Ayjim

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______to ______

Commission File Number: 001-34171

FOUNDATION HEALTHCARE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

OKLAHOMA

20-0180812

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

14000 N. Portland Avenue, Ste. 200

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73134

(Address of principal executive offices)

(405) 608-1700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨

Non-accelerated filer	¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ¨ Yes x No

As of ~~November~~May 216, ~~2015~~2016, 1718,~~273~~077,~~180~~894 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.0001 par value, were outstanding.

FOUNDATION HEALTHCARE, INC.

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I.	Financial Information	1
Item 1.	Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)	1
	a) Balance Sheets	2
	b) Statements of Operations	3
	c) Statements of Cash Flows	54
	d) Notes to Financial Statements	65
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1920
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	28
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	28
Part II.	Other Information	2930
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	2930
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	2930
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	2930
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	2930
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	2931
Item 5.	Other Information	2931
Item 6.	Exhibits	2931
SIGNATURES		3132

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Certain statements under the captions “Part I. Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and “Part II. Item 1A. Risk Factors,” and elsewhere in this report constitute “forward-looking statements.” Certain, but not necessarily all, of such forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” or “should” or other variations thereon, or by discussions of strategies that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results or industry results may be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include general economic and business conditions; our ability to implement our business strategies; competition; availability of key personnel; increasing operating costs; unsuccessful promotional efforts; changes in brand awareness; acceptance of new product offerings; and changes in, or the failure to comply with government regulations. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.

In this report, for example, we make forward-looking statements, including statements discussing our expectations about: future financial performance and condition; future liquidity and capital resources; future cash flows; existing debt; our business strategy and operating philosophy; effects of competition in our markets; costs of providing care to our patients; our compliance with new and existing laws and regulations as well as costs and benefits associated with compliance; the impact of national healthcare reform; other income from electronic health records (“EHR”); the impact of accounting methodologies; industry and general economic trends; patient shifts to lower cost healthcare plans which generally provide lower reimbursement; reimbursement changes; patient volumes and related revenues; claims and legal actions relating to professional liabilities; governmental investigations and voluntary self-disclosures; and physician recruiting and retention.

Throughout this report the first personal plural pronoun in the nominative case form “we” and its objective case form “us”, its possessive and the intensive case forms “our” and “ourselves” and its reflexive form “ourselves” refer collectively to Foundation Healthcare, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Foundation Healthcare, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

The condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report have been prepared by us pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, ~~2014,~~2015 has been derived from audited financial statements, and the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ~~and nine months~~ ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, have been prepared without audit. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes thereto included in our latest annual report on Form 10-K.

The consolidated statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present a fair statement of the results for such interim periods. The results for any interim period may not be comparable to the same interim period in the previous year or necessarily indicative of earnings for the full year.

FOUNDATION HEALTHCARE, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

	September 30,			December 31,
	March 31,			December 31,
	2015			2014
	2016			2015
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4,751,278		$	2,860,025
Cash	$	2,900,261		$	5,062,492
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,184,000 and $1,742,000, respectively		21,321,016			18,971,435
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,663,000 and $6,062,000, respectively		32,457,857			30,383,942
Receivables from affiliates		~~524~~680,~~479~~321			1509,~~157,184~~886
Supplies inventories		14,~~912~~584,~~887~~636			13,~~863~~737,~~175~~901
Prepaid and other current assets		37,~~187~~433,~~300~~688			43,~~487~~325,~~873~~330
Current assets from discontinued operations		~~246~~417,~~011~~884			~~342~~416,~~441~~390
Total current assets		3148,~~942~~474,~~971~~647			2943,~~682~~435,~~133~~941
Property and equipment, net		1151,~~962~~853,~~955~~537			1353,~~465~~515,~~190~~123
Equity method investments in affiliates		23,~~909~~127,~~701~~871			3,~~558~~012,~~020~~631
Intangible assets, net		7,536,727			9,080,395
Deferred tax asset		2,036,290			836,290
Goodwill		973,927			973,927
Intangible assets, net		10,389,354			7,022,170
Other assets		535,704			437,809
Goodwill		7,601,809			10,423,858
Other assets from discontinued operations		792,184			2,329,395
Other assets		580,580			1,016,093
Total assets	$	56,654,169		$	59,526,869
Other assets from discontinued operations		—			8,713
Total assets	$	124,064,088		$	119,270,819
LIABILITIES, PREFERRED NONCONTROLLING INTEREST AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	613,~~498~~342,~~219~~753		$	109,~~364~~060,~~160~~060
Accrued liabilities		1115,~~472~~265,~~795~~666			1012,~~223~~877,~~388~~711
Preferred noncontrolling interests dividends payable		~~177~~156,~~623~~171			~~195~~157,~~212~~888
Short-term debt		~~398~~804,~~207~~201			~~456~~308,~~784~~769
Current portion of long-term debt		4,~~828~~733,~~974~~276			54,~~023~~601,~~048~~320
Other current liabilities		1,349,586			1,052,543
Current portion of capital lease obligations		4,319,280			4,478,968
Current liabilities from discontinued operations		1,394,521			839,791
Other current liabilities		495,420			590,827
Total current liabilities		26,119,925			28,154,926
Current liabilities from discontinued operations		2,358,887			2,356,165
Long-term debt, net of current portion		18,318,716			24,737,719
Total current liabilities		41,475,654			34,431,708
Deferred lease incentive		7,908,895			8,608,716
Long-term debt, net of current portion		42,429,542			41,529,277
Other liabilities		6,380,263			5,424,313
Long-term capital lease obligations, net of current portion		28,541,990			29,130,693
Total liabilities		58,727,799			66,925,674
Deferred lease incentive		7,463,915			7,672,745
Preferred noncontrolling interest		7,830,000			8,700,000
Other liabilities		6,752,339			6,479,181
Total liabilities		126,663,440			119,243,604
Preferred noncontrolling interest		6,960,000			6,960,000
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Foundation Healthcare shareholders’ deficit:
Preferred stock $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 authorized; no shares issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock $0.0001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 17,273,180 and 17,263,842 issued and outstanding, respectively		1,727			1,726
Common stock $0.0001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 17,375,394 and 17,303,180 issued and outstanding, respectively		1,737			1,730
Paid-in capital		1920,~~900~~633,~~781~~155			1920,~~321~~885,~~267~~915
Accumulated deficit		(3334,~~718~~613,~~357~~019	)		(3732,~~265~~074,~~044~~090	)
Total Foundation Healthcare shareholders’ deficit		(13,~~815~~978,~~849~~127	)		(1711,~~942~~186,~~051~~445	)
Noncontrolling interests		34,~~912~~418,~~219~~775			14,~~843~~253,~~246~~660
Total deficit		(9,~~903~~559,~~630~~352	)		(166,~~098~~932,~~805~~785	)
Total liabilities, preferred noncontrolling interest and shareholders’ deficit	$	56124,~~654~~064,~~169~~088		$	59119,~~526~~270,~~869~~819

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FOUNDATION HEALTHCARE, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the Three Months Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015

(Unaudited)

	2015			2014
	2016			2015
Net Revenues:
Patient services	$	3138,~~765~~436,~~408~~243		$	2627,~~183~~937,~~803~~898
Provision for doubtful accounts		(1,~~402~~921,~~684~~985	)		(1421,~~562,147~~024	)
Net patient services revenue		3036,~~362~~514,~~724~~258			2427,~~621~~516,~~656~~874
Management fees from affiliates		1913,~~217,108~~033			1,~~352~~249,~~909~~322
Other revenue		1,~~017~~209,~~134~~787			1775,~~450,021~~954
Revenues		3238,~~596~~637,~~966~~078			2729,~~424~~542,~~586~~150
Equity in earnings of affiliates		~~247~~389,~~223~~370			~~581~~438,~~171~~909
Operating Expenses:
Salaries and benefits		813,~~698~~742,~~484~~548			7,~~339~~739,~~528~~863
Supplies		7,~~115~~622,~~559~~763			6,~~748~~069,~~785~~661
Other operating expenses		1216,~~445~~792,~~063~~797			1014,~~655~~083,~~907~~477
Depreciation and amortization		12,~~345~~748,~~340~~862			1,~~320~~381,~~527~~507
Total operating expenses		2940,~~604~~906,~~446~~970			2629,~~064~~274,~~747~~508
Other Income (Expense):
Interest expense, net		(~~221~~1,~~881~~191,946	)		(~~324~~326,~~700~~066	)
Other income		80229,~~043~~565			3017,~~000~~349
Net other (expense)		(~~141~~962,~~838~~381	)		(~~294~~308,~~700~~717	)
Income from continuing operations, before taxes		3,097,905			1,646,310
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before taxes		(2,842,903	)		397,834
Benefit for income taxes		—			—
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		1,200,000			—
Income from continuing operations, net of taxes		3,097,905			1,646,310
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of taxes		(1,642,903	)		397,834
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		34,744			(83,997	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		(11,761	)		(113,588	)
Net income		3,132,649			1,562,313
Net income (loss)		(1,654,664	)		284,246
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		2728,~~617,821~~095			1,~~208~~420,~~648~~894
Net income attributable to Foundation Healthcare		514,828			353,665
Net loss attributable to Foundation Healthcare		(2,382,759	)		(1,136,648	)
Preferred noncontrolling interests dividends		(~~175~~157,~~646~~887	)		(~~199~~195,~~502~~215	)
Net income attributable to Foundation Healthcare common stock	$	339,182		$	154,163
Net loss attributable to Foundation Healthcare common stock	$	(2,540,646	)	$	(1,331,863	)
Earnings per common share (basic and diluted):
Net income attributable to continuing operations attributable to Foundation Healthcare common stock	$	0.02		$	0.01
Net loss attributable to continuing operations attributable to Foundation Healthcare common stock	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.07	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		0.00			0.00
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		0.00			(0.01	)
Net income per share, attributable to Foundation Healthcare common stock	$	0.02		$	0.01
Net loss per share, attributable to Foundation Healthcare common stock	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.08	)
Weighted average number of common and diluted shares outstanding		17,~~271~~311,~~513~~947			17,~~182~~256,~~473~~347

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FOUNDATION HEALTHCARE, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Operations~~Cash Flows

For the ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~ 2015

(Unaudited)

	2015			2014
	2016			2015
Net Revenues:
Operating activities:
Patient services	$	89,855,903		$	65,607,006
Net income (loss)	$	(1,654,664	)	$	284,246
Provision for doubtful accounts		(4,001,230	)		(2,799,237	)
Less: Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		(11,761	)		(113,588	)
Net patient services revenue		85,854,673			62,807,769
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax		(1,642,903	)		397,834
Management fees from affiliates		4,440,184			4,056,981
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax, to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Other revenue		3,707,213			4,271,194
Depreciation and amortization		2,748,862			1,381,507
Revenues		94,002,070			71,135,944
Deferred tax asset		(1,200,000	)		—
Equity in earnings of affiliates		978,295			1,752,284
Stock-based compensation, net of cashless vesting		(252,753	)		118,954
Operating Expenses:
Provision for doubtful accounts		1,921,985			421,024
Salaries and benefits		24,354,308			22,317,768
Equity in earnings of affiliates		(389,370	)		(438,909	)
Supplies		20,575,610			17,383,162
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisition:
Other operating expenses		39,927,517			28,810,032
Accounts receivable, net of provision for doubtful accounts		(3,995,900	)		(137,980	)
Depreciation and amortization		4,072,795			4,204,828
Receivables from affiliates		(170,435	)		(9,270	)
Total operating expenses		88,930,230			72,715,790
Supplies inventories		(846,735	)		(127,251	)
Other Income (Expense):
Prepaid and other current assets		(4,108,358	)		403,965
Interest expense, net		(827,204	)		(1,329,932	)
Other assets		60,703			(115,625	)
Other income		65,161			30,840
Accounts payable		4,247,783			112,451
Net other (expense)		(762,043	)		(1,299,092	)
Accrued liabilities		2,390,643			(1,158,316	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before taxes		5,288,092			(1,126,654	)
Other current liabilities		(95,407	)		(29,772	)
Benefit for income taxes		114,038			852,005
Other liabilities		64,328			103,653
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of taxes		5,402,130			(274,649	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from continuing operations		(1,267,557	)		922,265
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		3,805,801			(333,296	)
Net cash used in operating activities from discontinued operations		(1,820	)		(38,625	)
Net income (loss)		9,207,931			(607,945	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(1,269,377	)		883,640
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		5,112,737			2,054,872
Investing activities:
Net income (loss) attributable to Foundation Healthcare		4,095,194			(2,662,817	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(1,225,379	)		(282,187	)
Preferred noncontrolling interests dividends		(548,507	)		(585,640	)
Disposal of property and equipment		—			98,414
Net income (loss) attributable to Foundation Healthcare common stock	$	3,546,687		$	(3,248,457	)
Distributions from affiliates		274,130			743,952
Earnings per common share (basic and diluted):
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from continuing operations		(951,249	)		560,179
Net loss attributable to continuing operations attributable to Foundation Healthcare common stock	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.17	)
Net cash provided by investing activities from discontinued operations		—			—
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		0.22			(0.02	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(951,249	)		560,179
Net income (loss) per share, attributable to Foundation Healthcare common stock	$	0.20		$	(0.19	)
Financing activities:
Weighted average number of common and diluted shares outstanding		17,258,727			17,016,318
Debt proceeds		2,201,863			1,750,391
Debt payments		(1,422,601	)		(1,352,324	)
Preferred noncontrolling interest dividends		(157,888	)		(197,359	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		(562,979	)		(965,000	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities from continuing operations		58,395			(764,292	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities from discontinued operations		—			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		58,395			(764,292	)
Net change in cash		(2,162,231	)		679,527
Cash at beginning of period		5,062,492			2,860,025
Cash at end of period	$	2,900,261		$	3,539,552
Cash Paid for Interest and Income Taxes:
Interest expense	$	1,191,946		$	534,000

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FOUNDATION HEALTHCARE, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

(Unaudited)

	2015			2014
Operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	9,207,931		$	(607,945	)
Less: Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		3,805,801			(333,296	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax		5,402,130			(274,649	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax, to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		4,072,795			4,204,828
Stock-based compensation, net of cashless vesting		579,515			876,851
Provision for doubtful accounts		4,001,230			2,799,237
Equity in earnings of affiliates		(978,295	)		(1,752,284	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net of provision for doubtful accounts		(6,350,811	)		(4,338,374	)
Receivables from affiliates		632,705			(175,698	)
Supplies inventories		(49,712	)		(35,657	)
Prepaid and other current assets		1,300,573			(1,489,956	)
Other assets		(97,895	)		(204,838	)
Accounts payable		(3,865,959	)		(1,791,968	)
Accrued liabilities		1,249,407			3,810,422
Other current liabilities		297,043			(2,330,737	)
Other liabilities		256,129			3,087,988
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations		6,448,855			2,385,165
Net cash used in operating activities from discontinued operations		(2,394,061	)		(454,338	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		4,054,794			1,930,827
Investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		(1,157,635	)		(1,810,180	)
Disposal of property and equipment		130,745			—
Proceeds from sale of equity investment		—			178,000
Distributions from affiliates		1,626,614			2,061,937
Net cash provided by investing activities from continuing operations		599,724			429,757
Net cash provided by investing activities from discontinued operations		8,388,233			—
Net cash provided by investing activities		8,987,957			429,757
Financing activities:
Debt proceeds		4,995,966			29,092,552
Debt payments		(11,667,620	)		(24,560,683	)
Preferred noncontrolling interest dividends		(566,096	)		(583,693	)
Preferred noncontrolling interest redemptions		(870,000	)		—
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		(3,043,748	)		(2,879,989	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities from continuing operations		(11,151,498	)		1,068,187
Net cash used in financing activities from discontinued operations		—			(4,072,896	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(11,151,498	)		(3,004,709	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		1,891,253			(644,125	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		2,860,025			4,212,076
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	4,751,278		$	3,567,951
Cash Paid for Interest and Income Taxes:
Interest expense	$	1,280,000		$	1,604,256
Interest expense, discontinued operations	$	—		$	168,733
Income taxes, continuing operations	$	—		$	3,255,623

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FOUNDATION HEALTHCARE, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Periods Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015

(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Nature of Business

Foundation Healthcare, Inc. (the “Company”) is organized under the laws of the state of Oklahoma and owns controlling and noncontrolling interests in surgical hospitals located in Oklahoma and Texas. The Company also owns noncontrolling interests in ambulatory surgery centers (“ASCs”) located in Texas, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Ohio, and Maryland. The Company provides management services to a majority of the facilities that it has noncontrolling interests (referred to as “Affiliates”) under the terms of various management agreements.

Note 2 – ~~Basis~~Summary of ~~Presentation~~Significant Accounting Policies

~~Elimination~~For ofa ~~Going~~complete ~~Concern~~list ~~– As~~ of ~~March~~the ~~31,~~Company’s ~~2015~~significant ~~and~~accounting ~~December 31~~policies, ~~2014,~~please see the Company’s ~~concluded~~Annual ~~that~~Report ~~based~~ on ~~the~~Form ~~cash~~10-K ~~flows~~for ~~from operations during~~ the ~~three months ended March 31, 2015 and~~ year ended December 31, ~~2014, respectively, and the due dates of certain liability and debt payments, it may not be able to meet all of its obligations as they became due in~~ 2015.

AsInterim ofFinancial ~~September 30,~~Information ~~2015,~~– ~~the~~The ~~Company~~condensed ~~had~~consolidated ~~cash~~financial ~~and~~statements ~~cash~~included ~~equivalents~~herein ofare ~~$4.8~~unaudited ~~million~~ and ~~working~~have ~~capital~~been ofprepared ~~$5.0~~in ~~million~~accordance ~~(adjusted~~with ~~for~~generally ~~redemption~~accepted ~~payments~~accounting ofprinciples ~~$0.9~~for ~~million~~interim ~~payable~~financial tostatements ~~preferred~~and ~~noncontrolling~~in ~~interest~~accordance ~~holders~~with inRegulation ~~October 2015)~~S-X. ~~During~~Accordingly, ~~the~~they ~~nine~~do ~~months~~not ~~ended~~include ~~September 30,~~all ~~2015,~~of the ~~Company~~information ~~generated~~and ~~income~~footnotes ~~from~~required ~~continuing~~by ~~operations~~accounting ~~(before~~principles ~~noncontrolling~~generally ~~interests)~~accepted ofin ~~$5.3~~the ~~million~~United ~~and~~States ~~generated~~of ~~$6.5~~America ~~million~~(“GAAP”) infor ~~cash~~complete ~~flow~~financial ~~from~~statements. ~~operating~~In ~~activities~~the ~~from~~opinion ~~continuing~~of ~~operations.~~management, Inall ~~addition~~adjustments to(consisting ~~the~~of ~~Company’s~~normal ~~improved~~recurring ~~cash~~adjustments) ~~flow~~considered ~~from~~necessary ~~operations,~~for ita ~~also~~fair ~~generated~~presentation $9have been included.5 ~~million,~~Operating ~~during~~results for the three months ended ~~June~~March 3031, ~~2015,~~2016 ~~from~~are ~~the~~not ~~sale~~necessarily ~~and~~indicative ~~redemption~~ of ~~certain~~results ~~equity~~that ~~investments.~~may ~~Based~~be onexpected for the ~~Company’s~~year ~~improved~~ended ~~operating~~December 31, ~~results~~2016. ~~during~~The ~~2015,~~consolidated ~~improved~~financial ~~cash~~statements ~~and~~should ~~working~~be ~~capital~~read ~~levels~~in atconjunction ~~September 30, 2015,~~with ~~and~~ the ~~Company’s~~consolidated ~~expected~~financial ~~borrowing~~statements ~~capacity~~and ~~over~~notes ~~the~~thereto ~~next~~included ~~twelve~~in ~~months,~~the ~~management~~Company’s ~~concluded~~Form ~~that~~10-K for the ~~doubt~~year ~~about~~ended ~~the~~December 31, ~~Company’s~~2015. ~~ability~~The toDecember 31, ~~continue~~2015 asconsolidated abalance ~~going~~sheet ~~concern~~was ~~has~~derived ~~been~~from ~~eliminated~~audited financial statements.

Reverse Stock Split – At the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders held on May 12, 2014, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to its amended and restated certificate of incorporation to effect a reverse split of its common stock at a ratio between 1-for-3 to 1-for-10 shares. The Company’s stockholders further authorized the board of directors to determine the ratio at which the reverse split would be effected by filing an appropriate amendment to its amended and restated certificate of incorporation. The Company’s board of directors authorized the ratio of the reverse split and corresponding reduction in authorized shares on December 29, 2014 and effective at the close of business on January 8, 2015, the Company amended its amended and restated certificate of incorporation to effect a 1-for-10 reverse split of its common stock. The board of directors considered a ratio that would allow the Company to have a number of outstanding shares to have a sufficient trading volume while considering stock price that would be consistent with the Company’s intention to eventually uplist its common stock from the OTC Markets QB Tier to a listing on the NYSE MKT exchange, though there can be no assurance that we will ultimately pursue or be successful in seeking to uplist the Company’s common stock on such exchange. The Board of Directors determined that a ratio of 1-for-10 was the best balance of these and other factors. The effect of the reverse split reduced the Company’s outstanding common stock shares from 172,638,414 to 17,263,842 shares as of the date of the reverse split. The accompanying consolidated financial statements give effect to the reverse split as of the first date reported.

Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

For a complete list of the Company’s significant accounting policies, please see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Interim Financial Information – The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements and in accordance with Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2015. The consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. The December 31, 2014 consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements.

Consolidation – The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned, majority owned and controlled subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company accounts for its investments in Affiliates in which the Company exhibits significant influence, but does not control, in accordance with the equity method of accounting. The Company does not consolidate its equity method investments, but rather measures them at their initial costs and then subsequently adjusts their carrying values through income for their respective shares of the earnings or losses during the period. The Company monitors its investments for other-than-temporary impairment by considering factors such as current economic and market conditions and the operating performance of the companies and records reductions in carrying values when necessary.

Use of estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management of the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications – Certain amounts presented in prior years have been ~~classified~~reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income.

Revenue recognition and accounts receivable – The Company recognizes revenues in the period in which services are performed and billed. Accounts receivable primarily consist of amounts due from third-party payors and patients. The Company’s ability to collect outstanding receivables is critical to its results of operations and cash flows. Amounts the Company receives for treatment of patients covered by governmental programs such as Medicare and Medicaid and other third-party payors such as health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations and other private insurers are generally less than the Company’s established billing rates. Additionally, to provide for accounts receivable that could become uncollectible in the future, the Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts to reduce the carrying value of such receivables to their estimated net realizable value. Accordingly, the revenues and accounts receivable reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements are recorded at the net amount expected to be received.

Contractual Discounts and Cost Report Settlements – The Company derives a significant portion of its revenues from Medicare, Medicaid and other payors that receive discounts from its established billing rates. The Company must estimate the total amount of these discounts to prepare its consolidated financial statements. The Medicare and Medicaid regulations and various managed care contracts under which these discounts must be calculated are complex and are subject to interpretation and adjustment. The Company estimates the allowance for contractual discounts on a payor-specific basis given its interpretation of the applicable regulations or contract terms. These interpretations sometimes result in payments that differ from the Company’s estimates. Additionally, updated regulations and contract renegotiations occur frequently, necessitating regular review and assessment of the estimation process by management. Changes in estimates related to the allowance for contractual discounts affect revenues reported in the Company’s accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Cost report settlements under reimbursement agreements with Medicare, Medicaid and Tricare are estimated and recorded in the period the related services are rendered and are adjusted in future periods as final settlements are determined. There is a reasonable possibility that recorded estimates will change by a material amount in the near term. The estimated net cost report settlements due to the Company were $418,055 and $617,955 as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 respectively, and are included in prepaid and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We decreased our cost report estimate by $199,900 during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 based on settlements from our final filed cost report for 2014 and an estimate of the 2015 cost report. The Company’s management believes that adequate provisions have been made for adjustments that may result from final determination of amounts earned under these programs. 5

these discounts to prepare its consolidated financial statements. The Medicare and Medicaid regulations and various managed care contracts under which these discounts must be calculated are complex and are subject to interpretation and adjustment. The Company estimates the allowance for contractual discounts on a payor-specific basis given its interpretation of the applicable regulations or contract terms. These interpretations sometimes result in payments that differ from the Company’s estimates. Additionally, updated regulations and contract renegotiations occur frequently, necessitating regular review and assessment of the estimation process by management. Changes in estimates related to the allowance for contractual discounts affect revenues reported in the Company’s accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Cost report settlements under reimbursement agreements with Medicare, Medicaid and Tricare are estimated and recorded in the period the related services are rendered and are adjusted in future periods as final settlements are determined. There is a reasonable possibility that recorded estimates will change by a material amount in the near term. The estimated net cost report settlements due to the Company were $2,112,000 and $500,000 as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 respectively, and are included in prepaid and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We increased our cost report estimate by $1,612,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2016 based on settlements from our final filed cost report for 2014 and an estimate of the 2015 cost report. The Company’s management believes that adequate provisions have been made for adjustments that may result from final determination of amounts earned under these programs.

Laws and regulations governing Medicare and Medicaid programs are complex and subject to interpretation. The Company believes that it is in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and is not aware of any pending or threatened investigations involving allegations of potential wrongdoing that would have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Compliance with such laws and regulations can be subject to future government review and interpretation as well as significant regulatory action including fines, penalties and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

Provision and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – To provide for accounts receivable that could become uncollectible in the future, the Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts to reduce the carrying value of such receivables to their estimated net realizable value. The primary uncertainty lies with uninsured patient receivables and deductibles, co-payments or other amounts due from individual patients.

The Company has an established process to determine the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts that relies on a number of analytical tools and benchmarks to arrive at a reasonable allowance. No single statistic or measurement determines the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Some of the analytical tools that the Company utilizes include, but are not limited to, the aging of accounts receivable, historical cash collection experience, revenue trends by payor classification, revenue days in accounts receivable, the status of claims submitted to third party payors, reason codes for declined claims and an assessment of the Company’s ability to address the issue and resubmit the claim and whether a patient is on a payment plan and making payments consistent with that plan. Accounts receivable are written off after collection efforts have been followed in accordance with the Company’s policies.

Due to the nature of the healthcare industry and the reimbursement environment in which the Company operates, certain estimates are required to record net revenues and accounts receivable at their net realizable values at the time products or services are provided. Inherent in these estimates is the risk that they will have to be revised or updated as additional information becomes available, which could have a material impact on the Company’s operating results and cash flows in subsequent periods. Specifically, the complexity of many third-party billing arrangements and the uncertainty of reimbursement amounts for certain services from certain payors may result in adjustments to amounts originally recorded.

The patient and their third party insurance provider typically share in the payment for the Company’s products and services. The amount patients are responsible for includes co-payments, deductibles, and amounts not covered due to the provider being out-of-network. Due to uncertainties surrounding deductible levels and the number of out-of-network patients, the Company is not certain of the full amount of patient responsibility at the time of service. The Company estimates amounts due from patients prior to service and generally collects those amounts prior to service. Remaining amounts due from patients are then billed following completion of service.

~~The activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts for the nine months ending September 30, 2015 follows:~~6

	2015
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,742,000
Provisions recognized as reduction in revenues		4,001,230
Write-offs, net of recoveries		(4,559,230	)
Balance at end of period	$	1,184,000

The activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts for the three months ending March 31, 2016 follows:

	2016
Balance at beginning of period	$	6,062,000
Provisions recognized as reduction in revenues		1,921,985
Write-offs, net of recoveries		(4,320,985	)
Balance at end of period	$	3,663,000

Cash and cash equivalents – The Company considers all highly liquid temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Certificates of deposit with original maturities of more than three months are also considered cash equivalents if there are no restrictions on withdrawing funds from the account.

Restricted Cash – As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015, the Company had restricted cash of approximately $0.51 million and $0.72 million respectively, included in ~~prepaid~~cash ~~and other current assets~~ in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The restricted cash is pledged as collateral against certain debt of the Company.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets – The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment at least on an annual basis and more frequently if certain indicators are encountered. Goodwill is to be tested at the reporting unit level, defined as an ASC or hospital (referred to as a component), with the fair value of the reporting unit being compared to its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered to be impaired. The Company will complete its annual impairment test in December ~~2015~~2016.

Intangible assets other than goodwill which include physician membership interests, service contracts and covenants not to compete are amortized over their estimated useful lives using the straight line method. The remaining lives range from ~~three~~two to ~~eight~~twenty years. The Company evaluates the recoverability of identifiable intangible asset whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an intangible asset’s carrying amount may not be recoverable.

Net income (loss) per share – Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted during the period. Dilutive securities having an anti-dilutive effect on diluted loss per share are excluded from the calculation.

Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Guidance

Adopted Guidance

OnIn January 1, 2015, the ~~Company~~FASB ~~adopted~~issued changes ~~issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)~~ to the ~~reporting~~presentation of ~~discontinued~~extraordinary ~~operations~~items. ~~and~~Such ~~disclosures~~items ofare ~~disposals~~defined ofas ~~components~~transactions ofor anevents ~~entity.~~that ~~These~~are ~~changes~~both ~~require~~unusual ain ~~disposal~~nature ofand ainfrequent ~~component~~in tooccurrence, ~~meet~~and, acurrently, ~~higher~~are ~~threshold~~required ~~in order~~ to be ~~reported~~presented asseparately ~~a discontinued operation~~ in an entity’s ~~financial~~income ~~statements.~~statement, ~~The~~net ~~threshold~~of isincome ~~defined as a strategic shift that has~~tax, orafter ~~will~~income ~~have,~~from acontinuing ~~major effect on an entity’s~~ operations. ~~and~~The ~~financial~~changes ~~results~~eliminate ~~such~~the asconcept ~~a disposal~~ of aan ~~major~~extraordinary ~~geographical~~item ~~area~~and, ~~or a major line of business. Additionally~~therefore, the ~~following~~presentation ~~two~~of ~~criteria~~such ~~have~~items ~~been~~will ~~removed~~no ~~from~~longer ~~consideration~~be ofrequired. ~~whether~~Notwithstanding athis ~~component~~change, ~~meets~~an ~~the~~entity ~~requirements~~will ~~for~~still ~~discontinued~~be ~~operations~~required ~~presentation:~~to ~~(i)~~present ~~the operations~~ and ~~cash~~disclose ~~flows of~~ a ~~disposal~~transaction ~~component have been~~ or ~~will~~event bethat ~~eliminated~~is ~~from~~both ~~the~~unusual ~~ongoing~~in ~~operations~~nature ~~of an entity as a result of the disposal transaction,~~ and ~~(ii)~~infrequent anin ~~entity~~occurrence ~~will not have any significant continuing involvement~~ in the ~~operations~~notes ofto the ~~disposal~~financial ~~component after the disposal transaction~~statements. ~~Furthermore,~~The ~~equity~~Company ~~method~~adopted ~~investments~~these ~~now may qualify for discontinued operations presentation. These~~ changes ~~also~~on ~~require~~January ~~expanded disclosures for all disposals of components of an entity~~1, ~~whether or not the threshold for reporting as a discontinued operation is met, related to profit or loss information and/or asset and liability information of the component~~2016. The adoption of these changes had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued changes to the analysis that an entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. These changes (i) modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities or voting interest entities, (ii) eliminate the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, (iii) affect the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with variable interest entities, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships, and (iv) provide a scope exception from consolidation guidance for reporting entities with interests in legal entities that are required to comply with or operate in accordance with requirements that are similar to those in Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for registered money market funds. The Company adopted these changes on January 1, 2016. The adoption of these changes had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

instrument. The changes require that debt issuance costs be presented in an entity’s balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the related debt liability. The amortization of debt issuance costs remains unchanged. The Company adopted these changes on January 1, 2016. The adoption of these changes resulted in a decrease of approximately $612,000, to other assets and long-term debt, net of current portion, respectively, debt included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

In August 2014, the FASB issued changes to the disclosure of uncertainties about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Under GAAP, continuation of a reporting entity as a going concern is presumed as the basis for preparing financial statements unless and until the entity’s liquidation becomes imminent. Even if an entity’s liquidation is not imminent, there may be conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Because there is no guidance in GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related note disclosures, there is diversity in practice with respect to whether, when, and how an entity discloses the relevant conditions and events in its financial statements. As a result, these changes require an entity’s management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that financial statements are issued. Substantial doubt is defined as an indication that it is probable that an entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that financial statements are issued. If management has concluded that substantial doubt exists, then the following disclosures should be made in the financial statements: (i) principal conditions or events that raised the substantial doubt, (ii) management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations, (iii) management’s plans that alleviated the initial substantial doubt or, if substantial doubt was not alleviated, management’s plans that are intended to at least mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt, and (iv) if the latter in (iii) is disclosed, an explicit statement that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company adopted these changes on January 1, 2016. The adoption of these changes had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. This guidance will need to be applied by management at the end of each annual period and interim period therein to determine what, if any, impact there will be on the consolidated financial statements in a given reporting period.

In September 2015, the FASB issued changes to the accounting for business combinations simplifying the accounting for measurement period Adjustments. The update eliminates the requirement for an acquirer to retrospectively adjust its financial statements for changes to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement-period following the consummation of a business combination. Instead, the update requires these types of adjustments to be made during the reporting period in which they are identified and would require additional disclosure or separate presentation of the portion of the adjustment that would have been recorded in the previously reported periods as if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. The Company adopted these changes on January 1, 2016. The adoption of these changes had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Issued Guidance

In January 2015, the FASB issued changes to the presentation of extraordinary items. Such items are defined as transactions or events that are both unusual in nature and infrequent in occurrence, and, currently, are required to be presented separately in an entity’s income statement, net of income tax, after income from continuing operations. The changes eliminate the concept of an extraordinary item and, therefore, the presentation of such items will no longer be required. Notwithstanding this change, an entity will still be required to present and disclose a transaction or event that is both unusual in nature and infrequent in occurrence in the notes to the financial statements. These changes become effective for the Company on January 1, 2016. Management has determined that the adoption of these changes will not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued changes to the analysis that an entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. These changes (i) modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities or voting interest entities, (ii) eliminate the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, (iii) affect the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with variable interest entities, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships, and (iv) provide a scope exception from consolidation guidance for reporting entities with interests in legal entities that are required to comply with or operate in accordance with requirements that are similar to those in Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for registered money market funds. These changes become effective for us on January 1, 2016. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of these changes on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued changes to the presentation of debt issuance costs. Currently, such costs are required to be presented as a noncurrent asset in an entity’s balance sheet and amortized into interest expense over the term of the related debt instrument. The changes require that debt issuance costs be presented in an entity’s balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the related debt liability. The amortization of debt issuance costs remains unchanged. These changes become effective for the Company on January 1, 2016. Management has determined that the adoption of these changes will result in a decrease of approximately $226,000 to both other assets and long-term debt, less amount due within one year of the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

In July 2015, the FASB issued changes to the subsequent measurement of inventory. Currently, an entity is required to measure its inventory at the lower of cost or market, whereby market can be replacement cost, net realizable value, or net realizable value less an approximately normal profit margin. The changes require that inventory be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value, thereby eliminating the use of the other two market methodologies. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. These changes do not apply to inventories measured using LIFO (last-in, first-out) or the retail inventory method. Currently, the Company applies the net realizable value market option to measure its inventories at the lower of cost or market. These changes become effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. Management has determined that the adoption of these changes will not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued changes to the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers. These changes created a comprehensive framework for all entities in all industries to apply in the determination of when to recognize revenue, and, therefore, supersede virtually all existing revenue recognition requirements and guidance. This framework is expected to result in less complex guidance in application while providing a consistent and comparable methodology for revenue recognition. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this principle, an entity should apply the following steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract(s), (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract(s), and (v) recognize revenue when, or as, the entity satisfies a performance obligation. These changes become effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of these changes on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued changes to the accounting for leases, which requires an entity that leases assets to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. The update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018 and must be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. Management is currently evaluating the impact of this update on the consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued changes to employee share-based payment accounting, which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification on the statement of cash flows. For public companies, the new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of this guidance on its financial statements.

Note 3 – Acquisition

On December 31, 2015, the Company closed the acquisition comprising substantially all of the hospital assets and hospital operating entity of University General Health Systems, Inc. (“UGHS”), consisting primarily of a sixty-nine bed acute care hospital located in the Medical City area of Houston, Texas (referred to as University General Hospital, LP or “UGH” and collectively referred to as the “Acquisition”). Subsequent to the Acquisition, UGH is being operated as Foundation Surgical Hospital of Houston.

The acquisition of UGH was based on management’s belief that UGH fits into the Company’s acquisition and development strategy and operating model that enables the Company to grow by taking advantage of highly-fragmented markets, an increasing demand for short stay surgery and a need by physicians to forge strategic alliances to meet the needs of the evolving healthcare landscape while also shaping the clinical environments in which they practice. The Company expects the acquisition of UGH will generate positive earnings and cash flow that will be accretive to the earnings and cash flow of the Company. The Company expects the goodwill attributable to UGH to be tax deductible.

The Company paid $25.1 million in cash for the net assets acquired from UGHS.

The fair value amounts have been initially recorded using preliminary estimates. The Company has engaged a third-party valuation company to complete a valuation of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition. A portion of the valuation was completed in March 2016 and management believes the valuation will be fully completed by June 30, 2016. The preliminary estimates will be revised in future periods and the revisions may materially affect the presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial results. Any changes to the initial estimates of the fair value of the assets and liabilities will be recorded as adjustments to those assets and liabilities and residual amounts will be allocated to goodwill. The preliminary purchase allocations for the Acquisition are as follows:

	Preliminary		Adjustments			Adjusted
Accounts receivable	$	7,229,000	$	—		$	7,229,000
Supplies inventories		1,689,000		—			1,689,000
Other current assets		395,000		—			395,000
Total current assets		9,313,000		—			9,313,000
Property and equipment		40,363,000		(733,000	)		39,630,000
Other assets		307,000		—			307,000
Intangible, net		—		3,930,000			3,930,000
Goodwill		9,450,000		(2,822,000	)		6,628,000
Total assets acquired		59,433,000		375,000			59,808,000
Liabilities assumed:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		1,589,000		375,000			1,964,000
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations		4,740,000		—			4,740,000
Total current liabilities		6,329,000		375,000			6,704,000
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion		28,004,000		—			28,004,000
Total liabilities assumed		34,333,000		375,000			34,708,000
Net assets acquired	$	25,100,000	$	—		$	25,100,000

~~guidance~~During isthe ~~that~~three anmonths ~~entity~~ended ~~should~~March ~~recognize~~31, ~~revenue~~2016, ~~to depict~~ the ~~transfer~~Company ofincurred ~~promised~~approximately ~~goods~~$167,000 ~~or services to customers~~ in anexpenses ~~amount~~related ~~that reflects the consideration~~ to ~~which~~ the ~~entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services~~Acquisition. The Toexpenses ~~achieve~~incurred ~~this~~related ~~principle,~~primarily anto ~~entity~~legal ~~should~~fees ~~apply~~related ~~the~~to ~~following steps: (i) identify~~ the ~~contract(s)~~purchase ~~with~~agreement aand ~~customer,~~structure ~~(ii)~~of ~~identify~~ the ~~performance obligations in the contract(s), (iii) determine the~~ transaction ~~price,~~and ~~(iv)~~professional ~~allocate~~fees ~~the~~related ~~transaction price~~ to the ~~performance~~audits ~~obligations~~of in the ~~contract(s),~~2015 and ~~(v)~~2014 ~~recognize~~financial ~~revenue~~statements ~~when, or as, the entity satisfies a performance obligation. These changes become effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact~~ of ~~these changes on the Company’s consolidated financial statements~~UGH.

InSince ~~August 2014,~~ the ~~FASB~~Acquisition ~~issued~~occurred ~~changes~~on toDecember ~~the disclosure of uncertainties about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Under GAAP~~31, continuation of a reporting entity as a going concern is presumed as the basis for preparing financial statements unless and until the entity’s liquidation becomes imminent. Even if an entity’s liquidation is not imminent2015, there ~~may~~are ~~be conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Because there is~~ no ~~guidance~~acquisition inrevenues GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related note disclosures, there is diversity in practice with respect to whether, when, and ~~how~~earnings anincluded ~~entity discloses the relevant conditions and events~~ in ~~its financial statements. As a result, these changes require an entity’s management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in~~ the ~~aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity~~Company’s ~~ability~~consolidated tostatements ~~continue~~of asoperations afor ~~going concern within one year after~~ the ~~date that financial statements are issued. Substantial doubt is defined as an indication that it is probable that an entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one~~ year ~~after~~ended ~~the~~December ~~date~~31, ~~that financial statements are issued~~2015. The Ifrevenue ~~management~~and ~~has~~earnings concluded that substantial doubt exists, then the following disclosures should be made in the financial statements: (i) principal conditions or events that raised the substantial doubt, (ii) management’s evaluation of the ~~significance~~combined ~~of those conditions or events in relation to the~~ entity’s ~~ability~~had ~~to meet its obligations, (iii) management’s plans that alleviated~~ the ~~initial~~Acquisition ~~substantial~~date ~~doubt~~been ~~or,~~January ~~if substantial doubt was not alleviated~~1, ~~management’s~~2015 ~~plans that~~ are intended to at least mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt, and (iv) if the latter in (iii) is disclosed, an explicit statement that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. These changes become effective for the Company for the 2016 annual period. Management has determined that the adoption of these changes will not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Subsequent to adoption, this guidance will need to be applied by management at the end of each annual period and interim period therein to determine what, if any, impact there will be on the consolidated financial statements in a given reporting period.follows:

									Attributable to Foundation HealthCare common stock
	Revenue		Loss From Continuing Operations			Net Income (Loss)			Net Loss			Net Loss Per Share
Actual:
From 1/1/2016 to 3/31/2016	$	38,637,000	$	(2,843,000	)	$	(2,855,000	)	$	(3,741,000	)	$	(0.22	)
Supplemental Pro Forma:
From 1/1/2015 to 12/31/2015	$	180,144,000	$	(69,000	)	$	6,662,000		$	(690,000	)	$	(0.04	)

The pro forma information is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that actually would have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of that time, nor is it intended to be a projection of future results.

Note 4 – Divestitures

On July 15, 2015, we sold our 10% interest in the Kirby Glen Surgery, LLC, one of our Equity Owned ASCs located in Houston, Texas. We received $0.2 million in combined proceeds for the sale of the equity interest and termination of our management agreement.

On June 12, 2015, the Company executed an agreement pursuant to which the Company sold a portion of its 20% equity investment in Grayson County Physician Property, LLC (“GCPP”) through a series of transactions. In conjunction with the sale, the management agreement under which the Company provided certain services including billing and collections, general management services, legal support, and accounting services was terminated. The Company’s decision to sell the assets of GCPP was part of the Company’s strategic plan to focus on the growth of its majority owned surgical hospital businesses. The Company received $7.8 million of proceeds as a result of the sale and $0.5 million for the termination of the management agreement. The Company used $7.0 million of these proceeds to reduce the Company’s principal balance of the note held by ~~Bank SNB (~~the Company’s senior lender). The remainder of the proceeds will be used for working capital needs and possible future acquisitions. See Note 5 – Discontinued Operations for additional information.

On March 31, 2015, Houston Orthopedic Surgical Hospital, L.L.C. (“HOSH”), our Equity Owned hospital in Houston, Texas, sold substantially all of its assets under an asset purchase agreement. Given that wethe doCompany does not exhibit control with ~~our~~the 20% investment in HOSH, wethe ~~account~~Company accounts for ~~our~~the investment on a cost or cash basis. As a result of the HOSH sale, ~~our~~the ~~equity~~Company ~~ownership~~received ~~was~~a ~~redeemed~~distribution on May 12, 2015 ~~for~~ $1.28 million, of which $0.6 million is being held in escrow until October 2016.

Note 5 – Discontinued Operations

The partial sale of GCPP in June 2015 was part of the Company’s strategic plan to focus on majority owned investments. As a result, the proceeds from the sale, the remaining equity ownership, and the results of operations and cash flows related to the equity investment in GCPP for all periods presented have been classified as discontinued operations. Therefore, the Company reclassified $~~2.2 million from equity method investments in affiliates to other assets from discontinued operations as of December 31, 2014. In addition, the Company reclassified $~~0.1 million ~~and $0.3 million~~ from equity in earnings from affiliates to income from discontinued operations, net of tax, for the three ~~and~~months ~~nine~~ending ~~month~~March ~~periods~~31, ~~ending~~2016 ~~September~~and 302015, ~~2014~~respectively.

~~In 2013, the Company committed to a plan to divest of or close certain sleep diagnostic and sleep therapy locations.~~ The ~~decision~~operating ~~was~~results ~~based~~for ~~on a combination of~~ the ~~financial~~Company’s ~~performance~~discontinued ofoperations ~~the~~for ~~facilities and~~ the ~~shift~~three inmonths ~~focus~~ended toMarch ~~surgical hospitals. As a result of the pending closure or sale of these locations~~31, ~~the~~2016 ~~related assets, liabilities, results of operations~~ and ~~cash~~2015 ~~flows~~are ~~were~~summarized ~~classified as discontinued operations which were acquired by the Company in the reverse acquisition.~~ below:

Under this plan, from July 2013 to October 2013, the Company closed or sold 24 sleep diagnostic locations including both stand alone and contracted locations in Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nevada, Oklahoma and Texas and 5 sleep therapy locations in Iowa, Kansas, Nevada, Oklahoma and Texas.

	2016			2015
Revenues:
Equity in earnings of GCCP	$	—		$	(27,510	)
Sleep operations		—			—
Total revenues	$	—		$	(27,510	)
Net income (loss) before taxes:
GCCP	$	—		$	(27,510	)
Sleep operations		(11,761	)		(86,078	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	(11,761	)	$	(113,588	)

The operating results for the Company’s discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 are summarized below:

	2015			2014
Revenues:
Equity in earnings of GCCP	$	25,033		$	287,527
Sleep operations		—			123,729
Total revenues	$	25,033		$	411,256
Net income (loss) before taxes:
GCCP	$	25,033		$	287,527
Sleep operations		(36,242	)		(812,247	)
Gain on sale of equity investment in GCCP		6,331,048			—
Income tax (provision) benefit		(2,514,038	)		191,424
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	3,805,801		$	(333,296	)

The balance sheet items for the Company’s discontinued operations are summarized below:

		September 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
Cash and cash equivalents	$	$6,712	~~4,197~~	$	$5,219	~~8,148~~
Other current assets		411,172	~~241,814~~		411,171	~~334,293~~
Total current assets		417,884	~~246,011~~		416,390	~~342,441~~
Equity method investments			691,709			2,164,110
Fixed assets, net		—			8,713
Fixed assets, net			100,475			165,285
Total assets	$	417,884		$	425,103
Total assets		$	1,038,195		$	2,671,836
Payables and accrued liabilities		777,553			774,831
Payables and accrued liabilities			594,521			839,791
Income taxes payable		1,581,334			1,581,334
Income taxes payable			800,000			—
Total liabilities	$	2,358,887		$	2,356,165
Total liabilities		$	1,394,521		$	839,791

Note 6 – Equity Investments in Affiliates

The Company invests in non-majority interests in its Affiliates. The Company’s equity investments and respective ownership interest as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015 are as follows:

		Ownership %
		September 30,		December 31,
		March 31,		December 31,
Affiliate	Location	~~2015~~2016		~~2014~~2015
Surgical Hospitals:
Grayson County Physicians Property, LLC	Sherman, TX		0%		200%
Houston Orthopedic Hospital, LLC	Houston, TX		0%		200%
Summit Medical Center	Edmond, OK		8%		08%
ASCs:
Foundation Surgery Affiliate of Nacogdoches, LLP	Nacogdoches, TX		13%		13%
Kirby Glenn Surgery Center	Houston, TX		0%		100%
Park Ten Surgery Center	Houston, TX		10%		10%
Park Ten Surgery Center/Physicians West Houston	Houston, TX		10%		10%
Foundation Surgery Affiliate of Middleburg Heights, LLC	Middleburg Heights, OH		10%		10%
Foundation Surgery Affiliate of Huntingdon Valley, LP	Huntingdon Valley, PA		20%		20%
New Jersey Surgery Center, LLC	Mercerville, NJ		10%		10%
Foundation Surgery Affiliate of Northwest Oklahoma City, LLC	Oklahoma City, OK		020%		20%
Cumberland Valley Surgery Center, LLC	Hagerstown, MD		3234%		3234%
Frederick Surgical Center, LLC	Frederick, MD		20%		20%

~~The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, of the Company’s equity investments in Affiliates are as follows:~~11

	2015		2014
Net operating revenues	$	35,389,891	$	65,165,852
Net income	$	7,532,487	$	25,171,091

The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, of the Company’s equity investments in Affiliates are as follows:

The results of financial position as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, of the Company’s equity investments in Affiliates are as follows:

	2016		2015
Net operating revenues	$	11,744,153	$	12,592,974
Net income	$	3,140,498	$	3,051,752

	September 30,		December 31,
	2015		2014
Current assets	$	10,254,448	$	12,458,663
Noncurrent assets		6,207,667		8,116,883
Total assets	$	16,462,115	$	20,575,546
Current liabilities	$	4,839,509	$	4,254,254
Noncurrent liabilities		2,146,579		1,928,324
Total liabilities	$	6,986,088	$	6,182,578
Members' equity	$	9,476,027	$	14,392,968

The results of financial position as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, of the Company’s equity investments in Affiliates are as follows:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2016		2015
Current assets	$	10,587,583	$	12,371,752
Noncurrent assets		6,038,579		7,699,093
Total assets	$	16,626,162	$	20,070,845
Current liabilities	$	4,190,426	$	4,240,326
Noncurrent liabilities		1,941,097		2,266,793
Total liabilities	$	6,131,523	$	6,507,119
Members' equity	$	10,494,639	$	13,563,726

Note 7 – Goodwill and Other Intangibles

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill ~~are~~ as follows:

				Accumulated			Net
	Gross			Impairment			Carrying
	Amount			Loss			Value
December 31, 2014	$	23,019,309		$	(22,045,382	)	$	973,927
December 31, 2015	$	32,469,240		$	(22,045,382	)	$	10,423,858
September 30, 2015	$	23,019,309		$	(22,045,382	)	$	973,927
Changes in UGH purchase price allocation		(2,822,049	)		—			(2,822,049	)
March 31, 2016	$	29,647,191		$	(22,045,382	)	$	7,601,809

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives must be tested for impairment at least once a year. Carrying values are compared with fair values, and when the carrying value exceeds the fair value, the carrying value of the impaired asset is reduced to its fair value. The Company tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis in the fourth quarter or more frequently if management believes indicators of impairment exist. The performance of the test involves a two-step process. The first step of the impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values, including goodwill. The Company generally determines the fair value of its reporting units using the income approach methodology of valuation that includes the discounted cash flow method as well as other generally accepted valuation methodologies. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, the Company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss. The second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying value of that goodwill.

~~Changes in the carrying amount of intangible assets during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 were as follows:~~ 12

	Carrying		Accumulated
	Amount		Amortization			Net
December 31, 2014	$	14,524,500	$	(5,444,105	)	$	9,080,395
Amortization		—		(1,543,668	)		(1,543,668	)
September 30, 2015	$	14,524,500	$	(6,987,773	)	$	7,536,727

Changes in the carrying amount of intangible assets during the three months ended March 31, 2016 were as follows:

Intangible assets as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 include the following:

	Carrying		Accumulated
	Amount		Amortization			Net
December 31, 2015	$	14,524,500	$	(7,502,330	)	$	7,022,170
Change in UGH purchase price allocation		3,930,000		—			3,930,000
Amortization		—		(562,816	)		(562,816	)
March 31, 2016	$	18,454,500	$	(8,065,146	)	$	10,389,354

		September 30, 2015							December 31,
	Useful	Carrying		Accumulated					2014
	Life (Years)	Value		Amortization			Net		Net
Management fee contracts	6 - 8	$	3,498,500	$	(2,496,059	)	$	1,002,441	$	1,328,593
Non-compete	5		2,027,000		(1,154,296	)		872,704		1,177,333
Physician memberships	7		6,468,000		(2,695,000	)		3,773,000		4,466,000
Trade Name	5		381,000		(169,205	)		211,795		270,038
Service Contracts	10		2,150,000		(473,213	)		1,676,787		1,838,431
		$	14,524,500	$	(6,987,773	)	$	7,536,727	$	9,080,395

Intangible assets as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 include the following:

Amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was $514,553 and $514,969, respectively. Amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was $1,543,668 and $1,542,704, respectively.

		March 31, 2016							December 31,
	Useful	Carrying		Accumulated					2015
	Life (Years)	Value		Amortization			Net		Net
Management fee contracts	6 - 8	$	3,498,500	$	(2,713,792	)	$	784,708	$	893,723
Non-compete	5		2,027,000		(1,357,382	)		669,618		771,161
Physician memberships	7		6,468,000		(3,157,000	)		3,311,000		3,542,000
Medicare license	20		3,930,000		(47,733	)		3,882,267		—
Trade name	5		381,000		(208,034	)		172,966		192,379
Service Contracts	10		2,150,000		(581,205	)		1,568,795		1,622,907
		$	18,454,500	$	(8,065,146	)	$	10,389,354	$	7,022,170

Amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was $562,816 and $514,556, respectively.

Amortization expense for the next five years related to these intangible assets is expected to be as follows:

Twelve months ended September 30,
Twelve months ending March 31,
2016	$	2,057,698
2017	$	2,248,629
2017		2,057,698
2018		2,011,506
2018		1,388,544
2019		1,356,950
2019		1,139,000
2020		944,931
2020		292,000
2021		405,931
Thereafter		~~601~~3,~~787~~421,406

Note 8 – Borrowings and Capital Lease Obligations

The Company’s short-term debt obligations are as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are as follows:

	Rate (1)		2016		~~September 30, 2015~~		2015		~~December 31, 2014~~
Insurance premium financings	34.98 - 45.90%		$	804,201	$	~~398,207~~	$	308,769	$	~~456,784~~
Line of credit - senior lender		3.0%				—				—
(1) Effective rate as of March 31, 2016
Short-term debt					$	398,207			$	456,784
(1) Effective rate as of September 30, 2015

The Company has various insurance premium financing notes payable that bear interest rates ranging from 4.8% to 5.0%. The insurance notes mature from June 2016 to October 2016 and the Company is required to make monthly principal and interest payments totaling $134,051.

The Company’s long-term debt obligations at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are as follows:

The Company’s long-term debt and capital lease obligations are as follows:

	Rate (1)		Maturity Date	2016			2015
Senior Lender:
Note payable		4.3%	Dec. 2020	$	28,375,000		$	28,375,000
Line of credit		4.3%	Dec. 2018		11,500,000			10,500,000
Unamortized loan origination costs					(612,182	)		(644,403	)
Other Lenders:
Note payable - subordinated note		3.0%	Dec. 2019		7,900,000			7,900,000
Total					47,162,818			46,130,597
Less: Current portion of long-term debt					(4,733,276	)		(4,601,320	)
Long-term debt				$	42,429,542		$	41,529,277
(1) Effective rate as of March 31, 2016

	Rate (1)		Maturity Date	September 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
Senior Lender:
Note payable		3.5%	Jul. 2021	$	16,874,395		$	25,750,000
Line of credit		3.0%	May 2017		2,485,170			—
Capital Lease Obligations	5.5 - 10.7%		Jan. 2017 - Dec. 2020		3,788,125			4,010,767
Total					23,147,690			29,760,767
Less: Current portion of long-term debt					(4,828,974	)		(5,023,048	)
Long-term debt				$	18,318,716		$	24,737,719
(1) Effective rate as of September 30, 2015

Texas Capital Bank Credit Facility

~~SNB~~Effective December 31, 2015, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the “TCB Credit Facility”) with Texas Capital Bank, National Association (“TCB”). The TCB Credit Facility replaced and consolidates all of the Company’s and the Company’s subsidiaries’ debt in the principal amount of $28.4 million, which is referred to as the Term Loan, and provides for an additional revolving loan in the amount of $12.5 million, which is referred to as the Revolving Loan. The Company has also entered into a number of ancillary agreements in connection with the TCB Credit Facility, including deposit account control agreements, subsidiary guarantees, security agreements and promissory notes.

~~Effective~~Maturity June 30, 2014, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Bank SNB, National Association, and Texas Capital Bank, together referred to as Lenders and collectively the agreement is referred to as the SNB Credit FacilityDates. The ~~SNB Credit Facility was used to consolidate substantially all of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ debt in the principal amount of $27.5 million, which is referred to as the~~ Term Loan, ~~and~~matures ~~provides~~on ~~for~~December ~~an additional revolving loan in the amount of $2.5 million, which is referred to as the Revolving Loan. As of September~~ 30, ~~2015,~~2020 ~~the~~and ~~Company has drawn $2.5 million of funds from~~ the Revolving Loan~~. The~~ ~~Company~~matures ~~also~~on ~~entered~~December ~~into a number of ancillary agreements in connection with the SNB Credit Facility~~30, ~~including deposit account control agreements, subsidiary guarantees, security agreements and promissory notes~~2018.

~~Maturity~~Interest ~~Dates~~Rates. ~~The~~Borrowings ~~Term~~under ~~Loan~~the ~~matures~~TCB onCredit ~~June~~Facility 30are made, ~~2021~~at the Company’s option, as either Base Rate loans or LIBOR loans. “Base Rate” for any day is the highest of (i) the Prime Rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Rate plus one half of one percent (0.5%), and (iii) Adjusted LIBOR plus one percent (1.00%). LIBOR loans are based on either the ~~Revolving~~one ~~Loan~~month, ~~matures~~two month or three month LIBOR rate at the Company’s option. The interest rate is either a Base Rate or LIBOR plus the Applicable Margins based on ~~May~~our 31Senior Debt to EBITDA Ratio, ~~2017~~as defined.

~~Interest~~ ~~Rates.~~ The ~~interest rate for the Term Loan and Revolving Loan is 30-day LIBOR plus the~~ Applicable Margins ~~based on the Company’s Senior Debt Ratio, as defined. The Applicable Margins~~ are as follows:

	Applicable Margin
Pricing Level	Senior Debt to EBITDA Ratio	Base Rate Portion		LIBOR Portion and Letter of Credit Fee		Commitment Fee
Senior Debt Ratio	Revolving Loan	Term Loan
1	< 2.0 : 1.0		2.75%		3.75%		0.375%
≥ 2.5x	3.75%	4.25%
2	≥ 2.0 : 1.0 but < 2.5 : 1.0		3.00%		4.00%		0.375%
< 2.5x, but ≥ 2.0x	3.25%	3.75%
3	≤ 2.5 : 1.0		3.25%		4.25%		0.375%
< 2.0 x	2.75%	3.25%

The Applicable ~~Margins~~Margin ~~are~~in effect will be adjusted onwithin a45 ~~quarterly~~days ~~basis~~following the end of each quarter based on the Company’s ~~senior~~Senior ~~debt~~Debt to EBITDA ratio. The Senior Debt to EBITDA Ratio is calculated by dividing all of ~~the~~our ~~Company’s~~senior indebtedness, ~~including~~(excluding capital ~~leases,~~lease ~~which~~obligations isfor ~~secured~~Foundation bySurgical aHospital ~~lien or security interest in any~~ of ~~the~~Houston), ~~Company’s~~that ~~assets~~is by the Company’s EBITDA for the preceding four fiscal quarters. EBITDA is defined in the ~~SNB~~TCB Credit Facility as the Company’s net income ~~calculated~~plus ~~before~~(b) ~~interest~~the ~~expense,~~sum ~~provision~~of ~~for~~the following: interest expense; income taxes,; depreciation; ~~and~~ amortization; ~~expenses,~~extraordinary losses determined in accordance with GAAP; cash and noncash stock compensation, ~~gains~~expense; ~~arising~~and ~~from~~other non‑recurring expenses reducing such net income which do not represent a cash item in such period or any future period, minus (c) the ~~write-up~~sum of ~~assets,~~the following: income tax credits; extraordinary gains determined in accordance with GAAP; and ~~any~~all ~~one-time~~non‑recurring, ~~expenses~~non‑cash ~~approved~~items byincreasing ~~Bank~~net ~~SNB~~income.

Interest and Principal Payments. The Company is required to make quarterly payments of principal and interest on the Term Loan. The first four quarterly payments on the Term Loan ~~are~~will be $~~875~~1,~~000~~013,393, ~~plus~~on ~~all~~the ~~accrued~~first ~~and~~day ~~unpaid~~of ~~interest. Each~~each ~~subsequent~~April, ~~quarterly~~July, ~~payment~~October, ~~will~~and beJanuary ~~$1,000,000~~during ~~plus~~the ~~all~~term ~~accrued~~hereof, ~~and~~commencing ~~unpaid~~April ~~interest~~1, 2016. The Company is required to make quarterly payments on the Revolving Loan equal to the accrued and unpaid interest. All unpaid principal and interest on the Term Loan and Revolving Loan must be paid on the respective maturity dates of ~~June~~each ~~30, 2021 and May 31, 2017~~Loan.

~~Permitted~~Borrowing ~~Acquisitions~~Base. The Company’s ~~must~~ability ~~obtain~~to ~~the~~borrow ~~Lenders~~money ~~approval~~under ~~for~~the ~~any~~Revolving ~~acquisition,~~Loan ~~merger~~is orlimited ~~consolidation~~to ~~in which~~ the ~~consideration~~Company’s ~~paid~~Borrowing ~~for~~Base. The ~~the~~Company’s ~~acquisition,~~Borrowing ~~merger~~Base ~~or consolidation~~ is inequal ~~excess~~to ~~of $1.0 million or for any acquisition, merger or consolidation in which~~ the ~~target~~sum ~~entity’s~~of ~~operating~~(i) ~~income~~80% ~~for~~of the ~~preceding~~eligible 12account ~~month~~of ~~period~~Foundation isSurgical ~~less~~Hospital ~~than~~of ~~zero.~~San

Mandatory Prepayments. If the Company sells any assets in excess of $100,000 or collectively sells any assets in a 12 month period in excess of $100,000, the Company must make a prepayment equal to the net proceeds of the asset sale(s). If the Company receives proceeds from a debt or equity offering that is not used for a permitted acquisition over a 12 month period following the offering or for repayment of the Company’s preferred noncontrolling interests, the Company must make a prepayment equal to the net proceeds of the debt or equity offering. Subsequent to the completion of the Company’s annual audited financial statements, the Company must make a prepayment equal to 30% of its Excess Cash Flow which is defined as the amount of EBITDA (as defined in

Antonio, not to exceed the ~~SNB~~outstanding ~~Credit~~principal ~~Facility)~~balance ~~for~~of the ~~fiscal~~intercompany ~~year~~note ~~that~~payable ~~exceeds~~by the ~~sum~~San ofAntonio ~~debt~~Hospital ~~service~~to ~~payments~~the ~~plus~~Company, ~~capital~~(ii) ~~expenditures~~80% ~~plus~~of ~~cash~~the ~~payments~~eligible ~~for~~account ~~federal,~~of ~~state~~Foundation ~~and~~Surgical ~~local~~Hospital ~~income~~of ~~taxes~~El Paso, ~~plus~~not ~~distributions~~to ~~made~~exceed the outstanding principal balance of the intercompany note payable by the ~~hospitals~~El ~~that~~Paso Hospital to the Company, ~~holds~~and a(iii) ~~noncontrolling~~80% ~~interest~~of ~~(“Equity~~the ~~Owned~~eligible ~~Hospitals”)~~account of Foundation Surgical Hospital of Houston, not to ~~persons~~exceed ~~other~~the ~~than~~outstanding principal balance of the intercompany note payable by the Houston Hospital to the Company.

~~Waiver of Regular Payment and~~ Mandatory ~~Prepayment~~Prepayments. The ~~sale of the~~ Company’s ~~equity~~must ~~investment~~make ~~in GCPP in June 2015 triggered a~~ mandatory ~~payment~~prepayments ~~under~~of the Term ~~Loan~~Loans ~~and~~in the ~~Company~~following ~~accordingly paid down the Term Loan by $7.0 million. As a result of the pay down~~situations, ~~Bank~~among SNB agreed to waive the Company’s regular quarterly payment due on June 30, 2015 of $1.2 million ($0.9 million principal plus interest of $0.3 million), and the mandatory prepayment due on June 30, 2015 of $0.5 million for the Excess Cash Flow related to the year ended December 31, 2014.others:

~~Voluntary~~· ~~Prepayments.~~ The Company ~~may~~must ~~prepay~~apply ~~amounts under the Term Loan at any time provided that the Company is required to pay a prepayment penalty of 2~~100% of the ~~amount~~net ~~prepaid~~proceeds iffrom ~~payment is made prior to~~ the ~~first~~sale ~~anniversary,~~of ~~1.5%~~worn ifout ~~the prepayment is made after the first anniversary but prior to the second anniversary~~ and 1%obsolete ifequipment ~~the~~not ~~prepayment~~necessary isor ~~made~~useful ~~after~~for the ~~second~~conduct ~~anniversary~~of ~~but prior to~~ the ~~maturity date. The~~ Company’s ~~may prepay amounts under the Revolving Loan at any time without penalty.~~business;

Commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016, the Company must apply 50% of our Excess Cash Flow for such fiscal year to the installment payments due on the Company’s Term Loan;

The Company must apply 50% of the net cash proceeds from the issuance of equity interests to the installment payments due on the Company’s Term Loan; provided that no prepayment need to be made for the year ended December 31, 2016 once the Company has made mandatory prepayments in excess of $10,000,000;

The Company must apply 100% of the net cash proceeds from the issuance of debt (other than certain permitted debt) to the prepayment of the Term Loan;

The Company must prepay 100% of the net cash proceeds paid to the Company other than in the ordinary course of business; and

The Company must prepay 100% of the net cash proceeds the Company receives from the prepayment of intercompany notes.

Voluntary Prepayments. The Company may prepay amounts under the Term Loan or Revolving Loan at any time provided that the Company is required to pay a prepayment fee of 2% of the amount prepaid if payment is made prior to the first anniversary, 1.5% if the prepayment is made after the first anniversary but prior to the second anniversary and 1% if the prepayment is made after the second anniversary but prior to the third anniversary.

Guaranties. Each of the Company’s direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries jointly and severally and unconditionally guaranty payment of the Company’s obligations owed to Lenders.

Financial Covenants:

~~Senior~~ Debt to EBITDA Ratio. ~~The~~As of December 31, 2015, the Company must maintain a ~~Senior~~ Debt to EBITDA Ratio, not in excess of 3.0050 to 1.00. Thereafter, the Company must maintain a Debt to EBITDA Ratio as of the ~~end~~last day of ~~each~~any fiscal quarter, ~~beginning~~not ~~with~~in excess of (a) 3.25 to 1.00 for the ~~quarter~~fiscal quarters ending December 31, 2015, March 31, 2016, June 30, ~~2014~~2016 and September 30, 2016; (b) 2.75 to 1.00 for the fiscal quarters ending December 31, 2016, March 31, 2017, June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2017; (c) 2.50 to 1.00 for the fiscal quarters ending December 31, 2017, March 31, 2018, June 30, 2018 and September 30, 2018; and (d) 2.25 to 1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2018 and at the end of each fiscal quarter thereafter. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, the ~~Senior~~Company’s Debt to EBITDA Ratio was 13.5112.

Senior Debt ~~Service~~to ~~Coverage~~EBITDA Ratio. ~~The~~As of December 31, 2015, the Company must maintain a Senior Debt ~~Service~~to ~~Coverage~~EBITDA Ratio of not ~~less~~in ~~than~~excess 1of 3.3000 to 1.00. Thereafter, the Company must maintain a Senior Debt to EBITDA Ratio as of the ~~end~~last day of ~~each~~any fiscal quarter, ~~beginning~~not ~~with~~in excess of (a) 3.00 to 1.00 for the ~~quarter~~fiscal quarters ending December 31, 2015, March 31, 2016, June 30, 2016 and September 30, ~~2014~~2016; (b) 2.50 ~~The~~to ~~Senior~~1.00 ~~Debt~~for ~~Service~~the ~~Coverage~~fiscal ~~ratio~~quarters isending ~~the~~December ~~ratio~~31, of2016, ~~EBITDA~~March ~~(as~~31, ~~defined~~2017, inJune ~~the~~30, ~~SNB~~2017 ~~Credit~~and ~~Facility~~September 30, 2017; (c) ~~for~~2.25 ~~the~~to ~~preceding~~1.00 ~~four~~for the fiscal quarters ~~minus~~ending ~~cash~~December ~~payments~~31, ~~for~~2017, ~~federal~~March 31, ~~state~~2018, June 30, 2018 and ~~local~~September ~~taxes~~30, ~~minus~~2018; ~~capital~~and ~~expenditures~~(d) 2.00 to 1.00 for the ~~Company’s~~fiscal ~~debt~~quarter ~~service~~ending ~~payments~~December ~~for~~31, 2018 and at the ~~same~~end ~~period~~of each fiscal quarter thereafter. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, the Company’s Senior Debt ~~Service~~to ~~Coverage~~EBITDA Ratio was 2.0269.

~~Adjusted~~Pre-Distribution ~~Senior~~Fixed ~~Debt~~Charge ~~Service~~ Coverage Ratio. The Company must maintain ~~an Adjusted Senior Debt Service Coverage Ratio of not less than 1.05 to 1.00~~ as of the ~~end~~last day of ~~each~~any fiscal quarter ~~beginning~~a ~~with~~Pre-Distribution ~~the~~Fixed ~~quarter~~Charge ~~ending September 30, 2014. The Adjusted Senior Debt Service~~ Coverage Ratio isin ~~the~~excess ~~ratio~~ of ~~EBITDA~~1.30 ~~(as defined in the SNB Credit Facility) for the preceding four fiscal quarters minus cash payments for federal, state and local taxes, minus capital expenditures, plus distributions made~~ to the Company’s preferred noncontrolling interest holders, plus distributions made by the Company’s Equity Owned Hospitals to persons other than the Company to the Company’s debt service payments for the same period1.00. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, the ~~Adjusted~~Company’s ~~Senior~~Pre-Distribution ~~Debt~~Fixed ~~Service~~Charge Coverage Ratio was 1.1682.

Post-Distribution Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio. The Company must maintain as of the last day of any fiscal quarter, a Post-Distribution Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio in excess of 1.05 to 1.00. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, the Company’s isPost-Distribution inFixed ~~compliance~~Charge ~~with~~Coverage ~~the~~Ratio ~~financial~~was ~~covenants~~1.30.

~~Restrictions~~Capital ~~on Indebtedness~~Expenditures. The Company ~~and~~shall ~~its Equity Owned Hospitals are~~ not ~~allowed~~make tocapital ~~create~~expenditures ~~any~~in ~~indebtedness~~excess ~~other than indebtedness for the purchase~~ of ~~fixed assets not exceeding~~ $~~500~~5,000 ~~in any fiscal year~~, ~~trade payables incurred in the ordinary course of business and not past due, contingent obligations and unsecured indebtedness not exceeding $100,~~000 induring ~~the aggregate at~~ any ~~time~~fiscal ~~outstanding~~year.

Use of Proceeds. All proceeds of the Term Loan were used solely for the refinancing of existing indebtedness. The proceeds of the Revolving Loan will be used for working capital.

Collateral. Payment and performance of the Company’s obligations under the SNB Credit Facility are secured in general by all of the Company’s assets.

Defaults and Remedies. In addition to the general defaults of failure to perform the Company’s obligations under the Loan Agreement, events of default also include the occurrence of a change in control, as defined, and the loss of the Company’s Medicare or Medicaid certification, collateral casualties, entry of a judgment of $150,000 or more, failure of first liens on collateral and the termination of any of the Company’s management agreements that represent more than 10% of the Company’s management fees for the preceding 18 month period. In the event of a monetary default, all of the Company’s obligations due under the SNB Credit Facility shall become immediately due and payable. In the event of a non-monetary default, the Company has 10 days or in some cases three days to cure before Bank SNB has the right to declare the Company’s obligations due under the SNB Credit Facility immediately due and payable.

AtAs ~~September~~of 30March 31, ~~2015~~2016, ~~future~~the ~~maturities~~Company is in compliance with all of ~~long-term~~the ~~debt~~TCB ~~were~~Credit asFacility ~~follows:~~financial covenants.

Twelve months ended September 30:
2016	$	4,828,974
2017		7,216,540
2018		4,664,753
2019		3,323,575
2020		1,986,188
Thereafter		1,127,660

Collateral. Payment and performance of the Company’s obligations under the TCB Credit Facility are secured in general by all of the Company and the Company’s guarantors’ assets.

Negative Covenants. The TCB Credit Facility has restrictive covenants that, among other things, limits or restricts the Company’s ability to do the following without the consent of TCB:

Incur additional indebtedness;

Create or incur additional liens on the Company’s assets;

Engage in mergers or acquisitions;

Pay dividends or make any other payment or distribution in respect of the Company’s equity interests;

Make loans and investments;

Issue equity, except for stock compensation awards to employees;

Engage in transaction with affiliates;

Dispose of the Company’s assets, except for certain approved assets;

Engage in any sale and leaseback arrangements; and

Prepay debt to debtors other than TCB.

Defaults and Remedies. In addition to the general defaults of failure to perform our obligations under the Loan Agreement, events of default also include the occurrence of a change in control, as defined, and the loss of our Medicare or Medicaid certification, collateral casualties, entry of a uninsured judgment of $500,000 or more, failure of first liens on collateral and the termination of any of the Company’s management agreements that represent more than 10% of the Company’s management fees for the preceding 18 month period. In the event of a monetary default, all of the Company’s obligations due under the TCB Credit Facility shall become immediately due and payable. In the event of a non-monetary default, the Company has 10 days or in some cases three days to cure before Texas Capital Bank has the right to declare the Company’s obligations due under the TCB Credit Facility immediately due and payable.

At March 31, 2016, future maturities of long-term debt were as follows:

Years ended March 31:
2017	$	4,733,276
2018		4,922,350
2019		16,560,781
2020		5,205,713
2021		16,352,880
Thereafter		—

The Company’s capital lease obligations as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are as follows:

	Rate (1)		Maturity Date	2016			2015
Capital Leases Obligations:
Building		7.5%	Jul. 2036		24,297,628			24,424,341
Equipment	5.6 - 9.0%		Mar. 2017 - Dec. 2020		8,563,642			9,185,320
Total					32,861,270			33,609,661
Less: Current portion of capital leases					(4,319,280	)		(4,478,968	)
Capital leases obligations				$	28,541,990		$	29,130,693
(1) Effective rate as of March 31, 2016

The Company has entered into a capital lease covering the FSH Houston hospital facility, see Note 3 - Acquisition. The capital lease bears an interest at fixed rate of 7.5%. The Company is required to make monthly principal and interest payments under the capital lease totaling $193,611.

The Company has entered into various capital leases that are collateralized by certain computer and medical equipment used by the Company. The capital leases bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.6% to 9.0%. The Company is required to monthly principal and interest payments under the capital leases totaling $300,084.

At March 31, 2016, future maturities of capital lease obligations were as follows:

Years ended March 31:
2017	$	4,319,280
2018		2,868,010
2019		1,680,296
2020		1,483,071
2021		1,310,455
Thereafter		21,200,158

Note 9 – Preferred Noncontrolling Interests

During 2013, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Foundation Health Enterprises, LLC (“FHE”) completed a private placement offering of $9,135,000. The offering was comprised of 87 units (“FHE Unit” or “preferred noncontrolling interest”). Each FHE Unit was offered at $105,000 and entitled the purchaser to one (1) Class B membership interest in FHE, valued at $100,000, and 1,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $5,000. The total consideration of $9,135,000 was comprised of $8,700,000 attributable to the preferred noncontrolling interest and $435,000 attributable to the 87,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

The FHE Units provide for a cumulative preferred annual return of 9% on the amount allocated to the Class B membership interests. The FHE Units will be redeemed by FHE in four annual installments beginning in July 2014. The FHE Unit holders agreed to defer the first installment payment until March 2015. The first installment was paid on April 1, 2015. The first three installments shall be in the amount of $10,000 per FHE Unit and the fourth installment will be in the amount of the unreturned capital contribution and any undistributed preferred distributions. The FHE Units are convertible at the election of the holder at any time prior to the complete redemption into restricted common shares of the Company at a conversion price of $20.00 per share. Since the FHE Units have a redemption feature and a conversion feature which the Company determined to be substantive, the preferred noncontrolling interests has been recorded at the mezzanine level in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the corresponding dividends are recorded as a reduction of accumulated deficit.

Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies

Legal claims – The Company is exposed to asserted and unasserted legal claims encountered in the normal course of business, including claims for damages for personal injuries, medical malpractice, breach of contracts, wrongful restriction of or interference with physicians’ staff privileges and employment related claims. In certain of these actions, plaintiffs request payment for damages, including punitive damages that may not be covered by insurance. Management believes that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the operating results or the financial position of the Company. There were no settlement expenses during the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 related to the Company’s ongoing unasserted legal claims.

Self-insurance – Effective January 1, 2014, the Company began using a combination of insurance and self-insurance for employee-related healthcare benefits. The self-insurance liability is determined actuarially, based on the actual claims filed and an estimate of incurred but not reported claims. Self-insurance reserves as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015 were $~~400~~567,~~784~~197 and $~~560~~424,~~851~~593, respectively, and are included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants. In determining fair value, the accounting standards established a three-level hierarchy that distinguishes between (i) market data obtained or developed from independent sources (i.e., observable data inputs) and (ii) a reporting entity’s own data and assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability (i.e., unobservable data inputs). Financial assets and financial liabilities measured and reported at fair value are classified in one of the following categories, in order of priority of observability and objectivity of pricing inputs:

pricing an asset or liability (i.e., unobservable data inputs). Financial assets and financial liabilities measured and reported at fair value are classified in one of the following categories, in order of priority of observability and objectivity of pricing inputs:

Level 1 – Fair value based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – Fair value based on significant directly observable data (other than Level 1 quoted prices) or significant indirectly observable data through corroboration with observable market data. Inputs would normally be (i) quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, (ii) quoted prices in inactive markets for identical or similar assets or liabilities or (iii) information derived from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 – Fair value based on prices or valuation techniques that require significant unobservable data inputs. Inputs would normally be a reporting entity’s own data and judgments about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The fair value measurement level for an asset or liability is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques should maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements: The carrying value of the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities is their cost, which may differ from fair value. The carrying value of cash held as demand deposits, money market and certificates of deposit, accounts receivable, short-term borrowings, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximated their fair value. At ~~June~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, including the current portion was determined to be approximately equal to its carrying value.

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements: During 2015, the ~~nine~~Company ~~months~~completed ~~ended~~the ~~September~~University ~~30,~~General ~~2015~~Hospital, ~~the~~LP ~~Company~~acquisition; ~~did~~see ~~not~~Note ~~have~~3 ~~any~~– Acquisition for additional information. The assets oracquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition were recorded ~~using~~at their fair values on the date of the acquisition. For the acquisition, the nonrecurring fair value measurements were developed using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) using discounted cash flow calculations based upon the Company’s weighted average cost of capital and third-party valuation services. Assumptions used were similar to those that would be used by market participants performing valuations of these business units and were based on analysis of current and expected future economic conditions and the updated strategic plan for each business unit. The assets acquired were valued at $59,808,000 and the liabilities assumed were $34,708,000.

Note 12 – ~~Real~~Related ~~Estate~~Party ~~Transaction~~Transactions

OnEffective ~~March~~June 1, 2014, the Company ~~executed a 15 year master lease on the building occupied by the Company~~’s hospital subsidiary located in ~~San Antonio~~El Paso, Texas ~~(“FBH~~entered ~~SA”)~~into ~~for~~a ansublease ~~annual~~agreement ~~rent of $2.3 million~~ with ~~annual escalations of 3%.~~ The ~~current~~New ~~lease~~Sleep ~~income~~Lab onInternational, ~~the~~Ltd., ~~underlying~~referred ~~sub-lease~~to isas ~~approximately~~New $2Sleep.1 ~~million~~New ~~per~~Sleep ~~year~~is ~~which~~controlled ~~includes~~by ~~the~~Dr. Robert ~~rent~~Moreno, ~~paid~~one byof ~~FBH~~our SADirectors. The ~~master~~sublease ~~lease~~with isNew anSleep ~~operating~~calls ~~lease.~~for Inmonthly ~~conjunction~~rent ~~with~~payments ~~the~~of ~~master~~$8,767 ~~lease~~ and ~~certain~~the ~~other~~sublease ~~agreements~~expires ~~with~~on ~~the landlord~~November 30, ~~the Company received $4~~2018.1 ~~million~~The atspace ~~the~~subleased ~~time~~from ofNew ~~the~~Sleep ~~lease.~~will ~~Given~~be ~~the~~sublet ~~disparity~~to ~~between~~physician ~~the~~partners ~~annual~~and ~~rent~~casual ~~expense~~uses ~~under~~of ~~the~~our ~~master~~hospital ~~lease~~ and ~~the~~is ~~rental~~located ~~income~~in ofa ~~the~~building ~~underlying~~that ~~sub-lease,~~also ~~the~~houses ~~cash~~one ~~received~~of atour ~~the~~imaging ~~execution~~facilities. ofDuring the ~~lease~~three ~~was~~months ~~deferred~~ended ~~and~~March ~~will~~31, be2016, ~~recorded~~the onCompany aincurred ~~straight-line~~approximately ~~basis~~$23,600 ~~as a reduction~~ in ~~the~~lease ~~rent~~ expense under the ~~master~~terms of the lease.

~~Note~~As 13of –March ~~Related~~31, ~~Party~~2016, ~~Transactions~~the Company had $0.1 million on deposit at Valliance Bank. Valliance Bank is controlled by Mr. Roy T. Oliver, one of our greater than 5% shareholders. A noncontrolling interest in Valliance Bank is held by Mr. Joseph Harroz, Jr., a director of the Company. Mr. Stanton Nelson, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Harroz also serve as directors of Valliance Bank.

Effective June 1, 2014, the Company’s hospital subsidiary located in El Paso, Texas entered into a sublease agreement with The New Sleep Lab International, Ltd., referred to as New Sleep. New Sleep is controlled by Dr. Robert Moreno, one of our Directors. The sublease with New Sleep calls for monthly rent payments of $8,767 and the sublease expires on November 30, 2018. The space subleased from New Sleep will be sublet to physician partners and casual uses of our hospital and is located in a building that also houses one of our imaging facilities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred approximately $81,400 in lease expense under the terms of the lease.

As of September 30, 2015, the Company had $0.4 million on deposit at Valliance Bank. Valliance Bank is controlled by Mr. Roy T. Oliver, one of our greater than 5% shareholders. A noncontrolling interest in Valliance Bank is held by Mr. Joseph Harroz, Jr., a director of the Company. Mr. Stanton Nelson, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Harroz also serve as directors of Valliance Bank.

The Company had office space subject to a lease agreement with City Place, LLC (“City Place”). Under the lease agreement, the Company paid monthly rent of $17,970 until June 30, 2014; $0 from July 1, 2014 to January 31, 2015 and $17,970 from February 1, 2015 to May 31, 2015 plus additional payments for allocable basic expenses of City Place; the lease was terminated early effective May 31, 2015, in which the Company agreed to pay $89,850 in five equal monthly installments of $17,970 ending October 31, 2015. A noncontrolling interest in City Place is held by Roy T. Oliver, one of the Company’s greater than 5% shareholders. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred approximately $53,900 and $70,000, respectively, in lease expense under the terms of the lease.

As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company has obligations of $1.3 million that are owed to the Company’s majority shareholder, Foundation Healthcare Affiliates, LLC (“FHA”) and certain real estate subsidiaries and affiliates of FHA related to transactions that occurred prior to the Foundation acquisition in July 2013. The amounts owed to FHA and FHA affiliates are included in other liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The Company has entered into agreements with certain of its Affiliate ASCs and hospitals to provide management services. As compensation for these services, the surgery centers and hospitals are charged management fees which are either fixed or are based on a percentage of the Affiliates cash collected or the Affiliates net revenue. The percentages range from 2.25% to 6.0%.

17Note 13 – Subsequent Events

~~Note~~Management 14evaluated –all ~~Subsequent~~activity ~~Events~~of the Company and concluded that no material subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, except for the following:

~~Management~~On ~~evaluated~~May ~~all~~11, ~~activity~~2016, the Company acquired 51% of the ~~Company~~outstanding ~~and~~membership ~~concluded~~interests ~~that~~of noNinety ~~material~~Nine ~~subsequent~~Healthcare ~~events~~Management, ~~have~~LLC ~~occurred~~(“99 ~~that~~Management”). 99 ~~would~~Management ~~require~~is ~~recognition~~a healthcare management located in Dallas, Texas. Management believes the ~~consolidated~~purchase ~~financial~~of ~~statements~~99 orManagement ~~disclosure~~will inallow the ~~notes~~Company to provide practice management services for the ~~consolidated~~Company’s ~~financial~~physician ~~statements~~partners. The Company paid $440,000 in cash and issued 700,000 shares of Company common stock for the purchase of the membership interests in

99 Management. The Company will issue an additional 200,000 shares of Company common stock upon the execution by 99 Management of a signed contract between 99 Management and Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Texas for a narrow network program covering the Houston, Texas market.

On May 11, 2016, the Company entered into a Loan Modification Agreement and Waiver with TCB (“TCB Modification”). Under the TCB Modification, the Company’s Revolving Loan under the TCB Credit Facility was increased from $12.5 million to $15.5 million. The $3.0 million of borrowing represents a temporary advance that must be repaid by July 31, 2016. In addition, TCB consented to the sale of certain Company assets and waived certain technical defaults in the TCB Credit Facility related to timing deadlines for certain financial information provided by the Company to TCB related to the UGH Acquisition.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Company Overview

WeOur ~~own~~primary ~~and~~business ~~manage~~is ~~facilities which operate in~~ the ~~rapidly~~ownership ~~growing specialized surgical segment~~ of ~~the healthcare industry. Today, our network consists of three~~ surgical hospitals, ~~seven~~and ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) ~~and one hospital outpatient department (HOPD). Our growth strategy involves increasing our footprint~~ in ~~our~~targeted ~~current~~regional markets ~~by acquiring controlling interests~~ in ~~surgical~~the ~~hospitals,~~Southeastern ~~nearby~~United ~~ASCs and ancillary service facilities~~States. We ~~ASCs~~currently ~~affiliated~~have ~~with~~three ~~surgical~~majority-owned hospitals ~~are~~(Consolidated ~~known~~Hospitals) ~~as HOPDs~~ and ~~generally~~one ~~benefit~~minority-owned ~~from~~hospitals ~~higher~~(Equity ~~payment~~Owned ~~rates~~Hospital) ~~from~~in ~~governmental~~Texas ~~insurance~~ and ~~other~~Oklahoma. We ~~payors~~have asseven ~~compared~~minority-owned ~~with unaffiliated~~ ASCs, ~~and~~located ~~both~~in ~~the~~Texas, ~~hospitals~~Pennsylvania, ~~and~~New ~~affiliated outpatient surgery centers benefit from regional branding~~Jersey, ~~increased~~Maryland ~~operating efficiencies~~ and ~~lower costs through economies of scale~~Ohio. Also, Wewe ~~believe~~have ~~that~~one ~~having~~hospital ~~the~~outpatient ~~ability~~department to(HOPD) ~~perform~~through ~~procedures~~our atinvestment ~~surgical~~in ~~hospitals~~the ~~for~~surgery ~~more~~hospital ~~complex~~in ~~surgeries~~Edmond, ~~and~~Oklahoma. In ataddition ~~ASCs~~to orour ~~HOPDs~~ownership ~~for same-day surgeries~~interests, ~~coupled~~we ~~with the ability to~~ provide ~~other~~management ~~related non-surgical~~ services, ~~will~~under ~~enable~~contract us to ~~capture~~most ~~an increasing share~~ of ~~surgical~~our ~~volumes~~minority-owned infacilities. Finally, ~~the markets in which~~ we ~~serve~~have ~~and to generate strong patient outcomes and satisfaction. We provide management services to~~ a ~~majority~~legacy ofbusiness ~~our~~that ~~Affiliates~~provides ~~under~~sleep ~~the~~testing ~~terms of various~~ management ~~agreements~~services.

WeOur ~~focus~~strategy ~~primarily~~is onto ~~investing~~create ina ~~and~~regional ~~managing~~network ~~high~~of high-quality, yet cost- effective, surgical ~~hospitals~~facilities that meet the needs of patients, physicians and payors. We believe ~~the~~our facilities weprovide ~~invest~~a infriendly and ~~manage~~convenient ~~provide~~environment ~~an enhanced~~for ~~quality of care to~~ our patients ~~while~~to ~~providing~~receive ~~administrative,~~high ~~clinical~~quality ~~and economic benefits to physicians~~care. We ~~Our~~operate our facilities, ~~currently~~structure ~~provide~~our ~~general~~strategic ~~surgeries~~relationships and ~~surgeries~~adopt instaffing, ~~such~~scheduling ~~specialties~~and asclinical ~~orthopedics,~~systems ~~neurosurgery,~~and ~~pain~~protocols ~~management,~~with ~~podiatry,~~the ~~gynecology,~~goal ~~optometry,~~of ~~gastroenterology~~increasing ~~and~~physician ~~pediatric~~productivity ~~ENT~~and ~~(tubes/adenoids)~~satisfaction. In ~~Our~~light ~~facilities~~of ~~also~~the ~~provide~~efficiency ~~ancillary~~of ~~services~~our ~~including: toxicology~~facilities, ~~wound~~we ~~care,~~believe ~~sleep~~we ~~management, radiology and imaging. We~~ are ~~expanding~~competitively ~~our~~positioned ~~service~~among ~~offering~~payors to ~~include~~generate ~~additional~~good ~~imaging,~~clinical ~~intraoperative~~outcomes ~~monitoring,~~while ~~robotic~~containing ~~surgery, and physical therapy services~~costs. Our Acommitment ~~key~~to ~~component~~the needs of ~~our~~all ~~success~~relevant ~~has~~parties ~~been~~coupled ~~our strong relationships~~ with ~~quality~~the ~~physician~~strong ~~partners.~~growth Wedynamics ~~believe~~of our ~~continued~~markets ~~emphasis~~lead onus ~~physician~~to ~~satisfaction~~believe ~~and~~that ~~productivity~~the ~~will~~number ~~continue~~of toprocedures ~~position~~performed usat ~~competitively~~our infacilities ~~the~~each ~~future~~year will increase.

Elimination of Going Concern

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we concluded that based on our cash flows from operations during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and year ended December 31, 2014, respectively, and the due dates of certain liability and debt payments, we may not be able to meet all of our obligations as they became due in 2015.

As of September 30, 2015, we had cash and cash equivalents of $4.8 million and working capital of $5.0 million (adjusted for redemption payments of $0.9 million payable to preferred noncontrolling interest holders in October 2015). During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we generated income from continuing operations of $5.3 million and generated $6.4 million in cash flow from operating activities from continuing operations. In addition to our improved cash flow from operations, we also generated $9.5 million, during the three months ended June 30, 2015, from the sale and redemption of certain equity investments. Based on our improved operating results during 2015, improved cash and working capital levels at September 30, 2015 and our expected borrowing capacity over the next twelve months, we have concluded that the doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern has been eliminated.

Hospital and ASC Business Overview

~~Today,~~At ~~we own 51% of two surgical hospitals located in San Antonio and El Paso, Texas which are reflected in~~ our ~~financials as our~~ Consolidated Hospitals~~. We maintain a minority interest in one hospital in Edmond~~, ~~Oklahoma~~we ~~and~~serve ~~seven ASCs in six states which are referred to~~ as ~~Equity~~a ~~Owned~~majority ~~Hospitals~~owner, ~~Equity~~day-to-day ~~Owned ASCs~~manager, ~~Equity~~and ~~Owned~~we ~~Facilities or Affiliates. We also~~ have ansignificant ~~interest~~influence inover ~~one~~the ~~HOPD~~operations ~~through~~of ~~our~~such ~~investment in the Edmond hospital~~facilities. When Wewe have acontrol ~~management~~of ~~contract~~the ~~with one ASC in Baton Rouge~~facility, ~~Louisiana in which~~ we ~~have~~account nofor ~~ownership interest. We generate revenue through~~ our ~~ownership~~investment ~~interests~~ in ~~these~~the ~~surgical~~facility ~~facilities~~ as ~~well~~a asconsolidated ~~management~~subsidiary. For ~~fees~~our ~~for~~Equity ~~providing~~Owned afacilities, ~~variety~~our ofinfluence ~~administrative~~does ~~services~~not torepresent ~~most~~control of ~~our~~the ~~Equity~~facility, ~~Owned~~but ~~Facilities.~~we Wedo ~~manage~~have ~~our~~the ~~facilities~~ability byto ~~overseeing~~exercise ~~their~~significant ~~business~~influence ~~office,~~over ~~contracting,~~operating ~~marketing,~~and financial ~~reporting~~policies, ~~accreditation,~~we ~~clinical,~~account ~~regulatory~~for ~~and~~our ~~administrative~~investment ~~operations.~~in Wethe ~~work~~facility ~~closely~~under ~~with~~the ~~our~~equity ~~physician~~method, ~~partners~~and totreat ~~increase~~ the ~~likelihood~~facility ofas ~~successful~~a ~~patient~~nonconsolidated ~~and financial outcomes~~affiliate.

Facility Location	Number of Physician Partners	Number of Operating Rooms	Percentage Owned by Company			Managed by Company	Mgmt. Agreement Exp. Date
Consolidated Hospitals:
San Antonio, Texas	22	4		51.00	%	Yes	n/a
El Paso, Texas	71	6		51.00	%	Yes	n/a
Equity Owned Hospitals:
Edmond, Oklahoma	42	3		8.00	%	No	n/a
Equity Owned ASCs:
Cumberland Valley, Maryland	14	1		31.94	%	Yes	9/30/2017
Frederick, Maryland	20	4		20.10	%	Yes	3/31/2017
Mercerville, New Jersey	25	3		10.00	%	Yes	4/30/2020
Middleburg Heights, Ohio	13	4		10.00	%	Yes	3/5/2016
Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania	22	4		20.00	%	Yes	Monthly
Houston, Texas	15	4		10.00	%	Yes	2/28/2016
Nacogdoches, Texas	9	3		12.50	%	Yes	Monthly
Equity Owned HOPDs:
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma	(a)	5		(b)		Yes	1/19/2018
Managed Only ASC:
Baton Rouge, Louisiana	17	6		0.00	%	Yes	Monthly

For our Consolidated Hospitals, our financial statements reflect 100% of the revenues and expenses for these subsidiaries, after elimination of intercompany transactions and accounts. The net income attributable to our physician partners who have ownership in our Consolidated Hospitals is included in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in our consolidated statements of operations.

For our Equity Owned facilities, our share of the net income of each Equity Owned facility is based on the facility’s net income and our percentage of ownership in the facility and is included in our consolidated statements as equity in earnings of affiliates. We earn management fees from most of our Equity Owned facilities for our management of the day-to-day operations. We also provide management services to one ASC that we don’t own any equity interest.

The following summarizes certain key metrics for our surgical hospital and ASC business:

Facility Location	Number of Physician Partners	Number of Operating Rooms	Percentage Owned by Company		Managed by Company	Mgmt. Agreement Exp. Date
Consolidated Hospitals:
San Antonio, Texas	22	6		51.0%	Yes	n/a
El Paso, Texas	71	6		51.0%	Yes	n/a
Houston, Texas	n/a	8		100.0%	Yes	n/a
Equity Owned Hospitals:
Edmond, Oklahoma	42	3		8.0%	No	n/a
Equity Owned ASCs:
Cumberland Valley, Maryland	14	1		33.7%	Yes	12/31/2020
Frederick, Maryland	20	4		20.1%	Yes	3/31/2017
Mercerville, New Jersey	25	3		10.0%	Yes	4/30/2020
Middleburg Heights, Ohio	13	4		10.0%	Yes	2/28/2021
Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania	22	4		20.0%	Yes	Monthly
Houston, Texas	15	4		10.0%	Yes	3/31/2021
Nacogdoches, Texas	9	3		12.5%	Yes	Monthly
Equity Owned HOPD:
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma	(a)	5	(b)		Yes	1/19/2018
Managed Only ASC:
Baton Rouge, Louisiana	17	6		0.0%	Yes	Monthly
Lafayette, Louisiana	3	4		0.0%	Yes	Monthly

(a)	The 42 physician partners in our hospital in Edmond also participate in this HOPD through the hospital’s 100% ownership of this HOPD.

(b)	This HOPD is 100% owned by our hospital in Edmond, Oklahoma.

(c)	This hospital is expected to be syndicated with physician partners.

Our facilities are licensed at the state level and are accredited by either the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Healthcare (AAAHC) or the Det Norske Veritas (DNV). The only exception is our ASC in Nacogdoches, Texas which meets the accreditation standards, but the governing board of this ASC has elected to not seek accreditation. We recognize that accreditation is a crucial quality benchmark for payors since many managed care organizations will not contract with a facility until it is accredited. We believe that our historical success in obtaining and retaining accreditation for our facilities reflects our commitment to providing high quality care in our facilities.

Generally, each facility is owned and operated by either a limited partnership or limited liability company in which ownership interests are held by our local physician partners who practice at the facility and by us. Our partnership and limited liability company agreements typically provide for the monthly or quarterly pro rata distribution of cash equal to net profits from operations, less amounts held in reserve for expenses and working capital. These limited partnership or limited liability company agreements generally grant us representation on the facility’s governing board and ensure our participation in fundamental decisions. Our influence over the businesses of our facilities is further enhanced by our management agreements with such facilities.

Our surgical hospitals and ASC facilities depend upon third-party reimbursement programs to pay for our services rendered to patients, including governmental Medicare and managed Medicare programs, a broad mix of private insurance programs, and co-pays, deductibles and cash payments from patients. Private payors typically employ reimbursement methodologies similar to those used by government providers. Under Medicare, our facilities are reimbursed for the services rendered through the payment of facility fees which vary depending on the type of facility (hospital, HOPD or ASC), and type of procedure. Hospitals and HOPDs are reimbursed for outpatient procedures in a manner similar to most ASCs except that the methodologies employed to calculate reimbursement rates generally result in rates that are higher than those for comparable procedures at free-standing ASCs. ASCs are reimbursed through the payment of a composite “ASC rate” which is set by us based on a survey of comparative rates, which includes payment for most of the expenses associated with the performance of a procedure such as nursing services, supplies, and staffing costs. Reimbursement rates for inpatient hospital services are determined using Medicare severity diagnosis related groups which are intended to compensate hospitals according to the estimated intensity of hospital resources necessary to furnish care for a particular diagnosed illness.

20Our surgical hospital and ASC facilities depend upon third-party reimbursement programs, including governmental and private insurance programs, to pay for the preponderance of the services rendered to patients. Our surgical hospital and ASC facilities derive a portion of their revenues from governmental healthcare programs, primarily Medicare and managed Medicare programs, and the

for inpatient hospital services are determined using Medicare severity diagnosis related groups which are intended to compensate hospitals according to the estimated intensity of hospital resources necessary to furnish care for a particular diagnosed illness.21

Our surgical hospital and ASC facilities depend upon third-party reimbursement programs, including governmental and private insurance programs, to pay for the preponderance of the services rendered to patients. Our surgical hospital and ASC facilities derive a portion of their revenues from governmental healthcare programs, primarily Medicare and managed Medicare programs, and the remainder from a wide mix of commercial payors and patient co-pays and deductibles. Private payors typically follow the method in which the government reimburses healthcare providers. Under the government’s methodology our surgical hospital and ASC facilities are reimbursed for the performance of services through the payment of facility fees which vary according to whether the facility is a hospital or an ASC and the type of procedure that is performed. Hospitals are reimbursed for outpatient procedures in a manner similar to ASCs except that the methodologies employed to calculate reimbursement generally result in hospitals being reimbursed in this setting at a higher rate than free-standing ASCs. ASCs are reimbursed through the payment of a composite “ASC rate” which includes payment for most of the expenses associated with the performance of a procedure such as nursing services, supplies, and staffing costs. The reimbursement rates for inpatient hospital services are determined using Medicare severity diagnosis related groups which are intended to compensate hospitals according to the estimated intensity of hospital resources necessary to furnish care for a particular diagnosed illness.

Our revenues from the ASC and surgical hospital facilities are derived from (i) the pro rata distributions we receive on our ownership in the facilities, and (ii) management fees that we receive from these facilities. Such management fees are generally calculated as a percentage of the monthly net revenues. We own equity interests in all of our ASC and surgical hospital facilities except the Lake Surgery Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana which we manage. We possess management agreements with all of our facilities.

~~Reverse~~Changes ~~Stock~~in ~~Split~~Consolidated Hospitals and Equity Owned Investments

AtOn ~~our annual meeting of stockholders held on~~ May 1211, ~~2014~~2016, ~~our~~we ~~stockholders~~acquired ~~approved~~51% anof ~~amendment~~the tooutstanding ~~our~~membership ~~amended~~interests ~~and restated certificate~~ of ~~incorporation~~Ninety toNine ~~effect~~Healthcare aManagement, ~~reverse~~LLC ~~split~~(“99 ofManagement”). 99 ~~our~~Management ~~common~~is ~~stock at~~ a ~~ratio~~healthcare ~~between~~management ~~1-for-3~~located toin ~~1-for-10~~Dallas, ~~shares~~Texas. ~~Our~~We ~~stockholders~~believe ~~further authorized~~ the ~~board~~purchase of ~~directors~~99 toManagement ~~determine~~will ~~the~~allow ~~ratio~~us atto ~~which~~provide ~~the~~practice ~~reverse~~management ~~split~~services ~~would~~for beour ~~effected~~physician bypartners. We ~~filing~~paid an$440,000 ~~appropriate~~in ~~amendment~~cash ~~to our amended~~ and ~~restated~~issued ~~certificate~~700,000 shares of ~~incorporation. Our~~our ~~board~~common ofstock ~~directors~~for ~~authorized~~ the ~~ratio~~purchase of the ~~reverse~~membership ~~split~~interests ~~and~~in ~~corresponding~~99 ~~reduction~~Management. We inwill ~~authorized~~issue ~~shares~~an onadditional ~~December 29~~200,000 ~~2014~~shares ~~and~~of ~~effective~~our atcommon ~~the~~stock ~~close~~upon ofthe ~~business~~execution onby ~~January~~99 8,Management ~~2015, we amended our amended and restated certificate~~ of ~~incorporation to effect~~ a ~~1-for-10~~signed ~~reverse~~contract ~~split~~between of99 ~~our~~Management ~~common stock, or the Reverse Split. All share~~ and ~~per~~Blue ~~share~~Cross/Blue ~~numbers~~Shield ~~included~~of inTexas ~~this~~for ~~annual~~a ~~report~~narrow ~~give~~network ~~effect~~program tocovering the ~~Reverse~~Houston, ~~Split.~~Texas market

~~Changes~~On December 31, 2015, we purchased substantially all of the hospital assets and hospital operating entity of University General Health Systems, Inc., consisting primarily of a sixty-nine bed acute care hospital located in ~~Equity~~the ~~Owned~~Medical ~~Hospitals~~City area of Houston, Texas (“UGH”). The purchase price of the UGH was $25.1 million, net of liabilities assumed. The UGH hospital is now operated as Foundation Surgical Hospital of Houston and referred to as “FSH Houston.”

On June 12, 2015, we sold a portion of our 20% equity investment in Grayson County Physician Property, LLC (“GCPP”), our Equity Owned hospital in Sherman, Texas, through a series of transactions. In conjunction with the sale, the management agreement under which we provided certain services including billing and collections, general management services, legal support, and accounting services was terminated. Our decision to sell the assets of GCPP was part of our overall strategic plan to focus on the growth of our majority owned surgical hospital businesses and divest any minority interest holdings. We received $7.8 million in proceeds as a result of the sale and $0.5 million in additional proceeds for the termination our management agreement. We used $7.0 million of these proceeds to reduce our principal balance of the note held by Bank SNB (our senior lender).

On March 31, 2015, Houston Orthopedic Surgical Hospital, L.L.C. (“HOSH”), our Equity Owned hospital in Houston, Texas, sold substantially all of its assets under an asset purchase agreement. Given that we do not exhibit control with our 20% investment in HOSH, we account for our investment on a cost or cash basis. As a result of the HOSH sale, ~~our~~we ~~equity~~received ~~ownership~~a ~~was~~distribution ~~redeemed~~ on May 12, 2015 for $1.28 million, of which $0.6 million is being held in escrow until October 2016.

On January 1, 2015, Foundation Surgery Affiliates of Northwest Oklahoma City, LLC, or FSA OKC, our Equity Owned ASC located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma was sold to Summit Medical Center LLC, or Summit Hospital, in exchange for unit ownership in Summit Hospital. As part of the transaction, the units of Summit Hospital were distributed to the individual FSA OKC investors including us. As a result of the transaction, we now hold an 8% ownership interest in Summit Hospital. In addition, the ASC facility in Oklahoma City is now operated as an HOPD for Summit Hospital.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth selected results of our operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. The following information was derived and taken from our unaudited financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report.

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Net Revenues:
Patient services	$	31,765,408		$	26,183,803		$	89,855,903		$	65,607,006
Provision for doubtful accounts		(1,402,684	)		(1,562,147	)		(4,001,230	)		(2,799,237	)
Net patient services revenue		30,362,724			24,621,656			85,854,673			62,807,769
Management fee from affiliates		1,217,108			1,352,909			4,440,184			4,056,981
Other revenue		1,017,134			1,450,021			3,707,213			4,271,194
Revenue		32,596,966			27,424,586			94,002,070			71,135,944
Equity in earnings from affiliates		247,223			581,171			978,295			1,752,284
Operating Expenses:
Salaries and benefits		8,698,484			7,339,528			24,354,308			22,317,768
Supplies		7,115,559			6,748,785			20,575,610			17,383,162
Other operating expenses		12,445,063			10,655,907			39,927,517			28,810,032
Depreciation and amortization		1,345,340			1,320,527			4,072,795			4,204,828
Net other expense		141,838			294,700			762,043			1,299,092
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before taxes		3,097,905			1,646,310			5,288,092			(1,126,654	)
(Provision) Benefit for income taxes		—			—			114,038			852,005
Loss from continuing operations, net of taxes		3,097,905			1,646,310			5,402,130			(274,649	)
Discontinued operations, net of tax		34,744			(83,997	)		3,805,801			(333,296	)
Net income (loss)		3,132,649			1,562,313			9,207,931			(607,945	)
Less: Noncontrolling interests		2,617,821			1,208,648			5,112,737			2,054,872
Net income (loss) attributable to Foundation Healthcare	$	514,828		$	353,665		$	4,095,194		$	(2,662,817	)

Discussion of Three Month Period Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

Patient services revenue increased $5.6 million, or 21.4%, during the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared with the third quarter of 2014. The increase was primarily due to:

● The addition of a new toxicology laboratory service in July 2014 at our Consolidated Hospital located in El Paso, Texas (East El Paso Physician Medical Center, LLC or EEPPMC), which resulted in an increase of $4.1 million;

● An increase in average reimbursement per surgical case at EEPPMC driven by an increase in inpatient spine and orthopedic cases, which resulted in an increase of $1.0 million; and

● An increase in surgical case volume at our Consolidated Hospital located in San Antonio, Texas (Foundation Surgical Hospital of San Antonio or FSH SA) driven primarily by an increase in bariatric, spine, and orthopedic procedures, which resulted in an increase of $0.5 million.

Provision for doubtful accounts decreased $0.2 million, or 12.5%, during the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared with the third quarter of 2014. Provision for doubtful accounts as a percent of patient services revenue was 4.4% and 6.0% for the third quarter of 2015 and 2014, respectively. Based on our monthly analysis of historic bad debt trends at EEPMC and the toxicology business, we reduced our allowance rates based on the actual historical trends, which resulted in the $0.2 million decrease compared to the third quarter of 2014.

Management fees from affiliates decreased $0.2 million, or 14.3%, during the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared with the third quarter of 2014. The decrease is due to the termination of the management contract with Grayson County Physician Property, LLC (“GCPP”) in the second quarter 2015. The GCPP management contract was terminated when we sold a portion of our equity investment in GCPP.

~~Other~~Results ~~revenue decreased $0.5 million, or 33.3%, during the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared with the third quarter~~ of ~~2014.~~Operations In October 2014, we sold our equity investment in an ASC located in Chevy Chase, Maryland (referred to as “Chevy Chase”). During the third quarter of 2014, we received $0.7 million in distributions from Chevy Chase. The decrease resulting from Chevy Chase was offset by the $0.2 million in meaningful use funds we received during the third quarter of 2015 at FSH SA.

~~Income~~The ~~from~~following ~~equity~~table ~~investments~~sets inforth ~~affiliates~~selected ~~decreased~~results ~~$0.4~~of ~~million,~~our oroperations ~~66.7%,~~for ~~during~~ the three months ended ~~September 30~~March 31, ~~2015~~2016 ~~compared~~and ~~with~~2015. ~~the~~The ~~third~~following ~~quarter~~information ofwas ~~2014.~~derived ~~The~~and ~~decrease~~taken ~~was~~from ~~primarily~~our ~~due~~unaudited tofinancial ~~lower~~statements ~~volumes~~appearing atelsewhere ~~our~~in ~~non-majority~~this ~~owned ASC’s~~report.

Salaries and benefits increased $1.4 million, or 19.2%, to $8.7 million from $7.3 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared with the third quarter of 2014. The increase in salaries and benefits was primarily due to accrued corporate incentives of $0.5 million related to 2015 performance targets and increased corporate staffing of $0.7 million. In addition, the increased case volumes and more complex procedures at EEPPMC resulted in additional staffing of $0.2 million.

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015
Net Revenues:
Patient services	$	38,436,243		$	27,937,898
Provision for doubtful accounts		(1,921,985	)		(421,024	)
Net patient services revenue		36,514,258			27,516,874
Management fee from affiliates		913,033			1,249,322
Other revenue		1,209,787			775,954
Revenue		38,637,078			29,542,150
Equity in earnings from affiliates		389,370			438,909
Operating Expenses:
Salaries and benefits		13,742,548			7,739,863
Supplies		7,622,763			6,069,661
Other operating expenses		16,792,797			14,083,477
Depreciation and amortization		2,748,862			1,381,507
Net other expense		962,381			308,717
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before taxes		(2,842,903	)		397,834
(Provision) Benefit for income taxes		1,200,000			—
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of taxes		(1,642,903	)		397,834
Discontinued operations, net of tax		(11,761	)		(113,588	)
Net income (loss)		(1,654,664	)		284,246
Less: Noncontrolling interests		728,095			1,420,894
Net loss attributable to Foundation Healthcare	$	(2,382,759	)	$	(1,136,648	)

~~Supplies~~Discussion ~~expense~~of ~~increased~~Three ~~$0.4~~Month ~~million,~~Period orEnded ~~6.0%,~~March ~~to $7.1 million from $6.7 million during the three months ended September 30~~31, ~~2015,~~2016 ~~compared with the third quarter of 2014. Increased volumes~~ and ~~more complex procedures resulted in more supplies expense at EEPPMC of $0.6 million which was offset by a decrease in supply cost at FSH SA of $0.2 million.~~2015

~~Other~~Patient ~~operating~~services ~~expenses~~revenue increased $110.75 million, or 1537.96%, ~~to $12.4 million from $10.7 million~~ during the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015,~~2016 compared with the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2014~~2015. The increase ~~in other operating expenses~~ was primarily due to: $2.4 million in outsource fees related to the tests processed at the new toxicology laboratory services at EEPPMC which was offset by a reduction of $0.2, $0.2, and $0.3 million in facilities and other operating expenses at EEPPMC, FSH SA, and corporate, respectively.

~~Depreciation~~● ~~and~~The ~~amortization~~addition ~~represents~~of the ~~depreciation~~FSH ~~expense~~Houston, ~~associated~~which ~~with~~resulted ~~our fixed assets and the amortization attributable to our intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization~~ in ~~the~~an ~~third~~increase ~~quarter~~ of ~~2015 approximated the third quarter of 2014~~$12. ~~Incremental~~0 ~~depreciation~~million; ~~from new assets was offset by existing assets becoming fully depreciated in the quarter.~~ and

~~Net~~● ~~other~~An ~~expense~~increase ~~represents~~of ~~primarily~~drug ~~interest~~testing ~~expense~~laboratory onservice ~~borrowings~~volume, ~~reduced~~at byEast ~~interest~~El ~~income~~Paso ~~earned~~Physician onMedical ~~cash~~Center, ~~and~~LLC ~~cash~~(“FSH ~~equivalents~~El ~~and~~Paso”) ~~the~~resulting ~~gain or loss on the sale of equity investments~~ in ~~affiliates. Net other expense decreased~~ $01.23 million ~~in the third quarter of 2015 compared to the third quarter of 2014~~. The decrease is related to the impact of the Bank SNB refinancing that occurred on June 30, 2014 and the rate reductions that have taken place in 2015 related to the decreasing senior debt ratio as well as principal paydowns.

~~Discontinued~~The ~~operations~~offsetting ~~represent~~decrease ~~the equity~~ in ~~earnings~~patient ofservices ~~GCPP~~revenue ~~and~~is ~~the~~due operations of our independent diagnostic testing facilities (“IDTF”) which were classified as held for sale in 2013. Our equity investment in GCPP and the related earnings were classified as discontinued in 2015 as the sale of our GCPP interest was part of our strategic shift to ~~focus on majority owned investments. The results from our discontinued operations for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 are summarized below~~:

	2015		2014
Revenues:
Equity in earnings of GCCP	$	—	$	35,788
Sleep operations		—		—
Total revenues	$	—	$	35,788
Net income (loss) before taxes:
GCCP	$	—	$	35,788
Sleep operations		34,744		(119,785	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	34,744	$	(83,997	)

●

A decrease in average reimbursement per surgical case at FSH El Paso driven by a reduced case mix of lower revenue surgical cases, primarily spine procedures, which resulted in a decrease of $2.7 million; and

~~Noncontrolling~~● ~~interests~~A ~~were~~decrease ~~allocated~~in ~~$2.6~~surgical ~~million~~case ~~and~~volume ~~$1.2~~at ~~million~~Foundation ofBariatric ~~net~~Hospital ~~income~~of ~~during~~San ~~the three months ended September 30~~Antonio, ~~2015~~LLC ~~and~~(“FSH ~~2014,~~San ~~respectively.~~Antonio”) ~~Noncontrolling~~resulting ~~interests are the equity ownership interests, held by outside investors,~~ in ~~our~~a ~~majority~~decrease ~~owned~~of ~~hospital subsidiaries, EEPPMC and FSH SA~~$0.1 million.

~~Net~~Provision ~~income~~for ~~(loss)~~doubtful ~~attributable~~accounts toincreased ~~Foundation~~$1.5 ~~Healthcare~~million, or 375.0%, ~~Our~~during ~~operations~~the ~~resulted~~three inmonths aended ~~net~~March ~~income~~31, 2016 compared with the first quarter of $02015. Provision for doubtful accounts as a percent of patient services revenue was 5.0% ~~million~~and ~~during~~1.5% for the ~~third~~first quarter of 2016 and 2015, ~~compared~~respectively. The increase is related to the drug testing laboratory service at FSH El Paso, which has a ~~net~~patient ~~income~~self-pay bad debt experience that is higher than the historical losses on our traditional surgical services, resulting in an increase of $0.6 million. The addition of the FSH Houston also resulted in an increase of $0.4 million. FSH San Antonio and FSH El Paso also experienced higher allowance rates during the ~~third~~three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with the first quarter of ~~2014~~2015 due to decreases in our overall collections resulting in an increase of $0.5 million.

Management fees from affiliates decreased $0.3 million, or 25.0%, during the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with the first quarter of 2015. The decrease is due to lower collections at FSH San Antonio and FSH El Paso resulting in $0.3 million.

~~Discussion~~Other ofrevenue ~~Nine~~increased ~~Month~~$0.4 ~~Period~~million, ~~Ended~~or ~~September~~50.0%, 30during the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared with the first quarter of 2015. The increase is due to the attestation and ~~2014~~qualification of meaningful use payments under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) at FSH El Paso of $0.4 million.

~~Patient~~Income ~~services~~from ~~revenue~~equity ~~increased~~investments ~~$24.3~~in ~~million,~~affiliates orin ~~37.0%, during~~ the ~~nine~~first ~~months~~quarter ~~ended~~of ~~September~~2016 ~~30,~~approximated ~~2015, compared with~~ the first ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ of ~~2014~~2015. ~~The increase was primarily due to:~~

●Salaries ~~The~~and ~~addition~~benefits ofincreased a$6.0 ~~new~~million, ~~toxicology~~or ~~laboratory~~77.9%, ~~service~~to at$13.7 ~~EEPPMC~~million infrom ~~July~~$7.7 ~~2014~~million during the three months ended March 31, ~~which~~2016, ~~resulted~~compared inwith anthe first quarter of 2015. The increase is due to the addition of the FSH Houston resulting in $195.39 million; and increased corporate staffing of $0.1 million.

●Supplies Anexpense ~~increase~~increased in$1.5 ~~average~~million, ~~reimbursement~~or ~~per~~24.6%, ~~surgical~~to ~~case~~$7.6 atmillion ~~EEPPMC~~from ~~driven~~$6.1 bymillion anduring ~~increase~~the inthree ~~inpatient~~months ~~spine~~ended ~~and~~March ~~orthopedic~~31, ~~cases~~2016, ~~which~~compared ~~resulted~~with inthe anfirst quarter of 2015. The increase is due to the addition of the FSH Houston resulting in $31.26 million; ~~and~~which was offset by a decrease in volumes at FSH San Antonio of $0.1 million.

●Other Anoperating ~~increase~~expenses inincreased ~~surgical~~$2.7 ~~case~~million, ~~volume~~or at19.1%, ~~FSH~~to SA$16.8 ~~driven~~million ~~primarily~~from by$14.1 anmillion ~~increase~~during inthe ~~bariatric~~three months ended March 31, ~~spine~~2016, ~~and~~compared ~~orthopedic~~with ~~procedures,~~the ~~which~~first ~~resulted~~quarter inof an2015. The increase is due to the addition of the FSH Houston resulting in $13.5 million which was offset by a $0.8 million decrease in outsource fees related to the drug testing laboratory services at FSH El Paso.

~~Provision~~Depreciation ~~for~~and ~~doubtful~~amortization ~~accounts~~represents ~~increased $1.2 million, or 42.9%, during~~ the ~~nine~~depreciation ~~months~~expense ~~ended~~associated ~~September~~with ~~30,~~our ~~2015,~~fixed ~~compared~~assets ~~with~~and the ~~first~~amortization ~~nine~~attributable ~~months~~to ofour ~~2014~~intangible assets. ~~Provision~~Depreciation ~~for~~and ~~doubtful~~amortization ~~accounts~~increased as$1.3 amillion, ~~percent~~or of92.9%, ~~patient~~to ~~services~~$2.7 ~~revenue~~million ~~was~~from 4$1.4% ~~and~~million ~~4.3%~~during ~~for~~ the ~~first~~three ~~nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015 and 2014~~2016, ~~respectively. The increase of the provision for doubtful accounts~~ compared with the first ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ of ~~2014~~2015. The ~~was~~increase ~~primarily~~is ~~related~~due to the addition of the ~~toxicology~~FSH ~~laboratory~~Houston ~~service~~resulting atin ~~EEPPMC. The patient self-pay bad debt experience for the toxicology services at EEPPMC has been higher than the historical losses on our traditional surgical services. We have recognized~~ $1.73 million ~~of bad debt expense, related to the toxicology services, in the first nine months of 2015~~.

~~Management~~Net ~~fees~~other ~~from~~expense ~~affiliates~~represents ~~increased~~primarily ~~$0.3~~interest ~~million,~~expense oron ~~7.3%,~~borrowings ~~during~~reduced ~~the~~by ~~nine~~interest ~~months~~income ~~ended~~earned ~~September~~on ~~30,~~cash ~~2015,~~and ~~compared with~~ the ~~first~~gain ~~nine~~or ~~months~~loss ofon ~~2014. We received $0.5 million related to~~ the ~~early~~sale ~~termination~~ of ~~the~~equity ~~management~~investments ~~contract~~in ~~with~~affiliates. ~~Grayson~~Net ~~County~~other ~~Physician~~expense ~~Property,~~increased ~~LLC~~$0.7 ~~(“GCPP”)~~million in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2015~~2016 ~~offset~~compared ~~by the reduction in the management fees related~~ to the ~~termination~~first ~~in the third~~ quarter of 2015. The ~~GCPP~~increase ~~management~~is ~~contract~~due ~~was~~to ~~terminated~~the ~~when~~addition ~~we sold a portion~~ of ~~our~~the ~~equity~~FSH ~~investment~~Houston resulting in ~~GCPP~~$0.7 million.

~~Other~~Discontinued ~~revenue~~operations ~~decreased~~represent ~~$0.6~~the ~~million,~~equity orin ~~14.0%,~~earnings ~~during~~of ~~the~~GCPP ~~nine~~and ~~months~~the ~~ended~~operations ~~September~~of ~~30,~~our ~~2015,~~independent ~~compared~~diagnostic ~~with~~testing ~~the~~facilities ~~first~~(“IDTF”) ~~nine~~which ~~months~~were ofclassified ~~2014. In~~as ~~October~~held ~~2014,~~for wesale ~~sold~~in ~~our~~2013. Our equity investment in anGCPP ~~ASC~~and ~~located~~the inrelated ~~Chevy~~earnings ~~Chase,~~were ~~Maryland~~classified ~~(referred to~~ as ~~“Chevy~~discontinued ~~Chase”).~~in ~~During~~2015 as the ~~first~~sale ~~nine months~~ of ~~2014,~~our weGCPP ~~received~~interest ~~$1.9~~was ~~million~~part inof ~~distributions~~our ~~from~~strategic ~~Chevy~~shift ~~Chase.~~to ~~The~~focus ~~decrease~~on ~~resulting~~majority ~~from~~owned ~~Chevy Chase was offset by the $1~~investments.1 ~~million~~The inresults ~~proceeds we received~~ from ~~the redemption of~~ our ~~HOSH~~discontinued ~~equity~~operations ~~investment~~for inthe ~~May~~three ~~2015~~months ~~and~~ended ~~meaningful~~March ~~use~~31, ~~funds~~2016 ~~received~~and by2015 ~~FSH~~are SAsummarized ~~of $0.2 million.~~below:

Income from equity investments in affiliates decreased $0.8 million, or 44.4%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared with the first nine months of 2014. The decrease was primarily due to lower volumes at our non-majority owned ASC’s.

	2016			2015
Revenues:
Equity in earnings of GCCP	$	—		$	(27,510	)
Sleep operations		—			—
Total revenues	$	—		$	(27,510	)
Net income (loss) before taxes:
GCCP	$	—		$	(27,510	)
Sleep operations		(11,761	)		(86,078	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	(11,761	)	$	(113,588	)

~~Salaries~~Noncontrolling ~~and~~interests ~~benefits~~were ~~increased~~allocated $20.17 million, orand ~~9.4%, to~~ $241.4 million ~~from~~of ~~$22.3~~net ~~million~~income during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015,~~2016 ~~compared with the first nine months of 2014. The increase in salaries~~ and ~~benefits was primarily due to accrued corporate incentives of $0.5 million related to~~ 2015, ~~performance targets and increased corporate staffing of $0~~respectively.5 ~~million.~~Noncontrolling Ininterests ~~addition,~~are the ~~increased~~equity ~~volumes~~ownership ~~and~~interests, ~~more~~held ~~complex~~by ~~procedures~~outside ~~resulted~~investors, in ~~additional~~our ~~staffing~~majority atowned ~~FSH~~hospital SAsubsidiaries, ofFSH ~~$0.5~~El ~~million~~Paso and ~~$0.6~~FSH ~~million~~San ~~at EEPPMC~~Antonio.

~~Supplies~~Net ~~expense~~income ~~increased~~(loss) ~~$3.2~~attributable ~~million,~~to orFoundation 18Healthcare.~~4%,~~ toOur ~~$20.6~~operations ~~million~~resulted ~~from~~in a net loss of $172.4 million during the ~~nine~~first ~~months~~quarter ~~ended~~of ~~September 30~~2016, ~~2015,~~ compared ~~with~~to ~~the~~a ~~first~~net ~~nine~~loss ~~months~~ of ~~2014. Increased volumes and more complex procedures resulted in more supplies expense at FSH SA of~~ $1.01 million ~~and~~during ~~$2.2~~the ~~million~~first atquarter ~~EEPPMC~~of 2015.

Other operating expenses increased $11.1 million, or 38.5%, to $39.9 million from $28.8 during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared with the first nine months of 2014. The increase in other operating expenses was primarily due to $12.6 million in outsource fees related to the tests processed at the new toxicology laboratory services at EEPPMC which was offset by a reduction of $1.0 million in facilities and other operating expenses at EEPPMC and $0.5 million at corporate.

Depreciation and amortization represents the depreciation expense associated with our fixed assets and the amortization attributable to our intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization decreased $0.1 million in the first nine months of 2015 compared to the first nine months of 2014. Incremental depreciation from new assets was offset by existing assets becoming fully depreciated in the first nine months of 2015.

Net other expense represents primarily interest expense on borrowings reduced by interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents and the gain or loss on the sale of equity investments in affiliates. Net other expense decreased $0.5 million during the

nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared with the first nine months of 2014. The decrease is related to the impact of the Bank SNB refinancing that occurred on June 30, 2014 and the rate reductions that have taken place in 2015 related to the decreasing senior debt ratio and principal paydowns.

Discontinued operations represent the net income from the sale of GCPP and the operations of our independent diagnostic testing facilities (“IDTF”) which were classified as held for sale in 2013. Our equity investment in GCPP and the related earnings were classified as discontinued in 2015 as the sale of our GCPP interest was part of our strategic shift to focus on majority owned investments. The results from our discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 are summarized below:

	2015			2014
Revenues:
Equity in earnings of GCCP	$	25,033		$	287,527
Sleep operations		—			123,729
Total revenues	$	25,033		$	411,256
Net income (loss) before taxes:
GCCP	$	25,033		$	287,527
Sleep operations		(36,242	)		(812,247	)
Gain on sale of equity investment in GCCP		6,331,048			—
Income tax (provision) benefit		(2,514,038	)		191,424
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	3,805,801		$	(333,296	)

Noncontrolling interests were allocated $5.1 million and $2.1 million of net income during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Noncontrolling interests are the equity ownership interests, held by outside investors, in our majority owned hospital subsidiaries, EEPPMC and FSH SA.

Net income (loss) attributable to Foundation Healthcare. Our operations resulted in a net income of $4.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared to a net loss of $2.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Generally our liquidity and capital resource needs are funded from operations, loan proceeds, equity offerings and more recently, lease and other real estate financing transactions. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, our liquidity and capital resources included cash ~~and cash equivalents~~ of 4$2.89 million and working capital of $57.80 million. We have working capital of $56.01 million after adjusting for $0.9 million of redemption payments due to preferred noncontrolling interest holders in ~~October~~August ~~2015~~2016. As of December 31, ~~2014~~2015, our liquidity and capital resources included cash ~~and cash equivalents~~ of $25.91 million and a working capital ~~deficit~~ of $08.21 million (adjusted for $10.79 million of redemption payments due to preferred interest holders during ~~2015~~2016).

Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was $6.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the first nine months of 2014 when cash used in operating activities from continuing operations was $2.4 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the primary sources of cash from operating activities from continuing operations were cash generated by income from continuing operations (net income increased by non-cash items) of $13.1 million, a decrease in prepaid and other current assets and receivables from affiliates of $1.9 million and increases in accrued liabilities and other current and noncurrent liabilities of $1.8 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the primary uses of cash from continuing operations, were increases in accounts receivable and other noncurrent assets of $6.5 million and a decrease in accounts payable of $3.9 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the primary sources of cash from operating activities from continuing operations were cash generated by income from continuing operations (net loss decreased by non-cash items) of $5.9 million and increase in accrued liabilities and other liabilities of $6.9 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the primary uses of cash from continuing operations were increases in accounts receivables and other current and noncurrent assets of $6.2 million and a decrease in accounts payable and other current liabilities of $4.1 million.24

Cash used byin operating activities from ~~discontinued~~continuing operations ~~for~~was ~~each~~$1.3 ofmillion during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2016 compared to the first three months of 2015 ~~and~~when ~~2014~~cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was $20.49 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the primary sources of cash from operating activities from continuing operations were cash generated by income from continuing operations (net income increased by non-cash items) of $1.2 million and other assets of $0.51 million, ~~respectively~~and increases in accrued liabilities and other current and noncurrent liabilities of $6. 7 million. During the ~~third~~three ~~quarter~~months ended March 31, 2016, the primary uses of cash from continuing operations, were increases in accounts receivable, receivables from affiliates, prepaids and other current assets of $9.1 million and a decrease in other current liabilities of $0.1 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, ~~there~~the ~~was~~primary ansources ~~estimated~~of ~~tax~~cash ~~payment~~from ~~resulting~~continuing operations were cash generated by income from ~~the~~continuing ~~sale~~operation (net income increased by non-cash items) of $1.9 million, a ~~portion~~decrease in prepaid and other current assets of ~~our~~$0.4 ~~equity~~million ~~investment~~and increases in ~~GCPP~~accounts payable and other liabilities of $10.62 million. The primary uses of cash from continuing operations, were increases in accounts receivables, supplies inventories and other current and noncurrent assets totaling $0.4 million and a decrease in accrued liabilities and other current liabilities totaling $1.2 million.

Cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations was $0.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to the first three months of 2015 when cash used in operating activities from discontinued operations was $0.1 million.

Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations during the three months ended March 31, 2016 was $1.0 million compared to the first three months of 2015 when net cash provided by investing activities from continuing operations was $0.6 million. Investing activities during the first three months of 2016 were primarily related to distributions received from equity investments of $0.3 million which were offset by purchases of property and equipment, net of disposals, of $1.3 million. Investing activities during the first three months of 2015 were primarily related to distributions received from equity investments of $0.7 million which were offset by purchases of property and equipment, net of disposals, of $0.2 million.

There was no investing activities from discontinued operations during the first three months of 2016 or 2015.

Net cash provided by financing activities from continuing operations during the three months ended March 31, 2016 was $0.1 million compared to the first three months of 2015 when net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations was $0.8 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, we received debt proceeds of $2.2 million and $1.8 million, respectively, and we made debt payments of $1.4 million, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, we made distributions to noncontrolling interests of $0.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, we paid preferred noncontrolling dividends of $0.2 million, respectively.

There was no financing activities from discontinued operations during the first three months of 2016 or 2015.

We expect the total level of spending for capital expenditures to be greater in 2016 as compared to 2015 as a result of our various capital commitments in connection with the acquisition of UGH and our other Consolidated Hospitals.

Our business strategy contemplates the selective acquisition of additional hospitals, and we regularly review potential acquisitions. It could be necessary for us to seek additional financing to fund larger hospital acquisitions. We regularly evaluate opportunities to sell additional equity, obtain credit agreements from lenders or restructure our long-term debt or equity for strategic reasons or to further strengthen our financial position. The sale of additional equity could result in additional dilution to our stockholders.

We believe that cash generated from our operations and borrowings available under the TCB Credit Facility will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs and planned capital expenditures and other expected operating needs over the next twelve months and into the foreseeable future prior to the maturity dates of our outstanding debt. We also have planned additional sales of non-strategic assets to generate additional cash.

Texas Capital Bank Credit Facility

Effective December 31, 2015, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the “TCB Credit Facility”) with Texas Capital Bank, National Association (“TCB”). The TCB Credit Facility replaced and consolidates all of the Company’s and the Company’s subsidiaries’ debt in the principal amount of $28.4 million, which is referred to as the Term Loan, and provides for an additional revolving loan in the amount of $12.5 million, which is referred to as the Revolving Loan. The Company has also entered into a number of ancillary agreements in connection with the TCB Credit Facility, including deposit account control agreements, subsidiary guarantees, security agreements and promissory notes.

Maturity Dates. The Term Loan matures on December 30, 2020 and the Revolving Loan matures on December 30, 2018.

~~Net~~Interest ~~cash~~Rates. Borrowings ~~provided~~under bythe ~~investing~~TCB ~~activities~~Credit ~~from~~Facility ~~continuing~~are ~~operations~~made, ~~during~~at the ~~nine~~Company’s ~~months ended September 30~~option, ~~2015~~as ~~was~~either ~~$0.6~~Base ~~million~~Rate ~~compared~~loans toor ~~the~~LIBOR ~~first~~loans. “Base ~~nine~~Rate” ~~months~~for ofany ~~2014~~day ~~when~~is ~~net~~the ~~cash~~highest ~~provided~~of by(i) ~~investing~~the ~~activities~~Prime ~~from~~Rate, ~~continuing~~(ii) ~~operations~~the ~~was~~Federal ~~$0.4~~Funds ~~million.~~Rate ~~Investing~~plus ~~activities~~one ~~during~~half ~~the first nine months~~ of ~~2015~~one ~~were~~percent ~~primarily~~(0.5%), ~~related~~and to(iii) ~~distributions~~Adjusted ~~received~~LIBOR ~~from~~plus ~~equity~~one ~~investments~~percent ~~of $~~(1.600%). LIBOR ~~million~~loans ~~which~~are ~~were~~based ~~offset~~on byeither ~~purchases~~the ofone ~~property and equipment~~month, ~~net~~two ofmonth ~~disposals,~~or ofthree ~~$1.0~~month ~~million.~~LIBOR ~~Investing~~rate ~~activities~~at ~~during~~ the ~~first~~Company’s ~~nine~~option. The ~~months~~interest ofrate ~~2014~~is ~~were~~either ~~primarily~~a ~~related~~Base toRate ~~distributions~~or ~~received~~LIBOR ~~from~~plus ~~equity~~the ~~investments~~Applicable ofMargins ~~$2.0~~based ~~million~~on ~~which~~our ~~were~~Senior ~~offset~~Debt byto ~~purchases~~EBITDA ofRatio, ~~property~~as ~~and equipment of $1~~defined.~~6 million.~~

~~Cash~~ ~~provided~~The byApplicable ~~investing~~Margins ~~activities~~are ~~from~~as discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $8.4 million and was comprised of the proceeds we received from the sale of our equity investment in GCPP. We used $7.0 million of the proceeds to pay down our senior debt. During the first nine months of 2014, there was no cash used in or provided by investing activities from discontinued operations.follows:

Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $11.2 million compared to the first nine months of 2014 when net cash provided by financing activities from continuing operations was $1.1 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, we received debt proceeds of $5.0 million and $29.1 million, respectively, and we made debt payments of $11.7 million and $24.6 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, we made distributions to noncontrolling interests of $3.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, we paid preferred noncontrolling dividends of $0.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively, along with noncontrolling interest redemptions of $0.9 million in 2015.

Pricing Level	Senior Debt to EBITDA Ratio	Base Rate Portion		LIBOR Portion and Letter of Credit Fee		Commitment Fee
1	< 2.0 : 1.0		2.75%		3.75%		0.375%
2	≥ 2.0 : 1.0 but < 2.5 : 1.0		3.00%		4.00%		0.375%
3	≤ 2.5 : 1.0		3.25%		4.25%		0.375%

~~There~~The ~~was~~Applicable noMargin ~~financing~~in ~~activities~~effect ~~from~~will ~~discontinued~~be ~~operations~~adjusted ~~during~~within ~~the~~45 ~~first~~days ~~nine~~following ~~months~~the end of ~~2015~~each quarter based on the Company’s Senior Debt to EBITDA ratio. ~~Cash~~The ~~used~~Senior Debt to EBITDA Ratio is calculated by ~~financing~~dividing ~~activities~~all ~~from~~of ~~discontinued~~our ~~operations~~senior indebtedness (excluding capital lease obligations for Foundation Surgical Hospital of Houston), that is by the ~~nine~~Company’s ~~months~~EBITDA ~~ended~~for ~~September~~the ~~30,~~preceding ~~2014~~four ~~consisted~~fiscal quarters. EBITDA is defined in the TCB Credit Facility as the Company’s net income plus (b) the sum of ~~debt~~the ~~payments~~following: interest expense; income taxes; depreciation; amortization; extraordinary losses determined in accordance with GAAP; cash and noncash stock compensation expense; and other non‑recurring expenses reducing such net income which do not represent a cash item in such period or any future period, minus (c) the sum of ~~$4.1~~the ~~million~~following: income tax credits; extraordinary gains determined in accordance with GAAP; and all non‑recurring, non‑cash items increasing net income.

~~SNB~~Interest ~~Credit~~and ~~Facility~~Principal Payments. The Company is required to make quarterly payments of principal and interest on the Term Loan. The first four quarterly payments on the Term Loan will be $1,013,393, on the first day of each April, July, October, and January during the term hereof, commencing April 1, 2016. The Company is required to make quarterly payments on the Revolving Loan equal to the accrued and unpaid interest. All unpaid principal and interest on the Term Loan and Revolving Loan must be paid on the respective maturity dates of each Loan.

~~Effective~~Borrowing ~~June~~Base. The ~~30,~~Company’s ~~2014,~~ability weto ~~entered~~borrow ~~into~~money aunder the Revolving Loan ~~Agreement~~is ~~with~~limited ~~Bank~~to ~~SNB,~~the ~~National~~Company’s ~~Association,~~Borrowing ~~and~~Base. The ~~Texas~~Company’s ~~Capital~~Borrowing ~~Bank,~~Base ~~together~~is ~~referred~~equal to asthe ~~Lenders~~sum ~~and~~of ~~collectively~~(i) ~~the~~80% ~~agreement~~of isthe ~~referred~~eligible toaccount asof ~~the~~Foundation ~~SNB~~Surgical ~~Credit~~Hospital ~~Facility. The~~of ~~SNB~~San ~~Credit~~Antonio, ~~Facility~~not ~~was~~to ~~used~~exceed tothe ~~consolidate~~outstanding ~~all~~principal balance of ~~our~~the ~~and~~intercompany ~~our~~note ~~subsidiaries’~~payable ~~debt~~by inthe San Antonio Hospital to the ~~principal~~Company, ~~amount~~(ii) 80% of ~~$27.5~~the ~~million,~~eligible ~~which~~account weof ~~refer~~Foundation toSurgical asHospital ~~the~~of ~~Term~~El ~~Loan~~Paso, ~~and~~not ~~provides~~to ~~for~~exceed anthe ~~additional~~outstanding ~~revolving~~principal ~~loan~~balance inof the ~~amount~~intercompany ofnote ~~$2.5~~payable ~~million,~~by ~~which~~the weEl ~~refer~~Paso Hospital to as the ~~Revolving~~Company, ~~Loan. We~~and ~~have~~(iii) ~~also~~80% ~~entered~~of ~~into~~the aeligible ~~number~~account of ~~ancillary~~Foundation ~~agreements~~Surgical inHospital ~~connection~~of ~~with~~Houston, not to exceed the ~~SNB~~outstanding ~~Credit~~principal ~~Facility,~~balance ~~including~~of ~~deposit~~the ~~account~~intercompany ~~control~~note ~~agreements,~~payable ~~subsidiary~~by ~~guarantees,~~the ~~security~~FSH ~~agreements~~Houston ~~and~~to ~~promissory~~the ~~notes~~Company.

~~Maturity~~Mandatory ~~Dates~~Prepayments. The ~~Term~~Company ~~Loan~~must ~~matures~~make onmandatory ~~June~~prepayments ~~30,~~of ~~2021 and~~ the ~~Revolving~~Term ~~Loan~~Loans ~~matures~~in onthe ~~June~~following 30situations, ~~2016.~~among others:

~~Interest~~· ~~Rates.~~ The ~~interest~~Company ~~rate~~must ~~for~~apply ~~the~~100% ~~Term~~of ~~Loan~~the ~~and~~net ~~Revolving~~proceeds ~~Loan~~from isthe ~~30-day~~sale ~~LIBOR~~of ~~plus~~worn ~~the~~out ~~Applicable~~and ~~Margins~~obsolete ~~based~~equipment onnot ~~our~~necessary ~~Senior~~or ~~Debt~~useful ~~Ratio,~~for asthe ~~defined. The~~conduct ~~Applicable~~of ~~Margins~~the ~~are~~Company’s ~~as follows:~~business;

	Applicable Margin
Senior Debt Ratio	Revolving Loan	Term Loan
≥ 2.5x	3.75%	4.25%
< 2.5x, but ≥ 2.0x	3.25%	3.75%
< 2.0 x	2.75%	3.25%

Commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016, the Company must apply 50% of our Excess Cash Flow for such fiscal year to the installment payments due on the Company’s Term Loan;

· The ~~Applicable~~Company ~~Margins~~must ~~are~~apply ~~adjusted~~50% onof athe ~~quarterly~~net ~~basis~~cash ~~based~~proceeds onfrom ~~our~~the ~~senior~~issuance ~~debt~~of ~~ratio. As~~equity ofinterests ~~September~~to ~~30,~~the ~~2015,~~installment payments due on the ~~Applicable~~Company’s ~~Margins~~Term ~~are~~Loan; ~~3.25%~~provided that no prepayment need to be made for the ~~Revolving~~year ~~Loan~~ended ~~and~~December ~~3.75%~~31, ~~for~~2016 once the ~~Term~~Company ~~Loan.~~has made mandatory prepayments in excess of $10,000,000;

· The ~~Senior~~Company ~~Debt~~must ~~Ratio~~apply is100% ~~calculated by dividing all~~ of ~~our indebtedness, including capital leases that is secured by a lien or security interest in any of our assets by our EBITDA for~~ the ~~preceding~~net ~~four~~cash ~~fiscal~~proceeds ~~quarters. EBITDA~~from ~~is defined in~~ the ~~SNB~~issuance ~~Credit~~of ~~Facility~~debt as(other ~~our~~than ~~net~~certain ~~income~~permitted ~~calculated~~debt) ~~before~~to ~~interest expense, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization expenses, stock compensation, gains arising from~~ the ~~write-up~~prepayment of ~~assets,~~the ~~extraordinary~~Term ~~gains and any one-time expenses approved by Bank SNB.~~Loan;

~~Interest~~· ~~and~~The ~~Principal~~Company ~~Payments. We~~must ~~are~~prepay ~~required~~100% ~~to make quarterly payments~~ of ~~principal and interest on~~ the ~~Term~~net ~~Loan. The~~cash ~~first~~proceeds ~~four~~paid ~~quarterly payments on the Term Loan are $875,000 plus all accrued and unpaid interest. Each subsequent quarterly payment will be $1,000,000 plus all accrued and unpaid interest. We are required~~ to ~~make quarterly payments on~~ the ~~Revolving~~Company ~~Loan~~other ~~equal~~than toin the ~~accrued~~ordinary ~~and~~course ~~unpaid interest. All unpaid principal and interest on the Term Loan and Revolving Loan must be paid on the respective maturity dates~~ of ~~June~~business; ~~30, 2021~~ and ~~May 31, 2017.~~

The Company must prepay 100% of the net cash proceeds the Company receives from the prepayment of intercompany notes.

~~Permitted~~if ~~Acquisitions. We must obtain~~ the ~~Lenders~~prepayment ~~approval~~is ~~for~~made ~~any~~after ~~acquisition,~~the ~~merger~~first oranniversary ~~consolidation~~but inprior ~~which~~to the ~~consideration~~second ~~paid~~anniversary ~~for~~and ~~the~~1% ~~acquisition,~~if ~~merger~~the orprepayment ~~consolidation~~ is inmade ~~excess~~after ~~of $1.0 million or for any acquisition, merger or consolidation in which~~ the ~~target~~second ~~entity’s~~anniversary ~~operating~~but ~~income~~prior ~~for~~to the ~~preceding~~third ~~12 month period is less than zero~~anniversary.

~~Mandatory Prepayments~~Guaranties. IfEach ~~we sell any assets in excess~~ of ~~$100,000 or collectively sell any assets in a 12 month period in excess of $100,000, we must make a prepayment equal to~~ the ~~net proceeds of the asset sale(~~Company’s~~). If~~ wedirect ~~receive proceeds from a debt~~ or ~~equity~~indirect ~~offering~~wholly-owned ~~that~~subsidiaries isjointly ~~not~~and ~~used~~severally ~~for~~and aunconditionally ~~Permitted~~guaranty ~~Acquisition~~payment ~~over a 12 month period following the offering or for repayment~~ of ~~our preferred noncontrolling interests, we must make a prepayment equal to~~ the ~~net~~Company’s ~~proceeds~~obligations ofowed ~~the debt or equity offering. Subsequent~~ to the completion of our annual audited financial statements, we must make a prepayment equal to 30% of our Excess Cash Flow which is defined as the amount of EBITDA (as defined in the SNB Credit Facility) for the fiscal year that exceeds the sum of debt service payments plus capital expenditures plus cash payments for federal, state and local income taxes, plus distributions made by our Equity Owned Hospitals to persons other than usLenders.

Waiver of Regular Payment and Mandatory Prepayment. The sale of our equity investment in GCPP in June 2015 triggered a mandatory payment under the Term Loan and we accordingly paid down the Term Loan by $7.0 million. As a result the pay down, Bank SNB agreed to waive our regular quarterly payment due on June 30, 2015 of $1.2 million ($0.9 million principal plus interest of $0.3 million), and the mandatory prepayment due on June 30, 2015 of $0.5 million for the Excess Cash Flow related to the year ended December 31, 2014.

Voluntary Prepayments. We may prepay amounts under the Term Loan at any time provided that we are required to pay a prepayment penalty of 2% of the amount prepaid if payment is made prior to the first anniversary, 1.5% if the prepayment is made after the first anniversary but prior to the second anniversary and 1% if the prepayment is made after the second anniversary but prior to the maturity date. We may prepay amounts under the Revolving Loan at any time without penalty.

Guaranties. Each of our direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries jointly and severally and unconditionally guaranty payment of our obligations owed to Lenders.

Financial Covenants:

~~Senior~~ Debt to EBITDA Ratio. WeAs of December 31, 2015, the Company must maintain a ~~Senior~~ Debt to EBITDA Ratio, not in excess of 3.0050 to 1.00. Thereafter, the Company must maintain a Debt to EBITDA Ratio as of the ~~end~~last day of ~~each~~any fiscal quarter, ~~beginning~~not ~~with~~in excess of (a) 3.25 to 1.00 for the ~~quarter~~fiscal quarters ending December 31, 2015, March 31, 2016, June 30, 2016 and September 30, ~~2014~~2016; (b) 2.75 to 1.00 for the fiscal quarters ending December 31, 2016, March 31, 2017, June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2017; (c) 2.50 to 1.00 for the fiscal quarters ending December 31, 2017, March 31, 2018, June 30, 2018 and September 30, 2018; and (d) 2.25 to 1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2018 and at the end of each fiscal quarter thereafter. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, ~~our~~the ~~Senior~~Company’s Debt to EBITDA Ratio was 13.5112.

Senior Debt ~~Service~~to ~~Coverage~~EBITDA Ratio. WeAs of December 31, 2015, the Company must maintain a Senior Debt ~~Service~~to ~~Coverage~~EBITDA Ratio of not ~~less~~in ~~than~~excess 1of 3.3000 to 1.00. Thereafter, the Company must maintain a Senior Debt to EBITDA Ratio as of the ~~end~~last day of ~~each~~any fiscal quarter, ~~beginning~~not ~~with~~in excess of (a) 3.00 to 1.00 for the ~~quarter~~fiscal quarters ending December 31, 2015, March 31, 2016, June 30, 2016 and September 30, ~~2014~~2016; (b) 2.50 ~~The~~to ~~Senior~~1.00 ~~Debt~~for ~~Service~~the ~~Coverage~~fiscal ~~ratio~~quarters isending ~~the~~December ~~ratio~~31, of2016, ~~EBITDA~~March ~~(as~~31, ~~defined~~2017, inJune ~~the~~30, ~~SNB~~2017 ~~Credit~~and ~~Facility~~September 30, 2017; (c) ~~for~~2.25 ~~the~~to ~~preceding~~1.00 ~~four~~for the fiscal quarters ~~minus~~ending ~~cash~~December ~~payments~~31, ~~for~~2017, ~~federal~~March 31, ~~state~~2018, June 30, 2018 and ~~local~~September ~~taxes~~30, ~~minus~~2018; ~~capital~~and ~~expenditures~~(d) 2.00 to ~~our~~1.00 ~~debt~~for ~~service~~the ~~payments~~fiscal ~~for~~quarter ending December 31, 2018 and at the ~~same~~end ~~period~~of each fiscal quarter thereafter. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, ~~our~~the Company’s Senior Debt ~~Service~~to ~~Coverage~~EBITDA Ratio was 2.0269.

~~Adjusted~~Pre-Distribution ~~Senior~~Fixed ~~Debt~~Charge ~~Service~~ Coverage Ratio. WeThe Company must maintain ~~an Adjusted Senior Debt Service Coverage Ratio of not less than 1.05 to 1.00~~ as of the ~~end~~last day of ~~each~~any fiscal quarter ~~beginning~~a ~~with~~Pre-Distribution ~~the~~Fixed ~~quarter~~Charge ~~ending September 30, 2014. The Adjusted Senior Debt Service~~ Coverage Ratio isin ~~the~~excess ~~ratio~~ of ~~EBITDA~~1.30 ~~(as defined in the SNB Credit Facility) for the preceding four fiscal quarters minus cash payments for federal, state and local taxes, minus capital expenditures, plus distributions made~~ to ~~our preferred noncontrolling interest holders, plus distributions made by our Equity Owned Hospitals to persons other than us to our debt service payments for the same period~~1.00. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, ~~our~~the ~~Adjusted~~Company’s ~~Senior~~Pre-Distribution ~~Debt~~Fixed ~~Service~~Charge Coverage Ratio was 1.1682.

~~Restrictions~~Post-Distribution onFixed ~~Indebtedness~~Charge Coverage Ratio. WeThe ~~and~~Company ~~our~~must ~~Equity~~maintain ~~Owned~~as ~~Hospitals~~of ~~are~~the ~~not~~last ~~allowed~~day toof ~~create~~ any ~~indebtedness~~fiscal ~~other~~quarter, ~~than~~a ~~indebtedness~~Post-Distribution ~~for~~Fixed ~~the~~Charge ~~purchase~~Coverage ofRatio ~~fixed assets not exceeding $500,000~~ in ~~any~~excess ~~fiscal~~of ~~year,~~1.05 ~~trade~~to ~~payables~~1.00. As ~~incurred in the ordinary course~~ of ~~business~~March ~~and~~31, ~~not past due~~2016, ~~contingent~~the ~~obligations~~Company’s ~~and~~Pre-Distribution ~~unsecured~~Fixed ~~indebtedness~~Charge ~~not~~Coverage ~~exceeding~~Ratio ~~$100,000~~was ~~in the aggregate at any time outstanding~~1.30.

~~Use~~Capital ~~of Proceeds~~Expenditures. ~~All~~The ~~proceeds~~Company ofshall ~~the~~not ~~Term~~make ~~Loan~~capital ~~were~~expenditures ~~used~~in ~~solely~~excess ~~for the refinancing~~ of ~~existing~~$5,000,000 ~~indebtedness. The~~during ~~proceeds~~any offiscal ~~the Revolving Loan will be used for working capital~~year.

~~Collateral. Payment~~As ~~and performance~~ of ~~our~~March ~~obligations~~31, ~~under~~2016, the ~~SNB~~Company ~~Credit~~is ~~Facility are secured~~ in ~~general~~compliance bywith all of ~~our~~the ~~assets~~TCB Credit Facility financial covenants.

~~Defaults and Remedies~~Collateral. InPayment ~~addition~~and toperformance ~~the general defaults~~ of ~~failure~~the toCompany’s ~~perform our~~ obligations under the ~~Loan~~TCB ~~Agreement,~~Credit ~~events~~Facility ofare ~~default~~secured ~~also~~in ~~include~~general ~~the~~by ~~occurrence~~all of ~~a change in control, as defined, and~~ the ~~loss~~Company ~~of our Medicare or Medicaid certification, collateral casualties, entry of a judgment of $150,000 or more, failure of first liens on collateral~~ and the ~~termination~~Company’s ofguarantors’ ~~any of our management agreements that represent more than 10% of our management fees for the preceding 18 month period~~assets. ~~In the event of a~~

Negative Covenants. The TCB Credit Facility has restrictive covenants that, among other things, limits or restricts the Company’s ability to do the following without the consent of TCB:

Incur additional indebtedness;

Create or incur additional liens on the Company’s assets;

Engage in mergers or acquisitions;

Pay dividends or make any other payment or distribution in respect of the Company’s equity interests;

Make loans and investments;

Issue equity, except for stock compensation awards to employees;

Engage in transaction with affiliates;

Dispose of the Company’s assets, except for certain approved assets;

Engage in any sale and leaseback arrangements; and

Prepay debt to debtors other than TCB.

~~monetary~~before ~~default,~~Texas ~~all~~Capital ~~of our obligations due under the SNB Credit Facility shall become immediately due and payable. In the event of a non-monetary default, we have 10 days or in some cases three days to cure before~~ Bank ~~SNB~~ has the right to declare ~~our~~the Company’s obligations due under the ~~SNB~~TCB Credit Facility immediately due and payable.

~~Financial~~Modification ~~Commitments~~and Waiver. On May 11, 2016, we entered into a Loan Modification Agreement and Waiver with TCB (“TCB Modification”). Under the TCB Modification, our Revolving Loan was increased from $12.5 million to $15.5 million. The $3.0 million of borrowing represents a temporary advance that must be repaid by July 31, 2016. In addition, TCB consented to the sale of certain of our assets and waived certain technical defaults in the TCB Credit Facility related to timing deadlines for certain financial information provided by us to TCB for the UGH Acquisition.

~~Our~~Contractual ~~future~~Obligations ~~commitments under contractual obligations by expected maturity date at September 30, 2015 are as follows:~~

	< 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		> 5 years		Total
Short-term debt (1)	$	424,601	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	424,601
Long-term debt (1)		6,657,491		13,966,732		6,599,855		1,151,280		28,375,358
Operating leases		12,142,329		28,337,936		27,716,659		66,764,730		134,961,654
Other long term liabilities		—		—		—		—		—
Preferred noncontrolling interest (2)		2,387,852		6,691,301		—		—		9,079,153
Total	$	21,612,273	$	48,995,969	$	34,316,514	$	67,916,010	$	172,840,766

Our future commitments under contractual obligations by expected maturity date at March 31, 2016 are as follows:

	< 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		> 5 years		Total
Short-term debt (1)	$	805,763	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	805,763
Long-term debt (1)		11,640,924		27,408,526		24,252,901		—		63,302,351
Capital building lease		2,320,035		4,639,288		4,638,107		35,493,493		47,090,923
Operating leases		12,486,916		24,918,253		24,718,441		80,525,059		142,648,669
Other long term liabilities		—		—		—		—		—
Preferred noncontrolling interest (2)		1,465,295		6,408,348		—		—		7,873,643
Total	$	28,718,933	$	63,374,415	$	53,609,449	$	116,018,552	$	261,721,349

(1)	Includes principal and interest obligations.

(2)	Represents the redemption obligation, including interest, of our preferred noncontrolling interests.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include amounts based on management’s prudent judgments and estimates. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Management believes that any reasonable deviation from those judgments and estimates would not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. To the extent that the estimates used differ from actual results, however, adjustments to the statement of earnings and corresponding balance sheet accounts would be necessary. These adjustments would be made in future statements. For a complete discussion of all our significant accounting policies including recently adopted and recently issued accounting guidance, please see Note 32 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part 1 Item 1 of the Form 10-Q and our ~~2014~~Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included our 2015 annual report on Form 10-K.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

We are a smaller reporting entity as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and as such, are not required to provide the information required by Item 305 of Regulation S-K with respect to Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management (with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016. Based on this evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended September 30, 2015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 31, 2016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting, except as noted below:

On December 31, 2015, we completed our acquisition of UGH. We have extended our oversight and monitoring processes that support our internal control over financial reporting to include UGH’s operations.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings.

Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Huntingdon Valley Surgery Center, Foundation Surgery Affiliates, LLC and Foundation Management Affiliates, LLC, Case No. 13-3101, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. On December 2, 2013, Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”) filed a complaint against Huntingdon Valley Surgery Center (“HVSC”) and the Foundation defendants alleging that the Foundation defendants impose on the ASCs that they manage an unlawful “out of network business model” by means of which the defendants offer illegal inducements to physicians and patients to drive patient referrals to HVSC, which does not have a contract with Aetna and could therefore charge higher rates for its services. Aetna ~~asserted~~is asserting violations of Pennsylvania’s anti-kickback statute by all defendants, conspiracy to violate Pennsylvania’s anti-kickback statute by all defendants, insurance fraud, aiding and abetting insurance fraud, tortious interference with the contracts between Aetna and its in-network physicians. In ~~July~~Aetna ~~2015,~~has ~~HVSC~~reached ~~settled~~a settlement with ~~Aetna~~HVSC. On ~~September 15, 2015,~~ the ~~Judge~~Aetna ~~issued~~claims aagainst ~~decision~~the ~~granting~~Foundation ~~summary~~defendants, ~~judgment~~the onCourt ~~all~~has ~~but~~granted ~~two counts in favor of~~ the Foundation defendants. ~~The~~a ~~only~~partial ~~remaining~~summary ~~counts~~judgment ~~are~~on ~~tortious~~all ~~interference~~such ofclaims ~~contract~~except ~~and conspiracy to commit~~ tortious interference. ~~Aetna~~In ~~has~~April ~~filed a motion for the judge to reconsider the summary judgment ruling~~2016, ~~or, in the alternative, permit~~ Aetna toappealed ~~immediate appeal~~ the ~~summary judgment ruling before trial~~decision. ~~We dispute Aetna’s claims and are vigorously defending this case.~~

United States of America ex rei. Mary Dupont, M.D., Relator, v. Metropolitan Medical Partners LLC. d/b/a Surgery Center of Chevy Chase; Surgical Synergies, Inc.; Foundation Surgery Affiliates, LLC; and Foundation Healtlzcare, Inc., Case No. No. 13-cv-03590-PJM, U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Greenbelt Division. In November, 2013, the relator, Mary Dupont, M.D. (“Dupont”), filed under seal a False Claims Act (“FCA”) or “qui tam” complaint initiating this action. On October 30, 2014, the federal government filed a Notice of Election to Decline Intervention and on November 12, 2014, the Court entered an Order unsealing the Dupont complaint. Dupont filed her First Amended Complaint on June 19, 2015. Dupont, a urologist and physician-investor in an ambulatory surgery center in Chevy Chase, Maryland (the “Center”), alleged that the Center, in concert with defendant Surgical Synergies, Inc. (“SSI”) and the Foundation defendants, effectively shut her out of her practice at the Center by imposing a 75 procedure-per-year quota on procedures performed at the Center, and, barring her from performing an allegedly unprofitable procedure involving the surgical implantation of a mesh sling. The First Amended Complaint alleged claims including Medicare fraud, Presentation of False Claims, and violations of the Maryland False Health Claims Act. ln August 2015, all defendants, including the Foundation defendants, moved to dismiss the First Amended Complaint and argued that the First Amended Complaint failed to state a claim for relief as against them under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b) because Dupont failed to plead the requisite details of any specific false claim with particularity, failed to adequately plead any conspiracy to violate the FCA, and failed to sufficiently plead any violation of the federal anti-kickback statute, which constituted the alleged substantive basis of her FCA claims. The Foundation defendants also argued that the FCA claims against them should be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In September 2015, Dupont filed a Second Amended Complaint by consent, making limited factual modifications to her pleading and reasserting the claims made in the First Amended Complaint. In October 2015, all defendants, including the Foundation defendants, filed motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on essentially the same grounds as were asserted against the First Amended Complaint. On February 3, 2016, the Court granted Defendants' motions to dismiss in part, dismissing with prejudice Dupont’s claim under the Maryland False Health Claims Act and dismissing without prejudice Dupont’s “Economic Loss” claim. The Court's February 3, 2016 Order did not reach the merits of Defendants’ motions to dismiss the remaining counts, but instead granted Dupont leave to file a Third Amended Complaint which was done in March 2016. In April 2016, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. A hearing on the motion to dismiss has been set for July 25, 2016. We intend to continue to defend the action vigorously.

In the normal course of business, we may become involved in litigation or in legal proceedings. Including the litigation described above, we are not aware of any such litigation or legal proceedings that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

There are no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our ~~2014~~2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

We do not have anything to report under this Item.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

We do not have anything to report under this Item.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5.

Other Information.

We do not have anything to report under this Item.

Item 6.

Exhibits.

(a) Exhibits:

Exhibit No.		Description
31.1+		Certification of Stanton Nelson, Chief Executive Officer of Registrant.
10.1		Lease Agreement, as Amended, dated July 21, 2005 by and between Cambridge Properties, a sole proprietorship of Dr. Timothy L. Sharma and University Hospital Systems, LLP is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2016.
31.2+		Certification of Hubert King, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant.
10.2+		Loan Modification Agreement and Waiver, dated May 11, 2016, by and between Foundation Healthcare, Inc. and Texas Capital Bank, National Association.
32.1+		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Stanton Nelson, Chief Executive Officer of Registrant.
31.1+		Certification of Stanton Nelson, Principal Executive Officer of Registrant.
32.2+		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Hubert King, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant.
31.2+		Certification of Hubert King, Principal Financial Officer of Registrant.
32.1+		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Stanton Nelson, Principal Executive Officer of Registrant.
32.2+		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Hubert King, Principal Financial Officer of Registrant.
101. INS		XBRL Instance Document.
101. SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101. CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101. DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101. LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101. PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

Exhibit No.		Description
101. DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101. LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101. PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

+	Filed herewith.

3031

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	FOUNDATION HEALTHCARE, INC.
	(Registrant)
	By:	/S/ STANTON NELSON
		Stanton Nelson
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: November 2, 2015
Date: May 16, 2016
	By:	/S/ HUBERT KING
		Hubert King
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: November 2, 2015
Date: May 16, 2016

3132

Filing Compare · Foundation Healthcare, Inc.