UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2013~~2014

¨ [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________ to __________

Commission file number: 333-178472

TRIO RESOURCES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		99-0369568
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

100 King Street West, Suite 5600 Toronto, ON		M5X 1C9
(Address of principal executive officers)		(Zip Code)

+416-409-2802

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days. YES [ ] NO [X]

~~YES~~Indicate ~~¨ NO~~by xcheck mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). The website of the Company is www.trioresources.com. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).. The website of the Company is www.trioresources.com.

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer ¨[ ] Accelerated filer ¨[ ] Non-accelerated filer ¨[ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company x[X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ~~¨ No~~[ ] xNo [X]

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 339,162,500 as of ~~February~~July 1917, 2014.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1	Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements	3
Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013	4
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	4
	Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss	5
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	10
	Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit	6
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	10
	Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Cash Flows	7
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements	8
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	21
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	25
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	25
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1	Legal Proceedings	26
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	11
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	2612
Item 3	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	26
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	12
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	26
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	12
Item 5	Other Information	26
Item 5.	Other Information	12
Item 6	Exhibits	27
Item 6.	Exhibits	12
	Signatures	2713

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

Trio Resources, Inc.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INDEX

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013 (unaudited)	4
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as at March 31, 2014 and September 30, 2013 (unaudited)	F-1
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the period from May 16, 2012 (inception) to December 31, 2013 (unaudited)	5
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)	F-2
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit for the period from May 16, 2012 (inception) to December 31, 2013 (unaudited)	6
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the six months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 and for the period from May 16, 2012 (inception) to March 31, 2014 (unaudited)	F-3
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the period from May 16, 2012 (inception) to December 31, 2013 (unaudited)	7
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit for the period from May 16, 2012 (inception) to March 31, 2014 (unaudited)	F-4
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (unaudited)	8 - 20
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 and for the period from May 16, 2012 (inception) to March 31, 2014 (unaudited)	F-5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (unaudited)	F-6 - F-22

Trio Resources, Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company)

~~(An~~Condensed Consolidated ~~Exploration~~Balance ~~Stage~~Sheets ~~Company)~~As At

~~Condensed~~Expressed in ~~Consolidated~~US Dollars

~~Balance Sheets~~(Unaudited)

Expressed in US Dollars

	March 31, 2014			September 30, 2013
	$			$
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash		—			—
Prepaid expenses and other receivables		80,463			122,930
Total current assets		80,463			122,930

Loan receivable - related party		61,215			65,673
Patented claims (Note 3)		9,228			9,900
Property and equipment (Note 3)		219,577			238,876
TOTAL ASSETS		370,483			437,379

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Bank indebtedness		62			10,830
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		772,117			763,775
Loans payable (Note 7)		438,350			257,399
Convertible notes payable (Note 10)		924,187			482,655
Convertible draw down loan payable (Note 8)		425,000			—
Total current liabilities		2,559,716			1,514,659

Convertible draw down loan payable (Note 8)		—			425,000
Convertible note payable - related party (Note 9)		405,560			384,899
Convertible notes payable (Note 10)		1,541			483,708
Derivative liabilities (Note 11)		103,457			—
TOTAL LIABILITIES		3,070,274			2,808,266

STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
Authorized:
400,000,000 common stock, no par value
Issued and outstanding:
339,162,500 common stock as at March 31, 2014 (September 30, 2013 : 338,650,000 common stock) - (Note 4)		339,163			338,650
Excess of purchase price over net asset value (Notes 6 and 9)		(299,105	)		(299,105	)
Additional paid-in capital		320,763			312,683
Accumulated other comprehensive income		170,318			23,159
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage		(3,230,930	)		(2,746,274	)
Total stockholders’ deficiency		(2,699,791	)		(2,370,887	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY		370,483			437,379

~~(Unaudited)~~See accompanying notes

	As at			As at
	December 31,			September 30,
	2013			2013
	$			$
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash		2,140			—
Prepaid expenses and other receivables (Note 4)		104,117			122,930
Total current assets		106,257			122,930
Loan receivable - related party		63,617			65,673
Patented claims (Notes 3)		9,590			9,900
Property and equipment (Note 3)		230,218			238,876
TOTAL ASSETS		409,682			437,379
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Bank indebtedness		—			10,830
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		704,865			763,775
Loans payable (Note 7)		432,705			257,399
Convertible notes payable (Note 10)		946,910			482,655
Convertible draw down loan payable (Note 8)		425,000			—
Total current liabilities		2,509,480			1,514,659
Convertible draw down loan payable (Note 8)		—			425,000
Convertible note payable - related party (Note 9)		397,160			384,899
Convertible notes payable (Note 10)		676			483,708
Derivative liabilities (Note 11)		69,917			—
TOTAL LIABILITIES		2,977,233			2,808,266
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
Authorized:
400,000,000 common stock, no par value
Issued and outstanding:
339,162,500 common stock as at December 31, 2013 (September 30, 2013 : 338,650,000 common stock) - (Note 4)		339,163			338,650
Excess of purchase price over net asset value (Notes 6 and 9)		(299,105	)		(299,105	)
Additional paid-in capital		320,763			312,683
Accumulated other comprehensive income		88,548			23,159
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage		(3,016,920	)		(2,746,274	)
Total stockholders' deficiency		(2,567,551	)		(2,370,887	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY		409,682			437,379

F-1

~~See accompanying~~Trio ~~notes~~Resources, Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company)

4Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

~~Trio~~Expressed in ~~Resources,~~US ~~Inc.~~Dollars

(~~An Exploration Stage Company~~Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidated Interim

	Three Months Ended			Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014			March 31, 2013
	$			$
REVENUE		—			166,299

EXPENSES
Corporate expenses		139,266			510,649
Exploration and development costs		—			85,518
Interest expense		68,713			56,411
Changes in fair value of derivative liabilities (Note 12)		4,080			—
Depreciation		1,951			3,686
Total expenses		214,010			656,264

Net loss for the period before income taxes		(214,010	)		(489,965	)

Income taxes		—			—
NET LOSS FOR THE PERIOD		(214,010	)		(489,965	)

Foreign currency translation adjustment		81,770			25,751

COMPREHENSIVE LOSS		(132,240	)		(464,214	)

Loss per share, basic and diluted		(0.0004	)		(0.0014	)

Weighted average number of common stock outstanding, basic and diluted		339,162,500			338,643,889

~~Statements~~See ofaccompanying ~~Operations and Comprehensive Loss~~notes

~~Expressed in US Dollars~~F-2

Trio Resources, Inc. (~~Unaudited~~An Exploration Stage Company)

	Three Months			Three Months			Cumulative from
	Ended December 31,			Ended December 31,			May 16, 2012
	2013			2012			(inception) to
							December 31, 2013
	$			$			$
REVENUE		—			—			219,385
EXPENSES
Corporate expenses		164,382			567,098			2,148,604
Exploration and development costs		21,775			66,217			467,605
Interest expense		69,179			50,150			309,908
Change in fair value of derivative liability (Note 11)		13,259			—			13,259
Depreciation		2,051			3,336			19,895
Total expenses		270,646			686,801			2,959,271
Net loss for the period before income taxes		(270,646	)		(686,801	)		(2,739,886	)
Income taxes		—			—			—
NET LOSS FOR THE PERIOD		(270,646	)		(686,801	)		(2,739,886	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		65,389			(12,881	)		88,548
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS		(205,257	)		(699,682	)		(2,651,338	)
Loss per share, basic and diluted		(0.0006	)		(0.0026	)
Weighted average number of
common stock outstanding, basic and diluted		338,694,583			273,459,140

Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

~~See~~Expressed in ~~accompanying~~US ~~notes~~Dollars

5(Unaudited)

Trio Resources, Inc.

							Cumulative from
							May 16, 2012
	Six Months Ended			Six Months Ended			(inception) to
	March 31, 2014			March 31, 2013			March 31, 2014
	$			$			$
REVENUE		—			166,299			219,385

EXPENSES
Corporate expenses		303,648			1,077,747			2,287,870
Exploration and development costs		21,775			151,735			467,605
Interest expense		137,892			106,561			378,621
Changes in fair value of derivative liabilities (Note 12)		17,339			—			17,339
Depreciation		4,002			7,022			21,846
Total expenses		484,656			1,343,065			3,173,281

Net loss for the period before income taxes		(484,656	)		(1,176,766	)		(2,953,896	)

Income taxes		—			—			—
NET LOSS FOR THE PERIOD		(484,656	)		(1,176,766	)		(2,953,896	)

Foreign currency translation adjustment		147,159			12,870			170,318

COMPREHENSIVE LOSS		(337,497	)		(1,163,896	)		(2,783,578	)

Loss per share, basic and diluted		(0.0010	)		(0.0039	)

Weighted average number of common stock outstanding, basic and diluted		338,952,847			295,888,736

~~(An~~See ~~Exploration~~accompanying ~~Stage Company)~~notes

~~Condensed Consolidated Interim~~F-3

~~Statement~~Trio Resources, ofInc. ~~Stockholders’~~(An ~~Deficit~~Exploration Stage Company)

~~Expressed~~Condensed Consolidated inInterim USStatements ~~Dollars~~of Stockholders’ Deficit

~~(Unaudited)~~Expressed in US Dollars

	Common stock				Additional		Excess of			Accumulated			Deficit
	Shares		Amount		paid-in		purchase			other			accumulated			Total
					capital		price over			comprehensive			during the
							net aset			(loss) income			exploration
							value						stage
			$		$		$			$			$			$
May 16, 2012 (inception) issuance		213,000,000		213,000		—		—			—			(191,334	)		21,666
Excess of purchase price over net asset value		—		—		—		(299,105	)		—			—			(299,105	)
Cumulative translation adjustment		—		—		—		—			(10,296	)		—			(10,296	)
Loss for the period		—		—		—		—			—			(479,034	)		(479,034	)
As at September 30, 2012		213,000,000		213,000		—		(299,105	)		(10,296	)		(670,368	)		(766,769	)
Acquisition of Allied Technologies Group, Inc.		109,000,000		109,000		—		—			—			(85,700	)		23,300
Issuance of shares re: consulting agreement		16,650,000		16,650		312,683		—			—			—			329,333
Cumulative translation adjustment		—		—		—		—			33,455			—			33,455
Loss for the year		—		—		—		—			—			(1,990,206	)		(1,990,206	)
As at September 30, 2013		338,650,000		338,650		312,683		(299,105	)		23,159			(2,746,274	)		(2,370,887	)
Issuance of shares re: consulting agreement		512,500		513		8,080		—			—			—			8,593
Cumulative translation adjustment		—		—		—		—			65,389			—			65,389
Loss for the period		—		—		—		—			—			(270,646	)		(270,646	)
As at December 31, 2013		339,162,500		339,163		320,763		(299,105	)		88,548			(3,016,920	)		(2,567,551	)

(Unaudited)

Note 1: The former stock split for previously issued common shares resulted in negative Additional Paid-In Capital. This has been charged to Accumulated Deficit as an Appropriation of Capital. The stock split has been accounted for on a retrospective basis.

							Excess of						Deficit
							purchase			Accumulated			accumulated
					Additional		price over			other			during the
	Common stock				paid-in		net asset			comprehensive			exploration
	Shares		Amount		capital		value			(loss) income			stage			Total
			$		$		$			$			$			$
May 16, 2012 (inception) issuance		213,000,000		213,000		—		—			—			(191,334	)		21,666

Excess of purchase price over net asset value		—		—		—		(299,105	)		—			—			(299,105	)

Cumulative translation adjustment		—		—		—		—			(10,296	)		—			(10,296	)

Loss for the period		—		—		—		—			—			(479,034	)		(479,034	)
As at September 30, 2012		213,000,000		213,000		—		(299,105	)		(10,296	)		(670,368	)		(766,769	)

Acquisition of Allied Technologies Group, Inc.		109,000,000		109,000		—		—			—			(85,700	)		23,300

Issuance of shares re: consulting agreement		16,650,000		16,650		312,683		—			—			—			329,333

Cumulative translation adjustment		—		—		—		—			33,455			—			33,455

Loss for the year		—		—		—		—			—			(1,990,206	)		(1,990,206	)
As at September 30, 2013		338,650,000		338,650		312,683		(299,105	)		23,159			(2,746,274	)		(2,370,887	)

Issuance of shares re: consulting agreement		512,500		513		8,080		—			—			—			8,593

Cumulative translation adjustment		—		—		—		—			147,159			—			147,159

Loss for the period		—		—		—		—			—			(484,656	)		(484,656	)
As at March 31, 2014		339,162,500		339,163		320,763		(299,105	)		170,318			(3,230,930	)		(2,699,791	)

~~See~~Note 1: ~~accompanying~~The ~~notes~~former stock split for previously issued common shares resulted in negative Additional Paid-In Capital. This has been charged to Accumulated Deficit as an Appropriation of Capital. The stock split has been accounted for on a retrospective basis.

6See accompanying notes

~~Trio Resources, Inc.~~F-4

Trio Resources, Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company)

Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Cash Flows

~~Interim~~Expressed in ~~Statements~~US ~~of Cash Flows~~Dollars

~~Expressed in US Dollars~~(Unaudited)

(Unaudited)

							Cumulative from
							May 16, 2012
	Six Months Ended			Six Months Ended			(inception) to
	March 31, 2014			March 31, 2013			March 31, 2014
	$			$			$
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss for the period		(484,656	)		(1,176,766	)		(2,953,896	)

Depreciation		4,002			7,022			21,846
Stock based payment for services		8,875			329,333			238,421
Accretion expense on convertible notes		44,095			41,293			145,950
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		17,339			—			17,339
Net change in non-cash working capital balances:
Prepaid expense and other assets		40,670			(379,073	)		17,007
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		30,311			468,137			805,010
Cash used in operating activities		(339,364	)		(710,054	)		(1,708,323	)

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase consideration (Note 6)		—			—			(99,510	)
Loan receivable - related party		—			2,220			(67,331	)
Purchase of Property and equipment		—			(12,337	)		(174,699	)
Cash used in investing activities		—			(10,117	)		(341,540	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
(Decrease) increase in bank indebtedness		(10,507	)		—			481
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		—			—			21,196
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes		67,500			689,089			1,054,261
Loans payable including draw down loan payable		233,407			10,335			925,726
Cash provided by financing activities		290,400			699,424			2,001,664

Net increase in cash during the period		(48,964	)		(20,747	)		(48,199	)
Effect of foreign currency translation		48,964			12,870			48,199
Cash, beginning of the period		—			8,086			—
Cash, end of period		—			209			—

Non cash financial activities (Note 6)
Increase in convertible note payable - related party		—			—			298,135
Non-cash investing and financing activities		—			—			(299,105	)
		—			—			(970	)

	Three Months			Three Months			Cumulative from
	Ended December 31,			Ended December 31,			May 16, 2012
	2013			2012			(inception) to
							December 31, 2013
	$			$			$
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss for the period		(270,646	)		(686,801	)		(2,739,886	)
Depreciation		2,051			3,336			19,895
Stock based payment for services		8,875			26,833			238,421
Accretion expense on convertible note - related party		24,642			22,483			126,497
Change in fair value of derivative liability		13,259			—			13,259
Net change in non-cash working capital balances:
Prepaid expense and other receivables		17,985			(71,422	)		(5,678	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(37,058	)		143,086			737,641
Cash used in operating activities		(240,892	)		(562,485	)		(1,609,851	)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase consideration (Note 6)		—			—			(99,510	)
Loan receivable - related party		—			—			(67,331	)
Purchase of Property and equipment		—			(11,681	)		(174,699	)
Cash used in investing activities		—			(11,681	)		(341,540	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
(Decrease) increase in bank indebtedness		(10,830	)		—			158
Issuance of common stock		—			—			21,196
Convertible notes payable		67,065			583,463			1,053,826
Loans payable including draw down loan payable		199,330			—			891,649
Cash provided by financing activities		255,565			583,463			1,966,829
Net increase in cash during the period		14,673			9,297			15,438
Effect of foreign currency translation		(12,533	)		(12,881	)		(13,298	)
Cash, beginning of the period		—			8,086			—
Cash, end of period		2,140			4,502			2,140
Non cash financial activities (Note 6)
Increase in convertible note payable - related party		—			—			298,135
Non-cash investing and financing activities		—			—			(299,105	)
		—			—			(970	)

See accompanying notes

~~See accompanying notes~~F-5

7Trio Resources, Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company)

~~Trio~~Notes to ~~Resources,~~the ~~Inc.~~Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~(An~~As ~~Exploration~~at March ~~Stage~~31, ~~Company)~~2014

~~Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim~~Expressed ~~Financial~~in ~~Statements~~US Dollars

~~(Unaudited)~~1. Organization, Nature of Business, Going Concern and Management Plans

~~Expressed~~Organization and inNature USof ~~Dollars~~Business

1Trio Resources, Inc. ~~Organization~~(“Trio Resources” or the “Company”), ~~Nature~~formerly ofAllied ~~Business~~Technologies Group, ~~Going~~Inc. ~~Concern~~(“Allied”), was ~~and~~incorporated ~~Management~~in ~~Plans~~the state of Nevada on September 22, 2011.

~~Organization~~On December 14, 2012, Allied entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with TrioResources AG Inc. (“Trio or TrioResources AG Inc.”), pursuant to which Trio Resources acquired 100% of the issued and ~~Nature~~outstanding equity securities of ~~Business~~Trio (the “Share Exchange”). As a result of the Share Exchange, Trio became the wholly-owned subsidiary of Trio Resources and the Trio shareholders became the controlling shareholders of Trio Resources, owning an aggregate of 66.15% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Trio Resources. The acquisition was accounted for as a recapitalization using accounting principles applicable to reverse acquisitions whereby the consolidated financial statements subsequent to the date of the acquisition are presented as a continuation of TrioResources AG Inc. Under reverse acquisition accounting TrioResources AG Inc. (legal subsidiary) will be treated as the accounting parent (acquirer) and Trio Resources, Inc. (legal parent) will be treated as the accounting subsidiary (acquiree). All outstanding shares have been restated to reflect the effect of the reverse acquisition, which includes one for one issuance of Trio Resources shares to the TrioResources AG Inc. shareholders.

~~Trio~~Under the ~~Resources~~terms of the Share Exchange, ~~Inc.~~the (“former sole director, officer, and principal shareholder of Trio Resources” or (the “~~Company~~Principal Shareholder”), ~~formerly~~cancelled ~~Allied~~all ~~Technologies Group~~1,500,000 ~~Inc.~~shares ~~(“Allied”)~~of common stock that he owned, ~~was~~which ~~incorporated in~~constituted 57.9% of the ~~state~~issued and outstanding shares of ~~Nevada~~common onstock ~~September~~prior ~~22,~~to ~~2011~~the Share Exchange.

On December 14, 2012, ~~Allied entered~~the ~~into~~Company filed a ~~share~~Certificate ~~exchange~~of ~~agreement~~Amendment of its Articles of Incorporation (the “~~Share~~Charter ~~Exchange Agreement~~Amendment”) with ~~TrioResources~~the AGSecretary ~~Inc.~~of ~~(“Trio~~State ~~or TrioResources~~of AGNevada ~~Inc.”), pursuant~~ to ~~which~~(1) ~~Trio~~change ~~Resources~~its ~~acquired~~name ~~100%~~from ofAllied ~~the~~Technologies ~~issued~~Group, ~~and~~Inc. ~~outstanding~~to ~~equity~~Trio ~~securities~~Resources, ~~of Trio~~Inc. (the “~~Share~~Name ~~Exchange~~Change”). Asand a(2) ~~result~~increase ofits ~~the~~total ~~Share~~authorized ~~Exchange,~~shares ~~Trio~~of ~~became~~common ~~the~~stock, ~~wholly-owned~~from ~~subsidiary~~75,000,000 ofshares ~~Trio~~to ~~Resources~~400,000,000 ~~and~~shares (the ~~Trio~~“Authorized ~~shareholders~~Share ~~became~~Increase”). ~~the~~Additionally, ~~controlling~~as ~~shareholders~~a ofcondition ~~Trio~~to ~~Resources,~~close ~~owning~~the anShare ~~aggregate~~Exchange, ~~of 66.15% of~~ the ~~issued and~~Company’s ~~outstanding~~Board ~~shares~~ of ~~common~~Directors ~~stock~~approved ofand ~~Trio~~authorized ~~Resources.~~the ~~The~~Company ~~acquisition was accounted for as a recapitalization using accounting principles applicable~~ to ~~reverse~~take ~~acquisitions whereby~~ the ~~consolidated~~necessary ~~financial~~steps ~~statements~~to ~~subsequent~~effect toa ~~the~~forward ~~date~~stock split of the ~~acquisition~~issued ~~are~~and ~~presented~~outstanding asshares ~~a continuation~~ of ~~TrioResources~~common AGstock, ~~Inc.~~such ~~Under~~that ~~reverse~~each ~~acquisition~~lot ~~accounting~~of ~~TrioResources~~one ~~AG Inc.~~ (~~legal subsidiary~~1) ~~will~~ beissued ~~treated as the accounting parent (acquirer)~~ and ~~Trio~~outstanding ~~Resources,~~share ~~Inc.~~of ~~(legal~~common ~~parent)~~stock ~~will~~shall be ~~treated~~automatically changed asand ~~the~~converted ~~accounting~~into ~~subsidiary~~ one hundred (~~acquiree~~100). ~~All outstanding~~ shares ~~have~~of ~~been~~common ~~restated~~stock, payable to ~~reflect~~all ~~the~~holders ~~effect~~of record of the ~~reverse~~common ~~acquisition,~~stock ~~which~~as ~~includes one for~~of ~~one~~December ~~issuance~~31, of2012 ~~Trio Resources shares to~~ (the ~~TrioResources~~“Forward AGStock ~~Inc~~Split”). ~~shareholders.~~

~~Under~~The Share ~~the~~Exchange ~~terms~~was ofaccounted ~~the~~for ~~Share Exchange,~~as ~~the~~a ~~former~~reverse ~~sole~~takeover/recapitalization ~~director,~~effected ~~officer,~~by ~~and~~a ~~principal~~share ~~shareholder~~exchange, ofwherein Trio ~~Resources~~is (considered the ~~“Principal~~acquirer ~~Shareholder”), cancelled~~for ~~all~~accounting ~~1,500,000~~and ~~shares~~financial reporting purposes. The effective date of ~~common~~the ~~stock~~Share ~~that~~Exchange heAgreement ~~owned,~~is ~~which~~December ~~constituted~~14, 2012 ~~57.9%~~and all of the ~~issued~~necessary ~~and~~accounting ~~outstanding~~adjustments ~~shares~~were offully ~~common stock~~reflected ~~prior~~in tothese ~~the~~unaudited ~~Share~~condensed ~~Exchange~~consolidated interim financial statements.

On December 14, 2012, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment of its Articles of Incorporation (the “Charter Amendment”) with the Secretary of State of Nevada to (1) change its name from Allied Technologies Group, Inc. to Trio Resources, Inc. (the “Name Change”) and (2) increase its total authorized shares of common stock, from 75,000,000 shares to 400,000,000 shares (the “Authorized Share Increase”). Additionally, as a condition to close the Share Exchange, the Company’s Board of Directors approved and authorized the Company to take the necessary steps to effect a forward stock split of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock, such that each lot of one (1) issued and outstanding share of common stock shall be automatically changed and converted into one hundred (100) shares of common stock, payable to all holders of record of the common stock as of December 31, 2012 (the “Forward Stock Split”).F-6

~~The Share Exchange was accounted~~Trio ~~for as a reverse takeover/recapitalization effected by a share exchange~~Resources, ~~wherein Trio is considered the acquirer for accounting and financial reporting purposes~~Inc. ~~The~~(An ~~effective~~Exploration ~~date~~Stage ~~of the Share Exchange Agreement is December 14, 2012 and all of the necessary accounting adjustments were fully reflected in these unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements.~~Company)

~~The Company is considered to~~Notes ~~be an exploration stage company as defined under U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Guide 7 (a) (4) (i) Description of Property by Issuers Engaged or~~ to ~~be Engaged in Significant Mining. The Company’s principal business is~~ the ~~exploration~~ ofCondensed ~~mineral~~Consolidated ~~resources~~Interim onFinancial ~~the~~Statements ~~Company’s existing property and any new properties it may acquire and processing of mineralized material on its property.~~(Unaudited)

~~Going~~As ~~Concern~~at March 31, 2014

The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. Since its inception on May 16, 2012 to December 31, 2013, the Company has not generated significant revenue. As at December 31, 2013, the Company has a working capital deficiency of $2,403,223 and has accumulated deficit during the exploration stage of $3,016,920. To date, the Company has not generated positive cash flows from operations and has primarily relied upon debt and equity financing from third parties and related parties to finance its operations. The Company anticipates that its future mill operations will generate positive cash flows Expressed in ~~fiscal~~US 2014 provided that it is successful in obtaining additional financing in the foreseeable future. The Company has negotiated a $500,000 Draw Down facility (Note 8) with Seagel Investments Corp. of which $425,000 has been drawn as at December 31, 2013. On November 27, 2013, the Company entered into a Draw Down Facility in the amount of $335,000 with a lender of which $50,000 has been obtained as at December 31, 2013.Dollars

81. Organization, Nature of Business, Going Concern and Management Plans (continued)

~~Trio~~The Company ~~Resources,~~is ~~Inc~~considered to be an exploration stage company as defined under U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Guide 7 (a) (4) (i) Description of Property by Issuers Engaged or to be Engaged in Significant Mining. The Company’s principal business is the exploration of mineral resources on the Company’s existing property and any new properties it may acquire and processing of mineralized material on its property.

~~(An Exploration Stage Company)~~Going Concern

~~Notes~~The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. Since its inception on May 16, 2012 to March 31, 2014, the ~~Condensed~~Company ~~Consolidated~~has ~~Interim~~not generated significant revenue. As at ~~Financial~~March ~~Statements~~31, 2014, the Company has a working capital deficiency of $2,479,253 and has accumulated deficit during the exploration stage of $3,230,930. To date, the Company has not generated positive cash flows from operations and has primarily relied upon debt and equity financing from third parties and related parties to finance its operations. The Company anticipates that its future mill operations will generate positive cash flows in fiscal 2015 provided that it is successful in obtaining additional financing in the foreseeable future. The Company has negotiated a $500,000 Draw Down facility (Note 8) with Seagel Investments Corp. of which $425,000 has been drawn as at March 31, 2014. On November 27, 2013, the Company entered into a draw down facility in the amount of $335,000 with a lender of which $75,000 has been obtained as at March 31, 2014. In addition, on July 3, 2014, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with accredited investors for the issuance of maximum of 25,000,000 shares at an offering price of $0.02 per share. As at the date of filing of this document, the Company raised $150,000 through the subscription for issuance of 7,500,000 shares pursuant to this subscription agreement.

~~(Unaudited)~~The Company is also pursuing additional financing. However, there can be no assurance that the additional financing shall be available on terms or conditions acceptable to the Company. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. No adjustment relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and the classification of liabilities has been made to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements, which could be material if the current business plan is not successful and when the Company is not able to continue as a going concern.

~~Expressed in US Dollars~~Acquisition

1On December 14, 2012, the Company completed a Share Exchange transaction pursuant to which it acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding equity securities of TrioResources AG Inc., ~~Organization~~which became its wholly owned subsidiary. Part of the consideration was a payment of $250,000, ~~Nature~~which was expensed during the previous year ended September 30, 2013, to Ihar Yaravenka, the former, sole officer, director and controlling shareholder for him to surrender and cancel 1,500,000 shares of ~~Business~~common stock of the Company. As at the close of the Share Exchange, ~~Going~~the ~~Concern~~Company had no assets or liabilities and ~~Management~~it ~~Plans~~was ~~(continued)~~a public shell company.

~~Going Concern (continued)~~F-7

~~The Company is also pursuing additional~~Trio ~~financing. However~~Resources, ~~there can be no assurance that the additional financing shall be available on terms or conditions acceptable to the Company~~Inc. ~~These~~(An ~~factors~~Exploration ~~raise~~Stage substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. No adjustment relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and the classification of liabilities has been made to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements, which could be material if the current business plan is not successful and when the Company ~~is not able to continue as a going concern.~~)

~~Acquisition~~Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (Unaudited)

On December 14, 2012, the Company completed a Share Exchange transaction pursuant to which it acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding equity securities of TrioResources AG Inc., which became its wholly owned subsidiary. Part of the consideration was a payment of $250,000, which was expensed during the year ended September 30, 2013, to Ihar Yaravenka, the former, sole officer, director and controlling shareholder for him to surrender and cancel 1,500,000 shares of common stock of the Company. As at March ~~the close of the Share Exchange~~31, ~~the~~2014 ~~Company had no assets or liabilities and it was a public shell company.~~

~~TrioResources AG Inc. was incorporated~~Expressed ~~on May 16, 2012 under the laws of the province of Ontario, Canada, is headquartered~~ in ~~Toronto,~~US ~~Ontario, Canada. This company is an exploration stage company intending to focus on exploration, milling, and processing of mineralized material located on its property.~~Dollars

~~Pursuant~~1. ~~to the terms and conditions of the Share Exchange Agreement~~Organization, ~~the Company acquired 100% of the capital stock, 2,130,000 common shares, of TrioResources AG Inc.~~ inNature ~~exchange for the issuance~~ of 2Business,~~130,000~~ ~~shares~~Going ofConcern ~~common~~and ~~stock~~Management ofPlans ~~the Company. The result is that the shareholders of TrioResourcses AG Inc. own 66.15% of the total shares of the Company outstanding effective the date of the Share Exchange Agreement.~~(continued)

~~The~~TrioResources AG ~~Share~~Inc. ~~Exchange~~ was ~~accounted for~~incorporated ason aMay ~~reverse~~16, ~~takeover/recapitalization~~2012 ~~effected~~under bythe alaws ~~share~~of ~~exchange~~the province of Ontario, ~~wherein~~Canada, ~~TrioResources~~is AGheadquartered ~~Inc~~in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. This company is ~~considered~~an ~~the~~exploration ~~acquirer for~~stage ~~accounting~~company intending to focus on exploration, milling, and ~~financial~~processing ~~reporting~~of ~~purposes~~mineralized material located on its property.

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Share Exchange Agreement, the Company acquired 100% of the capital stock, 2,130,000 common shares, of TrioResources AG Inc. ~~Summary~~in exchange for the issuance of ~~Significant~~2,130,000 ~~Accounting~~shares ~~Policies~~of common stock of the Company. The result is that the shareholders of TrioResourcses AG Inc. own 66.15% of the total shares of the Company outstanding effective the date of the Share Exchange Agreement.

~~Basis~~The Share ofExchange ~~Presentation~~was accounted for as a reverse takeover/recapitalization effected by a share exchange, wherein TrioResources AG Inc. is considered the acquirer for accounting and financial reporting purposes.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the SEC and are expressed in US dollars2. ~~Accordingly, the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements do not include all information and~~ ~~footnotes~~Summary ~~required by US GAAP for complete annual consolidated financial statements. In the opinion~~ of ~~management,~~Significant ~~the~~Accounting ~~accompanying unaudited~~Policies condensed consolidated interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation. Interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year ending September 30, 2014 or for any other interim period. The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company and the notes thereto as of and for the year ended September 30, 2013.

~~The Company’s fiscal year-end is~~Basis September 30. The Company’s functional currency is Canadian (“CDN”) dollars. The Company’s reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. Assets and liabilities are translated into the U.S. dollar using the exchange rates at each balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses are translated at average rates prevailing during the reporting period. Stockholders’ equity is translated at historical rates. Adjustments resulting from translating the condensed consolidated interim financial statements into the U.S. dollar are recorded as a separate component of ~~accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the statement of stockholders’ deficiency.~~Presentation

9The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the SEC and are expressed in US dollars. Accordingly, the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements do not include all information and footnotes required by US GAAP for complete annual consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation. Interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year ending September 30, 2014 or for any other interim period. The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company and the notes thereto as of and for the year ended September 30, 2013.

~~Trio~~The Company’s ~~Resources,~~fiscal ~~Inc~~year-end is September 30. The Company’s functional currency is Canadian (“CDN”) dollars. The Company’s reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. Assets and liabilities are translated into the U.S. dollar using the exchange rates at each balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses are translated at average rates prevailing during the reporting period. Stockholders’ deficiency is translated at historical rates. Adjustments resulting from translating the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements into the U.S. dollar are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the statement of stockholders’ deficiency.

~~(An Exploration Stage Company)~~F-8

~~Notes~~Trio Resources, toInc. ~~the~~(An ~~Condensed~~Exploration ~~Consolidated~~Stage ~~Interim Financial Statements~~Company)

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~Expressed~~As inat March US31, ~~Dollars~~2014

2.Expressed in ~~Summary~~US ~~of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)~~Dollars

~~Use~~2. Summary of ~~Estimates~~Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

~~The preparation of the unaudited condensed~~Use ~~consolidated interim financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts~~ of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Estimates may include those pertaining to valuation of inventories, stockpiles and mineralized material, the estimated useful lives and valuation of plant and equipment, mineral rights, deferred tax assets, convertible debt notes, derivative liabilities, reclamation liabilities, stock-based compensation and payments, and contingent liabilities. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

~~Recently~~The preparation ~~Issued~~of ~~Accounting~~the ~~Standards~~unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Estimates may include those pertaining to valuation of inventories, stockpiles and mineralized material, the estimated useful lives and valuation of plant and equipment, mineral rights, deferred tax assets, convertible debt notes, derivative liabilities, reclamation liabilities, stock-based compensation and payments, and contingent liabilities. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

~~From time to time, new accounting pronouncements~~Recently ~~are~~Issued ~~issued by the Financial~~ Accounting Standards ~~Board (FASB) or other standard setting bodies that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date.~~

~~Effective October 1, 2013, the Company~~From ~~adopted~~time ~~the~~to ~~amended guidance in ASC Topic 210~~time, ~~Balance~~new ~~Sheet.~~accounting ~~The~~pronouncements ~~amended~~are ~~guidance~~issued ~~addresses~~by ~~disclosure of offsetting financial assets and liabilities. It requires entities to add disclosures showing both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in~~ the ~~balance~~Financial ~~sheet~~Accounting ~~and~~Standards ~~instruments~~Board ~~and~~(FASB) ~~transactions~~or ~~subject~~other tostandard ~~an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement.~~setting ~~The~~bodies ~~updated~~that ~~disclosures~~are ~~have~~adopted ~~been~~by ~~implemented~~the ~~retrospectively~~Company ~~and~~as doof ~~not~~the ~~impact~~specified ~~our~~effective ~~financial position or results of operations~~date.

Effective October 1, 2013, the Company adopted the amended guidance in ASC Topic ~~220~~210, ~~Comprehensive~~Balance ~~Income~~Sheet. The amended guidance ~~requires~~ ~~entities~~addresses todisclosure of ~~disclose~~offsetting ~~additional~~financial ~~information~~assets ~~about~~and ~~reclassification~~liabilities. ~~adjustments,~~It ~~including~~requires ~~(1)~~entities ~~changes~~to inadd ~~accumulated~~disclosures ~~other comprehensive~~showing ~~income~~both bygross ~~component~~ and ~~(2)~~net ~~significant~~information about ~~items~~instruments ~~reclassified~~and ~~out~~transactions ofeligible ~~accumulated~~for ~~other~~offset ~~comprehensive~~in ~~income~~the bybalance ~~presenting the~~sheet ~~amount~~and ~~reclassified~~instruments and ~~the~~transactions ~~individual~~subject ~~income~~to ~~statement~~an ~~line~~agreement similar ~~items~~to ~~affected~~a master netting arrangement. The updated disclosures have been implemented ~~prospectively~~ retrospectively and do not impact our financial position or results of operations.

3Effective October 1, 2013, the Company adopted the amended guidance in ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income. ~~Property~~The amended guidance requires entities to disclose additional information about reclassification adjustments, including (1) changes in accumulated other comprehensive income by component and ~~Equipment:~~(2) significant items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by presenting the amount reclassified and the individual income statement line items affected. The updated disclosures have been implemented prospectively and do not impact our financial position or results of operations.

On May ~~June 15~~28, ~~2012~~2014, the ~~Company~~FASB ~~acquired property~~issued ~~and~~a ~~equipment~~new financial accounting standard on revenue from ~~2023682~~contracts ~~Ontario~~with ~~Inc.~~customers, aUpdate No. ~~commonly~~2014-~~controlled~~09—Revenue ~~related~~from ~~party~~Contracts ~~(see~~with ~~Note~~Customers 6(Topic 606). The ~~cost~~standard ofoutlines ~~these~~a ~~acquired~~single comprehensive model for ~~assets~~entities ~~was~~to ~~recorded~~use atin ~~the~~accounting ~~same~~for ~~historical~~revenue ~~carrying~~arising ~~values~~from ~~reflected~~contracts inwith ~~the~~customers ~~accounts~~and ofsupersedes ~~2023682~~most ~~Ontario~~current ~~Inc~~revenue recognition guidance. The accounting standard is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim reporting periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard”

~~Equipment~~Effective June ~~and~~2014, ~~buildings~~the ~~consist~~FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915). Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation. The objective of the amendments ~~following:~~is to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements for development stage entities. As a result, the amendments in this Update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities.

	December 31, 2013		September 30, 2013
Equipment	$	217,051	$	224,067
Less accumulated depreciation		15,249		14,057
Net equipment		201,802		210,010
Buildings		32,195		32,363
Less accumulated depreciation		3,779		3,497
Net buildings		28,416		28,866
Net property and equipment	$	230,218	$	238,876

F-9

~~Depreciation expense was $2,051 and $3,336~~Trio ~~for the period ended December 31~~Resources, ~~2103~~Inc. ~~and~~(An ~~2012,~~Exploration ~~respectively.~~Stage Company)

10Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~Trio~~As ~~Resources~~at March 31, ~~Inc.~~2014

~~(An~~Expressed in ~~Exploration~~US ~~Stage Company)~~Dollars

~~Notes~~2. toSummary of ~~the~~Significant ~~Condensed~~Accounting ~~Consolidated~~Policies ~~Interim Financial Statements~~(continued)

Recently Issued Accounting Standards (~~Unaudited~~continued)

~~Expressed~~The amendments also eliminate an exception previously provided to development stage entities in USTopic ~~Dollars~~810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity at risk. The amendments in this Update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the Accounting Standards Codification, thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to:

3.1) present ~~Property~~inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and ~~Equipment:~~shareholder ~~(continued)~~equity;

~~Equipment and buildings are depreciated~~2) onlabel athe ~~straight~~financial ~~line~~statements ~~basis,~~as ~~once~~those ~~they~~of ~~are~~a ~~put~~development instage ~~use, over their estimated useful lives:~~entity;

·3) disclose ~~Equipment~~a 15description ~~years~~of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged; and

·4) disclose ~~Buildings~~in 20the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage.

~~Patented~~The amendments ~~Claims:~~also clarify that the guidance in Topic 275, Risks and Uncertainties, is applicable to entities that have not commenced planned principal operations. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public business entities, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein.

~~At December 31, 2013 and September~~3. ~~30,~~Property ~~2013, the Company also has mining property patent claims of $9,590~~ and $9,900, respectively (CDN$ 10,200 as at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013). These patent claims provide the Company with mining rights to certain land located in Coleman Township, District of Temiskaming, Ontario, Canada. On February 4, 2013 the Company made its first shipment of mineralized material for refining.Equipment:

~~The~~On June ~~patented~~15, ~~claim was purchased in May~~ 2012, inthe aCompany ~~related~~acquired ~~party~~property ~~transaction~~and atequipment ~~CDN$10,200~~from ~~(4,000MT~~2023682 ofOntario ~~concentrate~~Inc., ~~and~~a ~~book~~commonly-controlled ~~value of~~ related party~~). No~~ ~~amortization~~(see ~~has~~Note ~~been~~6). ~~charged~~The ~~since~~cost ~~the date~~ of ~~purchase~~these asacquired ~~amortization~~assets iswas ~~based~~recorded onat ~~units of production and~~ the ~~Company’s~~same ~~production volume~~historical upcarrying tovalues ~~December~~reflected ~~31,~~in ~~2013~~the isaccounts ~~very~~of ~~insignificant~~2023682 Ontario Inc.

4.Equipment and ~~Stockholders’~~buildings ~~Deficit~~consist of the following:

The Company’s authorized capital consists of 400,000,000 shares of common stock. At December 31, 2013, there were 339,162,500 shares of common stock issued and outstanding (September 30, 2013 - 338,650,000). (See Note 1 - Acquisition).

	March 31, 2014			September 30, 2013

Equipment	$	208,857		$	224,067
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(16,243	)		(14,057	)
Net equipment		192,614			210,010

Buildings	$	30,980		$	32,363
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(4,017	)		(3,497	)
Net buildings		26,963			28,866
	$	219,577		$	238,876

Pursuant to a consulting agreement entered on May 17, 2012 with Seagel Investments Corp., the Company issued to Seagel Investments Corp., 16,100,000 common shares which were valued at $26,833, being the fair value of the common shares. The Company recorded this amount as a consulting expense during the previous year ended September 30, 2013.F-10

~~In January 2013 the Company entered into~~Trio ~~two consulting agreements which required the issuance of shares as part of the consideration. The first contact is for a 24 month term for 250~~Resources,~~000~~ ~~common shares issued for a total value of $137,500~~Inc. ~~The~~(An ~~second~~Exploration ~~contract~~Stage ~~is for a 6 month term for 300,000 common shares issued for a total value of $165,000. Both contracts were signed at the beginning of January 2013. The~~ Company ~~has recorded an expense in the amount of $25,938 during the three months period ended December 31, 2013 (2012 – Nil~~) and cumulative from inception to date $225,796 and $76,702 has been included in prepaid expenses and other receivables balance as of December 31, 2013 (September 30, 2013 - $99,687). The remaining value of the share-based considerations will be amortized over the term of the respective agreements as services are performed.

~~Effective~~Notes to ~~December 31, 2012~~ the ~~number of~~Condensed ~~shares~~Consolidated ~~outstanding~~Interim ~~were~~Financial ~~forward-split~~Statements ~~100 shares for each share of record prior to the split~~ (~~“Stock Split”~~Unaudited).

OnAs ~~December 13, 2013, the Company issued 437,500 shares in respect of consulting services valued~~ at ~~$0.02 per share (being the trading price) amounting to $8,750, which~~ ~~was~~March ~~expensed during the current period ended December~~ 31, ~~2013.~~2014

~~On December 13, 2013, the Company issued~~Expressed ~~75,000 shares~~ in ~~respect~~US ~~of Stairs/Option Joint Venture Agreement. These shares were valued at $0.02 per share (being the trading price) and recorded as expense in the period.~~Dollars

~~The total amount of the common shares outstanding was 339,162,500 as of December 31, 2013 comprising of 229,612,500 restricted shares and 109,550,000 non-restricted shares~~3. ~~The~~Property ~~number of common shares outstanding as at September 30, 2013 was 338,650,000 comprising of 229,100,000 restricted shares~~ and ~~109,550,000 non-restricted~~Equipment: ~~shares.~~(continued)

11Depreciation expense of $1,951 and $4,002 were charged for the three and six months period ended March 31, 2014, respectively (2013 - $3,686 and $7,022). Equipment and buildings are depreciated on a straight line basis, once they are put in use, over their estimated useful lives:

Trio Resources, Inc.

	●	Equipment 15 years; and

	●	Buildings 20 years.

~~(An Exploration Stage Company)~~Patented Claims:

~~Notes~~At March 31, 2014 and September 30, 2013, the Company also has mining property patent claims of $9,228 and $9,900, respectively (CDN$ 10,200 as at March 31, 2014 and September 30, 2013). These patent claims provide the Company with mining rights to certain land located in Coleman Township, District of Temiskaming, Ontario, Canada. On February 4, 2013 the ~~Condensed~~Company ~~Consolidated~~made ~~Interim~~its first shipment ~~Financial~~of ~~Statements~~mineralized material for refining.

The patented claim was purchased in May 2012, in a related party transaction at CDN$10,200 (~~Unaudited~~4,000MT of concentrate and book value of related party). No amortization has been charged since the date of purchase as amortization is based on units of production and the Company’s production volume up to March 31, 2014 is very insignificant.

~~Expressed~~4. Stockholders’ ~~in US Dollars~~Deficit:

4The Company’s authorized capital consists of 400,000,000 shares of common stock. ~~Stockholders’~~At ~~Deficit:~~March 31, 2014, there were 339,162,500 shares of common stock issued and outstanding (~~continued~~September 30, 2013 - 338,650,000). (See Note 1 - Acquisition).

~~The restricted shares have been issued~~Pursuant to ~~various~~a ~~parties~~consulting ~~through~~agreement ~~private~~entered ~~placement~~on May 17, as2012 ~~start-up~~with ~~capital~~Seagel orInvestments asCorp., ~~consideration~~the ~~for~~Company ~~professional~~issued ~~services~~to ~~under~~Seagel ~~the~~Investments ~~terms~~Corp., ~~and~~16,100,000 ~~conditions~~common ~~agreed~~shares ~~with~~which ~~each~~were ~~party.~~valued ~~These~~at ~~restricted~~$26,833, ~~shares~~being ~~will~~the befair ~~available~~value ~~for~~of ~~sale~~the ~~under~~common ~~SEC~~shares. ~~Rule~~The ~~144~~Company ~~when~~recorded ~~the~~this ~~conditions~~amount ~~have~~as ~~been~~a ~~met~~consulting ~~regarding~~expense during the ~~holding~~previous ~~period,~~year ~~trading~~ended ~~volume~~September ~~formula~~30, ~~and restrictive legends~~2013.

5In January 2013 the Company entered into two consulting agreements which required the issuance of shares as part of the consideration. The ~~Earnings~~first ~~(Loss)~~contact ~~Per~~is ~~Share~~for a 24 month term for 250,000 common shares issued for a total value of $137,500. The second contract is for a 6 month term for 300,000 common shares issued for a total value of $165,000. Both contracts were signed at the beginning of January 2013 and were recorded as prepaid expenses and are being amortized over the term of the respective agreements. The Company has recorded an expense in the amount of $25,938 and $51,876 for the three and six months period ended March 31, 2014 (~~“EPS”~~2013 – $99,687 and $126,520, respectively):.

~~FASB~~Effective December ~~ASC 260~~31, ~~Earnings~~2012 ~~Per~~the ~~Share~~number ~~provides for calculations~~ of ~~“basic”~~shares ~~and~~outstanding ~~“diluted”~~were ~~earnings~~forward-split ~~per~~100 ~~share. Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average common~~ shares ~~outstanding~~ for ~~the~~each ~~period. Diluted earnings per~~ share ~~reflect the potential dilution~~ of ~~securities~~record ~~that~~prior ~~could share in the earnings of an entity similar~~ to ~~fully diluted earnings per share. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. The weighted average number of shares outstanding for~~ the ~~period~~split ~~ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were 338,694,583 and 273,459,140,~~(“Stock ~~respectively~~Split”).

~~6. Related Party Transactions:~~F-11

~~On June 15~~Trio Resources, ~~2012, the Company purchased certain assets from 2023682 Ontario~~ Inc., a(An ~~related~~Exploration ~~party~~Stage ~~in which the~~ Company’s CEO was the sole director of 2023682 Ontario Inc. The value of the assets purchased by the Company was carried over at the historical carrying amounts that were recorded by the related party. The purchase consideration consisted of cash of CDN $100,000 ($99,510) and a promissory note in the amount of CDN $500,000 ($485,300). Because the purchase was from a commonly controlled related party, the excess of the purchase price over the carrying value of the assets purchased has been reflected as a deduction against Stockholders’ Deficit, equivalent to a distribution of equity to the stockholder. The assets purchased and consideration given is as follows:

Property and equipment	$	88,596
Patent claims		10,374
Inventory		1,770
Total assets purchased		100,740
Purchase price		(610,260	)
Discount on note payable (Note 7)		(210,415	)
Deduction in shareholders’ equity (deficit)	$	(299,105	)

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~This~~As ~~transaction was accounted for as a~~at ~~transfer~~March ~~between entities under common control~~31, ~~and~~2014 the cost of these assets is based on the transferor’s carrying value of the asset. Management determined that the assets acquired did not meet the definition of a “business” as defined by accounting standards, or as a “predecessor business”, as defined in SEC rules.

~~Consulting fees paid to Mr. J. Duncan Reid~~Expressed ~~(Director)~~in ~~for~~US ~~the period ended December 31, 2013 were Nil (2012: $20,000).~~Dollars

~~As at December 31, 2013, the Company had~~4. ~~advanced~~Stockholders’ toDeficit: ~~2023682 Ontario Inc. $63,617~~ (~~September 30, 2013 - $65,673~~continued)~~. The amount is unsecured, non-interest bearing and is recorded as a loan receivable with no specific terms of repayment.~~

7On December 13, 2013, the Company issued 437,500 shares in respect of consulting services valued at $0.02 ~~Loans~~per ~~Payable:~~share (being the trading price) amounting to $8,750, which was expensed during the previous quarter ended December 31, 2013.

~~Loan~~On December ~~payable~~31, ~~represent~~2013, ~~unsecured~~the ~~and~~Company ~~interest free~~issued ~~financing~~75,000 ~~provided~~shares byin arespect ~~third~~of ~~party~~Stairs/Option Joint Venture Agreement. These ~~loans~~shares were valued at $0.02 per share (being the trading price) and were recorded as prepaid expenses and are ~~repayable~~being onamortized ~~demand~~over the term of the agreement. The Company has recorded an expense in the amount of $125 and $126 for the three and six months period ended March 31, 2014 (2013 – $Nil and $Nil).

12The total amount of the common shares outstanding was 339,162,500 as of March 31, 2014 comprising of 229,612,500 restricted shares and 109,550,000 non-restricted shares. The number of common shares outstanding as at September 30, 2013 was 338,650,000 comprising of 229,100,000 restricted shares and 109,550,000 non-restricted shares.

~~Trio~~The restricted ~~Resources~~shares have been issued to various parties through private placement, ~~Inc~~as start-up capital or as consideration for professional services under the terms and conditions agreed with each party. These restricted shares will be available for sale under SEC Rule 144 when the conditions have been met regarding the holding period, trading volume formula and restrictive legends.

5. Earnings (AnLoss) ~~Exploration~~Per ~~Stage~~Share ~~Company~~(“EPS”):

~~Notes~~FASB ASC 260, Earnings Per Share provides for calculations of “basic” and “diluted” earnings per share. Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted ~~Condensed~~average ~~Consolidated~~common ~~Interim~~shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities ~~Financial~~that ~~Statements~~could share in the earnings of an entity similar to fully diluted earnings per share. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. The weighted average number of shares outstanding for the three and six months period ended March 31, 2014 were 339,162,500 and 338,952,847, respectively (2013 – 338,643,889 and 295,888,736, respectively).

~~(Unaudited)~~6. Related Party Transactions:

~~Expressed~~On June 15, 2012, the Company purchased certain assets from 2023682 Ontario Inc., a related party in USwhich ~~Dollars~~the Company’s CEO was the sole director of 2023682 Ontario Inc. The value of the assets purchased by the Company was carried over at the historical carrying amounts that were recorded by the related party. The purchase consideration consisted of cash of CDN $100,000 ($99,510) and a promissory note in the amount of CDN $500,000 ($485,300). Because the purchase was from a commonly controlled related party, the excess of the purchase price over the carrying value of the assets purchased has been reflected as a deduction against Stockholders’ Deficit, equivalent to a distribution of equity to the stockholder. The assets purchased and consideration given is as follows:

~~8. Convertible draw Down Loan Payable:~~F-12

~~The Company also entered into a~~Trio ~~one-year Draw Down Facility~~Resources, ~~dated as of November 1, 2012, with Seagel Investment Ltd~~Inc. as(An ~~lender,~~Exploration inStage ~~the maximum amount of $500,000. The facility bear interest at the rate of 10% per annum. The~~ Company may from time to time request draw downs on this convertible debt facility subject to the discretion of the lender. The term of the Draw Down Facility is for one year during which the Company may draw down up to $500,000.)

~~After the one year term, any outstanding~~Notes ~~principal and accrued interest shall be converted into a convertible note with an additional term of one (1) year. Pursuant~~ to the ~~terms~~Condensed ofConsolidated ~~this~~Interim ~~Draw~~Financial ~~Down~~Statements Facility, this convertible debt obligation may, at the option of the creditor, be converted into the common shares of the Company at the lower of $1.00 per share, the initial listing price of $0.55 less 20% discount of the price of the public shares, or any financing that is done by the Company by way of a registration statement. The Company has an option to convert at whichever price is the lowest of all options above. Through the completion of the reverse takeover of Allied Technologies Group Inc. on December 14, 2012 the Company became public. As at December 31, 2013 the amount outstanding under the Draw Down Facility was $425,000 (~~September 30, 2013 - $425,000~~Unaudited).

9.As ~~Convertible~~at March ~~Note~~31, ~~Payable~~2014 ~~– Related Party:~~

~~As of December 31, 2013, the Company has~~Expressed a convertible note payable of $470,100 (CDN $500,000) to 2023682 Ontario Inc. This note is due two years from the date of issue (June 15, 2012) and accrues interest at 3% per annum. The terms of the convertible notes specified that should the Company be successful in aUS ‘going public’ transaction it is convertible into common shares of the Company at the weighted average of the Company’s share price based on the average 5 day bid price, within 30 days of the Company going public. If there are no trades on any given day in the first 30 days after the Company’s stock begins to trade then the bid price will be used in determining the weighted average price. This convertible note may be repaid at any time without penalty or bonus. This convertible note is interest free for the first 12 months post-closing of the asset purchase, thereafter; it accrues interest at the rate of 3% per annum.Dollars

~~This note was discounted resulting in an effective interest rate of 27%~~6. ~~As a result, a $210,415 discount to the note was recorded which is being amortized to as accretion~~Related ~~expense~~Party ~~over~~Transactions: the term of the note. The Company completed its going public transaction and became public on December 14, 2012, the first trades took place on January 11, 2013 at $0.55 per share; however, the holder has not requested for conversion into shares. This has been classified as non-current as management has obtained a waiver for the next 12 months.(continued)

Accretion expense of $24,642 has been recognized during the first quarter ended December 31, 2013 (2012 - $22,483), which is included in interest expense in the unaudited condensed interim consolidated statements of operations.

Property and equipment	$	88,596
Patent claims		10,374
Inventory		1,770
Total assets purchased		100,740

Purchase price		(610,260	)

Discount on note payable (Note 7)		(210,415	)

Deduction in shareholders’ deficiency	$	(299,105	)

10This transaction was accounted for as a transfer between entities under common control, and the cost of these assets is based on the transferor’s carrying value of the asset. ~~Convertible~~Management ~~Notes~~determined ~~Payable:~~that the assets acquired did not meet the definition of a “business” as defined by accounting standards, or as a “predecessor business”, as defined in SEC rules.

	December 31, 2013			September 30, 2013
Convertible Notes (a)	$	946,910		$	966,363
Convertible Note (b)		676			-
		947,586			966,363
Current portion		(946,910	)		(482,655	)
	$	676		$	483,708

No consulting fees were paid to Mr. J. Duncan Reid (Director) for the three and six months period ended March 31, 2014 (2013 - $20,000 and $40,000, respectively). As at March 31, 2014, the Company had advanced to 2023682 Ontario Inc. $61,215 (September 30, 2013 - $65,673). The amount is unsecured, non-interest bearing and is recorded as a loan receivable with no specific terms of repayment.

137. Loans Payable:

~~Trio~~Loan payable ~~Resources,~~represent ~~Inc~~unsecured and interest free financing provided by a third party. These loans are repayable on demand.

~~(An~~8. ~~Exploration~~Convertible Draw ~~Stage~~Down ~~Company)~~Loan Payable:

~~Notes~~The Company entered into a one-year Draw Down Facility, dated as of November 1, 2012, with Seagel Investment Ltd. as lender, in the maximum amount of $500,000. The facility bear interest at the rate of 10% per annum. The Company may from time to time request draw downs on this convertible debt facility subject to the ~~Condensed~~discretion ~~Consolidated~~of ~~Interim~~the lender. The term of the Draw Down Facility is for ~~Financial~~one ~~Statements~~year during which the Company may draw down up to $500,000.

After the one year term, any outstanding principal and accrued interest shall be converted into a convertible note with an additional term of one (~~Unaudited~~1) year. Pursuant to the terms of this Draw Down Facility, this convertible debt obligation may, at the option of the creditor, be converted into the common shares of the Company at the lower of $1.00 per share, the initial listing price of $0.55 less 20% discount of the price of the public shares, or any financing that is done by the Company by way of a registration statement. The Company has an option to convert at whichever price is the lowest of all options above. Through the completion of the reverse takeover of Allied Technologies Group Inc. on December 14, 2012 the Company became public. As at March 31, 2014 the amount outstanding under the Draw Down Facility was $425,000 (September 30, 2013 - $425,000).

~~Expressed in US Dollars~~F-13

10Trio Resources, Inc. ~~Convertible~~(An ~~Notes~~Exploration ~~Payable:~~Stage ~~(continued~~Company)

~~(a)~~Notes to ~~The~~the ~~total~~Condensed ~~convertible~~Consolidated ~~notes~~Interim ofFinancial ~~$946,910~~Statements ~~issued and outstanding as at December 31, 2013 are classified as current in accordance with their terms of maturity~~ (~~Outstanding balances as at September 30, 2013 were $482,655 classified as current and $483,708 as non-current~~Unaudited).

~~The~~As ~~details of the convertible~~at ~~notes~~March ~~outstanding as at December~~ 31, ~~2013~~2014 ~~are as follows:~~

~~On September 30, 2012, the Company~~Expressed ~~entered into convertible notes with Incendia Management Group Inc.~~ in ~~the amount of CDN $266,445 (~~US $258,675), Siderion Capital Group Inc. in the amount of CDN $295,163 (US $286,415), and Seagel Investment Corp. in the amount of CDN $49,000 (US $47,559). Each of these September 30, 2012 convertible notes have a two (2) year term and have an interest rate of 10% per annum.Dollars

~~On October 31, 2012 the Company entered into convertible notes with Incendia Management Group Inc~~9. ~~in the amount of CDN $7,000 (US $6,794), Siderion Capital Group~~Convertible ~~Inc.~~Note inPayable ~~the~~– ~~amount~~Related of CDN $20,000 (US $19,412), Seagel Investment Corp. in the amount of CDN $2,500 (US $2,427), and Seagel Investment Ltd. in the amount of US $345,081 . Each of these October 31, 2012 convertible notes has a term of two (2) years and bears an interest rate of 10% per annum.Party:

~~All~~ As of March 31, 2014, the Company has a convertible ~~notes referred~~note ~~above~~payable ~~may~~of be$405,560 ~~converted~~(CDN $448,281) atto ~~any~~2023682 ~~time~~Ontario atInc. This note is due two years from the ~~option~~date of ~~the~~issue ~~holder~~(June 15, ~~into~~2012) ~~the~~and ~~common~~accrues ~~shares~~interest ofat ~~the~~3% ~~Company,~~per orannum. inThe terms of the ~~event~~convertible notes specified that ~~Debtor~~should ~~goes~~the Company be successful in a ‘going public’ transaction it is convertible into ~~the~~common shares of the ~~public~~Company ~~company~~ at the ~~lower~~weighted average of ~~$1.00~~the ~~per~~Company’s share, price based on the ~~initial~~average ~~listing~~5 day bid price, within 30 days of $0the Company going public.~~55 less~~ ~~20%~~If ~~discount~~there ofare no trades on any given day in the first 30 days after the Company’s stock begins to trade then the bid price ofwill be used in determining the ~~public~~weighted ~~shares,~~average orprice. This convertible note may be repaid at any time ~~financing~~without ~~that~~penalty or bonus. This convertible note is ~~done~~interest byfree for the ~~Company~~first by12 ~~way~~months post-closing of athe ~~registration~~asset ~~statement~~purchase, thereafter; it accrues interest at the rate of 3% per annum.

~~These~~This note ~~convertible~~was ~~notes~~discounted ~~and Drawn~~resulting ~~Down~~in ~~Loan~~an ~~Payable~~effective ~~are~~interest ~~secured~~rate ~~against~~of ~~the~~27%. ~~assets~~As ofa result, a $210,415 discount to the ~~TrioResources~~note AGwas ~~Inc.~~recorded which ~~until~~is being amortized to as accretion expense over the term of the note. The Company ~~becomes~~completed ~~publically~~its ~~traded~~going public transaction and ~~the~~became ~~convertible~~public ~~notes~~on ~~are~~December ~~converted~~14, to2012, ~~shares~~the orfirst ~~the~~trades ~~convertible~~took ~~notes~~place ~~are~~on ~~redeemed.~~January ~~All~~11, of2013 ~~the~~at ~~convertible~~$0.55 ~~notes~~per ~~and~~share; however, the ~~Draw~~holder ~~Down~~has ~~Facility~~not ~~remain~~requested ~~outstanding~~for ~~and~~conversion ~~none~~into ~~have~~shares. This has been ~~converted~~classified toas ~~common~~non-current ~~shares~~as management has obtained a waiver for the next 12 months.

~~The~~Accretion expense ~~convertible~~of ~~notes~~$26,788 ~~may~~and ~~be repaid~~$51,430 athave ~~any~~been ~~time~~recognized ~~without~~for ~~penalty~~the orthree ~~bonus.~~and ~~Subsequent~~six tomonths ~~year~~ended ~~end~~March ~~and~~31, up2014 to(2013 ~~the~~- ~~date~~$25,643 ofand ~~this filing~~$51,728, respectively), ~~none~~which ofis ~~the~~included ~~above~~in ~~notes were~~interest ~~either~~expense ~~paid~~in orthe ~~converted~~unaudited ~~into~~condensed ~~common~~consolidated ~~stocks~~interim statements of ~~the Company~~operations.

~~The~~10. ~~total amount of interest~~Convertible inNotes ~~respect of all convertible notes that has been expensed during the quarter ended December 31, 2013 is $39,555 (2012~~Payable: ~~$24,065).~~

(b) On November 27, 2013, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note agreement (the “Note”) whereby the investor may purchase up to $335,000 face value convertible notes. The consideration is equal to $300,000 resulting in an original issue discount of $30,000 (approximately 10%). The initial consideration (“Initial Tranche”) paid by the lender to the Company amounted to $50,000 (face value of $55,833). As of December 31, 2013, no additional consideration was paid. If the Company elects to repay the consideration received within 90 days from the effective date of the consideration, there is no interest due on the note. However, if the consideration is not repaid within 90 days of the effective date, there is a one-time interest charge equal to 12% of the outstanding principal balance. The note is convertible into common stock at the lender’s option, at the lower (a) $0.10 or (b) 60% of the lowest trade price in the 25 trading days previous to the conversion. The Note provides for redemption upon the occurrence of an event of default. Default conditions include non-servicing of the debt and certain other credit risk related conditions. Default conditions also include certain equity indexed events including failures to file public information documents and failure to comply with Rule 144 requirements. The remedy to the lender for an event of default is the greater of (i) the outstanding balance of the Note divided by the conversion price on the date the default amount is either demanded or paid in full, whichever has a lower conversion price multiplied by the VWAP on the date the default amount is either demanded or paid in full, whichever has a higher VWAP, or (ii) 150% of the outstanding balance of the note.

	March 31, 2014			September 30, 2013

Convertible Note (a)	$	924,187		$	966,363
Convertible Note (b)		1,540			-
		925,727			966,363
Current portion		(924,187	)		(482,655	)
	$	1,540		$	483,708

14(a) The total convertible notes of $924,187 issued and outstanding as at March 31, 2014 are classified as current in accordance with their terms of maturity (Outstanding balances as at September 30, 2013 were $482,655 classified as current and $483,708 as non-current).

~~Trio~~The details ~~Resources~~of the convertible notes outstanding as at March 31, ~~Inc.~~2014 are as follows:

~~(An Exploration Stage Company)~~F-14

~~Notes~~Trio Resources, toInc. ~~the~~(An ~~Condensed~~Exploration ~~Consolidated~~Stage ~~Interim Financial Statements~~Company)

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~Expressed~~As inat March US31, ~~Dollars~~2014

~~10.~~Expressed in ~~Convertible~~US ~~Notes Payable: (continued)~~Dollars

~~Accounting~~10. ~~Considerations~~Convertible Notes Payable: (continued)

~~The Company has accounted~~On ~~for~~September ~~the~~30, ~~Initial Tranche issued for cash as a financing transaction~~2012, ~~wherein~~ the ~~net~~Company ~~proceeds~~entered ~~that~~into ~~were~~convertible ~~received~~notes ~~were allocated~~with toIncendia ~~the~~Management ~~financial~~Group ~~instrument issued~~Inc. ~~Prior~~in ~~to making~~ the ~~accounting~~amount ~~allocation,~~of ~~the~~CDN ~~Company evaluated the Initial~~$266,445 ~~Tranche under ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging~~ (~~“ASC~~US ~~815”~~$241,053)., ~~ASC~~Siderion ~~815~~Capital ~~generally~~Group ~~requires~~Inc. in the ~~analysis~~amount ~~embedded terms and features that have characteristics~~ of ~~derivatives~~CDN to$295,163 be(US ~~evaluated~~$267,034), ~~for bifurcation~~ and ~~separate~~Seagel ~~accounting~~Investment Corp. in ~~instances where their economic risks and characteristics are not clearly and closely related to~~ the ~~risks of the host contract. The~~amount ~~material embedded derivative features consisted~~ of ~~the~~CDN ~~conversion~~$49,000 ~~option and certain redemption rights that were indexed to equity risks~~ (~~“Default~~US ~~Put”~~$47,559). ~~The~~Each ~~conversion~~of ~~option~~these ~~along~~September ~~with the redemption features bearing risks of equity~~30, ~~were~~ ~~not~~2012 ~~clearly~~convertible ~~and~~notes ~~closely~~have ~~related~~a totwo the host debt agreement and required bifurcation. Current accounting principles that are also provided in ASC 815 do not permit an issuer to account separately for individual derivative terms and features that require bifurcation and liability classification (~~see Note 11~~2). ~~Rather,~~year ~~such~~term ~~terms~~ and ~~features~~have ~~must~~an ~~be and were bundled~~interest ~~together~~rate ~~and~~of ~~fair~~10% ~~valued~~per ~~as a single, compound embedded derivative~~annum.

~~Based~~On October on31, 2012 the ~~previous~~Company ~~conclusions~~entered into convertible notes with Incendia Management Group Inc. in the amount of CDN $7,000 (US ~~the~~$6,333), ~~Company~~Siderion ~~allocated~~Capital Group Inc. in the ~~cash~~amount ~~proceeds~~of ~~first~~CDN to$20,000 (US $18,094), Seagel Investment Corp. in the ~~derivative~~amount ~~component~~of atCDN ~~its~~$2,500 (US ~~fair~~$2,262), ~~value~~and ~~with~~Seagel Investment Ltd. in the ~~residual~~amount ~~allocated~~of toUS ~~the host~~$345,081 ~~debt~~. ~~contract~~Each of these October 31, as2012 ~~follows:~~convertible notes has a term of two (2) years and bears an interest rate of 10% per annum.

	Allocation
Compound embedded derivative	$	62,007
Financing costs expense		(5,000	)
Day-one derivative loss		(7,007	)
	$	50,000

All of the convertible notes referred above may be converted, at any time at the option of the holder, into the common shares of the Company, or in the event that Debtor goes public into the shares of the public company at the lower of $1.00 per share, the initial listing price of $0.55 less 20% discount of the price of the public shares, or any financing that is done by the Company by way of a registration statement.

~~The proceeds~~These ~~were~~convertible ~~allocated~~notes ~~to between the compound embedded derivative~~ and ~~the~~Drawn ~~financing~~Down ~~costs~~Loan ~~expense.~~Payable ~~This~~are ~~resulted~~secured inagainst athe ~~day-one derivative~~assets ~~loss~~of ~~and~~the ~~therefore,~~TrioResources ~~there~~AG ~~was~~Inc. nountil ~~value~~the ~~allocated~~Company tobecomes publically ~~the~~traded ~~note~~and on the ~~inception~~convertible ~~date.~~notes ~~The~~are ~~Note~~converted ~~will be accreted up~~ to ~~its~~shares ~~face~~or ~~value of $55,833 over~~ the ~~life~~convertible ofnotes ~~Note~~are ~~based~~redeemed. onAll ~~an effective interest rate~~ of ~~21.15%.~~the ~~Amortization~~convertible notes ~~expense~~and ~~for~~ the ~~period~~ ~~amounted~~Draw toDown ~~$676.~~Facility ~~The~~remain ~~carrying~~outstanding ~~value~~and ofnone ~~the~~have ~~Note~~been asconverted ~~of December 31, 2013 amounted~~ to ~~$676~~common shares.

11The convertible notes may be repaid at any time without penalty or bonus. ~~Derivative~~Subsequent ~~Liabilities:~~to year end and up to the date of this filing, none of the above notes were either paid or converted into common stocks of the Company.

~~The following tables summarize the components~~Interest expense of ~~the~~$38,028 ~~Company’s derivative liabilities~~ and ~~linked~~$77,583 ~~common~~have ~~shares~~been asrecognized offor ~~December~~the ~~31,~~three ~~2013~~ and ~~the~~six ~~amounts~~months ~~that~~ended ~~were~~March ~~reflected in~~31, ~~income~~2014 ~~related~~(2013 to- ~~derivatives~~$30,768 ~~for~~and ~~the three months then ended:~~$54,835, respectively)

	December 31, 2013
The financings giving rise to derivative financial instruments	Indexed Shares		Fair Values
Compound embedded derivative		5,362,583	$	(69,714	)
Warrant derivatives		75,000		(203	)
		5,437,583	$	(69,917	)

(b)

On November 27, 2013, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note agreement (the “Note”) whereby the investor may purchase up to $335,000 face value convertible notes. The consideration is equal to $300,000 resulting in an original issue discount of $30,000 (approximately 10%). Pursuant to this agreement, the Company received $50,000 (face value of $55,833) on November 27, 2013 and $25,000 (face value of $27,917) on March 14, 2014. If the Company elects to repay the consideration received within 90 days from the effective date of the consideration, there is no interest due on the note. However, if the consideration is not repaid within 90 days of the effective date, there is a one-time interest charge equal to 12% of the outstanding principal balance. The note is convertible into common stock at the lender’s option, at the lower (a) $0.10 or (b) 60% of the lowest trade price in the 25 trading days previous to the conversion.

F-15

Trio Resources, Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company)

~~(An~~Notes to ~~Exploration~~the ~~Stage~~Condensed ~~Company~~Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~Notes~~As toat March ~~the~~31, ~~Condensed~~2014 ~~Consolidated Interim Financial Statements~~

~~(Unaudited)~~Expressed in US Dollars

~~Expressed~~10. inConvertible Notes USPayable: ~~Dollars~~(continued)

11The Note provides for redemption upon the occurrence of an event of default. ~~Derivative~~Default ~~Liabilities:~~conditions include non-servicing of the debt and certain other credit risk related conditions. Default conditions also include certain equity indexed events including failures to file public information documents and failure to comply with Rule 144 requirements. The remedy to the lender for an event of default is the greater of (~~continued~~i) the outstanding balance of the Note divided by the conversion price on the date the default amount is either demanded or paid in full, whichever has a lower conversion price multiplied by the VWAP on the date the default amount is either demanded or paid in full, whichever has a higher VWAP, or (ii) 150% of the outstanding balance of the note.

~~The following table summarizes the effects~~Accounting ~~on the Company’s gain (loss) associated with changes in the fair values of the derivative financial instruments by type of financing for the three months ended December 31, 2013:~~Considerations

The financings giving rise to derivative financial instruments and the income effects:	Three Months Ended December 31, 2013
Compound embedded derivative	$	(7,707	)
Warrant derivatives		1,455
Day-one derivative loss		(7,007	)
Total gain (loss)	$	(13,259	)

The Company has accounted for the Initial Tranche issued for cash as a financing transaction, wherein the net proceeds that were received were allocated to the financial instrument issued. Prior to making the accounting allocation, the Company evaluated the Initial Tranche under ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). ASC 815 generally requires the analysis embedded terms and features that have characteristics of derivatives to be evaluated for bifurcation and separate accounting in instances where their economic risks and characteristics are not clearly and closely related to the risks of the host contract. The material embedded derivative features consisted of the conversion option and certain redemption rights that were indexed to equity risks (“Default Put”). The conversion option along with the redemption features bearing risks of equity, were not clearly and closely related to the host debt agreement and required bifurcation. Current accounting principles that are also provided in ASC 815 do not permit an issuer to account separately for individual derivative terms and features that require bifurcation and liability classification (see Note 11). Rather, such terms and features must be and were bundled together and fair valued as a single, compound embedded derivative.

~~The Company’s face~~Based ~~value $55,833 Convertible Promissory Note issued~~ on ~~November~~the ~~27,~~previous ~~2013 and Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued on December 13~~conclusions, ~~2013 gave rise to derivative financial instruments. As more fully discussed in Note 10~~ the Company ~~issued~~allocated athe ~~face~~cash ~~value $55,833~~proceeds ~~Convertible~~first ~~Promissory~~to ~~Note~~the onderivative ~~November~~component ~~27,~~at ~~2013.~~its ~~The~~fair ~~Note~~value ~~embodied certain terms and conditions that were not~~with ~~clearly~~the ~~and~~residual ~~closely~~allocated ~~related~~ to the host debt ~~agreement~~contract, inas ~~terms of economic risks and characteristics. These terms and features consist of the embedded conversion option and default put.~~follows:

Current accounting principles that are provided in ASC 815 - Derivatives and Hedging require derivative financial instruments to be classified in liabilities and carried at fair value with changes recorded in income. In addition, the standards do not permit an issuer to account separately for individual derivative terms and features embedded in hybrid financial instruments that require bifurcation and liability classification as derivative financial instruments. Rather, such terms and features must be bundled together and fair valued as a single, compound embedded derivative. The Company has selected the Monte Carlo Simulations valuation technique to fair value the compound embedded derivative because it believes that this technique is reflective of all significant assumption types, and ranges of assumption inputs, that market participants would likely consider in transactions involving compound embedded derivatives. Such assumptions include, among other inputs, interest risk assumptions, credit risk assumptions and redemption behaviors in addition to traditional inputs for option models such as market trading volatility and risk free rates. The Company has selected Binomial Lattice to fair value the warrant derivatives because it believes this technique is reflective of all significant assumption types market participants would likely consider in transactions involving freestanding warrants derivatives. The Monte Carlo Simulations technique is a level three valuation technique because it requires the development of significant internal assumptions in addition to observable market indicators.

	Allocation
	$50,000 Note			$25,000 Note

Compound embedded derivative	$	62,007		$	29,461
Financing costs expense		(5,000	)		(2,500	)
Day-one derivative loss		(7,007	)		(1,961	)
	$	50,000		$	25,000

16The proceeds were allocated to between the compound embedded derivative and the financing costs expense. These resulted in a day-one derivative losses and therefore, there were no value allocated to these notes on the inception date. These Notes will be accreted up to its face value over the life of the Notes based on an effective interest rate of 21.15%. Amortization expense of $864 and $676 were recorded for the three and six months period ended March 31, 2014, respectively. The total carrying values of these Notes as of March 31, 2014 amounted to $1,541.

~~Trio Resources, Inc.~~F-16

Trio Resources, Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~(Unaudited)~~As at March 31, 2014

Expressed in US Dollars

11. Derivative Liabilities: ~~(continued)~~

~~Significant~~The ~~inputs~~following ~~and~~tables ~~results~~summarize ~~arising~~the ~~from~~components of the ~~Monte~~Company’s ~~Carlo Simulations~~derivative ~~process~~liabilities ~~are~~and linked common shares as ~~follows~~of ~~for~~March ~~the~~31, ~~compound~~2014 ~~embedded~~and ~~derivative~~the amounts that ~~has~~were ~~been~~reflected in ~~bifurcated~~income ~~from~~related ~~the~~to ~~Convertible~~derivatives ~~Note~~for the three and ~~classified~~ insix ~~liabilities~~months then ended:

	Inception date			December 31, 2013
	As at March 31, 2014
Quoted market price on valuation date	$	0.07		$	0.02
	Index shares			Fair values
Contractual conversion rate	$	0.048		$	0.012
Compound embedded derivatives		8,043,875		$	(103,254	)
Range of effective contractual conversion rates		--			--
Warrant derivatives		75,000			(203	)
Contractual term to maturity		2.00 Years			1.91 Years
		8,118,875		$	(103,457	)
Implied expected term to maturity		1.612 Years			1.442 Years
Market volatility:
Range of volatilities		125.65% - 183.52	%		127.09% - 191.72	%
Equivalent volatility		145.90	%		148.49	%
Contractual interest rate		6.0	%		6.0	%
Equivalent market risk adjusted interest rate		9.43	%		9.43	%
Equivalent credit risk adjusted yield		6.53	%		6.53	%

The following table ~~reflects~~summarizes the ~~issuances~~effects ofon ~~compound~~the ~~embedded~~Company’s ~~derivatives~~gain ~~and~~(loss) associated with changes in the fair ~~value~~values ~~inputs~~of ~~and~~the ~~assumptions~~derivative ~~related~~financial toinstruments ~~the~~by ~~compound~~type of ~~embedded~~financing ~~derivatives during~~for the ~~quarter~~three and six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2013.~~2014:

	December 31, 2013
	Three Months Ended			Six Months Ended
Balances at October 1	$	--
	December 31, 2013			March 31, 2014
Issuances:
Compound embedded derivatives	$	(7,707	)	$	(9,826	)
Convertible Note Financing		62,007
Warrant derivatives		1,455			1,455
Changes in fair value inputs and assumptions reflected in income		7,707
Day-one derivative losses		(7,007	)		(8,968	)
Balances at December 31	$	69,714
Total gain (loss)	$	13,259		$	(17,339	)

The ~~fair~~Company’s face value of$55,833 ~~the~~and $27,917 ~~compound~~Convertible ~~embedded~~Promissory Notes issued on November 27, 2013 and March 14, 2014, respectively (Also refer Note 10), and Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued on December 13, 2013 gave rise to derivative isfinancial ~~significantly~~instruments. ~~influenced~~The byNote ~~the~~embodied ~~Company’s~~certain ~~trading~~terms and ~~market~~conditions ~~price,~~that were not clearly and closely related to the ~~price~~host ~~volatility~~debt agreement in ~~trading~~terms ~~and~~of ~~the~~economic ~~interest~~risks and characteristics. ~~components~~These terms and features consist of the ~~Monte~~embedded ~~Carlo~~conversion ~~Simulation~~option ~~technique~~and default put.

~~The~~Current ~~Common~~accounting ~~Stock~~principles ~~Purchase~~that ~~Warrant~~are ~~issued~~provided onin ~~December~~ASC ~~13,~~815 ~~2013~~- ~~contained~~Derivatives aand ~~variable~~Hedging ~~conversion~~require ~~price,~~derivative financial instruments to be classified in liabilities and carried at fair value with changes recorded in income. In addition, the ~~Company~~standards ~~has~~do ~~classified~~not itpermit asan aissuer to account separately for individual derivative terms and features embedded in hybrid financial instruments that require bifurcation and liability classification as derivative financial instruments. Rather, such terms and features must be bundled together and fair valued as a single, compound embedded derivative.

The Binomial Lattice technique is a level three valuation technique because it requires the development of significant internal assumptions in addition to observable market indicators. Significant assumptions utilized in the Binomial Lattice process are as follows for the warrants as of December 31, 2013:F-17

17Trio Resources, Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company)

~~Trio~~Notes ~~Resources,~~to ~~Inc.~~the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~(An~~As ~~Exploration~~at ~~Stage~~March ~~Company)~~31, 2014

~~Notes~~Expressed toin ~~the~~US ~~Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements~~Dollars

11. Derivative Liabilities: (~~Unaudited~~continued)

~~Expressed~~The Company has selected the Monte Carlo Simulations valuation technique to fair value the compound embedded derivative because it believes that this technique is reflective of all significant assumption types, and ranges of assumption inputs, that market participants would likely consider in UStransactions involving ~~Dollars~~compound embedded derivatives. Such assumptions include, among other inputs, interest risk assumptions, credit risk assumptions and redemption behaviors in addition to traditional inputs for option models such as market trading volatility and risk free rates. The Company has selected Binomial Lattice to fair value the warrant derivatives because it believes this technique is reflective of all significant assumption types market participants would likely consider in transactions involving freestanding warrants derivatives. The Monte Carlo Simulations technique is a level three valuation technique because it requires the development of significant internal assumptions in addition to observable market indicators.

~~11.~~Significant ~~Derivative~~inputs ~~Liabilities:~~and ~~(continued)~~results arising from the Monte Carlo Simulations process are as follows for the compound embedded derivative that has been bifurcated from the Convertible Notes and classified in liabilities:

	December 31, 2013
	$50,000 Note						$25,000 Note
Linked common shares		75,000
	Inception date			31 March 2014			Inception date			31 March 2014
Quoted market price on valuation date	$	0.02
Quoted market price on valution date	$	0.07		$	0.02		$	0.02		$	0.01
Contractual exercise rate	$	0.598
Contractual conversion rate	$	0.048		$	0.012		$	0.02		$	0.012
Term (years)		1.73
Contractual term to maturities		2 years			1.66 years			2 years			1.95 years
Range of market volatilities		132.64% - 189.68	%
Implied expected term to maturity		1.612 years			0.992 years			1.612 years			1.527 years
Risk free rates using zero coupon US Treasury Security rates		0.07% - 0.38	%
Market volatility:
Range of volatities		125.65% - 183.52	%		127.09% - 191.72	%		125.65% - 183.52	%		127.09% - 191.72	%
Equivalent volatility		145.90	%		148.49	%		145.90	%		148.49	%
Contractual interest rate		6.00	%		6.00	%		6.00	%		6.00	%
Equivalent market risk adjusted interest rate		9.43	%		9.43	%		9.43	%		9.43	%
Equivalent credit risk adjusted yield		6.53	%		6.53	%		6.53	%		6.53	%

The following table reflects the issuances of ~~derivative~~compound ~~warrants~~embedded derivatives and changes in fair value inputs and assumptions related to the ~~derivative~~compound ~~warrants~~embedded derivatives during the ~~quarter~~six months ended ~~December~~ March 31, ~~2013~~2014.

	December 31, 2013
	March 31, 2014
Balances at October 1	$	--
Balances at October 1, 2013	$	-
Issuances:
Convertible Notes Financing		93,011
Common stock purchase warrants		1,658
Changes in fair value inputs and assumptions reflected in income		10,446
Changes in fair value inputs and assumptions reflected in income		(1,455	)
Balances at March 31, 2014	$	103,457
Balances at December 31	$	203

The fair value of all warrant derivatives is significantly influenced by the Company’s trading market price, the price volatility in trading and the risk free interest components of the Binomial Lattice technique.F-18

12Trio Resources, Inc. ~~Contingency~~(An Exploration Stage Company)

OnNotes October 22, 2012, the previous owner of the property, 2023682 Ontario Inc., owned by Duncan Reid (CEO of the Company), was fined CDN$56,265 by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment under the Environmental Protection Act for failing to ~~comply with a Court Order to remove specified waste materials from~~ the ~~mill~~Condensed ~~site.~~Consolidated ~~Under~~Interim ~~the~~Financial ~~terms of the Order, 2023682 Ontario Inc. had until January 15, 2014 to pay the fines and to comply~~Statements with the Court Order to remove the specified waste material and, in the interim, to ensure that there is no migration or discharge of these materials into the ground or water. The liabilities and obligations with respect to this fine are with 2023682 Ontario Inc. Nevertheless, the Company has obtained a contractual indemnity from 2023682 Ontario Inc. in respect of this matter and any related liabilities in the event that 2023682 Ontario Inc. does not duly satisfy its obligations and an agreement that 2023682 Ontario Inc. will hold harmless the Company for any fines, legal actions or penalties associated with this matter. In addition, the Company has an agreement with 2023682 Ontario Inc. pursuant to which 2023682 Ontario Inc. has undertaken to dispose, at its cost, of the material as required in the court order within the specified time. In the event that 2023682 Ontario Inc. defaults with respect to any of these obligations, the Company may be subject to liability and exposure, including the disposal of these materials, any interim discharge from these materials (~~which are not currently in a permitted tailings pond~~Unaudited) and related fines. If our business is involved in one or more of these hazards, we may be subject to claims of a significant size that could force us to cease our operations. There has been a Notice of Garnishment served against Trio Resources, Inc. in the amounts of $45,874 CAD and $47,863 USD in respect of a claim against the Company’s CEO in his other business ventures. Currently, the motion is returnable in fiscal year 2014 and hence, the management cannot assess the likelihood of any outcome.

18As at March 31, 2014

~~Trio~~Expressed ~~Resources,~~in ~~Inc.~~US Dollars

~~(An~~11. Derivative ~~Exploration~~Liabilities: ~~Stage Company~~(continued)

~~Notes~~The tofair value of the ~~Condensed~~compound ~~Consolidated~~embedded ~~Interim~~derivative ~~Financial~~is ~~Statements~~significantly influenced by the Company’s trading market price, the price volatility in trading and the interest components of the Monte Carlo Simulation technique.

~~(Unaudited)~~The Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued on December 13, 2013 contained a variable conversion price, the Company has classified it as a derivative liability.

~~Expressed~~The Binomial Lattice technique is a level three valuation technique because it requires the development of significant internal assumptions in USaddition ~~Dollars~~to observable market indicators. Significant assumptions utilized in the Binomial Lattice process are as follows for the warrants as of March 31, 2014:

13. Commitment

	March 31, 2014

Linked common shares		75,000
Quoted market price on valuation date	$	0.01
Quoted market price on valuation date	$	0.598
Term (years)		1.230
Range of market volatities		132.64% - 189.68	%
Risk free rates using zero coupon US Treasury Security rates		0.07% - 0.38	%

OnThe ~~September~~following ~~25,~~table ~~2013,~~reflects the ~~Company entered~~issuances ~~into~~of aderivative ~~“Stairs~~warrants ~~Option/Joint~~and ~~Venture~~changes ~~Agreement~~in ~~(the~~fair ~~“Agreement”)~~value ~~with~~inputs ~~Teck~~and ~~Resources~~assumptions ~~Limited~~related ~~(“Teck”), a~~to ~~corporation incorporated under~~ the ~~laws~~derivative ofwarrants ~~Canada.~~during ~~Teck is~~ the ~~registered~~six ~~and beneficial owner of a 100% undivided leasehold~~months ~~interest~~ended ~~(the~~March ~~“Teck~~31, ~~Interest”) in the Stairs property located in Ontario (the “Property”)~~2014.

Teck has agreed to grant the Company an option to acquire the Teck Interest, subject only to the Back-in Right and the NSR royalty reserved to Teck, upon and subject to the terms of the Agreement. If the Company exercises the Option and Teck exercises its Back-in Right, then the NSR Royalty will be extinguished and Trio and Teck will participate as joint venture partners for any further exploration or, if deemed warranted, development of the Property upon the terms set out in the Agreement.

	March 31, 2014

Balances at October 1, 2013	$	-
Common stock purchase warrants		1,658
Changes in fair value inputs and assumptions reflected in income		(1,455	)
Balances at March 31, 2014	$	203

InThe ~~consideration~~fair ~~for~~value ~~the grant~~ of ~~the~~all ~~Option, the~~warrant ~~Company issued 75,000 Units (the “First Units”), to Teck during the current quarter ended December 31, 2013. Each~~derivatives ~~“Unit”~~is ~~(First~~significantly ~~Units~~influenced ~~and~~by ~~Second Units) shall be comprised of one common share in~~ the ~~capital of the~~ Company’s (atrading ~~“Share”) and~~market ~~one~~price, ~~non-transferable share purchase warrant (a “Warrant”). Each Warrant that comprises~~ the ~~First Units shall entitle Teck to purchase one Share for a period of 24 months from the date of issue of the First Units at the~~ price ~~per~~volatility ~~common~~in ~~share~~trading ~~equal to $0.60. The terms~~ and ~~conditions which govern~~ the ~~Warrants~~risk ~~will~~free ~~be referred to on the certificates representing the Warrants,~~interest ~~the~~components ~~terms~~ of ~~such certificates to be acceptable to Teck, acting reasonably, and will contain, among other things, anti-dilution provisions. Each Warrant that comprises~~ the ~~Second~~Binomial ~~Units~~Lattice ~~shall be exercisable for a period of 24 months from the date of issue of the Second Units at a price per share equal to $0~~technique.~~75.~~

~~Under the Agreement, Teck has granted to the Company the sole, exclusive and irrevocable right and option (the “Option”) to earn, subject to Teck’s Back~~F-~~in Right and the NSR royalty reserved out of the grant, which rights and royalty were reserved from the Option. The Company may exercise the Option by:~~19

c)Trio ~~Incurring an aggregate $1~~Resources,~~500,000~~ inInc. ~~Expenditures~~(An asExploration ~~follows:~~Stage Company)

On or Before	Cumulative Expenditures
September 30, 2014	$	300,000
September 30, 2015	$	1,000,000
September 30, 2016	$	1,500,000

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~The~~As ~~Expenditure~~at ofMarch ~~$300~~31,~~000~~ ~~due to be incurred on or before September 30,~~ 2014 ~~is a commitment, whereas the balance of the Expenditures are optional; and~~

d)Expressed ~~Issuing~~in ~~and~~US ~~delivering to Teck a further 25,000 Units (the “Second Units”) on completion of the Expenditures necessary to exercising the Option.~~Dollars

Upon the Company expending an aggregate of $1,500,000 in Expenditures and satisfying the other obligations under the Agreement, the Company shall forthwith provide Teck Notice (the “Option Expenditure Notice”), which shall include a statement in reasonable detail evidencing such Expenditures and a technical report on the results obtained from such Expenditures12. ~~On the date on which the Option Expenditure Notice is delivered,~~ the Company will have exercised the Option and earned the Teck Interest subject to the Back-in Right and NSR royalty. As of such date, the Property shall be held in trust by Teck for the Company and, forthwith upon the Company exercising the Option unless Teck delivers the Back-in Notice, Teck will forthwith take all necessary steps to transfer registered title to the Company. If the Company has not incurred the requisite Expenditures as noted above, the Company may pay in cash to Teck, within 30 days of the listed due date, the amount of the deficiency and such amount shall thereupon be deemed to have been Expenditures duly and timely incurred by the Company.Contingency

AsOn atOctober 22, 2012, the ~~date~~previous owner of the ~~this~~property, ~~filing~~2023682 Ontario Inc., noowned ~~expenditure~~by Duncan Reid (CEO of the Company), was ~~incurred~~fined CDN$56,265 by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment under the Environmental Protection Act for failing to comply with a Court Order to remove specified waste materials from the mill site. Under the terms of the Order, 2023682 Ontario Inc. had until July 31, 2014 to pay the fines and to comply with the Court Order to remove the specified waste material and, in the interim, to ensure that there is no migration or discharge of these materials into the ground or water. The liabilities and obligations with respect to this fine are with 2023682 Ontario Inc. Nevertheless, the Company has obtained a contractual indemnity from 2023682 Ontario Inc. in respect of this matter and any related liabilities in the event that 2023682 Ontario Inc. does not duly satisfy its obligations and an agreement that 2023682 Ontario Inc. will hold harmless the Company for any fines, legal actions or penalties associated with this matter. In addition, the Company has an agreement with 2023682 Ontario Inc. pursuant to which 2023682 Ontario Inc. has undertaken to dispose, at its cost, of the material as required in the court order within the specified time. In the event that 2023682 Ontario Inc. defaults with respect to any of these obligations, the Company may be subject to liability and exposure, including the disposal of these materials, any interim discharge from these materials (which are not currently in a permitted tailings pond) and related fines. If our business is involved in one or more of these hazards, we may be subject to claims of a significant size that could force us to cease our operations. There has been a Notice of Garnishment served against Trio Resources, Inc. in the amounts of $45,874 CAD and $47,863 USD in respect of a claim against the Company’s CEO in his other business ventures. Currently, the motion is returnable in fiscal year 2014 and hence, the management cannot assess the likelihood of any outcome.

1913. Commitment

~~Trio~~On September 25, 2013, the Company entered into a “Stairs Option/Joint Venture Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Teck Resources Limited (“Teck”), a ~~Inc~~corporation incorporated under the laws of Canada. Teck is the registered and beneficial owner of a 100% undivided leasehold interest (the “Teck Interest”) in the Stairs property located in Ontario (the “Property”).

~~(An~~Teck ~~Exploration~~has ~~Stage~~agreed to grant the Company) an option to acquire the Teck Interest, subject only to the Back-in Right and the NSR royalty reserved to Teck, upon and subject to the terms of the Agreement. If the Company exercises the Option and Teck exercises its Back-in Right, then the NSR Royalty will be extinguished and Trio and Teck will participate as joint venture partners for any further exploration or, if deemed warranted, development of the Property upon the terms set out in the Agreement.

~~Notes~~In consideration for the grant of the Option, the Company issued 75,000 Units (the “First Units”), to Teck during the ~~Condensed~~previous ~~Consolidated~~quarter ~~Interim~~ended December 31, 2013. ~~Financial~~Each ~~Statements~~“Unit” (First Units and Second Units) shall be comprised of one common share in the capital of the Company (a “Share”) and one non-transferable share purchase warrant (a “Warrant”).

~~(Unaudited)~~F-20

~~Expressed~~Trio inResources, USInc. ~~Dollars~~(An Exploration Stage Company)

~~14.~~Notes ~~Subsequent~~to ~~Events:~~the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~The~~As ~~Company’s~~at ~~management~~March ~~has evaluated~~31, ~~subsequent~~2014 ~~events through the filing date of these unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and has determined there are no material subsequent events to report.~~

20Expressed in US Dollars

~~ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF~~13. ~~FINANCIAL~~Commitment ~~CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~(continued)

~~The~~Each ~~information~~Warrant ~~and~~that ~~financial~~comprises ~~data~~the ~~discussed~~First Units ~~below~~shall isentitle ~~derived~~Teck to purchase one Share for a period of 24 months from the ~~unaudited~~date ~~condensed~~of ~~consolidated~~issue ~~interim~~of ~~financial~~the ~~statements~~First ofUnits ~~Trio~~at ~~Resources,~~the ~~Inc.(“we,”~~price per ~~“us”~~common orshare equal to $0.60. The terms and conditions which govern the ~~“Company”)~~Warrants ~~for~~will be referred to on the ~~three~~certificates ~~months~~representing the ~~ended~~Warrants, ~~December~~the 31terms of such certificates to be acceptable to Teck, ~~2013~~acting reasonably, and ~~were~~will ~~prepared~~contain, ~~and~~among ~~presented~~other inthings, ~~accordance~~anti-dilution ~~with~~provisions. ~~generally~~Each ~~accepted~~Warrant ~~accounting~~that ~~principles~~comprises inthe Second Units shall be exercisable for a period of 24 months from the date ~~United~~of ~~States~~issue of the Second Units at a price per share equal to $0.75.

~~Forward~~Under ~~Looking~~the ~~Statements~~Agreement, Teck has granted to the Company the sole, exclusive and irrevocable right and option (the “Option”) to earn, subject to Teck’s Back-in Right and the NSR royalty reserved out of the grant, which rights and royalty were reserved from the Option. The Company may exercise the Option by:

~~Some~~c) ofIncurring ~~the~~an ~~statements~~aggregate ~~contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are “forward -looking statements” which can be identified by the use of the terminology such as “estimates~~$1,~~” “projects~~500,”000 “plans,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” or the negative or other variations, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. We urge you to be cautious of the forward-looking statements, that such statements, which are contained in ~~this~~Expenditures Quarterly Report, reflect our current beliefs with respect to future events and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors affecting our operations, market growth, services, products and licenses. No assurances can be given regarding the achievement of future results, as actual results may differ materially as a result of the risks we face, and actual events may differ from the assumptions underlying the statements that have been made regarding anticipated events. Factors that may cause actual results, our performance or achievements to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements include without limitationfollows:

· Our ability to raise capital when needed and on acceptable terms and conditions;

On or Before	Cumulative Expenditures
September 30, 2014	$	300,000
September 30, 2015	$	1,000,000
September 30, 2016	$	1,500,000

·The ~~Our~~Expenditure of ~~ability~~$300,000 due to ~~attract~~be ~~and~~incurred ~~retain~~on ~~management~~or before September 30, 2014 is a commitment, whereas the balance of the Expenditures are optional; and

·d) ~~Our~~Issuing ~~ability~~and delivering to ~~enter~~Teck ina tofurther ~~long-term~~25,000 ~~supply~~Units ~~agreements~~(the ~~for~~“Second Units”) on completion of the ~~mineralized~~Expenditures ~~material;~~necessary to exercising the Option.

·Upon ~~General~~the ~~economic~~Company ~~conditions;~~expending an aggregate of $1,500,000 in Expenditures and satisfying the other obligations under the Agreement, the Company shall forthwith provide Teck Notice (the “Option Expenditure Notice”), which shall include a statement in reasonable detail evidencing such Expenditures and a technical report on the results obtained from such Expenditures. On the date on which the Option Expenditure Notice is delivered, the Company will have exercised the Option and earned the Teck Interest subject to the Back-in Right and NSR royalty. As of such date, the Property shall be held in trust by Teck for the Company and, forthwith upon the Company exercising the Option unless Teck delivers the Back-in Notice, Teck will forthwith take all necessary steps to transfer registered title to the Company. If the Company has not incurred the requisite Expenditures as noted above, the Company may pay in cash to Teck, within 30 days of the listed due date, the amount of the deficiency and such amount shall thereupon be deemed to have been Expenditures duly and timely incurred by the Company.

·As ~~Other~~at ~~factors~~the ~~discussed~~date inof ~~Risk~~this ~~Factors~~filing, no expenditure was incurred by the Company.

All forward looking statements made in connection with this Quarterly Report that are attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Given the uncertainties that surround such statements you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward looking statements.F-21

~~Overview~~Trio Resources, Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company)

WeNotes ~~operate~~to ~~as a milling and exploration company in~~ the ~~province~~Condensed ofConsolidated ~~Ontario~~Interim ~~Canada. Our~~Financial ~~operations have been limited to acquiring our initial land holdings and~~Statements ~~patented claims and our initial milling and mining assets to allow us to begin to implement our plans to start small scale concentration of existing above ground mineral resources.~~(Unaudited)

WeAs ~~are~~at anMarch ~~exploration stage company and have not generated significant revenues to date. We are in the initial stages of developing our mineral properties~~31, ~~have~~2014 very limited cash resources and are in need of substantial additional capital to execute our business plan. For these and other reasons, our independent auditors have raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

AsExpressed an exploration company we have not as yet generated significant operating revenues and have incurred operating losses of $3,016,920 from our inception, May 16, 2012, to December 31, 2013, and of $270,646 for the three months ended December 31, 2013, respectively. To date we have funded our operations through advances from a related party and from private third party lenders utilizing convertible notes including draw down loan payable totaling $1,421,910 as explained in ~~detail~~US ~~in the section “Liquidity and Capital Resources”.~~Dollars

2114. Subsequent Events:

~~ITEM~~On ~~2: MANAGEMENT’S~~July ~~DISCUSSION~~3, ~~AND~~2014, ~~ANALYSIS~~the OFCompany entered into ~~FINANCIAL~~a ~~CONDITION~~subscription ~~AND~~agreement ~~RESULTS~~with OFaccredited ~~OPERATIONS~~investors ~~(continued)~~for the issuance of maximum of 25,000,000 shares at an offering price of $0.02 per share. As at the date of filing of this document, the Company raised $150,000 through the subscription for issuance of 7,500,000 shares pursuant to this subscription agreement.

~~Property~~F-22

~~The~~ITEM ~~Company~~2: ~~acquired the Duncan Kerr property~~MANAGEMENT’S inDISCUSSION ~~May~~AND ~~2012.~~ANALYSIS ~~This~~OF ~~property~~FINANCIAL isCONDITION ~~located~~AND inRESULTS ~~Ontario,~~OF ~~Canada, approximately three kilometers southeast of the town of Cobalt. Main features of this property are summarized as below:~~OPERATIONS

· The ~~property~~information isand ~~located~~financial indata adiscussed below ~~region that~~ is ~~well~~derived ~~known~~from ~~for~~the ~~its~~unaudited ~~base~~condensed ~~and~~consolidated ~~precious~~interim ~~metal~~financial ~~production.~~statements ~~Past~~of ~~producing~~Trio ~~mines~~Resources, atInc.(“we,” “us” ~~Duncan~~or ~~Kerr~~the ~~have~~“Company”) ~~mined~~for inthe ~~excess~~three ofmonths 32ended ~~million~~March ~~ounces of silver~~31, 2014 and ~~one~~were ofprepared ~~North~~and ~~America’s~~presented ~~richest~~in ~~silver~~accordance with ~~veins~~generally ~~ever~~accepted ~~explored~~accounting isprinciples ~~located~~in on the ~~property~~United ~~per preliminary geologist report from TMK Associates on March 22, 2013~~States.

·Forward ~~The~~Looking Company’s plans include 5,000 meters of diamond drilling and other exploration at the Duncan Kerr project as well as upgrading its existing mill capacity to be able to process up to 360 tons per day.Statements

·Some ~~The~~of ~~Company~~the ~~has~~statements ~~full~~contained ~~rights~~in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are “forward -looking statements” which can be identified by the use of the terminology such as “estimates,” “projects,” “plans,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” or the negative or other variations, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and ~~claims~~uncertainties. We urge you to ~~this~~be ~~property~~cautious ~~including~~of the ~~existing~~forward-looking ~~mineralized~~statements, ~~material~~that such statements, ~~onsite~~which ~~mill~~are contained in this Quarterly Report, ~~other~~reflect ~~structures~~our current beliefs with respect to future events and ~~equipment~~involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and ~~all~~other ~~surface~~factors affecting our operations, market growth, services, products and ~~mineral~~licenses. ~~rights~~No assurances can be given regarding the achievement of future results, as actual results may differ materially as a result of the risks we face, and actual events may differ from the assumptions underlying the statements that have been made regarding anticipated events. Factors that may cause actual results, our performance or achievements to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements include without limitation:

·● ~~This~~Our ~~property~~ability ~~has~~to araise ~~very~~capital ~~strategic~~when ~~location~~needed inand on acceptable terms ofand ~~its~~conditions; ~~access~~● Our ability to ~~major~~attract ~~highways,~~and ~~rail~~retain ~~spurs,~~management; ~~power~~● Our ability to enter in to long-term supply agreements for the mineralized material; ● General economic conditions; and ~~fresh~~● ~~water~~Other factors discussed in Risk Factors.

·All ~~Presence~~forward oflooking ~~estimated~~statements 1made in connection with this Quarterly Report that are attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements.3 ~~million~~Given ~~tons~~the ofuncertainties ~~mineralized~~that ~~material~~surround ~~already~~such ~~located~~statements ~~above~~you ~~ground~~are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward looking statements.

~~Recent Development~~Overview

~~Acquisition~~We operate as a milling and exploration company in the province of ~~TrioResources~~Ontario AGCanada. ~~Inc~~Our operations have been limited to acquiring our initial land holdings and patented claims and our initial milling and mining assets to allow us to begin to implement our plans to start small scale concentration of existing above ground mineral resources.

OnWe ~~December~~are ~~14,~~an ~~2012,~~exploration westage ~~entered into~~company aand ~~share~~have not ~~exchange~~generated ~~agreement~~significant ~~(the~~revenues ~~“Share~~to ~~Exchange Agreement”) with TrioResources AG Inc~~date., ~~pursuant~~We toare ~~which~~in ~~we acquired 100% of~~ the ~~issued~~initial ~~and~~stages ~~outstanding equity securities~~ of ~~TrioResources~~developing ~~AG Inc., which became~~ our ~~wholly~~mineral ~~owned~~properties, ~~subsidiary~~have ~~(the~~very ~~“Share~~limited ~~Exchange”).~~cash ~~Part~~resources ofand ~~the~~are ~~consideration~~in ~~was~~need ~~a payment~~ of ~~$250,000,~~substantial ~~which~~additional ~~was~~capital ~~expensed during the year,~~ to ~~Ihar~~execute ~~Yaravenka,~~our ~~the former,~~business ~~sole~~plan. ~~officer,~~For ~~director~~these and ~~controlling~~other ~~shareholder for him to surrender and cancel 1~~reasons,~~500,000~~ ~~shares of common stock of~~our ~~the~~independent ~~Company.~~auditors ~~Prior~~have toraised ~~the~~substantial ~~completion~~doubt ofabout ~~the~~our ~~Share~~ability ~~Exchange,~~to wecontinue ~~had~~as ~~no assets or liabilities and we were~~ a ~~shell~~going ~~company~~concern.

TrioResources AG Inc. was incorporated on May 16, 2012 under the laws of the province of Ontario, Canada, is headquartered in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. This company is an exploration stage company intending to focus on exploration, milling, and processing of mineralized material located on its property.4

~~Pursuant~~ITEM ~~to the terms and conditions of the Share Exchange Agreement, we acquired 100% of the capital stock,~~ 2~~,130,000~~: ~~common~~MANAGEMENT’S ~~shares,~~DISCUSSION ~~of TrioResources AG Inc. in exchange~~AND ~~for~~ANALYSIS ~~the~~OF ~~issuance~~FINANCIAL ofCONDITION ~~2,130,000~~AND ~~shares~~RESULTS ofOF ~~our~~OPERATIONS ~~common stock. The result is that the shareholders of TrioResourcses AG Inc. own 66.15% of the total outstanding shares of the Company effective the date of the Share Exchange Agreement.~~(continued)

~~Plan~~As an exploration company we have not as yet generated significant operating revenues and have incurred operating losses of ~~Operations~~$3,230,930 from our inception, May 16, 2012, to March 31, 2014, and of $214,010 and $484,656 for the three and six months ended March 31, 2014, respectively. To date we have funded our operations through advances from a related party and from private third party lenders utilizing convertible notes and loans payable including draw down loan payable totaling $2,299,513 as explained in detail in the section “Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

The Company’s intention is to conduct exploration initiatives, with the purpose of being cash-flow positive by processing precious metals, and other valuable minerals. The Company utilizes modern mining and exploration technology in conjunction with focusing on combining the right blend of experienced mining consultants and technological management in order to remain competitive.Property

WeThe ~~intend~~Company toacquired ~~conduct~~the ~~further~~Duncan ~~exploration initiatives,~~Kerr property in ~~order~~May ~~to target additional high-concentration regions, which would be profitable to develop~~2012. ~~Unlike~~This ~~other~~property ~~junior mining~~is ~~companies,~~located wein ~~plan to have our exploration initiative coincide with our milling program~~Ontario, ~~through which we are planning to be able to run a cash-flow positive business by producing precious metals~~Canada, ~~and~~approximately ~~other~~three ~~valuable~~kilometers ~~minerals.~~southeast Byof ~~reinvesting~~ the ~~profits realized~~town byof ~~capitalizing~~Cobalt. ~~on our existing mineralized mineral stock piles, we anticipate having the ability to expedite our business~~Main ~~plan,~~features ~~and fund some~~ of ~~the~~this ~~expansion~~property ofare ~~our~~summarized ~~operations,~~as ~~internally.~~below:

● The property is located in a region that is well known for its base and precious metal production. Past producing mines at Duncan Kerr have mined in excess of 32 million ounces of silver, and one of North America’s richest silver veins ever explored is located on the property per preliminary geologist report from TMK Associates on March 22, 2013. ● The Company’s plans include 5,000 meters of diamond drilling and other exploration at the Duncan Kerr project as well as upgrading its existing mill capacity to be able to process up to 360 tons per day. ● The Company has full rights and claims to this property including the existing mineralized material, onsite mill, other structures and equipment, and all surface and mineral rights. ● This property has a very strategic location in terms of its access to major highways, rail spurs, power and fresh water. ● Presence of estimated 1.3 million tons of mineralized material already located above ground.

~~ITEM~~Recent ~~2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)~~Development

~~Results~~Acquisition of ~~Operations~~TrioResources AG Inc.

WeOn ~~are~~December an14, ~~exploration~~2012, ~~stage~~we ~~company~~entered asinto a share ~~defined~~exchange inagreement (the ~~SEC~~“Share ~~Guideline~~Exchange ~~7 (a~~Agreement”) ~~(4)~~with ~~(i)~~TrioResources AG Inc. We, ~~have~~pursuant ~~not~~to ~~generated~~which ~~significant~~we ~~revenue~~acquired to100% of ~~date~~the issued and ~~consequently~~outstanding ~~our~~equity ~~operations are~~securities ~~subject~~of toTrioResources ~~all~~AG ofInc., ~~the~~which ~~risks~~became ~~inherent~~our inwholly owned subsidiary (the ~~establishment~~“Share Exchange”). Part of athe ~~new~~consideration ~~business~~was ~~enterprise. Our~~a ~~operations~~payment ~~have~~of ~~been limited~~$250,000, towhich ~~the~~was ~~purchase~~expensed ofduring ~~our~~the ~~initial~~year, ~~land~~to ~~position~~Ihar ~~including~~Yaravenka, the 2former, ~~patented~~sole ~~claims~~officer, director and ~~the~~controlling ~~acquisition~~shareholder offor ~~fixed~~him ~~assets~~to ~~which~~surrender ~~will be~~and ~~incorporated~~cancel ~~into~~1,500,000 ~~our~~shares ~~processing~~of ~~facility.~~common ~~Our~~stock of ~~analysis~~the onCompany. Prior to the ~~performance~~completion of the ~~Company~~Share isExchange, aswe ~~follows:~~had no assets or liabilities and we were a shell company.

~~Balance sheet – As at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013~~ 5

~~Cash/Bank~~ITEM ~~indebtedness~~2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

AtTrioResources ~~December~~AG ~~31,~~Inc. ~~2013~~was ~~the~~incorporated ~~Company~~on May ~~had $2~~16,~~140 of~~ ~~cash~~2012 asunder ~~compared~~the tolaws ~~bank~~of ~~indebtedness~~the province of ~~$10~~Ontario,~~830~~ ~~as at September 30~~Canada, ~~2013.~~is ~~The~~headquartered ~~change~~in ~~from~~Toronto, ~~bank~~Ontario, ~~indebtedness~~Canada. asThis atcompany ~~September~~is ~~30,~~an ~~2013~~exploration tostage ~~cash~~company asintending ~~at December 31, 2013 was mainly due~~ to ~~increase~~focus inon ~~loans payable from $257~~exploration,~~399~~ ~~as at September 30~~milling, ~~2013~~and ~~to $432,705~~processing asof atmineralized ~~December~~material ~~31,~~located ~~2013~~on ~~offset by the payments of expenses~~its property.

~~Prepaid~~Pursuant ~~expenses~~to the terms and ~~other~~conditions ~~receivables~~of the Share Exchange Agreement, we acquired 100% of the capital stock, 2,130,000 common shares, of TrioResources AG Inc. in exchange for the issuance of 2,130,000 shares of our common stock. The result is that the shareholders of TrioResourcses AG Inc. own 66.15% of the total outstanding shares of the Company effective the date of the Share Exchange Agreement.

AtPlan ~~December 31, 2013 the Company had $104,117~~ of prepaid expenses and other receivables as compared to $122,930 as at September 30, 2013. The decrease of $18,813 during the current period mainly represented $25,398 amortization of prepaid expenses relating to a consulting agreement offset by ITC recoverable on eligible expenses of $6,585 recorded during the current quarter ended December 31, 2013. Operations

~~Loan~~The ~~receivable~~Company’s –intention ~~related~~is ~~party~~to conduct exploration initiatives, with the purpose of being cash-flow positive by processing precious metals, and ~~Patented~~other ~~claims~~valuable minerals. The Company utilizes modern mining and exploration technology in conjunction with focusing on combining the right blend of experienced mining consultants and technological management in order to remain competitive.

~~There~~We ~~was~~intend noto ~~change~~conduct further exploration initiatives, in ~~the~~order ~~balance~~to oftarget ~~loan~~additional high-concentration regions, which would be profitable to develop. Unlike other junior mining companies, ~~from~~we aplan ~~related~~to ~~party~~have inour ~~the~~exploration ~~amount~~initiative ofcoincide ~~CDN~~with 67our milling program,~~663~~ ~~and~~through ~~patented~~which ~~claims~~we ofare ~~CAD~~planning 10to be able to run a cash-flow positive business by producing precious metals,~~200.~~ ~~The~~and ~~variation~~other invaluable ~~the~~minerals. ~~balance~~By asreinvesting atthe ~~December~~profits realized by 31capitalizing on our existing mineralized mineral stock piles, ~~2013~~we asanticipate ~~compared~~having the ability to ~~September~~expedite 30our business plan, and ~~2013~~fund ~~reflected~~some of the ~~change~~expansion inof ~~foreign~~our ~~exchange~~operations, ~~rates~~internally.

~~Property~~Results ~~and~~of ~~equipment~~Operations

AtWe ~~December~~are ~~31,~~an ~~2013~~exploration ~~the~~stage ~~Company~~company ~~had~~as ~~$230,218~~defined ofin ~~net~~the ~~book~~SEC ~~value~~Guideline of7 ~~property~~(a) (4) (i). We have not generated significant revenue to date and ~~equipment~~consequently asour ~~compared~~operations are subject to ~~$238,876~~all asof atthe ~~September~~risks ~~30,~~inherent ~~2013~~in the establishment of a new business enterprise. ~~The~~Our ~~decrease~~operations ishave ~~mainly~~been ~~due~~limited to ~~amortization expense~~the purchase of $our initial land position including 2 patented claims,~~051~~ and the ~~effects~~acquisition of ~~change~~fixed inassets ~~foreign~~which ~~exchange~~will ~~rates~~be ~~during~~incorporated into our processing facility. Our analysis on the ~~quarter~~performance ~~ended~~of ~~December~~the ~~31,~~Company ~~2013.~~is as follows:

~~Accounts~~Balance ~~payable~~sheet – As at March 31, 2014 and ~~accrued~~September ~~liabilities~~30, 2013

AtCash/Bank December 31, 2013 the Company had $704,865 of accounts payable and accrued liabilities as compared to $763,775 as at September 30, 2013. The decrease of $58,910 mainly represented payments made during the current quarter ended December 31, 2013 to the suppliers as the Company obtained financing through loans payable and convertible notes.indebtedness

~~Loans~~At ~~payable~~March 31, 2014 the Company had bank indebtedness of $62 of as compared to bank indebtedness of $10,830 as at September 30, 2013. The decrease in bank indebtedness was mainly due to issuance of $75,000 convertible notes during the six months ended March 31, 2014.

At December 31, 2013 the Company had $432,705 of loans payable as compared to $257,399 as at September 30, 2013. The increase of $175,306 represented an interest free loan obtained from a third party to meet the day to day working capital requirement of the Company.6

~~Convertible~~ITEM ~~draw~~2: ~~down~~MANAGEMENT’S ~~loan~~DISCUSSION ~~payable~~AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

~~The~~Prepaid ~~Company~~expenses ~~entered into a one-year Convertible Draw Down Facility, dated as of November 1, 2012, with Seagel Investment Ltd. as lender, in the maximum amount of $500,000. As at December 31, 2013~~ and ~~September~~other ~~30, 2013 the amount outstanding under the Draw Down Facility was $425,000.~~receivables

23At March 31, 2014 the Company had $80,463 of prepaid expenses and other receivables as compared to $122,930 as at September 30, 2013. The decrease of $42,467 during the six months period ended March 31, 2014 mainly represented amortization of prepaid expenses relating to consulting agreements.

~~ITEM~~Loan ~~2: MANAGEMENT’S~~receivable ~~DISCUSSION~~– ~~AND~~related ~~ANALYSIS~~party OFand ~~FINANCIAL~~Patented ~~CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)~~claims

~~Convertible~~There ~~note~~was ~~payable~~no –change ~~related~~in the balance of loan from a related party in the amount of CDN 67,663 and patented claims of CAD 10,200. The variation in the balance as at March 31, 2014 as compared to September 30, 2013 reflected the change in foreign exchange rates.

AtProperty December 31, 2013 the Company had $397,160 of convertible note payable to a related party as compared to $384,899 as at September 30, 2013. The increase of $12,261 represented accretion expense of $24,642 for the current period ended December 31, 2013 offset by the effects of change in foreign exchange rates. The note was issued on June 15, 2012 for a term of two years and ~~carries interest at 3% per annum. This note is interest free for the first twelve months.~~equipment

~~Convertible~~At ~~notes~~March ~~payable~~31, –2014 ~~third~~the Company had $219,577 ~~parties~~of net book value of property and ~~derivative~~equipment ~~liabilities~~as compared to $238,876 as at September 30, 2013. The decrease of $19,299 represented amortization expense of $4,002 for the six months period ended March 31, 2014 and the effects of difference in foreign exchange rates during the six months period ended March 31, 2014.

AtAccounts ~~December 31, 2013 the Company had $1,017,503 of convertible notes~~ payable ~~to third parties~~ and ~~derivative~~accrued liabilities as compared to $966,363 as at September 30, 2013. The increase of $51,140 represented mainly the issuance of a $50,000 convertible note during the current quarter ended December 31, 2013. These notes have been issued under multiple funding arrangements with third party investors for a term of two years and carries interest ranging from 10% to 12% per annum.

~~Statement~~At March 31, 2014 the Company had $772,117 of ~~Operations~~accounts –payable ~~For~~and accrued liabilities as compared to $763,775 as at September 30, 2013. The increase of $8,342 represented accruals of $50,500 during the ~~quarter~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2013~~2014 ~~and~~offset ~~2012~~by the payments to suppliers amounting to $42,158.

~~Expenses~~Loans payable

~~Our~~At ~~expenses~~March ~~are~~31, ~~classified~~2014 ~~primarily~~the ~~into~~Company had $438,350 of loans payable as compared to $257,399 as at September 30, 2013. The increase of $180,951 represented an interest free loan obtained from a third party to meet the ~~following~~day ~~categories~~to day working capital requirement of the Company.

·Convertible ~~Corporate~~draw ~~expenses;~~down loan payable

·The ~~Exploration~~Company entered into a one-year Convertible Draw Down Facility, dated as of November 1, 2012, with Seagel Investment Ltd. as lender, in the maximum amount of $500,000. As at March 31, 2014 and ~~development~~September ~~costs;~~30, 2013 the amount outstanding under the Draw Down Facility was $425,000.

·Convertible ~~Interest~~note ~~and~~payable ~~derivative~~– ~~expense; and~~related party

·At ~~Depreciation~~March 31, 2014 the Company had $405,560 of convertible note payable to a related party as compared to $384,899 as at September 30, 2013. The increase of $20,661 represented accretion expense of $51,430 for the six month period ended March 31, 2014 offset by the effects of change in foreign exchange rates. The note was issued on June 15, 2012 for a term of two years and carries interest at 3% per annum. This note is interest free for the first twelve months.

~~Corporate expenses and exploration and development costs~~7

~~Corporate~~ITEM ~~expenses~~2: ~~and~~MANAGEMENT’S ~~exploration~~DISCUSSION ~~and~~AND ~~development~~ANALYSIS ~~costs~~OF ~~for~~FINANCIAL ~~the~~CONDITION ~~quarters~~AND ~~ended~~RESULTS ~~December~~OF ~~31,~~OPERATIONS 2013 and 2012 were $164,382 and $21,775 as compared to $567,098 and $66,217, respectively. The expenses which are generally included in these categories are consulting, legal, professional and edgarization charges. TrioResources AG Inc. was operating as a private limited company up to December 14, 2012, when it became public through a reverse merger transaction. The increased corporate expenses and exploration and development costs in 2012 were mainly due to the reverse merger activities.(continued)

~~Interest~~Convertible ~~expense~~notes payable – third parties and ~~depreciation~~derivative liabilities

~~Interest~~At ~~expense~~March 31, ~~derivative~~2014 ~~expense and depreciation for~~ the ~~for~~Company ~~the~~had ~~quarters ended December 31~~$1,029,185 of ~~2013~~convertible ~~and~~notes ~~2012~~payable ~~were~~to ~~$69,179,~~third ~~$13,129~~parties and ~~$2,051~~derivative liabilities as compared to $50966,~~150,~~363 ~~$nil~~as ~~and~~at $3September 30,~~336,~~ ~~respectively~~2013. The increase inof ~~interest~~$62,822 ~~expense~~represented inmainly the ~~current~~issuance ~~quarter~~of asa ~~compared~~$75,000 toconvertible ~~the~~notes ~~previous quarter was mainly due to additional interest based financing obtained~~ during the ~~current~~six ~~quarter~~months period ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2013.~~ ~~Derivative~~2014. ~~expense~~These ~~represented~~notes ~~the~~have ~~derivative~~been ~~loss~~issued ~~recognized~~under ~~resulting~~multiple ~~from~~funding ~~the~~arrangements ~~change~~with inthird ~~fair~~party ~~value~~investors offor a ~~promissory convertible~~term ~~note~~of astwo ~~discussed~~years inand carries ~~note~~interest 11ranging offrom ~~the~~10% ~~unaudited~~to ~~condensed~~12% ~~consolidated~~per ~~interim financial statement~~annum.

24Statement of Operations – For the three and six months March 31, 2014 and 2013:

~~ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)~~Expenses

~~Liquidity~~Our ~~and~~expenses ~~Capital~~are ~~Resources~~classified primarily into the following categories.

At● ~~December~~Corporate ~~31,~~expenses; ~~2013,~~● ~~the~~Exploration ~~Company~~and ~~had~~development ~~a working~~costs; ~~capital~~● ~~deficit~~Interest ofand ~~$2,403,223~~derivative ~~compared~~expense; toand a● ~~working capital deficit of $1,391,729 as at September 30, 2013. The Company is actively seeking various financing operations to meet the working capital requirements.~~Depreciation

ToCorporate ~~date~~expenses ~~we have relied on third parties to provide financing for our operations by way of convertible notes~~ and other loans. The proceeds may not be sufficient to effectively develop our business to the fullest extent to allow us to maximize our revenue potential, in which case, we will need additional capital. We will need capital to allow us to acquire additional properties to expand our exploration base. The Company anticipates that its future mill operations will generate positive cash flows in fiscal 2014 provided that it is successful in obtaining additional financing in the foreseeable future. The Company has negotiated a $500,000 Draw Down facility with Seagel Investments Corp. of which $425,000 has been drawn as at December 31, 2013. On November 27, 2013, the Company entered into a Draw Down Facility in the amount of $335,000 with a lender of which the Company has obtained $50,000 at December 31, 2013. The Company is also pursuing an additional financing facility that is expected to close during the second quarter of fiscal 2014. In addition we will need to provide the Company with working capital. The amount and ~~timing of capital required will depend on when~~ wedevelopment are able to conclude agreements either to purchase additional land and the associated patented claims and/or enter into licensing or other working relationships to allow the Company to have access to the largest mining asset base possible within the financial constraints of the Company. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations we will be required to raise additional funds either in the form of capital or debt. There are no assurances that we will be able to generate the necessary capital or debt to carry out our current plan of operations.costs

~~Off-Balance~~Corporate ~~Sheet~~expenses ~~Arrangements~~and exploration and development costs for the three and six months ended March 31, 2014 were $139,266 and $325,423 as compared to $596,167 and $1,229,482 for the three and six months ended March 31, 2013, respectively. The expenses which are generally included in these categories are consulting, legal, professional and edgarization charges. TrioResources AG Inc. was operating as a private limited company up to December 14, 2012, when it became public through a reverse merger transaction. The increased corporate expenses and exploration and development costs in 2013 were mainly due to the reverse merger activities.

WeInterest ~~have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition~~expense, ~~changes~~change in ~~financial condition,~~derivative ~~revenues~~liabilities orand ~~expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.~~depreciation

~~Critical~~Interest expense, changes in derivative liabilities ~~Accounting~~and ~~Policies~~depreciation for the three ended March 31, 2014 were $68,713, $4,080 and $1,951 as compared to $56,411, $nil and $3,686, for the three months ended March 31, 2013, respectively. Interest expense, change in derivative liabilities and depreciation for the six ended March 31, 2014 were $137,892, $17,339 and $4,002 as compared to $106,561, $nil and $7,022, for the three months ended March 31, 2013, respectively. The increase in interest expense for the three and six months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to three and six months ended March 31, 2013 was mainly due to additional interest based financing obtained during the current period. Change in derivative liabiltities represented the derivative loss recognized resulting from the changes in fair values of promissory convertible notes as discussed in note 11 of the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statement.

~~Critical accounting policies are described in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2013.~~8

~~Subsequent~~ITEM ~~Events~~2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

~~The~~Liquidity ~~Company’s management has evaluated subsequent events through the filing date of these consolidated financial statements~~ and ~~has~~Capital ~~determined there are no material subsequent events to report.~~Resources

~~Description~~At OfMarch ~~Property~~31, 2014, the Company had a working capital deficit of $2,479,253 compared to a working capital deficit of $1,391,729 as at September 30, 2013. The Company is actively seeking various financing operations to meet the working capital requirements.

~~Our~~To ~~principal~~date ~~executive~~we ~~offices~~have ~~are~~relied ~~located~~on third parties to provide financing for our operations by way of convertible notes and other loans. The proceeds may not be sufficient to effectively develop our business to the fullest extent to allow us to maximize our revenue potential, in which case, we will need additional capital. We will need capital to allow us to acquire additional properties to expand our exploration base. The Company anticipates that its future mill operations will generate positive cash flows in fiscal 2014 provided that it is successful in obtaining additional financing in the foreseeable future. The Company has negotiated a $500,000 Draw Down facility with Seagel Investments Corp. of which $425,000 has been drawn as at ~~100~~March ~~King~~31, ~~Street~~2014. On November 27, 2013, the Company entered into a Draw Down Facility in the ~~West~~amount of $335,000 ~~Suite~~with ~~5600~~a lender of which the Company has obtained $75,000 ~~Toronto~~at March 31, ~~Ontario~~2014. ~~M5X~~Further, ~~1C9~~On July 3, 2014, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with accredited investors for the issuance of maximum of 25,000,000 shares at an offering price of $0.02 per share. As at the date of filing of this document, the Company raised $150,000 through the issuance of 7,500,000 shares pursuant to this subscription agreement. In addition we will need to provide the Company with working capital. The amount and timing of capital required will depend on when we are able to conclude agreements either to purchase additional land and the associated patented claims and/or enter into licensing or other working relationships to allow the Company to have access to the largest mining asset base possible within the financial constraints of the Company. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations we will be required to raise additional funds either in the form of capital or debt. There are no assurances that we will be able to generate the necessary capital or debt to carry out our current plan of operations.

~~The~~Off-Balance ~~mining~~Sheet ~~properties are located LOT 3, CON 4, Coleman Township, District of Temiskaming, Ontario.~~Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are described in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2013.

Subsequent Events

On July 3, 2014, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with accredited investors for the issuance of maximum of 25,000,000 shares at an offering price of $0.02 per share. As at the date of filing of this document, the Company raised $150,000 through the subscription for issuance of 7,500,000 shares pursuant to this subscription agreement.

ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Description Of Property

Our principal executive offices are located at 100 King Street West, Suite 5600, Toronto, Ontario M5X 1C9

The mining properties are located LOT 3, CON 4, Coleman Township, District of Temiskaming, Ontario.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this item.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) Rules 13a-15(e) and 15-d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer each concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Internal control over financial reporting includes maintaining records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions; providing reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of our consolidated financial statements; providing reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of our assets are made in accordance with management authorization; and providing reasonable assurance that unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements would be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our consolidated financial statements would be prevented or detected.

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this valuation, segregation of duties & maintenance of current accounting records have been identified as material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Management is in the continuous process of improving the internal control over financial reporting by engaging a Certified Public Accountant as a consultant to mitigate some of the identified weaknesses. The Company is still in its development stage and intends on bringing in necessary resources to address the weaknesses once full operations have commenced. Management concludes that internal control over financial reporting has material weaknesses at December 31, 2013.10

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (continued)

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes during the period ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2013~~2014 in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm business. We are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

On October 22, 2012, the previous owner of of the property, 2023682 Ontario Inc., owned by Duncan Reid (CEO of the Company), was fined CDN$56,265 by the Ontario Ministry of of the Environment under the Environmental Protection Act for failing to comply with a Court Order to remove specified waste materials from the mill site. Under the terms of the Order, 2023682 Ontario Inc. had until ~~January~~July 1531, 2014 to pay the fines and to comply with the Court Order to remove the specified waste material and, in the interim, to ensure that there is no migration or discharge of these materials into the ground or water. The liabilities and obligations with respect to this fine are with 2023682 Ontario Inc. Nevertheless, the Company has obtained a contractual indemnity from 2023682 Ontario Inc. in respect of this matter and ~~any~~ any related liabilities in the event that 2023682 Ontario Inc. does not duly satisfy its obligations and an agreement that 2023682 Ontario Inc. will hold harmless the Company for any fines, legal actions or penalties associated with this matter. In addition, the Company has an agreement with 2023682 Ontario Inc. pursuant to which 2023682 Ontario Inc. has undertaken to dispose, at its cost, of the material as required in the court order within the specified time. In the event that 2023682 Ontario Inc. defaults with respect to any of these obligations, the Company may be subject to liability and exposure, including the disposal of these materials, any interim discharge from these materials (which are not currently in a permitted tailings pond) and related fines. If our business is involved in one or more of these hazards, we may be subject to claims of a significant size that could force us to cease our operations. There has been a Notice of Garnishment served against Trio Resources, Inc. in the amounts of $45,874 CAD and $47,863 USD in respect of a claim against the Company’s CEO in his other business ventures. Currently, the motion is returnable in fiscal year 2014 and hence, the management cannot assess the likelihood of any outcome.

~~ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS~~11

OnITEM ~~December 13, 2013, the Company issued 437,500 shares in respect of consulting services valued at $0~~2.02 ~~per~~UNREGISTERED ~~share~~SALES ~~(being~~OF ~~the~~EQUITY ~~trading~~SECURITIES ~~price)~~AND ~~amounting~~USE toOF ~~$8,750, which was expensed during the current period ended December 31, 2013.~~PROCEEDS

On December 3113, 2013, the Company issued 437,500 shares in respect of consulting services valued at $0.02 per share (being the trading price) amounting to $8,750, which was expensed during the current period ended December 31, 2013. On December 31, 2013, the Company issued 75,000 shares in respect of Stairs/Option Joint Venture Agreement. These shares were valued at $0.02 per share (being the trading price) and were recorded as expense to be amortized over the period of the agreement. On July 3, 2014, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with accredited investors for the issuance of maximum of 25,000,000 shares at an offering price of $0.02 per share. As at the date of filing of this document, the Company raised $150,000 through the subscription for issuance of 7,500,000 shares.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

26ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

~~ITEM 6. EXHIBITS~~Exhibits:

Exhibits:

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a).*

32.1		Certifications pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.*

~~31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer~~* ~~and~~Filed ~~Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)~~herewith.

~~32.1 Certifications pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.~~12

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	TRIO RESOURCES, INC.
Dated: February 19, 2014	By:	/s/ J. Duncan Reid
Dated: July 17, 2014	By:	/s/ J. Duncan Reid
		J. Duncan Reid, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

2713

Filing Compare · Trio Resources, Inc.