. This guidance was effective and was adopted by the Partnership on January 1, 2016 and as result the Partnership has reclassified $261,000 of unamortized debt issuance costs at December 31, 2015 from deferred financing costs to liabilities as reduction of the related mortgage notes payable.

In September 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, "Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments" ("ASU 2015-16"), which eliminates the requirement to retroactively revise comparative financial information for prior periods presented in financial statements due to changes in provisional amounts recorded for acquisitions in subsequent periods. Upon adoption, disclosure of the amounts recorded in current-period earnings that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized at the acquisition date are required. ASU 2015-16 was effective and adopted by the Partnership on January 1, 2016 and the adoption had no impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15 "Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments" ("ASU 2016-13"), which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing existing diversity in practice. ASU 2016-13 has been early adopted by the Partnership. As result of adoption, the Partnership has classified cash paid on early extinguishment of debt as cash used in financing activities.

Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Effective.

In May 2014, FASB issued ~~Accounting Standards Update (“~~ASU") No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, which will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP. The core principle of ASU No. 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of goods or services equal to the amount that it expects to be entitled to receive for those goods or services. ASU No. 2014-09 requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments. ASU No. 2014-09 will be effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2018, including interim periods in 2018, and allows for both retrospective and prospective methods of adoption. The Partnership isdoes innot ~~the~~believe ~~process~~that ofthis ~~determining~~guidance ~~the~~will ~~method~~have ofany ~~adoption and assessing the~~ impact ~~of this guidance~~ on ~~the Partnership’s~~ consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows., as the Partnership expects to terminate in 2017.

In ~~August~~February ~~2014~~2016, FASB issued ASU No. ~~2014~~2016-1502, "~~Presentation~~Leases" ~~of Financial Statements-Going Concern~~ (~~Subtopic~~"ASU ~~205~~2016-4002")~~: Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern~~." ~~Under~~which ~~the~~is ~~new~~intended ~~guidance, an entity should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability~~ to ~~continue~~improve ~~as a going concern within one year after the date that the~~ financial ~~statements are issued. The guidance is effective for~~

~~the~~reporting ~~annual~~about ~~period~~leasing ~~ending~~transactions ~~after~~and ~~December~~requires ~~15,~~organizations ~~2016,~~that ~~and~~lease ~~for~~assets ~~annual~~to ~~periods~~recognize ~~and~~on ~~interim~~the ~~periods~~balance ~~thereafter.~~sheet ~~Early~~the ~~adoption~~assets isand ~~permitted.~~liabilities ~~The~~for ~~adoption~~the ofrights ~~the~~and ~~new~~obligations ~~requirements~~created isby ~~not~~those ~~expected~~leases. toASU ~~have~~2016-02 ais ~~significant~~effective ~~impact~~for onfiscal ~~the~~years, ~~Partnership's~~and ~~consolidated~~interim ~~financial~~periods ~~statements.~~

In January 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, "Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20), Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items. The amendments in ASU

No. 2015-01 eliminate from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. Although the amendment will eliminate the requirements

for reporting entities to consider whether an underlying event or transaction is extraordinary, the presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently will be retained and will be expanded to include items that are

both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring. ASU No. 2015-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those

years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning

of the fiscal year of adoption. The Partnership does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2015-01 to have a significant impact on

its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-02, "Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis" (“ASU 2015-02”), which makes certain changes to both the variable interest model and the voting model, including changes to (1) the identification of variable interests (fees paid to a decision maker or service provider), (2) the variable interest entity characteristics for a limited partnership or similar entity and (3) the primary beneficiary determination. ASU 2015-02 is effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2016. The Partnership is continuing to evaluate this guidance; however, it does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-02 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs" ("ASU 2015-03"),

which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected. Upon adoption, the Partnership will apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis and adjust the balance sheet of each individual period presented to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. This guidance is effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2016. The Partnership is continuing to evaluate this guidance; however, it does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-03 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-16, "Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments" ("ASU 2015-16"), which eliminates the requirement to retroactively revise comparative financial information for prior periods presented in financial statements due to changes in provisional amounts recorded for acquisitions in subsequent periods. Upon adoption, disclosure of the amounts recorded in current-period earnings that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized at the acquisition date are required. ASU 2015-16 is effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2016. The Partnership is continuing to evaluate this guidance; however, it does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-16 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases" ("ASU No. 2016-02"). which is intended to improve financial

reporting about leasing transactions and requires organizations that lease assets to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 7, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016

~~liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. ASU No. 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods~~ within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The ~~Company~~Partnership isdoes ~~continuing~~not tobelieve ~~evaluate~~that this guidance; ~~however,~~will ithave ~~does~~any ~~not~~impact ~~expect~~on ~~the~~consolidated ~~adoption~~financial ofposition, ~~ASU~~results ~~No.~~of ~~2016-02~~operations toand ~~have~~cash aflows, ~~significant~~as ~~impact~~the onPartnership ~~its~~expects ~~consolidated~~to ~~financial~~terminate ~~statements~~in 2017.

In June 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13 “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses” ("ASU 2016-13") which requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held. The standard update is effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2019. The Partnership does not believe that this guidance will have any impact on consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows, as the Partnership expects to terminate in 2017.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash” (“ASU 2016-18”), which provides guidance on the classification of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for us for our fiscal year beginning November 1, 2018. The Partnership does not believe that this guidance will have any impact on consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows, as the Partnership expects to terminate in 2017.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 850): Clarifying the Definition of

Business" ("ASU 2017-01"), which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of businesses. ASU 2017-01 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 but early adoption is allowed. The Partnership does not believe that this guidance will have any impact on consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows, as the Partnership expects to terminate in 2017.

NOTE 3 - RESTRICTED CASH

Restricted cash represents escrow deposits with lenders to be used to pay real estate taxes, insurance, and capital improvements. A summary of the components of restricted cash follows (in thousands):

	Years Ended
	December 31,
	2015		2014
	2016		2015
Real estate taxes	$	~~1,034~~—	$	1,~~089~~034
Insurance	~~180~~—		~~227~~180
Capital improvements	~~386~~—		~~673~~386
Total	$	~~1,600~~—	$	1,~~989~~600

NOTE 4 - DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS

Deferred financing costs include unamortized costs incurred to obtain financing which are being amortized over the term of the related debt. Accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $486,000 and $1.2 million, respectively. Estimated amortization of existing deferred financing costs for the next four years ending December 31, is as follows (in thousands):

2016	$	84
2017	82
2018	80
2019	15
	$	261

NOTE 5 - MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE

The following is a summary of mortgage notes payable (in thousands, except percentages):

	Balance at
	December 31,						Annual Interest Rate		Average
Property	2015		2014		Maturity Date				Monthly Debt Service
Tamarlane	$	—	$	8,906	05/01/2016		2.69%	(3)	$	—	(3)
Tamarlane	—		935		05/01/2016		2.69%	(3)	$	—	(3)
Bent Oaks	5,731		5,820		01/01/2019	(4)	5.99%		$	37	(1)
Cape Cod	5,951		6,045		01/01/2019	(4)	5.91%		$	38	(1)
Woodhollow	4,916		4,991		01/01/2019	(4)	6.14%		$	32	(1)
Hills	—		12,527		01/01/2016		3.39%	(2)	$	—	(2)
Village	9,293		9,468		04/01/2019		3.76%		$	31	(1)
Total	$	25,891	$	48,692

(1) Monthly payment includes principal and interest. Interest is fixed.

(2) On March 19, 2015, the Partnership paid the balance of the mortgage with the proceeds from the sale of the Hills.

(3) On December 1, 2015, the Partnership paid the balance of the mortgage with the proceeds from the sale of Tamarlane.

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 7, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016

(NOTE 4) ~~The~~- ~~Partnership~~MORTGAGE ~~has~~NOTES anPAYABLE option to extend the maturity date for an additional one year to January 1, 2020. During the extension period, the interest rate would convert to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Bill Index Rate plus 2.5%.

~~Annual~~The ~~principal~~following ~~payments~~is ona ~~the~~summary of mortgage notes payable ~~for~~(in ~~the future years ending December 31~~thousands, ~~are~~except ~~as follows (in~~percentages):

thousands):



	December 31, 2016						December 31, 2015
Property	Mortgage balance		Deferred Finance Costs, Net		Carrying Value		Mortgage balance		Deferred Finance Costs, Net⁽¹⁾			Carrying Value
Bent Oaks	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	5,731	$	(50	)	$	5,681
Cape Cod	—		—		—		5,951		(51		)	5,900
Woodhollow	—		—		—		4,916		(43		)	4,873
Village	—		—		—		9,293		(117		)	9,176
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	25,891	$	(261	)	$	25,630

2016	$	451
2017	478
2018	504
2019	24,458
	$	25,891

(1) Deferred financing costs include unamortized costs incurred to obtain financing which are being amortized over the term of the related debt.

InBent ~~addition~~Oaks toand ~~annual~~Woodhollow ~~principal~~were ~~payments~~sold on September 12, 2016. Woodland Village was sold on September 30, 2016. Cape Cod was sold on November 21, 2016. Proceeds from these sales were used to repay the ~~mortgage~~outstanding ~~notes~~borrowings. ~~payable~~During the year ended December 31, ~~total~~2016, ~~aggregate~~the ~~required~~Partnership ~~escrow~~incurred ~~payments~~losses ~~are~~of $42.64 million ~~through~~on ~~April~~extinguishment 1,of ~~2019~~debt due to defeasance prepayment costs.

~~The~~Deferred ~~mortgage~~financing ~~notes~~costs ~~payable~~included ~~are~~unamortized ~~with~~costs ~~recourse~~incurred ~~only~~ to ~~the~~obtain ~~Properties~~financing ~~securing them subject to certain limited standard exceptions, as defined in the mortgage notes,~~ which ~~the~~were GPamortized ~~has~~over ~~guaranteed with respect to each property. These exceptions are referred to as “carveouts”. In general, carveouts relate to damages suffered by~~ the lender for a subsidiary’s failure to pay rents, insurance or condemnation proceeds to the lender, to pay water, sewer and other public assessments or charges, to pay environmental compliance costs or to deliver books and records, in each case as required in the loan documents. The exceptions also require the GP to guarantee payment of audit costs, lender’s enforcement of its rights under the loan documents and payment of the loan if the subsidiary voluntarily files for bankruptcy or seeks reorganization, or if a related party of the subsidiary does so with respect to the subsidiary. term

~~NOTE~~of 6the -related ~~CERTAIN~~debt. ~~RELATIONSHIPS~~Accumulated ~~AND~~amortization ~~RELATED~~as ~~PARTY~~of ~~TRANSACTIONS~~December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $0 and $486,000, respectively.

InNOTE ~~the~~5 ~~ordinary~~- ~~course~~CERTAIN ofRELATIONSHIPS ~~its~~AND ~~business~~RELATED ~~operations,~~PARTY ~~the~~TRANSACTIONS ~~Partnership has ongoing relationships with several related entities.~~

~~Substantially~~ In ~~all of~~ the ~~receivables~~ordinary ~~from~~course ~~related~~of parties represents escrow funds held by RAI for self insurance. The Company's Properties participate in insurance pools with other properties directly and indirectly managed by RAI for both property insurance and general liability. RAI holds the escrow funds related to the insurance pool on its ~~books.~~business ~~The insurance pool covers losses up to $2.5 million for property losses and the first $25~~operations,~~000~~ ~~of each general liability loss up to an annual maximum of $1.0 million. Catastrophic insurance would cover property losses in excess of~~ the ~~insurance pool up to $140 million. Therefore, unforeseen or catastrophic losses in excess of the~~ Partnership's ~~insured~~had ~~limits~~ongoing ~~could~~relationships ~~have~~with aseveral ~~material~~related ~~adverse effect on the Partnership financial condition and operating results~~entities.

~~RCP~~Substantially isall ~~entitled~~of tothe ~~receive~~receivables anfrom ~~annual~~related ~~investment~~parties ~~management~~represent ~~fee~~insurance deposits held in escrow by Resource Real Estate, ~~payable~~Inc ~~monthly~~("RRE") for self insurance which, ~~equal~~if tounused, 1%will ofbe returned to the ~~gross~~Partnership. ~~offering~~The ~~proceeds,~~Partnership's ~~net~~properties ofparticipate ~~any~~in ~~amounts~~insurance ~~otherwise~~pools ~~attributable~~with toother LPproperties ~~interests~~directly ~~owned~~and indirectly managed by ~~RCP. During~~RAI for both the ~~term~~property ofinsurance ~~the~~and ~~Partnership,~~general ~~RCP~~liability. ~~must~~RRE ~~subordinate~~holds upthe deposits in escrow to ~~100%~~fund offuture ~~its~~insurance ~~annual~~claims. ~~investment~~The ~~management~~pool ~~fee~~for property insurance covers losses up to $2.5 million and the ~~receipt~~pool byfor the ~~LPs~~general liability covers losses up to the first $50,000 of ~~their~~each ~~Preferred~~general ~~Return~~liability incident. As Catastrophic insurance would cover losses in excess of ~~December 31,~~the ~~2015~~insurance ~~and~~pools ~~2014~~up to $140 million. Therefore, ~~the~~unforeseen ~~amount~~or catastrophic losses in excess of ~~unpaid~~the ~~subordinated~~Partnership's ~~investment~~insured ~~management~~limits ~~fees~~could ~~totaled~~have ~~$15,000~~a ~~and~~material ~~$1.9~~adverse ~~million,~~effect ~~respectively~~on the Partnership's financial condition and operating results. ~~During~~In the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016, the Partnership paid ~~investment~~approximately ~~management fees totaling~~ $~~2.1~~137,000 ~~million due~~into to the ~~sales~~insurance ~~of the Hills and Tamarlane~~pools.

A RCP ~~wholly-owned~~was ~~subsidiary~~entitled ofto ~~RCP~~receive an annual investment management fee, ~~Resource~~payable ~~Real~~monthly, ~~Estate~~equal ~~Management~~to 1% of the gross offering proceeds, ~~LLC~~net ~~(“RREML”)~~of isany ~~entitled~~amounts tootherwise ~~receive~~attributable ~~property~~to ~~and~~LP ~~debt~~interests ~~management~~owned ~~fees~~by RCP. ~~RREML~~During ~~engaged~~the ~~Resource~~term ~~Real~~of ~~Estate~~the ~~Management~~Partnership, ~~Inc~~RCP ~~(“RREMI”),~~must ansubordinate ~~indirect~~up ~~wholly~~to ~~owned~~100% ~~subsidiary~~ of ~~RAI,~~its annual investment management fee to ~~manage~~the receipt by the ~~Partnership’s~~LPs ~~Properties~~of their Preferred Return. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, ~~property~~the amount of unpaid subordinated investment management fees ~~due~~ totaled $~~62,000~~0 and $8515,000, respectively. ~~Because~~During the ~~Partnership~~year ~~has~~ended ~~not~~December 31, ~~acquired~~2016, ~~any~~the ~~real~~Partnership ~~estate~~paid ~~debt~~investment ~~investments~~management fees totaling $157,000 ~~there~~due ~~were~~to nothe ~~debt~~LP's ~~management~~Preferred ~~fees~~Return asthreshold ofhaving ~~December 31,~~been ~~2015~~satisfied ~~and~~during the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2016.

~~During~~A ~~the~~wholly-owned ~~ordinary~~subsidiary ~~course~~ of ~~business~~RCP, ~~RCP~~Resource ~~and~~Real ~~RREMI~~Estate ~~advance~~Management, ~~funds~~LLC ~~for~~(“RREML”), ~~ordinary~~was ~~operating~~entitled ~~expenses~~to onreceive ~~behalf~~property ofand ~~the~~debt ~~Properties,~~management ~~which~~fees. RREML ~~are~~engaged ~~repaid~~Resource ~~within~~Real aEstate ~~few days. As of December 31~~Management, ~~2015~~Inc ~~and 2014~~(“RREMI”), ~~advances~~an ~~for~~indirect ~~ordinary~~wholly ~~operating~~owned ~~expenses~~subsidiary ~~due~~of ~~totaled $61~~RAI,~~000~~ ~~and~~to ~~$67,000,~~manage ~~respectively. Total operating expenses reimbursed during~~ the ~~years~~Partnership’s ~~ended~~Properties. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, ~~were~~property ~~$1.7~~management ~~million~~fees ~~and~~due totaled $2.0 ~~million~~and $62,000, respectively. ~~Reimbursed~~Because ~~expenses~~the ~~include~~Partnership ~~payroll~~had ~~and~~not ~~miscellaneous~~acquired ~~operating~~any ~~expenses.~~real ~~Reimbursed~~estate ~~operating~~debt ~~expenses~~investments, ~~are~~there ~~included~~were inno ~~property~~debt ~~operating~~management ~~expenses~~fees inas ~~the consolidated statements~~ of ~~operations~~December 31, 2016 and ~~comprehensive loss~~2015.

During the ordinary course of business, RCP and RREMI advanced funds for ordinary operating expenses on behalf of the Properties, which were substantially repaid within a few days. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, advances for ordinary operating expenses due totaled $7,000 and $61,000, respectively. Total reimbursable operating expenses incurred during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $1.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Reimbursable expenses include payroll and miscellaneous operating expenses. Reimbursable operating expenses are included in property operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 7, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016

During the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, ~~the~~ total LP distributions paid to RCP, excluding investment management fees and Promote, were $~~940,000~~1.9 million and $92940,000, respectively.

~~The~~During ~~Partnership~~2016, ~~pays~~the ~~Investment~~General ~~Management~~Partner ~~Fees~~received ~~and~~$2.9 ~~Property~~million, ~~Management~~$157,000 ~~Fees~~relates to ~~related~~investment ~~parties~~management fees and $2.7 ~~These~~million ~~expenses~~represented the promote due to the sales of the four remaining Properties.

The Partnership pays investment management fees and property management fees to related parties. These expenses

are summarized as follows (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2015		2014
	2016		2015
RCP:
Investment management fees 1	$	~~251~~142	$	~~322~~251
RREML:
Property management fees - 5% of gross cash receipts 2	~~517~~308		~~613~~517
	$	~~768~~450	$	~~935~~768

(1) RCP iswas entitled to receive an annual investment management fee, payable monthly, equal to 1% of the gross proceeds that have been deployed in real estate investments from the offering of partnership units, net of any LP interest owned by RCP. During the term of the Partnership, RCP must subordinate up to 100% of its annual investment management fee to the receipt by the LPs of their Preferred Return.

(2) RREML iswas entitled to receive monthly property management fees equal to 5% of the gross operating revenues from the Partnership’s 100% owned Properties for managing or obtaining and supervising third party managers.

NOTE 76 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In analyzing the fair value of its financial instruments disclosed or accounted for on a fair value basis, the Partnership ~~follows~~followed the fair value hierarchy, which ~~requires~~required an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The Partnership ~~determines~~determined fair value based on quoted prices when available or, if quoted prices ~~are~~were not available, through the use of alternative approaches, such as discounting the expected cash flows using market interest rates commensurate with the credit quality and duration of the financial instruments. The fair value of cash, tenant receivables and accounts payable approximate their carrying values due to their short term nature. The hierarchy followed defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or can be corroborated with observable market data for substantially the entire contractual term of the asset.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that reflect the entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in the pricing of the asset and are consequently not based on market activity, but rather through particular valuation techniques.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of the Partnership’s financial instruments:

Ÿ Mortgage notes payable. Rates currently available to the Partnership for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities, which are Level 2 inputs, are used to estimate the fair value of existing debt.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Partnership’s financial instruments were as follows (in thousands):

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 7, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016

	December 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
	December 31, 2016				December 31, 2015
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Mortgage notes payable:
Tamarlane	$	—	$	—	$	9,842	$	9,867
Bent Oaks	—		—		$	5,731	$	6,121
Bent Oaks	5,731		6,121		5,820		6,327
Cape Cod	—		—		5,951		6,343
Cape Cod	5,951		6,343		6,045		6,554
Woodhollow	—		—		4,916		5,234
Woodhollow	4,916		5,234		4,990		5,416
Village	—		—		9,293		9,305
Hills	—		—		12,527		12,342
Total mortgage notes payable	$	—	$	—	$	25,891	$	27,003
Village	9,293		9,305		9,468		9,485
Total mortgage notes payable	$	25,891	$	27,003	$	48,692	$	49,991

NOTE 87 - ~~SALE~~DISPOSITION OF ~~RENTAL PROPERTY~~ PROPERTIES

The ~~Partnership~~following ~~recognized~~table ~~the~~presents ~~gains~~details ~~on sales~~ of ~~rental properties separately in~~ the ~~Consolidated Statement of Operations. In March 2015, the~~ Partnership's ~~sold~~disposition ~~its~~activities ~~interest~~during in the Hills and recognized a gain of $9.6 million on the sale. In December 2015, the Partnership sold its interest in Tamarlane and recognized a gain of $8.0 million on the sale. Pretax net income (loss) for The Hills was $135,000 and $91,000 for the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015 ~~respectively. Pretax net income~~ (~~loss)~~in ~~for Tamarlane was $332,000 and $(108,000~~thousands) ~~for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.~~ :

NOTE 9 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS



Multifamily Community	Location	Sale Date	Contract Sales Price		Gain on Sale
2016 Dispositions:
Bent Oaks	Austin, TX	9/12/2016	$	15,765	$	9,108
Woodhollow	Austin, TX	9/12/2016	12,420		6,685
Woodland Village	Columbia, SC	9/30/2016	20,650		9,122
Cape Cod	San Antonio, TX	11/21/2016	15,700		9,040
Tamarlane - additional gain recognized					10
			$	64,535	$	33,965

2015 Dispositions:
Hills	Decatur, GA	3/19/2015	$	25,200	$	9,603
Tamarlane	Portland, ME	12/1/2015	18,300		8,042
			$	43,500	$	17,645

The Partnership has evaluated subsequent events through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued and determined that no events have occurred, other than those disclosed above, which would require an adjustment to the consolidated financial statements.

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 7, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2016

The table below presents the revenues and net income attributable to properties sold for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):



	Revenue Attributable to Properties Sold		Net Income Attributable to Properties Sold
Multifamily Community	For the year ended December 31, 2016		For the year ended December 31, 2016
2016 Dispositions:
Bent Oaks	$	1,240	$	8,367
Woodhollow	1,031		6,002
Cape Cod	1,819		8,509
Woodland Village	2,266		8,637
	$	6,356	$	31,515

	For the year ended December 31, 2015		For the year ended December 31, 2015
2015 Dispositions:
Hills	$	602	$	9,740
Tamarlane	1,808		8,374
	$	2,410	$	18,114

NOTE 8 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On January 30, 2017, the Partnership distributed $874,000 to the Partners.

(Back to Index)

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON

ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our General Partner, including its ~~chief~~principal executive officer and its chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Under the supervision of the ~~chief~~principal executive officer and chief financial officer of our General Partner, we have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the ~~chief~~principal executive officer and chief financial officer of our General Partner concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Management's Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

Our General Partner is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our General Partner assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016. In making this assessment, the General Partner used the criteria set forth in the 2013 version of the Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based upon this assessment, our General Partner concluded that, as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, our internal control over financial reporting is effective.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Consumer Protection Act, which ~~exempted~~exempts smaller reporting companies from the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

(Back to Index)

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We do not have any officers, directors or employees. Rather, our General Partner manages our activities and supervises our ~~Real~~real ~~Estate~~estate ~~Investments~~investments using its affiliates under the provisions of our Limited Partnership Agreement which governs its conduct. Officers of our General Partner and its affiliates may spend a substantial amount of time managing its business and affairs and may face a conflict regarding the allocation of their time between our business and affairs and their other business interests.

Directors and Executive Officers of Our General Partner

The following table sets forth information with respect to the executive officers, directors and key personnel of our General Partner:

NAME	AGE	POSITION OR OFFICE
Jonathan Z. Cohen	45	Director and Chairman of the Board
Jeffrey P. Cohen	48	Director and Chief Executive Officer
Alan F. Feldman	5253	Director and Senior Vice President
David E. Bloom	5152	Director and Senior Vice President
Kevin M. Finkel	4445	President
Steven R. Saltzman	5253	Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
Darshan V. Patel	4546	Chief Legal Officer
Michael Yecies	48	Secretary
Lawrence S. Block	50	Vice President and Assistant Secretary
Shelle Weisbaum	49	Vice President and Secretary

~~Jonathan~~Jeffrey ZP. Cohen, has been a ~~Director~~director since ~~2002~~September 2016. Mr. Cohen ~~also~~ has served as ~~Chairman and a Director of Resource Real Estate Management since 2005 and as Chief~~ Executive ~~Officer,~~Vice President ~~and a Director~~ of Resource ~~Capital Corp., (NYSE: RSO), a real estate investment trust managed by Resource~~ America, since ~~its~~September ~~formation in 2005~~2016. Mr. Cohen has ~~been President since 2003 and Chief Executive Officer since 2004 of Resource America and also has~~ served as ~~Chairman~~an ~~and~~Executive aManaging Director of ~~Resource~~C-III ~~Financial~~Capital ~~Institutions~~Partners ~~Group,~~LLC ~~Inc., a subsidiary of Resource America,~~ since ~~2005. Mr.~~January ~~Cohen~~2011 ~~was~~and ~~Executive~~has ~~Vice~~primary ~~President~~responsibility offor ~~Resource~~its ~~America~~mergers ~~from~~and ~~2001~~acquisitions toactivity ~~2003,~~and ~~Senior~~previously ~~Vice~~served as President from ~~1999~~February 2010 to ~~2001~~January ~~and~~2011. ~~Chief Operating Officer from 2002 to 2004~~Mr. HeCohen has ~~been~~also ~~the~~served ~~Executive~~as ~~Vice Chairman of~~ the ~~Board~~President of Island ~~Directors~~Capital ofGroup ~~Atlas~~since ~~Growth~~September ~~Partners~~2006 ~~GP,~~and ~~LLC,~~has ~~the~~been ~~general~~a ~~partner~~principal of ~~Atlas~~Island ~~Growth~~Capital ~~Partners,~~Group ~~L.P.,~~since anit ~~emerging~~was ~~growth~~established ~~company~~ in ~~the~~2003. ~~oil~~Prior ~~and~~to ~~natural~~joining ~~gas~~Island ~~industry,~~Capital ~~since~~Group ~~its inception~~ in ~~2013.~~2003, Mr. Cohen ~~has~~was ~~served~~an ~~as the~~ Executive ~~Chairman~~Vice ofPresident ~~the Board~~ of ~~Directors~~Insignia ofFinancial ~~Atlas Energy~~ Group, ~~LLC (NYSE: ATLS) since February 2015, and before that was Vice Chairman~~ from ~~February~~1997 ~~2012.~~to Mr2003. ~~Cohen~~Before ~~has~~joining ~~served as Executive Vice Chairman of Atlas Resource Partners~~Insignia, ~~L.P. (NYSE: ARP) since August 2015.~~ Mr. Cohen served as ~~Executive~~a ~~Chairman~~corporate ofattorney ~~the~~with ~~Board of Atlas Energy, L.P.’s general partner inform January 2012 until~~ the ~~Atlas~~New ~~Energy~~York ~~Merger~~City inlaw ~~February~~firm ~~2015. Before that, he served as Chairman~~ of ~~the~~Rogers ~~Board~~& ofWells ~~Atlas~~(now ~~Energy’s~~Clifford ~~general~~Chance) ~~partner~~ from ~~February~~1993 ~~2011~~to ~~until~~1997 ~~January~~where ~~2012~~he ~~and~~primarily asworked ~~Vice~~on ~~Chairman~~matters ofrelating ~~the~~to ~~Board~~mergers ofand ~~its~~acquisitions, ~~general~~capital ~~partner~~markets, ~~from~~and ~~its~~corporate ~~formation in January 2006 until February 2011~~finance. Mr. Cohen ~~served~~is asa ~~the~~Trustee ~~chairman~~ of ~~the~~Dean ~~executive~~College ~~committee~~in ofFranklin, ~~Atlas~~MA ~~Energy’s~~and ~~general~~serves ~~partner~~on ~~from~~its ~~2006~~Executive ~~until~~Committee ~~the~~and ~~Atlas~~Investment ~~Energy Merger in February 2015~~Committee. Mr. Cohen ~~was~~brings ~~the~~to ~~Vice Chairman of~~ the ~~Board~~board of ~~Atlas~~directors ~~Energy,~~extensive ~~Inc.~~industry ~~from~~experience ~~its~~and ~~incorporation~~strategic inplanning, ~~September~~executive ~~2000~~management ~~until~~and ~~February~~financing ~~2011~~experience. ~~Mr.~~In ~~Cohen~~addition, ~~was~~ the ~~Executive Vice Chair of the managing~~ board of ~~Atlas~~directors ~~Pipeline~~will ~~Partners~~benefit ~~GP, LLC~~ from ~~its formation in 1999 until February 2015. Mr. Cohen was~~ the ~~Vice~~depth ~~Chairman~~and ofbreadth ~~the Board~~ of ~~Atlas~~his ~~Energy~~experience ~~Resources~~in investments, ~~LLC~~mergers and ~~its~~acquisitions ~~manager,~~and ~~Atlas~~corporate ~~Energy~~finance ~~Management,~~as ~~Inc.,~~well ~~from~~as ~~their~~his ~~formation~~understanding inof ~~June~~complex ~~2006~~financial ~~until February 2011~~transactions.

Alan F. Feldman, has served as a Director and Senior Vice President since 2004. Mr. Feldman also has served as Chief Executive Officer of Resource Real Estate, a subsidiary of Resource America, since 2004, President and a Director of Resource Real Estate Management since 2005 and a Senior Vice President of Resource America since 2002. Mr. Feldman was President of Resource Properties, a subsidiary of Resource America, from 2002 to 2005. From 1998 to 2002, Mr. Feldman was a Vice President at Lazard Freres & Co., an investment banking firm, specializing in real estate mergers and acquisitions, asset and portfolio sales and recapitalization. From 1992 through 1998 Mr. Feldman was an Executive Vice President of the Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust and its predecessor, The Rubin Organization, where he was responsible for the firm’s 20 million square feet of managed retail properties. From 1990 to 1992 Mr. Feldman was a Director at Strouse, Greenberg & Co., a regional full service real estate company. From 1986 through 1988, Mr. Feldman was an engineer at Squibb Corporation. Mr. Feldman’s extensive experience and knowledge in the real estate business is an asset to our General Partner’s board.

David E. Bloom, has served as a Director since 2002, President from 2002 to 2006 and Senior Vice President since 2006. Mr. Bloom also has served as President and a Director of Resource Real Estate since 2004, and as a Senior Vice President of Resource America, a position he has held since September 2001. Mr. Bloom joined Resource America from Colony Capital, LLC, a Los Angeles-based real estate fund, where he was a Senior Vice President as well as a Principal of Colony Capital Asia Pacific from 1999 to 2001. While at Colony, Mr. Bloom was responsible for the identification, evaluation and consummation of new investments, and he actively participated in the firm’s equity and debt raising efforts. From 1998 to 1999, Mr. Bloom was a Director at Sonnenblick-Goldman Company, a New York based real estate investment bank. From 1992 to 1998, Mr. Bloom practiced law in the real estate and corporate departments of Wilkie Farr & Gallagher in New York and Drinker Biddle & Reath in Philadelphia.

(Back to Index)

2728

2001. While at Colony, Mr. Bloom was responsible for the identification, evaluation and consummation of new investments, and he actively participated in the firm’s equity and debt raising efforts. From 1998 to 1999, Mr. Bloom was a Director at Sonnenblick-Goldman Company, a New York based real estate investment bank. From 1992 to 1998, Mr. Bloom practiced law in the real estate and corporate departments of Wilkie Farr & Gallagher in New York and Drinker Biddle & Reath in Philadelphia. Prior to practicing law, Mr. Bloom began his real estate career in 1987 as an Acquisitions and Development Associate with Strouse, Greenberg & Company, a regional full-service real estate company. Mr. Bloom’s extensive experience and knowledge in the real estate business is an asset to our General Partner’s board.

Kevin M. Finkel, has served as President since 2006 and Senior Vice President from 2003 to 2006, Senior Vice President of RAI since 2013 and Vice president of RAI from 2006-2006. Mr. Finkel also has served as Executive Vice President since 2008 and Director of Acquisitions since 2004 of Resource Real Estate. Mr. Finkel joined Resource America in 2002, and has been a Vice President of Resource America since 2006. Prior to joining Resource America, Mr. Finkel was an investment banker at Barclays Capital from 1998 to 2000 and at Deutsche Bank Securities from 1994 to 1998.

Steven R. Saltzman, has served as Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer since August 2003. Mr. Saltzman also has served as Vice President and Controller of Resource Real Estate since 2004 and Vice President of Finance of Resource Real Estate Management since 2006. From 1999 to 2003, Mr. Saltzman was Controller at WP Realty, Inc., a regional developer and property manager specializing in community shopping centers. Mr. Saltzman began his real estate career in 1988 as a Property Controller at The Rubin Organization, a predecessor to the Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust. Mr. Saltzman began his professional career at Price Waterhouse from 1985 to 1988.

Darshan V. Patel, has served as Chief Legal Officer since 2002. Mr. Patel also has served as Vice President of Resource America since 2005 and Associate General Counsel for Resource America since 2001. From 1996 to 1998, Mr. Patel was associated with the law firm of Glynn & Associates practicing litigation and real estate law.

~~Michael~~Lawrence S. ~~Yecies~~Block has served as Vice President and Assistant Secretary since September 2016. Mr. Block has served as SVP & Assistant Secretary of Resource America since September 2016. Since January, ~~Senior~~2011, Mr. Block has been a Managing Director, Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer for Island Capital Group LLC, a real estate merchant banking firm; Managing Director, Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer for C-III Capital Partners LLC and its affiliates, including C-III Investment Management LLC, an SEC-registered investment adviser; and President and Chief Compliance Officer of Anubis Securities LLC, a registered broker-dealer. From March 2005 through January 2011, Mr. Block was Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief ~~Legal~~Compliance Officer for The Kenmar Group, an alternative investment firm. From January 1998 through March 2005, Mr. Block was Managing Director, General Counsel and ~~Secretary~~Chief ~~since~~Compliance Officer for Lipper & Company L.P., an alternative investment firm. Mr. Block was a senior associate at the law firm Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft in New York from 1996 through 1998 and an associate at the law firm Proskauer Rose LLP from 1992 to 1996. Mr. ~~Yecies~~Block ~~has~~received ~~served~~a asB.S. ~~Senior~~degree in Business Administration with a concentration in Accounting from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1989 and a J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania School of Law in 1992.

Shelle Weisbaum has served as Vice President and Secretary since ~~2005~~September 2016. Ms. Weisbaum has also served as Senior Vice President, since January 2014, and General Counsel and Secretary, since August 2007, of Resource Real Estate. Previously she held the position of Vice President of Resource Real Estate from ~~1998~~August 2007 to ~~2005,~~December ~~and~~2013. ~~Senior~~She has also served as Vice President and Secretary of Resource Real Estate Management, ~~Chief~~LLC ~~Legal~~since ~~Officer~~August 2007. Ms. Weisbaum joined Resource Real Estate in October 2006 from Ledgewood Law, a Philadelphia-based law firm, where she practiced commercial real estate law from 1998 to 2006 as an associate and ~~Secretary~~later as a partner of the firm. Prior to Ledgewood, from 1987 to 1998, Ms. Weisbaum was Vice President and Assistant General Counsel at the Philadelphia Stock Exchange. Ms. Weisbaum received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Boston University and a Juris Doctor degree from Temple University.

Resource Capital Corp. since its inception in 2005. Mr Yecies previously served as Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Atlas

Energy, Inc., and Atlas Pipeline Partners GP, LLC since their inception through their initial public offerings and subsequent spinoffs from Resource America. Michael was an attorney in the Corporate and Special Litigation Departments at Duane Morris LLP (an international law firm) from 1994 to 1998.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Because we do not directly employ any persons, we rely on a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics adopted by Resource America that applies to the principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer of our General Partner, as well as to persons performing services for us generally. You may obtain a copy of this code of ethics by a request to our General Partner, Resource Capital Partners, at One Crescent Drive, Suite 203, Navy Yard Corporate Center, Philadelphia, PA 19112.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

Neither we nor our General Partner’s Board of Directors has a standing audit committee; our General Partner’s entire Board of Directors acts as the audit committee. Our General Partner’s Board of Directors does not currently have any member who qualifies as an audit committee financial expert. We believe that the cost related to retaining such a financial expert at this time is prohibitive for a small entity such as ours, and that it would reduce amounts otherwise distributable to our LPs.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which we refer to as the Exchange Act, requires the directors and executive officers of our General Partner, our General Partner, and holders greater than 10% of our limited partnership interests to file reports with the SEC. SEC regulations require us to identify anyone who filed a required report late during the most recent fiscal year. Based on our review of these reports, we believe that the filing requirements for all of these reporting persons were complied with during 2015.

(Back to Index)

2829

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We have no directors or officers and we do not directly employ any persons to manage or operate our business. Our affairs are managed by our General Partner and its affiliates. As compensation for its services, we pay our General Partner various fees as set forth in Item 13.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth the number and percentage of our limited partnership interests owned by beneficial owners of 5% or more of our limited partnership interests as well as the beneficial ownership of our General Partner, and its officers and directors, as of March 2928, ~~2016~~2017. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, our affairs are managed by our General Partner. We do not have any officers or directors. This information is reported in accordance with the beneficial ownership rules of the SEC under which a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power or investment power with respect to such security or has the right to acquire such ownership within 60 days.

Title of Class	Name and address of beneficial owner (1)	Amount and nature of beneficial ownership (2)	Percent of Class
Units of limited partnership interest	Resource Capital Partners, Inc.	183,768 units	5.62	%
Units of limited partnership interest	~~Jonathan~~Jeffrey ZP. Cohen, ~~Chairman~~CEO ~~of the Board~~ and Director	−	−
	Alan F. Feldman, Senior Vice President and Director	−	−
	Kevin M. Finkel, President	−	−
	Steven R. Saltzman, Vice President - Finance	−	−
	David E. Bloom, Senior Vice President and Director	−	−
	Darshan V. Patel, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary	−	−
	Michael S. Yecies, Secretary
	Lawrence S. Block, Vice President & Assistant	−	−
	Shelle Weisbaum, Vice President & Secretary	−	−
	All directors and executive officers as a group	−	−


(1)	The address for each beneficial owner is One Crescent Drive, Suite 203, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112.


(2)	Beneficial ownership for officers and directors excludes amounts that may be attributable to them as a result of the units beneficially owned by Resource Capital Partners.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

We pay our General Partner and its affiliates the following fees for their services.

Property Management Fees

We pay Resource Real Estate Management, an affiliate of our General Partner, a monthly property management fee in an amount equal to 5% of our gross cash receipts from the operation of our Properties. This fee is for Resource Real Estate Management’s services in managing the Properties or obtaining and supervising subcontractor Property managers, which may be affiliates of Resource Real Estate Management or independent third-parties. Resource Real Estate Management is permitted to manage the Properties through a property management affiliate or subcontract the management of the Properties out to unaffiliated third-party subcontractors. If Resource Real Estate Management subcontracts the management of the Properties, then it will pay all management fees payable to the subcontractor managers of our Properties. For the ~~year~~years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~December 31~~2015, ~~2014,~~ Resource Real Estate Management earned $~~517~~308,000 and $~~613~~517,000 respectively, in real estate property management fees. We do

Deferral of Real Estate Management Fees

We pay Resource Real Estate Management or its affiliates the real estate management fees for our Real Estate Investments from our operating revenues and our General Partner may, in its discretion, from time to time defer payment of all or any portion of such fees related to our Real Estate Investments, and accrue the same, if it deems our operating revenues are insufficient to pay such fees and still satisfy our investment objectives. We will pay any deferred fees to Resource Real Estate Management when

(Back to Index)

2930

~~our~~not ~~General~~anticipate ~~Partner~~any ~~deems~~further ~~our~~property ~~operating~~management ~~revenues~~fees ~~are~~as ~~sufficient~~the toPartnership ~~make such payment. As of December 31, 2015,~~ no ~~fees~~longer ~~had~~owns ~~been~~real ~~deferred~~estate assets.

Investment Management Fees

We pay our General Partner or its affiliates an annual investment management fee payable from our revenues in an amount equal to 1% of the gross offering proceeds from the offering that have been, and continue to be, deployed in real estate investments. The investment management fee is for our General Partner’s professional services rendered in our administration, including, but not limited to, the preparation and distribution of our required quarterly and annual reports to our limited partners. Since the annual investment management fee is for our General Partner’s professional services, it is in addition to the reimbursements we pay our General Partner for certain administrative expenses that it and its affiliates incur on our behalf as described below in “Reimbursement of Administrative Expenses and Direct Costs.” Up to 100% of our General Partner’s annual investment management fee is subordinated to our limited partners’ receipt of their Preferred Return. Our General Partner is entitled at any time to an additional share of our cash distributions to recoup any investment management fees or distributions that were previously subordinated to the extent that our cash distributions to our limited partners exceeded their Preferred Return. For the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015, our General Partner earned $~~251~~142,000 and $~~322~~251,000 respectively, in investment management fees. During the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 the Partnership paid $~~2.1~~157,000 ~~million~~ in investment management fees to the General Partner due to receipt by the ~~sales~~LP's of ~~the~~their ~~Hills~~Preferred ~~and Tamarlane~~Return.

Property Financing Fee for Refinancing a Property

We pay our General Partner or its affiliates a property financing fee equal to 0.5% of the face amount of any refinancing we obtain for our interest in the Properties. This fee is for our General Partner’s or its affiliates’ services in obtaining the financing and negotiating its terms. The property financing fee for refinancing will not be paid for real estate debt investments. There were no refinancings of the Properties during the year ended December 31, 2015, accordingly, no fees were paid.

Cash Distributions to Our General Partner

Our General Partner will receive distributions from us from the following sources:


•	distributable cash from operations;


•	distributable cash from capital transactions; and


•	cash distributions to the partners upon our liquidation.

Cash distributions from our operations will be first paid to our limited partners until they have received distributions totaling their Preferred Return and thereafter, 80% to our limited partners and 20% to our General Partner.

Cash distributions from capital transactions, which include cash we receive from the sale or refinancing of a Property or the sale or repayment in full of all outstanding principal and interest due and owing to us on a real estate debt investment, are distributed in the following order:


•	first, 100% to our limited partners until they receive distributions, including distributions of distributable cash from operations, totaling their Preferred Return;


•	second, 100% to our limited partners until their respective adjusted capital contributions (amount originally paid for a limited partnership interest less previous distributions of distributable cash from capital transactions) have been reduced to zero; and


•	thereafter, 80% to our limited partners and 20% to our General Partner.

When we dissolve and liquidate, we will distribute the liquidation proceeds in the following order of priority:


•	first, to the payment of our creditors in the order of priority provided by law, except obligations to partners or their affiliates;


•	next, to establish any reserve that our General Partner (or any other person effecting the winding up) determines is reasonably necessary for any contingent or unforeseen liability or obligation;

•

next, to the payment of all unpaid fees (other than our General Partner’s right to reimbursement of any fees previously subordinated to distributions to our limited partners) and other obligations owed by us to our General Partner and its affiliates (other than expense reimbursements), such as loans to us, in proportion to, and to the extent of, the unpaid fees, advances and other obligations to our General Partner and its affiliates under the Partnership Agreement;

(Back to Index)


•	next, to the payment of all expense reimbursements (other than our General Partner’s right to reimbursement of any fees previously subordinated to distributions to our limited partners) to which our General Partner or its affiliates may be entitled under the Partnership Agreement;


•	next, to the partners in proportion to, and to the extent of, the positive balances of their capital accounts;


•	next, 100% to our limited partners until they have received their respective Preferred Returns;


•	next, to our General Partner as reimbursement for any fees previously subordinated to distributions to our limited partners; and

(Back to Index)


•	thereafter, 80% to our limited partners and 20% to our General Partner.

During ~~2015~~2016, the General Partner received a total of $2.19 million. ofOf the $2.9 million, $157,000 relates to investment management ~~fee~~fees and $2.7 million represented the promote due to the ~~sale~~sales of ~~two~~the offour ~~the~~remaining Properties.

Director Independence

Because we are not listed on any national securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation system, we have elected to use the NASDAQ National Stock Market’s definition of “independent director” in evaluating whether any of our General Partner’s directors are independent. Under this definition, the board of directors of our General Partner has determined that our General Partner does not have any independent directors, nor are we required to have any.

Parent Entities

See Item 1, “Business - General”

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed by our independent auditors, Grant Thornton LLP for the ~~periods~~years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 for professional services rendered were $~~139~~180,000 and $~~112~~139,000, respectively.

Audit-Related Fees. We did not incur any audit related fees from Grant Thornton LLP during ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015.

Tax Fees. We did not incur any fees for tax services from Grant Thornton LLP during ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015.

All Other Fees. We did not incur any other fees from Grant Thornton LLP during ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015.

Procedures for Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditor. As a limited partnership, we do not have an audit committee. Our General Partner’s Board of Directors, acting as a committee of the whole, reviews and approves in advance any audit and any permissible non-audit engagement or relationship between us and our independent auditors.

(Back to Index)

3132

(Back to Index)

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


(a)	The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A:

1. Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the Years Ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - December 31, ~~2015~~2016

2. Financial Statement Schedules

Schedule III Investments in Real Estate

3. Exhibits

Exhibit No.		Description
3.1		Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership. (1)
3.2		Certificate of Limited Partnership. (1)
4.1		Forms of letters sent to limited partners confirming their investment. (1)
10.1		Agreement of Purchase and Sale - Casco Bay Portfolio (Tamarlane) (2)
10.2		Agreement of Purchase and Sale - Hills (2)
10.3		Agreement of Purchase and Sale - Bent Oaks (3)
10.4		Agreement of Purchase and Sale - Woodhollow (3)
10.5		Agreement of Purchase and Sale - Woodland Village (3)
10.6		Agreement of Purchase and Sale - Cape Cod
10.7		Reinstatement of and Amendment to Agreement of Purchase and Sale - Cape Cod
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 1350 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 1350 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.1		The following information from the Partnership's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Partners' Capital; and (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.


(1)	Filed previously as an exhibit to the Partnership’s registration statement on Form 10 for the year ended December 31, 2008 and by this reference incorporated herein.


(2)	Incorporated by reference to the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 29, 2016.


(3)	Incorporated by reference to the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 12, 2016.

(Back to Index)

3233

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 7, L.P.
	By: Resource Capital Partners, Inc., its general partner
March 29, 2016	By: /s/ Kevin M. Finkel
March 28, 2017	By: /s/ Kevin M. Finkel
	Kevin M. Finkel
	President
	(Principal Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/ Jonathan Z. Cohen	Director	March 29, 2016
/s/ Jeffrey P. Cohen	Director and CEO	March 28, 2017
JONATHAN Z. COHEN
JEFFREY P. COHEN
/s/ Alan F. Feldman	Director and Senior Vice President	March 2928, ~~2016~~2017
ALAN F. FELDMAN
/s/ David E. Bloom	Director and Senior Vice President	March 2928, ~~2016~~2017
DAVID E. BLOOM
/s/ Kevin M. Finkel	President	March 2928, ~~2016~~2017
KEVIN M. FINKEL	(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Steven R. Saltzman	Vice President - Finance	March 2928, ~~2016~~2017
STEVEN R. SALTZMAN	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

(Back to Index)

3334

(Back to Index)

Resource Real Estate Investors 7, L.P.

SCHEDULE III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

(dollars in thousands)

Column A	Column B		Column C		Column D		Column E		Column F			Column G	Column H	Column I
Description	Encumbrances		Initial cost to Company		Cost capitalized subsequent to acquisition		Gross amount at which carried at close of period		Accumulated depreciation			Date of construction	Date acquired	Life on which depreciation in latest income is computed
			Buildings and land improvements		Improvements carrying costs		Buildings and land improvements total
Real estate owned:
Residential	5,731		7,902		1,201		9,103		(2,528		)	1978	12/10/2008	3- 27.5 years
Austin, TX
Residential	5,951		8,407		638		9,045		(2,445		)	1985	12/10/2008	3 - 27.5 years
San Antonio, TX
Residential	4,916		6,765		1,067		7,832		(2,135		)	1974	12/12/2008	3 - 27.5 years
Austin, TX
Residential	9,293		11,500		1,689		13,189		(2,526		)	1970	3/7/2012	3 - 27.5 years
Columbia, SC
	$	25,891	$	34,574	$	4,595	$	39,169	$	(9,634	)

Column A

Column B

Column C

Column D

Column E

Column F

Column G

Column H

Column I

Description

Encumbrances

Initial cost to
Company

Cost capitalized
subsequent to
acquisition

Gross amount at which
carried at close
of period

Accumulated
depreciation

Date
of construction

Date acquired

Life on which depreciation in latest income is computed

Buildings and land
improvements

Improvements
carrying costs

Buildings and land
improvements total

Real estate owned:

—

	2015			2014
	2016			2015
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	71,844		$	71,377
Investments in Rental Properties:
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	39,169		$	71,844
Additions during period:
Improvements	~~663~~305			~~584~~663
Purchase of new asset	—			—
Deductions during period:
Sale of land	—			—
Disposals	(39,474		)	(33,338		)
Disposals	(33,338		)	(117		)
Balance at the end of the period	$	—		$	39,169
Balance at the end of the period	$	39,169		$	71,844
Accumulated Depreciation
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	(9,634	)	$	(16,255	)
Sales	10,482			8,453
Disposals	8			40
Depreciation	(856		)	(1,872		)
Balance at the close of period	$	—		$	(9,634	)

(Back to Index)

3435

Filing Compare · Resource Real Estate Investors 7, L.P.