UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2017

¨☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______________to ______________

Commission File Number 001-36832

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware

47-1455824

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or

Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

888 Seventh Avenue, 17th Floor New York, NY		10019
10990 Wilshire Blvd., Penthouse Los Angeles, CA		90024
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(~~212~~310) ~~974~~ 734-~~5710~~1310

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class:		Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered:
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share		Nasdaq Capital Market
Warrants to purchase one-half of one share of Common Stock		Nasdaq Capital Market
Rights, exchangeable into one-tenth of one share of Common Stock		Nasdaq Capital Market
Units, each consisting of one share of Common Stock, one Right and one Warrant		Nasdaq Capital Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨☐ No x ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ ☐ No x☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x ☐ No ¨☒

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or ~~information~~ information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x ☒ No ¨ ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See ~~definition~~the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “~~smaller~~emerging ~~reporting~~ growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨☐ Accelerated filer ¨☐ Non-accelerated filer ¨☐ Smaller reporting company x☒ ~~(Do~~Emerging ~~not~~growth ~~check if a smaller reporting~~ company) ☒

~~Indicate~~If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark ~~whether~~if the registrant ishas aelected ~~shell~~not ~~company~~to ~~(as~~use ~~defined~~the inextended ~~Rule~~transition ~~12b-2~~period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act). ~~Yes x No ¨~~ ☐

~~The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common~~Indicate ~~equity held~~ by ~~non-affiliates~~check ~~computed~~mark bywhether ~~reference~~the toregistrant ~~the~~is ~~closing~~a ~~price~~shell company (as ofdefined ~~the~~in ~~last~~Rule ~~business~~12b-2 ~~day~~ of the ~~registrant’s most~~Exchange ~~recently completed second fiscal quarter was approximately $43~~Act).~~1 million.~~ Yes ☒ No ☐

AsThe aggregate market value of ~~March~~the ~~30,~~voting ~~2017,~~and ~~there~~non-voting ~~were~~common ~~4,750,136~~equity ~~shares~~held ofby ~~Common~~non-affiliates computed by reference to the closing ~~Stock,~~price ~~$.0001~~as ~~par~~of ~~value~~the ~~per~~last ~~share,~~business ~~outstanding~~day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was approximately $34.9 million.

As of May 30, 2018, there were 2,246,236 shares of Common Stock, $.0001 par value per share, outstanding.

INDEX

	PART I
Item 1.	Business.	1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	610
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments.	610
Item 2.	Properties.	710
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings.	710
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.	710
	PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issue Purchases of Equity Securities.	710
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data.	811
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	811
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	1116
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.	1117
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.	1117
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures.	1117
Item 9B.	Other Information.	1118
	PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.	1219
Item 11.	Executive Compensation.	1422
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.	1523
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.	1624
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services.	1726
	PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.	1827
	Signatures	1928

PART I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS.

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Form 10-K”), references to the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Barington/Hilco Acquisition Corp.

Introduction

We are a Delaware blank check company incorporated on July 24, 2014. We were formed for the purpose of entering into a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, recapitalization, reorganization or other similar business combination with one or more target businesses (an “Initial Business Combination”). We have not generated any operating revenues and will not until after completion of our Initial Business Combination, at the earliest. We have generated non-operating income in the form of interest income on cash and cash equivalents from the proceeds derived from our initial public offering (the “Initial Public Offering”).

Company History

In September 2014, our original sponsors purchased an aggregate of 1,150,000 shares of our common stock, which we refer to throughout this report as the “Insider Shares,” for an aggregate purchase price of $25,000, or approximately $0.02 per share.

On February 11, 2015, the Company sold 4,000,000 Units at a purchase price of $10.00 per Unit in its Initial Public Offering. Each Unit consists of one share of the Company’s common stock, $0.0001 par value (“Common Stock”), one right (“Public Right”) and one redeemable Common Stock purchase warrant (“Public Warrant”). Each Public Right will convert into one-tenth (1/10) of one share of Common Stock upon the consummation of our Initial Business Combination. Each Public Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one-half share of Common Stock at an exercise price of $12.50 per whole share.

Simultaneously ~~with~~ with the closing of the Initial Public Offering, the Company consummated the sale of 295,000 Units (“Private Units”) at at a price of $10.00 per Unit in a private placement to the Company’s original sponsors and EarlyBirdCapital, Inc., the ~~representative~~ representative of the Company’s underwriters (“EBC”), generating gross proceeds of $2,950,000. On such date, EBC notified the Company of its election to exercise its over-allotment option to the extent of 293,069 out of a possible 600,000 Units. Pursuant to terms set forth upon their purchase, 76,733 Insider Shares held by our original sponsors were forfeited when the underwriters did not exercise their over-allotment option in full.

Of the net proceeds from our Initial Public Offering (including the exercise of the over-allotment option) and the private placement of the Private Units, $43,642,769 was placed in a trust account at Morgan Stanley with Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company acting as trustee (the “Trust Account”). Except as described in this Form 10-K, ~~these~~the remaining proceeds in the Trust Account will not be released until the earlier of the completion of our Initial Business Combination and our redemption of 100% of the outstanding public shares of Common Stock upon our failure to consummate an Initial Business Combination by ~~August 11~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018, or earlier at the Company’s option.

Our Initial Public Offering documents provided that we initially had until August 11, 2016 to complete an Initial Business Combination, with an option to extend the period of time to consummate a Business Combination up to two times, each by an additional three months (for a total of up to 24 months to complete a Business Combination). In order to extend the time available for us to consummate a Business Combination, the initial stockholders or their affiliates or designees were required to deposit into the Trust Account $100,000 prior to the applicable deadline for each three month extension. On August 8, 2016, we elected to extend the period of time to consummate a Business Combination for an additional three months ending on November 11, 2016 and, accordingly, deposited $100,000 into the Trust Account. Subsequently, on November 10, 2016, we elected to extend the period of time to consummate a Business Combination for an additional three months ending on February 11, 2017 and, accordingly, deposited an additional $100,000 into the Trust Account.

On February 10, 2017, we held a special meeting of stockholders pursuant to which the stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation (the “A&R Charter”) providing for an extension of the period of time in which we are required to consummate a Business Combination through August 11, 2017 (the “Extension Amendment”). This extension of up-to six (6) months has been and is to be implemented in 30-day increments, at our option. Pursuant to the terms of the A&R Charter, prior to the special meeting, stockholders were given the opportunity to redeem their shares of the Company’s Common Stock for their pro rata portion of the funds available in the Trust Account. The number of shares of Common Stock presented for redemption in connection with the Extension Amendment was 911,200. Accordingly, following the special meeting, the Company distributed $9,305,588, or approximately $10.21 per share, to redeeming stockholders. In addition, prior to the special meeting, the Company agreed to contribute $0.025 per share to the Trust Account for each public share that was not converted in connection with the approval of the Extension Amendment, for each 30-day period, or portion thereof, that is needed by the Company to complete a Business Combination from February 11, 2017 through August 11, 2017 (the “Contribution). To date, the Company has deposited an aggregate of $169,094 into the Company’s Trust Account in connection with the Contribution, which is funded on a monthly basis. The Contribution has been and will continue to be paid from funds loaned to us by a third party. As of the date of this filing, the balance in the Trust Account is $34,732,227.

In addition to the Extension Amendment, two other proposals were presented and approved at the special meeting – the Director Election Proposal and the Auditor Proposal. All six of the Company’s directors were re-elected to hold office until the annual meeting of stockholders in 2018, or until their successors are elected and qualified and the audit committee’s selection of Marcum LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 was ratified.

Subsequent to the special meeting, pursuant to the approval of the Extension Amendment, Amendment No. 1 to the A&R Charter was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

On January 3, 2017, the Company received a letter (the “Letter”) from the Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) stating that the Company had not yet held an annual meeting of shareholders within twelve months of the end of the Company’s fiscal year end. As a result, the Company was not in compliance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5620(a) (the “Annual Meeting Rule”). The Letter is only a notification of deficiency, not of imminent delisting, and had no current effect on the listing or trading of the Company’s securities on NASDAQ.

The Letter states that, under NASDAQ rules, the Company has 45 calendar days to submit a plan to regain compliance with the Annual Meeting Rule. If NASDAQ accepts the Company’s plan, NASDAQ may grant the Company an extension of up to 180 calendar days from the fiscal year end, or until June 29, 2017, to regain compliance with the Annual Meeting Rule. If NASDAQ does not accept the Company’s plan, the Company will have the opportunity to appeal the decision in front of a NASDAQ Hearings Panel.

The Company submitted a plan to regain compliance with the Annual Meeting Rule within the required timeframe, pursuant to which the Company noted its intention to hold the annual meeting in connection with a vote of its shareholders to extend the date by which the Company must complete a Business Combination. The Company held the annual meeting on February 10, 2017 (see above).

On February 10, 2017, we held a special meeting of stockholders pursuant to which the stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation (the “A&R Charter”) providing for an extension of the period of time in which we are required to consummate a Business ~~Strategy~~Combination through August 11, 2017 (the “First Extension Amendment”). The six (6) month extension was implemented in 30-day increments. Pursuant to the terms of the A&R Charter, prior to the special meeting, stockholders were given the opportunity to redeem their shares of the Company’s Common Stock for their pro rata portion of the funds available in the Trust Account. The number of shares of Common Stock presented for redemption in connection with the First Extension Amendment was 911,200. Accordingly, following the special meeting, the Company distributed $9,305,588, or approximately $10.21 per share, to redeeming stockholders. In addition, prior to the special meeting, the Company agreed to contribute $0.025 per share to the Trust Account for each public share that was not converted in connection with the approval of the First Extension Amendment, for each 30-day period, or portion thereof, that was needed by the Company to complete a Business Combination from February 11, 2017 through August 11, 2017 (the “Contribution). The Company deposited an aggregate of $507,280 into the Company’s Trust Account in connection with the First Extension Amendment. Of the aggregate of $507,734 deposited into the Company’s Trust Account in connection with the First Extension Amendment, $425,000 was paid from funds advanced to the Company by Oomba, Inc., a Delaware corporation. (“Oomba”). The advances were non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand.

~~Competitive~~On August ~~Strengths~~9, 2017, we held a special meeting of stockholders pursuant to which the stockholders approved an amendment to our A&R Charter providing for an additional extension of the period of time in which we were required to consummate a Business Combination through December 31, 2017 (the “Second Extension Amendment”). The extension was implemented in 30-day increments. Pursuant to the terms of the A&R Charter, prior to the special meeting, stockholders were given the opportunity to redeem their shares of the Company’s Common Stock for their pro rata portion of the funds available in the Trust Account. The number of shares of Common Stock presented for redemption in connection with the Second Extension Amendment was 1,966,096. Accordingly, following the special meeting, the Company distributed $20,373,670, or approximately $10.36 per share, to redeeming stockholders. In addition, prior to the special meeting, the Company agreed to contribute $0.025 per share to the Trust Account for each public share that was not converted in connection with the approval of the Second Extension Amendment, for each 30-day period, or portion thereof, that was needed by the Company to complete a Business Combination from August 11, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Second Contribution”). The Company deposited an aggregate of $164,412 into the Trust Account in connection with the Second Extension Amendment. The Second Contribution was paid by the Company and from funds loaned to us by the sponsors.

WeOn ~~believe~~December 29, 2017, we held a special meeting of stockholders pursuant to which the stockholders approved an amendment to our ~~competitive~~A&R Charter providing ~~strengths~~for an additional extension of the period of time in which we were required to consummate a Business Combination through June 30, 2018 (the “Third Extension Amendment”). The extension is to be implemented in 30-day increments. Pursuant to the ~~following:~~terms of the A&R Charter, prior to the special meeting, stockholders were given the opportunity to redeem their shares of the Company’s Common Stock for their pro rata portion of the funds available in the Trust Account. The number of shares of Common Stock presented for redemption in connection with the Third Extension Amendment was 537,804. Accordingly, on January 3, 2018, the Company distributed $5,635,379, or approximately $10.48 per share, to redeeming stockholders, resulting in $9,199,825 being held in the Trust Account as of January 3, 2018. In addition, prior to the special meeting, the Company agreed to contribute $0.04 per share to the Trust Account for each public share that was not converted in connection with the approval of the Third Extension Amendment, for each 30-day period, or portion thereof, that is needed by the Company to complete a Business Combination from December 31, 2017 through June 30, 2018 (the “Third Contribution”). Furthermore, the Company agreed to prepay the contributions for the three-month period from December 31, 2017 until March 31, 2018. On January 4, 2018 and April 23, 2018, the Company deposited an aggregate of $140,475 into the Trust Account in connection with the Third Extension Amendment. The Third Contribution was paid by the Company.

~~Status~~On January as3, 2017, the Company received a ~~public~~letter ~~company~~(the “Letter”) from the Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) stating that the Company had not yet held an annual meeting of shareholders within twelve months of the end of the Company’s fiscal year end. As a result, the Company was not in compliance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5620(a) (the “Annual Meeting Rule”). The Letter was only a notification of deficiency, not of imminent delisting, and had no contemporaneous effect on the listing or trading of the Company’s securities on NASDAQ. The Letter stated that, under NASDAQ rules, the Company had 45 calendar days to submit a plan to regain compliance with the Annual Meeting Rule. If NASDAQ were to accept the Company’s plan, NASDAQ could have granted the Company an extension of up to 180 calendar days from the fiscal year end, or until June 29, 2017, to regain compliance with the Annual Meeting Rule. If NASDAQ did not accept the Company’s plan, the Company would have had the opportunity to appeal the decision in front of a NASDAQ Hearings Panel. The Company submitted a plan to regain compliance with the Annual Meeting Rule, pursuant to which the Company noted its intention to hold the annual meeting in connection with a vote of its shareholders to extend the date by which the Company must complete a Business Combination. The Company held the annual meeting on February 10, 2017.

We believe our structure makes us an attractive business combination partner to target businesses. As an existing public company, we offer a target business an alternative to the traditional initial public offering through a merger or other business combination. In this situation, the owners of the target business would exchange their shares of stock in the target business for shares of our stock or for a combination of shares of our stock and cash, allowing us to tailor the consideration to the specific needs of the sellers. We believe target businesses might find this method a more certain and cost effective method to becoming a public company than the typical initial public offering. In a typical initial public offering, there are additional expenses incurred in marketing, roadshow and public reporting efforts that will likely not be present to the same extent in connection with a business combination with us. Furthermore, once the business combination is consummated, the target business will have effectively become public, whereas an initial public offering is always subject to the underwriters’ ability to complete the offering, as well as general market conditions, that could prevent the offering from occurring. Once public, we believe the target business would then have greater access to capital and an additional means of providing management incentives consistent with stockholders’ interests than it would have as a privately-held company. It can offer further benefits by augmenting a company’s profile among potential new customers and vendors and aid in attracting talented employees.2

~~Transaction~~On April ~~flexibility~~18, 2018 and May 17, 2018, the Company received a letter from NASDAQ stating that the Company had not timely filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2017 or its Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2018 (the “Filings”). As a result, the Company was not in compliance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) (the “Filing Rule”).The Company has 60 calendar days to submit a plan to regain compliance with the Annual Filing Rule. If NASDAQ were to accept the Company’s plan, NASDAQ could grant the Company an extension of up to 180 calendar days from the Filing’s due date, or until October 15, 2018, to regain compliance with the Filing Rule. If NASDAQ does not accept the Company’s plan, the Company will have the opportunity to appeal the decision in front of a NASDAQ Hearings Panel.

WeOn May ~~offer~~12, a2017, ~~target~~the ~~business~~ Company entered into a ~~variety~~merger ofagreement ~~options~~(the ~~such~~“Merger asAgreement”) ~~providing~~with Oomba pursuant to which the Company ~~owners~~agreed to acquire all of athe ~~target~~outstanding ~~business~~capital ~~with~~stock ~~shares~~of inOomba. aOn ~~public~~November ~~company~~29, ~~and~~2017, athe ~~public~~Company ~~means~~terminated tothe ~~sell~~Merger ~~such~~Agreement ~~shares~~with Oomba because Oomba breached several of its obligations under the Merger Agreement, ~~providing~~including, ~~cash~~but ~~for~~not ~~stock~~limited to, its ~~and~~obligation ~~providing~~to ~~capital~~deliver ~~for~~to the ~~potential~~Company ~~growth~~audited ~~and~~financial ~~expansion~~statements of ~~its~~Oomba ~~operations~~on or ~~strengthening~~prior to May 31, 2017. The termination of ~~its~~the ~~balance~~Merger ~~sheet~~Agreement bywas ~~reducing~~effective ~~its~~as ~~debt~~of ~~ratio.~~November ~~Because~~29, we2017, ~~are~~and ~~able~~the toCompany ~~consummate~~reserved ~~our~~its ~~Initial~~rights ~~Business~~to ~~Combination~~vigorously ~~using~~pursue ~~our~~all ~~cash,~~available ~~debt~~remedies oragainst ~~equity~~Oomba ~~securities,~~under orthe Merger Agreement and applicable law. As a ~~combination~~result of these breaches, the ~~foregoing,~~Company webelieves ~~have~~that ~~the~~approximately ~~flexibility~~$867,000 toof ~~use~~net expenses incurred by the ~~most~~Company ~~efficient~~are ~~combination~~the ~~that~~responsibility ~~will~~of ~~allow~~Oomba uspursuant to ~~tailor~~ the ~~consideration~~Merger toAgreement. beThese ~~paid~~reimbursable toexpenses ~~the~~are ~~target~~net ~~business~~of tothe ~~fit~~$425,000 ~~its~~advanced ~~needs~~by ~~and~~Oomba ~~desires~~to the Company.

While the Company believes it is owed the $867,000 from Oomba, the Company has not retained legal counsel with respect to the above demand for reimbursement, nor has the Company commenced any action against Oomba in order to collect the expenses it believes it is owed. It should also be noted that, even if the Company were to commence legal action against Oomba, the Company believes that the likelihood of collecting the receivable would be remote given that Oomba does not have sufficient cash funds to be able to make the payment.

On January 3, 2018, the Company, Barington Companies Advisors, LLC (“Barington”), Hilco Global (“Hilco Global”), Hilco Merchant Resources, LLC (“HMR” and, together with Hilco Global, collectively, “Hilco”), and certain additional parties, including members of the board of directors of the Company (together with Barington and Hilco, the “Sellers”), entered into an agreement (the “Change of Control Agreement”) with Sweiss Ventures, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“Sweiss”), JS Equity Holdings, LLC, a New York limited liability company (“JSE”), BAG Spac 1, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“BAG”), PLA99, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (”PLA”), and Oreva Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Oreva” and together with Sweiss, JSE, BAG and PLA, the “Investors”).

Pursuant to the Change of Control Agreement, the Sellers agreed to transfer to the Investors an aggregate of (a) 1,035,767 shares of common stock of the Company (the “Common Stock”), and (b) an aggregate of 142,500 warrants to purchase an additional 71,250 shares of Common Stock (collectively, the “Transferred Securities”). The 1,035,767 shares of Common Stock included in the Transferred Securities represented 96.5% of an aggregate of 1,073,267 insider promoter shares of Common Stock of the Company owned of record and beneficially by the Sellers (the “Insider Shares”). Under the terms of the Change of Control Agreement, the Sellers retained an aggregate of (i) 285,000 shares of Common Stock and associated rights, which entitle a holder to receive one-tenth (1/10) of a share of Common Stock (the “Rights”), and (ii) 37,500 promotional shares of Common Stock that were issued to directors, officers and a consultant of the Company as compensation for their services to the Company.

In consideration for their receipt of the Transferred Securities, the Investors and its affiliates obtained control of the board of directors of the Company. In such connection each of Jared L. Landaw, Jeffrey B. Hecktman, Robert Mettler, Frank R. Mori, James A. Mitarotonda and Jeffrey D. Nuechterlein, representing the entire former board of directors of the Company, resigned as directors effective as of the close of business January 4, 2018, and Adam Levin, Paul Abramowitz, Justin Ehrlich, Marc Beilinson and Colin Conway were appointed as directors of the Company, with Mr. Levin serving as Chairman of the Board. In addition, Cory Lipoff, Jeffrey D. Nuechterlein and Jared L. Landaw each resigned as officers of the Company, and Mr. Abramowitz was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, effective as of the close of business on January 4, 2018.

Mr. Abramowitz is the manager of PLA, Mr. Beilinson is the manager of BAG, Mr. Ehrlich is the manager of JSE and Mr. Levin is the manager of Sweiss.

Under the terms of the Change of Control Agreement, the Investors and its affiliates and associates (collectively, the “Investor Group”) agreed to use its and their best efforts to locate and consummate, on or prior to the June 30, 2018, a Business Combination for the Company acceptable to the Company’s stockholders. In addition, the Investors paid on behalf of the Company, or reimbursed the Sellers for, (i) $154,000, representing three months payment required to be paid by the Company for the Third Extension Amendment, and other accrued fees and expenses, and agreed pay approximately $59,229 in additional documented Company expenses within 30 days. The Investors also agreed to assume responsibility for all ongoing costs and expenses of the Company, including, without limitation, payments associated with the Third Extension Amendment and costs and expenses associated with running and maintaining a publicly traded company following the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement.

On February 14, 2018, the Company, Oreva Capital Corp., (“Oreva”) and an entity formed by Oreva, POP G Foods Holding, Inc. (“Pop G”) entered into a letter of intent (the “LOI”) with Specialty Brands Holdings, LLC (“the “Seller”) and Papa Gino’s Inc.. The parties agreed that until February 28, 2018 (the “Exclusivity Period”), none of the parties nor their affiliates would seek to consummate a sale or purchase transaction with any other person or entity.

Under the terms of the LOI, the Seller agreed in principle to sell to Pop G 100% of the capital stock of PGHC Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “PGHC”). PGHC is a holding company that owns 100% of the capital stock of Papa Gino’s Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation, which together with its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including Papa Gino’s, Inc., owns, operates and franchises (i) 148 company owned pizzeria restaurants and one venue licensee, under the trade name Papa Gino’s™ and (ii) 93 company owned sandwich restaurants, 31 franchised locations and three venue licensees under the trade name, D’Angelo’s™ ; in each case, throughout New England (collectively, the “Business”).

On or about March 21, 2018, the negotiation of the definitive stock purchase agreement was terminated as the parties were unable to agree upon the final purchase price.

Effecting Our Initial Business Combination

General

Our Initial Business Combination may involve the acquisition of, or merger with, a company which does not need substantial additional capital but which desires to establish a public trading market for its shares, while avoiding what it may deem to be adverse consequences of undertaking a public offering itself. These include time delays, significant expense, loss of voting control and compliance with various Federal and state securities laws. In the alternative, we may seek to consummate a business combination with a company that may be financially unstable or in its early stages of development or growth. While we may seek to effect simultaneous business combinations with more than one target business, we will probably have the ability, as a result of our limited resources, to effect only a single business combination.

Identifying a Target Business

Subject to our management team’s pre-existing fiduciary duties and the limitations that a target business have a fair market value of at least 80% of the balance in the Trust Account at the time of the execution of a definitive agreement for our Initial Business Combination, we have virtually unrestricted flexibility in identifying and selecting a prospective acquisition candidate. We have not established any other specific attributes or criteria (financial or otherwise) for prospective target businesses. In evaluating a prospective target business, our management may consider a variety of factors, including one or more of the following:

• ● financial condition and results of operation;

• ● growth potential;

• ● brand recognition and potential;

• ● return on equity or invested capital;

• ● market capitalization or enterprise value;

• ● experience and skill of management and availability of additional personnel;

• ● capital requirements;

~~• competitive~~● competitive position;

• ● barriers to entry;

• ● stage of development of the products, processes or services;

• ● existing distribution and potential for expansion;

• ● degree of current or potential market acceptance of the products, processes or services;

~~• proprietary~~● proprietary aspects of products and the extent of intellectual property or other protection for products or formulas;

• ● impact of regulation on the business;

• ● regulatory environment of the industry;

• ● costs associated with effecting the business combination;

~~• industry~~● industry leadership, sustainability of market share and attractiveness of market industries in which a target business participates; and

• ● macro competitive dynamics in the industry within which the company competes.

These criteria are not intended to be exhaustive. Our management may not consider any of the above criteria in evaluating a prospective target business.

Any evaluation relating to the merits of a particular business combination will be based, to the extent relevant, on the above factors as well as other considerations deemed relevant by our management in effecting a business combination consistent with our business objective. In evaluating a prospective target business, we will conduct an extensive due diligence review which will encompass, among other things, meetings with incumbent management and inspection of facilities, as well as review of financial and other information which is made available to us. This due diligence review will be conducted either by our management or by unaffiliated third parties we may engage, although we have no current intention to engage any such third parties.

The time and costs required to select and evaluate a target business and to structure and complete our Initial Business Combination remain to be determined. Any costs incurred with respect to the identification and evaluation of a prospective target business with which a business combination is not ultimately completed will result in a loss to us and reduce the amount of capital available to otherwise complete a business combination.

Fair Market Value of Target Business

Pursuant to Nasdaq listing rules, the target business or businesses that we acquire must collectively have a fair market value equal to at least 80% of the balance of the funds in the Trust Account at the time of the execution of a definitive agreement for our Initial Business Combination, although we may acquire a target business whose fair market value significantly exceeds 80% of the Trust Account balance. We currently anticipate structuring a business combination to acquire 100% of the equity interests or assets of the target business or businesses. We may, however, structure a business combination where we merge directly with the target business or where we acquire less than 100% of such interests or assets of the target business in order to meet certain objectives of the target management team or shareholders or for other reasons, but we will only complete such business combination if the post-transaction company owns or acquires 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the target or otherwise acquires a controlling interest in the target sufficient for it not to be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Even if the post-transaction company owns or acquires 50% or more of the voting securities of the target, our stockholders prior to the business combination may collectively own a minority interest in the post-transaction company, depending on valuations ascribed to the target and us in the business combination transaction. For example, we could pursue a transaction in which we issue a substantial number of new shares in exchange for all of the outstanding capital stock of a target. In this case, we would acquire a 100% controlling interest in the target. However, as a result of the issuance of a substantial number of new shares, our stockholders immediately prior to our Initial Business Combination could own less than a majority of our outstanding shares subsequent to our Initial Business Combination. If less than 100% of the equity interests or assets of a target business or businesses are owned or acquired by the post-transaction company, the portion of such business or businesses that is owned or acquired is what will be valued for purposes of the 80% of net assets test. In order to consummate such an acquisition, we may issue a significant amount of our debt or equity securities to the sellers of such businesses and/or seek to raise additional funds through a private offering of debt or equity securities. To date, we have not entered into any such fund raising arrangement and have no current intention of doing so. The fair market value of the target will be determined by our board of directors based upon one or more standards generally accepted by the financial community (such as actual and potential sales, earnings, cash flow and/or book value). If our board is not able to independently determine that the target business has a sufficient fair market value, we will obtain an opinion from an unaffiliated, independent investment banking firm, or another independent entity that commonly renders valuation opinions on the type of target business we are seeking to acquire, with respect to the satisfaction of such criteria. We will not be required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm, or another independent entity that commonly renders valuation opinions on the type of target business we are seeking to acquire, as to the fair market value if our board of directors independently determines that the target business complies with the 80% threshold. However, if we seek to consummate an Initial Business Combination with an entity that is affiliated with any of our officers, directors or sponsors and are therefore required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that the business combination is fair to our unaffiliated stockholders from a financial point of view, we would ask that banking firm to opine on whether the target business met the 80% fair market value test. Nevertheless, we are not required to do so and could determine not to do so without consent of our stockholders.

Lack of Business Diversification

We expect to complete only a single business combination, although this process may entail the simultaneous acquisitions of several operating businesses. Therefore, at least initially, the prospects for our success may be entirely dependent upon the future performance of a single business operation. Unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete several business combinations of entities operating in multiple industries or multiple areas of a single industry, it is probable that we will not have the resources to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses. By consummating our Initial Business Combination with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may:

•● subject us to negative economic, competitive and regulatory developments, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact upon the particular industry in which we may operate subsequent to our Initial Business Combination; and

3● result in our dependency upon the performance of a single operating business or the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services.

• result in our dependency upon the performance of a single operating business or the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services.

If we determine to simultaneously acquire several businesses and such businesses are owned by different sellers, we will need for each of such sellers to agree that our purchase of its business is contingent on the simultaneous closings of the other acquisitions, which may make it more difficult for us, and delay our ability, to complete the business combination. With multiple acquisitions, we could also face additional risks, including additional burdens and costs with respect to possible multiple negotiations and due diligence investigations (if there are multiple sellers) and the additional risks associated with the subsequent assimilation of the operations and services or products of the acquired companies in a single operating business.

Stockholder Approval of Business Combination

In connection with any proposed business combination, we will seek stockholder approval of our Initial Business Combination at a meeting called for such purpose at which public stockholders (but not our sponsors, officers or directors) may seek to convert their shares of Common Stock, regardless of whether they vote for or against the proposed Initial Business Combination, into a portion of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, subject to the limitations described herein.

We will consummate our Initial Business Combination only if we have net tangible assets of at least $5,000,001 upon such consummation and a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock voted are voted in favor of the business combination. As a result, if stockholders owning approximately 882% or more of the shares of Common Stock sold in the Initial Public Offering exercise conversion rights, the business combination will not be consummated. However, the actual percentages will only be able to be determined once a target business is located and we can assess all of the assets and liabilities of the combined company upon consummation of the proposed Initial Business Combination, subject to the requirement that we must have at least $5,000,001 of net tangible assets upon closing of such business combination. As a result, the actual percentages of shares that can be converted may be significantly lower than our estimates. We chose our net tangible asset threshold of $5,000,001 to ensure that we would avoid being subject to Rule 419 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. However, if we seek to consummate an Initial Business Combination with a target business that imposes any type of working capital closing condition or requires us to have a minimum amount of funds available from the Trust Account upon consummation of such Initial Business Combination, our net tangible asset threshold may limit our ability to consummate such Initial Business Combination (as we may be required to have a lesser number of shares converted) and may force us to seek third party financing which may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all. We may not be able to consummate a business combination unless the number of shares of Common Stock seeking conversion rights is significantly less than the 882% indicated above. As a result, we may not be able to consummate such Initial Business Combination and we may not be able to locate another suitable target within the applicable time period, if at all. Public shareholders may therefore have to wait until ~~August 11~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 in order to be able to receive a portion of the Trust Account.

Our sponsors and our officers and directors have agreed (1) to vote any shares of Common Stock owned by them in favor of any proposed business combination and (2) not to convert any shares of Common Stock into the right to receive cash from the Trust Account in connection with a stockholder vote to approve a proposed Initial Business Combination or a vote to amend the provisions of our certificate of incorporation relating to stockholders’ rights or pre-business combination activity.

Liquidation if No Business Combination

If we do not complete a business combination before ~~August~~June 1130, ~~2017~~2018, unless we are able to obtain a fourth extension, we will (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem 100% of the outstanding public shares and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining stockholders and our board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject (in the case of (ii) and (iii) above) to our obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. In connection with our redemption of 100% of our outstanding public shares for a portion of the funds held in the Trust Account, each holder will receive a full pro rata portion of the amount then in the Trust Account, plus any pro rata interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to us for our working capital requirements or necessary to pay our taxes payable on such funds (subject in each case to our obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors). There will be no distribution from the Trust Account with respect to our rights or warrants, which will expire worthless.

Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against a corporation to the extent of distributions received by them in a dissolution. The pro rata portion of our Trust Account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of 100% of our outstanding public shares in the event we do not complete our Initial Business Combination within the required time period may be considered a liquidation distribution under Delaware law. If the corporation complies with certain procedures set forth in Section 280 of the Delaware General Corporation Law intended to ensure that it makes reasonable provision for all claims against it, including a 60-day notice period during which any third-party claims can be brought against the corporation, a 90-day period during which the corporation may reject any claims brought, and an additional 150-day waiting period before any liquidating distributions are made to stockholders, any liability of stockholders with respect to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution.

4Furthermore, if the pro rata portion of our Trust Account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of 100% of our public shares in the event we do not complete our Initial Business Combination within the required time period is not considered a liquidation distribution under Delaware law and such redemption distribution is deemed to be unlawful, then pursuant to Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, the statute of limitations for claims of creditors could then be six years after the unlawful redemption distribution, instead of three years, as in the case of a liquidation distribution. If we are unable to complete a business combination within the prescribed time frame, we will (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem 100% of the outstanding public shares which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining stockholders and our board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject (in the case of (ii) and (iii) above) to our obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. Accordingly, it is our intention to redeem our public shares as soon as reasonably possible following June 30, 2018 and, therefore, we do not intend to comply with those procedures. As such, our stockholders could potentially be liable for any claims to the extent of distributions received by them (but no more) and any liability of our stockholders may extend well beyond the third anniversary of such date.

Furthermore, if the pro rata portion of our Trust Account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of 100% of our public shares in the event we do not complete our Initial Business Combination within the required time period is not considered a liquidation distribution under Delaware law and such redemption distribution is deemed to be unlawful, then pursuant to Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, the statute of limitations for claims of creditors could then be six years after the unlawful redemption distribution, instead of three years, as in the case of a liquidation distribution. If we are unable to complete a business combination within the prescribed time frame, we will (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem 100% of the outstanding public shares which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining stockholders and our board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject (in the case of (ii) and (iii) above) to our obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. Accordingly, it is our intention to redeem our public shares as soon as reasonably possible following August 11, 2017 and, therefore, we do not intend to comply with those procedures. As such, our stockholders could potentially be liable for any claims to the extent of distributions received by them (but no more) and any liability of our stockholders may extend well beyond the third anniversary of such date.

Because we will not be complying with Section 280 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, Section 281(b) of the Delaware General Corporation Law requires us to adopt a plan, based on facts known to us at such time that will provide for our payment of all existing and pending claims or claims that may be potentially brought against us within the subsequent 10 years. However, because we are a blank check company, rather than an operating company, and our operations will be limited to searching for prospective target businesses to acquire, the only likely claims to arise would be from our vendors (such as lawyers, investment bankers, etc.) or prospective target businesses.

We will seek to have all third parties and any prospective target businesses enter into valid and enforceable agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind they may have in or to any monies held in the Trust Account. The underwriters in the Initial Public Offering have already executed such a waiver agreement. As a result, the claims that could be made against us will be limited, thereby lessening the likelihood that any claim would result in any liability extending to the trust. We therefore believe that any necessary provision for creditors will be reduced and should not have a significant impact on our ability to distribute the funds in the Trust Account to our public stockholders. Nevertheless, there is no guarantee that vendors, service providers and prospective target businesses will execute such agreements. In the event that a potential contracted party was to refuse to execute such a waiver, we will execute an agreement with that entity only if our management first determines that we would be unable to obtain, on a reasonable basis, substantially similar services or opportunities from another entity willing to execute such a waiver. Examples of instances where we may engage a third party that refused to execute a waiver would be the engagement of a third party consultant who cannot sign such an agreement due to regulatory restrictions, such as our auditors who are unable to sign due to independence requirements, or whose particular expertise or skills are believed by management to be superior to those of other consultants that would agree to execute a waiver or a situation in which management does not believe it would be able to find a provider of required services willing to provide the waiver. There is also no guarantee that, even if they execute such agreements with us, they will not seek recourse against the Trust Account. As a result, if we liquidate, the per-share distribution from the Trust Account could be less than $10.23 due to claims or potential claims of creditors. We will distribute to all of our public stockholders, in proportion to their respective equity interests, an aggregate sum equal to the amount then held in the Trust Account, inclusive of any interest not previously released to us.7

We will seek to have all third parties and any prospective target businesses enter into valid and enforceable agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind they may have in or to any monies held in the Trust Account. The underwriters in the Initial Public Offering have already executed such a waiver agreement. As a result, the claims that could be made against us will be limited, thereby lessening the likelihood that any claim would result in any liability extending to the trust. We therefore believe that any necessary provision for creditors will be reduced and should not have a significant impact on our ability to distribute the funds in the Trust Account to our public stockholders. Nevertheless, there is no guarantee that vendors, service providers and prospective target businesses will execute such agreements. In the event that a potential contracted party was to refuse to execute such a waiver, we will execute an agreement with that entity only if our management first determines that we would be unable to obtain, on a reasonable basis, substantially similar services or opportunities from another entity willing to execute such a waiver. Examples of instances where we may engage a third party that refused to execute a waiver would be the engagement of a third party consultant who cannot sign such an agreement due to regulatory restrictions, such as our auditors who are unable to sign due to independence requirements, or whose particular expertise or skills are believed by management to be superior to those of other consultants that would agree to execute a waiver or a situation in which management does not believe it would be able to find a provider of required services willing to provide the waiver. There is also no guarantee that, even if they execute such agreements with us, they will not seek recourse against the Trust Account. As a result, if we liquidate, the per-share distribution from the Trust Account could be less than $10.72 due to claims or potential claims of creditors as of June 30, 2018. We will distribute to all of our public stockholders, in proportion to their respective equity interests, an aggregate sum equal to the amount then held in the Trust Account, inclusive of any interest not previously released to us.

We anticipate notifying the trustee of the Trust Account to begin liquidating such assets promptly after such date and anticipate it will take no more than 10 business days to effectuate such distribution. Our sponsors have waived their rights to participate in any liquidation distribution with respect to their Insider Shares. We will pay the costs of any subsequent liquidation from our remaining assets outside of the Trust Account and from the interest income on the balance of the Trust Account (net of income and other tax obligations) that may be released to us to fund our working capital requirements. If such funds are insufficient, affiliates of Barington Capital Group, L. P. and Hilco Global have agreed to pay the funds necessary to complete such liquidation (in an amount not to exceed $15,000) and have agreed not to seek repayment of such expenses.

If we are unable to consummate an Initial Business Combination and are forced to redeem 100% of our outstanding public shares for a portion of the funds held in the Trust Account, each holder will receive a full pro rata portion of the amount then in the Trust Account, plus any pro rata interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to us or necessary to pay our taxes. The proceeds deposited in the Trust Account could, however, become subject to claims of our creditors that are in preference to the claims of public stockholders.

Our public stockholders shall be entitled to receive funds from the Trust Account only in the event of our failure to complete our Initial Business Combination in the required time period or if the stockholders seek to have us convert their respective shares of Common Stock upon a business combination which is actually completed by us. In no other circumstances shall a stockholder have any right or interest of any kind to or in the Trust Account.

If we are forced to file a bankruptcy case or an involuntary bankruptcy case is filed against us which is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the Trust Account could be subject to applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in our bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over the claims of our stockholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the Trust Account, we may not be able to return to our public stockholders at least $10.2372 per share as of June 30, 2018.

5If we are forced to file a bankruptcy case or an involuntary bankruptcy case is filed against us which is not dismissed, any distributions received by stockholders could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent conveyance.” As a result, a bankruptcy court could seek to recover all amounts received by our stockholders. Furthermore, because we intend to distribute the proceeds held in the Trust Account to our public stockholders promptly after June 30, 2018, this may be viewed or interpreted as giving preference to our public stockholders over any potential creditors with respect to access to or distributions from our assets. Furthermore, our board may be viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to our creditors and/or may have acted in bad faith, and thereby exposing itself and our company to claims of punitive damages, by paying public stockholders from the Trust Account prior to addressing the claims of creditors. Claims may be brought against us for these reasons.

If we are forced to file a bankruptcy case or an involuntary bankruptcy case is filed against us which is not dismissed, any distributions received by stockholders could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent conveyance.” As a result, a bankruptcy court could seek to recover all amounts received by our stockholders. Furthermore, because we intend to distribute the proceeds held in the Trust Account to our public stockholders promptly after August 11, 2017, this may be viewed or interpreted as giving preference to our public stockholders over any potential creditors with respect to access to or distributions from our assets. Furthermore, our board may be viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to our creditors and/or may have acted in bad faith, and thereby exposing itself and our company to claims of punitive damages, by paying public stockholders from the Trust Account prior to addressing the claims of creditors. Claims may be brought against us for these reasons.8

Competition

In identifying, evaluating and selecting a target business, we may encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours. Many of these entities are well established and have extensive experience identifying and effecting business combinations directly or through affiliates. Many of these competitors possess greater technical, human and other resources than us and our financial resources will be relatively limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. While we believe there may be numerous potential target businesses that we could acquire with the net proceeds of the Initial Public Offering, our ability to compete in acquiring certain sizable target businesses may be limited by our available financial resources.

The following also may not be viewed favorably by certain target businesses:

•● our obligation to seek stockholder approval of our Initial Business Combination may delay the completion of a transaction; •● our obligation to convert shares of Common Stock held by our public stockholders may reduce the resources available to us for our Initial Business Combination; •● our outstanding rights, warrants and unit purchase options, and the potential future dilution they represent; •● our obligation to ensure that if we enter into a definitive agreement for an Initial Business Combination in which we will not be the surviving entity, the definitive agreement will provide for the holders of rights to receive the same per share consideration the holders of the Common Stock will receive in the transaction on an as-converted into Common Stock basis (for instance, if the business combination would result in each share of Common Stock outstanding being exchanged for two shares of Common Stock, each right would result in the holder receiving two-tenths (2/10) of a share of Common Stock upon consummation of such business combination); •● our obligation to pay a fee of approximately $1,717,000 to EBC for assisting us in connection with our Initial Business Combination; •● our obligation to either repay or issue private units upon conversion of up to $500,000 of working capital loans that may be made to us by our sponsors, officers, directors or their affiliates; •● our obligation to register the resale of the Insider Shares, as well as the private units (and underlying securities) and any shares issued to our sponsors, officers, directors or their affiliates upon conversion of working capital loans; and •● the impact on the target business’ assets as a result of unknown liabilities under the securities laws or otherwise depending on developments involving us prior to the consummation of an Initial Business Combination.

Any of these factors may place us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating our Initial Business Combination. Our management believes, however, that our status as a public entity and potential access to the United States public equity markets may give us a competitive advantage over privately-held entities having a similar business objective as ours in acquiring a target business with significant growth potential on favorable terms.

If we succeed in effecting our Initial Business Combination, there will be, in all likelihood, intense competition from competitors of the target business. Subsequent to our Initial Business Combination, we may not have the resources or ability to compete effectively.

Employees

We have two executive officers. These individuals are not obligated to devote any specific number of hours to our matters and devote only as much time as they deem necessary to our affairs. The amount of time they devote at any time varies based on whether a target business has been selected for the business combination and the stage of the business combination process the company is in. Accordingly, once a suitable target business to acquire has been located, management will spend more time investigating such target business and negotiating and processing the business combination (and consequently spend more time on our affairs) than had been spent prior to locating a suitable target business. We presently expect our executive officers to devote an average of approximately 10 hours per week to our business. We do not intend to have any full time employees prior to the consummation of our Initial Business Combination.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS.

Not required.

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES.

We currently maintain our principal executive offices at ~~888~~10990 ~~Seventh~~Wilshire ~~Avenue~~Blvd., ~~17th floor~~Penthouse, ~~New~~Los ~~York~~Angeles, NYCA ~~10019. Prior to January 1~~90024, ~~2016,~~for ~~the~~which ~~cost~~we ~~for this~~do ~~space~~not ~~was~~pay ~~included~~any inrent ~~the~~or ~~$7,500 per-month fee Barington Capital Group, L~~fees.~~P.,~~ anPrior ~~affiliate of James A. Mitarotonda, charged us for general and administrative services pursuant~~ to aJanuary ~~letter agreement between us and Barington Capital Group~~3, ~~L.P.. Barington Capital Group~~2018, ~~L.P.~~we nomaintained ~~longer~~our ~~charges~~office usat ~~this~~888 ~~fee.~~Seventh ~~We believe~~Avenue, ~~based~~17th onfloor, ~~rents and fees for similar services in~~ New York, ~~that~~NY ~~the~~10019, ~~fee~~for ~~charged~~which bywe ~~Barington~~did ~~Capital~~not ~~Group,~~pay ~~L.P.~~any ~~prior~~rent toor ~~January~~fees 1,during ~~2016 was at least as favorable as we could have obtained from an unaffiliated person~~2017. We consider our current office space, combined with the other office space otherwise available to our executive officers, adequate for our current operations.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

None.

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Our units, Common Stock, rights and warrants are traded on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbols BHACU, BHAC, BHACR and BHACW, respectively. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for our units, Common Stock, rights and warrants for the periods indicated since our units began public trading on February 6, 2015 and our Common Stock, rights and warrants began public trading on March 6, 2015.

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017	HIGH		LOW		HIGH		LOW		HIGH		LOW		HIGH		LOW
	UNITS				COMMON STOCK				RIGHTS				WARRANTS
1st Quarter	$	10.36	$	10.37	$	10.39	$	10.15	$	0.43	$	0.19	$	0.17	$	0.09
2nd Quarter	$	12.00	$	10.43	$	12.35	$	10.20	$	0.44	$	0.25	$	0.18	$	0.10
3rd Quarter	$	10.70	$	10.43	$	10.48	$	10.20	$	0.40	$	0.19	$	0.17	$	0.10
4th Quarter	$	10.70	$	8.52	$	10.99	$	10.30	$	0.31	$	0.11	$	0.11	$	0.05

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016	HIGH		LOW		HIGH		LOW		HIGH		LOW		HIGH		LOW
	UNITS				COMMON STOCK				RIGHTS				WARRANTS
1st Quarter	$	10.19	$	10.00	$	10.68	$	9.75	$	0.41	$	0.15	$	0.20	$	0.10
2nd Quarter	$	10.23	$	10.13	$	10.03	$	9.90	$	0.20	$	0.14	$	0.11	$	0.06
3rd Quarter	$	10.45	$	10.15	$	10.80	$	9.69	$	0.50	$	0.12	$	0.14	$	0.05
4th Quarter	$	10.88	$	10.28	$	10.35	$	9.97	$	0.27	$	0.12	$	0.14	$	0.04

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015	HIGH		LOW		HIGH		LOW		HIGH		LOW		HIGH		LOW
	UNITS				COMMON STOCK				RIGHTS				WARRANTS
1st Quarter	$	10.01	$	9.95	$	-	$	-	$	0.28	$	0.26	$	0.18	$	0.18
2nd Quarter	$	10.16	$	9.98	$	10.53	$	9.65	$	0.30	$	0.20	$	0.18	$	0.15
3rd Quarter	$	10.20	$	10.05	$	9.97	$	9.75	$	0.27	$	0.18	$	0.16	$	0.13
4th Quarter	$	10.20	$	10.02	$	9.85	$	9.67	$	0.29	$	0.11	$	0.18	$	0.12

Holders

As of ~~March~~April 30, ~~2017~~2018, there were 11 holders of record of our Units, 1314 holders of record of our Common Stock, 1 holder of record of our rights and 1 holder of record of our warrants.

Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock to date and do not intend to pay cash dividends prior to the completion of our Initial Business Combination. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be dependent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and general financial condition subsequent to the completion of a business combination. The payment of any cash dividends subsequent to our Initial Business Combination will be within the discretion of our board of directors at such time. In addition, our board of directors is not currently contemplating and does not anticipate declaring any stock dividends in the foreseeable future. Further, if we incur any indebtedness, our ability to declare dividends may be limited by restrictive covenants that we may agree to in connection therewith.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Except as previously disclosed with respect to the Insider Shares and Private Units, none.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not required.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report. Certain information contained in the discussion and analysis set forth below includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.

Overview

We were formed on July 24, 2014 for the purpose of entering into a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, recapitalization, ~~reorganization~~ reorganization or other similar business combination with one or more target businesses. We intend to ~~use~~utilize cash derived from the proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the private placement of the Private Units, our securities, debt or a combination of cash, securities and debt, in effecting ana ~~Initial~~ Business Combination. The issuance of additional shares of Common Stock or preferred stock in an ~~Initial~~a Business Combination:

·● may significantly dilute the equity interest of existing stockholders; ·● may subordinate the rights of holders of Common Stock if preferred stock is issued with rights senior to those afforded our Common Stock; ·● could cause a change of control if a substantial number of shares of our Common Stock are issued, which may affect, among other things, our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards, if any, and could result in the resignation or removal of our present officers and directors; ·● may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of us by diluting the stock ownership or voting rights of a person seeking to obtain control of us; and ·● may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our Common Stock, rights and/or warrants.

Similarly, if we issue debt securities, it could result in:

·● default and foreclosure on our assets if our cash flows after an ~~Initial~~initial ~~Business~~business ~~Combination~~combination are insufficient to repay our debt obligations; ·● acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness even if we make all principal and interest payments when due if we breach certain covenants that require the maintenance of certain financial ratios or reserves without a waiver or renegotiation of such covenants; ·● our immediate repayment of all principal and accrued interest, if any, if the debt security is payable on demand; ·and/or ● our inability to obtain necessary additional financing if the debt security contains covenants restricting our ability to obtain such financing while the debt security is outstanding;.

We expect to continue to incur significant costs in the pursuit of our acquisition plans. We cannot assure you that our plans to raise capital or to complete an Initial Business Combination will be successful.11

We expect to continue to incur significant costs in the pursuit of our acquisition plans. We cannot assure you that our plans to complete a Business Combination will be successful.

On February 10, 2017, we held a special meeting of stockholders pursuant to which the stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s A&R Charter providing for an extension of the period of time in which we are required to consummate ana ~~Initial~~ Business Combination through ~~August~~ August 11, 2017. ~~This~~(the ~~extension~~“First ofExtension ~~up-to~~Amendment”). The six (6) ~~months~~month ~~has~~extension ~~been~~was ~~and is to be~~ implemented in 30-day increments~~, at our option~~. Pursuant to the terms of the A&R Charter, prior to the special meeting, stockholders were given the opportunity to redeem ~~their~~ their shares of the Company’s Common Stock for their pro rata portion of the funds available in the Trust Account. The number of shares of Common Stock presented for redemption in connection with the First Extension Amendment was 911,200. Accordingly, following the special meeting, the Company distributed $9,305,588, or approximately $10.21 per share, to redeeming stockholders. In addition, prior to the special meeting, the Company agreed to contribute $0.025 per share to the Trust Account for each public share that was not converted in connection with the approval of the First Extension Amendment, for each 30-day period, or portion thereof, that iswas needed by the Company to complete ana ~~Initial~~ Business Combination from February 11, 2017 through August 11, 2017 (the “Contribution). The ~~To date, the~~ Company ~~has~~ deposited an aggregate of $~~169~~507,~~094~~280 into the Company’s Trust Account in connection with the ~~Contribution,~~First ~~which~~Extension isAmendment. Of ~~funded~~the onaggregate aof ~~monthly~~$507,734 ~~basis. The~~deposited ~~Contribution~~into ~~has~~the ~~been~~Company’s ~~and~~Trust ~~will~~Account ~~continue~~in toconnection with bethe First Extension Amendment, $425,000 was paid from funds ~~loaned~~advanced to usthe Company by aOomba ~~third~~and ~~party.~~the Asbalance ofwas ~~the~~loaned ~~date~~by our ofsponsors. ~~this filing,~~The ~~the~~advances ~~balance~~were innon-interest ~~the~~bearing, ~~Trust~~unsecured ~~Account~~and isdue ~~$34,732,227~~on demand.

8On August 9, 2017, we held a special meeting of stockholders pursuant to which the stockholders approved an amendment to our A&R Charter providing for an additional extension of the period of time in which we were required to consummate a Business Combination through December 31, 2017 (the “Second Extension Amendment”). The extension was implemented in 30-day increments. Pursuant to the terms of the A&R Charter, prior to the special meeting, stockholders were given the opportunity to redeem their shares of the Company’s Common Stock for their pro rata portion of the funds available in the Trust Account. The number of shares of Common Stock presented for redemption in connection with the Second Extension Amendment was 1,966,096. Accordingly, following the special meeting, the Company distributed $20,373,670, or approximately $10.36 per share, to redeeming stockholders. In addition, prior to the special meeting, the Company agreed to contribute $0.025 per share to the Trust Account for each public share that was not converted in connection with the approval of the Second Extension Amendment, for each 30-day period, or portion thereof, that was needed by the Company to complete a Business Combination from August 11, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Second Contribution”). The Company deposited an aggregate of $164,412 into the Trust Account in connection with the Second Extension Amendment. The Second Contribution was paid by the Company and from funds loaned to us by the sponsors.

On December 29, 2017, we held a special meeting of stockholders pursuant to which the stockholders approved an amendment to our A&R Charter providing for an additional extension of the period of time in which we were required to consummate a Business Combination through June 30, 2018 (the “Third Extension Amendment”). The extension is to be implemented in 30-day increments. Pursuant to the terms of the A&R Charter, prior to the special meeting, stockholders were given the opportunity to redeem their shares of the Company’s Common Stock for their pro rata portion of the funds available in the Trust Account. The number of shares of Common Stock presented for redemption in connection with the Third Extension Amendment was 537,804. Accordingly, on January 3, 2018, the Company distributed $5,635,379, or approximately $10.48 per share, to redeeming stockholders, resulting in $9,199,825 being held in the Trust Account as of January 3, 2018. In addition, prior to the special meeting, the Company agreed to contribute $0.04 per share to the Trust Account for each public share that was not converted in connection with the approval of the Third Extension Amendment, for each 30-day period, or portion thereof, that is needed by the Company to complete a Business Combination from December 31, 2017 through June 30, 2018 (the “Third Contribution”). Furthermore, the Company agreed to prepay the contributions for the three-month period from December 31, 2017 until March 31, 2018. On January 4, 2018 and April 23, 2018, the Company deposited an aggregate of $140,475 into the Trust Account in connection with the Third Extension Amendment. The Third Contribution was paid by the Company.

On May 12, 2017, the Company entered into a Merger Agreement with Oomba pursuant to which the Company agreed to acquire all of the outstanding capital stock of Oomba. On November 29, 2017, the Company terminated the Merger Agreement with Oomba because Oomba breached several of its obligations under the Merger Agreement, including, but not limited to, its obligation to deliver to the Company audited financial statements of Oomba on or prior to May 31, 2017. The termination of the Merger Agreement was effective as of November 29, 2017, and the Company reserved its rights to vigorously pursue all available remedies against Oomba under the Merger Agreement and applicable law. As a result of these breaches, the Company believes that approximately $867,000 of net expenses incurred by the Company are the responsibility of Oomba pursuant to the Merger Agreement. These reimbursable expenses are net of the $425,000 advanced by Oomba to the Company.

On January 3, 2018, the Company, Barington Companies Advisors, LLC (“Barington”), Hilco Global (“Hilco Global”), Hilco Merchant Resources, LLC (“HMR” and, together with Hilco Global, collectively, “Hilco”), and certain additional parties, including members of the board of directors of the Company (together with Barington and Hilco, the “Sellers”), entered into an agreement (the “Change of Control Agreement”) with Sweiss Ventures, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“Sweiss”), JSE Holdings, LLC, a New York limited liability company (“JSE”), BAG Spac 1, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“BAG”), PLA99, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (”PLA”), and Oreva Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Oreva” and together with Sweiss, JSE, BAG and PLA, the “Investors”).

Pursuant to the Change of Control Agreement, the Sellers agreed to transfer to the Investors an aggregate of (a) 1,035,767 shares of common stock of the Company (the “Common Stock”), and (b) an aggregate of 142,500 warrants to purchase an additional 142,500 shares of Common Stock (collectively, the “Transferred Securities”). The 1,035,767 shares of Common Stock included in the Transferred Securities represented 96.5% of an aggregate of 1,073,267 insider promoter shares of Common Stock of the Company owned of record and beneficially by the Sellers (the “Insider Shares”). Under the terms of the Change of Control Agreement, the Sellers retained an aggregate of (i) 285,000 shares of Common Stock and associated rights, which entitle a holder to receive one-tenth (1/10) of a share of Common Stock (the “Rights”), and (ii) 37,500 promotional shares of Common Stock that were issued to directors and officers of the Company and the acting chief financial officer of the Company as compensation for their services to the Company.

In consideration for their receipt of the Transferred Securities, the Investors and its affiliates obtaining control of the board of directors of the Company. In such connection each of Jared L. Landaw, Jeffrey B. Hecktman, Robert Mettler, Frank R. Mori, James A. Mitarotonda and Jeffrey D. Nuechterlein, representing the entire former board of directors of the Company, resigned as directors effective as of the close of business January 4, 2018, and Adam Levin, Paul Abramowitz, Justin Ehrlich, Marc Beilinson and Colin Conway were appointed as directors of the Company, with Mr. Levin serving as Chairman of the Board. In addition, Cory Lipoff, Jeffrey D. Nuechterlein and Jared L. Landaw each resigned as officers of the Company, and Mr. Abramowitz was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, effective as of the close of business on January 4, 2018.

Mr. Abramowitz is the manager of PLA, Mr. Beilinson is the manager of BAG, Mr. Ehrlich is the manager of JSE and Mr. Levin is the manager of Sweiss..

On or about March 21, 2018, the negotiation of the definitive stock purchase agreement was terminated as the parties were unable to agree upon the final purchase price.

Results of Operations

We have neither engaged in any operations nor generated any revenues to date. All activity from inception to December 31, ~~2016~~2017 relates to our formation, our Initial Public Offering and private placement and the identification and evaluation of prospective candidates for a Business Combination. Since the completion of our Initial Public Offering, we have not generated any operating revenues and will not generate such revenues until after the completion of our Business Combination. We generate non-operating income in the form of interest income on cash and marketable securities held~~, which we expect to be insignificant in view of the low yields on short-term government securities~~. We expect to incur increased expenses as a result of being a public company (for legal, financial reporting, accounting and auditing compliance), as well as for due diligence expenses.

For the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017, we had a net loss of $~~242~~2,~~690~~113,929, mainly consisting of target identification expenses and operating costs of $~~323~~2,~~397~~296, 452, offset by ~~$80,707 of~~ interest income of $182,523 on cash and marketable securities held in our Trust Account.

For the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016, we had a net loss of $~~473~~242,690, mainly consisting of target identification expenses and operating costs of $~~477~~323,~~604~~397, offset by $380,~~914~~707 of interest income on cash and marketable securities held in our Trust Account.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

On February 11, 2015, we consummated our Initial Public Offering of 4,000,000 units at a price of $10.00 per unit, generating gross proceeds of $40,000,000. Simultaneously with the closing of our Initial Public Offering, we consummated the private sale of an aggregate of 295,000 Units at a price of $10.00 per unit, generating gross proceeds of $2,950,000. Following the closing of our Initial Public Offering, our underwriters elected to exercise their over-allotment option to the extent of 293,069 Units at a price of $10.00 per Unit, generating gross proceeds of $2,930,690. We received net proceeds from our Initial Public Offering, sale of the Private Units and sale of the over-allotment Units of $44,266,968, net of $1,287,921 cash paid for underwriting fees and $325,801 cash paid for offering costs. ~~An aggregate of $43,642,769 was placed into a Trust Account, while the remaining funds of $624,199 were placed in an account outside of the Trust Account for working capital purposes.~~

AsAt of December 31, ~~2016~~ 2017, we had cash and marketable securities held in the Trust Account of $4314,~~927~~846,~~390~~465 (including approximately $8511,000 of interest income) consisting of cash and U.S. treasury bills with a maturity of 180 days or less. Interest income on the balance in the Trust Account may be available to us for working capital purposes and to pay taxes. ~~Through~~To ~~December 31~~date, ~~2016,~~ we ~~did~~have ~~not~~withdrawn ~~withdraw~~approximately ~~any funds~~$256,000 ~~from~~of ~~the~~ interest earned on the Trust Account in order to fund working capital requirements.

In each of August and November 2016, we deposited $100,000 into the Trust Account as payment for the extension of the period of time to consummate a Business Combination for a total of six months.

AsOn February a10, ~~result~~2017, ofwe ~~the~~ made a payment of $9,305,588 to the holders of the aggregate of 911,200 shares of common stock presented for redemption in connection with the First Extension Amendment~~, as of February 10, 2017, cash and marketable securities held in the Trust Account amounted to $34,636,110~~.

AsOn August of9, ~~December 31~~2017, ~~2016,~~ we ~~had~~made ~~cash~~a payment of $2220,~~271 held outside the Trust Account~~373,670 ~~which is available for use by us~~ to ~~cover~~ the ~~costs~~holders ~~associated~~of ~~with identifying~~the aaggregate ~~target~~of ~~business and negotiating a business combination and other general corporate uses. In addition~~1,966,096 asshares of ~~December 31,~~common ~~2016,~~stock wepresented for ~~had~~redemption ~~accounts~~in ~~payable~~connection ~~and~~with ~~accrued~~the ~~expenses~~Second ofExtension ~~$149,563~~Amendment.

~~For~~During the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017, ~~cash used~~ in ~~operating~~connection ~~activities~~with ~~amounted~~the toFirst ~~$207,165,~~Extension ~~resulting~~Amendment ~~from a net loss of $242,690, interest earned on cash~~ and ~~securities held in~~ the ~~Trust~~Second ~~Account~~Extension ~~of $80~~Amendment,~~707~~ ~~and~~we ~~changes~~deposited inan ~~our~~aggregate ~~operating assets and liabilities~~ of $~~116~~672,~~232.~~146 ~~For~~into the ~~year~~Trist ~~ended~~Account ~~December~~as ~~31,~~payment ~~2015,~~for ~~cash~~the ~~used~~extension inof ~~operating~~time ~~activities amounted~~ to ~~$368,800,~~consummate ~~mainly resulting from~~ a ~~net~~Business ~~loss of $473,690 and changes in our operating assets and liabilities of $108,804~~Combination.

WeOn January ~~intend~~3, to2018, ~~use~~we ~~substantially all~~made ofa ~~the~~payment ~~funds~~of ~~held~~$5,635,379 into the ~~Trust~~holders ~~Account~~of ~~(less~~the ~~amounts~~aggregate ~~used~~of ~~for~~537,804 ~~working~~shares ~~capital~~of ~~purposes~~common ~~and~~stock topresented ~~pay taxes) to complete our Initial~~for ~~Business~~redemption ~~Combination.~~in Weconnection dowith ~~not expect~~ the ~~interest~~Third ~~earned~~Extension onAmendment. ~~the~~On ~~amount~~January in4, ~~the~~2018, ~~Trust~~we ~~Account~~deposited ~~will~~an beaggregate ~~sufficient to pay all~~ of ~~our~~ ~~tax~~$105,356 ~~obligations.~~into To the Trust ~~extent~~Account ~~that our capital stock or debt is used,~~ in ~~whole~~connection orwith inthe ~~part,~~Third asExtension ~~consideration~~Amendment. toAs ~~complete~~a ~~our Business~~result ~~Combination~~thereof, ~~the~~cash ~~remaining~~and ~~proceeds~~marketable securities held in the Trust Account ~~will be used~~ as ~~working capital to finance the operations~~ of ~~the~~January ~~target business or businesses~~4, ~~make~~2018 ~~other~~amounted ~~acquisitions~~to ~~and pursue our growth strategies~~$9,305,181.

In January and April 2018, in connection with the Third Extension Amendment, we deposited an aggregate of $140,475 into the Trist Account as payment for the extension of time to consummate a Business Combination.

As of December 31, 2017, we had cash of $2,820 held outside the Trust Account. In addition, as of December 31, 2017, we had accounts payable and accrued expenses of $2,159,118.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, cash used in operating activities amounted to $283,824, resulting from a net loss of $2,113,929 and interest earned on cash and marketable securities held in the Trust Account of $182,523. Changes in our operating assets and liabilities used provided cash of $2,012,628.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, cash used in operating activities amounted to $207,165, resulting from a net loss of $242,690 and interest earned on cash and securities held in the Trust Account of $80,707. Changes in our operating assets and liabilities provided cash of $116,232.

We intend to use substantially all of the funds held in the Trust Account (less interest available to be used for working capital purposes and to pay taxes) to complete our Business Combination. We do not expect the interest earned on the amount in the Trust Account will be sufficient to pay all of our tax obligations. To the extent that our capital stock or debt is used, in whole or in part, as consideration to complete our Business Combination, the remaining proceeds held in the Trust Account will be used as working capital to finance the operations of the target business or businesses, make other acquisitions and pursue our growth strategies.

We intend to use the funds held outside the Trust Account primarily to identify and evaluate target businesses, perform business due diligence on prospective target businesses, travel to and from the offices, plants or similar locations of prospective target businesses or their representatives or owners, structure, negotiate and complete a Business Combination, and to pay taxes to the extent the interest earned on the Trust Account is not sufficient to pay our taxes.

9We need to obtain additional financing either to complete our Business Combination or because we become obligated to redeem a significant number of our public shares upon completion of our Business Combination, in which case we may issue additional securities or incur debt in connection with such Business Combination. Subject to compliance with applicable securities laws, we would only complete such financing simultaneously with the completion of our Business Combination. If we are unable to complete a Business Combination because we do not have sufficient funds available to us, we will be forced to cease operations and liquidate the Trust Account. In addition, following our Business Combination, if cash on hand is insufficient, we may need to obtain additional financing in order to meet our obligations.

If our estimates of the costs of identifying a target business, undertaking in-depth due diligence and negotiating a Business Combination are less than the actual amounts necessary to do so, we may have insufficient funds available to operate our business prior to our Business Combination. Moreover, we may need to obtain additional financing either to complete our Business Combination or because we become obligated to redeem a significant number of our public shares upon completion of our Business Combination, in which case we may issue additional securities or incur debt in connection with such Business Combination. Subject to compliance with applicable securities laws, we would only complete such financing simultaneously with the completion of our Business Combination. If we are unable to complete a Business Combination because we do not have sufficient funds available to us, we will be forced to cease operations and liquidate the Trust Account. In addition, following our Business Combination, if cash on hand is insufficient, we may need to obtain additional financing in order to meet our obligations.

On August 9, 2016, we entered into Extension Promissory Notes with affiliates of our sponsors for an aggregate amount of $130,000 in order to fund the deposit required to extend the date by which we must complete a Business Combination to November 11, 2016 and to fund working capital requirements. On November 10, 2016, we entered into Second Extension Promissory Notes with affiliates of our sponsors for an aggregate amount of $100,000 in order to fund the deposit required to extend the date by which we must complete a Business Combination to February 11, 2017. The Extension Promissory Notes and Second Extension Promissory Notes are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on the earlier of (i) the date on which we consummate a Business Combination or (ii) the date which we determine not to proceed with a Business Combination.

In February and March 2017, we entered into 2017 Promissory Notes with affiliates of our sponsors for an aggregate amount of $2535,000 in order to fund working capital requirements. The 2017 Promissory Notes are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on the earlier of (i) the date on which we consummate a Business Combination or (ii) the date which we determine not to proceed with a Business Combination. In addition, on February 14, 2017 and March 16, 2017, we received advances from a third party in the aggregate amount of $170,000 in order to fund the Contribution required under the Extension Amendment. The advances are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we entered into 2017 Trust Promissory Notes with affiliates of our sponsors to fund the Contribution required under the Extension Amendments. The 2017 Trust Promissory Notes are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on the earlier of (i) the date on which we consummate a Business Combination or (ii) the date which we determine not to proceed with a Business Combination. The loans are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on the earlier of (i) the date on which the Company consummates a Business Combination or (ii) the date on which we determine not to proceed with a Business Combination.

In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, we received advances from a third party in the aggregate amount of $425,000 in order to fund the Contribution required under the First Extension Amendment. The advances are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand.

In order to fund working capital deficiencies or finance transaction costs in connection with an intended Business Combination, our sponsors, officers and directors or their affiliates may, but are not obligated to, loan us funds, from time to time or at any time, in whatever amount they deem reasonable in their sole discretion. Each loan would be evidenced by a promissory note. The notes would be paid upon consummation of a Business Combination, without interest, or, at the lender’s discretion, up to $500,000 of the notes may be converted upon consummation of a Business Combination into additional Private Units at a price of $10.00 per Unit.

Our sponsors are not under any obligation to advance us funds, or to invest in us. Accordingly, we may not be able to obtain additional financing. If we are unable to raise additional capital, we may be required to take additional measures to conserve liquidity, which could include, but not necessarily be limited to, curtailing operations, suspending the pursuit of our business plan, and reducing overhead expenses. We cannot provide any assurance that new financing will be available to us on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Off-balance sheet financing arrangements

We have no obligations, assets or liabilities which would be considered off-balance sheet arrangements. We have not entered into any off-balance sheet financing arrangements, established any special purpose entities, guaranteed any debt or commitments of other entities, or purchased any non-financial assets.

Contractual obligations

We do not have any long-term debt, capital lease obligations, operating lease obligations or long-term liabilities.

~~Significant~~ Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and income and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. ~~We have~~The Company has identified the following ~~significant~~critical accounting policy:

Common Stock ~~stock~~ subject to possible redemption

We account for our ~~Common~~ ~~Stock~~common stock subject to possible conversion in accordance with the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.” Common ~~Stock~~stock subject to mandatory redemption (if any) is classified as a liability instrument and is measured at fair value. Conditionally redeemable common stock (including common stock that features redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within our control) is classified as temporary equity. At all other times, common stock is classified as stockholders’ equity. Our ~~Common~~common ~~Stock~~stock features certain redemption rights that are considered to be outside of our control and subject to occurrence of uncertain future events. Accordingly, at December 31, 2017, the ~~Common~~common ~~Stock~~stock subject to possible redemption is presented as temporary equity, outside of the stockholders’ equity section of our balance sheet.

Recent accounting pronouncements

Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material ~~effect~~ effect on the Company'’s financial statements.

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering, the sale of the Private Units and the sale of the over-allotment units held in the Trust Account are invested in U.S. government treasury bills with a maturity of 180 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations. Due to the short-term nature of these investments, we believe there will be no associated material exposure to interest rate risk.

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Reference is made to pages F-1 through F-14 comprising a portion of this report.

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer (together, the “Certifying Officers”), we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on the foregoing, our Certifying Officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Certifying Officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

As required by the SEC rules and regulations for the implementation of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

●

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of our company;

●

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

●

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect errors or misstatements in our ~~financial~~ financial statements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree or compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at December 31, ~~2016~~2017. In making these assessments, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). Based on our assessments and those criteria, management determined that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting at December 31, ~~2016~~2017.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. As we are an emerging growth company, management's report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management's report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.17

This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. As we are an emerging growth company, management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

None.

1118

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors and Executive Officers

Our directors and executive officers are as follows:

Name	Age	Position
Cory Lipoff	59	Chief Executive Officer
Paul Abramowitz	62	Chief Executive Officer and Director
James A. Mitarotonda	62	Chairman of the Board
Adam Levin	39	Chairman of the Board of Directors
Jared L. Landaw	51	Secretary and Director
Colin Conway	34	Secretary and Director
Jeffrey B. Hecktman	62	Director
Marc Beilinson	60	Director
Robert Mettler	75	Director
Justin Ehrlich	39	Director
Frank R. Mori	75	Director
Jeffrey D. Nuechterlein	59	Director

~~Cory Lipoff~~Paul Abramowitz. From 2008 to the present, Mr. Abramowitz has ~~served~~been asthe ~~our~~president and Chief Executive Officer ~~since~~of ~~May~~Liquidity 1Capital Group, ~~2015.~~LLC, ~~Mr.~~as ~~Lipoff~~private ~~has~~company ~~been~~engaged ain ~~trusted~~making direct investments in assets of and ~~passionate~~claims ~~advisor~~against companies subject to ~~retailers~~Chapter on11 ~~strategic~~ and ~~financial~~Chapter ~~performance~~7 ~~issues~~proceedings ~~for~~under ~~over~~the 30Federal ~~years~~Bankruptcy Law. HeFrom ~~currently~~2006 ~~serves~~to as2008, ~~Executive~~he ~~Vice~~served as President and aCEO ~~Principal in~~of ~~Hilco~~Neah ~~Merchant~~Power Systems, ~~Resources~~Inc., a ~~division~~micro offuel ~~Hilco~~development ~~Global,~~company ~~and~~engaged ain ~~respected~~development ~~advisor~~of porous silicon to ~~retail~~create ~~companies.~~higher Hefuel ~~has~~cell ~~assisted~~power. ~~numerous~~Under ~~retailers~~his ~~around~~leadership, ~~the~~Neah ~~world~~Power towas ~~create~~revived ~~significant~~after ~~shareholder~~a ~~value~~shutdown, ~~across~~raised ~~all~~over ~~key~~$15 ~~retail~~million ~~sectors~~in financing, ~~including~~restructured ~~department~~its ~~store,~~board ~~specialty~~of directors ~~apparel~~and management and ~~hard~~negotiated ~~lines,~~a ~~big~~strategic ~~box~~partnership ~~and~~with ~~grocery~~General Dynamics. AFrom ~~recognized~~2003 ~~expert~~to ~~in bankruptcy~~2004, ~~corporate~~Mr. ~~reorganization~~Abramowitz ~~and~~was ~~restructurings,~~recruited ~~Mr.~~by ~~Lipoff~~Paul ~~specializes~~Allen inand ~~structuring~~Vulcan, ~~and~~Inc. ~~implementing~~to ~~sophisticated~~turn ~~asset~~around ~~redeployment~~Experience ~~strategies~~Learning ~~for~~Communities, ~~retailers.~~a ~~Prior~~non-profit toeducational ~~joining Hilco~~company. inSince ~~2000~~1991, Mr. Abramowitz ~~Lipoff~~has ~~was~~been athe ~~Partner~~CEO inof ~~bankruptcy/commercial~~Special ~~law~~Investments, atInc., ~~Jones-Day~~a ~~and~~consulting ~~has~~company ~~served~~that asspecializes ~~Chairman~~in ofdebt ~~the~~reorganization ~~Compensation~~and financings ~~Committee~~for onmajor ~~the~~corporate ~~board~~clients. ofMr. ~~directors~~Abramowitz ofhas ~~Loehmann’s~~a ~~and~~BS ~~has~~from ~~served~~Ohio onState ~~the~~University ~~board~~and ofan ~~advisors~~MBA ~~for~~from the University of ~~Florida, Miller~~Southern ~~Retail Center~~California.

WeMarc Beilinson. ~~believe~~For the past five years, Mr. Beilinson has been the Managing Partner of Beilinson Advisory Group, a financial restructuring and hospitality advisory group that specializes in assisting distress companies. Throughout his career, Mr. Beilinson has been ~~Lipoff~~active in the restructuring of complex commercial and real estate portfolios throughout the United States and has also specialized in restructuring real estate chains. Mr. Beilinson is ~~well~~currently ~~qualified~~the toChief ~~serve~~Restructuring Officer/CEO of Eagle Hospitality. He previously served as ~~our~~the Chief ~~Executive~~Restructuring Officer/CEO ~~based~~of onInnkeepers ~~his~~USA ~~experience~~until ~~advising~~January ~~retail~~2012. ~~and~~Mr. ~~other~~Beilinson ~~consumer~~has ~~focused~~recently been appointed ~~businesses,~~to the ~~considerable~~Board ~~resources~~of heDirectors ~~brings~~of toMF ~~bear~~Global asAssurance Company by the ~~Executive~~Chapter ~~Vice~~11 ~~President~~trustee of ~~Hilco~~MF ~~Merchant~~Global ~~Resources~~Assurance and ~~his~~has ~~legal~~previously served ~~expertise~~on the Board of Directors of Wyndham Hotels, Apollo Real Estate Commercial Mortgage Inc., Innkeepers USA, Jameson Hotels and the University of California School of Law.

~~James A. Mitarotonda~~Between ~~has~~1992 ~~served~~and ~~as our Chairman of the Board since our inception. From the inception of the Company through May 1~~2007, ~~2015,~~ Mr. ~~Mitarotonda also~~Beilinson ~~served~~practiced aslaw ~~our~~with ~~Chief~~the ~~Executive~~firm ~~Officer. Mr. Mitarotonda is Chairman~~ of ~~the~~Pachulski, ~~Board~~Stang, ~~President~~Ziehl ~~and~~& ~~Chief Executive Officer of Barington Capital Group~~Jones, ~~L.P.,~~a annationally ~~investment~~recognized ~~management~~law firm specializing ~~that he co-founded~~ in ~~November~~corporate ~~1991~~restructuring. ~~Mr.~~During ~~Mitarotonda~~his is25 ~~also~~years ~~Chairman~~ of ~~the Board~~practice, ~~President~~Mr. ~~and~~Beilinson ~~Chief~~spearheaded ~~Executive Officer of Barington Companies Investors, LLC,~~ the ~~general~~operational ~~partner~~and ~~of Barington Companies~~financial ~~Equity~~restructuring ~~Partners,~~of ~~L.P.,~~nationally arecognized ~~value-oriented~~companies ~~activist~~such ~~investment fund. Mr. Mitarotonda currently serves~~ as aAmerican ~~director of A. Schulman~~Rice, ~~Inc.,~~ ~~where~~TreeSweet heJuice ~~serves on the Compensation Committee and the Strategic Committee~~Company, ~~and~~Coco’s ~~The Pep Boys — Manny~~Restaurants, ~~Moe~~General ~~& Jack~~Cinema, ~~where~~Loews heCineplex, ~~serves~~Wherehouse onEntertainment ~~the Compensation Committee~~ and ~~the~~DirecTV ~~Nominating~~Latin ~~and~~America. ~~Governance~~Mr. ~~Committee~~Beilinson ~~and~~graduated ~~was the Chairman of the Board~~ from ~~July 2008 until June 2009. During the past five years~~UCLA, hemagna ~~also~~cum ~~served as a director of The Jones Group~~laude, ~~Inc., Ameron~~ ~~International Corporation, Griffon Corporation~~ and ~~Gerber~~from ~~Scientific,~~UC ~~Inc.~~Davis HeLaw ~~is also a former director of Register~~School.~~com, Inc. and Sielox, Inc. Mr. Mitarotonda also serves as the Chairman of the Business Advisory Board of Queens College.~~

WeColin Conway. ~~believe~~Since ~~that~~October 2016, Mr. Conway has been a managing director of Oreva Capital Corp., a Los Angeles based ~~Mitarotonda~~merchant isbank ~~well~~focused ~~qualified~~on making direct investments in diversified, private operating companies. Mr. Conway participated in the acquisition of Trans High Corporation in March 2017. For four years prior to ~~serve~~Oreva Capital Mr. Conway served as a managing director ofat Vert Capital Corp., where he led the ~~Company~~business ~~based~~development onteam ~~his~~and ~~public~~participated ~~company~~in ~~director~~the ~~experience~~acquisition and restructuring of private operating companies in various industries including digital media, ~~his~~Internet, ~~investment~~software, and apparel. Adam E. Levin, ~~banking~~our ~~expertise~~Chief Executive Officer, is the chief executive officer of Oreva Capital and ~~his~~was ~~experience~~the ~~investing~~chief inexecutive ~~consumer~~officer ~~focused~~of ~~companies~~Vert Capital Corporation. From 2010 to 2012, Mr. Conway was previously an associate director at Weston Capital Management, LLC, a Connecticut based Hedge Fund and Fund of Funds.

Jared L. Landaw has served as our Secretary and a member of our board since our inception. Mr. Landaw is the Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel of Barington where he has been employed since 2004. From 1998 until 2003, Mr. Landaw worked at International Specialty Products Inc., or ISP, a manufacturer of specialty chemicals and performance enhancing products, where he was the Vice President of Law. At ISP, Mr. Landaw was responsible for, among other things, handling all merger and acquisition and strategic transactions and was the recipient of the Chairman’s Award for “outstanding work and notable contribution to the affairs of the Company.” Prior to that, he was an attorney in the Mergers & Acquisitions Practice Group at the law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. Mr. Landaw currently serves as a director of Costar Technologies, Inc., where he serves as Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and as a member of the Strategic Committee which oversees mergers, acquisitions and other strategic transactions. He is also a member of the Board of Trustees of Big Brothers Big Sisters of New York City, Inc.19

WeJustin Ehrlich. ~~believe~~Justin ~~that~~Ehrlich ~~Mr.~~is a partner in VE Equities LLC, a full-service real estate company with capabilities in investment, ~~Landaw~~finance, asset management and construction. Justin is ~~well~~responsible ~~qualified~~for tomanaging ~~serve~~the asfirm’s areal ~~director~~estate ofinvestment and finance activities and handling the ~~Company~~company’s ~~based~~overall ~~on,~~operations ~~among~~and ~~other~~asset ~~things~~management. He has completed over $10 billion of luxury mixed-use and condominium projects in Manhattan and is also currently developing several mixed-use projects in California. In addition, ~~his~~Justin ~~extensive~~is ~~experience~~a partner in ~~mergers~~Churchill Real Estate Holdings LLC, an alternative investment platform offering short term debt products to institutional and ~~acquisitions~~private clients. Mr. Ehrlich holds a BA in Business Administration from Boston University’s School of Management and ~~his~~earned ~~expertise~~a MS in ~~corporate~~Real ~~governance~~Estate Finance and Investment from New York University. He served as the Secretary of the 125th Street Business Improvement District from 2008 to 2009. He has received numerous awards and honors from multiple industry organizations including the 2011 Developer of The Year Award from Young Jewish Professionals and was the Guest of Honor at the YJP 2014 Founders Gala at Cipriani Downtown. Mr. Ehrlich is currently on the Board of Directors for A Caring Hand and BDS Analytics.

~~Jeffrey~~Adam Levin, BAdam Levin is the founder of Hightimes Holdings Corp. ~~Hecktman~~ and has served as aits ~~director~~Chairman ~~since~~and ~~September~~Chief Executive Officer, ~~2014~~since its inception in December 2016. InMr. Levin ~~2000~~currently serves on the board of directors of Pride Media, MrInc., ~~Nuechterlein~~and ~~founded~~previously served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Pixelmags until its sale in 2016. He brings over 15 years of leadership experience running Internet-based technology and ~~since~~e-commerce ~~inception~~companies. Mr. Levin has been Managing ~~Partner~~Director of ~~Nue~~Oreva Capital ~~LLC~~ Corp, since September 2016 and ~~investment~~for ~~management~~five ~~company~~years ~~based~~prior into ~~Alexandria,~~that ~~Virginia.~~was ~~Mr.~~the ~~Hecktman~~Managing ~~is Chairman~~Director ~~and~~of ~~Chief~~Vert ~~Executive~~Capital ~~Officer~~Corp where he oversaw the day to day operations of ~~Hilco~~the ~~Global~~firm, anand ~~independent~~led ~~financial~~the ~~services~~acquisition ~~company~~of ~~that~~a ~~helps~~number of companies. ~~maximize the~~He ~~value~~has extensive experience in the fields of ~~their~~mobile, ~~assets~~social networking, entertainment as well as venture capital and merger and acquisition strategies. Mr. ~~Hecktman~~Levin ~~founded~~has ~~Hilco~~been a infeatured ~~1987~~speaker toat ~~conduct~~CES, ~~business~~MIPTV, ~~asset~~MONY ~~liquidations.~~Conference, ~~Today~~CTIA, ~~Hilco~~Wireless ~~Global~~Influencers, and has been featured in The Wall Street Journal, ~~expanded~~The ~~its~~NY ~~services~~Times, ~~with~~Fortune, aBloomberg ~~portfolio~~and ofEntrepreneur ~~twenty~~Magazine. ~~companies~~He ~~that~~has ~~focus~~appeared on ~~asset~~CNN, ~~valuation~~NPR, ~~asset monetization~~MSNBC, HBO and ~~advisory~~Fox News. Mr. Levin ~~solutions~~also ~~for~~served ~~clients~~as ~~around~~Chief ~~the~~Executive ~~world.~~Officer ~~Mr.~~and ~~Hecktman~~a isdirector anof ~~active~~Bebo.com, Inc., ~~member~~a ofsocial ~~the~~networking ~~National~~and ~~Retail~~content ~~Federation~~website, ~~the~~from ~~Commercial~~2010 ~~Finance~~to ~~Association~~2012. Bebo.com, ~~the~~Inc., ~~Turnaround~~filed ~~Management~~for ~~Association~~protection ~~and~~under Chapter 11 of the ~~American~~United States Bankruptcy ~~Institute~~Code in May 2013. Mr. ~~Nuechterlein~~Levin was isan aofficer ~~member~~of Bebo within the two-year period prior to the filing of the ~~Public~~Chapter ~~Company~~11 ~~Accounting~~petition ~~Oversight~~but ~~Board’s~~had ~~Standing~~resigned ~~Advisory~~as an officer ~~Group~~and director prior to such filing. Mr. Levin earned a BA from Thomas Edison State College.

We believe that Mr. Hecktman is well qualified to serve as a director of the Company based on his experience advising retail and other consumer focused businesses, the considerable resources he brings to bear as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hilco Global and his management experience as a chief executive officer.

Robert Mettler has served as a director since September, 2014. Mr. Mettler was President of Special Projects of Macy's, Inc. from February 2008 until his retirement in January 2009. He previously served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Macy's West, a division of Macy's, Inc., from 2002 to 2008 and as President and Chief Operating Officer of Macy's West from 2000 to 2002. Prior to joining Macy's, Mr. Mettler held various executive positions in the retail industry, including President of Merchandising - Full Line Stores of Sears, Roebuck and Co. from 1996 to 2000, President of Apparel and Home Fashions of Sears from 1993 to 1996, and President and Chief Executive Officer of Robinson's May Company from 1987 to 1993. During the past five years, Mr. Mettler has served on the Board of Directors of Stein Mart, Inc., Quiksilver, Inc., and The Jones Group.

We believe Mr. Mettler is well qualified to serve as a director of the Company based on his experience in the retail industry, including more than 20 years in executive positions with major department stores, his merchandising and marketing expertise, and his experience as a public company director.

Frank R. Mori has served as a director since September, 2014. Mr. Mori is the Co-Chief Executive of Takihyo, LLC, a private investment firm headquartered in New York City. From 1986 to 2000, he served as a director of Donna Karan International, Inc. and served for part of this time as the company’s first Chief Executive Officer. From 1975 to 2002, he served as Chief Executive Officer and director of Anne Klein & Co., Inc. Mr. Mori has been a member of the Board of Directors of Dillard’s, Inc. since 2008, where he serves as a member of the Board's Stock Option and Executive Compensation Committee. From 2002 to 2007, Mr. Mori served as a member of the Board of Directors of The Stride Rite Corporation, where he served from 2005 to 2007 as lead outside director and spearheaded the sale of the company in 2007 to Collective Brands, Inc.

We believe Mr. Mori is well qualified to serve as a director of the Company based on his broad knowledge and perspectives as an apparel manufacturer, his sourcing and manufacturing expertise and his experience as a chief executive officer.

Jeffrey D. Nuechterlein has served as a director since September, 2014. In 2000, Mr. Nuechterlein founded and since inception has been Managing Partner of an investment management company now called Nue Capital LLC. Nue Capital manages public and private equity investments and frequently invests in retail and consumer focused companies. Previously, Mr. Nuechterlein served as Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer, Pension Fund Investments, at National Gypsum Company from 1997 until 2000, Senior Counsel to the U.S. Trade Representative from 1995 until 1996, was an attorney with Dewey Ballantine, LLP from 1992 until 1995, served as Special Assistant for Policy to the Governor of Virginia from 1990 to 1991, served as Counsel to the U.S. Senate's Judiciary Subcommittee on Technology from 1989 until 1990, and he practiced law with Covington & Burling from 1987 until 1989. Mr. Nuechterlein serves on the Board of Trustees of Chesapeake Lodging Trust, where he is a member of the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and he is Chairman of the Board of Directors of Cartica Capital, a privately-held equity manager that is focused on investments in emerging markets. In addition, he is a former member of the Board of Directors of The Jones Group, Inc., where he served on the Audit Committee. Among his non-profit activities, Mr. Nuechterlein serves on the board of Americans for Oxford, Inc. and the Classical American Homes Preservation Trust in New York, and he is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations in New York.

We believe Mr. Nuechterlein is well qualified to serve as a director of the Company based on, among other things, his experience in strategic planning, corporate finance and venture capital investing.

Audit Committee

~~Upon~~Prior to consummation of the ~~closing~~transactions of contemplated by the ~~Initial~~Change ~~Public~~of ~~Offering~~Control Agreement, wethe ~~established~~Company’s an audit committee of the board of directors, ~~consisting~~consisted of Jeffrey D. Nuechterlein, Robert Mettler and Frank Mori, each of whom iswas an independent director. As ~~Jeffrey~~a Dresult of the Change of Control Agreement and the resignations of Messrs. Nuechterlein, isMettler and Mori as directors, the former ~~chairman~~members of ~~our~~the audit committee were replaced by Justin Ehrlich, Marc Beilinson and Adam E. Levin. Mr. Ehrlich is the chairman of the reconstituted audit committee. The audit committee’s duties, which are specified in our Audit Committee Charter, include, but are not limited to:

·● reviewing and discussing with management and the independent auditor the annual audited financial statements, and recommending to the board whether the audited financial statements should be included in our Form 10-K; ·● discussing with management and the independent auditor significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of our financial statements; ·● discussing with management major risk assessment and risk management policies; ·● monitoring the independence of the independent auditor; ·● verifying the rotation of the lead (or coordinating) audit partner having primary responsibility for the audit and the audit partner responsible for reviewing the audit as required by law; ·● reviewing and approving all related-party transactions;

1320

·● inquiring and discussing with management our compliance with applicable laws and regulations; ·● pre-approving all audit services and permitted non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditor, including the fees and terms of the services to be performed; ·● appointing or replacing the independent auditor; ·● determining the compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditor (including resolution of disagreements between management and the independent auditor regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work; ·● establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or reports which raise material issues regarding our financial statements or accounting policies; and ·● approving reimbursement of expenses incurred by our management team in identifying potential target businesses.

Financial Experts on Audit Committee

The audit committee is composed exclusively of “independent directors” who are “financially literate” as defined under the Nasdaq listing standards. The Nasdaq listing standards define “financially literate” as being able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement.

In addition, wethe ~~have~~ Company has certified to Nasdaq that the committee has, and will continue to have, at least one member who has past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting, or other comparable experience or background that results in the individual’s financial sophistication. The board of directors has determined that ~~Jeffrey D~~Mr. Ehrlich ~~Nuechterlein~~ qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under rules and regulations of the SEC.

Nominating Committee

As a result of the Agreement and the resignations of Messrs. Mori, Mettler and Nuechterlein, the Company reconstituted the nominating committee of the board of directors to consist of Adam E. Levin, Justin Ehrlich and Colin Conway, each of whom is an independent director. Mr. Levin is the chairman of the nominating committee. The nominating committee is responsible for overseeing the selection of persons to be nominated to serve on our board of directors. The nominating committee considers persons identified by its members, management, stockholders, investment bankers and others.

Guidelines for Selecting Director Nominees

The guidelines for selecting nominees, which are specified in our Nominating Committee Charter, generally provide that persons to be nominated:

	●	should have demonstrated notable or significant achievements in business, education or public service;
	●	should possess the requisite intelligence, education and experience to make a significant contribution to the board of directors and bring a range of skills, diverse perspectives and backgrounds to its deliberations; and
	●	should have the highest ethical standards, a strong sense of professionalism and intense dedication to serving the interests of our stockholders.

The Nominating Committee will consider a number of qualifications relating to management and leadership experience, background, integrity and professionalism in evaluating a person’s candidacy for membership on the board of directors. The nominating committee may require certain skills or attributes, such as financial or accounting experience, to meet specific board needs that arise from time to time and will also consider the overall experience and makeup of its members to obtain a broad and diverse mix of board members. The nominating committee does not distinguish among nominees recommended by stockholders and other persons.

Compensation Committee

As a result of the Agreement and the resignations of Messrs. Mori, Mettler and Nuechterlein, the Company reconstituted the compensation committee of the board of directors to consist of Adam E. Levin and Colin Conway, each of whom is an independent director. Mr. Levin is the chairman of the compensation committee. The compensation committee will determine the salary, fees or other compensation (including any cash-based and equity-based compensation plans and arrangements) to be paid to our officers or directors. No salary, fees or other compensation will be paid to any officers and directors until the Company consummates its initial business combination. Therefore, the compensation committee will not conduct any meetings until after the Company consummates its initial business combination.

Code of Ethics and Audit Committee Charter

We have adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to our directors, officers and employees. We have filed a copy of our Code of Ethics and our audit committee charter as exhibits to the registration statement associated with our Initial Public Offering. You will be able to review these documents by accessing our public filings at the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov. In addition, a copy of the Code of Ethics will be provided without charge upon request from us. We intend to disclose any amendments to or waivers of certain provisions of our Code of Ethics in a Current Report on Form 8-K.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Executive Compensation

No executive officer has received any cash compensation for services rendered to us. From the date of effectiveness of the Initial Public Offering through December 31, 2015, we paid Barington Capital Group, L.P., an affiliate of James A. Mitarotonda, a fee of $7,500 per month for providing us with office space and certain office and secretarial services. However, this arrangement was solely for our benefit and was not intended to provide James A. Mitarotonda compensation in lieu of a salary. Other than the $7,500 per month administrative fee, no compensation or fees of any kind, including finder’s, consulting fees and other similar fees, has been or will be paid to our sponsors, members of our management team or their respective affiliates, for services rendered prior to or in connection with the consummation of our Initial Business Combination (regardless of the type of transaction that it is). However, such individuals may receive reimbursement for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in connection with activities on our behalf, such as identifying potential target businesses, performing business due diligence on suitable target businesses and business combinations as well as traveling to and from the offices, plants or similar locations of prospective target businesses to examine their operations. There is no limit on the amount of out-of-pocket expenses reimbursable by us; provided, however, that to the extent such expenses exceed the available proceeds not deposited in the Trust Account and the interest income earned on the amounts held in the Trust Account, such expenses would not be reimbursed by us unless we consummate an Initial Business Combination.

After our Initial Business Combination, members of our management team who remain with us may be paid consulting, management or other fees from the combined company with any and all amounts being fully disclosed to stockholders, to the extent then known, in the proxy solicitation materials furnished to our stockholders. It is unlikely the amount of such compensation will be known at the time of a stockholder meeting held to consider our Initial Business Combination, as it will be up to the directors of the post-combination business to determine executive and director compensation. In this event, such compensation will be publicly disclosed at the time of its determination in a Current Report on Form 8-K, as required by the SEC.

Compensation Committee

Upon the effectiveness of the Initial Public Offering, we established a compensation committee of the board of directors consisting of Robert Mettler, Frank Mori and Jeffrey D. Nuechterlein. Robert Mettler is the chairman of the compensation committee. The compensation committee will determine the salary, fees or other compensation (including any cash-based and equity-based compensation plans and arrangements) to be paid to our officers or directors. No salary, fees or other compensation will be paid to our officers and directors until we consummate our Initial Business Combination. Therefore, the compensation committee will not conduct any meetings until after we consummate our Initial Business Combination.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Except as disclosed, none of our executive officers currently serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of directors.

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

~~The~~Pursuant to ~~following~~the ~~table sets~~Change ~~forth~~of ~~information~~Control ~~regarding~~Agreement, the ~~beneficial~~Sellers ~~ownership~~transferred to the Investors listed belowan aggregate of ~~our~~(a) ~~shares~~1,035,767 shares of the Common Stock of the Company, and ~~rights~~(b) asan aggregate of ~~March~~142,500 30warrants to purchase an additional 142,500 ~~2017~~shares ~~based~~of onCommon ~~information~~Stock ~~obtained~~(collectively, ~~from~~the “Transferred Securities”). The 1,035,767 shares of Common Stock included in the ~~persons~~Transferred Securities ~~named~~represented ~~below~~96.5% of an aggregate of 1,073,267 ~~with~~insider ~~respect~~promoter toshares of Common Stock of the ~~beneficial~~Company ~~ownership~~owned of record and beneficially by the Sellers (the “Insider Shares”). Under the Change of Control Agreement, the Sellers retained an aggregate of (i) 285,000 shares of ~~our~~Common ~~common~~Stock ~~stock~~and associated rights, ~~by:~~which entitle a holder to receive one-tenth (1/10) of a share of Common Stock (the “Rights”), and (ii) 37,500 promotional shares of Common Stock that were issued to directors and officers of the Company and the acting chief financial officer of the Company as compensation for their services to the Company.

·Pending the ~~each~~Company’s ~~person~~ability ~~known~~to effect a business combination with an unaffiliated entity that is approved by usthe toCompany’s stockholders be(a “Business Combination”), the ~~beneficial~~Insider ~~owner~~Shares oforiginally ~~more~~issued ~~than~~to 5%the Sellers in connection with the formation of ~~our~~the ~~outstanding~~Company ~~shares~~as a special purpose acquisition corporation in 2014 were placed in escrow pursuant to a share escrow agreement dated as of ~~Common~~February 5, 2015 by and among the Sellers, the Company and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (“CSTC”). The Transferred Securities issued to the Investors will continue to be retained in escrow with CSTC pursuant to a separate letter agreement among the Sellers and the Investors, dated January 3, 2018. The Sellers also agreed to assign to the Investors their registration rights; with respect to the Transferred Securities and the Investors agreed to comply with such registration rights agreement. In addition, the Investors agreed to provide certain indemnification rights to the Sellers and to maintain in effect the current directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy maintained by the Company (or a policy of at least the same coverage and amounts containing terms and conditions which are no less advantageous to the Sellers).

·The following ~~each~~table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our ~~officers~~shares ~~and~~of ~~directors;~~Common Stock and rights as of April 30, 2018 based on information obtained from the persons named below, with respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock, by:

·● each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock and rights; ● each of our officers and directors; and ● all of our officers and directors as a group.

Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock and rights beneficially owned by them.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock	~~Amount~~Approximate ~~and~~Percentage ~~Nature~~ of ~~Beneficial~~Outstanding ~~Ownership~~Shares of Common Stock			~~Approximate Percentage of Outstanding Shares of Common Stock~~
Karpus Management, Inc.			757,568	(2)		13.4	%
Sweiss Ventures, LLC (2)	245,995	10.95%
James A. Mitarotonda			632,758	(3)		11.2	%
PLA 99, LLC (3)	245,995	10.95%
Barington Companies Advisors, LLC			625,258			11.0	%
BAG Spac1, LLC (4)	245.995	10.95%
River North Capital Management, LLC			622,740	(4)		11.0	%
JS Equity Holdings, LLC (5)	245.995	10.95%
Jeffrey B. Hecktman (5)			580,959	(6)		10.3	%
Oreva Partners, LLC (6)	51,787	2.30%
Hilco Global			575,959	(7)		10.2	%
Hilco Merchant Resources, LLC (1)(7)	127,500	5.68%
Davidson Kempner Partners			398,000	(8)		7.0	%
James A. Mitarotonda (1) (8)	122,500	5,45%
Robert Mettler (9)			47,300			*
All directors and executive officers as a group (six individuals)	1,285,767	57.23%
Frank R. Mori (10)			47,300			*
Jeffrey D. Nuechterlein (11)			47,300			*
Jared L. Landaw			12,845			*
All directors and executive officers as a group (six individuals)			1,368,462			24.2	%

* Less than 1%23

	(1)	~~Unless~~Each ~~otherwise~~share ~~indicated~~of Common Stock beneficially owned by Hilco Merchant Resources, ~~the~~LLC ~~business~~and ~~address~~James ofA ~~each~~Mitarotonda ofincludes ~~the~~an ~~individuals~~associated isright ~~888~~which ~~Seventh~~entitles ~~Avenue,~~the ~~17th~~holder ~~Floor,~~o ~~New~~receive ~~York,~~1/10 NYof ~~10019~~a share of Common Stock.
	(2)	The business address of ~~Karpus~~Sweiss ~~Management~~Ventures, ~~Inc~~LLC is 10990 Wilshire Blvd,, Penthouse Los Angeles, CA 90024. The member of Sweiss Ventues LLC is ~~183~~AEL ~~Sully’s~~Irrevocable ~~Trail~~Trust, ~~Pittsford~~Edwin Hur, NYtrustee. ~~14534~~Mr. Hur has sole voting and investment power over the shares.
	(3)	~~Includes~~The ~~the~~business ~~shares~~address of ~~Common~~PLA ~~Stock~~99, ~~beneficially~~LLC ~~owned~~is by16659 ~~Barington~~Ashley ~~Companies~~Oaks, ~~Advisors~~Suite 201, ~~LLC~~Encino, anCalifornia ~~affiliate~~91436. ofPaul ~~Barington~~Abramowitz, ~~Capital~~Chief ~~Group,~~Executive ~~L.P.,~~Officer of ~~which~~the ~~James~~Company A.is ~~Mitarotonda,~~the asmanaging ~~Managing Member~~member, and has sole voting and investment power over the shares.
	(4)	The business address of ~~River~~BAG ~~North~~Spac ~~Management~~1, LLC is ~~325~~11111 N.Santa ~~LaSalle~~Monica ~~Street~~Boulevard, ~~Suite~~Los ~~645~~Angeles, ~~Chicago~~CA 90024. Marc Beilinson is the managing member, ILand ~~60654~~has sole voting and investment power over the shares.
	(5)	The business address of ~~Mr.~~JS ~~Hecktman~~Equity Holdings, LLC is 5250 ~~Revere~~Bowery, ~~Drive~~2nd Floor, ~~Suite~~New ~~2056~~York, ~~Northbrook~~N.Y. 10012. Justin Ehrlich is the managing member, ILand ~~60062~~has sole voting and investment power over the shares.
	(6)	~~Includes~~The ~~the~~business ~~shares~~address of ~~Common~~Oreva ~~Stock~~Partners, ~~beneficially~~LLC ~~owned~~is by10990 ~~Hilco~~Wilshire ~~Global~~Blvd,, ~~and~~Penthouse ~~Hilco~~Los ~~Merchant Resources~~Angeles, CA 90024. Maxx Abramowitz is the managing member of ~~which~~Oreva ~~Jeffrey~~Partners, B.LLC ~~Hecktman~~and has sole voting and investment power over the shares.
	(7)	Includes the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Hilco Global and Hilco Merchant Resources, of which Jeffrey B. Hecktman has sole voting and investment power, and includes the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Hilco Merchant Resources, LLC, an affiliate of Hilco Global, of which Hilco Global has sole voting and investment power. The business address of Mr. Hecktman is 5 Revere Drive, Suite 2056, Northbrook, IL 60062.
	(8)	~~The~~Includes ~~business~~the ~~address~~shares of ~~Davidson~~Common ~~Kempner~~Stock beneficially owned by Barington Companies Advisors, LLC, an affiliate of Barington Capital ~~Management~~Group, LPL.P., isof 65which ~~East~~James ~~55th~~A. ~~Street~~Mitarotonda, ~~19th~~as Managing Member, has sole voting and investment power. The business address of James A. Mitarotonda is 888 Seventh Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY ~~10022~~10019.
	(9)	The business address of Mr. Mettler is P.O. Box 1209, Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067.
	(10)	The business address of Mr. Mori is 64 Turkey Hill Road South, Westport, CT 06880.
	(11)	The business address of Mr. Nuechterlein is 204 South Union Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Insider Shares

In September and October 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,150,000 shares of Common Stock to its sponsors (the “Insider Shares”) for an aggregate purchase price of $25,000. The 1,150,000 Insider Shares included an aggregate of up to 150,000 shares subject to forfeiture to the extent that the underwriters’ over-allotment was not exercised in full or in part, so that the Company’s sponsors would collectively own 20% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares after the Initial Public Offering (excluding the shares underlying the Private Units). As a result of the underwriters’ election to exercise their over-allotment option to purchase 293,069 Units on February 11, 2015 (see Note 6 to the Financial Statements), 73,267 Insider Shares are no longer subject to forfeiture. The underwriters elected not to exercise the remaining portion of the over-allotment option; accordingly, 76,733 Insider Shares were forfeited.

Pursuant to the Change of Control Agreement, an aggregate of 1,035,767 of the Insider Shares and all 142,500 of their Private Warrants (collectively, the “Transferred Securities”) were transferred to the Investors.

Private Placement

Simultaneously with the Initial Public Offering, the Company’s sponsors and EBC purchased 295,000 Private Units (285,000 Units by the Company’s sponsors and 10,000 Units by EBC) at a price of $10.00 per Unit ($2,950,000 in the aggregate) from the Company in a private placement. The proceeds from the Private Units were added to the net proceeds from the Initial Public Offering held in the Trust Account. The Private Units are identical to the Units sold in the Initial Public Offering, except for the private warrants (“Private Warrants”), as described in Note 8 to the Financial Statements. In addition, the holders of the Common Stock underlying the Private Units have agreed (a) to vote such shares in favor of an Initial Business Combination, (b) not to propose, or vote in favor of, an amendment to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation with respect to the Company’s pre-Initial Business Combination activities prior to the consummation of such Initial Business Combination, unless the Company provides dissenting stockholders with the opportunity to convert such shares in connection with any such vote, (c) not to convert such shares into the right to receive cash from the Trust Account in connection with a stockholder vote to approve the Company’s proposed Initial Business Combination or a vote to amend the provisions of the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation relating to stockholders’ rights or pre-Initial Business Combination activity and (d) that such shares shall not participate in any liquidating distribution upon winding up if an Initial Business Combination is not consummated. Additionally, the holders have agreed not to transfer, assign or sell any of the Private Units or underlying securities (except to certain permitted transferees and provided the transferees agree to the same terms and restrictions as the permitted transferees of the Insider Shares must agree to) until the completion of the Initial Business Combination. If the Company does not complete an Initial Business Combination, the Private Warrants and the Private Rights will expire worthless.

~~Administrative Services Agreement~~24

Promissory Notes

The Company entered into promissory notes with affiliates of certain of its sponsors, whereby the affiliates, Barington Capital Group, L.P. and Hilco Global, loaned the Company an aggregate of $120,000 (“Promissory Notes”) to be used for the payment of expenses related to the Initial Public Offering. The Promissory Notes were non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on the earlier of (i) September 29, 2015, (ii) the date on which the Company consummated its Initial Public Offering or (iii) the date on which the Company determined to not proceed with the Initial Public Offering. The Promissory Notes were repaid on February 12, 2015.

In February and March 2017, we entered into Promissory Notes with affiliates of our sponsors for an aggregate amount of $2535,000 in order to fund working capital requirements. The 2017 Promissory Notes are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on the earlier of (i) the date on which we consummate a Business Combination or (ii) the date which we determine not to proceed with a Business Combination. In addition, on February 14, 2017 and March 16, 2017, we received advances from a third party in the aggregate amount of $170,000 in order to fund the Contribution required under the Extension Amendment. The advances are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand.

16During the year ended December 31, 2017, we entered into 2017 Trust Promissory Notes with affiliates of our sponsors to fund the contributions required under the First Extension Amendment and Second Extension Agreement. The 2017 Trust Promissory Notes are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on the earlier of (i) the date on which we consummate a Business Combination or (ii) the date which we determine not to proceed with a Business Combination. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, we received advances from a third party in the aggregate amount of $425,000 in order to fund the Contribution required under the First Extension Amendment. The advances are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand.

Director Independence

Currently ~~Jeffrey~~Adam BE. ~~Hecktman,~~ ~~Robert Mettler~~Levin, Justin ~~Frank~~Ehrlich ~~R. Mori~~ and ~~Jeffrey~~Colin D.Conway ~~Nuechterlein~~ are each considered an “independent director” under the Nasdaq listing rules, which is defined generally as a person other than an officer or employee of the company or its subsidiaries or any other individual having a relationship, which, in the opinion of the company’s board of directors would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

We will only enter into an Initial Business Combination if it is approved by a majority of our independent directors. Additionally, we will only enter into transactions with our officers and directors and their respective affiliates that are on terms no less favorable to us than could be obtained from independent parties. Any related-party transactions must be approved by our audit committee and a majority of disinterested directors.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The firm of Marcum LLP acted as our independent registered public accounting firm during the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016. The following is a summary of fees paid or to be paid to Marcum LLP for services rendered.

Audit Fees

During the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, audit fees for our independent registered public accounting firm were $48,~~510~~595 and $6548,~~515~~510, respectively. Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our year-end financial ~~statements~~ statements and services that are normally provided by Marcum LLP in connection with regulatory filings.

Audit-Related Fees

We did not receive audit-related services that are not reported as audit fees for the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016.

Tax Fees

During the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, our independent registered public accounting firm did not render any ~~fees~~services for tax ~~services to~~related usmatters.

All Other Fees

During the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, ~~fees billed for services provided by~~ our independent registered public accounting firm ~~other~~ ~~than~~did ~~those~~not ~~set~~render ~~forth~~any ~~above~~other ~~amounted to $0 and $120,002, respectively~~services.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our audit committee, on at least an annual basis, reviews audit and non-audit services performed by Marcum LLP as well as the fees charged by Marcum LLP for such services. Our policy is that all audit and non-audit services must be pre-approved by the audit committee. All of such services and fees were pre-approved during the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017.

1726

PART IV

ITEM 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

Exhibit No.		Description
3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed with the Commission on February 5, 2015)
3.2		Amendment No. 1, dated February 10, 2017, to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 15, 2017)
3.3		Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Commission on November 13, 2014)
10.1		Form of Extension Promissory Note*
3.4		Agreement, dated as of January 3, 2018, among Barington/Hilco Acquisition Corp., Barington Companies Advisors, LLC, Hilco Global, Hilco Merchant Resources, LLC and certain additional parties, including members of the board of directors of the Company, and Sweiss Ventures, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, JSE Holdings, LLC, a New York limited liability company, BAG Spac 1, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, PLA99, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Oreva Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Interim Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 9, 2018)
14		Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed with the Commission on January 27, 2015)
31*		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
32*		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. 1350.
101.INS*		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

* Filed herewith.

1827

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Section 13 or 15 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the ~~31st~~15 day of ~~March~~June, ~~2017~~2018.

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP. By: /s/ ~~Cory~~Paul ~~Lipoff~~Abramowitz Name: ~~Cory~~Paul ~~Lipoff~~Abramowitz Title: Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

1928

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints ~~Cory~~Paul ~~Lipoff~~Abramowitz and ~~Jared~~Adam ~~L. Landaw~~ Levin his true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution and substitution for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities to sign any and all amendments including post-effective amendments to this annual report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact or his substitute, each acting alone, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Form 10-K has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name	Position	Date
/s/ Cory Lipoff	Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Paul Abramowitz	Chief Executive Officer
Cory Lipoff	(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)	March 31, 2017
Paul Abramowitz	(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)	June 15, 2018
/s/ James A. Mitarotonda
/s/ Adam Levin
James A. Mitarotonda	Chairman	March 31, 2017
Adam Levin	Chairman	June 15, 2018
/s/ Jared L. Landaw
/s/ Justin Ehrlich
Jared L. Landaw	Secretary and Director	March 31, 2017
Justin Ehrlich	Director	June 15, 2018
/s/ Jeffrey B. Hecktman
/s/ Marc Beilinson
Jeffrey B. Hecktman	Director	March 31, 2017
Marc Beilinson	Director	June 15, 2018
/s/ Robert Mettler
/s/ Colin Conway
Robert Mettler	Director	March 31, 2017
Colin Conway	Director	June 15, 2018
/s/ Frank R. Mori
Frank R. Mori	Director	March 31, 2017
/s/ Jeffrey D. Nuechterlein
Jeffrey D. Nuechterlein	Director	March 31, 2017

2029

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2
Balance Sheets	F-3
Statements of Operations	F-4
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity	F-5
Statements of Cash Flows	F-6
Notes to Financial Statements	F-7 to F-1518

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the ~~Audit~~Shareholders ~~Committee~~and of the Board of Directors ~~and~~ ~~Shareholders~~of

of Barington/Hilco Acquisition Corp.

~~We have audited the accompanying~~Opinion ~~balance~~on ~~sheets of Barington/Hilco Acquisition Corp. (~~the ~~“Company”)~~Financial as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.Statements

We ~~conducted~~have ~~our~~audited ~~audits in accordance with~~ the ~~standards~~accompanying balance sheets of ~~the~~Barington/Hilco ~~Public~~Acquisition ~~Company~~Corp. ~~Accounting Oversight Board~~ (~~United~~the ~~States~~“Company”). ~~Those~~as ~~standards~~of ~~require~~December ~~that we~~31, ~~plan~~2017 and ~~perform~~2016, the ~~audit~~related ~~to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial~~ statements ~~are free~~ of ~~material~~operations, ~~misstatement. The~~changes ~~Company~~in isstockholders’ ~~not~~equity ~~required~~and tocash ~~have,~~flows ~~nor~~for ~~were~~each weof ~~engaged~~the totwo ~~perform,~~years anin ~~audit~~the ofperiod ~~its~~ended ~~internal~~December ~~control over financial reporting.~~31, ~~Our~~2107, ~~audit~~and ~~included~~the ~~consideration~~related ofnotes ~~internal~~(collectively ~~control~~referred ~~over~~to ~~financial reporting~~ as athe ~~basis~~“financial ~~for~~statements”). ~~designing~~In ~~audit~~our ~~procedures~~opinion, ~~that~~the ~~are~~financial ~~appropriate~~statements inpresent ~~the circumstances~~fairly, ~~but~~in ~~not~~all ~~for~~material ~~the~~respects, ~~purpose of expressing an opinion on~~ the ~~effectiveness~~financial position of the Company~~’s internal~~ ~~control~~as ~~over~~of ~~financial~~December ~~reporting. Accordingly~~31, we2017 ~~express~~and no2016, ~~such~~and the ~~opinion.~~results Anof ~~audit~~its ~~also~~operations ~~includes~~and ~~examining,~~its oncash aflows ~~test basis,~~for ~~evidence~~each ~~supporting~~of the ~~amounts~~two ~~and~~years ~~disclosures~~ in the ~~financial~~period ~~statements,~~ended ~~assessing~~December ~~the~~31, ~~accounting~~2017, ~~principles~~in ~~used and~~conformity ~~significant~~with ~~estimates~~accounting ~~made~~principles bygenerally ~~management,~~accepted asin ~~well as evaluating~~ the ~~overall~~United ~~financial~~States ~~statement~~of ~~presentation~~America. ~~We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.~~

~~In our opinion, the~~Explanatory ~~financial~~Paragraph ~~statements~~– ~~referred~~Going to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Barington/Hilco Acquisition Corp. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 21 to the financial statements, ~~the Company has no present revenue,~~ its business plan is dependent on the completion of a business combination and the Company'’s cash and working capital as of December 31, 2017 are not sufficient to complete its planned activities ~~through~~for ~~August 11,~~one ~~2017,~~year from the date ~~the~~these ~~Company~~financial isstatements are ~~required to liquidate if it has not completed a business combination~~issued. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the ~~ability of the~~ Company’s ability to continue as a going concern ~~at December 31, 2016~~. Management’s plans in regard to ~~this~~these ~~matter~~matters are also described in Note 21. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Marcum LLP

Marcum LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

New York, NY

~~March~~June 3115, ~~2017~~2018

F-2

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

Balance Sheets

	December 31
	2016			2015
	2017			2016
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	22,271		$	199,436
Cash	$	2,820		$	22,271
Prepaid expenses		~~3,906~~833			503,~~670~~906
Total Current Assets		263,~~177~~653			~~250~~26,~~106~~177
Cash and securities held in Trust Account		4314,~~927~~846,~~390~~465			43,~~646~~927,~~683~~390
TOTAL ASSETS	$	4314,~~953~~850,~~567~~118		$	43,~~896~~953,~~789~~567
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	~~149~~2,~~563~~159,118		$	80149,~~095~~563
Promissory notes - related parties		~~230~~485,~~000~~183			-230,000
Total Liabilities		379,563			80,095
Advance from third party		425,000			—
Total Liabilities		3,069,301			379,563
Commitments and Contingencies
Common Stock subject to possible redemption, 3,769,876 and 3,817,993 shares at redemption value as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively		38,574,003			38,816,693
Common Stock subject to possible redemption, 646,625 and 3,769,876 shares at redemption value as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively		6,780,816			38,574,003
Stockholders' Equity
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 1,000,000 authorized, none issued and outstanding		-—			-—
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value; 11,000,000 shares authorized; 1,891,460 and 1,843,343 shares issued and outstanding (excluding 3,769,876 and 3,817,993 shares subject to possible redemption) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively		189			184
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value; 11,000,000 shares authorized; 2,137,415 and 1,891,460 shares issued and outstanding (excluding 646,625 and 3,769,876 shares subject to possible redemption) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively		214			189
Additional paid-in capital		57,~~717~~831,~~876~~780			5,~~475~~717,~~191~~876
Accumulated deficit		(~~718~~2,~~064~~831,993	)		(~~475~~718,~~374~~064	)
Total Stockholders' Equity		5,000,001			5,000,001
Total Stockholders’ Equity		5,000,001			5,000,001
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	43,953,567		$	43,896,789
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	14,850,118		$	43,953,567

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

F-3

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

Statements of Operations

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Operating costs	$	~~323~~2,~~397~~296,452		$	~~477~~323,~~604~~397
Loss from operations		(~~323~~2,~~397~~296,452	)		(~~477~~323,~~604~~397	)
Other income:
Interest income		80182,~~707~~523			380,~~914~~707
Net Loss	$	(~~242~~2,~~690~~113,929	)	$	(~~473~~242,690	)
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted(1)		1,861,400			1,816,854
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted (1)		1,935,546			1,861,400
Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(01.1305	)	$	(0.2613	)

(1) Excludes an aggregate of up to 3646,~~769,876~~625 and 3,~~817~~769,~~993~~876 shares subject to redemption at December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 respectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

F-4

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

Years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~ 2016

	Common Stock						Additional Paid-			Accumulated			Total Stockholders'’
	Shares			Amount			in Capital			Deficit			Equity
Balance – December 31, 2014		1,150,000		$	115		$	24,885		$	(1,684	)	$	23,316
Sale of 4,000,000 Units, net of underwriters discount and offering expenses		4,000,000			400			38,473,799			-			38,474,199
Sale of 295,000 Private Units		295,000			30			2,949,970			-			2,950,000
Unit Purchase Options issued to underwriters		-			-			100			-			100
Sale of 293,069 over-allotment Units to underwriters, net of underwriters discount and offering expenses		293,069			29			2,842,740			-			2,842,769
Forfeiture of 76,733 shares of Common Stock due to underwriters not exercising full over-allotment option		(76,733	)		(8	)		-			-			-
Common Stock subject to redemption		(3,817,993	)		(382	)		(38,816,311	)		-			(38,816,693	)
Net loss		-			-			-			(473,690	)		(473,690	)
Balance - December 31, 2015		1,843,343		$	184		$	5,475,191		$	(475,374	)	$	5,000,001
Common Stock subject to redemption		48,117			5			242,685			-—			242,690
Net loss		-—			-—			-—			(242,690	)		(242,690	)
Balance - December 31, 2016		1,891,460		$	189		$	5,717,876		$	(718,064	)	$	5,000,001
Common Stock subject to redemption		245,955			25			2,113,904			—			2,113,929
Net loss		—			—			—			(2,113,929	)		(2,113,929	)
Balance - December 31, 2017		2,137,415		$	214		$	7,831,780		$	(2,831,993	)	$	5,000,001

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

F-5

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

Statements of Cash Flows

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(~~242~~2,~~690~~113,929	)	$	(~~473~~242,690	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Interest earned on Trust Account		(80182,~~707~~523	)		(380,~~914~~707	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses		463,~~764~~073			~~(50~~46,~~670~~764	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		692,~~468~~009,555			7969,~~129~~468
Accrued formation and offering costs		-			80,345
Net cash used in operating activities		(283,824	)		(207,165	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(207,165	)		(368,800	)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Investment of cash and securities held in Trust Account		(~~200~~672,~~000~~146	)		(43200,~~642,769~~000	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(200,000	)		(43,642,769	)
Cash withdrawn from Trust Account		29,935,594			—
Net cash provided by (used in )investing activities		29,263,448			(200,000	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock to sponsors		-			-
Advances from third party		425,000			—
Proceeds from sale of Units, net of underwriting discounts paid		-			38,800,000
Proceeds from promissory notes - related parties		255,183			230,000
Proceeds from sale of Private Units		-			2,950,000
Redemption of common stock		(29,679,258	)		—
Proceeds from sale of over-allotment Units, net of underwriting discounts paid		-			2,842,769
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(28,999,075	)		230,000
Proceeds from sale of Unit Purchase Option		-			100
Net Change in Cash		(19,451	)		(177,165	)
Payment of offering costs		-			(325,801	)
Cash - Beginning		22,271			199,436
Proceeds from promissory notes - related parties		230,000			-
Cash - Ending	$	2,820		$	22,271
Repayment of promissory notes - related parties		-			(120,000	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		230,000			44,147,068
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(177,165	)		135,499
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning		199,436			63,937
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Ending	$	22,271		$	199,436
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Initial classification of common stock subject to possible redemption	$	-		$	36,445,325
Change in value of common stock subject to possible redemption	$	2,113,929		$	(242,690	)
Change in value of common stock subject to possible redemption	$	(242,690	)	$	2,371,368

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-6

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2016~~2017

NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS

Barington/Hilco ~~Acquisition~~ Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) is a blank check company incorporated in Delaware on July 24, 2014. The Company was formed for the purpose of entering into a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, recapitalization, reorganization or other similar business combination, with one or more businesses or entities (a “Business Combination”).

At December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the Company had not yet commenced any operations. All activity through December 31, ~~2016~~2017 relates to the Company’s formation, its ~~Initial~~initial ~~Public~~public ~~Offering~~offering, which is described below, ~~and~~ identifying a target company for a Business Combination and activities in connection with the announced and subsequently terminated proposed acquisition of Oomba, Inc. (“Oomba”), as described below, and Specialty Brands Holdings, LLC (“SBH”) (as described in Note 11).

On ~~January~~ 3May 12, 2017, the Company ~~received~~entered into a ~~letter~~merger agreement (the “~~Letter~~Merger Agreement”) ~~from~~with Oomba, pursuant to which the ~~Listing~~Company ~~Qualifications~~agreed to ~~Department~~acquire all of ~~The~~the ~~Nasdaq Stock~~outstanding ~~Market~~capital ~~(“NASDAQ”)~~stock ~~stating~~of ~~that~~Oomba. On November 29, 2017, the Company ~~had~~terminated ~~not~~the ~~yet~~Merger ~~held~~Agreement anwith Oomba ~~annual~~due ~~meeting~~to Oomba breaching several of ~~shareholders~~its ~~within~~obligations ~~twelve~~under ~~months~~the Merger Agreement, including, but not limited to, its obligation ofto deliver to the ~~end~~Company audited financial statements of ~~the~~Oomba ~~Company’s~~on ~~fiscal~~or ~~year~~prior ~~end~~to May 31, 2017. AsThe atermination ~~result~~of the Merger Agreement was effective as of November 29, 2017, and the Company ~~was~~reserved ~~not~~its inrights ~~compliance~~to ~~with~~vigorously ~~NASDAQ~~pursue ~~Listing~~all ~~Rule~~available ~~5620(a)~~remedies against ~~(the~~Oomba ~~“Annual~~under ~~Meeting~~the ~~Rule”).~~Merger ~~The~~Agreement ~~Letter~~and isapplicable ~~only~~law. As a ~~notification~~result of ~~deficiency~~these breaches, ~~not~~the ofCompany believes ~~imminent~~that ~~delisting~~approximately $867,000 ~~and~~of ~~had~~net ~~no current~~expenses ~~effect~~incurred onby the ~~listing~~Company orare ~~trading~~the responsibility of Oomba pursuant to the Merger Agreement. These reimbursable expenses are net of the $425,000 advanced by Oomba to the Company’s ~~securities~~(see onNote ~~NASDAQ~~6).

~~The~~While ~~Letter~~the ~~states~~Company ~~that,~~believes ~~under~~it ~~NASDAQ~~is ~~rules~~owed the $867,000 from Oomba, the Company has 45not ~~calendar~~retained ~~days~~legal tocounsel ~~submit~~with arespect ~~plan~~ to ~~regain compliance with~~ the ~~Annual~~above demand ~~Meeting~~for ~~Rule.~~reimbursement, Ifnor ~~NASDAQ~~has ~~accepts~~ the Company’s ~~plan,~~commenced ~~NASDAQ~~any ~~may~~action ~~grant~~against ~~the~~Oomba ~~Company~~in anorder ~~extension~~to ofcollect upthe toexpenses ~~180~~it ~~calendar~~believes ~~days~~it is owed. ~~from~~It ~~the~~should ~~fiscal~~also ~~year~~be ~~end~~noted that, oreven ~~until~~if ~~June~~the ~~29,~~Company ~~2017,~~were to ~~regain~~commence ~~compliance~~legal ~~with~~action ~~the~~against ~~Annual~~Oomba, ~~Meeting~~the ~~Rule.~~Company Ifbelieves ~~NASDAQ~~that ~~does~~the ~~not accept~~likelihood of collecting the ~~Company’s~~receivable ~~plan,~~would ~~the~~be ~~Company~~remote ~~will~~given ~~have~~that ~~the~~Oomba ~~opportunity~~does tonot ~~appeal~~have ~~the~~sufficient ~~decision~~cash infunds ~~front~~to ofbe aable ~~NASDAQ~~to ~~Hearings~~make ~~Panel~~the payment.

On January 3, 2017, the Company received a letter (the “Letter”) from the Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) stating that the Company ~~submitted~~had not yet held an annual meeting of shareholders within twelve months of the end of the Company’s fiscal year end. As a result, the Company was not in compliance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5620(a) (the “Annual Meeting Rule”). The Letter was only a notification of deficiency, not of imminent delisting, and had no contemporaneous effect on the listing or trading of the Company’s securities on NASDAQ. The Letter stated that, under NASDAQ rules, the Company had 45 calendar days to submit a plan to regain compliance with the Annual Meeting Rule. ~~within~~If NASDAQ were to accept the ~~required~~Company’s ~~timeframe~~plan, NASDAQ could have granted the Company an extension of up to 180 calendar days from the fiscal year end, or until June 29, 2017, to regain compliance with the Annual Meeting Rule. If NASDAQ did not accept the Company’s plan, the Company would have had the opportunity to appeal the decision in front of a NASDAQ Hearings Panel. The Company submitted a plan to regain compliance with the Annual Meeting Rule, pursuant to which the Company noted its intention to hold the annual meeting in connection with a vote of its shareholders to extend the date by which the Company must complete a Business Combination. The Company held the annual meeting on February 10, 2017 (see below).

On April 18, 2018 and May 17, 2018, the Company received a letter from NASDAQ stating that the Company had not timely filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2017 or its Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2018 (the “Filings”). As a result, the Company was not in compliance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) (the “Filing Rule”).The Company has 60 calendar days to submit a plan to regain compliance with the Filing Rule. If NASDAQ were to accept the Company’s plan, NASDAQ could grant the Company an extension of up to 180 calendar days from the Filing’s due date, or until October 15, 2018, to regain compliance with the Filing Rule. If NASDAQ does not accept the Company’s plan, the Company will have the opportunity to appeal the decision in front of a NASDAQ Hearings Panel.

The registration statement for the Company’s initial public offering (“Initial Public Offering”) was declared effective on February 5, 2015. The Company consummated the Initial Public Offering of 4,000,000 units (“Units”) at $10.00 per Unit on February 11, 2015, generating gross proceeds of $40,000,000, which is described in Note 4.

Simultaneously with the closing of the Initial Public Offering on February 11, 2015, the Company consummated the sale of 295,000 Units (“Private Units”) at a price of $10.00 per Unit in a private placement to the Company’s sponsors and EarlyBirdCapital, Inc. (“EBC”), generating gross proceeds of $2,950,000, which is described in Note 5.

Following the closing of the Initial Public Offering, an amount of $40,800,000 ($10.20 per Unit) from the net proceeds of the sale of the Units in the Initial Public Offering and the placement of the Private Units was placed in a trust account (“Trust Account”) and invested in U.S. government securities, within the meaning set forth in Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), with a maturity of 180 days or less or in any open-ended investment company that holds itself out as a money market fund selected by the Company meeting the conditions of paragraphs (c)(2), (c)(3) and (c)(4) of Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, as determined by the Company, until the earlier of: (i) the consummation of a Business Combination or (ii) the distribution of the Trust Account as described below.

On February 11, 2015, EBC notified the Company of its election to exercise its over-allotment option to the extent of 293,069 Units. The sale of the additional Units closed on February 18, 2015 at $10.00 per Unit, generating total gross proceeds of $2,930,690. Following the closing of the over-allotment, an additional $2,842,769 of net proceeds was placed in the Trust Account, resulting in $43,642,769 (approximately $10.17 per Unit) held in Trust Account.

Transaction costs amounted to $1,613,722, consisting of $1,287,921 of underwriting fees and $325,801 of Initial Public Offering costs. In addition, as of December 31, 2016, cash held outside of the Trust Account amounted to $22,271. In each of August and November 2016, we deposited $100,000 into the Trust Account as payment for the extension of the period of time to consummate a Business Combination for a total of six months (see below).

On February 10, 2017, the Company’s stockholders approved to extend the period of time for which the Company is required to consummate a Business Combination until August 11, 2017 (the “Extension Amendment”). This extension of up-to six (6) months has been and is to be implemented in 30-day increments, at the Company’s option. The number of shares of common stock presented for redemption in connection with the Extension Amendment was 911,200. The Company distributed $9,305,588, or approximately, $10.21 per share, to redeeming stockholders. In addition, the Company has agreed to contribute $0.025 per share to the Trust Account for each public share that was not converted in connection with the approval of the Extension Amendment, for each 30-day period, or portion thereof, that is needed by the Company to complete a Business Combination from February 11, 2017 through August 11, 2017 (the “Contribution”). To date, the Company has deposited an aggregate of $169,094 into the Company’s Trust Account. The Contribution was paid from funds loaned to the Company by a third party.

The Company’s management has broad discretion with respect to the specific application of the net proceeds of its Initial Public Offering and Private Units, although substantially all of the net proceeds are intended to be applied generally toward consummating a Business Combination. The Company’s Units are listed on NASDAQ. Pursuant to the NASDAQ listing rules, the Company’s Business Combination must be with a target business or businesses whose collective fair market value is equal to at least 80% of the balance in the Trust Account at the time of the execution of a definitive agreement for such Business Combination. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully effect a Business Combination.

The Company, after signing a definitive agreement for the acquisition of one or more target businesses or assets, may seek stockholder approval of a Business Combination at a meeting called for such purpose at which stockholders may seek to convert their shares, regardless of whether they vote for or against a Business Combination. In the event that the Company is required to seek stockholder approval in connection with a Business Combination, the Company will proceed with a Business Combination only if the Company has net tangible assets of at least $5,000,001 upon such consummation and a majority of the outstanding shares that are voted are voted in favor of the Business Combination. In connection with such a vote, the Company will provide its stockholders with the opportunity to convert their shares of common stock upon the consummation of a Business Combination for a pro-rata portion of the amount then in the Trust Account (approximately $10.23 per share). The Company’s sponsors, officers and directors have agreed, in the event the Company is required to seek stockholder approval of its Business Combination, to vote their Insider Shares (as defined in Note 7), shares underlying the Private Units and any public shares held by them, in favor of approving a Business Combination.

F-7

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2016~~2017

~~The Company initially had~~On ~~until~~February ~~August~~ 11, ~~2016~~2015, toEBC ~~complete~~notified athe ~~Business~~Company ~~Combination.~~of ~~However~~its ~~the~~election ~~Initial~~to ~~Public~~exercise ~~Offering~~its ~~documents~~over-allotment ~~provide~~option ~~that,~~to if the ~~Company anticipates~~extent itof ~~may~~293,069 ~~not~~Units. The besale ~~able~~of tothe ~~consummate~~additional aUnits ~~Business~~closed ~~Combination~~on byFebruary ~~such date~~18, ~~the~~2015 ~~Company~~at ~~may~~$10.00 ~~extend~~per ~~the~~Unit, ~~period~~generating oftotal ~~time~~gross ~~to consummate~~proceeds aof ~~Business~~$2,930,690. Following ~~Combination~~the upclosing toof ~~two~~the ~~times~~over-allotment, ~~each by~~ an additional ~~three~~$2,842,769 ~~months~~of ~~(for~~net aproceeds ~~total~~was ofplaced upin tothe 24Trust ~~months~~Account, ~~to complete~~resulting ain ~~Business~~$43,642,769 ~~Combination~~(approximately $10.17 per Unit) held in the Trust Account.

~~In order to extend the~~Transaction ~~time~~costs ~~available~~amounted ~~for the Company~~ to ~~consummate a Business Combination, the initial stockholders or their affiliates or designees must deposit into the Trust Account~~ $~~100~~1,~~000 prior to the applicable deadline for each three month extension. On August 8~~613, ~~2016~~722, ~~the~~ ~~Company~~consisting ~~elected to extend the period~~ of ~~time to consummate a Business Combination for an additional three months ending on November 11, 2016 and, accordingly, deposited~~ $~~100~~1,~~000 into the Trust Account. In order to fund the deposit~~287,921 ~~the~~of ~~Company~~underwriting ~~obtained loans~~fees inand ~~the aggregate amount of~~ $~~130~~325,~~000~~801 ~~from affiliates~~ of ~~its~~Initial ~~sponsors~~Public ~~(see~~Offering ~~Note 6)~~costs. ~~Subsequently~~In addition, onas ~~November 10, 2016, the Company elected to extend the period~~ of ~~time~~December ~~to consummate a Business Combination for an additional three months ending on February 11~~31, 2017 ~~and~~, ~~accordingly,~~cash ~~deposited~~held anoutside ~~additional~~of ~~$100,000 into~~ the Trust Account. Inamounted ~~order~~ to ~~fund the second deposit, the Company obtained loans in the aggregate amount of~~ $~~100~~2,~~000 from affiliates of its sponsors (see Note 3)~~820. ~~The Company’s initial stockholders and their affiliates or designees are not obligated to fund the Trust Account to extend the time for the Company to complete its Business Combination.~~

InOn February 10, 2017, the Company’s stockholders approved an extension of the period of time in which the Company was required to consummate a Business Combination until August 11, 2017 (the “First Extension Amendment”). This six (6) month extension was implemented in 30-day increments. The number of shares of common stock presented for redemption in connection with the First Extension Amendment ~~approved~~was by911,200. ~~the~~The Company’s ~~stockholders~~distributed on$9,305,588, ~~February~~or approximately, $10.21 per share, ~~2017~~to redeeming stockholders. In addition, the Company ~~has~~agreed ~~until~~to contribute $0.025 per share to the Trust Account for each public share that was not converted in connection with the approval of the First Extension Amendment, for each 30-day period, or portion thereof, that was needed by the Company to complete a Business Combination from February 11, 2017 through August 11, 2017 (the ~~“Combination~~ ~~Period~~“Contribution”). The Company has deposited an aggregate of $507,734 into the Company’s Trust Account in connection with the First Extension Amendment. The Contribution was paid from funds loaned to ~~complete~~the Company by the sponsors and a ~~Business~~third ~~Combination~~party.

On August 9, 2017, the Company’s stockholders approved an additional extension of the period of time in which the Company was required to consummate a Business Combination until December 31, 2017 (the “Second Extension Amendment”). This extension was implemented in 30-day increments. The number of shares of common stock presented for redemption in connection with the Second Extension Amendment was 1,966,096. The Company distributed $20,373,670, or approximately, $10.36 per share, to redeeming stockholders. In addition, the Company agreed to contribute $0.025 per share to the Trust Account for each public share that was not converted in connection with the approval of the Second Extension Amendment, for each 30-day period, or portion thereof, that was needed by the Company to complete a Business Combination from August 11, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Second Contribution”). The Company has deposited an aggregate of $164,412 into the Company’s Trust Account in connection with the Second Extension Amendment. The Second Contribution was paid by the Company and from funds loaned to the Company by its sponsors.

On December 29, 2017, the Company’s stockholders approved an additional extension of the period of time in which the Company is required to consummate a Business Combination until June 30, 2018 (the “Third Extension Amendment”). The extension is to be implemented in 30-day increments. The number of shares of common stock presented for redemption in connection with the Third Extension Amendment was 537,804. On January 3, 2018, the Company distributed $5,635,379, or approximately $10.48 per share, to redeeming stockholders, resulting in $9,199,825 being held in the Trust Account as of January 3, 2018. In addition, the Company agreed to contribute $0.04 per share to the Trust Account for each public share that was not converted in connection with the approval of the Third Extension Amendment, for each 30-day period, or portion thereof, that is needed by the Company to complete a Business Combination from December 31, 2017 through June 30, 2018 (the “Third Contribution”). Furthermore, the Company agreed to prepay the contributions for the three-month period from December 31, 2017 until March 31, 2018. On January 4, 2018 and April 23, 2018, the Company deposited an aggregate of $140,475 into the Trust Account in connection with the Third Extension Amendment. The Third Contribution was paid by the Company.

The Company’s management has broad discretion with respect to the specific application of the net proceeds of its Initial Public Offering and Private Units, although substantially all of the net proceeds are intended to be applied generally toward consummating a Business Combination. The Company’s Units are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market (“NASDAQ”). Pursuant to the NASDAQ listing rules, the Company’s Business Combination must be with a target business or businesses whose collective fair market value is equal to at least 80% of the balance in the Trust Account at the time of the execution of a definitive agreement for such Business Combination. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully effect a Business Combination.

F-8

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2017

The Company, after signing a definitive agreement for the acquisition of one or more target businesses or assets, may seek stockholder approval of a Business Combination at a meeting called for such purpose at which stockholders may seek to convert their shares, regardless of whether they vote for or against a Business Combination. In the event that the Company is required to seek stockholder approval in connection with a Business Combination, the Company will proceed with a Business Combination only if the Company has net tangible assets of at least $5,000,001 upon such consummation and a majority of the outstanding shares that are voted are voted in favor of the Business Combination. In connection with such a vote, the Company will provide its stockholders with the opportunity to convert their shares of common stock upon the consummation of a Business Combination for a pro-rata portion of the amount then in the Trust Account (plus any pro rata interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to the Company or necessary to pay its taxes). The Company’s sponsors, officers and directors have agreed, in the event the Company is required to seek stockholder approval of its Business Combination, to vote their Insider Shares (as defined in Note 7), shares underlying the Private Units and any public shares held by them, in favor of approving a Business Combination.

The Company initially had until August 11, 2016 to complete a Business Combination. However, the Initial Public Offering documents provided that, if the Company anticipated that it would not be able to consummate a Business Combination by such date, the Company could extend the period of time to consummate a Business Combination up to two times, each by an additional three months (for a total of up to 24 months to complete a Business Combination).

In order to extend the time available for the Company to consummate a Business Combination, the initial stockholders or their affiliates or designees were required to deposit into the Trust Account $100,000 prior to the applicable deadline for each three month extension. On August 8, 2016, the Company elected to extend the period of time to consummate a Business Combination for an additional three months ending on November 11, 2016 and, accordingly, deposited $100,000 into the Trust Account. In order to fund the deposit, the Company obtained loans in the aggregate amount of $130,000 from affiliates of its sponsors (see Note 6). Subsequently, on November 10, 2016, the Company elected to extend the period of time to consummate a Business Combination for an additional three months ending on February 11, 2017 and, accordingly, deposited an additional $100,000 into the Trust Account. In order to fund the second deposit, the Company obtained loans in the aggregate amount of $100,000 from affiliates of its sponsors (see Note 3). The Company’s initial stockholders and their affiliates or designees are not obligated to fund the Trust Account to extend the time for the Company to complete its Business Combination.

In connection with the First Extension Amendment, the Second Extension Amendment and the Third Extension Amendment (collectively, the “Extension Amendments”) approved by the Company’s stockholders, the Company has until June 30, 2018 (the “Combination Period”) to complete a Business Combination.

If the Company is unable to complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period, the Company will (i) cease all operations except for the purposes of winding up its affairs; (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem 100% of the outstanding public shares which redemption will completely extinguish such holders’ rights as stockholders, including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any; and (iii) as promptly as possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of the Company’s remaining holders of common stock and the Company’s board of directors, dissolve and liquidate the balance of its net assets to its remaining stockholders, as part of the Company’s plan of dissolution and liquidation. The Company will pay the costs of any subsequent liquidation from its remaining assets outside of the Trust Account. If such funds are insufficient, certain of the Company’s sponsors have agreed to pay the funds necessary to complete such liquidation (in an amount not to exceed $15,000) and have agreed not to seek repayment for such expenses.

In connection with the redemption of 100% of the Company’s outstanding public shares for a portion of the funds held in the Trust Account, each holder will receive a full pro rata portion of the amount then in the Trust Account, plus any pro rata interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to the Company for its working capital requirements or necessary to pay the Company’s taxes payable. Holders of rights and warrants will receive no proceeds in connection with the liquidation with respect to such rights and warrants, which will expire worthless.

NOTE 2. LIQUIDITY AND GOING CONCERN

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the Company had $222,~~271~~820 in its operating bank accounts, $4314,~~927~~846,~~390~~465 in cash and marketable securities held in the Trust Account to be used for a Business Combination or to repurchase or convert its common stock in connection therewith and a working capital deficit of $~~353~~3,~~386~~065,648. As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, approximately $8511,000 of the amount on deposit in the Trust Account represented interest income, which is available for working capital purposes and to pay the Company’s tax obligations. To ~~Since inception~~date, the Company has ~~not~~ withdrawn ~~any~~an ~~interest~~aggregate ~~income~~of ~~from the Trust Account. In February 2017, the Company withdrew~~ $84256,~~371~~336 of interest from the Trust Account in order to fund working capital requirements.

Until the consummation of a Business Combination, the Company will be using the funds not held in the Trust Account for identifying and evaluating prospective acquisition candidates, performing due diligence on prospective target businesses, paying for travel expenditures, selecting the target business to acquire, and structuring, negotiating and consummating the Business Combination.F-9

The Company may need to raise additional capital through loans or additional investments from its sponsors, stockholders, officers, directors, or third parties. The Company’s officers, directors and sponsors may, but are not obligated to, loan the Company funds, from time to time or at any time, in whatever amount they deem reasonable in their sole discretion, to meet the Company’s working capital needs.

None of the sponsors, stockholders, officers or directors, or third parties is under any obligation to advance funds to, or to invest in, the Company. Accordingly, the Company may not be able to obtain additional financing. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital, it may be required to take additional measures to conserve liquidity, which could include, but not necessarily be limited to, curtailing operations, suspending the pursuit of a potential transaction, and reducing overhead expenses. The Company cannot provide any assurance that new financing will be available to it on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recovery of the recorded assets or the classification of the liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

F-8

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2016~~2017

The Company will need to raise additional capital through loans or additional investments from its sponsors, stockholders, officers, directors, or third parties. The Company’s officers, directors and sponsors may, but are not obligated to, loan the Company funds, from time to time or at any time, in whatever amount they deem reasonable in their sole discretion, to meet the Company’s working capital needs.

NOTE 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation

The accompanying financial statements are presented in ~~rs in~~ conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Emerging growth company

The Company is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “Securities Act”), as modified by the Jumpstart ~~our~~Our Business Startups Act of 2012, (the “JOBS Act”), and it may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in its periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. The Company has elected not to opt out of such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, the Company, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of the Company’s financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.

F-10

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2017

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

Making estimates requires management to exercise significant judgment. It is at least reasonably possible that the estimate of the effect of a condition, situation or set of circumstances that existed at the date of the financial statements, which management considered in formulating its estimate, could change in the near term due to one or more future events. Accordingly, the actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents

The ~~amounts held in the~~ ~~Trust~~Company ~~Account~~considers ~~represent substantially~~ all ofshort-term ~~the~~investments ~~proceeds~~with ofan ~~the~~original ~~Initial~~maturity ~~Public~~of ~~Offering~~three ~~and~~months ~~proceeds~~or ~~from~~less ~~loans~~when ~~and~~purchased ~~are~~to ~~classified as restricted assets since such amounts can only~~ be ~~used~~cash byequivalents. The ~~the~~ Company indid ~~connection~~not ~~with~~have ~~the~~any ~~consummation~~cash ofequivalents aas ~~Business Combination. As~~ of December 31, ~~2016,~~2017 ~~cash~~ and ~~marketable securities held in the Trust Account consisted of $43,927,390 in United States Treasury Bills with a maturity date of 180 days or less~~2016.

Cash and marketable securities held in Trust Account

The amounts held in the Trust Account represent substantially all of the remaining proceeds of the Initial Public Offering and proceeds from loans and advances and are classified as restricted assets since such amounts can only be used by the Company in connection with the consummation of a Business Combination. As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, cash and marketable securities held in the Trust Account consisted of $4314,~~927~~846,~~390~~465 in United States Treasury Bills with a maturity date of 180 days or less.

F-9

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016

Common stock subject to redemption

The Company accounts for its common stock subject to possible redemption in accordance with the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.” Common stock subject to mandatory redemption (if any) is classified as a liability instrument and is measured at fair value. Conditionally redeemable common stock (including common stock that features redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within the Company’s control) is classified as temporary equity. At all other times, common stock is classified as stockholders’ equity. The Company’s common stock features certain redemption rights that are considered to be outside of the Company’s control and subject to the occurrence of uncertain future events. Accordingly, the common stock subject to possible redemption is presented at redemption value as temporary equity, outside of the stockholders’ equity section of the Company’s balance sheet.

Net loss per share

The Company complies with accounting and disclosure requirements of ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share.” Net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The Company applies the two-class method in calculating earnings per share. Common stock subject to possible redemption at December 31, 2017 and 2016, which is not currently redeemable and ~~2015~~is not redeemable at fair value, has been excluded from the calculation of basic net loss per share since such shares, if redeemed, only participate in their pro rata share of the Trust Account earnings. The Company has not considered the effect of (1) warrants sold in the Initial Public Offering and private placement to purchase 2,294,035 shares of common stock, (2) rights sold in the Initial Public Offering and private placement that convert into 458,807 shares of common stock, and (3) 200,000 shares of common stock, warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock and rights that convert into 20,000 shares of common stock in the unit purchase option sold to the underwriter, in the calculation of diluted loss per share, since the exercise of the warrants and the conversion of the rights into shares of common stock is contingent upon the occurrence of future events. As a result, diluted loss per share is the same as basic loss per share for the periods presented.

Income taxes

The Company complies with the accounting and reporting requirements of ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” which require an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in future taxable or deductible amounts, based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

ASC Topic 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be moreF-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. There were no unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2016. Since the Company was incorporated on July 24, 2014, the evaluation was performed for the 2014 and 2015 tax years, which will be the only periods subject to examination. The Company is currently not aware of any issues under review that could result in significant payments, accruals or material deviation from its position over the next twelve months.11

~~The Company may be subject~~BARINGTON/HILCO toACQUISITION ~~potential income tax examinations by federal or state authorities~~CORP. ~~These potential examinations may include questioning the timing and amount of deductions, the nexus of income among various tax jurisdictions and compliance with federal and state tax laws.~~

~~The Company’s policy~~NOTES ~~for~~TO ~~recording~~THE ~~interest~~FINANCIAL ~~and penalties associated with audits is to record such expense as a component of income tax expense. There were no amounts accrued for penalties or interest as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.~~STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2017

ASC Topic 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. There were no unrecognized tax benefits and no amounts accrued for interest and penalties as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. The Company is currently not aware of any issues under review that could result in significant payments, accruals or material deviation from its position.

The Company may be subject to potential income tax examinations by federal or state authorities. These potential examinations may include questioning the timing and amount of deductions, the nexus of income among various tax jurisdictions and compliance with federal and state tax laws. The Company’s management does not expect that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will materially change over the next twelve months.

On December 22, 2017 the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Tax Reform”) was signed into law. As a result of Tax Reform, the U.S. statutory tax rate was lowered from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, among other changes. ASC Topic 740 requires companies to recognize the effect of tax law changes in the period of enactment; therefore, the Company was required to revalue its deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2017 at the new rate. The SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) to address the application of GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain tax effects of Tax Reform. The ultimate impact may differ from this provisional amount, possibly materially, as a result of additional analysis, changes in interpretations and assumptions the Company has made, additional regulatory guidance that may be issued, and actions the Company may take as a result of Tax Reform.

Concentration of credit risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist of cash accounts in a financial institution which, at times may exceed the Federal depository insurance coverage of $250,000. At December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the Company had not experienced ~~losses~~ losses on these accounts and management believes the Company is not exposed to significant risks on such accounts.

Fair value of financial instruments

The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities, which qualify as financial instruments under ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” approximates the carrying amounts represented in the accompanying balance sheets, primarily due to their short-term nature.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the Company'’s financial statements.

F-10

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016

NOTE 4. INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING

In February 2015, the Company sold an aggregate of 4,293,069 Units at a purchase price of $10.00 per Unit in the Initial Public Offering. Each Unit consists of one share of the Company’s common stock, $0.0001 par value (“Common Stock”), one right (“Public Right”) and one redeemable Common Stock purchase warrant (“Public Warrant”). Each Public Right will convert into one-tenth (1/10) of one share of Common Stock upon the consummation of a Business Combination (see Note 8). Each Public Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one-half share of Common Stock at an exercise price of $12.50 per whole share (see Note 8).

NOTE 5. PRIVATE PLACEMENT

F-12

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2017

The Private Units are identical to the Units sold in the Initial Public Offering, except for the private warrants (“Private Warrants”), as described in Note 8. In addition, the holders of the Common Stock underlying the Private Units have agreed (a) to vote such shares in favor of a Business Combination, (b) not to propose, or vote in favor of, an amendment to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation with respect to the Company’s pre-Business Combination activities prior to the consummation of such Business Combination, unless the Company provides dissenting stockholders with the opportunity to convert such shares in connection with any such vote, (c) not to convert such shares into the right to receive cash from the Trust Account in connection with a stockholder vote to approve the Company’s proposed Business Combination or a vote to amend the provisions of the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation relating to stockholders’ rights or pre-Business Combination activity and (d) that such shares shall not participate in any liquidating distribution upon winding up if a Business Combination is not consummated. Additionally, the holders have agreed not to transfer, assign or sell any of the Private Units or underlying securities (except to certain permitted transferees and provided the transferees agree to the same terms and restrictions as the permitted transferees of the Insider Shares must agree to) until the completion of the Business Combination. If the Company does not complete a Business Combination, the Private Warrants and the Private Rights will expire worthless.

NOTE 6. ~~RELATED~~ADVANCE ~~PARTY~~FROM ~~TRANSACTIONS~~THIRD PARTY

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company received advances from a third party in the aggregate amount of $425,000 in order to fund the Contribution required under the First Extension Amendment. The advances are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand.

NOTE 7. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Insider Shares

In September and October 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,150,000 shares of Common Stock to its sponsors (the “Insider Shares”) for an aggregate purchase price of $25,000. The 1,150,000 Insider Shares included an aggregate of up to 150,000 shares subject to forfeiture to the extent that the underwriters’ over-allotment was not exercised in full or in part, so that the Company’s sponsors would collectively own 20% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares after the Initial Public Offering (excluding the shares underlying the Private Units). As a result of the underwriters’ election to exercise their over-allotment option to purchase 293,069 Units on February 11, 2015, 73,267 Insider Shares are no longer subject to forfeiture. The underwriters elected not to exercise the remaining portion of the over-allotment option; accordingly, 76,733 Insider Shares were forfeited.

Administrative Services Agreement

The Company entered into an Administrative Services Agreement pursuant to which the Company paid Barington Capital Group, L. P., an affiliate of James A. Mitarotonda, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, a total of $7,500 per month for office space, utilities and support commencing on February 11, 2015. Upon the completion of a Business Combination or the Company’s liquidation, the Company would cease paying these monthly fees. The Company ceased being charged and paying these fees effective January 1, 2016. Administrative fees in the amount of $0 and $75,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, are included in operating costs in the accompanying condensed statements of operations.

Promissory Notes

On August 9, 2016, the Company entered into promissory notes (“Extension Promissory Notes”) with affiliates of its sponsors for an aggregate amount of $130,000 in order to fund the deposit required to extend the date by which it must complete its Business ~~Combination~~ Combination to November 11, 2016 and to fund working capital requirements. On November 10, 2016, the Company entered into Second ~~Extension~~ Extension Promissory Notes with affiliates of its sponsors for an aggregate amount of $100,000 in order to fund the deposit required to extend the date by which it must complete its Business Combination to February 11, 2017. The Extension Promissory Notes and the Second Extension Promissory Notes are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on the earlier of (i) the date on which the Company consummates a Business Combination or (ii) the date on which the Company determines not to proceed with a Business Combination.

AsIn February ofand ~~December~~March 312017, ~~2016,~~ the ~~amounts~~Company ~~owed~~entered ~~under~~into ~~the~~promissory ~~Extension~~notes (“2017 Promissory Notes”) ~~and~~with ~~Second~~affiliates ~~Extension~~of ~~Promissory~~its ~~Notes~~sponsors ~~amounted~~for to an aggregate amount of $~~230~~35,000 to fund working capital requirements.

~~F-11~~During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company entered into promissory notes (the “2017 Trust Promissory Notes”) with affiliates of its sponsors for an aggregate amount of $220,183 to fund the contributions required under the Extension Amendments.

The Extension Promissory Notes, the Second Extension Promissory Notes, the 2017 Promissory Notes and the 2017 Trust Promissory Notes are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on the earlier of (i) the date on which the Company consummates a Business Combination or (ii) the date on which the Company determines not to proceed with a Business Combination.

F-13

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2016~~2017

As of December 31, 2017, the amounts owed under the Extension Promissory Notes, Second Extension Promissory Notes, the 2017 Promissory Notes and the 2017 Trust Promissory Notes amounted to an aggregate of $485,183.

In order to meet the Company’s working capital needs following the consummation of the Initial Public Offering, the Company’s sponsors, officers and directors or their affiliates may, but are not obligated to, loan the Company funds, from time to time or at any time, in whatever amount they deem reasonable in their sole discretion. Each loan would be evidenced by a promissory note. The notes either would be paid upon consummation of the Business Combination, without interest, or, at the lender’s discretion, up to $500,000 of the notes may be converted upon consummation of a Business Combination into additional Private Units at a price of $10.00 per Unit.

NOTE 7 8. COMMITMENTS &AND CONTINGENCIES

Registration Rights

Pursuant to a registration rights agreement entered into on February 5, 2015, the holders of the Insider Shares, as well as the holders of the Private Units (and underlying securities) and any shares the Company’s sponsors, officers, directors or their affiliates may be issued in payment of working capital loans made to the Company, are entitled to registration rights. The holders of a majority of these securities are entitled to make up to two demands that the Company register such securities. Notwithstanding the foregoing, EBC may only exercise such demand rights on one occasion. The holders of a majority of the Insider Shares can elect to exercise these registration rights at any time commencing three months prior to the date on which these shares of Common Stock are to be released from escrow. The holders of a majority of the Private Units or shares issued in payment of working capital loans made to the Company can elect to exercise these registration rights at any time after the Company consummates a Business Combination. In addition, the holders have certain “piggy-back” registration rights with respect to the registration statements filed subsequent to the consummation of a Business Combination. The Company will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any such registration statements.

Business Combination Marketing Agreement

The Company has engaged EBC as an advisor in connection with its Business Combination to assist the Company in holding meetings with its stockholders to discuss the potential Business Combination and the target business’ attributes, introduce the Company to potential investors that are interested in purchasing the Company’s securities, assist the Company in obtaining stockholder approval for the Business Combination and assist the Company with its press releases and public filings in connection with the Business Combination. The Company will pay EBC a cash fee for such services upon consummation of the Business Combination in an amount equal to 4% of the total gross proceeds raised in the Initial Public Offering (exclusive of any applicable finders’ fee which might become payable) and the Company has the option to pay up to 25% of the 4% fee with shares of the Company’s Common Stock priced at $10.00 per share.

Legal Matters

The Company ~~has~~had engaged a law firm to assist the Company with its legal matters in identifying, negotiating, and consummating a Business Combination, as well as assisting with other legal matters. In the event of a successful Business Combination, the amount of fees to be paid ~~will~~ was to be agreed upon between the Company and the law firm in light of all the facts and circumstances at that point in time. If a Business Combination ~~does~~did not occur, the Company ~~will~~would not be required to pay this contingent fee. ~~Management~~In isconnection with ~~unable~~the signing of the Oreva Agreement (as defined and discussed in Note 11), management was able to determine the amount of the legal fees toowed beand, ~~paid~~accordingly, athas ~~this~~recorded ~~time.~~an ~~There~~amount ~~can~~payable beto nothe ~~assurance~~law ~~that~~firm of $2,000,000 in the ~~Company~~accompanying ~~will~~balance sheet ~~complete~~at aDecember ~~Business~~31, ~~Combination~~2017.

NOTE 8 9. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred ~~Stock~~ Stock - The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.0001 per share in one or more series. The Company’s board of directors will be authorized to fix the voting rights, if any, designations, powers, preferences, the relative, participating, optional or other special rights and any qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof, applicable to the shares of each series. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, there are no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding.

Common Stock – The Company is authorized to issue 11,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.0001 per share. Holders of the Company’s Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each common share. At December 31, 2016, there were 1,891,460 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding (excluding 3,769,876 shares of Common Stock subject to possible redemption).F-14

Rights - Each holder of a right will receive one-tenth (1/10) of one share of Common Stock upon consummation of a Business Combination, even if the holder of such right converted all shares of Common Stock held by him, her or it in connection with the Business Combination or an amendment to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation with respect to the Company’s pre-Business Combination activities.

F-12

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2016~~2017

Common Stock – The Company is authorized to issue 11,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.0001 per share. Holders of the Company’s Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each common share. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were 2,137,415 shares and 1,891,460 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding (excluding 646,625 shares and 3,769,876 of Common Stock subject to possible redemption), respectively.

Rights - Each holder of a right will receive one-tenth (1/10) of one share of Common Stock upon consummation of a Business Combination, even if the holder of such right converted all shares of Common Stock held by him, her or it in connection with the Business Combination or an amendment to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation with respect to the Company’s pre-Business Combination activities.

No additional consideration will be required to be paid by a holder of rights in order to receive his, her or its additional shares of Common Stock upon consummation of a Business Combination as the consideration related thereto has been included in the Unit purchase price paid for by investors in the Initial Public Offering.

The number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of the rights may be adjusted in certain circumstances including in the event of a stock dividend, or recapitalization, reorganization, merger or consolidation. Additionally, in no event will the Company be required to net cash settle the rights. Accordingly, the rights may expire worthless.

Warrants - - Public Warrants may only be exercised for a whole number of shares of Common Stock. No fractional shares will be issued upon exercise of the Public Warrants. The Public Warrants will become exercisable onupon ~~the later of (a) the~~ consummation of a Business Combination ~~and (b) 12 months from the effective date of the registration statement relating to the Initial Public Offering~~. No Public Warrants will be exercisable for cash unless the Company has an effective and current registration statement covering the Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Public Warrants and a current prospectus relating to such shares of Common Stock. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a registration statement covering the shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the Public Warrants is not effective within 90 days from the consummation of the Business Combination, the holders may, until such time as there is an effective registration statement and during any period when the Company shall have failed to maintain an effective registration statement, exercise the Public Warrants on a cashless basis pursuant to an available exemption from registration under the Securities Act. If an exemption from registration is not available, holders will not be able to exercise their Public Warrants on a cashless basis. The Public Warrants will expire three years after the consummation of a Business Combination or earlier upon redemption or liquidation.

The Private Warrants are identical to the Public Warrants underlying the Units sold in the Initial Public Offering, except the Private Warrants are exercisable for cash (even if a registration statement covering the Common Stock issuable upon exercise of such Private Warrants is not effective) or on a cashless basis, at the holder’s option, and are not redeemable by the Company, in each case so long as they are still held by the initial stockholders or their permitted transferees.

The Company may call the warrants for redemption (excluding the Private Warrants but including any outstanding warrants issued upon exercise of the unit purchase option issued to EBC), in whole and not in part, at a price of $.01 per warrant:

·● at any time while the Public Warrants are exercisable, ·● upon not less than 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption to each Public Warrant holder, ·● if, and only if, the reported last sale price of the Common Stock equals or exceeds $17.50 per share, for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading day period ending on the third business day prior to the notice of redemption to Public Warrant holders, and ·● if, and only if, there is a current registration statement in effect with respect to the shares of Common Stock underlying such warrants at the time of redemption and for the entire 30-day trading period referred to above and continuing each day thereafter until the date of redemption.

If the Company calls the Public Warrants for redemption, management will have the option to require all holders that wish to exercise the Public Warrants to do so on a “cashless basis.”

The exercise price and number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants may be adjusted in certain circumstances including in the event of a stock dividend, or recapitalization, reorganization, merger or consolidation. However, the warrants will not be adjusted for issuances of Common Stock at a price below its exercise price. Additionally, in no event will the Company be required to net cash settle the warrants. Accordingly, the warrants may expire worthless.

~~NOTE 9. INCOME TAX~~F-15

The Company’s net deferred tax assets are as follows:

	December 31,
	2016			2015
Deferred tax asset
Net operating loss carryforward	$	218,065		$	122,873
Business combination search expenses		87,310			93,373
Total deferred tax assets		305,375			216,246
Valuation allowance		(305,375	)		(216,246	)
Deferred tax asset, net of allowance	$	-		$	-

F-13

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2016~~2017

NOTE 11. INCOME TAX

The Company’s net deferred tax assets are as follows:

	December 31,
	2017			2016

Deferred tax asset
Net operating loss carryforward	$	594,533		$	218,065
Business combination search expenses		—			87,310
Total deferred tax assets		594,533			305,375
Valuation allowance		(594,533	)		(305,375	)
Deferred tax asset, net of allowance	$	—		$	—

The income tax provision (benefit) consists of the following:

	Year Ended December 31,
	Years Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Federal
Current	$	-—		$	-—
Deferred		(82289,~~382~~158	)		(~~160~~82,~~956~~382	)
State
Current	$	-—		$	-—
Deferred		~~(20,789~~	)		(5420,~~616~~789	)
Change in valuation allowance		~~103~~289,~~171~~158			~~215~~103,~~572~~171
Income tax provision (benefit)	$	-		$	-
Income tax provision	$	—		$	—

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the Company had U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryovers (“NOLs”) of approximately $~~512~~2,~~131~~831,109 available to offset future taxable income. These NOLs expire beginning in 2034. In accordance with Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, deductibility of the Company’s NOLs may be subject to an annual limitation in the event of a change in control as defined under the regulations.

In ~~assessing~~ assessing the realization of the deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion of all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the ~~generation~~ generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences representing net future deductible amounts become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. After consideration of all of the information available, management believes that significant uncertainty exists with respect to future realization of the deferred tax assets and has therefore established a full valuation allowance. For the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the change in the valuation allowance was $89289,~~129~~158.

A reconciliation of the federal income tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate at December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 is as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Statutory federal income tax rate		(34.0	)%		(34.0	)%
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit		(80.60	)%		(118.56	)%
Change in valuation allowance		42.6	%		45.5	%
Deferred rate tax change		20.3	%		—
Change in valuation allowance		13.7	%		42.6	%
Income tax provision (benefit)		0.0	%		0.0	%

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction in various state and local jurisdictions and is subject to examination by the various taxing authorities. The Company considers New York to be a significant state tax jurisdiction. F-16

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2017

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction in various state and local jurisdictions and is subject to examination by the various taxing authorities.

NOTE 10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company follows the guidance in ASC 820 for its financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period, and non-financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value at least annually.

The fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities reflects management’s estimate of amounts that the Company would have received in connection with the sale of the assets or paid in connection with the transfer of the liabilities in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In connection with measuring the fair value of its assets and liabilities, the Company seeks to maximize the use of observable inputs (market data obtained from independent sources) and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs (internal assumptions about how market participants would price assets and liabilities). The following fair value hierarchy is used to classify assets and liabilities based on the observable inputs and unobservable inputs used in order to value the assets and liabilities:

F-14

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016

	Level 1:	Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for an asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
	Level 2:	Observable inputs other than Level 1 inputs. Examples of Level 2 inputs include quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities and quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
	Level 3:	Unobservable inputs based on our assessment of the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation inputs the Company utilized to determine such fair value:

Description	Level		December 31, ~~2016~~2017		December 31, ~~2015~~2016
Assets:
Cash and marketable securities held in Trust Account		1	$	43,927,390	$	43,646,683
Marketable securities held in Trust Account		1	$	14,846,465	$	43,927,390

NOTE 11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company evaluates subsequent events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date up to the date that the financial statements were issued. Other than as described below, the Company did not identify subsequent events that would have required adjustment or disclosure in the financial statements.

~~On February 10, 2017,~~Oreva ~~the~~Agreement Company’s stockholders approved the Extension Amendment. The number of shares of common stock presented for redemption in connection with the Extension Amendment was 911,200. The Company distributed $9,305,588, or approximately, $10.21 per share, to redeeming stockholders. In addition, the Company has agreed to contribute $0.025 per share to the Trust Account for each public share that was not converted in connection with the approval of the Extension Amendment, for each 30-day period, or portion thereof, that is needed by the Company to complete a Business Combination from February 11, 2017 through August 11, 2017. To date, the Company has deposited an aggregate of $169,094 into the Company’s Trust Account. The Contribution was paid from funds loaned to the Company by a third party.

InOn January ~~February~~3, ~~2017~~2018, the Company, ~~entered~~Barington ~~into~~Companies ~~Promissory~~Advisors, ~~Notes~~LLC ~~with~~(“Barington”), ~~affiliates~~Hilco ofGlobal ~~its~~(“Hilco ~~sponsors~~Global”), Hilco ~~for~~Merchant anResources, ~~aggregate~~LLC ~~amount~~(“HMR” ~~of $25~~and,~~000~~ intogether ~~order~~with toHilco ~~fund working~~Global, ~~capital~~collectively, ~~requirements (the~~ “~~2017 Promissory Notes~~Hilco”)., ~~The~~and ~~2017~~certain additional ~~Promissory~~parties, ~~Notes~~including ~~are~~members ~~non-interest bearing,~~of ~~unsecured~~the ~~and~~board ~~due~~of ondirectors of the ~~earlier~~Company of (i)together ~~the~~with ~~date~~Barington onand ~~which~~Hilco, the ~~Company~~“Sellers”), entered ~~consummates~~into aan ~~Business~~agreement ~~Combination~~(the or“Oreva ~~(ii~~Agreement”) ~~the date~~with ~~which~~Sweiss ~~the~~Ventures, ~~Company~~LLC, ~~determines~~a ~~not~~Nevada tolimited ~~proceed~~liability ~~with~~company a(“Sweiss”), JSE ~~Business~~Holdings, ~~Combination.~~LLC, Ina ~~addition,~~New onYork ~~February~~limited 14liability company (“JSE”), ~~2017 and~~BAG ~~March~~Spac 161, ~~2017~~LLC, ~~the~~a ~~Company received~~Delaware ~~advances~~limited ~~from~~liability acompany (“BAG”), ~~third~~PLA99, ~~party~~LLC, ina ~~the~~Delaware ~~aggregate~~limited ~~amount~~liability ofcompany ~~$170~~(”PLA”),~~000~~ inand ~~order~~Oreva toPartners, ~~fund~~LLC, ~~the~~a ~~Contribution~~Delaware limited ~~required~~liability ~~under~~company ~~the Extension~~(“Oreva” ~~Amendment.~~and ~~The~~together ~~advances~~with ~~are~~Sweiss, ~~non-interest bearing~~JSE, ~~unsecured~~BAG and ~~due~~PLA, onthe ~~demand~~“Investors”).

InPursuant ~~February~~to ~~2017~~the Oreva Agreement, the Sellers agreed to transfer to the Investors an aggregate of (a) 1,035,767 shares of Common Stock of the Company, and (b) an aggregate of ~~withdrew~~142,500 ~~$84~~warrants to purchase an additional 71,~~371~~250 shares of ~~interest~~Common ~~from~~Stock (collectively, the ~~Trust~~“Transferred ~~Account~~Securities”). The 1,035,767 shares of Common Stock included in ~~order~~the Transferred Securities represented 96.5% of an aggregate of 1,073,267 insider promoter shares of Common Stock of the Company owned of record and beneficially by the Sellers (the “Insider Shares”). Under the Oreva Agreement, the Sellers retained an aggregate of (i) 285,000 shares of Common Stock and associated rights, which entitle a holder to ~~fund~~receive ~~working~~one-tenth ~~capital~~(1/10) ~~requirements~~of a share of Common Stock (the “Rights”), and (ii) 37,500 promotional shares of Common Stock that were issued to directors, officers and a consultant of the Company as compensation for their services to the Company.

F-1517

BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2017

In consideration for their receipt of the Transferred Securities and its affiliates obtaining control of the board of directors of the Company, the Investors and its affiliates and associates (collectively, the “Investor Group”) agreed to use its and their best efforts to locate and consummate, on or prior to the June 30, 2018, a Business Combination for the Company acceptable to the Company’s stockholders. In addition, the Investors paid on behalf of the Company, or reimbursed the Sellers for, (i) $154,000, representing three months payment required by the Company for the Third Extension Amendment, and other accrued fees and expenses, and agreed pay to approximately $59,229 in additional documented Company expenses within 30 days. The Investors also agreed to assume responsibility for all ongoing costs and expenses of the Company, including, without limitation, payments associated with the Third Extension Amendment and costs and expenses associated with running and maintaining a publicly traded company following the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement.

Specialty Brands Holdings

On February 14, 2018, the Company, Oreva Capital Corp. and an entity formed by Oreva, Pop G Food Holdings Corp. (“PopG”) entered into a letter of intent (the “LOI”) with SBHand Papa Gino’s, Inc. The parties agreed that until February 28, 2018 (the “Exclusivity Period”), none of the parties nor their affiliates would seek to consummate a sale or purchase transaction with any other person or entity.

Under the terms of the LOI, SBH agreed in principle to sell to Pop G 100% of the capital stock of PGHC Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “PGHC”). PGHC is a holding company that owns 100% of the capital stock of Papa Gino’s Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation, which together with its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including Papa Gino’s, Inc., owns, operates and franchises (i) 148 company owned pizzeria restaurants and one venue licensee, under the trade name Papa Gino’s™ and (ii) 93 company owned sandwich restaurants, 31 franchised locations and three venue licensees under the trade name, D’Angelo’s™ ; in each case, throughout New England (collectively, the “Business”).

On or about March 21, 2018, the negotiation of the definitive stock purchase agreement was terminated as the parties were unable to agree upon the final purchase price.

F-18

Filing Compare · BARINGTON/HILCO ACQUISITION CORP.