Freve Maria G 4
Research Summary
AI-generated summary
Symbotic (SYM) Insider Freve Maria G Sells Shares
What Happened
Freve Maria G (reporting person) had restricted stock units vest/convert on Jan 23, 2026 and subsequently sold shares in a mandated sell-to-cover transaction. The filing shows conversions/settlements on Jan 23 of 1,144 and 13,824 derivative units and a grant/acquisition of 13,810 RSU-related shares (totaling 28,778 shares reflected across entries). On Jan 26, 2026 the reporting person disposed of 6,667 shares in the open market at an average price around $59.99, generating proceeds of approximately $399,957. The filing indicates the sale was required by the issuer to satisfy tax withholding obligations and was not a discretionary trade.
Key Details
- Transaction dates: conversions/settlement and grant on 2026-01-23; open-market sale on 2026-01-26; Form 4 filed 2026-01-27.
- Sale details: 6,667 shares sold for total proceeds ≈ $399,957; reported price shown as $59.99 and note indicates sales occurred across prices from $59.78 to $60.21.
- Derivative/RSU activity: entries on 1/23 show exercise/conversion (code M) and a grant/acquisition (code A) tied to restricted stock units (RSUs). Footnote F1: each RSU converts to one share.
- Tax withholding / sell-to-cover: Footnote F2 states the sale was mandatory to cover tax withholding on vesting and is not a discretionary trade by the insider.
- Shares owned after transaction: not specified in the provided filing excerpt.
- Filing timeliness: the Form 4 was filed Jan 27, 2026; the Jan 23 activity appears to have been reported several days after the vesting (Form 4s are generally due within two business days), while the Jan 26 sale was reported promptly the next day.
Context
- These entries reflect RSU vesting/settlement rather than an independent open‑market purchase or a voluntary sale for investment reasons. The sell-to-cover is a common administrative step to satisfy tax obligations when equity awards vest.
- Sales required to cover taxes or to satisfy award-related obligations are generally considered routine and do not necessarily indicate the insider’s view of the company’s prospects. Purchases would typically be a stronger signal of insider confidence.