UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

———————

FORM 10-K

———————

þ	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
☑	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
Or
¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from: _____to _____

———————

BREKFORD CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

———————

Delaware		000-52719		20-4086662
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		Commission File Number		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

7020 Dorsey Road

Hanover, Maryland 21076

(Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)

(443) 557-0200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.0001

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨☐ No þ☑

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨☐ No þ☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ☑ No ¨☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ☑ No ¨☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o☐ Accelerated filer o☐ Non-accelerated filer o☐ Smaller reporting company þ☑ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨☐ No þ☑

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, as of June 30, ~~2015~~ 2016, was approximately $42,~~519~~507,~~508~~425. For purposes of the above statement only, all directors, executive officers and 10% shareholders are assumed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for any other purpose.

The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of March 2415, ~~2016~~2017 was 4549,~~627~~311,~~754~~264.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: Part III of this 10-K incorporates by reference certain information from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its annual stockholders meeting to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.

BREKFORD CORP.

INDEX

PART I
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS		21
ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	21
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	8
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	8
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	8
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	8
PART II		9
ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	9
ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	10
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	11
ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	16
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	17
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	3744
ITEM 9A	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	3744
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	3946
PART III		46
ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	3946
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	3948
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	3951
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	4052
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	4052
PART IV		3953
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	4053
SIGNATURES		4154

PART I

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”) may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve substantial risk and uncertainties. Readers of this report should be aware of the speculative nature of “forward-looking statements.” Statements that are not historical in nature, including those that include the words “anticipate”, “estimate”, “should”, “will”, “expect”, “believe”, “intend”, and similar expressions, are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about, among other things, the industry and the markets in which we operate, and they are not guarantees of future performance. Whether actual results will conform to expectations and predictions is subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including risks and uncertainties discussed in this Annual Report; general economic, market, or business conditions and their effects; industry competition, conditions, performance and consolidation; changes in applicable laws or regulations; changes in the budgets and/or public safety priorities of our customers; economic or operational repercussions from terrorist activities, war or other armed conflicts; the availability of debt and equity financing; and other circumstances beyond our control. Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this report are qualified by these cautionary statements, and there can be no assurance that the actual results anticipated will be realized, or if substantially realized, will have the expected consequences on our business or operations.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statements are made. Except as required by applicable laws, we do not intend to publish updates or revisions of any forward-looking statements we make to reflect new information, future events or otherwise. If we update one or more forward-looking statements, then no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect thereto or with respect to other forward-looking statements.

As used in this Annual Report, the terms “Brekford”, “the Company”, “we”, “our”, and “us” refer to Brekford Corp. and, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, its consolidated subsidiary.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Our History

The Company (formerly California Cyber Design, Inc. (“CCDI”)) was incorporated in Delaware on May 27, 1998 and changed its name to American Financial Holdings, Inc. (“AFHI”) on August 11, 2004. AFHI, a publicly-traded corporation with no operations, announced the completion of its share exchange transaction with Pelican Mobile Computers, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Pelican Mobile”), on January 6, 2006. Pelican Mobile exchanged each issued and outstanding share of Pelican Mobile Computers (1,000 shares issued and outstanding at the time of the share exchange) for 25,000 shares of AFHI on a post-split basis (the “Share Exchange”) with an aggregate of 25,000,000 shares of common stock of AFHI issued to the former stockholders of Pelican Mobile. At the time of the Share Exchange, the existing stockholders of AFHI retained 5,512,103 shares of AFHI’s outstanding common stock after the cancellation of approximately 2,549,000 shares of common stock. As a result, the former stockholders of Pelican Mobile became the majority stockholders of AFHI. Under the terms of the Share Exchange, the Company changed its name to Tactical Solution Partners, Inc. On April 25, 2008, the Company’s stockholders approved a proposal to change its name from Tactical Solution Partners, Inc. to Brekford International Corp. to better reflect our business strategy. Subsequently, on July 9, 2010, the Company’s stockholders approved a proposal to change our name from Brekford International Corp. to Brekford Corp. On October 27, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the merger of Pelican Mobile with Brekford Corp. pursuant to Section 253 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, with Brekford Corp. as the surviving corporation. The merger became effective upon the filing of a Certificate of Ownership and Merger with the State of Delaware (and the appropriate Articles of Merger with the State of Maryland), pursuant to the terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger. The merger documents were filed with the States of Delaware and Maryland on October 28, 2010. Effective upon the completion of the merger, the Company’s corporate name of the Company remained as Brekford Corp. The operations of Pelican Mobile were continued by the Company without interruption following the merger.

On February 7, 2017, the Company entered into a Contribution and Unit Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with LB&B Associates Inc. (the “Purchaser”) and Global Public Safety, LLC (“GPS”). The closing for the transaction set forth in the Agreement occurred on February 28, 2017 (the “Closing”) and on such date the Company contributed substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities related to its vehicle services business (the “Business”) to GPS. On the Closing, GPS sold units representing 80.1% of the units of GPS to the Purchaser, and Brekford continues to own 19.9% of the units of GPS. After the Closing, Brekford will continue to own and run other business operations that are not related to the Business. For additional detail regarding this transaction, refer to Note 18 (Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements) elsewhere in this Annual Report.

On February 10, 2017, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) to combine the businesses of Brekford and KeyStone Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“KeyStone”). Upon closing of the merger, Brekford will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Novume Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Novume”). For additional detail regarding this transaction, refer to the Sale of Assets and Investment in Global Public Safety section and Note 18 (Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements) elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Overview

~~Brekford~~ The ~~Corp. (BFDI)~~Company, headquartered in Hanover, Maryland, is a leading public safety technology service provider of fully integrated traffic safety solutions, parking enforcement citation management, and mobile technology equipment for public safety vehicle services to state and local municipalities, the U.S. Military and various federal public safety agencies throughout the United States and Mexico. Brekford’s combination of upfitting services, cutting edge technology, and automated traffic safety enforcement (“ATSE”) solutions, ~~services~~including ~~offers~~speed, ared ~~unique~~light, ~~360º~~and ~~solution~~distracted ~~for~~driving camera ~~law enforcement agencies and municipalities~~systems. ~~Our~~The Company’s core values of integrity, accountability, respect, and teamwork drive our employees to achieve excellence and deliver industry leading technology and services, thereby enabling a superior level of ~~safety~~reliability ~~solutions~~ to our clients. Brekford has one wholly owned subsidiary, Municipal Recovery Agency, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, formed in 2012 for the purpose of providing collection systems and services for unpaid citations and parking fines.

Products and Services

Automated Traffic Safety Enforcement ~~(“ATSE”)~~ – Red Light and Speed Camera Systems

Public safety is a major concern for most communities – especially as populations grow, and yet there is continual pressure on public safety budgets. One way to help make streets safer while reducing workload is a well-run photo red light or speed enforcement program. The objective of photo enforcement is to help curtail aggressive driving through voluntary compliance. Revenue generated from fines routinely goes directly back into supporting other public safety initiatives.

Although opponents of red light cameras cite the increase in rear end collisions as cause for disapproval of cameras, a study conducted in February 2011 by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (the “IIHS”) reported that red-light cameras reduced fatal red light running crashes by 24% in 14 large U.S. cities with populations over 200,000. IIHS concluded that if red light cameras had been operating in all 99 U.S. cities with populations over 200,000 during this study period (five years), a total of 815 deaths could have been avoided. Because the types of crashes prevented by red light cameras tend to be far more severe than rear-end crashes, research has shown there is a net positive benefit. Photo enforcement solutions can reduce collisions, injuries and deaths by providing a useful tool for municipalities and law enforcement agencies, without unduly taxing drivers who do not break the law. Today, nearly 600 communities across the U.S. operate red light or speed camera enforcement programs.

Despite the increased safety effects and prevention of fatalities, there is still a common misconception that automated traffic safety enforcement systems are not supported by the general public. An IIHS survey conducted in November 2012 found that a large majority of people living in Washington, D.C., one of the largest combined red light and speed enforcement programs in the U.S., favor camera enforcement. Of those surveyed, 87% support red light cameras and 76% support speed cameras. Even the majority of violators (59%) agreed that they deserved their most recent citation. In 2012, IIHS reported that 633 people were killed and an estimated 133,000 were injured in crashes that involved red light running. Speeding was a factor in 31% of motor vehicle crash deaths in 2012.

Brekford’s ATSE products offer intersection safety (red light), speed, and cell phone enforcement options by way of a complete suite of solution-based products. Our team of industry professionals has extensive experience in this field, we have developed equipment and a full turnkey solution that we believe will ensure the success of any program. We have created and implemented some of the most cutting-edge features into our design while constructing end-to-end systems specifically with our clients’ needs in mind.

ATSE systems are one of a wide range of measures that are effective at reducing vehicle speeds and crashes. The ATSE system is an enforcement technique with one or more motor vehicle sensors producing recorded images of motor vehicles traveling at speeds above a defined threshold. Images captured by the ATSE system are processed and reviewed in an office environment and violation notices are mailed to the registered owner of the identified vehicle. ATSE is a technology available to law enforcement as a supplement and not a replacement for traditional enforcement operations. Evaluations of ATSE, both internationally and in the United States have identified some advantages over traditional speed enforcement methods. These include:

●	High rate of violation detection. ATSE units can detect and record multiple violations per minute. This can provide a strong deterrent effect by increasing drivers’ perceived likelihood of being cited for speeding.

●

Physical safety of ATSE operators and motorists. ATSE can operate at locations where roadside traffic stops are dangerous or infeasible, and where traffic conditions are unsafe for police vehicles to enter the traffic stream and stop suspected violators. With ATSE there is normally no vehicle pursuit or confrontation with motorists. ATSE might also reduce the occurrence of traffic congestion due to driver distraction caused by traffic stops on the roadside.

●	Fairness of operation. Violations are recorded for all vehicles traveling in excess of the enforcement speed threshold. Efficient use of resources. ATSE can act as a “force multiplier,” enhancing the influence of limited traffic enforcement staff and resources.

Beyond traditional tax collection on income or property, state agencies and local municipalities rely heavily on fine and fee revenue generated from a multitude of violator-funded sources. For example, jurisdictions generate sizable revenues from court fees, traffic and parking violations, ordinance infractions, and library and utility arrearages. Each of these revenue sources funds public safety and community development initiatives and without the income, the services are curtailed. Brekford offers client-specific solutions to these agencies and municipalities to assist them with collecting unpaid fines, including:

●	Notification continuance
●	Mail house and printing
●	Data purification and verification
●	Back office support
●	Call center response (inbound & out bound)
●	Lock-box & treasury
●	Payment processing

~~Electronic~~ Sale ~~Ticketing~~of ~~System~~Assets -and ~~Slick-Ticket~~Investment ™in Global Public Safety

~~Many~~ Vehicle of today’s law enforcement agencies are struggling to balance the increasing demand from their citizens for more services with limited and/or declining budgets. One of the easiest and most cost-effective ways agencies can address this issue is by deploying an electronic ticketing, or E-Ticketing solution. Automating the ticket issuing and processing system can significantly decrease cost, increase productivity and improve officer safety.Services

~~Brekford~~ Prior ~~offers~~to aMarch ~~unique~~1, ~~functionality~~2017, ~~that~~part ~~streamlines~~of ~~the~~Brekford’s ~~data~~business ~~entry~~included sales ~~process~~of ~~even~~products ~~further. Many~~and ~~law~~services ~~enforcement~~focusing ~~agencies~~on ~~that~~law ~~have~~enforcement vehicles. ~~deployed~~These aproducts ~~mobile~~and ~~data~~services ~~system~~included ~~run~~rugged ~~background~~information technology ~~queries~~solutions, ~~from~~mobile ~~national~~data, ~~(NCIC)~~digital video, ~~state~~electronic ticketing, and ~~local~~vehicle ~~databases~~upfitting. ~~and~~Rugged ~~Brekford’s~~information ~~solution~~technology solutions ~~captures~~included ~~the~~both ~~data~~ruggedized ~~from~~laptops ~~these mobile query files~~ and ~~auto~~in-~~populates~~car ~~all of the requisite data into the electronic citation (E-Tix) form on the screen. Brekford’s Slick-Ticket ™ product is a fully portable~~video solutions, ~~over-the-seat~~among ~~organizer~~other ~~for~~technology ~~public safety vehicles~~offerings, ~~specially~~in ~~designed~~addition to ~~house~~vehicle mounting asystems, ~~printer~~docking stations, and ~~scanner~~custom-built topackages. Vehicle ~~allow~~upfitting ~~law~~solutions ~~enforcement~~included ~~officers~~the toturnkey ~~quickly~~installation ~~access~~of various ~~driver's~~components ~~license~~including ~~and~~rugged ~~registration~~technology, ~~information~~ as well as ~~issue~~sirens, lights, ~~tickets~~radios, ~~warnings~~gun racks, and ~~citations~~decals. .

~~Rugged~~ As ~~Information~~previously ~~Technology~~reported ~~Solutions~~on –a ~~Mobile~~Current ~~Data~~Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7, 2017, on February 6, 2017, the Company entered into a Contribution and Unit Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with LB&B Associates ~~Digital~~Inc. ~~Video~~(the “Purchaser”) and Global Public Safety, LLC (“GPS”).

~~Law~~ The ~~enforcement~~closing ~~agency,~~for ~~fire~~the ~~department~~transaction ~~and~~set ~~emergency~~forth ~~medical~~in ~~services~~the ~~(“EMS”)~~Agreement ~~personnel~~occurred on ~~have~~February ~~unique~~28, ~~requirements~~2017 ~~for~~(the ~~fleet~~“Closing”) ~~vehicle~~and ~~upfitting~~on ~~and~~such ITdate the ~~equipment~~Company tocontributed ~~include~~substantially ~~characteristics~~all ~~such~~of asthe ~~ruggedness~~assets and ~~reliability.~~certain liabilities ~~The~~related ~~equipment must be able~~ to ~~work~~its invehicle ~~extreme~~services ~~environments~~business ~~that~~(the “Business”) ~~include~~to ~~high~~GPS. ~~levels~~After ofthe ~~vibration and shock~~Closing, ~~wide~~Brekford ~~temperature~~will continue ~~ranges,~~to ~~varying~~own ~~humidity, electromagnetic interference as well as voltage~~ and ~~current~~run ~~transients.~~other ~~Our~~business ~~rugged~~operations ~~and~~that ~~non-rugged~~are ITnot related ~~products~~to ~~and mobile data communication systems provide public safety workers with~~ the ~~unique functionalities necessary to enable effective response to emergency situations~~Business.

~~For~~ On ~~more~~the ~~than a decade~~Closing, ~~Brekford~~GPS ~~has~~sold ~~been~~units arepresenting ~~distributor for most major brands in the mobile technology arena~~80.1% ~~We handle everything from Panasonic Toughbooks® and Arbitrator® digital video systems to emergency lighting systems and wireless technology. We believe that we have all~~ of the ~~high-end~~units ~~products~~of GPS ~~our customers need~~ to ~~handle their day-to-day operations and protect~~ the ~~public~~Purchaser ~~they~~for ~~serve.~~$6,048,394, ~~Every~~after ~~product~~certain wepurchase ~~sell~~price adjustments isof ~~tested~~prepaid byexpenses ~~highly trained technicians~~ and ~~guaranteed~~unbilled tocustomer ~~work in even the most extreme conditions~~deposits. $4,048,394 Wewas ~~specialize~~paid in ~~seamlessly~~cash, ~~incorporating~~including ~~custom-built~~a ~~solutions~~$250,000 ~~within~~deposit ~~existing networks. We deliver our end-to-end solutions with service programs~~ that ~~work~~was paid ~~for~~on ~~agencies~~February ~~large~~6, 2017, and ~~small~~$2,000,000 ~~from turnkey~~was ~~drop~~paid ~~shipping~~by toPurchaser issuing ~~municipal~~the ~~leases.~~Company ~~Our~~a ~~commitment~~promissory isnote to(the ~~design~~“Promissory Note”). ~~and~~After ~~deliver~~the ~~solutions~~Closing, ~~that~~Brekford ~~meet~~continues orto ~~exceed~~own ~~industry~~19.9% ~~standards~~of the ~~for~~units ~~safety,~~of ~~ergonomics, reliability, serviceability and uniformity~~GPS.

4 The Promissory Note is subordinated to the Purchaser’s senior lender and accrues interest at a rate of 3% per annum. The maturity date of the Promissory Note is March 31, 2022. The Promissory Note is to be repaid as follows: (a) $75,000 plus all accrued interest on each of September 30, 2017; December 31, 2017; March 31, 2018, June 30, 2018 and September 30, 2018 (or, in the event any such date is not a business day, the first business day after such date), (b) $100,000 plus all accrued interest on each of December 31, 2018; March 31, 2019; June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2019 (or, in the event any such date is not a business day, the first business day after such date) (c) $125,000 plus all accrued interest on each of December 31, 2019; March 31, 2020; June 30, 2020; September 30, 2020, December 31, 2020; March 31, 2021, June 31, 2021; September 30, 2021; and December 31, 2021 (or, in the event any such date is not a business day, the first business day after such date), and (d) $100,000 on March 31, 2022.

We The ~~develop~~Promissory ~~integrated,~~Note ~~interoperable,~~is ~~feature-rich~~secured ~~mobile~~pursuant ~~systems~~to ~~that~~the ~~enable~~terms ~~first~~of ~~responders,~~a ~~such~~Pledge Agreement as(the ~~police,~~“Pledge ~~fire~~Agreement”) ~~and~~between ~~EMS,~~the ~~to obtain~~ Company and ~~exchange information in real time~~Purchaser. ~~The~~Pursuant ~~rapid dissemination of real time information is critical~~ to ~~determine~~the ~~and~~Pledge ~~assure~~Agreement ~~timely~~the ~~and~~Purchaser granted ~~precise~~the ~~resource~~Company ~~allocation by public sector decision makers. As~~ a ~~premiere~~continuing ~~Panasonic~~second ~~Toughbook~~priority ~~partner,~~lien ~~we augment these rugged laptops by designing~~ and ~~manufacturing~~security interest ~~vehicle mounting systems and docking stations for~~ in~~-vehicle~~ ~~communications~~the ~~equipment.~~Purchaser’s ~~With~~units ~~rugged~~of ~~laptop computers, tablets and hand-helds devices,~~ GPS ~~terminals,~~subject ~~two-way~~to ~~radios,~~liens ~~and~~of the ~~full~~Purchaser’s ~~console~~senior ~~systems, we provide ergonomically sound mounting products with full port replication~~lender.

Toughbook Arbitrator is a rugged revolution in law enforcement video capture. The fully integrated system offers unparalleled video capture (up to 360 degrees), storage and transfer, and is designed to work with back-end software for seamless video management, including archiving and retrieving. Brekford augments this solution with an Automatic License Plate Reader (ALPR / LPR), an image-processing technology used to identify vehicles by their license plates. License Plate Readers (LPRs) can record plates at about one per second at speeds of up to 70 MPH and they often utilize infrared cameras for clarity and to facilitate reading at any time of day or night. The data collected can either be processed in real-time, at the site of the read, or it can be transmitted to remote centers and processed at a later time. When combined with wearable body cameras, our total client solution provides a video capture solution that maintains the chain of evidence from the initial event through to court proceedings.3

~~360°~~ Pursuant ~~Vehicle~~to ~~Solution~~the ~~- Upfitting~~Agreement, the Company and GPS executed a Transition Services Agreement (the “Transition Services Agreement”). Pursuant to the Transition Services Agreement, the Company will perform certain support services to promote the efficient transition of the Business for the fees set forth in the Agreement.

~~The Brekford~~ In ~~360-degree~~connection ~~vehicle~~with ~~solution~~the ~~provides~~Agreement ~~complete~~the ~~vehicle~~Company ~~upfitting,~~entered ~~mobile~~into ~~data~~an Amended and ~~video~~Restated ~~solutions~~Limited ~~including~~Liability ~~municipal~~Company ~~financing~~Agreement ~~and~~of ~~leasing~~Global Public ~~services~~Safety, ~~for~~LLC ~~agencies~~(the “LLC Agreement”). The ~~360-degree~~LLC Agreement ~~vehicle solutions approach~~ provides ~~customers~~for ~~with~~the aoperations ~~one-stop~~of ~~upfitting,~~GPS ~~cutting edge technology~~ and ~~installation~~provides ~~service.~~that ~~The~~all limited ~~comprehensive~~liability ~~approach~~company ~~enables~~powers ~~Brekford~~of ~~to be~~ the ~~only~~Company ~~stop~~shall ~~our~~be ~~customers~~exercised by ~~need~~and tounder ~~make~~the toauthority ~~purchase~~of ~~law~~the ~~enforcement~~Board ~~vehicles~~of ~~(GM,~~Representatives ~~Ford,~~except as ~~Dodge),~~otherwise ~~have~~provided ~~them~~by ~~upfitted~~the ~~with~~LLC ~~lights,~~Agreement ~~sirens,~~or ~~radio~~applicable ~~communication~~law. ~~and~~The initial ~~rugged~~number ITof ~~technology,~~representatives ~~and~~constituting ~~have~~the ~~them~~Board ~~“ready~~of Representatives ~~to roll”. Our mission~~ is tothree, ~~provide~~of ~~and~~which ~~install~~the ~~equipment~~Company ~~that~~appointed ~~ensures~~one ~~safe~~ member and ~~efficient~~if ~~mission critical vehicles while incorporating~~ the ~~latest~~number ~~technological~~of ~~advances.~~Board Weof ~~adhere~~Representatives tois ~~strict~~increased ~~quality~~the Company ~~control~~shall ~~procedures~~be ~~and~~able ~~provide~~to ~~comprehensive~~appoint ~~services. The Brekford certified installation team provides our customers~~ the ~~highest~~number ~~level~~ of ~~expertise~~members ~~and~~required ~~service~~to maintain ~~from~~1/3 ~~inception~~of tothe ~~completion,~~seats ~~including~~on ~~maintenance~~the ~~and~~Board ~~upgrades~~of Representatives.

Pursuant to a month-to-month sublease agreement between GPS and the Company, the Company will continue to occupy 3,362 square feet of office space, located at 7020 Dorsey Road, Suite C, Hanover, Maryland 21076.

The Company also entered into a Pre-Novation Agreement with GPS pursuant to which performance under certain contracts being assigned to GPS will be made while these contracts are being assigned to GPS. The Company will also enter into a Novation Agreement pursuant to which the government contracts being assigned to GPS will be transferred.

With respect to information provided within this Annual Report, including management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and operating results, the sale transaction was contemplated as having been completed as of December 31, 2016. Products and services related to vehicle services have been treated as discontinued operations within this Annual Report.

Purchasing and Order Fulfillment

We work with manufacturers and distributors to secure the lowest cost possible while taking advantage of any available incentives in order to provide competitive pricing and minimize delivery time to our customers while maintaining our product margins. Typically, once ~~our~~we ~~sales~~sign ~~team~~an ~~receives~~ATSE ~~orders~~contract ~~from~~with our customers, we then purchase ~~the~~ required ~~products~~components from manufacturers and ~~sell~~assemble the ~~products~~camera systems toat our ~~customers~~facility in Hanover, Maryand. Sales ~~may~~generally ~~include~~are for ~~products~~services only, orwith ~~both~~Brekford ~~products~~maintaining ~~and~~ownership ~~installation~~of ~~services~~provided hardware and software.

~~Business~~ Merger ~~Strategy~~Agreement

~~Brekford~~ As ~~Corp.~~reported ison aAmendment ~~technology~~Number ~~services~~1 ~~provider~~to ofa ~~mobile~~Form ~~computer~~8-K filed with the Securities and ~~video~~Exchange ~~systems~~Commission ~~through~~on ~~its~~February ~~vehicle~~14, ~~upfitting~~2017, ~~services~~on February 10, 2017, Brekford entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) to ~~homeland~~combine ~~security~~the businesses ~~agencies~~of Brekford and ~~federal~~KeyStone Solutions, ~~state~~Inc., ~~and~~a ~~local~~Delaware corporation ~~law~~(“KeyStone”). ~~enforcement~~The ~~agencies~~Merger Agreement provides that Brekford and ~~traffic~~KeyStone ~~safety~~will ~~enforcement~~each ~~which~~engage ~~includes~~in ~~photo~~merger ~~speed~~transactions (the “Mergers”) with separate wholly-owned subsidiaries of a newly-formed company, ~~red~~Novume ~~light~~Solutions, ~~and~~Inc., ~~parking~~a ~~enforcement~~Delaware corporation ~~solutions~~(“Novume”). Under one merger transaction (the “Brekford Merger”), one wholly-owned subsidiary of Novume will merge with and ~~citation~~into ~~management~~Brekford, ~~for~~leaving ~~municipalities~~Brekford as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Novume. ~~The~~Under ~~primary~~a ~~products~~separate merger transaction (the “KeyStone Merger”), KeyStone will merge with and ~~services~~into ~~from~~another wholly-owned subsidiary of Novume (“KeyStone Merger Sub”), with KeyStone Merger Sub surviving such merger. The time at which ~~Brekford~~the ~~has~~Mergers ~~earned~~are completed ~~revenue~~in ~~and~~accordance ~~anticipates~~with wethe ~~will~~Merger ~~continue~~Agreement is referred to ~~earn~~as the ~~revenue~~“Effective isTime”. ~~through~~As ~~this~~soon ~~suite~~as ofpracticable ~~products~~after the Effective Time, Brekford will change its name to “Brekford Traffic Safety, Inc.” and ~~services~~KeyStone Merger Sub will change its name to “KeyStone Solutions, Inc.”

~~Management estimates that the public safety communications market is a $~~4.2 billion market, growing at more than 10% per annum. Police, fire and EMS personnel have unique requirements for communication, ruggedness, reliability and quality. Their equipment must be able to work in extreme environments that include high levels of vibration and shock, wide temperature ranges, varying humidity, electromagnetic interference and voltage and current transients. Furthermore, public safety personnel and emergency responders are demanding tailored mobile communication solutions that enable real-time access and exchange of critical data to assure timely and precise resource allocation by public sector decision makers. Brekford’s in-vehicle technology and communication solutions provide public safety workers and emergency responders with the unique, integrated functionalities necessary to enable effective response to emergency situations.

Merger Consideration

As consideration for the Mergers, each outstanding share of the common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of Brekford (“Brekford Common Stock”) immediately prior to the Effective Time will become convertible into and exchangeable for 1/15th of a share of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of Novume (“Novume Common Stock” and such ratio, the “Brekford Exchange Ratio”). Each outstanding share of the common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of KeyStone (“KeyStone Common Stock”) immediately prior to the Effective Time, will become convertible into and exchangeable for 1.9975 shares of Novume Common Stock, and each outstanding share of the Series A Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of KeyStone (“KeyStone Preferred Stock”) will become convertible into and exchangeable for 1.9975 shares of the Series A Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock of Novume (“Novume Preferred Stock” and such ratio, the “KeyStone Exchange Ratio”). The outstanding warrants and options to purchase shares of Brekford Common Stock and KeyStone Common Stock, as applicable, shall be exchanged for warrants and options to purchase Novume Common Stock at the Brekford Exchange Ratio or the KeyStone Exchange Ratio, as applicable. Collectively, the forgoing is referred to herein as the “Merger Consideration”.

The Merger Consideration, and each of the Brekford Exchange Ratio and the KeyStone Exchange Ratio, were determined so that, immediately after the Effective Time, the pre-merger stockholders of Brekford will own such portion of the capital stock of Novume as shall be equal to approximately 20% of the issued and outstanding NovumeCommon Stock, on a fully-diluted basis, and the pre-merger stockholders of KeyStone will own that portion of the capital stock of Novume as is equal to approximately 80% of the issued and outstanding Novume Common Stock, on a fully-diluted basis.

Closing Conditions

The closing of the Merger Agreement will take place upon the fulfillment or waiver of all of the conditions to closing set forth in Article VIII of the Merger Agreement or as soon thereafter as practicable, but not later than June 1, 2017, unless otherwise mutually agreed by Brekford and KeyStone. One closing condition is that each of Brekford and KeyStone receive all stockholder approvals and corporate approvals required by the Delaware General Corporations Code and the organizational documents of each company to complete the Mergers. This satisfaction of this condition is assured. On February 10, 2017, the board of directors of Brekford authorized and approved the Mergers and the adoption of the Merger Agreement. On the same day, Chandra Brechin, a member of Brekford’s Board of Directors, Scott Rutherford, Brekford’s Chief Strategic Officer and a member of its Board of Directors and Robert West, a member of the Board of Directors of Brekford who own an aggregate of 25,712,787 shares of Brekford Common Stock, which represent approximately 52.13% of the issued and outstanding shares of Brekford's Common Stock entered into separate agreements (“Voting Agreements”) with Brekford pursuant to which they separately agreed with Brekford to vote all of their shares in favor of the Brekford Merger and against any action or transaction that would delay or compromise the ability of Brekford to effectuate the Mergers. On February 9, 2017, the board of directors of KeyStone (the “KeyStone Board”) authorized and approved the Mergers and the adoption of the Merger Agreement. On the same date, certain holders of more than 51% of the issued and outstanding shares of KeyStone Common Stock entered into Voting Agreements with KeyStone, and such holders indeed delivered written consents to KeyStone approving the Mergers and adopt the Merger Agreement.

A second closing condition requires Novume to prepare and file a Registration Statement on Form S-4 (the “Registration Statement”), which shall be declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) prior to the Effective Time, registering the Merger Consideration. This shall not include registration of the options issuable as Merger Consideration in exchange for options previously received by stockholders of Brekford under Brekford’s 2008 Director’s Compensation Plan or stockholders of KeyStone under KeyStone’s 2016 Equity Award Plan, which are intended to be registered separately on a Registration Statement on Form S-8 after the Effective Time. The Registration Statement will include an information statement of Brekford, which Brekford shall distribute to its stockholders in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, prior to the Effective Time. In furtherance of this condition, Novume filed the Registration Statement with the SEC on February 10, 2017. The Registration Statement remains subject to the SEC’s review and comment, and to amendment, as appropriate, by Novume.

Finally, prior to the Effective Time, Novume shall enter into five-year employment agreements with each of Scott Rutherford, Brekford’s current Chief Strategy Officer, and Rodney Hillman, Brekford’s current President and Chief Operating Officer (the “Employment Agreements”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement Mr. Rutherford shall serve as Chief Technology Officer and Mr. Hillman shall serve as President and Chief Operating officer of Brekford Traffic Safety, Inc.

Under the Merger Agreement, Novume shall use its best efforts, as soon as practicable after the Effective Time, to obtain listings for Novume Common Stock, Novume Preferred Stock and certain warrants to purchase Novume Common Stock on a national stock exchange, or, alternatively, to obtain quotations for such securities on the OTCQX.

~~ATSE~~ Leadership solutions include speed and red-light camera technologies that are increasingly in demand, as well as parking enforcement solutions with a complete turnkey backend citation management software suite. The U.S. market for red-light systems is estimated at 20,000 to 30,000 systems and the market for speed cameras is estimated at 35,000 to 50,000 systems. According to the IIHS, as of March 2015, 466 communities have red light cameras currently operating and 138 communities have speed cameras operating in at least one location. We have established a foothold in this business by securing contracts with several municipalities in the Mid-Atlantic region, and we are currently implementing plans for national and international expansion. There are only a handful of competitors that are currently providing ATSE services with three companies that are considered leaders of this industry. Management believes that the Company possesses a technical advantage over its competitors. Due to our flexible customized solutions and superior customer service, we believe we are poised to capture increased market share in the U.S., Mexico, and other countries in the near future.Novume

The leadership of Novume shall be substantially comprised of the current management of KeyStone.

At the Effective Time, the Board of Directors of Novume (the “Novume Board”), shall have seven (7) members, four (4) of whom shall be independent within the meaning of the Exchange Act, and the national stock exchange to which Novume intends to apply for listings of the Novume securities indicated above. Six (6) members of the Novume Board shall be designated by KeyStone, and one (1) member of the Novume Board shall be designated by Brekford, subject to the approval of KeyStone.

Termination Fee

If (i) the Merger Agreement (A) is terminated by KeyStone due to the withdrawal of the recommendation of the Merger Agreement by the board of directors of Brekford (the “Brekford Board”), or by Brekford or KeyStone because of the failure to obtain the requisite Brekford stockholders’ approval, or (B) is terminated as a result of Brekford’s material breach of its obligations with regard to Closing and to filing and distributing of the Registration Statement required for the transaction, which breach is not cured within thirty (30) days after notice thereof to Brekford, and (ii) at the time of such termination there shall have been an Acquisition Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement) involving Brekford or any of its subsidiaries (whether or not such offer shall have been rejected or shall have been withdrawn prior to the time of such termination), Brekford shall pay KeyStone a termination fee of $250,000 (the “Termination Fee”). The Termination Fee shall be payable in cash at the date of termination.

Business Strategy

Brekford’s ATSE solutions include speed and red-light camera technologies that are increasingly in demand, as well as parking enforcement solutions with a complete turnkey backend citation management software suite. The U.S. market for red-light systems is estimated at 20,000 to 30,000 systems and the market for speed cameras is estimated at 35,000 to 50,000 systems. According to the IIHS, as of December 2016, 426 communities have red light cameras currently operating and 142 communities have speed cameras operating in at least one location. We have established a foothold in this business by securing contracts with several municipalities in the Mid-Atlantic region, and we are currently implementing plans for national and international expansion. There are only a handful of competitors that are currently providing ATSE services with three companies that are considered leaders of this industry. Management believes that the Company possesses technical and operational advantages over its competitors. Due to our flexible customized solutions and superior customer service, we believe we are poised to capture increased market share in the U.S., Mexico, and other countries in the near future.

Competition

Although we operate in an industry that has experienced substantial growth in recent years, it is also characterized by customers ~~that~~and states ~~are~~with ~~extensively~~vastly ~~fragmented~~different requirements for photo enforcement operations. Further, although there are only a handful of competitors in our industry, competition among those companies is intense. Larger competitors ~~may~~tend ~~have greater buying power and, therefore, may be able~~ to ~~offer~~invest ~~better~~significant ~~pricing~~capital ~~than we can offer, which is one of the key factors~~ in business ~~determining~~development ~~whether~~and alobbying ~~contract will be awarded by local~~efforts, ~~state~~providing ~~and~~them ~~federal agencies~~ with ~~limited~~more leverage ~~budgets.~~in ~~The~~terms ~~majority~~ of ~~our~~acceptance ~~sales are to government agencies~~ and ~~other~~contract ~~government contractors with historically stable operating budgets, thus our operating results and growth are largely dependent on national and local economic conditions~~awards. At ~~the~~We ~~same time, we~~ believe that our technology, size, and strategy provide more flexibility when bidding on contracts in smaller to medium sized municipalities which collectively constitutes the majority of installation opportunities within the U.S.

To address these competitive pressures and industry trends, we intend to grow revenues by:

·● ~~Offering~~Increasing anATSE ~~expanded~~installation ~~platform~~and ofservices ~~products~~(speed, red light, and ~~higher-end~~parking) ~~technical~~both ~~services~~nationally and internationally. The global economic environment may present opportunities and challenges in the year ahead, yet municipalities will still need to address road safety issues and photo-enforcement is a crucial tool in that task; ● Refining our ~~existing~~strategy to focus on smaller and medium-sized customers, in states that enable ATSE technology, where we are able to profitably provide high quality solutions; and

·● ~~Increasing~~Continuing ~~our~~to ~~customer~~invest ~~base~~in byresearch ~~expanding~~and ~~our~~development ~~offerings~~to ~~into~~ensure ~~additional~~that ~~regions;~~out technologies remain at the forefront of the industry.

· Offering a 360 Degree one-stop shop for “smart” law enforcement vehicle and municipal lease/financing options on full vehicle build-outs;

· Using our placement on the General Services Administration (“GSA”), a preferred, pre-negotiated contract that provides significant revenue opportunities from federal, state and local governments, which, along with the passage of the Local Preparedness Acquisition Act, management believes will benefit our upfitting group by opening up our products and services to federal, state and local governments with which we have not done business before;

· Increasing ATSE installation and services (speed, red light, and parking) both nationally and internationally. The global economic environment may present opportunities and challenges in the year ahead, yet municipalities will still need to address road safety issues and photo-enforcement is a crucial tool in that task; and

· Continuing to invest in research and development to ensure that out technologies remain at the forefront of the industry.

Customers

The Company has several ATSE contracts with government agencies, of which net revenue from ~~one~~four ~~customer~~customers during the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 represented 1763% of the total net revenue. ~~Two~~ Four customers accounted for 5388% of total accounts receivable as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, which was subsequently collected in ~~2016~~ 2017.

Net revenue from ~~one~~five ~~customer~~customers during the year ended December 31, 2015 ~~2014~~ represented 1080% of the total net revenue. Accounts receivable due from ~~one~~three ~~customer~~customers at December 31, ~~2014~~2015 amounted to 5391% of total accounts receivable at that date.

Vendors

The Company purchased ~~substantially all rugged IT~~ products ~~that it resold during the periods presented from a single distributor. Revenue from rugged IT products amounted to 59%~~ and ~~53%~~services ~~of total revenue~~ for ~~the~~fulfillment ~~years~~of ~~ended~~ATSE contracts ~~December~~from ~~31,~~several ~~2015 and 2014, respectively~~vendors. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, accounts payable due to ~~this~~these ~~distributor~~vendors amounted to 7247% and 5338% of total accounts payable, respectively.

Government Contracts and Regulation

All companies engaged in supplying equipment and services to government agencies, either directly or by subcontract, are subject to business risks. Government contracts generally contain provisions permitting termination, in whole or in part, without prior notice at the government’s convenience, as well as termination for default based on lack of performance. Upon termination for convenience, we generally would be entitled to compensation only for work done, supplier costs and termination liability at the time of termination and to receive an allowance for profit on the work performed. A termination arising out of our default could expose us to liability and have a negative impact on our ability to obtain future government contracts and orders. Furthermore, on government contracts for which we are a subcontractor and not the prime contractor, the government could terminate the prime contract for convenience or otherwise, which would likely result in the termination of our subcontract.

Future Legislation

Because much of our business growth involves providing traffic enforcement solutions to governmental agencies and municipalities, the future passage of laws and regulations affecting red light camera and speed camera systems could have a material adverse impact on our business. Camera-operated traffic enforcement solutions have recently been the subject of significant public criticism and legislators in various jurisdictions have introduced, or have indicated that they intend to introduce, legislation to better monitor and control traffic enforcement activities. For example, legislation passed in Maryland in 2014 imposes a civil penalty on enforcement contractors if they issue erroneous citations on behalf of a municipality. It also prohibits contractors from receiving compensation based on the number of citations issued by the municipality or citations actually paid. We cannot predict whether additional pieces of legislation will be enacted, or the impact they may have on our business.

Employees

As of ~~March~~February 24, ~~2016~~2017, we employed 3841 full-time employees. Employees related to ATSE and discontinued operations were 23 and 18 respectively. We have never had a work stoppage, and none of our employees are represented by collective bargaining agreements. We anticipate hiring additional employees to ensure timely delivery of customer projects and services, as necessary. Additionally, we intend to use the services of independent consultants and contractors to perform various professional services, when appropriate. We believe that this use of third-party service providers may enhance our ability to contain general and administrative expenses.

Corporate Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 7020 Dorsey Road, Hanover, Maryland 21076. Our telephone number is (443) 557-0200.

Available Information

We maintain an Internet website at www.brekford.com on which we make available, free of charge, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments thereto as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Information appearing on our website is not incorporated by reference in, and is not a part of, this Annual Report.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information required by this item.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our corporate headquarters is located in Hanover, Maryland in an approximately 223,~~000~~700 square foot office ~~and warehouse~~ facility which is sub-leased from Global Public Services at ~~various~~a ~~rates~~rate ~~through~~of ~~April~~15% ~~30,~~of ~~2020~~GPS’s invoiced monthly rent and utilities. The sub-lease permits either party to terminate upon 120 days advance written notice. The Company also leases approximately 2,500 square feet of office space from Peppermill Properties, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company (“Peppermill”). Peppermill is owned and managed by Chandra (C.B.) Brechin and Scott Rutherford, who are ~~officers,~~ directors and principal stockholders of the Company. On June 1, 2010, the Company entered into a three-year lease with Peppermill, which was subsequently amended to extend the lease expiration date to June 30, ~~2016~~2017. This space is used for the expansion of business. The total minimum annual lease payments due under the Company’s lease agreements ~~are~~under continuing operations are $~~786~~116,~~975~~742.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not currently involved in any legal proceedings, however, from time to time, we may become a party to various legal actions and complaints arising in the ordinary course of business. In addition to commitments and obligations in the ordinary course of business, we may become subject to various claims, pending and potential legal actions for damages, investigations relating to governmental laws and regulations and other matters arising out of the normal conduct of our business. It is possible that cash flows or results of operations could be materially affected in any particular period by the unfavorable resolution of one or more of these contingencies.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

As of March 20, ~~2016~~2017, 4549,~~627~~311,~~754~~364 shares of Brekford Corp. common stock were outstanding and held by approximately 5356 stockholders of record (based solely on the information provided to us by our transfer agent). This number of stockholders does not include:

~~· any beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of various dealers, clearing agencies, banks, brokers and other fiduciaries, or~~ ●

·any beneficial ~~broker-dealers~~owners orof ~~other~~common ~~participants~~stock ~~who~~whose ~~hold or clear~~ shares ~~directly~~are orheld ~~indirectly~~in ~~through~~ the names ~~Depository~~of ~~Trust~~various ~~Company~~dealers, orclearing ~~its~~agencies, ~~nominee~~banks, ~~Cede~~brokers &and other ~~Co.~~fiduciaries, or

●

broker-dealers or other participants who hold or clear shares directly or indirectly through the Depository Trust Company, or its nominee, Cede & Co.

On January 30, 2008, our common stock began trading on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (the “OTCBB”) under the ticker symbol “BFDI”. Since April 2010, our common stock has also been quoted on the OTCQB marketplace of the OTC Markets Group under the ticker symbol “BFDI”. Beginning November 2015 our Company began trading on OTCQX under the symbol “BFDI”. Our common stock is not listed on any national or regional securities exchange.

The following table sets forth, for the periods presented, the high and low bid price ranges of our common stock as reported on the OTCQB and OTCQX. These over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

	High	Low	~~High~~		~~Low~~
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2014:
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2015:
First Quarter	$0.40	$0.15	~~0.34~~	$	~~0.14~~
Second Quarter	$0.28	$0.16	~~0.20~~	$	~~0.10~~
Third Quarter	$0.29	$0.20	~~0.39~~	$	~~0.13~~
Fourth Quarter	$0.28	$0.18	~~0.49~~	$	~~0.16~~
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2015:
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2016:
First Quarter	$0.21	$0.14	~~0.40~~	$	~~0.15~~
Second Quarter	$0.30	$0.10	~~0.28~~	$	~~0.16~~
Third Quarter	$0.12	$0.08	~~0.29~~	$	~~0.20~~
Fourth Quarter	$0.12	$0.06	~~0.28~~	$	~~0.18~~

On March 2320, ~~2016~~2017, the closing sales price of our common stock as reported on the OTCQX was $0.1611 per share.

Dividends

We have never declared or paid dividends on our Common Stock. We intend to use retained earnings, if any, for the operation and expansion of our business, and therefore do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Moreover, the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware provides that the Company’s board of directors may declare and pay a dividend on the common stock only out of surplus or, if we have no surplus, out of net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that dividends will be paid on our common stock even if our board desires to do so.

Equity Compensation Plan

The following table provides information as of December 31, ~~2015~~ 2016 with respect to Company’s equity compensation plans.

Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)	~~Number~~Weighted-average ~~of securities to be issued upon~~ exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (ab)	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a) (c)	~~Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)~~		~~Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)~~
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	225,000	$ 0.12	~~225~~5,339,000	$	~~0.24~~		~~5,896,000~~
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	-	-	-		-		-
Total	225,000	$ 0.12	~~225~~5,339,000	$	~~0.24~~		~~5,896,000~~

(1) Note: In addition to stock options and stock appreciation rights, the 2008 Incentive Plan permits the grant of stock awards, stock units, performance units and other stock-based awards. As of December 31, 2015, the Company has granted 1,704,000 shares of restricted stock that are not reflected in column (a) of this table.

Note: In addition to stock options and stock appreciation rights, the 2008 Incentive Plan permits the grant of stock awards, stock units, performance units and other stock-based awards. As of December 31, 2016, the Company has granted 2,036,000 shares of restricted stock that are not reflected in column (a) of this table.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

Issuer Repurchases

On September 28, 2012, the Company’s board of directors adopted a stock repurchase program which permits the Company to repurchase up to $363,280 in shares of our common stock in open market transactions or in privately negotiated transactions at the Corporation’s discretion over a 24-month period. The stock repurchase program expired on September 28, 2014. The Company announced this stock repurchase program in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 16, 2012. None

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

~~On October 23, 2015, the Investor converted $25,000 of principal and $904 of accrued interest due under the Investor Note into 169,530 shares of Common Stock~~ None.

On All ~~December~~other 2,equity ~~2015,~~securities of the ~~Investor~~Company ~~converted~~sold ~~$50,000~~during of2016 ~~principal~~in transactions ~~and~~that ~~$2,136~~were ofnot ~~accrued~~registered ~~interest~~under ~~due~~the ~~under~~Securities Act were previously reported in the ~~Investor~~Company’s ~~Note~~Quarterly ~~into~~Reports ~~349,155~~on Form ~~shares~~10-Q ofand/or ~~Common~~Current ~~Stock~~Reports on Form 8-K.

All other equity securities of the Company sold during 2015 in transactions that were not registered under the Securities Act were previously reported in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and/or Current Reports on Form 8-K.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not Applicable.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, our financial statements (and notes related thereto) and other more detailed financial information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. Consequently, you should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with such financial statements and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis are set forth elsewhere in this Annual Report, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Pronouncements

The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and judgments affecting the reporting amounts of assets and liabilities, expenses and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience, our knowledge of economic and market factors and various other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. We may also engage third party specialists to assist us in formulating estimates when considered necessary. Estimates and judgments used in the preparation of our financial statements are, by their nature, uncertain and unpredictable and depend upon, among other things, many factors outside of our control, such as demand for our products and economic conditions. Accordingly, our estimates and judgments may prove to be different from actual amounts that may only be determined upon the outcome of one or more confirming events and actual results may differ, perhaps significantly, from these estimates under different estimates, assumptions or conditions. The Company believes the critical accounting policies below are affected by estimates, assumptions and judgments used in the preparation of our financial statements.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are carried at estimated net realizable value. The Company has a policy of reserving for uncollectable accounts based on its best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in its existing accounts receivable. The Company calculates the allowance based on a specific analysis of past due balances. Past due status for a particular customer is based on how recently payments have been received from that customer. Historically, the Company’s actual collection experience has not differed significantly from its estimates, due primarily to credit and collections practices and the financial strength of its customers.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes ATSE revenue ~~relating to its vehicle upfitting solutions~~ when ~~all of~~ the ~~following~~required ~~criteria~~collection efforts ~~have~~are ~~been satisfied: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery or installation has been~~ completed; ~~(iii)~~and the ~~customer~~respective ~~accepts~~municipality ~~and~~is ~~verifies~~billed depending ~~receipt;~~on ~~and~~the ~~(iv)~~terms ~~collectability~~of isthe ~~reasonably~~respective ~~assured~~contract. The Company records ~~considers~~revenue ~~delivery~~related to ~~its~~automated ~~customers~~traffic toviolations ~~have~~for ~~occurred at~~ the Company’s ~~time~~share atof ~~which~~the ~~products~~violation ~~are~~amount ~~delivered and/~~or ~~installation~~on ~~work~~a ismonthly ~~completed~~basis for ~~and~~fixed-fee ~~the customer acknowledges its acceptance of the work~~arrangements.

~~The~~ Fair ~~Company~~Value ~~recognizes ATSE revenue when the required collection efforts are completed and the respective municipality is billed depending on the terms~~ of ~~the~~Financial ~~respective contract. The Company records revenue related to automated traffic violations for the Company’s share of the violation amount.~~Instruments

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amount of the Company’s promissory note obligations approximate fair value, as the terms of these notes are consistent with terms available in the market for instruments with similar risk.

We account for our derivative financial instruments, consisting solely of certain stock purchase warrants that contain non-standard anti-dilutions provisions and/or cash settlement features, and certain conversion options embedded in our convertible instruments, at fair value using Level 3 inputs, which are discussed in Note 14 to these consolidated financial statements. We determine the fair value of these derivative liabilities using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model when appropriate, and in certain circumstances using binomial lattice models or other accepted valuation practices.

When determining the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, we are required to use various estimates and unobservable inputs, including, among other things, contractual terms of the instruments, expected volatility of our stock price, expected dividends, and the risk-free interest rate. Changes in any of the assumptions related to the unobservable inputs identified above may change the fair value of the instrument. Increases in expected term, anticipated volatility and expected dividends generally result in increases in fair value, while decreases in the unobservable inputs generally result in decreases in fair value.

Foreign Currency Transactions

The Company has certain revenue and expense transactions with a functional currency in Mexican pesos and the Company's reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. Assets and liabilities are translated from the functional currency to the reporting currency at the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date and equity at the historical exchange rates. Revenue and expenses are translated at rates in effect at the time of the transactions. Resulting translation gains and losses are accumulated in a separate component of stockholders' equity - other comprehensive income (loss). Realized foreign currency transaction gains and losses are credited or charged directly to operations.

Income Taxes

The Company uses the liability method to account for income taxes. Income tax expense includes income taxes currently payable and deferred taxes arising from temporary differences between financial reporting and income tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred income taxes are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense, if any, consists of the taxes payable for the current period. Valuation allowances are established when the realization of deferred tax assets are not considered more likely than not.

The Company files income tax returns with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and with the revenue services of various states. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. The Company believes that it has appropriate support for the income tax positions it takes and expects to take on its tax returns, and that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open years based on an assessment of many factors including past experience and interpretations of tax law applied to the facts of each matter.

Results of Operations

Prior year balances have been recast to reflect the sale of 80% of our interest in the Vehicle Services operations on February 28, 2017. Results of ~~Operations~~discontinued ~~for~~operations are excluded from the accompanying ~~Years~~results ~~Ended~~of ~~December 31~~operations for all periods presented, unless ~~2015~~otherwise ~~and~~noted. ~~2014~~See Note 4 – discontinued operations in the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

~~The~~ Results ~~following tables summarize and compare selected items from the statements~~ of ~~operations~~Operations for the ~~years~~Years ~~ended~~Ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014.~~ 2015

	Year Ended December 31,						Increase(Decrease)
	2015			2014			$		%
Net Revenues	$	19,833,681		$	17,659,533		$	2,174,148	12.3	%
Cost of Revenues		15,773,184			14,527,646			1,245,538	8.6	%
Gross Profit	$	4,060,497		$	3,131,887		$	928,610	29.7	%
Gross Profit Percentage of Revenue	20.5		%		17.7	%

The following tables summarize and compare selected items from the statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

	Year Ended December 31,		Increase(Decrease)
	2016	2015	$	%
Net Revenues	$2,534,264	$2,811,929	$(277,665)	(9.9)%
Cost of Revenues	827,304	804,171	23,133	2.9%
Gross Profit	$1,706,960	$2,007,758	$(300,798 )	(15.0)%

Gross Profit Percentage of Revenue	67.4%	71.4%

Revenues

Revenues for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 amounted to $192,~~833~~534,~~681~~264 as compared to revenues of $172,~~659~~811,~~533~~929 for the year December 31, ~~2014~~2015, representing ana ~~increase~~decrease of $2277,~~174,148~~665 or 129.39%. ~~Each~~ ATSE ofservices ~~our~~decrease ~~main~~in ~~service~~revenue ~~platforms~~was ~~provided~~primarily ~~significant~~driven ~~contributions,~~by ~~with~~certain U.S. ~~vehicle~~clients ~~services~~that ~~increasing~~transitioned byto ~~10.9%~~flat ~~and~~fee ~~ATSE~~contract ~~services~~structures, ~~increasing~~as well byas ~~21.9%. Vehicle~~a ~~services~~decrease ~~growth~~in recurring revenue contributed from our Saltillo, Mexico program which was ~~primarily~~temporarily ~~driven~~suspended by ~~increased~~the City ~~sales~~in ~~and~~October ~~installation~~2016 ofin ~~Panasonic~~order ~~rugged~~to ITperform ~~products~~an ~~and~~audit ~~Arbitrator~~of ~~in-car~~the ~~video~~program and ~~capture~~review ~~systems~~collection efforts. ~~ATSE~~ ~~services~~Additionally ~~growth~~the ~~was~~Company ~~primarily~~has requested ~~driven~~to byestablish ~~recurring~~a ~~revenue~~direct ~~contributed~~contract ~~from~~with ~~our~~the ~~Saltillo,~~City. ~~Mexico~~On ~~program~~March 11, as2017 ~~well~~the asCity ~~slight~~announced ~~increases~~that ~~from~~collection ~~our~~efforts ~~U.S.~~for ~~clients~~unpaid fines ~~who~~will ~~have~~resume ~~transitioned~~immediately toand ~~flat~~continue ~~fee~~for ~~contract~~the ~~structures. For~~remainder of the contract, ~~year~~which ~~ended~~expires December 31, ~~2015,~~2017. ~~ATSE~~The ~~paid~~overall ~~citations~~revenue decrease ~~amounted~~was tooffset ~~166,649~~by ~~from~~added 59revenues ~~cameras~~from asnewly ~~compared~~added toprograms ~~113,720 from 43~~ and cameras ~~for~~in ~~the~~New ~~year~~Rochelle, ~~ended~~New ~~December~~York, 31Brice, ~~2014~~Ohio, ~~representing~~and anCalvert ~~increase of 52~~County,~~929 or 47%~~ Maryland.

In April 2015, the Company began operations on its Saltillo, Mexico program which has resulted in recurring revenue from the City of Saltillo, Mexico under an exclusive agreement signed in 2014 with Grupo Canviso Tec (“Canviso”), a Mexican Corporation, for the purposes of supplying turnkey ATSE services to cities and municipalities in Mexico. As of June 30, 2015, the Company had installed all necessary technology and communications infrastructure to operate the Saltillo program as well as other programs as they are added, with Saltillo being the main operations hub for the entire country. As of December 31, 2015, there were 16 speed photo enforcement cameras in live operation. Based upon timing of the rollout schedule thus far, the Company does not anticipate installing all 210 cameras as contemplated by the agreement with the City. We are working closely with Canviso and the City to determine additional unit counts for 2016 installation along with an associated rollout schedule. Also, as of December 31, 2015 the City had made limited progress in implementing enforcement operations in order to ensure higher citation collection rates. The Company is working closely with Canviso and the City to implement sufficient enforcement measures, including vehicle checkpoints monitored by automated license plate readers and door-to-door collection of unpaid fines. Despite a lower than anticipated collection rate, Saltillo was our 4th largest customer in terms of revenue for 2015, with a total of 39,207 collected citations from the 16 cameras. This is due to significantly higher violation rates as compared to our U.S. contracts. More importantly, with a view toward sustainability and longevity, the Saltillo program has been a model program for Mexico in terms of reducing accidents, injuries, and deaths caused by speeding.

Our contract structures generate revenue based on either a percentage of fines collected by our customers or a fixed monthly flat fee per camera. At December 31, 2016 approximately 80% of our contracts were based on a percentage of fines collected and 20% were based on a monthly flat fee per camera. Certain contracts in the state of Maryland were converted in 2016 from percentage of fines collected to monthly flat fee as a result of a change in the law that prohibits ATSE contractors from being compensated in relation to volume of fines collected. The remainder of our Maryland contracts will be converted to a flat monthly fee structure in 2017.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 amounted to $15827,~~773,184~~304 as compared to $14804,~~527,646~~171 for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~ 2015, an increase of $123,~~245,538~~133 or 82.69%. ~~The~~ This increase was ~~primarily~~directly related ~~driven~~to ~~by higher~~ direct labor and ~~product costs for vehicle services in conjunction with the increased sales volume. This was offset by lower direct labor and~~ materials costs associated with ATSE services, asfor wenew ~~experienced~~programs ~~operational~~during ~~efficiencies in terms of less camera maintenance~~2016.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 amounted to $41,~~060~~706,~~497~~960 as compared to $32,~~131~~007,~~887~~758 for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015, ana ~~increase~~decrease of $~~928~~300,~~610~~798 or 2915.70%. ~~Two~~The ~~key~~decrease was ~~drivers~~primarily ofdue ~~the~~to ~~increase~~U.S. ~~were~~clients awho ~~higher~~have ~~percentage~~transitioned ofto ~~revenues~~flat ~~from~~fee contract ~~ATSE~~structures ~~services~~combined aswith ~~well as~~ a ~~higher~~reduction ~~gross~~in ~~margin~~recurring revenue from ~~ATSE services as a result of~~ the ~~operational efficiencies noted above. Overall gross margin for the year ended December 31~~Saltillo, ~~2015~~Mexico ~~was~~program ~~20.5%~~ as ~~compared to 17~~discussed previously.~~7% for the year ended December 31, 2014.~~ ATSE gross margin for ~~the~~ year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 was 7167.4% as compared to 5571.24% for the year ended December 31, ~~2014. Vehicle services gross margin for the year ended December 31,~~ 2015 ~~was 12~~.~~1% as compared to 12.1% for the year ended December 31, 2014.~~

For the full year 2015, the Company exceeded the expected ATSE gross margin of 65% and met the expected vehicle services gross margin of 12%. As contributed revenues from ATSE services continue to rise as a percentage of overall revenues, we anticipate continued growth in the Company’s overall gross margin.

Expenses

	Year Ended December 31,	~~Year Ended December 31,~~	Increase(Decrease)				~~Increase(Decrease)~~
		2015			2014		$			%
	2016	2015	$	%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Salaries and related expenses	$1,645,073	$1,628,150	2$16,~~038,644~~923	1.0%	$	~~1,878,671~~	$	~~159,973~~		~~8.5~~	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses	1,071,272	1,213,864	1(142,~~675,837~~592)	(11.7)%		~~2,585,302~~		~~(909,465~~	)	~~(35.2~~	)%
Total operating expenses	$2,716,345	$2,842,014	3$(125,~~714,481~~669 )	(4.4)%	$	~~4,463,973~~	$	~~(749,492~~	)	~~(16.8~~	)%

Salaries and Related Expenses

Salaries and related expenses for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~ 2016 amounted to $21,~~038~~645,~~644~~073 as compared to $1,~~878~~628,~~671~~150 for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015, an increase of $~~159~~16,~~973~~923 or 81.50%. ~~The~~ There ~~increase~~ was no ~~due~~material tochange higher costs for corporate support labor, increased sales commissions, higher health insurance costs, and issuance of shares of restricted stock, offset by reductions in program support labor for ATSE services. The Company will continue to ~~invest~~personnel inhead ~~salary~~count ~~related~~or ~~infrastructure~~compensation ~~support in conjunction with our aggressive business development plan, especially with respect to ATSE services~~expense.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 amounted to $1,~~675~~071,~~837~~272 as compared to $21,~~585~~213,~~302~~ 864 for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015, a decrease of $~~909~~142,~~465~~592 or 35 11.27%. The decrease was primarily driven by lower ~~depreciation~~ATSE ~~expense~~program management ~~as certain obsolete assets had been disposed of during the same period of 2014~~ and ~~the~~depreciation ~~Company did not incur significant capital expenditures in 2015~~expenses.

Other Expense and Income

	Year Ended December 31,	~~Year Ended December 31,~~	(Decrease)/Increase					~~(Decrease)/Increase~~
		2015			2014			$			%
	2016	2015	$	%
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME
Interest expense	$(402,168)	$(455,937)	~~(676~~$53,~~950~~769	)11.8%	$	~~(170,561~~	)	$	~~(506,389~~	)	~~296.9~~	%
S Interest income			—			—			—		—
Loss on extinguishment of debt	(291,911)	(55,021)	(236,890)	(430.5)%
O Loss on extinguishment of debt			(55,021	)		—			(55,021	)	—
Change in derivative liability	74,676	14,784	59,892	405.1%
O Change in derivative liability			14,784			—			14,784		—
Total other (expense) income	$(619,403 )	$(496,174 )	$(123,229 )	(24.8)%
Total other (expense) income		$	(717,187	)	$	(170,561	)	$	(546,626	)	320.5	%

Total ~~other~~interest ~~expenses~~expense for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~ 2016 amounted to $~~717~~402,~~187~~168 as compared to $~~170~~455,~~561~~937 for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015, ana ~~increase~~decrease of $~~546~~53,~~646~~769 or ~~320~~11.58%. The decrease ~~increased~~was ~~expenses were~~ due primarily to a net increase in financing cost of $~~506~~139,~~449~~172 ~~that~~for ~~includes non-cash interest expense related to~~ the ~~original~~year ~~issue~~end ~~discount~~December ~~of $29~~31,~~820,~~ ~~debt~~2016 ~~discount~~compared ~~amortization of~~to $~~328~~91,~~021~~896 ~~and~~ for the ~~loss~~year onended ~~extinguishment~~December ~~of debt of $55~~31,~~021,~~ 2015 offset by annon-cash ~~increase~~interest expense inrelated ~~warrant~~to ~~liability~~debt discount amortization of $14263,~~784~~950 ~~related~~for the toyear ~~the~~ended ~~March~~December ~~2015~~31, ~~issuance~~2016 ofcompared ato $~~650~~345,~~000~~614 ~~convertible~~for ~~promissory note that matures in March 2017 (~~the ~~“Investor Note”) and a related five-~~year ended ~~common~~December ~~stock~~31, ~~purchase warrant (the “Warrant”)~~2015. The remainder of the ~~increase~~decrease in interest expense was due to ~~an increase in~~ cash interest expense associated with balances on the Company’s revolving line of credit.

In addition, there was an increase in the loss on extinguishment of debt of $291,911 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the $55,021 for the year ended December 31, 2015, which was offset by an increase in warrant liability of $74,676 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the $14,784 for the year ended December 31, 2015 related to the March 2015 issuance of a $650,000 convertible promissory note that matures in March 2017 (the “Investor Note”) and a related five-year common stock purchase warrant (the “Warrant”).

Net Loss

Net loss from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 ~~2015~~ amounted to $~~371~~944,~~171~~830 compared to a net loss from continuing operations of $1,~~502~~397,~~647~~888 for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015, a decrease of $1453,~~131,476~~058 or 7532.34%. The ~~improvement~~increase ~~was~~in ~~primarily~~net ~~due~~loss tofrom continuing ~~higher~~operations ~~overall~~was ~~gross~~driven ~~profit~~by ~~margins and~~ lower ~~overall~~gross ~~operating~~profit ~~expenses. Excluding~~and ~~other~~ higher expenses ~~consisting~~associated ofwith ~~both cash and non-cash interest expense of $286,910 and debt discount amortization of $328,021 and~~ the ~~loss~~Investor ~~on extinguishment of debt of $55~~Note,~~021,~~ offset by ana ~~increase~~decrease in operating warrant liability of $14,784, income from operations amounted to $346,016 for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to a loss of $1,332,086 for the year ended December 31, 2014, for an improvement of $1,678,102expenses.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, ~~2015~~2016, we had total current assets of approximately $52.3936 million and total current liabilities of approximately $41.97 81 million resulting in a working capital surplus of approximately $0.4255 million. At December 31, ~~2015~~2016 inventory totaled approximately $0.62 million consisting primarily of ~~raw~~ATSE ~~materials~~cameras ~~related to our existing pipeline of committed customer sales orders~~components. In In comparison, at December 31, ~~2014~~2015, we had total current assets of approximately $35.8534 million and total current liabilities of approximately $34.9095 million, resulting in a working capital ~~deficit~~ surplus of approximately $~~50,000~~0.39 million.

The Company’s accumulated deficit increased to approximately $1012.90 million at December 31, ~~2015~~2016 from $10.69 million at December 31, ~~2014~~2015, as a result of the net loss recorded for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016. Cash flows used in continuing operations for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 were approximately $0.812 million, compared to cash flows used in continuing operations for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 of approximately $0.3 03 million.

~~The~~ On ~~Company~~July ~~relies~~12, on2016 ~~cash~~(the ~~reserves~~“Closing Date”), ~~cash~~the ~~flows~~Company entered ~~from~~into ~~operations~~a loan and ~~the~~security ~~Credit~~agreement ~~Facility~~ (asthe ~~defined below~~“Loan Agreement”) towith ~~fund~~Fundamental ~~its~~Funding ~~operations~~LLC (the “Lender”). AtThe ~~December~~primary ~~31,~~purpose ~~2015,~~of the ~~Company~~new Loan ~~had~~Agreement ~~approximately~~is ~~$0.6~~to ~~million~~pay inoff ~~unrestricted~~the ~~cash~~prior ~~available~~loan, ~~compared~~and toprovide ~~approximately~~additional working $1capital.1 ~~million~~The atLoan ~~December~~Agreement ~~31,~~provides ~~2014. In~~for ~~addition,~~a multi-draw loan to the Company ~~has~~for ~~established~~(i) athe ~~credit~~Company’s ~~facility~~accounts (receivable, the lesser ~~“Credit~~of ~~Facility”~~(y) ~~with~~$2,500,000 or ~~Rosenthal & Rosenthal~~ (~~“Rosenthal”~~z) ~~consisting~~85% of ~~$2.5~~the ~~million~~Company’s eligible inaccounts ~~revolving~~and ~~loans~~ (ii) the ~~“Revolving~~Company’s ~~Facility”)~~inventory ~~and~~advances, the alesser of (y) $~~0.5~~500,000 ~~million~~or ~~non-revolving~~(z) ~~term~~50% ~~loan~~of the eligible inventory (the “~~Term~~Revolving ~~Loan~~Loans”). The maximum amount ofavailable to ~~funds~~the ~~available~~Company under the ~~Revolving~~Loan ~~Facility~~Agreement ~~from~~for ~~time~~the toRevolving ~~time~~Loans is ~~subject to certain limits based on~~ $3, ~~among other things~~500,000 (the ~~Company’s~~“Credit ~~receivables and inventory~~Limit”). At ~~December~~In 31addition, ~~2015,~~ the Lender ~~Company~~agreed ~~had~~to ~~$1.4~~provide ~~million in outstanding indebtedness under~~ the ~~Revolving~~Company ~~Facility~~with ~~and~~an ~~$166,667~~accommodation loan in an ~~outstanding~~amount ~~indebtedness~~not ~~under~~to ~~the~~exceed ~~Term Loan. As of December 31~~$500, ~~2015~~000, wewhich ~~were~~shall ~~out~~be ofrepaid ~~compliance with one of the financial covenants contained~~ in thirty-six ~~the~~(36) ~~Credit~~equal ~~Facility~~monthly asinstallments aof ~~result~~principal ofand interest (the ~~net~~“Accommodation ~~loss~~Loan” ~~recorded~~and ~~for~~together with the ~~year~~Revolving ~~ended December 31~~Loans, ~~2015. We have reported this non-compliance to Rosenthal & Rosenthal and recevied~~ the ~~waiver~~“Loans”).

As discussed in Note 6 to the ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere in this Annual Report, the Company is indebted to C.B. Brechin and Scott Rutherford under unsecured promissory notes in the aggregate balance of $500,000 as of December 31, ~~2015~~ 2016. On November 97, ~~2015~~2016, the maturity dates of these unsecured promissory notes were extended to the earlier of (i) November 97, ~~2016~~2017 or (ii) 10 business days from the date on which Brekford closes an equity financing that generates gross proceeds in the aggregate amount of not less than $5,000,000.

On March 17, 2015, the Company entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement providing for immediate funding of $650,000 through the issuance of the Investor Note (see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional detail). The primary use of proceeds was to fund startup costs for the initial phase of a project in Mexico providing turnkey ATSE services to the City of Saltillo, which began operations in the second quarter of 2015.

~~The Company intends to continue its efforts to expand sales of ATSE services, and such expansion may significantly increase the Company’s working capital needs.~~ On ~~March~~February 1728, ~~2015~~2017, ~~the~~as Company entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement providing for immediate funding of $650,000 through the issuance of the Investor Note (see Note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements presented elsewhere in this Annual Report ~~for additional detail). The primary use of proceeds was to fund startup costs for~~ , the ~~initial~~Company ~~phase~~completed of a ~~project~~transaction ~~in Mexico providing turnkey ATSE services~~ to ~~the~~sell ~~City~~substantially ofall assets ~~Saltillo,~~and ~~which~~certain ~~began operations~~liabilities inrelated ~~the~~to ~~second~~its ~~quarter~~vehicle ~~of 2015~~services business. WeFrom ~~have~~the ~~achieved~~approximately ~~positive cash flow generation from this project as of December 31, 2015~~$4. ~~Additionally,~~0 ~~the~~million ~~Company entered contracts for two ATSE programs~~ in ~~Brice,~~cash ~~Ohio and New Rochelle~~proceeds, ~~New~~all outstanding ~~York,~~debt ~~which are expected to begin revenue generation in the 2nd quarter~~ of ~~2016. Management believes that~~ the Company’s ~~current~~was ~~level~~retired, ofincluding ~~cash combined with cash that it expects to generate in its operations during~~ the ~~next~~Loan Agreement, ~~12 months and funds available from~~ the ~~Revolving~~Investor ~~Facility will be sufficient to sustain the Company’s business initiatives through at least December 31~~Note, ~~2016. Management has taken certain measures to conserve the Company’s capital resources~~ and ~~maintain liquidity that it believes will permit~~ the ~~Company~~notes payable to ~~meet~~Brechin ~~its future capital requirements, but there can be no assurance that these measures will be successful or adequate~~and Rutherford.

In Management ~~the~~believes ~~event~~ that the Company’s ~~cash~~current ~~reserves,~~level of cash combined ~~flow~~with ~~from~~cash ~~operations~~that ~~and funds available under the Credit Facility are not sufficient to fund the Company’s future operations,~~ it ~~may~~expects ~~need~~ to ~~obtain~~generate ~~additional capital. No assurance can be given that the Company will be able to obtain additional capital~~ in ~~the~~its ~~future~~operations during ~~or that such capital will be available to~~ the ~~Company~~next ontwelve ~~acceptable~~months ~~terms. The~~including ~~Company’s~~anticipated ~~ability~~new tocustomer contracts ~~obtain additional capital~~ will be ~~subject~~sufficient to asustain ~~number of factors, including market conditions,~~ the Company’s business ~~operating~~initiatives ~~performance~~through ~~and investor sentiment, which may make it difficult for the Company to consummate a transaction~~ at ~~the~~least ~~time,~~March ~~in the amount and/or upon the terms and conditions that the Company desires. Even if we are able to raise the funds required~~28, ~~it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and expenses~~2018, ~~fail~~but tothere ~~collect~~can be ~~significant~~no ~~amounts~~assurance ~~owed to us, or experience unexpected cash requirements~~ that ~~would~~these ~~force~~measures uswill to seek alternative financing. Further, if we issue additional equity or debt securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our shares of common stock or the debt securities may cause us to be ~~subject~~successful ~~to restrictive covenants. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital at the times, in the amounts,~~ or ~~upon the terms and conditions that it desires, then it might have to delay, scale back or abandon its expansion efforts~~ adequate. ~~Even with such changes, the Company’s operations could consume available capital resources and liquidity.~~

~~Cash~~ In ~~Flows~~the ~~Used~~event that the Company’s cash reserves and cash flow from operations are not sufficient to fund the Company’s future operations, it may need to obtain additional capital. No assurance can be given that the Company will be able to obtain additional capital in ~~Operating~~the ~~Activities~~future or that such capital will be available to the Company on acceptable terms. The Company’s ability to obtain additional capital will be subject to a number of factors, including market conditions, the Company’s operating performance and investor sentiment, which may make it difficult for the Company to consummate a transaction at the time, in the amount and/or upon the terms and conditions that the Company desires. Even if we are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek alternative financing. Further, if we issue additional equity or debt securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our shares of common stock or the debt securities may cause us to be subject to restrictive covenants. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital at the times, in the amounts, or upon the terms and conditions that it desires, then it might have to delay, scale back or abandon its expansion efforts. Even with such changes, the Company’s operations could consume available capital resources and liquidity.

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

Our cash flows from operating activities are significantly affected by our cash to support the growth of our business in areas such as selling, general and administrative. Our operating cash flows are also affected by our working capital needs to support growth and fluctuations in inventory, personnel related expenditures, accounts payable and other current assets and liabilities.

Net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations was $~~0.8~~117,213 ~~million~~ for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 compared to net cash used byin operating activities offrom ~~$0.3~~continuing ~~million~~operations of $32,608 for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015. Cash was used primarily to fund our operations and working capital needs, net of non-cash expenditures such as depreciation and amortization, share based compensation for services and financing related costs. For the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016, the net loss of $~~0.4 million, the increase in accounts receivable of $2.~~1 million and unbilled receivable of $0.1 million offset by the increase of accounts payable of $1.1 million were the primary drivers of the cash used in operating activities. For the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~054, ~~the net loss of $1.5 million~~403, adjusted for a non-cash ~~disposal~~net offinancing ~~equipment~~related expenses of $~~0.3 million~~500, ~~offset by~~ 095, a decrease in ~~inventory~~current assets, net, of $~~0.6~~99,231 ~~million~~ and an increase in current ~~accounts~~liabilities, ~~payable~~net, of $~~0.4~~168,797 ~~million~~ were the primary drivers of the cash provided by operating activities for continuing operations.

~~Cash~~ Net ~~Flows~~cash ~~Used~~provided by operating activities from discontinued operations was $1,211,871 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to net cash used in ~~Investing~~operating ~~Activities~~activities from discontinued operations of $783,852 for the year ended December 31, 2015.

~~Net~~ Cash ~~cash~~Flows ~~used~~From inInvesting investing activities was $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to $40,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014. Capital expenditures during 2015 were related to cameras and technology infrastructure for commencing Mexico operations.Activities

~~Cash~~ Net ~~Flows~~cash ~~Provided~~used byin ~~Financing~~investing ~~Activities~~activities from continuing operations was $133,574 for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to $128,638 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Capital expenditures during 2016 were related to cameras and technology infrastructure new ATSE programs implemented in 2016.

Net cash ~~provided~~used byin ~~financing~~investing activities from discontinued operations was $~~0.4~~7,000 ~~million~~ for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 ~~and~~compared ~~net~~to net cash used in ~~financing~~investing activities ~~was~~from discontinued operations of $0.6 ~~million~~ for the year ended December 31, ~~2014. The Company received $0.65 million of net proceeds from the issuance of the Investor Note in March~~ 2015. Furthermore, the Company made aggregate principal payments of $0.4 million under capital leases and other note obligations. In the corresponding period of 2014, aggregate principal payments of $0.8 million under capital leases and other note obligations were offset by proceeds from a note payable of $0.5 million.

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations was $30,787 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and net cash provided by financing activities was $464,718 for the year ended December 31, 2015. In the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company paid other notes payable and capital lease obligations of $30,787. In the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company received $650,000 of proceeds and paid $52,499 in deferring financing costs from the issuance of the Investor Note in March 2015. Furthermore, the Company made aggregate principal payments of $154,578 under capital leases and other note obligations and advanced net proceeds of $21,795 from the line of credit.

Net cash used in financing activities from discontinued operations was $913,766 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to net used in financing activities from discontinued operations of $50,639 for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table is a summary of contractual cash obligations for the periods indicated that existed as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, and is based on information appearing in the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

	Payments due by period	~~Payments due by period~~
Contractual Obligations	Total	~~Total~~Less than 1 year	1-3 years	3-5 years	More than 5 years	~~Less than 1 year~~		~~1-3 years~~		~~3-5 years~~		~~More than 5 years~~
Long-Term Debt		$	50,937			$	29,277	$	21,660	$	—	$	—
Operating Leases – ATSE (1)	$116,742	$51,282	$65,460	$—	$—
Capital Lease Obligations			—				—		—		—		—
Operating Leases- Discontinued Operations (2)	522,137	151,197	370,940	—	—
Operating Leases			786,975				172,697		549,803		64,475		—
Purchase Obligations	—	—	—	—	—
Purchase Obligations			—				—		—		—		—
Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the Registrant's Balance Sheet under GAAP	311,171	311,171	—	—	—
Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the Registrant's Balance Sheet under GAAP			1,140,000				1,140,000		—		—		—
Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the Registrant's Balance Sheet under GAAP – Discontinued Operations	989,520	989,520	—	—	—
Total	$1,939,570	$1,503,170	1$436,~~977,912~~400	$—	$—	$	~~1,341,974~~	$	~~571,463~~	$	~~64,475~~	$	—

(1)

On February 28, 2017, the Company sub-leased 15% of the Hanover, MD facility from Global Public Services.

(2)

On February 28, 2017, Global Public Services assumed the long-term lease of the Hanover, MD facility.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX
	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		18
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms		18-19
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2015 and 2014		19
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2016 and 2015		20
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014		20
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015		21
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014		21
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015		22
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014		22
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015		23
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		2324

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Brekford Corp.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Brekford Corp. (the Company) as of December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Brekford Corp. as of December 31, 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of merger as well as a contribution and unit purchase agreement in February 2017.

We have also audited the adjustments to the 2015 consolidated financial statements to retrospectively apply the change in accounting for discontinued operations, as described in Note 4. In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2015 consolidated financial statements of the Company other than with respect to the adjustments and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2015 consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

BD & Company, Inc.

Owings Mills, MD

March 28, 2017

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and

Stockholders of Brekford Corp.

We have audited, before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively apply the presentation of discontinued operations, the accompanying consolidated balance ~~sheets~~sheet of Brekford Corp. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015 ~~and 2014~~, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ ~~equity~~ (deficit) equity, and cash flows for ~~each of~~ the ~~years in the two~~ year ~~period~~then ended ~~December 31, 2015~~. The Company’s management is responsible for ~~these~~the 2015 financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our ~~audits~~audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our ~~audits~~audit ~~provide~~provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the 2015 consolidated financial statements, before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively apply the presentation of discontinued operations described in Note 4, referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Brekford Corp. as of December 31, 2015 ~~and 2014~~, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for ~~each of~~ the ~~years in the two~~ year ~~period~~ then ended ~~December 31, 2015~~ in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

~~/s/~~ We ~~Stegman~~were &not ~~Company~~engaged ~~Stegman~~to &audit, ~~Company Baltimore~~review, ~~Maryland~~or ~~March~~apply 24any procedures to the adjustments to retrospectively apply the presentation of discontinued operations described in Note 4 and, ~~2016~~accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance about whether such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. Those adjustments were audited by BD & Company, Inc.

18 /s/ Stegman & Company

Stegman & Company

Baltimore, Maryland

March 24, 2016

BREKFORD CORP.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

		December 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
	December 31, 2016	December 31, 2015
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$591,618	$580,400	~~580,400~~		$	~~1,112,881~~
Accounts receivable, net of allowance $0 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively			3,781,263			1,706,704
Accounts receivable, net of allowance $0 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively	115,106	131,839
Unbilled receivables	314,262	304,470	~~304,470~~			~~198,725~~
Prepaid expenses	53,211	49,912	~~122,914~~			~~146,569~~
Inventory	221,186	316,775	~~606,471~~			~~681,948~~
Total current assets			5,395,518			3,846,827
Current assets - discontinued operations	1,069,511	3,960,950
Property and equipment, net			223,347			284,322
Total current assets	2,364,894	5,344,346
Other non-current assets			179,208			112,132
Property and equipment, net	208,310	176,300
TOTAL ASSETS		$	5,798,073		$	4,243,281
Other non-current assets	9,877	83,478
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Non-current assets - discontinued operations	40,387	142,777
CURRENT LIABILITIES
TOTAL ASSETS	$2,623,468	$5,746,901
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		$	2,979,131		$	1,842,892
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Accrued payroll and related expenses			98,000			23,252
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Line of credit			1,421,800			1,169,558
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$721,880	$638,117
Term loan – current portion			166,667			250,000
Accrued payroll and related expenses	17,062	13,840
Deferred revenue			95,233			255,405
Obligations under other notes payable – current portion	20,150	29,277
Customer deposits			36,070			137,826
Derivative liability	24,360	99,036
Obligations under capital lease – current portion			—			140,209
Other liabilities	55,408	46,979
Obligations under other notes payable – current portion			29,277			28,602
Current liabilities - discontinued operations	971,466	4,125,526
Derivative liability			99,036			—
Total current liabilities	1,810,326	4,952,775
Other liabilities			46,979			48,669
LONG - TERM LIABILITIES
Total current liabilities			4,972,193			3,896,413
Other notes payable - net of current portion	—	21,660
LONG - TERM LIABILITIES
Deferred rent, net of current portion	6,520	6,739
Notes payable – stockholders			500,000			500,000
Convertible promissory notes, net of debt discounts of $40,853 and $418,730 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively	299,147	221,269
Other notes payable - net of current portion			21,660			48,371
Long term liabilities - discontinued operations	989,520	538,184
Deferred rent, net of current portion			44,923			—
Total long-term liabilities	1,295,187	787,852
Convertible promissory notes, net of debt discounts of $386,976 and $0 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively			253,023			—
TOTAL LIABILITIES	3,105,513	5,740,627
Term notes payable, net of current portion			—			166,667
STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY
Total long-term liabilities			819,606			715,038
Preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share; 20,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding	—	—
TOTAL LIABILITIES			5,791,799			4,611,451
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 49,311,264 and 45,151,254 issued and outstanding, at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively	4,931	4,515
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Additional paid-in capital	11,515,472	10,951,491
Preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share; 20,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding			—			—
Treasury Stock, at cost 10,600 shares at December 31, 2016 and 2015 respectively	(5,890)	(5,890)
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 45,151,254 and 44,500,569 issued and outstanding, at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively			4,515			4,450
Accumulated deficit	(11,996,783)	(10,942,380)
Additional paid-in capital			10,951,491			10,204,479
Other comprehensive income (loss)	225	(1,462)
Treasury Stock, at cost 10,600 shares at December 31, 2015 and 2014 respectively			(5,890	)		(5,890	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY	(482,045 )	6,274
Accumulated deficit			(10,942,380	)		(10,571,209	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY	$2,623,468	$5,746,901
Other comprehensive loss			(1,462	)		—
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)			6,274			(368,170	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY		$	5,798,073		$	4,243,281

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

1920

BREKFORD CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

	Years Ended December 31,	~~Years Ended December 31,~~
		2015			2014
	2016	2015
Net Revenue	$2,534,264	$2,811,929	~~19,833,681~~		$	~~17,659,533~~
Cost of Revenue	827,304	804,171	~~15,773,184~~			~~14,527,646~~
Gross profit	1,706,960	2,007,758	~~4,060,497~~			~~3,131,887~~
Operating expenses:
Salaries and related expenses	1,645,073	1,628,150	~~2,038,644~~			~~1,878,671~~
Selling, general and administrative expenses	1,071,272	1,213,864	~~1,675,837~~			~~2,585,302~~
Total operating expenses	2,716,345	2,842,014	~~3,714,481~~			~~4,463,973~~
Income (Loss) from operations			346,016			(1,332,086	)
Loss from operations	(1,009,385)	(834,256)
Other (expense) income:
Interest expense	(402,168)	(455,937)	~~(676,950~~	)		~~(170,561~~	)
Change in fair value in derivative liability			14,784			—
Change in fair value of derivative liability	74,676	14,784
Loss on extinguishment of debt	(291,911)	(55,021)	~~(55,021~~	)		—
Total other (expense)income	(619,403 )	(496,174 )	~~(717,187~~	)		~~(170,561~~	)
Loss before income taxes	(1,628,788)	(1,330,430)	~~(371,171~~	)		~~(1,502,647~~	)
Income tax expense			—			—
Income tax expense (benefit)	(230,900 )	(385,600 )
Net loss			(371,171	)		(1,502,647	)
Net loss from continuing operations	(1,397,888)	(944,830)
Other comprehensive loss – foreign currency translation			(1,462	)		—
Net income from discontinued operations	343,485	573,659
Comprehensive loss		$	(372,633	)	$	(1,502,647	)
Net loss	(1,054,403)	(371,171)
Loss per share – basic and diluted		$	(0.01	)	$	(0.03	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) – foreign currency translation	1,687	(1,462)
Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing per share amounts:
Comprehensive loss	$(1,052,716 )	$(372,633 )
Basic			44,690,550			44,499,610
Net loss per share from continuing operations – basic	$(0.03)	$(0.02)
Diluted			44,690,550			44,499,610
Net income per share from discontinued operations – basic	$0.01	$0.01
Net loss per share – basic	$(0.02)	$(0.01)
Net loss per share from continuing operations – diluted	$(0.03)	$(0.02)
Net income per share from discontinued operations – diluted	$0.01	$0.01
Net loss per share – diluted	$(0.02)	$(0.01)
Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing per share amounts:
Basic	47,357,787	44,690,550
Diluted	53,154,216	52,201,684

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2021

BREKFORD CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY

For the Years Ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015

	Common Stock	~~Common Stock~~	Treasury Stock						~~Treasury Stock~~
	Shares	~~Shares~~Par Value	Shares	Par Value	Additional Paid-In Capital	~~Par~~Accumulated ~~Value~~.Deficit	Other comprehensive loss	Total	~~Shares~~			~~Par Value~~			~~Additional Paid-In Capital~~		~~Accumulated Deficit~~			~~Other comprehensive loss~~			~~Total~~
BALANCE – January 1, 2014			44,450,569				4,445			(10,600	)		(5,890	)		10,184,751		(9,068,562	)					1,114,744
BALANCE – January 1, 2015	44,500,569	$4,450	(10,600)	$(5,890)	$10,204,479	$(10,571,209)	—	$(368,170)
Restricted shares issues to non-employees			50,000				5			—			—			13,495		—						13,500
Restricted shares issues to employees	132,000	13	—	—	44,867	—		44,880
Stock options to non-employees										—			—			6,233		—						6,233
Convertible debt exchanged for common shares	518,685	52			133,010			133,062
Net loss			—				—			—			—			—		(1,502,647	)		—			(1,502,647	)
Debt discount feature related to issuance of convertible note payable					557,921			557,921
BALANCE-December 31, 2014			44,500,569			$	4,450		$	(10,600	)	$	(5,890	)	$	10,204,479	$	(10,571,209	)		—		$	(368,170	)
Stock options to non-employees			—	—	11,214	—		11,214
Restricted shares issues to employees			132,000				13			—			—			44,867		—						44,880
Other comprehensive loss	—	—	—	—	—		(1,462)	(1,462)
Convertible debt exchanged for common shares			518,685				52									133,010								133,062
Net loss	—	—	—	—	—	(371,171)	—	(371,171)
Debt discount feature related to issuance of convertible note payable																557,921								557,921
BALANCE-December 31, 2015	45,151,254	$4,515	(10,600)	$(5,890)	$10,951,491	$(10,942,380)	$(1,462)	$6,274
Stock options to non-employees										—			—			11,214		—						11,214
Restricted shares issues to employees	332,000	33	—	—	52,967	—		53,000
Other comprehensive loss			—				—			—			—			—					(1,462	)		(1,462	)
Convertible debt exchanged for common shares	3,828,010	383			496,510			496,893
Net loss			—				—			—			—			—		(371,171	)					(371,171	)
Stock options to non-employees			—	—	14,504	—		14,504
BALANCE – December 31, 2015			45,151,254			$	4,515		$	(10,600	)	$	(5,890	)	$	10,951,491	$	(10,942,380	)	$	(1,462	)	$	6,274
Other comprehensive income	—	—	—	—	—		1,687	1,687
Net loss	—	—	—	—	—	(1,054,403)		(1,054,403)
BALANCE – December 31, 2016	49,311,264	$4,931	(10,600)	$(5,890)	$11,515,472	$(11,996,783)	$225	$(482,045)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2122

BREKFORD CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Years Ended December 31,	~~Years Ended December 31,~~
		2015			2014
	2016	2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$(1,054,403)	$(371,171)	~~(371,171)~~		$	~~(1,502,647)~~
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	101,564	149,232	~~189,613~~			~~777,434~~
Share-based compensation	67,504	56,094	~~56,094~~			~~19,733~~
Bad debt expense			—			51,178
Amortization of debt discount and warrant features	234,664	328,021
Amortization of debt discount and warrant features			328,021			—
Amortization of financing cost	48,195	21,741
Amortization of financing cost			42,487			—
Change in fair value of derivative liability	(74,676)	(14,784)
Change in fair value of derivative liability			(14,784	)		—
Loss on extinguishment of debt	291,911	55,021
Loss on extinguishment of debt			55,021			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities including assets and liabilities held for sale:
Loss on disposal of property and equipment			—			319,739
Accounts receivable	16,733	83,095
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Unbilled receivables	(9,792)	(105,745)
Accounts receivable			(2,074,560	)		(367,581)
Prepaid expenses and other non-current assets	(3,299)	40,446
Unbilled receivables			(105,745	)		(72,894)
Inventory	95,589	(65,929)
Prepaid expenses and other non-current assets			7,753			(24,421)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	83,763	(105,147)
Inventory			75,477			582,151
Accrued payroll and related expenses	3,222	8,552
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			1,139,281			363,184
Customer deposits	—	(137,827)
Accrued payroll and related expenses			74,748			(80,848	)
Deferred rent	(218)	6,738
Other liabilities	82,030	19,055	~~(1,690~~	)		~~(1,253~~	)
Customer deposits			(101,756	)		110,186
Net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations	(117,213 )	(32,608)
Deferred rent			44,923			(58,527)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from discontinued operations	1,211,871	(783,852)
Deferred revenue			(160,172	)		(422,217	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	1,094,658	(816,460)
Net cash (used in) operating activities			(816,460	)		(306,783	)
Cash flows from investing activities including non-current assets held for sale:
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment	(133,574)	(128,638)
Purchases of property and equipment			(128,638	)		(40,293	)
Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations	(133,574 )	(128,638 )
Net cash used in investing activities			(128,638	)		(40,293	)
Net cash used in investing activities from discontinued operations	(7,000)	—
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net cash used in investing activities	(140,574 )	(128,638 )
Net change in line of credit			252,243			(300,975	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Principal payments on lease obligation			(140,209	)		(673,738	)
Net change in line of credit	—	21,795
Payments on other notes payable			(26,036	)		(34,303	)
Principal payments on lease obligation	—	(140,209)
Borrowings on term notes			650,000			500,000
Payments on other notes payable	(30,787)	(14,369)
Deferred financing cost			(71,919	)		—
Borrowings on term notes	—	650,000
Payments on term notes			(250,000	)		(83,333	)
Deferred financing cost	—	(52,499)
Net cash provided (used in) by financing activities			414,079			(592,349	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities from continuing operations	(30,787)	464,718
Effect of foreign currency translation			(1,462)			—
Net cash used in discontinued operations financing activities	(913,766)	(50,639)
Net change in cash			(532,481	)		(939,425	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(944,553)	414,079
Cash – beginning of year			1,112,881			2,052,306
Effect of foreign currency translation	1,687	(1,462)
Cash – end of year		$	580,400		$	1,112,881
Net change in cash	11,218	(532,481)
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash – beginning of year	580,400	1,112,881
Cash paid for interest		$	236,355		$	170,561
Cash – end of year	$591,618	$580,400
Cash paid for income taxes		$	17,096		$	1,253
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Conversion of notes payable in exchange for common stock		$	75,000			—
Cash paid for interest	$292,292	$236,355
Liabilities settled in exchange for equipment		$	-		$	260,000
Cash paid for income taxes	$(8,429)	$1,690
Conversion of notes payable in exchange for common stock	$300,000	$75,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2223

BREKFORD CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015

NOTE 1 – DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS

Brekford Corp. (“the Company”) (OTCBB; OTCQB:; BFDI) , headquartered in Hanover, Maryland, is a leading public safety technology service provider of fully integrated ~~traffic~~automated traffic safety ~~solutions, parking~~ enforcement ~~citation~~(“ATSE”) ~~collections and integrator of mobile technology equipment for public safety vehicle services to State and Local municipalities~~solutions, ~~the~~including ~~U.S. Military and various Federal public safety agencies throughout the United States. Brekford’s combination of upfitting services~~speed, red ~~cutting edge technology~~light, and ~~automated~~distracted ~~traffic~~driving ~~enforcement~~camera ~~services offers a unique 360º solution for law enforcement agencies and municipalities~~systems. ~~Our~~The Company’s core values of integrity, accountability, respect, and teamwork drive our employees to achieve excellence and deliver industry leading technology and services, thereby enabling a superior level of ~~safety~~reliability ~~solutions~~ to our clients. Brekford has one wholly-owned subsidiary, Municipal Recovery Agency, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, that was formed in 2012 for the purpose of providing collection systems and services for unpaid citations and parking fines.

Prior to March 1, 2017, part of Brekford’s business included sales of products and services focusing on law enforcement vehicles. These products and services included rugged information technology solutions, mobile data, digital video, electronic ticketing, and vehicle upfitting. Rugged information technology solutions included both ruggedized laptops and in-car video solutions, among other technology offerings, in addition to vehicle mounting systems, docking stations, and custom-built packages. Vehicle upfitting solutions included the turnkey installation of various components including rugged technology, as well as sirens, lights, radios, gun racks, and decals. Subsequent to the Closing on February 28, 2017, Brekford will continue to retain a 19.9% ownership interest in this business, which continues to operate under the name Global Public Safety (See Subsequent Event Note 18).

As used in these notes, the terms “Brekford”, “the Company”, “we”, “our”, and “us” refer to Brekford Corp. and, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, its consolidated subsidiary.

NOTE 2 – LIQUIDITY

For the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 the Company incurred a net loss of approximately $~~371 thousand~~1,054,403, and ~~used~~provided ~~approximately~~ $~~816~~1,094,658 ~~thousand~~ of cash for operations. Additionally, at December 31, ~~2015~~2016 the company has cash available of ~~approximately~~ $~~580 thousand~~591,618, a working capital surplus of ~~approximately~~ $~~423~~554,568 ~~thousand~~ and availability under the established credit facility (see Note 5) of approximately $12.17 million.

~~Management~~ On ~~believes~~February ~~that~~28, ~~the~~2017, ~~Company’s~~as ~~current~~presented ~~level~~elsewhere ~~of cash combined with cash that it expects to generate~~ in ~~its~~this ~~operations~~Annual ~~during~~ Report, the ~~next~~Company 12completed ~~months~~a ~~including~~transaction ~~anticipated~~to ~~new~~sell ~~customer~~substantially ~~contracts~~all assets and ~~funds~~certain ~~available~~liabilities ~~from~~related ~~the~~to ~~credit~~its ~~facility~~vehicle ~~and~~services business. ~~the~~From ~~note will be sufficient to sustain~~ the ~~Company’s~~approximately ~~business~~$4.0 ~~initiatives~~million ~~through~~in atcash ~~least December 31~~proceeds, ~~2016,~~all outstanding ~~but~~debt ~~there~~of ~~can be no assurance that these measures will be successful or adequate. In~~ the ~~event that the~~ Company’s ~~cash~~was ~~reserves~~retired, ~~cash~~including ~~flow~~the ~~from~~Loan Agreement, ~~operations and funds available under~~ the ~~Credit~~Investor ~~Facility (see~~ Note, 5)and ~~are not sufficient to fund~~ the ~~Company’s~~two ~~future~~of ~~operations~~its directors, itMessrs. C.B. ~~may~~Brechin ~~need~~and toScott ~~obtain additional capital~~Rutherford.

Management believes that the Company’s current level of cash combined with cash that it expects to generate in its operations during the next 12 months including anticipated new customer contracts will be sufficient to sustain the Company’s business initiatives through at least March 28, 2018, but there can be no assurance that these measures will be successful or adequate. In the event that the Company’s cash reserves and cash flow from operations are not sufficient to fund the Company’s future operations, it may need to obtain additional capital.

NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICES

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Brekford Corp. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Municipal Recovery Agency, LLC. Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)

requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. In the accompanying unaudited ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements, estimates are used for, but not limited to, stock-based compensation, allowance for doubtful accounts, sales returns, allowance for inventory obsolescence, fair value of long-lived assets, deferred taxes and valuation allowance, and the depreciable lives of fixed assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in prior-year financial statements have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the presentation in the current year financial statements.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company maintains cash accounts with major financial institutions. From time to time, amounts deposited may exceed the FDIC insured limits.

Accounts Receivable

Inventory

Inventory principally consists of hardware and third-party packaged software that is modified to conform to customer specifications and held temporarily until the completion of a contract. Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market value. The cost is determined by the lower of first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method, while market value is determined by replacement cost for raw materials and parts and net realizable value for work-in- process.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation of furniture, vehicles, computer equipment and software and phone equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives (two to ten years), and leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the lease term (which is three to five years).

Management reviews property and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the long-lived asset is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue relating to its vehicle upfitting solutions when all of the following criteria have been satisfied: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery or installation has been completed; (iii) the customer accepts and verifies receipt; and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company considers delivery to its customers to have occurred at the time at which products are delivered and/or installation work is completed and the customer acknowledges its acceptance of the work.

The Company provides its customers with a warranty against defects in the installation of its vehicle upfitting solutions for one year from the date of installation. Warranty claims were insignificant for the year ended December 31, 2015 and $10,111 for the year ended December 31, 2014. The Company also performs warranty repair services on behalf of the manufacturers of the equipment it sells. The Company also offers separately-priced extended warranty and product maintenance contracts to its customers on the equipment sold by the Company. Revenues from extended warranty services are apportioned over the period of the extended warranty service contracts and the warranty costs are expensed as incurred. Revenue from extended warranties for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 amounted to $237,286 and $443,737, respectively.

For automated traffic safety enforcement revenue, the Company recognizes the revenue when the required collection efforts are completed and the respective municipality is billed depending on the terms of the respective contract. The Company records revenue related to automated traffic violations for the Company’s share of the violation amount.

Shipping and Handling Costs

All amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling are included in products revenues and all costs of shipping and handling are included in cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company incurred shipping and handling costs of $5815,~~120~~525 and $5745,~~843~~255 for continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company incurred shipping and ~~2014~~handling costs of $59,094 and $58,120 for discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

2425

Advertising Costs

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. These expenses are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of operations. Advertising expense ~~amounted to $8,000 and $30,412~~were insignificant for the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company complies with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, in measuring and disclosing stock based compensation cost. The measurement objective in ASC Paragraph 718-10-30-6 requires public companies to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of the award. The cost is recognized in expense over the period in which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award (the vesting period). Performance-based awards are expensed ratably from the date that the likelihood of meeting the performance measures is probable through the end of the vesting period.

Treasury Stock

The Company accounts for treasury stock using the cost method. As As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, 10,600 shares of our common stock were held in treasury at an aggregate cost of $5,890.

Income Taxes

In the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we reported financial results for both operations and discontinued operations. ASC 740-20-45 sets down the general rule for allocating income tax expense or benefit between operations and discontinued operations. The general rule requires the computation of tax expense or benefit by entity taking into consideration all items of income, expense, and tax credits. Next, a computation is made taking into consideration only those items related to continuing operations. Any difference is allocated to items other than continuing operations e.g. discontinued operations. Under these general rules, no tax expense or benefit would be allocated to discontinued operations.

An exception to these rules apply under ASC 740-20-45-7 where an entity has 1) a loss from continuing operations and income related to other items such as discontinued operations and 2) the entity would not otherwise recognize a benefit for the loss from continuing operations under the approach described in ASC 740-20-45. This fact pattern applies for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Application of this rule exception results in the allocation of tax expense to discontinued operations with an offsetting amount of tax benefit reported by the continuing operations.

Overall, we allocated $230,900 and $385,600 of tax expense to net income from discontinued operations and an offsetting tax benefit to net loss from continuing operations in the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Loss per Share

Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and does not include the effect of any potentially dilutive common stock equivalents. Diluted loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding, adjusted for the effect of any potentially dilutive common stock equivalents. There is no dilutive effect on the loss per share during loss periods. See Note 11 for the calculation of basic and diluted loss earnings per share.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We account for our derivative financial instruments, consisting solely of certain stock purchase warrants that contain non-standard anti-dilutions provisions and/or cash settlement features, and certain conversion options embedded in our convertible instruments, at fair value using Level 3 inputs, which are discussed in Note 14 to these ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements. We determine the fair value of these derivative liabilities using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model when appropriate, and in certain circumstances using binomial lattice models or other accepted valuation practices.

Foreign Currency Transactions

Segment Reporting

FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, requires that an enterprise report selected information about operating segments in its financial reports issued to its stockholders. Based on its current analysis, management has determined that the Company has only one operating segment, which is Traffic Safety Solutions. ~~The chief operating decision-makers use combined results to make operating and strategic decisions, and, therefore, the Company believes its entire operation is covered under a single segment.~~

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014 the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (May 2014). The topic of Revenue Recognition had become broad with several other regulatory agencies issuing standards, which lacked cohesion. The new guidance established a “comprehensive framework” and “reduces the number of requirements to which an entity must consider in recognizing revenue” and yet provides improved disclosures to assist stakeholders reviewing financial statements. The amendments in this Update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company will adopt the methodologies prescribed by this ASU by the date required. Adoption of the ASU is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The FASB has issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. ASU 2014-15 is intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), financial statements are prepared under the presumption that the reporting organization will continue to operate as a going concern, except in limited circumstances. Financial reporting under this presumption is commonly referred to as the going concern basis of accounting. The going concern basis of accounting is critical to financial reporting because it established the fundamental basis for measuring and classifying assets and liabilities. Currently, GAAP lacks guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt the organization’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide footnote disclosures. The ASU provides guidance to an organization’s management, with principles and definition that are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of disclosures that are commonly provided by organizations today in the financial statement footnotes. The amendments in this update are effective for the annual period ending after December 31, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company ~~will~~has ~~adopt~~ the adopted the methodologies prescribed by this ASU by the date required. ~~Adoption~~and ~~of the ASU~~ there is ~~not~~no ~~expected~~material toimpact ~~have a significant effect~~ on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of the Debt Issuance Cost.” To simplify the presentation of the debt issuance costs, the amendments in this ASU require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this ASU. The amendments in this ASU are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those years. Early adoption of the amendments in this ASU is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. By adopting this standard, we will reclassify certain of our assets and liabilities but have not calculated the amounts of those recalculations at this time.27

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of the Debt Issuance Cost.” To simplify the presentation of the debt issuance costs, the amendments in this ASU require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this ASU. The amendments in this ASU are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those years. By adopting this standard, we have reclassified certain of our assets and liabilities.

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU-2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)." The guidance requires that a lessee recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right of use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. For finance leases: the right-of-use asset and a lease liability will be initially measured at the present value of the lease payments, in the statement of financial position; interest on the lease liability will be recognized separately from amortization of the right-of-use asset in the statement of comprehensive income; and repayments of the principal portion of the lease liability will be classified within financing activities and payments of interest on the lease liability and variable lease payments within operating activities in the statement of cash flows. For operating leases: the right-of-use asset and a lease liability will be initially measured at the present value of the lease payments, in the statement of financial position; a single lease cost will be recognized, calculated so that the cost of the lease is allocated over the lease term on a generally straight-line basis; and all cash payments will be classified within operating activities in the statement of cash flows. Under Topic 842 the accounting applied by a lessor is largely unchanged from that applied under previous GAAP. The amendments in Topic 842 are effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019, including interim periods within that fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance of the consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"), issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-01, "Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities," which amends the guidance in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles on the classification and measurement of financial instruments. Changes to the current guidance primarily affect the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, the ASU clarifies guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The new standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and are to be adopted by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet at the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. Early adoption is not permitted except for the provision to record fair value changes for financial liabilities under the fair value option resulting from instrument-specific credit risk in other comprehensive income. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes," which simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes by requiring that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. This ASU is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 16, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of this standard will not have any impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations and disclosures.

~~NOTE~~ In 4July 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-11, ~~PROPERTY~~Simplifying ~~AND~~the ~~EQUIPMENT~~Measurement of Inventory (“ASU 2015-11”), to simplify the guidance on the subsequent measurement of inventory, excluding inventory measured using last-in, first out or the retail inventory method. Under the new standard, inventory should be at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standard will not have any impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations and disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”), which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions for both public and nonpublic entities, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard will not have any impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations and disclosures.

4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On February 6, 2017, the Company entered into a Contribution and Unit Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with LB&B Associates Inc. (the “Purchaser”) and Global Public Safety, LLC (“GPS”).

The closing for the transaction set forth in the Agreement occurred on February 28, 2017 (the “Closing”) and on such date the Company contributed substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities related to its vehicle services business (the “Business”) to GPS. After the Closing, the Company will continue to own and run other business operations that are not related to the Business.

On the Closing, GPS sold units representing 80.1% of the units of GPS to the Purchaser for $6,048,394, after certain purchase price adjustments of prepaid expenses and unbilled customer deposits. $4,048,394 was paid in cash, including a $250,000 deposit that was paid on February 6, 2017, and $2,000,000 was paid by Purchaser issuing the Company a promissory note (the “Promissory Note”). After the Closing, the Company continues to own 19.9% of the units of GPS. (See Subsequent Event footnote – Note 17).

ASC 360-10-45-9 requires that a long-lived asset (disposal group) to be sold shall be classified as held for sale in the period in which a set of criteria have been met, including criteria that the sale of the asset (disposal group) is probable and actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. This criteria was achieved on December 21, 2016 as the Company entered into a letter of intent with the purchaser. Additionally, the discontinued operations are comprised of the entirety of the vehicle services business, excluding corporate services expenses. Lastly, for comparability purposes certain prior period line items relating to the assets held for sale have been reclassified and presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statements of cash flows, and the consolidated balance sheets.

In accordance with ASC 205-20-S99, "Allocation of Interest to Discontinued Operations", the Company elected to not allocate consolidated interest expense to discontinued operations where the debt is not directly attributable to or related to discontinued operations.

The following information presents the major classes of line item of assets and liabilities included as part of discontinued operations in the consolidated balance sheet:

	December 31,	December 31,
	2016	2015
Current assets - discontinued operations:
Accounts receivable	$776,715	$3,649,425
Inventory	272,679	289,696
Prepaid expenses	20,117	21,829
Total current assets - discontinued operations	$1,069,511	$3,960,950

Noncurrent assets - discontinued operations:
Property and equipment, net	$27,362	$47,047
Other non-current assets	13,025	95,730
Total noncurrent assets - discontinued operations	$40,387	$142,777

Current liabilities - discontinued operations:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$664,569	$2,341,016
Accrued payroll and related expenses	15,386	84,159
Customer deposits	34,219	36,070
Deferred revenue	54,581	95,233
Term loan – current	—	166,667
Line of credit	202,711	1,402,381
Total current liabilities - discontinued operations:	$971,466	$4,125,526

Long term liabilities - discontinued operations:
Note payable - long term portion	$452,572	$—
Deferred rent	36,948	38,184
Notes payable - related parties, long term portion	500,000	500,000
Total long term liabilities - discontinued operations	$989,520	$538,184

The following information presents the major classes of line items constituting the after-tax loss from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016	2015
Revenue	$10,311,558	$17,021,752
Cost of goods sold	8,727,310	14,969,013
Gross margin	1,584,248	2,052,739

Salaries and related expenses	338,031	410,494
Selling, general and administrative expenses	403,165	461,966
Total operating expenses	741,196	872,460

Operating income	843,052	1,180,279

Other expense:
Interest expense, net	268,667	221,020
Total other expense	268,667	221,020

Income from discontinued operations before tax	574,385	959,259

Income tax expense	230,900	385,600

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax	$343,485	$573,659

The following information presents the major classes of line items constituting significant operating and investing cash flow activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows relating to discontinued operations:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2016	2015
Cash flows from operating activities of discontinued operations:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations:
Depreciation and amortization	$26,685	$40,382
Changes in operating assets and liabilities including assets and liabilities held for sale:
Accounts receivable	2,872,709	(2,157,654)
Prepaid expenses and other non-current assets	84,417	(32,693)
Inventory	17,017	141,406
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	(1,676,445)	1,244,430
Deferred revenue	(40,652)	(160,172)
Other liabilities	(71,860)	140,449
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from discontinued operations	1,211,871	(783,852 )

Cash flows from investing activities in discontinued operations:
Purchases of property and equipment	(7,000)	—
Net cash used in investing activities in discontinued operations	(7,000)	—

Cash flows from financing activities in discontinued operations:
Net change in line of credit	(1,199,670)	230,449
Payments on other notes payable	—	(11,668)
Borrowings on term notes	452,571	—
Deferred financing cost	—	(19,420)
Payments on term notes	(166,667)	(250,000)
Net cash used in financing activities in discontinued operations	$(913,766 )	$(50,639)

NOTE 5 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consists of the following:

	December 31,
	2016	2015
Leasehold improvements	$25,792	$25,792
Computer equipment and software	420,569	420,569
Vehicles	215,358	206,702
Furniture	22,965	22,965
Cameras	819,466	703,392
Phone equipment	16,811	16,811
Handheld ticketing system	30,293	30,293
	1,551,254	1,426,524
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	(1,342,944)	(1,250,224)
	$208,310	$176,300

	December 31,
	2015			2014
Leasehold improvements	$	502,092		$	502,092
Computer equipment and software		519,368			519,368
Vehicles		333,531			333,531
Furniture		100,089			100,089
Cameras		703,392			574,753
Phone equipment		48,817			48,817
Handheld ticketing system		30,293			30,293
		2,237,582			2,108,943
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(2,014,235	)		(1,824,621	)
	$	223,347		$	284,322

Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment from continuing operations the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $101,564 and $149,231, respectively. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment for discontinued operations the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $26,685 and $40,382, respectively.

~~Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment for the years ended December~~ 31~~, 2015 and 2014 was $189,613 and $777,434, respectively.~~

NOTE 56 – LINE OF CREDIT AND OTHER NOTES PAYABLE

Line of Credit

On ~~May~~July 2712, ~~2014,~~2016 ~~Brekford Corp. closed~~ (the “Closing”) ~~on an aggregate $3.0 million credit facility (the “Credit Facility~~Date”) ~~with Rosenthal & Rosenthal~~, ~~Inc. (“Rosenthal”) as lender consisting of $2.5 million in revolving loans (~~the ~~“Revolving~~Company entered ~~Facility”)~~into ~~and~~ a ~~$500,000~~loan ~~non-revolving~~and ~~term~~security ~~loan~~agreement (the “~~Term~~ Loan Agreement”). ~~The~~with ~~terms~~Fundamental ~~and~~Funding ~~conditions~~LLC ~~of the Credit Facility are set forth in a Financing Agreement between the Company and Rosenthal dated May 27, 2014~~ (the “~~Financing Agreement~~Lender”). The ~~Term~~ Loan isAgreement ~~additionally~~provides ~~evidenced~~for by a multi-draw ~~Term~~loan ~~Note~~to ~~issued by~~ the Company infor ~~favor~~(i) ~~of Rosenthal. The maximum amount that~~ the Company’s ~~may~~accounts receivable, ~~borrow from time to time under~~ the ~~Revolving Facility will be the~~ lesser of (y) $2~~.5 million~~ ,500,000 or ~~the “Loan Availability”~~ (~~as defined in the Financing Agreement~~z), ~~which~~85% ~~is tied to the amount~~ of the Company’s ~~“Eligible~~eligible ~~Receivables”~~accounts ~~(as defined in the Financing Agreement)~~ and ~~the amount of its “Eligible Inventory”~~ (~~as defined in the Financing Agreement~~ii). ~~Interest on~~ the ~~unpaid~~Company’s inventory ~~principal~~advances, ~~balances due under~~ the ~~Credit~~lesser ~~Facility~~of ~~will be payable monthly in arrears. Amounts borrowed under the Revolving Facility that do not exceed the “Receivable Availability”~~ (asy) ~~defined~~$500,000 inor ~~the Financing Agreement~~(z) ~~will~~50% ~~bear~~of ~~interest at an annual rate equal to~~ the eligible ~~prime~~inventory ~~rate from time to time publicly announced in New York City by JPMorgan Chase Bank~~ (the “~~Prime~~Revolving ~~Rate~~Loans”) ~~plus 2~~.~~5%;~~ ~~amounts~~The ~~borrowed~~maximum amount ~~under~~available ~~the Revolving Facility that relate~~ to the ~~“Inventory~~Company ~~Availability”~~under ~~(as defined in~~ the ~~Financing~~Loan Agreement) ~~will~~for ~~bear interest at an annual rate equal to~~ the Revolving ~~Prime~~Loans ~~Rate~~is ~~plus~~ $3~~.0%~~,500,000 (the “~~Inventory~~Credit ~~Rate~~Limit”);. ~~and any amounts that~~In addition, ~~on any day, exceed~~ the ~~Loan~~Lender ~~Availability~~agreed ~~will bear interest at an annual rate equal~~ to ~~the~~provide ~~Inventory Rate plus 4.0%; provided, however, that~~ the ~~Prime Rate will never be deemed to be less than 4.0%. The~~ Company ~~agreed~~with toan accommodation ~~pay~~loan ~~a minimum of $3,000~~ in ~~monthly~~an ~~interest~~amount ~~under~~not ~~the~~to ~~Revolving~~exceed ~~Facility, as well as a~~ $1500,000 ~~monthly loan administration fee. In addition~~, ~~the~~which ~~Company~~shall be ~~agreed~~repaid ~~to pay Rosenthal a facility fee at the Closing~~ in ~~the~~thirty-six ~~amount~~(36) ofequal ~~$30,000.~~monthly Atinstallments ~~each annual renewal~~ of principal ~~the~~and ~~Financing~~interest ~~Agreement,~~ (the ~~Company~~“Accommodation ~~will~~Loan” ~~pay~~and together ~~Rosenthal~~with ~~a facility fee in~~ the ~~amount~~Revolving ~~of $18~~Loans,~~750~~ the “Loans”).

~~The~~ On ~~Company’s~~the ~~obligations~~Closing ~~under~~Date, the ~~Financing~~Lender ~~Agreement~~advanced ~~and~~the ~~related~~Company $533,670. The ~~documents~~amounts ~~are~~advanced ~~secured~~under bythe aLoan ~~continuing~~Agreement are ~~lien~~due on and ~~security~~payable ~~interest~~on inthe ~~substantially~~three ~~all~~(3) year anniversary of the Closing ~~Company’s~~Date ~~assets.~~(the ~~The~~“Maturity ~~Company’s~~Date”), ~~repayment~~and ~~obligations~~thereafter, ~~under~~ the Maturity ~~Revolving~~Date ~~Facility~~shall ~~are~~automatically ~~due~~be onextended ~~demand~~for bysuccessive periods ~~Rosenthal~~of ~~or,~~one atyear ~~Rosenthal’s~~unless ~~option,~~the ~~upon~~Company ~~the~~shall ~~expiration~~give lender written notice of ~~the~~termination ~~Financing~~not ~~Agreement~~less ~~and/or~~than ~~the~~ninety ~~occurrence~~(90) ofdays anprior ~~event~~to the end of ~~default~~such ~~thereunder.~~term ~~The~~or ~~original~~renewal term, ofas applicable. Lender may terminate the ~~Financing~~Loan Agreement ~~will~~at ~~expire~~any ontime ~~May~~in ~~31,~~its ~~2016~~sole ~~but~~discretion ~~will~~by giving ~~automatically~~the ~~renew~~Company ~~for~~ninety ~~successive~~(90) ~~one-year~~days ~~terms~~prior ~~unless~~written ~~the~~notice, ~~Company~~provided that ~~elects~~upon ~~not~~an toEvent ~~renew~~of ~~the~~Default ~~Financing~~(as ~~Agreement~~defined byin ~~providing~~the atLoan ~~least~~Agreement), Lender 60may ~~days’~~terminate ~~prior~~the ~~written~~Loan ~~notice~~Agreement ~~thereof~~without notice to ~~Rosenthal~~the Company, effective immediately. ~~Rosenthal~~Upon ~~may~~termination ~~terminate~~by the ~~Financing~~Lender, ~~Agreement~~the Company atshall ~~any~~be ~~time~~required ~~upon~~to 60pay ~~days’~~certain ~~prior~~termination ~~written~~fees ~~notice~~based toon a percentage of the ~~Company~~Credit Limit as set forth in the Loan Agreement.

The ~~Credit~~outstanding ~~Facility~~principal ~~replaced~~balance under the ~~Company’s~~Note ~~$2.0~~for ~~million~~the ~~credit~~Revolving Loans ~~facility~~shall ~~with~~bear ~~PNC~~interest ~~Bank,~~at ~~National~~a ~~Association~~rate ~~(“PNC”),~~per ~~under~~annum ~~that~~equal ~~certain~~to ~~Loan~~the “prime ~~Agreement,~~rate” ~~dated~~published asfrom oftime ~~June~~to ~~28,~~time ~~2012,~~in the Wall ~~as amended~~ Street Journal (the “~~PNC Facility~~Prime Rate”), ~~and~~plus ~~refinanced~~1.75% ~~the~~per ~~amounts~~annum, ~~that~~accruing ~~were~~daily ~~due~~and payable monthly. The outstanding principal balance under the ~~PNC~~Accommodation Loan ~~Facility.~~shall Atbear ~~the~~interest ~~Closing,~~at ~~the~~a ~~Company~~rate ~~paid~~per ~~approximately~~annum ~~$1,030,707~~equal to ~~PNC~~the Prime Rate in ~~satisfaction~~effect offrom ~~its~~time ~~obligations~~to ~~under~~time, ~~the~~plus ~~PNC~~12.75% ~~Facility~~per annum, accruing daily and payable monthly. Notwithstanding any Inother ~~addition~~provision in the Loan Agreement, interest on Loans shall be calculated on the ~~Company~~higher ~~used~~of: ~~proceeds~~(i) the actual average monthly balance of all Loans from the ~~Credit~~prior ~~Facility~~month, ~~totaling~~or ~~approximately~~(ii) $~~310~~1,~~649~~350,000. toIn addition ~~satisfy~~the ~~its~~Company ~~obligations~~will tobe ~~Bank~~subject ofto ~~America,~~certain ~~N.A.,~~monthly ~~under~~or ~~its~~annual fees ~~Master~~on ~~Lease~~the ~~Agreement,~~Loans ~~dated~~ as ofset ~~December~~forth ~~13,~~in ~~2011~~the Loan Agreement.

At The ~~December~~remaining ~~31,~~portion ~~2015,~~of ~~the~~Credit ~~Company~~Limit ~~had~~may ~~$1.4~~be ~~million~~advanced into ~~outstanding indebtedness under~~ the Company ~~Revolving~~upon ~~Facility~~written ~~and~~notice ~~$166,667~~provided into ~~outstanding~~the ~~indebtedness~~Lender ~~under~~during the period ~~Term~~beginning ~~Loan,~~from ~~and~~ the ~~Company~~Closing ~~could~~Date ~~have~~through ~~borrowed~~the upMaturity toDate provided anno ~~additional~~default ~~$1.1~~has ~~million~~occurred under the ~~Revolving~~Loan ~~Facility~~Agreement. AsThe Company ofmay ~~December 31,~~prepay ~~2015,~~any weportion ~~were out~~ of ~~compliance with one of~~ the ~~financial~~Accommodation ~~covenants~~Loan, ~~contained~~ in ~~the~~whole or ~~Credit~~in ~~Facility~~part, asto aLender ~~result~~on ofor ~~the~~prior ~~loss recorded for the year ended 2015. We reported this non-compliance~~ to ~~Rosenthal & Rosenthal and received~~ the ~~waiver~~Maturity Date.

27 Initial borrowings under the Loan Agreement were subject to, among other things, the substantially concurrent repayment by the Company of all amounts due and owing under the Companyís credit facility, dated May 24, 2014, with Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. and the satisfaction and termination of such borrowing and all liens thereunder (collectively, the “Rosenthal Loan”). All amounts owed under the Rosenthal Loan, which were $2,253,617, were satisfied and terminated by the Company on the Closing Date.

In addition, on the Closing Date, the Company entered into a subordination agreement with each of C.B. Brechin and Scott Rutherford, the Companyís chief executive officer and chief strategy officer, respectively, as well as with the Investor described in Note 8 pursuant to which each of the parties agreed to subordinate all present and future indebtedness held by each of them to the obligations of the Lender.

On the Closing Date, as part of the Loan Agreement and to secure the payment and performance of all of the obligations owed to Lender under the Loan Agreement when due, the Company granted to Lender a security interest in all right, title and interest to all assets of the Borrower, whether now owned or hereafter arising or acquired and wherever located.

The Loan Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants for loan agreements of its type, including but not limited to, limiting the Company’s ability to pay dividends or make any distributions, incur additional indebtedness, grant additional liens, engage in any other lime of business, make investments, merge, consolidate or sell all or substantially all of its assets and enter into transactions with related parties. The Loan Agreement also contains certain financial covenants, including, but not limited to, a debt service coverage ratio.

The Loan Agreement includes customary events of default, including but not limited to, failure to pay principal, interest or fees when due, failure to comply with covenants, default under certain other indebtedness, certain insolvency or bankruptcy events, the occurrence of certain material judgments the institution of any proceeding by a government agency or a change of control of the Company.

All borrowings under the Loan Agreement are due upon a default under the terms of the Loan Agreement. The Company’s obligations under the Loan Agreement are guaranteed by C.B. Brechin, the Company’s chief executive officer pursuant to the terms of a surety agreement.

At December 31, 2016, the Company had $274,795 in outstanding indebtedness under the Revolving Facility and $452,571 in outstanding indebtedness under the Term Loan, and the Company could have borrowed up to an additional $2,725,205 under the Revolving Facility. As of December 31, 2016, we were out of compliance with one of the financial covenants contained in the Credit Facility as a result of the loss recorded for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company did not request a waiver for the year ended December 31, 2016 and the Revolving Facility and Term Loan were repaid in full on February 28, 2017.

Other Notes Payable

The Company financed certain vehicles and equipment under finance agreements. The agreements mature at various dates through December 2017. Principal maturities in 2017 are $20,150. The agreements require various monthly payments of principal and interest until maturity. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, financed assets of $4719,~~732~~475 and $7547,~~988~~732, respectively, net of accumulated amortization of $98122,~~184~~441 and $6598,~~927~~184, respectively, are included in property and equipment on the balance sheets. The weighted average interest rate was 3.7075% at December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~3.75% at~~ December 31, ~~2014. Future maturities of notes payable are as follows as of December 31,~~ 2015:.

2016	$	29,277
2017		21,660
Total	$	50,937

NOTE 7 – NOTES PAYABLE – STOCKHOLDERS

~~NOTE~~ Brekford 6financed –the ~~NOTES~~repurchase ~~PAYABLE~~of –shares ~~STOCKHOLDERS~~of its common stock and warrants from the proceeds of convertible promissory notes that were issued by Brekford on November 9, 2009 in favor of a lender group that included two of its directors, Messrs. C.B. Brechin and Scott Rutherford, in the principal amounts of $250,000 each (each, a “Promissory Note” and together, the “Promissory Notes”). Each Promissory Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum and at the time of issuance was to be convertible into shares of Brekford common stock, at the option of the holder, at an original conversion price of $.07 per share. At the time of issuance, Brekford agreed to pay the unpaid principal balance of the Promissory Notes and all accrued but unpaid interest on the date that was the earlier of (i) two years from the issuance date or (ii) 10 business days after the date on which Brekford closes an equity financing that generates gross proceeds in the aggregate amount of not less than $5,000,000.

~~Brekford~~ On ~~financed~~April ~~the~~1, ~~repurchase~~2010, ofBrekford ~~shares of its common stock~~ and ~~warrants~~each ~~from~~member ~~the proceeds~~ of ~~convertible~~the ~~promissory notes that were issued by Brekford on November 9, 2009 in favor of a~~ lender group executed ~~that~~a ~~included~~First ~~two~~Amendment ofto ~~its directors, Messrs. C.B. Brechin and Scott Rutherford, in the principal amounts of $250,000~~ each ~~(each, a “~~Promissory Note~~” and together~~, which amended the ~~“Promissory~~respective ~~Notes”). Each~~ Promissory Note ~~bears~~as interest at the rate of 12% per annum and at the time of issuance was to be convertible into shares of Brekford Corp. common stock, at the option of the holder, at an original conversion price of $.07 per share. At the time of issuance, Brekford agreed to pay the unpaid principal balance of the Promissory Notes and all accrued but unpaid interest on the date that was the earlier of (i) two years from the issuance date or (ii) 10 business days after the date on which Brekford Corp. closes an equity financing that generates gross proceeds in the aggregate amount of not less than $5,000,000.follows:

On April 1, 2010, Brekford Corp. and each member of the lender group executed a First Amendment to the Unsecured Promissory Note, which amended the Promissory Notes as follows:

●	Revise the conversion price in the provision that allows the holder of the Promissory Note to elect to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal portion of the Promissory Note and any accrued but unpaid interest into shares of the common stock at a price of fourteen cents ($0.14) per share, and

●	Each Promissory Note’s maturity date was extended to the earlier of (i) four years from the issuance date or (ii) 10 business days after the date on which Brekford closes an equity financing that generates gross proceeds in the aggregate amount of not less than $5,000,000.

On November 8, 2013, Brekford ~~Corp.~~ and each member of the lender group agreed to extend the maturity dates of the Promissory Notes to the earlier of (i) November 9, 2014 or (ii) 10 business days after the date on which Brekford ~~Corp.~~ closes an equity financing that generates gross proceeds in the aggregate amount of not less than $5,000,000.

On November 4, 2014, Brekford ~~Corp.~~ and each member of the lender group agreed to further extend the maturity dates of the Promissory Notes to the earlier of (i) November 9, 2015 or (ii) 10 business days after the date on which Brekford ~~Corp.~~ closes an equity financing that generates gross proceeds in the aggregate amount of not less than $5,000,000.

On November 9, 2015, the maturity dates of the ~~Stockholder~~Promissory Notes were extended to the earlier of (i) November 9, 2016 or (ii) 10 business days from the date on which Brekford ~~Corp.~~ closes an equity financing that generates gross proceeds in the aggregate amount of not less than $5,000,000. ~~Mr. Brechin and Mr. Rutherford have indicated that they will not exercise their right of repayment prior to December 31, 2016.~~

~~The~~ On ~~Company~~November ~~anticipates~~4, 2016, the maturity ~~date~~dates of the ~~Stockholder~~Promissory Notes were ~~will~~extended ~~continue~~ to bethe ~~extended~~earlier ~~for~~of (i) November 9, 2017 or (ii) 10 business days from the ~~foreseeable~~date ~~future;~~on ~~thus,~~which ~~they~~Brekford ~~are~~closes an ~~classified~~equity asfinancing ~~long~~that ~~term~~generates ~~liabilities.~~gross Asproceeds in the aggregate amount of ~~December~~not 31less than $5,000,000. ~~2015~~Mr. Brechin and ~~2014,~~Mr. ~~the~~Rutherford have ~~amounts~~indicated ~~outstanding~~that ~~under~~they ~~the~~will ~~Stockholder~~not ~~Notes~~exercise ~~totaled~~their ~~$500~~right of repayment prior to September 30,~~000~~ 2017.

2833

~~NOTE~~ The 7Company –anticipates ~~CONVERTIBLE~~the ~~PROMISSORY~~maturity ~~NOTES~~date ~~PAYABLE~~of the Promissory Notes will continue to be extended for the foreseeable future; thus, they are classified as long-term ~~INVESTOR~~liabilities in Discontinued Operations – Long Term Liabilities (Note 4). As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the amounts outstanding under the Promissory Notes totaled $500,000.

On NOTE ~~March~~8 ~~17,~~– ~~2015,~~CONVERTIBLE ~~the~~PROMISSORY ~~Company~~NOTES ~~entered~~PAYABLE into a note and warrant purchase agreement (the “Agreement”) with an accredited investor (the “Investor”) pursuant to which the Investor purchased an aggregate principal amount of $715,000 of a 6% convertible promissory note issued by the Company for an aggregate purchase price of $650,000 (the “Investor Note”). The Investor Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and the principal amount is due on March 17, 2017. Any interest that accrues under the Investor Note is payable either upon maturity or upon any principal being converted on any voluntary conversion date (as to that principal amount then being converted). The Investor Note is convertible at the option of the Investor at any time into shares of Common Stock at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) $0.25 per share and (ii) 70% of the average of the lowest three volume weighted average prices for the twelve (12) trading days prior to such conversion (the “Conversion Price”). In no event can the Conversion Price be less than $0.10; provided, however, that if on or after the date of the Agreement the Company sells any Common Stock or Common Stock Equivalents (as defined in the Agreement) at an effective price per share that is less than $0.10 per share, then the Conversion Price shall be equal to the par value of the Common Stock then in effect. In connection with the Agreement, the Investor received a warrant to purchase 780,000 shares of Common Stock (the “Warrant”). The Warrant is exercisable for a period of five years from the date of issuance at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, subject to adjustment (the “Exercise Price”).- INVESTOR

On ~~October~~March 2317, 2015, the Company entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement (the “Agreement”) with an accredited investor (the “Investor”) ~~converted~~pursuant to which the Investor purchased an aggregate principal amount of $25715,000 of ~~principal~~a 6% ~~and~~convertible promissory note issued by the Company for an aggregate purchase price of $~~904~~650,000 (the “Investor Note”). The Investor Note bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum and the principal amount is due on March 17, 2017. The note and accrued interest ~~due~~was repaid on February 28, 2017. Any interest that accrues under the Investor Note ~~into~~is ~~169,530~~payable either upon maturity or upon any principal being converted on any voluntary conversion date (as to that principal amount then being converted). The Investor Note is convertible at the option of the Investor at any time into shares of Common Stock at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) $0.25 per share and (ii) 70% of the average of the lowest three volume weighted average prices for the twelve (12) trading days prior to such conversion (the “Conversion Price”). In no event can the Conversion Price be less than $0.10; provided, however, that if on or after the date of the Agreement the Company ~~recognized~~sells any Common Stock or Common Stock Equivalents (as defined in the Agreement) at an effective price per share that is less than $0.10 per share, then the Conversion Price shall be equal to the par value of the Common Stock then in effect. In connection with the Agreement, the Investor received a ~~loss~~warrant to onpurchase ~~extinguishment~~780,000 shares of ~~debt~~Common Stock (the “Warrant”). The Warrant is exercisable for a period of five years from the date of issuance at an exercise price of $190.50 per share,~~869~~ subject to adjustment (the “Exercise Price”).

On October 23, 2015, the Investor converted $25,000 of principal and $904 of accrued interest due under the Investor Note into 169,530 shares of Common Stock and the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $19,861.

On December 2, 2015, the Investor converted $50,000 of principal and $2,129 of accrued interest due under the Investor Note into 349,155 shares of Common Stock and the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $35,160.

~~The~~ On ~~following~~February ~~table~~26, ~~provides~~2016 ~~information~~the ~~relating~~Investor toconverted $50,000 of principal and $2,844 of accrued interest due under the Investor Note atinto 476,500 ~~December~~shares ~~31,~~of ~~2015,~~Common ~~excluding~~Stock and the ~~$75,000~~Company ofrecognized ~~converted~~a loss on extinguishment of debt: of $49,525.

	2015
Convertible promissory note payable	$	640,000
Original issuance discount, net of amortization of the $23,002 as of December 31, 2015		(35,180	)
Beneficial conversion feature, net of amortization of $197,437 as of December 31, 2015		(301,960	)
Warrant feature, net of amortization of the $32,585 as of December 31, 2015		(49,835	)
Convertible promissory note payable, net	$	253,023

On March 31, 2016 the Investor converted $50,000 of principal and $3,123 of accrued interest due under the Investor Note into 510,310 shares of Common Stock and the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $72,947.

On May 31, 2016 the Investor converted $50,000 of principal and $3,625 of accrued interest due under the Investor Note into 605,928 shares of Common Stock and the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $38,923.

On July 1, 2016 the Investor converted $50,000 of principal and $3,880 of accrued interest due under the Investor Note into 699,733 shares of Common Stock and the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $40,875.

On July 27, 2016 the Investor converted $50,000 of principal and $4,093 of accrued interest due under the Investor Note into 758,670 shares of Common Stock and the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $45,024.

On August 31, 2016 the Investor converted $50,000 of principal and $4,381 of accrued interest due under the Investor Note into 776,869 shares of Common Stock and the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $44,617.

The following table provides information relating to the Investor Note at December 31, 2016 and :

	December 31, 2016	December 31, 2015
Convertible promissory note payable	$340,000	$640,000
Original issuance discount, net of amortization of the $61,786 and $23,002 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015	(3,214)	(35,180)
Beneficial conversion feature, net of amortization of $530,338 and $197,437 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015	(27,583)	(301,959)
Warrant feature, net of amortization of the $87,527 and $32,585 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015	(4,552)	(49,835
Original issuance cost, net of amortization of $46,996 and $20,744 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015	(5,504)	(31,756)
Convertible promissory note payable, net	$299,147	$221,269

We evaluated the financing transactions in accordance with ASC Topic 470, Debt with Conversion and Other Options, and determined that the conversion feature of the Investor Note was afforded the exemption for conventional convertible instruments due to its fixed conversion rate. The Investor Note has an explicit limit on the number of shares issuable so it did meet the conditions set forth in current accounting standards for equity classification. The debt was issued with non-detachable conversion options that are beneficial to the investors at inception, because the conversion option has an effective strike price that is less than the market price of the underlying stock at the commitment date. The accounting for the beneficial conversion feature requires that the beneficial conversion feature be recognized by allocating the intrinsic value of the conversion option to additional paid-in-capital, resulting in a discount on the convertible notes, which will be amortized and recognized as interest expense.

Accordingly, a portion of the proceeds was allocated to the Warrant based on its relative fair value, which totaled $92,079 using the Black Scholes option-pricing model. Further, the Company attributed a beneficial conversion feature of $557,921 to the shares of Common Stock issuable under the Investor Note based upon the difference between the effective Conversion Price and the closing price of the Common Stock on the date on which the Investor Note was issued. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model are as follows: (i) dividend yield of 0%; (ii) expected volatility of 80.5%, (iii) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 1.56%, (iv) expected life of five years, and (v) estimated fair value of the Common Stock of $0.26 per share. The expected term of the Warrant represents the estimated period of time until exercise and is based on historical experience of similar awards giving consideration to the contractual terms. The Company recorded amortization of the beneficial conversion feature and warrant feature of the Investor Note in other expense in the amount of $274,377 and $45,284 during the year ended December 31, 2016 and $255,~~960~~961 and $42,243, ~~respectively,~~ during the year ended December 31, 2015 which also includes the unamortized beneficial conversion feature and warrant feature attributable to the $75375,000 principal converted to equity.

The Company recorded an original issue discount of $65,000 to be amortized over the term of the Agreement as interest expense. The Company recognized $31,966 and $29,820 of interest expense as a result of the amortization during the nine months ended December 31, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015 ~~which~~respectively, which also includes the unamortized original issue discount attributable to the $75375,000 principal converted to equity.

29 NOTE 9 – WARRANT DERIVATIVE LIABILITY

NOTE 8 – WARRANT DERIVATIVE LIABILITY

On March 17, 2015, in conjunction with the issuance of the Investor Note (see Note 7), the Company issued the Warrant, which permits the Investor to purchase 840,000 shares of Common Stock, including 60,000 related to the financing costs, with an exercise price of $0.50 per share and a life of five years.

The Exercise Price is subject to anti-dilution adjustments that allow for its reduction in the event the Company subsequently issues equity securities, including shares of Common Stock or any security convertible or exchangeable for shares of Common Stock, for no consideration or for consideration less than $0.50 a share. The Company accounted for the conversion option of the Warrant in accordance with ASC Topic 815. Accordingly, the conversion option is not considered to be solely indexed to the Company’s own stock and, as such, is recorded as a liability. The derivative liability associated with the Warrant has been measured at fair value at March 17, 2015 and December 31, ~~2015~~2016 using the Black Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model are as follows: (i) dividend yield of 0%; (ii) expected volatility of 80.5% - 105.1%; (iii) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 1.5614-1.7693%; (iv) expected life of five years; and (v) estimated fair value of the Common Stock of $0.2010-$0.26 per share.

At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the outstanding fair value of the derivative liability was $24,360 and $99,036, respectively.

~~NOTE 9 – LEASES~~35

~~Capital~~ NOTE ~~Leases~~10 – LEASES

The Company financed certain equipment under separate non-cancelable equipment loan and security agreements. The agreements matured in April 2015. The agreements required various monthly payments and were secured by the assets under lease. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, no capital lease was included in property and equipment on the consolidated balance sheets.

Operating Leases

The Company rents office space under separate non-cancelable operating leases expiring in April 2020. Rent expense under our main headquarters lease, expiring on April 30, 2020 amounted to $171,243 and $169,297 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Future minimum lease payments under these lease agreements, exclusive of the Company’s share of operating costs at December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

2016			172,697
2017	$177,878
2017			177,878
2018	183,214
2018			183,214
2019	188,711
2019			188,711
2020	64,475
2020			64,475
Total	614,278
Total		$	786,975
Discontinued operations	522,136
Total minimum lease payment under continuing operations	$92,142

The Company ~~rents~~also ~~office~~leases ~~space~~approximately ~~under separate~~2,500 ~~non-cancelable~~square ~~operating~~feet ~~leases.~~of ~~Rent~~office space ~~expense~~from a related party under ~~our~~a ~~main~~non-cancelable ~~headquarters~~operating lease, expiring on ~~April~~June 30, ~~2020~~2017. ~~amounted~~Rent toexpense ~~$169,297~~under ~~and~~this $lease ~~212~~amounted to $49,~~736~~200 for the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively.

~~The~~ Future ~~Company~~minimum ~~also~~lease ~~leases~~payments ~~approximately~~under ~~2,500~~these ~~square~~lease ~~feet~~agreements, exclusive of ~~office~~the ~~space~~Company’s ~~from~~share aof ~~related party under a non-cancelable~~ operating ~~lease~~costs ~~expiring~~at December ~~on June 30~~31, 2016. ~~Rent~~are ~~expense under this lease amounted to~~ $4924,~~200~~600 ~~and~~during ~~$46,800 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively~~2017.

NOTE 1011 – INVENTORY

As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015 inventory consisted entirely of ~~the~~raw ~~following:~~materials of $221,816 and $316,775, respectively.

	2015		2014
Raw Materials	$	573,769	$	579,279
Work in Process		32,702		102,669
Total Inventory	$	606,471	$	681,948

NOTE 12 – LOSS PER SHARE

30 The following table provides information relating to the calculation of loss earnings per common share for continuing operations:

NOTE 11 – LOSS PER SHARE

	Years Ended December 31,
	2016	2015

Basic loss earnings per share
Net loss from continuing operations	$(1,397,888 )	$(944,830 )
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic	47,357,787	44,690,550
Basic loss per share	$(0.03)	$(0.02)

Diluted loss per share
Net loss from continuing operations	$(1,397,888 )	$(944,830 )
Weighted average common shares outstanding	47,357,787	44,690,550
Potential dilutive securities	—	—
Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted	44,357,787	44,499,610
Diluted loss per share	$(0.03)	$(0.02)
Common stock equivalents excluded due to anti-dilutive effect	6,961,429	8,576,134

~~The following table provides information relating to the calculation of loss earnings per common share.~~36

	Years Ended December 31,
	2015			2014
Basic loss earnings per share
Net loss	$	(371,171	)	$	(1,502,647	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic		44,690,550			44,499,610
Basic loss per share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.03)
Diluted loss per share
Net loss	$	(371,171	)	$	(1,502,647	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding		44,690,550			44,499,610
Potential dilutive securities		—			—
Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted		44,690,550			44,499,610
Diluted loss per share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.03	)
Common stock equivalents excluded due to anti-dilutive effect		8,576,134			3,796,429

The following table provides information relating to the calculation of net income per common share for discontinued operations:

NOTE 12 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

	Years Ended December 31,
	2016	2015

Basic net income per share
Net income from discontinued operations	$343,485	$573,659
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic	47,357,787	44,690,550
Basic loss per share	$0.01	$0.01

Diluted net income per share
Net income from discontinued operations	$343,485	$573,659
Weighted average common shares outstanding	47,357,787	44,690,550
Potential dilutive securities	5,796,429	7,511,134
Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted	53,154,216	52,201,684
Diluted loss per share	$0.01	$0.01
Common stock equivalents excluded due to anti-dilutive effect	1,165,000	1,065,000

At NOTE ~~December~~13 ~~31,~~- ~~2015 and 2014, the Company~~STOCKHOLDERS’s ~~authorized stock consists of 20,000,000 shares of $.0001 par value preferred stock and 150,000,000 shares of $.0001 par value common stock.~~EQUITY

At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s authorized stock consists of 20,000,000 shares of $.0001 par value preferred stock and 150,000,000 shares of $.0001 par value common stock.

The following common stock transactions occurred during the period:

On During ~~January~~the 5,period ~~2015~~ended December 31, ~~the~~2016 the Company granted an aggregate of ~~132~~332,000 shares of restricted Common Stock to the key employees in consideration of services rendered. The weighted average fair value of the shares amounted to $0.3416 per share based upon the closing price of shares of Common Stock on the date of the grant. These shares were fully vested on the date of the grant. The Company recorded $4453,~~880~~ 000 in share-based compensation expense related to restricted stock grants.

On During ~~October~~the ~~23,~~period ~~2015~~ended December 31, 2016 the Company issued ~~169~~ 3,~~530~~828,010 shares at an average valued atof $0.27 13 per share to convert $25300,000 of principal and $~~904~~21,945 of accrued interest due under the Convertible Note Agreement ~~Note~~ and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $19291,~~869~~911.

On During the period ended December 231, 2015, the Company granted an ~~issued~~aggregate ~~349~~of 132,~~155~~000 shares ~~valued~~of restricted atCommon Stock to the key employees in consideration of services rendered. The weighted average fair value of the shares amounted to $0.2534 per share tobased ~~convert~~upon ~~$50,000~~the ofclosing ~~principal~~price ~~and~~of ~~$2,129~~ shares of ~~accrued~~Common ~~interest~~Stock ~~due~~on ~~under~~ the ~~Convertible~~date ~~Note~~of ~~Agreement~~the ~~and~~grant. These ~~recognized~~shares were afully ~~loss~~vested on ~~extinguishment~~the date of ~~debt~~the ofgrant. The Company recorded $3544,~~160~~880 in share-based compensation expense related to restricted stock grants.

On During ~~January 7, 2014,~~ the ~~Company granted an~~period ~~aggregate~~ended ofDecember 5031,~~000~~ ~~shares~~2015 ~~of restricted Common Stock to~~ the ~~non-employees~~Company inissued 518,685 ~~consideration~~shares ofat ~~services~~an ~~rendered. The weighted~~ average ~~fair~~valued ~~value~~ of ~~the shares amounted to~~ $0.2726 per share ~~based~~to ~~upon~~convert $75,000 ~~the~~of ~~closing~~principal ~~price~~and of$3,033 ~~shares~~ of ~~Common~~accrued ~~Stock~~interest ondue ~~the~~under ~~date of~~ the Convertible ~~grant. These~~Note ~~shares~~Agreement ~~were~~and ~~fully~~recognized ~~vested~~a loss on ~~the~~extinguishment of ~~date~~debt of ~~the grant. The Company recorded~~ $1355,~~500 in share-based compensation expense related to restricted stock grants~~021.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

On September 7, 2010, Brekford Corp. issued a press release announcing that its board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program permitting the Company to repurchase up to $500,000 in outstanding shares of the Common Stock from time to time over a period of 12 months in open market transactions or in privately negotiated transactions at the Company's discretion. The stock repurchase program was subsequently extended for an additional 12 months until September 7, 2012. On September 28, 2012, the Company adopted a new stock repurchase program which permits the Company to repurchase the $363,280 in shares that remained available for repurchase under the old program, with the same terms and conditions except that the term of the new stock repurchase program was 24 months. The repurchase plan expired in September 2014.

3137

Warrants

The assumptions used to value warrant grants during the year ended December 31, 2015, which consisted solely of the Warrant, were as follows:

	Year ended December 31, 2015	~~Year ended December 31, 2015~~
Expected life (in years)	5.00		~~5.00~~
Volatility	80.50%		~~80.5%~~
Risk free interest rate	1.56%		~~1.56%~~
Expected Dividend Rate	0%		0

Summary of the warrant activity for year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 is as follows:

	Number of Warrants	~~Number~~Weighted ofAverage ~~Warrants~~Exercise Price	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value	~~Weighted Average Exercise Price~~		~~Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)~~		~~Aggregate Intrinsic Value~~
Outstanding at January 1, 2015	—	$—	—	$0.00	$	—		—	$	~~0.00~~
Granted	840,000	0.50	~~840,000~~4.21	0.00		~~0.50~~		~~4.21~~		~~0.00~~
Forfeited or expired	—	—	—	0.00		—		—		~~0.00~~
Exercised	—	—	—	0.00		—		—
Outstanding at December 31, 2015	840,000	0.50	~~840,000~~4.21	0.00		~~0.50~~		~~4.21~~		~~0.00~~
Exercisable at December 31, 2015			840,000			0.50		4.21		0.00
Granted	—	—	—	0.00
Forfeited or expired	—	—	—	0.00
Exercised	—	—	—
Outstanding at December 31, 2016	840,000	0.50	3.21	0.00
Exercisable at December 31, 2016	840,000	0.50	3.21	0.00

The weighted average remaining contractual life of warrants outstanding as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 was as follows:

Weighted

~~Weighted~~

Average

~~Average~~

Stock

Remaining

~~Stock~~

~~Remaining~~

Exercisable

Warrants

Contractual

~~Warrants~~

~~Contractual~~

Prices

Outstanding

Exercisable

Life (years)

~~Outstanding~~

~~Exercisable~~

~~Life (years)~~

0.50

840,000

4.21

$0.50

840,000

3.21

Total

840,000

3.21

~~840,000~~

~~4.21~~

NOTE 1314 – SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company has issued shares of restricted common stock and warrants to purchase shares of common stock and has granted non-qualified stock options to certain employees and non-employees. On April 25, 2008, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2008 Incentive Plan”). During the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016, Brekford Corp. granted stock options under the 2008 Incentive Plan to its non-employee directors. These options have exercise prices equal to the fair market value of a share of Common Stock as of the date of grant and have terms of ten years.

Stock Options

Option grants during the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 were made to non-employee directors who elected to receive options during the annual equity grant period in the first quarter of each fiscal year. The options had a grant date fair value of $0.1312 per share and will vest and become exercisable with respect to option shares over a three year period commencing from the date of grant at a rate of 33.33% per year.

3238

Option grants during the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 were made to non-employee directors who elected to receive options during the annual equity grant period in the first quarter of each fiscal year. The options had a grant date fair value of $0.1024 per share and will vest and become exercisable with respect to option shares over a three year period commencing from the date of grant at a rate of 33.33% per year.

The Company recorded $1114,~~214~~504 and $611,~~233~~214 in stock option compensation expense during the period ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~ 2015, respectively, related to the stock option grants.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options granted to employees and recognizes the compensation cost of employee share-based awards in its statement of operations using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the award, net of estimated forfeitures.

The use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of share-based awards requires that the Company make certain assumptions and estimates for required inputs to the model, including (1) the fair value of the Company’s common stock at each grant date, (ii) the expected volatility of the Company’s common stock value based on industry comparisons, (iii) the expected life of the share-based award, (iv) the risk-free interest rate, and (v) the dividend yield.

The following are the assumptions made in computing the fair value of share-based awards granted in the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~ 2016 and ~~2014~~2015:

		Year ended December 31, 2015			Year ended December 31, 2014
	Year ended December 31, 2016	Year ended December 31, 2015
Expected life (in years)	3.50	3.50	~~3.50~~			~~3.50~~
Volatility	78.8%	80.5%	~~80.5~~	%		~~70.8~~	%
Risk free interest rate	0.88%	0.95%	~~0.95~~	%		~~0.72~~	%
Expected Dividend Rate	0	0	0			0

Summary of the option activity for the period ended December 31, 2016 ~~2015~~ is as follows:

	Number of Options	~~Number~~Weighted ofAverage ~~Options~~Exercise Price	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value	~~Weighted Average Exercise Price~~		~~Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)~~			~~Aggregate Intrinsic Value~~
Outstanding at January 1, 2014			—		$	0.00		—	$	0.00
Outstanding at January 1, 2015	225,000	$0.00	—	$0.00
Granted	225,000	0.20	~~225,000~~—	0.00		~~0.20~~		—		~~0.00~~
Forfeited or expired	(50,000)	—	—	0.00		—		—		~~0.00~~
Exercised	—	—	—			—		—
Outstanding at January 1, 2015			225,000		$	0.20		4.15	$	0.00
Outstanding at January 1, 2016	400,000	$0.20	3.25	$0.00
Granted	225,000	0.12	~~225,000~~3.50	0.00		~~0.24~~		~~3.25~~		~~0.00~~
Forfeited or expired	(75,000)	0.22	~~(50,000)~~2.00	0.00		—		—		~~0.00~~
Exercised	—	—	—			—		—
Outstanding at December 31, 2015			400,000		$	0.20		3.25		0.00
Outstanding at December 31, 2016	550,000	$0.20	3.00	0.00
Exercisable at December 31, 2015			75,000					—		0.00
Exercisable at December 31, 2016	225,000	$0.20	—	0.00
Vested and expected to vest	325,000	$0.20	~~325,000~~3.00	0.00	$	~~0.20~~		~~3.25~~		~~0.00~~

The unrecognized compensation cost for unvested stock option awards outstanding at December 31, ~~2015~~2016 was approximately $3421,~~871~~032 to be recognized over approximately 13years.~~97 years.~~

3339

Restricted Stock Grants

During the period ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016 the Company ~~issued~~granted an aggregate of ~~132~~332,000 shares of restricted ~~common~~Common ~~stock~~Stock to ~~its~~the key employees in consideration of services rendered ~~and part of employment agreement~~. The weighted average fair value of the shares amounted to $0.3416 per share based upon the closing price of shares of ~~the Company’s~~ Common Stock on the date of the grant. These shares were fully vested on the date of the grant. The Company recorded $4453,~~880~~ 000 in share-based compensation expense ~~for the year ending December 31, 2015~~ related to restricted stock grants.

During the period ended December 31, ~~2014,~~2015 the Company granted an aggregate of 50132,000 shares of restricted ~~stock~~Common Stock to the ~~directors~~key asemployees ~~part of our director compensation program and~~ in consideration of services rendered. The weighted average fair value of the shares amounted to $0.2734 per share based upon the closing price of shares of ~~common~~Common ~~stock~~Stock on the date of the grant. These shares were fully vested on the date of the grant. The Company recorded $1344,~~500~~880 in share-based compensation expense ~~for the year ending December 31, 2014~~ related to restricted stock grants.

	Restricted Stock Shares	~~Restricted~~Weighted ~~Stock~~Average ~~Shares~~Value			~~Weighted Average Value~~
Nonvested restricted stock at January 1, 2014			—		$	—
Nonvested restricted stock at January 1, 2015	—	$—
Granted	132,000	0.34	~~50,000~~			~~0.27~~
Vested	(132,000)	0.34	~~(50,000~~	)		~~0.27~~
Forfeited or expired	—	—	—			—
Nonvested restricted stock at December 31, 2014			—		$	—
Nonvested restricted stock at December 31, 2015	—	$—
Granted	332,000	0.16	~~132,000~~			~~0.34~~
Vested	(332,000)	0.16	~~(132,000~~	)		~~0.34~~
Forfeited or expired	—	—	—			—
Nonvested restricted stock at December 31, 2015			—		$	—
Nonvested restricted stock at December 31, 2016	—	$—

2008 Stock Incentive Plan

The 2008 Incentive Plan is designed to provide an additional incentive to executives, employees, directors and key consultants, aligning the long term interests of participants in the 2008 Incentive Plan with those of the Company and the Company’s stockholders. The 2008 Incentive Plan provides that up to 8 million shares of the Company’s common stock may be issued pursuant to awards granted under the 2008 Incentive Plan. As of December 31, ~~2015~~ 2016, 65,~~680~~339,000 shares of common stock remained available for future issuance under the 2008 Incentive Plan.

2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

On February 19, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized the adoption of the 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Purchase Plan”), subsequently approved by the stockholders on April 25, 2008, which is designed to encourage and enable eligible employees to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company’s common stock. The Purchase Plan provides that up to 2 million shares of the Company’s common stock may be issued under the Plan. No shares have been issued under the Plan.

NOTE 1415 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company has a defined contribution savings plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The 401(k) Plan is a defined contribution plan, which covers substantially all U.S.-based employees of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries who have completed three months of service. The 401(k) Plan provides that the Company will match 50% of the participant salary deferrals up to 3% of a participant’s compensation for all participants. The Company contributed $813,~~718~~352 and $118,~~833~~718 during the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and, ~~2014~~2015, respectively.

NOTE 1516 – MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND VENDORS

Major Customers

The Company has several ATSE contracts with government agencies, of which net revenue from ~~one~~four ~~customer~~customers during the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 represented 1763% of the total net revenue. ~~for~~Four customers ~~such~~accounted ~~year.~~for ~~Accounts~~88% ~~receivable~~of ~~due~~total ~~from~~accounts ~~customers~~receivable atas of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, ~~amounted~~which towas ~~53%~~subsequently ofcollected ~~total accounts receivable at that date~~in 2017.

34 Net revenue from five customers during the year ended December 31, 2015 represented 80% of the total net revenue. Accounts receivable due from three customers at December 31, 2015 amounted to 91% of total accounts receivable at that date.

The Company has several contracts with government agencies, of which net revenue from two customers during the year ended December 31, 2014 represented 10% of the total net revenue for such year. Accounts receivable due from customers at December 31, 2014 amounted to 53% of total accounts receivable at that date.

Major Vendors

The Company purchased ~~substantially all rugged IT~~ products ~~that it resold during the periods presented from a single distributor. Revenues from rugged IT products amounted to 59%~~ and ~~53%~~services ~~of total revenues~~ for ~~the~~fulfillment ~~years~~of ~~ended~~ATSE contracts ~~December~~from ~~31,~~several ~~2015 and 2014, respectively~~vendors. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, accounts payable due to ~~this~~these ~~distributor~~vendors amounted to 7247% and 5338% of total accounts payable, respectively.

~~NOTE 16 – INCOME TAXES~~40

As NOTE of17 ~~December 31,~~– ~~2015,~~INCOME the Company has approximately $6.64 million of federal and state net operating loss carryforwards available to offset future taxable income, if any, through 2033. These net operating losses begin to expire in 2028. If, however, there is an ownership change in the Company, Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code may restrict the Company’s ability to utilize these loss carryforwards to a percentage of the market value of the Company at the time of the ownership change. Therefore, these operating loss carryforwards could become limited in future years if ownership changes were to occur as defined in the Internal Revenue Code and similar state income tax provisions. The Company files income tax returns with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and with the revenue services of various states.TAXES

~~The~~ As of December 31, 2016, the Company has approximately $7.55 million of federal and state net operating loss carryforwards available to offset future taxable income, if any, through 2034. These net operating losses begin to expire in 2028. If, however, there is an ownership change in the Company, some of the Company’s ~~deferred~~ tax ~~assets~~attributes ~~and~~may ~~liabilities~~limit ~~are~~the Company’s ability to utilize loss carryforwards. Therefore, these operating loss carryforwards could become limited in future years if ownership changes were to occur as ~~follows~~defined ~~for~~in ~~each~~the ofInternal Revenue Code and similar state income tax provisions. The Company files income tax returns with the ~~periods~~U.S. Internal ~~presented:~~Revenue Service and with the revenue services of various states.

	December 31,
	2015		2014
Net operating loss carry forwards	$	2,780,000	$	2,640,000
Property and Equipment		(500,000)		(513,000	)
Other		—		3,000
		2,280,000		2,130,000
Valuation allowance		(2,280,000)		(2,130,000	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	—	$	—

The Companyís deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

	December 31,
	2016	2015

Net operating loss carry forwards	$3,112,000	$2,780,000
Property and Equipment	(490,000)	(500,000)
Other	—	—
	2,622,000	2,280,000
Valuation allowance	(2,622,000)	(2,280,000)
Net deferred tax asset	$—	$—

The Company’s recorded income tax, net of the change in the valuation allowance for each of the periods presented, is as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,	~~Years Ended December 31,~~
		2015		2014
	2016	2015
Current
Federal	$—	$—	—	$	—
State	—	—	—		—
	—	—	—		—
Deferred
Federal	(369,000)	(130,000)	~~(130,000)~~		~~(486,000~~	)
State	(55,000)	(20,000)	~~(20,000)~~		~~(110,000~~	)
			(150,000)		(596,000	)
	(424000)	(150,000)
Change in valuation allowance	424,000	150,000	~~150,000~~		~~596,000~~
Income tax expense	$—	$—	—	$	—

Management has evaluated the recoverability of the deferred income tax assets and the level of the valuation allowance required with respect to such deferred income tax assets. After considering all available facts, the Company fully reserved for its deferred tax assets because management believes that it is more likely than not that their benefits will not be realized in future periods. The Company will continue to evaluate its deferred tax assets to determine whether any changes in circumstances could affect the realization of their future benefit. If it is determined in future periods that portions of the Company’s deferred income tax assets satisfies the realization standard, the valuation allowance will be reduced accordingly.

A reconciliation of the expected Federal statutory rate of 35% to the Company’s actual rate as reported for each of the periods presented is as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,	~~Years Ended December 31,~~
		2015			2014
	2016	2015
Expected statutory rate	(35.0)%	(35.0)%	~~(35.0)~~	%		~~(34.0)~~	%
State income tax rate, net of Federal benefit	(5.2)%	(5.2)%	~~(5.2)~~	%		~~(5.4)~~	%
Permanent differences
Other	—%	—%	—	%		~~0.1~~	%
	40.2	40.2%	~~40.2~~	%		~~39.3~~	%
Valuation allowance	(40.2)%	(40.2)%	~~(40.2)~~	%		~~(39.3)~~	%
			—	%		—	%
	—%	—%

NOTE 1718 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On Merger ~~February 26, 2016, the Investor converted $50,000 of principal and $2,844 of accrued interest due under the Investor Note into 476,500 shares of Common Stock.~~Agreement

36 On February 10, 2017, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) to combine the businesses of Brekford and KeyStone Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“KeyStone”). The Merger Agreement provides that Brekford and KeyStone will each engage in merger transactions (the “Mergers”) with separate wholly-owned subsidiaries of a newly-formed company, Novume Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Novume”). Under one merger transaction (the “Brekford Merger”), one wholly-owned subsidiary of Novume will merge with and into Brekford, leaving Brekford as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Novume. Under a separate merger transaction (the “KeyStone Merger”), KeyStone will merge with and into another wholly-owned subsidiary of Novume (“KeyStone Merger Sub”), with KeyStone Merger Sub surviving such merger. The time at which the Mergers are completed in accordance with the Merger Agreement is referred to as the “Effective Time”. As soon as practicable after the Effective Time, Brekford will change its name to “Brekford Traffic Safety, Inc.” and KeyStone Merger Sub will change its name to “KeyStone Solutions, Inc.”

Merger Consideration

Contribution and Unit Purchase Agreement

On February 6, 2017, the Company entered into a Contribution and Unit Purchase Agreement (the “ LB&B Agreement”) with LB&B Associates Inc. (the “Purchaser”) and Global Public Safety, LLC (“GPS”).

The closing for the transaction set forth in the Agreement occurred on February 28, 2017 (the “LB&B Closing”) and on such date the Company contributed substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities related to its vehicle services business (the “Business”) to GPS. After the LB&B Closing, the Company will continue to own and run other business operations that are not related to the Business.

On the LB&B Closing, GPS sold units representing 80.1% of the units of GPS to the Purchaser for $6,048,394, after certain purchase price adjustments of prepaid expenses and unbilled customer deposits. $4,048,394 was paid in cash, including a $250,000 deposit that was paid on February 6, 2017, and $2,000,000 was paid by Purchaser issuing the Company a promissory note (the “Promissory Note”). After the LB&B Closing, the Company continues to own 19.9% of the units of GPS.

The Promissory Note is subordinated to the Purchaser’s senior lender and accrues interest at a rate of 3% per annum. The maturity date of the Promissory Note is March 31, 2022. The Promissory Note is to be repaid as follows: (a) $75,000 plus all accrued interest on each of September 30, 2017; December 31, 2017; March 31, 2018, June 30, 2018 and September 30, 2018 (or, in the event any such date is not a business day, the first business day after such date), (b) $100,000 plus all accrued interest on each of December 31, 2018; March 31, 2019; June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2019 (or, in the event any such date is not a business day, the first business day after such date) (c) $125,000 plus all accrued interest on each of December 31, 2019; March 31, 2020; June 30, 2020; September 30, 2020, December 31, 2020; March 31, 2021, June 31, 2021; September 30, 2021; and December 31, 2021 (or, in the event any such date is not a business day, the first business day after such date), and (d) $100,000 on March 31, 2022.

The Promissory Note is secured pursuant to the terms of a Pledge Agreement (the “Pledge Agreement”) between the Company and Purchaser. Pursuant to the Pledge Agreement the Purchaser granted the Company a continuing second priority lien and security interest in the Purchaser’s units of GPS subject to liens of the Purchaser’s senior lender.

Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company and GPS executed a Transition Services Agreement (the “Transition Services Agreement”). Pursuant to the Transition Services Agreement, the Company will perform certain support services to promote the efficient transition of the Business for the fees set forth in the Agreement.

In connection with the Agreement the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Global Public Safety, LLC (the “LLC Agreement”). The LLC Agreement provides for the operations of GPS and provides that all limited liability company powers of the Company shall be exercised by and under the authority of the Board of Representatives except as otherwise provided by the LLC Agreement or applicable law. The initial number of representatives constituting the Board of Representatives is three, of which the Company appointed one member and if the number of Board of Representatives is increased the Company shall be able to appoint the number of members required to maintain 1/3 of the seats on the Board of Representatives.

Director Resignation

On February 18, 2017, Edward Parker notified Brekford Corporation (the “Company”) that he was resigning from the Company’s board of directors effective immediately.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

~~None~~ On June 9, 2016, the Company engaged BD & Company, Inc. (“BD”) as the new independent registered public accounting firm for the Company and its subsidiaries. There were no disagreements between the Company and our former audit firm Stegman & Company on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed under the Exchange Act with the SEC, such as this Annual Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in those rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer who also serves as the principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer (“CEO”), to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

An evaluation of the effectiveness of these disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the CEO. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the CEO, has concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting discussed below. A material weakness is a control deficiency (within the meaning of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 5) or combination of control deficiencies, that result in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

During the quarter ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016, there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Limitation on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures

In designing and evaluating these disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain judgments and assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management has performed an evaluation and testing of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016. Management’s report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is included on the following page. The Company is a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Rule 12b-2 promulgated under the Exchange Act and, accordingly, its independent registered public accounting firm is not required to attest to the foregoing management report.

3744

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Board of Directors

Brekford Corp.

Management of Brekford Corp. (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. This internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to management and the Board of Directors as to the reliability of the Company’s financial reporting and the preparation and presentation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, as well as to safeguard assets from unauthorized use or disposition.

An internal control system, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation and may not prevent or detect misstatements in the financial statements or the unauthorized use or disposition of the Company’s assets. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of internal controls to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a control deficiency (within the meaning of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 5) or combination of control deficiencies, that result in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in 2013 Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment and on the foregoing criteria, management has concluded that, as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective due to the material weakness described below.

Management has concluded that, as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, a material weakness exists because the Company does not currently employ a sufficient number of qualified accounting personnel to ensure proper and timely evaluation of complex accounting, tax, and disclosure issues that may arise during the course of the Company’s business. The Company intends to address this material weakness by reviewing the Company’s accounting and finance processes to identify any improvements thereto that might enhance the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and determine the feasibility of implementing such improvements and by seeking qualified employees and/or outside consultants who possess the knowledge needed to eliminate this weakness. The Company’s ability to remediate this weakness may, however, be delayed or limited by resource constraints, a lack of qualified persons in the Company’s market area and/or competition from other employers.

Dated: March 24, 2016		/s/ Chandra (C.B.) Brechin
		Chandra (C.B.) Brechin
		Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
		and Financial Officer)

Dated: March 28, 2017

38 /s/ Rodney Hillman

Rodney Hillman

President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our proxy statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Nominee	Age	Position with the Company
Rodney Hillman	51	President and Chief Operating Officer
Scott Rutherford	57	Chief Strategic Officer and Director
C.B. Brechin	44	Director
Robert West	47	Director
Steve Ellis	54	Director

The following discussion sets forth biographical and other information about our directors, as well as the specific experience, qualifications, other attributes and skills of each director nominee that led the Board of Directors to determine that such person should serve on the Board of Directors.

Rodney Hillman, President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Hillman, age 51, joined the Company in May 2012 and served as its Strategy & Finance Analyst since October 2012 and as its Director of Operations from May 2012 to September 2012. He was appointed as our President and Chief Operating Officer in December 2013. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Hillman served in various executive level capacities during his 28 year career. Most recently, he spent 10 years as Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director of Game Trading Technologies, Inc. (“GMTD”), a publicly-traded company in the consumer electronics industry that he co-founded. Prior to his tenure at GMTD, Mr. Hillman was Vice President of Product Development at InterAct Accessories, Inc. and held various management positions at both Baltimore Gas & Electric and Constellation Energy Group. Mr. Hillman has an M.S. degree in Finance from Loyola College in Baltimore, Maryland, an M.B.A. degree from the University of Baltimore, and a B.S. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from The Johns Hopkins University.

Scott Rutherford. Mr. Rutherford has served as Chief Strategic Officer since December 2013 and, prior to that, as our President since July 8, 2008. Prior to 2008, he was Director of Engineering of our Pelican division since January 2006. He has also served as a director of the Company since January 2006. He co-founded Pelican in 1997 and served as its Vice President from 1997 to 2006. Mr. Rutherford has more than 25 years of entrepreneurial experience in conceiving, developing and building technical solutions for clients in both the corporate and government sectors. For Pelican, Mr. Rutherford was responsible for all aspects of technology evaluation and deployment to meet its clients’ needs for mobile, ruggedized computing solutions. This included locating and assimilating complex solutions from various vendors to ensure a turnkey installation in highly variable models of police and fire vehicles. In addition, Mr. Rutherford launched and continues to develop Pelican’s technical support infrastructure, for which he and his team of engineers have been presented with awards for Outstanding Technical Support by various clients, including the Maryland State Police. Leveraging his extensive mechanical, electronic and computer expertise, Mr. Rutherford has developed a large array of products from concept, including a Mobile Training Center for the Department of Defense and proprietary irrigation control filters to eliminate RF interference from the Annapolis Naval Radio Transmitter Station. Mr. Rutherford is the recipient of several awards for his innovative technology systems, including the “Comdex Most Innovative” award in 1998. In nominating Mr. Rutherford for election to the Board of Directors, the Board considered Mr. Rutherford’s experience discussed above, particularly his extensive technical knowledge in areas of mechanical, electronics and computers, his familiarity with and involvement in the Company’s key market areas, and his significant business experience gained through the ownership and operation of the Company.

C.B. Brechin. Mr. Brechin served as our Chief Executive Officer from July 2008 until November 2016, as our Chief Financial Officer from March 2011 until November 2016, and as a director of the Company since January 2006. Mr. Brechin co-founded the Companyís predecessor, Pelican Mobile, in 1996 which had been a leading provider of rugged, mobile technology solutions providing services to branches of the U.S. military, various federal entities and numerous security and public safety agencies throughout the Mid-Atlantic region for more than a decade. Mr. Brechin possesses several years of technology expertise in the areas of hardware configuration, software installation, troubleshooting and network administration as a computer consultant for a number of organizations before founding the company. Mr. Brechin managed all aspects of the Pelicanís corporate and government sales, including sales strategy, partner/vendor relations, corporate structure, contract acquisition, training and development. In addition, Mr. Brechin managed Pelicanís financial planning, cash flow and risk analysis. He successfully closed over $20 million in sales and secured key client relationships. Through his sales efforts and strategic vision, Pelican was twice been recognized as a top reseller of Panasonic equipment, including “Reseller of the Year” in 2004. Mr. Brechin has a Bachelorís Degree in Political Science and International Affairs from Kalamazoo College and a Masterís Degree in Information and Telecommunications Systems from Johns Hopkins University. In nominating Mr. Brechin for election to the Board of Directors, the Board considered Mr. Brechinís experience discussed above, particularly his management experience in running a successful company involved in sales and contracts with government agencies as well was his expertise in technology, corporate governance and financial management.

Steve Ellis. Mr. Ellis has served as a director of the Company since July 2015. He is a partner of EagleFirst, LLC, an advisory firm providing CFO, Merger and Acquisition (“M&A”) and business development support services to small and medium sized businesses with a focus on government contracting, technology and manufacturing. Mr. Ellis has more than 25 years of experience in M&A and senior accounting roles in the United States and internationally. He has managed the negotiation and due diligence processes of more than 30 acquisitions and divestments globally, as well as creating and executing post-acquisition integration plans. Prior to EagleFirst, Mr. Ellis was a CFO at Smith’s Group plc, where he helped create Smiths Detection, a manufacturer of sensors used by government agencies that detect and identify explosives, weapons, chemical agents, and biohazards. Over an eight-year period, he was instrumental in growing Smiths Detection’s revenues from $20 million to nearly $1 billion

Robert West. Mr. West has served as a director of the Company since October 2012. He has been the Managing Partner at C3 Healthcare Solutions, LLC since he led its formation in March 2008 with five other members. C3 Healthcare Solutions provides business development and marketing consulting services to health care organizations including hospitals and physician practices. Additionally, Mr. West is the Chief Executive Officer of Pulmonary and Critical Care Associates of Baltimore, PA (“PCCAB”), a 43 physician group practice specializing in pulmonology, critical care, and sleep medicine. He is responsible for oversight of all financial, accounting, and billing operations and has led the organization to 55% revenue growth in the past five years. Mr. West is also the President of Proximall, LLC, a physician billing company that is a wholly owned subsidiary of PCCAB, formed in January 2012. Prior to these endeavors, Mr. West served as Administrative Director of Orthopedics, Neurosciences, and Bariatrics at Greater Baltimore Medical Center from August 2003 to February 2007. Mr. West’s board experience includes the Baltimore Spine Center from January 2005 to February 2007 and he is currently on the Executive Advisory Board of The Doctors Company. Mr. West earned a Master of Science in Management from The University of Maryland in 1999 and a Bachelor of Science from James Madison University in 1991. In nominating Mr. West for election to the Board of Directors, the Board considered Mr. West’s experience discussed above in relation to the financial, management, and organizational aspects of these positions.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Committees of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Corporate Governance Committee, each of which is briefly described below.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in maintaining the integrity of our financial statements, and of our financial reporting processes and systems of internal audit controls, and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee reviews the scope of independent audits and assesses the results. The Audit Committee meets with management to consider the adequacy of the internal control over, and the objectivity of, financial reporting. The Audit Committee also meets with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and with appropriate financial personnel concerning these matters. The Audit Committee selects, determines the compensation of, appoints and oversees our independent registered public accounting firm. Representatives of the independent registered public accounting firm periodically meet with the Audit Committee and always have unrestricted access to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee, which currently consists of Steve Ellis and Robert West, met four times during 2016. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Ellis is an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the SEC in Item 407 of Regulation S-K. The Audit Committee has adopted a charter, a copy of which is available on our website at: http://ir.issuerdirect.com/bfdi/corporate_governance.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee administers incentive compensation plans, including stock option plans, and advises the Board of Directors regarding employee benefit plans. The Compensation Committee establishes the compensation structure for our senior managers, approves the compensation of our senior executives, and makes recommendations with respect to compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and our other executive officers. The Compensation Committee advises and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors on all matters concerning director compensation. The Compensation Committee, which currently consists of Robert West (Chairman) and Steve Ellis, met once during 2016. The Compensation Committee has adopted a charter, a copy of which is available on our website at: http://ir.issuerdirect.com/bfdi/corporate_governance.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of our compensation committee was, during 2016, an officer or employee of ours, was formerly an officer of ours or had any relationship requiring disclosure by us under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. No interlocking relationship as described in Item 407(e)(4) of Regulation S-K exists between any of our executive officers or Compensation Committee members, on the one hand, and the executive officers or compensation committee members of any other entity, on the other hand, nor has any such interlocking relationship existed in the past.

Corporate Governance Committee

The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates and recommends candidates for election to the Board of Directors, reviews the performance and contribution of directors, recommends membership for standing committees, reviews director independence, and adopts and reviews Company corporate governance guidelines and codes of conduct. The Corporate Governance Committee, which was established in February 2008, currently consists of Robert West (Chairman) and Steve Ellis. The Corporate Governance Committee met once during 2016. The Corporate Governance Committee has not adopted a charter.

Director Independence

To determine whether directors are “independent”, the Board of Directors has adopted the independence standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market Rules (the “NASDAQ Rules”). The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Ellis, Parker and West is an “independent director” as defined by NASDAQ Rule 5605(b)(1). Each member of the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee other than Mr. Brechin and Mr. Rutherford is an “independent director,” and Messrs. West and Ellis satisfy the independence requirements of NASDAQ Rule 5605(c)(2)(A) relating to the independence of Audit Committee members. The Company’s criteria for independence as approved by the Board of Directors is available on our website at: http://www.brekford.com/investorrelations.html.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among the executive officers and directors of the Company.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers, directors, and persons who own more than ten percent (10%) of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of securities ownership and changes in such ownership with the SEC on Forms 3, 4 and 5. Officers, directors, and greater-than-ten-percent stockholders are required by SEC regulations to provide us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file.

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock to file reports of initial ownership of common stock and other equity securities and subsequent changes in that ownership with the SEC. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To our knowledge, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with, except that Robert West filed a late form 4.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The ~~information~~following ~~required~~table sets forth, for each of the last two fiscal years, the total remuneration awarded to, earned by, ~~this~~or paid to (i) each person who served as the Company’s principal executive officer at any time during 2016, (ii) the Company’s two most highly compensated executive officers other than the persons described in item is(i) ~~incorporated~~who bywere ~~reference~~serving ~~from~~as ~~our~~executive ~~proxy~~officers ~~statement~~as ~~for~~of December ~~our~~31, 2016 ~~Annual~~and ~~Meeting~~whose total compensation (excluding above-market and preferential earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation) exceeded $100,000 during 2015, and (iii) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided pursuant to item (ii) had they been serving as executive officers of ~~Stockholders~~the Company as of December 31, 2016 (the principal executive officers and such other persons are referred to as the “named executive officers”). The Company has determined that its named executive officers for 2016 are C.B. Brechin, who served as its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Rodney Hillman, who served as its President and Chief Operating Officer, and Scott Rutherford, who served as its Chief Strategic Officer.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Stock awards ($)(2)	Option awards ($)(2)	Total ($)
C.B Brechin	2016	200,000	-	-	200,000
(CEO and CFO until November 2016)	2015	191,539	-	-	191,539


Rodney Hillman	2016	157,000	13,200	-	170,200
President & Chief Operations Officer, Chief Financial Officer	2015	137,270	13,200	-	150,470

Scott Rutherford	2016	185,000	-	-	185,000
Chief Strategic Officer (1)	2015	177,174	-	-	177,174

Notes:

(1)	Messrs. Brechin and Rutherford also serve on the Board of Directors of the Company but do not receive any separate compensation for such service.
(2)	The amounts shown reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of stock and option awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 718. See Note 10 to the audited consolidated financial statements contained herein for the year ended December 31, 2016 regarding assumptions underlying valuation of equity awards.

Employment Agreements and Change in Control Agreements

None of the named executive officers is a party to an employment agreement with the Company, and all of them serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

The terms of their employment arrangements entitle Messrs. Brechin, Hillman and Rutherford to annual base salaries of $200,000, $157,000 and $185,000, respectively, payable in accordance with our normal payroll practices. Between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2015, the salary levels for Messrs. Brechin and Rutherford were $170,000 and $185,000, respectively. None of the named executive officers received any bonus, equity or other non-salary compensation for 2016 or 2015, except that Mr. Hillman received a grant of 66,000 shares of Common Stock in 2016 for service in 2015 and a grant of 66,000 shares of Common Stock in 2015 for service in 2014.

Potential Payments Upon Termination Or Change In Control

We have no liabilities under termination or change in control conditions as of December 31, 2016 other than noted below. We do not have a formal policy to determine executive severance benefits. Each executive severance arrangement is negotiated on an individual basis.

Separation Agreement – Brechin

On November 23, 2016, Brekford entered into a separation agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) with C.B. Brechin, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, as of the Effective Date Mr. Brechin commenced a sabbatical leave from his positon as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Brechin will continue to serve as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company. For a period of 18 months from the Effective Date, Mr. Brechin will continue to be paid at the rate of $200,000 per year and will continue to participate in the Company’s sponsored retirement plan and medical and dental insurance plans. The salary and benefits described above will continue beyond the 18 months until such time as Mr. Brechin is removed as a personal guarantor for certain Company obligations.

Commencing 18 months after the Effective Date, Mr. Brechin will serve as a consultant to the Company for a period of four years pursuant to the terms of a consulting agreement between the Company and Mr. Brechin (the “Consulting Agreement”). Pursuant to the Consulting Agreement, Mr. Brechin will provide consulting, organizational and strategic services, including, but not limited to, assistance or implementation of the strategic business plans of the Company and assistance with customer relations and project management and he will be paid an annual fee of $150,000.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to all persons who served as members of our Board of Directors (other than our named executive officers) during 2016 Information about the compensation paid to our named executive officers is provided below in the section entitled “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION”.

Director Compensation Table

Name	Fees earned or paid in cash ($)	Stock awards ($) (1)(2)	Option awards ($) (1)(2)	All other compensation ($)	Total ($)
Steve Ellis	3,000	-	4,141	-	7,141
Gregg Smith	1,000	-	2,907	-	3,907
Robert West	2,000	-	6,634	-	8,634
Edward Parker (resigned from the Board In February 2016)	1,000	-	821	-	1,821

Notes:

(1)

The amounts shown reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of stock and option awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 718. See Note 10 to the audited consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 regarding assumptions underlying valuation of equity awards.

(2)

As of December 31, 2016, each of Messrs. Ellis held options to purchase 150,000 shares of Common Stock, Messrs. Smith held options to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock, Messrs. West held options to purchase 225,000 shares of Common Stock and Messrs. Parker held options to purchase 75,000 share of Common Stock.

In April 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Director’s Compensation Plan, which provides for the following compensation:

Equity Grants

During the second quarter of 2016, each non-employee director who attended at least 75% of the regular and special meetings of the Board of Directors and of any committees to which he was appointed during the preceding year received an option to purchase shares of Common Stock. Each of Messrs. Ellis, West and Parker satisfied the foregoing requirement and received a stock option exercisable for 75,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.12 per share. These options will vest ratably over a three-year period commencing on their grant dates.

Cash

The Chairman of the Board is entitled to receive cash in the amount of $1,000 per calendar quarter and each other non-employee director is entitled to receive cash in the amount of $1,000 per calendar quarter as compensation for attending Board meetings held during that quarter, provided that a director must attend a minimum of 75% of the regular and special meetings of the full Board and of any committees upon which they sit. The Board held four meetings during 2016.

Out-of-Pocket Expenses

The Company reimburses a director’s out-of-pocket expenses for in-person meetings upon submission of an expense statement and receipts, up to a maximum of $500 per in-person meeting.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

~~The~~ Outstanding ~~information~~Equity ~~required~~Awards byat ~~this item is incorporated by reference from our proxy statement for our~~ 2016 ~~Annual~~Fiscal ~~Meeting of Stockholders.~~Year-End

39 The following table sets forth information for the named executive officers regarding the number of shares subject to both exercisable and unexercisable stock options and restricted stock, as well as the exercise prices and expiration dates thereof, as of December 31, 2016.

	Option Awards					Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable	Number of Securities underlying Unexercised Options (#) Un-exercisable	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have not Vested ($)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)
CB. Brechin	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Rodney Hillman	—	—	—	—	—	66,000	$13,200	—	—
President & Chief Operating Officer									—
Scott Rutherford	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Chief Technology Officer

(1)	Mr. Hillman was awarded 198,000 shares of restricted stock vesting at the date of grant in consideration of services rendered and part of employment agreement. A vesting schedule at a maximum of 66,000 shares at the end of years 1, 2, and 3 based upon attainment of goals set forth by the company.

(2)	Based on the closing trading price of our Common Stock on April 13, 2016 or $0.20 per share.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The ~~information~~Company’s Audit Committee has the responsibility to review and approve all related-party transactions, as contemplated by Item 404 of the SEC’s Regulation S-K, to prevent potential conflicts of interest and to ensure that related party transactions are disclosed in the reports that the Company files with the SEC as and when required by ~~this~~applicable ~~item~~securities laws and regulations. The term “related party transaction” is ~~incorporated~~generally bydefined ~~reference~~as ~~from~~any ~~our~~transaction ~~proxy~~(or series ~~statement~~of related transactions) in which the Company is a participant and the amount involved exceeds the lesser of (i) $120,000 or (ii) one percent of the Company’s average total assets at year-end for ~~our~~the ~~2016~~last ~~Annual~~two ~~Meeting~~completed fiscal years, and in which any director, director nominee or executive officer of ~~Stockholders~~the Company, any holder of more than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of the Company, or any immediate family member of the foregoing persons will have a direct or indirect interest. The term includes most financial transactions and arrangements, such as loans, guarantees and sales of property, and remuneration for services rendered (as an employee, consultant or otherwise) to the Company and its subsidiaries.

The following paragraphs discuss related party transactions that occurred during 2015 and 2016 (other than compensation paid or awarded to the Company’s directors, director nominees and executive officers that is required to be discussed, or is exempt from discussion, in the sections of this proxy statement entitled “DIRECTOR COMPENSATION” and “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION”).

On October 1, 2009, C.B. Brechin and Scott Rutherford, as well as one other individual, entered into a stock purchase agreement on behalf of the Company (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”), with the court-appointed receiver, Robert D. Gordon (the “Receiver”), for our former stockholder Legisi Marketing, Inc., to repurchase 18,910,000 shares of our common stock, par value $.0001 per share (“Common Stock”), and cancel warrants to purchase 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock that were exercisable at $.39 per share (the “Warrants”), which shares of Common Stock and Warrants had been in the custody of the Receiver. The aggregate purchase price for the securities under the Stock Purchase Agreement was $700,000. The effectiveness of the Stock Purchase Agreement was subject to court approval which was received on November 4, 2009. The repurchased shares of Common Stock and Warrants were returned to our treasury and cancelled.

Brekford financed the repurchase of these shares and Warrants from the proceeds of convertible promissory notes that were issued by Brekford on November 9, 2009 in favor of a lender group in the principal amounts of $250,000 each (each, a “Promissory Note” and together, the “Promissory Notes”). Each Promissory Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum and at the time of issuance was to be convertible into shares of Common Stock, at the option of the holder, at an original conversion price of $.07 per share. At the time of issuance, Brekford agreed to pay the unpaid principal balance of the Promissory Notes and all accrued but unpaid interest on the date that was the earlier of (i) two years from the issuance date or (ii) 10 business days after the date on which Brekford closes an equity financing that generates gross proceeds in the aggregate amount of not less than $5,000,000. The Promissory Notes have since been extended and are currently due on the earlier of (x) November 9, 2016 or (y) 10 business days after the date on which Brekford closes an equity financing that generates gross proceeds in the aggregate amount of not less than $5,000,000. In addition to the extensions, the Promissory Notes were amended in April 2010 to increase the conversion price to $.14 per share.

On March 1, 2017 the promissory note to Mr. CB. Brechin and Mr. Scott Rutherford was fully settled through payment of principal amount of $250,000 each.

While we do not maintain a written policy with respect to related party transactions, our Audit Committee routinely reviews potential transactions with those parties we have identified as related parties.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The ~~information~~Board’s ~~required~~Audit byCommittee ~~this~~has ~~item~~appointed isBD ~~incorporated~~& byCompany, Inc. ~~reference~~to ~~from~~serve ~~our~~as ~~proxy~~the ~~statement~~Company’s ~~for~~independent ~~our~~registered public accounting firm for 2016. ~~Annual~~Representatives ~~Meeting~~of BD & Company, Inc. are expected to be present at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, ~~Stockholders~~in person or by telephone, to make a statement if so desired, and to respond to any appropriate questions.

The following table presents fees for professional services rendered to the Company by BD & Company, Inc. during fiscal year 2016 and Stegman & Company during fiscal year 2015.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016	2015
Audit fees	$67,000	$74,670
Audit-related fees	-	-
Tax fees	4,500	9,500
All other fees	-	-
Total fees	$71,500	$84,170

Audit Fees for 2016 and 2015 include fees associated with the audits of the annual financial statements, the quarterly reviews of the unaudited interim financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and services related to other reports filed with the SEC. Audit-Related Fees for 2015 also include fees associated with the restatement of our form 10-Q for the three quarterly periods in the year ended December 31, 2015. Tax Fees for 2016and 2015 include fees associated with the preparation and reviews of tax returns, advising on the impact of local tax laws, and tax planning.

It is the Audit Committee’s policy to pre-approve all services to be performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, subject to the de minimis exceptions for non-audit services described in Section 10A(i)(l)(B) of the Exchange Act, which, when needed, are approved by the Audit Committee prior to the completion of the independent registered public accounting firm’s audit. Pre-approval may be granted by action of the full Audit Committee or, in the absence of such Audit Committee action, by the Chairman of the Audit Committee whose action shall be considered to be that of the entire Audit Committee. All of the 2016 and 2015 services described above were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1), (2) and (c) Financial Statements.

~~Report~~Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting ~~Firm~~Firms Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive loss for the Years Ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Years Ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(a)(3) and (b) Exhibits.

The exhibits filed or furnished with this annual report are listed on the Exhibit Index that follows the signatures to this Annual Report, which list is incorporated herein by reference.

4053

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	Brekford Corp.
Date: March 24, 2016	By:	/s/ C.B. Brechin
Date: March 28, 2017	By:	/s/ Rodney Hillman
		Chandra (C.B.) Brechin Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer , Treasurer and Director(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
		Rodney Hillman President and Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ C.B. Brechin	Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial	March 24, 2016
/s/ Rodney Hillman	President and Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial	March 28, 2017
C.B. Brechin	Officer, Treasurer and Director (Principal
Rodney Hillman	Officer (Principal
	Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ Rodney Hillman	President and Chief Operating Officer	March 24, 2016
/s/ CB, Brechin	Director	March 28, 2017
Rodney Hillman
CB Brechin
/s/ Scott Rutherford	Director	March 2428, ~~2016~~2017
Scott Rutherford
/s/ Stephen Ellis	Director	March 2428, ~~2016~~2017
Stephen Ellis
/s/ Gregg Smith	Director	March 24, 2016
/s/ Robert S. West	Director	March 28, 2017
Gregg Smith
/s/ Robert S. West	Director	March 24, 2016
Robert S. West

4154

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number		Description
2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger among Pelican Mobile Computers, Inc., American Financial Holdings Inc. and the Pelican Stockholders (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
2.2		Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between the Company and Pelican Mobile Computers, Inc., dated October 27, 2010 (previously filed as Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s form 10-Q filed on November 2, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.1.1		Certificate of Incorporation of California Cyber Design, Inc. as filed with the State of Delaware on May 27, 1998 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.1.2		Certificate of Correction of Certificate of Incorporation of California Cyber Design, Inc. as filed with the State of Delaware on July 17, 1998 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.1.3		Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of California Cyber Design, Inc. as filed with the State of Delaware on August 11, 2004 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.1.4		Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of American Financial Holdings Inc. (formerly known as California Cyber Design, Inc.) as filed with the State of Delaware on January 6, 2006 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.1.5		Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of American Financial Holdings Inc. as filed with the State of Delaware on January 6, 2006 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.1.6		First Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Brekford International Corp. as filed with the State of Delaware on January 4, 2006 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.1.7		Certificate of Amendment to the First Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Tactical Solution Partners, Inc. as filed with State of Delaware on April 29, 2008. (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.1.8		Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Brekford International Corp. as filed with the State of Delaware on February 4, 2010 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1.8 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.1.9		Certificate of Amendment to the Second Amended and Restricted Certificate of Incorporation of the Company as filed with the State of Delaware on July 9, 2010 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 4, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.1.10		Certificate of Ownership and Merger of Pelican Mobile Computers, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 2, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference)
3.2		Bylaws of Brekford Corp. (previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
4.1		Stock Purchase Agreement by and between Brekford International Corp. and Paul Harary and Paris McKenzie TBE (Subscriber) dated January 31, 2007 (previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on September 21, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
4.2		Warrant to Purchase Brekford International Corp. Common Stock in favor of Paul Harary and Paris McKenzie TBE (Warrant Holder) dated January 31, 2007 (previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
4.3		Form of Subscription Agreement to Purchase Units of Brekford International Corp. (previously filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
4.4		Form of Warrant to Purchase Brekford International Corp. Common Stock by and among Brekford International Corp. and the Unit purchasers signatory thereto (previously filed as Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)

4.2		Warrant to Purchase Brekford International Corp. Common Stock in favor of Paul Harary and Paris McKenzie TBE (Warrant Holder) dated January 31, 2007 (previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
4.3		Form of Subscription Agreement to Purchase Units of Brekford International Corp. (previously filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
4.4		Form of Warrant to Purchase Brekford International Corp. Common Stock by and among Brekford International Corp. and the Unit purchasers signatory thereto (previously filed as Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)

4.5		Form of Registration Rights Agreement, by and among Brekford International Corp. and the Unit purchasers signatory thereto (previously filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
4.6		Form of Warrant issued to Sierra Equity Group, Ltd. Inc. with respect to the Company’s March 2007 private offering closed March 30, 2007 and its assigns (previously filed as Exhibit 4.7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
4.7		Form of Warrant issued to Sierra Equity Group, Ltd. Inc. under the Investment Banking Advisory Agreement dated December 18, 2006 and its assigns (previously filed as Exhibit 4.8 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
4.8		Warrant issued to Trilogy Capital Partners, Inc., dated May 23, 2007 (previously filed as Exhibit 4.9 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 23, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference)
4.9		Form of Warrant issued to Birch Systems, LLC pursuant to the General Release and Settlement Agreement between the Company and Birch Systems, LLC (previously filed as Exhibit 4.10 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 23, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.1		Lease Agreement by and between Brekford International Corp. and Greenbrier Point Partners, L.P. dated February 13, 2006 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.2		Contract by and between Pelican Mobile Computers, Inc. and the State of Maryland dated July 15, 2001 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.3		Lease Agreement by and between Brekford International Corp. and FRP Hillside LLC #3 dated May 16, 2007 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.4		Letter from Panasonic Personal Computer Company confirming Pelican Mobile Computers, Inc. as the only Maryland based Company authorized to sell the fully ruggedized line of Panasonic Notebooks to Maryland State and Local government agencies dated February 8, 2006 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the Company’s Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on September 21, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.5		Sublease Agreement by and between Brekford International Corp. and TSO Armor and Training, Inc. dated December 8, 2008 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 23, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.6		Stock Purchase Agreement, effective November 4, 2009, by and between the receiver of stockholder Legisi Marketing, Inc. and certain directors of Brekford International Corp., on behalf of the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 10, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.7		Form of Promissory Note, dated November 9, 2009, in favor of certain directors of Brekford International Corp. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 10, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.8		Form of First Amendment to Unsecured Promissory Note, dated April 30, 2010, between the Company and each member of the Company’s lender group (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 6, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.9		Form of Promissory Note Extension Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2014, between the Company and C.B. Brechin and Scott Rutherford (filed herewith)
10.10		Landlord –Tenant Lease, by and between Peppermill, Properties, LLC and Brekford Corp., dated June 1, 2010 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 4, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.11		Loan and Security Agreement dated November 4, 2010 by and between Brekford Corp. and Bank of America N.A. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.12		Form of Non-Qualified Option Agreement to Purchase Shares of Common Stock of Brekford International Corp. (previously filed as Exhibit 4.9 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (SEC File No. 000-52719) filed on July 6, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.13		2008 Stock Incentive Plan (previously filed as Appendix C to the Company’s definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 10, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.14		Loan Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2012, between the Company and PNC Bank, National Association (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference)

4356

10.15		Committed Line of Credit Note, dated as of June 28, 2012, issued by the Company to the order of PNC Bank, National Association (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.16		Subordination Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2012, by and among PNC Bank, National Association, the Company and C.B. Brechin (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.17		Subordination Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2012, by and among PNC Bank, National Association, the Company and Scott Rutherford (previously filed as Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.18		Second Amendment to Loan Documents, dated as of September 27, 2013, between the Company and PNC Bank, National Association (filed herewith)
10.19		Borrowing Base Rider, effective as of September 28, 2013, between the Company and PNC Bank, National Association (filed herewith)
10.20		Waiver and Fourth Amendment to Loan Documents, dated as of March 24, 2014, by and between Brekford Corp. and PNC Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 2014)
10.21		Financing Agreement, dated as of May 27, 2014, between Brekford Corp. and Rosenthal & Rosenthal Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 28, 2014)
10.22		Term Note, dated as of May 27, 2014, issued by Brekford Corp. to the order of Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 28, 2014)
10.23		Form of Agreement of Subordination and Assignment, dated May 27, 2014, between C.B. Brechin and Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. and Scott Rutherford and Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 28, 2014)
10.22		Term Note, dated as of May 27, 2014, issued by Brekford Corp. to the order of Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 28, 2014
10.23		Form of Agreement of Subordination and Assignment, dated May 27, 2014, between C.B. Brechin and Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. and Scott Rutherford and Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 28, 2014)
10.24		Note and Warrant purchase agreement, dated as of March 17, 2015, between Brekford Corp. and Gemini Master Fund , Ltd. (filed herewith)
10.25		Contribution and Unit Purchase Agreement (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.26		Agreement and Plan of Merger dated February 10, 2017, among Novume Solutions, Inc., KeyStone Solutions, Inc., Brekford Corp., KeyStone Merger Sub, Inc., and Brekford Merger Sub, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.27		Subordinated Promissory Note issued to Brekford Corp. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 6, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.28		Pledge Agreement by LB&B Associates Inc. in favor of Brekford Corp. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 6, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.29		Transition Services Agreement between Brekford Corp. and Global Public Safety, LLC (previously filed as Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 6, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.30		Sublease Agreement between Global Public Safety, LLC and Brekford Corp. (previously filed as Exhibit 10. 5 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 6, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.31		Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement (previously filed as Exhibit 10. 6 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 6, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference)
21		Subsidiaries of the Company (filed herewith)
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
101		Financial statements from the annual report on Form 10-K of Brekford Corp. for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016, filed on March __, 2016, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity (Deficit) (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text. (filed herewith)

44 57

Filing Compare · Brekford Traffic Safety, Inc.