UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-D

ASSET-BACKED ISSUER

DISTRIBUTION REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the semi-annual distribution period from

July 16, 2014 to January 15, 2015



Commission	Registrant; State of Incorporation;		I.R.S. Employer
File No.	Address; and Telephone Number		Identification No.

333-187692-06	FIRSTENERGY OHIO PIRB SPECIAL PURPOSE TRUST 2013 (Exact name of issuing entity as specified in its charter)		46-6795854
001-02323	THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY (Exact name of sponsor and depositor as specified in its charter)		34-0150020
001-02578	OHIO EDISON COMPANY (Exact name of sponsor and depositor as specified in its charter)		34-0437786
001-03583	THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY (Exact name of sponsor and depositor as specified in its charter)		34-4375005
333-187692-03	CEI FUNDING LLC (Exact name of bond issuer as specified in its charter)		46-1367273
333-187692-01	OE FUNDING LLC (Exact name of bond issuer as specified in its charter)		46-1367425
333-187692-04	TE FUNDING LLC (Exact name of bond issuer as specified in its charter)		46-1367453
	Delaware (State or jurisdiction of incorporation or organization of the issuing entity and the bond issuers)

	76 South Main Street Akron, OH (Address of principal executive offices of the issuing entity and the bond issuers)	44308 (zip code)
	(800)736-3402
	(Issuing entity’s and bond issuers’ telephone number, including area code)



	Registered/reporting pursuant to (check one)			Name of exchange (If Section 12(b))
Title of Class	Section 12(b)	Section 12(g)	Section 15(d)	Name of exchange (If Section 12(b))
2013 Pass-Through Trust Certificates, Tranche A-1			X
2013 Pass-Through Trust Certificates, Tranche A-2			X
2013 Pass-Through Trust Certificates, Tranche A-3			X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No __

PART I - DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION

Item 1. Distribution and Pool Performance Information.

The response to Item 1 is set forth in part herein and in part in Exhibits 99.1, 99.2, 99.3 and 99.4.

The record date for distributions (i.e., the interest and scheduled principal payments) described in Exhibit 99.1 is January 14, 2015.

Introductory and explanatory information regarding the material terms, parties and distributions described in Exhibit 99.1 is included in the Prospectus Supplement relating to the 2013 Pass-Through Trust Certificates (the “2013 Trust Certificates”) issued by FirstEnergy Ohio PIRB Special Purpose Trust 2013 (the “Issuing Entity”), dated June 12, 2013, and related Prospectus, dated June 7, 2013, of CEI Funding LLC, OE Funding LLC, TE Funding LLC and the Issuing Entity filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on June 13, 2013.

As indicated in Exhibit 99.1, all required interest and scheduled principal payments on the 2013 Trust Certificates have been made with respect to the January 15, 2015 distribution date.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2. Legal Proceedings.

In June 2014, a civil complaint was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, by a group of institutional investors against U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”), in its capacity as trustee or successor trustee (as the case may be) under certain residential mortgage backed securities ("RMBS") trusts. The plaintiffs are investment funds formed by nine investment advisors (AEGON, BlackRock, Brookfield, DZ Bank, Kore, PIMCO, Prudential, Sealink and TIAA) that purport to be bringing suit derivatively on behalf of 841 RMBS trusts that issued $771 billion in original principal amount of securities between 2004 and 2008. According to the plaintiffs, cumulative losses for these RMBS trusts equal $92.4 billion as of the date of the complaint. The complaint is one of six similar complaints filed against RMBS trustees (Deutsche Bank, Citibank, HSBC, Bank of New York Mellon and Wells Fargo) by certain of these plaintiffs. The complaint against U.S. Bank alleges the trustee caused losses to investors as a result of alleged failures by the sponsors, mortgage loan sellers and servicers for these RMBS trusts and asserts causes of action based upon the trustee's purported failure to enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for alleged breaches of representations and warranties concerning loan quality. The complaint also asserts that the trustee failed to notify securityholders of purported events of default allegedly caused by breaches by mortgage loan servicers and that the trustee purportedly failed to abide by appropriate standards of care following events of default. Relief sought includes money damages in an unspecified amount and equitable relief. In November 2014, the plaintiffs sought leave to voluntarily dismiss their original state court complaint and filed a substantially similar complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The federal civil complaint added a class action allegation and a change in the total number of named trusts to 843 RMBS trusts. In December 2014, the plaintiffs’ motion to voluntarily dismiss their original state court complaint was granted. Other cases alleging similar causes of action have previously been filed against U.S. Bank and other trustees by RMBS investors in other transactions.

There can be no assurances as to the outcome of the litigation, or the possible impact of the litigation on the trustee or the RMBS trusts. However, U.S. Bank denies liability and believes that it has performed its obligations under the RMBS trusts in good faith, that its actions were not the cause of losses to investors and that it has meritorious defenses, and it intends to contest the plaintiffs’ claims vigorously.

Item 3. Sales of Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 4. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

TOLEDO EDISON CO 10-D