Zapata Quantum: 2026 annual meeting voting results

What happened Zapata Quantum reported that on Oct 9, 2026 it held its 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and stockholders voted on six proposals, including the election of three directors and approval of a reverse stock split proposal. Of the 234,170,076 votes constituting the outstanding voting power, 148,463,029 votes were represented at the meeting.

Key details

• Proposal 1 — election of directors (votes for / votes withheld / broker non-votes): Sumit Kapur 139,792,581 / 71,624 / 8,598,824; William E. Klitgaard 139,788,168 / 76,037 / 8,598,824; Clark Golestani 139,716,306 / 147,899 / 8,598,824.
• Proposal 2 — amend certificate to permit reverse stock split (one-for-2 through one-for-50): 144,666,524 votes for; 3,029,085 votes against; 767,420 abstentions; no broker non-votes.
• Proposal 3 — ratify Weinberg & Company as independent registered public accounting firm for year ending Dec 31, 2026: 147,458,955 votes for; 64,145 votes against; 939,929 abstentions; no broker non-votes.
• Proposal 4 — non-binding advisory approval of named executive officer compensation: 138,593,117 votes for; 310,521 votes against; 960,567 abstentions; 8,598,824 broker non-votes.
• Proposal 5 — non-binding advisory vote on frequency of future say-on-pay votes (board recommended three years): one year 9,040,354; two years 9,928,823; three years 120,138,727; 756,301 abstentions; no broker non-votes. After receiving the results, the company determined to proceed with a frequency of every three years.
• Proposal 6 — approve adjournment if necessary to solicit additional proxies: 145,999,526 votes for; 1,597,218 votes against; 866,285 abstentions; no broker non-votes. Because there were sufficient votes to approve Proposals 1 through 5, adjournment was not necessary.

Why it may matter The filing reports Item 5.07: submission of matters to a vote of security holders and provides the detailed vote counts for each proposal voted on at the Oct 9, 2026 annual meeting. This filing does not show why the insider traded or why the company acted.