UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark one)

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2014~~2015



o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________________to


Commission File Number: 000-54492

IPOWORLD

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

_________________

3472 Research Pkwy., No. 104, Colorado Springs, CO	80920
18 Los Monteros, Monarch Beach, CA	92629
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(~~719~~949) ~~445~~637-~~1234~~3909

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.

Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þo No oþ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ~~[X]~~þ

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer		o
	Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller Reporting Company		þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

The aggregate market value of the Company's common shares of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Company as of ~~January~~March 1330, ~~2015~~2017, computed by reference to the last sale on ~~November~~August 78, ~~2014~~ 2016 of $40.7510 per-share price quoted on the ~~OTCBB~~Pink Sheets was $681,~~875~~450,000.

There were 4227,~~000~~500,000 ~~shares~~ shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding as of ~~January~~March 1330, ~~2015~~2017.

INDEX

	TITLE	PAGE
ITEM 1.	Business	5
ITEM 2.	Properties	2019
ITEM 3.	Legal Proceedings	2019
ITEM 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	2019
ITEM 5.	Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters	20
ITEM 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition	2321
ITEM 8.	Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	26
ITEM 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	27
ITEM 9A.	Controls and Procedures	27
ITEM 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	3130
ITEM 11.	Executive Compensation	3534
ITEM 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners Management and Related Stockholder Matters	3735
ITEM 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence	4037
ITEM 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	4038
ITEM 15.	Exhibits, Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules	4139

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-K, the words "may," "could," "estimate," "intend," "continue," "believe," "expect" or "anticipate" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our plans, intentions, and expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are reasonable, these plans, intentions, or expectations may not be achieved. Our actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed, or implied, by the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements are set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates on which they are made. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as required by federal securities laws, we are under no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in any of our forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in any of our forward-looking statements. Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and inherent risks and uncertainties. The factors impacting these risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

· inability to raise additional financing for working capital;

· inability to build a customer base for our services;

· deterioration in general or regional economic, market and political conditions;

· the fact that our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we report our financial condition and results of operations, and they may require management to make estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain;

· adverse state or federal legislation or regulation that increases the costs of compliance, or adverse findings by a regulator with respect to existing operations;

· changes in U.S. GAAP or in the legal, regulatory and legislative environments in the markets in which we operate;

· inability to efficiently manage our operations;

· inability to achieve future operating results;

· our ability to recruit and hire key employees;

· the inability of management to effectively implement our strategies and business plans; and

· the other risks and uncertainties detailed in this report.

In this form 10-K references to "IPOWorld", "the Company", "we", "us", and "our" refer to IPOWorld.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly and special ~~reports~~ reports and other information with the SEC. You can read these SEC filings and reports over the Internet at the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. You can also obtain copies of the documents at prescribed rates by writing to the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 am and 3:00 pm. Please call the SEC at (800) SEC-0330 for further information on the operations of the public reference facilities. We will provide a copy of our annual report to security holders, including audited consolidated financial statements, at no charge upon receipt to of a written request to us at IPOWorld , ~~3472~~18 ~~Research~~Los ~~Pkwy.~~Monteros, ~~No.~~Monarch ~~104~~Beach, ~~Colorado~~CA ~~Springs, CO 80920~~92629.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

History and Organization

The Company was organized April 26, 2010 (Date of Inception) under the laws of the State of Nevada, as General Cleaning and Maintenance. On March 15, 2013, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment with the Nevada Secretary of State to change its corporate name to: IPOWorld. The original business of the Company was to provide a wide range of janitorial and cleaning services for clients. IPOWorld incorporated MSPR, a Nevada corporation, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of IPOWorld on November 24, 2014. As the Company underwent a change of control and management, it shifted its business to creating a portfolio of real estate properties that service the cannabis industry. The Company business focus includes consulting, construction, property management and land/equipment leasing to licensed cannabis production and processing clients.

Our Business

IPOWorld is focused on creating a portfolio of real estate properties that service the cannabis industry. We are in the business of consulting, construction, property management and land/equipment leasing to licensed cannabis production and processing clients. We do not grow, harvest, distribute, market nor sell cannabis. The company acquires and/or leases properly zoned land and related facilities with the intent to build and/or do leasehold improvements to existing buildings and rent to licensed tenants for their operations. Lessees pay rent and other management fees for the use of our properties, all in compliance with applicable local and state laws and regulations.

The cannabis industry is still concentrated in a few States and lacks recognized regional or national leaders. Those companies that understand the Washington and Colorado business "landscape" have an opportunity to pursue and develop other markets.

About IPOWorld

IPOWorld is a single-source, integrated engineering and construction management firm that specializes in build-to-succeed cannabis facilities. We utilize the highest quality components and newest technologies to virtually meet any licensees requirements. Our independent contract team consists of design engineers, licensed contractors, steel building manufacturers, specialty licensed subcontractors and outside consultants. IPOWorld can design, manage and build-out a new or existing building and transform it into a state-of-the-art marijuana growing/processing operation.

The IPOWorld lease and consult model also allows clients to avoid having to seek an equity partner for capitalization and funding of their licensed growing operations. IPOW simply provides state applicant grower/processors with its infrastructure asset in exchange for monthly rental and ongoing management fees.

IPOWorld believes that creating infrastructure alone does not necessarily insure a financially successful operation. As such, the Company provides licensees with access to professional consultants that have extensive hands-on experience as actual commercial cannabis growers, processors and dispensary owners. This access to expert knowledge is an important piece to the potential future success of grower/processor clients.

IPOWorld intends to provide the following consulting services to its licensee production/processing clients:

·Business Planning

·Preparation of Applications for Licensing

·Define Start-up Costs

·Operational Analysis

·Preparation of Operating Plans for Licensing

·Cultivation/Processing Management Software

·Real Estate or Facility Sourcing

·Cultivation Facility Design and Build Out

·Selection of Necessary Equipment

·Select Contractors

·Supervise Build Out

·Point of Sale Systems

·Regulatory and Licensing

·Compliance and Applications

·Develop Business Growth Strategies

·Business Coaching

·Project Management for Outdoor, Greenhouse or Indoor Facilities

·Yield Analysis

·Staffing Requirements

·Financial Projections

·Potential Yield Analysis

·Soil or Growing Medium Management

·Environmental Controls

·Define Integrated Pest Management Systems

·Develop Processing Protocols and Train Employees

·Define Sales and Marketing Strategies

·Develop Branding Program

·Create Public Relations and Social Media Programs

·Training and Education of Staff

·Set up Tracking Systems

·Define Security Systems

·Set up Accounting System

·Create Employees Handbook

Overview of the Market

As of January ~~2014~~2015, four (4) States, Washington, Colorado, Oregon and Alaska, have legalized the recreational use of marijuana. Additionally, twenty three (23) States and the District of Columbia have enacted laws legalizing medical use of marijuana (including recreational states), while six more states are considering similar measures. According to the latest Gallop Poll, for the first time in history, a majority (58%) of U.S. citizens believe marijuana use for both medical and recreational purposes should be legalized.

At present, there are over one million registered holders of medical marijuana cards in the United States. The average medical marijuana user spends approximately $2,000 a year.

Funding

With the $200,000 funding we received on September 30, 2014, we are now in the process of building a cannabis cultivation facility in Olympia, Washington. Construction of the facility is underway. The cannabis grower/processor has permission from the local and state authorities in the State of Washington to build up to a 10,000 square foot cannabis cultivation facility. They have applied for a Tier II cannabis license that requires that their facility be built and then inspected before a final cultivation/processing license is issued. This 10,000 sq. ft. facility is located on a 65 acre parcel of land owned by the Licensee. Once the facility is completed and final inspection is approved by the State of Washington, we expect our fees to complete the facility and provide consulting will range between $350,000 to $400,000. If this materializes, this will generate for the Company between $150,000 to $200,000 in profit. After the final license has been issued and we receive our construction/consulting fees, we plan to expand our operations. We have identified a larger construction site in Elma, Washington to build a state of the art Co-location Facility for additional grower/processors to conduct their business.

MSPR Subsidary

IPOWorld incorporated MSPR, a Nevada corporation, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of IPOWorld on November 24, 2014. It is management's intention that the subsidiary act as a separate entity that provides security and protection services for IPOWorld's and other businesses operations. The subsidiary will be a distinct company with different financial, investment and operating characteristics so that each company can adopt their own business strategies and objectives tailored to their respective markets.

Competition

Our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, and marketing resources than we do and may succeed in developing products that would render our services obsolete or noncompetitive. In addition, many of these competitors have significantly greater experience than we do in their respective fields. Our ability to compete successfully will depend on our ability to develop proprietary products that reach the market in a timely manner and are technologically superior to, and/or are less expensive than, other products/services on the market. Current competitors or other companies may develop technologies and services that are more effective than ours. Our technologies and services may be rendered obsolete or uneconomical by technological advances or entirely different approaches developed by one or more of our competitors. The existing approaches of our competitors or new approaches or technology developed by our competitors may be more effective than those developed by us.

IPOWorld's Funding Requirements

Future funding could result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities and/or amortization expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets, which could materially adversely affect the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition. Any future acquisitions of other businesses, technologies, services or product(s) might require the Company to obtain additional equity or debt financing, which might not be available on terms favorable to the Company, or at all, and such financing, if available, might be dilutive.

Patent, Trademark, License and Franchise Restrictions and Contractual Obligations and Concessions

We do not have any trademarks, patents, or other intellectual property. We plan to rely on trade secrets, technical know-how, and continuing invention to develop and maintain our competitive position. We will take security measures to protect our trade secrets, proprietary know-how and technologies, and confidential data and continue to explore further methods of protection. Our policy is to execute confidentiality agreements with our employees and consultants upon the commencement of an employment or consulting arrangement with us. These agreements generally require that all confidential information developed or made known to the individual by us during the course of the individual’s relationship with us be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties. These agreements also generally provide that inventions conceived by the individual in the course of rendering services to us shall be our exclusive property.

Effect of Government Regulation on Business

Marijuana is a Schedule I controlled substance and is illegal under federal law. Even in those States in which the use of cannabis has been legalized, its use remains a violation of federal laws.

A Schedule I controlled substance is defined as a substance that has no currently accepted medical use in the United States, a lack of safety for use under medical supervision and a high potential for abuse. If the federal government decides to enforce the Controlled Substances Act in Colorado with respect to marijuana, persons that are charged with distributing, possessing with intent to distribute, or growing marijuana could be subject to fines and terms of imprisonment, the maximum being life imprisonment and a $50 million fine.

As of December 30, ~~2014~~2015, twenty-three (23) States and the District of Columbia allowed its citizens to use Medical Marijuana. Additionally, voters in the states of Colorado, Washington, Oregon and Alaska approved ballot measures last November to legalize cannabis for adult use. The state laws are in conflict with the federal Controlled Substances Act, which makes marijuana use and possession illegal on a national level. The Obama administration has effectively stated that it is not an efficient use of resources to direct law federal law enforcement agencies to prosecute those lawfully abiding by state-designated laws allowing the use and distribution of medical marijuana. However, there is no guarantee that the administration will not change its stated policy regarding the low-priority enforcement of federal laws. Additionally, any new administration that follows could change this policy and decide to enforce the federal laws strongly. Any such change in the federal government’s enforcement of current federal laws could cause significant financial damage to us. While we do not intend to harvest, distribute or sell cannabis, we may be irreparably harmed by a change in enforcement by the Federal or state governments.

Despite the Obama administration’s statements, the Department of Justice has stated that it will continue to enforce the Controlled Substance Act with respect to marijuana in regulated states to prevent:

the distribution of marijuana to minors;

criminal enterprises, gangs and cartels receiving revenue from the sale of marijuana;

the diversion of marijuana from states where it is legal under state law to other states;

state-authorized marijuana activity from being used as a cover or pretext for the trafficking of other illegal drugs or other illegal activity;

violence and the use of firearms in the cultivation and distribution of marijuana;

driving while impaired and the exacerbation of other adverse public health consequences associated with marijuana use;

the growing of marijuana on public lands; and

marijuana possession or use on federal property.

In the future we may be subject to additional laws, regulations, policies, approvals and the like of federal, state, local, municipal, foreign and other bodies.

Compliance With Environmental Laws

We seek to comply with all applicable statutory and administrative requirements concerning environmental quality. We are required to comply with environmental compliance and protection. Expenditures for compliance with environmental laws have not had, and are not expected to have, a material effect on our capital expenditures, results of operation or competitive position.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

The Company plans to rely on a combination of trademark, copyright, trade secret and patent laws in the United States as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary technology and our brand. The Company plans also to rely on copyright laws to protect our future computer programs and our proprietary databases.

From time-to-time, IPOWorld may encounter disputes over rights and obligations concerning intellectual property. Also, the efforts management has taken to protect its proprietary rights may not be sufficient or effective. Any significant impairment of our intellectual property rights could harm the business, the brand and reputation, and the ability to compete. Also, protecting IPOWorld's intellectual property rights could be costly and time consuming.

Employees

The Company currently has one employee who is also the officer/director of the Company. The Company plans to utilize additional independent contractors on a part-time/as needed basis.

RISK FACTORS

RISK FACTORS RELATING TO OUR COMPANY

RISK FACTORS RELATING TO OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION

1. We have limited historical financial information upon which you may evaluate our performance.

We have a limited history and we are subject to all risks inherent in a developing business enterprise. Our likelihood of success must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications, and delays frequently encountered in connection with developmental stage companies and the competitive and regulatory environment in which we operate. You should consider, among other factors, our prospects for success in light of the risks and uncertainties encountered by companies that, like us, are in their early stages of research. We may not successfully address these risks and uncertainties or successfully implement our operating and acquisition strategies. If we fail to do so, it could materially harm our business to the point of having to cease operations and could impair the value of our common stock to the point investors may lose their entire investment. Even if we accomplish these objectives, we may not generate positive cash flows or profits we anticipate in the future.

2. As we have never generated any revenues since our inception, there is no assurance that we will be able to continue as a going concern.

Our financial statements included with ~~this~~ this Annual Report for the year ended September 30, ~~2014~~2015, have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. ~~Our~~ Our auditors have made reference to the substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern in their audit report on on our audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, ~~2014~~2015. Because the Company has been issued an opinion by its ~~auditors~~ auditors that substantial doubt exists as to whether the company can continue as a going concern, it may be more difficult for the company to attract investors. Since our auditor’s have raised a substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, this typically results in greater difficulty to obtain loans than businesses that do not have a qualified auditors opinion. Additionally, any loans we might obtain may be on less advantageous terms. We plan to seek additional funds through private placements of our common stock. You may be investing in a company that will not have the funds necessary to continue to deploy its business strategies. If we are not able to achieve revenues or find financing, then we likely will be forced to cease operations and investors will likely lose their entire investment, investors may lose their entire investment.

3. WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ATTAIN PROFITABILITY WITHOUT ADDITIONAL FUNDING, WHICH MAY BE UNAVAILABLE.

We have prepared audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, ~~2013~~2015, which show we have no cash and cash equivalents. Our ability to continue to operate as a going concern is fully dependent upon the Company obtaining sufficient financing to continue its development and operational activities. The ability to achieve profitable operations is in direct correlation to our ability to generate revenues or raise sufficient financing. It is important to note that even if the appropriate financing is received, there is no guarantee that we will ever be able to operate profitably or derive any significant revenues from its operation.

4. IF WE ARE NOT ABLE TO COMPETE EFFECTIVELY AGAINST LARGER COMPETITORS WITH GREATER RESOURCES, OUR PROSPECTS FOR FUTURE SUCCESS WILL BE JEOPARDIZED.

We will face intense competition from larger and better-established companies that may prevent us from ever becoming a significant company. Management expects the competition to intensify in the future. Pressures created by our future competitors could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Many of our potential competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, and significantly greater financial, marketing, technical and other resources. In addition, our competitors may acquire or be acquired by, receive investments from or enter into other commercial relationships with larger, well-established and well-financed competitors. Therefore, some of our competitors with other revenue sources may be able to devote greater resources to marketing and promotional campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies and devote substantially more resources to product development. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors.

COMPANY RISK FACTORS

5. THERE MAY BE A POSSIBLE INABILITY TO FIND SUITABLE EMPLOYEES.

In order to implement our business plan, management recognizes that additional staff will be required. No assurances can be given that we will be able to find suitable employees that can support our needs or that these employees can be hired on favorable terms. We do not plan to hire any additional employees until our cash flows can justify the expense. When we are ready to hire new employees, we will most likely look for people who have some type of industry experience or a working knowledge of industry, which may be difficult to find.

6. Our proposed business is dependent on laws pertaining to the cannabis industry.

Continued development of the cannabis industry is dependent upon continued legislative authorization of cannabis at the state level. Any number of factors could slow or halt progress in this area. Further, progress, while encouraging, is not assured. While there may be ample public support for legislative action, numerous factors impact the legislative process. Any one of these factors could slow or halt use of cannabis, which would negatively impact our proposed business. As of September 30, ~~2014~~2015, 23 States and the District of Columbia allow its citizens to use medical cannabis. Additionally, voters in the states of Colorado, Washington, Oregon, and Alaska approved ballot measures last November to legalize cannabis for adult use. The state laws are in conflict with the federal Controlled Substances Act, which makes cannabis use and possession illegal on a national level. The Obama administration has effectively stated that it is not an efficient use of resources to direct law federal law enforcement agencies to prosecute those lawfully abiding by state-designated laws allowing the use and distribution of medical cannabis. However, there is no guarantee that the administration will not change its stated policy regarding the low-priority enforcement of federal laws. Additionally, any new administration that follows could change this policy and decide to enforce the federal laws strongly. ~~Any~~ ~~such~~Any such change in the ~~federal~~ federal government’s enforcement of current federal laws could cause significant financial damage to us and its shareholders.

7. Cannabis REMAINS ILLEGAL UNDER FEDERAL LAW.

Cannabis is a Schedule I controlled substance and is illegal under federal law. Even in those States in which the use of cannabis has been legalized, its use remains a violation of federal law. Since federal law criminalizing the use of cannabis preempts state laws that legalize its use, strict enforcement of federal law regarding cannabis would likely result in our inability to proceed with our business plan.

8. The cannabis industry faces strong opposition.

It is believed by many that large, well-funded businesses may have a strong economic opposition to the cannabis industry. We believe that the pharmaceutical industry clearly does not want to cede control of any product that could generate significant revenue. For example, medical cannabis will likely adversely impact the existing market for the current “cannabis pill” sold by mainstream pharmaceutical companies. Further, the medical cannabis industry could face a material threat from the pharmaceutical industry, should cannabis displace other drugs or encroach upon the pharmaceutical industry’s products. The pharmaceutical industry is well funded with a strong and experienced lobby that eclipses the funding of the medical cannabis movement. Any inroads the pharmaceutical industry could make in halting or impeding the cannabis industry could have a detrimental impact on our proposed business.

9. Potential USERS OF OUR PROPOSED FACILITIES MAY HAVE DIFFICULTY ACCESSING THE SERVICE OF BANKS, WHICH MAY MAKE IT DIFFICULT FOR THEM TO OPERATE.

Since the use of cannabis is illegal under federal law, there is a compelling argument that banks cannot accept for deposit funds from businesses involved with cannabis. Consequently, businesses involved in the cannabis industry often have trouble finding a bank willing to accept their business. The inability to open bank accounts may make it difficult for our proposed facility to operate.

10. LAWS AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING THE CANNABIS INDUSTRY ARE CONSTANTLY CHANGING, WHICH COULD DETRIMENTALLY AFFECT OUR PROPOSED OPERATIONS.

Local, state and federal medical cannabis laws and regulations are broad in scope and subject to evolving interpretations, which could require us to incur substantial costs associated with compliance or alter its business plan. In addition, violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on its operations. In addition, it is possible that regulations may be enacted in the future that will be directly applicable to our proposed business. We cannot predict the nature of any future laws, regulations, interpretations or applications, nor can we determine what effect additional governmental regulations or administrative policies and procedures, when and if promulgated, could have on its business.

11. Our SOLE officer HAS no experience in operating a RELATED CANNABIS BUSINESS, and HE HAS no experience in evaluating the success of SUCH A BUSINESS.

Our sole executive officer, has no experience in operating a cannabis related business. He has no experience in independently developing, manufacturing, marketing, or selling cannabis related services. Due to his lack of experience, our executive officer may make wrong decisions and choices on behalf of the Company. Consequently, our Company may suffer irreparable harm due to management's lack of experience in this industry. As a result, we may have to suspend or cease operations, which will result in the loss of your investment.

12. We are subject to all governmental rules, laws and regulations relating to the Cannabis industry in the U.S.

Marijuana is a Schedule I controlled substance and is illegal under federal law. Even in those States in which the use of cannabis has been legalized, its use remains a violation of federal laws.

As of September 30, ~~2014~~2015, twenty-three ~~States~~ States and the District of Columbia allowed its citizens to use Medical Marijuana. Additionally, voters in the States of Colorado, Washington, Oregon and Alaska approved ballot measures in November, 2013 to legalize cannabis for adult use. The state laws are in conflict with the federal Controlled Substances Act, which makes marijuana use and possession illegal on a national level. Any change in the federal government’s enforcement of current federal laws could cause significant financial damage to us. While we do not intend to harvest, distribute or sell cannabis, we may be irreparably harmed by a change in enforcement by the Federal or state governments.

13. Our results of operations may be adversely affected by environmental, health and safety laws, regulations and liabilities.

Our properties subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, including those relating to the discharge of materials into the air, water and ground, the generation, storage, handling, use, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials, and the health and safety of our employees. We will need to meet a significant number of environmental and other regulations and standards established by various federal, state and local regulatory agencies.

In addition, some of these laws and regulations require our contemplated facilities to operate under permits that are subject to renewal or modification. These laws, regulations and permits can often require expensive pollution control equipment or operational changes to limit actual or potential impacts to the environment. As these regulations and standards evolve, and if new regulations or standards are implemented, we may be required to modify our proposed facilities and processes or develop and support new facilities or processes and this will increase our costs. Any failure to comply, or delays in compliance, with the various existing and evolving industry regulations and standards could prevent or delay our production of our services. Any inability to address these requirements and any regulatory changes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

A violation of these laws and regulations or permit conditions can result in substantial fines, natural resource damages, criminal sanctions, permit revocations and/or facility shutdowns.

14. Our management controls a large block of our preferred voting stock that will allow him to control the Company.

As of January 13, 2015, our sole officer/director owned 1,000,000 Voting Preferred Shares, which represents approximately 54.3% of our total voting shares. As a result, our sole officer/director will have the ability to control substantially all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval including:

a) election of our board of directors;

b) removal of any of our directors;

c) amendment of our Articles of Incorporation or bylaws; and

d) adoption of measures that could delay or prevent a change in control or impede a merger, takeover or other business combination involving us.

As a result of his ownership, he has the ability to influence all matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. In addition, the future prospect of sales of significant amounts of shares held by our sole director and executive officer could affect the market price of our common stock if the marketplace does not orderly adjust to the increase in shares in the market and the value of your investment in the company may decrease. Management's stock ownership may discourage a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us, which in turn could reduce our stock price or prevent our stockholders from realizing a premium over our stock price.

Investors will own a minority percentage of the Company’s common stock and will have minority voting rights. Investors will not have the ability to control either a vote of the Company’s Shareholders or Board of Directors.

RISK FACTORS RELATING TO OUR COMMON STOCK AND THIS OFFERING

1514. Future sales of shares by existing Controlling stockholders could cause our stock price to decline. FURTHER, Certain shares of our common stock are restricted from immediate resale.

If our existing ~~controlling~~ controlling stockholders sell, or indicate an intention to sell, substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, the trading price of our common stock could decline. As of ~~January~~March 1330, ~~2015~~2017, we have 4227,~~000~~500,000 common shares issued and outstanding. ~~There~~ There are 5,000,000 registered shares freely tradable, without restriction. If in the future, these shareholders decide to sell ~~their~~ their shares or if it is perceived that they will be sold, to the extent permitted by the Rules 144 and 701 under the Securities Act, the trading price of our common stock could decline.

16We have 22,500,000 restricted shares issued and outstanding. The restricted shares are restricted in accordance with Rule 144, which states that if unregistered, restricted securities are to be sold, a minimum of one year must elapse between the later of the date of acquisition of the securities from the issuer or from an affiliate of the issuer, and any resale of those securities in reliance on Rule 144. The Rule 144 restrictive legend remains on the stock until the holder of the stock holds the stock for longer than six months (unless an affiliate) and meets the other requirements of Rule 144 to have the restriction removed. The sale or resale of those shares in the public market, or the market’s expectation of such sales, may result in an immediate and substantial decline in the market price of our shares. Such a decline will adversely affect our investors, and make it more difficult for us to raise additional funds through equity offerings in the future.

We have 42,000,000 restricted shares issued and outstanding. The restricted shares are restricted in accordance with Rule 144, which states that if unregistered, restricted securities are to be sold, a minimum of one year must elapse between the later of the date of acquisition of the securities from the issuer or from an affiliate of the issuer, and any resale of those securities in reliance on Rule 144. The Rule 144 restrictive legend remains on the stock until the holder of the stock holds the stock for longer than six months (unless an affiliate) and meets the other requirements of Rule 144 to have the restriction removed. The sale or resale of those shares in the public market, or the market’s expectation of such sales, may result in an immediate and substantial decline in the market price of our shares. Such a decline will adversely affect our investors, and make it more difficult for us to raise additional funds through equity offerings in the future.

16. We have never declared dividends on our common stock and do not plan to do so in the foreseeable future.

We intend to retain any future earnings to finance the operation and expansion of its business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. As a result, stockholders will need to sell shares of common stock in order to realize a return on their investment, if any. You should not rely on an investment in our company if you require dividend income. The only possibility of any income to investors would come from any rise in the market price of your stock, which is uncertain and unpredictable.

A holder of common stock will be entitled to receive dividends only when, as, and if declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefore. We have never issued dividends on our common stock. Our Board of Directors will determine future dividend policy based upon our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, and other circumstances.

17. Holders of our common stock have a risk of potential dilution if we issue additional shares of common stock in the future.

Although our Board of Directors intends to utilize its reasonable business judgment to fulfill its fiduciary obligations to our then existing stockholders in connection with any future issuance of our common stock, the future issuance of additional shares of our common stock would cause immediate, and potentially substantial, dilution to the net tangible book value of those shares of common stock that are issued and outstanding immediately prior to such transaction. Any future decrease in the net tangible book value of our issued and outstanding shares could have a material effect on the market value of the shares.

18. We do not have insurance and, therefore, liability we incur could have substantial impact on our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have limited capital and, therefore, we do not currently have a policy of insurance against liabilities arising out of the negligence of our officers and directors and/or arising from deficiencies in any of our business operations. Even assuming we obtained insurance, there is no assurance that such insurance coverage would be adequate to satisfy any potential claims made against us, our officers and directors, or our business operations or assets. Any such liability which might arise could be substantial and would likely exceed our total assets. However, our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws provide for indemnification of officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted under Nevada law. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officer and controlling persons, it is the opinion of the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission that such indemnification is against public policy, as expressed in the Act, and is therefore, unenforceable.

19. If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud and as a result, investors may be misled and lose confidence in our financial reporting and disclosures, and the price of our common stock may be negatively affected.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we report annually on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. A "significant deficiency" means a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the Company’s financial reporting. A "material weakness" is a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

As of September 30, 2014 management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting. The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: (1) lack of a functioning audit committee due to a lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; and (2) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives.17

18As of September 30, 2015 management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting. The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: (1) lack of a functioning audit committee due to a lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; and (2) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives.

In addition, in connection with our on-going assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we may discover "material weaknesses" in our internal controls as defined in standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the PCAOB. A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.

Failure to provide effective internal controls may cause investors to lose confidence in our financial reporting and may negatively affect the price of our common stock. Moreover, effective internal controls are necessary to produce accurate, reliable financial reports and to prevent fraud. If we have deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting, these deficiencies may negatively impact our business and operations.

20. LOW-PRICED STOCKS MAY AFFECT THE RESELL OF OUR SHARES.

Penny Stock Regulation Broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in "Penny Stocks" are regulated by certain penny stock rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system). The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the risk associated with the penny stock market. The broker-dealer must also provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. In addition, the penny stock rules generally require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock; the broker-dealer must make a written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for a stock that becomes subject to the penny stock rules. When the Registration Statement becomes effective and the Company's securities become registered, the stock will likely have a trading price of less than $5.00 per share and will not be traded on any exchanges. Therefore, the Company's stock is initially selling at $0.01 per share they will become subject to the penny stock rules and investors may find it more difficult to sell their securities, should they desire to do so.

21. IN THE FUTURE, WE WILL INCUR INCREMENTAL COSTS AS A RESULT OF OPERATING AS A PUBLIC COMPANY, AND OUR MANAGEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED TO DEVOTE SUBSTANTIAL TIME TO COMPLIANCE INITIATIVES.

Because we are a fully reporting company ~~with~~ with the SEC, we will incur additional legal, accounting and other expenses. Moreover, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Sarbanes-Oxley Act"), as well as new rules subsequently implemented by the SEC, have imposed various new requirements on public companies, including requiring changes in corporate governance practices. Our management will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these new compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly. We expect to incur approximately $20,000 of incremental operating expenses in ~~2015~~2016.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

Item 2. Properties.

Properties

Our offices are currently located at ~~3472~~18 ~~Research~~Los ~~Pkwy #104~~Monteros, ~~Colorado~~Monarch ~~Springs~~Beach, COCA ~~80920~~92629. Our telephone number is (~~719~~949) ~~445~~637-~~1234~~3909. Management believes that its current facilities are adequate for its needs through the next twelve months, and that, should it be needed, suitable additional space will be available to accommodate expansion of the Company's operations on commercially reasonable terms, although there can be no assurance in this regard.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business.

We are not presently a party to any material litigation, nor to the knowledge of management is any litigation threatened against us, which may materially affect us.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.

~~Item 5. Mine Safety Disclosures~~19

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

(a) Market Information

IPOWorld Common Stock, $0.001 par value, can be found on the OTC-Bulletin Board under the symbol: IPOW.

There have been limited trades of the Company’s stock, since it was listed on the OTCBB, there are no assurances that a market will ever develop for the Company's stock.

Year ended September 30, 2013	High			Low
First Quarter	$	0.25	$		0.20
Second Quarter	$	0.75	$		0.51
Third Quarter	$	0.50	$		0.40
Fourth Quarter	$	0.80	$		0.53

Year ended September 30, 2014	High			Low
First Quarter	$	0.75	$		0.41
Second Quarter	$	0.55	$		0.55
Third Quarter	$	1.00	$		0.51
Fourth Quarter	$	6.75	$		0.30

The first trade of the Company’s stock took place on September 25, 2012. As of the date of this Annual Report, the last trade took place on November 7, 2014 at $4.75. Our stock is very thinly traded.

Year ended September 30, 2015	High			Low
First Quarter	$	6.75	$		2.14
Second Quarter	$	4.75	$		1.05
Third Quarter	$	4.50	$		2.50
Fourth Quarter	$	3.00	$		1.70

The first trade of the Company’s stock took place on September 25, 2012. As of the date of this Annual Report, the last trade took place on March 1, 2017 at $0.055. Our stock is very thinly traded.

(b) Holders of Common Stock

As of September 30, ~~2014~~2015, there were ~~approximately~~ approximately twenty-nine (29) holders of record of our Common Stock and 2527,~~000~~500,000 shares issued and outstanding.

In the future we intend to follow a policy of retaining earnings, if any, to finance the growth of the business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of future dividends on the Common Stock will be the sole discretion of the board of directors and will depend on our profitability and financial condition, capital requirements, statutory and contractual restrictions, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant.

(d) Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

There are no outstanding grants or rights or any equity compensation plan in place.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On November 14, 2014, IPOWorld with the approval of the Board of Directors agreed to issue 2,500,000 unregistered restricted common shares to satisfy a Convertible Note debt obligation of $200,000 between the Company and Lakeview Media, a Nevis corporationNone. The Company entered into the Convertible Note with Lakeview Media on September 30, 2014. The debt holder agreed to tender their original note, marked satisfied, upon the issuance of 2,500,000 IPOWorld restricted common shares. The shares were issued as follows: 1,250,000 restricted shares to Lakeview Media; and, 1,250,000 restricted shares to Pacific Pier Corp., a Marshall Island Company. Lakeview Media independently assigned 1,250,000 restricted shares to Pacific Pier Corp. Subsequently, Pacific Pier Corp, privately sold their 1,250,000 restricted shares to Hexon Group Corp., a Marshall Island Company.

The shares were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. We believed that Section 4(2) was available because the offer and sale did not involve a public offering and there was not general solicitation or general advertising involved in the offer or sale.

Since the issuance of shares was based on the terms of an existing Convertible Note with Lakeview Media, we did not engage in any form of general solicitation or general advertising in connection with this transaction. Lakeview Media was provided access to all material information, and they were afforded access to our management in connection with this transaction. They acknowledged to us that the shares were acquired for investment purposes and not with a view toward distribution. They understood the ramifications of their actions. The shares of common stock issued contained a legend restricting transferability absent registration or applicable exemption.

As of January 13, 2015, the Company has a total 42,000,000 common shares issued and outstanding to approximately thirty-two (32) shareholders.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

We did not repurchase any of our equity ~~securities~~ securities during the years ended September 30, ~~2014~~2015 or ~~2013~~2014.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

Not applicable.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview of Current Operations

IPOWorld is a start-up company focused on creating a portfolio of real estate properties that service the cannabis industry. The Company business focus includes consulting, construction, property management and land/equipment leasing to licensed cannabis production and processing clients. We do not grow, harvest, distribute, market nor sell cannabis. The company acquires and/or leases properly zoned land and related facilities with the intent to build and/or do leasehold improvements to existing buildings and rent to licensed tenants for their operations. Lessees pay rent and other management fees for the use of our properties, all in compliance with applicable local and state laws and regulations.

Management does not believe that the Company will be able to generate any significant profit during the coming year. Management has agreed to keep the Company funded at its own expense, without seeking reimbursement for expenses paid. The Company's need for capital may change dramatically if it can generate additional revenues from its operations. In the event the Company requires additional funds, the Company will have to seek loans or equity placements to cover such cash needs. There are no assurances additional capital will be available to the Company on acceptable terms.

~~Results of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013~~21

~~Since~~Results ~~our~~of ~~inception~~Operations onfor ~~April~~the ~~26,~~year ~~2010~~ended ~~through~~ September 30, 2015 ~~2013,~~and weSeptember ~~generated~~30, ~~no revenues. We do not anticipate earning any significant revenues in the next 12-18 months.~~2014

23Since our inception on April 26, 2010 through September 30, 2015, we generated no revenues. We do not anticipate earning any significant revenues in the next 12-18 months.

For the fiscal year ending September 30, ~~2014~~2015, we experienced a net loss of $(46142,~~317~~773) as compared to a net loss of $(11100,~~600~~146) for the same period last year. The net loss for the year ending September 30, ~~2014~~2015 was attributed to audit fees of $915,~~750~~250 as compared to audit fees of $119,~~600~~750 for the same period last year; general & administrative fees of $855,~~317~~235 as compared to $016,567 of general and administrative fees for the same period last year, ~~legal~~consulting fees of $822,~~250~~000 as compared to $020,000 for the same period last year, ~~and~~construction ~~related~~expense of ~~party~~$45,288 ~~consulting~~as ~~fees~~compared to $52,162 for the same period last year, and interest expense of $205,000, as compared to $01,667 for the same period last year. We had cash and cash equivalents of $~~109~~21,~~621~~848 as of September 30, ~~2014,~~2015 ~~a prepaid expense of $0 and construction in progress of $52,162,~~ as compared to cash and cash equivalents of $0109,621 ~~prepaid expense of $1,500 and construction in progress of $0~~ for the same period last year. As of the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2014~~2015, we had liabilities of ~~$0, net~~ of ~~unamortized discount of~~ $~~200~~6,~~000.~~667 as compared to no$201,667 in liabilities for the same period last year. In our September 30, ~~2014~~ 2015 and ~~2013~~2014 year-end financials, our auditor issued an opinion that our financial condition raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company gained/(used) net cash in operations of $~~(44~~62,~~817)~~227 and $(1896,~~350~~979) during the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. The Company (used )/generated cash of $(52150,~~162~~000) in ~~investing~~and ~~activities for construction in progress, as compared to~~ $~~0 for last year. The Company generated cash of $~~206,600 ~~and $12,075~~ from financing activities during the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively.

Revenues

Since our inception on April 26, 2010 ~~through~~ through September 30, ~~2014~~2015, we generated no revenues. We do not anticipate earning any significant revenues until such time as we can establish our business and build a client base. We are presently in the development stage of our business and we can provide no assurance that we will be successful in executing our business plan.

Going Concern

The financial conditions evidenced by the accompanying consolidated financial statements raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. Our plans include obtaining additional capital through debt or equity financing. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

Summary of any product research and development that we will perform for the term of our plan of operation

We do not anticipate performing any product research and development under our current plan of operation.

Expected purchase or sale of property and significant equipment

We do not anticipate the purchase or sale of any property or significant equipment; as such items are not required by us at this time.

Significant changes in the number of employees

As of September 30, ~~2014~~2015, we did not have any employees. We are dependent upon our sole officer and director for our future business development. As our operations expand we anticipate the need to hire additional employees, consultants and professionals; however, the exact number is not quantifiable at this time.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our balance sheet as of September 30, ~~2014~~ 2015 and ~~2013~~2014 reflects current assets of $~~161~~21,~~783~~848 and $1109,~~500~~621 and current liabilities of $06,667 and $0201,667, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents from inception to date have been sufficient to provide the operating capital necessary to operate to date. Notwithstanding, we anticipate generating losses and therefore we may be unable to continue operations in the future. If we require additional capital, we plan to issue debt or equity or enter into a strategic arrangement with a third party. There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available to us. We currently have no agreements, arrangements or understandings with any person to obtain funds through bank loans, lines of credit or any other sources.

As a result of the Company's current ~~limited~~ limited available cash, no officer or director received cash compensation during the year ended September 30, ~~2014~~2015. The Company has no employment agreements in place with its officer.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results or operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes revenue on an accrual basis as it invoices for services. Revenue is generally realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: 1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists between the Company and our customer(s); 2) services have been rendered; 3) our price to our customer is fixed or determinable; and 4) collectability is reasonably assured.

Recent Pronouncements

~~The~~With ~~Company's~~the ~~management~~exception ~~has~~of ~~evaluated~~those ~~all~~discussed ~~the~~below, ~~recently~~there ~~issued~~have ~~accounting~~not ~~pronouncements~~been ~~through~~any ~~the~~recent ~~filing~~changes ~~date~~in ofaccounting ~~these~~pronouncements ~~consolidated~~and ~~financial~~Accounting ~~statements~~Standards ~~and~~Update ~~does~~(ASU) ~~not~~issued ~~believe~~by the ~~that~~Financial ~~any~~Accounting ofStandards ~~these~~Board ~~pronouncements~~(FASB) ~~will~~during ~~have~~the ayear ~~material~~ended ~~impact~~September on30, ~~the~~2015 ~~Company's~~that ~~financial~~are ~~position~~of ~~and~~significance ~~results~~or ofpotential ~~operations except~~significance ~~following~~to the Company.

OnIn ~~June~~May 102014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, ~~accounting~~Revenue ~~principles~~from ~~generally~~Contracts ~~accepted~~with inCustomers ~~the~~(Topic ~~United~~606) ~~States~~(“ASU ~~were~~No. ~~amended~~2014-09”). toASU ~~remove~~No. 2014-09 supersedes the ~~definition~~previous ofrevenue arecognition ~~development~~requirements, along ~~stage~~with most existing industry-specific guidance. The guidance requires an entity ~~thereby~~to ~~removing~~review ~~the~~contracts ~~financial~~in five steps: 1) identify ~~reporting~~the ~~distinction~~contract, ~~between~~2) ~~development~~identify ~~stage~~performance ~~entities~~obligations, ~~and~~3) ~~other~~determine ~~reporting~~the ~~entities. In~~transaction ~~addition~~price, ~~the~~4) ~~amendments~~allocate ~~eliminate~~ the ~~requirements~~transaction ~~for~~price, ~~the~~and ~~Company~~5) recognize torevenue. ~~present~~The ~~inception-to-date~~new ~~information~~standard ~~and~~will toresult ~~label~~in enhanced disclosures regarding the ~~financial~~nature, ~~statements~~amount, astiming, ~~those~~and uncertainty of revenue aarising ~~development stage~~from ~~entity~~contracts with customers. ~~The~~ ~~amendments~~In ~~are~~August ~~effective~~2015, ~~for~~the FASB issued guidance approving a one-year deferral, making the standard ~~Company’s~~effective ~~financial~~for ~~statements~~reporting asperiods ofbeginning after December 3115, ~~2016~~2017, ~~and~~with ~~interim~~ early adoption permitted only for reporting periods beginning ~~therein;~~after ~~however~~December 15, ~~early~~2016. ~~application~~In ofMarch ~~each~~2016, ofthe FASB issued guidance to clarify the ~~amendments~~implementation isguidance ~~permitted~~on ~~for~~principal versus ~~any~~agent considerations for reporting ~~period. The~~revenue ~~Company has~~gross ~~adopted~~rather ~~the~~than ~~amendments~~net, ~~and~~with nothe ~~longer~~same ~~presents~~deferred ~~inception-to-~~effective date. ~~information~~In inApril 2016, the ~~statements~~FASB ofissued ~~operations,~~guidance ~~statement~~to ofclarify ~~changes in~~the ~~stockholders'~~identification ~~equity~~of performance obligations and ~~statements~~licensing arrangements. The Company has not determined the impact of ~~cash~~adopting ~~flows~~ASU No. In 2014-09 ~~addition,~~on ~~the~~our financial statements ~~will~~and nocurrently ~~longer~~plan beto ~~labeled~~complete asour evaluation ~~those~~by oflate ~~a development stage entity~~2017.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements, Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) which requires management to evaluate on a regular basis whether any conditions or events have arisen that could raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. The guidance 1) provides a definition for the term “substantial doubt,” 2) requires an evaluation every reporting period, interim periods included, 3) provides principles for considering the mitigating effect of management's plans to alleviate the substantial doubt, 4) requires certain disclosures if the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of management's plans, 5) requires an express statement, as well as other disclosures, if the substantial doubt is not alleviated, and 6) requires an assessment period of one year from the date the financial statements are issued. The standard is effective for the annual reporting period beginning after December 31, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this new accounting pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes, or ASU No. 2015-17. To simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes, the amendments in this update require that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The amendments in this Update apply to all entities that present a classified statement of financial position. The current requirement that deferred tax liabilities and assets of a tax-paying component of an entity be offset and presented as a single amount is not affected by the amendments in this Update. The amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Earlier application is permitted. The amendments in this Update may be applied either prospectively to all deferred tax liabilities and assets or retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2015-17 on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. Topic 842 affects any entity that enters into a lease, with some specified scope exemptions. The guidance in this Update supersedes Topic 840, Leases. The core principle of Topic 842 is that a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases. A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. For public companies, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) that clarifies how to apply revenue recognition guidance related to whether an entity is a principal or an agent. ASU 2016-08 clarifies that the analysis must focus on whether the entity has control of the goods or services before they are transferred to the customer and provides additional guidance about how to apply the control principle when services are provided and when goods or services are combined with other goods or services. The effective date for ASU 2016-08 is the same as the effective date of ASU 2014-09 as amended by ASU 2015-14, for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. The Company has not yet determined the impact of ASU 2016-08 on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation, or ASU No. 2016-09. The areas for simplification in this Update involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. For public entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. Amendments related to the timing of when excess tax benefits are recognized, minimum statutory withholding requirements, forfeitures, and intrinsic value should be applied using a modified retrospective transition method by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the period in which the guidance is adopted. Amendments related to the presentation of employee taxes paid on the statement of cash flows when an employer withholds shares to meet the minimum statutory withholding requirement should be applied retrospectively. Amendments requiring recognition of excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies in the income statement and the practical expedient for estimating expected term should be applied prospectively. An entity may elect to apply the amendments related to the presentation of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows using either a prospective transition method or a retrospective transition method. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-09 on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, which provides further guidance on identifying performance obligations and improves the operability and understandability of licensing implementation guidance. The effective date for ASU 2016-10 is the same as the effective date of ASU 2014-09 as amended by ASU 2015-14, for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. The Company has not yet determined the impact of ASU 2016-10 on its consolidated financial statements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Not applicable.

Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

	Financial Statements
		Page
Independent Auditors' Report		F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets		F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations		F-3
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity		F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-6

Financial Statements

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-3
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit/Equity	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-6

DeANTON ~~Joya~~& ~~Griffith~~CHIA

~~Certified~~CERTIFIED ~~Public~~PUBLIC ~~Accountants and Consultants~~ACCOUNTANTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

IPOWorld

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of IPOWorld (the “"Company”) as of September 30, 2015 ~~2014~~ and ~~2013~~2014, and the related consolidated ~~statements~~ statement of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit/equity, and cash ~~flows~~ flow for the years ~~then~~ ended. ~~IPOWorld’s~~September ~~management~~30, is2015 ~~responsible for~~and ~~these~~2014. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with ~~the~~ standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The ~~company is~~Company was not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our ~~audit~~audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the ~~company’~~Company's internal control over ~~the~~ financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit ~~also~~ includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements,. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall ~~financial~~consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of ~~IPOWorld~~the Company as of September 30, ~~2014~~ 2015 and ~~2013~~2014, and the ~~consolidated~~results ~~result~~ of its consolidated operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit/equity and its cash ~~flows~~flow for the years ~~then~~ ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 32 to the consolidated financial statements, ~~the Company~~these ~~has~~conditions ~~suffered losses from operations, which~~ raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’'s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 32. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result ~~from~~should the ~~outcome~~Company ofbe ~~this~~unable ~~uncertainty~~to continue as a going concern.

/s/ DeAnton ~~Joya~~& ~~Griffith~~Chia, ~~LLC~~LLP Newport Beach, California March 30, 2017

Henderson, Nevada

January 13, 2014

De Joya Griffith, LLC ● 2580 Anthem Village Dr. ● Henderson, NV ● 89052

Telephone (702) 563-1600 ● Facsimile (702) 920-8049

www.dejoyagriffith.com

F-1

IPOWorld

(~~formerly~~Formerly General Cleaning and Maintenance)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Audited)

			September 30, 2015	September 30, 2014
		ASSETS
Current assets:
	Cash		$ 21,848	$ 109,621
		Total current assets	21,848	109,621

TOTAL ASSETS			$ 21,848	$ 109,621

		LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

	Notes payable		-	200,000
	Interest payable		6,667	1,667
		Total current liabilities	6,667	201,667

Stockholders' equity (deficit):
	Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 15,000,000 shares		-	-
		authorized, no shares issued and outstanding
		as of 9/30/2015 and 9/30/2014, respectively
	Common stock, $0.001 par value, 185,000,000 shares		27,500	25,000
		authorized, 27,500,000 and 25,000,000 shares issued and
		outstanding as of 9/30/2015 and 9/30/2014, respectively
	Additional paid-in capital		275,175	27,675
	Accumulated deficit		(287,494)	(144,721)
		Total stockholders' equity (deficit)	15,180	(92,046)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)			$ 21,848	$ 109,621

			September 30, 2014	September 30, 2013
		ASSETS
Current assets:
	Cash		$ 109,621	$ -
	Prepaid expense		-	1,500
	Construction in progress		52,162	-
		Total current assets	161,783	1,500
TOTAL ASSETS			$ 161,783	$ 1,500
		LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
	Convertible note, net of unamortized discount of $200,000		$ -	$ -
		Total current liabilities	-	-
TOTAL LIABILITIES			-	-
Stockholders' equity:
	Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 15,000,000		-	-
		and nil shares authorized as of 9/30/2014 and
		9/30/2013, respectively. Nil and nil shares
	Common stock, $0.001 par value, 185,000,000 and		25,000	25,000
		75,000,000 shares authorized, 25,000,000
		and 25,000,000 shares outstanding as of
		9/30/2014 and 9/30/2013, respectively
	Additional paid-in capital		227,675	21,075
	Accumulated deficit		(90,892)	(44,575)
		Total stockholders' equity	161,783	1,500
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY			$ 161,783	$ 1,500

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2

IPOWorld

(~~formerly~~Formerly General Cleaning and Maintenance)

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Audited)

			For the year ended September 30, 2015	For the year ended September 30, 2014
Revenue			$ -	$ -

Expenses:
	Audit		15,250	9,750
	General & administrative		55,235	16,567
	Consulting-related party		22,000	20,000
	Construction expense		45,288	52,162
		Total expenses	137,773	98,479

Net operating loss			(137,773)	(98,479)

Other expense
	Interest expense		(5,000)	(1,667)
	Total other expense		(5,000)	(1,667)

Net loss			$(142,773)	$ (100,146)

Weighted average number of common
	shares outstanding- basic and diluted		27,198,630	25,000,000

Net loss per share – basic and diluted			$ (0.01)	$ (0.00)

			For the year ended September 30, 2014	For the year ended September 30, 2013
Revenue			$ -	$ -
Expenses:
	Auditing fees		9,750	11,600
	General & administrative		8,317	-
	Legal fees		8,250	-
	Consulting-related party		20,000	-
		Total expenses	46,317	11,600
Net loss			$ (46,317)	$ (11,600)
Weighted average number of common
	shares outstanding-basic		25,000,000	25,000,000
Net loss per share-basic			$ (0.00)	$ (0.00)

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

IPOWorld

(formerly General Cleaning and Maintenance)

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

(Audited)

							Total
	Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-In	Accumulated	Stockholders'
	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount	Capital	Deficit	Equity
Balance, September 30, 2013	-	-	25,000,000	25,000	21,075	(44,575)	1,500

Contributed capital (cash)	-	-	-	-	6,600	-	6,600

Net loss	-	-	-	-	-	(100,146)	(100,146)

Balance, September 30, 2014	-	-	25,000,000	25,000	27,675	(144,721)	(92,046)

Contributed capital	-	-	-	-	50,000	-	50,000

November 14, 2014, Shares issued for conversion of debt	-	-	2,500,000	2,500	197,500	-	200,000

Net loss	-	-	-	-	-	(142,773)	(142,773)

Balance, September 30, 2015	-	$ -	27,500,000	$27,500	$275,175	$(287,494)	$15,180

							Total
	Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-In	Accumulated	Stockholders'
	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount	Capital	Deficit	Equity
Balance, September 30, 2012	-	$ -	25,000,000	$ 25,000	$ 9,000	$ (32,975)	$ 1,025
Contributed capital (cash)	-	-	-	-	12,075	-	12,075
Net (loss)	-	-	-	-	-	(11,600)	(11,600)
Balance, September 30, 2013	-	-	25,000,000	25,000	21,075	(44,575)	1,500
Contributed capital (cash)	-	-	-	-	6,600	-	6,600
Beneficial conversion feature of Lakeview Media note	-	-	-	-	200,000	-	200,000
Net (loss)	-	-	-	-	-	(46,317)	(46,317)
Balance, September 30, 2014	-	$ -	25,000,000	$ 25,000	$ 227,675	$ (90,892)	$ 161,783

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

IPOWorld

(~~formerly~~Formerly General Cleaning and Maintenance)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Audited)

		For the year ended September 30, 2015	For the year ended September 30, 2014
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss		$ (142,773)	$ (100,146)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:		-	-
	Increase in interest payable	5,000	1,667
	Decrease in prepaid expense	-	1,500
Net cash used in operating activities		(137,773)	(96,979)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from notes payable		-	200,000
Proceeds from line of credit		50,000	6,600
Net cash provided by financing activities		50,000	206,600

NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH		(87,773)	109,621
CASH - BEGINNING OF THE YEAR		109,621	-
CASH - END OF THE YEAR		$ 21,848	$ 109,621

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:
Interest paid		$ -	$ -
Income taxes paid		$ -	$ -

Non cash investing and financing activities:
Services provided by majority shareholder		$ 40,000	$ -
Shares issued in settlement of debt		$ 200,000	$ -

		For the year ended September 30, 2014	For the year ended September 30, 2013
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss		$ (46,317)	$ (11,600)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
	Increase (decrease) in accounts payable	-	(5,250)
	(Increase) in prepaid expense	1,500	(1,500)
Net cash used by operating activities		(44,817)	(18,350)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
(Increase) in construction in progress		(52,162)	-
Net cash used in investing activities		(52,162)	-
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from convertible note		200,000	-
Contributed capital		6,600	12,075
Net cash provided by financing activities		206,600	12,075
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		109,621	(6,275)
CASH - BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD		-	6,275
CASH - END OF THE PERIOD		$ 109,621	$ -
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:
Interest paid		-	-
Income taxes paid		-	-
Non-cash transactions		-	-

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

IPOWorld

(formerly General Cleaning and Maintenance)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, ~~2014~~2015

~~(Audited)~~NOTE 1. - BUSINESS

~~NOTE~~IPO 1.World, (The “Company”) was organized on April 26, 2010 (Date of Inception) under the laws of the State of Nevada, as General ~~Organization~~Cleaning and ~~Business~~Maintenance. On March 15, 2013, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment with the Nevada Secretary of State to change its corporate name to: IPOWorld. The original business of the Company was to provide a wide range of janitorial and cleaning services for clients.

~~The~~IPOWorld is ~~Company~~focused ~~was organized~~ on ~~April~~creating ~~26,~~a ~~2010 (Date~~portfolio of ~~Inception)~~real ~~under~~estate ~~the~~properties ~~laws~~that ofservice the ~~State~~cannabis ofindustry. ~~Nevada,~~The asCompany ~~General~~does ~~Cleaning~~not ~~and Maintenance. On February 13~~grow, harvest, ~~2013~~distribute, ~~the~~market ~~Company changed~~nor ~~its~~sell ~~name~~cannabis. ~~from~~The ~~General~~company ~~Cleaning~~may acquire and/or ~~Maintenance~~leases toproperly ~~IPOWorld.~~zoned ~~Concurrently,~~land itand ~~also~~related ~~increased its authorized shares of common~~facilities ~~stock~~with ~~from~~the ~~75,000,000~~intent to ~~185,000,000~~build ~~shares~~and/or ofdo ~~common~~leasehold ~~stock,~~improvements ~~par~~to ~~value~~existing ~~$0.001,~~buildings and ~~added~~rent ~~the~~to ~~authorization~~licensed tenants for uptheir ~~to 15~~operations,~~000,000~~ ~~shares~~all ofin ~~preferred~~compliance ~~stock,~~with ~~par~~applicable ~~value~~local $0and state laws and regulations.~~001.~~

~~IPOWorld~~The ~~incorporated~~cannabis ~~MSPR,~~industry ~~a Nevada corporation, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of IPOWorld on November 24, 2014. It~~ is ~~management's~~still ~~intention that the subsidiary act as a separate~~concentrated ~~entity~~in ~~that provides security and protection services for IPOWorld's and other businesses operations. The subsidiary will be~~ a ~~distinct~~ ~~company~~few ~~with~~States ~~different financial, investment~~ and ~~operating~~lacks ~~characteristics~~recognized soregional ~~that~~or ~~each~~national ~~company can adopt their own business strategies and objectives tailored to their respective markets~~leaders.

~~NOTE~~The 2Company intends to limit our business to states (e.g., ~~Summary~~Washington, Colorado and Oregon) that have approved cannabis use based on the type of ~~Significant~~usage ~~Accounting~~permitted. ~~Policies~~There are some states in which the Company cannot market its services due to local state restrictions. The Company intends to market its services in states that have regulatory systems in place to license cannabis production and processing. Of these states, the Company currently considers Washington and Colorado to be its primary target market. Both Washington and Colorado have legalized the recreational use of cannabis. Once the Company is able to establish its operations in Washington and Colorado, it may seek business opportunities in other states that have approved cannabis such as Oregon.

~~Basis~~IPOWorld incorporated MSPR, a Nevada corporation, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of ~~Accounting~~IPOWorld on November 24, 2014. It is management's intention that the subsidiary act as a separate entity that will provide security and protection services for IPOWorld's and other businesses operations. The subsidiary, MPSR, will be a distinct company with different financial, investment and operating objectives, so that it can adopt its own business strategies and objectives tailored to its respective markets. MSPR has not yet commenced operations.

The basis is United States generally accepted accounting principles.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all unrestricted highly liquid investments with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts.

Earnings per Share

The basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing the Company's net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding during the year. The diluted earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing the Company's net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding is the basic weighted number of shares adjusted for any potentially dilutive debt or equity.

The Company has not issued any options or warrants or similar securities since inception.

Fair value of financial instruments

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of September 30, 2014 and 2013. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. These financial instruments include cash and accounts payable. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for cash because they are short term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair values.

F-6

IPOWorld

(formerly General Cleaning and Maintenance)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, ~~2014~~2015

~~(Audited)~~NOTE 2. - GOING CONCERN

~~Level~~These 1:consolidated ~~The~~financial ~~preferred~~statements have ~~inputs~~been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to ~~valuation~~a going concern which contemplates ~~efforts~~the ~~are~~realization ~~“quoted~~of ~~prices~~assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in ~~active~~the ~~markets~~normal ~~for~~course ~~identical~~of ~~assets~~business. orThe ~~liabilities~~Company has an accumulated deficit since inception of $287,”494 ~~with~~and ~~the~~has ~~caveat~~incurred ~~that~~losses in the ~~reporting~~years ended September 30, 2015 and September ~~entity~~30, ~~must~~2014. ~~have~~The ~~access~~Company has not generated any revenues to ~~that~~date, ~~market.~~and ~~Information~~its atability ~~this~~to ~~level~~continue as a going concern is ~~based~~contingent onupon the ~~direct~~successful ~~observations~~completion of ~~transactions~~additional ~~involving~~financing ~~the~~arrangements and its ability to achieve and maintain profitable operations. Management ~~same~~plans ~~assets~~to raise equity capital to finance the operating and ~~liabilities,~~capital ~~not~~requirements ~~assumptions~~of the Company. Amounts raised will be used for further development of the Company's products, to provide financing for marketing and ~~thus~~promotion ~~offers~~and ~~superior~~for ~~reliability~~other working capital purposes. While ~~However,~~the ~~relatively~~Company ~~few~~is ~~items~~putting forth its best efforts to achieve the above plans, ~~especially~~there ~~physical~~is no assurance that any such activity will ~~assets,~~generate ~~actually~~funds ~~trade~~that inwill ~~active~~be ~~markets~~available for operations.

~~Level~~These 2:conditions ~~FASB~~raise ~~acknowledged~~substantial ~~that~~doubt about ~~active~~the ~~markets for~~Company's ~~identical~~ability ~~assets~~to ~~and~~continue ~~liabilities~~as ~~are~~a ~~relatively~~going ~~uncommon~~concern. ~~and,~~These ~~even~~consolidated ~~when~~financial ~~they~~statements do ~~exist,~~not ~~they~~include ~~may~~any beadjustments relating ~~too thin~~ to ~~provide~~the ~~reliable information.~~recoverability Toand ~~deal~~classification ~~with this shortage~~ of ~~direct~~recorded ~~data~~asset amounts, ~~the~~or ~~board~~amounts ~~provided~~and aclassification ~~second level~~ of ~~inputs~~liabilities that might ~~can~~result befrom ~~applied~~this ~~in three situations~~uncertainty.

~~Level~~NOTE 3~~: If inputs from levels 1 and 2 are not available, FASB acknowledges that fair value measures of many assets and liabilities are less precise~~. ~~The~~- ~~board~~SIGNIFICANT ~~describes Level~~ACCOUNTING 3 inputs as “unobservable,” and limits their use by saying they “shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available.” This category allows “for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date”. Earlier in the standard, FASB explains that “observable inputs” are gathered from sources other than the reporting company and that they are expected to reflect assumptions made by market participants.POLICIES

The ~~fair~~relevant ~~value~~accounting ~~measurements~~policies ofare listed below. There have been no significant changes in the Company’'s ~~financial~~significant ~~instruments at~~accounting ~~September~~policies during the year ended September 30, 2015 ~~2014~~compared ~~and~~to ~~2013~~what ~~were~~was aspreviously ~~follows:~~disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.

	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
September 30, 2014
Cash and cash equivalents	$109,621	-	-
September 30, 2013
Cash and cash equivalents	$ -	-	-

Basis of Presentation

~~Prepaid~~The ~~expense~~accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as promulgated in the United States of America. The Company's fiscal year-end is September 30th.

~~During~~Principles ~~the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company prepaid for construction that was in progress but not yet completed in the amount~~ of ~~$52,162. This construction is expected to be completed during 2015.~~Consolidation

~~Revenue~~The ~~recognition~~consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of IPOWorld and its wholly owned subsidiary, MSPR Corp. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. For the year ended September 30, 2015, MSPR Corp. had no operations to report.

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 605-10-599 which requires that all of the following conditions are satisfied: (1) there is a persuasive evidence of an arrangement; (2) the product or service has been provided to the customer; (3) the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable; and (4) the collection of our fees is probable.

The Company recognizes revenue from services at the time the services have been rendered to the customers. The Company did not realize any revenues from Inception on April 26, 2010 through September 30, 2014.

Dividends

The Company has not yet adopted any policy regarding payment of dividends. No dividends have been paid during the period shown.

F-7

IPOWorld

~~(formerly~~Notes ~~General~~to ~~Cleaning~~Consolidated ~~and~~Financial ~~Maintenance)~~Statements

~~Notes~~September to30, ~~Financial Statements~~2015

~~September~~Cash ~~30,~~and ~~2014~~Cash Equivalents

~~(Audited)~~The Company considers all short-term investments with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash and cash equivalents. The Company had no cash equivalents as of September 30, 2015 and 2014.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes is the total of the current taxes payable and the net of the change in the deferred income taxes. Provision is made for the deferred income taxes where differences exist between the period in which transactions affect current taxable income and the period in which they enter into the determination of net income in the consolidated financial statements.

Year-end

The Company has selected September 30 as its year-end.

Advertising

Advertising is expensed when incurred. There has been no advertising during the period.

Use of Estimates

~~The~~In ~~preparation~~preparing of consolidated financial ~~statements~~ statements in conformity with ~~accounting principles~~ generally accepted inaccounting ~~the~~principles, ~~United~~management ~~States~~is ofrequired ~~America requires management~~ to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the ~~consolidated~~ financial statements and ~~the~~revenues ~~reported amounts of revenue~~ and expenses during the ~~reporting~~reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management makes estimates that affect certain accounts including, deferred income tax assets, estimated useful lives of property and equipment, accrued expenses, fair value of equity instruments and reserves for any other commitments or contingencies. Any adjustments applied to estimates are recognized in the year in which such adjustments are determined.

~~Beneficial~~Earnings ~~Conversion~~(Loss) ~~Feature~~Per Share Calculations

IfThe ~~the~~Company ~~conversion~~follows ~~features~~ASC ofTopic ~~conventional~~260 to ~~convertible~~account ~~debt provides~~ for athe ~~rate~~earnings of(loss) ~~conversion~~per ~~that~~share. isBasic ~~below~~earnings ~~market~~(loss) ~~value,~~per ~~this~~common ~~feature~~share ~~is characterized as a beneficial conversion feature~~ (“~~BCF~~EPS”). Acalculations ~~BCF~~are isdetermined by ~~recorded~~dividing net income by the ~~Company~~weighted asaverage anumber ~~debt~~of ~~discount~~shares ~~pursuant~~of tocommon ~~ASC~~stock ~~Topic~~outstanding ~~470-20 “Debt with~~during ~~Conversion~~the ~~and~~year. ~~Other~~Diluted ~~Options.” In~~earnings ~~those~~per common ~~circumstances,~~share ~~the~~calculations ~~convertible~~are ~~debt~~determined isby ~~recorded~~dividing net ofincome by the ~~discount~~weighted ~~related to~~average ~~the~~number ~~BCF~~of common shares and ~~the~~dilutive ~~Company~~common share ~~amortizes~~equivalents ~~the~~outstanding. ~~discount~~During toperiods ~~interest~~when ~~expense~~common ~~over~~stock ~~the~~equivalents, ~~life~~if ofany, ~~the~~are ~~debt~~anti-dilutive ~~using~~they ~~the~~are ~~effective~~not ~~interest~~considered in ~~method~~the computation.

~~NOTE~~Fair 3.value -of ~~Going~~financial ~~concern~~instruments

~~The~~Fair ~~Company's~~value ~~consolidated~~estimates ~~financial~~discussed ~~statements~~herein are ~~prepared~~based ~~using~~upon ~~the~~certain ~~generally~~market ~~accepted~~assumptions ~~accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets~~ and ~~liquidation~~pertinent ofinformation ~~liabilities~~available into ~~the~~management ~~normal~~as ~~course~~ of ~~business.~~September ~~However~~30, ~~the~~2015 ~~Company~~and ~~has not commenced its planned principal~~September ~~operations~~30 ~~and it has not generated any revenues~~2014. InThe ~~order~~respective tocarrying ~~obtain~~value ~~the~~of ~~necessary~~certain ~~capital,~~on-balance-sheet ~~the~~financial ~~Company~~instruments isapproximated ~~seeking~~their ~~equity~~fair ~~and/or debt financing~~values. ~~There~~These financial ~~are~~instruments noinclude ~~assurances~~cash ~~that the Company will be successful~~equivalents, ~~without~~accrued ~~sufficient~~expenses ~~financing~~and itaccounts ~~would~~payable. beFair ~~unlikely for~~values ~~the~~were ~~Company~~assumed to ~~continue~~approximate carrying asvalues afor ~~going~~cash ~~concern.~~and ~~The~~payables ~~accompanying~~because ~~consolidated~~they ~~financial~~are ~~statements~~short doterm ~~not~~in ~~include~~nature ~~any adjustments relating to the recoverability~~ and ~~classification~~their ofcarrying ~~recorded asset~~ amounts orapproximate ~~amounts~~fair ~~and classification of liabilities that might~~values ~~result~~or ~~from~~they ~~the~~are ~~outcome~~payable ofon ~~this uncertainty~~demand.

~~NOTE~~Level 41: The preferred inputs to valuation efforts are “quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities,” with the caveat that the reporting entity must have access to that market. -Information ~~Stockholders'~~at ~~Equity~~this level is based on direct observations of transactions involving the same assets and ~~Contributed~~liabilities, ~~Capital~~not assumptions, and thus offers superior reliability. However, relatively few items, especially physical assets, actually trade in active markets.

~~The~~Level ~~Company~~2: isFASB ~~authorized~~acknowledged tothat ~~issue 15,000,000~~active ~~preferred~~markets ~~shares~~for atidentical ~~par~~assets ~~value $0.001~~ and ~~185,000,000~~liabilities ~~common~~are ~~shares~~relatively atuncommon ~~par~~and, ~~value~~even ~~$0.001.~~when Onthey ~~February~~do 13exist, ~~2013,~~they ~~the~~may ~~Company~~be ~~increased the~~too ~~authorized~~thin ~~stock~~to ofprovide reliable ~~the~~information. ~~company~~To ~~from~~deal ~~75,000,000~~with ~~shares~~this toshortage ~~185,000,000~~of ~~common~~direct ~~shares~~data, atthe ~~par~~board ~~value~~provided ~~$0.001~~a ~~and~~second ~~15,000,000~~level ~~preferred shares~~of atinputs ~~par~~that ~~value~~can ~~$0.001~~be ~~for~~applied in ~~total~~three ~~authorized shares of 200,000,000~~situations.

F-8

IPOWorld

(formerly General Cleaning and Maintenance)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, ~~2014~~2015

~~(Audited)~~Level 3: If inputs from levels 1 and 2 are not available, FASB acknowledges that fair value measures of many assets and liabilities are less precise. The board describes Level 3 inputs as “unobservable,” and limits their use by saying they “shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available.” This category allows “for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date”. Earlier in the standard, FASB explains that “observable inputs” are gathered from sources other than the reporting company and that they are expected to reflect assumptions made by market participants.

~~NOTE~~The 4.Company -did ~~Stockholders'~~not ~~Equity~~have ~~and~~any ~~Contributed~~assets or ~~Capital~~liabilities ~~(Continued)~~measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2015 or September 30, 2014.

~~During~~Income ~~the year ended September 30, 2013, an officer of the company contributed capital of $12,075 to pay for audit fees.~~Taxes

~~During~~The provision for income taxes is the total ~~year~~of ~~ended~~the ~~September~~current ~~30,~~taxes ~~2014,~~payable anand the net of the change in the deferred income taxes. Provision is made for the deferred income ~~officer~~taxes where differences exist between the period in which transactions affect current taxable income and the period in which they enter into the determination of net income in the ~~company~~financial ~~contributed~~statements. ~~capital~~A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some of ~~$6,600~~the todeferred ~~pay~~tax assets will not be realized. In determining the need for ~~audit~~valuation ~~fees~~allowances, we consider projected future taxable income and the availability of tax planning strategies. After evaluating all positive and negative historical and perspective evidences, management has determined it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will not be realized.

~~There~~The ~~have~~Company ~~been~~has norecorded ~~issuances~~a full valuation allowance against its otherwise recognizable deferred tax assets as of ~~stock~~September ~~options~~30, 2015. As such, the Company has not recorded ora ~~warrants~~provision for income tax for the period ended September 30, 2015.

~~NOTE~~Comprehensive 5.Income ~~Related Party Transactions~~(Loss)

OnThe ~~December~~Company ~~13,~~is ~~2012,~~required anto ~~officer~~display ofcomprehensive ~~the~~income ~~company~~(loss) ~~contributed~~and ~~capital~~its components as part of $4the Company’s consolidated financial statements. For the years ended September 30,~~075~~ to2015 ~~pay~~and 2014, ~~for~~the ~~audit~~Company ~~fees~~had no elements of comprehensive income (loss).

On February 4, 2013, an officer of the company contributed capital of $2,000 to pay for review fees.

On July 3, 2013, an officer of the company contributed capital of $6,000 to pay for review fees.

On November 4, 2013, an officer of the company contributed capital of $3,000 to pay for audit fees.

On February 18, 2014, an officer of the company contributed capital of $1,750 to pay for review fees.

On May 12, 2014, an officer of the company contributed capital of $1,750 to pay for review fees.

On September 19, 2014, an officer of the company contributed capital of $100 to provide working capital.

F-9

IPOWorld

(formerly General Cleaning and Maintenance)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, ~~2014~~2015

~~(Audited)~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements

~~NOTE~~With 5.the ~~Related~~exception ~~Party~~of ~~Transactions~~those discussed below, there have not been any recent changes in accounting pronouncements and Accounting Standards Update (~~Continued~~ASU) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) during the year ended September 30, 2015 that are of significance or potential significance to the Company.

~~The~~In ~~Company~~May ~~does~~2014, ~~not~~the ~~lease~~Financial orAccounting Standards ~~rent~~Board ~~any~~(“FASB”) ~~property~~issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. ~~Office~~ ~~services~~2014-09, ~~are~~Revenue ~~provided~~from ~~without~~Contracts with ~~charge~~Customers by(Topic a606) ~~director~~(“ASU No. ~~Such~~2014-09”). ~~costs~~ASU ~~are~~No. ~~immaterial~~2014-09 tosupersedes the ~~consolidated~~previous ~~financial~~revenue ~~statements~~recognition ~~and~~requirements, ~~accordingly,~~along ~~have~~with ~~not~~most ~~been~~existing ~~reflected~~industry-specific ~~therein~~guidance. The ~~officers~~guidance ~~and~~requires ~~directors~~an ofentity ~~the~~to ~~Company~~review ~~are~~contracts ~~involved~~ in ~~other~~five ~~business~~steps: ~~activities~~1) identify ~~and~~the ~~may~~contract, in2) identify performance obligations, 3) determine the ~~future~~transaction price, ~~become~~4) ~~involved~~allocate the transaction price, and 5) recognize revenue. The new standard will result in ~~other~~enhanced ~~business~~disclosures ~~opportunities~~regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue arising from contracts with customers. IfIn August 2015, the FASB issued guidance approving a ~~specific~~one-year ~~business~~deferral, ~~opportunity~~making ~~becomes~~the standard ~~available~~effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted only for reporting periods ~~such~~beginning ~~persons~~after ~~may~~December ~~face~~15, a2016. ~~conflict~~In inMarch ~~selecting~~2016, ~~between~~the FASB issued guidance to clarify the ~~Company~~implementation ~~and~~guidance ~~their~~on ~~other~~principal versus ~~business~~agent ~~interests~~considerations for reporting revenue gross rather than net, with the same deferred effective date. In April 2016, the FASB issued guidance to clarify the identification of performance obligations and licensing arrangements. The Company has not ~~formulated~~ adetermined ~~policy for~~ the ~~resolution~~impact of ~~such~~adopting ~~conflicts~~ASU No. 2014-09 on our consolidated financial statements and currently plan to complete our evaluation by late 2017.

~~NOTE~~In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements, Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) which requires management to evaluate on a regular basis whether any conditions or events have arisen that could raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. The guidance 1) provides a definition for the term “substantial doubt,” 2) requires an evaluation every reporting period, interim periods included, 3) provides principles for considering the mitigating effect of management's plans to alleviate the substantial doubt, 4) requires certain disclosures if the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of management's plans, 5) requires an express statement, as well as other disclosures, if the substantial doubt is not alleviated, and 6) requires an assessment period of one year from the date the financial statements are issued. ~~Provision~~The standard is effective for the ~~Income~~annual ~~Taxes~~reporting period beginning after December 31, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this new accounting pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements.

~~The~~In ~~Company~~November ~~accounts~~2015, ~~for~~the ~~income~~FASB ~~taxes~~issued ~~under~~ASU ~~FASB~~No. ~~Accounting~~2015-17, ~~Standard~~Income ~~Codification~~Taxes, ~~ASC~~or ~~740~~ASU ~~"Income~~No. ~~Taxes"~~2015-17. ~~ASC~~To ~~740~~simplify ~~requires~~the ~~use~~presentation of ~~the~~deferred ~~liability~~income ~~method.~~taxes, ~~ASC~~the ~~740~~amendments ~~provides~~in this update require that deferred tax ~~assets~~liabilities and ~~liabilities~~assets ~~are~~be ~~recorded~~classified ~~based~~as onnoncurrent ~~the~~in ~~differences~~a ~~between~~classified ~~the~~statement ~~tax bases~~ of ~~assets~~financial ~~and~~position. ~~liabilities~~The ~~and~~amendments ~~their~~in ~~carrying~~this ~~amounts~~Update ~~for~~apply ~~financial~~to ~~reporting~~all ~~purposes,~~entities ~~referred~~that topresent asa ~~temporary~~classified ~~differences~~statement of financial position. ~~Deferred~~The current requirement that deferred tax liabilities and assets of a tax-paying component of an entity be offset and ~~liabilities~~presented as a single amount is not ataffected by the ~~end~~amendments ofin ~~each~~this ~~period~~Update. The amendments in this Update are ~~determined~~effective ~~using~~for ~~the~~financial ~~currently~~statements ~~enacted~~issued ~~tax~~for ~~rates~~annual periods ~~applied~~beginning toafter ~~taxable~~December ~~income~~15, in2016, ~~the~~and interim periods inwithin ~~which~~those annual periods. Earlier application is permitted. The ~~the~~amendments in this Update may be applied either prospectively to all deferred tax ~~assets~~liabilities and ~~liabilities~~assets ~~are~~or ~~expected~~retrospectively to all beperiods ~~settled~~presented. orThe ~~realized~~Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2015-17 on its consolidated financial statements.

As of September 30, 2014, the Company had net loss carry forwards of $90,892 that may be available to reduce future years' taxable income through 2013. Future tax benefits which may arise as a result of these losses have not been recognized in these consolidated financial statements, as their realization is determined not likely to occur and accordingly, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset relating to these tax loss carry-forwards. Net loss carry forwards will begin to expire in 2030.

Components of net deferred tax assets, including a valuation allowance, are as follows at September 30, 2014 and 2013:

	2014	2013
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carry forward	$ 90,892	$ 44,575
Total deferred tax assets	31,812	15,601
Less: valuation allowance	(31,812)	(15,601)
Net deferred tax assets	$ -	$ -

F-10

IPOWorld

(formerly General Cleaning and Maintenance)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, ~~2014~~2015

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (~~Audited~~Topic 842) to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. Topic 842 affects any entity that enters into a lease, with some specified scope exemptions. The guidance in this Update supersedes Topic 840, Leases. The core principle of Topic 842 is that a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases. A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. For public companies, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements.

~~The~~In ~~valuation~~March ~~allowance~~2016, ~~for~~the ~~deferred~~FASB ~~tax~~issued ~~assets~~ASU 2016-08, asRevenue offrom ~~September~~Contracts ~~30,~~with ~~2014,~~Customers ~~was $~~(~~31,812~~Topic 606),: asPrincipal ~~compared~~versus toAgent $Considerations (~~15,601)~~Reporting asRevenue ofGross ~~September~~versus ~~30,~~Net) ~~2013.~~that clarifies Inhow ~~assessing~~to ~~the~~apply ~~recovery~~revenue ofrecognition ~~the~~guidance ~~deferred tax~~related ~~assets,~~to ~~management considers~~ whether itan entity is ~~more~~a ~~likely~~principal ~~than~~or ~~not~~an agent. ASU 2016-08 clarifies that ~~some~~the ~~portion~~analysis ormust ~~all~~focus on whether the entity has control of the ~~deferred~~goods ~~tax~~or ~~assets~~services ~~will~~before ~~not be~~they ~~realized.~~are ~~The~~transferred ~~ultimate~~to ~~realization~~the ofcustomer and ~~deferred~~provides ~~tax~~additional ~~assets~~guidance isabout ~~dependent~~how ~~upon~~to apply the ~~generation~~control ofprinciple ~~future~~when ~~taxable~~services ~~income~~are inprovided ~~the~~and ~~periods~~when goods or services inare ~~which~~combined ~~those~~with ~~temporary~~other ~~differences~~goods ~~become~~or ~~deductible~~services. ~~Management~~The ~~considers~~effective date for ASU 2016-08 is the ~~scheduled~~same ~~reversals~~as ofthe ~~future~~effective ~~deferred~~date ~~tax~~of ~~assets,~~ASU 2014-09 ~~projected~~as ~~future~~amended ~~taxable~~by ~~income~~ASU 2015-14, ~~and~~for ~~tax~~annual ~~planning~~reporting ~~strategies~~periods inbeginning ~~making~~after ~~this~~December ~~assessment.~~15, ~~As a result~~2017, ~~management~~including ~~determined~~interim itperiods ~~was~~within those ~~more~~years. ~~likely~~The ~~than~~Company has not ~~the~~yet ~~deferred~~determined ~~tax~~the ~~assets~~impact ~~would~~of ~~not~~ASU be2016-08 ~~realized~~on asits ofconsolidated ~~September~~financial ~~30, 2014~~statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation, or ASU No. 2016-09. The ~~provision~~areas for simplification in this Update involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income ~~taxes~~tax ~~differs~~consequences, ~~from~~classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the ~~amount~~statement ~~computed~~of bycash ~~applying~~flows. For public entities, the ~~statutory~~amendments ~~federal~~in ~~income~~this Update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. Amendments related to the timing of when excess tax ~~rate~~benefits are recognized, minimum statutory withholding requirements, forfeitures, and intrinsic value should be applied using a modified retrospective transition method by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to ~~income~~equity ~~before~~as ~~provision~~of ~~for~~the ~~income~~beginning of the period in which the guidance is adopted. Amendments related to the presentation of employee taxes paid on the statement of cash flows when an employer withholds shares to meet the minimum statutory withholding requirement should be applied retrospectively. ~~The~~Amendments ~~sources~~requiring recognition of excess tax benefits and tax ~~effects~~deficiencies in the income statement and the practical expedient for estimating expected term should be applied prospectively. An entity may elect to apply the amendments related to the presentation of excess tax benefits on the ~~differences~~statement of ~~are~~cash asflows ~~follows:~~using either a prospective transition method or a retrospective transition method. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-09 on its consolidated financial statements.

U.S federal statutory rate (35.0%)

Valuation reserve 35.0%

Total -%

NOTE 7. Operating Leases and Other Commitments

The Company has no leases. The Company is in the process of building a cannabis cultivation facility in Olympia, Washington. Construction of the facility is underway, and the Company paid for construction in progress of $52,162. The cannabis licensee has permission from the local and state authorities in the State of Washington to build up to a 10,000 square foot cannabis cultivation facility. They have applied for a Tier II cannabis license that requires that their facility be built and then inspected before a final cultivation/processing license is issued. This 10,000 sq. ft. facility is located on a 65 acre parcel of land owned by the Licensee. Once the facility is completed and final inspection is approved by the State of Washington, the Company expects to receive its fees for completion of the facility and providing consulting services.

NOTE 8. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company's management has evaluated all the recently issued accounting pronouncements through the filing date of these financial statements and does not believe that any of these pronouncements will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations except the following:

On June 10, 2014, accounting principles generally accepted in the United States were amended to remove the definition of a development stage entity thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for the Company to present inception-to-date information and to label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity. The amendments are effective for the Company’s financial statements as of December 31, 2016, and interim periods therein; however, early application of each of the amendments is permitted for any reporting period. The Company has adopted the amendments and no longer presents inception-to-date information in the statement of operations, statement of stockholders' equity, and statement of cash flows. In addition, the financial statements will no longer be labeled as those of a development stage entity.

F-11

IPOWorld

(formerly General Cleaning and Maintenance)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, ~~2014~~2015

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (~~Audited~~Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, which provides further guidance on identifying performance obligations and improves the operability and understandability of licensing implementation guidance. The effective date for ASU 2016-10 is the same as the effective date of ASU 2014-09 as amended by ASU 2015-14, for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. The Company has not yet determined the impact of ASU 2016-10 on its financial statements.

NOTE 94. - ~~SUBSEQUENT~~STOCKHOLDERS' ~~EVENTS~~DEFICIT

OnThe ~~October 17, 2014, the~~ Company ~~agreed~~is authorized to issue 115,000,000 preferred ~~unregistered~~shares ~~restricted~~at ~~Preferred~~par ~~Voting~~value ~~Stock,~~$0.001 ~~which carries a voting weight equal to fifty (50) Common Shares~~ and 14185,~~500~~000,000 ~~restricted~~ common shares toat ~~Edward~~par ~~Heckerson~~value ~~for his services, which include but are not limited to: corporate guidance, operations, regulatory compliance and the seeking and successful acquisition of Company financing. The shares were valued~~ $~~15,500.00, based on $~~0.001 ~~par value~~.

On October 17, 2014, the Company designated a class of its non-convertible Preferred Voting Stock, par value $0.001. One Million (1,000,000) Preferred Voting Stock were authorized. ~~The~~ The Preferred Voting Stock carry a voting weight equal to fifty (50) Common Shares. The shares of the Preferred Voting Stock ~~are~~ are not redeemable and cannot be converted into Common Shares, unless it is approved by the Board of Directors and agreed upon by the Preferred Voting Shareholders. These Preferred Shares do not participate in dividends and have no liquidation rights. Their sole right is in voting.

On ~~November~~October 1417, 2014, ~~IPOWorld with~~ the ~~approval of~~Company ~~the Board of Directors~~ agreed to issue 21,~~500~~000,000 unregistered restricted, ~~common~~non-convertible ~~shares~~Preferred toVoting ~~satisfy~~Stock, awhich ~~Convertible~~carries ~~Note~~a ~~debt~~voting ~~obligation of~~weight ~~$200,000~~equal ~~between~~to ~~the~~fifty (50) ~~Company~~Common Shares and ~~Lakeview Media~~14,500,000 arestricted ~~Nevis~~common ~~corporation.~~shares ~~The~~to ~~Company~~Edward ~~entered~~Heckerson ~~into~~for ~~the~~his ~~Convertible~~services ~~Note~~provided ~~with~~during ~~Lakeview Media~~the onquarter ~~September~~ended December 3031, 2014., ~~The~~which ~~debt~~include ~~holder~~but ~~agreed~~are tonot ~~tender~~limited ~~their~~to: ~~original~~corporate ~~note~~guidance, ~~marked satisfied~~operations, ~~upon~~regulatory ~~the~~compliance ~~issuance~~and ofthe ~~2,500,000~~seeking ~~IPOWorld~~and ~~restricted~~successful ~~common~~acquisition ~~shares~~of Company financing. The common shares were ~~issued~~valued ~~pursuant~~at to the ~~exemption~~fair ~~from~~market ~~registration~~value ~~provided by Section 4(2)~~ of ~~the Securities Act~~$2.70 Weper ~~believed~~share ~~that~~as ~~Section 4(2) was available because~~ on the ~~offer~~date ~~and~~of ~~sale~~issuance ~~did~~for ~~not~~a ~~involve~~total avalue ~~public~~of ~~offering~~ $39,150,000 and ~~there~~preferred ~~was~~shares ~~not~~were ~~general~~valued ~~solicitation~~for or$1,000, ~~general~~based ~~advertising~~on ~~involved~~$0.001 inpar ~~the~~value ~~offer~~of preferred ~~or sale~~stock.

In the case of the Common Shares, the most reliably measured value was determined by the market price of the Common stock, which is not supported by material volume and thus may represent a category III valuation. In the case of the Preferred Shares, which have no market, are not convertible to Common Shares, do not participate in dividends, and have no liquidation rights, the Company believes no reliable measure of value exists for either the security issued or the consideration received by the Company, and chose par value as a last resort.

During June 2015, the Company determined that several legal and accounting mistakes were made in the issuance of both the Common and Preferred Shares to Mr. Edward Heckerson, as noted above. It was mutually determined that the most prudent course was to declare both issuances void accordingly, the transaction was rescinded. The grantee Mr. Edward Heckerson, agreed to rescind the transaction.

Due to errors made, the Company will present the effect of the recision/ annulment of the transaction retrospectively in the first quarter of fiscal year 2015. This treatment renders the transaction set null for financial statement purposes, and accordingly the Company expects to update and restate its quarterly filings for the quarters ended December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2015, the affected periods within the next ninety days.

F-12

~~Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants On Accounting and Financial Disclosure.~~IPOWorld

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2015

On November 14, 2014, the Board of Directors approved and agreed to issue 2,500,000 unregistered restricted common shares at an agreed value of $ 0.08 per share to satisfy a Convertible Note debt obligation of $200,000 between the Company and Lakeview Media, a Nevis corporation. The Company had entered into the Convertible Note with Lakeview Media on September 30, 2014. The debt holder agreed to tender their original note, marked satisfied, upon the issuance of 2,500,000 IPOWorld restricted common shares and the debt discount calculated under the embedded beneficial conversion feature of $200,000 was entirely amortized and recorded as interest expense as at December 31, 2014. The shares were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. We believed that Section 4(2) was available because the offer and sale did not involve a public offering and there was not general solicitation or general advertising involved in the offer or sale.

There have been no issuances of stock options or warrants during the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

NOTE 5 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the year ended September 30, 2015, the Company paid a related party $22,000 for consulting expenses related to the coordination of construction services currently in progress. This related party entity is controlled by the sole officer of the Company.

The Company does not lease or rent any property. Nominal office services are provided without charge by a director. Such costs are immaterial to the financial statements and, accordingly, have not been reflected therein. The officer and directors of the Company are involved in other business activities and may, in the future, become involved in other business opportunities. If a specific business opportunity becomes available, such persons may face a conflict in selecting between the Company and their other business interests. The Company has not formulated a policy for the resolution of such conflicts.

NOTE 6 - LINE OF CREDIT

On June 25, 2015, the Company received a line of credit in the amount of $150,000 from Clear Water Technologies which bears interest at a rate of 2% per month, due and payable within 60 days. The Company has borrowed $50,000 to date, and received a verbal extension. However, since that time all efforts to communicate with the company have failed, and it is believed that Clear Water Technologies has ceased operations.

F-13

IPOWorld

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2015

NOTE 7 - CONSTRUCTION EXPENSE

The Company was investing in a colocation facility for a turn-key marijuana production and processing location on behalf of a future client. As of September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company had not completed the Washington State Liquor Control Board approved site plan, consulted the client and has expensed $45,288 and $52,162 for construction at this site. However, a variety of operational and client monetary difficulties combined to end the project without completion, and for the costs incurred to date offered no further economic benefit to the Company.

NOTE 8 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated subsequent events from September 30, 2015 through the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, and has determined that no such events have occurred.

F-14

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

Our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in rules and forms adopted by the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, who is also the sole member of our Board of Directors, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K. Based on such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2014, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. Our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective because of the "material weaknesses" described below under "Management's annual report on internal control over financial reporting," which are in the process of being remediated as described below under "Management Plan to Remediate Material Weaknesses."

27Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management's Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officer and effected by the company's board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:

· Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;

· Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and

· Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process, and it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk. Further, over time control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As of September 30, 2015 management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on that evaluation, they concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: 1) lack of a functioning audit committee due to a lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; and 2)

inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives.

The aforementioned material weakness was identified by our President in connection with the review of our consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2015.

As of September 30, 2014 management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on that evaluation, they concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

The aforementioned material weakness was identified by our President in connection with the review of our consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2014.

Management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors and inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives results in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our consolidated financial statements in future periods.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Corporation's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Corporation's registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Corporation to provide only the management's report in this annual report.

Management's Remediation Initiatives

In an effort to remediate the identified material weaknesses and other deficiencies and enhance our internal controls, we have initiated, or plan to initiate, the following series of measures:

We plan to appoint one or more outside directors to our board of directors who shall be appointed to an audit committee resulting in a fully functioning audit committee who will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures such as reviewing and approving estimates and assumptions made by management when funds are available to us.

Management believes that the appointment of one or more outside directors, who shall be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our Board.

We anticipate that these initiatives will be at least partially, if not fully, implemented by September 30, ~~2015~~2016, if funds are available to us. Additionally, we plan to test our updated controls and remediate our deficiencies by September 30, ~~2015~~2016.

Changes in ~~internal~~Internal ~~controls~~Controls over ~~financial~~ ~~reporting~~Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

3029

PART III

ITEM 10. ~~DIRECTORS~~Directors, ~~EXECUTIVE~~Executive ~~OFFICERS~~Officers, ~~PROMOTERS~~Promoters, ~~AND~~and ~~CONTROL~~Control ~~PERSONS~~Persons and Corporate Governance

The following table sets forth the names and ages of the current director and executive officer of the Company, the principal offices and positions with the Company held by each person and the date such person became a director or executive officer of the Company. The executive officers of the Company are elected annually by the Board of Directors. The directors serve one-year terms until their successors are elected. The executive officers serve terms of one year or until their death, resignation or removal by the Board of Directors. There are no family relationships among any of the directors and officers.

Name	Age	Position & Offices Held
Edward Heckerson	47	Chief Executive Officer/Director Chief Accounting Officer
Harrysen Mittler	64	Chief Executive Officer/Chairman Chief Accounting Officer

Our director holds office until the next annual meeting of stockholders of the Company and until his successors have been elected and qualified. Directors currently receive no fees for services provided in that capacity.

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of our officers and directors.

~~Edward~~Harrysen ~~Heckerson~~Mittler, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, ~~Director~~Chairman

Mr. ~~Heckerson~~Harrysen ~~brings~~Mittler, toage ~~IPOWorld~~64, ~~his~~has over thirty years of experience in corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions, business administration and commerce. He commenced his career with the accounting firm of Deloitte Haskins & Sells in ~~running~~the audit division, the predecessor company to Deloitte & Touche. Mr. Mittler has served in a ~~fully~~senior ~~reporting~~executive and director capacity with several privately held and publicly quoted emerging growth companies in North America and Europe. In 2016 to present Mr. Mittler serves as President and Director of ePiQ Entertainment Inc. a privately held company ~~that~~which ~~was~~has ~~cleared~~interests ~~for~~in ~~quotation~~a onvariety ~~the~~of ~~OTC~~Arts and Entertainment venues. In 2009 -BB2010 Mr. ~~From~~Mittler ~~January~~served as ~~28,~~President ~~2006~~and ~~through~~Director ~~April~~of ~~15,~~publically ~~2009,~~quoted Pacific Software Inc. a development stage Software Company. From 2006-2007 Mr. Mittler heserved ~~was~~as Chief Financial Officer and Director of Autoworks International Ltd. a company listed on the ~~Principal~~Frankfurt ~~Executive~~Stock Exchange trading in aftermarket automotive parts. In 2004 and 2005 Mr. Mittler served as Director and Chief Financial Officer of ~~AirtimeDSL~~Nortia Capital Partners Inc. Ona orpublically ~~about~~traded ~~April~~merchant 15banking company. It supplied mergers & acquisitions, ~~2009~~financial and management services to emerging growth companies. In 2001 and 2002, ~~the~~Mr. ~~company~~Mittler ~~was~~served ~~acquired~~as byChairman ~~Clear-Lite~~and President of Grand Prix Sports, Inc., ~~and~~a ~~Mr.~~publically ~~Heckerson~~traded ~~stepped-down~~motor assports ~~Principal~~company ~~Executive~~that ~~Officer~~owned a 40% equity stake in Nordic Racing Ltd., a FIA F3000 racing team.

~~2009 to Present, Independent Business Consultant, helping companies market their services.~~30

~~January~~The ~~2006~~title tosponsor ~~2009~~of -the ~~AirtimeDSL~~team was Coca-Cola Europe, ~~Director~~other major sponsors included: Jet Fuels, a division of Conoco, and Euro sport, a leading broadcaster of major sporting events in Europe. The racing series is regarded as the support venue for the popular Formula 1 International Auto Racing Championship Series showcased globally. Since 2011, Mr. Mittler served as a corporate consultant to variety of enterprises, a partial list includes: Spectra Automotive Group, Royal Bees Company, Inc., Silicon South Inc. and Aquila Vision Corporation Plc.

January 2002 to November 2006 – Airtime Wireless, Inc. – President

September 1999 to August 1999 - Independent Communications Consultant

Education:

Bonita High School, San Dimas, CA - Graduated, 1986

Attended Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Our directors, executive officers and control persons have not been involved in any of the following events during the past ten years and which is material to an evaluation of the ability or the integrity of our director or executive officer:

(1)

The registrant has no standing audit, nominating and compensation committees of the Board of Directors, or committees performing similar functions. The Board acts itself in lieu of committees due to its small size.

(2)

The view of the board of directors is that it is appropriate for the registrant not to have such a committee because its director participate in the consideration of director nominees and the board and the company are so small.

(3)

The members of the Board who acts as nominating committee is not independent, pursuant to the definition of independence of a national securities exchange registered pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78f(a).

(4)

The nominating committee has no policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by security holders, but the committee will consider director candidates recommended by security holders.

(5)

The basis for the view of the board of directors that it is appropriate for the registrant not to have such a policy is that there is no need to adopt a policy for a small company.

(6)

The nominating committee will consider candidates recommended by security holders, and by security holders in submitting such recommendations.

(7)

There are no specific, minimum qualifications that the nominating committee believes must be met by a nominee recommended by security holders except to find anyone willing to serve with a clean background.

(8)

The nominating committee's process for identifying and evaluation of nominees for director, including nominees recommended by security holders, is to find qualified persons willing to serve with a clean backgrounds. There are no differences in the manner in which the nominating committee evaluates nominees for director based on whether the nominee is recommended by a security holder, or found by the board.

3231

Board of Directors

Our board of directors consists of only one member, ~~Edward~~Harrysen ~~Heckerson~~Mittler, who serves one-year terms without any compensation.

Audit Committee

The company does not presently have an Audit Committee. The sole member of the Board sits as the Audit Committee. No qualified financial expert has been hired because the company is too small to afford such expense.

Committees and Procedures

1) The registrant has no standing audit, nominating and compensation committees of the Board of Directors, or committees performing similar functions. The Board acts itself in lieu of committees due to its small size.

2) The view of the board of directors is that it is appropriate for the registrant not to have such a committee because its directors participate in the consideration of director nominees and the board and the company are so small.

3) The members of the Board who acts as nominating committee is not independent, pursuant to the definition of independence of a national securities exchange registered pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78f(a).

4) The nominating committee has no policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by security holders, but the committee will consider director candidates recommended by security holders.

5) The basis for the view of the board of directors that it is appropriate for the registrant not to have such a policy is that there is no need to adopt a policy for a small company.

6) The nominating committee will consider candidates recommended by security holders, and by security holders in submitting such recommendations.

7) There are no specific, minimum qualifications that the nominating committee believes must be met by a nominee recommended by security holders except to find anyone willing to serve with a clean background.

8) The nominating committee's process for identifying and evaluation of nominees for director, including nominees recommended by security holders, is to find qualified persons willing to serve with a clean backgrounds. There are no differences in the manner in which the nominating committee evaluates nominees for director based on whether the nominee is recommended by a security holder, or found by the board.

3332

Code of Ethics

We have not adopted a Code of Ethics for the Board and any salaried employees.

Limitation of Liability of Directors

Pursuant to the Nevada General Corporation Law, our Articles of Incorporation exclude personal liability for our Directors for monetary damages based upon any violation of their fiduciary duties as Directors, except as to liability for any breach of the duty of loyalty, acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, or any transaction from which a Director receives an improper personal benefit. This exclusion of liability does not limit any right which a Director may have to be indemnified and does not affect any Director's liability under federal or applicable state securities laws. We have agreed to indemnify our directors against expenses, judgments, and amounts paid in settlement in connection with any claim against a Director if he acted in good faith and in a manner he believed to be in our best interests.

Nevada Anti-Takeover Law and Charter and By-law Provisions

The anti-takeover provisions of Sections 78.411 through 78.445 of the Nevada Corporation Law apply to IPOWorld Section 78.438 of the Nevada law prohibits the Company from merging with or selling more than 5% of our assets or stock to any shareholder who owns or owned more than 10% of any stock or any entity related to a 10% shareholder for three years after the date on which the shareholder acquired the IPOWorld shares, unless the transaction is approved by IPOWorld's Board of Directors. The provisions also prohibit the Company from completing any of the transactions described in the preceding sentence with a 10% shareholder who has held the shares more than three years and its related entities unless the transaction is approved by our Board of Directors or a majority of our shares, other than shares owned by that 10% shareholder or any related entity. These provisions could delay, defer or prevent a change in control of IPOWorld.

3433

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The following summary compensation table sets forth all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the named executive officer paid by us for the Company's last completed fiscal year in all capacities for the accounts of our executives.

Compensation

Summary Compensation Table

		Year
	Principal	Ending	Salary	Bonus	Awards	Compensation	Total
Name	Position	Sept 30,	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)
Theo Baldi	Former CEO	2014	0	0	0	0	0
Edward Heckerson	Former CEO	2015	0	0	0	0	0
Appointed 2/11/13		2013	0	0	0	0	0
Appointed 2/15/14		2014	0	0	0	0	0
Resigned 2/15/14
Resigned 7/13/16
Edward Heckerson	CEO	2014	0	0	0	0	0
Harrysen Mittler	CEO	2015	0	0	0	0	0
Appointed 2/15/14
Appointed 7/13/16

We do not maintain key-man life insurance for our executive officer/director. We do not have any long-term compensation plans, stock option plans or employment agreements with our executive officers/directors.

We do not maintain key-man life insurance for our executive officer/director. We do not have any long-term compensation plans or stock option plans.

As of the date hereof, there have been no grants of stock options to purchase our Common Stock made to the executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table.

There have been no awards made to the named executive officer under any long term incentive plan.

Compensation of Directors

Directors are permitted to receive fixed fees and other compensation for their services as directors. The Board of Directors has the authority to fix the compensation of directors. No amounts have been paid to, or accrued to our two directors in such capacity.

Stock Option Grants

We did not grant any stock options to the executive officer or director from inception through fiscal year end September 30, ~~2014~~2015.

Outstanding Equity Awards at ~~2013 Fiscal~~2015 Fiscal Year-End

We did not have any outstanding equity ~~awards~~ awards as of September 30, ~~2014~~2015 or September 30, ~~2013~~2014.

Option Exercises for Fiscal ~~2014~~2015

There were no options exercised by our named executive officer in in fiscal ~~2014~~2015 or ~~2013~~2014.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

We have not entered into any compensatory plans or arrangements with respect to our named executive officer, which would in any way result in payments to such officer because of his resignation, retirement, or other termination of employment with us or our subsidiaries, or any change in control of, or a change in his responsibilities following a change in control.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table presents information, to the best of our knowledge, about the ownership of our common stock on January 13, 2015, relating to those persons known to beneficially own more than 5% of our capital stock and by our named Executive Officer and Directors.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission and does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes those shares of common stock over which the stockholder has sole or shared voting or investment power. It also includes shares of common stock that the stockholder has a right to acquire within 60-days after September 30, 2014 pursuant to options, warrants, conversion privileges or other right. The percentage ownership of the outstanding common stock, however, is based on the assumption, expressly required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, that only the person or entity whose ownership is being reported has converted options or warrants into shares of IPOWorld common stock. The Company does not have any outstanding options, warrants, preferred shares or other securities exercisable for or convertible into shares of its common stock.

Shares Beneficially Owned								% of Total Voting Power⁽¹⁾
	Common		Voting Preferred
Name of Beneficial Owner	Shares	%	Shares		%
Named Executive Officers and Directors:
Harrysen Mittler	0	0%		0		0%	0%


All Officers and Directors as a Group	0	0%		0		0%	0%

Other 5% Stockholders

ESE Group, LLC (2)	12,850,000	46.7%		0		0%	46.7%

Shares Beneficially Owned								% of Total Voting Power(1)
	Common		Voting Preferred
Name of Beneficial Owner	Shares	%	Shares		%
Named Executive Officers and Directors:
Edward Heckerson(2)	0	0%		1,000,000		100%	54.3%
All executive officers and directors as a group (1 person)	0	0%		1,000,000		100%	54.3%
Other 5% Stockholders
MOBO Family Trust(3)	14,500,000	34.5%		0		0%	15.7%
ESE Group, LLC (4)	13,000,000	30.9%		0		00%	14.1%		-

1) Percentage of total voting power represents voting power with respect to all shares of our common stock (27,500,000 issued and outstanding).

12) ~~Percentage~~ESE ofGroup, ~~total voting power represents voting power with respect to all shares of our common stock (42~~LLC,~~000,000~~ ~~issued~~120 ~~and~~State ~~outstanding) and Preferred Voting~~Ave. ~~Stock (1~~NE,~~000,000~~ ~~shares~~PMB ~~issued~~268, ~~and outstanding)~~Olympia, asWA ~~a single class~~98501. ~~The~~Marlena ~~holders~~Niemann ofis ~~our~~the ~~Preferred~~beneficial ~~Voting~~owner ~~Stock~~who ~~are~~exercises ~~entitled~~the tosole ~~fifty (50)~~voting ~~votes per share,~~ and ~~holders~~dispositive ofpowers ~~our common stock are entitled to one vote per share. The 1,000,000 Preferred Voting Shares~~with ~~have~~respect ~~voting rights equal~~ to ~~50,000,000~~the ~~common~~ shares. ~~Percentage~~owned ofand ~~Total~~has ~~Voting~~the ~~Power~~ultimate isvoting ~~calculated~~control ~~based~~over onthe ~~an aggregate of 92,000,000 (42,000,000 Common + 50,000,000 Preferred Voting Rights)~~ shares ~~issued~~held ~~and~~this ~~outstanding~~entity.

2) Edward Heckerson, 3472 Research Pky #104, Colorado Springs CO 80920. This number does not include the 13,000,000 common shares owned by ESE Group, LLC that is owned and controlled by an immediate family member of Mr. Heckerson.

3) MOBO Family Trust, 500 N Rainbow, Suite 300 Las Vegas NV 89107 Lauren Metzger, is the Trustee who exercises the sole voting and dispositive powers with respect to the shares owned and has the ultimate voting control over the shares held this entity.

4) ESE Group, LLC, 120 State Ave. NE, PMB 268, Olympia, WA 98501. Marlena Niemann is the beneficial owner who exercises the sole voting and dispositive powers with respect to the shares owned and has the ultimate voting control over the shares held this entity.

We are not aware of any arrangements that may result in "changes in control" as that term is defined by the provisions of Item 403(c) of Regulation S-B.

We believe that all persons named have full voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated, unless otherwise noted in the table. Under the rules of the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission, a person (or group of persons) is deemed to be a "beneficial owner" of a security if he or she, directly or indirectly, has or shares the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. Accordingly, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security, which that person has the right to acquire within 60-days, such as options or warrants to purchase our common stock.

Change of Control

We are not aware of any other arrangements that may result in "changes in control" as that term is defined by the provisions of Item 403(c) of Regulation S-B.

We believe that all persons named have full voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated, unless otherwise noted in the table. Under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a person (or group of persons) is deemed to be a "beneficial owner" of a security if he or she, directly or indirectly, has or shares the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. Accordingly, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security, which that person has the right to acquire within 60 days, such as options or warrants to purchase our common stock.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The Company does not lease or rent any property. Office services are provided without charge by a director. Such costs are immaterial to the consolidated financial statements and, accordingly, have not been reflected therein.

The officer/director of the Company is involved in other business activities and may, in the future, become involved in other business opportunities. If a specific business opportunity becomes available, such persons may face a conflict in selecting between the Company and their other business interests. The Company has not formulated a policy for the resolution of such conflicts.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

De Joya Griffith, LLC, Henderson, NV, ~~served~~ served as our principal independent public accountants for fiscal years ending September 30, ~~2014~~2015 and September 30, ~~2013~~2014. Aggregate ~~fees~~ fees billed to us for the years ended September 30, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 were as follows:

	For Year Ended Sept. 30,	~~For Year Ended Sept. 30,~~	For the Year Ended Sept. 30,	~~For the Year Ended Sept. 30,~~
		2014		2013
	2015		2014
(1) Audit Fees (1)	~~(1) Audit Fees (1)~~$15,250	~~$9,750~~	$9,750	~~$11,600~~
(2) Audit-Related Fees	~~(2) Audit-Related Fees~~
(3) Tax Fees	~~(3) Tax Fees~~
(4) All Other Fees	~~(4) All Other Fees~~

Total fees paid or accrued to our principal auditors.

(1) Audit Fees include fees billed and expected to be billed for services performed to comply with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS), including the recurring audit of the Company's financial statements for such period included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and for the reviews of the quarterly financial statements included in the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Audit Committee Policies and Procedures

We do not have an audit committee; therefore our sole director pre-approves all services to be provided to us by our independent auditor. This process involves obtaining (i) a written description of the proposed services, (ii) the confirmation of our Principal Accounting Officer that the services are compatible with maintaining specific principles relating to independence, and (iii) confirmation from our securities counsel that the services are not among those that our independent auditors have been prohibited from performing under SEC rules. Our sole director then makes a determination to approve or disapprove the engagement of De Joya Griffith for the proposed services. In the fiscal year ending September 30, 2014, all fees paid to De Joya Griffith were unanimously pre-approved in accordance with this policy.

Less than 50 percent of hours expended on the principal accountant's engagement to audit the registrant's financial statements for the most recent fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant's full-time, permanent employees.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

The following information required under this item is filed as part of this

report:

(a) 1. Financial Statements

				Page

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting				23
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm				F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets				F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations				F-3
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity				F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows				F-5

(b) 2. Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules

None.

			Incorporated by reference
Exhibit	Exhibit Description	Filed herewith	Form	Period Ending	Exhibit	Filing Date
3.1	Articles of Incorporation, as currently in effect		S-1	12/31/2010	3.1	03/31/2011
3.2	Bylaws, as currently in effect		S-1	12/31/2010	3.2	03/31/2011
3.3	Bylaws, as currently in effect		10-Q	03/31/2013	3.3	05/20/2013
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act	X
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act	X

4239

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	IPOWorld Registrant
Dated: January 13, 2015	By:/s/ Edward Heckerson
Dated: March 30, 2017	By: Harrysen Mittler
	Edward Heckerson President, Treasurer, Secretary and Director Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer
	Harrysen Mittler President, Treasurer, Secretary and Chairman Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, this Annual Report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ Edward Heckerson Edward Heckerson	President, Treasurer, Secretary, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director	January 13, 2015
Harrysen Mittler Harrysen Mittler	President, Treasurer, Secretary, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Chairman	March 30, 2017

4340

(State or Other Jurisdiction

(I.R.S. Employer

of Incorporation or Organization)

Identification No.)

Filing Compare · IPOWorld