UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10‑K

(Mark one)

/X/ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2024~~2025 OR

// TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 333-180779-05

Central Index Key Number of the issuing entity: 0001587497

Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C12

(exact name of issuing entity as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of the depositor: 0001547361

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

(exact name of the depositor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001541557

Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC

(exact names of the sponsors as specified in their charters)

Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001102113

Bank of America, National Association

(exact names of the sponsors as specified in their charters)

Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001548567

CIBC Inc.

(exact names of the sponsors as specified in their charters)

New York	38‑3918474 38‑3918793 38‑3918794 38‑7109047
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Numbers)

c/o Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as agent for

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD

(Address of principal executive offices)

21045

(Zip Code)

Telephone number, including area code:

(667) 786‑1992

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

NONE.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ___ No X

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes ___ No X

Note - Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X No ___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ___

Accelerated filer ___

Non-accelerated filer X (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company ___

Emerging growth company ___

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

Not applicable.

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the

registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes ___ No X

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Not applicable.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Not applicable.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1)Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3)Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

Not applicable.

EXPLANATORY NOTES

The MSBAM 2013-C12 mortgage pool includes the following mortgage loans, each of which is serviced pursuant to a separate pooling and servicing agreement (each, an “Outside Pooling and Servicing Agreement”):

• the Westfield Countryside mortgage loan, which is serviced pursuant to the MSBAM 2013-C11 pooling and servicing agreement attached hereto as Exhibit 4.2.

Except as set forth below, each of the parties to each pooling and servicing agreement listed in the Exhibit Index both (1) participates in the servicing function for purposes of Item 1122 of Regulation AB and (2) constitutes a servicer that meets the criteria in Item 1108(a)(2)(i) through (iii) of Regulation AB for purposes of Item 1123 of Regulation AB:

• The trustee under a pooling and servicing agreement has a nominal role with respect to the mortgage pool securitized pursuant to such pooling and servicing agreement. The trustee’s only servicing function is the contingent obligation to make certain advances if the master servicer under such pooling and servicing agreement fails to do so, while all other servicing functions are performed by other parties. The trustee under each of the pooling and servicing agreements listed in the Exhibit Index has confirmed to the registrant that it has not made any such contingent advances during the reporting period, and consequently, each such trustee does not participate in the servicing function for purposes of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, nor does it perform the functions of a servicer for purposes of the definition of “servicer” under Item 1101 of Regulation AB or for purposes of Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

• The certificate administrator under a pooling and servicing agreement performs various payment administration functions solely for the securitization governed by such pooling and servicing agreement and the mortgage pool securitized pursuant to such pooling and servicing agreement and does not have any obligations with respect to any other transaction. Consequently, the certificate administrator under an Outside Pooling and Servicing Agreement does not participate in the servicing function for purposes of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, nor does it perform the functions of a servicer for purposes of the definition of “servicer” under Item 1101 of Regulation AB or for purposes of Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

• The operating advisor under a pooling and servicing agreement represents the interests of senior certificateholders in the transaction governed by such pooling and servicing agreement and is responsible for monitoring the performance of the special servicer under such pooling and servicing agreement and producing certain reports to certificateholders relating to the resolution of the mortgage pool securitized pursuant to such pooling and servicing agreement. The operating advisor under a pooling and servicing agreement does not have any obligations with respect to any other transaction and is solely obligated to perform loan reporting functions with respect to the securitization governed by such pooling and servicing agreement. Consequently, the operating advisor under an Outside Pooling and Servicing Agreement neither participates in the servicing function for purposes of Item 1122 of Regulation AB nor performs the functions of a servicer for purposes of the definition of “servicer” under Item 1101 of Regulation AB or for purposes of Item 1123 of Regulation AB. In addition, while the operating advisor under a pooling and servicing agreement has certain reporting obligations in respect of the related mortgage pool, it has no obligation to collect or disburse funds in respect of the mortgage pool or to administer any of the underlying mortgage loans. Consequently, the operating advisor under a pooling and servicing agreement participates in the servicing function for purposes of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, but is not responsible for the “management or collection of the pool assets or making allocations or distributions to holders of the asset-backed securities” within the meaning of “servicer” under Item 1101 of Regulation AB and does not perform the functions of a servicer for purposes of Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

• ~~CWCapital~~Rialto ~~Asset~~Capital ~~Management~~Advisors, LLC is the current special servicer under the MSBAM 2013-C12 pooling and servicing agreement. On June 24, 2021, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association was replaced as special servicer under the MSBAM 2013-C12 pooling and servicing agreement and was succeeded by CWCapital Asset Management LLC. On April 29, 2025, CWCapital Asset Management LLC was replaced as special servicer under the MSBAM 2013-C12 pooling and servicing agreement and was succeeded by Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC.

• The Burnham Center mortgage loan, which was serviced pursuant to the MSBAM 2013-C10 pooling and servicing agreement, was paid in full on October 1, 2022.

• BellOak, LLC is the current operating advisor under the MSBAM 2013-C12 pooling and servicing agreement. On March 31, 2023, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC resigned as operating advisor under the MSBAM 2013-C12 pooling and servicing agreement and was succeeded by BellOak, LLC.

• Effective as of March 1, 2025, Trimont LLC purchased the third party servicing segment of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association’s commercial mortgage servicing business and replaced Wells Fargo Bank, National Association in its capacities as master servicer, primary servicer and special servicer, as applicable, under the MSBAM 2013-C12 pooling and servicing agreement and each Outside Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

In addition, each of the following parties engaged the services of certain servicing function participants and sub-servicers for the reporting period, as set forth below:

• Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, engaged the services of CoreLogic Solutions, LLC as a servicing function participant in respect of the entire mortgage pool for the reporting period.

• Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer under the MSBAM 2013-C11 pooling and servicing agreement, pursuant to which the Westfield Countryside mortgage loan is serviced, engaged the services of CoreLogic Solutions, LLC as a servicing function participant in respect of the Westfield Countryside mortgage loan for the reporting period.

• On November 1, 2021, pursuant to the second amended and restated servicing agreement attached hereto as Exhibit 99.4, Computershare Trust Company, National Association was engaged to perform all or virtually all of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association’s roles as certificate administrator, custodian and trustee, as applicable, under (i) the pooling and servicing agreement and (ii) each Outside Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

• Effective as of March 1, 2025, Trimont LLC, as the successor to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association in each of its servicing capacities described above, engaged CoreLogic Solutions, LLC to act as a servicing function participant with respect to the same servicing and reporting functions for which Wells Fargo Bank, National Association engaged CoreLogic Solutions, LLC as described above.

PART I

Item 1.	Business.
	Omitted.
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.
	Omitted.
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments.
	None.
Item 1C.	Cybersecurity.
	Omitted.
Item 2.	Properties.
	Omitted.
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings.
	Omitted.
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.
	Omitted.

PART II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
	Omitted.
Item 6.	[Reserved]
Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
	Omitted.
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
	Omitted.
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
	Omitted.
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
	Omitted.
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures.
	Omitted.
Item 9B.	Other Information.
	None.
Item 9C.	Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.
	None.

PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
	Omitted.
Item 11.	Executive Compensation.
	Omitted.
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
	Omitted.
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
	Omitted.
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
	Omitted.

ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS FOR REGULATION AB

Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant Obligor Financial Information.

Not applicable.

Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Significant Enhancement Provider Financial Information.

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any enhancement or other support for the certificates as described under Item 1114(a) of Regulation AB.

Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain Derivatives Instruments (Financial Information).

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any derivative instruments for the certificates as described under Item 1115 of Regulation AB.

Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.

The registrant knows of no legal proceeding pending against the sponsors, depositor, trustee, issuing entity, servicer contemplated by Item 1108(a)(3) of Regulation AB, originator contemplated by Item 1110(b) of Regulation AB, or other party contemplated by Item 1100(d)(1) of Regulation AB, or of which any property of the foregoing is the subject, that is material to security holders, other than as follows:

In December 2014, Phoenix Light SF Limited (Phoenix Light) and certain related entities filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging claims against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in its capacity as trustee for a number of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) trusts. Complaints raising similar allegations have been filed by Commerzbank AG in the Southern District of New York, IKB International and IKB Deutsche Industriebank (together, IKB) in New York state court, and Park Royal I LLC and Park Royal II LLC in New York state court. In each case, the plaintiffs allege that Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee, caused losses to investors, and plaintiffs assert causes of action based upon, among other things, the trustee’s alleged failure to notify and enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representations and warranties, notify investors of alleged events of default, and abide by appropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. In July 2022, the district court dismissed Phoenix Light’s claims and certain of the claims asserted by Commerzbank AG, and subsequently entered judgment in each case in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. In August 2022, Phoenix Light and Commerzbank AG each appealed the district court’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Phoenix Light dismissed its appeal in May 2023, terminating its case. In October 2024, the Second Circuit denied Commerzbank AG’s appeal. In November 2023, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. entered into an agreement with IKB to resolve IKB’s claims. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. previously settled two class actions filed by institutional investors and an action filed by the National Credit Union Administration with similar allegations.

U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) and other large financial institutions have been sued in their capacity as trustee or successor trustee for certain residential mortgage backed securities ("RMBS") trusts. The complaints, primarily filed by investors or investor groups against U.S. Bank and similar institutions, allege the trustees caused losses to investors as a result of alleged failures by the sponsors, mortgage loan sellers and servicers to comply with the governing agreements for these RMBS trusts. Plaintiffs generally assert causes of action based upon the trustees’ purported failures to enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for alleged breaches of representations and warranties, notify securityholders of purported events of default allegedly caused by breaches of servicing standards by mortgage loan servicers and abide by a heightened standard of care following alleged events of default.

U.S. Bank denies liability and believes that it has performed its obligations under the RMBS trusts in good faith, that its actions were not the cause of losses to investors, that it has meritorious defenses, and it has contested and intends to continue contesting the plaintiffs’ claims vigorously. However, U.S. Bank cannot assure you as to the outcome of any of the litigation, or the possible impact of these litigations on the trustee or the RMBS trusts.

On March 9, 2018, a law firm purporting to represent fifteen Delaware statutory trusts (the “DSTs”) that issued securities backed by student loans (the “Student Loans”) filed a lawsuit in the Delaware Court of Chancery against U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) in its capacities as indenture trustee and successor special servicer, and three other institutions in their respective transaction capacities, with respect to the DSTs and the Student Loans. This lawsuit is captioned The National Collegiate Student Loan Master Trust I, et al. v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al., C.A. No. 2018-0167-JRS (Del. Ch.) (the “NCMSLT Action”). The complaint, as amended on June 15, 2018, alleged that the DSTs have been harmed as a result of purported misconduct or omissions by the defendants concerning administration of the trusts and special servicing of the Student Loans. Since the filing of the NCMSLT Action, certain Student Loan borrowers have made assertions against U.S. Bank concerning special servicing that appear to be based on certain allegations made on behalf of the DSTs in the NCMSLT Action.

U.S. Bank has filed a motion seeking dismissal of the operative complaint in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Chancery Court Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, a stay of the case while other prior filed disputes involving the DSTs and the Student Loans are litigated. On November 7, 2018, the Court ruled that the case should be stayed in its entirety pending resolution of the first-filed cases. On January 21, 2020, the Court entered an order consolidating for pretrial purposes the NCMSLT Action and three other lawsuits pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery concerning the DSTs and the Student Loans, which remains pending.

U.S. Bank denies liability in the NCMSLT Action and believes it has performed its obligations as indenture trustee and special servicer in good faith and in compliance in all material respects with the terms of the agreements governing the DSTs and that it has meritorious defenses. It has contested and intends to continue contesting the plaintiffs’ claims vigorously.

From time to time, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“CWCAM”), is a party to lawsuits and other legal proceedings as part of its duties as a special servicer (e.g., enforcement of loan obligations) and/or arising in the ordinary course of business. Other than as set forth in the following paragraphs, there are currently no legal proceedings pending, and no legal proceedings known to be contemplated by governmental authorities, against CWCAM or of which any of its property is the subject, that are material to the certificateholders.

On December 171, ~~2015~~2017, ~~U.S.~~a complaint ~~Bank~~against ~~National~~CWCAM ~~Association,~~and others was filed in the ~~trustee~~United ~~under~~States ~~five~~District ~~pooling~~Court ~~and~~for ~~servicing~~the ~~agreements~~Southern ~~for~~District ~~(i)~~of ~~Wachovia~~New ~~Bank~~York ~~Commercial~~styled ~~Mortgage~~as CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. ~~Trust~~v. ~~2007-C30,~~CWCapital ~~(ii)~~Investments ~~COBALT~~LLC, ~~CMBS~~et ~~Commercial~~al., ~~Trust~~No. ~~2007~~17-~~C2,~~cv-9463 (~~iii)~~the ~~Wachovia~~“Original ~~Bank~~Complaint”). ~~Commercial~~The ~~Mortgage~~gravamen ~~Trust~~of ~~2007-C31,~~the ~~(iv)~~Original ~~ML-CFC~~Complaint ~~Commercial~~alleged ~~Mortgage~~breaches ~~Trust 2007-5~~of a contract and fiduciary ~~(v)~~duties ~~ML-CFC~~by ~~Commercial~~CWCAM’s ~~Mortgage~~affiliate, ~~Trust~~CWCapital ~~2007-6~~Investments ~~commenced~~LLC ain ~~proceeding~~its ~~with~~capacity as collateral manager for the ~~Second~~collateralized ~~Judicial~~debt ~~District~~obligation transaction ~~Court~~involving ofCWCapital ~~Ramsey~~Cobalt ~~County~~Vr, ~~Minnesota~~Ltd. (In total, there are 14 counts pled in the ~~“State~~Original Complaint. Of those 14, 5 claims were asserted against ~~Court”)~~CWCAM for aaiding ~~declaratory~~and ~~judgment~~abetting asbreach toof ~~the~~fiduciary ~~proper~~duty, ~~allocation~~conversion ofand ~~certain~~unjust ~~proceeds~~enrichment. ~~(“Disputed~~On ~~Proceeds”)~~May ~~received~~23, by2018, ~~CWCAM~~the inOriginal ~~connection~~Complaint ~~with~~was ~~the~~dismissed ~~sale~~for lack of ~~the~~subject ~~Peter~~matter ~~Cooper~~jurisdiction. ~~Village~~On ~~and~~June ~~Stuyvesant~~28, ~~Town~~2018, ~~property~~CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. filed a substantially similar complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York ~~securing~~ ~~loans~~styled ~~held~~as byCWCapital ~~those~~Cobalt ~~trusts~~Vr Ltd. ~~CWCAM~~v. ~~was~~CWCapital Investments LLC, et al., Index No. 653277/2018 (the ~~special~~“New ~~servicer~~Complaint”). The gravamen of ~~such~~the ~~property.~~New ~~The~~Complaint ~~petition~~is ~~requests~~the same as the ~~State~~previous ~~Court~~complaint tofiled ~~instruct~~in the ~~trustee,~~United State District Court for the Southern District of New York. In total there are 16 ~~trust~~counts ~~beneficiaries~~pled in the New Complaint. Of those 16 counts, ~~and~~5 ~~any~~claims ~~other~~were ~~interested~~asserted against ~~parties~~CWCAM asfor toaiding ~~the~~and ~~amount~~abetting breach of ~~the Disputed~~fiduciary ~~Proceeds~~duty, ifconversion ~~any~~and unjust enrichment, ~~that~~1 ~~constitute~~count ~~penalty~~seeks ~~interest~~a ~~and/or~~declaratory judgement that the ~~amount~~plaintiff has ofthe right to enforce the ~~Disputed~~contracts ~~Proceeds,~~in ifquestion ~~any,~~and ~~that~~1 ~~constitute~~count ~~gain-on-sale~~seeks ~~proceeds,~~an ~~with~~injunction ~~respect~~requiring the defendants to ~~each~~recognize ~~trust~~the plaintiff as the directing holder for the trusts in question. On ~~February~~January 2411, ~~2016~~2019, ~~CWCAM~~the ~~made~~plaintiff adismissed ~~limited appearance~~ with prejudice the ~~State~~declaratory ~~Court~~judgment toand ~~file~~injunction acounts. ~~motion~~The toNew ~~dismiss~~Complaint ~~this~~and related ~~proceeding~~summons ~~based~~was not served on ~~lack of~~the ~~jurisdiction,~~defendants ~~mootness~~until July 13, ~~standing~~2018 and ~~forum~~July 16, ~~non conveniens~~2018. OnThe ~~July~~plaintiff’s ~~19,~~motion ~~2016, the~~for ~~State~~a ~~Court~~preliminary injunction was denied ~~CWCAM’s~~by ~~motion~~the court toon ~~dismiss~~July 31, 2018. On ~~July~~August 223, ~~2016~~2018, the ~~action~~defendants, including CWCAM, ~~was~~filed ~~removed~~a motion to ~~federal~~dismiss ~~court~~the inNew ~~Minnesota~~Complaint ~~(“Federal~~in ~~Court”)~~its entirety. On ~~October~~August 2120, ~~2016~~2019, the ~~Federal~~court ~~Court~~entered ~~held~~an aorder ~~hearing~~granting ondefendants’ ~~the~~ motion toalmost ~~transfer~~in its entirety, dismissing 11 of the ~~action~~16 tocounts and partially dismissing 2 additional counts. Of the ~~United~~remaining ~~States~~counts, ~~District~~2 ~~Court~~are asserted against CWCAM for ~~the~~aiding ~~Southern~~and abetting ~~District~~breach of ~~New~~fiduciary ~~York~~duty ~~(“SDNY Court”)~~and unjust enrichment. On September 19, 2019, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. filed a ~~motion~~notice toof ~~remand~~appeal relating to ~~state~~the ~~court~~August 20, 2019 dismissal order and aon ~~motion~~September to26, ~~hear~~2019, ~~CWCAM’s~~filed ~~request~~an amended complaint ~~for~~against ~~reconsideration~~CWCI ofand ~~the~~CWCAM ~~motion~~attempting to ~~dismiss.~~address Ondeficiencies ~~March~~relating ~~14,~~to ~~2017,~~certain of the ~~Federal Court~~claims ~~reserved~~dismissed by the ~~determination~~August, on20, ~~the~~2019 ~~motion~~order. toCWCI ~~hear~~and CWCAM’s ~~request~~filed ~~for~~its ~~reconsideration~~Motion ofto Dismiss the ~~motion~~amended tocomplaint ~~dismiss~~on October 28, ~~denied~~2019. The court heard argument on the ~~motion~~Motion to ~~remand~~Dismiss the ~~matter~~ toamended ~~state~~complaint ~~court~~on January 22, 2020 and on October 23, 2020, the court granted the motion todismissing ~~transfer~~ the ~~proceeding~~amended claims. On November 30, 2020, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd filed a notice of appeal relating to the ~~SDNY~~ ~~Court~~October 23, 2020 dismissal order. ~~Cross~~On ~~motions~~April ~~for~~27, ~~judgment~~2021, onthe First Department affirmed the ~~pleadings~~dismissal as to claims against CWCAM that were ~~filed~~part of the August 20, 2019 dismissal, but reversed the ~~SDNY~~dismissal of two counts for ~~Court~~breach ~~was~~of ~~unable~~the Collateral Management Agreement against CWCI. CWCI sought leave to ~~decide~~file an appeal of the ~~case~~decision. ~~based~~The onplaintiff also sought leave to appeal the ~~pleadings~~dismissal ~~and~~of the ~~SDNY~~claims ~~Court ordered~~against ~~discovery~~CWCAM. ~~All~~Both ~~fact~~requests ~~discovery~~for ~~was~~leave ~~completed~~were indenied by ~~December~~the First Department. On May 15, ~~2018~~2020, CWCI and CWCAM filed a motion to ~~expert~~renew ~~discovery~~its ~~was~~motion ~~completed~~to ondismiss ~~March~~as ~~15,~~to ~~2019.~~4 ~~The~~of ~~parties~~the ~~submitted~~remaining ~~cross~~counts (including the ~~motions~~remaining ~~for~~two ~~summary~~counts ~~judgment,~~against CWCAM for aiding and onabetting ~~March~~breach ~~19,~~of ~~2020~~fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment), ~~the~~based ~~SDNY~~on ~~Court~~a decision entered anby Judge Failla in a ~~opinion~~trust ~~and~~instruction ~~order~~proceeding in ~~which~~the itUS ~~granted~~District Court for the Southern District of New York awarding summary judgment in ~~CWCAM’s~~ favor ~~and held~~of ~~that~~ CWCAM. ~~was~~On ~~entitled~~September to7, 2021, the ~~entire~~court ~~amount~~denied ofthe ~~penalty~~motion ~~interest~~to renew. CWCI and ~~that~~ CWCAM’s ~~determination~~filed ofa ~~Yield~~notice ~~Maintenance~~of ~~was~~appeal, which ~~correct.~~they Inperfected ~~the~~by ~~127-page opinion,~~ the ~~SDNY~~filing ~~Court~~of ~~found~~their ~~for~~opening ~~CWCAM~~brief on ~~every~~July ~~issue~~1, ~~presented~~2022. ~~by the~~On ~~trustee’s~~November ~~petition~~15, ~~namely~~2022, ~~that~~ the ~~funds~~First inDepartment ~~dispute~~affirmed ~~constitute~~the ~~penalty~~court’s denial of the ~~interest~~motion ~~and~~to ~~yield~~renew. ~~maintenance,~~On ~~not~~October ~~gain-on-sale~~1, ~~proceeds~~2021, CWCI and ~~that~~CWCAM moved to reargue the ~~amount~~denial of ~~penalty~~the ~~interest~~motion ~~and~~to ~~yield~~renew ~~maintenance~~(or ~~was~~alternatively, ~~correctly~~the ~~calculated.~~motion Anto ~~appeal~~dismiss) with respect ofto ~~the~~certain ~~SDNY~~of ~~Court~~Cobalt’s ~~decision~~claims, ~~was~~including ~~taken~~the onremaining ~~April~~2 ~~29,~~claims ~~2020.~~against ~~Oral~~CWCAM, based ~~argument~~ on the ~~appeal~~ ~~occurred~~First onDepartment’s ~~June~~April 2127, 2021 decision. On ~~July~~March 1424, 2022, the court ~~Second~~denied ~~Circuit~~the ~~entered a~~relief ~~decision~~sought ~~affirming~~ in ~~part~~the ~~and~~motion ~~reversing~~to inreargue. ~~part~~CWCI ~~the~~and ~~SDNY~~CWCAM ~~Court~~appealed the court’s decision ~~and~~ ~~remanding~~on the motion to ~~the~~reargue ~~SDNY~~and ~~Court~~filed ~~for~~their ~~further~~opening ~~proceedings~~brief on July 11, 2022. The ~~Second~~appeal ~~Circuit~~was dismissed as being non-appealable on August 30, ~~affirmed~~2022. ~~the~~Discovery ~~SDNY’s~~(both ~~Court~~fact ~~holding~~and ~~that~~expert) ~~Penalty~~concluded ~~Interest~~on March 1, 2024. CWCAM and CWCI ~~Yield~~filed ~~Maintenance~~a motion for summary judgment on March 29, 2024, seeking dismissal ~~are~~of ~~paid~~all ~~before~~the ~~Gain-On-Sale~~claims ~~Proceeds~~in their entirety. ~~The~~On ~~Second~~that ~~Circuit~~same ~~reversed~~date, ~~and~~the ~~remanded~~plaintiff cross moved for ~~further~~summary ~~proceedings~~judgment ~~that~~on ~~portion~~one of the ~~SDNY~~claims ~~Court’s~~asserted ~~decision~~against ~~related~~only toCWCI. ~~approximately~~Oral ~~$67.2~~argument ~~million~~on inthe ~~interest~~parties’ summary judgment motions were heard on ~~advances~~October 22, 2024. . On January 13, ~~2023~~2026, the court denied plaintiff’s motion for ~~parties~~summary ~~entered~~judgment ~~into~~and agranted, ~~settlement~~in ~~agreement~~part, and denied, in ~~which~~part, ~~(among~~the ~~other~~motion ~~things)~~filed ~~they~~by ~~agreed~~CWCI toand ~~stipulate~~CWCAM. ~~that~~Specifically, the ~~amount~~court ofdismissed ~~interest~~the onremaining ~~advances~~two ~~that~~counts against ~~accrued~~CWCAM onfor ~~or before~~aiding ~~June~~and 3,abetting ~~2014~~breach isof ~~$27~~fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment.5 ~~million~~With respect to CWCI, the court dismissed two counts against CWCI in their entirety and ~~that~~dismissed ~~CWCAM~~portions ~~would~~of ~~pay~~one ~~that~~count ~~amount~~against ~~into~~CWCI. The only ~~escrow~~three ~~for~~counts ~~distribution~~that tosurvived ~~certificateholders~~and ~~upon~~remain in the ~~entry~~case ofare anagainst ~~order~~CWCI. byThe ~~the~~court ~~Court~~severed ~~approving~~the dismissed claims from the ~~settlement.~~surviving Uclaims.S. ~~Bank~~On ~~National~~January ~~Association~~22, as2026, CWCI ~~Trustee~~and ~~for~~ CWCAM submitted an order to the ~~trusts~~court, ~~provided~~requesting ~~notice~~that ofit direct the clerk’s ~~settlement~~office to ~~all~~enter ~~parties~~judgment inon ~~interest~~the ~~via~~dismissed aclaims and that CWCAM be ~~notice~~dismissed ~~program~~as ~~approved~~a bydefendant from the ~~Court~~action. ACWCAM ~~hearing~~believes onthat it has performed its obligations under the ~~settlement~~related ispooling ~~scheduled for~~and ~~March~~servicing ~~16,~~agreements ~~2023~~in good faith.

On ~~December~~ 1January 13, ~~2017~~2025, ~~a complaint against CWCAM and others was filed~~ in the ~~United~~ ~~States~~Supreme ~~District~~ Court ~~for~~of the ~~Southern~~State ~~District~~ of New York, ~~styled~~ROC asDebt ~~CWCapital Cobalt~~Strategies VrII ~~Ltd.~~Bond ~~v. CWCapital~~ Investments LLC, et(“Bridge ~~al.,~~Investment ~~No.~~Group ~~17-cv-9463~~or ~~(the~~ “~~Original Complaint~~Bridge”)~~. The gravamen of the Original Complaint alleged breaches of a contract and fiduciary duties by CWCAM’s affiliate~~, ~~CWCapital Investments LLC in its capacity~~ as ~~collateral~~Directing ~~manager for the collateralized debt~~Certificateholder ~~obligation~~(“DCH”) ~~transaction~~filed ~~involving~~suit against CWCapital ~~Cobalt~~Asset ~~Vr,~~Management ~~Ltd.~~LLC ~~In total~~(“CWCAM”), ~~there are~~alleging ~~14 counts pled in the Original Complaint. Of those 14, 5 claims were asserted against CWCAM for aiding and abetting~~ breach of ~~fiduciary duty, conversion and unjust enrichment. On May 23, 2018,~~ the ~~Original Complaint was dismissed for lack of~~ subject ~~matter~~Pooling ~~jurisdiction.~~and OnServicing ~~June~~Agreement 28, 2018, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. filed a substantially similar complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York styled as CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. v. CWCapital Investments LLC, et al., Index No. 653277/2018 (~~the~~ “~~New Complaint~~PSA”). ~~The gravamen~~and ofviolation of the ~~New~~Servicing ~~Complaint~~Standard iswhile ~~the~~acting ~~same~~ as ~~the~~special ~~previous~~servicer ~~complaint filed in the United State District Court~~ for the ~~Southern~~FREMF ~~District of New York. In total~~2016-KS06 ~~there are 16 counts pled in the New Complaint~~pool. OfIt ~~those~~is 16alleged ~~counts,~~that ~~5 claims were asserted against~~ CWCAM ~~for~~was ~~aiding~~negligent ~~and~~in ~~abetting~~the ~~breach~~servicing of ~~fiduciary duty, conversion and unjust enrichment, 1 count seeks~~ a ~~declaratory~~portfolio ~~judgement that~~of ~~the~~9 ~~plaintiff~~loans ~~has~~ (the ~~right~~“Ranger toPortfolio”) ~~enforce~~that ~~the~~were ~~contracts~~ in ~~question~~special ~~and~~servicing 1starting ~~count seeks an injunction requiring the defendants to recognize the plaintiff as the directing holder for the trusts~~ in ~~question. On January 11, 2019, the plaintiff~~ ~~dismissed with prejudice the declaratory judgment and injunction counts~~2022. The ~~New~~ ~~Complaint~~suit ~~and~~demands ~~related~~unspecified ~~summons~~compensatory ~~was~~damages ~~not served on the defendants until July 13, 2018~~ and ~~July 16, 2018. The plaintiff’s motion for~~ a ~~preliminary injunction~~Declaratory ~~was~~Judgment ~~denied~~that ~~by the court on July 31, 2018. On August 3, 2018, the defendants, including~~ CWCAM, ~~filed~~is anot ~~motion~~entitled to ~~dismiss~~indemnification ~~the~~or ~~New~~payment ~~Complaint~~for ~~in its entirety.~~expenses Onfrom ~~August 20, 2019,~~ the ~~court~~Trust ~~entered~~under ~~an order granting defendants’ motion almost in its entirety, dismissing 11 of~~ the ~~16 counts and partially dismissing 2 additional counts~~PSA. OfCWCAM ~~the~~disagrees ~~remaining~~vehemently ~~counts,~~with 2these ~~are asserted against CWCAM for~~allegations ~~aiding~~ and ~~abetting breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment. On September 19, 2019, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. filed~~ a ~~notice~~Motion ~~of appeal relating~~ to ~~the~~Dismiss ~~August~~was ~~20, 2019 dismissal order and on September 26, 2019,~~ filed ~~an amended complaint against CWCI and CWCAM attempting to address deficiencies relating to certain of the claims dismissed~~ by ~~the August 20, 2019 order. CWCI and~~ CWCAM ~~filed~~ ~~its Motion to Dismiss the amended complaint~~ on ~~October~~March 2814, ~~2019~~2025. The ~~court~~ ~~heard argument on the Motion to Dismiss the amended complaint on January 22, 2020 and on October 23, 2020, the court granted the~~ motion ~~dismissing the~~has ~~amended~~been ~~claims.~~fully Onbriefed ~~November~~and ~~30, 2020, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd filed~~ a ~~notice~~hearing ~~of appeal~~was ~~relating~~held toon ~~the~~August ~~October 23~~25, ~~2020~~2025 ~~dismissal~~While ~~order. On April 27, 2021, the First Department affirmed the dismissal as to claims against CWCAM~~ that ~~were~~motion ~~part~~was ~~of the August 20~~pending, ~~2019 dismissal, but reversed~~ the ~~dismissal~~parties ofreached two counts for breach of the Collateral Management Agreement against CWCI. CWCI sought leave to file an appeal of the decision. The plaintiff also sought leave to appeal the dismissal of the claims against CWCAM. Both requests for leave were denied by the First Department. On May 15, 2020, CWCI and CWCAM filed a ~~motion to~~business ~~renew~~resolution ~~its motion to dismiss as to 4 of the remaining counts (including the remaining two counts against CWCAM for aiding~~ and ~~abetting breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment), based on a decision entered~~ by ~~Judge~~stipulation ~~Failla in a trust instruction proceeding in~~ the ~~US District Court for the Southern District~~ oflawsuit ~~New~~was ~~York~~dismissed awarding summary judgment in favor of CWCAM. On September 7, 2021, the court denied the motion to renew. CWCI and CWCAM filed a notice of appeal, which they perfected by the filing of their opening brief on July 1, 2022. On November 15, 2022, the First Department affirmed the court’s denial of the motion to renew. On October 1, 2021, CWCI and CWCAM moved to reargue the denial of the motion to renew (or alternatively, the motion to dismiss) with ~~respect to~~prejudice ~~certain of Cobalt’s claims, including the remaining 2 claims against CWCAM, based~~ on ~~the~~January ~~First Department’s April 27~~22, ~~2021 decision~~2026. On March 24, 2022, the court denied the relief sought in the motion to reargue. CWCI and CWCAM have appealed the court’s decision on the motion to reargue and filed their opening brief on July 11, 2022. The appeal was dismissed as being nonappealable on August 30, 2022. CWCAM believes that it has performed its obligations under the related pooling and servicing agreements in good faith and the remaining allegations in the New Complaint are without merit.

Item 1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

The information regarding this Item has been provided previously in an annual report on Form 10-K of the issuing entity or in the prospectus of the issuing entity filed in a 424(b)(5) filing dated October 21, 2013. In addition, effective as of March 1, 2025, Trimont LLC purchased the third party servicing segment of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association’s commercial mortgage servicing business and is acting as master servicer, primary servicer and special servicer, as applicable, under the MSBAM 2013-C12 pooling and servicing agreement and each Outside Pooling and Servicing Agreement to the same extent that Wells Fargo Bank, National Association previously acted in such capacities.

Item 1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The reports on assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and the related attestation reports on such assessments of compliance are attached hereto under Item 15.

Item 1123 of Regulation AB, Servicer Compliance Statement.

The servicer compliance statements are attached hereto under Item 15.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) Exhibits.

(4.1) Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2013, between Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as special servicer, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as trust advisor, U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as certificate administrator, certificate registrar, authenticating agent and custodian (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on February 25, 2014 under SEC File No. 333-180779-05 and incorporated by reference herein).

(4.2) Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2013, between Banc of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as special servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as certificate administrator, certificate registrar and authenticating agent, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as custodian, and Situs Holdings, LLC, as trust advisor, relating to the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the Westfield Countryside Mortgage Loan is serviced (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2014 under SEC File No. 333-180779-05 and incorporated by reference herein).

(31) Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

(33) Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.

33.1 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator

33.2 Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator

33.3 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian

33.4 Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian

33.5 Trimont ~~Wells Fargo Bank~~LLC, ~~National Association,~~ as Master Servicer (from 3/1/25 to 12/31/25)

33.6 ~~CWCapital~~ Wells ~~Asset~~Fargo ~~Management~~Bank, ~~LLC~~National Association, as ~~Special~~ Master Servicer (from 1/1/25 to 2/28/25)

33.7 ~~BellOak~~ Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as ~~Operating~~Special ~~Advisor~~Servicer (from 4/29/25 to 12/31/25)

33.8 ~~CoreLogic~~ CWCapital ~~Solutions,~~Asset Management LLC, as ~~Servicing~~Special ~~Function~~Servicer ~~Participant~~(from 1/1/25 to 4/28/25)

33.9 ~~Wells Fargo Bank~~ BellOak, ~~National Association~~LLC, as ~~Master Servicer~~Operating ~~under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/24 to 12/31/24) (See exhibit 33.5)~~Advisor

33.10 CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant ~~under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/24 to 12/31/24) (See exhibit 33.8)~~

33.11 ~~Midland~~ ~~Loan~~Trimont ~~Services~~LLC, ~~a Division of PNC Bank, National Association,~~ as ~~Special~~Master Servicer under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 13/1/2425 to 12/31/2425) (See exhibit 33.5)

33.12 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master ~~Custodian~~Servicer under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/2425 to 122/3128/2425) (See exhibit 33.36)

33.13 ~~Computershare~~ ~~Trust~~CoreLogic ~~Company~~Solutions, ~~National Association~~LLC, as Servicing Function Participant under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/2425 to 12/31/2425) (See exhibit 33.410)

~~(34) Attestation reports~~33.14 onMidland ~~assessment~~Loan Services, a Division of ~~compliance~~PNC ~~with~~Bank, National ~~servicing~~Association, ~~criteria~~as ~~for~~Special ~~asset~~Servicer under the MSBAM 2013-~~backed~~C11 ~~securities.~~securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/25 to 12/31/25)

33.15 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/25 to 12/31/25) (See exhibit 33.3)

33.16 Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/25 to 12/31/25) (See exhibit 33.4)

(34). Attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.

34.1 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator

34.2 Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator

34.3 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian

34.4 Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian

34.5 ~~Wells~~ Trimont ~~Fargo Bank~~LLC, ~~National Association,~~ as Master Servicer (from 3/1/25 to 12/31/25)

34.6 ~~CWCapital~~ Wells ~~Asset~~Fargo ~~Management~~Bank, ~~LLC~~National Association, as ~~Special~~ Master Servicer (from 1/1/25 to 2/28/25)

34.7 ~~BellOak~~ Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as ~~Operating~~Special ~~Advisor~~Servicer (from 4/29/25 to 12/31/25)

34.8 ~~CoreLogic~~ CWCapital ~~Solutions,~~Asset Management LLC, as ~~Servicing~~Special ~~Function~~Servicer ~~Participant~~(from 1/1/25 to 4/28/25)

34.9 ~~Wells Fargo Bank~~ BellOak, ~~National Association~~LLC, as ~~Master Servicer~~Operating ~~under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/24 to 12/31/24) (See exhibit 34.5)~~Advisor

34.10 CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant ~~under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/24 to 12/31/24) (See exhibit 34.8)~~

34.11 ~~Midland~~ ~~Loan~~Trimont ~~Services~~LLC, ~~a Division of PNC Bank, National Association,~~ as ~~Special~~Master Servicer under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 13/1/2425 to 12/31/2425) (See exhibit 34.5)

34.12 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master ~~Custodian~~Servicer under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/2425 to 122/3128/2425) (See exhibit 34.36)

34.13 ~~Computershare~~ ~~Trust~~CoreLogic ~~Company~~Solutions, ~~National Association~~LLC, as Servicing Function Participant under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/2425 to 12/31/2425) (See exhibit 34.410)

~~(35)~~ 34.14 Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer under the MSBAM 2013-C11 ~~compliance~~securitization, ~~statement.~~pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/25 to 12/31/25)

34.15 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/25 to 12/31/25) (See exhibit 34.3)

34.16 Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/25 to 12/31/25) (See exhibit 34.4)

(35). Servicer compliance statement.

35.1 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator

35.2 Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator

35.3 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian

35.4 Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian

35.5 ~~Wells~~ Trimont ~~Fargo Bank~~LLC, ~~National Association,~~ as Master Servicer (from 3/1/25 to 12/31/25)

35.6 ~~CWCapital~~ Wells ~~Asset~~Fargo ~~Management~~Bank, ~~LLC~~National Association, as ~~Special~~ Master Servicer (from 1/1/25 to 2/28/25)

35.7 ~~Wells~~ Rialto ~~Fargo~~Capital ~~Bank~~Advisors, ~~National Association~~LLC, as ~~Master Servicer~~Special ~~under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the~~Servicer ~~following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside~~ (from 14/129/2425 to 12/31/2425) ~~(See exhibit 35.5)~~

35.8 ~~Midland~~ CWCapital ~~Loan~~Asset ~~Services,~~Management ~~a Division of PNC Bank~~LLC, ~~National~~ ~~Association,~~ as Special Servicer ~~under the MSBAM 2013-C11~~ ~~securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside~~ (from 1/1/2425 to 124/3128/2425)

35.9 ~~Wells~~ Trimont ~~Fargo Bank~~LLC, ~~National~~as ~~Association,~~Master ~~as Custodian~~Servicer under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 13/1/2425 to 12/31/2425) (See exhibit 35.35)

35.10 ~~Computershare~~ ~~Trust~~Wells ~~Company~~Fargo Bank, National Association, as ~~Servicing~~Master Servicer ~~Function Participant~~ under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/2425 to 122/3128/2425) (See exhibit 35.46)

35.11 Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/25 to 12/31/25)

35.12 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/25 to 12/31/25) (See exhibit 35.3)

35.13 Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant under the MSBAM 2013-C11 securitization, pursuant to which the following mortgage loans were serviced by such party: Westfield Countryside (from 1/1/25 to 12/31/25) (See exhibit 35.4)

(99.1) Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated October 10, 2013, between Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. and Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2013 under SEC File No. 333-180779-05 and incorporated by reference herein).

(99.2) Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated October 10, 2013, between Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. and Bank of America, National Association (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2013 under SEC File No. 333-180779-05 and incorporated by reference herein).

(99.3) Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated October 10, 2013, between Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. and CIBC Inc. (filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2013 under SEC File No. 333-180779-05 and incorporated by reference herein).

(99.4) Second Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, effective as of October 31, 2021, between Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, N.A., Computershare Trust Company, N.A., Computershare Delaware Trust Company and Computershare Limited (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 5, 2021 under SEC File No. 333-180779-05 and incorporated by reference herein).

(b) See (a) above.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

(Depositor)

By: /s/ Jane Lam

Jane Lam, President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

Date: March 2425, ~~2025~~2026

Filing Compare · Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C12