UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal ~~year~~ quarter ended ~~September~~July 261, ~~2003~~2005

Commission File Number: 0-28426

ZOMAX INCORPORATED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Minnesota		No. 41-1833089
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)
5353 Nathan Lane Plymouth, MN		55442
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)
(763) 553-9300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(763) 553-9300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YESý

NOo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

YESý

NOo

The number of shares ~~outstanding~~ outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of ~~October 31~~July 29, ~~2003~~2005 was 32,~~578~~690,~~409~~570 shares.

ZOMAX INCORPORATED

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

DESCRIPTION
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Item 1.	Financial Statements
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
		Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
		Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
	Item 6.	Exhibits
	Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ZOMAX INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months EndedSeptember						Nine Months EndedSeptember
	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	2003			2002			2003			2002
	July 1, 2005			June 25, 2004 (Restated – See Note 7)			July 1, 2005			June 25, 2004 (Restated – See Note 7)
Sales	$	44,535		$	43,719		$	135,760		$	135,064
Revenue	$	42,585		$	45,082		$	84,766		$	95,117
Cost of sales	38,145			35,789			116,341			109,711
Cost of revenue	39,269			37,062			79,654			80,147
Gross profit	63,~~390~~316			78,~~930~~020			195,~~419~~112			2514,~~353~~970
Selling, general and administrative expenses	8,035			8,963			26,248			26,784
Operating costs and expenses:
Charge related to settlement of customer claim	3,000			—			3,000			—
Selling, general and administrative expenses	9,734			9,622			19,961			19,027
Operating loss	(4,645		)	(1,033		)	(9,829		)	(1,431		)
Restructuring costs (See Note 8)	2,179			—			2,409			—
Other income, net	252			297			18			801
Litigation reserve adjustment	(415		)	—			(2,245		)	—
Loss before income taxes	(4,393		)	(736		)	(9,811		)	(630		)
Total operating costs and expenses	11,498			9,622			20,125			19,027
Income tax benefit	(1,859		)	(262		)	(4,042		)	(226		)
Operating loss	(8,182		)	(1,602		)	(15,013		)	(4,057		)
Net loss	$	(2,534	)	$	(474	)	$	(5,769	)	$	(404	)
Interest income	378			127			722			305
Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities	—			2,770			—			2,770
Other income	43			34			49			15
Income (loss) before income taxes	(7,761		)	1,329			(14,242		)	(967		)
Income tax (benefit) expense	(2,082		)	795			(4,415		)	45
Net earnings (loss)	$	(5,679	)	$	534		$	(9,827	)	$	(1,012	)
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(0.0817	)	$	(0.0102	)	$	(0.1830	)	$	(0.0103	)
Diluted	$	(0.0817	)	$	(0.0102	)	$	(0.1830	)	$	(0.0103	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic	32,~~553~~632			3332,~~130~~790			32,~~635~~623			3332,~~038~~753
Dilutive effect of stock options	—			—283			—			—
Diluted	32,~~553~~632			33,~~130~~073			32,~~635~~623			3332,~~038~~753

See ~~notes~~ notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

ZOMAX INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

	September 2003		December 2002
	July 1, 2005		December 31, 2004
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7354,~~647~~129	$	7241,~~146~~092
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,481 in 2003 and $1,937 in 2002	28,234		32,785
Available-for-sale securities	—		19,200
Inventories, net	9,582		9,712
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $727 in 2005 and $868 in 2004	23,662		36,180
Other current assets	11,862		10,580
Inventories	14,943		14,633
Total current assets	123,325		125,223
Deferred income taxes	1,690		1,704
Property and equipment, net	36,334		34,947
Other current assets	7,469		10,410
Available-for-sale securities	11,039		7,013
Total current assets	101,893		123,219
	$	170,698	$	167,183
Property and equipment held for use, net	30,979		35,408
Available-for-sale securities	1,177		3,624
Deferred income taxes	11,579		5,903
	$	145,628	$	168,154
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of notes payable	$	—	$	2,989
Accounts payable	$	14,924	$	20,710
Accounts payable	14,699		14,333
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	16,297		19,177
Accrued expenses	24,648		17,422
Total current liabilities	31,221		39,887
Income taxes payable	—		519
Deferred rent	303		155
Total current liabilities	39,347		35,263
Total liabilities	31,524		40,042
Long-term notes payable, net of current portion	—		747
Deferred income taxes	2,261		624
Total liabilities	41,608		36,634
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, no par value, 100,000 shares authorized; 32,576 and 33,028 shares issued and outstanding in 2003 and 2002, respectively	62,326		64,071
Common stock, no par value, 100,000 shares authorized; 32,632 and 32,536 shares issued and outstanding in 2005 and 2004, respectively	62,423		62,134
Retained earnings	6047,~~678~~034		6656,~~447~~861
Accumulated other comprehensive income	64,~~086~~647		319,117
Total shareholders’ equity	~~129~~114,~~090~~104		~~130~~128,~~549~~112
	$	~~170~~145,~~698~~628	$	~~167~~168,~~183~~154

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

ZOMAX INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWFLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

	Nine Months Ended September
	Six Months Ended
	2003			2002
	July 1, 2005			June 25, 2004 (Restated – See Note 7)
Operating activities:
Net loss	$	(59,~~769~~827	)	$	(~~404~~1,012	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	6,124			6,669
Depreciation	4,178			4,783
Other, net	443			(33		)
Change in deferred taxes	(4,819		)	1,341
Change in litigation reserves	(2,245		)	—
Non-cash restructuring charges	852			—
Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities	—			(2,770		)
Other, net	—			42
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	511,~~619~~683			212,~~169~~372
Inventories	~~436~~(597		)	21,~~963~~515
Other current assets	(12,~~185~~798		)	(331,017		)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	6(5,~~213~~941		)	(117,~~085~~623		)
Income taxes	~~(4,397~~258		)	(~~3,454~~328		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	7,484			6,792
Net cash used by operating activities	(3,660		)	(2,697		)
Investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment	(5,656		)	(1,351		)
Capital expenditures	(2,296		)	(1,463		)
Escrow deposit returned (paid) on terminated acquisition	3,902			(3,902		)
Purchases of available-for-sale securities	(14,500		)	(16,950		)
Investment in Intraware	—			(5,019		)
Sale of available-for-sale securities	33,700			13,230
Other	—			(3		)
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities	16,904			(5,183		)
Net cash used by investing activities	(1,754		)	(10,275		)
Financing activities:
Repayments of notes payable	(3,781		)	(2,236		)
Stock sales	289			491
Repurchases of common stock	(2,587		)	—
Net cash provided by financing activities	289			491
Issuance of common stock, net	842			1,194
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	(496		)	(606		)
Net cash used by financing activities	(5,526		)	(1,042		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	13,037			(7,955		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	1,297			1,982
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	41,092			51,899
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	1,501			(2,543		)
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	54,129		$	43,904
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	72,146			74,999
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	73,647		$	72,456

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

ZOMAX INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

~~Note~~NOTE 1. ~~General~~GENERAL

Basis of Presentation. The ~~accompanying~~condensed ~~interim~~ consolidated financial statements for Zomax Incorporated (“the Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) have been prepared, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The information furnished in the condensed consolidated financial statements ~~are~~includes ~~unaudited;~~normal ~~however~~recurring adjustments and reflects all adjustments which, in the opinion of our management, ~~all~~ ~~adjustments~~are necessary for a fair presentation ~~(consisting~~ of ~~normal~~such financial statements. Certain information and ~~recurring~~footnote ~~adjustments)~~disclosures ~~have~~normally ~~been~~included ~~reflected~~in financial statements prepared in accordance ~~the~~with ~~interim~~accounting ~~periods~~principles ~~presented. Due~~generally ~~principally~~accepted toin the ~~seasonal~~United ~~nature~~ States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and ~~our~~regulations. ~~business,~~Although ~~results~~we ~~may~~believe ~~not~~that bethe ~~indicative~~disclosures ofare ~~results~~adequate ~~for~~to amake ~~full~~the information ~~year. The~~presented ~~accompanying~~not ~~consolidated~~misleading, ~~financial~~it is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements ~~should~~ be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in our ~~2002~~2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of the actual results that may occur for the entire fiscal year.

Fiscal Quarters. Our fiscal quarters consist of 13-weeks ending on a Friday so that our ~~end~~fiscal year ends on the last Friday of the calendar ~~quarter~~year. ~~References~~Our ~~herein~~fiscal toquarters ~~the periods ended September 2003,~~referenced ~~December 2002~~herein ~~and September 2002~~ refer to the ~~fiscal~~ periods ended ~~September 26~~ July 1, ~~2003~~2005, December 2731, ~~2002~~2004 and ~~September 27~~June 25, ~~2002, respectively~~2004.

~~Reclassifications~~Restatement. ~~Our~~ ~~investment~~As fully indiscussed ~~a terminated acquisition~~ in ~~the~~Note ~~first~~7 ~~quarter~~and ofin ~~2002~~our ~~has~~2004 ~~been~~Form ~~reclassified~~10-K, inour ~~the~~quarterly ~~2002 consolidated~~2004 ~~statement~~consolidated offinancial ~~cash~~results ~~flows~~have ~~from~~been ~~operating~~restated ~~activities~~ to ~~investing~~correct ~~activities to~~previously ~~conform~~disclosed tomisstatements ~~the presentation~~ in our ~~2002~~Ireland ~~Annual~~subsidiary, ~~Report~~Zomax ~~on Form 10-K~~Limited. ~~This reclassification had no effect on consolidated net loss or stockholders’ equity as previously reported.~~

~~Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements~~Reclassifications. ~~In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation 46 (“FIN 46”),~~ Certain ~~“Consolidation~~reclassifications ofhave ~~Variable~~been ~~Interest Entities”. FIN~~made ~~46 addresses~~ to the ~~consolidation~~2004 offinancial ~~variable~~statements ~~interest entities,~~and ~~including~~footnotes ~~entities commonly referred~~ to asconform ~~special purpose entities. We were required~~ to ~~apply~~the ~~FIN~~presentation ~~46 to all new variable interest~~used ~~entities~~in ~~created or acquired after January 31, 2003~~2005. AsThese itreclassifications ~~relates~~had ~~to variable interest entities~~no ~~created~~effect oron ~~acquired prior to February 1, 2003,~~ the ~~FASB~~consolidated ~~issued~~amounts ~~a deferral~~ of ~~the~~total ~~effective~~current ~~date~~assets, oftotal ~~FIN 46 until the first interim or annual period ending after December 15~~assets, ~~2003. The adoption of FIN 46 is not expected to have a~~net ~~material~~loss ~~impact on our consolidated balance sheet~~ or ~~results~~cash offlow from operations.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements. In ~~April~~November ~~2003,~~2004 the FASB issued ~~Statement~~SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of ~~Financial~~ARB ~~Accounting~~No. ~~Standards~~43, Chapter 4” (SFAS 151). SFAS 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. ~~149~~43, Chapter 4, “~~Amendment~~Inventory Pricing”, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of ~~Statement~~idle ~~133~~facility onexpense, ~~Derivative~~freight, handling ~~Instruments~~costs, and ~~Hedging Activities”~~spoilage. ~~SFAS~~ ~~149~~This ~~amends~~statement ~~and~~requires ~~clarifies~~that ~~financial~~those items be ~~accounting~~recognized ~~and~~as ~~reporting~~current ~~for~~period ~~derivative~~charges ~~instruments,~~regardless ~~including~~of ~~certain~~whether they meet the ~~derivative~~criterion ~~instruments~~of ~~embedded~~“so inabnormal” ~~other~~which ~~contracts~~was ~~and~~the ~~for~~criterion ~~hedging~~specified ~~activities~~in ~~under SFAS~~ARB ~~133~~No. ~~SFAS~~ ~~149~~43. isIn addition, ~~effective~~this ~~for~~Statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads ~~contracts~~to ~~entered~~the ~~into~~cost orof ~~modified~~production ~~after~~be ~~June 30,~~based ~~2003,~~on ~~with~~normal ~~certain~~capacity of the production ~~provisions~~facilities. This pronouncement is effective ~~prior~~for tothe ~~this~~Company ~~date.~~ beginning in the first quarter of 2006. The Company is in the process of evaluating whether the adoption of ~~this~~SFAS ~~Statement~~151 ~~had~~will nohave ~~effect~~a significant impact on ~~our~~the ~~consolidated~~Company’s overall results of operations, financial position or ~~results~~cash offlows; ~~operations~~however, it is unlikely that impact will be material.

In ~~May~~December ~~2003~~2004, the FASB issued ~~Statement~~SFAS onNo. ~~Financial~~153, ~~Accounting~~“Exchanges ~~Standards~~of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. ~~150~~ 29, ” Accounting for ~~Certain Financial~~Nonmonetary Transactions.” The amendments ~~Instruments~~made ~~with~~by ~~Characteristics~~Statement of153 ~~both~~are ~~Liabilities~~based ~~and~~on ~~Equity”.~~the ~~This~~principle that exchanges of nonmonetary ~~statement~~assets ~~establishes~~should ~~standards~~be ~~for~~measured ~~how~~based anon ~~issuer~~the ~~classifies~~fair ~~and~~value ~~measures~~of inthe assets exchanged. ~~its~~Further, ~~statement~~the ofamendments ~~financial~~eliminate ~~position~~the ~~certain~~narrow ~~financial~~exception ~~instruments~~for ~~with~~nonmonetary ~~characteristics~~exchanges of ~~both~~similar ~~liabilities~~productive assets and ~~equity.~~replace Init ~~accordance~~ with ~~the~~a broader exception ~~standard, financial instruments that embody obligations~~ for ~~the issuer are required to be classified as~~exchanges ~~liabilities. FAS~~of Nononmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. ~~150~~The Statement is effective for ~~financial~~ ~~instruments~~the ~~entered~~Company ~~into~~relative orto ~~modified~~nonmonetary ~~after~~asset ~~May~~exchanges beginning December 31, ~~2003, and was~~ ~~otherwise~~2005. ~~effective~~The ~~for~~provisions ~~the~~of this Statement shall be applied prospectively. The Company ~~during~~is in the ~~third quarter~~process of ~~2003. The~~evaluating whether the adoption of ~~FAS~~SFAS ~~150~~153 ~~did~~will ~~not~~ have a ~~material~~ significant impact on the Company’s ~~consolidated~~overall results ~~balance~~of ~~sheet~~operations or ~~results~~financial ofposition; ~~operations~~however, it is unlikely the impact will be material.

~~Note~~In December 2004, 2the FASB issued SFAS No. ~~Other~~ ~~Financial~~123(R) “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS 123(R) requires the recognition of compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued as of the grant date, based on the estimated number of awards that are expected to vest. SFAS 123(R) covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. Statement 123(R) replaces FASB Statement No. ~~Information~~123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” In April 2005, the SEC delayed the effective date of SFAS 123(R) to fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. As a result, SFAS 123(R) will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2006. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of SFAS 123(R) on the Company’s overall results of operations, financial position and cash flows. Refer to pro forma disclosure in Note 3 for an indication of ongoing expense that will be included in the income statement once SFAS 123(R) is adopted.

~~Inventories~~On October 22, 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 109-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, for the Tax Deduction Provided to U.S. Based Manufacturers by the American Job Creation Act of 2004, and FSP 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provisions within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. FSP No. 109-1 clarifies how to apply SFAS No. 109 to the new law’s tax deduction for income attributable to “domestic production activities.” The fully phased-in ~~thousands):~~deduction is up to nine percent of the lesser of taxable income or “qualified production activities income.” The staff proposal would require that the deduction be accounted for as a special deduction in the period earned,

	September 2003		December 2002
Raw materials	$	6,961	$	6,910
Work in process	864		1,318
Finished goods	1,757		1,484
	$	9,582	$	9,712

~~Comprehensive~~not ~~Income. The table below presents comprehensive income, defined~~ as ~~changes~~a intax-rate ~~shareholders’ equity excluding changes resulting from investments by and distributions to shareholders (in thousands):~~reduction.

	Three Months Ended September						Nine Months Ended September
	2003			2002			2003			2002
Net loss	$	(2,534	)	$	(474	)	$	(5,769	)	$	(404	)
Unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax	2,012			1,158			2,442			1,158
Translation adjustments	73			(590		)	3,613			3,076
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(449	)	$	94		$	286		$	3,830

FSP No. 109-2, provides guidance under SFAS No. 109 with respect to recording the potential impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Jobs Act”) on enterprises’ income tax expense and deferred tax liability FSP 109-2 states that an enterprise is permitted time beyond the financial reporting period of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of applying SFAS No. 109. By electing to apply the provisions of Section 965 of the Internal Revenue Code, enacted as part of the Jobs Act, to repatriate extraordinary dividends we will therefore be eligible to claim an eighty-five percent dividends received deduction for income tax purposes on the eligible amounts. As discussed in our 2004 10-K, we have evaluated this opportunity and, based on these requirements, the Company currently has $7.0 million of cash held outside the U.S., which could be eligible for the special deduction in fiscal year 2005. It is anticipated that we will complete any dividend by the end of our current fiscal year. The range of possible amounts that the Company is currently considering eligible for repatriation is between zero and $3.6 million. The related potential range of income tax is between zero and $0.2 million.

In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 154 “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections - A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.” The new standard changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. Among other changes, SFAS No. 154 requires that a voluntary change in accounting principle be applied retrospectively with all prior period financial statements presented based on the new accounting principle unless it is impracticable to do so. SFAS No. 154 also provides that (1) a change in method of depreciating or amortizing a long-lived nonfinancial asset be accounted for as a change in estimate (prospectively) that was effected by a change in accounting principle, and (2) correction of errors in previously issued financial statements should be termed a “restatement.” The new standard is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 154 will have a material effect on its financial statements.

NOTE 2. OTHER FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION

Inventories (in thousands):

	July1, 2005		December 31 2004

Raw materials	$	8,630	$	7,531
Work in process	2,872		2,821
Finished goods	3,441		4,281
	$	14,943	$	14,633

Supplemental Cash Flow Information (in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended September
	Six Months Ended
	2003			2002
	July 1, 2005			June 25, 2004
Cash paid for:
Interest	$	23—		$88	~~183~~
Income taxes	~~582~~174			~~2,578~~843
Non-cash transactions:
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities	4,026			1,829
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred taxes of $913 in 2005 and $236 in 2004	(1,534		)	(790	)

~~Note 3~~Comprehensive Loss. ~~Stock~~ The ~~Based~~table ~~Compensation~~below presents our comprehensive loss, defined as changes in shareholders’ equity excluding changes resulting from investments by and distributions to shareholders (in thousands):

We have a 1996 Stock Option Plan (the 1996 Plan), nonqualified stock options issued outside of the 1996 Plan, and an Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Options granted are accounted for under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Because our stock options are granted at the market value on the date of grant, no related compensation expense is recognized. However, had the compensation expense of option grants been determined using a fair-value based method as described in SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure”, our net earnings (loss) and earnings (loss) per share (EPS), on a pro forma basis, would have been reported as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	July 1, 2005			June 25, 2004 (Restated – See Note 7)			July 1, 2005			June 25, 2004 (Restated – See Note 7)

Net earnings (loss)	$	(5,679	)	$	534		$	(9,827	)	(1,012	)
Reclassification to net earnings (loss) of gain on available-for-sale securities previously deferred, net of tax	—			(1,629		)	—			(1,629	)
Unrealized holding loss on available-for-sale securities, net of tax	(310		)	(344		)	(1,534		)	(790	)
Translation adjustments	(1,752		)	(312		)	(2,936		)	(1,183	)
Comprehensive loss	$	(7,741	)	$	(1,751	)	$	(14,297	)	(4,614	)

	Three Months Ended September						Nine Months Ended September
	2003			2002			2003			2002
Net loss:
As reported	$	(2,534	)	$	(474	)	$	(5,769	)	$	(404	)
Stock based compensation expense, net of tax	366			498			1,247			1,798
Pro forma	$	(2,900	)	$	(972	)	$	(7,016	)	$	(2,202	)
Basic EPS:
As reported	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.18	)	$	(0.01	)
Pro forma	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.07	)
Diluted EPS:
As reported	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.18	)	$	(0.01	)
Pro forma	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.07	)

Note 4. Royalties

We have license agreements with certain companies for the use of CD and DVD manufacturing technology. While we believe we have obtained, or are in the process of obtaining, all the necessary licenses to conduct our business, no assurances can be given that we are immune from patent claims from other companies. The cost of these royalties is accrued based on units sold and charged to cost of sales. As previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2002, we have been in ongoing negotiations with Philips Corporation for a reduction in the

~~royalty rate paid to Philips~~NOTE ~~under their Compliance Reward Program introduced in July 2002~~3. ~~These~~STOCK ~~negotiations~~BASED are continuing but no assurances can be given that we will successfully negotiate a reduced royalty rate, and accordingly, our financial results do not reflect the potential benefit of this reduction. Had this reduced rate been in effect at the beginning of the July 2002, we estimate it would have reduced our 2003 cost of sales by approximately $500,000 in the third quarter and $1,800,000 year-to-date, and our 2002 cost of sales by approximately $1,400,000.COMPENSATION

~~Note~~We 5have a 1996 Stock Option Plan, a 2004 Equity Incentive Plan and an Employee Stock Purchase Plan. ~~Segment~~Options granted under these plans are accounted for under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Because our stock options are granted at the market value on the date of grant, no related compensation expense is recognized. However, had the compensation expense of option grants been determined in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), our net earnings (loss) and ~~Geographical~~earnings (loss) ~~Information~~per share, on a pro forma basis, would have been reported as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

We operate in one industry segment. The geographic distributions of our sales, operating income (loss), capital expenditures and identifiable assets for 2003 and 2002 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	July 1, 2005			June 25, 2004 (Restated – See Note 7)		July 1, 2005			June 25, 2004 (Restated – See Note 7)
Net earnings (loss):
As reported	$	(5,679	)	$	534	$	(9,827	)	(1,012	)
Pro forma	$	(5,856	)	$	230	$	(10,251	)	(1,548	)

Basic earnings (loss) per share:
As reported	$	(0.17	)	$	0.02	$	(0.30	)	(0.03	)
Pro forma	$	(0.18	)	$	0.01	$	(0.31	)	(0.05	)

Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
As reported	$	(0.17	)	$	0.02	$	(0.30	)	(0.03	)
Pro forma	$	(0.18	)	$	0.01	$	(0.31	)	(0.05	)

	Three Months Ended September						Nine Months Ended September
	2003			2002			2003			2002
Sales:
United States	$	39,114		$	38,195		$	118,081		$	118,689
Ireland	9,560			7,086			25,428			22,091
Canada	6,143			6,068			20,793			18,942
Intergeographic sales	(9,282		)	(7,630		)	(28,542		)	(24,658		)
	$	44,535		$	43,719		$	135,760		$	135,064
Operating income (loss):
United States	$	313		$	2,048		$	647		$	6,852
Ireland	374			83			1,060			177
Canada	92			699			1,021			2,132
Corporate and eliminations	(5,424		)	(3,863		)	(12,557		)	(10,592		)
	$	(4,645	)	$	(1,033	)	$	(9,829	)	$	(1,431	)
Capital expenditures:
United States	$	567		$	455		$	2,937		$	1,180
Ireland	189			—			1,058			56
Canada	1,318			25			1,661			115
	$	2,074		$	480		$	5,656		$	1,351
Depreciation and amortization:
United States	$	1,530		$	1,465		$	4,456		$	4,498
Ireland	155			440			563			1,248
Canada	433			308			1,105			923
	$	2,118		$	2,213		$	6,124		$	6,669
	September 2003			December 2002
Assets:
United States	$	42,109		$	49,390
Ireland	24,253			25,174
Canada	19,582			17,519
Total identifiable assets	85,944			92,083
Corporate assets	84,754			75,100
	$	170,698		$	167,183

NOTE 4. AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES

Our short-term investments in available-for-sale securities consist of auction rate preferred securities and municipal auction rate notes. These investments, which have original maturities beyond one year, may be classified as short-term based on their highly liquid nature and because these securities represent the investment of cash that is available for current operations. These investments are classified as available-for-sale and recorded at fair value. The carrying value of short-term available-for-sale securities approximates fair market value due to their short maturities. As of July 1, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we had $0 and $19,200,000 in short term available-for-sale securities, respectively.

Our long-term investment in available-for-sale securities consists of 3,098,000 shares of Intraware common stock (NASDAQ symbol: ITRA). We purchased 6,000,098 shares for $0.82 per share in August 2002 in connection with the establishment of a strategic relationship with Intraware, a provider of electronic software delivery services. In May 2004, we sold 3,000,000 shares which resulted in proceeds of approximately $5,230,000 and a pre-tax gain of approximately $2,770,000. The market value of our investment in Intraware was $1,177,000 as of July 1, 2005 and $3,624,000 as of December 31, 2004.

~~Note 6~~NOTE 5. ~~Termination~~COMMITMENTS ofAND ~~Financing Agreements~~CONTINGENCIES

In“Wells Notice” and Shareholder Lawsuit. As previously disclosed in our filings with the ~~second~~SEC, ~~quarter~~we have been the subject of ~~2003~~an weSEC ~~paid~~investigation ~~all~~and ~~amounts~~a ~~due~~consolidated ~~under~~class ~~our~~action ~~term~~lawsuit ~~loan~~involving ~~agreement~~allegations ~~and~~of ~~terminated~~securities ~~both~~law violations. ~~this~~The ~~agreement~~allegations relate to Company disclosures and ~~our~~certain stock ~~$25,000,000~~sales ~~revolving~~by ~~line~~two former officers during the third quarter of ~~credit~~the ~~facility~~year 2000.

~~Note~~On 7April 27, 2005, we announced, without admission of liability, an agreement to settle the outstanding class action lawsuit. ~~iLogistix~~This ~~Settlement~~stipulation of settlement, if ultimately approved by the Court, will result in payments of $2,250,000 in cash and 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The entire $2,250,000 cash payment will be paid by proceeds received from our directors’ and officers’ insurance carrier. These settlement payments will be distributed to shareholders who incurred losses as a result of stock purchases between May 25, 2000 and October 18, 2002, inclusive, and to plaintiffs’ attorneys as fees and costs awarded by the Court. The charge against earnings associated with the issuance of the 1,500,000 shares of stock was initially recorded in the third quarter of 2004, and the charge will continue to be adjusted based on the market price of the Company’s stock until final Court approval of the settlement, currently expected to occur in the third quarter of 2005.

On ~~February 21~~June 9, ~~2002~~2005, we ~~signed~~announced anthat ~~Asset~~the ~~Purchase~~Company ~~Agreement~~reached ~~(“APA”)~~a tosettlement ~~purchase~~agreement with the ~~business~~SEC. Under ~~and~~the ~~substantially~~terms ~~all~~of the settlement agreement, ~~assets~~the ofCompany ~~Software~~agreed ~~Logistics~~to ~~Corporation~~pay ~~(“iLogistix”)~~a ~~and~~civil ~~deposited~~penalty in the amount of $32,~~902~~000,000 which has inbeen andeposited in escrow ~~account. The~~and ~~deposit~~is ~~was~~ recorded inas other current assets inon our ~~consolidated~~ balance sheet. ~~The~~We ~~closing~~expect ofpayment ~~the transaction was scheduled for February 28, 2002, subject~~ to ~~significant~~be ~~closing~~made ~~conditions. As~~ out of ~~March 19,~~the ~~2002,~~escrow ~~several~~account ofduring ~~these conditions had not been satisfied by iLogistix, leading to~~ our ~~termination~~third quarter of ~~the~~ ~~APA~~2005.

~~Following~~We ~~our~~have ~~termination~~established ofreserves ~~the~~for ~~APA, iLogistix~~these ~~commenced~~two anmatters ~~action~~which ~~against~~we ~~us,~~believe ~~alleging~~to ~~that~~be ~~our~~adequate ~~termination~~and ~~was~~are inbased ~~violation of~~on the terms of the ~~APA. The suit~~ ~~sought~~settlement ~~unspecified~~agreements ~~damages~~ and ~~claimed that~~ the ~~termination~~provisions of ~~the~~FASB ~~APA triggered~~Statement ~~the right of iLogistix to the escrow deposit~~No. We ~~answered~~5, ~~the~~“Accounting ~~claim~~for Contingencies”, and ~~filed~~FASB aInterpretation No. ~~counterclaim~~14, ~~against~~“Reasonable ~~iLogistix~~Estimation ~~seeking a return~~ of the ~~escrow~~Amount ~~deposit~~of ~~and~~a ~~the~~Loss, an ~~payment~~interpretation of ~~interest,~~FASB ~~attorney’s~~Statement ~~fees,~~No. ~~and costs~~5”. These reserves are as follows:

On April 14, 2003, we announced the settlement of the litigation and the return of 100% of the deposit, plus accrued interest. As part of the settlement, no damages, fees or costs were awarded to either party.

	July 1, 2005		December 31, 2004

Class action lawsuit, net of expected insurance proceeds	$	6,463	$	6,520
SEC investigation	2,000		2,000
	$	8,463	$	8,520

~~Note~~The portion of the consolidated class ~~8. Subsequent Event~~action –lawsuit ~~Settlement~~settlement ofpayable ~~Claim~~in shares of ~~Unauthorized~~Company ~~Production~~stock has been valued at $4,275,000 and $6,165,000 based on the closing market prices of ~~Customer~~$2.85 ~~Software~~and $4.11 on July 1, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.

~~During the~~We ~~second quarter of 2003 one of our major customers alleged~~are ~~that~~involved ~~Zomax~~in ~~Ireland,~~certain aother ~~subsidiary~~claims wearising ~~acquired from Kao Corporation~~ in ~~January 1999,~~ ~~was~~the ~~responsible~~normal ~~for~~course ~~unauthorized production~~ of ~~the customer’s software~~business. ~~Our~~In ~~customer claimed~~our ~~that~~opinion, ~~because~~the final resolution of these claims ~~alleged~~should ~~unauthorized~~not ~~activities~~have ita ~~had~~material ~~suffered significant~~adverse ~~damages~~effect ~~representing lost profits~~ on ~~displaced~~our ~~product~~financial ~~sales. We~~position, cash ~~have~~flow ~~vigorously~~or ~~denied~~results ~~all~~from ~~claims~~operations.

Contractual Obligations. Subsequent to the ~~end~~second quarter of ~~the third quarter~~2005, we ~~and~~entered into an agreement with our ~~customer~~supplier ~~reached~~of polycarbonate, a ~~final~~petroleum-based ~~accomodation~~commodity ~~related~~which tois the ~~these~~primary ~~claims~~raw material used in the production of CD and DVD media. ~~While~~Beginning wein ~~continue~~the tofirst ~~deny these~~half ~~claims~~of 2004, supply shortages and increases in ~~order~~petroleum toprices ~~avoid~~have ~~potentially~~placed ~~lengthy~~significant ~~and~~upward pressure ~~expensive~~on ~~litigation,~~polycarbonate pricing. Under the agreement, which runs through June 2006, we have agreed to ~~make~~purchase polycarbonate aat ~~one-time~~set ~~payment~~price terms. These price terms restrict monthly price increases and help us to limit our ~~customer~~exposure to ofpotential ~~$3,000,000. As~~future aprice ~~part~~increases ofwhile ~~the~~also ~~settlement~~allowing ~~agreement,~~us to reduce our ~~neither~~purchase ~~party~~volume ~~admitted~~should ~~any~~the ~~liability~~price ~~and~~terms ~~both~~increase ~~parties~~above ~~obtained~~an ~~mutual~~agreed-upon ~~releases~~level over ~~related~~the initial base price. Minimum remaining commitments under this agreement subject to purchase volume reductions, are approximately $5.8 million based on the ~~claims~~current adjusted base price and minimum remaining quantity. ~~The~~We ~~payment~~believe ofthat this agreement will allow us ~~$3,000,000~~to ~~was~~minimize ~~accrued~~our ~~and~~near-term ~~charged~~exposure to ~~results~~continuing ofupward ~~operations~~price inpressures ~~the~~on ~~third~~this ~~quarter.~~key raw material.

~~ITEM 2.~~ NOTE ~~MANAGEMENT’S~~6. SEGMENT ~~DISCUSSION~~ AND ~~ANALYSIS~~GEOGRAPHICAL ~~OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~INFORMATION

~~Business~~We operate in one industry segment. The geographic distributions of our revenue, operating income (loss), capital expenditures, depreciation and identifiable assets for 2005 and 2004 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Our business is focused on providing outsourcing services that help our customers more efficiently bring their products and content to market worldwide. We market and sell our services to industry leading customers in a variety of markets including IT hardware manufacturers, software publishers, consumer electronics, marketing services and corporate information services. We believe our expertise in integrating and managing critical supply chain functions allows our customers to focus on their core competencies, reduce costs, accelerate time to market, decrease inventory obsolescence, and improve response to the demands of their customers in a variety of geographic regions.

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	July 1, 2005			June 25, 2004 (Restated – See Note 7)			July 1, 2005			June 25, 2004 (Restated – See Note 7)
Revenue:
United States	$	31,055		$	33,811		$	62,943		$	71,303
Ireland	6,669			8,365			14,700			17,625
Canada	11,770			6,756			18,676			14,343
Intergeographic sales	(6,909		)	(3,850		)	(11,553		)	(8,154		)
	$	42,585		$	45,082		$	84,766		$	95,117

Operating income (loss):
United States	$	(1,676	)	$	1,811		$	(3,806	)	$	2,019
Ireland	(2,809		)	(531		)	(4,751		)	(787		)
Canada	160			715			(70		)	1,266
Corporate and eliminations	(3,857		)	(3,597		)	(6,386		)	(6,555		)
	$	(8,182	)	$	(1,602	)	$	(15,013	)	$	(4,057	)

Capital expenditures:
United States	$	398		$	422		$	697		$	758
Ireland	—			289			192			570
Canada	1,349			137			1,407			135
	$	1,747		$	848		$	2,296		$	1,463

Depreciation:
United States	$	1,154		$	1,483		$	2,332		$	2,967
Ireland	415			287			914			702
Canada	465			547			932			1,114
	$	2,034		$	2,317		$	4,178		$	4,783

	July 1, 2005			As of December 31, 2004
Assets:
United States	$	29,368		$	42,946
Ireland	19,001			27,646
Canada	22,324			17,384
Total identifiable assets	70,693			87,976
Corporate assets	74,935			80,178
	$	145,628		$	168,154

Our outsourcing solutions are provided in a modular suite of supply chain services that enable our customers to select the combination of services that best meet their unique needs. These services include customer contact center services, procurement and material management services, CD/DVD replication, print services, electronic software delivery (“ESD”) services through a strategic partnership with Intraware, a leading provider of these services, assembly and kitting services, fulfillment services and returns management services. We deliver these services from twelve facilities across North America, Mexico, Canada, and Ireland.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

There were no significant changes to our critical accounting policies during the quarter ended September 2003. See our 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of our critical accounting policies.

Results of Operations

Our fiscal quarters end on the last Friday of the calendar quarter. Unless otherwise indicated, references to 2003 and 2002 refer to the fiscal periods ended September 26, 2003 and September 27, 2002, respectively.

The table below provides certain operating data as an aid in the understanding of the discussion and analysis of the results of operations. Amounts are shown as a percentage of sales, except for the effective income tax rate, which represents income tax benefit as a percentage of the loss before taxes.

	Three Months Ended September				Nine Months Ended September
	2003		2002		2003		2002
Sales	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Gross profit	14.3		18.1		14.3		18.8
Selling, general and administrative expenses	18.0		20.5		19.3		19.8
Charge related to settlement of customer claim	6.7		—		2.2		—
Operating loss	(10.4	)	(2.4	)	(7.2	)	(1.1	)
Other income, net	0.6		0.7		—		0.6
Effective income tax rate	42.3		35.6		41.2		35.9
Net loss	(5.7	)	(1.1	)	(4.2	)	(0.3	)

Three Months Ended September 2003 vs. September 2002

Net Loss. Our net loss for the third quarter of 2003 was ($2.5) million, or ($0.08) per share, compared to a net loss of ($0.5) million, or ($0.01) per share, in the same period in 2002. As discussed in more detail below, the increase in our net loss is primarily attributable to the decline in our gross profit margins and a $3.0 million charge related to the settlement of a claim of unauthorized production of software by one of our customers.

Sales. Sales in the third quarter increased two percent to $44.5 million in 2003 from $43.7 million in 2002. Sales were favorably impacted by the results of our efforts in 2003 to obtain new customers and increase sales to existing customers, offset by the effect of declines in CD and DVD unit prices attributable to industry over-capacity and declining demand for CD media.

~~Gross profit~~NOTE 7. ~~Our~~RESTATEMENT ~~gross~~OF ~~profit~~2004 ~~decreased~~QUARTERLY ~~to 14.3% of sales~~FINANCIAL in 2003 from 18.1% of sales in 2002. This decrease reflects the continued shift in our product mix to products that contain a higher content of lower margin packaging materials and the price deterioration on CD and DVD media attributable to the factors discussed under “Sales” above.STATEMENTS

~~Selling~~As previously disclosed in our 2004 Form 10-K, ~~general~~on February 24, 2005, our management and ~~administrative~~the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors concluded that, as a result of our internal investigation into financial reporting and accounting irregularities at our Ireland Subsidiary, Zomax Limited (~~SG&A~~“Zomax Ireland”), ~~expenses.~~ the Company’s financial ~~SG&A~~statements ~~expenses~~for ~~decreased~~the tofirst, $8second and third quarters of 2004, should be restated.0 ~~million~~These irregularities resulted in ~~2003~~the ~~from~~aggregate understatement of 2004 consolidated net loss by $~~9.0~~1,823,000 ~~million~~for inthe nine months ended September 24, ~~2002~~2004. ~~SG&A~~For ~~expenses~~further ~~were~~discussion ~~favorably~~of the ~~impacted~~impact byof athis ~~reduction~~matter inon ~~bad~~our ~~debt~~evaluation ~~expense~~of ~~attributable~~our tointernal ~~improvements~~controls inover ~~the~~financial ~~quality~~reporting, see Item 9A of our ~~customer~~2004 ~~receivables~~Form ~~portfolio~~10-K and ~~reductions~~Item in4 ~~incentive compensation~~of ~~and~~this ~~legal~~Form ~~expenses~~10-Q.

~~Charge related to settlement of customer~~The ~~claim. As discussed~~Company’s inpreviously ~~Note~~reported 8unaudited toCondensed Consolidated ~~Financial~~Statement ~~Statements, subsequent to the end~~ of ~~the third quarter of 2003, we reached a settlement with one of our customers~~ ~~related~~Operations toand ~~allegations~~Condensed ofConsolidated ~~unauthorized~~Balance ~~production~~Sheet offor ~~their software. The allegations were initiated in~~ the second quarter of ~~2003. While we continue to~~ ~~deny~~2004 ~~these~~on ~~claims,~~Form ~~in order to avoid potentially lengthy and expensive litigation, we agreed to make a one~~10-~~time~~Q ~~payment~~are torestated ~~our customer of $3.0 million and accrued this payment~~ as ~~a charge to our third quarter results of operations.~~follows:

Income taxes. Our effective tax rate in the third quarter of 2003 was 42.3% compared to 35.6% in 2002 The increase reflects changes from 2002 to 2003 in how annual taxable earnings and losses are projected to occur across the tax jurisdictions in which we operate.

Nine Months Ended September 2003 vs. September 2002

Net loss. Our year-to-date net loss in 2003 was ($5.8) million, or ($0.18) per share, compared to a net loss of ($0.4) million, or ($0.01) per share during the same period in 2002. As discussed in more detail below, the increase in our net loss is attributable to the decline in our gross profit margins and a $3.0 million charge related to the settlement of a claim of unauthorized production of software by one of our customers.

Sales. Sales in for the first nine months of 2003 were $135.8 million, a slight increase from sales of $135.1 million in the comparable period of 2002. Unit prices on CD and DVD media have declined from 2002 to 2003 reflecting industry over-capacity and lower demand for CD media. However, the negative effect of these factors on our revenues was offset by the addition of new customers and increases in business volume with existing customers during the same time period.

Gross profit. Our gross profit decreased to 14.3% of sales in the first nine months of 2003 from 18.8% of sales in the comparable period of 2002. This decrease reflects the continued shift in our product mix to products that contain a higher content of lower margin packaging materials, and the price deterioration of CD and DVD media attributable to the factors discussed under “Sales” above.

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses. As reported, SG&A expenses decreased to $26.2 million in the first nine months of 2003 from $26.8 million in the same period of 2002. However, SG&A expenses in 2002 reflect approximately $2.2 million in expenses related to possible acquisitions we pursued in the first quarter. Excluding the effects of these costs from 2002, SG&A expenses increased $1.6 million, of which approximately $0.6 million is attributable to the translation effect of currency exchange rate changes on expenses incurred in our Ireland and Canadian operations. The balance of the increase reflects investments we have made aimed at increasing the suite of services we offer, the number of customers and markets we serve and our capabilities to support them, including new locations in the U.S. and Mexico.

Charge related to settlement of customer claim. As discussed in Note 8 to Consolidated Financial Statements, subsequent to the end of the third quarter of 2003, we reached a settlement with one of our customers related to allegations of unauthorized production of their software. The allegations were initiated in the second quarter of 2003. While we continue to deny these claims, in order to avoid potentially lengthy and expensive litigation, we agreed to make a one-time payment to our customer of $3.0 million and accrued this payment as a charge to our third quarter results of operations.

Other income, net. Net other income in 2003 was approximately zero compared to $0.8 million in 2002. The decline is due primarily to the negative effect on our foreign operations of the change from 2002 to 2003 in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar and the Euro. Net interest income decreased to $0.6 million in 2003 from $0.9 million in 2002 as a result of the effect of declining interest rates on the earnings from our investments offset by a reduction in interest expense on our long-term debt which we retired in the second quarter of 2003.

Income taxes. Our expected effective tax rate for 2003 changed to 41% from approximately 36% in 2002, reflecting differences between the years in how taxable earnings and losses are projected to occur across the tax jurisdictions in which we operate.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and Cash Equivalents. At the end of the third quarter of 2003, our cash and cash equivalents balances totaled $73.6 million, an increase of $1.5 during the year. Cash generated by operating activities was $7.5 million and an additional $3.9 million was generated by the return of our escrow deposit from our terminated acquisition of iLogistix. These cash inflows were offset by capital equipment purchases of $5.7 million, repayment of notes payable of $3.8 million and repurchases of 761,900 shares of common stock for $2.6 million. There were no stock repurchases in the third quarter of 2003.

Working Capital and Liquidity. Our cash and cash equivalents balances continue to be our primary source of working capital. Our future liquidity needs will depend on, among other factors, the timing of capital expenditures, expenditures in connection with possible acquisitions, changes in customer order volume and the timing and collection of receivables. During the second quarter of 2003, we paid all remaining amounts due under our term loan agreement and terminated both this agreement and our $25.0 million revolving line of credit facility. We believe our existing cash balances and anticipated cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund our operations for the foreseeable future.

Outlook

This section should be read in conjunction with the section below titled “Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995”.

We believe that worldwide demand for CDs and our other services has declined due to difficult economic conditions in the personal computer hardware and software markets and continuing uncertainty in the worldwide economy. General economic factors affecting demand in the personal computer hardware and software industry directly impact us.

The supply chain services industry in which we operate is highly competitive, which coupled with declining CD media demand over the past several years, has resulted in overcapacity in the industry, declining unit prices, industry consolidation and in some cases, the bankruptcy of competitors. Some of our remaining competitors are larger and more established with greater financial and other resources, particularly as consolidation in the industry continues. However, the financial strength of some other competitors is weak in comparison to us. As financial strength becomes a key decision making component for customers, our financial position becomes an advantage over these competitors.

Overcapacity in our industry, lower CD media demand and declining unit prices over the past several years have adversely affected our revenues and gross margins. While there can be no assurances that these industry factors will not continue, we believe that they have recently moderated and expect their adverse effect on our revenues and gross margins to moderate as well. However, if market demand and unit prices continue to decline, our revenues and gross margins will continue to be directly and adversely impacted, capacities will be further underutilized and our return to profitability will be in doubt. Furthermore, a substantial part of our revenues and unit volume is derived from a relatively small number of key customers, including Microsoft and AOL, and our revenues and profits will be significantly lower than currently expected if we cannot retain these customers. In addition, if we do not respond rapidly to technological changes, we will be subject to the loss of some of our customer base, which will materially and adversely affect revenue.

Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

The foregoing discussion contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations or beliefs concerning future events. Such statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “could,” “possible,” “plan,” “project,” “will,” “forecast” and similar words or expressions. Our forward-looking statements generally relate to our assessments of expected market demand and pricing, financial results, sales efforts, acquisition plans and cash requirements. There are certain important factors that could cause results to differ materially from those anticipated by some of the statements made herein. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties.

Although it is not possible to foresee all of the factors that may cause actual results to differ from our forward-looking statements, such factors include, among others:

• our ability to effectively compete in an increasingly intense competitive environment;

• our dependence on a relatively small number of key customers in the personal computer hardware and software industries;

• our ability to maintain our status as a Microsoft Authorized Replicator;

• our ability to respond to declining market demand and unit prices;

• our ability to meet our customers’ increasing security requirements regarding their intellectual property, inventory and other assets;

• our ability to attract and retain a skilled and qualified workforce in diverse locations at acceptable costs;

• risks associated with establishing and maintaining international operations;

• our dependence on our ability to obtain and maintain licenses to use patented technology in our manufacturing operations; and

• the development and rate of market acceptance of new electronic media products or technologies, including DVD and electronic software downloading services, and other media storage techniques.

We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, but investors are advised to consult any further disclosures by us on this subject in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, especially on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K (if any), in which we discusses in more detail various important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expected or historical results. It is not possible to foresee or identify all such factors. As such, investors should not consider any list of such factors to be an exhaustive statement of all risks, uncertainties or potentially inaccurate assumptions.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Foreign Currency. A portion of our operations are located in Ireland, Canada and Mexico. The financial results of these operations are translated to US dollars at current exchange rates. Changes in exchange rates between periods can affect the comparability of results reported in US dollars.

In addition to these translation gains and losses, we also incur transaction gains and losses which are reflected in our financial statements. A majority of the sales from our Canadian operations, and a portion of the related costs, are denominated in US dollars. As a result, we have limited exposure to the Canadian currency. The majority of sales revenues and related costs in our Ireland operations are denominated in Euros. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses historically have not been material to our results of operations or our financial condition. However, we anticipate we will continue to incur exchange gains and losses from foreign operations in the future. These gains and losses may be significant depending on factors such as changes in foreign currency or weak economic conditions in foreign markets. In addition, demand for our products and services can be directly impacted by the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, such as this Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to satisfy the objectives for which they are intended. There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

See Notes 7 and 8 to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of the settlement of a claim for unauthorized production of customer software and the settlement of an outstanding claim related to the termination of our acquisition of iLogistix.

We are a party to various other suits, claims and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business, and we intend to vigorously defend them. The amount of monetary liability, if any, resulting from an adverse result in any of such suits, proceedings and claims in which we are a defendant cannot be determined at this time. However, in the opinion of our management, the aggregate amount of liability under these other suits, proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) Exhibits.

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

We filed a Form 8-K dated July 31, 2003 announcing our second quarter 2003 financial results.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: November 10, 2003		ZOMAX INCORPORATED
	By:	/s/ James T. Anderson
		James T. Anderson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
	By:	/s/ John Gelp
		John Gelp, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

ZOMAX INCORPORATED

~~FORM~~CONDENSED ~~10-Q~~CONSOLIDATED ~~FOR~~STATEMENTS ~~QUARTER ENDED~~OF ~~SEPTEMBER 26,~~OPERATIONS ~~2003~~(UNAUDITED)

Exhibit Number		Description
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

	Three Months Ended June 25, 2004						Six Months Ended June 25, 2004
	As Reported			As Restated			As Reported			As Restated

Revenue:	$	45,082		$	45,082		$	95,117		$	95,117

Cost of revenue	36,289			37,062			78,985			80,147
Gross profit	8,793			8,020			16,132			14,970

Selling, general and administrative expenses	9,597			9,622			18,763			19,027
Operating loss	(804		)	(1,602		)	(2,631		)	(4,057		)

Interest income	127			127			305			305
Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities	2,770			2,770			2,770			2,770
Other expense, net	34			34			15			15
Income (loss) before income taxes	2,127			1,329			459			(967		)

Income tax expense	875			795			188			45
Net earnings (loss)	$	1,252		$	534		$	271		$	(1,012	)

Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic	$	0.04		$	0.02		$	0.01		$	(0.03	)
Diluted	$	0.04		$	0.02		$	0.01		$	(0.03	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic	32,790			32,790			32,753			32,753
Dilutive effect of stock options	283			283			362			—
Diluted	33,073			33,073			33,115			32,753

ZOMAX INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

	As of June 25, 2004
	As Reported			As Restated
ASSETS

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$		69,854	$	43,904
Available-for-sale securities	—			25,950
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $1,035 as reported and $1,035 restated	27,765			26,962
Inventories	11,238			10,754
Deferred income taxes	2,670			2,670
Other current assets	7,882			7,927
Total current assets	119,409			118,167

Property and equipment, net	35,016			34,616
Deferred income taxes	33			—
Available-for-sale securities	5,390			5,390
	$	159,848		$		158,173

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	12,514		$		12,818
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	12,408			12,400
Total current liabilities	24,922			25,218

Deferred income taxes	—			—
Total liabilities	24,922			25,218

Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock	62,960			62,960
Retained earnings	66,163			64,260
Accumulated other comprehensive income	5,803			5,735
Total shareholders’ equity	134,926			132,955
	$	159,848		$		158,173

NOTE 8. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER RELATED COSTS

At the end of the first quarter of 2005, we announced our intentions to begin a restructuring plan in the second quarter of 2005. The activities undertaken in this plan primarily consist of media replication equipment consolidation within our North American and Ireland asset groups and reductions in headcount in both North America and Ireland. As a part of the consolidation efforts we had assets approximating $852,000 in aggregate net book value which were either abandoned or disposed of and were accounted for as long-lived assets to be abandoned and adjusted to be fully depreciated as of the end of our 2^nd quarter (the date of abandonment or disposal). Additionally, the useful lives of certain assets in North America approximating $164,000 in aggregate carrying value will be depreciated over the next 9 months (their approximate original remaining useful lives) and continue to be accounted for as assets held and used. In Ireland, assets approximating $310,000 in aggregate value are considered abandoned and held for disposal. No further depreciation will be recorded on these assets.

We have recorded pretax charges related to this restructuring plan of $2,409,000 thus far in 2005, including employee separation costs, accelerated depreciation on assets held and used until disposal and other costs directly related to the restructuring plan, including decommission costs. Liabilities accrued as part of the plan were $641,000 as of July 1, 2005. Details of the restructuring activity for 2005 are as follow (in thousands):

	Employee Severance and Benefits			Accelerated Depreciation			Other			Total

Total liabilities at December 31, 2004	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—

Total charges	1,293			852			264			2,409
Non-cash	—			(852		)	—			(852		)
Cash payments	(910		)	—			(6		)	(916		)

Total liabilities at July 1, 2005	$	383		$	—		$	258		$	641

We expect to complete our restructuring activities in the third quarter of 2005.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Fiscal Quarter-End

Our fiscal quarters consist of 13-weeks ending on a Friday so that our fiscal year ends on the last Friday of the calendar year. Our fiscal quarters referenced herein refer to the periods ended July 1, 2005, December 31, 2004 and June 25, 2004.

Introduction and Overview

For the second quarter of 2005, we recorded a loss of $0.17 per share compared to earnings of $0.02 per share in the second quarter of 2004 (as restated). Revenues declined in the second quarter of 2005 by 5.5% to $42.6 million, compared to $45.1 million in the second quarter of 2004. The revenue decline reflects a decrease of approximately 22% in media units sold, primarily to our Personal Computer Original Equipment Manufacturer (PC OEM) customer base. This decline reflects a previously disclosed trend in this customer base to eliminate certain recovery CD’s and printed material shipped with some of their PC’s, as well as the effects of our previously disclosed ability or willingness to provide services at prices acceptable to these customers. These trends also affected our year-to-date revenue and profitability performance as compared to 2004. Year-to-date, our revenues declined 10.9% to $84.8 million as compared to $95.1 million in 2004 and our loss per share increased to ($0.30) per share from ($0.03) per share in 2004.

The deterioration in our profitability reflects the under utilization of capacity and resulting high fixed costs relative to current revenue levels, changes in customer and product mix, customer pricing reductions, continued losses in our Irish operations, ongoing increases in polycarbonate costs and, in the first quarter of 2005, increased professional services associated with our 2004 year end audit and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance activities.

In response to the profitability deterioration, we began executing a set of initiatives late in the first quarter that included a reduction in excess CD replication capacity and related costs, the transition of some assembly and other services to lower cost facilities and the evaluation of our pricing strategies to ensure that they reflect the value we provide to our customers and the cost drivers in our business. The objective of this overall plan is to achieve profitability at or near the level of quarterly revenues we experienced in the first two quarters of 2005. As a result of these activities, our 2005 results include restructuring costs of approximately $2.2 million, or ($0.05) per share, in the second quarter, and $2.4 million, or ($0.05) per share, on a year-to-date basis. While we are confident in our ability to complete the execution of this plan, it is not without risk or uncertainty. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the potential negative impact on our customer relationships as we transition their production to other locations or attempt to execute pricing strategies that are not acceptable to the market place, our ability to accurately predict the amount of time and cost required to fully complete this plan, and our ability to retain key employees during and subsequent to the execution of these activities. In addition to the risks and uncertainties specific to this plan, our business faces other risks and uncertainties, a more detailed discussion of which can be found in Part I, Item 1 of our 2004 Form 10-K and later in this section under the captions “Outlook” and “Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.”

During the second quarter of 2005, we announced the settlement of our outstanding SEC investigation and our consolidated class action lawsuit, both of which related to activities in the year 2000. We announced settlement offers in both of these matters in the third quarter of 2004 and the final settlements were consistent with these initial settlement offers.

While we recognize the many risks and challenges to returning our business to consistent profitability, we believe we are well-positioned to address them. Our core market – supply-chain outsourcing services – continues to show promising growth in a variety of market segments. We believe we have strong relationships with our customers and that our knowledge of their businesses, our flexibility to meet their changing needs, our broad range of service capabilities and our financially strong balance sheet continue to be important decision factors for these customers. We further believe that upon completion of our plan to achieve consistent profitability at lower levels of revenue, there are opportunities available to us to achieve top line growth through both internal efforts and acquisitions activities.

General Factors Affecting Our Financial Results

Revenue. We derive our revenues from a wide variety of supply chain services provided to our customers. The number of CD and DVD media units that we replicate for our customers, changes in pricing, changes in the composition of the products and services we provide, consumer demand for our customers’ products, seasonal consumer buying patterns, and changes in the mix of customers

we serve, are all factors that contribute to fluctuations in our revenues from period to period. Revenues are generally more favorably impacted when our mix of customers is weighted toward those who are using a broad range of our services. Bundled pricing, changes in the content of the products we make for our customers and other market dynamics make it difficult to precisely determine the impact each of these factors has on changes in our total revenue.

Gross Profit Percentage. Our gross profit percentage during a period is dependent on a number of factors. Changes in raw material prices, particularly polycarbonate, a petroleum-based plastic used in the manufacturing of CD and DVD media, can impact margins. Increases in petroleum prices and supply constraints that began in the first half of 2004 continue to put upward pressure on polycarbonate pricing and are negatively impacting our gross profit margins. In addition to changes in pricing and raw material costs, the volume of business we experience in a given period also impacts our margins. A large portion of the costs required to deliver our products and services are fixed in nature. Increases in business volume allow us to leverage these costs resulting in higher gross profit margins, while decreases in volume have the opposite effect. Our relative mix of customers, as well as the related content of products or services we provide them, can also have a significant impact on gross profit margins. For example, the relative mix of CD/DVD media, labor, print and other material in the products we produce for our customers can affect our overall gross profit percentage. Although gross profit measured as a percentage of revenue may be lower, we believe providing incremental, value-added services to our customers, has an overall positive effect on gross margin as measured in dollars. Additionally, our ability to utilize automated packaging equipment versus manual labor can have a favorable effect on gross profit.

Selling General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses. A substantial portion of our SG&A expenses are fixed in nature. However, certain components such as incentive compensation, professional services, travel and other expenses can vary based on business results, individual events, or initiatives we may be pursuing at various times throughout the year. In addition to these factors, some of our SG&A expenses are incurred in Ireland and Canada and changes in the respective foreign currency rates can cause our expenses reported in U.S. dollars to fluctuate.

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes certain key information to aid in the understanding of our discussion and analysis of results of operations.

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	July 1, 2005		June 25, 2004 (Restated – See Note 7)		July 1, 2005		June 25, 2004 (Restated – See Note 7)
Percent of Revenue:
Gross profit	7.8	%	17.8	%	6.0	%	15.7	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses	22.9		21.3		23.5		20.0
Restructuring costs	5.1		—		2.8		—
Litigation reserve adjustment	(1.0	)	—		(2.6	)	—
Operating loss	(19.2	)	(3.6	)	(17.7	)	(4.3	)
Other income, net	1.0		0.4		0.9		0.3
Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities	—		6.1		—		2.9
Income tax expense (benefit)	(4.9	)	1.8		(5.2	)	0.0
Net earnings (loss)	(13.3	)	1.2		(11.6	)	(1.1	)

Other Operating Statistics:
Media units sold - % change from prior year	(21.8	)%	8.7	%	(20.4	)%	0.5	%
Revenue - % change from prior year	(5.5	)%	2.5	%	(10.9	)%	4.3	%
SG&A expenses - % change from prior year	0.1	%	8.4	%	4.9	%	4.5	%
Effective tax rate	26.8	%	59.8	%	31.0	%	(0.5	)%

Note: As previously disclosed in our 2004 Form 10-K and our 2005 first quarter Form 10-Q, we have restated our first and second quarter 2004 condensed consolidated financial statements for misstatements in financial results discovered in our Ireland subsidiary. These restatements primarily affected cost of revenue and selling, general and administrative expenses and resulted in a decrease of our second quarter 2004 earnings per share from $0.04 to $0.02 and our year-to-date earnings (loss) per share from $0.01 to ($0.03). See Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of this restatement.

Revenue

Our second quarter 2005 revenue decreased to $42.6 million, representing a 5.5% decrease from revenue of $45.1 million in the second quarter of 2004, reflecting a decrease of approximately 22% in media unit volume over the same period, primarily within our PC OEM customer base. This decline reflects a previously disclosed trend in this customer base to eliminate certain recovery CD’s and printed material shipped with some of their PC’s, as well as the effects of our previously disclosed willingness or ability to provide services at prices acceptable to these large customers.

Our volumes with Microsoft and Dell continue to drive significant amounts of our overall revenue. Revenue from Dell comprised approximately 17% of our total revenue in the second quarter of 2005, down from approximately 21% in both the second quarter of 2004 and the first quarter of 2005. Second quarter business with Microsoft, which remains our largest customer, generated approximately 26% of our total revenue in 2005 as compared to approximately 23% in both the second quarter of 2004 and the first quarter of 2005. In addition, in the second quarter of 2005, a third customer exceeded 10% of total revenue in the quarter, but we do not expect this customer to exceed 10% of total revenues for the full year.

On a year-to-date basis, 2005 revenues declined approximately 11% to $84.8 million from $95.1 million in 2004. In addition to the factors discussed above affecting our second quarter revenues, our 2005 revenues were affected in the first quarter by the timing and size of certain customer product launches and subscription cycles versus the first quarter of 2004, a decrease in the seasonal sell through for one of our retail customers, generally softer demand from our PC OEM customers, customer pricing reductions, and content shifts from CD media to DVD media made by certain customers.

Gross Profit

Our reported second quarter gross profit percentage decreased from 17.8% in 2004 to 7.8% in 2005. The decrease is primarily attributable to lower capacity utilization resulting in higher fixed costs as a percentage of revenue, increases in the price of polycarbonate, a petroleum-based plastic that is the primary raw material used in the manufacturing of CD and DVD media, operational inefficiencies in our Ireland manufacturing facility, changes in customer mix, and the effects of customer pricing reductions. Since the first quarter of 2004, petroleum price increases and supply shortages have more than doubled the price of polycarbonate. We have secured an adequate supply of polycarbonate through a purchase agreement with our supplier. Although the supply agreement limits price increases, the increases allowed under the agreement have had a negative impact on our gross profit. Polycarbonate cost increases accounted for an estimated decline of $1.2 million in our second quarter 2005 gross profit margins or 2.8% of revenues as compared to the same period in 2004. This decline includes the offsetting effect of a one cent surcharge on CD and DVD media passed on to our customers beginning in the fourth quarter of 2004.

Our reported year-to-date gross profit percentage declined from 15.7% in 2004 to 6.0% in 2005, reflecting the same factors affecting our second quarter 2005 margins as discussed above. Polycarbonate cost increases, net of the surcharge discussed above, accounted for an estimated decline of $2.1 million in our gross profit margins or 2.5% of revenues as compared to the year-to-date period in 2004.

Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses

SG&A expenses in the second quarter were comparable with the same period in 2004. On a year-to-date basis, SG&A expenses increased $0.9 million, or 4.9% due primarily to first quarter 2005 professional fees as a result of additional audit work for the previously disclosed Ireland restatement, the additional cost of the independent investigation of the accounting irregularities in Ireland and related controls testing for Sarbanes Oxley compliance. In addition, our first quarter 2005 SG&A expense includes incremental costs related to acquisition activities terminated during that period.

Restructuring Costs

As discussed above in the “Introduction and Overview” in this Item 2, we continued the implementation in the second quarter of an operational plan aimed at improving the alignment of our fixed cost structure with current revenue levels. In conjunction with this plan we have incurred approximately $2.2 million and $2.4 million in restructuring costs for the second quarter and year-to-date periods of 2005, respectively. These costs consist primarily of employee severance and accelerated depreciation on assets which have been abandoned or disposed, and costs of relocating certain production equipment.

Litigation Reserve Adjustment

As previously disclosed in our filings with the SEC, we have been the subject of an SEC investigation and a consolidated class action lawsuit involving allegations of securities law violations. The allegations relate to Company disclosures and certain stock sales by two former officers during the third quarter of the year 2000. In the third quarter of 2004, we established a reserve associated with settlement offers made in relation to these matters, a portion of which represents the proposed issuance of 1.5 million shares of the

Company’s common stock which is valued based on the market price of the stock as of the end of each reporting period. Accordingly, during the second quarter of 2005, we reduced the reserve by approximately $0.4 million, and on a year-to-date basis, reduced the reserve by $2.2 million. These reductions represent the decrease in the market value of these shares during these respective periods.

On April 27, 2005,we announced, without admission of liability, an agreement to settle the outstanding class action lawsuit. However, the portion of the reserve related to the proposed issuance of shares will continue to be adjusted based on the market price of the Company’s stock until final Court approval of the settlement. On June 9, 2005, we announced the settlement of the SEC matter relating to activities in the year 2000. See Note 5 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the details of these settlements.

Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2005 was 26.8% as compared to 59.8% in the second quarter of 2004. This decrease reflects a significant change in the mix of operating results from 2004 to 2005 between our Ireland operations, which are subject to relatively low tax rates, and our North American operations, which are subject to higher tax rates.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires estimation and judgment that affect the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Following are our most critical accounting policies that affect significant areas and involve judgment and estimates. If these estimates differ materially from actual results, the impact to the condensed consolidated financial statements may be material.

Revenue Recognition. We record revenue at the time product is shipped or as services are rendered. For certain customers, product is invoiced upon completion of production and assembly services, with final shipment occurring based on written customer instructions. In these cases, the customer accepts title to the goods as of the date of the invoice and revenue is recognized. In each case of these “bill and hold” sales, we ensure that the transaction complies with the conditions and considerations contained in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 and Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 108 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

On a year-to-date basis in 2005 and 2004, one customer accounted for approximately 25% and 24%, respectively, of our consolidated revenue, and a second customer accounted for approximately 19% and 20%, respectively, of our consolidated revenue. A third customer accounted for approximately 11% of our 2005 year-to-date consolidated revenues.

Cost of Revenue. We include direct labor, direct materials, royalties and production overhead, which includes shipping costs, in cost of revenue on the consolidated statements of operations.

Royalties. We have license agreements with several companies for the use of certain CD and DVD manufacturing technology we use in our business. We do not necessarily have agreements with every patent holder that may assert or has asserted a claim to royalties. The cost of these royalties is accrued based on units sold and charged to cost of revenue based upon the terms of our royalty agreements and, in accordance with the provisions of FASB Statement No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” and FASB Interpretation No. 14, “Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 5”, our assessment of the likelihood that other royalty claims may be asserted against us. Royalty expense included in cost of revenue was $2.2 million and $2.6 million in the first six months of 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or change this allowance in a period, we must include an expense or a benefit within the tax provision in our statement of operations.

Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our deferred tax assets. At July 1, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we had a valuation allowance of $2.3 million, due to the uncertainty of realizing the benefits of certain loss carryforwards before they expire. The valuation allowance was based on our historical taxable income and our estimates of future taxable income in each jurisdiction in which we operate and the

period over which our deferred tax assets will be recoverable. We will continue to assess the likelihood that the deferred tax assets will be realizable and the valuation allowance will be adjusted accordingly, which could materially impact our financial position and results of operations.

Our effective tax rate for interim reporting periods represents our best current estimate of our effective tax rate for the full year, which requires estimates of full year income or losses across each of the tax jurisdictions in which we operate. These estimates may change throughout the year resulting in potentially significant changes to our overall effective tax rate due to the effect of differences in the tax rates in each jurisdiction. In addition, the preparation of our income tax returns requires the interpretation of the associated tax laws. Many tax laws are complex, and at times ambiguous, and our interpretations of these laws may differ from the interpretations of the taxing authorities who have the right to audit our returns within statutory time periods. Where we believe there is a quantifiable risk that our interpretations of these laws could reasonably differ from those of the taxing authorities, we make appropriate provisions in our tax liabilities.

Accounts Receivable. We review our accounts receivable balances on a regular basis to determine their collectability. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded based on management’s estimate of those accounts which may become uncollectible.

Inventory. We review our inventory on a regular basis with the objective of assessing its net realizable value. We adjust the carrying value of inventory according to our estimates of the net realizable value of individual inventory components relative to their purchase or carrying value.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2004 the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (SFAS 151). SFAS 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing”, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and spoilage. This statement requires that those items be recognized as current period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal” which was the criterion specified in ARB No. 43. In addition, this Statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the cost of production be based on normal capacity of the production facilities. This pronouncement is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2006. The Company is in the process of evaluating whether the adoption of SFAS 151 will have a significant impact on the Company’s overall results of operations, financial position or cash flows; however, it is unlikely that impact will be material.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions.” The amendments made by Statement 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the narrow exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replace it with a broader exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. The Statement is effective for the Company relative to nonmonetary asset exchanges beginning December 31, 2005. The provisions of this Statement shall be applied prospectively. The Company is in the process of evaluating whether the adoption of SFAS 153 will have a significant impact on the Company’s overall results of operations or financial position; however, it is unlikely the impact will be material.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R) “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS 123(R) requires the recognition of compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued as of the grant date, based on the estimated number of awards that are expected to vest. SFAS 123(R) covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. Statement 123(R) replaces FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” In April 2005, the SEC delayed the effective date of SFAS 123(R) to fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. As a result, SFAS 123(R) will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2006. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of SFAS 123(R) on the Company’s overall results of operations, financial position and cash flows. Refer to pro forma disclosure in Note 3 for an indication of ongoing expense that will be included in the income statement once SFAS 123(R) is adopted.

On October 22, 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 109-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, for the Tax Deduction Provided to U.S. Based Manufacturers by the American Job Creation Act of 2004, and FSP 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provisions within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. FSP No. 109-1 clarifies how to apply SFAS No. 109 to the new law’s tax deduction for income attributable to “domestic production activities.” The fully phased-in deduction is up to nine percent of the lesser of taxable income or “qualified production activities income.” The staff proposal would require that the deduction be accounted for as a special deduction in the period earned, not as a tax-rate reduction.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Available-for-Sale Securities. As of July 1, 2005, cash and cash equivalents and short-term available-for-sale securities, in the aggregate, totaled $54.1 million, a decrease of $6.2 million from December 31, 2004. During the first two quarters of 2005, cash flows used in operating activities totaled $3.7 million while the remainder of the overall decrease is primarily related to capital expenditures totaling $2.3 million.

Working Capital and Liquidity. Working capital totaled $70.7 million and $83.3 million at July 1, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. This decrease primarily reflects the operating losses incurred in the first half of 2005. Our principal source of working capital continues to be cash and cash equivalents and short-term available-for-sale securities. In addition to our working capital balances, we also hold long term available-for-sale securities which represent our investment in Intraware (see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). These securities are registered and readily tradable and had a market value at July 1, 2005 of $1.2 million.

Our future liquidity needs will depend on, among other factors, the timing of capital expenditures, expenditures in connection with possible acquisitions and the timing of our ability to return the business to profitability. We believe that existing cash and investment balances and anticipated cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund our operations for the foreseeable future.

Contractual Obligations. Subsequent to the second quarter of 2005, we entered into an agreement with our supplier of polycarbonate, a petroleum-based commodity which is the primary raw material used in the production of CD and DVD media. Beginning in the first half of 2004, supply shortages and increases in petroleum prices have placed significant upward pressure on polycarbonate pricing. Under the agreement, which runs through June 2006, we have agreed to purchase polycarbonate at set price terms. These price terms restrict monthly price increases and help us to limit our exposure to potential future price increases while also allowing us to reduce our purchase volume should the price terms increase above an agreed-upon level over the initial base price. Minimum remaining commitments under this agreement, subject to purchase volume reductions, are approximately $5.8 million based on the current adjusted base price and minimum remaining quantity. We believe that this agreement will allow us to minimize our near-term exposure to continuing upward price pressures on this key raw material.

Outlook

Our business continues to be focused on CD and DVD media replication services and related assembly, distribution and contact center services which we deliver primarily through Company-owned facilities. We continue to evaluate our strategy of delivering our services through a vertically integrated model, with large fixed investments in facilities and equipment, versus a model in which we place more emphasis on our program management capabilities. As our relationships with our customers evolve, we believe many of these customers place greater value on our ability to program manage their end-to-end supply chain and less emphasis on our ability to directly deliver those services.

In the first half of 2005 we began a restructuring plan which eliminated approximately 20% of our CD replication capacity. While this restructuring plan was primarily aimed at reducing this capacity and its related costs, it also represents a move toward less dependency on Company-owned assets in the delivery of our services and will result in a greater dependence on outsourcing this volume in peak demand periods.

We expect to continue to evolve our strategy of increasing our emphasis on the value we provide our customers through our program management capabilities, with less dependency on Company-owned assets in delivering those services. However, this value proposition is not fully tested and we can not be assured that it will be accepted by the marketplace or that we will be successful in implementing it. Should we fully implement this model, we will face a number of risks and uncertainties, including the following:

• A program management business model is very dependent on customer relationships, vendor relationships and the ability of those vendors to commit and deliver to required service levels, and the ability to employ and retain qualified employees. It also requires the ability to deliver to service levels profitably when the delivery of these services is not within the direct control of the company.

• The implementation of this model will require that the skill sets of our employees be adapted or developed to align with the emphasis on program management capabilities. If we are not successful in doing so, it will impact our ability to be successful.

• Changes in our service offerings resulting from this shift could negatively affect our profitability;

• A shift toward less dependency on Company-owned facilities and equipment will result in additional restructuring activities and the need to continue to develop and implement future cost savings initiatives to align costs with the market place. These activities may not be successful or meet the changes in the marketplace and could have a disruptive impact on our customers and employees which could significantly affect future levels of revenue and profitability.

As previously discussed in our filings with the SEC, starting in the second quarter of 2004, we were informed of changes to certain programs we support for several of our large customers that may result in noticeable future declines in the level of business we currently have with these customers. The first of these customer-driven changes involves the elimination of certain recovery CDs and printed materials from some of the new PCs sold by one of our PC OEM customers. This change began to significantly impact our revenues with this customer starting in the second quarter of 2005 and we expect that this continuing initiative will negatively impact our revenues with this customer for the balance of 2005. While growth in other segments of our business with this customer provides an opportunity to offset some of this decline, we are not assured of the timing or extent of those opportunities, and to date they have not been significant. Within the quarter, we were also informed by another PC OEM of their intention to replace certain recovery media with a non media based solution for a certain segment of their business. We expect that this change, if fully implemented, will negatively affect our revenues with this customer beginning in the later part of 2005. We had also been informed in 2004 by one of our larger customers that, possibly starting in 2005, a certain portion of their customer base supported by us will be migrated to a new service delivery system operated by one of our competitors. We expect this new delivery system to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2005, however due to the continuing uncertainties surrounding this potential change, we are unable at this time to accurately quantify the exact timing and its future affect on our business. However, this change could have a significant impact on our future revenues and profitability should it be fully and permanently implemented in a manner that excludes our participation in the delivery of this revenue stream. One of our customers has also recently announced plans to expand their internal capabilities for producing DVD media. We don’t anticipate that this change will have any affect on our business over the next twelve months. At this time, we are unable to accurately quantify its potential affect, if any, on our business with this customer past that period. Finally, in addition to these and other market changes, our customers continue to demand general pricing decreases in the services we provide. We continue to evaluate our response to these pricing pressures and in some instances have implemented strategies designed to properly align our pricing with the value of products and services we provide. These pricing strategies may result in losses of significant portions of business if not accepted by our customers and affect our ability to grow or achieve consistent levels of revenue and profitability.

Beginning in the first half of 2004, supply shortages and petroleum price increases have placed significant upward pressures on the price of polycarbonate, a petroleum-based plastic that is the primary raw material used in the manufacturing of CD and DVD media. While we believe there are alternative sources of polycarbonate available in addition to our current inventory of polycarbonate, we have entered into a new purchase agreement with our polycarbonate supplier that limits price increases through June 2006. However, the increases allowed under the previous agreement have had, and the increases allowed in the new agreement will continue to have, a negative impact on our gross profit margins. While we will be working with our customers in 2005 to pass on to them some or all of these cost increases, there are no assurances that we will be successful in doing so or that our attempts to pass along these cost increases will not result in a loss of business to competitors.

We continue to face significant costs and resource constraints in connection with our compliance with the necessary reporting, compliance and administrative aspects of a public company. These requirements drive additional SG&A costs for professional services, both legal and accounting, governance, and management requirements to support all of the additional legislation imposed on public companies. Many of our competitors are not public entities or are larger public entities and the related impact of complying with these requirements can affect our ability to perform competitively.

As discussed in previous sections of this Form 10-Q, in the second quarter of 2005 we implemented a restructuring plan that includes both cost reduction activities as well the implementation of pricing strategies with an overall goal of profitability at or near

the level of quarterly revenue we experienced in the first two quarters of 2005. It is difficult at this time to predict with certainty the final timing and costs associated with its implementation and whether the resulting impact of these initiatives will have a further negative impact on our ability to achieve these revenue levels. During the second quarter, the restructuring activities caused us to not meet all service level requirements of all customers. While we believe we have responded appropriately and that ultimately the changes will result in an improved service/delivery model for our customers, the risk of loss of opportunities with these customers may by affected by this service level performance. In addition, the restructuring has resulted in some employee turnover and the risk exists that we may not be able to replace these employees on a timely basis with qualified and experienced people. In line with our goal, we have completed a significant portion of this plan in the early part of our third quarter of 2005.

Given the dynamic market conditions in which we operate, our ability to accurately predict revenue and earnings for a given time period is difficult. Any predictions made are subject to management’s interpretation of all of the data available, and may not directly reflect forecasts produced internally within any individual forecast. We have very limited visibility to our customers’ near or long-term demand for our services, and changes by our customers in the content of the products we produce for them can significantly affect our levels of reported revenue and related profits.

In light of the discussion above, we are forecasting revenues in the third quarter of 2005 to be approximately $40 million and our net loss to be in the range of ($0.04) per share to ($0.09) per share including restructuring charges related to our current cost reduction initiatives, or a loss of ($0.03) per share to ($0.07) per share excluding these charges.

Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

This report on Form 10-Q contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “could,” “possible,” “plan,” “project,” “will,” “forecast” and similar words or expressions. Our forward-looking statements represent our expectations or beliefs concerning future events, including but not limited to the following:

• our ability to successfully execute our plans to achieve our goal of profitability at or near the levels of quarterly revenue we experienced in the first two quarters of 2005;

• our belief that subsequent to our plan to achieve profitability at lower levels of revenue, opportunities will exist to allow us to achieve top line growth through both internal efforts and acquisition activities;

• the negative effect on our revenues of one of our larger customer’s continuing initiative to eliminate certain recovery CDs and print material from some of their new PC shipments and the opportunity to offset some of this effect with new business from this customer;

• the effect on our business of communication from one of our larger customers regarding their intention to award certain business currently provided by us to one of our competitors, and the possible lack of permanency of that decision and/or changes in their implementation timeline;

• the impact of polycarbonate price increases on our gross profit margins and our ability to pass these price increases on to our customers;

• our expectations about our ability to meet the challenges of our business;

• the growth prospects of supply-chain outsourcing services;

• the impact on our revenues of our ability or willingness to perform our services at prices acceptable to our customers;

• the sufficiency of our cash balances and cash generated from operating and financing activities for our future liquidity and capital resource needs;

• our ability to manage near-term exposure to continuing upward polycarbonate pricing pressures through our supply agreement with our polycarbonate supplier; and

We caution that any forward-looking statements made by us in this report or in other announcements made by us are qualified by important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties described below may not be the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we do not yet know of or that we currently think are immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the events or circumstances described in the following listing of risks and uncertainties actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer. The risks and uncertainties described below may be amended, supplemented or superseded from time to time by other reports we file with the SEC in the future. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, the risks and uncertainties described in the section captioned “Outlook” above, the changes and volatility in the personal computer hardware and software industry, particularly with respect to the demand for CD and DVD media, from which a significant portion of our revenues are derived; macroeconomic factors that influence the demand for personal computer hardware and software and the resulting demand for our services; consolidation among our customers or competitors, which could cause disruption in our customer relationships or displacement of us as a services provider to one or more customers; our ability to make the proper strategic choices with respect to pursing profitable growth in our business; increased competition within our industry and increased pricing pressure from our customers; the volatility of polycarbonate prices; our dependence on relatively few customers for a majority of our revenues; fluctuations in our operating results from quarter-to-quarter, which are influenced by many factors outside of our control, including variations in the demand for particular services we offer or the content included in the products we produce for our customers; the potential negative impact on our customer relationships as we transition their production to other locations or attempt to execute pricing strategies that are not acceptable to the market place, our ability to accurately predict the amount of time and cost required to fully complete our restructuring plan, our ability to retain key employees during and subsequent to the execution of these restructuring activities; turnover in our financial organization, including the announced resignation of our current CFO, may impact our ability meet all of our reporting and internal control compliance requirements; and other risks and uncertainties, as discussed in detail under the caption “Risks and Uncertainties” in Item 1 of our 2004 Form 10-K captioned as follows:

• We are dependent on a small number of key customers in the personal computer (PC) hardware and software industries.

• We may not be able to effectively compete in an increasingly competitive environment.

• We have experienced increasing costs of polycarbonate, a petroleum-based raw material used in the manufacture of optical media.

• We may not be able to meet our customers’ requirements regarding the security of their intellectual property, inventory and other assets.

• We are dependent on revenues from the replication of CD and DVD media which may be threatened by the development and rate of market acceptance of new media storage techniques or other electronic media technologies.

• We concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting were not operating effectively as of December 31, 2004. The circumstances giving rise to such conclusion may be the subject of governmental investigations or other proceedings.

We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements we make in this report due to new information or future events. Investors are advised to consult any further disclosures we make on this subject in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, especially on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, in which we discuss in more detail various important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expected or historical results.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Foreign Currency. A portion of our operations is located in Ireland and Canada. The financial results of these operations are translated to US dollars at current exchange rates. Changes in exchange rates between periods can affect the comparability of results reported in US dollars.

In addition to these translation gains and losses, we also incur transaction gains and losses which are reflected in our financial statements. A majority of the sales from our Canadian operations, and a large portion of the related costs, are denominated in US dollars. As a result, we have limited exposure to the Canadian currency. The majority of sales revenues and related costs in our Ireland operations are denominated in Euros. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses historically have not been material to our results of operations or our financial condition. However, we anticipate we will continue to incur exchange gains and losses from foreign operations in the future. These gains and losses may be

significant depending on factors such as changes in foreign currency or weak economic conditions in foreign markets. In addition, demand for our products and services can be impacted by the value primarily of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure controls and procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). In light of the material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting in the supervision and oversight of accounting personnel at the Company’s Ireland subsidiary, Zomax, Ltd. (“Zomax Ireland”) as discussed below and as reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of July 1, 2005, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.

(b) Change in internal control over financial reporting

The Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and the board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting identified a material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting in the supervision and oversight of accounting personnel at the Company’s Ireland subsidiary, Zomax, Ltd. (“Zomax Ireland”). Specifically, there was insufficient review of journal entries and account reconciliations prepared by Zomax Ireland accounting personnel, and Company accounting policies communicated to Zomax Ireland were not followed. The aforementioned material weakness in internal control permitted (i) the intentional recording of incorrect accounting entries by local accounting personnel, (ii) the inadequate preparation and review of certain balance sheet account reconciliations, and (iii) failure of Zomax Ireland to follow certain Company accounting policies. The Company is fully cooperating in an informal inquiry by the SEC into these activities.

During the first six months of 2005, the Company has implemented the following remediation steps to address the material weakness discussed above:

• The former Ireland financial controller has been replaced by an individual with appropriate experience and qualifications.

• Our corporate operations controller has been assigned to directly oversee and implement changes to the monthly financial close process in Zomax Ireland. These changes include the implementation of appropriate journal entry reviews, balance sheet reconciliation processes and procedures to ensure Company policies are followed.

• We have established owners of all primary business processes across our global operations who are responsible for ensuring formalized policies and procedures are created and that employees are properly trained on these policies. This training will emphasize employee’s general understanding of our control system with particular attention to their responsibility for the integrity of the control procedures within their respective operations.

Additionally, the Company has begun to implement the following remediation steps to further address the material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting discussed above:

• We are evaluating the establishment of an internal audit program for possible implementation in 2006.

• We continue to assess our global financial organization structure for possible staffing and structural changes. The assessment is focused toward better positioning the organizations’ ability to supervise and oversee the performance and compliance of all aspects of the financial reporting and control requirements necessary for support of the Company.

The Company believes that, once fully implemented, these remediation steps will correct the material weakness discussed above.

There were no other changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during its most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect its internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

See Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.

In addition to the proceedings described in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report, we are a party to various other suits, claims and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business and we intend to vigorously defend them. The amount of monetary liability, if any, resulting from an adverse outcome in any of such suits, proceedings and claims in which we are a defendant cannot be determined at this time. However, in the opinion of our management, the aggregate amount of liability under these other suits, proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

(a) Our annual meeting was held on May 24, 2005.

(b) Proxies for the Annual Meeting were solicited pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. There was no solicitation in opposition to management’s nominees as listed in the proxy statement and all of such nominees were elected.

The shareholders set the number of directors at six (6) by electing six (6) directors. The following persons were elected to serve as directors on our Board until the next annual meeting of shareholders with the following votes:

Nominees	Votes For	Votes Withheld

Anthony Angelini	29,320,981	358,258

Janice Ozzello Wilcox	29,323,836	355,403

Robert Ezrilov	29,316,059	363,180

Howard P. Liszt	29,315,759	363,480

Paul F. Foley	29,315,548	363,691

Joseph J. Lahti	29,310,659	368,580

The shareholders ratified the appointment of Deloitte & Touche, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2005, by a vote of 29,502,675 shares in favor, with 109,073 shares voted against and 67,491 shares abstaining.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed with this Report:

10.1	Stipulation and Settlement Agreement dated April 27, 2005
10.2	Separation Agreement and Release dated June 14, 2005 with Robert J. Rueckl
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: August 10, 2005		ZOMAX INCORPORATED


	By:	/s/ Anthony Angelini
		Anthony Angelini, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)


	By:	/s/ Robert J. Rueckl
		Robert J. Rueckl, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

ZOMAX INCORPORATED

FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDED JULY 1, 2005

Exhibit Number		Description

10.1		Stipulation and Settlement Agreement dated April 27, 2005
10.2		Separation Agreement and Release dated June 14, 2005 with Robert J. Rueckl
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

ZOMAX INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWFLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

(In thousands, except per share data)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

Introduction and Overview

• our ability to successfully execute our plans to achieve our goal of profitability at or near the levels of quarterly revenue we experienced in the first two quarters of 2005;

• our belief that subsequent to our plan to achieve profitability at lower levels of revenue, opportunities will exist to allow us to achieve top line growth through both internal efforts and acquisition activities;

• the negative effect on our revenues of one of our larger customer’s continuing initiative to eliminate certain recovery CDs and print material from some of their new PC shipments and the opportunity to offset some of this effect with new business from this customer;

• the effect on our business of communication from one of our larger customers regarding their intention to award certain business currently provided by us to one of our competitors, and the possible lack of permanency of that decision and/or changes in their implementation timeline;

• the strength of our customer relationships and related impact on our ability to retain such customers in the future;

• the impact of polycarbonate price increases on our gross profit margins and our ability to pass these price increases on to our customers;

• our expectations about our ability to meet the challenges of our business;

• the growth prospects of supply-chain outsourcing services;

• the impact on our revenues of our ability or willingness to perform our services at prices acceptable to our customers;

• the sufficiency of our cash balances and cash generated from operating and financing activities for our future liquidity and capital resource needs;

• our ability to manage near-term exposure to continuing upward polycarbonate pricing pressures through our supply agreement with our polycarbonate supplier; and

• our forecast of revenues and net loss per share in the third quarter of 2005.

Filing Compare · ZOMAX INC /MN/