10-Q 1 form10q093001.txt 10-Q 3RD QUARTER 2001 FORM 10-Q UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 [x] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2001 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ____________________to_____________________ Commission file number 333-14217 ============ Core-Mark International, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 91-1295550 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 395 Oyster Point Boulevard, Suite 415 South San Francisco, CA 94080 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (650) 589-9445 ============ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. _x_ Yes ___ No At October 31, 2001, Registrant had outstanding 5,500,000 shares of Common Stock. =============================================== Core-Mark International, Inc. and Subsidiaries FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS OR INFORMATION Certain statements contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q under the caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and elsewhere herein and in the documents (if any) incorporated herein by reference are not statements of historical fact but are future-looking or forward-looking statements that may constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Certain, but not necessarily all, of such forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of such forward-looking terminology as the words "believes," "expects," "may," "will," "should," or "anticipates" (or the negative of such terms) or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or because they involve discussions of Core-Mark International, Inc.'s (the "Company's") strategy. Such forward-looking statements are based upon a number of assumptions concerning future conditions that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. The ability of the Company to achieve the results anticipated in such statements is subject to various risks and uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company or the industry in which it operates to be materially different from any future results, level of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the general state of the economy and business conditions in the United States and Canada; adverse changes in consumer spending; the ability of the Company to implement its business strategy, including the ability to integrate recently acquired businesses into the Company; the ability of the Company to obtain financing; competition; the level of retail sales of cigarettes and other tobacco products; possible effects of legal proceedings against manufacturers and sellers of tobacco products and the effect of government regulations affecting such products. As a result of the foregoing and other factors affecting the Company's business beyond the Company's control, no assurance can be given as to future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements and neither the Company nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these statements.

-2- CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (In Thousands of Dollars)

-3- CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (In Thousands of Dollars) (Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. -4- CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (In Thousands of Dollars) (Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. -5- NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 (UNAUDITED) 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2001, the condensed consolidated statements of income for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2000 and 2001, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2000 and 2001 have been prepared by Core-Mark International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company"). In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company at September 30, 2001, and of the results of its operations and cash flows for the interim periods then ended, have been included. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2000, is derived from the audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The notes accompanying the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 ("2000 Form 10-K") include a description of the Company's significant accounting policies and additional information pertinent to an understanding of both the December 31, 2000 balance sheet and the interim financial statements included herein. 2. INVENTORIES The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared using the LIFO method of accounting for inventories. The use of the LIFO method resulted in an increase in cost of goods sold and a corresponding decrease in inventories of $0.8 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2000 and 2001, respectively, and $1.7 million and $5.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2000 and 2001, respectively. Interim LIFO calculations are based on management's estimates of year-end inventory levels and inflation rates for the year. 3. EXCISE TAXES State and provincial excise taxes on cigarettes included in sales and cost of goods sold were $153.2 million and $162.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2000 and 2001, respectively, and $449.3 million and $464.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2000 and 2001, respectively. 4. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS In September 2000, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities," which revises the standards for accounting for securitizations and other transfers of financial assets and collateral and requires entities that have securitized financial assets to provide specific disclosures. SFAS No. 140 is effective for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities occurring after March 31, 2001. The Company adopted the standard effective April 1, 2001, as required. The adoption of SFAS No. 140 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In June 2001, the FASB approved for issuance SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" and SFAS No.142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". SFAS No. 141 addresses the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in a business combination and SFAS No. 142 addresses the initial recognition and measurement of intangibles assets acquired outside of a business combination whether acquired individually or with a group of other assets. SFAS No. 142 also addresses the recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangibles assets subsequent to their acquisition. SFAS No. 141 is applicable to business combinations beginning July 1, 2001. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 142 no later than its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2002 at which time goodwill will no longer be amortized but will be required to be tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level. Intangible assets are required to be tested for impairment. Intangible assets with definitive useful lives will be amortized over their useful life and intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are not amortized until a definitive useful life is determined. The Company is evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142 will have on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Upon implementation of the statement, the Company will cease to record amortization expense, which will total $2.1 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001. -6- In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." SFAS No. 143 will become effective for Core-Mark on January 1, 2002. The Company is currently analyzing the effect that this standard will have on its financial statements, but does not expect a material impact. In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." SFAS No. 144 will become effective for Core-Mark on January 1, 2002. The Company is currently analyzing the effect that this standard will have on its financial statements, but does not expect a material impact. 5. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME The Company's total comprehensive income was $3.3 million and $4.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2000 and 2001 respectively, and $8.6 million and $9.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2000 and 2001 respectively, which included net income and other comprehensive income and losses related to foreign currency translation adjustments. 6. SEGMENT INFORMATION Management has determined that the only reportable segment of the Company is its wholesale distribution segment, based on the level at which executive management reviews the results of operations in order to make decisions regarding performance assessment and resource allocation. There has been no change in the segment reported or the basis of measurement of segment profit or loss from that which was reported in the Company's 2000 Form 10-K. Wholesale distribution segment information for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, and asset information as of December 31, 2000 and September 30, 2001 is set forth below (dollars in thousands):

----------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Represents operating income, including allocated interest expense, but excluding amortization of goodwill and debt refinancing costs, and income taxes. -7- MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis and the discussion under the heading "Legal Proceedings - Regulatory and Legislative Matters" included in the Company's 2000 Form 10-K. GENERAL The Company is one of the largest broad-line, full-service wholesale distributors of packaged consumer products to the convenience retail industry in western North America. The products distributed by the Company include cigarettes, food products such as candy, fast food, snacks, groceries and non-alcoholic beverages, and non-food products such as film, batteries and other sundries, health and beauty care products and tobacco products other than cigarettes. For the nine months ended September 30, 2001, approximately 72%, 19% and 9% of the Company's net sales were derived from cigarettes, food products and non-food products, respectively. TOBACCO INDUSTRY BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Manufacturers and distributors of cigarettes and other tobacco products are currently facing a number of significant issues that affect the business environment in which they operate including proposed additional governmental regulation; actual and proposed excise tax increases (see "Impact of Tobacco Taxes " below); increased litigation involving health and other effects of cigarette smoking and other uses of tobacco; and litigation by the U.S. Department of Justice to recover federal Medicare costs allegedly connected to smoking. The tobacco industry is also currently subject to significant regulatory restrictions, such as the requirement that product packages display warning labels, a prohibition on television and radio advertising and prohibitions on sales to minors. In August 1996, the United States Food and Drug Administration (the "FDA") determined that it had jurisdiction over cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products and issued regulations restricting the sale, distribution and advertising of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products, especially to minors. The FDA regulations are significant not only because of their substance, but also because the FDA determined that it has jurisdiction over cigarettes and smokeless tobacco as "combination products having both a drug component, including nicotine, and device components." The regulations regulate such products as "devices." The major U.S. tobacco manufacturers challenged the jurisdiction of the FDA to regulate tobacco products as "drugs" or "devices" and in April 1997 the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina held that the FDA could impose restrictions on access to and labeling of tobacco products, but did not have authority to restrict the promotion and advertisement of such products. The court stayed implementation of the FDA regulations except for those establishing a federal minimum age of 18 for the sale of tobacco products and requiring proof of age for anyone under the age of 27. On August 14, 1998, however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed the decision of the District Court, finding that the FDA lacked statutory authority to regulate tobacco products altogether. The FDA's petition for review was granted by the Supreme Court, and on March 21, 2000, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the FDA did not have authority to regulate tobacco products. In response to the Supreme Court ruling, legislation has recently been introduced in Congress that would grant authority to the FDA to regulate tobacco products. One cigarette manufacturer expressed interest in such legislation but the remaining companies have stated their opposition. The prospects for this legislation are uncertain. In June 1997, a so called "national settlement" of many of these issues was proposed following negotiations among major U.S. tobacco manufacturers, state attorneys general, representatives of the public health community and attorneys representing plaintiffs in certain smoking and health litigation. The national settlement required implementation by federal legislation, however, and such legislation was considered but not passed by the Congress in 1998. -8- In light of the failure of the national settlement legislation, in November 1998, 46 states, five territories and the District of Columbia entered into a settlement of approximately $250 billion with four major tobacco companies to resolve litigation over smoking-related costs incurred by state Medicaid programs. The settlement - which takes effect in each settling jurisdiction when the courts in each such jurisdiction enter a final consent decree and any appeals of such decree are disposed of or become time-barred - allows for payment of the agreed sum by the cigarette manufacturers over 25 years, settles the state and territory health-care claims against the tobacco industry and imposes a number of new marketing, advertising, sales and other restrictions on tobacco products. Included in the terms of the settlement are conditions that tobacco companies participating in the settlement may not: target youth in the advertising, promotion or marketing of tobacco products (including the use of cartoons in such promotion); use tobacco brand names to sponsor concerts, athletics events or other events in which a significant percentage of the audience is under 18 years of age; advertise products in conspicuous places outdoors (such as billboards) or on transit vehicles; merchandise a tobacco brand name through the marketing, distribution or sale of apparel or other merchandise; provide free samples of tobacco products in any area except an adults-only facility; distribute or sell cigarettes in pack sizes of less than 20; or lobby state legislatures on certain anti-tobacco initiatives (such as limitations on youth access to vending machines). These provisions took effect by April 23, 1999. Over the past decade, various state and local governments have imposed significant regulatory restrictions on tobacco products, including sampling and advertising bans or restrictions, packaging regulations and prohibitions on smoking in restaurants, office buildings and public places. With a limited number of exceptions, the state Medicaid litigation settlement prohibits the participating tobacco manufacturers from challenging any restriction relating to tobacco control enacted prior to June 1, 1998. Additional state and local legislative and regulatory actions are being considered and are likely to be promulgated in the future. The Company is unable to assess the future effects that these various proposals may have on the sale of the Company's products. On September 22, 1999, the U.S. Department of Justice filed "an action to recover health care costs paid for and furnished...by the federal government for lung cancer, heart disease, emphysema and other tobacco-related illnesses caused by the fraudulent and tortious conduct of..." the major tobacco manufacturers. The defendant companies announced that they would fight the litigation, and on December 27, 1999 moved to dismiss the government's complaint. On September 28, 2000, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed some of the government's claims but allowed the case to precede on two "civil RICO" grounds, on which all parties have filed procedural motions that the court continues to review. A recent offer by the Justice Department to settle the litigation has not been accepted to date and the parties are engaging in discovery and pre-trial motions. If the Justice Department prevails in the litigation, or if the litigation is settled, there can be no assurance that the litigation will not result in increased cigarette prices and/or a material reduction of the consumption of tobacco products in the United States; such circumstances could have a material adverse affect on the Company's business and financial position. In addition, proposals have been made in Congress in recent years to require additional warning notices on tobacco products, to disallow advertising and promotional expenses as deductions under federal tax law and to further regulate the production and distribution of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. While neither the FDA regulations, the state Medicaid litigation settlement, nor recent legislation would impose restrictions on the sale of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products to adults, there can be no assurance such restrictions will not be proposed in the future or that any such proposed legislation or regulations would not result in a material reduction of the consumption of tobacco products in the United States or would not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and financial position. On July 14, 2000, a Florida state court jury awarded $145 billion in punitive damages against the major U.S. tobacco companies to a class of Florida smokers who allegedly died or became ill due to cigarette smoking. The tobacco companies have moved to set aside the award and remove the case to federal court. On November 3, 2000, U.S. District Judge Ursula Ungaro - Benages of the Southern District of Florida denied the defendants motion to remove the case to federal court. The $145 billion judgment was returned to the state court for further proceedings. On November 6, 2000, the Florida state court denied the defendants' motion to set aside the punitive damage award and rejected the tobacco companies request for a new trial. The tobacco companies appealed the judgment. The appeal is pending in the Third District Court of Appeals, 11th and 16th Circuits, in Miami, Florida. -9- The Company is subject to various federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. Generally, these laws impose limitations on the discharge of pollutants and the presence of hazardous substances in the workplace and establish standards for vehicle and employee safety and for the handling of solid and hazardous wastes. These laws include the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, the Clean Air Act, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act and the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Future developments, such as stricter environmental or employee health and safety laws and regulations thereunder, could affect the Company's operations. The Company does not currently anticipate that the cost of its compliance with or of any foreseeable liabilities under environmental and employee health and safety laws and regulations will have a material adverse effect on its business and financial condition. THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 NET SALES. Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2001 were $904.4 million, an increase of $121.7 million or 15.5% over the same period in 2000. The increase in net sales was primarily due to an increase in net sales of cigarettes, as well as increased sales of food and non-food products in 2001 compared to 2000. While sales increased within the Company's existing customer base, a significant portion of the increase was attributed to new customer relationships commencing since September 30, 2000. Net sales of cigarettes for the three months ended September 30, 2001 were $645.3 million, an increase of $88.9 million or 16.0% over the same period in 2000. The increase in net sales of cigarettes was principally due to increases in manufacturers' list prices, which have been passed on to the Company's customers in the form of higher prices and an increase in carton sales. The Company's total cigarette unit sales for the three months ended September 30, 2001 were 22.5 million cartons, an increase of 2.0 million cartons or 9.7% from the same period of 2000. The increase in carton sales was attributable to increased volume with new and existing customers. Net sales of food and non-food products for the three months ended September 30, 2001 were $259.1 million, an increase of $32.7 million or 14.5% over the same period in 2000. GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2001 was $55.3 million, an increase of $3.4 million or 6.5% over the same period in 2000. The gross profit margin for the three months ended September 30, 2001 decreased to 6.1% of net sales as compared to 6.6% of net sales for the comparable period in 2000. For the three months ended September 30, 2001, the Company recognized LIFO expense of $0.2 million compared to $0.8 million for the comparable period in 2000. The decrease in LIFO expense for the three months ended September 30, 2001, was primarily the result of a cigarette price increase that occurred in the third quarter of 2000, whereas no such increase occurred in the third quarter of 2001. OPERATING AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Operating and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2001 were $43.2 million, an increase of $1.8 million or 4.3% over the same period in 2000, which was at a slower rate than real growth in volume. Such expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2001 decreased to 4.8% of net sales as compared to 5.3% of net sales for the same period in 2000, primarily due to the fact that the Company continues to exert tight control over expenses. OPERATING INCOME. As a result of the foregoing factors, operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2001 was $12.1 million, an increase of $1.6 million or 15.5% over the same period in 2000. As a percentage of net sales, operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2001 and September 30, 2000 was 1.3%. NET INTEREST EXPENSE. Net interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2001 was $2.7 million, a decrease of $0.6 million or 19.3% as compared to the same period in 2000, which resulted from a decrease in the Company's average debt levels and a decrease in average borrowing rates. NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 COMPARED TO NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 NET SALES. Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 were $2,537.2 million, an increase of $259.9 million or 11.4% over the same period in 2000. The increase in net sales was primarily due to an increase in net sales of cigarettes, as well as increased sales of food and non-food products in 2001 compared to 2000. While sales increased within the Company's existing customer base, a significant portion of the increase was attributed to new customer relationships commencing since September 30, 2000. -10- Net sales of cigarettes for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 were $1,821.7 million, an increase of $197.6 million or 12.2% over the same period in 2000. The increase in net sales of cigarettes was principally due to increases in manufacturers' list prices, which have been passed on to the Company's customers in the form of higher prices, and an increase in carton sales. The Company's total cigarette unit sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 were 64.2 million cartons, an increase of 4.1 million cartons or 6.8% from the same period of 2000. Cigarette carton sales in the U.S. increased by 3.8 million cartons or 7.7% compared to the same period in 2000. The increase in carton sales was attributable to increased volume with new and existing customers. Net sales of food and non-food products for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 were $715.5 million, an increase of $62.2 million or 9.5% over the same period in 2000. GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 was $158.3 million, an increase of $9.6 million or 6.4% over the same period in 2000. The gross profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 decreased to 6.2% of net sales as compared to 6.5% of net sales for the comparable period in 2000. For the nine months ended September 30, 2001, the Company recognized LIFO expense of $5.2 million compared to $1.7 million for the comparable period in 2000. The increase in LIFO expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, was primarily the result of a cigarette price increase that occurred in the first nine months of 2001, which was substantially in excess of the increases occurring in the first nine months of 2000. OPERATING AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Operating and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 were $128.5 million, an increase of $8.1 million or 6.8% over the same period in 2000. However, such expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 decreased to 5.1% of net sales as compared to 5.3% for the same period in 2000, primarily due to the fact that the Company continues to exert tight control over expenses. OPERATING INCOME. As a result of the foregoing factors, operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 was $29.7 million, an increase of $1.4 million or 5.1% as compared to the same period in 2000. As a percentage of net sales, operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 and September 30, 2000 was 1.2%. NET INTEREST EXPENSE. Net interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 was $8.5 million, a decrease of $1.0 million or 10.6% compared to 2000, which resulted from a decrease in the Company's average debt levels and a decrease in average borrowing rates. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES The Company's liquidity requirements arise primarily from the funding of its working capital needs, capital expenditure programs and debt service requirements with respect to its credit facilities. The Company has no mandatory reductions of principal on its Revolving Credit Facility, its Accounts Receivable Facility or its $75 million Senior Subordinated Notes prior to their final maturities in 2003. The Company has historically financed its operations through internally generated funds and borrowings under its credit facilities. The Company's debt obligations totaled $130.0 million at September 30, 2001, a decrease of $56.6 million or 30.3% from $186.6 million at December 31, 2000. The net decrease in outstanding debt is primarily due to decreased borrowings needed to finance working capital funding requirements. Debt requirements are generally the highest at December 31, when the Company historically carries higher inventory. The Company's principal sources of liquidity are net cash provided by operating activities and its credit facilities. At year end the Company typically carries higher inventories which are then liquidated in future periods. Therefore, net cash provided by operating activities is typically higher at interim periods than at the end of any fiscal year. The Company made capital expenditures of $4.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, primarily related to warehouse and equipment purchases. For the remainder of 2001, the Company estimates it will spend approximately $3 to $4 million on similar capital requirements. -11- IMPACT OF TOBACCO TAXES State and Canadian provincial tobacco taxes represent a significant portion of the Company's net sales and cost of goods sold attributable to cigarettes and other tobacco products. In the first nine months of 2001, such taxes on cigarettes represented approximately 23% of cigarette net sales in the U.S. and 43% in Canada. In general, such taxes have been increasing, and many states and Canadian provinces are currently weighing proposals for higher excise taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products. Under current law, almost all state and Canadian provincial taxes are payable by the Company under credit terms which, on the average, exceed the credit terms the Company has approved for its customers to pay for products which include such taxes. This practice has benefited the Company's cash flow. If the Company were required to pay such taxes at the time such obligation was incurred without the benefit of credit terms, the Company would incur a substantial permanent increase in its working capital requirements and might be required to seek additional financing in order to meet such higher working capital requirements. Consistent with industry practices, the Company has secured a bond to guarantee its tax obligations to those states and provinces requiring such a surety (a majority of states in the Company's operating areas). The U.S. federal excise tax on cigarettes is currently $3.40 per carton of cigarettes. The federal excise tax will increase by $.50 per carton of cigarettes in 2002. Unlike the state and provincial taxes described above, U.S. federal excise taxes on cigarettes are paid by the cigarette manufacturers and passed through to the Company as a component of the cost of cigarettes. Such increases in U.S. federal taxes will increase the Company's working capital requirements by increasing the balances of its inventories and accounts receivable. Legislation has been introduced in Congress in 2001 to further increase the federal excise tax on cigarettes, but prospects for its passage are uncertain. ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK The Company believes there has been no material change in its exposure to market risk from that discussed in the Company's 2000 Consolidated Financial Statements. -12- PART II - OTHER INFORMATION Item 1: Legal Proceedings As previously reported, in November 1999, the Company was named in two separate law suits filed in State Court in New Mexico by two individual plaintiffs. The other defendants include the principal U.S. tobacco manufacturers, as well as other distributors. The complaints seek compensatory and punitive damages for injuries allegedly caused by the use of tobacco products. During the first quarter of 2001, the Company was dismissed from one of the above cases. The Company does not believe the remaining suit above will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition. The Company has been indemnified with respect to certain claims alleged in the remaining suit above. In addition, the Company is a party to other lawsuits incurred in the ordinary course of its business. The Company believes it is adequately insured with respect to such lawsuits or that such lawsuits will not result in losses material to its consolidated financial position or results of operations. Item 2: Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds Not applicable Item 3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities Not applicable Item 4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Not applicable Item 5: Other Information Not applicable Item 6: Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K (a) Exhibits None. (b) Reports on Form 8-K: None. -13- SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of South San Francisco, California, on November 12, 2001. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC. By /s/ Leo F. Korman ----------------------------------- Leo F. Korman, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer -14-

CORE MARK INTERNATIONAL INC 10-Q