UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012

o[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________ to ___________

Commission file number: 0-20057

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.

California	33-0391979
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)
17782 Sky Park Circle
Irvine, CA	92614-6404
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(714) 662-5565

(Telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ~~Yes x No o~~

~~Indicate~~Yes by[X] check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o[ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has issubmitted aelectronically ~~large~~and ~~accelerated~~posted ~~filer,~~on anits ~~accelerated~~corporate ~~filer~~Web site, aif ~~non-accelerated filer~~any, orevery aInteractive ~~smaller~~Data ~~reporting~~File ~~company.~~required ~~See~~to ~~the~~be ~~definitions~~submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of ~~"large~~Regulation ~~accelerated~~S-T ~~filer,"~~(232.405 ~~"accelerated~~of ~~filer"~~this ~~and~~chapter) ~~"smaller~~during ~~reporting~~the ~~company"~~preceding in12 ~~Rule~~months ~~12b-2~~(or offor such shorter period that the ~~Exchange~~registrant ~~Act.~~was ~~(Check~~required ~~one~~to submit and post such files):.

~~Large~~Yes ~~accelerated~~[X] ~~filer~~No o[ ~~Accelerated~~] ~~filer o Non-accelerated filer x Smaller reporting company o~~

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a ~~shell~~large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. ~~(as~~See ~~defined~~the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ~~Yes o No~~ x(Check one):

Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [X] Smaller reporting company [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [ ] No [X]

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.

(A California Limited Partnership)

INDEX TO FORM 10 – Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
	Item 1.	Financial Statements
Condensed Balance Sheets As of December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011	3
		Condensed Balance Sheets As of June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012	F-1
Condensed Statements of Operations For the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010	4
		Condensed Statements of Operations For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011	F-2
Condensed Statement of Partners' Deficit For the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2011	5
		Condensed Statement of Partners' Deficit For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012	F-3
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows For the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010	6
		Condensed Statements of Cash Flows For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011	F-4
~~Notes to Condensed Financial Statements~~	7	Notes to Condensed Financial Statements	F-5
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	16
	Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks	19
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks	4
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	19
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	4
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	20
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	5
Item 1A. Risk Factors	20
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	5
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	20
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	5
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	20
	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	5
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)	20
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	5
Item 5. Other Information	20
	Item 5.	Other Information	5
Item 6. Exhibits	20
	Item 6.	Exhibits	5
~~Signatures~~	21Signatures		6

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.

(A California Limited Partnership)

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	December 31, 2011			March 31, 2011
	June 30, 2012			March 31, 2012
ASSETS
Cash	$	7664,~~073~~482		$	4364,~~639~~478
Investments in Local Limited Partnerships, net (Note 2)		-			-
Other assets		19,405			51,500
Due from affiliate		9,000			-
Total Assets	$	95,478		$	95,139
Other assets		-			19,405
Total Assets	$	73,482		$	83,883
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' DEFICIT
Liabilities:
Accrued fees and expenses due to
Accrued fees and expenses due to General Partner and affiliates (Note 3)	$	2,500,656		$	2,528,838
General Partner and affiliates (Note 3)	$	2,528,198		$	2,573,107
Total Liabilities		2,500,656			2,528,838
Partners’ Deficit:
General Partner		(81,~~488~~432	)		(81,~~940~~610	)
Limited Partners (12,000 Partnership Units authorized; 7,000 Partnership Units issued and outstanding)		(2,~~351~~345,~~232~~742	)		(2,~~396~~363,~~028~~345	)
Total Partners’ Deficit		(2,~~432~~427,~~720~~174	)		(2,~~477~~444,~~968~~955	)
Total Liabilities and Partners’ Deficit	$	9573,~~478~~482		$	9583,~~139~~883

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements

3F-1

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.

(A California Limited Partnership)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~ 2012 and ~~2010~~2011

(Unaudited)

	2011						2010
	2012			2011
	Three Months			~~Nine~~Three Months			~~Three Months~~			~~Nine Months~~
Distribution income	$	-		$	500		$	-		$	-
Reporting fees		-			6,134			-			11,767
Total operating income		-			500
Total operating income		-			6,634			-			11,767
Operating expenses:
Operating expenses:
Asset management fees (Note 3)		10,169			20,203
Asset management fees (Note 3)		12,284			50,721			25,844			79,947
Legal and accounting		17,500			28,389
Legal and accounting fees		127			31,779			43			33,378
Write off of other assets		8,950			-
Other		~~651~~1,424			111,~~938~~738			~~2,599~~			~~3,424~~
Total operating expenses		1338,~~062~~043			9450,~~438~~330			~~28,486~~			~~116,749~~
Loss from operations		(1338,~~062~~043	)		(8749,~~804~~830	)		~~(28,486~~	)		~~(104,982~~	)
Gain on sale of Local Limited Partnerships		7755,~~114~~820			~~133~~38,~~042~~924			~~41,056~~			~~91,056~~
Interest income		64			102			4			9
Net income (loss)	$	6417,~~058~~781		$	45(10,~~248~~904	)	$	~~12,574~~		$	~~(13,917~~	)
Net income (loss) allocated to:
General Partner	$	~~640~~178		$	~~452~~(109	)	$	~~126~~		$	~~(139~~	)
Limited Partners	$	6317,~~418~~603		$	44(10,~~796~~795	)	$	~~12,448~~		$	~~(13,778~~	)
Net income (loss) per Partnership Unit	$	93		$	6(2	)	$	2		$	(2	)
Outstanding weighted Partnership Units		7,000			7,000			~~7,000~~			~~7,000~~

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements

4F-2

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.

(A California Limited Partnership)

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS’ DEFICIT

For the ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012 (Unaudited)

(Unaudited)

	General			Limited
	Partner			Partners			Total

Partners’ deficit at March 31, 2012	$	(81,610	)	$	(2,363,345	)	$	(2,444,955	)

Net income		178			17,603			17,781

Partners’ deficit at June 30, 2012	$	(81,432	)	$	(2,345,742	)	$	(2,427,174	)

	General Partners			Limited Partners			Total
Partners’ deficit at March 31, 2011	$	(81,940	)	$	(2,396,028	)	$	(2,477,968	)
Net income		452			44,796			45,248
Partners’ deficit at December 31, 2011	$	(81,488	)		(2,351,232	)		(2,432,720	)

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements

5F-3

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.

(A California Limited Partnership)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~ 2012 and ~~2010~~2011

(Unaudited)

	2011			2010
	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	4517,~~248~~781		$	(1310,~~917~~904	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Gain on sale of Local Limited Partnerships		(133,042	)		(91,056	)
Increase in other assets		(1,075	)		(12,689	)
(Increase) in other assets		(26,507	)		(5,600	)
Increase in accrued expenses		-			25,534
Increase (decrease) in accrued fees and expenses due to General Partner and affiliates		~~(44~~30,~~909~~168	)		65(50,~~349~~577	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(159,210	)		(45,224	)
Write off of other assets		8,950			-
Gain on sale of Local Limited Partnerships		(55,820	)		(38,924	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		4			(87,560	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of Local Limited Partnerships		~~191,644~~-			9468,~~056~~063
Net cash provided by investing activities		~~191,644~~-			9468,~~056~~063
Net increase in cash		32,434			48,832
Net increase (decrease) in cash		4			(19,497	)
Cash, beginning of period		4364,~~639~~478			2743,~~658~~639
Cash, end of period	$	7664,~~073~~482		$	7624,~~490~~142
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Taxes paid	$	-		$	-

NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Three Local Limited Partnerships were sold for $67,350 with proceeds paid directly to Associates, which resulted in a decrease in accrued fees and expenses due to General Partner and affiliates of $58, 350 and an increase in due from affiliates of $9,000.

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements

6F-4

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.

(A California Limited Partnership)

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

General

The accompanying condensed unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q for quarterly reports under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending March 31, ~~2012~~2013. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, ~~2011~~2012.

Organization

WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund II, L.P., (the "Partnership"), is a California Limited Partnership formed under the laws of the State of California on January 19, 1990. The Partnership was formed to acquire limited partnership interests in other limited partnerships (“Local Limited Partnerships”) which own multi-family housing complexes (“Housing Complexes”) that are eligible for Federal low income housing tax credits (“Low Income Housing Tax Credits”). The local general partners (the “Local General Partners”) of each Local Limited Partnership retain responsibility for maintaining, operating and managing the Housing Complexes. Each ~~Local~~ Local Limited Partnership is governed by its agreement of limited partnership (the “Local Limited Partnership Agreement”).

The general partner of the Partnership is WNC Financial Group, L.P., a California partnership (the “General Partner”). The general partners of the General Partner are WNC & Associates, Inc., a California corporation (“Associates”), and Wilfred N. Cooper Sr. The chairman and president of Associates own substantially all of the outstanding stock of Associates. The business of the Partnership is conducted primarily through Associates, as the Partnership has no employees of its own.

The Partnership shall continue in full force and effect until December 31, 2045 unless terminated prior to that date pursuant to the partnership agreement or law.

The financial statements include only activity relating to the business of the Partnership, and do not give effect to any assets that the partners may have outside of their interests in the Partnership, or to any obligations, including income taxes, of the partners.

The Partnership Agreement authorized the sale of up to 12,000 units of Limited Partnership interests (“Partnership Units”) at $1,000 per Partnership Unit. The offering of Partnership Units concluded onin December 31, 1992 at which time 7,000 Partnership Units representing subscriptions in the amount of $7,000,000, had been accepted. The General Partner has a 1% interest in operating profits and losses, taxable income and losses, cash available for distribution from the Partnership and Low Income Housing Tax Credits of the Partnership. The investors (the “Limited Partners”) will be allocated the remaining 99% of these items in proportion to their respective investments.

7The proceeds from the disposition of any of the Local Limited Partnership Housing Complexes will be used first to pay debts and other obligations per the respective Local Limited Partnership Agreement. Any remaining proceeds will then be paid to the Partnership. The sale of a Housing Complex may be subject to other restrictions and obligations. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that a Local Limited Partnership will be able to sell its Housing Complex. Even if it does so, there can be no assurance that any significant amounts of cash will be distributed to the Partnership. Should such distributions occur, the Limited Partners will be entitled to receive distributions equal to their capital contributions and their return on investment (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) and the General Partner would then be entitled to receive proceeds equal to its capital contributions from the remainder. Any additional sale or refinancing proceeds will be distributed 95% to the Limited Partners (in proportion to their respective investments) and 5% to the General Partner.

F-5

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.

(A California Limited Partnership)

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - – CONTINUED

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

The proceeds from the disposition of any of the Local Limited Partnership Housing Complexes will be used first to pay debts and other obligations per the respective Local Limited Partnership Agreement. Any remaining proceeds will then be paid to the Partnership. The sale of a Housing Complex may be subject to other restrictions and obligations. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that a Local Limited Partnership will be able to sell its Housing Complex. Even if it does so, there can be no assurance that any significant amounts of cash will be distributed to the Partnership. Should such distributions occur, the Limited Partners will be entitled to receive distributions equal to their capital contributions and their return on investment (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) and the General Partner would then be entitled to receive proceeds equal to its capital contributions from the remainder. Any additional sale or refinancing proceeds will be distributed 95% to the Limited Partners (in proportion to their respective investments) and 5% to the General Partner.

Risks and Uncertainties

An investment in the Partnership and the Partnership’s investments in Local Limited Partnerships and their Housing Complexes are subject to risks. These risks may impact the tax benefits of an investment in the Partnership, and the amount of proceeds available for distribution to the Limited Partners, if any, on liquidation of the Partnership’s investments. Some of those risks include the following:

The Low Income Housing Tax Credits rules are extremely complicated. Noncompliance with these rules results in the loss of future Low Income Housing Tax Credits and the fractional recapture of Low Income Housing Tax Credits already taken. In most cases the annual amount of Low Income Housing Tax Credits that an individual can use is limited to the tax liability due on the person’s last $25,000 of taxable income. The Local Limited Partnerships may be unable to sell the Housing Complexes at a price which would result in the Partnership realizing cash distributions or proceeds from the transaction. Accordingly, the Partnership may be unable to distribute any cash to its Limited Partners. Low Income Housing Tax Credits may be the only benefit from an investment in the Partnership.

The Partnership has invested in a limited number of Local Limited Partnerships. Such limited diversity means that the results of operation of each single Housing Complex will have a greater impact on the Partnership. With limited diversity, poor performance of one Housing Complex could impair the Partnership’s ability to satisfy its investment objectives. Each Housing Complex is subject to mortgage indebtedness. If a Local Limited Partnership failed to pay its mortgage, it could lose its Housing Complex in foreclosure. If foreclosure were to occur during the first 15 years ~~(the “Compliance Period”)~~, the loss of any remaining future Low Income Housing Tax Credits, a fractional recapture of prior Low Income Housing Tax Credits, and a loss of the Partnership’s investment in the Housing Complex would occur. The Partnership is a limited partner or a non-managing member of each Local Limited Partnership. Accordingly, the Partnership will have very limited rights with respect to management of the Local Limited Partnerships. The Partnership will rely totally on the Local General Partners. Neither the Partnership’s investments in Local Limited Partnerships, nor the Local Limited Partnerships’ investments in Housing Complexes, are readily marketable. To the extent the Housing Complexes receive government financing or operating subsidies, they may be subject to one or more of the following risks: difficulties in obtaining tenants for the Housing Complexes; difficulties in obtaining rent increases; limitations on cash distributions; limitations on sales or refinancing of Housing Complexes; limitations on transfers of interests in Local Limited Partnerships; limitations on removal of Local General Partners; limitations on subsidy programs; and possible changes in applicable regulations. Uninsured casualties could result in loss of property and Low Income Housing Tax Credits and recapture of Low Income Housing Tax Credits previously taken. The value of real estate is subject to risks from fluctuating economic conditions, including employment rates, inflation, tax, environmental, land use and zoning policies, supply and demand of similar Housing Complexes, and neighborhood conditions, among others.

8The ability of Limited Partners to claim tax losses from the Partnership is limited. The IRS may audit the Partnership or a Local Limited Partnership and challenge the tax treatment of tax items. The amount of Low Income Housing Tax Credits and tax losses allocable to Limited Partners could be reduced if the IRS were successful in such a challenge. The alternative minimum tax could reduce tax benefits from an investment in the Partnership. Changes in tax laws could also impact the tax benefits from an investment in the Partnership and/or the value of the Housing Complexes.

All of the Low Income Housing Tax Credits anticipated to be realized from the Local Limited Partnerships have been realized. The Partnership does not anticipate being allocated any Low Income Housing Tax Credits from the Local Limited Partnerships in the future.

F-6

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.

(A California Limited Partnership)

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - – CONTINUED

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

The ability of Limited Partners to claim tax losses from the Partnership is limited. The IRS may audit the Partnership or a Local Limited Partnership and challenge the tax treatment of tax items. The amount of Low Income Housing Tax Credits and tax losses allocable to Limited Partners could be reduced if the IRS were successful in such a challenge. The alternative minimum tax could reduce tax benefits from an investment in the Partnership. Changes in tax laws could also impact the tax benefits from an investment in the Partnership and/or the value of the Housing Complexes.

No trading market for the Partnership Units exists or is expected to develop. Limited Partners may be unable to sell their Partnership Units except at a discount and should consider their Partnership Units to be a long-term investment. Individual Limited Partners will have no recourse if they disagree with actions authorized by a vote of the majority of Limited Partners.

The Partnership currently has insufficient working capital to fund its operations. Associates has agreed to continue providing advances sufficient enough to fund the operations and working capital requirements of the Partnership through ~~February~~August 2831, 2013.

Anticipated future and existing cash resources of the Partnership are not sufficient to pay existing liabilities of the Partnership. However, substantially all of the existing liabilities of the Partnership are payable to the General Partner and/or its affiliates. Though the amounts payable to the General Partner and/or its affiliates are contractually currently payable, the Partnership anticipates that the General Partner and/or its affiliates will not require the payment of these contractual obligations until capital reserves are in excess of the aggregate of ~~then~~the existing contractual obligations and then anticipated future foreseeable obligations of the Partnership. The Partnership would be adversely affected should the General Partner and/or its affiliates demand current payment of the existing contractual obligations and or suspend services for this or any other reason.

Exit Strategy

The Compliance Period for a Housing Complex is generally 15 years following construction or rehabilitation completion. Associates was one of the first in the industry to offer syndicated investments in Low Income Housing Tax Credits. The initial programs have completed their Compliance Periods.

Upon the sale of a Local Limited Partnership Interest or Housing Complex after the end of the Compliance Period, there would be no recapture of Low Income Housing Tax Credits. ~~A sale prior to the end of the Compliance Period could result in recapture if certain conditions are not met.~~ All Local Limited Partnerships have completed their 15-year Compliance Period.

With that in mind, the General Partner is continuing its review of the Housing Complexes. The review considers many factors, including extended use requirements (such as those due to mortgage restrictions or state compliance agreements), the condition of the Housing Complexes, and the tax consequences to the Limited Partners from the sale of the Housing Complexes.

9Upon identifying those Housing Complexes with the highest potential for a successful sale, refinancing or re-syndication, the Partnership expects to proceed with efforts to liquidate them. The objective is to wind down the Partnership as Low Income Housing Tax Credits are no longer available. Local Limited Partnership interests may be disposed of any time by the General Partner in its discretion. While liquidation of the Housing Complexes continues to be evaluated, the dissolution of the Partnership was not imminent as of June 30, 2012.

Upon management of the Partnership identifying a Local Limited Partnership for disposition, costs incurred by the Partnership in preparation for the disposition are deferred. Upon the sale of the Local Limited Partnership interest, the Partnership nets the costs that had been deferred against the proceeds from the sale in determining the gain or loss on sale of the Local Limited Partnership. Deferred disposition costs are included in other assets on the balance sheets.

F-7

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.

(A California Limited Partnership)

NOTES TO ~~CONDENSED~~ FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -– CONTINUED

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

~~Upon~~The ~~identifying~~Partnership ~~those~~has ~~Housing~~received ~~Complexes~~the ~~with~~majority ~~the~~vote in ~~highest~~favor ~~potential~~of ~~for~~the aplan ~~successful~~of ~~sale,~~liquidation ~~refinancing~~of orthe ~~syndication~~Partnership. Therefore, the Partnership ~~expects~~is toengaging ~~proceed~~third ~~with~~party ~~efforts~~appraisers to ~~liquidate~~appraise several ~~them~~of the Local Limited Partnerships in this Partnership. The ~~objective~~appraisal is toone ~~maximize~~of the ~~Limited~~preliminary ~~Partners’~~steps ~~return~~that ~~wherever~~need ~~possible~~to ~~and,~~be ~~ultimately,~~completed in order to ~~wind~~move ~~down~~forward with the ~~Partnership~~approved liquidation plan. ~~Local~~Expenses ~~Limited~~incurred for the appraisals, or any other disposition related expenses the Partnership ~~interests~~incurs, ~~may~~are bebeing ~~disposed~~capitalized ofand ~~any~~will ~~time~~remain byon the ~~General~~balance ~~Partner~~sheet atuntil ~~its~~the ~~discretion~~respective Local Limited Partnership is sold. ~~While~~At ~~liquidation~~the time of ~~the~~disposition ~~Housing~~all ~~Complexes~~related ~~continues~~capitalized tocosts will be ~~evaluated,~~netted ~~the~~with ~~dissolution~~any ofsale ~~the~~proceeds ~~Partnership~~received in ~~was~~order ~~not~~to ~~imminent~~calculate asthe ofnet ~~December~~gain ~~31,~~or ~~2011~~loss on the disposition.

~~Upon~~Prior ~~management~~to of the quarter ended June 30, 2012, the Partnership ~~identifying~~sold aits Local Limited Partnership ~~for~~Interest ~~disposition~~in Lake View, ~~costs~~a ~~incurred~~California bylimited ~~the~~partnership, ~~Partnership~~Ashland inInvestment ~~preparation~~Group, Wilcox ~~for~~Investment ~~the~~Group, ~~disposition~~Cherokee ~~are~~Square, ~~deferred~~Ltd., ~~Upon~~Divall ~~the~~Midland ~~sale~~Associates ofLimited ~~the~~Partnership ~~Local~~II, ~~Limited~~Candleridge ~~Partnership~~Apartments ~~interest~~of Perry, L.P., ~~the~~Candleridge ~~Partnership~~Apartments ~~nets~~of ~~the~~Runnells, ~~costs~~L.P., ~~that~~Whitewater ~~had~~Woods, ~~been~~Brian’s ~~deferred~~Village ~~against~~Apartments, ~~the~~L.P., ~~proceeds~~Rociada, ~~from~~L.P., ~~the~~Idalou Manor, ~~sale~~L.P., inLittlefield ~~determining~~Manor, ~~the~~L.P., ~~gain~~Brantley orHousing, ~~loss~~Ltd, onEclectic ~~sale~~Housing, ofLtd., ~~the~~Perry ~~Local~~County ~~Limited~~Housing, ~~Partnership~~Ltd., ~~Deferred~~Pine ~~disposition~~Hill ~~costs~~Housing, Ltd., ~~are~~and ~~included~~Wadley inHousing, ~~other~~Ltd. ~~assets~~Each onof the ~~condensed~~Local ~~balance~~Limited ~~sheets~~Partnerships had completed its Compliance Period.

~~The~~During ~~Partnership has received~~ the ~~majority~~three ~~vote~~months inended ~~favor~~June of30, 2012, the ~~plan~~Local ofLimited ~~liquidation~~Partnership ofInterests ~~the~~for ~~Partnership. Therefore,~~ the ~~Partnership~~three isfollowing ~~engaging third party appraisers to appraise several or all of the~~ Local Limited Partnerships inwere ~~this Partnership~~sold. ~~The~~ ~~appraisal~~No isdistributions ~~one~~will ~~of the preliminary steps that need to~~ be made ~~completed in order~~ to ~~move forward with~~ the ~~approved~~Limited ~~liquidation~~Partners ~~plan. The~~as ~~expense~~a ~~incurred~~result ~~for~~of ~~the~~these ~~appraisals,~~dispositions. orEach ~~any~~of ~~other disposition related expenses~~ the ~~Partnership incurs, are being capitalized and will remain on the balance sheet until the respective~~ Local Limited ~~Partnership~~Partnerships ishad ~~sold. At~~completed ~~the~~its ~~time of disposition the capitalized costs will be~~Compliance ~~netted~~Period ~~with~~so ~~any~~there ~~cash~~is ~~proceeds~~no ~~that~~risk ~~are~~of ~~received~~recapture ~~in order~~ to ~~calculate~~ the ~~gain~~investors orin ~~loss on~~ the ~~disposition~~Partnership.

The following table reflects the 12 Local Limited Partnership interests that were sold during the nine months ended December 31, 2011:

Local Limited Partnership	Debt at 12/31/11		Appraisal Value		Date of Sale		Sales Price		Actual Appraisal Expense		Sales Related Expenses		Gain on sale
Airport Road Associate, LTD	$	1,381,000	$	950,000		6/01/2012	$	22,450	$	3,100	$	744	$	18,606
Am-Kent Associates		1,061,000		940,000		6/01/2012		22,450		3,100		743		18,607
Elizabeth Square, LP		1,367,000		1,270,000		6/01/2012		22,450		3,100		743		18,607

	Debt at 12/31/10	Appraisal Value	Date of Sale	Sales Price	Sales Related Expenses	Gain (loss) on sale
Brantley Housing	546,000	$365,000	May 1, 2011	$16,372	$8,855	$7,517
Eclectic Housing	365,000	260,000	May 1, 2011	10,936	5,071	5,865
Perry Housing	417,000	200,000	May 1, 2011	12,521	5,071	7,450
Pine Hill Housing	518,000	365,000	May 1, 2011	15,685	5,071	10,614
Wadley Housing	418,000	360,000	May 1, 2011	12,549	5,071	7,478
Rociada	693,000	120,000	August 24, 2011	20,000	2,996	17,004
Emory Capital	353,000	180,000	October 1, 2011	10,575	5,212	5,363
Emory Manor	527,000	310,000	October 1, 2011	15,920	4,251	11,669
Idalou Manor	591,000	300,000	October 1, 2011	17,726	4,251	13,475
Jefferson Capital	682,000	360,000	October 1, 2011	20,466	4,251	16,215
Jefferson Manor	729,000	400,000	October 1, 2011	21,876	4,251	17,625
Littlefield Manor	567,000	280,000	October 1, 2011	17,018	4,251	12,767

All of the sales proceeds were paid directly to the General Partner or affiliates. As shown in the table below, $58,350 was used to reimburse the General Partner or affiliates for accrued asset management fees or operating expenses paid on behalf of the Partnership. The remaining $9,000 will be returned to the Partnership’s reserves and is included in due from affiliate as of June 30, 2012.

10The following table represents the anticipated use of the cash proceeds from the disposition of the three Local Limited Partnerships.

Local Limited Partnership	Expected Cash Proceeds		Payment of accrued asset management fees		Reimburse GP or affiliates for expenses		Remaining cash to remain in reserve for future expenses
Airport Road Associate, LTD	$	22,450	$	11,749	$	7,701	$	3,000
Am-Kent Associates		22,450		11,749		7,701		3,000
Elizabeth Square, LP		22,450		11,749		7,701		3,000

F-8

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.

(A California Limited Partnership)

NOTES TO ~~CONDENSED~~ FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -– CONTINUED

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

Subsequent to June 30, 2012, the Local Limited Partnership Interest in Arizona I, L.P. (“Arizona”) was identified to be sold to an affiliate of the Local General Partner. The ~~following~~buyer ~~table~~offered ~~represents~~$25,000 to purchase the Local Limited Partnership Interest. Arizona I was appraised for $785,000 and had a mortgage note balance of $1,412,689 as of June 30, 2012. The Partnership has incurred $3,000 in sales related expenses which will be netted against the proceeds from calculating the gain on sale. The Partnership will use all of the cash proceeds ~~from~~to pay the ~~disposition~~remaining accrued asset management fees. The Partnership’s investment balance is zero; therefore a gain of $22,000 will be recorded during the 12respective ~~Local~~period. No cash distribution will be made to the Limited ~~Partnerships~~Partners ~~that~~as ~~were~~a ~~disposed~~result of asthis sale. The Compliance Period has been completed therefore there is no risk of ~~the~~recapture ~~issuance~~and investor approval is not required. The sale of the ~~report~~Local Limited Partnership is expected to close on August 31, 2012.

Local Limited Partnership	Expected Cash Proceeds	Reimburse GP or affiliates for expenses	Payment of accrued asset management fees	Remaining cash to remain in reserves for future expenses
Brantley Housing	$16,372	-	$5,612	$10,760
Eclectic Housing	10,936	-	$5,612	5,324
Perry Housing	12,521	-	$5,612	6,909
Pine Hill Housing	15,685	-	$5,612	10,073
Wadley Housing	12,549	-	$5,612	6,937
Rociada	20,000	-	-	20,000
Idalou Manor, LP	17,726	-	6,363	11,363
Littlefield Manor, LP	17,018	-	6,009	11,009
Emory Capital	10,575	-	2,788	7,787
Emory Manor	15,920	-	5,460	10,460
Jefferson Capital	20,466	-	7,733	12,733
Jefferson Manor	21,876	-	8,438	13,438

Subsequent to June 30, 2012, the Local Limited Partnership Interest in Casa Alegre Apartments (“Casa Alegre”) was identified to be sold to an affiliate of the Local General Partner. The buyer offered $25,000 to purchase the Local Limited Partnership Interest. Casa Alegre was appraised for $925,000 and had a mortgage note balance of $1,206,354 as of December 31, 2011. The partnership has incurred $12,900 in sales related expenses which will be netted against the proceeds from calculating the gain on sale. The Partnership will use all cash proceeds to pay accrued asset management fees and reimburse the General Partner or affiliates for operating expenses paid on its behalf. The Partnership’s investment balance is zero. No cash distribution will be made to the Limited Partners as a result of this sale. The Compliance Period has been completed therefore there is no risk of recapture and investor approval is not required. The sale of the Local Limited Partnership is expected to close on August 31, 2012.

As of December 31, 2011 the Partnership has identified three Local Limited Partnerships for potential disposition as listed in the table below. The Compliance Period for all Local Limited Partnerships has expired so there is no risk of recapture to the investors in the Partnership.

Local Limited Partnership	Debt at 12/31/10	Appraisal value	Difference between mortgage balance and appraisal value**	Estimated sales price	Actual appraisal expense	Estimated legal expense	Estimated gain on sale
Airport Road Associate, LTD	1,381,000	950,000	(431,000)	30,000	3,100	385	26,515
Am-Kent Asssociates	1,066,000	940,000	(126,000)	30,000	3,100	385	26,515
Elizabeth Square, LP	1,367,000	1,270,000	(97,000)	30,000	3,100	385	26,515

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.

(A California Limited Partnership)

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2011

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

Method of Accounting for Investments in Local Limited Partnerships

The Partnership accounts for its investments in Local Limited Partnerships using the equity method of accounting, whereby the Partnership adjusts its investment balance for its share of the Local Limited Partnerships’ results of operations and for any contributions made and distributions received. The Partnership reviews the carrying amount of an individual investment in a Local Limited Partnership for possible impairment ~~at least annually or~~ whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such investment may not be recoverable. ~~Recoverability~~ Recoverability of such investment is measured by the estimated value derived by management, generally consisting of the sum of the remaining future Low Income Housing Tax Credits estimated to be allocable to the Partnership and ~~any~~the estimated residual value to the Partnership. If an investment is considered to be impaired, the Partnership reduces the carrying value of its investment in any such Local Limited Partnership. The accounting policies of the Local Limited Partnerships, generally, are expected to be consistent with those of the Partnership. Costs incurred by the Partnership in acquiring the investments are capitalized as part of the investment account and were being amortized over 27.5 years (see Note 2).

“Equity in losses of Local Limited Partnerships” for the periods ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 has been recorded by the Partnership. Management’s estimate for the ~~nine~~three-month ~~periods~~period is based on either actual unaudited results reported by the Local Limited Partnerships or historical trends in the operations of the Local Limited Partnerships. Equity in losses of Local Limited Partnerships allocated to the Partnership ~~are~~is not recognized to the extent that the investment balance would be adjusted below zero. If the Local Limited Partnerships report net income in future years, the Partnership will resume applying the equity method only after its share of such net income equals the share of net losses not recognized during the period(s) the equity method was suspended (see Note 2).

In accordance with the accounting guidance for the consolidation of variable interest entities, the Partnership determines when it should include the assets, liabilities, and activities of a variable interest entity (VIE) in its financial statements, and when it should disclose information about its relationship with a VIE. The analysis that must be performed to determine which entity should consolidate a VIE focuses on control and economic factors. A VIE is a legal structure used to conduct activities or hold assets, which must be consolidated by a company if it is the primary beneficiary because it has (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. If multiple unrelated parties share such power, as defined, no party will be required to consolidate the VIE. Further, the guidance requires continual reconsideration of the primary beneficiary of a VIE.F-9

Based on this guidance, the Local Limited Partnerships in which the Partnership invests meet the definition of a VIE because the owners of the equity at risk in these entities do not have the power to direct their operations. However, management does not consolidate the Partnership's interests in these VIEs, as it is not considered to be the primary beneficiary since it does not have the power to direct the activities that are considered most significant to the economic performance of these entities. The Partnership currently records the amount of its investment in these Local Limited Partnerships which are considered VIEs as assets on its balance sheets, recognizes its share of partnership income or losses in the statements of operations, and discloses how it accounts for material types of these investments in its financial statements. The Partnership's balance in investment in Local Limited Partnerships represents its maximum exposure to loss. The Partnership's exposure to loss in these Local Limited Partnerships is mitigated by the condition and financial performance of the underlying Housing Complexes as well as the strength of the Local General Partners and their guarantee against credit recapture to the investors in the Partnership.

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.

(A California Limited Partnership)

NOTES TO ~~CONDENSED~~ FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -– CONTINUED

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

~~Distributions~~In ~~received~~accordance bywith the accounting guidance for the consolidation of variable interest entities, the Partnership ~~are~~determines ~~accounted~~when ~~for~~it asshould ainclude ~~reduction~~the assets, liabilities, and activities of ~~the~~a ~~investment~~variable ~~balance~~interest entity (VIE) in its financial statements, and when it should disclose information about its relationship with a VIE. ~~Distributions~~ ~~received~~The ~~after~~analysis that must be performed to determine which entity should consolidate a VIE focuses on control and economic factors. A VIE is a legal structure used to conduct activities or hold assets, which must be consolidated by a company if it is the ~~investment~~primary beneficiary because it has ~~reached~~(1) ~~zero~~the ~~are~~power ~~recognized~~to asdirect ~~income. As~~the activities of ~~December~~the 31VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. If multiple unrelated parties share such power, ~~2011~~as defined, ~~all~~no party will be required to consolidate the VIE. Further, the guidance requires continual reconsideration of the ~~investment~~primary ~~balances~~beneficiary ~~had~~of ~~reached~~a ~~zero~~VIE.

Based on this guidance, the Local Limited Partnerships in which the Partnership invests meet the definition of a VIE because the owners of the equity at risk in these entities do not have the power to direct their operations. However, management does not consolidate the Partnership’s interests in these VIEs, as it is not considered to be the primary beneficiary since it does not have the power to direct the activities that are considered most significant to the economic performance of these entities. The Partnership currently records the amount of its investment in these Local Limited Partnerships as an asset on its balance sheets, recognize its share of partnership income or losses in the statements of operations, and disclose how it accounts for material types of these investments in its financial statements. The Partnership’s balance in investment in Local Limited Partnerships, plus the risk of recapture of tax credits previously recognized on these investments, represents its maximum exposure to loss. The Partnership’s exposure to loss on these Local Limited Partnerships is mitigated by the condition and financial performance of the underlying Housing Complexes as well as the strength of the Local General Partners and their guarantee against credit recapture to the investors in the Partnership.

Distributions received by the Partnership are accounted for as a reduction of the investment balance. Distributions received after the investment has reached zero are recognized as income. As of June 30, 2012, all of the investment balances had reached zero.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Partnership considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. As of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012 and March 31, ~~2011~~2012, the Partnership had no cash equivalents.

Reporting Comprehensive Income

The Partnership had no items of other comprehensive income for all periods presented.

F-10

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.

(A California Limited Partnership)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued

Income Taxes

The Partnership has elected to be treated as a pass-through entity for income tax purposes and, as such, is not subject to income taxes. Rather, all items of taxable income, deductions and tax credits are passed through to and are reported by its owners on their respective income tax returns. The Partnership’s federal tax status as a pass-through entity is based on its legal status as a partnership. Accordingly, the Partnership is not required to take any tax positions in order to qualify as a pass-through entity. The Partnership is required to file and does file tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service and other taxing authorities. Accordingly, these financial statements do not reflect a provision for income taxes and the Partnership has no other tax positions which must be considered for disclosure.

Net Loss Per Partnership Unit

Net loss per Partnership Unit includes no dilution and is computed by dividing loss allocated to Limited Partners by the weighted average number of Partnership Units outstanding during the period. Calculation of diluted net loss per Partnership Unit is not required.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership is entitled to receive reporting fees from the Local Limited Partnerships. The intent of the reporting fees is to offset (in part) administrative costs incurred by the Partnership in corresponding with the Local Limited Partnerships. Due to the uncertainty of the collection of these fees, the Partnership recognizes reporting fees as collections are made.

13F-11

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.

(A California Limited Partnership)

NOTES TO ~~CONDENSED~~ FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -– CONTINUED

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012

(Unaudited)

NOTE 2 - INVESTMENTS IN LOCAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS

As of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012 and March 31, ~~2011~~2012, the Partnership owns Local Limited Partnership interests in 63 and 186 Local Limited Partnerships, respectively. ~~Each~~ All of these Local Limited Partnership’s own one Housing Complex consisting of an aggregate of ~~244~~124 and ~~505~~244 apartment units, respectively. The Local General Partners of the Local Limited Partnerships manage the day to day operations of the entities. Significant Local Limited Partnership business decisions require approval from the Partnership. The Partnership, as a Limited Partner, is generally entitled to 99%, as specified in the Local Limited Partnership governing agreements, of the operating profits and losses, taxable income and losses, and tax credits of the Local Limited Partnerships.

Selected financial information for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 from the unaudited combined condensed financial statements of the Local Limited Partnerships in which the Partnership has invested is as follows:

COMBINED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	2011			2010
	2012			2011
Revenues	$	1177,~~475,~~000		$	2564,~~205,~~000
Expenses
Interest expense		~~156~~17,000			~~255~~60,000
Depreciation and amortization		~~302~~38,000			~~438~~112,000
Operating expenses		1127,~~153,~~000			1452,~~777,~~000
Total expenses		1182,~~611,~~000			2624,~~470,~~000
Net loss	$	(~~136~~5,000	)	$	(~~265~~60,000	)
Net loss allocable to the Partnership	$	(~~135~~4,000	)	$	(~~262~~59,000	)
Net loss recorded by the Partnership	$	-		$	-

Certain Local Limited Partnerships have incurred significant operating losses and/or have working capital deficiencies. In the event these Local Limited Partnerships continue to incur significant operating losses, additional capital contributions by the Partnership may be required to sustain operations of such Local Limited Partnerships.

14F-12

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.

(A California Limited Partnership)

NOTES TO ~~CONDENSED~~ FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -– CONTINUED

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership has paid or is obligated to the General Partner or its affiliates the following fees:

(a) An annual asset management fee equal to 0.5% of the invested assets of the Partnership, as defined. “Invested Assets” means the sum of the Partnership’s investment in Local Limited Partnership interests and the Partnership’s ~~allocable~~Allocable share of mortgage loans on and other debts related to the Housing Complexes owned by such Local Limited Partnerships. ~~Asset~~Fees ~~management fees~~ of $5010,~~721~~169 and $7920,~~947~~203 were incurred during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, respectively. The Partnership paid the General Partner and /or its affiliates $6935,~~854~~246 and $528,~~000~~063 of those fees during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, respectively.

(b) The Partnership reimburses the General Partner or its affiliates for operating expenses incurred by the Partnership and paid for by the General Partner or its affiliates on behalf of the Partnership. Operating expense reimbursements ~~were~~was $8623,~~000~~104 and $5260,000 during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, respectively.

(c) A subordinated disposition fee in an amount equal to 1% of the sale price may be received in connection with the sale or disposition of a Housing Complex or Local Limited Partnership interest. Payment of this fee is subordinated to the Limited Partners receiving a preferred return of 6% (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) and is payable only if the General Partner or its affiliates render services in the sales effort. No such fee was incurred for ~~period~~the periods presented.

The accrued fees and expenses due to the General Partner and affiliates consist of the following at:

	December 31, 2011		March 31, 2011
	June 30, 2012		March 31, 2012
Expenses paid by the General Partner or affiliates on behalf of the Partnership	$	3217,~~631~~880	$	5820,~~406~~985
Accrued asset management fees		2,~~495~~482,~~567~~776		2,~~514~~507,~~701~~853
Total	$	2,~~528~~500,~~198~~656	$	2,~~573~~528,~~107~~838

The General Partner and/or its affiliates do not anticipate that these accrued fees will be paid until such time as capital reserves are in excess of future foreseeable working capital requirements of the Partnership.

15NOTE 4 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to June 30, 2012, the Local Limited ~~Item~~Partnership 2Interest in Arizona I, L. ~~Management's~~P. ~~Discussion~~(“Arizona”) was identified to be sold to an affiliate of the Local General Partner. The buyer offered $25,000 to purchase the Local Limited Partnership Interest. Arizona I was appraised for $785,000 and ~~Analysis~~had a mortgage note balance of ~~Financial~~$1,412,689 ~~Condition~~as of June 30, 2012. The Partnership has incurred $3,000 in sales related expenses which will be netted against the proceeds from calculating the gain on sale. The Partnership will use all of the cash proceeds to pay the remaining accrued asset management fees. The Partnership’s investment balance is zero; therefore a gain of $22,000 will be recorded during the respective period. No cash distribution will be made to the Limited Partners as a result of this sale. The Compliance Period has been completed therefore there is no risk of recapture and ~~Results~~investor approval is not required. The sale of ~~Operations~~the Local Limited Partnership is expected to close on August 31, 2012.

~~Forward~~F-~~Looking Statements~~13

~~With~~WNC ~~the~~HOUSING ~~exception~~TAX ofCREDIT ~~the~~FUND ~~discussion regarding historical information~~II, ~~this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and other discussions elsewhere in this Form 10-Q contain forward looking statements~~L. Such statements are based on current expectations subject to uncertainties and other factors which may involve known and unknown risks that could cause actual results of operations to differ materially from those projected or impliedP. ~~Further, certain forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions about future events which may not prove to be accurate.~~

~~Risks~~(A ~~and~~California ~~uncertainties~~Limited ~~inherent in forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, the~~ Partnership’s future cash flows and ability to obtain sufficient financing, level of operating expenses, conditions in the Low Income Housing Tax Credit property market and the economy in general, as well as legal proceedings. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for any future period.)

~~Subsequent~~NOTES ~~written~~TO ~~and~~FINANCIAL ~~oral~~STATEMENTS ~~forward~~– looking statements attributable to the Partnership or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by cautionary statements in this Form 10-Q and in other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.CONTINUED

~~The~~For ~~following discussion and analysis compares~~ the ~~results~~Quarterly ofPeriod ~~operations~~Ended ~~for~~June ~~the three and nine months ended December 31~~30, ~~2011 and 2010, and should be read in conjunction with the condensed unaudited condensed financial statements and accompanying notes included within this report.~~2012

~~Financial Condition~~(Unaudited)

~~The~~NOTE ~~Partnership’s~~4 ~~assets~~– SUBSEQUENT ~~at December 31~~EVENTS, ~~2011 consisted of $76,000 in cash and other assets of $19,000. Liabilities at December 31, 2011 consisted of $2,528,000 of accrued fees and expenses due to the General Partner and affiliates.~~continued

~~Results~~Subsequent to June 30, 2012, the Local Limited Partnership Interest in Casa Alegre Apartments (“Casa Alegre”) was identified to be sold to an affiliate of ~~Operations~~the Local General Partner. The buyer offered $25,000 to purchase the Local Limited Partnership Interest. Casa Alegre was appraised for $925,000 and had a mortgage note balance of $1,206,354 as of December 31, 2011. The partnership has incurred $12,900 in sales related expenses which will be netted against the proceeds from calculating the gain on sale. The Partnership will use all cash proceeds to pay accrued asset management fees and reimburse the General Partner or affiliates for operating expenses paid on its behalf. The Partnership’s investment balance is zero. No cash distribution will be made to the Limited Partners as a result of this sale. The Compliance Period has been completed therefore there is no risk of recapture and investor approval is not required. The sale of the Local Limited Partnership is expected to close on August 31, 2012.

Three Months Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to the Three Months Ended December 31, 2010. The Partnership’s net income for the three months ended December 31, 2011 was $64,000, reflecting an increase of $51,000 from the $13,000 net income during the three months ended December 31, 2010. The increase in income was due to a $36,000 increase in gain on sale of Local Limited Partnerships for the three months ended December 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended December 31, 2010. The gain on sale of Local Limited Partnerships will vary from period to period depending on the values and sales prices of the Housing Complexes that have been identified for disposition and the closing dates of such transactions. There was a $13,000 decrease in asset management fees for the three months ended December 31, 2011. The fees are calculated based on the value of invested assets, which decreased due to the sales of Local Limited Partnerships.F-14

~~Nine~~Item ~~Months Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010~~2. ~~The Partnership~~Management’s ~~net~~Discussion income for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 was $45,000 reflecting an increase of approximately $59,000 from the ($14,000) net loss experienced during the nine months ended December 31, 2010. The increase in income was partially due to a $42,000 increase in gain on sale of Local Limited Partnerships for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 compared to the nine months ended December 31, 2010. The gain on sale of Local Limited Partnerships will vary from period to period depending on the values and ~~sales~~Analysis ~~prices~~ of ~~the~~Financial ~~Housing~~Condition ~~Complexes that have been identified for disposition~~ and ~~the~~Results ~~closing dates~~ of such transactions. There was a $29,000 decrease in asset management fees for the nine months ended December 31, 2011. The fees are calculated based on the value of invested assets, which decreased due to the sales of Local Limited Partnerships. In addition, the legal and accounting fees decreased by $2,000 for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 due to the timing of accounting work performed for the Partnership. There was a $(9,000) increase in other expenses for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 due to the fact that the Partnership outsourced a portion of the data entry management to increase efficiency. Reporting fees decreased by $6,000 compared to the nine months ended December 31, 2010. Those fees fluctuate from year to year due to the fact that Local Limited Partnerships pay those fees to the Partnership when the Local Limited Partnerships’ cash flow will allow for the payment.Operations

16Forward-Looking Statements

With the exception of the discussion regarding ~~Item~~historical 2. information, this “Management'’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and other discussions elsewhere in this Form 10-Q contain forward looking statements. Such statements are based on current expectations subject to uncertainties and other factors which may involve known and unknown risks that could cause actual results of operations to differ materially from those projected or implied. Further, ~~continued~~certain forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions about future events which may not prove to be accurate.

~~Liquidity~~Risks and ~~Capital~~uncertainties ~~Resources~~inherent in forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, the Partnership’s future cash flows and ability to obtain sufficient financing, level of operating expenses, conditions in the Low Income Housing Tax Credit property market and the economy in general, as well as legal proceedings. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for any future period.

~~Nine~~Subsequent ~~Months~~written ~~Ended~~and ~~December~~oral ~~31,~~forward ~~2011~~looking statements ~~Compared~~attributable to ~~Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010. The net increase in cash during~~ the nine months ended December 31, 2011 was $32,000 compared to a net increase in cash during the nine months ended December 31, 2010 of $49,000. The change is partially due to the fact that during the nine months ended December 31, 2011, the Partnership ~~received~~or ~~$192,000~~persons inacting ~~cash~~on ~~proceeds~~its ~~from~~behalf ~~the~~are ~~sale~~expressly ofqualified ~~six Local Limited Partnerships compared to $94,000~~ in ~~proceeds~~their ~~received~~entirety ~~on sales during the nine months ended December 31, 2010. The reporting fees decreased~~ by ~~($6,000) during the nine months ended December 31,~~cautionary ~~2011~~statements ~~compared to the nine months ended December 31, 2010 as explained above. During the nine months ended December 31, 2011 the Partnership paid the General Partner or an affiliate $156,000~~ in ~~accrued~~this ~~asset~~Form ~~management~~10-Q ~~fees~~ and ~~reimbursements~~in ofother ~~operating~~reports ~~expenses~~filed ~~that~~with ~~were paid on~~ the ~~Partnership’s~~Securities ~~behalf~~and ~~compared~~Exchange ~~to $57,000 paid during the nine months ended December 31, 2010~~Commission. ~~The amount paid varies depending on the cash that the Partnership collected throughout the period.~~

~~During~~The ~~the~~following ~~nine~~discussion ~~months~~and ~~ended~~analysis ~~December~~compares the ~~31,~~results ~~2011, accrued payables, which consist primarily~~ of ~~related~~operations ~~party~~for ~~asset~~the ~~management~~three ~~fees~~months ~~and~~ended ~~advances~~June ~~due to the General Partner~~30, ~~decreased~~2012 byand ~~$45~~2011,~~000.~~ ~~The~~and ~~General~~should ~~Partner~~be ~~does~~read ~~not~~in ~~anticipate~~conjunction ~~that~~with the ~~balance~~condensed unaudited offinancial ~~the~~statements ~~accrued fees~~ and ~~advances~~accompanying ~~will~~notes beincluded ~~paid~~within ~~until~~this ~~such time as capital reserves are in excess of foreseeable working capital requirements of the Partnership~~report.

~~The~~Financial Partnership expects its future cash flows, together with its net available assets as of December 31, 2011, to be insufficient to meet all currently foreseeable future cash requirements. Associates have agreed to continue providing advances sufficient enough to fund the operations and working capital requirements of the Partnership through February 28, 2013.Condition

~~Recent~~The ~~Accounting~~Partnership’s assets ~~Changes~~at June 30, 2012 consisted of $64,000 in cash and $9,000 in due from affiliate. Liabilities at June 30, 2012 consisted of $2,501,000 of accrued fees and expenses due to the General Partner and affiliates.

InResults September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued accounting guidance for Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and shall be applied prospectively except for very limited transactions. In February 2008, the FASB delayed for one year implementation of the guidance as it pertains to certain non-financial assets and liabilities. The Partnership adopted GAAP for Fair Value Measurements effective April 1, 2008, except as it applies to those non-financial assets and liabilities, for which the effective date was April 1, 2009. The Partnership has determined that adoption of this guidance had no material impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.Operations

InThree ~~November~~Months ~~2008,~~Ended ~~the~~June ~~FASB~~30, ~~issued~~2012 ~~accounting~~Compared to ~~guidance~~Three onMonths ~~Equity~~Ended ~~Method~~June ~~Investment~~30, ~~Accounting~~2011. ~~Considerations~~The ~~that~~Partnership’s ~~addresses~~net ~~how~~income for the ~~initial~~three ~~carrying~~months ~~value~~ended ofJune an30, ~~equity~~2012 ~~method~~was ~~investment~~$18,000, reflecting ~~should~~an beincrease ~~determined~~of $29,000 ~~how~~from anthe ~~impairment~~loss ~~assessment~~recorded offor anthe ~~underlying~~three ~~indefinite-lived~~months ~~intangible~~ended ~~asset~~June 30, 2011 of an$(11,000). ~~equity~~The ~~method~~increase ~~investment~~in net ~~should~~income bewas ~~performed,~~primarily ~~how~~due to an ~~equity~~increase ~~method~~of ~~investee’s~~$17,000 ~~issuance~~in gain on sale of ~~shares~~Local ~~should~~Limited bePartnerships ~~accounted~~recorded ~~for~~during the three months ended June 30, ~~and~~2012 ~~how~~compared to ~~account~~the ~~for~~three amonths ~~change~~ended inJune an30, ~~investment~~2011. ~~from~~The gains recorded by the ~~equity~~Partnership ~~method~~can tovary depending on the ~~cost~~sales ~~method.~~prices ~~This~~and ~~guidance~~values isof ~~effective~~the inHousing ~~fiscal~~Complexes ~~years~~that ~~beginning~~are onbeing orsold. ~~after~~In ~~December 15~~addition, ~~2008,~~ the legal and ~~interim~~accounting ~~periods~~expenses ~~within~~decreased by ~~those~~$11,000 ~~fiscal~~during ~~years~~the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 2011. The ~~Partnership~~legal ~~adopted~~and accounting expenses can vary depending on the ~~guidance~~timing of the accounting work performed. The asset management fees decreased by $10,000 for the three months ended June 30, ~~interim~~2012 ~~quarterly~~due ~~period~~to ~~beginning~~the ~~April~~fact 1that the fees are calculated based on the value of the invested assets, ~~2009.~~which ~~The~~decreased ~~impact~~due to the sale of Local ~~adopting~~Limited itPartnership ~~did~~Interests. ~~not~~There ~~have~~was a ~~material~~$(9,000) ~~impact~~increase onin write off of other assets for the ~~Partnership’s~~three ~~financial~~months ~~condition~~ended orJune 30, ~~results~~2012. Capitalized costs from the potential dispositions of ~~operations~~Local Limited Partnerships were expensed due to the length of time it has taken to dispose of the properties.

InLiquidity ~~April 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance for Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. This requires disclosure about the method~~ and ~~significant~~Capital Resources assumptions used to establish the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods as well as annual statements. It became effective for as of and for the interim period ended June 30, 2009 and had no impact on the Partnership’s financial condition or results of operations.

17Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2011. The net change in cash during the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $0 compared to a net decrease in cash for the three months ended June 30, 2011 of $20,000. The change is due partially to the fact that during the three months ended June 30, 2012 the Partnership received no sales proceeds from the dispositions of Local Limited Partnership Interests compared to proceeds of $68,000 received during the three months ended June 30, 2011. During the three months ended June 30, 2011 the Partnership paid $(28,000) of accrued asset management fees to the General Partners or its affiliates along with $(60,000) paid to the General Partner for reimbursements of expenses paid on behalf of the Partnership, compared to no such cash payments during the three months ended June 30, 2012.

~~Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued~~3

InItem ~~May 2009, the FASB issued guidance regarding subsequent events, which was subsequently updated in February 2010~~2. ~~This~~Management’s ~~guidance~~Discussion ~~established~~and ~~general~~Analysis ~~standards~~ of ~~accounting~~Financial ~~for~~Condition and ~~disclosure~~Results of ~~events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular~~Operations, this guidance sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This guidance was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, and was therefore adopted by the Partnership for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption did not have a significant impact on the subsequent events that the Partnership reports, either through recognition or disclosure, in the financial statements. In February 2010, the FASB amended its guidance on subsequent events to remove the requirement to disclose the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events, alleviating conflicts with current SEC guidance. This amendment was effective immediately and therefore the Partnership did not include the disclosure in this Form 10-Q.continued

~~In June 2009,~~ During the ~~FASB~~three ~~issued~~months anended ~~amendment~~June to30, ~~the~~2012, ~~accounting~~accrued ~~and~~payables, ~~disclosure~~which ~~requirements~~consist ~~for~~primarily ~~the consolidation~~ of ~~variable~~related ~~interest~~party ~~entities~~asset ~~(VIEs). The~~management ~~amended~~fees ~~guidance~~and ~~modified~~advances due ~~the consolidation model~~ to ~~one~~the ~~based~~General ~~on control and economics~~Partner, ~~and~~decreased ~~replaced~~by ~~quantitative primary beneficiary analysis with a qualitative analysis~~$28,000. The ~~primary~~General ~~beneficiary~~Partner ofdoes anot ~~VIE~~anticipate ~~will be the entity~~ that ~~has~~these ~~(1) the~~accrued ~~power~~fees ~~to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance~~ and ~~(2) the~~advances will ~~obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially~~ be ~~significant~~paid tountil ~~the VIE. If multiple unrelated parties share~~ such ~~power,~~time as ~~defined,~~capital ~~no party~~reserves ~~will~~are bein ~~required~~excess ~~to consolidate the VIE. Further, the amended guidance requires continual reconsideration~~ of ~~the~~foreseeable ~~primary~~working ~~beneficiary~~capital ofrequirements ~~a VIE and adds an additional reconsideration event for determination~~ of ~~whether an entity is a VIE. Additionally,~~ the amendment requires enhanced and expanded disclosures around VIEs. This amendment was effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance on April 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on the Partnership~~’s financial statements~~.

InThe ~~June~~Partnership ~~2009,~~expects ~~the~~its ~~FASB~~future ~~issued~~cash ~~the Accounting Standards Codification (Codification). Effective July 1~~flows, together ~~2009,~~with ~~the~~its ~~Codification~~net isavailable ~~the~~assets ~~single~~as ~~source~~ of ~~authoritative~~June ~~accounting~~30, ~~principles~~2012, ~~recognized by the FASB~~ to be ~~applied~~insufficient byto ~~non-governmental~~meet ~~entities~~all incurrently ~~the~~foreseeable ~~preparation~~future ofcash ~~financial statements in conformity with GAAP~~requirements. ~~The~~ Associates ~~Codification~~has isagreed ~~intended~~ to ~~reorganize,~~continue ~~rather~~providing ~~than~~advances ~~change,~~sufficient ~~existing~~enough ~~GAAP. Accordingly, all references~~ to ~~currently~~fund ~~existing~~the ~~GAAP~~operations ~~have been removed~~ and ~~have~~working ~~been~~capital ~~replaced with plain English explanations~~ requirements of the Partnership’s ~~accounting~~through ~~policies. The~~August ~~adoption~~31, ~~of the Codification did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial position or results of operations~~2013.

18Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

~~Item~~In 3June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an amendment to the accounting and disclosure requirements for the consolidation of variable interest entities (VIEs). ~~Quantitative~~ The amended guidance modified the consolidation model to one based on control and ~~Qualitative~~economics, ~~Disclosures~~and ~~About~~replaced quantitative ~~Market~~primary ~~Risks~~beneficiary analysis with a qualitative analysis. The primary beneficiary of a VIE will be the entity that has (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. If multiple unrelated parties share such power, as defined, no party will be required to consolidate the VIE. Further, the amended guidance requires continual reconsideration of the primary beneficiary of a VIE and adds an additional reconsideration event for determination of whether an entity is a VIE. Additionally, the amendment requires enhanced and expanded disclosures around VIEs. This amendment was effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance on April 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on the Partnership’s financial statements.

~~NOT~~In ~~APPLICABLE~~May 2011, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance related to fair value measurements on how to measure fair value and what disclosures to provide about fair value measurements. For fair value measurements categorized as level 3, a reporting entity should disclose quantitative information of the unobservable inputs and assumptions, a description of the valuation processes and narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value to changes in unobservable inputs. This update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this update did not materially affect the Partnership’s condensed financial statements.

Item 43. ~~Controls~~ Quantitative and ~~Procedures~~Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks

~~(a) Disclosure~~NOT ~~controls and procedures~~APPLICABLE

AsItem of the end of the period covered by this report, the Partnership’s General Partner, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Associates, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Partnership’s “disclosure controls and procedures” as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15 and 15d-154. ~~Based~~Controls ~~on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer~~ and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that material information required to be disclosed in the Partnership’s periodic report filings with SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified by the SEC’s rules and forms, consistent with the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Procedures

~~The~~(a) ~~Partnership~~Disclosure ~~must~~controls rely on the Local Limited Partnerships to provide the Partnership with certain information necessary to the timely filing of the Partnership’s periodic reports. Factors in the accounting at the Local Limited Partnerships have caused delays in the provision of such information during past reporting periods, and ~~resulted in the Partnership’s inability to file its periodic reports in a timely manner.~~procedures

~~Once~~As of the ~~Partnership~~end ~~has~~of ~~received~~ the ~~necessary~~period ~~information~~covered by ~~from~~this report, the ~~Local~~Partnership’s ~~Limited~~General ~~Partnerships~~Partner, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and ~~the~~ Chief Financial Officer of Associates, ~~believe~~carried ~~that~~out ~~the~~an ~~material~~evaluation ~~information~~of ~~required~~the toeffectiveness beof ~~disclosed in~~ the Partnership’s ~~periodic~~“disclosure controls ~~report~~and ~~filings~~procedures” ~~with~~as ~~SEC~~defined isin ~~effectively~~Securities ~~recorded,~~Exchange ~~processed,~~Act ~~summarized~~of 1934 Rule 13a-15 and ~~reported~~15d-15. Based on that evaluation, the ~~albeit~~Chief ~~not~~Executive inOfficer aand ~~timely~~Chief ~~manner.~~Financial ~~Going~~Officer ~~forward~~have concluded that, as of the ~~Partnership~~end ~~will~~of ~~use~~the period covered by this report, the ~~means~~Partnership’s ~~reasonably~~disclosure ~~within~~controls ~~its~~and ~~power~~procedures were not effective to ~~impose~~ensure ~~procedures~~that ~~designed~~material information required to ~~obtain~~be disclosed ~~from~~in the ~~Local~~Partnership’s ~~Limited~~periodic ~~Partnerships~~report ~~the~~filings ~~information~~with ~~necessary~~SEC tois recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time ~~timely~~period ~~filing~~specified ofby the ~~Partnership~~SEC’s ~~periodic~~rules ~~reports~~and forms, consistent with the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

~~(b) Changes in internal controls~~4

~~There~~Item ~~were~~4. noControls ~~changes~~and ~~in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31~~Procedures, ~~2011 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.~~continued

19The Partnership must rely on the Local Limited Partnerships to provide the Partnership with certain information necessary to the timely filing of the Partnership’s periodic reports. Factors in the accounting at the Local Limited Partnerships have caused delays in the provision of such information during past reporting periods, and resulted in the Partnership’s inability to file its periodic reports in a timely manner.

~~PART~~Once IIthe -Partnership ~~OTHER~~has ~~INFORMATION~~received the necessary information from the Local Limited Partnerships, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Associates believe that the material information required to be disclosed in the Partnership’s periodic report filings with SEC is effectively recorded, processed, summarized and reported, albeit not in a timely manner. Going forward, the Partnership will use the means reasonably within its power to impose procedures designed to obtain from the Local Limited Partnerships the information necessary to the timely filing of the Partnership’s periodic reports.

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings
	NONE
Item 1A.	Risk Factors
	No material changes in risk factors as previously disclosed in the Partnership’s Form 10-K.
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
	NONE
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities
	NONE
Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)
Item 5.	Other Information
	NONE
Item 6.	Exhibits

(b)

Changes in internal controls

	31.1	Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (filed herewith)
	31.2	Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (filed herewith)
	32.1	Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. (filed herewith)
	32.2	Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. (filed herewith)
	101	Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and (iv) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

There were no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

~~Exhibits~~Part 32II.1, Other 32.2 and 101 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Such exhibits shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Information

20Item 1. Legal Proceedings

~~SIGNATURES~~NONE

~~Pursuant~~Item to1A. ~~the~~Risk ~~requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.~~Factors

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.
By: WNC Financial Group, L.P. General Partner of the Registrant
By:	/s/ Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
	Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
	President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
Date: February 10, 2012
By:	/s/ Melanie R. Wenk
	Melanie R. Wenk
	Vice-President - Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
Date: February 10, 2012

No material changes in risk factors as previously disclosed in the Partnership’s Form 10-K.

21Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

NONE

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

NONE

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

NOT APPLICABLE

Item 5. Other Information

NONE

Item 6. Exhibits

31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (filed herewith)

31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (filed herewith)

32.1		Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. (filed herewith)

32.2		Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. (filed herewith)

101		Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Condensed Balance Sheets at June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, (ii) the Condensed Statements of Operations for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, (iii) the Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 and (iv) the Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.

		Exhibits 32.1, 32.2 and 101 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Such exhibits shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.

By: WNC Financial Group, L.P.	General Partner of Registrant

By: WNC & Associates, Inc.	General Partner of WNC Financial Group, L.P.

By:	/s/ Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.

Date: August 10, 2012

By:	/s/ Melanie R. Wenk
Melanie R. Wenk
Vice President – Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.

Date:	August 10, 2012

Filing Compare · WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND II LP